Rural Development
Programme of the
Republic of Slovenia
2007 - 2013
20.07.2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
2
TITLE OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN______________________________ 7
MEMBER STATE ________________________________________________________ 8
2.1
Geographical coverage of the plan ______________________________________ 8
2.2
Areas covered by the “Convergence” Objective ___________________________ 8
3
ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION IN THE LIGHT OF STRENGTHS AND
WEAKNESSES, STRATEGY CHOSEN TO TACKLE THEM AND EX ANTE
EVALUATION _______________________________________________________________ 9
3.1
Analysis of the situation in the light of strengths and weaknesses _____________ 9
3.1.1 Overall socio-economic features _________________________________________ 9
3.1.2 Agriculture, food industry and forestry characteristics _______________________ 22
3.1.3 State of the environment ______________________________________________ 32
3.1.4 Rural areas and the quality of life in the rural areas__________________________ 46
3.1.5 LEADER __________________________________________________________ 53
3.2
Strategy chosen to cover strengths and weaknesses________________________ 56
3.3
Ex ante evaluation ___________________________________________________ 59
3.4
Impacts from previous programming period and other information _________ 68
3.4.1 Pre-accession instruments _____________________________________________ 69
3.4.2 RDP 2004-2006 _____________________________________________________ 71
3.4.3 SPD_______________________________________________________________ 74
4
RATIONALE OF PRIORITIES CHOSEN WITH REGARD TO COMMUNITY
STRATEGIC GUIDELINES, NATIONAL STRATEGY PLAN AND ANTICIPATED
IMPACT OF EX ANTE EVALUATION _________________________________________ 77
4.1
Rationale of the RDP 2007-2013 priorities chosen with regard to the Community
Strategic Guidelines and the National Strategy Plan_____________________________ 77
4.2
Anticipated impact from the ex-ante evaluation with regard to the priorities
chosen 83
5
INFORMATION ON AXES AND MEASURES PROPOSED UNDER EACH AXIS AND
THE DESCRIPTION THEREOF_______________________________________________ 86
5.1
General requirements ________________________________________________ 88
5.2
Requirements on all or certain measures ________________________________ 90
5.3
Information necessary for axes and measures ____________________________ 93
5.3.1 Axis 1: Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector _____ 93
5.3.2 Axis 2: Improving the environment and the countryside_____________________ 126
5.3.3 Axis 3: Quality of life in the countryside and diversification or rural economy ___ 248
5.3.4 Axis 4: Implementation of the LEADER approach _________________________ 260
6
FINANCIAL PLAN _____________________________________________________ 268
6.1
Annual contribution by EAFRD ______________________________________ 268
6.2
Financial plan by axes_______________________________________________ 268
7
FRAMEWORK ALLOCATION BY RURAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURE _______ 269
8
DDITIONAL NATIONAL FINANCING AT DISTINCTION OF MEASURES
CONCERNED, AS LAID DOWN BY REGULATION 1698/2005 ____________________ 270
9
ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE ASSESSMENT IN THE LIGHT OF
2
COMPETITIVENESS RULES AND AID SCHEME APPROVED PURSUANT TO
ARTICLES 87, 88 AND 89 OF THE TREATY, APPLIED FOR THE PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION _______________________________________________________ 271
10
INFORMATION ON COMPLEMENTARITY WITH MEASURES FINANCED BY
OTHER INSTRUMENTS UNDER THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY,
COHESION POLICY AND COMMUNITY AID FOR FISHERIES __________________ 272
10.1 Complementarity with Community activities, policies and priorities ________ 272
10.2 Complementarity of RDP 2007-2013 with Cohesion Policy ________________ 276
10.3 Demarcation from fisheries development instruments ____________________ 279
10.4 Complementarity of RDP 2007-2013 with other policies and instruments ____ 280
11
DESIGNATION OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND BODIES RESPONSIBLE
283
11.1 Managing Authority ________________________________________________ 283
11.2 Paying Agency _____________________________________________________ 285
11.3 Certification body __________________________________________________ 287
11.4 Description of the management structure and financial flow for payments to final
beneficiaries _____________________________________________________________ 287
11.5 Monitoring system__________________________________________________ 289
12
MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS AND ENVISAGED FORMATION
OF THE MONITORING COMMITTEE ________________________________________ 291
12.1 Monitoring and evaluation systems ____________________________________ 291
12.2 Envisaged formation of the Monitoring Committee ______________________ 294
13
PROVISIONS FOR ENSURING PUBLIC INFORMATION ON THE PROGRAMME
295
13.1 Envisaged measures for informing potential beneficiaries, professional
organisations, economic, social and environmental partners, bodies involved in
promoting equality between men and women and non-governmental organisations of the
possibilities offered by the Programme and the rules for obtaining financial resources
under the Programme_____________________________________________________ 296
13.2 Envisaged measures for informing beneficiaries on Community contribution_ 298
13.3 Measures for information of general public on Community role in programmes
and their results__________________________________________________________ 298
14
THE DESIGNATION OF THE PARTNERS CONSULTED AND THE RESULTS OF
THE CONSULTATION______________________________________________________ 300
14.1 Designation of consultation partners___________________________________ 300
14.2 The results of the consultation ________________________________________ 305
15
EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN AND NON-DISCRIMINATION __ 320
16
THECHNICAL ASSISTANCE __________________________________________ 322
16.1 Description of drawing up, running, monitoring and evaluation of information
and control activities and aid programmes financed under Technical assistance ____ 322
16.2 National rural network ______________________________________________ 322
3
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
AAS
AE
AH
AIS
and accordingly
AMTS
ARSAMRD
ARSE
ASH
ASM
CAEP
CAFS
CAG
CAP
CBI/FBI
CC
CCIS
c.c.
CCDVR
CO2
DG AGRI
DOPPS
DPC
e.g.
EAFRD
EAGGF
EC
ECom
EEC
EIA
EISA
EAA
EAF
EFF
ESF
ESU
ETA
EU
EUR, €
EUR/SIT
EUROSTAT
FAO
FIFG
GAO
GDP
GEM
GERK
GMO
GOLSGRP
GVA
ha
HDI
i.e.
IACS
ICT
IFP
IH
INFO point
ISPA
IT
Agricultural Advisory Service
Agri-environmental
Agricultural holding
Agricultural Institute of Slovenia
And accordingly
Association of Municipalities and Towns of Slovenia
Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Agricultural Markets and Rural Development
Agency of the RS for Environment
Areas affected by specific handicaps
Association of Slovene municipalities
Common Agri-Environmental Programme
Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry of Slovenia
Coastal action group
Common Agriculture Policy
Common Bird Index/ Farmland Bird Index
Chamber of Craft
Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia
Cadastral community
The Comprehensive Countryside Development and Village Renovation Programme
Carbon dioxide
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
DOPPS – BirdLife Slovenia
Development Programme for the Countryside
For example
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund
European Community
European Commission
European Economic Community
Environmental Impact Assessment
European Initiative for Sustainable Development in Agriculture
Economic accounts for agriculture
Economic accounts for forestry
European Fisheries Fund
European Social Fund
European Size Unit
Maintenance of extensive grassland
European Union
Euro
Exchange rate (Euro/Slovenian tolar)
Statistical Office of the European Communities
Food and Agriculture Organisation
Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
Gross agricultural output
Gross domestic product
Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring
Graphical unit of use of KMG
Genetically modified organisms
Government Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy
Gross value added
Hectare
Human development index
That is
Integrated Administration and Control System
Information and communication technology
Integrated fruit production
Integrated horticulture
Information point
Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession
Information technology
4
IVP
JRC
k
kg
km
KMG-MID
kt eq
Ktoe
LAG
LEADER
LFA
LFS
LPA
LU
m
MA
MAr
MAFF
MAS
MC
ME
MES
MESP
MF
milliard
Mio.
MLFSA
mm
MP
NGO
No.
NPEP
NSPRD
NSRF
NUTS
OECD
OF
OJ L
OJ RS
OP
PARS
PDO
PE
PGI
PHARE
PMWU
PPP
RDA
RDAg
RDP 2004-2006
RDP 2007-2013
RS
RSE
SAPARD
SCA
SDS
SFI
SIFP
SIT
SLO
SMEs
so called
Integrated vine production
Joint Research Centre
Kilo
Kilogram
Kilometre
Agricultural holding registration code
Kilo tonne equivalent
Unit representing equivalent for 1000 tonnes of oil
Local action group
Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Economie Rurale (EC initiative supporting rural
communities in improving the quality of life and economic welfare in their local areas)
Less favoured areas
Labour force survey
Maintaining utilised and settled landscape in protection areas
Livestock unit
Meter
Managing Authority
Mountain Areas
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food
Municipalities Association of Slovenia
Ministry of Culture
Ministry of Economy
Ministry of Education and Sport
Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning
Ministry of Finance
Milliard
Million
Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Affairs
Millimetre
Mountain pasture
Non-governmental organisation
Number
National Programme on Environmental Protection
National Strategy Plan of the Rural Development of RS
National Strategic Reference Framework
Nomenclature of Territorial Statistical Units – system of region classification
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Organic farming
EU Official Journal – L series (Legislation)
Official Journal of the Republic of Slovenia
Operational Programme
Phytosanitary Administration of RS
Protected designation of origin
Private entrepreneur
Protected geographical indication
One of three pre-accession instruments financed by the EU
Productive man-work unit
Plant protection product
Research and development activity
Regional Development Agency
Rural Development Programme of the Republic of Slovenia 2004-2006
Rural Development Programme of the Republic of Slovenia 2007-2013
Republic of Slovenia
Renewable sources of energy
Special Action for Pre-accession Measures for Agriculture and Rural Development
Statistical Classification of Activities
Strategy for the Development of Slovenia
Slovenia Forest Institute
Slovenian integrated fruit production
Slovenian tolar
Slovenia
Small and medium sized enterprises
so called
5
SO2
SORS
SPA
SPD
SRDA
STAR Committee
SWOT
t
TAIEX
TSG
UAA
UMAR
UNEP WCMC
WB
WPA
WTT
Sulphur dioxide
Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
Special Protection Area
Single programming document
Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Tonne
Technical Assistance and Information Exchange Office
Traditional Speciality Guaranteed
Utilised agricultural area
Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis and Development
United Nations Environment Programme - World Conservation Monitoring Centre
Water bodies
Water protection areas
Wine and Tourism Trails
6
1
TITLE OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Document title: Rural Development Programme of the RS 2007-2013 (hereafter referred to as
RDP 2007-2013).
The RDP was drawn up in accordance with Regulation 1698/20051, Regulation 1290/20052,
Regulation 1974/20063, Regulation 1320/20064, Regulation 1975/20065, Regulation 1848/20066
and Council Decision 2006/144/EC7.
1
Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the EAFRD (OJ L
277, 21.10.2005, p. 1–40)
2
Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (OJ L
209, 11.8.2005, p. 1–25)
3
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of
Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the EAFRD (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 15–
73)
4
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1320/2006 of 5 September 2006 laying down rules for the transition to the rural
development support provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 243, 6.9.2006, p. 6–19)
5
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 of 7 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation
of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as crosscompliance in respect of rural development support measures (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 74–84)
6
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1848/2006 of 14 December 2006 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums
wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the common agricultural policy and the organisation of an information
system in this field and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (OJ L 355, 15.12.2006, p. 56–62)
7
2006/144/EC: Council Decision of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development
(programming period 2007 to 2013) (OJ L 55, 25.2.2006, p. 20–29)
7
2
2.1
MEMBER STATE
Geographical coverage of the plan
The RDP 2007-2013 is a uniform implementing document of the rural development policy applying
to the whole territory of the RS.
2.2
Areas covered by the “Convergence” Objective
At the NUTS 2 level Slovenia is a single region and thus wholly eligible for funding under the
Convergence Objective.
8
3
3.1
ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION IN THE LIGHT OF STRENGTHS AND
WEAKNESSES, STRATEGY CHOSEN TO TACKLE THEM AND EX ANTE
EVALUATION
Analysis of the situation in the light of strengths and weaknesses
3.1.1 Overall socio-economic features
With the total area of 20,273 km2 Slovenia is a rather small European country. To the North it
borders Austria (length of the borderline 324 km), to the West Italy (235 km), to the Northeast
Hungary (102 km) and to the South and Southeast Croatia (546 km), which is also the external EU
border. Slovenian coast of the Adriatic Sea to the Southwest is 47 km long.
Slovenia is positioned at the junction of different climatic and geomorphologic features as well as
of different cultural influences of the Alpine, Mediterranean and Pannonian landscapes. The
strategic position between the Alps and the most northern golf of the Mediterranean Sea represents
one of the most important European transitions from Southeast Europe towards the West and from
Central Europe towards the South. Slovenia is known for its great relief diversity, distinct cultural
landscape, architecture and settlement heritage and rich and versatile natural systems. Nearly 90
percent of the territory lies at altitudes exceeding 300 m, while plain areas in the shape of
contiguous valleys and basins represent only about 20 percent of the entire Slovenian territory
(Annex 1, Figure 1). Consequently, the transitivity of the areas in the past was quite difficult as well
as the settlement conditions and the establishment of economic activities.
The relatively unfavourable yet vivid natural conditions have a direct impact on:
 the dispersed settlement and large number of small settlements;
 the specific structure of land use;
 the high level of natural and biological diversity;
 the cultural diversity;
 the rich surface and groundwater resources;
 the cultural landscape diversity.
The administrative organisation of Slovenia is structured on two levels: national (state) and local.
The basic unit of the local self-government is municipality (NUTS 5). At the beginning of the
programming period 2007-2013 Slovenia shall have 210 municipalities. Slovenia is divided into 12
development regions at the NUTS 3 level. They have no additional administrative or regulatory
function; they function for statistical purposes only and for the implementation of programming and
granting of direct aids under the national regional policy.
Slovenia is a Member State with an above-average rural areas share. Given the OECD8 criteria 67
percent of all Slovenian municipalities (NUTS 5), representing 77 percent of the entire national
territory, are designated as rural areas, having 41 percent of the total population. At the NUTS 3
level eleven of twelve statistical regions are designated as rural and at the NUTS 2 level Slovenia is
a single region and thus entirely defined as rural area.
8
For the purposes of the RDP 2007-2013 the RS applies the OECD methodology for the designation of rural areas.
9
Table 1: Classification of Slovenian rural areas by the OECD methodology at the NUTS 5 (municipalities)
and NUTS 3 (statistical regions) level
ALL MUNICIPALITIES
RURAL MUNICIPALITIES*
No. of
Area
No. of
No. of Share
Area Share
No. of Share
municipal.
(km2) inhabit. municipal.
(%)
(km2)
(%) inhabit. (%)
Statistical region
Predominantly
rural*
Spodnjeposavska
3
885
69,826
3 100.0
885 100.0
Notranjsko-kraška
6
1,456
51,032
6 100.0
1,456 100.0
Jugovzhodna Slov.
16
2,675 139,095
15
93.8
2,377 88.9
Koroška
12
1,041
73,839
9
75.0
893 85.8
Goriška
12
2,325 119,622
10
83.3
2,001 86.1
Significantly
rural*
Pomurska
26
1,337 122,717
16
61.5
944 70.6
Savinjska
32
2,384 256,752
22
68.8
1,723 72.3
Podravska
34
2,170 319,114
21
61.8
1,492 68.8
Osrednjeslovenska
25
2,555 496,675
13
52.0
1,616 63.2
Gorenjska
17
2,137 198,342
10
58.8
1,528 71.5
Obalno-kraška
7
1,044 105,029
4
57.1
660 63.2
Predominantly
urban*
Zasavska
3
264
45,547
0
0.0
0
0.0
SLOVENIA
193
20,273 1,997,590
129
66.8
15,575 76.8
* Municipalities with population density under 98 inhabitants per km2
** OECD classification of areas in regard of population share living in rural municipalities:
- Predominantly rural areas: more than 50 percent of population lives in rural municipalities
- Significantly rural areas: 15 to 50 percent of population lives in rural municipalities
- Predominantly urban areas: less than 15 percent of population lives in rural municipalities
Source: SORS (Population census 2002), data processing KIS
69,826 100.0
51,032 100.0
97,661 70.2
51,020 69.1
77,127 64.5
60,321
103,818
117,445
108,787
65,351
23,436
49.2
40.4
36.8
21.9
32.9
22.3
0
825,824
0.0
41.3
DEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES
With the population of 2 million (0.5 percent of the EU population) and the population density of
98 inhabitants per square kilometre Slovenia is relatively sparsely populated Member State.
Characteristic for the population pattern are densely populated basins and valleys as almost 60
percent of the total population lives on less than 20 percent of the whole Slovenian territory. In the
hilly Prealpine and Dinaric-Karst areas the population density is sparse, where small dispersed
settlements with aging population prevail. Similar trends appear in the areas alongside the state
borderline.
With permanent population renewal the demographic trends in Slovenia show birth rate decline and
slowing-down of mortality, which is also generally present in other EU countries. The share of
births is decreasing, while the share of labour force as well as old population is increasing. At
present this process is still slow due to the relatively great demographic losses during both world
wars, thus in the old population share Slovenia is still behind the EU average. It could become
critical as soon as in the next decade when numerous generations born after World War II shall
10
enter the old population contingent, whereas the children and labour force contingents shall start to
decline (as a result of low birth rate after 1980s).
Table 2: Population structure in Slovenia by age groups (%) and the number of women per 100 men
31.12. 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
0-14 years
15.7 15.4 15.0 14.6 14.4 14.1
15-24 years
14.5 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.4 13.1
25-49 years
38.4 38.4 38.3 38.2 38.0 38.0
50-64 years
17.2 17.5 18.0 18.4 18.8 19.2
65-79 years
11.8 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4
80 + years
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.0
3.2
Number of women per 100 men 104.6 104.5 104.5 104.4 104.5 104.1
The gender structure of the population is similar to the majority of the European countries. The
number of women is higher than the number of men, but the ratio is gradually narrowing down.
The demographic structure of rural areas in Slovenia differs considerably from the general
demographic pattern. This applies to the employment as well as the age structure. Due to the ageing
population and simultaneous migration of young people from rural areas (brain-drain) the
demographic structure is less favourable in predominately rural regions.
The unfavourable age structure of rural areas is particularly evident in farm households. More than
50 percent of agricultural holding operators are over 55 years old. The share of operators under 45
years is only 19 percent (Table 2). The age structure of operators on larger farms is slightly better,
but the age structure deterioration of operators of farms larger than 10 ha UAA was even severer as
in all farms.
In Slovenia, the average age of farm women is 50 years. Seven of ten farm women are older then 45
years. Thereof, two thirds have concluded or incomplete elementary education and one third have
concluded secondary education. In 2005 women engaged in agriculture worked 42 hours weekly on
average. In addition to this, women under 45 years raise 1.3 children.
There are two types of migration flows in rural areas. In the rural areas near urban centres increased
population density has been registered. The more marginal rural areas, however, are still being
abandoned. Negative demographic and economic trends are therefore particularly evident in more
rear and marginal rural areas. These areas also lack infrastructure equipment as one of the
prerequisites of economic and social development.
11
ECONOMIC GROWTH
Slovenia has successfully integrated into the European economic area. After three years of
relatively meagre economic growth a renewed accelerated growth was registered in 2004 and 2005
(to 4.2 and 4.0 percent respectively). In the average of the period 2000-2005 the economic growth
amounted to 3.4 percent and was above the EU-25 average. Considering the EU average, in 2004
Slovenia thus reached 79 percent of the GDP per capita in purchasing power and after 2005 it
already exceeded 80 percent of the EU-25 average, after 2005 it has already exceeded 80 percent of
this average (EUROSTAT, 2006). The GDP per capita in purchasing power comparison to other
countries is shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Gross domestic product per capita in purchasing power under purchasing power standards, volume
index, EU-25 = 100
EU-15
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxemburg
Malta
Nederland
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
2000
110.0
125.8
116.7
80.9
64.9
126.2
42.1
114.3
113.6
111.9
72.9
54.0
126.3
113.3
35.4
38.0
222.4
78.7
124.3
46.8
80.5
47.5
72.9
92.3
119.0
112.0
Source: EUROSTAT, 2006
2001
109.6
122.1
117.2
82.8
65.8
124.9
44.7
115.5
113.9
110.0
73.2
56.9
128.5
112.0
37.1
40.2
214.6
74.6
127.0
46.1
79.9
48.5
73.9
93.2
115.2
113.1
2002
109.3
120.0
117.5
82.0
67.7
121.4
46.8
114.7
112.0
108.5
77.2
59.1
132.3
110.0
38.7
41.9
220.7
75.6
125.3
46.3
79.4
51.0
74.5
95.2
113.6
116.0
2003
109.0
120.3
117.9
79.8
68.3
120.8
50.3
112.6
111.6
108.1
80.9
60.1
133.7
107.6
40.8
45.2
232.7
73.7
124.7
46.9
72.7
51.9
75.9
97.4
115.6
116.4
2004
108.6
121.7
118.1
82.6
70.5
121.5
53.0
113.7
109.5
108.0
81.8
60.9
135.8
105.5
42.8
47.8
237.5
70.2
124.4
48.7
72.3
52.9
79.2
97.7
117.1
117.1
2005
108.3
122.5
117.5
83.3
73.8
124.2
60.1
113.3
108.8
109.3
82.0
61.4
137.5
102.6
47.2
52.1
247.5
69.5
124.2
49.8
71.2
55.0
80.6
98.6
114.5
116.5
The competitiveness of Slovenian economy has increased. The key competitiveness indicators show
a continuation of graduate improvement in labour productivity and market shares as well as the
fluctuation of the cost competitiveness. After a relatively high growth in the second half of 1990s
(4.8 percent real average annual growth) the labour productivity growth is gradually becoming
steady (3.1 percent in 2000-2005). Hence, due to the far lower labour productivity growth in the
majority of the more developed EU Member States Slovenian shortcoming on the European average
is decreasing. However, to reach the European average and the average of the more developed
Member States more quickly, the present, relatively high, productivity growth should enhance even
more in the future. Therefore, a more educated labour force and technologically advanced
production is required.
12
Table 4: Selected indicators of the economic development in Slovenia
Development indicators
Population
Employment (national accounts)
Gross domestic product (GDP)
Real GDP growth rate
GDP per capita
GDP per capita in purchasing power
GDP per employee
Value added per employee
Inflation
Labour productivity
Measuring unit
(000)
(000)
(Mio. EUR)
(%)
(EUR)
EU-25 = 100
(EUR)
(EUR)
Annual average (%)
Real LP growth (%)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1,990
894.8
1,992
898.9
1,996
912.5
1,997
910.5
1,997
913.5
2,001
916.2
20,974
22,099
23,673
24,876
26,257
27,626
4.1
2.7
3.5
2.7
4.4
4.0
10,543
11,094
11,866
12,461
13,103
13,677
72.9
73.9
74.5
75.9
79.2
80.6
23,440
24,585
25,944
27,322
28,743
30,153
20,320
21,403
22,482
23,727
25,021
26,277
8.9
8.4
7.5
5.6
3.6
2.5
3.3
2.2
3.8
2.9
3.9
3.7
Source: SORS, EUROSTAT
The regional GDP distribution (2003) by activities shows that the disparities in the development
between regions are considerable, whereas only two regions (Osrednjeslovenska and ObalnoKraška) have a higher GDP per capita than the national average. These two regions are more
urbanised and have an above-average share of the service sector.
Table 5: Regional gross domestic product (2003)
Statistical region
Spodnjeposavska
Notranjsko-kraška
Jugovzhodna Slovenija
Koroška
Goriška
Pomurska
Savinjska
Podravska
Osrednjeslovenska
Gorenjska
Obalno-kraška
Zasavska
SLOVENIA
Area
(OECD)*
PRA
PRA
PRA
PRA
PRA
SRA
SRA
SRA
SRA
SRA
SRA
PUA
GDP per capita
**GVA structure (%)
EUR SLO=100 A and B C to F G to P
9,961
79.9
5.6
49.2
45.2
9,523
76.4
5.5
43.8
50.7
11,234
90.2
4.7
50.0
45.3
9,723
78.0
3.3
50.8
45.9
11,892
95.4
2.7
39.6
57.7
8,535
68.5
8.1
36.2
55.7
11,062
88.8
3.1
47.0
49.9
10,382
83.3
3.1
35.5
61.4
17,954
144.1
1.0
25.2
73.8
10,830
86.9
1.8
43.8
54.3
12,882
103.4
1.3
23.6
75.1
8,937
71.7
1.6
49.1
49.3
12,461
100.0
2.6
35.6
61.9
* PRA – predominantly rural areas; SRA – significantly rural areas; PUA – predominantly urban areas
** A + B Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fisheries, C + D Mining industry and processing activities, E electrical power and
drinking water supply, F Construction industry, G Trade, repair of motor vehicles, H Hotels and restaurants, I Traffic, storing and
communications, J Financial intermediation, K Real estates, lease and business services, L Public administration, compulsory social
security, M Education, N Health care and social security, O + P Other public, common and personal services; private households
with employed staff.
Source: SORS
In relation to the EU Slovenia has a comparable economy structure regarding the economic operator
size. According to the data on 2004 micro and small companies represent 98.4 percent, employ 43.4
percent of all employees in Slovenia and produce 38.9 percent of the total turnover9. An average
Slovenian enterprise employs 6.4 persons, a micro company 1.9 and a small company 20.2
workers10. An enterprise in the EU as a whole as well as in the non-Member States employs 7
persons on average.
In spite of the progress in the last year, Slovenia is still very low ranked in international
comparisons as regards the business activity as well as the accessibility of financing resources. In
1999-2004 the number of enterprises in business sector increased only by 2.6 percent and the rate of
9
SORS: Statistical information No 291/4.11.2005
Rebernik, Miroslav, etc.: SLOVENSKI podjetniški observatorij. 2004. Del 1, nov. 2004 (Transl.: SLOVENIAN
business observatory. 2004. Part 1, Nov. 2004).
10
13
early business activity declined from 4.6 percent in 2002 to 2.6 percent in 2004, but increased to 4.4
percent in 2005, which is, however, still the fourth lowest rate among the EU Member States.
Additionally characteristic for Slovenia is also relatively high business mortality.
The unfavourable business environment in Slovenia, as a result of the low level of the initial
business activity and high level of emerging business mortality, has a negative impact on the weak
economy of the initial phases of the business process. The shift from the group of emerging into
new enterprises is comparatively among the least effective. However, the situation within the group
of longer operating businesses has been improving. In new and established enterprises Slovenia is
among the countries with the most favourable relation between the two groups. In 2005 positive
shifts in shares of economically active population ware noted as the declining tendency of the early
business activity from 2002-2004 was reversed. Evident is also an increased share of people
entering business processes due to sensed business opportunity, which is positive in the light of the
business stability and business process quality. Nevertheless, in 2005 the total initial business
activity level was still lower than in 2002.
The progress is evident in investments in research and development activity (R&D) as their share in
the GDP increased to 1.61 percent in 2004 (in the year before 1.53 percent). Thus the lag on the EU
average (1.90 percent of GDP) decreased to 0.29 percentage point, which is Slovenia’s lowest lag
so far. Given the indicator value Slovenia is still in front of all new Member States as well as the
Mediterranean countries (Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) and Ireland. The government sector
share in the structure of financing resources amounts to 35.3 percent, whereby it is positive that the
business sector has increased the expenditure on investments in R&D, which is compliant with
development documents in this area.
In the area of innovation and patent application Slovenia has made some progress. In the goods
export structure the highest growth was registered in the share of medium and high technologically
intensive products in the last years. Thus, with 55.9 percent of these products in the goods export
structure Slovenia has come very close to the European average. It is also necessary to emphasise
that the majority are medium technologically intensive products. The share of high technologically
intensive products is increasing very slowly and is relatively low.
LABOUR MARKET
Slovenia is facing strong developmental disproportions in employment between individual
economic activities. In spite of the intensified structural problems in some labour intensive
industrial branches the employment rate in Slovenia has increased in the past years. The
employment rate or the labour activity of the population aged 25-64 years has increased from 71
percent in 2000 to 73.5 percent in 2005 and 15-64 years from 62.8 percent to 66 percent. The
employment rate of women is lower than the employment rate of men. However, it does exceed the
60 percent goal which was set by the Lisbon Strategy in 2000 and to be reached by the Member
States by 2010. In the past two years the total employment rate in Slovenia is higher than the EU
average, whereby the employment rate of women is slightly higher than the EU average (EU-25:
56.3 percent).
14
Table 6: Employment and unemployment rate in Slovenia (%)
Indicator
Employment rate (15-64 years)
- Employment rate of men (15-64 years)
- Employment rate of women (15-64 years)
Employment rate (25-64 years)
- Employment rate of men (25-64 years)
- Employment rate of women (25-64 years)
Unemployment rate
- Unemployment rate of men
- Unemployment rate of women
Source: SORS, EUROSTAT (2006)
2000
62.8
67.2
58.4
71.0
75.3
66.5
6.7
6.5
7.0
2001
63.8
68.6
58.8
72.6
77.7
67.3
6.2
5.6
6.8
2002
63.4
68.2
58.6
73.0
77.9
67.9
6.3
5.9
6.8
2003
62.6
67.4
57.6
71.2
75.8
66.5
6.7
6.3
7.1
2004
65.3
70.0
60.5
73.6
77.8
69.2
6.3
5.8
6.8
2005
66.0
70.4
61.3
73.5
78.1
68.6
6.5
6.1
7.0
In the recent period the unemployment rate in Slovenia has gradually decreased. In 2005 the ILO
unemployment rate was 6.5 percent, which is lower than the EU average (EU-25: 8.7 percent).
However, the unemployment rate by regions deviates significantly from the national average.
As long as by 2003 the employment rate in Slovenia was lower than the EU-15 average and in 2003
it was even lower than the EU-25 average. Only in 2004 the employment rate in Slovenia was
higher than (both) EU averages and remained so in the second quarter 2005 as well. The
employment of men in Slovenia is continually somewhat lower and the employment of women
slightly higher than both EU averages. The employment of young people (15-24 years) as well of
people over 55 years (Figure 1) in Slovenia is still lower than the EU average. The problematically
low employment in the age group 55-64 years, with the Lisbon target of 50 percent by 2010, is
slowly improving. In 2004 it increased to 29.0 percent (EU-25: 41.0 percent) and in 2005 to 30.5
percent11. The differences with young people arise as a result of a relatively high participation of
young people in secondary in tertiary education programmes and a relatively higher unemployment
rate of young people than the EU average. With older people these differences arise as a result of a
high structural unemployment, which particularly affects older unemployed people. The lower
employment rate in this age group is still affected by the relatively low retirement age. However,
the average retirement age has also gradually increased – in 2005 it was 58 years and 10 months for
old-age pension and 52 years and three months for disability pension (in 1995: 55 years and seven
months and 47 years and 1 month respectively) – but it is still lower than the EU-25 average: 60.7
years. The lower employment rate of elder people is still affected by massive early retirement in the
early 1990s.
11
According to an unofficial calculation by the Institute of macroeconomic analysis and development based on
published survey data on labour force by the Statistical Office of RS for all four quarters of 2005.
15
Figure 1: Employment rate by age groups in Slovenia and the EU-25 for 2000 and 2005
In 2005 the ILO unemployment rate increased slightly and the decline of the registered
unemployment rate was slowed down (Figure 2). In 1995-2000 the ILO unemployment rate ranged
between 7 and 8 percent and has declined since 2001. In the second quarter 2005 it reached the
lowest level (5.8 percent) since measured (from 1993), but has increased in the third and fourth
quarter 2005, thus the average annual ILO unemployment rate in 2005 (6.5 percent) was higher than
in 2004 (6.3 percent) (Table 7). The unemployment rate in 2005 was 6.1 percent for men and 7.1
percent for women. According to labour force survey results the number of unemployed persons,
amounting to approximately 70,000 in 1995-2000 and declining to 62,000 by 2002, remains at
64,000 from 2003 onward. Such was also the average number of the ILO unemployed in the first
three quarters 2005. In the fourth quarter the number increased again to 74,000. Thus, in 2005 the
average ILO unemployment was at 67,000.
16
Table 7: Unemployment rate (%)
EU-25
EU-15
EU-10
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
Czech
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxemburg
Hungary
Malta
Germany
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovenia
Slovakia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
1995
no data
10.1
no data
3.9
9.7
no data
no data
6.7
no data
15.4
11.1
9.2
12.3
11.2
no data
no data
2.9
no data
no data
8.0
6.6
no data
7.3
7.4
no data
18.8
8.8
8.5
2000
8.6
7.7
13.6
3.6
6.9
4.8
8.7
4.3
12.8
9.8
9.1
11.3
4.3
10.1
13.7
16.4
2.3
6.4
6.7
7.2
2.8
16.1
4.0
6.7
18.8
11.4
5.6
5.4
2001
8.4
7.3
14.5
3.6
6.6
3.9
8.0
4.5
12.4
9.1
8.4
10.8
4.0
9.1
12.9
16.5
2.1
5.7
7.6
7.4
2.2
18.2
4.0
6.2
19.3
10.8
4.9
5.0
2002
8.8
7.6
14.8
4.2
7.5
3.6
7.3
4.6
10.3
9.1
8.9
10.3
4.5
8.6
12.2
13.5
2.8
5.8
7.5
8.2
2.8
19.9
5.0
6.3
18.7
11.5
4.9
5.1
2003
9.0
8.0
14.3
4.3
8.2
4.1
7.8
5.4
10.0
9.0
9.5
9.7
4.7
8.4
10.5
12.4
3.7
5.9
7.6
9.0
3.7
19.6
6.3
6.7
17.6
11.5
5.6
4.9
2004
9.1
8.1
14.2
4.8
8.4
4.7
8.3
5.5
9.7
8.8
9.6
10.5
4.5
8.0
10.4
11.4
4.8
6.1
7.3
9.5
4.6
19.0
6.7
6.3
18.2
11.0
6.3
4.7
Source: Population and social conditions – Labour Market, EUROSTAT, 2005. Statistical information – Labour Market, SORS.
2005
8.7
7.9
13.4
5.2
8.4
5.3
7.9
4.8
7.9
8.4
9.5
10.0
4.3
7.7
9.0
8.2
5.3
7.2
7.3
9.5
4.7
17.7
7.6
6.5
16.4
9.2
6.3
4.7
Figure 2: ILO and registered unemployment rate by gender
Slovenia continues strengthening the knowledge-based economy factors. The education structure is
improving and is slowly catching up with the EU average. Although the tertiary educated
population share has increased to 20.0 percent in 2005, Slovenia is approaching the EU-25 average
(22.8 percent) only slowly. The lag is especially high in comparison to Scandinavian countries.
Estonia and Lithuania also progress much faster than Slovenia. The total education expenditure is
high (6 percent of GDP), but Slovenia falls behind in the expenditure per participant in the tertiary
17
education. The ratio between the student number and teaching staff is also significantly behind the
developed countries, which is summarised in Table 8.
Table 8: Selected indicators in the field of education and training
Slovenia
EU-25
EU-15
Tertiary educated population share (25-64 years) in % (2nd quarter 2005)
20.0
22.8
24.0
Public expenditure on education in v % GDP (2002)
5.98
5.22
5.22
Private expenditure share for educational institutions at tertiary level in
% (2002)
23.3
17.2
12.8
Annual expenditure for educational institutions per tertiary education
student in € SKM (2002)
6,138
7,946
8,562
Number of students per 1000 inhabitants (2003)
50.9
37.0
35.6
Number of graduates per 1000 inhabitants aged 20-29 years (2003)
46.6
52.9
51.2
Source: SORS, EUROSTAT, UMAR calculations
The development of the services society and the globalisation enhance the challenges by way of
reduction of employment and education disparities in the labour market. Quick technological
changes emphasise the need for lifelong learning and new, less typical and more flexible forms of
employment relations.
In 2005 172,000 persons of age group 25 to 64 years have attended vocational trainings, which
represents 15.3 percent of the total population in this age group. The extent of the lifelong learning
has increased and exceeded the EU-25 average, in 2005 this share was 10 percent (EUROSTAT).
The lifestyle standard has improved: given the human development index (HDI) Slovenia has
continuously improved its placement in comparison to other countries – in 2003 the HDI in
Slovenia value exceeded 0.90 (0.904) for the first time, which is a very high level of development
(average HDI value in EU-25 in 2003 was 0.907, in EU-10 0.865). Gross salary as the main income
source is increasing (in 1995-2004 the average gross salary per employee actually increased on
average 2.8 percent annually and was by 1.1 percentage point behind the labour productivity
growth.
LAND USE
In the land use structure of Slovenia the predominant part is covered by forests (59.8 percent of the
total national territory)12, whereas to date their share has gradually increased. Agricultural land
represents 32 percent of total Slovenian territory, and other land 8.2 percent.
Table 9: Actual land use in Slovenia, 2005
Land use
Area (ha)
Share (%)
Forest
Other land
Agricultural land
1,213,424
165,837
648,113
59.8
8.2
32
Source: MAFF, 2005
Given the latest official statistics at European level (Forest Resources Assessment 2005 – FAO) 62.8 percent of
Slovenian territory is covered by forest (http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0400e00.htm).
12
18
Table 10: Actual agricultural land use in Slovenia, 2005
Land use
Fields and gardens
Meadows and pastures
Perennial crops
Other agricultural land
Total agricultural land
Area (ha)
196,204
353,901
54,649
43,360
648,113
Share (%)
30.3
54.6
8.4
6.7
100
Source: MAFF, 2005
The greatest share of the structure of agricultural land use is covered by permanent grassland and
pastures (54.6 percent), followed by fields (30.3 percent) and perennial crops (8.4 percent) (Table
10). Nearly 7 percent of agricultural land is other agriculturally land. There, the production was
abandoned in the past due to different natural, economic and social causes.
The grassland share in the agricultural land use structure is nearly as twice as large as the average
EU share. In spite of the high share, characteristic for grassland in Slovenia is a relatively low
economic cultivation as extensive meadows still represent a higher share that intensive meadows.
Meadows and pastures cover nearly two thirds of the total agricultural land in Slovenia.
The reasons therefore are:
- dissected terrain and structured surface,
- climate humidity providing favourable conditions for the growth of grassland plant varieties
due to the above-average humidity and a relatively favourable distribution of precipitation
and temperatures throughout the year,
- altitude, together with dissected terrain, disabling more intensive types of use of arable land
particularly in mountain areas,
- karstic surface features in the majority of the country conditioning predominant grassland
use of the soil due to shallowness and lower quality of the soil.
The trend of increasingly overgrown surfaces, present in the past decades, has declined since 2003.
Hence, in the last three years the total agricultural land surface has not changed significantly.
Characteristic for agricultural land in Slovenia, which covers nearly 650,000 ha according to the
latest data, is high absolute grassland share and a relatively low arable land and perennial crops
share. The ratio between grassland and arable land areas has significantly changed in the last
century to the favour of grassland.
In agricultural land area per capita (0.32 ha) Slovenia is close to the European average, whereas in
arable land area per capita (0.11 ha) it is at the bottom of the European scale (Figure 3). Slovenia
disposes of no larger continuous areas suitable for crop production. Due to the dissected surface
arable land is mainly situated in plain areas in valleys and basins, with the exemption of the
Pannonian area to the Northeast representing the most important crop production area in the
country.
As a traditional vine and fruit growing country Slovenia’s perennial crops area per capita is
comparable to the EU (Figure 3). Due to its geographical position, which is partially
Submediterranean and partially Subpannonian, the share of agricultural land adequate for
cultivation of vineyards, orchards and olive groves in Slovenia is relatively high. But the terrain
there is much dissected and the areas are hilly, which limits the options for setting up plantations.
Vineyards and orchards are mainly restricted to sites in inclination – the so-called absolute vineyard
areas.
19
Figure 3: Average agricultural land area per capita (SORS 2005)
The majority of agricultural land (72.5 percent) is situated in less favoured areas in accordance with
the RDP 2004-2006 (see chapter 5.3.2.1). The unfavourable conditions do not make agricultural
activity entirely impossible, but they cause lower production capacity of the farms, narrow down the
choice of crops, production management and demand technology adaptation, which again causes a
more expensive production. Farms in these areas are less competitive and, due to the reflection of
specific natural conditions under the agricultural land use structure, less adaptable. In spite of lower
production potentials in these areas agriculture plays an important role in the maintenance of the
settlement and cultural landscape as well as ecological balance.
In Slovenia agriculture is predominantly founded on family farms, representing 99.8 percent of the
total number of agricultural holdings and utilising 94.8% of the total utilised agricultural area
(2005). The 1990s changes have accelerated the concentration and specialisation process in
agriculture, but the average holding size still remains small (6.3 ha of agricultural land).
In 2000, family farms and agricultural enterprises, surveyed within the framework of the census of
agriculture, owned 848,058 ha of land in total. Calculated per holding unit family farms own nearly
10 ha of land on average, which is more than five times less than agricultural enterprises. The
disparities in the land size owned show in the average size as well as in the size structure of
holdings. Among family farms medium sized holdings prevail, the major share (27.3 percent) of
which represent farms with 5 to 10 ha of land owned. In the size structure of agricultural enterprises
nearly fifty percent are captured by holdings owning over 20 ha of land. Agricultural holdings let
out more than 8,000 ha or 9.3 percent of the total land owned on lease to other users. The majority
of land (98.5 percent) is let out on lease by family farms. On average these lease out 1.7 ha of land
per holding. Nearly 30 percent of farms lease out from 1 to 2 ha of land owned. In the light of the
number of holdings as well as the areas the rental of land is more extensive. Nearly 30 percent of
agricultural holdings in Slovenia decide for rental. More than one fourth of the total land is rented
by agricultural enterprises. While family farms mainly rent smaller areas, among agricultural
enterprises prevail holdings which rent 50 or more hectares of land.
Table 11: Family farms and agricultural enterprises
All AH
- family farms
- agricultural enterprises
Number of AH (2005)
77,175
77,042
133
Source: SORS
20
Table 12: Age structure of agricultural holding owners
Total
2003
2005
Total
77,149
77,175
Source: SORS
Younger than 45 years
2003
2005
14,389
14,503
45 to less than 55 years
2003
2005
19,158
18,777
55 years and more
2003
2005
43,602
43,894
Table 13: Agricultural holding owners structure by gender
Gender
Percentage
Women
27.26
Men
68.88
Unknown
3.86
Total
100
Source: Register of agricultural holdings
Private property and split-up estate are predominant in forestry as well. Due to the denationalisation
process the ownership structure of Slovenian forests is still intensively changing. It is estimated that
after the conclusion of the denationalisation process 20 percent of forests shall remain in the
possession of the state. Family farms own nearly one half of private forests. Private non-farm
property has increased in the total share of private forest cover, especially in the number of estates.
21
3.1.2 Agriculture, food industry and forestry characteristics
The accession to the European Union entailed the Common Agricultural Policy and other single
market provisions upon Slovenian agriculture. In spite of prior harmonisation of the national
legislation with the EU legal order in the pre-accession period, certain problems occur in the
implementation of regulations in agriculture, which are being resolved ongoing. In general, the EU
accession brought no major difficulties for Slovenian agriculture. The analysis of trends and key
income factors in agriculture indicate no greater changes that could directly be related to Slovenia’s
accession to the European Union.
By adopting the of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform in June 2003 on direct payments
Slovenia has also committed to implement the it. On 1 June 2006 the Government of the RS
adopted the decision on the model for implementing the CAP reform on direct payments for
Slovenia in 2007-2013, whereby Slovenia is designated as a single region. The Decree on
implementing direct payments in agriculture lays down the payment entitlements in detail
representing the amount of the per-hectare payment of eligible area. Payment entitlements are a
basis for obtaining direct payments from 2007 onward. In Slovenia, there are three payment
entitlement types: payment entitlement comprising of regional payment (or also from supplement
for milk and/or supplement for sugar and/or supplement for cattle sector and/or for specific
conditions), payment entitlement accompanied by an approval for fruit, vegetable and potato
production, and payment entitlement for set aside land. The amount of the regional payment shall
range from EUR 133 per hectare for grassland to EUR 332 per hectare for arable land.
Slovenia has transferred all EU regulation establishing the standards on the common agricultural
policy into the national legislation. The fulfilment of the requirements and conditions set out by the
standards shall be checked by way of the cross compliance control system and regular inspections.
Slovenia adopted the Regulation on statutory management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended), which is compliant with the
requirements under the Community standards and represents the legal basis for the supervision over
the implementation of the standards in the light of obtaining direct payments and other per area
payments under the common agricultural policy.
AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY
Agriculture, food industry and forestry in Slovenia are facing restructuring processes. Low
productivity remains predominantly the problem of agriculture. The causes therefore can be found
in the weak land and parcel structure, low professionalisation rate and relatively low labour
intensity. According to data of the economic accounts for agriculture in 2004-2005 the gross value
added of agriculture in Slovenia amounted on average to EUR 5,499 per productive man-work unit
(PMWU), which is less than one third of the EU-25 value.
22
Table 14: Economic development indicators of Slovenian agriculture
Economic accounts for agriculture (EAA)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
GVA (Mio. €)
434.5 400.8 505.1 391.8 499.5 492.1
- share in the total GVA in Slovenia (%)
2.4
2.1
2.5
1.8
2.2
2.0
- share in the total GDP in Slovenia (%)
2.1
1.8
2.1
1.6
1.9
1.8
Employment (000 PMWU)
103.8 107.1 106.0
95.6
90.2
90.2
- share in the total employment rate (%)
11.6
11.9
11.6
10.5
9.9
9.8
GVA/PMWU (€)
4,187 3,743 4,766 4,098 5,541 5,458
Index - GVA/employee of all activity branches = 100
20.6
17.5
21.2
17.3
22.1
20.8
- GVA/employee EU-25 = 100
27.8
23.4
29.8
24.6
30.7
33.6
EU-25
GVA/PMWU (€)
15,047 16,028 15,971 16,648 18,033 16,233
Source: SORS (Economic accounts for agriculture, NA), EUROSTAT (EAA)
Next to the unfavourable size structure, among the factors contributing to the low productivity of
agriculture, are also the age and education structure as well as the low level of production
specialisation on agricultural holdings.
In 2005 the average economic size of holdings amounted to only 4.6 ESU. In spite of the
concentration process the average size of agricultural holdings in Slovenia is still nearly three times
smaller than the EU average. Additionally, the labour input on Slovenian agricultural holdings,
measured in PMWU, is at the EU level, which indicates a low productivity and poorly exploited
labour potential in agriculture.
Table 15: Number and average agricultural holding size in Slovenia
Agricultural holdings
2000
86,467
470,498
Year
2003
77,149
456,167
2005
77,175
421,587
2005/2000
89.3
89.6
Index
2005/2003
100
92.4
utilised agricultural area (ha)
5,6
6.3
6.3
111.9
100
number of livestock units (LU)
6,2
5.9
5.5
88.7
93.2
standard gross margin (ESU)
4,7
4.6
4.6
98.5
100
Number of agricultural holdings
Number of LU
Average size with regard to:



Source: SORS
One of the reasons for the low productivity of agriculture is also the unfavourable age and education
structure of the agricultural holding operators. According to the structural survey (SORS-AHS) in
2005 more than 50 percent of the operators on agricultural holdings were over 55 years old, the
share of operators under 45 years was only 19 percent.
Table 16: Age structure of operators on family farms in Slovenia
2000
Number
%
Total
86,336
100.0
< 45 years
17,709
20.5
45-55 years
19,779
22.9
>=55 years
48,648
56.3
Source: SORS (Structural surveys of agricultural holdings)
2003
Number
77,037
14,341
19,117
43,579
%
100.0
18.6
24.8
56.6
2005
Number
77,042
14,461
18,703
43,877
%
100.0
18.8
24.3
57.0
In 2005 the share of operators with vocational or higher education was 46.8 percent. The share of
agricultural holding operators with any agricultural education was only 27.8 percent.
23
Table 17: Agricultural education of operators on family farms in Slovenia
Education
Operators, total
No data
Practical experience only
Agricultural courses
Vocational or secondary education
Higher, university or postgraduate education
Operators with any agricultural education
Source: SORS (Structural surveys of agricultural holdings)
2000
2003
2005
Number
% Number
% Number
%
86,336 100.0
77,037 100.0
77,042 100.0
1,869
2.2
1,001
1.3
0
0.0
72,440 83.9
63,104 81.9
55,562 72.1
7,045
8.2
7,415
9.6
16,368 21.2
4,340
5.0
4,755
6.2
4,429
5.7
642
0.7
763
1.0
681
0.9
12,027 13.9
12,933 16.8
21,478 27.8
Younger farm operators have a higher level of formal education and are better trained for work in
agriculture and are thus able to adjust to technological changes and market conditions more
efficiently. The transfer of farms to younger farmers as well as training and more efficient use of
already established advisory, education, information and training systems throughout the country
can make an important contribution to a greater innovation, structural changes and raised
competitiveness of agriculture.
Characteristic for Slovenia are split-up agricultural units, which are, in addition to this, mainly
small and dispersed. Utilised agricultural area is divided into 720,000 agricultural units extending
over more than 1,700,000 parcels. This makes 9 to 10 agricultural units per agricultural holding,
which are generally dispersed on several locations. The unfavourable parcel structure is a
considerable structural obstacle in further development of agriculture. In the last few years certain
improvements have been noted, which are still being obstructed by the immobility of the
agricultural land market and an inefficient land use policy. However, this is one of the key
conditions for improving the parcel structure. On the other hand, the split-up agricultural land
contributes to the conservation of biodiversity, habitats and environmental specifics, which is
positive for the preservation of the environment.
The extent of conducted land consolidation, which can efficiently contribute to solving the problem
of agricultural land fragmentation, has been very limited in the past years. Hence, in the past 15
years only 5,000 ha have been consolidated, which represents only 1 percent of the total utilised
agricultural area. The experience on supporting the land consolidation has shown that it can be
effective only if the initiative to introduce land consolidation comes directly from farmers. This
particularly applies if the support involves the land improvement and the arrangement of the traffic
infrastructure in the consolidated area.
Another problem of Slovenian agriculture with negative impacts on the competitiveness is the great
dependency of production on the natural conditions. The problem mainly relates to the extent,
quality and environmental carrying capacity of the hydro-melioration systems. Climate change and
more frequent longer lasting droughts on one hand and exuberant precipitation on the other cause
great loss of income in agriculture. In Slovenia only a small percentage of agricultural land is
irrigated. The construction of new irrigation systems with a controlled use of water is, next to the
long-term adaptation of plant production to the climate change, one of the more effective measures
providing for greater crop and income stability in agriculture, which, through continuous training
and awareness raising of the irrigation users, must contribute to a better environmental carrying
capacity of the use of natural resources which do not burden the environment.
Slovenian agriculture still carries the burden of the past. For decades it had developed under a
specific political and economic influence not in favour of private farming. Due to the decentralised
regional development providing for jobs nearby a special socio-economic structure of agricultural
24
holdings was established with prevailing mixed farms, which combined the income from various
sources, and where agriculture was often merely the secondary and not the primary activity. The
1990s changes have accelerated the concentration and specialisation process, but mixed farms still
prevail. Significant for this situation is also the smallness of Slovenian farms.
For a long period of time Slovenian agriculture had developed in the totally opposite direction than
agriculture in the majority of the European countries. This especially applies for the agrarian
structure and its development. While in the agriculturally developed countries in a relatively short
time the establishment size and the production specialisation were increased together with the
improvement of agricultural technology, the opposite process took place in Slovenia all up to 1990s.
Characteristic was weakening of parcel and land use structure, low professionalisation level and
relatively low labour intensity.
Slovenia is a European country with the lowest rate of specialisation in agriculture. While within
the EU-15 nearly 85 percent of agricultural holdings are specialised in a specific plant or animal
production, only 43.5 percent of Slovenian agricultural holdings are specialised, given the data of
the agricultural holdings survey in 2003. Characteristic for plant production is a relatively intensive
specialisation in horticulture and perennial crops production and a moderate specialisation in crop
production. Livestock holdings are specialised particularly in meat and milk production. The
livestock production of Slovenian farms is less versatile than crop production. Cattle production is
prevailing due to the natural conditions and indirectly due to great grassland share within the
agricultural land structure. Specialised holdings manage more than the half of agricultural land (55
percent) and produce 62.7 percent of the total standard recovery value of agricultural production in
Slovenia. The production structure of Slovenian farms is a direct reflection of the agricultural land
use structure. In plant production the seeding composition is relatively narrowed and simplified.
The three leading crops – maize, wheat and silage maize – cover nearly two thirds of the entire
arable land in Slovenia. High share of farms growing individual crops and generally small average
area size indicate a low level of specialisation and great dispersion of crop production.
In the last decade, in particular after Slovenia’s accession to the EU, agrarian structure began to
improve. This shows especially in progressed parcel concentration and consequently in a larger
average size of agricultural establishments.
Given the research on the agricultural holdings structure (KMG) in Slovenia, in 2005 77,175
agricultural holdings were engaged in agricultural production, which is 10 percent fewer than in
2000 (Table 15). Although the number of agricultural holdings in 2003 declined in comparison to
2000, the area of utilised agricultural area remained basically unchanged. According to statistical
data from 2003 and 2005 the average size of agricultural holdings in Slovenia was 6.3 ha.
The structural changes reflect also in the farm size structure. While ten years ago more than two
thirds of total agricultural land was managed by farms of which more than one the half were smaller
than 2 ha and nearly 70 percent smaller than 5 ha, today the production core has shifted towards
larger and development-oriented farms. The share of small farms (under 2 ha UAA) amounts to 23
percent and they utilise only about 4 percent of the total UAA. In 2000-2005 the umber of farms
larger than 20 ha UAA had increased by more than 50 percent. Based on the relatively fast land
increase these farms manage over 23 percent of total agricultural land.
Nevertheless, the farm size structure in Slovenia is still incomparable to that in the EU, where
similar structure can be found only in some Mediterranean countries (Greece, Italy and Portugal).
The farm size and the production structure significantly govern the production type of farms in
Slovenia. In general, the structural conditions are far more appropriate for labour and income
intensive livestock production and less for specialised crop and mixed production.
25
16 - < 40 ESU
3,7%
=< 40 ESU
0,6%
8 - < 16 ESU
7,9%
4 - < 8 ESU
14,4%
> 2 ESU
48,9%
2 - < 4 ESU
24,5%
Figure 4: Production types and economic size of agricultural holdings in Slovenia (SORS, 2003)
In Slovenia, two production types prevail – grazing livestock rearing and mixed livestock
production (Figure 4). In total, these two types represent more than one half of all farms. In 2005,
51.2 percent of agricultural holdings were engaged in a certain type of plant or livestock production
(SORS-AHS). Compared to 2004 the share increased by nearly 8 percentage points. Nevertheless,
compared to the EU average the percentage remains low (EU-25 2003: 72%). The share of
agricultural holdings engaged in the production of grazing animals (cattle, sheep and goats) has
increased the most as well as the share of holdings engaged in crop production.
The extent and type of agricultural production are closely related to the average economic size of
agricultural holdings. Given the data of the agricultural holdings survey in 2005 the economic size
was 4.6 ESU. The economic size of nearly 50 percent of agricultural holdings is lower than 2 ESU,
and of another 25 percent between 2 and 4 ESU. Low level of economic size of Slovenian farms
reflects in the fact that only about 4 percent holdings dispose of economic size over 16 ESU.
In 2004 agriculture and forestry contributed 2.2 percent of the total GDP and employed 10.5 percent
of all employed population in the country. In the past decade the contribution of agriculture to GDP
and employment rate has steadily declined and in 2005 it decreased to 2.0 percent. Compared to
1995, the agriculture share in GDP decreased by 1.4 percentage point, while employment went back
by 3.7 percentage points. In spite of the lower share of agriculture in the Slovenian economy the
importance of the sector is still higher than the EU-25 average. Although the economic importance
of agriculture is decreasing, other functions of agriculture, having an impact on the development,
are increasing – multifunctional role of agriculture. The economic importance of agriculture
remains relatively high in predominately rural areas where economy is less developed.
From the disparity between the participation of agriculture in the value added and the employment
structure the low productivity of the sector compared to other activities can be gathered. Low labour
productivity emerges from various factors, among them unfavourable age, education and parcel
structure and low degree of production specialisation. Based on the data of economic accounts for
agriculture in Slovenia the average gross value added of agriculture in 2000-2004 amounted to EUR
4,800 per productive man-work unit (PMWU), while the EU-25 average for the same period was
EUR 16,478 per PMWU, which is 3.4 times more than in Slovenia. Due to the decreasing number
of persons employed in agriculture the value added per productive man-work is rising. However,
even in the very prosperous year 2004 it reached only 20 percent of average GVA per employee at
the national level.
Slovenian agriculture is dealing with a serious income issue. The income in agriculture is about 50
percent lower than the income average in the economy. It also falls significantly behind the income
26
of agricultural holdings in the old Member States, particularly in the neighbouring countries to
which Slovenian agriculture is often compared. The level of the aggregate income in the last decade
has remained unchanged, whereas due to the decline of the extent of labour the income per manwork unit is improving. The structure of the income generated is also changing. As a result of the
accession to the EU and the price depression of agricultural products at operators, direct payments
under the common agricultural policy gain in importance.
For already 135 years Slovenian agriculture and countryside have significantly been shaped by
cooperatives. End of 2005 497 cooperatives were registered in Slovenia, thereof 145 in the filed of
agriculture, hunting and forestry and 9 in the filed of fisheries. Cooperatives are active in farm and
rural population supply, especially in remote places, and buying-in of over 90 percent of slaughter
cattle, 81 percent of milk, and over 58 percent of grapes and potato. They are also an important
purchaser of vegetables, cereals, wood, hop and other agricultural products. But their most
important role is in the sale of plant protection products, seeds, mineral fertilisers and concentrated
feedingstuffs. Within the range of their operation are also processing activities, e.g. of grapes, meat
and milk.
As a result of the unfavourable income situation the investment capacity of agricultural holdings is
weak. The investments in agriculture have increased in the past years, but mainly due to the
increased restructuring funds from the European and national resources. The response to such
development support enhances the thesis on the importance of the public financial support to
investments as well as the organisation and cooperation with the food processing industry. This is
particularly important in the light of the direct payments reform within the framework of the first
pillar of the CAP, which shall be carried out in Slovenia 2007 onward.
The reform model in Slovenia retains to a certain permissible extent some production linked
payments13, but the majority of direct payments shall be included into the regional model of the
single payment scheme (in combination with various historic supplements)14 which is not linked to
any production type. Single payment per hectare shall substitute different types of support per
hectare or per animal applicable so far and is the same for all agricultural holdings in Slovenia. The
only difference shall be in the amount of the single payment under the regional model for grassland
areas, which were not entitled for direct payments so far, and for other eligible areas (higher
payments).
It is anticipated that the reform shall induce the restructuring need towards more market oriented
and competitive agriculture as well as towards the extensification and diversification of activities.
Additional restructuring needs derive from making the payments conditional on the fulfilment of
the cross compliance requirements related to the protection of the environment, people, animals and
plants as well as the standards on land utilisation to prevent overgrowing and other environmental
issues.
13
From the currently production linked aids Slovenia shall retain 75 percent of the special premium for bulls and steers,
50 percent of the sheep and goats premiums and 25 percent of the hops area payment.
14
The historic supplements per single regional payment shall be calculated individually. They shall be allocated from
the resources for milk premium, together with additional payments from resources for sugar beet ant the national
reserve for helping cattle breeders which would be in a very difficult situation due to the transfer to the new direct
payments system. The individual producers shall be eligible for supplements by 2013, by meeting the cross compliance
requirements and without the obligation to keep the agricultural production concerned.
27
FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY
Compared to some new Member States Slovenia has a relatively economically and technologically
well developed food processing industry. This part of the agrifood chain contributes 2.1 percent of
the total GDP and 2.4 percent of the employment structure. Given the value added contribution in
2004 the food processing industry was the fourth most important processing activity and the third
largest employer in the aggregate of processing activities. According to the national accounts data
(SORS) the GVA per employee in food and beverages production (without tobacco production)
amounted in 2004-2005 to 23,763 EUR on average, which is 93 percent of the GVA average per
employee in Slovenia and less that 50 percent of the EU-25 average (2003: EUR 50,500 per
employee).
Table 18: Economic development indicators of food industry in Slovenia
Food and beverages production (DA 15)
GVA (Mio. €)
- share in the total GVA in Slovenia (%)
- share in the total GDP in Slovenia (%)
Employment (000 PMWU)
- share in the total employment rate (%)
GVA/employee (€)
Index - GVA/employee of all activity branches = 100
Source: SORS (National accounts)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
467.6
496.4
518.3
542.2
522.9
472.8
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.7
22.6
22.2
21.9
21.5
21.3
20.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.2
20,692 22,318 23,680 25,393 24,501 23,024
101.8 104.3 105.3 107.0
97.9
87.6
Given the numerous indicators of economic performance the branch has denoted a steady decline in
the recent years, as a result of the late opening of the markets and the increasing pressures and
changes exerted by the relatively high-developed trade. The importance of the food processing
branch is declining in both key macroeconomic aggregates. Considering the industry production
volume index, it is in stagnation (Table 19, Figure 5). However, this is only a temporary and not a
long-term structural crisis. The competitiveness circumstances at domestic and export markets have
been intensified.
Table 19: Trend of important indicators of food processing industry operations in 2000-2004
Number of enterprises
Number of employees
Resources (milliard SIT)
Sales revenues (milliard SIT)
Export revenues (milliard SIT)
Export orientation
Productivity (000 SIT)
Value added per employee (000
SIT)
Profit / loss per employee (000
SIT)
Return on assets (ROA)
Return on sale (ROS)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
424
18,141
568.1
434.9
72.0
16.56%
23,974
6,206
Index
2004/2003
105.0
95.8
102.3
97.2
92.6
91.9
101.4
93.5
Index
2004/2000
109.3
93.2
103.7
96.0
91.0
74.4
103.0
95.4
388
19,473
429.9
355.4
62.1
17.46%
18,252
5,105
377
19,281
461.4
391.1
74.1
18.94%
20,284
5,450
394
19,841
512.0
418.3
76.,6
18.30%
21,083
5,910
404
18,938
535.8
432.1
75.1
17.40%
22,816
6,407
241.6
72.0
503.4
541.2
-119.8
-661.1*
-361.5*
1.09%
1.32%
0.30%
0.35%
1.95%
2.39%
1.91%
2.37%
-0.38%
-0.50%
-2.3°
-2.9°
-2.0°
-1.8°
Source: Agency of the RS for public and legal records and services (2005), data processing: Kuhar (2005)
Remark: Indicators indexes in SIT are revalorised
Remark: * Absolute difference in 000 SIT, ° Absolute difference in percentage points.
28
Figure 5: Importance of Slovenian food industry by key macroeconomic aggregates between 1999 and 2004
Enterprises in this branch (especially enterprises processing foodstuffs of animal origin) have put
great efforts in the past years (and must consequently put up with high expenses) to adapt to the
Community quality standards. The branch also faces considerable structural deficits and a low level
of research and development activities. Substantial reserves exist in the area of efficient work
organisation, more efficient marketing, vertical networking and participation in quality schemes.
Regardless of the current deficits it is estimated that food processing industry in Slovenia has longterm perspectives, indicated by the investments and further concentration processes, by maintaining
the aggregate production level.
In 2005 an average food industry enterprise in Slovenia employed 40.5 workers and produced EUR
4.13 million turnover. On average the productivity of food enterprises between 2000 and 2005 has
increased by more than 3 percent.
Food industry is the third largest employer in the Slovene processing industry. In 2005 426
enterprises in the food processing industry employed 18,315 workers, whereby about 10 percent
were large enterprises, 10 percent medium large and nearly 80 percent were small enterprises.
Thereof 182 enterprises were engaged in the processing of the products referred to in Annex I to the
Treaty and employed nearly 11,000 workers.
Table 20: Number of food processing enterprises and other economic operators engaged in processing of
agricultural products under Annex I to the Treaty and of wood, with regard to the number of regularly
employed persons
Enterprise type
Micro company
0-9 persons
Small company
10-49 persons
Medium company
50-249 persons
Large company
250 persons and
Food
processing
enterprises
Self-employed
persons
Wood
processing
enterprisessawmills
Farms with subsidiary
activity – processing of
agri. products and wood
Total
116
133
170
324
743
31
13
0
0
44
16
2
0
0
18
17
0
0
0
17
29
more
Total
180
148
170
324
822
With regard to the number of regularly employed persons micro processing enterprises prevail (90
percent of all establishments). In the new programming period of the RDP 2007-2013 they shall be
the only ones to be granted development funds to adapt to the newly introduced minimum
Community standards. The enterprise structure in regard of the employee number is shown in Table
20.
The competitiveness potential of the Slovene agriculture and other operators alongside the agrifood
chain lies is a long-term policy towards the quality food production and marketing, which
contributes also towards healthier nutrition as well as the protection and strengthening of health.
This has been confirmed by the growing interest in various quality schemes, which have been
intensively introduced. Appropriate legal bases ensure the implementation of the registration,
certification and quality monitoring processes for special agricultural products and foodstuffs, for
which indications of protection can be acquired.
The policy of special agricultural products and foodstuffs protection has two main purposes:
- enable the producers and processors to be competitive as regards the quality enabling them
economic presence in the market;
- comply with the consumer demand to purchase products which are produced in a special
manner and are authentic and of better quality.
Currently, there is only one certification body in Slovenia accredited in accordance with the EN
45011 standard. So far, 26 agricultural products and foodstuffs are protected with one of the
following indications: “designation of origin”, “geographical indication”, “traditional reputation”
and “higher quality”. Of these 26 protected agricultural products and foodstuffs 15 have been
certified and 4 are currently undergoing the certification process.
In organic and integrated production 5 inspection bodies operate. A certificate for organic and
integrated production has been obtained by 1,379 organic and 5,314 integrated farms or agricultural
holdings.
By 25.04.2007 only one product was protected and registered by the European Commission, while
17 applications of preliminarily protected agricultural products and foodstuffs at the national level
are currently undergoing the registration procedure at the European Commission. All 17
applications are in the registration procedure ever since May 2004.
A preliminary study of market and a long-term development of special agricultural products and
foodstuffs showed that Slovenia's market potential lies in special agricultural products and
foodstuffs. The consumer awareness of product indications is however still weak. Since sufficient
consumer demand is the key element for the quality schemes operation substantial investments shall
be necessary for the promotion and enhancement of special products and foodstuffs sales.
A research conducted by the Institute for sustainable development (2005) showed that only 15-20
percent of organic farms are market oriented. The consumer interest in organic products increases
year by year. Therefore the supply of organic products and foodstuffs at organic markets no longer
satisfies the consumer demand as regards the quantity as well as the type of the products. Poor
market organisation and low market share of organic products and foodstuffs is one of the key
issues of further development of organic farming in Slovenia.
30
FORESTRY
Forestry plays an important role in the economy and the nature protection in Slovenia. Forests cover
59.8 percent of the entire Slovenian territory and have gradually expanded. Wood supply and
increment have increased in the last fifty years. Due to various causes the production capacity, in
particular of private forests, is not fully exploited. In accordance with the forestry management
plans about 62 percent of the wood output could be extracted, but currently only 40 percent are
actually being extracted (Table 21).
Table 21: Forest area, wood supplies, increment and felling in Slovenia
Forest area (000 ha)*
Wood supply (000 m3)
Increment (000 m3)
Felling (000 m3)
- Felling compared to annual increment (%)
*without overgrown area
Source: SORS
2000
1,134
262,795
6,872
2,609
38.0
2001
1,143
267,912
6,925
2,614
37.7
2002
1,150
276,574
7,102
2,646
37.3
2003
1,158
285,735
7,290
3,007
41.2
2004
1,164
293,532
7,446
2,958
39.7
2005
1,169
300,795
7,569
3,236
42.8
Due to the denationalisation process the ownership structure of Slovenian forests is still intensively
changing. The analysis performed simultaneously with the preparation of the forestry management
plans 2001-2010 showed the following structure: 71 percent of private forests owned by natural
persons, 1 percent of private forests owned by legal persons, 26 percent of national forests and 2
percent of municipal forests. During 2000-2005 private forests gained one or two percent on the
account of national forests. It is anticipated that after the conclusion of the denationalisation process
approximately 20 percent of forests shall remain in the possession of the state. Family farms, 68,644
in 2003, own less than 50 percent of private forests (385,361 ha). Private non-farm property has
increased in the total share of private forest surface (53 percent), especially in the number of
holdings (78 percent).
According to the national accounts the average GVA per employee in forestry in 2004-2005
amounted to EUR15,455, which makes 60 percent of Slovenian average. The contribution of the
forestry to the GDP in the recent years is about 0.2 percent. The management performance
indicators (Table 22) show that forestry falls behind the average of other national processing
branches. The return on assets and capital in forestry is also lower than the average of other industry
branches; over-averaged are only the short-term financial and business commitments of the forestry
branch.
Table 22: Economic development indicators of Slovenian forestry
Economic accounts for forestry (EAF)
GVA (Mio. €)
- share in the total GVA in Slovenia (%)
- share in the total GDP in Slovenia (%)
Employment (000 PMWU)
- share in the total employment rate (%)
GVA/employee (€)
Index (GVA/employee of all activity branches = 100)
2000
65.2
0.4
0.3
2001
67.5
0.4
0.3
2002
66.4
0.3
0.3
2003
70.5
0.3
0.3
2004
68.7
0.3
0.3
2005
69.3
0.3
0.3
5.1
5.0
5.6
5.2
4.5
4.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
12,779 13,522 11,769 13,600 15,322 15,587
62.9
63.2
52.4
57.3
61.2
59.3
Slovenian forestry has low labour performance. This could be overcome only by an intensive
grouping of forest owners, which would significantly reduce the felling, storage and sale costs,
while the sale of forestry wood assortments would increase. To improve the utilisation of forests it
is necessary to increase the accessibility of forests by providing forest roads and trails.
31
For various reasons the forest productivity, in particular private forests productivity, is not
sufficiently exploited. The main reasons are split-up forest structure (2.6 ha of forest/owner), great
dispersion (214,000 private owners and 485,000 forest owners), insufficient collaboration of forest
owners in forestry work performance and wood sales, weak and inadequate infrastructure, and
insufficient qualification of forest owners and equipment for forestry work as well as inadequate
organisation and too low efficiency of existing advisory services. As a result of present conditions
management costs are high. Simultaneously, in the last decade a trend of wood price depression is
evident.
Greater efforts must be put in the improvement of technological qualification and the level of
knowledge required for the application of more advanced technologies as well as the networking of
producers, and in higher value added rate of public resources. New income opportunities with
explicit positive environmental effects can also be accomplished by a higher exploitation of
alternative forest resources (wood as renewable energy source).
The forest management policy in Slovenia is aimed at sustainable forest use. The national
regulations in force make sure that the natural conditions are respected. Further on, any intervention
into forests shall be subject to an assessment on the impacts on the environment.
3.1.3 State of the environment
Agricultural land and forests in Slovenia cover nearly 92 percent of the surface and have an
important environmental, aesthetic and spatial function. The nature and environmental protection
have a common social value in Slovenia, which also reflects in the policies concerned. Slovenia’s
forest management is sustainable and has a relatively high standard as its policy is often serves as
an example to others. In agriculture the wide-ranged implementation of agri-environmental
measures helps maintain the utilisation of agricultural areas. In less favoured areas and the
preservation of the multifunctional role of agriculture other measures for rural development are
important as well. These measures have been the key element of the rural development policy so far
and are well accepted by the beneficiaries and by the public.
NATURAL HANDICAPS AND THREAT OF ABANDONMENT AND MARGINALISATION
Less favoured areas cover 85 percent of the whole national territory, whereof nearly 72 percent are
mountain areas (Annex 1, Figure 2). Within the less favoured areas are mountain areas with typical
steep slopes and high altitudes, making agricultural production more difficult, areas with frequent
floods and strong winds, the Ljubljansko barje marsh and the Karst areas restricting the agricultural
land use due to their specific natural elements, i.e. limestone terrain, different soil depth, dissected
micro relief, sinkholes, flood fields and other karstic features, as well as erosion threatened hills in
the central and north-east Slovenia. Agricultural holdings in these areas are less competitive and
due to the reflection of specific natural conditions in the agricultural land use structure also less
adaptable. In spite of lower production potentials agriculture in these areas plays an important role
in maintenance of the settlement and cultural landscape as well as ecological balance.
Table 23: Total and agricultural land by less favoured areas as confirmed in the RDP 2004-2006
Total land
(%)
Agricultural land (without other
agricultural area)
32
Handicapped areas
Mountain area
Other less favoured area
Areas affected by specific handicaps
Less favoured areas
Areas outside LFA
Total area
Source: MAFF 2005
71.8
4.0
9.2
85.0
15.0
100.0
Surface
(000 ha)
325
23
91
439
166
605
Structure
(%)
53.7
3.8
15
72.5
27.5
100.0
Due to the specific natural features various ecosystems and habitats have been established in these
areas which depend on the cultivation of agricultural areas. A wide-ranged set of environmental
characteristics and high share of utilised agricultural land in these areas indicate a high level of
biodiversity conservation and confirm the efficiency of the current measures for less favoured areas
in prevention of the abandonment of agricultural activity and the marginalisation of these areas. The
trend of increasingly overgrowing areas, present in the past decades, is in decline since 2003.
Hence, the total surface of agricultural land has not changed significantly in the last three years.
HABITATS AND BIODIVERSITY
The commitment to the conservation of habitats and biodiversity reflects in the high share of
protected areas. As much as 47.7 percent of the whole national territory was designated as
ecologically important areas (Annex I, Figure 4) covering 202,000 hectares of agricultural land and
660,000 ha of forests. Ecologically important areas cover habitat types, parts of habitat types or
larger ecosystem units which substantially contribute towards the conservation of biodiversity.
Cartographically, these areas are designated in detail in the Decree on ecologically important areas
(OJ RS No 48/04).
Due to the high level of conservation of biodiversity, variety, habitats and landscape specifics in
Slovenia there is a need for further preservation of these conditions. The best possible method to
achieve this is by maintaining the utilisation of agricultural land in an environment-friendly manner,
by maintaining agricultural activity in marginal areas and in areas unfavourable for agriculture,
where great risk of land abandonment and overgrowing is present, and by sustainable forest use.
Agriculture plays an important role in the habitat, biodiversity and landscape conservation. Areas,
such as permanent grassland, areas with low production intensity and mosaic-like structure, and
areas with endangered species and high biodiversity cover 300,000 ha of Slovenia (Annex I, Figure
3). This is over fifty percent of all agricultural land, which is mainly located in marginal and natural
handicap areas. Abandonment of agriculture in these areas and reduction of open area would mean a
serious environmental hazard and potential loss of cultural landscapes. Therefore, agricultural
activity in these areas must be maintained to prevent the loss of habitats and reduction of animal
and plant biodiversity as well as to preserve the landscape diversity and the recognisability of
Slovenian landscape.
The high level of biodiversity, preservation of habitats and other natural and landscape diversity
emerges also from the split up agricultural land and forest structure. The dispersed agricultural
parcel structure preserves the mosaic-like landscape where the semi-natural areas are interwoven
with other utilised areas. In high nature value areas the split up land structure must be preserved and
support to farmers must be secured to compensate for the economic shortcoming emerging from
such structural conditions.
With the Decree on special protection areas (Natura 2000 sites) (OJ RS No 49/04) 286 different
Natura 2000 sites were designated throughout the national territory as a part of the European special
33
protection areas network – the Natura 2000 sites. Thereof 260 areas were designated on the bases of
the Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of
wild fauna and flora, and 26 areas on the basis of the Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979
on the conservation of wild birds. The designation of special protection areas represents an
important step in the implementation of the Birds Directive, which is groundwork for the long-term
provision of favourable conditions of bird population status, as well as in achieving the Göteborg
objectives to reverse the decline of the biodiversity level by 2010. The Natura 2000 sites (Annex 1,
Figure 5) cover 36 percent of the Slovenian territory (thereof forests represent 71 percent), which is
30 percent of agricultural and forestry areas and one of the highest shares of protected areas in
Europe.15 The favourable natural status with high level habitat and biodiversity conservation in
Slovenia needs to be preserved by way of appropriate strategic guidelines and measures.
Nevertheless, it must not restrict too severely the optimal utilisation of economic potentials of
agriculture and forestry in these areas. The measures under the RDP 2007-2013 putting special
focus on the agri-environmental measures represent an important contribution towards achieving
favourable farmland bird population status.
The common index of the farmland bird population status, which is one of the key indicators on the
biodiversity status at the EU level, indicates a downward trend in the last decade (Figure 7) and
since 1996 it has decreased by more than 10 percent. Given the data the decline in the bird count in
agricultural areas has been caused by the specialisation and the changes in the processes and
technologies of the agricultural activity. The key changes affecting the birds are the removal of
hedgerows, land amelioration, higher degree of mechanisation application, and increased land
application of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as the simplification of the crop rotation and decline
of farming diversity.
Figure 6: Trend of the farmland bird population status at the EU level. Index 2000 = 100.
15
In Europe Natura 2000 sites cover approximately 15 percent of the entire territory, which is 12.5 percent of the
European agricultural and forestry land.
34
In designating the special protection areas for birds in Slovenia 51 qualifying species were used,
among them also the White stork Ciconia ciconia, Short-Toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus, Rock
Partridge Alectoris graeca, Corncrake Crex Crex, Scops Owl Otus scops, Roller Coracias
garrulous, Wryneck Jynx torquilla, Woodlark Lullula arborea and Lesser Grey Shrike Lanius
minor, as well as other species inhabiting agricultural areas and the countryside in general. Given
the data analysis of the 1990-2000 period the bird count of 55 species had decreased in the past
decade, which is more than one fourth of all nesting birds in Slovenia. Thereof, 32 species (58
percent) are farmland birds. In no other bird habitat type the population status has declined as much
as with farmland birds. Hence, it is not surprising that many of them are classified as very or even
critically endangered on the Red List of Nesting Birds in the RS. Most affected are the nesting
populations of the Roller, Lesser Grey Shrike and Snipe, which are threatened with extinction in
Slovenia. Three typical farmland bird species (Lesser Kestrel, Meadow Pipit and Rook) have
unfortunately already extinct in 1990-2000. However, numerous farmland bird species classified as
endangered in the major part of Western Europe are relatively frequent in Slovenia. Presently,
farmland birds are the main bird group in the light to be protected. Of 32 farmland bird species with
declining population status, 16 species are significantly dependent on different grassland types
(“grassland bird species”) and 16 species which depend on the rich, predominantly extensive,
mosaic-like cultural landscape. Both habitat types mentioned are exposed to numerous changes
which can negatively affect the birds.
The Slovenian ornithology association DOPPS-BirdLife Slovenia, together with the BirdLife
International, has prepared guidelines for the favourable conservation status of qualification and
other endangered farmland and forest bird species in special protection areas in Slovenia. The
guidelines mentioned are a baseline for the preparation of appropriate actions at the national level,
in particular within the framework of the possibilities under the programming period 2007-2013, in
which the financing of Natura 2000 under the structural funds is foreseen, as well as under the RDP
and a special financing programme LIFE+. Special emphasise shall be on the RDP 2007-2013
measures, whereby the key measures for the conservation of farmland bird populations are in
particular: extensive grassland maintenance, preservation of special grassland habitats, preservation
of humid extensive meadows, high-trunk orchards and the wide range of actions under organic
farming.
In the majority of special protection areas in Slovenia certain basic habitat types occur which
represent the basis for the categorisation of ecological requirements of endangered bird species and
consequently the protection measures for individual habitat types in protected areas. Basically, three
main habitat types of farmland birds exist: mosaic-like cultural landscape, humid extensive
meadows and dry extensive grassland.
Humid extensive meadows represent an important habitat for birds in eight Slovenian special
protection areas: Ljubljansko barje marsh, Lake Cerknica, Nanošèica River basin, Planinsko polje
field, Reka River valley, Jovsi, Mura River and Snežnik-Pivka. In the areas mentioned one of the
main negative impacts in the past was the drainage of humid grassland. To secure favourable status
of humid grassland types the land amelioration activities need to be reduced and/or their
acceptability assessed, especially from in the light of biodiversity. It is also important that the
existing land amelioration systems be maintain in a manner minimizing negative effects on the
species (cleaning and maintenance off the nesting season, alternating cleaning of river banks,
maintenance of ditch and canal vegetation). The regulation on cross compliance (Regulation on
statutory management requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions for
farming, OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) partially, but not entirely, resolved the problem of
permanent grassland conversion into arable land.
Dry extensive grassland is an important habitat in six Slovenian special protection areas: Karst,
Snežnik-Pivka, Trnovski gozd forest – southern borderline stripe and Nanos, Banjšice, Julian Alps,
Breginjski Stol and Planja. In the light the preservation of favourable bird population status the
35
main threat represents the loss of considerable areas of dry grassland due to the abandonment of
pasture and consequently of overgrowing.
Mosaic-like cultural landscape is a complex habitat maintaining important populations of
endangered bird species in seven Slovenian special protection areas: Gorièko, Mura River,
Dravinjska valley, Slovenske gorice valleys, Kozjansko, Drava River and Šentjernejsko polje field.
The trend of agricultural intensification in these areas is still deemed the main threat for farmland
birds. Due to agricultural intensification the elements of the traditional cultural landscape vanish,
i.e. hedgerows, border strips, certain trees and bushes, field paths and high-trunk orchards. For the
purposes of more intensive food production the conversion of meadows into arable land is still
present. The traditional land use in the form of grassland and old crop varieties have been replaced
by foreign, more intensive cultures, which negatively affect the population of Slovenian nesting
bird species due to the land application of fertilisers and the use of plant protection products. In the
Natura 2000 sites farmers as agricultural land managers are recognised a special social status, based
on which it is important to produce quality and healthy food and also that the farmer lives and
works in a sustainable manner in a healthy environment and preserves the traditional cultural
landscape as well as a high biodiversity level.
Since no common monitoring system for biodiversity monitoring has yet been established in
Slovenia, the results on the situation are only qualitative. The indications on the indicator species
and habitat types status show that populations within the areas with a great extent of land engaged
in the agri-environmental measures have not decreased and remained within the range of natural
fluctuations. Table 1, Annex 1, shows the farmland bird status in Slovenia and the nesting
population trends in 1990-2000.
STATE OF WATERS
The Water Framework Directive introduced a new approach to water management in Europe and
pays special attention to ecology as the overall water status indicator. Simultaneously, common
approaches and standards are also evident from the requirements to group different viewpoints on
water protection, and particularly from the requirements for overall designing of measures with
regard to different viewpoints and criteria.
Under the Rules on determining and classification for water bodies (WB) of surface water (OJ RS
No 63/05 and 26/06) 155 surface water bodies16 were designated in the RS and under the Rules on
determining WB of groundwater (OJ RS No 63/05) 21 groundwater bodies17 were designated. In
accordance with the Nitrate Directive (91/676/EEC) and the Decree on the limit input concentration
values of dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the entire Slovenian
territory was designated a vulnerable zone, where land application of nitrogen from livestock
manure may not exceed 170 kg/ha. Hence, the entire agricultural sector must comply with the strict
requirements on livestock manure management and take into consideration the principles of good
agricultural practice. Within the framework of the adaptation to the nitrate directive standard a
considerable amount of resources was devoted in 2004 and 2005 to the construction of sufficient
16
Thereof 122 WB of watercourses, 3 WB of natural lakes, 4 WB of seas, 4 artificial water bodies and 22 candidates for
strongly modified water bodies, thereof 2 at sea.
WB Savska kotlina basin and Ljubljansko barje marsh, WB Savinjska kotlina basin, WB Krška kotlina basin, WB
Julian Alps in the Sava River basin, WB Karavanke, WB Kamniško-Savinjske Alps, WB Cerkljansko, Škofjeloško and
Polhograjsko, WB Posavsko hribovje to the central Sotla, WB Lower Savinja River to the Sotla River, WB Kraška
Ljubljanica, WB Dolenjski kras, WB Drava River basin, WB Haloze and Dravinjske gorice, WB Western Slovenske
gorice, WB Murska basin, WB Eastern Slovenske gorice, WB Gorièko, WB Coast and Karst with Brkini, WB Julian
Alps in the Soèa River basin and WB Goriška Brda and Trnovsko-Banjška planota plateau.
17
36
storage capacities for livestock manure, in accordance with the standard requirements. Given the
groundwater monitoring data the impact of the arrangement of the livestock manure storage
capacities, could at present not yet be assessed. Considering that agriculture is one of the main
pollution sources of nitrogen compounds in the environment and that the input and manure storing
are under strict supervision, positive results regarding the nitrates contents in water can be
anticipated in near future.
In surface water the impact of nitrogen load from agriculture is treated as an increased nitrate
concentration in surface waters. Increased nitrate contents in surface waters are deemed contents of
over 4.5 mg nitrate per litre, which is currently present in about 30 percent of agricultural land in
rear areas. Thus, with unchanged agricultural practice in surface WB with over 30 percent of
agriculturally utilised land an increased nitrate concentration in surface waters can be anticipated.
The 30 percent criterion of agriculturally used land representing the threshold for assessing the
impacts of relevant loads from local agricultural sources was also checked on the basis of
information on where the actual surplus exceeded the permissible nitrogen surplus. Permissible
nitrogen surplus is surplus not exceeding the limit concentration 50 mg nitrate per litre in soil water
by precipitation dilution in the area concerned.
The local pollution sources from agricultural activity or urban area18 activities cause considerable
loads affecting the groundwater quality. The highest shares of anticipated loads from the local
pollution sources from agricultural and artificial (urban) surfaces in groundwater WB are in the
areas of intergranular aquifers of the Savinjska, Krška and Murska basin (82-93 percent).
Significant loads affecting the groundwater quality also occur in the other two most important
intergranular aquifers, i.e. the area of the Dravska kotlina basin and Savska kotlina basin with
Ljubljansko barje marsh. High loads are evident also in some smaller aquifer systems and their
parts, particularly in densely populated and agricultural coastal area, parts of the Vipavska dolina
valley and the Goriška Brda. The lowest shares of surface with typical local pollution are located in
the Alps (Karavanke 7 percent, Julian Alps 10 percent and Kamniško-Savinjske Alps 18 percent).
The data on the plant protection products residues and their metabolites show a reduction trend in
the majority of aquifers, as a result of the atrazine and desetilatrazine concentration reduction based
on the prohibition of its application from 2002 onward. The number of certain active substances and
their breakdown products, exceeding limit values 0.1 ìg/l for individual substances, has also
decreased. Thereof, most frequently detected in groundwater is metolachlor, one of the most
frequently used active substances in maize production in Slovenia.
Based on the information of the national groundwater quality monitoring poor chemical status is
present in three groundwater bodies: Dravska, Murska and Savinjska kotlina (Figure 7). Given the
current trend on certain most relevant parameters on chemical status the prognoses for 2015 is also
not promising.
The WB Dravska dolina in the Drava River basin is most affected by the impacts of the agricultural
activity in Slovenia. In the majority of the sampling stations of the national monitoring network the
nitrate values exceed the top limit 50 mg/l and are increasing. The poor condition of the Dravsko
and Ptujsko polje field aquifer is mainly caused by pesticides (in particular atrazine and
desetilatrazine), the contents of which substantially exceed the top limits in most cases.
In the WB Murska kotlina increasing nitrate contents in groundwater are registered. Most frequently
present pesticides causing poor water status are atrazine and desetilatrazine. At all sampling stations
a decline of the atrazine and desetilatrazine contents was noted.
18
In urban areas the input of harmful substances into groundwater is caused by constructions not intended for human
habitation, industrial and craft facilities, public utility and transport infrastructure and to a smaller extent by apartment
blocks and other areas.
37
The chemical status of the WB Savinjska kotlina is poor due to the overrun of the representative
nitrate content, which had exceeded the top limit 50 mg/l in 2004. The trends indicate further
increase. The waters are also overloaded with the pesticide atrazine and its degradation element
desetilatrazine. However a downward trend was recorded at all sampling stations.
Figure 7: Annual average of nitrates concentration (mg/l) in observed alluvial aquifers in 1993-2004.
Annual average of nitrates concentration in three karst/fissure porosity aquifers (Karst Ljubljanica,
Trnovsko Banjška Plateau and Triest-Quarnero Bay) was lower than 6 mg/l (ARSE).
AIR POLLUTION, CLIMATE CHANGE
The most important greenhouse gases in agriculture are methane and dinitrous oxide. In 2004
Slovenian agriculture released 1,973,000 tons of equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2)19, methane and
dinitrous oxide, which is about 10 percent of the total greenhouse gas releases in Slovenia.
Considering the base year 1986, which is a baseline for the calculation of Slovenia’s commitments
for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, by 2004 the releases in agriculture were reduced by
14.4 percent. Given the Kyoto Protocol commitments for Slovenia (8 percent by 2008-2013), this is
favourable. The reduction is mainly a result of reduced cattle and poultry production and new waste
treatment plants on large pig farms.
Greenhouse gases are also a result of the fossil fuel use in agriculture. Mobile users of fossil fuels in
agriculture, forestry and fisheries (tractors, mobile agricultural machinery and others) contribute
approximately 1.3 percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions in Slovenia.
Bio gas facilities can considerably contribute to the methane emissions in livestock manure storing.
According to raw estimations only 10 percent of the potential in cattle production and one third in
pig production are realised due to the dispersed agriculture. In plant production it is most important
19
Due to the differences in the greenhouse effect the release of methane and dinitrous oxide is shown in carbon dioxide
equivalents.
38
to promote a technically founded fertilisation by applying adequate input technologies emphasising
efficient nitrogen cycle in agriculture.
Although agri-environmental submeasures in the programme are not directly aimed at reducing the
greenhouse gas emissions, their indirect effect is considerable. In the light of the reduction of the
greenhouse gas emissions the following agri-environmental submeasures are crucial: integrated fruit
production, integrated vine production, integrated horticulture, mountain pastures, sustainable
rearing of domestic animals, extensive grassland maintenance, permanent green cover in water
protection area and organic farming.
A considerable economic and environmental damage is caused by release of ammonia into the
atmosphere. It contributes to acid rain and soil acidification and by discharging nitrogen and all
ammonia emissions the changes of the natural environment (eutrophication) occur. The majority of
ammonia is discharged from stables and during livestock manure storage and fertilisation with
livestock manure. A large amount is also produced through the fertilisation with mineral fertilisers.
Annual ammonia emissions per hectare of utilised agricultural area (UAA) in Slovenia amount to
39.1 kg and are considerably higher than the EU-15 average (21.7 kg). The high releases per area
unit are mainly a result of high grassland share and the corresponding well-developed animal
husbandry as well as the prevailing stable rearing where discharges are much higher than in pasture
rearing.
During 1990-2002 the ammonia releases in Slovenia decreased from 22,012 to 19,749 tones or by
10.3 percent, which is mainly a result of herd reduction and the fact that due to the increased rearing
intensity and changes in rearing methods the discharges did not entirely follow the changes in the
herd size. Given the estimation, without any special intervention it is unlikely to keep the level of
ammonia emissions under 20,000 tones per year as set out in the Directive 2001/81/EC on national
emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants. The most important measure in the ammonia
emission reduction is the promotion of technically founded fertilisation emphasising the efficient
nitrogen cycle in agriculture. The measure also contributes to the water protection and greenhouse
gas emission reduction (Table 24). The emissions can be reduced by increasing pasture rearing,
with adequate methods of keeping stable rearing, through adequate methods of livestock manure
storing and appropriate application thereof. Required are overall solutions as it is typical for
ammonia emissions that positive effects of individual measure can be completely neutralised if they
are not integrated into the entire chain of livestock manure treatment. In Slovenia, most critical is
the spreading of the liquid livestock manure since practically all farmers apply the least favourable
method, i.e. slurry spreading with a splash plate. Within the framework of agri-environmental
payments requirements on registered application of livestock manure are set as well as preparation
of fertilisation plans based on the soil analysis, which provides for a more balanced nitrogen
application and prevents too excessive inputs into the environment.
Table 24: Greenhouse gas emissions in 1986, 2000 and 2004 and projections for 2008-2012 without the
measures for reduction and with the envisaged measures
[kt CO2 equ]
Emissions without
measure
Envisaged effect
without measure
1. Anaerobic digesters
2. Grazing cattle
3. Rational fertilisation
Emissions with
measure
Source: ARSE, AIS
1986
2000
2004
2008
2010
2012
2305.4
2136.4
1972.6
2216.8
2245.0
2255.2
Average
2008-2012
2239.8
37.2
67.7
99.0
68.0
7.7
7.0
22.5
2179.6
15.5
14.8
37.4
2177.2
23.5
23.1
52.4
2156.2
15.6
14.9
37.5
2171.8
39
The greatest problems in agriculture can be expected as a result of the anticipated increased drought
frequency and intensity, in particular, if simultaneously with the increased temperature a reduced
quantity of precipitation during the summer months should occur, accompanied by the aboveaverage duration of the sunny weather. On frequent occasions in the last decade the drought has a
considerably reduced the produce. In addition thereto, the agricultural production may be negatively
affected by increased frequency of natural disasters, frostbite, hail, heavy rainfalls or substantial
long-lasting precipitation and consequently floods. According to estimations the positive effects
shall not offset for the negative impacts and thus in future the agricultural production shall become
more expensive. One shall also have to take into account the envisaged weather and climate change
and not only the gradual warming of the atmosphere as a result of the increasing greenhouse gas
concentrations.
Yearlings represent a considerable share of plants in agricultural production. This can ease the
adaptation to the climate change by adjusting the soil cultivation, and sowing time as well as the
selection of appropriate cultivars and species. Perennial crops, e.g. fruit trees and vine, shall
experience more severe climate change, but these effects as well may at least partially be mitigated
through an appropriate agricultural practice. Hence, a considerable share of adjustment measures
can be made at the farm level. These shall be promoted by the Government by increasing the level
of professionalism in farming, training and information actions, by promoting a better use of agrimeteorological data and forecasts as well as research directed towards the additional prediction and
evaluation of adaptation capacities. The changed and inconsistent weather and climate conditions
shall also change the conditions for the appearance and spreading of plant diseases and insects.
Plants weakened by unfavourable weather and climate conditions shall be receptive to diseases and
insect attacks. Under the changed climate conditions changes of the plant pathogen life cycles are
more likely to occur. It shall be necessary to improve the prognosis service which shall be expected
to deliver more accurate and earlier information and warnings of diseases occurrence, pest
development and plant endangerment due to weather conditions. Intensified must also be the
prevention measures for input of new diseases and pests.
The irrigation possibilities and the introduction thereof must be carefully thought through as regards
their potential side effects, in particular to establish a system of adequate agri-meteorological
support for the irrigation systems.
The submeasures mountain pasture and sustainable rearing of domestic animals are particularly
directed towards the production of grazing cattle, while integrated production is the most important
instrument aimed at improving the nitrogen cycle efficiency, whereas reasonable fertilisation is
related to the use of mineral fertilisers, which is limited in several measures.
As a result of the limited land application of nitrogen from livestock manure, farmers are redirecting
the livestock manure application technologies by ways causing fewer nitrogen losses from ammonia
and ensuring a potentially higher utilisation thereof through plants. The more sophisticated and
controlled methods of livestock manure application, considerably supported by training, also
contribute to the reduction of the ammonia emissions.
In accordance with meeting the requirements of the Council Directive (EC/676/1991) a large
number of manure storage capacities were built in Slovenia in 2004-2006. Therefore an additional
reduction of the ammonia emission level from agriculture can be expected. In 2004 and 2005 the
funds under the measure “Support for meeting the EU standards on agricultural holdings” were used
to co-finance the construction of livestock manure storage capacities for 123,600 LUs, which
represents nearly 30 percent of the total domestic animals count in Slovenia.
Compliant with the regulation governing the nitrogen input agricultural holdings in Slovenia must
meet the requirement on the size and the arrangement of livestock manure storage capacities, which
are checked by the agricultural inspectors in accordance with the regulation concerned. The
regulation applies throughout the territory of the RS, which is entirely designated as vulnerable
40
zone. Simultaneously, in accordance with the cross compliance requirements agricultural holdings
obtaining agricultural subsidies must meet the same requirement, which is additionally checked by
controllers within the range of the 1 percent mandatory controls. The storage capacities must suffice
for the period during which the livestock manure application is prohibited or not possible. In
Slovenia the storage capacities must suffice for the amount of livestock manure produced on
agricultural holding within six months or four months in the coastal area.
Forests are a dominant and most preserved natural ecosystem. They protect the landscape and
secure ecological balance therein. Due to their well preserved status forests are for the time being
successfully mitigating the negative impacts on the environment impaired by the civilisation.
Forests represent important CO2 and carbon sinks. Given the data the annual CO2 accumulation in
Slovenian forests in 1990-2005 amounted to 9.867 Mt CO2 per year on average, which means that
in Slovenian forests over 60 percent of annual CO2 emissions in Slovenia are accumulated.
Due to their slow response and long life span of trees forests are particularly sensitive for climate
change. Forests shall be exposed to the stress occurring as a result of climate change in almost all
sites. Particularly vulnerable are sites at lower and medium high altitudes where the forest structure
has been anthropogenically changed in the past centuries by the spruce introduction, which
originally grows in colder areas. In the exposed sites the protection role of forests shall also be
endangered. The advantage of Slovenian forests in adapting to the climate change is the traditional
sustainable practice of forest management, which avoids the vulnerable monoculture stands. The
sustainable forest management, which is already one of the standard practices in Slovenian forestry,
is a good basis for the adjustment of forests to the climate change. The increased wood supply in
Slovenian forests shall contribute to a better resistance of forest ecosystems and thus to their
tolerance to climate change. The key issue of the adaptation is the change of the forest stand
structure. The basic guidance is an increased count of thermophilous species. The majority of
forestry experts favour the increased share of deciduous trees, particularly beech. To guide the
forest stand structure the monitoring of the status must be accelerated as well as the vulnerability
research of potentially most endangered lowland and sub-mountain forests with a disproportionately
high share of conifers.
The potentially increased fire hazard requires measures of passive and active forest protection,
particularly in already more endangered areas. Locally, forests are also threatened by wind damage
caused by the Karavanke foehn, a strong south wind, or by summer thunderstorms. Forests can also
be damaged by rim, deciduous trees in particular by a stronger spring snowfall, which breaks
greening branches. The changing climate conditions may affect the insect threat and their changed
life cycle, which could coincide with the diminished tree resistance when exposed to the stress
caused by the unfavourable climate conditions. It is necessary to research the threat arising from the
increasing air pollution from photochemical smog in the worm period of the year.
Agriculture has several options for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, due to
various reasons the effects of many of them cannot be adequately recorded and demonstrated in the
official emission trends reports. Among the most important measures for the greenhouse gas
emissions reduction is the promotion of more efficient livestock breeding (efficient selection,
optimal feeding, provision of good reproduction parameters and long life of the pure bred females).
In the cattle production, which produces the most greenhouse gases, much can be done by
enhancing pasture rearing and optimising the rations with the purpose to reduce the methane
emissions and nitrogen secretion. Based on the general stocking density ceiling (maximum 1.9 LU)
on agricultural holding the implementation of all agri-environmental submeasures shall contribute
to the greenhouse gas emissions reduction originating from livestock production. The submeasure
“Sustainable rearing of domestic animals” in particular enhances the use of home made feed and
limits the purchase of concentrated feedingstuffs, which additionally reduces the production of the
surplus nitrogen on agricultural holding.
41
Agriculture can contribute to the greenhouse gas emissions reduction by producing energy crops,
particularly oilseed rape for biodiesel production as well as electricity and heat production from
biogas. Currently, biodiesel is the only bio fuel produced in Slovenia. The main raw material for
this production is oilseed rape. In 2006 oilseed rape was grown on about 3,000 ha of arable land.
According to data of the paying agency in 2005 the claims for energy crops production captured
1,395 ha and in 2006 1,938 ha. The trend indicates an increase of energy crops production.
To promote the energy crops production Slovenia shall support the producers through a measure
bringing EUR45 per hectare additionally to the basic direct payment (EUR332 per hectare for
fields). For setting up of perennial plantations for biomass production the EU granted national aid.
In 2007 about 4,000 ha are under oil plants and planned is also sowing of soy and sunflowers.
It is estimated that about 10 percent of arable land (15,000 ha) can be used for production of energy
crops. In practice this means a smaller surface due to the unfavourable land and parcel structure in
Slovenia. If translating the number of hectares (provided they are under oilseed rape) into bio fuel,
this would represent 15,000 tonnes of biodiesel.
An enormous amount of renewable energy resources represent forests as nearly two thirds of the
territory are covered with forests. The production of renewable energy in forestry amounts to 454
Ktoe20.
SOIL
During the last period the land application of plant nutrients has decreased (Figure 8). The total
amount of mineral fertilisers used in 2000-2005 was reduced by 14 percent and the application of
pure nutrients by 21 percent (SORS). In 2000 the average land application of plant fortifiers was
172 kg/ha of fertilised land, by 2005 it was reduced to 133 kg/ha.
Table 25: Application of mineral fertilisers in Slovenia
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Mineral fertilisers application (t)
174,180 178,166 175,724 177,589 162,680 149,467
Application of pure nutrients per ha of fertilised land (kg)
172.3
166.4
162.3
155.9
147.1
133.2
-N
78.8
80.0
77.7
77.1
70.1
66.2
- P2O5
42.1
38.2
36.5
34.2
33.9
30.5
- K2O
51.3
48.1
48.0
44.7
43.0
36.5
Source: SORS
The land application reduction was achieved also by the establishment and the use of fertilisation
plans introduced as an obligatory part of good agricultural practice in the use of fertilisers.
Fertilisation plans based on soil analysis contribute significantly to a balanced land application of
plant nutrients as well as to a favourable nutrient balance in the soil and water. Therefore a
favourable gross nutrient balance, in particular of nitrogen, in the soil is expected. In 1995-1997
there was a high nitrogen surplus of 40 kg per hectare of agricultural land. Nevertheless, it is still far
lower than the EU average value at that time. Currently, Slovenia does not dispose of more updated information on the nutrient balance in the soil, but there is a research in preparation to give
new information.
20
Ktoe is a unit standing for the equivalent of 1000 tonnes of oil.
42
Figure 8: Use of plant nutrients per hectare of utilised agricultural area in Slovenia 1992-2004. (SORS,
Phytosanitary Office of the RS, and Agricultural Institute of Slovenia)
A general restriction of land application of nitrogen from livestock manure amounting to 170 kg per
hectare annually applies for the entire agricultural sector. In certain water protection areas the
permissible land application of nutrients is even lower. Based on the construction of sufficient
storage facilities for livestock manure the agriculture substantially contributes to the reduction of
nitrates application, favourable nutrients level and the improvement of chemical status in waters.
Areas at great erosion risk appear locally and depend on relief, vegetation, soil type and climatic
conditions. According to the estimations of the JRC Institute (Ispra) in 2004 0.87 tons of soil per
hectare on average were to be washed away during the erosion process in Slovenia, which is about
one half of the EU-25 average. The level of erosion is significantly affected by the land use. Erosion
can be prevented primarily through sustainable land use permanently covered with green cover.
Slovenia must enhance the utilisation of agricultural land to preserve or even decrease the erosion
level.
In general, the soil in Slovenia is well provided with organic matter. The soil maps indicate that the
organic matter content on 86.2 percent of agricultural land amounts to over 2 percent, on 30.9
percent of agricultural land it amounts to 4 percent. Laboratory sample analyses showed similar
results, as in 88.6 percent of the samples the organic matter content was over 2 percent and in 37.3
percent of the samples it amounted to over 4 percent. The relatively good condition results from the
fact that in the agricultural land structure grassland prevails.
The allowed contents of heavy metals in the soil are locally exceeded in the surroundings of
industrial centres (Mežiška dolina valley, Celje and Jesenice). According to data available the
application of fertilisers (livestock manure and mineral fertilisers) in agriculture does not cause any
exceeding heavy metals contents in the soil. Due to the use of plant protection products based on
copper compounds increased copper concentrations can be detected in areas where intensive vine
growing is present. This particularly applies for vineyards with a vine growing tradition of several
decades.
43
ORGANIC FARMING
One of the most efficient ways for sustainable agricultural use of natural resources is organic
farming as it significantly contributes to the provision of public goods, preservation and
improvement of biodiversity, preservation of drinking water sources, conservation of agricultural
landscape and environmental protection. Furthermore, it ensures the production of high-quality food
and healthy food with high nutritional contents and has the best possible impact on sustainable
management of the non-renewable natural resources and exerting the principle on adequate animal
rearing.
Organic farming is one of the most efficient methods of sustainable agricultural use of natural
resources. According to DG AGRI reference data in 2002 organic farming was carried out on
15,400 ha of Slovenian agricultural land. First organic farms in control system were registered in
1998. Given the statistics their number and the land under organic farming have continuously
increased ever since. In 2006 organic farming was carried out on 1,876 agricultural holdings on
26,830.62 ha of agricultural land. In the recent years the organic agricultural holdings share under
organic production increased from 1.5 percent to 2.4 percent.
Table 26: Organic farming*
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Number of holdings under organic farming
600
1,000
1,160
1,415
1,568
1,718
Number of certificates
115
322
412
632
910
1,220
Area under organic farming (ha)
5,440 10,828 13,828 20,018 23,023 23,553
- share in total agricultural land use (%)
1.1
2.1
2.08
3.01
3.4
3.8
*Agricultural holdings and land already engaged in organic farming or converting to organic production.
Source: MAFF
2006
1,876
1,379
26,830.62
4.16
In 2004 support for organic farming under the agri-environmental measures set out in the RDP
2004-2006 was disbursed for 15,477 ha of agricultural land.
As a result of the increasing consumer sensitivity for health, environmental and animal welfare
issues the demand for organically produced foodstuffs has increased immensely.
Given its natural features Slovenia has excellent opportunities for further development of organic
farming. Hence, based on the European action plan, Slovenia drew up the national action plan for a
long-term development of organic farming, containing analyses and setting out the needs, goals,
proposals and measures for enhancing the long-term development of organic farming in Slovenia by
2015.
Based on the increasing number of organic farms and natural conditions in Slovenia as well as the
raised consumer awareness and demand for organic products, organic farming represents an
opportunity for Slovenian farmers to secure an adequate source of income. In connection to
adequate processing and marketing of organic products the consumers are offered higher quality
food products.
The supply of Slovenian organic foodstuffs on the market does not grow proportionally to the
number of organic farms, which indicates that the demand for organic products in Slovenia is
currently greater than the supply. One of the reasons is the prevailing engagement of organic farms
in animal husbandry, although the greatest demand is for vegetables and fruit.
Due to the high level of biodiversity, habitat diversity and extent as well as landscape specifics in
Slovenia the need to preserve these features in future was made priority. This can be achieved best
by applying environment friendly technologies, maintaining agricultural activity in areas at risk of
abandonment and overgrowing as well as by sustainable forest use. The utilisation of agricultural
land is important also with respect to the maintenance or reduction of the erosion level. As the
44
agricultural practices mentioned have positive impacts on the nature and environment conservation
as well as on water protection it is important to continue supporting these farming methods in the
next programming period.
In Slovenia integrated production is present, which was carried out in 2006 on 5,767 agricultural
holdings on 49,458 ha of agricultural land. Integrated production is also based on meeting stricter
rules on fertiliser application and the use of plant protection products.
ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTION OF FORESTS
In Slovenia the protection of the nature and environment has a common social value, which also
shows in the concerning policies so far. Slovenia has managed with forests in a sustainable manner
and has a relatively high standard in this field which has achieved the contents and the level laid
down by the Forestry Strategy for the European Union (Council Resolution of 15 December 1998
1999/C 56/01).
Forests in Slovenia are prevailing and most preserved natural ecosystem; they protect the landscape
and ensure ecological balance therein as forests represent the habitat or at least shelter and a source
of food to many animals which live outside the forest as well. They also successfully mitigate the
negative impacts of the civilisation. Such forest status was achieved through a consequent
implementation of sustainable and multifunctional management in which all functions of the forests
are basically equal.
Slovenian forests have important environmental functions. They are important for the biodiversity
conservation as they provide living environment to numerous organisms. In Slovenia 100,750 ha
have been designated as protective forests and 9,630 ha as forest reserves. Protective forests protect
and preserve the ecologic balance where it is particularly sensitive and endangered. The protective
forest management is aimed at strengthening their protective and biotope functions. Forest reserves,
where forests are left to the natural development, contribute to increased biodiversity and enable
research on the natural forest development. Good preservation of Slovenian forests also shows in
the high percentage of the national territory designated as the Natura 2000 sites. In the Natura 2000
71.3 percent of the surface is covered by forest, which represents 42.3 percent of Slovenian forests.
A large portion of Slovenian forests represents important habitat types which under the European
criteria are endangered and rare. Forests contribute to the renewal and functioning of natural
systems and provide conditions for a favourable conservation status of wild birds and plants. This
way Slovenian forests contribute to the accomplishment of the environmental objective: reversing
the biodiversity decline by 2008.
Forests in Slovenia are very versatile. Inside them are certain tree structures and other vegetation
coinciding with the protected species under Natura 2000. Diverse sites and climate conditions
ensure great versatility of the forest communities (habitat types). The high biodiversity conservation
is ensured mainly through wide closed forest areas in different stages of succession with a high
share of dead tree volume and forest islands in agricultural and suburban landscape (in particular
the Dinaric fir-beech forests, lowland alder groves and flooded oak forests, rare forest communities
of other fresh and headwater sites, other rare ecosystems, habitats and biotopes/ ecocells in forest,
forest at the upper forest borderline, primeval reserves, natural and old semi-natural forest types,
forest genetic reserves and autochthonous provenances). In such forests rare habitat and organism
types have often been preserved, which particularly need to be protected. Important for the
protected species among the forest vegetation are older hollow trunk trees and dead trees. There,
45
individual animal species (birds) find food and nesting place. Next to the hollow trunk trees other
specific biotopes for the protected species exist (water areas inside a forest, hollows, etc.).
Forests have ecological, social and production functions. In the light of the environment most
important are the ecological functions evaluated in Table 27.
Table 27: Evaluation of ecological forest functions
Level 1*
Function
Area
ha
158,850
59,241
28,557
22,748
Level 2*
Share
%
13.1
4.9
2.4
1.9
Area
ha
269,699
157,568
510,496
45,698
Share
%
22.1
13.0
42.1
3.8
Protection of forest land and stands
Biotope function
Hydrologic function
Climatic function
Source: Slovenia Forest Service
*The focus of the functions is evaluated in forest management plans. The focus of the function at Level 1 means that
forest management must conform to the function (Level 1 sets out the manner of management), while the focus of a
certain function at Level 2 only impacts the forest management.
Forests also contribute to the pollution sink for greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and thus to a
more favourable national carbon balance. Organic matter in forests accumulates CO2, the utilisation
of wood for energy reduces the use of fossil fuels; the application of wood as material contributes to
a more favourable carbon balance (carbon storage for the duration of the wood product).
Forests have an important impact on the quality and quantity of water and the quantity distribution
in the landscape. Preserved forests and forest soil are a natural water “filter” which shifts from
precipitation into forests (sulphur and nitrogen compounds, heavy metals as well) and mitigate the
acidification and eutrophication processes of water and soil. Due to the extreme weather
occurrences the importance of preserved forests (particularly in the Karst) is crucial to balance and
mitigate the water flows. Forests not only affect the amount of the water flow and its time
distribution, but also secure water purity which runs off the forest or drains through the forest soil.
Therefore forests are an irreplaceable source of clean drinking water. Hence, the overall forest
management must consider the maintenance of water flows and headwaters as well.
Through their protective function forests balance the water drainage, protect the land from
deposition, leaching and crumbling, mitigate climate extremes and are the most important source of
clean drinking water and designer of the water source regimes. They also have an irreplaceable
function in soil protection in steep areas, particularly in mountain areas, where they protect the
lower located land and buildings from natural threats. The protection function is particularly evident
in forests providing soil resistance to erosion caused by water and wind. Slovenian forests
significantly contribute to the accomplishment of the environmental objective of the soil protection.
3.1.4 Rural areas and the quality of life in the rural areas
In the past decades Slovenian rural areas have been facing explicit economic, social and
demographic restructuring. The intensive transformation of the unique agrarian countryside
proceeded relatively fast, under the influence of urbanisation, and is considerably different from the
development of rural areas in Western Europe. The deagrarisation which reflected in the
abandonment of the agricultural production, employment restructuring, and in some areas even in
population migration and depopulation, included wide range of rural areas. In approximately 40
years the share of agricultural population decreased from approximately 50 to about 5 percent.
Here, the polycentric regional development is important, which was one of the main factors of
bringing urbanisation in rural areas. The industrialisation, contingent on the concept of this
46
development, accelerated the development of the tertiary and quartary activities, which contributed
to larger and faster growing number of population employed outside agriculture.
Under the influence of these processes a characteristic settlement pattern was established in
Slovenia, which reflects mainly in:
-
different demographic area types;
-
typical settlement size and social structure.
Characteristic for Slovenian rural areas are three different types of demographic areas. Particularly
in the valleys and in the lain the urbanisation area has formed with a relatively stabile population
count and poly-structured distribution of jobs. Increasing employment outside the agriculture
reflects in increased disproportion within the agrarian structure (increasing share of mixed and
subsidiary farms, deprofessionalisation of agriculture). However, due to the possibility of daily
labour migration the settlement of rural areas was preserved with a different, less classical rural
lifestyle.
In the wide ranging mountain and karst areas as well as in borderline areas the classical agrarian
landscape was preserved. Rural areas, which are less attractive to work and live in, still fall behind
in development and are being demographically emptied in some parts. The main reasons for such
trends are mainly:
-
the leading economic activities – agriculture and forestry do not provide for sufficient
income;
-
job opportunities in non-agricultural activities are still not available in the areas themselves
nor within the range of the daily migration;
-
lack of larger urban centres and poor traffic infrastructure.
Between the urbanised and peripheral areas are the so called transitional areas. Typical for these
areas is interlocking of individual urbanised islands around smaller central settlements and
relatively wide ranging non-urbanised hinterland with greater or smaller share of agrarian
population. These relatively wide ranging areas are located predominantly in Slovenian hilly and
peripheral lowland.
Characteristic for Slovenian rural areas settlement is also the disproportionally high number of
smaller and medium large settlements. Of about 6,000 settlements only 16 have more than 10,000
inhabitants. In settlements with the town status lives about one third of the total population. The
settlement size differs from region to region. In the lowland the majority of the settlements has
more than 200 inhabitants, while in the hilly, karst and mountain areas small settlements prevail (in
mountain areas about 25 percent of all settlements have less than 20 inhabitants). In Slovenia the
rural areas with the lowest population density are also the areas with the smallest average
settlements.
Generally, the economic development of Slovenia has lead to a reduced share of agriculture and an
increased share of non-agricultural activities as regards the value added structure as well as
employment structure. In 2005 the secondary and tertiary sector produced 97.5 percent of the total
GVA, whereby the service sector alone contributed 63.4 percent, and employed 89.9 percent of the
total employed population.
47
Table 28: Development indicators of non-agricultural activities in Slovenia
Activities
Production activities (C to F)
GVA (Mio. €)
- share in total GVA in Slovenia (%)
Employment (000)
- share in total employment (%)
Service activities (G to P)
GVA (Mio. €)
- share in total GVA in Slovenia (%)
Employment (000)
- share in total employment (%)
Non-agricultural activities, total (C to P)
GVA (Mio. €)
- share in total GVA in Slovenia (%)
Employment (000)
- share in total employment (%)
Source: SORS (National accounts)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
6,582.6
36.2
340.6
38.1
6,914.1
35.9
341.1
37.9
7,247.4
35.3
335.3
36.7
7,689.1
35.6
329.4
36.2
7,991.0
35.0
326.2
35.7
8,203.7
34.1
324.3
35.4
11,018.5 11,753.8 12,613.0 13,362.1 14,251.4 15,259.5
60.6
61.1
61.5
61.9
62.4
63.4
447.7
454.8
476.9
482.6
492.8
499.7
50.0
50.6
52.3
53.0
54.0
54.5
17,601.1 18,667.9 19,860.4 21,051.1 22,242.4 23,463.2
96.8
97.0
96.8
97.4
97.3
97.5
788.3
795,9
812.1
812.0
819.0
823.9
88.1
88.5
89.0
89.2
89.7
89.9
Parallel to the development of the non-agricultural activities the share of self-employed persons in
these sectors has also increased, while the self-employment in agriculture has declined.
Table 29: Self-employment in Slovenia
Economically active population (000)
Self-employed persons (000)
Source: SORS (Labour force survey)
2003
%
897 100.0
89
9.9
2004
%
943 100.0
92
9.8
2005
%
949 100.0
96 10.1
It may be anticipated that the intensified global competitiveness and expensive domestic labour
force shall have important impacts on the business of economic operators in Slovenia in the coming
years and create additional pressures on the labour market, whereby the importance of selfemployment shall become even more evident. Labour intensive branches, in which the
consequences of the intensified market conditions shall be most evident, employ many people from
the rural areas who gravitate to their jobs in smaller urban centres.
The relatively polycentric spatial pattern of economic development in the past which, through the
development of cities and regional and local centres, provided jobs nearby for rural population had
an important impact on agriculture. A specific socio-economic structure of agricultural holdings
was developed in which farms combine their income from different sources and in which
agriculture is often only an additional and not the main activity. According to data of the structural
agriculture survey for 2005 (EUROSTAT, 2006) as much as 74.4 percent of agricultural holding
operators made their income also from other activities.
One of additional sources of income and employment on agricultural holdings are subsidiary
occupations. Subsidiary occupations are activities related to the agricultural and forestry activity
providing a better output of the working mechanisation and labour force on family farms. In 2003
1,262 family holdings were officially engaged in subsidiary activity, 1.7 percent of all farms. In
2005 the number of farms increased to 2,148 or 3 percent of all farms (MAFF). Four activities
prevail in particular: agricultural machinery services, tourism on agricultural holdings, wood
processing, and fruit and vegetable processing. Other subsidiary occupations are represented only to
a smaller extent (Table 30). The demand for products and services of subsidiary occupations is
increasing.
48
Table 30: Main subsidiary occupations on family farms
Type of subsidiary occupation
Services
Tourism on farm
Processing
Handicraft
Flower arranging
Obtaining energy form renewable sources
Education
Sales
Collecting and composting organic
material
Aquaculture
Total
Source: MAFF
Number of farms
2003
2005
261
1015
337
458
206
336
36
143
57
96
23
43
20
34
7
19
6
11
8
1,262
11
2,148
Index
2005/03
388.8
135.9
163.1
397.2
168.4
186.9
170
271.4
183.3
137.5
170.2
Structure (%)
2003
2005
20.7
47.3
26.7
21.3
16.3
15.6
2.8
6.7
4.5
4.5
1.8
2.0
1.6
1.6
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
100.0
0.5
100.0
Tourism is one of the most important economic branches worldwide. The importance of tourism is
increasing year by year and the same trend is also present in Slovenia. According to the estimations
of the Strategy of Slovenian tourism 2002-2006 tourism makes 9.1 percent of the GDP, employs
52,500 people and with the inflow of EUR 1.2 milliard represents 1 percent of Slovenian export. In
2001 Slovenia was visited by 2 million domestic and foreign gests; together with daily visitors the
total tourist number amounted to approximately 6 million. In 2002 and 2004 the number of tourists
increased by about 3.8 percent, while the number of overnight stays only by 2.5 percent. The
number of foreign tourist increased faster, the average stay however is relatively short. According to
2005 data this was a record year since the Slovenian independence since 2.395 million domestic and
foreign guests were registered, which is by 2.3 percent more than in 2004. In the past years the
number of guest arrivals has increased as well as the number of the overnight stays. In 2005, 7.573
million overnight stays were registered (58.1 percent thereof were foreign guests).
In Slovenia certain tourist centres (ski resorts, spas, and coast) are well developed and update their
offer, while rural areas still lack tourist offer. Rural areas have great potential in cultural and natural
heritage, cuisine and wines as well as leisure, but the offer is not sufficiently developed and
recognisable.
According to data from the cultural heritage register, kept by the Ministry of Culture, 24,120 units
of different heritage types are registered; thereof 11,152 are units of ethnologic heritage. About
5,000 more units are yet to be registered. Prevailing among the heritage types is architectural
heritage.
Table 31: Data on number of registered heritage units by heritage types
HERITAGE TYPE
archaeological heritage
profane architectural heritage
sacral architectural heritage
sacral-profane architectural heritage
memorial heritage
park architectural heritage
urban heritage
cultural heritage
historic heritage
other
TOTAL
NUMBER
2632
11080
5746
166
3133
194
917
153
18
81
24120
By organising training, advisory service and various programmes for investment support, the state
has contributed substantially to the promotion and development of additional employment
49
opportunities and making of income on holdings in the last decade. In future, the state shall
continue pursuing a more intensive support for development of business in rural areas, whereas the
focus shall be put on the activities based on competitive advantages of the rural areas (e.g.
traditional knowledge, manpower, raw materials).
In the past, agriculture was predominant in the economic structure of Slovenian rural areas, whereas
economic development was directed in cities as well as regional and local centres. In spite of the
relatively polycentric spatial pattern of economic development in the past, the trends of
demographic structure deterioration captured the majority of predominately rural areas. Data
analysis of national accounts by regions and activities for 1995-2003 showed that in the
predominantly rural areas the service activity (53 percent) is lower than the average in Slovenia.
The disparities between them grow further. The closeness of stabile and interesting jobs outside
agricultural activity and positive restructuring processes in agriculture have given some rural areas a
new impulse. In places where no considerate development in agriculture had taken place a social
degradation and even a renewed appearance of poverty is registered, which, at least in the rural
areas, were less present in the past.
In the recent decades the rural population share is declining as the majority of inhabitants living in
Slovenian countryside does not make a living from farming. Nevertheless, rural areas preserved
typical developmental and cultural patterns. The countryside has also become an attractive place for
living, work and leisure, at the same time the economic interaction and coherence between urban
and rural areas have emerged. Although various business activities are available, they remain less
developed in the countryside than in urban centres. Enterprises located in the rural areas produced
made 19 percent more income in 2004 than in 2002 and employed 6.6 percent more workers.
Nevertheless, the income of rural enterprises per capita is 2.7 times lower than the income in urban
municipalities21. A more active role of the state and the local communities is required in securing
quality jobs in rural areas. Even though agriculture is still a typical economic activity of rural
communities the rural areas are increasingly becoming a place to live and work in for people
engaged in various non-agricultural activities.
In 2003 207,743 family members and 268 full-time employees were involved in work on family
farms (Table 32). Agricultural businesses and cooperatives had 3,234 full-time employees. Together
with seasonal and occasional work and machinery services the input of on-farm work, expressed in
productive man-work units (PMWU), was 95,605, which is by 11 percent lower than in 2000. The
reduction of the PMWU number was similar to the reduction of the number of agricultural holdings.
Thus, compared to 2000 the average PMWU number per agricultural holding declined by less than
1 percent. More severe (by 12 percent) was the reduction of labour input expressed in per UAA
unit.
Table 32: Labour force in agriculture
Number
Total labour force in agriculture (number
of persons)
Labour force in agricultural businesses and
cooperatives
Labour force on family farms
Thereof: Family labour force
PMWU number
Labour force in agricultural businesses and
cooperatives
Labour force on family farms
21
Index
2003/00
82.3
Share (%)
2000
2003
100.0
100.0
2000
256,783
2003
211,245
4,058
3,234
79.7
1.6
1.5
252,725
252,528
107,809
4,032
208,011
207,743
95,605
3,383
82.3
82.3
88.7
83.9
98.4
98.3
100.0
3.7
98.5
98.3
100.0
3.5
103,777
92,222
88.9
96.3
96.5
Source: SORS and MAFF calculations
50
Thereof: Family labour force
PMWU/number of persons working on
holdings
PMWU/100 ha UAA
PMWU/holding
99,718
40.5
87,741
45.3
22.2
1.25
19.6
1.24
88.0
111.9
92.5
-
91.8
-
88.3
99.2
-
-
A faster development of non-agricultural activities requires a keen-witted entrepreneurship. The
development of the existing and new non-agricultural activities in the rural areas can create
numerous opportunities for self-employment and new jobs for the members of farm households as
well as for other inhabitants and thus contributes to an optimally utilised labour potential and the
preservation of populated rural areas. Thereby, it is necessary to develop the activities based on the
competitive advantages of the rural areas, which requires additional education actions,
establishment of information systems and provision of good practices transfer.
To raise the quality of life and increase the economic diversification of activities in the rural areas it
is necessary to make optimum use of the following advantages of Slovenian rural areas:
- infrastructure availability, rich architectural, cultural and natural heritage as the basis for the
development of alternative economic activities in the rural areas;
- traditional handicraft as the basis for the development of entrepreneurship based on the
advantages of the rural areas;
- diversity of cultural landscape and the conservation of the natural environment as the
opportunity for the development of rural tourism.
In relation to the EU Slovenia has a comparable economy structure as regards the economic
operator size. Micro and small enterprises represent 98.4 percent and employ 37.5 percent of all
employees in Slovenia. They produce 38.8 percent of the total turnover and 51 percent of the net
income and 52 percent of the net loss (2003 situation). An average Slovenian enterprise employs 6
persons, a micro company 1.8 and a small company 20.2 workers. National surveys on the situation
among small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) indicate a decline of the entrepreneurship in
Slovenia. Recently, the entrepreneurship passed the transition stage and has catch up on the
“normal” trend, currently a downward trend.
Although a wide range of business activities is available, these are less developed in the rural than
in urban areas. Slovenia has not yet developed any entrepreneurship culture. According to the GEM
data (Global Entrepreneurship Monitoring) only 2.6 percent of the active population in Slovenia
(about 35,000) were engaged in the early phases of the entrepreneurship process. Hence, as regards
the initial business activity Slovenia was placed even lower than in the previous years. Given the
GEM data in 2002, 2003 and 2004 Slovenia took the 41st place among 44 countries of a reduced
sample.
In Slovenia only every thirty-eighth inhabitant between 18 and 64 years of age is engaged in
business. Whether they started with an undertaking or a business or own and run a small enterprise.
According to GEM the share of adult population in Slovenia intending to enter entrepreneurship or
already owning an enterprise for less than three years and a half increased to 4.4 percent in 2005,
which means approximately 20,000 people more than in 2004. Nevertheless, Slovenia is still in 17th
place of 20 European countries by early business activity and placed in the last fifth in the global
respect.
In the past, Slovenian rural areas plaid the role of spare space, supply of natural resources and
unorganised cheap labour force. The development in Slovenia as in most Western Europe was
concentrated in the cities. Thus rural areas fell behind the urban ones. Development opportunities of
the countryside were not sufficiently exploited and the demographic situation and age structure
51
were visibly deteriorating. The majority of rural population is 35-49 years old; and except in the age
group over 70 years men prevail.
The rural population share has been declining ever since 1990s, however, the rural areas retained
the typical social and cultural patterns. Agriculture is still the most typical economic activity of the
rural communities, but the rural areas are becoming increasingly the place for living and working
for people engaged in different non-agricultural activities. The decline of the population employed
in the agricultural sector is typical for the economy, but employment opportunities outside this
sector are minimal. This particularly applies for marginal rural areas with weak economic structure
and basic infrastructure. Characteristic for further agricultural development shall most likely be
greater concentration, specialisation and industrialisation of the activity on farms engaged in
agriculture professionally.
The regional GDP allocation shows that in regard of business infrastructure and other supportive
services affecting the quality of life Slovenian rural areas fall behind the developed urban areas.
However, in the recent years the rural areas are becoming an attractive place for living, work and
leisure. Simultaneously, the economic links and interdependence between urban and rural areas
grow stronger.
Positive trends are also recorded in the Internet use as the Internet users share increased from 48
percent in 2005 to 54 percent in 2006. Thereby Slovenia exceeded the EU-25 average (51 percent).
Among the new Member States Slovenia continues to have the highest share of households with the
Internet access. Among the old Member States 10 countries have a higher share than Slovenia
(SORS, UMAR, 2006).
The Internet access rate in households in densely populated areas (minimum 500 inhabitants/km2)
amounts to 65 percent, in households in moderately populated areas (between 100 and 499
inhabitants/km2) amounts to 52 percent and in households in sparsely populated areas (less than 100
inhabitants/km2) amounts to 51 percent (EUROSTAT, Households – Level of Internet access 2006).
However, with regard to investments in ICT Slovenia has fallen behind in the past years (by
investment share in ICT expressed in GDP) since investments in 2004 amounted to only 5.2 percent
of the GDP, while in the EU-25 the share was 6.4 percent.
Municipalities and local communities play an important role in the development of Slovenia as they
enable the local population to participate in the decision making processes on local matters under
the “bottom-up approach”. Local communities are irreplaceable in the implementation of public
policies since they know the problems in their areas best as well as the means and methods to deal
with them. Slovenia has long-year experience in active integration of local communities and
population into development planning. The turning point in this area was the initiation of the
comprehensive countryside development and village renovation programmes (CCDVR). The
CCDVR programmes were based on the animation of the local population. Eventually, the CCDVR
programmes were upgraded with the development programmes for the countryside, which included
development initiatives on a wider area then the CCDVR (areas of multiple municipalities).
The strategic orientations in the field of traffic and traffic infrastructure are laid down by the
traffic policy of the RS. The focus lies on the accomplishment of social optimum related to the
traffic sector. Investments in the field of the environment are based on the orientations of the
National Programme on Environmental Protection, whereas the priority is to improve the provision
of quality public services on environmental protection for as much of the population of the RS as
possible. The development of new infrastructure and the construction of facilities for wastes and
wastewater as well as the facilities for drinking water distribution, monitoring on the state of the
environment and facilities for protection against floods set the groundwork for integrated water
management in accordance with the WFD. Development priority in urban wastes management
emerges from the Operational programme on waste disposal aimed at reducing the quantity of bio
waste degradability by the end of 2008, adopted by the Government of the RS in 2004, and the
52
Operational programme on waste collection. The programme Reduction of harmful water
operations is aimed at reducing the endangerment due to floods and the corresponding erosion in
the RS.
Investments in energy are based on the orientations of the National energy programme (NEP) and
shall be carried out in industry, service and public sector, and traffic as well as households. The
investments shall significantly contribute to Slovenia's fulfilment of the obligations regarding the
greenhouse gas emission reduction in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol and fulfilment of the
objectives laid down in the EU directives and the NEP.
The Operational programme on the development of the environmental and traffic infrastructure
shall be financed under the Cohesion Fund and to a smaller extent from the European Fund for
Regional Development. Under the RDP 2007-2013 individual investments in the area of individual
villages shall be supported within the framework of the measure Village renewal and development.
In 2004-2006 the rural activities were supported within the framework of structural funds as well.
Therefore the main objective of the SPD was pursued - increasing the competitiveness of Slovenia
and economic strengthening of its regions – which was outlined in three priority tasks and
measures.
In 2007-2013 an important role for a balanced regional development and thus the development of
the countryside shall play the Operational Programme for Strengthening Regional Development
Potentials for the period 2007-2013, in particular its priority Development of regions. The proposed
amount of resources for the Operational Programme for Strengthening Regional Development
Potentials for the period 2007-2013 is EUR 2,011,470,027 (EU and national participation) and for
the priority Regional development EUR 728,756,042 (EU and national participation).
3.1.5 LEADER
In the recent years a strong process of developmental networking of local communities in Slovenia
is evident. Since adopting the Promotion of Balanced Regional Development Act (1999) the local
communities have concluded agreements on cooperation. They established regional development
agencies and programme committees as an implementation structure of regional programming. In
the recent years regional development programmes have been designed and adopted in all 12
territorial units NUTS 3. The new Promotion of Balanced Regional Development Act (2005)
provided a new system framework for these activities. The drawing up of development regions at
the NUTS 3 level and cohesion regions at the NUTS 2 level represents an upgrade and
reorganisation of the current model of regional development management in Slovenia. New legal
persons (e.g. regional development agencies) with financial accounts and management authorities
have been established to perform original and delegated tasks of the state and municipalities. Thus a
new implementation structure at the regional level has been built up competent to gradually take
over the implementation of certain sections of the EU cohesion policy programmes.
Slovenia has fifteen years of experience in the implementation of programmes for the overall rural
development and in active animation of local communities in development planning. A milestone in
this area was reached with the Programmes of integrated comprehensive countryside development
and village renovation programmes (CCDVR) in the beginning of 1990s. The CCDVR programmes
were based on the local population animation. By intense participation and cooperation of local
population during the initial phase local development programmes were designed. The initial phase
was followed by the implementation of the priority projects. Eventually, the CCDVR programmes
were substituted by development programmes for the countryside (DPC). They upgraded the
CCDVR programmes. The resemblance between them is in the methodology approach, but they
53
differ in territorial extent22. By greater target orientation and wider-ranging area the Development
Programmes for the Countryside address a better defined target population and a larger potential
critical mass of participants. Thereby, the conditions for drawing up efficient local development
partnerships were set. By 2005 31 programmes for the development of the countryside have been
realised or were in the preparation phase, which covered about 96 percent of the total national
territory and 88 percent of the total population.
The initiative LEADER is aimed at the realisation of development programmes at the local level
based on the initiative and cooperation of the local population. The introduction of the initiative
shall contribute towards the strengthening of the existing partnerships and creation of new
partnerships, increased integration of private sector into the local development and promotion of the
local capacity building. By implementing the development programmes in accordance with the
LEADER the decisions on the local development shall be transferred to the local level and shall be
based on developmental needs and potentials of individual areas. The promotion of public-private
partnerships shall strengthen the local awareness on possibilities and obligations at the local level
for independent decisions on the development and implementation of development projects. The
initiative LEADER was not implemented in Slovenia in the previous periods.
In the countryside the lack of interest and the necessary knowledge for local development as well as
the participation of the local population in the designing and decision making on the development is
present. Therefore it is necessary to encourage local population for networking into local publicprivate partnerships (LAG) and support the establishment thereof in the new programming period.
For successful establishment of LAG and participation of local population in the designing and
realisation process of the development programmes (local development strategies) the training on
gaining of adequate professional skills and knowledge on principles, methods and applicability of
the initiative LEADER must be promoted and encouraged.
In the new programming period Slovenia shall apply the experience on comprehensive countryside
development and village renovation programmes, the local development programmes and the
integration of local communities into the development planning and upgrade them within the
framework of the priorities under the LEADER axis.
22
By 2001 (by the end of initial phase) 290 IRDVR programmes had been realised. By 2005 31 rural development
programmes have been realised or are in preparation. Nearly entire Slovenian territory is included in at least one of the
rural development programmes mentioned.
54
SWOT ANALYSIS
The SWOT analysis is founded on a thorough analysis of the conditions and the situation of
agriculture, food industry and forestry as well as the incorporation of these sectors into the
countryside and the wider-ranging rural areas. Special attention was paid to the strengths and
weaknesses in relation to the environment as the structural conditions and circumstances into which
people are imbedded and which influence the quality of their life. In the following these strengths
and weaknesses as well as opportunities and threats to the rural development in Slovenia are laid
down.
-
Strengths (S)
established quality standards and good hygiene
practices
established certification and quality control system
-
- low
- favourable supporting environment for sustainable farming and forest management
- well preserved and diverse environment and favourable species and habitat status
- favourable environmental conditions for organic farming
- diversity of cultural landscape and preservation of
the natural environment on the countryside
- rich cultural and natural heritage
- craft tradition in the countryside
- integration of enterprises in rural areas into local
community
- established local development partnerships through
CCDVR and DVC projects
- established information, advisory, education and
training network throughout Slovenia and
awareness of its importance
- non-governmental organisations active in the
countryside
Opportunities (O)
- high consumer preference for domestic products
- creation of local markets
- recognisable trade mark of organic products
- demand for organic products and other
feedingstuffs of higher quality
- expansion to EU market and third countries
markets
- strengthening multifunctional role of agriculture
- active and healthy leisure options in the countryside
- recognisability of Slovenia as a country with high
level of natural preservation
Weaknesses (W)
low productivity of agrifood and forestry sector
level of production specialisation and
professionalisation of agricultural holdings
weak investment capacity of agrifood and forestry
sector
lack of efficient vertical and horizontal networking
in agrifood and forestry sector and lack of efficient
marketing
unfavourable parcel and land holding structure
- unfavourable age and educational structure of the
-
population in rural areas
potential environmental hazard due to locally
intensive farming
difficult natural conditions for farming
soil sensitivity to erosion in some areas of Slovenia
- low income structure and lack of alternative income
-
sources (high dependency on primary agricultural
production)
lack of business and other specialised knowledge
and skills in the countryside
- low level of business activity in the countryside
- lack of infrastructural equipment in the countryside
- undefined status and lack of experience in
partnership developmental cooperation at local level
Threats (T)
- uncompetitive domestic products in single and world
markets
- increased demand for high-qualified labour force
(“brain drain” threat)
- Establishment of production methods potentially
harming the environment due to current economy
and competitiveness pressure
- abandonment of production in agriculture and
forestry and thus loss of traditional rural lifestyle
- abandonment of agricultural land
- unbalanced development of agriculture
55
3.2
Strategy chosen to cover strengths and weaknesses
The strategy chosen to tackle the advantages and weaknesses emerging from the baseline analysis,
potentials and specific needs of the rural areas of Slovenia was outlined in the National strategy
plan for rural development 2007-2013 (NSP). It reflects the needs for the improvement of
competitiveness of all three sectors of the primary production, i.e. agriculture, food industry and
forestry. In addition thereto it strives towards strengthening the economic and social conditions of
the rural areas as well as the establishment of the entrepreneurship logic to increase the
employment. Special attention is paid to the sustainable management of the natural resources,
maintenance of the cultural landscape, environmental protection, and preservation of the settlement
and the identity of the rural areas.
The national priorities of the RDP 2007-2013, outlined on the basis of the NSP, cover the measures
under four axes:
- improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector (axis 1);
- improving the environment and the rural areas (axis 2);
- improving the quality of life in the rural areas and the diversification of the rural economy
(axis 3);
- LEADER (axis 4).
The selection and the hierarchy between the rural development measures, in three key intervention
areas: competitiveness, environment, diversification and quality of life in Slovenia, shall be
achieved by a target-oriented and deliberated allocation of resources among the intervention areas.
National priorities set out on the basis of the baseline analysis, potentials and specific needs shall
contribute towards an effective accomplishment of the common EU objectives laid down in the
Council Decision on Community strategic guidelines for Rural Development as well as the Lisbon
Strategy and Göteborg objectives.
For the accomplishment of the objective raising the competitiveness of the agri-processing and
forestry sector and thus the implementation of the axis 1 measures Slovenia allocated about 33
percent of the EAFRD resources. The measures under axis 1 are divided into three priority tasks:
- measures to raise the qualification and to strengthen the human potential in agriculture and
forestry;
- measures to restructure the physical capital in agriculture and forestry as well as enhancing
the innovation;
- measures to improve the quality of the agricultural production and products.
Unfavourable size, age and education structure, low specialisation level in agriculture and the lag in
productivity in agriculture and forestry diminish the efficient use of production sources and prevent
appropriate market orientation. A lag in achieving the quality, hygiene and food safety standards is
also recorded. To raise the competitiveness a new development cycle is necessary, which cannot be
achieved without a more active participation of public resources, therefore the measures are aimed
at raising the qualification level for work in agriculture and forestry, improving the age structure of
operators on farms, increasing the application performance of production factors in agriculture, food
industry and forestry as well as the quality raising and adaptation of supply to market requirements.
The measures under axis 1 shall contribute towards raising the productivity of the agri-food and
forestry sector, raising the innovation level, production specialisation and professionalisation by
considering the principles of the sustainable management. Within the framework of these priorities
about 65 percent of the resources shall be devoted to the agricultural sector, nearly 25 percent to the
processing sector of agricultural products and about 14 percent to forestry and the processing of
forestry products. Axis 1 shall support all sectors of agricultural production and rearing. In the area
of cattle production as the leading branch support shall mainly be directed towards the production
raising, perennial plantations and vegetable production shall be directed towards the adaptation to
56
the market requirements, and the entire plant production towards the adaptation to the productivity
and climate change.
Due to its well preserved and diverse environment, favourable species and habitat status, favourable
environmental conditions for organic farming and sparsely populated rural areas Slovenia has put
into the first place the implementation of the axis 2 measures to contribute to the utilisation and the
preservation of these conditions. In addition thereto these measures shall reduce the hazard to the
environment as a result of the locally intensive farming, preserve the agricultural activity in less
favoured areas and prevent the soil erosion processes in certain areas. For this purpose Slovenia
allocated nearly 53 percent of the EAFRD resources. Under axis 2 the measures agri-environmental
payments and less favoured areas shall be implemented. In regard of the allocation of the resources
more resources were devoted to the implementation of the measure agri-environmental payments.
To accomplish the goals of Natura 2000, the Water Framework Directive and mitigation of climate
change the programme under axis 2 does not envisage any specific measures. The goals shall be
realised through the measures set.
The habitat and biodiversity status within the Natura 2000 sites in Slovenia indicates a good
conservation and functionality. The favourable situation is also indicated by the high share of the
national territory in special protection areas. The current practice of forest management, based on
the preservation of the ecological forest functions, provides a favourable status of the species and
habitat types in the Natura 2000 sites. In the most important parts of the agricultural areas
(permanent grassland, meadow orchards and structural elements of the agricultural landscape)
located in the Natura 2000 sites, the preservation of the favourable status of species and habitat
types is ensured through the permanent utilisation of these areas. The majority of the Natura 2000
sites (94 percent) coincide with the less favoured areas. Within the range of the implementation of
the measure less favoured areas the utilisation of the agricultural land in these areas is support as
well. Additionally, in 2007 the regional model of the single payment scheme was introduced, which
also covers payments for grassland and thus emphasises the need for preserving these areas utilised.
Currently, there are no specific requirements set for farming in the Natura 2000 sites which would
specify the land management in individual sites. Therefore no measure has been set out providing
compensation allowances for extra costs and income foregone as a result of performing agricultural
activity in these areas. The goals of the Natura 2000 shall be achieved by preserving the sustainable
forest management and maintaining agricultural land utilised. The habitat and biodiversity status
shall be monitored by way of various indicators. Currently, a system for farmland birds monitoring
is being established, which shall indicate common trends of the species populations and the habitat
conservation. The system shall enable the monitoring of the populations in specific areas as well
(e.g. in areas where certain agri-environmental submeasures are implemented). For several years the
monitoring of the populations of endangered birds in special protection areas Natura 2000 and the
monitoring of water birds populations has been conducted.
The goals of the Water Framework Directive shall be achieved by the strict environmental policy on
water protection. The entire Slovenian territory was designated as nitrate vulnerable zone in
accordance with the Nitrate Directive. Hence, the entire national territory and the whole agricultural
branch are subjected to the restrictions as regards the quantities, period and the method of land
application of nitrogen. In addition thereto all agricultural holdings must provide for adequate
livestock manure storage facilities. In water protection areas, representing approximately 20 percent
of the national territory, additional stricter requirements on farming apply. Prohibited is the
application of certain fertilisers, the quantities are additionally restricted and the permanent green
cover of crop land is mandatory as well as the fulfilment of other specific requirements related to
the area. In future it shall be possible to claim compensatory allowances in these areas for the
income foregone and additional costs emerging from the restrictions in farming, which shall be
57
disbursed as state aid. Through the cross compliance mechanisms containing the nitrate directive
standard the area linked measures and payments shall contribute to the accomplishment of the
improved water quality goals. Additionally, the measures under axis 1 shall provide the possibility
of purchasing the mechanisation enabling the optimal application of fertilisers and plant protection
products and thus reduce the possibility of residues leaching into the groundwater and other water
bodies.
To achieve the reduction of the greenhouse gas emissions emerging from the agricultural,
processing and forestry sector the programme foresees measures which shall contribute to the
mitigation of the climate change. All agri-environmental submeasures require a common stocking
density restriction and a controlled and limited application of fertilisers, which shall contribute
towards the reduction of the methane, ammonia and dinitrous oxide emissions. Similar impact shall
arise form the investment measures for the construction of new buildings for animal rearing, biogas
facilities and investments in mechanisation functioning in an environment friendly manner.
Investment measures in forestry shall help to optimise the utilisation of wood as a renewable source
of energy. In addition thereto the measures shall enhance the efficiency of domestic animals rearing.
In cattle production, which produces most greenhouse gases, the measures shall enhance the pasture
rearing and optimised feeding rations with the purpose to reduce the methane emissions and
nitrogen secretion. The most important measure for ammonia emissions reduction is the promotion
of technically founded fertilisation with emphasise on an efficient nitrogen cycle in agriculture.
Projects providing adequate animal housing solutions with appropriate livestock manure storage
facilities shall be adequately supported.
A large potion of Slovenian territory are rural areas (according to OECD), 85 percent are designated
as less favoured areas, 36 percent as Natura 2000 sites and a considerable portion of agricultural
land meet the criteria on high nature value area. All areas mentioned overlap in the main part. This
means that certain measures can contribute to the achievement of the goals and favourable situation
on particular areas and level simultaneously. The measure less favoured areas horizontally
positively affects the preservation of populated areas and agricultural activity in the major part of
areas mentioned before. It contributes to the habitat and ecosystem conservation arising from the
implementation of the agricultural activity and which would extinct if the activity were abandoned.
In addition thereto some agri-environmental submeasures which are target oriented to the
production extensification and biodiversity conservation also have an impact on the preservation of
the conditions in these areas.
Typical for Slovenia are the craft tradition and the potential for further development of
entrepreneurship in the countryside, good integration of enterprises into local communities, the
established structure of local development partnerships and the rich natural and cultural heritage.
The measures under axis 3 for which nearly 11 percent of the EAFRD resources had been allocated
shall be aimed at improving the quality of life and encourage the economic diversification in the
countryside. This intervention areas is devoted the least resources, but it shall contribute towards the
improvement of the unfavourable age structure of the rural population, the increase of the low
income grade and the increase of the knowledge and capacity level in the rural entrepreneurship. In
the light of the resources allocation Slovenia shall pay the greatest attention to the measure
Supporting the establishment and development of enterprises (66 percent of the resources under
axis 3), followed by the measures Village renewal and development (23 percent of the resources
under axis 3) and Conservation of the heritage in the countryside (11 percent of the resources under
axis 3). With appropriate support to individual activities within the axis 3 the upgrading and
complementarity with other measures under RDP 2007-2013 shall be achieved, as well as with
other OPs, which shall contribute to a more efficient utilisation of the countryside advantages. The
promotion of the entrepreneurship in the rural areas is aimed at the utilisation of the countryside
potential showing in labour force, utilisation of natural resources, whereby the inclusion of young
58
people, women and high educated people is very important. The measure Village renewal and
development is aimed at preserving or bringing back the life in villages by considering the tradition
and heritage component as well as the needs and development. The conservation and upgrading of
the heritage is aimed at presenting the countryside as a place with rich heritage and a place
interesting for leisure.
Approximately 3 percent of the resources shall be devoted to the implementation of the LEADER
axis capturing activities of all intervention areas and contributes towards the achievement of all
overall objectives of the RDP 2007-2013 by establishing the rules on the development of the
decision-making process under the bottom up approach. The measures shall support the operation of
local action groups, skills acquisition and animation (20 percent), cooperation between LAGs (10
percent) and the implementation of projects under the LEADER principle (70 percent). LEADER as
a method of constitution and achievement of sustainable development of rural areas based on an
overall approach for finding new solutions to remain or become competitive, for exploiting their
conditions and tackling the challenges by involving the local population in the management of the
preliminary development of their areas, shall significantly contribute to the accomplishment of the
objectives under all other three axes and particularly the objectives under axis 3.
3.3
Ex ante evaluation
The ex ante evaluation process was initiated at a relatively early stage of the programming period
making the opportunity for the evaluator to be involved in the process in an interactive way. This
has resulted in different types of activities like workshop, day – to – day assistance as well as
commenting on measure sheets and the National Strategy. The Draft RDP was submitted to the
team on the 18th September for the official ex ante evaluation.
It should be emphasised that the evaluator finds that a lot of work has been done so far and it is
obvious that a lot of resources and effort has been out into preparing the National Strategy as well
as the RDP. This said, the ex ante evaluation has shown that there is still room for improvements
and that crucial issues needs to be dealt with before the RDP can be submitted officially to the EC
Commission e.g. the chapters on complementary and competitiveness are absent in the current draft
and needs to be developed shortly.
In general, the impression is that the main focus has been at preparing the measure sheets whereas
horizontal issues and co-ordination e.g. objective hierarchy, complementarity, SWOT etc. of the
RDP program has achieved less attention during the programming period. This is to some extent
understandable however, it should be emphasised by the evaluator that both issues are equally
important in order to design a coherent RDP.
Furthermore, information on the level of aid per measures and also their determination
(calculations), according the regulation criteria, are not presented in the current draft. This is
especially a matter that relates to axis 2 measures. Due to this, the evaluation was only made
partially. It is strongly suggested that this is brought into line, especially in light of the financial
weighting of axis 2 measures.
The analysis of the current situation gives some basic facts founded on primary statistical and
academic sources, however in several cases the description of the problems/disparities and the
evidences cannot be directly linked to the selected objectives. The dilemma is that many empirical
evidences for qualitative problem statements do not exist. For the future more targeted research to
prove the qualitative statement is strongly recommended, especially in the field of environmental
and forestry economics.
59
In addition, the definition of objectives could with advantages be enhanced. Several of the measures
lack a clear and logic objective hierarchy defining the overall specific and operational objectives for
each measure, which again links up to the objective hierarchy for the entire programme.
The selection and design of the measures is mainly based on previous programmes. To some extend
such an approach is logical; however, the pitfall is that it might lead to prolongations of deficiencies
into the next programme period. Sufficient and substantial reflection on actual policy could be
improved in the current version including a deeper impact analysis of the SAPARD, RDP 04-06
and SPD measures.
It has not been easy to assess the cost-effectiveness of the measures and thus of the programme as
such. The report does several time express that some measures maybe could be implemented for
less public expenses, but in order to assess this more carefully, targets (results and impacts) need to
be better quantified. The horizontal overview and discussion about the financial priorities could also
be improved significantly. Due to the fact that the majority of the proposed measures are based on
previous programmes, the administration set-up and implementation of the project would not be
expected to be a key problem of the future RDP policy. However, in order to enhance the quality of
the programme some critical overview of existing practices and development of more transparent
and efficient procedures could be considered. It is the assessment that this would improve the
absorption capacity of the programme.
Ensuring an efficient RD policy in Slovenia, the internal and external coherence of the RDP needs
to be enhanced. In several cases the evaluators find that the measures are not distinguished
sufficiently. This is especially valid for direct payments (LFA, Agri-environment, 1st pillar
payments), but also some measures between axis 3 and regional policy should be more precisely
defined.
As a summary statement, the ex ante evaluators recommend that the issues outlined in the table at
the next pages are taken aboard by MAFF in order to improve the current RDP version. The entire
ex-ante evaluation report comprising synthesis report and annexes which cover the strategic impact
assessment on the environment is contained in the Annexes to the RDP 2007-2013.
60
Table 33: Key recommendations of the ex-ante evaluation group
No.
Chapter RDP
Subject
Recommendations
1.
3.1
Analysis
2.
3.1
SWOT
3.
3.2
Strategy
4.
3.4
Lessons learned
5.
4.1
Objectives, priorities
6.
5.1
Measures
–
requirements
gen.
7.
5.2
Measures
requirem.
–
spec.
8.
5.3
Measure
general
9.
5.3
Measure 111
10.
5.3
Measure 112
In order to improve effectiveness of the measure, an increase in the allocated resources (and thus
a higher number of supported beneficiaries) could be considered.
11.
5.3
Measure 113
Significant revision of the measure or, alternatively its abolishment. Question for
reconsideration: shifting of funds from measure 113 to measure 112?
description
–
General and cross-cutting issues
Summarize key problems and challenges of the programme at the end of the analysis chapter
(e.g. as a table presentation).
Improve the links between the SWOT analysis and programme objectives (can be demonstrated
with a summarised presentation of outcomes of the SWOT matrix).
Improve the links between the problems analysed in Ch. 3.1 and the strategy chosen in Ch. 3.2.
(more references to the key problems and challenges from Ch. 3.1).
Include a description of (i) impacts caused by previous actions and (ii) relevant findings of
evaluations of previous programmes.
Revision: (i) improve the focus of the (overall) programme objectives; (ii) improve the hierarchy
of objectives by adding axis-related objectives (one per axis); define and quantify the objectives
(targets) at the programme level.
Revision in line with requirements from the RDP template, Annex II of the implementing
regulation (for each priority axis, identify the rationale for intervention, the objectives, the scope
and actions, indicators, quantified targets).
Revision in line with requirements from the RDP template (Annex II of the implementing
regulation). Divide bulleted text into six sub-chapters, resuming six requirements from the
template for Ch. 5.2.
Improve the consistency of the measure descriptions: (i) sequence of measures should be derived
from the objectives of the RDP (and NS); (ii) measures should be described at comparable level
of detail, preferably using common structure for all measures (‘summary technical sheets’).
Axis 1 Measures
It is suggested to clarify the types of eligible training costs. Additional incentives (e.g.
reimbursement of transport costs and opportunity costs) could be considered as well.
Reference to ER
Presented within SWOT analysis.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendations largely considered.
Target values considered in chapter 5.3
for individual measure.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendations largely considered.
Recommendation considered. Eligible
expenditure set out. A detailed
definition of eligible expenditure
(amount, individual type) laid down in
call for tender.
Recommendation considered. Amount
of resources for this measure has
increased and thus a higher number of
beneficiaries is anticipated.
Recommendation partially considered.
Measure thoroughly revised. Given the
lessons learned and beneficiaries
response the measure implementation
is assessed suitable under RDP 20072013.
61
No.
12.
Chapter RDP
5.3
Subject
Measure 121
Recommendations
Revisions suggested: (i) maximum amount of support could be lowered (e.g. 100,000 €); (ii)
reduction of support rate and decreasing rate of public support in relation to investment value;
(iii) aggregation of output and results indicators.
13.
5.3
Measure 123
Question for reconsideration: shift of investment support for processing at the farm level (not
explicitly stated as eligible in Art. 24 of Regulation 1698/2005) to the measure 121
(Modernisation of agricultural holdings), where on/off farm diversification activities are referred
as eligible.
14.
5.3
Measure 123
Suggested revision: (i) re-assessment of result indicators; (ii) measure could be stimulative
towards vertical and horizontal cooperation (e.g. by selection criteria).
15.
5.3
Measure 125
Suggested revision: (i) reconsideration of indicators and their quantification; (ii) less detailed
description of implementing provisions (level of detail deviates from other measure sheets).
16.
5.3
Measure 131
17.
5.3
Measure 132
Revisions needed for improvement of transparency and intervention logic of the measure: (i) a
clear statement that the measure is intended for payments of commitments from RDP 2004-06
(measure sheet); (ii) clearly explained phasing-out procedure of the measure.
The maximum level of support could be reconsidered using the additional cost criterion.
Varying level of support by categories of quality schemes (and their market presence) could be
considered.
18.
5.3
Measure 132
It is recommended to include the information what should be the evidence for “market presence”
which beneficiaries are expected to present.
Reference to ER
Recommendation on support amount
considered. Recommendation on
different support shares regarding the
range of investment not considered.
Possible detailed division implemented
in call for tender. Recommendation on
aggregation of output and result
indicators not considered, therefore the
EC instructions.
Recommendation not considered.
Measure No 123 does not apply only
to food industry, but to all enterprises
adding value in the production of
Annex 1 products. Thereby the
European definition of “enterprise”
applies as it is broader than the
Slovenian definition.
Recommendation on result indicator
adequacy not considered, as EC
instruction was complied. Promotion
and contribution of the measure to the
enhancement of horizontal and vertical
links implemented in call for tender.
Recommendation partially considered.
In drawing up indicators the EC
instructions complied. Indicator values
are set out. Measure description
reduced and harmonised with
descriptions of other RDP 2007-2013
measures.
Recommendation considered.
Transparency and explanation
improved.
Recommendation considered. The
highest support level decreased.
Detailed criteria by individual schemes
included in call for tender.
Recommendation considered.
62
No.
19.
Chapter RDP
5.3
Subject
Measures 132, 133
Recommendations
Incentives to improve presence of quality scheme products at the market could be strengthened
(e.g. by improved coherence with measures 123 and 133; participation in quality schemes
considered as additional weight/ponder in selection criteria).
20.
5.3
Measure 133
21.
5.3
Measure 133
Suggested revision: (i) replacement of the existing (sector-related) result indicators to more
measure-related ones; (ii) selection criteria needs to be defined; (iii) risks of overcompensation
needs to be minimised (revision of the list of eligible costs).
Extension of eligibility criteria to all holders of adequate quality marks (eg. also enterprises
awarded with national quality signs) should be considered.
22.
5.3
Measures 122 and 142
23.
5.3
Measures 122 and 142
24.
5.3
All Axis 2 measures
25.
5.3
Measures 211, 212
Problem description needs to be improved in order to justify public intervention. Improvements
should be made in measure descriptions, especially concerning administrative setup and measure
indicators.
Division of measure 122 to specific sub-measures (e.g. forest infrastructure, forest
mechanisation, silviculture) should be reconsidered and financial allocations between different
activities should be defined.
Axis 2 Measures
Calculations (both methodology and results) need to be presented in the revised version of the
programme. Special attention should be devoted to legally and economically correct justification
of additional costs level related to specific areas (LFA compensatory allowances) / submeasures
(agri-environmental measures).
The design of measure sheet has to be brought into line with other RDP measures and
complemented with the missing information (esp. indicators, justification of payment level).
Reference to ER
Recommendation considered. Link
between measure 132 and 133
considered in criteria chosen in call for
tender. In call for tender the measure
123 shall better evaluate products
under quality schemes.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation not considered.
Measure intended for all producer
groups participating in eligible quality
schemes. Measure not targeted at
enterprises and promotion of awards
received as a result of quality. Only
quality schemes proving constant
control are eligible, which is
considered already in preposition of
measure.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendations largely considered,
but the measure description cannot be
harmonised with other measures as the
description of this chapter complies
with Regulation 1257/99 and
implementing regulation 817/04.
63
No.
26.
Chapter RDP
5.3
Subject
Measures 211, 212
Recommendations
Payment level should be reconsidered by the additional criterion (adjustment against the CAP
pillar I, single area payments for grassland).
27.
5.3
Measure 214
The measure sheets need to be completed with financial details (presentation of payment levels,
financial allocation by sub-measures) and quantification of measure indicators. A clear
distinction has to be determined between certain sub-measures (e.g integrated crop production
and sustainable livestock production) and LFA or CAP Pillar I payments in order to prevent
overcompensations.
Reference to ER
Recommendation not considered.
Annex to RDP 2007-2013 contains
calculation methodology for payment
amounts already included in
calculations for RDP 2004-2006.
Recalculation (due to comparison to
pillar 1 and direct payments)
unnecessary as compensatory
allowances merely defray higher
production costs in LFA with regard to
non-LFA.
Recommendation partially considered.
Payment amounts by individual submeasures are shown, but are not yet
finalised. Implementing regulation
does not require resources allocation
by sub-measures but only at measure
level – in this case agri-environmental
payments, which was considered.
Overpayments are already considered,
therefore conditions on
implementation of sub-measures are
appropriately designed. Calculations
also consider cross compliance serving
as the basis. Conditions on individual
sub-measures upgrade these
conditions, i.e. stricter requirements as
set by cross compliance. Indicators
also included.
64
No.
28.
Chapter RDP
5.3
Subject
Measure 214
Recommendations
Introduction of additional measures of relevance within axis 2 could be considered (e.g. by
measures 215 (animal welfare payments), 224 (Natura 2000 payments) and 225 (forestenvironment payments)).
29.
5.3
Measure 214
Transparency of agri-environmental scheme could be improved by aggregation of related submeasures, with distinction of payments for subcategories if necessary (e.g. integrated
agricultural production).
30.
5.3
Measure 311
31.
32.
5.3
5.3
Measure 311
Measure 311, 312
33.
34.
5.3
5.3
Measure 312
Measure 312
Axis 3 Measures
Areas of support in RDP and measure sheet need to be brought into line (only investment
support or coverage of operational costs as well);
Withdrawal of support for investments in retail from the list of eligible activities is suggested.
Overlaps of ‘support for social activities’ between measures 311 and 312 needs to be avoided.
Description of eligible activities in RDP and measure sheet needs to be brought into line.
A clear-cut distinction of eligibility criteria between this measure and similar schemes under the
cohesion policy should be defined.
Reference to ER
Recommendation not considered.
Objectives and requirements under
Regulation 1698/2005 are sufficiently
captured in proposed sub-measures
within measure agri-environmental
payments. Agri-environmental scheme
is the only obligatory and is also
included in RDP 2007-2013. Meeting
requirements on animal welfare reflect
in certain submeasures (EK, PP, REJ),
Natura 2000 objectives are covered by
submeasures HAB, MET, STE and
VTR. Forestry environmental
measures are not included as forest use
is already sustainable and it concerns
the maintenance of the current status.
Recommendation not considered.
Combining certain sub-measures under
integrated production is not
reasonable. Each sub-measure is a
completed unit and relates to an exact
area as it is specific in production
technology and is based on an
independent regulation and
technological rules. Control and
certification system of integrated
production is linked thereto. It is more
transparent in the light of
implementing procedures.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered. Support
for social activities was included in
measure 321.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered. Division
is territory linked regarding enterprise
size.
65
No.
35.
Chapter RDP
5.3
Subject
Measure 321
36.
5.3
Measure 322
37.
5.3
Measure 331
38.
5.3
Measure 331
Activity ‘Awareness-raising programmes about healthy nutrition’ falls out of the concept of
vocational training and is suggested to be eliminated from the list of eligible activities.
39.
5.3
Measure 41 (411, 412,
Axis 4 Measures
Inclusion of orientation information about the total value of projects per individual local
development strategy is suggested (as guidance to potential beneficiaries in preparation of their
local development programmes).
413)
40.
5.3
Measures 421, 431a
41.
5.3
Measure 431b
42.
5.3
Measure 431b
43.
6
Financial plan
44.
45.
6.2
9
46.
47.
10
10
Financial plan by axes
Competition rules, state
aid
Complementarity
Complementarity
48.
11
Administrative setup
Recommendations
Measure sheet needs to be more elaborated esp. in terms of indicators and general administration
set up. A clear-cut distinction between this measure and similar activities from Operational
Programme for strengthening of regional development potentials in 2007-2013 needs to be
defined.
Reformulation of target group of potential beneficiaries is suggested (‘municipalities and nonprofit organisations’ instead of ‘municipalities and NGOs’).
Overlaps between this measure and measure 111 need to be avoided and a clear-cut distinction
should be made (e.g. by focusing the measure 111 to technical skills and measure 331 to
entrepreneurial/managerial skills).
Suggested revision: (i) indicative allocation of public expenditure should be made between the
two types of activities carried out under this measure; (ii) designation of maximum eligible cofinancing rate for running the LAG should be revised and put in line with the Art. 37 of the
implementing regulation.
Suggested revision: (i) reference to the measure 341 (animation and acquisition of skills for
areas not included in Leader programmes) should be added; (ii) preparation of a yearly financial
breakdown of the measure.
There are potential overlaps with the measure ‘Running the local action groups, acquiring skills
and animating the territory’ (421, 431a). Clear-cut criteria to avoid such overlaps should be
defined.
General and cross-cutting issues (cont’d)
Table 35 (Financial plan for Leader measures and Technical support) could be incorporated into
Table 37 (Annual contribution of EARDF)
Table 36 needs to be revised.
Reference to the state aid and competition rules should be added. Beforehand, it is
recommended to consult the Commission about the required contents of the chapter.
The chapter needs to be inserted.
The demarcation lines to e.g. actions supported by ERDF in the current version are not explicitly
clear. It is recommended that this be done in order to avoid overlaps between the two funds. The
same exercise needs to be carried out for other EU and national funds as well.
Paying agency: revision of implementing provisions is suggested particularly for: (i) submission
of projects; (ii) project assessment procedures; (iii) project selection procedures.
Reference to ER
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered. Training
under measure 111 relates to training
in agricultural, forestry and food
activities. Measure 331 covers other
activities.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered. As the
number of LAGs is not yet known no
allocation of resources per LAG or
individual project is possible.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
66
No.
49.
Chapter RDP
12
Subject
Monitoring & evaluation
50.
12
Monitoring Committee
51.
13
Publicity
52.
14
Public consultations
53.
RDP
General
54.
Annex 4
Baseline indicators
55.
Annex 4
Technical sheets
Recommendations
Description of the monitoring system should be thoroughly completed. The collection system for
monitoring data should be described. Construction of a central monitoring system should be
considered (and briefly described in the programme).
Governmental and non-governmental organisations included in the Monitoring committee
should be explicitly indicated.
The information plan needs to be supplemented: (i)
indicative budget for implementing
the information plan; (ii) definition of criteria for evaluating the impact of information and
publicity actions.
Required completion: a clear indication as to what extent the views and suggestions of social
partners were accepted and included in the program.
The programme has to be sufficiently formatted in style and form (meaningful division into subchapters (numbering to 4th level at most), avoid repetitions, quotations from previous
programmes, chapters balanced in terms of details presented).
Table ‘baseline indicators related to context’ to be brought into line with Table 2, Annex VIII of
the draft implementing regulation.
Result and impact indicators for 2nd Axis measures in Technical sheets should be brought into
line with Table III, Annex VIII of the draft implementing regulation.
Reference to ER
Recommendation largely considered.
Recommendation largely considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation largely considered.
Broader public discussion and
consultations expected with public
publication of RDP 2007-2013 draft.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
Recommendation considered.
67
By setting and implementing the priorities Slovenia shall contribute towards accomplishing national
objectives related to rural development and put effort in achieving a balance and synergy within
individual axes as well as between the axes. Successful exertion of individual axis depends on
successful implementation of measures under the axis concerned (successfully completed training
and knowledge transfer into practice means successful modernisation of economy). The same
applies for impacts between axes (successful farm modernisation contributes to mobilisation of
labour force, which may mean an introduction of non-agricultural activities).
3.4
Impacts from previous programming period and other information
The key documents on the rural development in Slovenia: the Rural Development Programme for
the RS 2000-2006 (SAPARD) in the pre-accession period, the Rural Development Programme for
the RS 2004-2006 (RDP 2004-2006) as well as the Single Programming Document 2004-2006
(SPD) (third priority Restructuring of agriculture, forestry and fisheries) after the EU accession,
were aimed at improving all three developmental components: economic, social and environmental.
They also contributed to the reduction of the regional disparities between urban centres and rural
areas.
Among the measures which were financed from the budget of the RS in the preliminary
programming period 2000-2006 it is necessary to point out the Slovene Agri-Environmental
Programme 2001-2006 (SAEP) which laid special focus on the environment and was divided into
three basic groups:
- Group I: reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment (9 measures);
- Group II: preservation of natural features, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional cultural
landscape (8 measures);
- Group III: maintenance of protection areas (5 measures).
Group IV comprised training and promotion, which were not designed as measures of per area
payments. In this period the SAEP comprised 22 measures and training and promotion. Based on an
annual decree at the national level the SAEP was initiated with 10 pilot measures in 2001, in 2002
12 measures were implemented and in 2003 already 14 measures.
By 2003 agri-environmental measures were entirely financed from the national budget as state aid.
From 2004 onward 21 measures of the SAEP have been implemented under the RDP 2004-2006,
whereas training and promotion as technical assistance, in accordance with Council Regulation
1257/199923 and Commission Regulation 817/200424. The number of the measures was reduced
from 22 to 21.
The response of producers to the SAEP was relatively high as in the first year of the implementation
about 20 percent of all agricultural holdings applied for agri-environmental payments. In total SIT
1,393,680,692 were disbursed, the most (41 percent) for the measure sustainable rearing of
domestic animals (REJ). In 2001 agri-environmental measures were implemented by 11,400
agricultural holdings covering 93,736 ha; in 2002 by 11,859 agricultural holdings covering 110,849
ha and in 2003 by 12,422 agricultural holdings covering 124,838 ha. Compared to 2001 the extent
of agricultural land under agri-environmental measures in 2002 increased by approximately 18
percent and in 2003 by about 33 percent.
23
Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European
Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations (OJ L 160,
26.6.1999, p. 80–102)
24
Commission Regulation(EC) No 817/2004 of 29 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council
Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and
Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ L 153, 30.4.2004, p. 30–81)
68
One of the measures financed from the national budget in the preliminary programming period was
Compensatory allowances for less favoured areas (LFA), which was an integral part of the
agricultural policy reform in Slovenia. The Programme of the Slovene agricultural policy reform
(1998) for these areas was coordinated with the EU criteria already in the pre-accession period. In
compliance with the National agriculture reform programme the shift to the compensatory
allowances for LFA was completed – per hectare payments were laid down in a decree on the
introduction of financial investments for the preservation and development of agriculture and food
production for 2000. In the first year after the establishment of the new system compensatory
allowances for production costs were obtained by 40,773 agricultural holdings. In the second year
of the implementation of the LFA measure the number of the beneficiaries claiming compensatory
allowances for 300,526 ha of agricultural land increased to 44,206.
In addition thereto, in Slovenia landscape and environmental measures based on the strategic
orientations of the Development programme of agriculture, food industry, forestry and fisheries
200-2002 and the Agricultural policy reform programme 1999-2002 have been implemented since
1999 and some even earlier (measure “Pohorje beef” rearing in 1995-2000). In 2000 the measure
erosion control in vineyards with minimum 20 percent inclination was initiated, which was
transformed into a new measure in 2001 with changed conditions. The new measure Erosion
reduction in fruit and vine production became integral part of the SAEP, but was not implemented
in 2001. In Slovenia the following structural measures and rural development measures were
financed from the national budget: investments in agricultural holdings, renewal of perennial crops
and programmes supporting the restructuring of agricultural holdings.
3.4.1 Pre-accession instruments
During the pre-accession period Slovenia disposed of the financial instrument for rural development
(SAPARD). Under the pre-accession aid of the SAPARD programme, comprising four basic
measures and the technical assistance, the support was aimed at the realisation of the following two
priorities:
-
Improving production structures in agriculture and food processing industry (measures:
investments on agricultural holdings and investments in food processing industry)
The main goal of the measure investments on agricultural holdings was the adaptation of the sectors
milk, meat and vegetable production and processing to the requirements within the framework of
veterinary and sanitary regulations, animal protection, environmental protection and marketing
improvement. In the first and second public tender the funds under this measure were allocated to
milk and meat production and processing. In the third call for tender, involving also the
amendments to the SAPARD programme, the funds were allocated to the support for investments in
vegetable, berries and berry bushes production and processing, investments in independent purchase
of agricultural mechanisation and the first purchase of breeding animals in accordance with the
investment in stalls.
The measure investments in processing and marketing of agricultural and fisheries products was
aimed at the adaptation of meat, fish and milk sectors to the requirements under the veterinary and
sanitary regulations, animal and environmental protection and the improvement of marketing,
competitiveness in the market and working conditions of employees. Within the range of this
measure the funds were allocated for investments in technological equipment, including computer
hard- and software as well as the adaptation of existing real estates.
-
Economic diversification and the improvement of rural infrastructure (measures: economic
diversification on farms and the development and improvement of infrastructure in the
countryside)
69
The measure economic diversification on farms was aimed at providing additional income on farms,
new jobs, improving the social status of farmers in preserve the settlement in the countryside. The
funds were devoted to investments on tourist farms with accommodation facilities, excursion
tourism and handicraft. The investments could be realised as new constructions or reconstructions.
The main aim of the measure development and improvement of the infrastructure in the countryside
was to improve rural infrastructure, which is one of the crucial prerequisites for preserving the
settlement in the countryside as well as the preservation and development of agriculture. Financial
aid was devoted to areas where the Regional Development Programmes of the Countryside have
been initiated, which were implemented by the MAFF. The funds were allocated to co-financing
investments in the arrangement of thematic trails to improve the tourism infrastructure in the
countryside and water infrastructure in the countryside for drinking water supply.
The total available public resources for four basic measures under the SAPARD and supporting
measure technical assistance amounted to SIT9.1 milliard. The co-financing share by the EU was
66.6 percent, the remaining resources were provided from the national budget. In 2002 and 2003 the
ARSAMRD published 4 calls for tender and based thereon awarded contracts with the beneficiaries
by the EU accession (by 30.04.2004) on the implementation and financing of projects which are
mostly multi-annual and last by the end of 2006.
Table 34: Overview of number of contracts awarded, commitments undertaken and disbursements by
measures under the SAPARD programme
MEASURE
TOTAL
Investments in
agricultural holdings
Investments in
processing and
marketing of
agricultural and
fisheries products
Economic
diversification on
farms
Development and
improvement of rural
infrastructure
Technical assitance
9,100,337
10.172,621
563
Share of
commitme
nts entred
by
31.12.2005
533
112%
3,165,218
3,653,489
406
397
115%
3,573,120
808,672
97.8%
3,617,391
3,974,457
32
31
110%
3,954,727
830,336
99.5%
1,266,135
1,367,815
86
67
108%
1,217,401
421,922
89.0%
983,821
1,153,050
36
35
117%
1,108,821
348,540
96.2%
67,772
23,810
3
3
35%
23,810
0
100.0%
Resources
available
(2000–2003)
No. of contracts
Commitment
s entered by Total - Concl
situation
31.12.05
uded
31.12.05
Disbursed
In % of all
commitme
nts entered
Total by
31.12.05
In 2005
9,854,069
2,409,470
96.9%
Source: MAFF
By the end of 2005 96.9 percent of commitments undertaken have been disbursed, which means
Slovenia has already exceeded the 100 percent value of the annual contracts awarded and started to
use the resources under the EAFRD, Guarantee Section within the Rural Development Programme
2004-2006.
By the end of 2005 95 percent of all projects have been concluded.
The midterm evaluation showed that the SAPARD programme was very adequate for resolving the
rural problems, in particular for increasing the competitiveness and thus the sustainability of farms
and food processing enterprises. The programme has also contributed to the improved income and
employment situation of the agricultural and food processing sector. The implementation of the
programme had a significant impact on the improvement of the institutional competence of some
administrative and other structures (MAFF, ARSAMRD, and advisory services) and more efficient
implementation of other programmes.
70
Next to SAPARD and ISPA, the third pre-accession financial instrument for co-financing the
investments in traffic and environment was PHARE. It was aimed at co-financing projects
providing professional help in restructuring of economy and the realisation of the EU legal order as
well as investments. Within the range of the PHARE programme several projects on agriculture
have been implemented. Based on the activities on rural development which were carried out by
way of the European resources during the pre-accession period as well as preliminary programming
period Slovenia has undoubtedly gained valuable experience in planning, management and
implementation of the European structural policy, which shall contribute to a more effective
exhaustion of resources.
3.4.2 RDP 2004-2006
Special attention of the RDP 2004-2006, the main objective of which was to support a consistent
implementation of the developmental policy in the countryside and which connects different sectors
for the sustainable raising of the quality of life and work of rural population, was aimed at the
balanced regional development by considering the social and economic aspects. Within the
framework of the two priority tasks under the RDP 2004-2006, i.e. sustainable development of
agriculture and rural areas as well as economic and social restructuring of agriculture, different
measures were implemented:
- compensatory allowances for less favoured areas;
- agri-environmental measures (21 measures);
- early retirement;
- support for meeting the EU standards on agricultural holdings;
- technical assistance.
The implementation of the measures was conducted within the expected range, the EU standards
even above the expectations.
In 2004-2006 the resources under individual measures are presented in Table 35.
71
Table 35: Framework financial table
Public
expenditure
2004
EC
contribution
Private
sector
contribution
Priority 1: Sustainable development of agriculture and countryside
LFA
(Mio. €)
42.0
33.6
0.0
Agri-environmental measures
(Mio. €)
32.9
26.3
0.0
Total Priority 1
(Mio. €)
74.9
59.9
0.0
Priority 2: Economic and social restructuring of agriculture
Early retirement
(Mio. €)
1.8
1.4
0.0
Support for meeting EU
standards
(Mio. €)
9.4
7.5
0.0
Technical assistance
(Mio. €)
2.2
1.7
0.0
Total Priority 2
(Mio. €)
13.4
10.6
0.0
Total Priority 1 + 2
(Mio. €)
88.3
70.5
0.0
Programme SAPARD
(Mio. €)
0.0
0.0
0.0
Complements to direct payments
(Mio. €)
17.8
14.2
0.0
TOTAL
(Mio. €)
106.1
84.7
0.0
Source: Rural Development Programme of the RS 2004-2006
Public
expenditure
2005
EC
contribution
Private
sector
contribution
Public
expenditure
2006
EC
contribution
Private
sector
contribution
Public
expenditure
Total
EC
contribution
47.3
37.8
0.0
35.2
28.1
0.0
124.5
99.5
0.0
36.3
29.0
0.0
56.4
45.1
0.0
125.6
100.4
0.0
83.6
66.8
0.0
91.6
73.2
0.0
250.1
199.9
0.0
2.8
2.2
0.0
1.3
1.0
0.0
5.9
4.6
0.0
17.0
13.6
0.0
32.9
26.3
0.0
59.3
47.4
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.5
0.4
0.0
3.0
2.3
0.0
20.1
16.0
0.0
34.7
27.7
0.0
68.2
54.3
0.0
103.7
82.8
0.0
126.3
100.9
0.0
318.3
254.2
0.0
1.6
1.1
1.3
0.8
0.5
0.8
2.4
1.6
2.1
13.2
10.5
0.0
1.4
1.1
0.0
32.4
25.8
0.0
118.5
94.4
1.3
128.5
102.5
0.8
353.1
281.6
2.1
Private
sector
contribution
72
The aim of the measure compensatory allowances for less favoured areas was the protection of
agricultural land, the preservation of utilised agricultural land and the positive impact on the
preservation of the settlement in areas with low population density. The agri-environmental
measures were aimed at reducing the negative effects of agriculture on the environment,
maintenance of the current status, as well as at the contribution to the long-term improvement of
natural resources in Slovenia. In addition thereto, the measures have positive impacts on the
raising of the education and competence level for the implementation of the sustainable farming
methods. The measure early retirement was targeted at improving the age structure on farms.
The early retirement support disbursed to the transferors simultaneously improved the economic
position of agricultural holdings. The measure support for meeting the EU standards on
agricultural holdings contributed especially to the positive impact on the environment and the
improvement of the safety at work on farms as well.
The RDP measures have significantly contributed to the economic, social and environmental
benefits of the rural areas, they were also connected to other measures of agricultural policy, i.e.
measures under structural policy (land operations, investments in agricultural holdings and
restructuring of food processing industry) and the measures of the overall rural development
(innovative programmes, village renewal, conservation of cultural heritage in the countryside,
encouraging on-farm subsidiary occupations and agricultural infrastructure management).
Significant influence on the RDP 2004-2006 had also the measures and direct payments under
the first pillar of the CAP.
The changed conditions, trends and policy in relation to the role of agriculture in the countryside
and the natural and environmental preservation are a result of the implementation of the RDP
2004-2006 measures and have a long-term impact on:
-
reinforcement of the multifunctional role of agriculture,
balanced and common rural development, environmental protection, in particular of
water and soil against pollution and degradation,
ensuring the settlement by preserving jobs and securing adequate income on farms,
implementation of nature friendly production methods contributing also to the
preservation of the agricultural landscape elements,
production of high-quality agricultural products and foodstuffs,
improvement of agriculture structure (socio-economic structure).
The implementation of the measures contributed to an increased farmers’ awareness for the longterm and sustainable farming. As a result of the reduced substances release and the decreasing
intensification of agricultural activity into the environment the long-term impacts of the
measures shall reflect in an improved environment status. The measures enabled further decline
of harmful substances contents in the groundwater, reduced nitrogen concentrations in the water
and the preservation of the favourable habitat and biodiversity status. In addition to that they
contribute to an improved production quality under the nature friendly management methods and
the improvement of the age structure of farmers as well as meeting the EU standards. The
implementation of the measures under the RDP 2004-2006 contributed to the settlement of rural
areas and agricultural activity in marginal and less favoured areas.
An independent expert group shall conduct the ex post evaluation on the effects of the
implementation of the measures under the RDP 2004-2006 to define in detail the impacts
thereof.
73
3.4.3 SPD
The Single Programming Document of the RS 2004-2006 (SPD) supported agriculture within the
third priority Restructuring of agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Within this priority 7 measures
were implemented in 2004-2006, as follows:
- four measures in agriculture
- one measure in forestry and
- two measures in fisheries
3.1 Improving the production and marketing of agricultural products,
3.2 Investments in agricultural holdings,
3.3 Diversification of agricultural activities and activities close to agriculture,
3.4 Investments in forests to improve their ecological and economical value,
3.5 Marketing of quality agricultural and food products,
3.6 Modernisation of existing vessels and small-scale coastal fisheries,
3.7 Aquaculture, processing and marketing.
Table 36 shows financial resources allocated to the priority 3 and the SPD 2004-2006 measures:
Table 36: Financial resources for individual priorities/measures
Priority/
measure
Total
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Improvement of processing and
marketing of agricultural products
Total
Total EU
ERDF
334,516,689
174,444,715
96,899,124
49,512,906
16,498,364
237,509,597
129,240,164
72,674,342
25,350,133
8,249,182
136,523,478
129,240,164
0
0
0
75,635,986
0
72,674,342
0
0
23,569,093
0
0
23,569,093
8,249,182
1,781,040
0
0
1,781,040
0
14,141,456
9,427,638
7,070,728
4,713,819
0
0
0
0
7,070,728
4,713,819
0
0
4,713,818
2,356,910
2,356,909
1,178,455
0
0
0
0
2,356,909
1,178,455
0
0
1,187,360
890,520
0
0
0
890,520
1,187,360
890,520
0
0
0
890,520
13,659,944
10,244,958
7,283,314
2,961,644
0
0
Investments in agricultural holdings
Diversification of agricultural
activities
Investments in forests
Marketing of quality agricultural
and food products
Modernisation of existing vessels
and small-scale coastal fisheries
Aquaculture, processing and
marketing
Technical assistance
ESF
EAGGF
FIFG
Source: SPD 2004-2006
Table 37: Overview of number of contracts awarded, commitments undertaken and disbursements by
measures under the SPD 2004-2006
MEASURE
TOTAL
Improving the production
and marketing of
agricultural products
Investments in agricultural
holdings
Diversification of
agricultural activities
Marketing of quality
agricultural and food
products
Resources
available
(2004–2006)
(Mio. SIT)
Funds granted
(Mio. SIT)
Total by
31.12.05
Share of
commitments
entred by
Granted
31.12.2005
No. of contracts
In 2005 Sumbitted
Disbursed (Mio. SIT)
Total by
31.12.05
In % of all
commitments
entered
2,005.6
40.6%.6%
In 2005
7,371.2
5,150.9
3,000.9
943
266
69.9%
2,090.3
3,010.2
2,320.7
1,429.9
92
27
77.1%
880.4
880.4
37.9%
2,589.9
1,477.2
690.2
596
120
57.0%
567.6
567.6
38.4%
1,378.5
1,265.3
829.7
217
98
91.8%
591.2
520.6
46.7%
392.6
87.7
51.1
38
21
22.3%
51.1
37.0
58.3%
Source: MAFF
74
The priority contributed to higher competitiveness of the agricultural and food sector and
promoted the efficient use of resources in rural areas. Due to their economic and wider social
importance the structural support was also oriented to the forestry and fisheries sector. The
objective of the priority was the competitive adaptation of the sector to the single market
requirements, promoting the food safety and quality, development of alternative sources of
income in rural areas and sustainable development of forests as well as the competitive
adaptation of the fisheries and aquaculture.
The most important objectives of the third SPD priority were:
- raising the competitiveness of the agrifood, forestry and fishery sector,
- creation of conditions to achieve equal income level of the rural population,
- maintenance of settlement patterns and economic restructuring of rural areas,
- sustainable use of natural resources,
- environmental protection in the countryside and preservation of natural resources.
The measures under this priority were aimed at enhancing the restructuring of agriculture,
forestry and fisheries and ensured the gradual increase of production and processing performance
as well as the competitiveness of these sectors. The Specific objectives to improve the
competitiveness of the agrifood, forestry and fisheries sector were aimed at:
- improving the economic performance and competitiveness of agriculture, forestry and
fisheries,
- successful adaptation to the single market requirements,
- promotion of other sources of income in rural areas,
- promotion of safety and quality of food products,
- maintenance and sustainable development of forests.
The objective of the measure improving the production and marketing of agricultural products
was to increase the efficiency and competitiveness of the agrifood industry and to raise the value
added of food products by investing in the construction, purchase or renovation of real estates,
new machinery and equipment. The results of the midterm evaluation of the third SPD priority25,
which was evaluating the first results of the implementation of the measures, show the
correctness and compliance of the activities financed with the actual needs. The investments in
production modernisation have increased the competitiveness of enterprises and have had a
positive impact on the environmental aspects; however, simultaneously a negative trend in
employment of the labour force has occurred.
The measure Investments in agricultural holdings was targeted at increasing the competitiveness
and market orientation through investments in agricultural holdings, which contributed to the
income increase. The investments have contributed to the improved technological equipment and
productivity of agricultural holdings. In addition to this they have contributed to the pollution
reduction in agriculture, lower energy consumption and improved working conditions.
The objective of the measure diversification of agricultural activities and activities close to
agriculture – alternative income sources was to improve the efficiency of work allocation on
agricultural holdings and thus secure additional sources of employment and productivity and
better income. The objective was accomplished through investments in small processing
establishments, building of tourism capacities, workshops and exhibitions and sales facilities,
25
Considering the short programming period 2004-2006 in which Slovenia started to benefit from the structural
funds this task was not mandatory. Nevertheless, the Managing Authority decided to conduct a smaller-scale
evaluation to assess the impact of the selected activities/measures in relation to the objectives set and to analyse the
effects on specifically structural issues. This task was also outlined in the SPD 2004-2006 in Chapter 6.1.2
Management arrangements.
75
and investments in energy production from biomass. Through the implementation of the measure
the number of employees on agricultural holdings has increased, in particular the employment
opportunities for groups in the countryside, which are more difficult to employ. The investments
have also contributed to the quality of the living and working environment as well as the
renovation of the building and cultural heritage.
The measure marketing of quality agricultural and food products was aimed at encouraging the
producers of special agricultural products and foodstuffs to participate in the market and
simultaneously towards achieving higher prices and satisfying the consumer requirements for
authentic products of higher quality. The measure has contributed to a higher awareness and
education on the nature conservation.
Nevertheless, the low labour productivity and consequently the high expenses of agricultural
production remain the key issues of Slovenian agriculture. The social structure of the agricultural
population has increased recently, but is still unfavourable and obstructs a more efficient
management of agricultural holdings. With regard to the organisation the vertical networking of
agriculture with other production sectors is still weak.
The measures within the framework of the SPD are necessary for further development of
Slovenian agriculture, forestry and agrifood industry, which was also indicated by the results of
the midterm evaluation.
76
4
RATIONALE OF PRIORITIES CHOSEN WITH REGARD TO COMMUNITY
STRATEGIC GUIDELINES, NATIONAL STRATEGY PLAN AND ANTICIPATED
IMPACT OF EX ANTE EVALUATION
The national priorities outlined in the RDP 2007-2013 and set out by Slovenia based on the
baseline analysis, potentials and specific needs shall contribute to the efficient accomplishment
of the common Community objectives laid down in the Council Decision on Community
strategic guidelines for rural development, the Lisbon Strategy and the Göteborg objectives.
4.1
Rationale of the RDP 2007-2013 priorities chosen with regard to the Community Strategic
Guidelines and the National Strategy Plan
The entire rural development policy, the RDP 2007-2013 with its priorities, activities and
measures reflect the national priorities which are compliant with the European strategy and
outlined in the NSP. The balance between the key intervention areas at the national level is
compliant with the most important European priorities in this field. It concerns the balance
between the competitiveness of agriculture, food industry and forestry, environmental protection
and the conservation of natural landscape as well as the improvement of the quality of life in
rural areas and the promotion of diversification.
The priorities under the NSN are designed in accordance with the Council Decision on
Community strategic guidelines for rural development26 together with the Lisbon strategy
guidance, the decisions of Göteborg and the key principles of the Common agricultural policy.
Next to the Community strategic guidelines, in drawing up the national RDP 2007-2013
priorities the objectives of the aforementioned strategic documents were considered: creation of
new and better jobs, establishment of stronger and more stabile economic growth, promotion of
sustainable development and adding the environmental dimension to all key processes.
In accordance with the Community strategic guidelines the rural development policy must assist
the rural areas to accomplish the objectives of greater competitiveness, job creation and
innovation. Required is greater focus on investments in human resources, knowledge and
experience as well as in the capital in agricultural and forestry sector, new methods of
conducting environmental services and creation of more and better jobs in the rural areas.
By helping rural areas to accomplish their potential as an attractive place for investment, work
and living and by adapting these activities to the conditions of the environment and the nature
the rural development policy indirectly supports the sustainable development. The rural
development contributes towards an increased competitiveness in agricultural and food
processing sector, whereas the innovation and information and communication technology must
be particularly emphasised. To encourage the innovation and entrepreneurship local initiatives
are required (LEADER) contributing to the creation of new jobs, increased income and
promotion of equal opportunities in the countryside – and support for extension of activities.
Substantial source of income and employment opportunities in the countryside are environmentrelated activities, i.e. tourism. Important for the development of the rural areas are in addition to
the rural development policy also and foremost the measures under the structural funds.
Slovenian agriculture and agri-food industry are not sufficiently competitive to operate
effectively under the single market conditions. Still the consequences of the previous policies are
evident, which show in the small and dispersed farms where most frequently farming is only an
additional activity to people employed in other sectors. Similar situation is present in the
26
Council Decision of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development (programming
period 2007 to 2013) 2006/144/EC (OJ L 055/20)
77
Slovenian forestry. The activities under axis 1 – improving the competitiveness of the
agricultural and forestry sector – shall contribute to a raised productivity and thus the
competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector. In addition thereto, they shall directly and
indirectly have an impact on the preservation of the environment and improved quality of life in
the rural areas. In determining the measures, which shall enable the modernisation of the existing
and the introduction of new technologies, the environmental requirements and the application of
renewable energy resources shall be particularly emphasised. Hence the activities under axis 1
shall indirectly contribute to a more favourable balance of nutrients in the soil and to a better
water and air quality (axis 2). The activities supporting the modernisation and raised value added
in agriculture, food processing industry and forestry shall, through the multiplicative effects,
contribute to improved employment opportunities and quality of life in the rural areas, i.e. the
key objectives under axis 3. Explicit synergy effects can also emerge from the measures
supporting the quality schemes, which simultaneously contribute to the income diversification
(axis 3) and the establishment of environment friendlier production practices (axis 2).
Characteristic for Slovenia is the high diversity of the natural resources and landscape types. The
protection of the nature and environment are deemed a common social value in Slovenia. The
activities under axis 2 – improving the environment and the rural areas lead to the utilisation
of the rural areas and the implementation of nature friendly technologies in agriculture and
forestry. They contribute to the environmental protection, conservation of the natural resources
and production conditions for agriculture. The settlement of rural areas and population activity in
agriculture is essential in providing sustainable development of the rural areas. The established
forest management system and the preservation and promotion of sustainable farming shall to a
great extent ensure a favourable biodiversity status and the preservation of habitats in the Natura
2000 sites. The activities under axis 2 mainly complement with the activities under axis 1 and 3.
They area aimed at encouraging agricultural holdings and the rural population to engage in
innovative practices which are related to the preservation of the rural areas and environmental
protection and which are more interesting as regards the income and improve the living standard
in the rural areas. The implementation of the measures under axis 2 captures the accomplishment
of the objectives on the conservation of the Natura 2000 sites, reversing the biodiversity decline
under the Göteborg commitment, water quality preservation in accordance with the Directive
2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as well as mitigating the climate
change under the Kyoto Protocol. All envisaged measures shall contribute to an efficient
implementation of the National Strategy Plan of Rural Development 2007-2013 which in its
strategy foresees the same measures for the accomplishment of the objectives on environmental
protection. The measures under axis 2 consider in the maximum possible way the comments and
recommendations of the ex ante evaluation of the programme and are predominantly balanced
with the guidelines delivered.
Slovenia shall pursue to accomplish the objectives of the Water Framework Directive
(2000/60/EC), i.e. secure and maintain good condition of surface and groundwater bodies,
through the Donube River Basin District Management Plan and the Adriatic River Basin District
Management Plan as well as the corresponding Measure Programmes, by considering measures
under sister directives, in particular Nitrate Directive (91/676/EEC), Urban Waste Water
Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC), Protection of Groundwater against Pollution and
Deterioration Directive (2006/118/EC), Dangerous Substances Directive (76/464/EEC) and
Bathing Water Directive (2006/7/EC). Based on conducted assessment of the surface and
groundwater bodies status, where problems have been identified as a result of loads from
agriculture, additional actions have been envisaged, in particular increased buffer zone width by
watercourses and lakes, on which the use of fertilisers and plant protection products shall not be
allowed, designation of water protection areas of water sources intended for drinking water
supply of the population, improved hydro-morphological condition of surface water bodies and
adaptation of crops and farming methods to environmental requirements. To implement these
78
measures Slovenia has envisaged a possibility of appropriate adaptation of instruments and
measures under agricultural and environmental policy.
The Natura 2000 objectives, i.e. conserving natural habitats, wildlife and wild birds as well as
biodiversity, shall be accomplished through the implementation of measures under the
Operational programme-Natura 2000 Sites Management Programme, laying down the objectives,
actions and support activities in these areas. By considering both directives, i.e. Habitat Directive
(92/43/EEC) and Birds Directive (79/409/EEC), as well as through the implementation of
measures under the Operational programme-Natura 2000 Sites Management Programme and
certain RDP 2007-2013 measures (some agri-environmental submeasures) as well as by
considering forest management plans Slovenia shall prevent the deterioration of the Natura 2000
sites condition. In Slovenia the Environment Protection Act (UJ RS No 39/06) establishes a
systems framework for nature conservation the main component of which is biodiversity
conservation. The Nature Conservation Act (OJ RS No 96/04) lays down an overall nature
conservation system aimed at protecting natural values and conserving biodiversity components.
Set out were protection subjects, protection methods and measures, organisation in the field of
nature protection and its financing, as well programming and planning in nature protection and
other contents necessary for efficient nature protection. The Act on Forests (OJ RS No 30/93 and
67/02) lays down sustainable multifunctional forest management and need be considered in
accordance with the principles on environmental protection and natural values and in a manner
securing the action of forests as ecosystem when planning and implementing management
guidance. In Slovenia, Natura 2000 sites management is satisfactory and is carried out mainly
through agri-environmental measures. Currently, there is no need for setting up additional
requirements restricting agricultural and forestry production in these areas. Hence, there is also
no need for designing a measure on payments for Natura 2000 sites. In case that in certain areas
stricter requirements, under individual management plans, should be set out Slovenia shall
establish a system of compensations to farmers and forest owners from national resources or
shall adapt the RDP 2007-2013 accordingly.
Characteristic for Slovenian rural areas are unutilised human and natural potentials, insufficient
entrepreneurship activity and lack of income alternatives. The activities under axis 3 - the
quality of life in the rural areas and diversification of the rural economy – promote the
entrepreneurship and are aimed at raising the quality of life in the rural areas. They provide for
higher employment and have positive impacts on the economic development of the rural areas as
well as on the conservation of the natural and cultural heritage. The utilisation of other features
in the rural areas provide for the diversification of economic activities in the rural areas. The
activities under axis 3 upgrade, complement and refine the effects of axis 1 and 2. New
employment opportunities in the rural areas release the pressure on jobs in agriculture and
forestry. Simultaneously, by expanding the activity in the rural areas, they can contribute to
increased value added of the economic chain.
Axis 4 – LEADER initiative and its measures are aimed at promoting the decision-making on
the development of individual rural areas under the bottom up approach by local action groups
(LAG). The local population must be able to decide alone on the development of its area and
realise its development ideas. For a successful operation of LAGs and integration of the rural
population into the process of drawing up and the implementation of the development
programmes (local development strategies) it is necessary to promote the training for the
acquisition of appropriate skills. The priorities contributing to the accomplishment of the
objectives under axis 4 must also contribute to the achievement of the objectives under axes 1
and 2 and particularly axis 3.
Technical assistance is a set of activities crucial for the efficient management and
implementation of the programme. A detailed determination of these activities shall be outlined
79
by a special programme. The resources are devoted to the management and implementation of
the RDP 2007-2013, information actions for general public, research and technical support for
the implementation, running, control and evaluation as well as technical activities for the overall
implementation for 2007-2013. Eligible for the resources under the measure technical assistance
is the MAFF as the Managing Authority of the RDP 2007-2013 which runs the activities under
this measure.
The allocation of financial resources by axes is in accordance with the requirements on minimum
shares per axis laid down by Regulation 1698/2005. Slovenia shall devote 33 percent of the total
resources for axis 1 measures, 52 percent for the preservation of cultural landscape and
environmental protection, 11 percent to axis 3 and 3 percent to the LEADER axis. The Leader
axis shall be devoted to the objectives of all three axes, but it shall particularly contribute to the
objectives under axis 3.
80
Table 38: Objectives at programme level by axes and priorities with measures
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
COMMON OBJECTIVES
Improving the competitiveness of
agricultural and forestry sector
Enhancing environment friendly Improving the economic and
farming
social status in the countryside
Enhancing the local development
initiatives
Improving the income situation on
holdings supported and with private
forest owners.
Establish the balance between
agricultural production and the
protection of the nature and the
environment.
Awareness raising of the local
population on the initiative
LEADER.
Increasing the innovation and the
development of new products and
introducing new production
technologies.
Adaptation to newly introduced
minimum Community standards on
holdings supported.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Improving the parcel structure of
agricultural land and arrangement of
functional infrastructure.
Raising the income level in the
countryside.
Creating employment
opportunities in the countryside.
Involve local partnerships in
Preserve agricultural activity in
rural development.
areas with difficult conditions for Improving the quality of living in
farming.
the countryside.
Promote the LEADER approach
in rural development
Preserve the settlement of rural
programming.
areas.
Promote inter-territorial and
Stop the biodiversity decline,
transnational cooperation.
protect water quality and
mitigate climate change.
Chronologically planned production
and increasing the amount of
irrigated agricultural areas.
Increasing the production value of
agricultural products under quality
schemes.
Increasing the number of agricultural
holdings and private forest owners
entering the market.
Raising the competence of persons
engaged in agriculture, food industry
and forestry.
81
AXIS
MEASURES BY PRIORITIES
AXIS 1 – Improving the
competitiveness of the agricultural
and forestry sector
AXIS 2 – Improving the
AXIS 3 – Improving the quality
environment and the countryside of life in rural areas and the
promotion of economic
diversification
AXIS 4 – LEADER
1. Competence raising and
strengthening of human potential in
agriculture and forestry
- Setting up of young farmers
- Early retirement of farmers
1. Preserving agriculture in less
favoured areas
- Compensatory allowances to
farmers in less favoured areas
1. Implementing local
development strategies
- Implementing local
development strategies
2. Restructuring of physical capital
in agriculture and forestry and
promoting innovation
- Modernisation of agricultural
holdings
- Improving the economic value of
forests
- Adding value to agricultural and
forestry products
- Improving and developing
infrastructure related to the
development and adaptation of
agriculture
2. Enhancing nature friendly
agricultural practices
- Agri-environmental payments
1. Improving employment
opportunities in the countryside
- Diversification into nonagricultural activities
- Support for the creation and
development of enterprises
2. Running local action groups
and encouraging cooperation
2. Improving the quality of life in - Running local action groups
the countryside
and animating cooperation
- Village renewal and
development
3. Promoting inter-territorial
- Conservation and upgrading of and transnational cooperation
rural heritage
- Promoting inter-territorial and
transnational cooperation
3. Improving the quality of
agricultural production and products
- Participation of farmers in food
quality schemes
- Supporting producer groups for
information and promotion activities
for products under food quality
schemes
- Supporting setting up of producer
groups
82
4.2
Anticipated impact from the ex-ante evaluation with regard to the priorities chosen
The RDP 2007-013 draft drawn up by the MAFF in August 2006 does not outline the anticipated
intervention impacts and does not contain any quantitative target output values (specific targets)
nor any impact values (general targets) at the programme level. The major part also lacks
quantitative defining of outputs and results at the measure level. Regardless thereof, it may be
anticipated that the RDP 2007-2013 and its measures shall have a direct or an indirect structural,
economic, social or environmental impact. Therefore the ex-ante evaluation group provides an
assessment of the anticipated outputs and impacts based on the following issues:
Economic and social impacts
It can be anticipated that the majority of the measures shall have an economic impact on the aid
recipients and indirectly also on rural areas in broader sense. In the new programming period the
public resources amount to EUR 1,158,928,916, this shall be complemented by private funding
and thus related effects when the economic activity shall draw in private funds into rural areas,
amounting approximately €387 million. A certain multiplication effects of the above mentioned
public and private resources may be expected. In case that the rural development resources are
spent, the empiric assessments for Slovenia (summoned from the results of the 5th OP
REAPBALK) indicate an aggregate multiplication effects within the range of 30 percent.
It must be stressed out that the real economic impacts shall depend on the amount of the financial
resources per individual measure and on the input of resources within the measures for different
purposes. Based on the assumption that the absorption of public resources shall be at 100 percent
the public support for the modernisation of agricultural holdings shall for example amount to
approximately EUR 82,334,549 followed by an identical amount of private funds. The economic
impacts of investments shall depend on the purpose of an investment and the division between
the sector and the sub-sectors. The same applies for the measure Adding value to agricultural
products in which EUR 81,525,471 shall be invested equally divided among public and private
resources. Both measures shall contribute to a greater productivity. Considering the trends of the
previous years in the sector it is not realistic to anticipate an increase of jobs.
Some other measures may contribute to the economic growth and higher employment, e.g.
Setting up of young farmers, Supporting setting up of producer groups, Early retirement,
Supporting farmers who participate in food quality schemes, Support for the creation and
development of micro enterprises, Basic services and Vocational training, but to a smaller extent
than the measures mentioned earlier.
It is anticipated that the social impacts shall be stronger than in the previous period, especially
due to the LEADER approach aimed at increasing the responsibility and motivating individuals
as well as the collective development of local communities. The social impacts in general shall
be strengthened within the range of all axes by improving the vocational and general
qualifications, e.g. through “vocational training” and “training and information actions”.
Another expected social and economic impact of the RDP 2007-2013 is a better self-organisation
of individuals in want of improving their living conditions. Again, this is particularly supported
by the LEADER approach and the measure support for the creation and development of
enterprises under axis 3 as well as the support for setting up of producer groups under axis 1.
The axis 2 measures – LFA and agri-environmental payments – shall substantially contribute
towards achieving the overall programme objectives. Additionally, they shall also contribute
towards achieving the economic and social objectives of rural development. In the economic
sense the implementation of the measures shall prevent the loss of a part of the income made by
agricultural holdings as a consequence of the natural resources protection. The compensation
system shall contribute to the income stabilisation, which is in particular important for farmers in
83
LFA. Another economic consequence may be also the development of service activities based on
the sustainable development paradigm (e.g. eco-tourism, conservation and improvement of rural
heritage).
Environmental impacts
In accordance with the Guidelines and the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework the
programme was also subjected to the Strategic Environmental Assessment.
The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) was prepared to check the conformity of the
Slovenian Rural Development Programme (RDP) for 2007-2013 with the environmental aims of
relevant legislation and strategic documents, asses its impact on the environment, nature, human
health and cultural heritage, and to form effective mitigation measures for potential adverse
effects. The outcome of the SEA is this Environmental Report and an adapted RDP.
The Environmental Report contains the main data on the RDP and the environmental baseline,
outlines the complete evaluation process and key findings, and gives possible alternatives, an
impact analysis and mitigation measures. The SEA process also promotes the inclusion of the
public in decision-making related to programme adoption.
This Environmental Report has been prepared as part of the ex ante evaluation of the RDP, in
line with the recommendations contained in the Guidelines for the Common Monitoring and
Evaluation Framework (CMEF). The guidelines state that European Directive 2001/42/EC on the
assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the SEA
directive) applies to programmes funded from the European Agriculture Fund for Rural
Development (EAFRD). The legal basis for the implementation of the strategic evaluation
assessment represent the regulations based on which Directive 2001/42/EC was transposed into
the Slovenian legal order. The Decision of the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning No
35409-253/2006 of 29 September 2006 lays down that for the RDP the Environmental Impact
Assessment on protected areas is required. The findings of the programme's impact on areas
protected under environmental regulations are outlined in the Appendix on the appraisal of the
programme's effects on protected areas, an independent supplement to the report. In particular
segments, related to the nature and protected areas, of the environmental report the evaluators
worked together with experts on the nature conservation.
Alternatives were considered as part of preparations for the Strategic Environmental Assessment.
The process established that the implementation of the RDP would have both negative and
positive effects, but that the positives would prevail and that the selection of the »zero
alternative« (i.e. not implementing the programme) would be less favourable in terms of the
environment.
The assessment of the impacts was carried out for groups of related measures within the
individual priorities of the RDP.
Measures under axis 1 were found to have diverse environmental effects, ranging from positive
to negative effects that could be overcome with mitigation measures. Generally speaking
however the established effects were negligible when mitigation measures were implemented.
Axis 2 is dedicated fully to activities that aim to promote environmentally-friendly agricultural
practices and contribute to limiting adverse environmental, land and social effects of abandoning
agricultural production on less favoured areas. Generally speaking positive effects were
registered for virtually all segments of the environment.
The measures under axis 3 were found to have negligible effects on the environment if
mitigation measures were applied. Positive effects were registered foremost in the segments of
cultural heritage and the health of people as well as the quality of rural life.
The »Implementing the LEADER Programme« priority cannot be subject to the Significant
84
Effects Assessment due the nature of the LEADER programme - its effects cannot be anticipated
since the list of approved projects is unknown. The effects are heavily dependent on the type of
projects that shall be selected by local development partnerships.
Considering that at the level of individual projects under the RDP 2007-2013 no activities are to
be anticipated which would exceed the limit values for SEA and that the majority of the
producers in the primary agricultural production are bound to cultivate in accordance with the
cross compliance principles, the risk of negative environmental and spatial effects is relatively
low.
85
5
INFORMATION ON AXES AND MEASURES PROPOSED UNDER EACH AXIS
AND THE DESCRIPTION THEREOF
The RDP 2007-2013 of the RS shall be implemented through measures of all four axes as laid
down in the following.
Table 39: Measures and activities of the RDP 2007-2013 by axes
86
Code
Axis 1
111
112
113
121
122
123
125
132
133
142
Axis 2
211
212
214
Axis 3
311
312
322
323
Axis 4
41
(411,
412,
413)
421
431
511
Measure
Regulation (1698/2005
Measure description
IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY SECTOR
Measures to raise the competence and strengthen human potential in agriculture and forestry
Training for persons engaged in agriculture Article 20 (a) (i), Article 21
Defraying training costs
and forestry
Supporting young farmers
Article 20 (a) (ii), Article 22 Defraying the costs of farm transfer and
structural adaptation of the holding after
the transfer
Early retirement of farmers
Article 20 (a) (iii), Article 23 Financial aid to farm transferors
Measures for restructuring of physical capital in agriculture and forestry and for promoting innovation
Modernisation of agricultural holdings
Article 20 (b) (i), Article 26
Co-financing investments in primary
production
Improving the economic value of forests
Article 20 (b) (ii), Article 27 Co-financing investments in extraction
and primary production of wood
Adding value to agricultural and forestry
Article 20 (b) (iii), Article 28 Co-financing investments in production
products
and marketing of agricultural and
forestry products
Improving and developing infrastructure
Article 20 (b) (v), Article 30 Co-financing land consolidation, hydrorelated to the development and adaptation of
meliorations and infrastructure
agriculture
Measures to improve the quality of agricultural production and products
Participation of farmers in food quality
Article 20 (c) (ii), Article 32 Defraying costs emerging from
schemes
participation in quality schemes
Supporting producer groups for information Article 20 (c) (iii), Article 33 Co-financing promotion costs
and promotion activities for products under
food quality schemes
Supporting setting up of producer groups
Article 20 (d) (ii), Article 35 Co-financing establishment and
operation costs
IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COUNTRYSIDE
Natural handicap payments to farmers in
Article 36 (a) (i)
Compensation due to natural handicaps
mountain areas
in area concerned
Article 36 (a) (ii)
Compensation due to natural handicaps
Payments to farmers in areas with
in area concerned
handicaps, other than mountain areas
Agri-environmental payments
Article 36 (a) (iv)
Compensation due to stricter farming
requirements
QUALITY OF LIFE IN RURAL AREAS AND DIVERSIFICATION OF RURAL ECONOMY
Measures to diversify the rural economy
Co-financing investments in
Diversification into non-agricultural
Article 52 (a) (i), Article 53
diversification of economic activities in
activities
the countryside
Support for the creation and development of Article 52 (a) (ii), Article 54 Co-financing investments in micro
micro enterprises
enterprises and training costs
Measures to improve the quality of life in rural areas
Article 52 (b)(i),(ii), Article
Co-financing the arrangement of areas in
Village renewal and development
56
public use and buildings
Co-financing renewal costs of cultural
Conservation and upgrading of the rural
Article 52 (b) (iii), Article 57 heritage facilities and areas of natural
heritage
values
LEADER
Implementing local development strategies Article 63 (a), Article 64
Co-financing implementation projects
Promotion of inter-territorial and
transnational cooperation
Running local action groups, skills
acquisition and animation of the territory
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
Article 63 (b), Article 65
Co-financing LAG cooperation projects
Article 63 (c)
Co-financing animation, establishment
and operation of LAGs
Financing activities under technical
assistance programme
Article 66
A detailed description of the axes, measures and activities as well indicators for progress,
effectiveness and performance measurement of all four axes is contained in Chapter 5.3.
87
5.1
General requirements
By setting up and the implementing the priorities by axes Slovenia shall endeavour to enhance
the balance and synergy within each axis as well as between the axes. Successful implementation
of each axis is dependant on successful implementation of the measures under each axis. The
same applies for the output between axes. At the beneficiary level the implementation of
activities under certain measure can animate the implementation of other measures. This shall
enable a more efficient utilisation of the resources and a quicker and more successful
accomplishment of the measure and axis objectives.
Table 40: Interaction of the RDP 2007-2013 measures for accomplishment of common objectives by axes
MEASURES
111
112
113
121
Training for persons engaged in agriculture and forestry
122
Improving the economic value of forests
123
Adding value to agricultural and forestry products
125
Improving and developing infrastructure related to the development
and adaptation of agriculture
Participation of farmers in food quality schemes
Supporting producer groups for information and promotion activities
for products under food quality schemes
Supporting setting up of producer groups
Natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas
132
133
142
211
Setting up of young farmers
Early retirement of farmers
Modernisation of agricultural holdings
214
Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain
areas
Agri-environmental payments
311
Diversification into non-agricultural activities
312
Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises
322
Village renewal and development
323
Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage
41
(411,
412,
413)
421
Implementing local development strategies
431
Running local action groups, skills acquisition and animation of the
territory
212
Promotion of inter-territorial and transnational cooperation
INTERACTION WITH MEASURES
112, 121, 122, 123, 125
111, 113, 121, 123, 311, 312, 323
112
111, 112, 122, 123, 125, 211, 311, 312,
41 (411, 412, 413)
111, 121, 123, 311, 312, 41 (411, 412,
413)
111, 112, 121, 122, 132, 133, 142, 311,
312, 41 (411, 412, 413)
111, 121, 322, 323, 41 (411, 412, 413)
123, 133, 142, 214
123, 132, 142, 214
123, 132, 133, 214
121, 212, 214, 323
211, 214, 323
132, 133, 142, 211, 212
112, 121, 122, 123, 322, 323, 41 (411,
412, 413), 421
112, 121, 122, 123, 322, 323, 41(411,
412, 413), 421
125, 311, 312, 323, 41 (411, 412, 413),
421
112, 125, 211, 212, 311, 312, 322, 41
(411, 412, 413), 421
121, 122, 123, 125, 311, 312, 322, 323,
421, 431
121, 122, 123, 125, 311, 312, 322, 323,
41 (411, 412, 413), 431
41 (411, 412, 413), 421
The Community contribution for the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013 measures in the
seven-year period is estimated at EUR 900 million (in 2004 prices) and from the national budget
20-25 percent for co-financing of the measures shall be allocated, in accordance with the
provision on the co-financing rate by Regulation 1698/2005. The total amount of the EAFRD
resources devoted to the rural development of Slovenia is earmarked within the framework of the
Convergence Objective.
The importance of each objective under the RDP 2007-2013 reflects also in the percentage of the
resources allocated for each axes. The greatest share is devoted to the land management and the
88
preservation of the utilisation of the countryside (52.22 percent). The competitiveness in
agriculture and forestry was devoted 33.28 percent, 11 percent were allocated to the
improvement of the quality of life in rural areas and the promotion of diversification, while
LEADER activities were devoted 3 percent and technical assistance 0.5 percent of the EAFRD
resources.
Table 41: Financial resources by individual axes and percentage of EAFRD co-financing rate
AXIS
Total
399,487,151
587,640,844
132,039,136
33,760,006
Public resources (€)
EAFRD co-financing
75.00%
80.00%
75.00%
80.00%
EAFRD resources
% per EAFRD axis
Axis 1
299,615,363
* 33.28
Axis 2
470,112,675
* 52.22
Axis 3
99,029,352
11.00
Axis 4
27,008,005
3.00
Technical
75.00%
0.50
assistance
6,001,779,00
4,501,334
77.68%
100.00
Total
1,158,928,916
900,266,729
*The EAFRD percentage in this table has been rounded to two decimal places for reasons of transparency. The
amounts by each axis are set based on rounding to seven decimal places.
Table 1: Impact indicators and anticipated impact as a result of the implementation of the RDP 20072013 measures in certain areas
IMPACT INDICATORS
Economic growth
(Net value added)
Economic size of agricultural holdings
(Change in economic size of KMG)
Employment creation
(Net number of created jobs)
Labour productivity
(Change in GVA/MWU)
Anticipated impact
+0.1 %
+ 0.6 ESU
+2,755
Agriculture: +EUR1,900
Forestry: +EUR4,645
Food industry: +EUR4,737
Reversing the trend of declining biodiversity
50% trend reversal
(Stopping the biodiversity declining trend with regard to farmland birds population)
Maintenance of high nature value farming and forestry areas
+2,700 ha
(Changes in high nature value area)
Improvement in water quality
Trend: decline
(Changes in gross nutrient balance – surplus of nitrogen )
-4 kg/ha
Land application of nutrients
- 10 kg/ha
(Change in the quantity of applied nutrients)
Contribution to combating climate change
Agriculture: low*
(Increase in production of energy from renewable sources in agriculture and
Forestry: significant
forestry)
* Within the framework of the RDP 2007-2013 measures the agricultural sector shall have an impact on climate
change mitigation through investment measures of axes 1 and 3. The impact of the RDP 2007-2013 implementation
on climate change mitigation shall be significant.
89
5.2
Requirements on all or certain measures
Measures and expenditure transferred from the previous programming period
Early retirement
Pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation 1320/2006 Slovenia shall transfer the commitments
undertaken in the previous programming period for the measure early retirement from the RDP
2004-2006. In 2004, 2005 and 2006 contracts with the beneficiaries were awarded enabling them
to obtain early retirement support for the duration of 10 years. As this time period continues into
the new programming period the beneficiaries shall receive the support until the conclusion of
the contractual commitment in the 2007-2013 period as well. From 1 January 2007 onward the
expenditure shall entirely charge the 2007-2013 programming period and shall be earmarked as
axis 1 expenditure. The total amount allocated for commitments undertaken from the previous
programming period amounts to approximately EUR 14.5 Mio. In accordance with the
Correlation table for measures from Annex II to Regulation 1320/2006 provided for in
1698/2005 the given resources are included into axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013.
Support for meeting the EU standards
Pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation 1320/2006 Slovenia shall transfer the commitments
undertaken in the previous programming period for meeting the EU standards into the
programming period 2007-2013 and thus ensure the conclusion of the activities. The selection of
the beneficiaries was conducted in accordance with the RDP 2004-2006 provisions. The total
sum devoted thereto amounts to approximately EUR40.4 Mio. The disbursement of the resources
shall be compliant to the Correlation table of measures under Annex II of Regulation 1320/2006
provided for in Regulation 1698/2005 included in axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013.
Table 43: List of existing standards based on Community regulations and the date from which a standard
must obligatory be implemented in compliance with the Community rules
Area
Standard
Environmental
protection
Nitrate
Directive
Plant health
Agricultural
plant health
protection
Date on which
standard
became valid
01.05.2004
01.05.2004
Regulations
SLO
Decree on the limit input
concentration values of
dangerous substances and
fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05)
Rules concerning good
agricultural practice in
manuring (OJ RS No
130/04)
Plant Protection Products
Act (OJ RS No 98/2004 –
UPB 1)
Rules on professional
training and assessment of
knowledge in
phytomedicine (OJ RS Nos
36/02, 41/04, 17/05)
Rules on handling the stocks
of plant protection products
after the expiry of
registration (OJ RS No
59/03, 6/05)
Rules on the responsibilities
of users of plant protection
products (OJ RS No 62/03)
EC
Council Directive
91/676/EEC of 12 December
1991 concerning the
protection of waters against
pollution caused by nitrates
from agricultural sources(OJ
L No 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1)
Council Directive
91/414/EEC concerning
the placing of plant
products on the market
(OJ L No 230, 19.8.1991,
p. 1)
90
Area
Standard
Occupational
safety
Safety and
health at
work
Date on which
standard
became valid
01.05.2004
Regulations
SLO
Occupational Health and
Safety Act (OJ RS No
56/99, 64/01)
EC
Council Directive
89/391/EEC on the
introduction of measures
to encourage
improvements in the
safety and health of
workers at work (OJ No L
183 of 29. 6. 1989, p. 1)
Single Programming Document 2004-2006
Pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 1320/2006 Slovenia shall transfer a part of commitments
undertaken in the previous programming period for the implementation of the third priority
under the Single Programming Document of the RS 2004-2006 into the programming period
2007-2013. In 2006, in the Decision of the Government of the RS No 55402-1/2006/13
additional entitlements were granted to optimise the drawing on of funds of the third priority
under the SPD, which amount for the EAGGF - Guidance Section approximately EUR5.36 Mio.
These resources shall be disbursed for the commitments under the third SPD priority - EAGGF Guidance Section. The payments under this measure shall be conducted in 2007 and 2008. In
accordance with the Correlation table for measures from Annex II to Regulation 1320/2006
provided for in Regulation 1698/2005 the given resources are included into axis 1 of the RDP
2007-2013.
Agri-environmental measures
Pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation 1320/2006 Slovenia shall transfer the commitments
undertaken in the previous programming period for the implementation of agri-environmental
measures into the programming period 2007-2013. The commitments under this measure shall be
entered by 31.12.2006 and the disbursements conducted in 2007 and 208. The total amount
allocated for the commitments entered in the previous period is EUR 5 Mio. In accordance with
the Correlation table for measures from Annex II to Regulation 1320/2006 provided for in
Regulation 1698/2005 the given resources are included into axis 2 of the RDP 2007-2013.
Cross compliance
Pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation 1320/2006 Slovenia shall transfer the commitments
undertaken in the previous programming period. Fulfilment of the cross compliance provisions is
a condition for granting any support per area under the measures of axis 2. At the national level
the cross compliance requirements are laid down in the Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07,
as amended), which captures the provisions of Regulation 1782/200327.
Support for investments
In support for investments in production, processing and marketing of agricultural and forestry
products the marketing possibilities of the product concerned shall be considered. Support shall
not be granted for investments which would lead to a production above the quotas or other
production limitations emerging from the CAP provisions.
27
Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support
schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending
Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC)
No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ L 270,
21.10.2003, p. 1–69)
91
Products supported under the first pillar of the CAP
Measures under the RDP 2007-2013, pursuant to Article 5(6) of Regulation 1698/2005, are laid
down in a manner providing that the purposes of the support schemes outlined in Annex I of
Regulation 1974/2006 and related to fruit and vegetable, wine, olive oil, hops, cattle and calves,
goats and sheep, beekeeping, sugar and direct payments are not supported under the RDP 20072013, except for exemptions laid down under measure 121 Modernisation of agricultural
holdings.
The criteria and rules confirming that the support under the first CAP pillar outlined in Annex I
to Regulation 1974/2006 do not overlap with the activities under the RDP 2007-2013 are
outlined under each measure in Chapter 5.3. A detailed explanation and demarcation of the first
pillar of the CAP and RDP 2007-2013 measures is given in Chapter 10.
Before the funds under the measures of axis 1 are granted and disbursed, the MAFF and
ARSAMRD shall conduct an administrative control and compliant with the rules also on-thespot checks to avoid potential doubling of funds for the same purpose with CAP measures.
Applicants entitled to aid under the measures of axis 1 of the RDP who already obtained public
funds of the RS or EU funds for the same purpose for which they are applying under the RDP
shall not be eligible for these funds, which the applicants shall confirm in a written statement.
Applicants for support deriving from the RDP 2007-2013 submit individual claims and the
paying agency separately checks the fulfilment of the criteria for the allocation of the resources.
A connection between the direct payments and axis 2 measures exists, which are related due to
the conduction of cross compliance controls.
Verifying the adequacy of payment amount calculations
In cases where setting up of payments for certain measures and activities under axis 2 of the
RDP 2007-2013 requires a preliminary evaluation of costs or income foregone, in accordance
with Articles 48(2) of the decree on the implementation of rural development measures the costs
were evaluated and the calculations drawn up by an independent institution which enables the
verification of the data and calculation baselines relevance.
Other provisions
The measures under the rural development programme do not refer to the defraying of the
interest rate and to other forms of financial transactions referred to in Articles 49 to 52 of the
regulation on the implementation of rural development measures.
92
5.3
Information necessary for axes and measures
5.3.1 Axis 1: Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector
Rationale
In labour productivity Slovenian agriculture and forestry fall behind the average in the economy
as well as the average of these activities in the EU-25. Basic factors having an impact on the low
competitiveness are as follows:
- low education and unfavourable age structure of agricultural holding operators as a factor
diminishing the prospects of farming as a profession and hampering the agriculture
restructuring;
- unfavourable agricultural holding size structure, immense parcel fragmentation and poor land
infrastructure as a factor diminishing the investment capacity of the holdings and thus makes
the adaptation to the stricter environmental, hygiene and other standards difficult, reduces the
innovation and opportunity of introducing new or better technologies and products and thus
the application effectiveness of production factors in agriculture and primary processing;
- large number of small private forest owners with poor equipment for forestry tasks and
insufficiently qualified as a factor hampering better utilisation of the economic potential of
forests and introduction of new products;
- insufficient participation of holdings and production in quality schemes, low share of
marketability and inefficiently market oriented producers within the framework of these
schemes and poor consumer awareness of such products as factors obstructing an increase of
the production and products quality and thus the value added growth in agriculture and food
industry.
- With regard to the natural features Slovenia is a very heterogeneous land. Next to the natural
features the activities structure is also affected by other factors, e.g. the closeness of the
market, economic position of agriculture, age and education structure of farmers and activity
operators, etc.
As regards investments the selection of priority sectors under measures of axis 1 shall be ensured
through public tenders.
Although measures of axis 1 are aimed at increasing the competitiveness of the agricultural,
forestry and food industry sector, this shall not cause environmental pollution, biodiversity
deterioration, habitat loss or decreased natural and landscape diversity. In implementing
measures of axis 1 all provisions and commitments shall be considered which emerge from
Natura 2000 and are outlined in regulations governing environmental protection and spatial
planning. Each investment which represents an activity affecting the environment must be
compliant with the spatial plan preliminarily confirmed by the ministry responsible for
environment and spatial planning. As regards consents for activities affecting the environment
the ministry responsible for environment and spatial planning gives its consent on compliance of
an investment with the regulations governing environmental protection and spatial planning, as
follows:
- At the first stage of administrative ruling the consent is issued by an appropriate
administrative unit, which operates as a field office of the ministry responsible for
environment and spatial planning;
- In the procedures of issuing consents for activities affecting the environment the ministry
responsible for environment and spatial planning functions as appeal body and second
instance.
Objectives
93
The measures and activities under this axis are aimed at increasing the labour productivity in
agriculture and forestry and thus raise the competitiveness level of these sectors, whereby the
activities shall be targeted at:
- raising the qualification level for engagement in agriculture and improving the competence
of farms as well as contributing to the improved value added in agriculture and forestry;
- enhancing investments in agriculture, parcel structure and primary processing aimed at
improve the restructuring of agricultural holdings and food processing establishments and
thus contribute to a better management effectiveness;
- enhancing investments on holdings managing private forests and in micro enterprises for
wood processing, raising the qualification for engagement in forestry and increasing
organised supply of wood assortments to increase the utilisation of economic potentials of
forests and make the adaptation to the market requirements easier, particularly in the light of
the needs for energy from renewable resources and thus contribute to increased value added
in forestry;
- animating producers to participate in quality schemes and increase the production and sale of
higher quality products to raise the quality level of agricultural production and products, to
make the adaptation to the market requirements easier and contribute to increased value
added in agriculture and processing.
Measures and activities
Code
11
111
112
113
12
121
122
123
125
13
132
133
142
Measure
Measures to raise the qualification and strengthen human potential in
agriculture and forestry
Training for persons engaged in agriculture and forestry
Setting up of young farmers
Early retirement of farmers
Measures to restructure physical capital in agriculture and forestry and top
promote the innovation
Modernisation of agricultural holdings
Improving the economic value of forests
Adding value to agricultural and forestry products
Improving and developing infrastructure related to the development and
adaptation of agriculture
Measure to improve the quality of agricultural production and products
Participation of farmers in food quality schemes
Supporting producer groups for information and promotion activities for
products under food quality schemes
Supporting setting up of producer groups
Regulation 1698/2005
Article 20 (a) (i), Article 21
Article 20 (a) (ii), Article 22
Article 20 (a) (iii), Article 23
Article 20 (b) (i), Article 26
Article 20 (b) (ii), Article 27
Article 20 (b) (iii), Article 28
Article 20 (b) (v), Article 30
Article 20 (c) (ii), Article 32
Article 20 (c) (iii), Article 33
Article 20 (d) (ii), Article 35
Next to the specific conditions under each measure the following provisions for the measures
under axis 1 apply accordingly:
-
-
The measures shall be implemented in the RS throughout the programming period.
The measures shall be implemented in accordance with the criteria set as one or multiannual
commitments.
A beneficiary obtaining aid under the measures of axis 1 must keep the required
documentation set out by a call for tender and a contract on granting funds and is to be kept
for at least 5 years after the last disbursement of funds.
Agricultural holdings and other subjects must be recorded in adequate registers and meet all
other conditions in accordance with applicable legislation and tender conditions.
Costs eligible for co-financing are costs arising in the period from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2015.
If an investment or activity has already started in the previous period only the costs arising
from 01.01.2007 onward shall be acknowledged. Preliminary arising general costs related to
the preparation and implementation of an investment or activity shall also be acknowledged
regardless of the date they arose. Detailed provisions for each measure shall be outlined in
94
-
-
-
-
-
the implementation rules.
As eligible costs in investments shall not be deemed: purchase of annual seedlings and
breeding animals, paying of taxes, customs and duties, purchase of transport vehicles, except
the equipment (trailers) for animal transport, current business costs, bank and guarantees
costs, purchase of used machinery and equipment. A project must be concluded before the
last funds disbursement. Detailed provisions as to what is deemed project conclusion for each
measure shall be outlined in the implementation rules.
The beneficiary may not use the investment contrary to the purpose of funds granted.
Durability of activities linked to investments pursuant to the provisions of Article 72 of
Regulation 1698/2005.
Considering force majeure pursuant to the provisions of Article 47 of Regulation 1974/2006.
Based on the investment and technical documentation a beneficiary applying for funds for a
part of an investment must provide an inventory of works and costs for the entire investment,
in case of a phased construction he must provide a proof of the works completed and the
value thereof.
In case of investments in new constructions or a reconstruction of facilities and the purchase
of the corresponding equipment located or to be located in the buildings constructed for other
purposes as well, only the costs, of the total construction or reconstruction costs of the entire
building, in the proportional share with regard to the net surface of the building covered by
the facilities concerned (common use areas, roof, façade, etc.) shall be deemed eligible costs.
Investments in environment friendly technologies shall be given various advantages, e.g.
higher aid share, priority in application selection.
If a beneficiary is deemed contractor in accordance with the rules on public procurement he
must furnish proof that the contractor selection procedure was carried out in accordance with
the Public Procurement Act.
A beneficiary who has already obtained public funds of the RS or EU funds for the same
purpose as given in the application for RDP funds is not eligible for funds.
Measure combinations and demarcation
The delimitation to the measures of other axes is set by the beneficiaries, activities and/or
purposes, as follows:
- Within the range of axis 1 eligible for support are agricultural holdings, food processing
establishments and private forest owners;
- Within the range of axis 1 the support shall be granted for the production of agricultural and
forestry products.
- The support shall be devoted to own primary production. If an investment can be partially
intended for the implementation of other activities as well it shall not be eligible for support
for that particular part under axis 1.
This is clearly evident in case of investments in renewable energy resources. Support may be
granted only for investments in own energy consumption from renewable energy resources,
whereas the sale of energy to other users shall no be supported within the range of the measures
under axis 1. If not otherwise specified for each measure, the application for payments under axis
1 is excluded by applications under other operational programmes, pursuant to the provisions of
Article 70 of Regulation 1698/2005 and of state aid. Before granting each project the MAFF
shall check the data on already obtained public funds for individual project.
Target group
The measures and activities under this axis are intended for natural and legal persons engaged in
agriculture, forestry and processing of agricultural and forestry products by considering the
restrictions and conditions under individual measures or activities.
95
Financial provisions
The measures under 1 are financed by public resources, whereby up to 75 percent of the
resources are co-financed by the EAFRD and at least 25 percent by the national budget of the
RS.
The share of public resources for each measure shall be laid down in a decree governing the
payments for the measures under axes 1, 3 and 4, as well as by calls for tender. The
commitments for granting funds to the beneficiaries may be made up to the amount of opened
resources for each measure. The restriction criteria as a safety mechanism preventing the
available resources from being exceeded shall be outlined by the implementation rules.
General objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
BASELINE INDICATORS
Improving the education and age
structure on agricultural holdings
Share of operators with any agricultural
attainment
Raising the labour productivity in
agriculture
GVA/PMWU in agriculture
GVA/PMWU in agriculture; EU25=100
Gross fixed capital formation in
agriculture
Economic size of agricultural holdings
Raising the labour productivity in
food industry
GVA/PMWU in food industry
Raising the labour productivity in
forestry
GVA/PMWU in forestry
VALUES
Baseline
28%
(2005)
Target (2013)
45%
€5,500
(2004-2005)
32%
(2004-2005)
€199 Mio.
(2004-2005)
€7,400
37%
€227 Mio.
4.6 ESU
(2005)
€23,763
(2004-2005)
5.5 ESU
€15,455
(2004-2005)
€20,100
€28,500
96
5.3.1.1 Measures to raise the qualification and strengthen human potential in agriculture
and forestry
5.3.1.1.1 Training for persons engaged in agriculture and forestry
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (a) (i), Article 21
Measure code: 111
Rationale of the measure:
The education structure of the agricultural holding operators and private forest owners is poor;
however the labour in agriculture and forestry requires new knowledge and skills. For a quicker
development of both sectors a continuous training of producers is necessary in technological as
well as economic field. Higher qualification level contributes to increased labour productivity
and better competitiveness of agricultural holdings.
Objectives
By supporting training actions the qualification level for engagement in agriculture and forestry
shall be raised and education structure improved and thus the labour productivity in agriculture
and forestry raised.
Measure description:
The measure supports the acquisition of new knowledge and vocational education within the
range of training programmes from the field of agriculture and forestry which are not included in
the regular education system. The training must be verifiable by a proof on concluded training.
Within this range support shall be granted for:
- training and vocational qualification acquisition for the measures under axis 1 and 2 relevant
to perform the activities under the RDP 2007-2013 measures and:
• provides for certificate acquisition on vocational qualification in accordance with the
National Vocational Qualifications Act and the Catalogues of professional knowledge and
skill standards, or
• is a condition for obtaining support within the framework of certain measures under axes 1
and 2 of the RDP 2007-2013;
- training for specific skills acquisition in accordance with thematic sets to be set out in call for
tender.
Support for training shall be implemented as financial aid to the beneficiaries to defray training
and examination costs. Proof of participation and successful completion of training or certificate
acquisition must be submitted together with the application.
Training shall be carried out by specially selected institutions which were granted concession
within the framework of the national vocational qualifications system, or by institutions which
shall be selected in a call for tender.
Target group
Beneficiaries are producers engaged in production and processing of agricultural and forestry
products laid down in Annex I to the Treaty and private forest owners.
Financial provisions:
Maximum aid rate amounts up to 100 percent of the eligible costs. Maximum aid amount granted
per person is up to EUR 1,000 annually.
97
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Raising the competence level
of engagement in agriculture
and forestry
Making training and
information actions easier
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Number of participants who
successfully completed training
(acquired certificate)
Number of training participants
Number of training days received
Baseline
0
0
0
VALUES
Target (2013)
10,000
15,500
5,000
98
5.3.1.1.2 Setting up of young farmers
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (a) (ii), Article 22
Measure code: 112
Rationale of the measure:
The age structure of agricultural holding owners in Slovenia is unfavourable and has
deteriorated, which negatively affects farming as profession. Younger farm operators are
generally more qualified for engagement in agriculture and more enterprising and are therefore
able to adapt to the technological changes and market conditions more effectively, which is a
condition for raised labour productivity and competitiveness of agriculture. Often young people
do not decide to take over a farm even if they have an opportunity to do so as this is closely
related to the problem of paying off other heirs and providing the stat-up capital for structural
adaptation of the holding.
Objective
This measure is aimed at promoting the transfer of farms on the younger generation, improving
the age structure of agricultural holding operators, raising the development capacity of farms
taken over and thus contributing to increased labour productivity in agriculture.
Measure description
Support for setting up of young farmers shall be implemented as a single financial aid to enable
easier transfer and structural adaptation of the agricultural holding after the transfer. First
ownership takeover is deemed the first ownership takeover of the entire farm, which is verified
by the ownership right entry into the land register. In case the entry procedure has not yet been
concluded it is sufficient for the fulfilment of the condition to submit the application for entry
into the land register. First ownership takeover is also deemed the takeover of a farm larger than
the farm owned by the young farmer so far and for which the resources have not yet been used
under this measure.
Additionally to the application young farmer must submit a business plan on the development of
the agricultural activity in the transferred agricultural holding, which must contain the following:
- the description of the starting situation on the agricultural holding and of specific needs,
turning points and development goals after the transfer;
- a plan of trainings in case the transferee does not meet the requirements set as regards the
adequate skills and qualification;
- an investment plan in case investments are necessary for the realisation of the development
goals set after the transfer.
Based on the submitted business plan a young farmer may apply for support under the following
measures as well:
- under measure 111: Training for persons engaged in agriculture for the acquisition of
adequate vocational knowledge and qualification;
- under measure 121: Modernisation of agricultural holdings for planned investments on
agricultural holding if the business plan contains the information required for this measure
and if the investment is to be implemented within five years from the first ownership
takeover.
General conditions:
- At submitting the application the agricultural holding must poses at least 3 ha of comparable
agricultural land, except in cases of farms engaged in intensive plant production, beekeeping,
or poultry rearing for meat or eggs production, rabbit rearing for meat production or intensive
99
-
-
-
-
-
rearing of cattle, equines, pigs or sheep and goats. In such cases at submitting the application
the beneficiary must possess at least 40 bee families and/or must rear a minimum of:
 1000 chicken broilers or 200 turkeys per cycle, or 400 laying poultry,
 or 50 breeding females or 200 broilers per cycle in case of rabbit rearing for meat
production, or
 5 LUs for intensive rearing of cattle, equines, pigs or sheep and goats.
The ownership takeover of the farm must be conducted up to 18 months prior to the issuing
of the decision.
At the application submission the entire farm must be taken over by the young farmer or by
the young farmer and his/her spouse from marital or non-marital relationship. Excluded may
be agricultural or forestry land in the size of 0.5 hectares comparable agricultural land to be
kept by the transferor or for disbursing heirs, by considering the conditions that after
depreciation of this agricultural land the agricultural holding still must meet the requirement
on the minimum amount of comparable agricultural land possessed.
At the application submission young farmer must have adequate vocational knowledge and
qualification. The condition is fulfilled if the young transferee has:
completed at least primary education, had minimum 5 years of work experience in
agriculture and acquired the national vocational qualification in agriculture or farming
related activities,
or completed at least vocational education in agriculture or farming related activities and
had minimum 3 years of experience in work on farm.
Inasmuch a young farmer does not fulfil the conditions on adequate vocational knowledge
and qualification at the time of the application submission he must fulfil these requirements
within 36 months from the issuing of the notification on funds grant provided that these
needs are outlined in the business plan.
A beneficiary obtaining aid under this measure must establish a business result monitoring
system in one year after receiving the funds at the latest and must monitor the business
results for at least five years after receiving the disbursement of funds under this measure.
Young farmer undertakes to remain the operator and owner of the agricultural holding for at
least 5 years from receiving the aid under this measure.
If, based on a control conducted not later than 3 years after receiving the decision on funds
grant under this measure, young farmer does not fulfil the requirements set out in the
business plan, he shall have to return all funds obtained under this measure. In case the
business plan envisages investments as well and the young farmer obtained funds under the
measure 121: Modernisation of agricultural holdings, the goals set out in the business plan
must be fulfilled not later than within five years from issuing of the decision on funds grant
under this measure. In case he did not obtain funds at a call for tender within the framework
of other measures for which he applied in accordance with the business plan, or obtained
them outside the time frame set out in the business plan, it is considered that he did not
breach the provisions of the business plan.
Target group
The beneficiaries are young farmers over 18 years and less than 40 years of age or turning 40 in
the year of the call for tender was published, which have taken over an agricultural holding as
operators for the first time.
Financial provisions
The support shall be provided as single financial aid. The aid amount is based on points achieved
in the evaluation of submitted applications, which shall fulfil the conditions set and may amount
up to EUR 40,000 per beneficiary. The point system shall consider the marketing and economic
production elements as well as the development, regional, social and environmental aspects of
the farm and the costs of the farm transfer.
100
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Increasing the development
capacity of transferred farms
GVA on holdings supported
(index)
Ease farm transfer and structural
adaptation after the transfer
Total number of assisted young
farmers
Total volume of investments
VALUES
Baseline
Target (2013)
100
120
0
1,200
0
€50 Mio.
101
5.3.1.1.3 Early retirement of farmers
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (a) (iii), Article 23
Measure code: 113
Rationale of the measure:
The average age of farm holders in Slovenia is over 56 years. The share of persons over 55 years
is more than 55 percent and is not decreasing. Older farm holders find it difficult to transfer their
farms to younger farmers. Not transferring agricultural holdings to the younger generation
indirectly diminishes the development capacity of farms and obstructs the process of
concentration and consolidation of agriculture. By encouraging older farmers to stop farming
early and transfer their farm to a younger farmer a new job on farm has indirectly been created.
Objective
The measure is aimed at enhancing structural changes on agricultural holdings, improving the
age structure of farm operators and increasing the development capacity of the transferred farms
and thus contributing to increased labour productivity in agriculture.
Measure description
The measure is implemented as annuity to older farmers for stopping the gainful agricultural and
forestry activity on agricultural holding due to the transfer of the holding to the younger, more
active generation or any other transferee who increases his holding through the transfer. The
condition is also fulfilled if in exceptional cases, e.g. death of transferee, the agricultural holding
is temporarily transferred to the Farmland and Forest Fund of the RS, until new transferee is
found, but not longer than for the period of one year.
The transferor may not be less than 57 years and may not be yet retired. The total period of
obtaining support under this measure is 10 years and no longer than until the transferor reaches
the age of 70 years. When the transferor begins to obtain the pension under the national pension
scheme, the pension is subtracted from the early retirement support.
The transferor must
- irrevocably quit gainful activity related to agriculture and forestry;
- have farmed on the agricultural holding to be transferred at least for the last 10 years;
- have pension and disability insurance under the heading agriculture for at least the last 7
years.
The transferee must
- succeed the transferor by taking over the agricultural holding;
- be older than 18 years and have at least 5 years of experience in farming or 3 year in case he
has completed at least agriculture or farming related specialised school.
The transferor must transfer the entire agricultural holding to the selected transferee. In case
there is more than one farm owner (transferors) and they all fulfil the requirements under this
measure, they split the annuity with regard to their farm share. In case there is more than one
farm owner (transferors) and only one of them fulfils the requirements under this measure, only
the transferor fulfilling the conditions obtains the annuity for the entire agricultural holding
transferred. In case of the death of the transferor the annuity may be transferred to his spouse or
non-marital partner or children if they have no sources of income of their own providing for
social security.
102
The size of the agricultural holding to be transferred must not be less than 5 hectares of
comparable agricultural land. The transferor may keep no more than 0.5 hectare comparable
agricultural land at the most for his own needs and the accommodation facility.
Target group
Beneficiaries under this measure are farmers engaged in agricultural and forestry activity who
are more than 57 years old and not yet retired.
Financial provisions
Financial aid is provided as annual annuity disbursed monthly. It comprises of a fixed part,
amounting to EUR 5,000 per farm annually, and a variable part which depends on the size of the
agricultural holding transferred. The variable part is calculated on the basis of the actual use of
the comparable agricultural land in the year of entering the measure. For each hectare of
transferred comparable agricultural land the amount of EUR 300 per hectare annually is paid, but
maximum for 20 ha of comparable agricultural land. If the transferred farm is larger, the entire
land must be transferred, but the annuity does not increase. The total amount of the annuity
obtained in the entire period may not exceed EUR 110,000 per transferor.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Increasing the farm
development capacity
Enhancing structural changes
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
GVA on holdings supported
(index)
Total number of farmers early
retired
Total extent of agricultural and
forest land released
Baseline
100
VALUES
Target (2013)
120
0
210
0
2,226 ha
103
5.3.1.2 Measures to restructure physical capital in agriculture and forestry and top promote
the innovation
5.3.1.2.1 Modernisation of agricultural holdings
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (b) (i), Article 26
Measure code: 121
Rationale of the measure:
Low labour productivity is to a great extent a result of unfavourable agricultural holding size
structure and low specialisation level and frequently by out-dated fixed assets. The improvement
of the competitiveness of agriculture is closely related to the investments in fixed assets on
agricultural holdings providing better utilisation of production factors and better labour
productivity. Particularly on smaller holdings (below 15 LU) the compliance of the facilities
with the requirements of the newly introduced standard on animal welfare is problematic.
Additionally, in Slovenia great dependence on natural conditions has been registered, which
additionally diminishes the competitiveness of the agricultural sector. In future, the adaptation to
the new climate conditions shall play a key role in further development of agricultural sector.
With measures under the first pillar of the agricultural policy no overlapping with investments
under this measure is expected. Nevertheless, within the scope of areas Fruit and vegetables and
Hop, pursuant to Article 5, paragraph 6 of Regulation 1698/2005, in relation to Article 2,
paragraph 2 of Regulation 1974/2006, recognised producer organisations and groups with
preliminary recognition or their members are granted an exemption and may apply for support
under this measure. Support shall be granted for investments types of agricultural holdings,
which may also be obtained under operational programmes under the first pillar of the CAP, but
only for investments for which more than EUR3,500 of support from public resources is
obtained. Operational programmes under the first pillar of the CAP shall support investments
amounting to less than EUR3,500 of support from public resources. In case of aforementioned
sectors nets against hail are supported under the RDP 2007-2013 and not under the first pillar of
the CAP. Exemption is allowed also to beekeepers for investments in the apiculture sector.
Investments in equipment purchase, supported within the framework of Technical assistance
under the Apiculture programme of Slovenia for the period 2008-2010, which was adopted on
19.06.2007 by the Management Committee for Poultry meat and Eggs, shall not be supported
under this measure. A special attention will be made to the amount of support given for honey
ensuring there is no overlapping with aid granted on measures improving general conditions for
the production and marketing of apiculture products following Council Regulation (EC) Nº
797/2004.
Prior to granting and disbursing funds under this measure, the ARSAMRD, which implements
all MAFF measures of the first pillar of the CAP as well as of the rural development, shall
conduct a centralised administrative control and if required on-the-spot visit to prevent potential
doubling of funds for the same purpose with measures under the CAP. Beneficiaries for aid
under this measure who already obtained public funds of the RS or EU funds for the same
purpose for which they are applying under the RDP shall not be eligible for these funds, which
the applicants shall confirm with a written statement.
Although the measure is aimed at increasing the competitiveness of the agricultural sector, this
shall not cause environmental pollution, biodiversity deterioration, habitat loss or decreased
natural and landscape diversity. In implementing the investments the provisions emerging from
Natura 2000 shall be considered at all times. Agricultural holdings located in the Natura 2000
sites or in water protection areas linked to Directive 2000/60/EC shall be granted a higher aid
share, which shall contribute that in these areas farming and consequently biodiversity arising
104
from traditional use shall be preserved.
Specific objectives
The support for modernisation of agricultural holdings is aimed at enhancing the restructuring
and increasing the management efficiency by:
- introducing new products, technologies and production improvements;
- qualifying agricultural holdings for meeting newly introduced minimum standards of the
Community , for improving the environmental protection, hygiene and safety at work;
- stabilising the income on agricultural holdings,
and thus contribute to increased investment capacity or labour productivity in agriculture.
Measure description
The support shall be granted for investments in own primary production of agricultural products
as laid down in Annex I to the Treaty, including investments intended for conducting agricultural
mechanisation services. Within the range of this measure support shall be granted for
investments of individual agricultural holdings (individual investments) as well as investments
conducted by two or more agricultural holdings organised as agricultural holding associations
and registered in accordance with the regulations governing companies or cooperatives (joint
investments).
The investment must contribute to improved overall performance of the agricultural holding and
comply with the minimum standards of the Community. The improved performance of the
agricultural holding must be evident from the application form for simple investments and for
demanding investments from the business plan. Simple investments are deemed projects the total
value of which does not exceed EUR 50,000 per project. The support shall be devoted to
agricultural holdings which make an appropriate gross income from the agricultural activity or
from the agricultural, forestry and subsidiary activities on farms per unit of labour input at the
time of the application submission. Appropriate gross income is deemed the income of 1 gross
minimum salary per employee in the RS in the year before the year of the call for tender.
In case that at the application submission an agricultural holding does not conduct agricultural
activity the appropriate income referred to in the previous paragraph must be achieved not later
than at the conclusion of the investment.
For investments aimed at meeting the Community standards support may be granted only to
investments aimed at adapting agricultural holdings to the requirements of the newly introduced
minimum standards. In this case agricultural holdings are permitted a period of grace to adapt to
the standard, which may not exceed 36 months from the date on which the standard becomes
mandatory for the agricultural holding.
Young farmers obtaining support under the measure 112: Setting up of young farmers may be
granted support for investments to qualify for meeting the existing Community standards if these
investments are outlined in the business plan. The period of grace to meet the standards may not
exceed 36 months from the date of the first ownership takeover by the young farmer.
Supported shall be the following types of investments:
- investments in stables with corresponding interior equipment (production, feeding, milking
and secretion equipment) for milk, eggs and meat production; at the level of individual
beneficiaries the production restrictions apply which emerge from the market organisation;
- investments in fodder storage facilities and corresponding equipment;
- investments in other facilities for production, storing and preparation of agricultural products
for the market as well as for the direct on-farm sale of agricultural products and
corresponding equipment;
- investments in facilities and corresponding equipment for honey production and other bee
products as well as bee queen breeding, except the equipment to be supported within the
105
-
-
-
range of the technical assistance for support under the first CAP pillar (Programme of the
beekeeping measures in Slovenia 2008-2010 or later);
investments in facilities and corresponding equipment for storing of agricultural
mechanisation intended for own primary production on agricultural holding or for conducting
agricultural mechanisation services;
investments in purchase and setting up of greenhouses and corresponding equipment;
purchase of agricultural mechanisation and equipment intended for own primary production
and/or services with agricultural mechanisation, storage and marketing of agricultural
products;
purchase of agricultural land which does not exceed 10 percent of the total investment value;
first setting up or restructuring of orchards, olive groves and hop gardens;
purchase and setting up of nets against hail;
investments in setting up of pastures and pens for controlled pasture of domestic animals and
farmed game;
investments in agri-amelioration works on agricultural holdings, within the range of
conducted consolidations;
investments in irrigation infrastructure for irrigation systems in private property, including
the construction of corresponding water resources;
investments in renewable sources of energy for agricultural holdings needs;
investments in road and water infrastructure on agricultural holdings (field paths, access
roads, trails in permanent plantations).
Eligible costs:
- acquisition, construction and improvement costs of real estates, agricultural land,
infrastructure and corresponding equipment for agricultural production on agricultural
holding;
- purchase costs of new mechanisation and equipment and computer hard- and software;
- contributions in kind;
- costs related to the agricultural holding management and the purchase of corresponding
computer hard- and software;
- general costs related to the preparation and implementation of projects.
Target group
Beneficiaries are agricultural holdings engaged in agricultural activity or agricultural
mechanisation services and fulfilling the conditions set.
Demarcation
The investments under this measure are delimited to other RDP 2007-2013 measures and other
operational programmes by the designation of the beneficiaries, activities and/or purposes, as
follows:
- eligible for support are only agricultural holdings;
- support is allocated for investments in the primary production of agricultural products. In
cases of investments which can be partially intended for the implementation of other
activities, this particular part of the activities shall not be supported under this measure.
This is clearly evident in case of investments in renewable energy sources. Support may be
granted only for investments in own energy consumption from renewable energy resources on
the agricultural holding, whereas the sale of energy to other users or mare use in own household
shall no be supported within the range of this measure. The claim for aid disbursement under this
measure is delimited from the claims under other OPs and states aids. Under this measure only
investments in private infrastructure and/or arrangement of access to the public infrastructure on
the agricultural holding shall be supported, whereby overlapping with measure 125 is avoided.
106
Financial provisions
Financial support is allocated in the form of non-refundable funds. The maximum aid rate
amounts up to 40 percent of the acknowledged investment value. When a beneficiary applies for
investments under the heading young farmer in accordance with the provisions of measure 112:
Setting up of young farmers, the co-financing rate amounts up to 60 percent of the acknowledged
investment value for investments of agricultural holdings located in areas referred to in Article
36(a)(i), (ii) and (iii), or up to 50 percent of the acknowledged investment value for investments
of agricultural holdings located outside areas referred to in Article 36(a)(i), (ii) and (iii).
When a beneficiary claims a higher aid share for investments of agricultural holdings in areas
referred to in Article 36(a)(i), (ii) and (iii), the co-financing rate amounts up to 50 percent of the
acknowledged investment value.
In case of agricultural mechanisation purchase the aid rate amounts up to 30 percent of the
acknowledged investment value, regardless of the beneficiary status. If purchasing special
mechanisation for farming in mountain areas the aid rate amounts up to 40 percent of the
acknowledged investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 3.500 per project. Maximum aid amount granted is EUR
1,000,000 per project. In the programming period 2007-2013 an agricultural holding may obtain
maximum EUR 2,000,000 public aid under this measure.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Enhancing the introduction of
new products, technologies or
production improvements on
agricultural holdings
Qualifying agricultural
holdings to meet newly
introduced minimum
standards of the Community,
for improving the
environmental protection,
hygiene and safety at work
Stabilising the income in
agricultural holdings
Increasing the development
capacity of agricultural
holdings and the performance
of the use of production
factors
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Number of agricultural holdings
introducing new products
and/or techniques
Number of agricultural holdings
adapted to the newly introduced
minimum Community standards
Agricultural land on which the
investment has stabilised the
income from agricultural
activity
Gross value added on
agricultural holdings supported
(index)
Total number of agricultural
holdings supported
Total investment value
Baseline
0
VALUES
Target (2013)
490
0
1,225
0
1,000 ha
100
130
0
2,450
0
€164.7 Mio.
107
5.3.1.2.2 Improving the economic value of forests
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (b) (ii), Article 27
Measure code: 122
Rationale of the measure:
Nearly 60 percent of the entire surface of Slovenia is covered by forests. Therefore Slovenian
forestry has an important impact on the economic vitality of the entire rural area. Due to the outdated means of work by private forest owners and poor technical equipment for work in forests
the utilisation of the economic potential of forests and thus the income from forestry is low. In
addition thereto, there are many accidents and injuries at work in forests. An important factor
diminishing the income in forestry is insufficient openness of forests with forest roads. Better
openness of forests reduces the costs of obtaining wood and thus provides for increased income
from forest.
For better safety at work in forests and better utilisation of forests, which also creates
opportunities for the diversification of production and introduction of new forestry products
investments in private forests in particular are necessary.
Although the activities under this measure are aimed at increasing the economic value of forests,
this shall not cause environmental pollution, biodiversity deterioration, habitat loss or decreased
natural and landscape diversity. In implementing the activities under this measure all provisions
and commitments emerging from Natura 2000 shall be considered.
Objectives
The support is aimed at improving the performance of the private forests management through:
- increased utilisation of the production potential of forests;
- introduction of new products and production improvements in felling and extraction;
- increased safety at work in forests,
and thus contributes to increased labour productivity in forestry in accordance with the
objectives of the national and EU forestry strategy.
Measure description
In the field of investments in private forests the following investments shall be eligible for
support:
- in purchase of mechanisation for wood felling and extraction, provided the beneficiary fells
and/or extracts minimum 150 m3 of wood annually, in machinery felling minimum 2,500 m3
of wood annually;
- in purchase of equipment for wood felling and extraction, provided the beneficiary fells
and/or extracts minimum 150 m3 of wood annually or owns at least 3 ha of forest;
- in construction and reconstruction of forest tracks, provided the forest track enables annual
extraction of at least 3 m3 of wood per 100 m of the forest track;
- in construction and reconstruction of forest roads, provided the forest road enables annual
transport of at least 10 m3 of wood per 100 m of the forest road.
Support to investments in construction or reconstruction of forest roads must comply with
applicable forest management plan; whereas support to investments in felling and extraction of
wood and for forest tracks must comply with the silvicultural plan. For forest roads and tracks
appropriate permits must be obtained and a calculation of extraction costs reduction made, which
is to be drawn up by the SFI.
Eligible costs regarding investments in private forests are:
–
costs of new mechanisation and equipment purchase;
108
–
–
–
–
costs of purchase of personal protection equipment for work with machinery and equipment;
costs of training for work with mechanisation or equipment which is the subject of the
investment;
costs of construction, reconstruction of forest roads or tracks and equipment therefore,
including the contribution in kind by the beneficiary (own work of the investor confirmed by
the SFS and the value of the land on which the traffic route shall be built);
general costs related to the preparation and implementation of projects.
Target group
Beneficiaries for support to investments in private forests are private forest owners or co-owners,
their associations, municipalities and their associations.
Demarcation
In case of investments in forest roads and private tracks, under this measure investments on
private land are supported. The OP (ERDF) supports local roads, which are public infrastructure.
Financial provisions
Financial aid is provided as non-repayable funds. For investments in private forests the
maximum aid rate amounts to:
- for less favoured areas and Natura 2000 sites: up to 60 percent of the acknowledged
investment value;
- for areas outside these areas: up to 50 percent of the acknowledged investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR500 and maximum aid amount granted up to EUR 500,000.
In the whole programming period 2007-2013 a beneficiary may obtain maximum EUR 500,000
of aid under this measure.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Improving the management
performance of private forests
Raising the economic value of
private forests
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICTORS
Number
of
forest
owners
introducing new products or
production improvements
Number of forest owners and their
associations improving the safety
at work in forest
GVA of private forest owners
supported (index)
Total number of forest owners
supported (investments in private
forests)
Total value of investments in
increasing the economic value of
forests
Baseline
0
VALUES
Target (2013)
490
0
490
100
120
0
3,276
0
€49.9 Mio.
109
5.3.1.2.3 Adding value to agricultural and forestry products
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 20 (b) (iii), Article 28
Measure code: 123
Rationale of the measure:
Efficient performance of the food processing industry is vital for the existence of the primary
agricultural production. The food processing industry is equally dispersed throughout the country
and plays an important role in the job preservation and creation. It functions as a factor of
production stability and economic development alongside the entire food chain. Investments in
the food processing establishments are necessary in the light of the productivity growth and thus
to the competitiveness of the entire sector as well as in the light of the required adaptation to
stricter hygiene and environmental standards.
The processing of agricultural products conducted as additional and subsidiary on-farm
activity represents an important source of income, particularly on small family farms, provides
for their existence and has positive impacts on the vitality of rural areas.
In the first processing stage and marketing of wood, where for quite some time poor
competitiveness and low performance of micro enterprises is evident, technological
modernisation and networking can ensure better competitiveness and source of income, in
particular since lately the demand for products of the first stage of wood processing has
increased.
Objective
Support for adding value to agricultural and forestry products is aimed at:
- the introduction of new products and efficient marketing of the products;
- the modernisation of production processes and the improvement of environmental
protection, hygiene and safety at work;
- income stabilisation in the field of processing and marketing of agricultural and forestry
products,
and thus contribute to a better overall labour efficiency and productivity.
Measure description
As regards the processing of agricultural and forestry products support shall be granted to
investments related to:
a) processing and marketing of products outlined in Annex I to the Treaty (hereafter
referred to as agricultural products), except fish products and products skimming and
supplementing milk and milk products;
b) processing and marketing of other products, the raw material of which are agricultural
products;
c) first stage of wood processing and marketing.
The investment must contribute to an improved overall performance of enterprises and comply
with the minimum standards of the Community applying for such an investment. Improved
performance of the enterprise must be evident from the application form for simple investments
and for demanding investments from the business plan. Simple investments are deemed projects
the total value of which does not exceed EUR 80,000 per project. In case of demanding
investments the beneficiary must draw up a business plan to prove the economic eligibility for
investments.
As regards investments aimed at meeting the Community standards aid may be granted only to
those carried out by micro enterprises and which were implemented with the purpose of meeting
the newly introduced standards of the Community, in a period which may not exceed 36 months
110
from the date on which the standard becomes mandatory for the enterprise.
Support shall not be granted to enterprises in difficulty in the sense of the Community guidelines
on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty.
The beneficiaries under the measure must fulfil all conditions to perform a certain activity in
accordance with the applicable legislation.
Support shall be granted to:
- investments in the purchase, construction and renovation of real estates;
- investments in the purchase of machinery and equipment as well as computer hard- and
software;
- investments in equipment for production of energy from renewable resources for own needs;
- general costs related to the preparation and realisation of projects, including costs of training
for work with machinery or equipment which is the subject of the investment;
- purchase of patents and licences directly related to the implementation of a project.
Target group
Beneficiaries in the field of processing of agricultural products are:
- micro, small and medium sized enterprises registered for food processing activity as well as
large enterprises with the same activity, provided they employ less than 750 employees or
their annual turnover is under EUR 200 Mio.;
- members of a farm household engaged in the processing of agricultural products in
accordance with the Agriculture Act;
- privately owned alps engaged in milk production.
Beneficiaries in the field of the first stage of wood processing are:
- micro enterprises;
- members of an agricultural holding on farm engaged in the activity of wood processing in
accordance with the applicable legislation.
Processing establishments on agricultural holdings are deemed micro enterprises, provided they
employ less than 10 persons and have less than EUR 2,000,000 turnover.
Demarcation
Investments under this measure are delimited from other RDP measures and other operational
programmes through the designation of the beneficiaries, activities and/or purposes, as follows:
- Eligible for support are food and wood processing establishments.
- Support is allocated for investments in the processing and marketing of agricultural products
and products raw materials of which are agricultural products. In cases of investments which
can be partially intended for the implementation of other activities, the particular part of
those activities shall not be supported under this measure. This is clearly evident in case of
investments in renewable energy sources. Support may be granted only for investments in
own energy consumption from renewable energy resources in the processing establishment,
whereas the sale of energy to other users shall no be supported within the range of this
measure.
- Under this measure support shall be allocated to the first stage of wood processing under the
statistical classification of activities (SCA) SORS 20.10. Other processing is supported under
measures 311 Diversification into non-agricultural activities and 312 Support for the creation
and development of micro enterprises.
The claim for aid disbursement under this measure is delimited from the claims under other OPs
and states aids.
111
Financial provisions
Financial aid shall be granted as non-repayable funds. Support for micro, small and medium
sized enterprises in the sense of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC shall amount up to
50 percent of the acknowledged investment value. In case of enterprises which are not covered
by Article 2 (1) of the aforementioned Recommendation, with less than 750 employees and
turnover under EUR 200 Mio. the aid intensity is cut in half.
A higher share of support, but not higher than 50 percent of the acknowledged investment value,
is granted when a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise applies for support in investments in
products raw material of which are agricultural products from organic production.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 3,500 and maximum aid amount granted for different
investment types is as follows:
a) for processing and marketing of products outlined in Annex I to the Treaty (hereafter
referred to as agricultural products), except fish products and products skimming and
supplementing milk and milk products, up to EUR1,800,000. In the entire programming
period 2007-2013 a beneficiary may obtain maximum EUR4,000,000 under this measure.
b) For processing and marketing of other products and/or raw materials from renewable
energy sources, the raw material of which are agricultural products, up to EUR200,000 in
the last three budget years.
c) First stage of wood processing and marketing up to EUR200,000 in the last three budget
years.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Enhancing the modernisation
and increasing the
performance of processing of
agricultural products
Improving the processing and
marketing of agricultural
products
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Number of establishments
introducing new products or
production improvements
Total GVA in establishments
supported (index)
Number of food establishments
supported
Total number of supported
micro enterprises and farm
households (investments in the
first stage of wood processing)
Total volume of investments
Baseline
0
VALUES
Target (2013)
100
100
130
0
450
0
126
€227.1 Mio.
112
5.3.1.2.5 Improving and developing infrastructure related to the development and adaptation
of agriculture
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (b) (v), Article 30
Measure code: 125
Rationale of the measure:
Next to the unfavourable size structure one of the main development problems of Slovenian
agriculture is land and parcel dispersion. The bad size and property structure significantly
contribute to the high costs of land utilisation per area unit and thus to lower economic
performance of the agricultural production. The unfavourable property structure represents a
major obstacle in further development of agriculture and hinders faster restructuring as well as
reduces the competitiveness at the level of individual agricultural holdings as well as at the level
of agriculture as a whole.
The agriculture is increasingly facing the consequences of the climate change. As a result of the
limited extent of irrigated areas the extended drought periods cause a high loss of the produce,
which has negative impacts on the amount and the stability of the income in agriculture. The
study on the feasibility of the national irrigation programme in Slovenia, conducted under the
auspices of the World Bank in 1999, showed that in the light of the environment and the
availability of water resources in areas under fruit and vegetables production, nurseries and
production of other products, the establishment of irrigation systems is necessary for the stability
and the quality of the production.
The design of the existing hydro-melioration systems is technologically inadequate, which
diminishes the economic performance of agricultural production and excessive consumption of
water in these areas.
Although the activities under this measure are aimed at restructuring the agriculture, which leads
to more efficient utilisation of production factors and thus increased income and labour
productivity, this restructuring shall not cause environmental pollution, biodiversity
deterioration, habitat loss or decreased natural and landscape diversity. In implementing the
activities under this measure all provisions and commitments emerging from Natura 2000 shall
be considered.
Objectives
By investing in land infrastructure the measure is aimed at accelerating the restructuring of the
agriculture, leading to a more efficient utilisation of production factors and thus to increased
income and labour productivity; within the range of the technical upgrading of the existing
amelioration systems and the construction of new irrigation systems as well as more rational
water consumption and more controlled input of nutrients. The implementation of the measures
related to irrigation is strictly linked to the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).
Measure description
Under this measure the following activities shall be performed:
- land consolidations carried out on the basis of the regulation governing agricultural land
arrangement (considering the past experience support to the conduction of land consolidation
is envisaged in the land consolidation areas which shall not exceed 300 ha on average);
- construction and arrangement of new infrastructure necessary in relation to the land
consolidation, and foreseen in the idea design of consolidation area arrangement and directly
related to agriculture);
- construction and upgrading of large irrigation systems based on the regulation governing the
agricultural land arrangement, whereby preferential treatment shall be devoted to
113
-
technological upgrading of irrigation systems;
technological revitalisation of water amelioration systems based on regulations governing the
agricultural land arrangement, facilities construction and spatial planning;
construction of demonstration irrigation centres intended for education and certification of
irrigation system users with focus on technologies for reduction of water consumption and
land application of nitrates and pesticides.
Support for investments in land infrastructure is provided on the basis of proof on the economic
eligibility of the investment. In investments in irrigation systems the verified internal
profitability grade must amount to at least 6.5. In accordance with the national and Community
legislation any spatial intervention is allowed on the basis of obtained mandatory permissions
together with consistent consideration of requirements under the Water Framework Directive and
Habitat Directive. In case of land operations representing spatial intervention, under the
applicable legislation for obtaining construction licence, it is necessary to draw up an assessment
of impacts on the environment and to obtain nature protection consent, for irrigation systems also
water consent.
Issuing of construction licence for a certain spatial intervention requires that the purpose is
clearly indicated and permitted in all documents and permissions. To obtain water permission,
which is a mandatory document for issuing of construction licence, it is necessary to conduct
analyses of water source availability by considering the requirements on the application of
technologically advanced equipment providing reduced consumption of water and electricity.
Co-financed shall be:
- all construction, geodetic and other craft services;
- costs of land purchase for joint facilities and infrastructure (pumping stations, transformer
stations, water collector, expanding of amelioration ditches for the purposes of the ecoremediation, for wind protection stripes);
- technical equipment of demonstration irrigation centres and irrigation equipment including
delivery and mounting costs;
- general costs directly related to the preparation and implementation of projects.
Target group
- applicants for support to carrying out of land consolidation and/or construction and
arrangements of the emerging new infrastructure envisaged in the idea plan for the
arrangement of the land consolidation area are municipalities in which the land consolidation
is carried out; the final beneficiaries of the effects of the non-repayable funds granted are the
owners of the consolidated land;
- applicants for support to investments in large irrigation systems and the upgrading of hydroamelioration systems are natural or legal persons authorised by the land owners to run the
investment; the final beneficiaries of the effects of the non-repayable funds granted are the
land owners or multiannual leaseholders who shall use these systems;
- applicants for support to the construction of the demonstration irrigation centres are
adequately registered legal persons which shall be selected in a public tender to perform the
works.
Demarcation
RDP 2007-2013
Under this measure the support shall be devoted to the construction and arrangement of new
infrastructure the construction of which was necessary for the conduction of consolidations,
however only in cases the construction is located or carried out in the area where land
consolidation is conducted. The infrastructure is to be established on the basis of the regulation
governing the agricultural land arrangement. The infrastructure must be envisaged in the idea
114
design of consolidation area arrangement and be directly related to the development of
agriculture or forestry. The infrastructure outlined in the idea design of consolidation area
arrangement which is not directly related to the development of agriculture (e.g. cycling tracks
and other recreation facilities, thematic tracks, park arrangement, etc.) is not eligible for support
under this measure. This infrastructure is supported under the measure 322: Village renewal and
development.
Other operational programmes
The infrastructure construction under this measure is delimited to the infrastructure arrangement
under other operational programmes in a manner in which under this measure only infrastructure
is supported which is located in areas where land consolidation is conducted and that it regards
the infrastructure which is basically intended for the development of agriculture and forestry.
Financial provisions:
The financial aid is granted as non-repayable funds. The share of public financing amounts up to
100 percent of the acknowledged costs. Minimum amount of aid granted is EUR 20,000 and the
maximum amount of aid granted is EUR 1,500,000; in case of irrigation systems, including the
conduction of a water source for irrigation purposes only, those investments showing the internal
profitability grade of at least 11.5.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Enhancing the
restructuring of
agricultural holdings
Increasing the range of
irrigated and hydromeliorated land and thus
reduce the dependency of
production from the natural
conditions
Improving the land holding
structure
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Total GVA on holdings
where operations were
conducted
Number of operations
supported
Total extent of supported
operations
Areas equipped with water
gauges
Total volume of investments
Number of operations
supported
Average parcel size within
consolidation area
Number of parcels within
consolidation area
Total volume of investments
VALUES
Baseline
Target (2013)
100
120
0
45
4,000 ha
400 ha
3,400 ha
0
€26.2 Mio.
50
100%
200%
100%
50%
€17.4 Mio.
115
5.3.1.3 Measure to improve the quality of agricultural production and products
5.3.1.3.2 Participation of farmers in food quality schemes
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (c) (ii), Article 32
Measure code: 132
Rationale of the measure
Slovenia has established a quality scheme system for producers ensuring that the quality of their
agricultural products and foodstuffs is of higher quality than the standard quality and that they
are produced under a certain method. Participation in quality scheme is related to additional costs
and obligations which are usually not entirely reimbursed by the market and which often
represents an obstacle for a quicker and more better participation of producers in these schemes.
More intensive participation of farmers in the quality schemes creates new marketing
opportunities and thus indirectly contributes to increased income and consequently to better
competitiveness of the agricultural sector.
Objective
The measure is aimed at encouraging agricultural producers to participate in the quality schemes
which stand for improved quality of the agricultural production and products and thus contribute
to increased value added in agriculture.
Measure description
Support for agricultural producers participating in quality schemes is granted as annual payment,
a compensation for fixed costs related to the integration and participation in the quality schemes.
Support is granted for a period of 5 years at the most. Quality schemes supported under this
measure are as follows:
 Community quality schemes (Regulations 509/200628, 510/200629 and 2092/9130):
- special agricultural products and foodstuffs (protected designation of origin or geographical
origin; protected geographical indication or geographical indication; traditional specialty
guaranteed or traditional reputation);
-
organic production and processing;
 acknowledged national quality schemes:
-
integrated production;
-
higher quality.
Support shall be granted for agricultural products outlined in Annex I to the Treaty and the
Annexes to Regulations 509/2006, 510/2006 and 2092/91, except for fish products. Eligible for
geographical denominations and traditional speciality guaranteed are those agricultural products
which are on the day of application submission of single beneficiary entered in the EU register.
28
Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional
specialities guaranteed (OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1–11)
29
Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and
designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12–25)
30
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 of 24 June 1991 on organic production of agricultural products and
indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 198, 22.7.1991, p. 1–15)
116
Eligible for higher quality are those agricultural products which are on the day of application
submission of single beneficiary entered in the national register.
Support shall be devoted to agricultural producers producing agricultural products and foodstuffs
in accordance with the regulations and rules governing the aforementioned quality schemes.
Regardless of the quality scheme type, the common condition to be fulfilled by all agricultural
holdings is to furnish proof that the producer group or agricultural holding has applied for
certification procedure, or in case of already concluded certification procedure to furnish a copy
of the certificate or proof of successfully completed inspection.
Obtained certificate for production of special agricultural products and foodstuffs under the
Community quality schemes assures the consumer that the products were produced in
accordance with the requirements under the specification which is an integral part of the
registration procedure for every product. At the first stage the registration procedure, which
simultaneously represents the protection of the name of a certain product, is performed by the
MAFF, whereas the registration applies only in the RS. When the registration is also confirmed
by the European Commission, the product is also protected in the entire EU. Under the organic
production and processing scheme product registration is not required. For these products the
certification is enough.
Obtained certificate for integrated production under the national quality scheme assures the
consumer that the products were produced under the technological guidelines set out in advance
and that they are compliant with the national rules laying down technological requirements and
restrictions on integrated production of fruit, crops, grapes and vegetables. Each year the expert
working group draws up Technological guidelines for each category separately. Technological
guidelines lay down detailed production rules and conditions for fruit, crops, grapes and
vegetables, which are each year confirmed and published by the MAFF. The rules and
technological guidelines are obligatory for producers under the integrated production scheme.
Integrated production is based on stricter requirements on production and the use of plant
protection products. The scheme is available to all producers meeting the requirements on
integrated production and providing a complete traceability of the products. Each year the
producers are controlled by an inspection body appointed on the basis of the regulation
governing the technical and organisation conditions to be fulfilled by an organisation controlling
the integrated agricultural products and foodstuffs. The inspection body controls the compliance
with the provisions of the technological guidelines and the rules on integrated production.
Obtained certificate for higher quality under the national quality scheme assures the consumer
that the products have specific characteristics which exceed the due minimum quality and are set
out in detail in the product specification which is integral part of the registration of each higher
quality product. The specific characteristics of an agricultural product are determined with regard
to its composition, sensory and physical and chemical features as well as to the production
and/or processing method. The specification contains a description of the characteristics of the
higher quality product, documentation proving that the product, given the specific
characteristics, is of higher quality than the corresponding agricultural products of minimum
quality, and the description of the production and/or processing procedure. The specification is
checked by an expert committee which states an expert opinion. Based on a positive expert
opinion the MAFF issues a decision on the acknowledgment under this scheme. Each year the
producers are controlled by a certification body which must be accredited in accordance with the
standard EN 45011 and appointed by the Ministry. The certification body checks the compliance
with the provisions laid down in the specification of the higher quality product. The scheme is
available to all producers and provides a complete traceability of the products.
For each scheme the minister of agriculture, forestry and food appoints inspection and
certification bodies conducting controls of agricultural products and agricultural holdings and
checking the compliance with the requirements set. The controls must be carried out mandatory
117
once per year at the producers under individual scheme. Next to the annual controls the
certification body conducts about 10 percent of unannounced controls, which are random and a
part of the required procedure of the certification body under EN 45011. In case of suspected
misuse of the requirements set the certification body conducts an additional control. The internal
control is carried out by a producer group providing for compliance with the specification and/or
required rules.
To conduct control of quality schemes an inspection and/or a certification body must submit an
application at the Ministry, together with evidence on the fulfilment of the technical and
organisation conditions. Submitted must also be the accreditation document issued by an
accreditation service included into the European accreditation, which indicates that the body was
accredited in accordance with EN 45011. If an inspection and/or a certification body no longer
fulfils the conditions set, then, based on a Decision of the Minister, the body concerned is
withdrawn the authorisation to conduct controls and/or certification of agricultural products and
agricultural holdings.
The official supervision over the implementation of the applicable legislation for all quality
schemes is carried out by the Inspectorate of the RS for Agriculture, Forestry and Food as a body
under the responsibility of the MAFF.
Target group
Beneficiaries are natural or legal persons (agricultural holdings) producing agricultural products
intended for human consumption and participating in one of the Community or national quality
schemes.
Demarcation
Support under this measure may not overlap with support under the first CAP pillar outlined in
Annex I to Regulation 1974/2006. Overlapping could occur in the field of fruit, vegetables, olive
oil and honey for support for activities on quality improvement. Eligible for support under the
measures of the first CAP pillar are producer organisations, whereas under this measure the
beneficiaries are individual agricultural holdings.
Before granting and disbursing the funds under this measure the MAFF and the ARSAMRD
necessary on-the-spot checks to avoid the funds for the same purpose being paid twice.
Applicants for aid under this measure who already obtained public funds of the RS or EU funds
for the same purpose for which they are applying under the RDP shall not be eligible for these
funds, which the applicants shall confirm with a written statement.
Financial provisions
Financial support shall be granted as non-repayable funds in the form of a single annual
payment. In setting up the aid amount the fixed costs shall be considered emerging from entering
and participating in food quality schemes and having a form of annual payment. Fixed costs with
special agricultural products and foodstuffs as well as higher quality products are specified with
regard to the quality scheme, and product and production type. Fixed costs with organic
production and processing as well as with integrated production are specified with regard to
quality scheme, production type and agricultural holding size.
In the production of special agricultural products and foodstuffs (Community schemes) and
higher quality products (national scheme) as fixed costs shall be deemed:
- costs of control ensuring the compliance with the specification requirements (certification,
annual external control, unannounced external control, control by producer group, internal
control);
- costs of agricultural products and foodstuffs sample analyses required by the product
specifications (organoleptic analyses, physical and chemical analyses, micro-biological
118
-
analyses, GMO determination, etc.);
administrative costs (annual membership fee for participation in producer group, keeping of
records, printing of labels of the quality symbols, etc.).
In organic production and processing (Community scheme) as fixed costs are deemed:
- costs of control ensuring the compliance with the regulation and the rules (annual production
control on agricultural holding, annual control of the processing establishment on agricultural
holding, unannounced controls, control by producer group),
- analyses costs of foodstuffs of plant origin, fodder and soil (physical and chemical analyses,
GMO determination);
- administrative costs (annual membership fee to participate in producer group, keeping of
records, printing of labels of the quality symbols, etc.).
In integrated production (national scheme) as fixed costs are deemed:
- costs of control ensuring the compliance with the rules (annual production control);
- administrative costs (annual membership fee to participate in producer group, keeping of
records, printing of labels of the quality symbols, etc.).
Maximum aid amount for participation in food quality schemes is EUR 3,000 per agricultural
holding. With regard to the quality scheme the applicants involved into the quality schemes are
eligible for support amounting:
- up to EUR 1,500 for special agricultural products and foodstuffs (Community scheme) and
for the higher quality products (national scheme);
- up to EUR 3,000 for organic production and processing (Community scheme);
- up to EUR 1,000 for integrated production (national scheme).
The amount of the annual payment under each scheme shall be defined in more detail in the bill
of costs within the call for tender.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Improving the quality
of agricultural
production and
products
Encouraging
agricultural holdings to
participate in quality
schemes
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICTORS
Agricultural production value under
quality scheme
GVA of supported producer groups
in agriculture (index)
number of supported agricultural
holdings participating in quality
schemes
VALUES
Baseline
Anticipated
(2013)
€56 Mio.
€100 Mio.
100
130
7,000
10,000
119
5.3.1.3.3 Supporting producer groups for information and promotion activities for products
under food quality schemes
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (c) (iii), Article 33
Measure code: 133
Rationale of the measure:
In Slovenia a system of special indications of agricultural and food products applies, which are
included in quality schemes and protected under the national and/or European legislation, which
however are still not very known. Studies show that a need for raised consumer awareness is
present on the existence of products with indications of higher quality, which are subjected to
strict control performed by certification bodies, as well as on their specific characteristics and
advantages.
In Slovenia the producers of special agricultural products and foodstuffs group for each protected
product separately. In the recent years a high grade of non-activity of the existing producer
groups was recorded, which shows in deficient planning and insufficient supply concentration as
well as joint marketing of products by the producer group members.
Better information on the products with special indications for consumers and better organised
and more active marketing by the producers makes the supply coordination easier and creates
new marketing opportunities for the producers, which consequently has an impact on the value
added growth in agriculture and the competitiveness of the agri-food sector.
Objective
Support under this measure is aimed at increasing the production and marketing extent of
products protected under a quality symbol, contributing to raised quality of agricultural products
and foodstuffs and increased value added in agriculture.
Measure description
Support under this measure is granted for information activities for consumers and sales
promotion. The activities shall promote the purchase and application of agricultural and food
products under the acknowledged quality schemes. Quality schemes under this measure are:
 Community quality schemes (Regulations 1698/2005, 509/2006, 510/2006 2092/91 and
1493/199931):
-
special agricultural products and foodstuffs (protected designation of origin or geographical
origin; protected geographical indication or geographical indication; traditional specialty
guaranteed or traditional reputation);
-
organic production and processing;
-
quality wines produced in specific production area (quality wine psr, superior wine psr and
wine rtd).
 Acknowledged national quality schemes:
-
integrated production;
-
higher quality.
31
Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (OJ L
179, 14.7.1999, p. 1–84)
120
Within this range support shall be devoted to activities which clearly indicate that specific
quality symbols mark specific characteristics of products, in particularly as regards the quality,
specific characteristics of production methods or the impact of geographical area on the product
quality.
Support shall be devoted to defraying of costs emerging from performing information and sale
promotion activities for products under the eligible quality schemes, such as:
- costs of organisation and participation in fairs, thematic markets, exhibitions, thematic
shows and other forms of public appearance and events;
- costs for advertising and information actions at retailers and other communication channels;
- costs of preparation, publication and distribution of information and promotion material;
- costs of organisation and performance of other adequate forms of advertising.
The condition for obtaining support is the submission of a sale promotion programme by the
producer group with envisaged advertising and information actions for a five-year period
containing a detailed plan on information and promotion actions with anticipated results for the
project concerned and simultaneously enabling a preliminary checks of materials intended for
information, advertising and sale promotion actions as regards the compliance with the EU
legislation.
The paying agency ensures that the activities supported under the submitted project were not
financed for the same purpose under Regulation (EC) No 2826/200032.
The materials aimed at informing, advertising and sales promotion contain in the front of the
protected product the quality symbol of the product, as follows:
- for organic products or products protected under the European legislation as special
agricultural products and foodstuffs (protected designation of origin or geographical origin,
protected geographical indication or geographical indication, traditional specialty guaranteed
or traditional reputation) the corresponding EU quality symbol and/or national quality
symbol;
- for integrated products or products protected under the national legislation as special
agricultural products and foodstuffs and higher quality, the corresponding quality symbol;
- for quality wine psr, superior wine psr and wine rtd correct indication of the name and area.
Support shall be granted for agricultural products outlined in Annex I to the Treaty and in
Annexes to Regulations 1698/2005, 509/2006, 510/2006, 2092/91 and 1493/1999, except for fish
products.
Target group
Beneficiaries are legal persons registered as a producer group grouping producers under one of
quality schemes for a specific agricultural product or foodstuff and using the corresponding
quality symbol and:
- have protected their products at the European level, or their products have already been
protected at the national level and are in the procedure of acquiring the European protection
for protected designation of origin, protected geographical indication, or traditional specialty
guaranteed;
- represent producers of organically produced and processed products and foodstuffs with the
indication organically produced;
- have protected their products at the national level with the indication higher quality;
- represent producers of integrated products and foodstuffs with the indication integrated
production;
32
Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 of 19 December 2000 on information and promotion actions for
agricultural products on the internal market (OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2–6)
121
-
represent the producers of quality wines produced in certain production area (quality wine
psr, superior wine psr and wine rtd).
Single application may be submitted by multiple producer groups which are individual
beneficiaries under this measure.
Professional and branch groups or producer organisations representing one or more sectors are
not deemed producer groups under this measure.
Demarcation
Support under this measure may not overlap with support under the first pillar of the CAP
outlined in Annex I to Regulation 1974/2006. Overlapping could occur in the field of fruit,
vegetables, olive oil and honey for support for information and promotion activities. Eligible for
support under the measures of the first pillar of the CAP are producer organisations, whereas
under this measure the beneficiaries are producer groups joining producers participating in one
of the quality schemes. To avoid the possibility of overlapping this measure contains the
provision that professional and branch groups or producer organisations representing one or
more sectors are not deemed producer groups under this measure. Based on this requirement
which shall be checked in submitted applications the possibility of overlapping was eliminated.
Nevertheless, before granting and disbursing the funds under this measure the MAFF and the
ARSAMRD shall conduct an administrative control and where necessary on-the-spot checks to
avoid the funds for the same purpose being paid twice. Applicants for aid under this measure
who already obtained public funds of the RS or EU funds for the same purpose for which they
are applying under the RDP shall not be eligible for these funds, which the applicants shall
confirm with a written statement.
Financial provisions
Financial aid shall be granted as non-repayable funds. Aid intensity for information, advertising
and sales promotion activities amounts up to 70 percent of acknowledged costs of the project.
The maximum aid amount per call for tender for a project of the final beneficiary is up to EUR
200,000.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Improving the quality of
agricultural production
and products
Improving
consumer
awareness on products
under quality schemes
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICTORS
Agricultural production value
under quality symbol
Number of projects supported
VALUES
Baseline
Anticipated
(2013)
€150 Mio.
€ 300 Mio.
0
50
122
5.3.1.4 Transitional measures for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania,
Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
5.3.1.4.2 Supporting setting up of producer groups
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 20 (d) (ii), Article 35
Measure code: 142
Rationale of the measure:
Slovenian organic farmers are joined under two framework associations organised mainly under
the territory principle and do not have any marketing characteristics. The majority of market
oriented organic farms and other organic food producers are bound to the direct sale methods at
home or on weekly local markets (the so called eco markets). The direct sale alone has become
insufficient for larger organic farmers and organic foodstuff producers, which are therefore in
search of new marketing channels. Poor marketing organisation and low market share of organic
products and foodstuffs are the key problems of further development of organic farming in
Slovenia. Similar situation is present in the production of special agricultural products and
foodstuffs, where no increase of these products in the market can be expected without
appropriate organisation.
Objective
The measure is aimed at enhancing the establishment and operation of producer groups in
organic production and production of special agricultural products leading to increased supply
concentration and easier adaptation of production to the market requirements and contributing to
increased value added in agriculture.
Measure description
Support under this measure shall be granted to producer groups of organic and special
agricultural products (protected designation of origin or geographical origin, protected
geographical indication or geographical indication, traditional specialty guaranteed or traditional
reputation) for defraying the operating and establishment costs. Due to different actual situations
and requirements support for producer groups of organic agricultural products shall be allocated
to producer integrations by products (e.g. milk products) as well as producer integrations from
different areas by the production method (e.g. organic producers of organic products of the
Pomurje region). For producer groups of special agricultural products support shall be allocated
to producer integrations by products (e.g. producers of the “kraški pršut”). Producer groups must
officially be recognised by the competent authority by 31.12.2013 and must have at least 3
members. They must submit an operational activities programme for the duration of at least 5
years containing:
i. Concept plan of harmonising the production with the demand;,
ii. Concept plan of accelerating the supply concentration and joint product marketing of
its members;
iii. Plan on drawing up joint marketing, information and promotion actions.
Support shall be devoted to administrative costs, including the facilities arrangement,
registration, drawing up of common rules on production, purchase of information technology and
other equipment, and salary for one permanent employee as well as the costs of purchasing the
primary equipment necessary for joint marketing of the producer group.
Support is allocated in annual rates for the first 5 years from the date of the producer group
recognition. It is calculated based on the annual market production of each group.
123
Support shall be granted for agricultural products outlined in Annex I to the Treaty and in
Annexes to Regulations 1698/2005, 509/2006, 510/2006 and 2092/91, except for fish products.
Target group
Beneficiaries for support under this measure are producer groups which:
- group organic agricultural producers of a specific organic agricultural product for the
purposes of the joint operation of this agricultural product in the market,
- group organic agricultural producers from specific areas of the RS for the purposes of the
joint operation of organic agricultural products of this area in the market;
- group producers of a specific protected special agricultural product for the purposes of the
joint operation of this product in the market.
Demarcation
Support under this measure may not overlap with support under the first pillar of the CAP
outlined in Annex I to Regulation 1974/2006. Overlapping could occur in the field of fruit,
vegetables, olive oil and honey. Eligible for support under the measures of the first pillar of the
CAP are producer organisations, whereas under this measure the beneficiaries are producer
groups joining producers engaged in organic production and processing as well producers
engaged in production of special agricultural products and foodstuffs. Due to the possibility of
overlapping, before granting and disbursing the funds under this measure the MAFF and the
ARSAMRD shall conduct an administrative control and where necessary on-the-spot checks to
avoid the funds for the same purpose being paid twice. Applicants for aid under this measure
who already obtained public funds of the RS or EU funds for the same purpose for which they
are applying under the RDP shall not be eligible for these funds, which the applicants shall
confirm with a written statement.
Financial provisions:
The maximum aid rate amounts up to 5 percent of the own marketable production.
Maximum amount of support amounts with regard to the range of the own marketable
production up to EUR 1,000,000 in the first five years, as follows:
Year 1:
5 percent from marketable production,
Year 2:
5 percent from marketable production,
Year 3:
4 percent from marketable production,
Year 4:
3 percent from marketable production,
Year 5:
2 percent from marketable production,
Maximum amount of support amounts in regard of the range of the own marketable production
to over 1,000,000 EUR in the first five years, as follows:
Year 1:
2.5 percent from marketable production,
Year 2:
2.5 percent from marketable production,
Year 3:
2.0 percent from marketable production,
Year 4:
1.5 percent from marketable production,
Year 5:
1.5 percent from marketable production,
But in each of the first five years supported it may not exceed the amounts, as follows:
Year 1:
EUR 100, 000;
Year 2:
EUR 100, 000;
Year 3:
EUR 80, 000;
Year 4:
EUR 60, 000;
Year 5:
EUR 50, 000;
124
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Supply concentration and
making adaptation of
production to market
requirements easier
Promoting the establishment
and operation of producer
groups of organic products
and special agricultural
products
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Number of agricultural holdings
entering the market
Number of agricultural holdings
participating in supported producer
groups of organic products and
special agricultural products
GVA of supported producer groups
in agriculture (index)
Number of supported producer
groups
Gross income of supported producer
groups
Baseline
200
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
700
1,000
1,500
100
130
0
30
€150 Mio.
€450 Mio.
125
5.3.2 Axis 2: Improving the environment and the countryside
Rationale
Agricultural land and forests in Slovenia present nearly 92 percent of the territory use and have
an important environmental, aesthetic and spatial function. The nature and environmental
protection has a common social value, which also reflects in the relatively well preserved and
diverse environment, favourable species and habitats status and favourable environmental
conditions for organic farming. The general commitment to the environmental protection goals
also reflects in the fact that a considerable proportion of Slovenian territory was designated as
ecologically important areas, whereby the high nature value areas are predominantly located in
marginal and in less favoured areas, where farming is economically less interesting. Farming
abandonment in these areas and the reduction of open area would mean an environmental hazard
and potentially a loss of cultural landscapes with negative impacts on the settlement of the rural
areas. Soil, water and air pollution and erosion risk as the consequence of intensive farming have
increased in the past years and the entire Slovenia has been designated as nitrates vulnerable
zone.
Objectives
In 2007-2013 one of the priority objectives in Slovenia is the implementation of activities which
maintain the utilised countryside and by the adaptation of technologies contribute to the
reduction of the negative impacts of the agriculture on water, air and biodiversity. Identified and
acknowledged is the priority conservation of utilised agricultural area, particularly in areas
unsuitable for intensive farming and where additional source of income needs to be provided by
way of compensatory allowances for farmers, as well as by preventing the marginalisation of
these areas. The second priority under this axis is further conversion of farms into sustainable
practices which are nature friendly and have a long-term positive impact on the environmental
conditions, the implementation of which has already started during the pre-accession period.
The measures under axis 2 are aimed at the conservation and improvement of the environment
(soil, water and air), biodiversity and cultural landscape conservation and thus directly contribute
to the accomplishment of the objectives in Natura 2000 sites and high nature value areas, which
are essential for the biodiversity conservation.
Measures and activities
Activities under this axis are mainly focused on agriculture, while as regards the forest
management Slovenia fulfils the objectives under this axis through consistent observation of the
national legislation and the implementation of the already established sustainable forest
management.
The activities under this axis are adjusted to the natural conditions of Slovenia and the options
provided by the farming technologies. The measures are horizontal and are intended for all
farmers in Slovenia meeting the criteria on obtaining payments under each individual measure.
The measure of compensatory allowances may be applied only for areas which are designated
under this programme as LFA. Certain spatial restrictions apply also for some specific agrienvironmental submeasures which depend on the protection regimes or management
requirements on the preservation of individual habitats.
Code
211
212
214
Measure
Natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas
Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas
Agri-environmental payments
Regulation 1698/2005
Article 36 (a) (i)
Article 36 (a) (ii)
Article 36 (a) (iv)
126
In addition to the specific conditions for each measure under axis 2 it is also necessary to
implement the cross compliance requirements outlined in Regulation 1782/2003 and Regulation
on statutory management requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions for
farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) as well as additional minimum requirements on the use
of fertilisers and plant protection products.
Combination with other measures and demarcation
Due to the calculation method, which covers only the difference emerging from the specific
natural conditions and/or additional production restrictions, the claims for payments under axis 2
measures may be applied for areas for which single payments per area under the first pillar of the
CAP are being applied as well.
Target group
The beneficiaries under axis 2 are agricultural holdings farming in less favoured areas as well as
agricultural holdings which undertake to implement at least one agri-environmental submeasure
on the entire area or a part of the area by considering the restrictions and conditions set out under
each measure, submeasure or activity.
Demarcation
Measures under axis 2 are linked to utilised agricultural area and through the support for physical
handicaps or additional environmental requirements they complement the payments under the
first pillar of the CAP as well as the measures which enhance rural development under axes 1, 3
and LEADER.
Measures under axis 2 contribute to improved status of the environment and nature achieving a
synergy effect with the OP for environment and transport. The measures are not doubled as the
purposes are kept separate.
Financial provisions
The measures under this axis are financed from public resources, whereby up to 80 percent of the
resources are co-financed by the EAFRD and at least 20 percent from the national budget of the
RS.
Setting up of payments is based on the preliminary estimation of additional costs and/or income
foregone for each measure or submeasure, which was made by a qualified independent
institution by a methodology providing a verification of the data relevance and calculation
baselines.
General objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
BASELINE INDICATORS
VALUES
Baseline
Target (2013)
Stopping biodiversity decline
Population of indicator bird species*
Declining
Trend reversal
Conservation of high nature value
systems
High nature value agricultural areas
268,000 ha
 268,000 ha
Overgrown agricultural land in Natura
2000 sites
10,500 ha
9,000 ha
Land application of nutrients
129 kg/ha
115 kg/ha
40 kg/ha
 40 kg/ha
Conservation of Natura 2000 sites
Improved water quality
Gross nutrient balance – surplus of
nitrogen
127
Remedying marginalisation and land
UAA share with regard to total area
abandonment
29.5%
30%
Overgrown agricultural land
25,200 ha
20,000 ha
Soil erosion reduction
Annual amount of soil in areas at risk of
erosion
0.874 t/ha
0.825 t/ha
Maintaining soil quality
Agricultural area under organic
production
26,800 ha
64,000 ha**
Mitigation of climate change
Area devoted to production of renewable
energy sources
300 ha
3,000 ha
production of renewable energy sources
from forestry
454 kToe
Increase
production of renewable energy sources
from agriculture
0
Increase
1,967,000 t
(CO2 eq)
1,850,000 t
(CO2 eq)
20,600 t/year
20,400 t/year
Greenhouse gas emissions from
agriculture
Ammonia releases
* In 2007 Slovenia initiated the monitoring of farmland bird populations.
* * UAA included in the organic farming control
128
5.3.2.1 Preserving agriculture in less favoured areas
Measure: Less favoured areas
Measure code: 211 and 212 (Article 36 (a) (i), Article 36 (a) (ii) and Article 93)
In 2007-2013 Slovenia shall continue to implement the measure compensatory allowances for
less favoured areas (LFA) based on Article 93 of Regulation 1698/2005 which sets out that for
the period 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 Articles 13(a), 14(1) as well as indent one and two of 14(2),
15, 17 to 20, 51(3) and 55(4) apply as well as a part of Annex I laying down the amount referred
to in Article 15(3) of Regulation 1257/1999.
By 31.12.2009 the provisions 9.V.A.1., 9.V.B.2., 9V.B.3. and 9.V.B., second paragraph of
Regulation 817/2004 in accordance with Annex II of Regulation 1974/2006 apply for the
description of the measure compensatory allowances for LFA.
Rationale of the measure
In the past agricultural utilisation had been abandoned in LFA. Indirectly the impoverishment of
the cultural landscape and the depopulation of these areas occurred. In Slovenia the support for
agricultural production in LFA has been implemented since mid 1980s. Positive effects reflect in
the cessation of agricultural production abandonment in LFA. The measure providing
agricultural holdings in LFA compensatory allowance covers the costs emerging in these areas
from the specific natural conditions which negatively affect the farming process.
The measure has proven effective in the past in the preventing the agricultural land abandonment
and the corresponding negative consequences. Therefore it is sound to continue with the
implementation of this measure.
Less favoured areas cover 86 percent of the national territory. Utilised agricultural land in LFA
captures 74 percent of the total UAA.
Objectives
To preserve and enhance further utilisation of LFA compensatory allowances are needed due to
the additional costs in farming.
Compensatory allowances shall contribute to:
- the preservation and promotion of sustainable farming systems,
- the maintenance of the cultural landscape,
- the sustainable use of agricultural land,
- the preservation of jobs in rural areas.
Description of LFA
In 2007-2013 Slovenia shall implement compensatory allowances for all areas which have been
supported under the RDP 2004-2006, as follows:
- mountain area;
- other areas;
- areas affected by specific handicaps.
Detailed descriptions are contained in Annex 3 to the RDP.
Supplementation of the LFA in the programming period 2007-2013
In the new programming period Slovenia applies the criteria and the LFAs from the RDP 20042006. For the new programming period up-to-date information on less favoured areas were
reviewed and the procedure on designating the areas rerun. It was ascertained that by applying
the same criteria as set out in the RDP 2004-2006 certain areas meet the conditions for LFA and
129
in the RDP 2007-2013 these areas were designated as mountain area and areas affected by
specific handicaps.
1) The supplementation of the list of mountain area is based on:
the ascertainment that certain parts of cadastral communities border mountain areas and
meet the criteria set out in the RDP 2004-2006. Therefore cadastral communities were
divided and certain cadastral community parts which fulfilled the conditions were
attached to mountain areas. The same analysis applies for areas which were designated in
the RDP 2004-2006 as areas affected by specific handicaps.
Rationale:
Slovenia carried out the division of cadastral communities under this criterion already in the
RDP 2004-2006. There, 66 divided cadastral communities, covering 32,270 ha in total (1.56
percent of the country), were included into mountain areas. After a thorough analysis it was
ascertained that considering this criterion 41 more divided cadastral communities, covering
7,838 ha in total (0.4 percent of the country), can be included in mountain area.
the ascertainment that homogenous smaller areas which do not meet the criteria on
mountain area but are surrounded by mountain area are deemed mountain area if the area
concerned is:
- smaller or equals five cadastral communities, or
- larger than five cadastral communities and simultaneously shows the criteria of poorer
soil production capacity and the share of poorer categories amounts to minimum 75
percent.
It is deemed that an area is surrounded by mountain area in accordance with the previous
paragraph if:
- minimum 90 percent of the area concerned is surrounded by mountain area, or
- minimum 40 percent of the area concerned is surrounded by mountain area and the
remaining part of the area borders a river, sea or state border (minimum 90 percent in
total).
Rationale:
In Slovenia, the rounding off in accordance with this criterion was conducted already in the RDP
2004-2006. There, 168 cadastral communities, covering 80,966 ha in total (3.99 percent of the
country), were included in the mountain area. After a thorough analysis it was ascertained that
according to this criterion 8 more cadastral communities, covering 2,704 ha in total (0.1 percent
of the country), can be included in the mountain area.
Mountain area was added 10,542 ha or 0.5 percent of the Slovenian territory. The total area of
mountain area has increased from 71.8 percent to 72.3 percent.
2) The supplementation of the list of areas affected by specific handicaps is based on:
 a detailed analysis of the Dolenjsko podolje, where it was ascertained that it is affected
by handicaps described for the Karst area (Annex 3). The karstic features are very
explicit here, therefore a part of the Dolenjsko podolje was attached to areas affected by
specific handicaps. Characteristic for the Dolenjsko podolje is stony, humid and watered
soil with karstic features. Farming in these areas is possible. However it is very limited
due to the water regime between the vegetation and fast water fluctuations. Characteristic
is grassland use and specific ecological conditions have shaped “humid meadows”, in
some parts dry meadows, with typical karstic flora and fauna. Therefore these areas
should continue being agriculturally utilised.
130
Areas affected by specific handicaps were added 17,578 ha of area.
Hence 0.8 percent of Slovenian territory was attached to areas affected by specific handicaps.
The total extent of areas affected by specific handicaps has increased from 9.2 percent to 10.0
percent of the national territory.
The LFAs have thus increased by 1.3 percent from the total of 85 percent of Slovenian territory
to 86.3 percent. The share of added areas is shown in Table 44.
Table 44: Supplementations for the RDP 2007-2013
Added areas
Mountain area
Areas affected by specific handicaps
Total
Surface of cadastral
communities (ha)
10,542
17,578
28,120
Share of total
surface (%)
0.5
0.8
1.3
Utilised agricultural area
Area (ha)
Share (%)
5,500
0.9
7,000
1.1
12,500
2.0
Figure 9: LFAs confirmed in the RDP 2004-2006 according to Regulation 1257/99
131
Figure 10: LFAs designated by the RDP 2004-2006 and marked supplementations for the RDP 20072013: Added divided c.c. in mountain area
Figure 11: LFAs designated by the RDP 2004-2006 and marked supplementations for the RDP 20072013: Added rounded off c.c. in mountain area
132
Figure 12: LFAs designated by the RDP 2004-2006 and marked supplementations for the RDP 20072013: Added areas affected by specific handicaps
Figure 13: LFAs designated by the RDP 2004-2006 and marked supplementations for the RDP 20072013
133
The share of LFA with regard to the total territory of the RS is shown in Table 45.
Table 45: Scope of LFAs in 2007-2013
Area
Mountain area
Other LFAs
Areas affected by specific handicaps
Total LFAs
Non-LFAs
Slovenia
Area of cadastral
communities
1,467,240
81,200
202,480
1,750,920
276,370
2,027,300
% SLO
72.3
4.0
10.0
86.3
13.6
100.0
Utilised agricultural area
Area (000 ha) Share (%)
328
54.2
23
3.8
98
16.2
449
74.2
156
25.8
605
100.0
The criteria and less favoured areas were designated under the RDP 2004-2006 and
supplemented by the RDP 2007-2013. Pursuant to Article 93 of Regulation 1698/2005 they shall
apply until 31.12.2009. It is anticipated that the measure shall capture 45,000 agricultural
holdings utilising 300,000 hectares of agricultural land.
Figure 14: LFAs in Slovenia under the RDP 2007-2013
Measure description
For the areas referred to in Article 13(a) of Regulation 1257/1999, different amounts of
compensatory allowance are introduced in accordance with Article 15(2). The amount of
compensatory allowance depends, by considering the delimitation of the LFAs and the
environmental properties of each area, on the classification of agricultural holdings into one of
the classification categories. For the purpose of payments differentiation the calculations where
made by the Agriculture Institute of Slovenia.
In 2003, Slovenia began to implement the EU comparable compensatory alowances scheme in
LFAs in compliance with Regulation 1257/1999 and the Decree on the designation of less
134
favoured areas (OJ RS No 18/03). The payments for the areas were carried out according to the
“Detailed report on areas with natural restrictions in the RS” confirmed by the Minister in 1990.
The study of the Agriculture Institute of Slovenia “Costs of agricultural production in different
less favoured areas” drawn up for 2004-2006 established the difference in the costs of production
“between sub-areas” within LFAs defined by the EU. On this basis the actual level of
compensatory allowances in LFAs were structured with respect to Article 15 of Regulation
1257/1999. In 2006 the study was amended and considers the amended baseline costs, resulting
in amended calculations of per-hectare allowance amounts (see Annex 4) (Reference: AIS;
Rednak et al., 2003, 2006).
The essentials of the study were:
• The level of the compensatory allowance per hectare for specific crops should provide that
the own price (at the threshold and/or storage of holding) of the product produced in less
favourable conditions equals the own price of the product produced in favourable conditions.
• Differentiation of payments was defined in a simulation model with various natural and
production factors to determine the probable differences at the level of economic indicators.
• The analysis of production costs and the impact of different factors, which are typical for
production in LFAs, on production costs has shown that the differences in costs for
individual crops are substantiated enough if the following two indicators are used as criteria
for different cultivation conditions: (1) intensity of production (yield quantity) and (2) the
potential productivity of human and machinery work (possible use of machinery in
production). The impact of these two factors on costs is significantly different for specific
crops. The level of costs also depends on the type of agricultural land use.
• In case of Slovenia, the level of necessary compensatory allowances for LFAs has been
defined on the basis of a model matrix calculation. It has taken into account the current
criteria for the definition of LFAs and the available data of agricultural land use. Agricultural
land was classified under the individual elements of the matrix according to altitude (four
classes) and inclination (six categories). Categories were identified on the basis of analysis of
use in LFAs and analysis of trends of costs for specific products in difficult production
conditions. Representative calculations of costs were made for different crops: potatoes,
wheat and maize and for grassland - hay, silage and pasture.
Table 46: Differentiated compensatory allowances per ha for LFAs
Type of agricultural
holding
Mountain
Alpine pasture
Steep slope
Karst
Hilly
Different unfavourable conditions
Basic
Calculated
compensatory
allowance per
hectare (EUR)
Target compensatory
allowances per hectare
(EUR)
254.4
254.4
218.8
218.8
178.9
90.5
25.0
185.3
185.3
158.4
158.4
130.3
63.9
25.0
Eligible area
(ha)
96,000
6,000
17,500
35,500
67,000
58,000
20,000
Payments for areas above 100 ha are gradually reduced, which means that the areas exceeding
100 ha receive 50 percent of the envisaged payment.
Beneficiaries
- Compensatory allowances are granted to agricultural holding operators for utilised
agricultural land in LFAs;
- The agricultural holding must meet the cross compliance requirements in accordance with
Regulation 1782/2003 (for more detailed description see chapter 5.3.2);
- The minimum area per agricultural holding, which is eligible for compensatory allowance is
1 ha;
135
-
The beneficiary undertakes to pursue his agricultural activity in the LFAs for at least five
years upon receiving first compensatory allowance for this purpose;
Total UAA in the LFA list is eligible for compensatory allowances.
Objectives and activities
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Maintaining the extent of utilised
agricultural areas in Natura 2000
sites.
Maintaining the extent of utilised
agricultural land in less favoured
areas.
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Area on which the LFA measure
is implemented within Natura
2000 sites
Area under successful land
management contributing to:
- Biodiversity,
- Marginalisation and land
abandonment prevention
Number of agricultural holdings
Operational Preserving the number of
agricultural holdings engaged in the engaged in the measure:
measure.
- Natural handicap payments
Preserving the extent of the area
to farmers in mountain areas
under the measure.
- Payments to farmers in areas
with handicaps, other than
mountain areas
Area on which the measure is
implemented:
- Natural handicap payments
to farmers in mountain areas,
- Payments to farmers in areas
with handicaps, other than
mountain areas
Payments to farmers in:
- mountain areas,
- areas with handicaps, other
than mountain areas
VALUES
Baseline
81,300 ha
Anticipated
(2013)
84,000 ha
300,000 ha
300,000 ha
300,000 ha
300,000 ha
33,000
33,000
10,600
11,000
226,000 ha
226,000 ha
74,000 ha
74,000 ha
€37 Mio
€7.1 Mio
€34 Mio
€6.3 Mio
136
5.3.2.2 Promoting environment friendly agricultural practices
Measure title: Agri-environmental payments
Article (and paragraph) related to the measure:
• Articles 36(a)(iv) and 39 of Regulation 1698/2005.
• Article 27 and point 5.3.2.1.4 of Annex II to Regulation 1974/2006.
Measure code: 214
Rationale of the measure
Agri-environmental payments support agriculture in its environmental function and, by means of
sustainable farming methods, contribute towards the reduction of environmental pollution, the
conservation of biodiversity and specific values of Slovenian countryside, such as traditional
farming methods and the conservation of cultural heritage and typical Slovenian landscapes
related thereto. Payments contributing towards the sustainable development of rural areas and the
provision of public goods, which are also a reflection of society demands for environmental
services, are granted to agricultural holdings for farming methods ensuring the protection and
improvement of the environment, landscape, natural resources and genetic diversity as well as
public health.
Measure objectives
-
General objectives
Agri-environmental payments support sustainable agricultural practices and contribute towards
the performance of public functions of agriculture related to the maintenance of cultural
landscape, the conservation of biodiversity as well as water and soil protection from potential
agricultural pollution. The measure is aimed at balancing agricultural production and protection
of the nature and environment.
-
Specific objectives
Agri-environmental payments are aimed at:
• the reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment,
• the conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional cultural
landscape,
• the maintenance of protection areas.
-
Operational objectives
Agri-environmental payments are aimed at:
• improving soil quality and fertility,
• reducing the discharges of chemical substances into the environment (soil, water, air),
• producing higher quality products and protecting potential consumer health,
• preserving traditional farming methods,
• conserving typical cultural landscape, specific natural features and habitats,
• preserving autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds and agricultural plant varieties,
• maintaining and preserving the extent of animal and plant habitats,
• preventing agricultural pollution of drinking water sources.
137
Aim and activities
-
Aim
Agri-environmental payments are aimed at conducting environment friendly farming methods
emphasising the multifunctional role of agricultural production reflecting in the public function
of maintaining the landscape and biodiversity as well as preserving the settlement of Slovenian
countryside by taking into account ecological, social and spatial settlement patterns in the rural
areas. Payments are granted for socially relevant activities, e.g. conservation of settlement,
cultural landscape and environment, which are not directly measurable from the marketing
viewpoint. Payments are disbursed per hectare of utilised agricultural land, in some cases per
animal, and are intended for partial compensation of costs for additionally invested effort due to
the environmental and landscape protection requirements as well as for the preservation of
traditional farming methods.
-
Activities
To accomplish the objectives set, the following sub-measures, divided into three groups, shall be
implemented within the framework of agri-environmental payments:
• Group I - reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment:
- preservation of crop rotation,
- greening of arable land,
- integrated vine production,
- integrated fruit production,
- integrated vine production,
- integrated horticulture,
- organic farming;
• Group II - conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional
cultural landscape:
- mountain pastures,
- steep slopes mowing,
- humpy meadows mowing,
- meadow orchards,
- rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds,
- production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties,
- sustainable rearing of domestic animals,
- extensive grassland maintenance;
• Group III - maintenance of protection areas:
- animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores,
- preservation of special grassland habitats,
- preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies,
- preservation of litter meadows,
- bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura 2000 sites,
- permanent green cover in water protection areas.
Confirmation that cross compliance requirements are identical with requirements set out
in Regulation 1782/2003
Beneficiaries engaged in the agri-environmental payments scheme shall meet cross compliance
requirements set out in Regulation 1782/2003 and Regulation on statutory management
138
requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07,
as amended).
Measure description and payment entitlement based on anticipated effects on the
environment with regard to environmental requirements and priorities
-
Measure description
A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental submeasures
Eligible for agri-environmental payments, comprising 21 agri-environmental submeasures, are
agricultural holdings implementing at least one of these submeasures and considering
environmental protection requirements under different farming methods, maintaining plant and
animal habitats as well as contributing to the preservation of the settlement and in the utilisation
of the countryside. Entering the agri-environmental payments scheme is voluntary. Beneficiaries
alone choose the submeasures which they shall implement on a part of or on the whole farm and
undertake to implement the submeasure(s) under the agri-environmental payments scheme in
accordance with the conditions set for the whole duration of the commitment. In implementing
the submeasures the beneficiaries must consequently meet all conditions under each submeasure
and keep a mandatory and up-to-date record on all work tasks under the submeasures chosen for
the whole duration of the commitment. Agri-environmental payments are granted at the national
level, with an exemption of some submeasures related to certain areas (i.e. humpy meadows
areas, central areas of appearance of large carnivores, ecologically important areas, central areas
of appearance of humid extensive meadow birds in Natura 2000 sites, and water protection
areas). Payments are disbursed as aids for the current year.
Additionally, agricultural holdings implementing agri-environmental submeasures must fulfil the
cross compliance requirements as well as the minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and
plant protection products, as well as all conditions under the Integrated Administration and
Control System (IACS) for the whole duration of the commitment.
The measure Agri-environmental payments is implemented throughout the programming period
and the commitments undertaken for the implementation of the agri-environmental payments last
five years with the possibility of a prolongation.
-
Details on eligibility conditions
1. Payment entitlement
Beneficiaries under the agri-environmental submeasures are agricultural holdings entered into
the register of agricultural holdings in accordance with the regulation governing the register of
agricultural holdings, and which enter the implementation of the submeasures voluntarily and
meet the conditions set. Holders of the rights and commitments eligible for payments for agrienvironmental submeasures are agricultural holding operators.
2. Size of agricultural land
Minimum size of agricultural land of one use eligible for payment for one agri-environmental
submeasure is 0.1 ha, provided that on agricultural holding at least 0.3 ha of agricultural land in
total is available for this submeasure, unless defined otherwise under the conditions for
individual submeasures (e.g. integrated fruit production).
3. Commitment duration
139
By entering the agri-environmental payments scheme, the beneficiary undertakes to implement
the agri-environmental submeasures for the whole duration of the commitment (at least five
years), in accordance with the conditions applied in obtaining payments for a particular
submeasure. Derogations from the commitment are allowed only in the following cases:
• if, after having discharged obligations for a period of four years, the beneficiary definitely
ceases agricultural production, or, his successor is incapable of discharging the obligations,
• if the area of the agricultural holding increases during the commitment duration, the
beneficiary is allowed to enter the scheme with the increased acreage, provided that the
increased area clearly contributes to the environmental protection with regard to the character
of the submeasures and required conditions and provides for an efficient supervision of the
implementation of the submeasures; even in case the beneficiary does not enter the scheme
with the increased acreage, he is nevertheless bound to implement the principles of cross
compliance and the minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection
products, whereas the efficiency of the implementation and supervision of other submeasures
shall not be impaired,
• if the area of an agricultural holding decreases during the commitment duration and this does
not impair the efficiency of the implementation and supervision of agri-environmental
submeasures,
• if the acreage of agricultural land or farming practises on an agricultural holding have
changed independently of the beneficiary (land consolidation, land development operations,
denationalisation proceedings, compulsory auction, inheritance),
• if, in entering the obligation, the changes affecting the later implementation of the
submeasures are not yet known or in case of force majeure, as referred to in Article 47 of
Regulation 1974/2006.
In cases of meteorological disasters (drought, hail, flood) the beneficiary may withdraw the
implementation of the submeasure for the current year.
If the beneficiary proofs derogation from the commitment as a result of the aforementioned
circumstances, his commitment is suspended without the obligation to reimburse the funds
obtained.
In case of force majeure or aforementioned circumstances the beneficiary must inform the
ARSAMRD thereof in writing and furnish appropriate evidence within 10 days from the day he
is able to do so.
Any derogation from the obligations is handled individually based on an appropriate application
submitted by the beneficiary to the ARSAMRD.
4. General objectives
In addition to fulfilling the conditions under individual agri-environmental submeasures, the
beneficiary shall further meet the following requirements:
• Individual agri-environmental submeasures shall be implemented on the same area for the
whole duration of the commitment.
• In implementing the agri-environmental submeasures the beneficiary eligible for payments
shall consequently comply with cross compliance requirements, minimum requirements on
the use of fertilisers and plant protection products and utilise agricultural land adequately,
whereas the agricultural production shall be adjusted to ecological and soil conditions,
appropriate methods to the land and site shall be applied to prevent soil compaction, erosion
and pollution, as well as sustainable soil fertility shall be ensured. In addition thereto in
implementing agri-environmental submeasures, the beneficiaries shall comply with the
applicable agricultural legislation as well as the legislation governing environmental
140
•
•
▪
•
•
•
•
•
protection, health, and veterinary medicine and meet other legal provisions.
On areas not included into the agri-environmental payments scheme, agricultural production
on these land areas shall have no negative impacts on the environment or impair the
efficiency of the submeasures on the areas included in agri-environmental payments.
The beneficiary undertakes to implement the submeasure(s) with which he entered the agrienvironmental scheme in accordance with the conditions set for the whole duration of the
commitment. During the commitment period, at the turn of a year (not in course of a year),
one agri-environmental submeasure may be substituted with another one, provided that such
a substitution contributes significantly to the environmental protection. Any derogation from
the commitments as regards the substitution of one submeasure with another is handled
individually based on an appropriate application submitted by the beneficiary.
Stocking density on agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural
area. In calculating the number of LUs the total cultivated agricultural land of an agricultural
holding is to be taken into account (total utilised area).
Inasmuch mineral fertilisers are applied on an agricultural holding, the soil fertility and
fertilisation control must be carried out every five years, whereas mineral fertilisers are to be
applied on the basis of an annual fertilisation plan.
For the whole commitment duration the beneficiary applying for payments under agrienvironmental submeasures shall continuously keep mandatory and up-to-date records of all
activities conducted within the scope of submeasures selected, whereby he may use the
MAFF forms “Records on working activities” or notes kept by the farmers themselves. For
the submeasures integrated crop production, integrated fruit production, integrated vine
production and integrated horticulture correspond the records defined by the rules governing
integrated crop production, rules governing integrated fruit production, rules governing
integrated grape and wine production and rules governing integrated horticulture. For the
submeasure organic farming records defined by an inspection body for the control of organic
agricultural products and foodstuffs apply.
During commitment period a beneficiary eligible for payments under agri-environmental
submeasures shall participate in training programme taking at least 4 hours annually during
the period set out in the regulation governing the payments for the measures under axis 2.
After concluding the education process the beneficiary receives a certificate on contents,
operator and the number of hours of the training.
A beneficiary obtaining payments under the agri-environmental submeasures is committed to
keep all documentation (application copies, other claims and required enclosures, certificate
on concluded training) and all records (crop rotation plan, records on work tasks) throughout
the commitment period and for four more years from the day of the last obtained payments.
An agricultural holding engaged in the implementation of agri-environmental submeasures
shall fulfil all conditions specified by the IACS for the whole duration of the commitment, as
provided by the regulations applicable for granting payments.
5. Administrative procedures
Administrative procedures for the allocation of resources for agri-environmental submeasures
are carried out by the ARSAMRD applying IACS. The ARSAMRD also carries out on-the-spot
controls. A more detailed description of the procedure is contained in chapter 11.5 Control
system.
Based on application form set a beneficiary enters the agri-environmental scheme on a voluntary
basis and undertakes to fulfil all conditions and provisions for the whole duration of the
commitment.
The procedure of submitting payment applications under agri-environmental submeasures is laid
down in a decree on the implementation of agricultural policy measures. Granting of funds is
141
carried out in accordance with the regulation governing the payments for measures under axis 2.
6. Supervision and sanctions
The supervision over the implementation of agri-environmental submeasures and monitoring of
the resources spending are carried out by the ARSAMRD in accordance with Regulation
1975/2006 and Regulation 796/200433.
The ARSAMRD checks the fulfilment of the conditions on an agricultural holding, particularly
the fulfilment of conditions set for individual submeasures and eligibility for claimed or already
disbursed funds.
The sanctions system is set out by IACS and applies for all irregularities concerning per area
and/or per animal payments. For these purposes the ARSAMRD has drawn up the instructions in
accordance with Regulation 796/2004. Any other irregularities (breach of minimum
requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products and non-compliance with
other specific conditions for agri-environmental submeasures) in the procedure of conducting
controls prior or after the disbursements are sanctioned on the bases of the Catalogue of breaches
and sanctions set out in the regulation governing the payments for measures under axis 2.
The control conducted by inspection bodies for integrated and organic production to obtain a
certificate is kept separately from the control of the implementation and fulfilment of obligations
for granting funds under individual agri-environmental submeasures conducted by the
ARSAMRD.
The beneficiary shall reimburse all payments for the implementation of agri-environmental
submeasures from undertaking a commitment:
- if he fails to allow or prevents the inspection of applicable records and documents kept at the
agricultural holding, or the access to agricultural land or premises for IACS purposes or
supervision of funds utilisation,
- if he does not meet the general provisions and does not implement the agri-environmental
submeasures for which he obtained the funds, in accordance with the conditions set,
- if, during the period defined for keeping the documentation, it is impossible to check the
eligibility for already disbursed payments.
In case that in the current year an agricultural holding does not fulfil obligations for a particular
agri-environmental submeasure, the beneficiary is not eligible for payment under the submeasure
concerned for the current year. The funds obtained in previous years need not be reimbursed.
If in implementing an agri-environmental submeasure agricultural holding fails to fulfil any
condition in two successive years the claim for payments under the submeasure concerned shall
be refused.
If in implementing an agri-environmental submeasure agricultural holding fails to fulfil any
condition in three successive years the claim for payments under the submeasure concerned shall
be refused and the commitment of further implementation of the submeasure concerned shall be
terminated, whereas the beneficiary, upon a written demand from the ARSAMRD, becomes
bound to reimburse any payments received for the implementation of the submeasure concerned
in the previous years.
33
Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of
cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in of Council
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common
agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p. 18–58)
142
In case that in integrated production or organic farming the beneficiary had obtained a certificate
from the inspection body for the control of integrated or organic production and that an
agricultural inspector subsequently detected deviations from the obligations set, the certificate
shall be annulled, and upon a written demand from the ARSAMRD, the beneficiary becomes
bound to reimburse payments received.
In case the ARSAMRD notifies a beneficiary in writing that a payment has been disbursed to
him by mistake, and the beneficiary fails to reimburse thus received payment within 15 days
from receiving the notification, the recipient becomes bound to pay legal delayed payment
interest.
The beneficiary is exempt from reimbursing the funds in all cases referred to in Point 3
Commitment period.
7. Combinations of agri-environmental submeasures
The combinations of agri-environmental submeasures on the same area are presented in Table
48. In order to avoid overcompensation, only certain combinations of agri-environmental
submeasures are possible. Therefore the maximum payment amounts per hectare of agricultural
land, available to agricultural holdings for the combination of these submeasures, are limited.
In payments for a combination of agri-environmental submeasures the total amount is reduced by
the amount for costs which were included into the calculation of the payment amounts for
submeasures under the combination (e.g. in the combination greening of arable land, integrated
crop production and production of autochthonous and traditional varieties of agricultural plants
the amount for training costs included into the calculation of the payment amounts for all three
submeasures must be subtracted twice from the total payment amount).
Unless otherwise specified for a particular submeasure, payment application under the agrienvironmental scheme may also be submitted for areas being the subject to compensatory
allowances for LFAs and/or for areas for which the single area payment applies.
143
ZEL
IPL
IPS
IVG
IVR
EK
PP
PPP
S35
S50
GRB
TSA
SOR
REJ
ETA
ZVE
HAB
MET
STE
VTR
VVO
KOL
ZEL
IPL
IPS
IVG
IVR
EK
PP
PPP
S35
S50
GRB
TSA
SOR
REJ
ETA
ZVE
HAB
MET
STE
VTR
VVO
KOL
Table 47: Combinations of agri-environmental submeasures on the same area
214I/1
214I/2
214I/3
N
214I/4
N
N
N
214I/5
N
N
N
N
214I/6
N
214I/7
N
214II/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/2
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/2
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/3
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/4
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/6
214II/7
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/8
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/2
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/3
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/4
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/5
N
N
N
N
N
N
214III/6
214/I-1
214/I-2
214/I-3
214/I-4
214/I-5
214/I-6
214/I-7
214/II-1
214/II-1
214/II-2
214/II-2
214/II-3
214/II-4
214/II-6
214/II-7
214/II-8
214/III-1
214/III-2
214/III-3
214/III-4
214/III-5
214-III/6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/2
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/4
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/5
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214I/7
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/2
N
N
N
214II/2
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/4
214II/6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
214II/7
214II/8
N
N
N
N
N
214III/1
N
N
N
N
214III/2
N
N
N
214III/3
N
N
214III/4
N
214III/5
N
N
N
N
N
214/I-1
214/I-2
214/I-3
214/I-4
214/I-5
214/I-6
214/I-7
214/II-1
214/II-1
214/II-2
214/II-2
214/II-3
214/II-4
214/II-6
214/II-7
214/II-8
214/III-1
214/III-2
214/III-3
214/III-4
214/III-5
214-III/6
214III/6
N: Combination NOT possible
: Combination possible
Legend of agri-environmental submeasures:
KOL
ZEL
IPL
IPS
IVG
IVR
Preservation of crop rotation
Greening of arable land
Integrated crop production
Integrated fruit production
Integrated vine production
Integrated horticulture
PPP
S35
S50
GRB
TSA
SOR
EK
PP
Organic farming
Mountain pastures without
herdsman
REJ
ETA
Mountain pastures with herdsman
Steep slopes mowing with inclination 35-50%
Steep slopes mowing with inclination over 50%
Humpy meadows mowing
Meadow orchards
Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant
varieties
Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
Extensive grassland maintenance
ZVE
HAB
MET
STE
VTR
VVO
Animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores
Preservation of special grassland habitats
Preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies
Preservation of litter meadows
Bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura 2000 sites
Permanent green cover in water protection areas
144
-
Commitment adaptation
Agri-environmental commitments may be adapted for the duration of the implementation if the
adaptation is adequately founded with regard to the objectives set. These adaptations also refer to
the application of new technologies and facilities in the implementation of agri-environmental
submeasures and the extension of the commitment duration as well.
-
Amendments of the national and Community legislation
In case of amendments to the national and Community legislation the existing agri-environmental
commitments shall be harmonised accordingly.
Commitments undertaken on the bases of the provisions under Article 39 of Regulation 1698/2005
may be adapted to the amendments of appropriate obligatory standards and requirements referred to
in Article 39(3) of the aforementioned regulation, established pursuant to Articles 4 and 5 of
Regulation 1782/2003 and Annexes III and IV of the regulation concerned, as well as minimum
requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products and other compulsory
requirements captured by the national legislation. If a beneficiary does not accept such an
adaptation, his commitment to implement agri-environmental submeasures ceases, whereby the
funds obtained for the period when the commitment was valid need not be reimbursed.
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Submeasures under the agri-environmental payments scheme represent nature and consumer
friendly production method, which:
• provides sustainable food production and improves the quality and safety of food thus produced,
• maintains natural balance in the soil,
• improves and maintains permanent fertility and (micro)biological soil activity,
• prefers natural regulatory mechanisms,
• accelerates and maintains the biodiversity of agri-ecosystems,
• protects the environment by reducing potential pollution sources,
• minimises water, soil, air and biotope pollution by optimizing the production,
• considers the environmental, social, cultural and tourism functions of rural areas.
Agri-environmental submeasures are compliant with the priorities and objectives set out in the
National Environmental Protection Programme, Strategy for the Conservation of Biodiversity,
Nitrate Directive (91/676/EC) (particularly in the Operational programme on water protection from
pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources for Slovenia 2004-2008), Water Framework
Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Natura 2000 programme (Directive on the conservation of natural
habitats and of wild fauna and flora - 92/43/EC and Directive on the conservation of wild birds 79/409/EC). In addition thereto, the conditions on the implementation of these submeasures exceed
the cross compliance requirements (1782/2003/EC) as well as the minimum requirements on the use
of fertilisers and plant protection products.
Therefore, agri-environmental submeasures have positive impacts on the environment, reflecting in:
• the preservation of the mosaic-like cultural landscape and specific secondary habitat types
essential for the biodiversity conservation (submeasures: mountain pastures, steep slopes
mowing, humpy meadows mowing, meadow orchards, sustainable rearing of domestic animals),
• the preservation of genetic resources (submeasures: rearing of autochthonous and traditional
domestic breeds, production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties),
• groundwater protection and the implementation of Nitrate Directive (91/676/EC) (submeasures:
preservation of crop rotation, greening of arable land, integrated crop production, integrated
145
•
•
•
fruit production, integrated vine production, integrated horticulture, organic farming, permanent
green cover in water protection areas),
the protection and preservation of ecologically important areas – protection areas and Natura
2000 sites (submeasures: animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores,
preservation of special grassland habitats, preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies,
preservation of litter meadows and bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura
2000 sites),
sustainable use in accordance with the Strategy for the Conservation of Biodiversity in Slovenia
is provided through the fulfilment of cross compliance requirements and minimum requirements
on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products (all submeasures),
the reduction of greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions by production extensification
(submeasures: organic farming, mountain pastures, rearing of autochthonous and traditional
domestic breeds, sustainable rearing of domestic animals and animal husbandry in central areas
of appearance of large carnivores).
Monitoring and evaluation of agri-environmental submeasures
The aim of monitoring and evaluation is to gather information on the implementation of agrienvironmental submeasures for the purposes of potential modifications and amendments of agrienvironmental payments.
Monitoring shall provide data on the implementation of individual submeasures for the duration of
the commitment and also show how the commitments are actually being put into practice. The data
shall be gathered in a manner as to allow the submeasures to be adapted to the needs which shall
become evident in course of their implementation.
The evaluation of agri-environmental submeasures is an in-depth analysis of their impacts and shall
be implemented on the basis of the pre-determined objectives, monitoring data and other relevant
information sources. The evaluation shall be based on socio-economic, agricultural and
environmental aspects of the area where the submeasures are implemented.
It is practically not feasible to monitor and analyse all parameters affected by agri-environmental
submeasures. Hence, under the agri-environmental scheme, a set of indicators was defined, which
shall serve as the basis for the evaluation of effects of individual submeasures. Control (short-term)
and long-term indicators are listed with each of the submeasures.
Monitoring of the environmental situation, habitats and biodiversity shall be provided by the
ministry responsible for environment; the data on monitoring of brown bear by the Slovenia Forest
Service. The monitoring system shall be adjusted to the needs of the implementation of agrienvironmental submeasures.
B. Requirements related to individual agri-environmental submeasures
Agri-environmental submeasures aimed at the popularisation of agricultural production,
corresponding to consumer demand and protection of public health, providing sustainable utilisation
of natural resources and conservation of biodiversity and characteristic Slovenian landscape are,
with special focus on the environmental component, divided into three basic groups defining the
nature and the contents of the submeasures.
• Group I: reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment,
• Group II: conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional cultural
landscape,
• Group III: maintenance of protection areas.
Group I: Reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment
146
Intensive food production may have negative impacts on the environment and the soil - plant –
groundwater system, as a result of inappropriate application of fertilisers and plant protection
products. Irrational production may lead to soil erosion and compaction.
Nature friendly production and rearing methods have positive impacts on the environment since the
controlled application of plant protection products reduces a potential threat of environmental
pollution, increases the biodiversity of plant and animal species, preserves soil fertility and the
structure and balance of soil micro organisms, reduces soil leaching, and due to a lower energy
consumption reduces the dependency of farms on external inputs, and contributes to selfsufficiency.
To reduce the anthropogenic environmental pollution as a result of agricultural production the
following sustainable farming submeasures are laid down under Group I:
214-I/1
214-I/2
214-I/3
214-I/4
214-I/5
214-I/6
214-I/7
Preservation of crop rotation,
Greening of arable land,
Integrated crop production,
Integrated fruit production,
Integrated vine production,
Integrated horticulture,
Organic farming.
Submeasure 214-I/1 Preservation of crop rotation
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
-
Content
• Preservation of crop rotation on agricultural holdings to improve soil properties and
fertility
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Crop rotation on arable land and controlled application of fertilisers and plant
protection products in crop production
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
·
Stabilisation of crop rotation (crop rotation plan)
·
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
• Long-term:
·
Controlled application of fertilisers and plant protection products in crop production
·
Improved quality of food (less chemical residues in foodstuffs) and ensuring
consumers health
·
Less chemical residues in the soil
· Improved groundwater quality
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
Requirements for final beneficiaries
147
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost is allowed. For these areas agricultural
holding must draw up an annual operational plan of
mud, silt or compost distribution with a limited
application as set out in Article 7 of the Decree on the
limited input concentration values of dangerous
substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05).
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment or
sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock manure.
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. Producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
By implementing the submeasure land application of
sewage sludge, silt and residues from fish farms is not
allowed; only compost produced on agricultural
holdings may be applied.
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
148
•
•
•
•
•
-
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in soil: In accordance
with Annex 2 of Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
the three-year crop rotation is mandatory on at least
50 percent of arable areas of the entire agricultural
holding. Grasses, clovers, grass-clover mixtures and
clover-grass mixtures on arable areas are a part of
crop rotation and may be on the same area longer than
three years.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: The amount of applied mineral nitrogen is
250 kg/ha annually.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products: Pursuant to Articles 3
and 8 of the Plant Protection Products Act (OJ RS No
98/04 - official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended application
in the RS, or a permission for trade of identical plant
protection products from other EU Member States.
Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the package
leaflet, label indication or information in the
permission and by considering the principles of good
agricultural practice in plant protection and the Rules
on the responsibilities of users of plant protection
products (OJ RS No 62/03, as amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
Requirements for final beneficiaries
• The entire arable land must be included into the
submeasure.
• The five-year crop rotation shall:
- include at least three different crops,
- cereals share may not exceed 60 percent,
- legumes must be present at least once.
 Stubble crops are considered as one the three different
crops to be included into the five-year rotation, and
maize as a root crop. As legumes shall also be
considered the clover-grass mixtures, whereby the
legumes share must amount to at least 50%.
 The crop rotation must be designed at entering the
submeasure. In case of force majeure or changed
market conditions the potential change of the crops in
the rotation may not have negative impacts on the
environment nor diminish the performance of the
submeasure.
• The amount of applied mineral nitrogen may not
exceed 170 kg/ha annually.
•
•
In wheat, rye, barley, oats and triticale production the
application of growth regulators is not allowed.
The application of plant protection products is
possible on the basis of a prognosis, where one exists.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
As a result of plant protection products application, monoculture crop production, mechanisation of
production and universal agricultural development, necessary additional production planning and
required knowledge, crop rotation on fields had increasingly lost in its significance. Data on the
crop structure itself show that in Slovenia crop rotation is mostly no common practice on
agricultural holdings. Main crops are maize and wheat, primarily grown as monocultures or within a
two- or three-year rotation cycle, while in some places stubble crops are sown after the maize and
cereals harvest.
In general, Slovenian farms are not specialised; but mixed, combining animal husbandry and plant
production. Harmonisation of crop rotation with animal husbandry brings the livestock production
in line with arable areas used for self-production of fodder on which the manure of from the
livestock production can be applied. Thus planned production prevents a surplus of organic
fertilisers (manure, slurry and liquid manure), whereas the fertilisation with organic fertilisers
reduces the consumption of mineral fertilisers, which results in reduced loads on the environment
149
and in creating better sustainable production methods. Inclusion of legumes into crop rotation helps
protecting the soil and environment. Based on their roots system legumes loosen the soils and
reduce the erosion of fertile land. Since legumes supply the soils with nitrogen, the need for
fertilisation with mineral nitrogen fertilisers is diminished or even disappears, which results in
reduced risk of groundwater pollution with nitrates and contributes to ecologically cleaner
production and thus complying with the National Environmental Protection Programme.
The implementation of the submeasure facilitates the inclusion of all arable land on agricultural
holdings in crop rotation, introduction of alternative crops (pulses, oilseeds) in crop rotation,
introduction of alternative plant nutrient resources (green manure plants, organic waste, etc.) and
reflects in the improved existing crop rotation and thus maintenance and improvement of soil
fertility with controlled use of fertilisers and plant protection products. The effects of implementing
the submeasure result in the reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment,
improved crop structure and consequently in better food quality (less chemical residues in
foodstuffs) as well as in ensured potential consumer health.
To revive crop rotation, which would include fodder grasses and other soil improving crops having
a favourable impact on soil fertility and improve its properties, payments are granted at the national
level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the comparison of the three-year and five-year crop rotation as
envisaged in the submeasure. Included are greening and fallow with oilseed rape. Taken into
account was a lower maize yield in sowing after greening (by about 16 percent) and lower potato
produce (by about 11 percent). The calculation of payment amounts thus considers the costs of
wheat production, greening costs (ploughing costs, costs of equipment use, sowing costs and costs
of alfalfa seed purchase), maize production costs (twice), potato production costs, costs of fallow
with oilseed rape (ploughing costs, costs of equipment use, and sowing costs), time spent on
training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower maize yield in sowing after greening and
lower potato yield.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-I/2 Greening of arable land
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Greening of arable land to reduce erosion and surface leaching of nutrients
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Improving soil properties and fertility and reducing erosion and leaching of nutrients
by greening arable areas through autumn and winter with adequate vegetation
150
Indicators
•
·
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Green cover through autumn and winter (ha)
Stabilisation of crop rotation (crop rotation plan)
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
Long-term:
Improvement of potential soil fertility
Reduced soil pollution
Improved groundwater quality
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost is allowed. For these areas agricultural
holding must draw up an annual operational plan of
mud, silt or compost distribution with a limited
application as set out in Article 7 of the Decree on the
limited input concentration values of dangerous
substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05).
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
By implementing the submeasure land application of
sewage sludge, silt and residues from fish farms is not
allowed; only compost produced on agricultural
holdings may be applied.
151
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in soil: In accordance
with Annex 2 of Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
the three-year crop rotation is mandatory on at least
50 percent of arable areas of the entire agricultural
holding. Grasses, clovers, grass-clover mixtures and
clover-grass mixtures on arable areas are a part of
crop rotation and may be on the same area longer than
three years.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil erosion: In accordance with Annex 2
to the Regulation about cross compliance (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) agricultural land need be utilised
in a manner minimising the erosion risk and agritechnical measures applied which reduce the erosion
risk.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex 2 to the Regulation about
cross compliance (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) the
grower acts with due care and attention if on utilised
agricultural area he/she:
- regularly utilises and maintains agricultural land;
- provides for the conservation or improvement of
soil fertility by an adequate use method,
- does not cause land degradation (erosion,
compaction, pollution) with inadequate
technology,
- exemplary and regularly maintains the land;
- utilises land to enable optimal and economical
production by applying appropriate agricultural
technology,
- manages all areas belonging to agricultural
holding to avoid the endangerment of the holding
vitality,
- provides for adequate land utilisation in case of
his/her disability or longer absence,
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: The amount of applied mineral nitrogen is
250 kg/ha annually.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
Five-year crop rotation shall include at least three
different crops.
Agricultural plant engaged for greening of arable land
is considered as one of the three different crops that
need be included into the five-year crop rotation.
The crop rotation must be designed at entering the
submeasure. In case of force majeure or changed
market conditions the potential change of the crops in
the rotation may not have negative impacts on the
environment nor diminish the performance of the
submeasure.
Soil covered with winter crops through autumn and
winter is mandatory.
Sowing of winter crops in the period from 1.7. to
25.10. of the current year, immediately after the
harvest of main crops.
Green (winter sustaining) cover shall spread over the
fields from 15.11. of the current year to 15.2. next
year.
Tillage of greened arable land may start on 15.2. next
year.
The amount of applied mineral nitrogen may not
exceed 170 kg/ha annually.
152
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In wheat, rye, barley, oats and triticale production the
application of growth regulators is not allowed.
The application of plant protection products is
possible on the basis of a prognosis, where one exists.
In case the beneficiaries apply for payments under submeasure 214-I/2 Greening of arable land in
the current year, they may claim payments under submeasure 214-I/1 Preservation of crop rotation
in the ensuing years. If beneficiaries do not apply for payments under submeasure 214-I/1
Preservation of crop rotation and/or submeasure 214-I/2 Greening of arable land in the ensuing
year(s), they have to perform at least the simple crop rotation on these land areas including at least 3
different crops.
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
In a not too distant past, sowing of winter crops was a common practice ensuring the improvement
of soil properties and soil fertility, reduction of erosion and surface nutrient leaching. The
introduction of monoculture production and inexpensive nitrogenous fertilisers encouraged many
people to discontinue this practice. Today, farmers are rediscovering winter cover crops during
autumn and winter and their significance.
Since Slovenia is characterised by a large quantity of precipitation, distributed also in spring and
autumn (between 800 and 1,500 mm and more annually), nutrients leach also during the growing
period and not only in winter, like in most European countries. On the other hand, more than
elsewhere, precipitation surplus more than elsewhere dilutes nitrates and other nutrients in
percolating water which, given a relatively fast flow of groundwater, decreases the risk of it being
polluted above the maximum level allowed for drinking water. Nevertheless, some studies have
shown that under the conditions in Slovenia, 10-40 kg of N, 4-9 kg of P2O5, 9-10 kg of K2O, 400900 kg of CaO, 80-230 kg of MgO, 40-280 kg of SO4, 25-100 kg of Cl and 10-30 kg of Na34 per
hectare are leached from crop fields annually.
Leskošek, M. Gnojenje: za velik in kakovosten pridelek, za zboljšanje rodovitnosti tal, za varovanje narave
(Fertilisation: for high and quality yields, for improvement of soil fertility, for nature preservation). Ljubljana, ÈZP
Kmeèki glas, 1993
34
153
Therefore, in the light of conservation of natural resources, it is necessary to prevent or to reduce
the risk of nutrient leaching from agricultural areas. Numerous benefits of growing cover crops
show in:
• reduced erosion threat,
• improved soil structure and reduced surface crusting,
• increased water holding capacity of the soil,
• reduced weed growth,
• reduced herbicide injury,
• improved soil conditions for the following crop,
• nitrogen provided if the cover crop is a legume.
By implementing the submeasure the soil cover with winter crops through autumn and winter is
provided and erosion and nutrient leaching reduced, which results in reduced soil pollution,
improved potential soil fertility and improved groundwater quality. Payments are therefore granted
at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the five-year crop rotation with and without greening (twice in the
rotation). Since in this case the only difference is greening, the payment amount was calculated as
the difference between the total costs. Considered were wheat production costs (twice), greening
costs (twice), maize production costs (twice), potato production costs, time spent on training and
keeping of records on work tasks, lower crop produce as a result of autumn fertilisation
abandonment and consequently lower fertilisation costs. The greening costs capture ploughing
costs, costs of equipment use, and costs of sowing and alfalfa seed.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Controlled application of fertilisers and plant protection products in crop production
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Integrated crop production
154
Indicators
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
·
-
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
Number of certificates issued
Long-term:
Increased acreage of land area engaged in integrated crop production (ha)
Improved food quality (less chemical residues in foodstuffs) and ensuring consumer
health
Less chemical residues in the soil
Improved groundwater quality
Reduced threat of erosion
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
In implementing the submeasure it is necessary to comply with the regulation governing the
integrated crop production and with the technological guidelines on integrated crop production,
whereby the beneficiary must:
• include all areas into the integrated crop production on which crops are produced in the current
year and are owned, leased or rented by him, except areas which are being in the conversion to
organic or which are organic in accordance with the regulations governing organic production
and areas on which vegetables under crop rotation are produced within the framework of the
submeasure integrated crop production, or areas engaged in the submeasure integrated fruit
production - berries, or in integrated horticulture, or mandatory fallow;
• follow up the forecast of the observation and forecast service to determine the crops health
protection measures laid down in the technological guidelines as well as consider the actual crop
situation;
• identify the actual crop situation by checking the crops and using appropriate accessories;
• apply chemical measures or use plant protection products if the mechanical, biological and
biotechnical measures in pest control were already exhausted;
• use only plant protection products outlined in the technological guidelines or plant protection
products and other plant protection preparations allowed in organic production, in accordance
with the regulations on organic production;
• in chemical pest control, for which the technological guidelines set damage threshold, provide
information on the pest and the exceeded damage threshold for this pest in the data sheet,
received from the inspection body, to justify the use of plant protection products;
• fertilise in accordance with the fertilisation plan;
• carry out soil analysis every five years;
• apply only fertilisers outlined in the technological guidelines and fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with the regulations on organic production;
• draw up a five-year crop rotation plan;
• if exceeding the limit values of mineral nitrogen in the soil, abandon the application of
nitrogenous fertilisers for the next crop or include into the rotation an intermediate crop using
up the nitrogen to prevent its leaching into the subsoil;
• register for integrated crop production control at an authorised inspection body by 31 December
of the current year at the latest for next year’s control;
• keep records and save the documentation, which enables the inspection body to check the types,
quantities and use of purchased material (plant protection products, fertilisers) and to check the
varieties and the quantities of the crops sold;
• save the records for at least five years and the documentation for at least one year;
• allow an insight in the records and documentation if required by the inspection body or a
competent inspection service;
• report to the MAFF every six months the varieties and the quantities of integrated crops
produced in the past six months, in fifteen days after the last six months have passed;
• ensure traceability of integrated crops on the market.
155
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: On agricultural holdings land
application of mud, silt or compost is allowed. For
these areas agricultural holding must draw up an
annual operational plan of mud, silt or compost
distribution with a limited application as set out in
Article 7 of the Decree on the limited input
concentration values of dangerous substances and
fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05), which also lays
down the land application of sewage sludge, compost
or silt form river and lake beds as well as the
application of substances in plant irrigation and
fertilisation, particularly limit values for annual
application of dangerous substances and plant
nutrients into and on the soil, input reduction grades
and other measures regarding the input.
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Prohibited is the application of all fertilisers with high
heavy metals content.
Applied may be only fertilisers outlined in the
technological guidelines for integrated crop
production or fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
156
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: The amount of applied mineral nitrogen is
250 kg/ha annually.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: The
production method is set out in Annex II of the
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended).
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in the soil: In
accordance with Annex II to the Regulation on
statutory management requirements and good
agricultural and environmental conditions for farming
(OJ RS No 34/07, as amended):
- the three-year crop rotation is mandatory on at least
50 percent of arable areas of the entire agricultural
holding.
- grass, clover, grass-clover mixtures and clover-grass
mixtures on arable areas are a part of crop rotation
and may be on the same area longer than three years.
- for a planned increase and/or keeping of the organic
matter and humus share in soil the standard
agricultural practice considers mainly crop rotation,
ploughing in of harvest remains, regular and
balanced fertilisation with livestock manure or
inclusion of legumes into crop rotation.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
The amount of applied mineral nitrogen may not
exceed 170 kg/ha annually.
In implementing the submeasure farming is
conducted in accordance with special technological
guidelines on integrated crop production.
Applied may be only plant protection products
outlined in the technological guidelines for integrated
crop production or plant protection products and other
plant protection preparations allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
Plant protection products may be used only based on
a prognosis.
The application of certain active substances is limited;
the number of treatments is limited as well.
In weed, diseases and pest control mechanical/
physical and biotic measures are preferred.
The application of growth regulators is prohibited.
In implementing the submeasure:
- on all arable areas a five-year crop rotation is
mandatory with obligatory use of legumes;
- in the soil with humus content under 1.5% it is
mandatory to leave all harvest remains in the field,
sow plants for green manure and/or cover plants
and/or compensate for the taken organic matter with
livestock manure;
- stubble remains are to be ploughed in already in
autumn (but not in frozen soil) to avoid pests
development.
157
•
•
-
Baseline
A grower may utilise agricultural land without
acquiring a certificate.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in the soil: Crop
production in monoculture is allowed. In accordance
with Annex II to the Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) on all arable areas of an
agricultural holding maize may be produced for three
years at the most.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Integrated crop production certificate acquisition is
required.
Monoculture production of individual crops and
related plant varieties (identical genus) is prohibited,
with the exemption of hop.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
In Slovenia, integrated production of crops has been implemented since 2004 and is based on the
European Initiative for Sustainable Development in Agriculture (EISA) taking into account
regulations on environmental protection, plant protection products and research results in Slovenia
and in countries which have organised the integrated crop production, and other conceptual IOBC
guidelines (International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals
and Plants).
The anticipated impacts of the implementation of the submeasure are:
• long-term environmental protection in all areas under crops on agricultural holding, in particular
reduced and controlled use of plant protection products and fertilisers,
• improvement of the crop production technique whilst introducing nature friendly farming
practices,
• preservation and improvement of soil structure and fertility,
• production of quality and safe food and raw materials acceptable to consumers (fresh, pest-free,
of nice appearance, of adequate size, etc.),
• economically acceptable application of means of production,
• economical use of energy by applying modern mechanisation.
The effects of integrated agriculture are visible in the reduction of negative impacts of crop
production on the environment. The careful choice of plant protection products, which are less
harmful to the environment, reduces the use of these products and positively affects the
biodiversity. However, the input of plant protection products into soil and subsequently into
groundwater is also reduced by crop rotation. A rational strategy of fertilisation, in particular soil
analysis and elaboration of fertilisation plans, provide optimal fertilisation. The system of integrated
production also permits pH balancing of the soil and the achievement and preservation of an
appropriate soil structure and thereby also the prevention of soil erosion, while having positive
impacts on the macro and micro fauna as well as beneficial insects. Production method can have
different impacts on the cultural landscape: monoculture production impoverishes its appearance,
while the system of integrated production makes it diverse (crop rotation, crop structure, green
stripes of fields, and hedgerows). Green field stripes are very suitable for nesting and provide refuge
for wild fauna (birds and small mammals), as well as many beneficial insects (e.g. predator bugs).
The system of integrated crop production is based on: (1) regulation governing integrated crop
production and (2) technological guidelines intended for crop producers and agricultural advisors
and elaborated for individual crop varieties, including technical (organisation requirements and
possibility of joining the system of integrated production of crops) and specific guidelines (agritechnical measures).
Control of integrated crop production is carried out by inspection bodies. Crops produced in
158
Slovenia may bear the official indication “integrated” if they had been produced in compliance with
the rules and if a certificate was issued by an appointed inspection body. This designation, together
with the certificates, issued by appointed inspection bodies, ensures quality and guarantees that
crops have been produced in integrated manner.
Given the data the interest of producers in this kind of production is in continuous increase. In 2004
the integrated crop production certificate was obtained by 829 producers, in 2005 the number
increased to 1,309.
For Slovenian agriculture, integrated crop production represents a long-term strategy of crop
production on agricultural holdings based on nature friendlier cultivation systems with efficient
inputs, modern machinery and economically and ecologically justified target crops for the purpose
of ensuring greater food quality and safety than by conventional farming.
Per-area payments aimed at defraying a part of the costs for additional labour emerging from the
more demanding farming method, with controlled use of fertilisers and plant protection products in
crop production, are granted to beneficiaries at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on wheat production. It was made by considering the restrictions under the
integrated crop production set out in the submeasure. Taken into account was the produce reduction,
which, based on the data provided by regional institutes of the CAFS, in integrated production
amounts to about 30 percent. Hence, the calculation considered the wheat production costs, material
and energy costs (costs for fertilisation, plant protection products and seed), costs of machinery
work (own machinery work and hired machinery services), costs of domestic work, costs of crop
production in crop rotation, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks and lower
income as a result of lower yield.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Controlled application of fertilisers and plant protection products in fruit production
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Integrated fruit production
159
Indicators
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
·
-
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
Number of certificates issued
Long-term:
Increased acreage of land area under integrated fruit production (ha)
Improved quality of fruit produced and ensuring potential consumer health
Less chemical residues in the soil
Improved groundwater quality
Reduced threat of erosion
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
The minimum total acreage of orchards of one fruit variety eligible for payment under the
submeasure is 0.5 ha for apples and pears, and 0.3 ha for other fruit varieties. The minimum eligible
acreage of an agricultural land unit of one use (single orchard) is 0.1 ha.
In implementing the submeasure it is necessary to comply with the regulation governing the
integrated fruit production and with technological guidelines on integrated fruit production,
whereby the beneficiary must:
• include into integrated production all orchards he utilises and which are recorded in the register
of fruit producers in intensive orchards, except intensive orchards which are in conversion to
organic or which are organic in accordance with the regulations on organic production,
• consider that the number of trees must amount to at least 150 trees/ha for olives, at least 100
trees/ha for walnuts and chestnuts and at least 200 trees/ha for any other fruit variety;
• follow up the forecast of the observation and forecast service to determine the health protection
measures for fruit trees and berries laid down in the technological guidelines as well as consider
the actual situation in the orchard or plantation;
• identify the actual situation in the orchard or plantation by checking the fruit trees and berries
and using appropriate accessories;
• apply chemical measures or use plant protection products if the mechanical, biological and
biotechnical measures in pest control were already exhausted;
• use only plant protection products outlined in the technological guidelines or plant protection
products and other plant health preparations allowed in organic production, in accordance with
the regulations on organic production;
• in chemical pest control, for which the technological guidelines sets a damage threshold,
provide information on the pest and the exceeded damage threshold for this pest in the data
sheet, received from the inspection body, to justify the use of plant protection products;
• apply only fertilisers outlined in the technological guidelines and fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with the regulations on organic production;
• register for integrated fruit production control at authorised inspection body by 31 December of
the current year at the latest for next year’s control, if he is registering for control for the first
time;
• keep records and save the documentation, which enables the inspection body to check the types,
quantities and use of purchased material (plant protection products, fertilisers) and to check the
varieties and the quantities of the fruit sold;
• save the records for at least five years and the documentation for at least one year;
• allow an insight in the records and documentation if required by the inspection body or a
competent inspection service;
• report to the MAFF every six months the varieties and the quantities of integrated fruit produced
in the past six months, in fifteen days after the last six months have passed;
• ensure traceability of integrated fruit on the market.
160
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: On agricultural holdings land
application of mud, silt or compost is allowed. For
these areas agricultural holding must draw up an
annual operational plan of mud, silt or compost
distribution with a limited application as set out in
Article 7 of the Decree on the limited input
concentration values of dangerous substances and
fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05), which also lays
down the land application of sewage sludge, compost
or silt form river and lake beds as well as the
application of substances in plant irrigation and
fertilisation, particularly limit values for annual
application of dangerous substances and plant
nutrients into and on the soil, input reduction grades
and other measures regarding the input.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: The
production method is set out in Annex II of the
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended).
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
The producer is obliged to enter into the record all
fertilisers applied in the orchard.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Prohibited is the application of all fertilisers with high
heavy metals content.
Applied may be only fertilisers outlined in the
technological guidelines for integrated fruit
production or fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
In implementing the submeasure farming is
conducted in accordance with special technological
guidelines on integrated fruit production.
161
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
- Standard on good agricultural and
environmental conditions, organic matter in
the soil: For a planned increase and/or keeping of
the organic matter and humus share in soil the
standard agricultural practice considers mainly
crop rotation, ploughing in of harvest remains,
regular and balanced fertilisation with livestock
manure or inclusion of legumes into crop
rotation.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
A grower may utilise agricultural land without
acquiring a certificate.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Applied may be only plant protection products
outlined in the technological guidelines for integrated
fruit production or plant protection products and other
plant protection preparations allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
Plant protection products may be used only based on
a prognosis.
The application of certain active substances is limited;
the number of treatments is limited as well.
In weed, diseases and pest control mechanical/
physical and biotic measures are preferred.
The producer must record the type, quantity and time
of applied chemical and store fruit separately for at
least 3 months after the treatment, if the fruit is
chemically protected prior to the storing.
In a plantation the width of herbicidal zone may not
exceed 1/3 of the row spacing on average (with the
exemption for older multiple-row plantations: up to
45%).
In implementing the submeasure the target humus
content in the soil is 2-4%.
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 150 kg/ha
annually.
In the period from defoliation to blooming of fruit
trees or greening of orchard grassland adding of
nitrogenous fertilisers is not allowed as well as in the
period from end June to autumn, with the exemption
of cherries which may be additionally fertilised after
harvesting. Olives may be fertilised with nitrogen
from end February to mid June and walnut from end
March to mid June.
Beneficiary eligible for payment under this
submeasure must obtain a certificate on integrated
fruit production.
162
•
•
-
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil erosion: In accordance with Annex 2
to the Regulation about cross compliance (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) agricultural land need be utilised
in a manner minimising the erosion risk and agritechnical measures applied which reduce the erosion
effect.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
- Olive groves must be maintained/ managed in
accordance with the established technological
practice.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
The producer must maintain the orchard grassland
system in row spacing as well, with some exemptions
(berry plantations; young plantations in the period of
berry volume formation; peach and apricot terrains in
the Primorska where no possibilities of irrigation
exist).
Due to the closed cycle the producer must leave the
mown grass in the plantation.
In new plantations immediate green cover is
mandatory (with the exemption of peach plantations
until the 3. year, cherry, sour cherry, plum and
quetsch plantations until the 5. year; khaki until the 6.
year, olives until the 7. year and actinidia until the 4.
year).
If the producer has a terraced plantation mowing of
terrace banks is mandatory.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Integrated fruit production means balance established by preserving life diversity in the nature
through the production of quality and healthy fruit crops in a commercially acceptable way along
with controlled use of fertilisers and prescribed plant protection products.
Integrated fruit production shall mean the following:
• balanced implementation of agri-technical measures whilst taking into account the economic,
ecological and toxicological factors,
• preferring natural measures over plant protection and bio-technological measures,
• reduced use and careful choice of plant protection products,
• preferring organic fertilisers over mineral fertilisers,
• regular Nmin analysis before nitrogen fertilisation in order to prevent the nitrate leaching into
the groundwater and accumulation of nitrates in the plants,
• constant control over production by appointed inspection body,
• labelled products are compliant with higher production standards.
Integrated fruit production is based on: (1) the regulation governing integrated fruit production and
(2) technological guidelines intended for fruit producers and agricultural advisors laying down the
conditions for setting-up of orchards, orchard fertilisation based on soil analysis, orchard irrigation,
soil management in the orchard, pruning, mechanical and technical requirements necessary to
maintain the orchards, harvesting and storage, methods of integrated protection of fruit trees against
diseases, pests and weeds and list of permitted plant protection products for the following fruit
varieties: apple trees, pear trees, peach and nectarine trees, apricot trees, cherry and sour cherry
trees, quetsch and plum trees, strawberry, American blueberry, olive trees, actinidia, khaki, fig,
163
walnut, hazel and chestnut trees.
Control of integrated fruit production is carried out by inspection bodies. Fruit produced in Slovenia
may bear the official indication “integrated” if it had been produced in compliance with the rules
and if a certificate has been issued by an appointed inspection body. This designation, together with
the certificates, issued by an appointed inspection body, ensures quality and guarantees that fruit
was produced in integrated manner.
Data show that the interest among producers increases each year, which indicates that producers are
becoming aware of the importance of environment friendly farming practices. In 1999 the
integrated fruit production certificate was obtained by 451 producers, in 2005 the number increased
to 1,131. Integrated fruit production, which is widespread in Slovenia, integrates the economic and
the nature protection aspects of agricultural production and, by preserving the diversity of life in the
nature, facilitates the production of quality and safe food in an economically viable manner. The
development of integrated production contributes to reduced use of chemicals and thus safeguards
the environment and public health and, at the same time, ensures improved internal and external
properties of fruit. Per-area payments aimed at defraying a part of the costs for additional labour
emerging from more demanding farming method, by controlled use of fertilisers and plant
protection products in fruit production, are granted to beneficiaries at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
- Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation considered the apple production costs and plantation maintenance costs, time spent
on training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower produce (by
about 8 percent) due to the use of less effective plant protection products, particularly to control the
codling moth, which consequently reflects in the reduced produce. The calculation was made by
considering the restrictions under the integrated fruit production set out in the submeasure.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Controlled application of fertilisers and plant protection products in vine production
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Integrated vine production
164
Indicators
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
·
-
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
Number of certificates issued
Long-term:
Increased acreage of land area under integrated fruit production (ha)
Improved quality of grapes and wine produced and ensuring potential consumer
health
Less chemical residues in the soil
Improved groundwater quality
Reduced threat of erosion
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
In implementing the submeasure it is necessary to comply with the regulation governing the
integrated vine production and with the technological guidelines on integrated vine production,
whereby the beneficiary must:
• include into integrated production all vineyards he utilises and which are recorded in the register
of grape and wine producers, except vineyards which are in conversion to organic or which are
organic in accordance with the regulations on organic production,
• follow up the forecast of the observation and forecast service to determine the health protection
measures for vine laid down in the technological guidelines as well as consider the actual
situation in the vineyard;
• identify the actual situation in the vineyard by checking the vine and using appropriate
accessories;
• apply chemical measures or use plant protection products if the mechanical, biological and
biotechnical measures in pest control were already exhausted;
• use only plant protection products outlined in the technological guidelines or plant protection
products and other plant health preparations allowed in organic production, in accordance with
the regulations on organic production;
• in chemical pest control, for which the technological guidelines sets a damage threshold,
provide information on the pest and the exceeded damage threshold for this pest in the data
sheet, received from the inspection body, to justify the use of plant protection products;
• apply only fertilisers outlined in the technological guidelines and fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with the regulations on organic production;
• register for integrated vine production control at authorised inspection body by 31 December of
the current year at the latest for next year’s control, if he is registering for control for the first
time;
• keep records and save the documentation, which enables the inspection body to check the types,
quantities and use of purchased material (plant protection products, fertilisers) and to check the
varieties and the quantities of the grapes and wine produced, in accordance with the regulations
governing the cellaring records and register;
• save the records for at least five years and the documentation for at least one year;
• allow an insight in the records and documentation if required by the inspection body or a
competent inspection service;
• ensure traceability of integrated grapes and wine on the market.
Baseline
Requirements for final beneficiaries
165
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: On agricultural holdings land
application of mud, silt or compost is allowed. For
these areas agricultural holding must draw up an
annual operational plan of mud, silt or compost
distribution with a limited application as set out in
Article 7 of the Decree on the limited input
concentration values of dangerous substances and
fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05)
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: The
production method is set out in Annex II of the
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended).
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Applied may be only fertilisers outlined in the
technological guidelines for integrated vine
production or fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
In implementing the submeasure farming is
conducted in accordance with special technological
guidelines on integrated vine production.
166
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A grower may utilise a vineyard without acquiring a
certificate.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Applied may be only plant protection products
outlined in the technological guidelines for integrated
vine production or plant protection products and other
plant protection preparations allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
The frequency of plant protection products
application must be reduced.
Preferred are mechanical/physical measures for weed,
diseases and pests control and measures aimed at the
reduction of plant protection products application
(selecting adequate site and location, selecting
appropriate root stocks and clones, balanced
fertilisation - especially with nitrogen).
It is necessary to remove leaves from grapes to
achieve good aeration and only when a real need
arises the application of chemicals for plant protection
is allowed.
Plant protection products are applied only after all
other options have been exhausted and the harmful
organisms have exceeded the damage threshold,
which mainly applies for pests.
A systematic changing of products is necessary.
Combinations of products from different chemical
groups are necessary, as well as rotation with plant
protection products, not only with active substances.
In the stripe under the vines weeds may be removed
only mechanically. Only in cases this is insufficient,
herbicide treatment is allowed, but the width of the
treated stripe under the vines may amount to
maximum 25% of the net vineyard area.
Herbicide application can only be an additional
measure.
Herbicide application is allowed only by 15. July
(with the exemption of vineyards in which particular
diseases appear).
Special measures for protection against particular
diseases have been set.
In implementing the submeasure the acquisition of the
certificate on integrated vine production is required.
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 170 kg/ha
annually.
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
167
•
•
•
•
-
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil structure: In accordance to Annex II
to the Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
it is required to apply adequate mechanisation.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil erosion: In accordance with Annex 2
to the Regulation about cross compliance (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) agricultural land need be utilised
in a manner minimising the erosion risk and agritechnical measures applied which reduce the erosion
effect.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the grower acts with due care and
attention if on utilised agricultural land he:
- regularly utilises and maintains agricultural land;
- provides for the conservation or improvement of
soil fertility by an adequate use method,
- does not cause land degradation (erosion,
compaction, pollution) with inadequate
technology,
- maintains land exemplary and regularly,
- utilises land to enable optimal and economical
production by applying appropriate agricultural
technology,
- manages all areas belonging to agricultural
holding to avoid the endangerment of the holding
vitality,
- provides for adequate land utilisation in case of
his/her disability or longer absence,
Pursuant to Article 10 of the Wine Act (OJ RS No
105/06) the planting density in a vineyard must be
minimum 1,500 vines per hectare.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Prohibited is mechanical treatment of soil throughout
the year.
In integrated grape production permanent greening
(sowing of grass-clover mixtures or natural greening
where a controlled weed or green cover development
is present), short-term greening (sown or natural
green manure), soil cultivation (rough tillage in every
second row) and soil cover (straw, bark) are
mandatory.
In the period from 1. November until the
phonological phase of the vine B-C the soil in the row
spacing must have green cover or be adequately
covered.
In case the producer clears a vineyard and land he/she
must replant it in the next year; during the winter the
soil must be protected from erosion.
It is very important to conduct green activities as a
safety measure to avoid occurrence of infections
(topping, weeding).
The number of shoots may not exceed 20 shoots per
running row metre.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
The integrated production of grapes and wine is a nature friendly method of production of high
quality grapes and wines using natural resources and mechanisms minimising negative impacts of
farming on the environment and public health.
Integrated production of grapes and wine is a production method which:
• provides the sustainable production of healthy grapes and high quality wines by reducing the
chemical residues in products,
• maintains the natural balance in the soil,
• reduces a potential risk of producers’ health in plant protection products application,
• enhances and maintains the biodiversity of the vineyard agri-ecosystem and surrounding areas,
• prefers natural regulatory mechanisms,
• minimises water, soil, air and biotope pollution by optimizing the production,
• improves the quality and healthiness of grapes and wine produced,
• considers the environmental, social, cultural and tourism functions of vine production,
• conserves the natural and cultural landscape,
168
•
•
is under constant control carried out by appointed inspection bodies
provides that marked products meet the higher quality standards.
Integrated production of grapes and wine is based on: (1) the regulation governing integrated
production of grapes and wine and (2) technological guidelines intended for producers of grapes
and agricultural advisors laying down the obligations of vine producers to ensure traceability,
fertilisation of vineyards based on the soil analysis, methods of soil management in vineyards, grass
cover and mulching in the vineyards, vineyard loads, protection of leaf area in vineyards after frost,
yield regulation (by removing grapes), integrated protection methods of vines against diseases, pest
and weeds, vine sprinkling technique, list of permitted preparations and plant protection products.
Producers were granted payments for the implementation of integrated vine production for the first
time in 1999 and the interest in integrated vine production has increased noticeably in the recent
years. In 2001 the integrated grapes production certificate was obtained by 505 producers, in 2005
the number increased to 2,283.
The control of integrated vine production is carried out by inspection bodies. Grapes produced in
Slovenia may bear the official indication “integrated” if they had been produced in compliance with
the rules and a certificate has been issued by an appointed inspection body. This designation,
together with the certificates, issued by appointed inspection body, ensures quality and guarantees
that grapes were produced in integrated manner.
The anticipated effects of implementing the submeasure are increased area under integrated grape
and wine production, consequently reflecting in the reduction of environmental loads, improved
wine and grapes quality and ensuring potential consumer health. Integrated production of grapes
and wine pursues the objectives of the soil, water and air protection using environment friendly
methods, which help to maintain economical production of quality grapes and wine, but foremost
the preservation of public health and protection of areas under crops. Payments are therefore
granted at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation considered the grapes production costs, material and energy costs (fertilisation and
plant protection products costs), costs of machinery production (domestic machinery work, hired
machinery services), domestic work costs, time spent on training and keeping of records on work
tasks, lower income as a result of lower grapes produce (by about 35 percent) due to grapevine
yellow. The calculation was made by considering the restrictions under the integrated grapes
production set out in the submeasure.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture
-
Measure description
Objective
Content
• Controlled application of substrates, fertilisers and plant protection products in
horticulture
169
Mechanism
•
Implementation activity
Indicators
•
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
-
Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
Integrated production in horticulture
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Recorded application of substrates, fertilisers and plant protection products
Number of certificates issued
Long-term:
Increased acreage under integrated horticulture (ha)
Improved quality of vegetables produced and ensuring potential consumer health
Less chemical residues in the soil
Improved groundwater quality
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Payments for integrated production of vegetables are granted both for the production in the open air
or in protected indoor areas.
In implementing the submeasure it is necessary to comply with the regulation governing the
integrated production of vegetables and with the technological guidelines on integrated production
of vegetables, whereby the beneficiary must:
• include into integrated production all areas on which he produces vegetables in the current year
and are owned, leased or rented by him, except areas which are in conversion in organic or
which are organic in accordance with the regulations on organic production, and areas which are
engaged in the submeasure integrated crop production or mandatory fallow;
• follow up the forecast of the observation and forecast service to determine the health protection
measures for vegetables laid down in the technological guidelines;
• identify the actual situation of the produce by checking the produce and using appropriate
accessories;
• apply chemical measures or use plant protection products if the mechanical, biological and
biotechnical measures in pest control were already exhausted;
• use only plant protection products outlined in the technological guidelines or plant protection
products and other plant health preparations allowed in organic production, in accordance with
the regulations on organic production;
• in chemical pest control, for which the technological guidelines sets a damage threshold,
provide information on the pest and the exceeded damage threshold for this pest in the data
sheet, received from the inspection body, to justify the use of plant protection products;
• apply only fertilisers outlined in the technological guidelines and fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with the regulations on organic production;
• if exceeding the limit values of mineral nitrogen in the soil, abandon the application of
nitrogenous fertilisers for the next crop or include into the rotation an intermediate crop using
up the nitrogen to prevent its leaching into the subsoil;
• register for control of integrated production of vegetables at authorised inspection body by 31
December of the current year at the latest for next year’s control, if he is registering for control
for the first time;
• keep records and save the documentation, which enables the inspection body to check the types,
quantities and use of purchased material (plant protection products, fertilisers) and to check the
varieties and the quantities of vegetables sold;
• save the records for at least five years and the documentation for at least one year;
• allow an insight in the records and documentation if required by the inspection body or a
competent inspection service;
• report to the MAFF every six months the varieties and the quantities of integrated vegetables
produced in the past six months, in fifteen days after the last six months have passed;
• ensure traceability of integrated vegetables on the market.
170
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: On agricultural holdings land
application of mud, silt or compost is allowed. For
these areas agricultural holding must draw up an
annual operational plan of mud, silt or compost
distribution with a limited application as set out in
Article 7 of the Decree on the limited input
concentration values of dangerous substances and
fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05), which also lays
down the land application of sewage sludge, compost
or silt form river and lake beds as well as the
application of substances in plant irrigation and
fertilisation, particularly limit values for annual
application of dangerous substances and plant
nutrients into and on the soil, input reduction grades
and other measures regarding the input.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: The
production method is set out in Annex II of the
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended).
A grower may utilise agricultural land without
acquiring a certificate.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Prohibited is the application of silt and compost from
sewage sludge.
It is allowed to apply exclusively organic fertilisers
and materials which do not contain undesirable
foreign substances (e.g. heavy metals).
Applied may be only fertilisers outlined in the
technological guidelines for integrated production of
vegetables or fertilisers allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
In implementing the submeasure farming is
conducted in accordance with special technological
guidelines on integrated production of vegetables.
In implementing the submeasure the acquisition of the
certificate on integrated production of vegetables is
required.
171
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil structure: In accordance to Annex II
to the Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
it is required to apply adequate mechanisation.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil erosion: In accordance with Annex 2
to the Regulation about cross compliance (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) agricultural land need be utilised
in a manner minimising the erosion risk and agritechnical measures applied which reduce the erosion
effect.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the grower acts with due care and
attention if on utilised agricultural area he:
- regularly utilises and maintains agricultural land;
- provides for the conservation or improvement of
soil fertility by an adequate use method,
- does not cause land degradation (erosion,
compaction, pollution) with inadequate
technology,
- maintains land exemplary and regularly,
- utilises land to enable optimal and economical
production by applying appropriate agricultural
technology,
- manages all areas belonging to agricultural
holding to avoid the endangerment of the holding
vitality,
- provides for adequate land utilisation in case of
his/her disability or longer absence.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in soil: In accordance
with Annex 2 of Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
the three-year crop rotation is mandatory on at least
50 percent of arable areas of the entire agricultural
holding. Grasses, clovers, grass-clover mixtures and
clover-grass mixtures on arable areas are a part of
crop rotation and may be on the same area longer than
three years.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In soil treatment all measures must be aimed at the
conservation and improvement of soil fertility.
It is necessary to avoid land sliding and land
compaction.
The soil on inclined areas must be cultivated
crossways to the slope (erosion prevention).
It is necessary to conduct deep tillage, but only in
optimal soil conditions.
In autumn the ploughing in of harvest remains is
conducted as late as possible.
It is necessary to prevent winter fallow (unsown areas
during winter)
The soil must be treated in the manner providing for
the conservation of the soil structure.
In case a winter furrow is required it is to be ploughed
in as late as possible.
Mandatory is a more than three-year crop rotation
which must be widely planned and diverse.
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 170 kg/ha
annually, except in certain vegetables outlined in the
technological guidelines for integrated production of
vegetables in which the amount of applied mineral
nitrogen may not exceed 200 kg/ha annually.
172
•
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In implementing the submeasure stocking density on
agricultural holding shall not exceed 1.9 LU/ha of
utilised agricultural area.
Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
Applied may be only plant protection products
outlined in the technological guidelines for integrated
production of vegetables or plant protection products
and other plant protection preparations allowed in
organic production, in accordance with Annex II, Part
A and B of Regulation 2092/91.
Plant protection products may be used only on the
bases of a prognosis.
The application of certain active substances is limited
as well as the number of treatments.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Integrated production of vegetables is a nature and consumer friendly method of production, having
the following key objectives:
• production of healthy vegetables and improvement of consumers’ nutrition habits,
• decreased and controlled use of fertilisers and plant protection products,
• improved quality of vegetables produced and ensuring potential consumer health,
• environmental protection by reducing potential pollution production sources,
• preservation of natural enemies by application of appropriate plant protection methods,
• improvement and maintenance of permanent fertility and (micro)biologic activity of the soil,
• constant control over production and ensuring consumers that these products are subjected to
permanent technical control,
• labelled products are compliant with higher production standards.
Integrated production of vegetables is based on: (1) the regulation governing integrated production
of vegetables and (2) technological guidelines intended for vegetable producers and agricultural
advisors laying down the methods of soil management, irrigation conditions, fertilisation of
vegetables on the basis of soil analysis, reference Nmin values as a basis for nitrogen fertilisation,
selection of cultivars, selection of site for the production of vegetables, crop rotation, production in
protected indoor areas, harvesting and storage, integrated protection methods of vegetables against
173
diseases, pests and weeds and list of permitted preparations and/or plant protection products for the
following vegetable species : beans and peas, mangold, endive, brassicas, carrots, celery and
parsley, early potatoes, tomatoes, peppers and eggplant produced in open fields and under shelters,
cucumbers and gherkins, pumpkins, water melon and melon produced in open fields and cucumbers
and courgettes produced under shelters, melons, red beet, lettuce, asparagus, spinach, alliaceous
plants and witloof.
The control of integrated production of vegetables is carried out by inspection bodies. Producers are
organised within the frame of Slovenian Association for Integrated Production of Vegetables, which
organises education courses, meetings of producers and consumers, provides for application of the
trademark, product labelling, promotion and presentations at exhibitions and fairs. Payments for
integrated production of vegetables were granted for the first time in 1999. Integrated horticulture is
well accepted by the producers, as in the recent years the interest therein has notably increased. In
1999 the integrated vegetable production certificate was obtained by 43 producers, in 2005 the
number increased to 380. Compared to market oriented production in Slovenia, in 1998 integrated
production of vegetables was carried out by 1 percent of the members, in 1999 by 10 percent, in
2000 by 24 percent, in 2001 by 45 percent, in 2002 by 55 percent and in 2003 by 65 percent of the
members.
Vegetables produced in accordance with the rules may bear the official indication “integrated” and
the indication of the Slovenian Association for Integrated Production of Vegetables in the form of a
ladybug. These indications, together with the certificates, issued by appointed inspection body,
ensure quality and guarantee that vegetables were produced in integrated manner.
The anticipated effects of implementing the submeasure are increased area under integrated
production of vegetables, consequently reflecting in a reduction of environmental loads, improved
quality of vegetables and ensuring consumer health.
The focus of integrated horticulture lies on farm as a whole and is concerned with environmental
balance; fertilisation must be based on soil analysis and the needs of plants, maintaining and
increasing soil fertility, crop rotation, and selection of resistant varieties/cultivars. Basic objectives
of the integrated production of vegetables are: production of healthy vegetables of high internal and
external quality, environmental protection and economical employment of raw materials.
Production control includes the analysis of pesticide and nitrate residues in crops and, in addition to
external product control, also guarantees a high internal control and sanitary suitability of
vegetables. Payments are granted at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation considered the restrictions of integrated production of vegetables outdoors and in
protected indoor areas as set out in the submeasure. In the calculation for integrated horticulture
certain differences occur, particularly in the application of manual labour as a result of mechanical
weed and pest control. The calculation took into account the vegetable production costs, material
and energy costs (fertilisation, plant protection products and seed costs), costs of machinery
production (domestic machinery work, hired machinery services), domestic work costs, time spent
on training and keeping of records on work tasks and in integrated horticulture outdoors the costs of
vegetable production under crop rotation as well.
174
Submeasure 214-I/7 Organic farming
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
-
Content
• Controlled production of high-quality foodstuffs and reduction of loads on the
environment in accordance with guidance of Regulation 2092/91
• Payment for extra work involved in more sophisticated farming practice aimed at
environmental protection
• Production employing special controls and technologic limitations
• Control:
·
Records on organic farming (number of farms, number of hectares, livestock count)
·
Acreage of land area under different crops (ha)
·
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
·
Number of positive reports on organic production and/or processing or certificates
issued
• Long-term:
·
Increased number of organic farms (ha, livestock count)
·
Improved quality of food produced and ensuring potential consumer health
·
Improved soil properties
· Improved groundwater quality
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Payments under organic farming are granted for:
• fields-crops,
• vegetables grown outdoors,
• vegetables grown in protected indoor areas,
• olive groves with tree density of minimum 150 trees/ha, orchards with minimum 100 trees/ha
for walnut and chestnut and minimum 200 trees/ha for other fruit varieties,
• grassland high-trunk orchards with tree density of 50-200 trees per ha,
• vineyards, hop gardens, tree nurseries,
• grassland (grasses, grass-clover mix in the fields, extensive grassland).
The total area, regardless of the utilisation type, for which payments can be claimed under the
submeasure, must cover at least 0.3 ha. The minimum agricultural land area of one use may not be
smaller than 0.1 ha.
In implementing the submeasure it is mandatory to comply with the regulation governing organic
production and processing of agricultural products and/or foodstuffs as well as the regulation
designating the areas in the RS suitable for organic beekeeping.
Beneficiaries may obtain payments for meadow orchards if they meet the following conditions:
• meadow orchards must be recorded in the register of fruit producers in extensive and meadow
orchards;
• the tree density must range from minimum 50 trees to maximum 200 trees/ha;
• maintenance of high-trunk extensive orchards, which includes tree maintenance and plantation
renewal (filling in the blank spots);
• restoration pruning must be carried out in the first or second year of engagement in the
submeasure (for beneficiaries who shifted from the old agri-environmental measures scheme
into the new scheme of agri-environmental submeasures it is considered that this condition is
fulfilled if they carried out the restoration pruning in the first or second year of engagement in
the agri-environmental measure under the old scheme);
• in plantation renewal no weak root stocks may be used;
• green cover in the orchard;
175
•
•
mowing or grazing of grassland areas;
use of plant protection products based on a prognosis.
176
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex 2 of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the grower acts with due care and
attention if he/she performs the most essential
measures with appropriate technology, in particular
by regularly utilising and maintaining agricultural
areas by applying appropriate agricultural
technologies and thus provides for optimal and
economic production.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
In accordance with Regulation 2092/91 a detailed
record on production and processing must be kept.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
In accordance with Regulation 2092/91 in organic
farming the restrictions on the application of
fertilisers are important, the application of nonsynthetic fertilisers and livestock manure is also
limited.
Only the application of organically produced seeds
and vegetative propagating material is allowed, unless
exemptions are allowed.
177
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
Annual production plan and livestock management
plan are not mandatory.
The use of genetically modified organisms and
products obtained from GMO is allowed in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 22
September 2003 on genetically modified food and
feed (OJ L 268, 8.10.2003, p. 1–23).
The use of plant protection products containing or
comprising of genetically modified organisms is
governed by the Plant Protection Products Act (OJ RS
No 98/04 – official consolidated text).
A grower may utilise agricultural land without
acquiring a certificate.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Beekeeping is possible everywhere.
Entry of a meadow orchard into a register is not
obligatory.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In accordance with Regulation 2092/91 in organic
farming the restrictions on the use of plant protection
products and other plant protection preparation.
The application of growth regulators is prohibited.
Each year the producer must draw up an annual
production plan and organic livestock management
plan in accordance with Regulation 2092/91.
In accordance with Regulation 2092/91 the use of
genetically modified organisms and products obtained
from GMO is not allowed.
Beneficiaries eligible for payments under this
submeasure must obtain a statement on organic
production and/or processing of agricultural products
and/or foodstuffs or a certificate.
In implementing the submeasure:
- beneficiaries are eligible for payments for utilised
grassland only for organic livestock breeding
with stocking density 0.2-1.9 LU/ha of utilised
agricultural area in 2007, 0.3-1.9 LU/ha in 2008,
0.4-1.9 LU/ha in 2009 and 0.5-1.9 LU/ha in
2010-2013, except when animals are grazing on
alps or common pastures and the stocking density
on the primary agricultural holding may be 0-1.9
LU/ha of utilised agricultural area.
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
Organic beekeeping is allowed only in an area
designated by the minister responsible for agriculture.
In implementing the submeasure the entry of a
meadow orchard into the register of fruit producers in
extensive or meadow orchards is obligatory.
178
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on animal welfare: Pursuant to Annex I to the
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) domestic
animals are to be bred in a manner to satisfy their
biological needs, to avoid distraction of their physical
functions and behaviour, to prevent their adjustment
capability from being overcharged and to treat them
in accordance with regulations governing animal
protection and veterinary. Feeding, care and
accommodation are suitable if the physiological,
ethological and other needs of domestic animals are
satisfied. Domestic animals are to be fed in a manner
suitable for individual domestic species, they are
properly cared for and adequate accommodation
facilities are provided. Forced feeding of domestic
animals is allowed if it is necessary for their survival
or for medical reasons. A breeder must regularly and
sufficiently provide the animals with quality and
adequate fodder and water.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In accordance with Regulation 2092/91 in organic
farming tethered breeding is prohibited; additionally,
some other restrictions on fodder, pasture, disease
control apply.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
In Slovenia, organic farming has been carried out since the late 1980s and the producers were
granted payments for the first time in 1999. The implementation of organic farming is based on
regulation governing organic production and processing of agricultural products and foodstuffs and
rules governing the designation of areas in the RS suitable for organic beekeeping. Both are in
accordance with Regulation 2092/91. Organic farming arouse great interest in producers (in 1999,
300 producers were included in the control of organic production and processing, while in 2006 as
many as 1,876) and therefore it is expected that organic farming shall include approximately 10
percent of utilised agricultural area by 2013. Additionally, there is also a growing interest of
consumers in this kind of products and foodstuffs, since consumers are becoming more and more
demanding and aware of the quality and healthiness of such products and foodstuffs.
In order to promote organic farming:
• payments for different crops have been granted since 1999,
• a network of organic farmers was established,
• inspection bodies for control of agricultural products and foodstuffs were officially appointed,
• with the financial support of the MAFF trademarks of different associations of organic
producers were developed (BIODAR),
• official label “ ekološki ” (organic) was designed,
• MAFF keeps the register of organic producers and processors and manages the labelling system
of organic agricultural products and foodstuffs,
• MAFF keeps a data base on organic seeds, seed potato and vegetative propagating material,
• control of import from third countries was established,
• well organised market of organic agri-foodstuff products was founded,
• active organic market stands were organised (sale of organic agricultural products and
foodstuffs),
• in 2005 the Government of the RS adopted the Action plan for the development of organic
farming in Slovenia by 2015.
In organic farming method production control is mandatory. Certificate issued by an inspection
179
body is a guarantee to consumers on special production methods of organic products and foodstuffs.
In compliance with the orientation of safe food production and processing, the safest is certainly the
controlled organically produced or processed food since it may not contain any residues of plant
protection products and heavy metals, or growth regulators or hormones and genetically modified
organisms residues. In order to prove that the products and foodstuffs are organically produced, the
consumers or buyers may verify whether a certificate of an appointed inspection body has been
issued for these products and foodstuffs.
On the areas on which the submeasure is implemented the application of plant protection products
and light soluble mineral fertilisers, growth regulators, genetically modified organisms is
prohibited. This means that the surface areas shall not be loaded with this type of substances as soon
as in the first year of implementing the submeasure. This way, organic farming also contributes to
the environmental protection against additional loads resulting from agriculture and to the
biodiversity conservation.
The average intensity of Slovenian farms is considerably lower than that in the Western European
countries. Mostly, the production is still traditional, with a large share of manual work, which,
taking into account the increasing consumer demand for higher quality food, contributes to a
quickened establishment of organic farming. Small to medium-sized mixed farms also offer ideal
opportunities for conversion to organic food production. Therefore per-area payments intended to
support the production under the special control and technological restrictions are granted to
beneficiaries at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation for organic farming is based on the direct comparison of costs (in envisaged yield
and produce prices) and income of existing calculation system of the Faculty of Agriculture,
Maribor. Basic differences mainly occur in products (products are predominantly so much smaller
that even higher price cannot compensate for the financial loss), as well as in production costs
themselves due to the organic production technology. The calculation was made by considering the
restrictions in organic farming set out in the submeasure.
The calculation of payment amounts took into consideration:
• fields-crops: maize production costs, material and energy costs (fertilisation and seed costs),
costs of machinery production (domestic machinery work, hired machinery services), domestic
work costs, crop rotation costs, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks,
higher produce price (by about 29 percent), lower income as a result of lower yield (by about 55
percent), operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs emerging from
the commitment made);
• vegetables grown outdoors: cucumber production costs, material and energy costs (fertilisation,
plant protection products and seed costs), costs of domestic machinery production (ploughing,
harrowing, produce transport, fertilisation, irrigation, cultivation, sprinkling costs), domestic
manual labour costs, crop rotation costs, time spent on training and keeping of records on work
tasks, lower cucumber yield (by about 37 percent), higher produce price (by about 55 percent),
operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs emerging from the
commitment made);
• vegetables grown in protected indoor areas: cucumber production costs, material and energy
costs (fertilisation, plant protection products and seed costs), costs of domestic machinery
180
•
•
•
•
production (ploughing, harrowing, produce transport, fertilisation, irrigation, cultivation,
sprinkling costs), domestic manual labour costs, time spent on training and keeping of records
on work tasks, lower cucumber yield (by about 37 percent), higher produce price (by about 55
percent), operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs emerging from
the commitment made);
orchards: apple production costs, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks,
lower apple yield (by about 39 percent), higher apple price (by about 33 percent), operating
costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs emerging from the commitment
made);
meadow high-trunk orchards: production costs on the meadow mown three times, additional
costs of orchard maintenance (harvesting, pruning and cleaning costs), time spent on training
and keeping of records on work tasks, lower hay yield (by about 40 percent), apple yield value,
operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs emerging from the
commitment made);
vineyards: grape production costs, material and energy costs (fertilisation, plant protection
products costs), costs of domestic machinery production, domestic work costs, time spent on
training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower grape yield (by about 59 percent), higher
grape price (by about 40 percent), operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and
additional costs emerging from the commitment made);
grassland: production costs on the meadow mown three times, time spent on training and
keeping of records on work tasks, lower hay yield (by about 38 percent), higher produce price
(by about 25 percent), operating costs (20 percent of the income foregone and additional costs
emerging from the commitment made).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Group II: Conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional
cultural landscape
Natural conditions are specific properties of a given region. In order to conserve them or at least
preserve them to a certain degree, Group II of agri-environmental submeasures is aimed at the
promotion and preservation of suitable land management within traditional agricultural practices,
emphasising the protection and conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity of the rural areas,
soil fertility and traditional cultural landscape in rural areas.
Biodiversity of a particular eco-system is based on biologic diversity and variations within species
and among them. The submeasures are aimed directly at the conservation of habitats and ecosystems, as the variety of species and habitats are strongly dependent on the framing practices as
well.
Since, in the rural areas, biodiversity and cultural landscape are related also to agriculture, the
submeasures facilitate the establishment of the required balance between these elements, observing,
as well, the environmental component, since, in the opposite case, there is a risk to loose the rich
biologic and cultural heritage of the rural areas.
Hence, the preservation of nature, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional cultural landscape are
comprised under the following submeasures:
214-II/1
214-II/2
214-II/3
214-II/4
214-II/5
214-II/6
Mountain pastures,
Steep slopes mowing,
Humpy meadows mowing,
Meadow orchards,
Rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds,
Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties,
181
214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals,
214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance.
The objectives, mechanisms and applicable obligations under each agri-environmental submeasure
are listed in the following pages.
Submeasure 214-II/1 Mountain pastures
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
-
Content
• Mountain pastures aimed at preserving traditional farming methods in mountain areas
and at preserving environmental, cultural and landscape diversity of mountains
• Payment per pasture land as compensation for costs of extra work involved in the
preservation of traditional farming practices
• Pasture in mountains during the pasture season
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
·
Count of grazing animals
·
Contract with the herdsman
• Long-term:
·
Preservation of utilised mountain areas
·
Conservation of a typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant and animal
species
· Production of healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin and ensuring consumer
health
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Payment may be obtained for mountain pasture with or without a herdsman.
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
182
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Herdsman is not obligatory.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of fertilisers and the use of plant
protection products.
In case of common use of an alp or mountain pasture
a pasture order is required.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
In accordance with Annex II, Part A and B of
Regulation 2092/91 only the fertilisers allowed in
organic farming may be applied.
Utilisation of grassland areas is possible only in a
traditional manner with grazing animals.
In implementing the submeasure
- stocking density during the pasture season shall be
0.5-1.9 LU/ha (by considering all grazing animals).
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
In mountain pasture with a herdsman the presence of
a herdsman is mandatory.
The herdsman must be under contract.
183
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
Cleaning mowing is not obligatory.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Applied may be only plant protection products and
other plant protection preparations allowed organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
After the pasture season manual removal of bushes
and weeds is mandatory.
Alp on which mountain pasture is employed shall, in addition to the above, meet the following
requirements:
• by tradition, it is employed in individual or common agricultural land use in the high-altitude
region of Slovenia,
• it is a geographically rounded estate with farm buildings (stables, dairies), dwelling buildings
(shepherd cottages), with its own water supply for human and animal consumption (spring
tapping, well),
• it is characterised with a shorter vegetation period, versatile climatic and soil conditions, animal
and plant life diversity,
• it is employed in seasonal pasture of animals, without their daily returning to domestic care,
• the animals remain on pasture for a minimum of 80 days, and the extent of grassland area in use
is minimum 5 ha.
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Similarly to certain neighbouring countries, a significant part of Slovenia lies in the alpine and highaltitude areas. As a result, mountain pasture has a long-standing and rich tradition dating back to the
12th century when written documents first mention mountain pastures under the Krn Mountain. A
particular form of economy was established. Mountain pasture begins each year with the movement
of animals from the valleys to mountain pastures and ends with their return to the indoor housing
facilities in autumn. To manage mountain pasture a special pasture order was established and
applied officially in the 19th century for the first time. Pasture order contains the rights and
obligations of farmers regarding pasture and work. The significant role of mountain pasture has
been preserved to date since summer pasture in high-altitude areas has continued this long-standing
tradition of pasture and the processing of milk into milk products (cheese-making); it has also
preserved the biodiversity of pastures and prevented overgrowing. The annual use of these pastures
allows the maintenance and preservation of infrastructure in the mountains as well.
Mountain pastures are located in particular in the Alpine area (Julian Alps, Karavanke, Kamniško184
Savinjske Alps) and the Prealpine area (Polhograjsko-Škofjeloško highlands, Cerkljansko-Idrijsko
highlands, Tolminsko highlands, Posavsko highlands, the Zgornja Savinjska valley, Pohorje and
Kozjansko) and, to a certain extent, in the Dinaric-Karst area (elevated karst plateaux, karst
plateaux of southern Slovenia). In these areas, livestock production and dairy sheep and goat
breeding are prevalent and mountain pasture in summer takes place on the alpine pastures. All
together, mountain pastures comprise around 12,000 ha, their size ranging from 5 to 250 ha, on
average about 44 ha35. Due to the shorter vegetation period, pasture lasts between 80 and 120 days.
Mountain pastures mostly feature huts for shepherds, housing for animals, fences, and access roads.
Electricity and water supply are more or less available. Buildings are often architectural monuments
and as such represent a valuable cultural and architectural heritage of the countryside.
The environmental, cultural and landscape variety of mountain pastures makes these areas
multifunctional. Traditional mountain pasture is a nature-friendly method of managing the alpine
areas and at the same time facilitating their multifaceted sustainable development. The
implementation of the submeasure of mountain pasture is therefore intended to preserve the
utilisation of alpine areas and traditional farming methods; preserve the typical landscape and
habitat for many plant and animal species; ensure healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin
and thus also promote consumer health.
Mountain pastures represent a traditional form of individual or common use of agricultural land in
the alpine regions of Slovenia. It contributes to preservation of natural and cultural landscape. In
order to preserve these areas utilised and inhabited, payments are granted to beneficiaries who
manage mountain pastures, as follows: (1) area payment for mountain pasture alone or (2) area
payment for mountain pasture and the herdsman.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation for mountain pasture is based on the comparison of classical rearing in stables and
rearing in which dairy cows are grazing during a certain period. The calculation considered the
classical rearing costs (9 months), mountain rearing costs (3 months), animal transport and alp
maintenance costs, cleaning mowing costs, (manual removal of bushes and weeds), time spent on
training and keeping of records on work tasks and costs for herdsman in case of mountain pasture
with herdsman. Considered was also lower milk production and milk price as a result of poorer
feeding on alp as well as reduced stocking density due to mountain pasture, which is not necessary
in regular farming.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing
-
Measure description
Objective
35
Content
• Steep slopes mowing aimed at preserving traditional farming methods and typical
landscape, natural features and habitats
Data from the register of agricultural holdings.
185
Mechanism
•
Implementation activity
•
Indicators
•
·
·
•
·
·
·
-
Per area payment land as compensation for costs of extra work involved in the
conservation of traditional farming practices
Mowing of steep slopes to conserve traditional ways of grassland use in specific
natural conditions
Control:
Acreage with inclination 35-50% (ha) on which the submeasure is being
implemented
Acreage with inclination over 50% (ha) on which the submeasure is being
implemented
Long-term:
Conservation of traditional farming practices and typical cultural landscape
Conservation of natural features
Conservation of habitats of numerous plant and animal species
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Payments for mowing of steep slopes may be obtained for meadows with inclination 35-50 percent
and for meadows with inclination over 50 percent.
•
•
-
•
•
-
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, , as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
-
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of fertilisers and the use of plant
protection products.
186
-
•
-
-
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg//ha annually.
-
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
In implementing the submeasure
- Stocking density on agricultural holding may not
exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area..
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
-
Mandatory are minimum one additional mowing
(manual with a self-propelled mower or specialised
mechanisation) and gathering (manual or with a
special mechanisation) annually.
-
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 170 kg/ha
annually.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Slovenia is among countries with highly diversified agricultural areas reflecting in varied relief.
One of the recognisable Slovenian features is landscape diversity, formed at the contact of natural
regional units as the consequence of specific land use and the way of life of our predecessors. Very
common landscape elements are thus steep slope meadows. As a part of agricultural landscape they
should be regularly maintained, but owing to steep slopes these meadows are abandoned. In order to
prevent the abandonment of farming and consequential overgrowing the implementation of
submeasure is aimed at mowing of steep slope meadows to prevent the overgrowing, conserve the
traditional farming practices (hay mowing and gathering) and typical landscape, conserve specific
natural features and the habitats of numerous plant and animal species, which in lower inclinations
reflects in intensification prevention (conversion of meadows in perennial crops) and in higher
inclinations in afforestation prevention. To prevent such negative trends and to conserve traditional
farming practices, payments for mowing of steep slope meadows are granted to beneficiaries whose
187
meadows are located on slopes with inclination of 35 to 50 percent or over 50 percent.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times in comparison to the steep slope meadow
mown only once. Considered were production costs on the meadow mown once, machinery work
costs (produce transport costs), manual labour costs (manual mowing costs), time spent on training
and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower hay yield (by about 69
percent) and lower hay price (by about 40 percent) on meadow mown once due to lower feed
quality of hay.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/3 Humpy meadows mowing
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
•
•
Content
• Humpy meadows mowing aimed at conserving cultural landscape and habitats
• Per area payment as compensation for costs of extra work involved in the
conservation of traditional farming practices
• Manual mowing of humpy meadows to conserve traditional farming practices and
natural landscape features
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
• Long-term:
·
Conservation of traditional farming practices and typical cultural landscape
·
Conservation of natural features
· Conservation of habitats of numerous plant and animal species
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
188
•
•
-
•
-
•
Baseline
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
Agricultural land must be managed every year.
The application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
-
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of fertilisers and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
-
Agricultural holding or certain areas of agricultural
holding must be situated in humpy meadow areas
from official register (Annex 7).
• In implementing the submeasure
- Stocking density on agricultural holding may exceed
1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area.
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
-
Mandatory are minimum one manual mowing and
gathering annually.
-
In implementing the submeasure the application of
mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
189
•
-
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03,
5/07).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Additional feature of Slovenian landscape is high spatial fragmentation, which gives a very
interesting and varied landscape image of a mosaic-like structure. One of these features can be
found on limestone glacial deposits, mainly ground moraines, where chemical dissolving caused
formation of shallow sinkholes. As regards the shape and size they are much alike, but irregularly
dispersed over meadows. Shallow hollows most frequently separate less than 1 m high rounded
embossments, known as humpy meadows.
Humpy meadows are an agricultural landscape feature and a natural heritage, but unfortunately they
are disappearing due to difficult utilisation conditions. Production intensification can cause a loss of
this identity and along with the economical reasons also the disappearance of certain habitats and
species since these meadows are being flattened for easier utilisation. In order to preserve these
Pleistocene features, the submeasure foresees at least one manual mowing and gathering annually.
Thus the conservation of traditional farming practices and of typical landscape, specific natural
features and habitats of numerous plant and animal species shall be provided for. Payments are
therefore devoted to the conservation of the cultural landscape and traditional methods of humpy
meadows management and are granted to beneficiaries in areas specified in Annex 7.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times in comparison to the humpy meadow
mown only once. Considered were production costs on the meadow mown once, machinery work
costs (produce transport costs), manual labour costs (mowing of humpy meadows), time spent on
training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower hay yield (by about
190
69 percent) and lower hay price (by about 40 percent) due to lower feed quality of hay.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/4 Meadow orchards
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
•
•
•
Content
• Conservation of meadow orchards to preserve traditional cultural landscape and
biodiversity
• Per area payment as compensation for costs of extra work involved in the
conservation of traditional farming practices
• Conservation of traditional extensive perennial orchards
• Control:
·
Acreage of cultivated meadow orchards (ha)
·
Reduced application of plant protection products in accordance with the prognosis
·
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
• Long-term:
·
Reduced threat of erosion
·
Conservation of traditional and autochthonous fruit varieties
·
Conservation of traditional meadow orchard, with possible dual use
·
Conservation of typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant and animal species
· Wider range of fruit products, based on old aromatic fruit varieties
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
191
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
- Olive groves must be maintained/ managed in
accordance with the established technological
practice.
- It is required to implement the necessary measures
within the framework of appropriate technology and
to maintain the land regularly and exemplary.
Entry of meadow orchard in register is not obligatory.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of fertilisers and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Orchards must be under permanent green cover.
Required is maintenance of orchard grassland and
mowing or pasture of grassland areas.
Application of weak growing rootstocks in the
plantation renewal is not allowed.
Required is maintenance of high-trunk meadow
orchards, including the treatment of trees and
plantation restoration (planting of empty spots).
Minimum number of trees per hectare is 50 and
maximum 200 trees per hectare.
Restoration pruning must be carried out in the first or
second year of engagement in the submeasure (for
beneficiaries who shifted from the old agrienvironmental measures scheme into the new scheme
of agri-environmental submeasures it is considered
that this condition is fulfilled if they carried out the
restoration pruning in the first or second year of
engagement in the agri-environmental measure under
the old scheme).
Grassland is to be mown under the tree crowns as
well.
Meadow orchards must be recorded in the register of
fruit producers in extensive or meadow orchards.
192
•
•
•
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products: Pursuant to Articles 3
and 8 of the Plant Protection Products Act (OJ RS No
98/04 - official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended application
in the RS, or a permission for trade of identical plant
protection products from other EU Member States.
Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the package
leaflet, label indication or information in the
permission and by considering the principles of good
agricultural practice in plant protection and the Rules
on the responsibilities of users of plant protection
products (OJ RS No 62/03, as amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In implementing the submeasure
- Stocking density on agricultural holding may not
exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area.
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 150 kg/ha
annually.
Application of plant protection products may be
allowed on the basis of a prognosis, where one exists.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Meadow orchards represent a Slovenian countryside identity and the treasury of biodiversity in
agriculture. They are spread practically throughout the country, but have been strongly neglected in
the last decades. Many meadow orchards have survived to date, but modern commercial orchards
have replaced the significance of meadow orchards to a great extent; mainly because they are not
economical and interesting for the market. Compared to modern intensive orchards, high-trunk trees
are less economic to grow and more susceptible to pests and diseases. Consequently, they have not
been utilised or renewed and the threes not maintained. Nevertheless, they are still valuable as a
source of apple vinegar, cider, and apple juice and apple segments.
According to data on the land use (2005) extensive orchards cover less than 1 percent of the total
surface area in Slovenia. The surface area of extensive orchards has gradually fallen in the recent
years, while that of intensive orchards has grown. Particular for extensive orchards is alternative
fruitfulness; therefore the oscillation of the production volume varies from year to year. In extensive
meadow orchards with high-trunk trees the traditional old varieties prevail (bobovec apples,
carjeviè apples, Jonathan apples, golden parmena apples), while intensive orchards mostly contain
modern apple varieties (IdaRed, JonaGold, Golden Delicious, Gloucester).
Meadow orchards represent a traditional farming method and are closely related to environmental
protection. They are planted on permanent grassland in a wide range of soil conditions and types as
well as different fruit varieties. The structural variety of an orchard provides home for numerous
193
animal and plant species. Mice and hedgehogs live on the ground. The trunk of an old fruit tree is
covered with lichens, mushrooms and moss. Cavities in the trunk give shelter to hole-nesting birds,
woodpeckers, robins or endangered species like wrynecks, owls or bats. The blossoms provide
nectar for honeybees, bumble bees, or butterflies. The fruits are not only for human consumption,
but also feed to many birds, hedgehogs, badgers or other wildlife.
Typical for meadow orchards is their dual use: grassland can be mown or grazed, and at the same
time fruit is produced. Fruit grown in traditional meadow orchards is not treated with chemicals and
tastes just as well as or even better than commercially grown fruit. Since meadow orchards are
valuable landscape features, and biodiversity and cultural resources they must be preserved.
Therefore, the submeasure is aimed at ensuring the appropriate management of meadow orchards to
benefit wildlife and plant species. As a result of consumer interest and the reintroduction of
traditional varieties meadow orchards are being revived. Therefore per-area payments aimed at
partial compensating for costs of extra work involved in the reviving and maintenance of meadow
orchards are granted to beneficiaries at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation was based on the comparison of the meadow mown three times comprising no hightrunk trees and the meadow mown three times comprising high-trunk trees. Considered were
production costs on the meadow mown three times, orchard maintenance costs (harvesting, pruning,
cleaning), time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower hay yield (by about
25 percent) and the value of apple yield.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
Content
• Conservation of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds, their genetic
diversity and prevention of loss of biological material adapted to certain
environment
• Payment per LU for retaining the autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds in
production
• Breeding of pure-breed animals
• Control:
·
Number of animals under the submeasure
·
Number of individual autochthonous and traditional breeds reared under the
submeasure
• Long-term:
·
Conservation of (endangered) autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds
·
Conservation of typical cultural landscape associated with the breeding of specific
breeds of domestic animals in typical regional manner
· Production of healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin and ensuring
consumer health
194
Payments are granted for:
1. Cattle:
- Cika breed;
2. Equidae:
- Lipizzan horse,
- Posavje horse,
- Slovenian cold-blooded horse,
- Ljutomer trotter,
- Haflinger;
3. Pigs:
- Krško Polje breed,
- Slovenian landrace (Line 11),
- Slovenian landrace (Line 55),
- Large white (Line 22);
4. Sheep:
- Jezersko-Solèava sheep,
- Bovec sheep,
- Istrian pramenka,
- Bela krajina pramenka,
- Improved Jezersko-Solèava sheep;
5. Goats:
- Drežnica goat,
- Slovenian Saanen goat,
- Slovenian Alpine goat;
6. Avian:
- Styrian hen,
- Slovenian barred hen,
- Slovenian silver hen,
- Slovenian brown hen,
- Slovenian early fathering hen,
- Slovenian late fathering hen,
- Slovenian heavy weight hen.
To turn the number of animals into LU the coefficients laid down in Annex V of Regulation
1974/2006 apply.
The description of the aforelisted domestic breeds, including the number of breeding females of
each breed, is shown in Annex 8. The list and description have been confirmed by duly recognised
bodies, that is:
Breed
Duly recognised body
Cika breed
Commercial Association for Cattle
Breeding
Jable, Grajska cesta 1, 1234 Mengeš
Public Institute Kobilarna Lipica
Lipica 5, SI 6210 Sežana
The Posavje Horse Breeders’
Association
Ravno 4, SI 8274 Raka
Slovenian Cold-Blooded Horse
Breeders’ Association
Iška vas 63a, SI 1292 Ig
Lipizzan horse
Posavje horse
Slovenian cold-blooded horse
Organisation keeping the breeding
book
Agriculture Institute of Slovenia
Hacquetova 17, SI 1000 Ljubljana
Public Institute Kobilarna Lipica
Lipica 5, SI 6210 Sežana
University of Ljubljana - Veterinary
Faculty
Gerbièeva 60, SI 1000 Ljubljana
University of Ljubljana - Veterinary
Faculty
Gerbièeva 60, SI 1000 Ljubljana
195
Breed
Duly recognised body
Ljutomer trotter
Trotting Association of Slovenia
Ulica 1. slovenskega tabora 13a, SI 9240
Ljutomer
Slovenian Haflinger Breeders’
Association
Kokra 42, SI 4205 Preddvor
Slovenian Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry
Celovška 135, SI 1000 Ljubljana
Organisation keeping the breeding
book
University of Ljubljana - Veterinary
Faculty
Gerbièeva 60, SI 1000 Ljubljana
University of Ljubljana - Veterinary
Faculty
Gerbièeva 60, SI 1000 Ljubljana
University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical
Faculty, Zootechnical Department
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
Slovenian Associations’ Union of Sheep
and Goat Breeders
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical
Faculty, Zootechnical Department
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
Slovenian Associations’ Union of Sheep
and Goat Breeders
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical
Faculty, Zootechnical Department
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical
Faculty, Zootechnical Department
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical
Faculty, Zootechnical Department
Groblje 3, SI 1230 Domžale
Haflinger
Krško Polje breed, Slovenian
landrace (Line 11), Slovenian
landrace (Line 55), Large white
(Line 22)
Jezersko-Solèava sheep, Bovec
sheep, Istrian pramenka –
Istrijanka, Bela krajina
pramenka, Improved JezerskoSolèava sheep
Drežnica goat, Slovenian Alpine
goat, Slovenian Saanen goat
Styrian hen, Slovenian barred
hen, Slovenian silver hen,
Slovenian brown hen, Slovenian
early feathering hen, Slovenian
late feathering hen, Slovenian
heavy weight hen
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Beneficiaries may claim payments for minimum 1 LU. In poultry production beneficiaries must rear
at least 100 adult animals.
For animals supported under the Gene Bank Programme no payments may be claimed under this
RDP measure.
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records is not mandatory.
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure.
It is mandatory to keep records on fodder purchase by
agricultural holdings which buy fodder in addition.
196
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Pursuant to Article 3 of the Livestock Breeding Act
(OJ RS No 18/02, as amended) breeding of all
domestic animals is allowed, i.e. animals bred by man
for his own benefit and living under his guardianship
and care and are not deemed wild animals under the
regulations on the nature conservation.
Animals need not be recorded in a breeding book.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard:
standard on animal welfare: Pursuant to Annex I to
the Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions for
farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) a breeder must
regularly and sufficiently provide the animals with
quality and adequate fodder and water.
 No period is set for rearing of individual animals. The
breeder rears each animal according to his/her
economic interests.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
In implementing the submeasure
- Stocking density on agricultural holding may not
exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area.
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure.
Mandatory is rearing of autochthonous and traditional
domestic breeds specified in a special list.
•
Animals must be recorded in a breeding book or
register.
• In cattle, horse, sheep and goat production the
maximum permitted purchase of compound
feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other concentrated
feedingstuffs per LU is 1,200 kg annually.
• In pig production the maximum purchase of compound
feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other compound
feed is 2,100 kg per LU annually.
• In laying hens production the maximum purchase of
compound feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other
compound feed per LU annually is 7,000 kg, with
broilers maximum 6,500 kg and with turkey hens
maximum 4,000 kg annually.
• Fodder and feedingstuffs additives used to feed the
animals on agricultural holding must produced
pursuant to Annex I B, Chapter 4, point 4.18,of
Regulation 2092/91.
In implementing the submeasure:
- the number of animals must be bred for five years
from entering the submeasure.
- after the expiry of the deadline for the application
submission the beneficiaries must keep the animals
for which they have submitted a claim for at least 6
months with cattle, 100 days with sheep and goats, 3
months with horses and pigs and 2 months with
poultry.
In the fodder purchase record the purchase of compound feedingstuffs, cereals, oilseeds and pulses,
by-products of milling and oilseeds processing industry, and dried products from sugar and brewery
industry are recorded. The records apply for purchase in the market as well as the purchase from
other agricultural holdings. The purchase from other agricultural holding is allowed only if this
other agricultural holding is engaged in organic or integrated production.
The record must contain the following information: fodder or feedingstuffs type, quantity (kg), date
of purchase, name and address of the vendor and KMG-MID number if the vendor is an agricultural
holding. For fodder purchased in the market the record must contain invoice and a declaration.
Purchase of maize silage is allowed only from another agricultural holding which is engaged in
organic or integrated production; there are no quantity limitations. The record must contain only
fodder type, date of purchase, name and address of the vendor and KMG-MID number.
Purchase of hay and grass silage is not limited.
197
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Domestic animals have always had a cultural value to the mankind. For thousands of years man has
used them for food and raw material production, work and as pets. In the centuries and millenniums
of development, after the domestication, the geographically isolated populations evolved into
subspecies and within these subspecies into various animal types adapted to particular
environmental and climatic conditions. Thus, numerous autochthonous breeds of domestic animals
developed contributing to a biotic (genetic) diversity in the Slovenian space. The rearing of
domestic animals in Slovenia was well developed as far back as the Middle Ages. At the beginning
of 20th century, the number of most domestic animal species was higher than today and not too long
ago, Slovenian autochthonous domestic animals provided the basis of farmers' income. In the past
decades, genotypes with high productivity substituted the less productive autochthonous and
traditional domestic animal types, which were gone and the genetic diversity in individual types has
decreased. Hence, numerous old autochthonous Slovenian domestic breeds have vanished and only
their remains preserved. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent the loss of biological material and
maintain the genetic variability of domestic animals for the purposes of maintaining breeds and/or
lines and ensuring food safety of the population. Payments are intended for the conservation of
autochthonous and traditional breeds in production and thus contribute to the conservation of
biodiversity and sustainable utilisation of natural resources.
Autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds are a part of the cultural heritage that has already
contributed to the preservation of population density in remote Slovenian areas in the past, and also
contributed to the preservation of the utilisation of agricultural areas. Today, the increased number
of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds plays an important role in the preservation of
traditional farming practices and in environmental protection, conservation of typical cultural
landscape associated with rearing of specific species and breeds of domestic animals in typical
regional manner, production of healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin and ensuring
customer health. Payments per LU are therefore granted at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Next to area-linked agri-environmental submeasures the beneficiaries may simultaneously
implement the submeasure 214-II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds.
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the comparison of a regular breed and autochthonous and traditional
domestic breed. The differences in financial results emerge mainly due to poorer production
properties of autochthonous and traditional breeds. Considered were the rearing costs of
autochthonous and traditional breeds, and time spent on training and keeping of records on work
tasks. The data on production properties of autochthonous and traditional breeds were taken from a
study by the Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana (Kastelic et al., 200636).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Miran Kastelic, PhD, Drago Kompan, PhD, prof. Andrej Šalehar, PhD, 2006. Predlogi višine podpor in postopki
izraèuna za posamezne vrste in pasme v Republiki Sloveniji (transl.: Proposed support amounts and calculation
procedures for individual species and breeds in the Republic of Slovenia). University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty
– Zootechnical Department.
36
198
Submeasure 214-II/6 Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
Content
• Conservation of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties, their
genetic diversity and genetic potential and prevention of the loss of biological
material adapted to specific environmental conditions
• Per area payment for the conservation of autochthonous and traditional agricultural
plant varieties in production
• Production of rare autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
·
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
·
Number of individual autochthonous and traditional varieties in production under the
submeasure (ha)
• Long-term:
·
Conservation of (endangered) autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant
varieties
·
Conservation of typical cultural landscape associated with the production of specific
varieties of agricultural plants in typical regional manner
· Production of healthy and quality foodstuffs, ensuring customer health
Payments are granted for:
1. Cereals:
- buckwheat: 'Darja', 'Siva', 'Èrna gorenjska', 'Èebelica',
- millet: 'Sonèek';
2. Maize:
- 'Lj - 275 t (FAO 200)', 'Lj-180';
3. Fodder plants:
- tall oatgrass: 'Sora',
- red fescue: 'Jasna',
- meadow fescue: 'Jabelska',
- Italian ryegrass: 'Draga',
- perennial ryegrass: 'Ilirka',
- cock s foot: 'Kopa',
- timothy: 'Krim',
- rapeseed: 'Starška', 'Daniela',
- turnip rape: 'Kranjska okrogla', 'Kranjska podolgovata',
- Swede cabbage: 'Rumena maslena',
- red clover: 'Živa', 'Poljanka',
- crimson clover: 'Inkara',
- alfalfa: 'Bistra', 'Soèa', 'Krima';
4. Vegetables:
- onion: 'Belokranjka', 'Ptujska rdeèa', 'Tera',
- garlic: 'Ptujski jesenski', 'Ptujski spomladanski',
- carrot: 'Ljubljansko rumeno', 'Semor'
- cabbage: 'Kranjsko okroglo', 'Emona', 'Ljubljansko', 'Varaždinsko',
- large-leaved chicory: 'Anivip', 'Monivip', 'Solkanski',
- lettuce: 'Dalmatinska ledenka', 'Leda', 'Bistra',
- corn salad or lamb's lettuce: 'Ljubljanski', 'Žlièar',
- climbing french bean: 'Jabelski stroènik', 'Jabelski pisanec', 'Jeruzalemski', 'Klemen',
'Semenarna 22', 'Ptujski maslenec', 'Maslenec rani',
- bush bean: 'Èešnjevec', 'Zorin',
199
5.
6.
7.
8.
- paprika - peppers: 'Ferdi',
- tomato: 'Val';
Potato:
- 'Kresnik', 'Jana', 'Cvetnik', 'Vesna';
Oil plants:
- oilseed pumpkin: 'Slovenska golica';
Hop:
- 'Savinjski golding';
Fruit plants:
- apple: 'Dolenjska vošèenka', 'Gorenjska vošèenka', 'Goriška sevka', 'Lonjon', 'Majda',
'Priolov delišes', 'Bobovec', 'Boskop', 'Beliènik', 'Carjeviè', 'Grafenštajnc', 'Kanadka',
'Krivopecelj', 'Londonski peping', 'Štajerski mošancelj', 'Ovèji nos', 'Pisani kardinal', 'Zlata
parmena', 'Jonatan', 'Legro', 'Krvavka', 'Bužlovka', 'Jakobovka', 'Rožmarinka', 'Špièka',
'Èebulka', 'Peteršiljka', 'Maslenka', 'Grinštantin', 'Klanferca, sladka jabolka', 'Rožnik,
rožinski', 'Rambura', 'Lovrenèovka', 'Rdeèi bobovec', 'Železnica', 'Vrtnica', 'Vinšca štrudlovka', 'Brtavka', 'Citronka', 'Štupanka', 'Prsnika', 'Ferdekelca', 'Damasonski kosmaè',
'Harbertova reneta', 'Pogaèar',
- pear: 'Tepka', 'Rjavka', 'Pohorska moštnica', 'Vinska moštnica', 'Mleènica ali bela tepka',
'Kraljica julija', 'Šmarjetnica', 'Rožmarinka', 'Vinogradovka', 'Kravšca', 'Špehovka', 'Debela
Rupret', 'Pituralke', 'Avranška', 'Druardova maslenka', 'Lukasova',
- plum: 'Domaèa èešplja',
- cherry: 'Vipavka', 'Vigred', 'Brusniška hrustavka', 'Kozanka', 'Èrna cepika', 'Èufarca',
'Divjaka', 'Terèentka', 'Petrovka', 'Francoska', 'Popovka', 'Napoleonova',
- peach: 'Veteran', 'Triogem',
- apricot: 'Pišeška', 'Catarji', 'Domaèi flokarji', 'Ogrska',
- chestnut: 'Vitoveljski maron',
- walnut: 'Elit', 'Haloze', 'MB-24', 'Petovio', 'Raèe-866',
- hazel: 'Istrska dolgoplodna (debeloplodna) leska', 'Istrska okrogloplodna leska',
- olive: 'Istrska belica', 'Èrnica', 'Buga', 'Štorta';
9. Vine:
- 'Maloèrn', 'Pinela', 'Ranfol', 'Radgonska ranina', 'Rebula', 'Refošk', 'Rumeni plavec', 'Šipon',
'Zelen', 'Žametovka', 'Kraljevina', 'Malvazija', 'Vitovska grganja', 'Cipro', 'Klarnica',
'Pergolin', 'Poljšakica'.
The description of agricultural plant varieties listed above is shown in Annex 9. The list and
description have been confirmed by duly recognised bodies, which are:
Agriculture Institute of Slovenia
Hacquetova 17
SI 1000 Ljubljana
University of Ljubljana
Biotechnical faculty – Department of Agronomy
Jamnikarjeva 101
SI 1000 Ljubljana
Institute of Hop Research and Brewing
Žalskega tabora 2
SI 3310 Žalec
Experimental Centre for Olive Production
Ulica 15. maja 17
SI 6000 Koper
-
Vegetables, potato, fodder plants, vine
Buckwheat, maize, fruit plants, grasses, clovers
Hop
Olive
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
Requirements for final beneficiaries
200
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
under the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of fertilisers and the use of plant
protection products.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
In implementing the submeasure
- Stocking density on agricultural holding may not
exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area.
- Agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 170 kg/ha
annually for cereals, maize fodder plants, vegetables,
potato, oil plants, hop and vine, and 150 kg/ha
annually for fruit plants.
201
•
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in the soil: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the 3-year crop rotation is
mandatory on at least 50 percent of arable areas of the
entire agricultural holding. Grasses, clovers, grassclover mixtures and clover-grass mixtures on arable
areas are a part of crop rotation and may be on the
same area longer than three years.
•
•
•
•
Tree density in orchards is not specified.
•
•
Meadow orchard need not be recorded in register.
•
•
•
-
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Mandatory is five year crop rotation, which shall
include at least 3 different autochthonous or traditional
crop varieties.
Stubble crops are considered as one of the three
different crops to be included into the five year crop
rotation.
The crop rotation must be designed at entering the
submeasure. In case of force majeure or changed
market conditions the potential change of the crops in
the rotation may not have negative impacts on the
environment nor diminish the performance of the
submeasure.
Tree density of autochthonous and traditional fruit
tree varieties must be 50-200 trees/ha in high-trunk
meadow orchards and minimum 150 trees/ha in olive
groves, at least 100 trees/ha with walnut and chestnut,
and at least 200 trees/ha with other fruit varieties.
Meadow orchards must be recorded in the register of
fruit producers in extensive or meadow orchards.
Application of growth regulators is not allowed.
The application of plant protection products is
possible on the basis of a prognosis, where one exists.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Generations of breeding work contributed to the preservation of agricultural plant varieties that are
optimally adapted to their specific local environmental conditions. In the same way, the landscape
bears the distinct imprint of farmers' widely varying, regionally adapted land utilisation and
production methods. The industrialisation of agriculture in the recent decades has increasingly
threatened this genetically and historically valuable human-imprinted biodiversity.
Many of the original regional agricultural plants are often characterised by low yields, slow growth
and seem to be without important economic value and are therefore threatened to be foregone.
Unfortunately, numerous agricultural plant varieties possessing genetic potential worthy of
conservation as well as many regional sites with their specific flora and fauna are already
irretrievably lost. In order to keep this genetic heritage, the submeasure is aimed at conserving
autochthonous and traditional varieties of agricultural plants, with per-area payments encouraging
202
farmers to carry out traditional farming practices and improving the conditions to continue the
production of these varieties.
High diversity of climatic and soil conditions ensure that numerous plant types within the same
species grow on natural sites, with a high variety of species. In order to preserve the original
characteristics and genetic variation of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties,
payments for growing and retaining of these plant varieties in production are granted to
beneficiaries at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the comparison of a regular variety and autochthonous and traditional
variety. The differences in financial results emerge mainly from poorer production properties of
autochthonous and traditional varieties (lower yield). The difference in lower costs was considered
in the basic model. Considered were production costs of autochthonous and traditional varieties,
time spent on training and keeping of records and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income
as a result of lower yield (by about 7-33 percent with regard to variety).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
Content
• Sustainable rearing of domestic animals aimed at achieving complete nutrient cycle
(e.g. nitrogen, nutrients, organic matter, etc.) on an agricultural holding and reduction
of loads on the environment
• Per area payment as compensation for costs of extra work involved in the
conservation of traditional farming practices
•
•
·
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
·
-
Rearing of domestic animals to conserve traditional grassland use, and to ensure
fodder produced on agricultural holdings and healthy and quality products of animal
origin
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Recorded use of fertilisers
Recorded fodder purchase
Number of animals per ha of utilised agricultural areas
Long-term:
Animal friendly rearing
Natural nutrient cycle on farm
Reduction of environmental pollution with organic waste
Reduced pollution of soil and waters
Production of healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin and ensuring consumer
health
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
Requirements for final beneficiaries
203
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure.
It is mandatory to keep records on fodder purchase by
agricultural holdings which buy fodder in addition.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
204
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
Agricultural holding with livestock manure surplus
must have a receipt on the relinquishment or sale of
the exceeded quantity of livestock manure.
Additional minimum requirements on the
application of fertilisers: The amount of applied
mineral nitrogen is 250 kg/ha annually.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on animal welfare: In accordance with Annex I of
Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions
for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended) a breeder
must regularly and sufficiently provide the animals
with quality and adequate fodder and water.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Mandatory are minimum one use (pasture or mowing)
and gathering annually.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 0.5
- 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area, except when
animals are grazing on alp or common pasture and
stocking density on the primary agricultural holding
may amount to 0-1.9 LU/ha;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
•
•
•
•
In implementing the submeasure the amount of
applied mineral nitrogen may not exceed 170 kg/ha
annually.
In cattle, horse, sheep and goat production the
maximum permitted purchase of compound
feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other concentrated
feedingstuffs per LU is 1,200 kg annually.
In pig production the maximum purchase of compound
feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other compound
feed is 2,100 kg per LU annually.
In laying hens production the maximum purchase of
compound feedingstuffs, cereals, oil cakes and other
compound feed per LU annually is 7,000 kg, in broiler
production maximum 6,500 kg and in turkey hens
production maximum 4,000 kg per LU annually.
Fodder and feedingstuffs additives used to feed the
animals on agricultural holding must produced
pursuant to Annex I B, Chapter 4, point 4.18 of
Regulation 2092/91.
In the fodder purchase record the purchase of compound feedingstuffs, cereals, oilseeds and pulses,
by-products of milling and oilseeds processing industry, and dried products from sugar and brewery
industry are recorded. The records apply for purchase in the market as well for purchase from other
agricultural holdings. Purchase from other agricultural holding is allowed only if this other
agricultural holding is engaged in organic or integrated production.
The record must contain the following information: fodder or feedingstuffs type, quantity (kg), date
of purchase, name and address of the vendor and KMG-MID number if the vendor is an agricultural
holding. For fodder purchased in the market the record must contain invoice and a declaration.
Purchase of maize silage is allowed only from another agricultural holding which is engaged in
205
organic or integrated production; there are no quantity limitations. The record must contain only
fodder type, date of purchase, name and address of the vendor and KMG-MID number.
Purchase of hay and grass silage is not limited.
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
In Slovenia livestock production is the most important agricultural branch as it represents 55
percent of agricultural production market value and over two thirds of the final agricultural
production value. The most spread livestock production is cattle production, followed by poultry
and pig production. Sheep and goat production, horse breeding, rabbit breeding, beekeeping and
fish farming are less extended production branches.
Slovenia is very sensitive to farming methods, predominantly due to a high share of karstic and
sandy agricultural surface area, which is ecologically very sensitive and not suitable for intensive
conventional production. Therefore, sustainable farming methods are suitable for Slovenia ensuring
quality food production. The environment and animal friendly management methods contribute to
the preservation of the settlement and cultural landscape. In addition thereto consumers demand
quality products of animal origin, and this can be provided best by sustainable rearing methods of
domestic animals.
Cattle production is ensured by natural conditions in Slovenia with high grassland share as
meadows and pastures represent more than 60 percent of utilised agricultural area. These grassland
areas can hence be used best by ruminants rearing.
Next to cattle, sheep and goat rearing, particularly for karst and somewhat overgrown grassland
areas, is the best solution. In the last decade sheep and goat rearing in Slovenia has been the most
developing livestock branch, whereas breeding and feeding methods remain within the range of
sustainable rearing. This mainly concerns rearing in pastures and overgrowing areas with the
predominant application of a controlled pasture system, only to a smaller extent also traditional
short movement of the herd to mountain pastures.
Pig rearing, as the second most important livestock production branch, is concentrated in eight large
pig farms and larger market oriented farms. Agricultural holdings with animal stock 200 (including
farms), representing nearly 0.5 percent of pig agricultural holdings, produce 46 percent of pig stock
in Slovenia. The greatest problem of these large systems is the extensive amount of livestock
manure which cannot be economically used on areas for fodder production and thus represent a
great threat to the environment. Therefore the submeasure is aimed at sustainable methods of
rearing and providing quality pork products.
The majority of poultry meat and eggs are intensively produced and the majority of raw materials
for the preparation of fodder mixtures are imported. Therefore in poultry production sustainable
production systems and systems providing the best protection of natural resources possible should
be promoted.
The objective of the submeasure, whilst taking into account ethological requirements with regard to
animal and environmental standards, is to achieve closed matter cycle on agricultural holdings,
reduce the pollution of natural resources, decrease the loads on the utilised agricultural land, adjust
the number of animals to the fodder basis on agricultural holdings and thus decrease their
dependency on external inputs.
In order to promote sustainable animal rearing along with the proper grassland maintenance, the
implementation of the submeasure is intended for agricultural holdings with stocking density 0.51.9 LU/ha of UAA. Such practice results in animal friendly rearing methods, enables natural onfarm matter cycle, reduction of environmental pollution with organic waste and production of
healthy and quality foodstuffs of animal origin, and ensuring customer health. Payments for the
206
implementation of the submeasure are therefore granted at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on reduced LUs density in the sustainable rearing. Considered were rearing
costs by taking into account lower milk yield in feed ration for dairy cows or rearing costs by taking
into account higher fodder costs for broilers, and time spent on training and keeping of records and
keeping of records on work tasks.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
•
•
Content
• Preservation of biodiversity through extensive use of grassland
• Per area payment to conserve extensive farming practices
• Efficient use of grassland to preserve traditional grassland use
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
·
Count of animals
·
Quantity of green forage produced
·
Recorded use of fertilisers
• Long-term:
·
Conservation of habitats and biodiversity
·
Conservation of the landscape and mosaic-like structure of rural areas
· Preservation of traditional farming methods
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
207
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
Agricultural holding with livestock manure surplus
must have a receipt on the relinquishment or sale of
the exceeded quantity of livestock manure.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
The manner of hay gathering is not prescribed.
The application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 00.5 - LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
•
•
•
Mandatory are minimum one use (pasture or mowing)
and gathering annually.
Mowing is conducted after the full flowering of the
main grass varieties.
In implementing the submeasure hay is gathered in
traditional manners.
The application of mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
208
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
The application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
As a result of the need for agricultural intensification, the vast majority of the extensive permanent
grassland has not been properly managed. In the past decades the intensive grassland management
resulted in variety-poor composition of green cover. Contrary thereto, grassland extensification
increases the proportion of plant varieties which are not sown. Traditional farming in grassland
resulted in the appearance of specific types of secondary habitats, which are also very important for
the conservation of biodiversity. Characteristic landscape diversity is threatened through the
abandoning of agricultural land use in certain areas and the intensification of agricultural
production, which changes the appearance of the landscape and negatively affects the biodiversity.
Intensive management methods reflect also in the unfavourable botanic composition of the green
cover and reduced count of animal species which are dependent on certain habitats.
Extensive grassland use is not economic, still it emphasises the nature protection aspect through the
recreation of rich flora and fauna in meadows. The maintenance of permanent grassland by
traditional grassland management regime includes restrictions on stocking density and is aimed at
overgrowing prevention, enabling conservation of habitats and biodiversity, landscape and mosaiclike structure of the rural areas and enabling the full flowering of the main grass varieties. Per area
payments aimed at preserving the extensive grassland are therefore granted at the national level.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the comparison of the meadow mown three times and extensive
grassland meadow, whereby a lower hay price on the meadow mown once was considered due to
poorer hay quality. Considered were also the costs of machinery work (mowing, turning, and
209
swathing of hay, transport), manual labour costs, time spent on training and keeping of records on
work tasks, lower income as a result of lower yield (by about 62 percent) and lower hay price (by
about 40 percent).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Group III: Maintenance of protection areas
A part of agri-environmental payments is intended for submeasures supporting protection areas,
such as water reserves, national and landscape parks, natural reserves, natural heritage sites and
ecologically important areas.
By compensating costs emerging as a result of specific environmental conditions, the
implementation of submeasures shall also contribute to the conservation of landscape features and
areas intended for biotope development.
In order to preserve the utilisation and the settlement in special status areas, agri-environmental
payments envisage the following submeasures:
214-III/1
214-III/2
214-III/3
214-III/4
214-III/5
214-III/6
Animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores,
Preservation of special grassland habitats,
Preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies,
Preservation of litter meadows,
Bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura 2000 sites,
Permanent green cover in water protection areas.
The MAFF receives the official register of protected, ecologically important and water protection
areas in digital graphic format, appropriate for the implementation of the submeasures from the
MESP, which also provides for the monitoring of the state of the environment, habitats and
biodiversity. The monitoring system must be adjusted to the needs of agri-environmental
submeasures.
The MAFF receives the official register of central areas of appearance of large carnivores from the
Slovenia Forest Service, which also provides for the implementation of the monitoring of large
carnivores. The system of monitoring of large carnivores must be adjusted to the needs and
requirements of agri-environmental submeasures.
The objectives, mechanisms and applicable obligations under each agri-environmental submeasure
are listed in the following.
Submeasure 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Animal husbandry in central areas of appearance of large carnivores to ensure coexistence with large carnivores and to preserve favourable status of the preservation
of large carnivores population (brown bear)
• Payment per acreage of grassland as compensation for costs of extra work required to
protect the herd against attacks by large carnivores
•
Rearing of domestic animals to conserve grassland and prevent overgrowing, and of
establishing conditions for coexistence with large carnivores
210
Indicators
•
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
Control:
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Number and breed of animals grazing
Long-term:
Grassland maintenance
Alleviation of conflicts between large carnivores and farming
Reduction of frequency of attacks by large carnivores
Coexistence of large carnivores and domestic animals
Beneficiaries are eligible for payments only for the period in which animals are actually grazed and
guarded.
-
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Beneficiaries may be eligible for payments only for pasture areas grazed during the pasture season.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Agricultural holding or individual areas of
agricultural holding must be situated in central areas
of appearance of large carnivores from the official
register (Annex 10).
211
•
•
•
-
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous
substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05) the annual nitrogen input in the
application of livestock manure may not exceed
170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
It is not required that sheep and goats on pasture shall
be guarded at all times.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Grassland areas must be grazed.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 0.51.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
• agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
•
On pasture, sheep and goats shall be guarded at all
times.
Where possible mobile protection fences and nets are
applied.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Brown bear was widely spread in Slovenia until the 18th century. Due to activities affecting the
nature and direct extermination (hunting, poisoning) by man throughout centuries brown bear was
pushed to the forests of High Karst. At the time of most intensive persecution only some ten bears
survived. After protective measures have been introduced on large farms in the Koèevsko and
Notranjsko regions at the end of the 19th century, the number of the species increased again and has
been maintained.
The central area is defined as the site where the bear has always been present and currently
continuously populated. It does not concern the introduction of bears into this area, but the
preservation of brown bear population in a favourable state, in a natural age-sex structure and in
such a number which enables coexistence between the bear and man.
Expected effects of implementing the submeasure derive from the provisions of the Bern
Convention ratified by both the RS and the European Community and from the laws laying down
its implementation. In the European Community, this concerns Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the
conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, whereas in Slovenia, the Nature
Conservation Act and Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) Management Strategy in Slovenia based on the
maintenance of favourable conservation status for large carnivore species listed in Annexes II and
IV of Council Directive 92/43/EEC.
212
Where the brown bear appearance coincides with agricultural production areas, particularly with
sheep and goat rearing, it may result in a certain loss of income due to damage caused by bears. The
loss of income and simultaneous maintenance of favourable conservation status for large carnivores
(in particular brown bear) can be prevented by additional protection of herds and flocks, particularly
of sheep and goats, or by restructuring the sheep and goat rearing into livestock production. The
payment is devoted to an increased scope of work carried out for implementing the protective
measures of pasture control (fences, pens, regular opening and closing of passages). Moreover, it
encourages the restructuring of sheep and goat breeding into livestock production and provides the
coexistence between man and bears, in particular with local population.
A central area of appearance of large carnivores is deemed the area defined as such by a special act
of the Government of the RS. Central areas of appearance of large carnivores comprise: wider
Koèevska region with Ribnica valley, Notranjska region with Krim-Mokrec mountains, part of
Dolenjska region and part of Bela Krajina, Nanos, Hrušica, Trnovski gozd, part of Idrija hills.
Animals present in these areas indeed live in the forest, but utilised areas offer them food, and the
lack of feeding areas, decreased due to excessive number of certain wild animals in the forest,
drives them to urban zones and causes conflicts with rural inhabitants and their activities (e.g.,
sheep rearing). Per grassland area payments compensate for the costs of extra work required to
protect the herd against attacks by large carnivores in areas listed in Annex 10.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation took into account the animal protection costs, and time spent on training and
keeping of records on work tasks.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland habitats
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Increase of grassland area allowing successful reproduction of endangered plant
varieties and animal species and targeted nesting of endangered grassland bird
species in ecologically important areas
• Per area payment to defray for costs of extra work required by environmental and
landscape requirements
•
Conservation of extensive grassland and border strips (tree and bush growth) within
ecologically important areas
213
Indicators
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
•
•
•
•
•
•
Control:
Grassland areas on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Areas within the ecologically important areas mown or grazed in accordance with the
conditions (ha)
Recorded use of fertilisers
Long-term:
Conservation of typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant, bird and other
animal species
Population count of indicator bird species
Population count of indicator plant species
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Agricultural holding or individual areas of
agricultural holding must be situated in ecologically
important areas as specified in the official register
(Annex 11, Point 11.1).
214
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation: In
accordance with Annex I of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) land must be utilised at least once
per year.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation:
Trimming and thinning of hedgerows is allowed only
during a certain season.
Application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Green cover use, including pasture or mowing, not
allowed prior to flowering of grasses and raising of
the offspring of endangered bird species (before 15
July).
Pasture or mowing and gathering are performed after
the flowering of grasses and raising of the offspring
of endangered bird species (after 15 July).
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 0.21.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
• agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
•
In implementing the submeasure the existent border
tree strips and hedgerows shall be trimmed and
thinned every second year.
Application of mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
215
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
The application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
Traditional and extensive methods of farming have been widely spread in Slovenia in the past and
thus enabled the preservation of habitats to numerous animal and plant species. In the last centuries
due to the changes in natural and agricultural landscape, many animal and plant species became
dependent on the human activity. Swallows shifted their nests from rock walls to houses, barns and
stables, white storks that used to nest on high trees, nowadays build their nests on chimneys or poles
in the middle of settlements.
Despite its small size, Slovenia has a very diverse landscape and climate and traditional agricultural
practices, which contribute to the relatively high biodiversity. Slovenia is situated at the junction of
eastern, western and northern fauna elements. Here, numerous animal and plant species also reach
the northern, southern, eastern or western borderline of their distribution. All this contributes to the
relatively high biodiversity, which also makes Slovenia the second richest country in the EU
(UNEP WCMC biodiversity index). Over 850 endemic species, over 250 species and over 40
habitat types are of the European conservation interest, and as such a subject to habitat conservation
measures according to the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC), Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and
Natura 2000 network. In order to preserve the diversity, the implementation of this submeasure is
directed towards nature friendly farming which enables the preservation of their habitats. The
submeasure is aimed at the preservation of grassland being a natural habitat, in particular for
endangered grassland birds listed in Article 4 of the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC), grassland habitat
types and grassland plant species listed in Annexes I and II of the Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC)
and for which Natura 2000 sites were designated. The submeasure requires adjusted mowing and
pasture securing the existence of habitat types, i.e. Orchids (Orhidaceae), Marsh Gladiolus
(Gladiolus palustris), Meadow Squill (Scilla litardierei) growing in the areas, and a successful
nesting and raising of the offspring, especially of Corncrake (Crex crex), and the reproduction of
amphibians, insects and other animals serving as food to White Stork (Cicionia ciconia), Lesser
Grey Shrike (Lanius minor) and Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio).
Expected effects of implementing the submeasure derive from the provisions of the Convention on
Biological Diversity ratified by both Slovenia and the European Community and the legislation
216
laying down its implementation. In the European Community, this concerns Birds Directive
(79/409/EEC) and Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC), whereas in Slovenia, the Nature Conservation
Act. This effect results in the maintenance of favourable state of preservation of endangered species
and habitat types, particularly in the ecologically important areas (Decree on ecologically important
areas) and within them the Natura 2000 sites (Decree on special protection areas – Natura 2000
sites) being in agricultural use and designated to achieve favourable conditions for the existence of
grassland habitat types, in particular the sites of Orchids (Orhidaceae), Marsh Gladiolus (Gladiolus
palustris), Meadow Squill (Scilla litardierei), Corncrake (Crex crex), White Stork (Cicionia
ciconia), Lesser Grey Shrike (Lanius minor) and Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio).
Ecologically important areas are areas with preserved or characteristic biodiversity. Within the
framework of this submeasure the use of agricultural land shall be sustainable which contributes to
a high biodiversity of the area and preserves habitats (living environment) of ecologically
demanding species. In Slovenia, the habitats of numerous endangered species and habitat types are
also late mown humid and dry meadows on poor mineral soils. The expected effect of implementing
the submeasure is the preservation of a specific targeted scope and quality of these meadows within
the designated areas. In numerous ecologically important areas these meadows are subject to
changes into more intensive forms of agricultural use (intensively fertilised meadows or fields).
Therefore the preservation of these special grassland habitats is of great importance.
Payments are aimed at the maintenance of meadows for mowing or pasture and/or their renewed
establishment. The integral part of this submeasure is mowing after full flowering which enables the
survival of plant species that bloom late, and successful breeding of progeny to nesting birds and
certain other animal species. Such land use is more specific and causes a certain loss of income to
the owner, mainly the income of the first and second mowing. Therefore there is a need to provide a
certain financial support for farmers adjusting their activities in order to preserve habitats of
ecologically demanding plant and animal species. An appropriate payment provides income
equality of farmers who decide to implement this submeasure with those farmers who do not
implement such a submeasure and, consequently, do not suffer any loss of income. Payments are
granted to beneficiaries the land of which is located in areas referred to in Annex 11, point 11.1.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times. Considered was lower hay price on the
meadow mown once due to lower hay quality, as well as the costs of machinery work (mowing,
turning, and swathing of hay, transport), manual labour costs, costs of trimming the stripe under the
trees, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower
yield (by about 62 percent) and lower hay price (by about 40 percent).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies
-
Measure description
Content
217
Objective
•
Mechanism
•
Implementation activity
•
Indicators
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
•
•
•
•
•
•
Increased grassland area, allowing successful reproduction of endangered plant and
animal species and targeted reproduction of endangered grassland butterfly species in
internal zones of ecologically important areas
Per area payment to defray costs of extra work required by environmental and
landscape requirements
Conservation of extensive grassland and border strips (tree and bush growth) within
ecologically important areas
Control:
Grassland areas on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Areas within the ecologically important areas mown or grazed in accordance with the
conditions (ha)
Recorded use of fertilisers
Long-term:
Conservation of typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant, bird and other
animal species
Population count of indicator butterfly species
Population count of indicator plant species
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Agricultural holding or individual areas of
agricultural holding must be situated in ecologically
important areas as specified in the official register
(Annex 11, Point 11.2).
218
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation: In
accordance with Annex I of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) land must be utilised at least once
per year.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation:
Trimming and thinning of hedgerows is allowed only
during a certain season.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Between 1.7. and 20.8., during the butterfly
development on nutritional grassland plants, mowing
and pasture are not allowed.
Pasture or mowing and gathering may be carried out
before 1.7. and after 20.8.
In implementing the submeasure the existent border
tree strips and hedgerows shall be trimmed and
thinned every second year.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 0.21.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
Application of mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
219
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
The application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
To preserve the high biodiversity in Slovenia, the implementation of this submeasure is aimed at the
preservation of meadows being natural habitats to endangered butterfly species listed in Annex II of
the Habitat Directive (92/43/EC) and for which Natura 2000 sites were designated. Mowing or
pasture right after the conclusion of the conditions under submeasure 214-III/2 Preservation of
special grassland habitats, does not secure the habitat of these butterfly species due to various
ecological requirements of endangered butterfly and bird as well as plant species.
The submeasure requires adjusted mowing or pasture enabling the butterflies to successfully
develop to fully grown animals, in particular the following butterfly species: Large copper butterfly
(Lycaena dispar), Scarce Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea teleius), Dusky Large Blue Butterfly
(Maculinea nausithous), and Marsh Fritillary Butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). The submeasure also
contributes to the maintenance of favourable preservation conditions of other butterfly species listed
in Annex II of the Habitat Directive, grassland habitat types listed in Annex I of the same directive,
and White Stork (Cicionia ciconia), Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio) and some other bird
species referred to Article 4 of the Birds Directive (70/409/ES) (providing a food basis of
amphibians, insects and other animals).
Expected effects of implementing the submeasure derive from the provisions of the Convention on
Biological Diversity ratified by both Slovenia and the European Community and the legislation
laying down its implementation. At the EU level these are the Birds Directive (79/409/EC) and the
Habitat Directive (92/43/EC) and at the national level the Nature Conservation Act. These effects
maintain the favourable conditions of the preservation of endangered species and habitat types,
especially in ecologically important areas (Decree on ecologically important areas) and the Natura
2000 sites (Decree on special protection areas (Natura 2000 sites), which are agriculturally used and
designated to achieve favourable conditions of grassland habitat types and butterflies, i.e. Large
Copper Butterfly (Lycaena dispar), Scarce Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea teleius), Dusky Large
Blue Butterfly (Maculinea nausithous), and Marsh Fritillary Butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). The
aim is to preserve the target-oriented amount and quality of meadows within the aforementioned
areas. In numerous areas these meadows are subject to changes into more intensive forms of
220
agricultural use (intensively fertilised meadows or fields). Therefore the preservation of these
special grassland habitats of butterflies is of great importance.
Payments are aimed at the maintenance of meadows by mowing or pasture and/or their renewed
establishment. The main issue of this submeasure is a loss of hay harvest in the period during which
the butterfly development is dependent on the nutrition supplied by plants on meadows (July and
August). Such land use is far more specific and means a certain loss of income for the owner, in
principle the loss of the second and third mowing. Therefore, farmers should be given a certain
financial encouragement to adjust the farming method aimed at the preservation of ecologically
demanding plant and animal species. Appropriate payment provides income equality of farmers
who decide to implement this submeasure with those farmers who do not implement such a
submeasure and, consequently, do not suffer any loss of income. Payments are granted to
beneficiaries the land of which is located in areas referred to in Annex 11, point 11.2.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times. Considered was lower hay price on the
meadow mown once due to lower hay quality, as well as the costs of machinery work (mowing,
turning, and swathing of hay, transport), manual labour costs, costs of trimming the stripe under the
trees, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower
yield (by about 62 percent) and lower hay price (by about 40 percent).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
Content
• Increased grassland share, allowing successful reproduction of endangered plant and
animal species and targeted reproduction (nesting) of ecologically most demanding
endangered bird and butterfly species in ecologically important areas
• Per area payment to defray costs of extra work required by environmental and
landscape requirements
•
•
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
·
Conservation of extensive grassland and border strips (tree and bush growth) within
ecologically important areas
Control:
Grassland areas on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
Areas within the ecologically important areas mown or grazed in accordance with the
conditions (ha)
Recorded use of fertilisers
Long-term:
Conservation of typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant, bird and other
animal species
Population count of indicator bird species
Population count of indicator butterfly species
Population count of indicator plant species
221
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Agricultural holding or individual areas of
agricultural holding must be situated in ecologically
important areas as specified in the official register
(Annex 11, Point 11.3).
222
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation: In
accordance with Annex I of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) grassland must be maintained at
least once per year.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation:
Trimming and thinning of hedgerows is allowed only
during a certain season.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Pasture and mowing not allowed by 25.8.
Obligatory is pasture or mowing and gathering after
25.8.
In implementing the submeasure the existent border
tree strips and hedgerows shall be trimmed and
thinned every second year.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 0.21.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
Application of mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
223
•
•
-
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
The application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
The submeasure is aimed at the preservation of litter meadows. Litter meadows are meadows mown
once a year in late summer or in autumn, whereby the mown grass is used as litter for animals, and
are a natural habitat for most demanding endangered grassland birds referred to in Article 4 of the
Birds Directive (79/409/EC), and grassland butterfly species, habitat types and grassland plant
species listed in Annexes I and II of the Habitat Directive (92/43/EC) and for which the Natura
2000 sites were designated. The submeasure requires adjusted mowing and pasture providing for a
successful butterfly development, i.e. Danube Clouded Yellow (Colias myrmidone) and False
Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus), and simultaneously providing the existence of grassland habitat
types and Orchids (Orhidaceae) growing in these areas, successful nesting and breeding of progeny,
especially of Corncrake (Crex crex), and successful development of butterflies to fully adult
animals, i.e. Large Copper Butterfly (Lycaena dispar), Scarce Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea
teleius), Dusky Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea nausithous), and Marsh Fritillary Butterfly
(Euphydryas aurinia).
Expected effects of implementing the submeasure derive from the provisions of the Convention on
Biological Diversity ratified by both Slovenia and the European Community and the legislation
laying down its implementation. In the European Community, this concerns Council Directive
79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds and Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the
conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, whereas in Slovenia, the Nature
Conservation Act. These effects maintain the favourable conditions for the preservation of
endangered species and habitat types, especially in ecologically important areas (Decree on
ecologically important areas) and the Natura 2000 sites (Decree on special protection areas (Natura
2000 areas)), which are agriculturally used and designated to achieve favourable conditions for the
existence of grassland habitat types, in particular the sites of Orchids (Orhidaceae), Corncrake
(Crex crex), Danube Clouded Yellow (Colias myrmidone), Large Copper Butterfly (Lycaena
dispar), Scarce Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea teleius), Dusky Large Blue Butterfly (Maculinea
nausithous), and Marsh Fritillary Butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). The habitat for these species in
the described areas of habitat overlapping with the submeasures 214-III/2 Preservation of special
224
grassland habitats and 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies cannot be secured if
the beneficiaries mow or graze right after the conclusion of the conditions under the submeasure
214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland habitats.
The implementation of the submeasure is aimed at the preservation of the specific amount and
quality of these meadows within the aforementioned areas. In numerous areas litter meadows are
subjected to changes into more intensive forms of agricultural use (intensively fertilised meadows
or fields), therefore their preservation is of great importance.
Payments are aimed at the maintenance of litter meadows by mowing or pasture and/or their
renewed establishment. The integral part of this submeasure is mowing or pasture in the late
summer (after August) to provide for a successful development of butterflies and nesting birds.
Such land use is more specific and causes a certain loss of income to the owner, mainly the income
of the first, second and third mowing. Therefore there is a need to provide a certain financial
support for farmers adjusting their activities in order to preserve habitats of ecologically demanding
plant and animal species. Appropriate payment provides income equality of farmers who decide to
implement this submeasure with those farmers who do not implement such a submeasure and
consequently do not suffer any loss of income. Eligible for payments are beneficiaries the land of
which is situated in areas designated in Annex 11, point 11.3.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times. Considered was lower hay price on the
meadow mown once due to lower hay quality, as well as the costs of machinery work (mowing,
turning, and swathing of hay, transport), manual labour costs, costs of trimming the stripe under the
trees, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks, income foregone as a result of
lower produce which, due to the late mowing (after 25 August), can be used only for litter.
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura 2000 sites
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Content
• Providing favourable population status of endangered birds species and habitats in
humid extensive meadows
•
•
Per area payment to defray income forgone and additional costs of performing
special farming methods
Conservation of humid extensive grassland, border strips and other structural
elements of agricultural landscape (individual trees and bushes and waterside
vegetation) and implementation of special agricultural practices
225
Indicators
•
·
·
·
·
•
·
·
·
•
•
•
•
•
•
Control:
Total permanent grassland area on which the submeasure is implemented (ha)
Areas within the Natura 2000 sites managed in accordance with the conditions
Total area and share of structural elements in landscape
Area of humid extensive meadows within ecologically important areas mown or
grazed in accordance with the conditions (ha)
Long-term:
Population count of indicator bird species in humid extensive meadows
Population count of indicator plant species
Conservation of typical landscape and habitats of numerous plant and animal species
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of meadows are utilised identically,
regardless of the area where they are situated.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure and not only a record on the
application of livestock manure.
Land application of sewage sludge, silt and residues
from fish farms is not allowed; applied may be only
compost produced on agricultural holdings.
Agricultural holding or individual areas of
agricultural holding must be situated in central areas
of appearance of birds of humid extensive meadows
in the Natura 2000 sites as specified in the official
register (Annex 12).
226
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, Standard
on animal species and habitat conservation: In
accordance with Annex I of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) land must be utilised at least once
per year.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Application of mineral fertilisers is allowed.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Obligatory is minimum one mowing and gathering
annually.
First mowing is possible only after 1.8.
Pasture is not possible.
Mowing is done from meadow centre outwards
(applies for GERK over 1 ha in size).
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding must be 01.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
•
•
Application of mineral fertilisers is not allowed.
The application of plant protection products is not
allowed.
227
Recommendations:
- use of scythe mower at reduced speed,
- mowing at minimum altitude 10 cm above the ground,
- leaving 3-5 m wide unmown stripes (suitable for GERK over 5 ha),
- equally left and maintained individual bushes and trees within GERK, 5-15 m wide (total area
of elements may not amount to more than 3 percent of the total GERK).
Monitoring shall be carried out within the CBI/FBI indicator. Indicator species are:
- Corncrake (Crexcrex),
- Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus),
- Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus),
- Curlew (Numenius arquata),
- Barred Warbler (Sylvia nisoria),
- Quail (Coturnix coturnix),
- Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra),
- Whitethroat (Sylvia communis),
- Grasshopper Warbler (Locustella naevia),
- Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio).
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
In the last decade (1990-2000 period) a decline in the number of at least 52 nesting birds species in
Slovenia was registered, which is approximately one quarter of all nesting bird species in this area.
Of the declining population species 27 species are farmland birds. About one half of these species
accommodate the rich structured, mosaic-like cultural landscape and the other half are birds
specialised for various extensive grassland types. Most endangered are species in humid extensive
meadows, e.g. Corncrake (Crex crex), Curlew (Numenius arquata), Common Snipe (Gallinago
gallinago) and others populations which have declined as much as by over 50 percent in the last ten
years. Today, larger areas of humid extensive meadows are preserved only on flooded plains by the
rivers and in karstic fields in the central part, and to the South and Southeast of Slovenia.
For birds most important humid extensive meadow areas were designated as Special protection
areas (SPA) based on the provisions of the Bird Directive (79/409/EEC) and integrated into the
European network of the Natura 2000 protection sites based on the Decree on special protection
areas (Natura 2000 sites). Slovenia is bound to provide a favourable preservation situation of
protected species populations in the Natura 2000 sites.
For long term preservation of the populations of ecologically demanding bird species in humid
extensive meadows it is necessary to secure further land management in areas which are less
interesting from economic viewpoint due to difficult conditions for farming. It is important that the
period of mowing and the conduction of certain agricultural techniques, particularly in central areas
of humid meadows, be adapted to the habits and features of birds living in humid extensive
meadows. The submeasure is aimed at preserving the species populations listed in Article 4 of Bird
Directive (79/409/EC). Payments are therefore granted to beneficiaries in areas laid down in Annex
12.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
228
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation is based on the meadow mown three times. Considered was lower hay price on the
meadow mown once due to lower hay quality, as well as the costs of machinery work (mowing,
turning, and swathing of hay, transport), manual labour costs, costs of trimming the stripe under the
trees, time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks, lower income as a result of lower
hay yield (by about 62 percent) and lower hay price (by about 40 percent).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Submeasure 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water protection areas
-
Measure description
Objective
Mechanism
Implementation activity
Indicators
-
Content
• Maintaining utilised and settled landscape with special status to maintain and
improve groundwater quality
• Per area payment to defray costs of extra work due to environmental and landscape
requirements as well as the conservation of traditional farming methods
• Preservation of green soil cover in water protection areas throughout the year
• Control:
·
Acreage on which the submeasure is being implemented (ha)
·
Green cover throughout the year (ha)
·
Recorded application of fertilisers and plant protection products
• Long-term:
·
Reduction of groundwater pollution
· Conservation and improvement of groundwater quality
Requirements for final beneficiaries under the submeasure in comparison to the baselines
Payments are granted for:
- fields,
- perennial crops,
- grassland (grass and grass-clover mixes in the fields, extensive grassland).
Baseline
Requirements for final beneficiaries
229
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Baseline
In the RS no additional education of farmers is
required.
Pursuant to Article 24 of the Agricultural Land Act
(OJ RS No 55/03 - official consolidated text) a farmer
is competent to perform agricultural activity if he/she
has an agricultural education of IV. degree or any
other IV. degree education and an exam in accordance
with the applicable programme of agricultural
technical or secondary schools on the agricultural
activity he/she performs or shall perform, or by
obtaining the national vocational qualification in
agriculture in accordance with the act governing the
national vocational qualifications.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with the
Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine (OJ RS No 36/02, as
amended) all plant protection operators must pass an
exam in phytomedicine
Keeping of records on work tasks is not mandatory.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers: Agricultural holdings must keep a record
on the application of livestock manure, which must
indicate at least the quantity and type of livestock
manure, application time and information on the area
on which the manure was applied.
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: In accordance with
Annex 1 of the Rules on the responsibilities of users
of plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended) it is required to keep a record on the use of
plant protection products, which must contain
information on the areas and crops where these
products are used. These records must be saved for at
least 5 years.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on sewage sludge: Land application of mud, silt or
compost on agricultural holdings is allowed. For these
areas agricultural holding must draw up an annual
operational plan of mud, silt or compost distribution
with a limited application as set out in Article 7 of the
Decree on the limited input concentration values of
dangerous substances and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No
84/05).
Different types of agricultural land are utilised
identically, regardless of the area where they are
situated.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
During the commitment period a beneficiary eligible
for payments under the submeasure shall participate
in an educational programme taking at least 4 hours
annually. After concluding the education process the
beneficiary receives a certificate on contents, operator
and the number of hours of the training.
Keeping of records is mandatory for all producers
engaged in the submeasure. The producers must keep
records on all work tasks carried out within the range
of the submeasure not only the records on the
application of livestock manure and the use of plant
protection products.
Applied may be only organic mass (waste) produced
on agricultural holdings.
Only fertilisers allowed in organic farming may be
applied, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and B of
Regulation 2092/91.
Agricultural holding or certain areas of thereof must
be situated in narrowest water protection areas from
the official register (Annex 13).
The submeasures capture the whole agricultural
holding if it is situated in a narrowest water protection
zone or those utilised agricultural areas which are
situated in a narrowest water protection zone (Annex
13).
230
•
•
•
Baseline
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on plant protection products:
- Pursuant to Articles 3 and 8 of the Plant
Protection Products Act (OJ RS No 98/04 official consolidated text) only the use of
registered plant protection products is allowed, or
products for which an exceptional permission has
been given, or a permission for extended
application in the RS, or a permission for trade of
identical plant protection products from other EU
Member States.
- Registered plant protection products must be
appropriately used in accordance with the
package leaflet, label indication or information in
the permission and by considering the principles
of good agricultural practice in plant protection
and the Rules on the responsibilities of users of
plant protection products (OJ RS No 62/03, as
amended).
Additional minimum requirements on the use of
plant protection products: Only appliances which
are regularly checked and have a regular check mark,
to be obtained every two years, may be used.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, organic matter in the soil: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the 3-year crop rotation is
mandatory on at least 50 percent of arable areas of the
entire agricultural holding. Grasses, clovers, grassclover mixtures and clover-grass mixtures on arable
areas are a part of crop rotation and may be on the
same area longer than three years.
•
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Applied may be only plant protection products and
other plant protection preparations allowed in organic
production, in accordance with Annex II, Part A and
B of Regulation 2092/91.
The five year crop rotation shall include at least 3
different crops.
Subsequent crops are considered as one of the three
different crops to be included into the five year crop
rotation.
The crop rotation must be designed at entering the
submeasure. In case of force majeure or changed
market conditions the potential change of the crops in
the rotation may not have negative impacts on the
environment nor diminish the performance of the
submeasure.
231
•
•
•
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil structure: In accordance to Annex II
to the Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental
conditions for farming (OJ RS No 34/07, as amended)
it is required to apply adequate mechanisation.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, soil erosion: In accordance with Annex II
to the Regulation about cross compliance (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) agricultural land need be utilised
in a manner minimising the erosion risk and agritechnical measures applied which reduce the erosion
effect.
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended) the grower acts with due care and
attention if on utilised agricultural area he:
- regularly utilises and maintains agricultural land;
- provides for the conservation or improvement of
soil fertility by an adequate use method,
- does not cause land degradation (erosion,
compaction, pollution) with inadequate
technology,
- maintains land exemplary and regularly,
- utilises land to enable optimal and economical
production by applying appropriate agricultural
technology,
- manages all areas belonging to agricultural
holding to avoid the endangerment of the holding
vitality,
- provides for adequate land utilisation in case of
his/her disability or longer absence,
- maintains olive groves in good vegetative
condition,
- maintains olive groves and olive tree groups
where these represent traditional growing of olive
trees in the Mediterranean areas of Slovenia.
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Mandatory is year-round green cover.
Suitable for the year-round green cover are grass,
clover, alfalfa crops, as well as grass-clover mixtures,
clover-grass mixtures, winter cereals, and other winter
crops.
Utilisation must be suitable to crops, soil conditions
and timing.
232
•
Baseline
Standard on good agricultural and environmental
conditions, minimum maintenance level: In
accordance with Annex II of Regulation on statutory
management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming (OJ RS No
34/07, as amended):
- Minimum livestock density if livestock is kept on an
agricultural holding. Where no livestock is
produced, grassland is maintained through mowing.
- Ensuring grassland management through pasture,
mowing or combination of pasture and mowing;
- Conserving agricultural land, which preserves
traditional cultural landscape;
- In cases of extensive land operations the
conservation of elements of landscape features is
ensured; whereas in olive growing areas olive tree
groups are also deemed elements of landscape
features.
- Agricultural land must be managed every year.
- Olive groves must be maintained/ managed in
accordance with the established technological
practice.
Regulatory requirements on operations, standard
on nitrates:
- Pursuant to Article 4 of the Decree on the limit
input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil (OJ RS No 84/05) the annual
nitrogen input in the application of livestock manure
may not exceed 170 kg/ha.
- Agricultural holding with livestock manure
surplus must have a receipt on the relinquishment
or sale of the exceeded quantity of livestock
manure.
Tree density in orchard is not specified.
•
Meadow orchard need not be recorded in the register.
-
Payment entitlement based on anticipated impacts on the environment with regard to
environmental requirements and priorities
•
•
•
Requirements for final beneficiaries
Mowing and gathering in grassland is obligatory at
least twice per year.
In implementing the submeasure:
- stocking density on agricultural holding may not
exceed 1.9 LU/ha of utilised agricultural area;
- agricultural holding may not produce livestock
manure surplus.
- single rate of nitrogen shall not exceed 30 kg/ha.
•
•
Tree density must be 50-200 trees/ha in high-trunk
meadow orchards and minimum 150 trees/ha in olive
groves, at least 100 trees/ha with walnut and chestnut,
and at least 200 trees/ha with other fruit varieties.
Meadow orchard must be recorded in the register of
fruit producers in extensive and meadow orchards.
Slovenia has rich water resources, groundwater and water springs, which yield clean drinking water
of the highest quality. Groundwater resources, which are the source of drinking water, are mostly
shallow and located in alluvial river valleys. Most of these are agricultural areas under intensive
agricultural production.
In 2000, one third of the investigated groundwater sources were clean and, according to the
Slovenian and European conditions for drinking water, of sufficient quality to be used as source of
drinking water. In other two-thirds, at least one substance was found to damage the quality of
groundwater and be the cause of deviation from the EU guideline values. Most frequently, these
were atrazine and desethylatrazine. Other contaminants that exceeded the limit values for drinking
water are: nitrates, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, metals (Fe, Mn, Cr, Pb, Zn, Cd), ammonium and
nitrites.
It is not always easy to determine the share that the agricultural sector contributes to the pollution;
however, the use of mineral fertilisers in areas with intensive land cultivation represents the main
233
source of pollutants (mainly nitrates) in the environment. The damaging effects of agriculture on
water sources, especially the quality of groundwater, are most visible in the basins of the Drava and
Mura rivers. In the eastern part of Slovenia (Mursko plain, Ptujsko plain and Dravsko plain), the
quality of groundwater is directly influenced by intensive crop production. The lowlands of the
Pomurje and Maribor regions with intensive production of cereals and in the Celje region with hop
plantations are polluted with nitrates. The quality of the groundwater at the Krško-Brežiško polje is
also influenced by intensive farming; however, in 2000 nitrate concentrations did not considerably
exceed the limit value. In the Pomurje and Celje regions, the increase in the contents of nitrates in
groundwater is also influenced by manure surplus from large livestock production farms. In the
western part of Slovenia (Vipava valley), the quality of groundwater is relatively good. In the
Alpine hinterland sources are much cleaner than elsewhere.
With regard to the European standards, water quality of most underground sources in Slovenia is
still appropriate for drinking. In recent years, the quality of groundwater shows a trend of
improvement with regard to the contents of nitrates and pesticides in samples taken, whereas the
quality of waters in Slovenia is also better than decades ago. Nevertheless, measures to preserve and
improve groundwater quality are necessary. The entire Slovenia is defined as a vulnerable zone;
however, the restrictions to the pollution of groundwater with pesticide and nitrate residues apply in
water catchments areas. Along with environmental protection regulations, which shall not be
violated under any circumstances, additional restrictions and limitation are set out in the present
submeasure. Green soil cover throughout the year and recorded application of fertilisers and plant
protection agents reflect in reduction of groundwater pollution and conservation as well as
improved groundwater quality.
In order to maintain and improve groundwater quality and at the same time preserve utilised and
populated landscape with special status, payments are granted to beneficiaries located in narrowest
water protected areas listed in Annex 13.
-
Combinations with other agri-environmental submeasures
Combination options are given in chapter A. Requirements related to all agri-environmental
submeasures (Details on eligibility conditions, point 7).
-
Detailed description of calculation methodology
The calculation considered costs for:
•
fields: wheat production costs, greening costs, costs of the year-round green cover (costs of
ploughing, harrowing, machinery application, sowing of clover-grass mixture, and mulching –
applied twice), maize production costs, potato production costs, and time spent on training and
keeping of records on work tasks;
•
perennial crops: production costs, costs of maintenance of surface under the trees (total green
cover), and time spent on training and keeping of records on work tasks;
•
grassland: production costs on the meadow mown twice, time spent on training and keeping of
records on work tasks, lower income due to lower hay yield (by about 39 percent).
The calculation methodology is shown in Annex 6.
Methodology, prerequisites and parameters for calculating the support amounts for the
measure agri-environmental payments
-
Baselines
234
The existing methodology for calculating payment amounts for agri-environmental measures under
the Rural Development Programme of the RS 2004-2006 (OJ RS No 116/04, 45/06) – the
“Computer programme SKOP 1.0” (Rozman et al., 200237) (hereafter referred to as SKOP model
1.0) is based on “partial budget”, the so called assessment of the difference between the sum of
additional costs and the income foregone and the sum of reduced costs and the additional income
arising as a result of the implementation of an agri-environmental measure on agricultural holding.
Whereas, as regards the costs, the so called “public utilities” emerging as a result of the measure
implementation are quantified in different ways. As regards the model development, the main
problem was a lack of basic input data, i.e. costs of individual sustainable production methods
(integrated crop, vegetable and fruit production, organic farming and sustainable rearing of
domestic animals). The lack of basic cost studies to provide basic input data for a regular
application and the update of the SKOP 1.0 model, as well as further upgrades thereof, shows the
need for a basic methodological tool for assessing the sustainable production method costs. The
currently applied approaches are based on the technologically economic simulation models
(Rednak, 199738; Rozman, 200439, Rozman et al., 200640; Pažek et al., 200641). For the
programming period 2007-2013 it is thus required to design a model calculation system enabling an
assessment of the cost and income differences emerging as a result of the implementation of
individual agri-environmental submeasures. The assessed differences shall represent the basis for
determining the payments for each agri-environmental submeasure.
-
Methodology
The basis for further development of the methodology is the existing SKOP 1.0 model, which is to
be upgraded and adjusted in accordance with the relevant EC regulations covering the area
concerned. The basis – reference rate for calculating payment amounts – shall be the standard good
agricultural practice (conventional practice). Since payments for agri-environmental submeasures
can represent only the amount of costs exceeding the costs of implementing the conventional
practice principles, also covering the cross compliance requirements, the basis for the proposed
methodology is the direct comparison of cost calculations of conventional production/rearing
(intensive production/rearing considering all principles of the standard agricultural practice) and the
production/rearing calculations under agri-environmental submeasures. Payment calculation is thus
based on the cost and income comparison of conventional production/ rearing with production/
rearing under each agri-environmental submeasure.
The most important decision in methodology development of calculating payment amounts was the
application of the model calculation system of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maribor.
Computerised and integrated simulation model provides comparative cost analysis of individual
productions/rearing with different input parameters. The model development is based on applied
knowledge of the system theory, whereas agricultural holding represents a system and the
individual productions and types of rearing the subsystems. Thereby, the corresponding
technologically economical models for conventional productions/rearing were developed (covering
Rozman, È, Tojnko, S., Turk, J., Par, V., Pavloviè, M., 2002. Die Anwendung eines Computersimulationsmodells zur
Optimierung der Erweiterung einer Apfelplantage unter den Bedingungen der Republik Slowenien. Berichte über
Landwirtschaft 80/4: 632-642.
37
Rednak, M. 1997. Modelne kalkulacije - Splošna izhodišèa in metodologija izdelave modelnih kalkulacij za potrebe
kmetijske politike. Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Prikazi in informacije 189: p. 15.
38
Rozman, È. 2004. Aplikacija simulacijskih modelov in pozitivnega matematiènega programiranja pri ekonomski
analizi sadjarske proizvodnje: doktorska disertacija. Unoversity of Maribor – Faculty of Agriculture.
39
Rozman, È., Pažek, K., Bavec, M., Bavec, F., Turk, J., Majkoviè, D., 2006. The Multi-criteria Analysis of Spelt Food
Processing Alternatives on Small Organic Farms. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28/2: 159-179.
40
Pažek, K., Rozman, È., Borec, A., Turk, J., Majkoviè, D., Bavec, M., Bavec, F., 2006. The Multi criteria models for
decision support on organic farms. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 24/1: 73-89.
41
235
only the conventional practice) as well as for productions/rearing for the implementation of each
agri-environmental submeasure. Agricultural management often requires research on production
costs where lack of data is present, disabling a calculation settlement design. In such cases it is
possible to apply methods of simulation modelling to ascertain (simulate) the anticipated costs of
new agricultural production or costs of newly introduced technology. In this context, the
mathematical system model (in this case the system investigated is an agricultural production or a
farm or an agricultural business system) represents technical relationships between the inputs and
outputs. Based on the specific model developed the computer programme calculates technological
parameters of agricultural production as a basis for the technological map including the calculations
of the total costs. Therefore the following calculation systems of the Faculty of Agriculture,
University of Maribor, were applied: KARSIM 1.0, KARSIM EKO 1.0 (Pažek et al., 200642) and
SIMSAD 1.0 (Rozman, 200443). Hence, basic input parameters in conventional production/rearing
and production/rearing under each agri-environmental submeasure were selected and processed by
adequate model. Cost assessments in the calculations for agri-environmental submeasures are thus a
result of succeeding processing by the calculation system.
A detailed description of methodology and model calculation is shown in Annex 6.
Minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products and other
obligatory requirements
Agri-environmental payments relate only to those commitments exceeding adequate mandatory
standards laid down on the basis of Articles 4 and 5 and Annexes III and IV of Regulation
1782/2003, Regulation on statutory management requirements and good agricultural and
environmental conditions for farming as well as additional minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers and plant protection products and other adequate mandatory requirements laid down in
the national legislation and EU regulations.
The minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products mean that farmers
must carry out at least the minimum technological production procedures which would be carried
out by a farmer acting with due care by considering the agricultural legislation. This means he shall
carry out economic activities in a manner ensuring the economical treatment of agricultural land
without any long-term negative impacts on the environment, in particular soil, water and plants.
The minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products also mean a
responsible handling to ensure soil fertility, crop health and clean environment and to provide for
quality food production.
-
Minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers
Considering the minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers means a technically founded
application of plant nutrients which:
• reduces a risk of pollution of agricultural soil and waters by nutrient residues,
• protects natural resources from potential agricultural pollution,
• enables economical agricultural production,
Pažek, K., Rozman, È., Borec, A., Turk, J., Majkoviè, D., Bavec, M., Bavec, F., 2006. The Multi criteria models for
decision support on organic farms. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture24/1: 73-89.
42
Rozman, È. Aplikacija simulacijskih modelov in pozitivnega matematiènega programiranja pri ekonomski analizi
sadjarske proizvodnje: doktorska disertacija = Application of simulation models and positive mathematical
programming for the economic analysis of fruit production : Ph.D. Thesis, (Doktorske disertacije podiplomskega študija
Fakultete za kmetijstvo, št. 2). Maribor: [È. Rozman], 2004. XI, 151 f., [8] f. pril., graf. prikazi. [COBISS.SI-ID
2074924]
43
236
which is accomplished through:
•
cross compliance requirements set out in the Regulation on statutory management requirements
and good agricultural and environmental conditions for farming;
•
minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers related to the livestock manure application
record to be kept by agricultural holding and which must contain at least the quantity and type
of livestock manure, time of fertilisation and information on areas on which the manure was
applied, as well as fertilisation with mineral nitrogen, whereby the amount applied may not
exceed 250 kg/ha annually,
•
fertilisation prohibition on coastal land in the surface width of 15 metres off banks of the first
rank waters and in the surface width of 5 metres off banks of the second rank waters as laid
down in the Water Act.
-
Minimum requirements on the use of plant protection products
The minimum requirements on the use of plant protection products lay down that these products
need to be used in a manner, so that:
- the biodiversity of the broader biotope is not endangered,
- the environment is affected as little as possible,
- drinking water sources are not endangered,
- the health of people implementing the plant protection measures and of consumers is not
endangered,
as they are implemented through
•
the cross compliance requirements laid down in Regulation on statutory management
requirements and good agricultural and environmental conditions for farming,
•
as well as minimum requirements on the use of plant protection products referring to:
- keeping of records on the use of plant protection products in accordance with Annex 1 of the
Rules on the responsibilities of users of plant protection products which must contain
information on areas and crops where these products were applied, whereby the records are to
be saved for at least five years,
- course and exam in phytomedicine to be concluded by plant protection operators in
accordance with the Rules on professional training and assessment of knowledge in
phytomedicine,
- application of devices which are regularly checked and have a label confirming periodic
inspection to be obtained by device owners every two years;
• the prohibition of the use of plant protection products on coastal land in the surface width of 15
metres off banks of the first rank waters and in the surface width of 5 metres off banks of the
second rank waters as laid down in the Water Act.
-
Phosphorous pollution
To avoid environmental pollution by phosphorous of agricultural origin, in phosphorous
fertilisation it is necessary to consider the following:
•
expert recommendations on phosphorous fertilisation;
•
phosphorous fertilisation is possible only on the basis of soil analysis and fertilisation plan;
•
in accordance with the Decree on the limit input concentration values of dangerous substances
and fertilisers in soil the annual phosphorous input through livestock manure fertilisation may
not exceed the limit value of 120 kg P2O5/ha.
237
Rates of aid
Rates of aid for agri-environmental submeasures amount:
Table 48: Rates of aid for agri-environmental submeasures
Submeasure
group
Group I:
Reduction
negative
impacts of
agriculture on
the
environment
Submeasure
214-I/1
Preservation of
crop rotation
214-I/2
Greening of
arable land
214-I/3
Integrated crop
production
214-I/4
Integrated fruit
production
214-I/5
Integrated vine
production
214-I/6
Integrated
horticulture
214-I/7 Organic
farming
- Fields - crops:
- Vegetables:
grown outdoors:
- Vegetables:
grown indoors:
- Olive groves
with at least 150
trees/ha, orchard
plantations with
at least 100
trees/ha for
walnut and
chestnut and at
least 200
trees/ha for other
fruit varieties:
- High-trunk
meadow
orchards with
density 50-200
trees/ha:
- Vineyards, hop
gardens, tree
nurseries:
- Grassland**:
Calculated
payment
amount under
model
calculation
€224 per
hectare
Maximum
possible
payment
under Annex
to
Regulation
1698/2005
€600 per
hectare
Single
payment per
area*
Maximum
possible
payment
Target
payment
value
Anticipated
ha (number of
animals)
(2013)
-
€224 per
hectare
€91.84 per
hectare
12,000 ha
€420 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
-
€420 per
hectare
€172.2 per
hectare
20,000 ha
€481 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
-
€481 per
hectare
€197.21 per
hectare
25,000 ha
€821 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
-
€821 per
hectare
€336.61 per
hectare
3,200 ha
€931 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
-
€900 per
hectare
€381.71 per
hectare
8,000 ha
€451 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
-
€451 per
hectare
€184.91 per
hectare
1,000 ha
60,000 ha**
€727 per
hectare
€1,345 per
hectare
€1,190 per
hectare
€1,353 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
€298.07 per
hectare
€551.45 per
hectare
€487.90 per
hectare
€554,73 per
hectare
€580 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
-
€580 per
hectare
€237.80 per
hectare
€1,412 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
-
€900 per
hectare
€578.92 per
hectare
€555 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
-
€450 per
hectare
€227.55 per
hectare
-
238
Submeasure
group
Group II:
Conservation
of natural
conditions,
biodiversity,
soil fertility
and traditional
cultural
landscape
Group III:
Maintenance of
protection
areas
Submeasure
Calculated
payment
amount under
model
calculation
Maximum
possible
payment
under Annex
to
Regulation
1698/2005
Single
payment per
area*
Maximum
possible
payment
Target
payment
value
Anticipated
ha (number of
animals)
(2013)
€282 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€149 per
hectare
61,09 €/ha
500 ha
€310 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€177 per
hectare
€72.57 per
hectare
5,500 ha
€353 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€220 per
hectare
€90.20 per
hectare
16,000 ha
€480 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€347 per
hectare
€142.27 per
hectare
6,000 ha
€457 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€324 per
hectare
€132.84 per
hectare
100 ha
€229 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
-
€229 per
hectare
€93.89 per
hectare
€218 per LU
€200 per LU
-
€200 per
LU
€89.38 per
LU
€251 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
-
€251 per
hectare
€102.91 per
hectare
8,500 ha
€206 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
-
€206 per
hectare
€84.46 per
hectare
65,000 ha
€251 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€118 per
hectare
€48.38 per
hectare
10,000 ha
€71 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
-
€71 per
hectare
€29.11 per
hectare
8,000 ha
€296 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€163 per
hectare
€66.83 per
hectare
1,000 ha
214-II/1
Mountain
pastures
- Mountain
pastures without
herdsman:
- Mountain
pastures with
herdsman:
214-II/2 Steep
slopes mowing
- Steep slope
inclination 3550%:
- Steep slope
inclination over
50%:
214-II/3 Humpy
meadows
mowing
214-II/4
Meadow
orchards
214-II/5 Rearing
of
autochthonous
and traditional
domestic breeds
214-II/6
Production of
autochthonous
and traditional
agricultural
plant varieties
214-II/7
Sustainable
rearing of
domestic
animals
214-II/8
Extensive
grassland
maintenance
214-III/1
Animal
husbandry in
central areas of
appearance of
large carnivores
214-III/2
Preservation of
special grassland
habitats
1,000 ha
20,000
animals
239
Submeasure
group
Submeasure
214-III/3
Preservation of
grassland
habitats of
butterflies
214-III/4
Preservation of
litter meadows
214-III/5 Bird
conservation in
humid extensive
meadows in
Natura 2000
sites
214-III/6
Permanent green
cover in water
protection areas
- Fields:
- Permanent
plantations:
- Grassland***:
Calculated
payment
amount under
model
calculation
Single
payment per
area*
Maximum
possible
payment
Target
payment
value
€296 per
hectare
Maximum
possible
payment
under Annex
to
Regulation
1698/2005
€450 per
hectare
Anticipated
ha (number of
animals)
(2013)
€133 per
hectare
€163 per
hectare
€66.83 per
hectare
500 ha
€484 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€351 per
hectare
€143.91 per
hectare
200 ha
€336 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€203 per
hectare
€83.23 per
hectare
1,000 ha
1,000 ha
€204 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€210 per
hectare
€600 per
hectare
€900 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€133 per
hectare
€204 per
hectare
€450 per
hectare
€77 per
hectare
€83.64 per
hectare
€184.50 per
hectare
€31.57 per
hectare
*: Single payment in the amount of €133 per ha is set out in the Decree on implementing direct payments in agriculture (OJ RS No 99/06
as amended) and is subtracted from the calculated payment amount with those submeasures where animal husbandry is not obligatory
(submeasures: 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing, 214-II/3 Humpy meadows mowing, 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance, 214-III/2
Preservation of special grassland habitats, 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of butterflies, 214-III/4 Preservation of litter
meadows, 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive meadows in Natura 2000 sites, 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas – grassland) or where animal are related to the primary agricultural holding (submeasure 214-II/1 Mountain pasture)
obtaining only single per area payment.
**: UAA included in the implementation of the submeasure 214-I/7 Organic farming
***: Grasses and grass-clover mixtures on fields, permanent grassland.
The annual payment amounts for each individual agri-environmental submeasure are laid down by a
regulation governing the payments for measures under axis 2.
Measures, objectives and conditions applied in case of beneficiaries selection based on a
public tender in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 39(4) of Regulation
1698/2005:
Not relevant.
Proof as referred to in Article 48(2) of the implementing rules enabling the Commission to
check the compliance and credibility of the calculations
The methodology and model calculations for setting payment amounts for agri-environmental
submeasures were designed and confirmed by an independent institution: University of Maribor,
Faculty of Agriculture, Vrbanska 30, SI 2000 Maribor.
Model calculations are shown in Annex 6.
Conservation of endangered animal and plant genetic resources
240
Endangered animal and plant genetic resources shall be conserved within the framework of two
agri-environmental submeasures:
• 214-II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds;
• 214-II/6 Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties.
-
List of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds
The list of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds is shown in chapter B. Requirements
related to individual agri-environmental submeasures (Group II, Submeasure 214-II/5 Rearing of
autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds); the description, together with the number of purebred females for every individual breed, is shown in Annex 8.
The number of breeding females of individual autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds is the
following:
Table 49: Slovenian autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds count in the RS
Year
Estimation of pure
bred animals count
Number of pure
bred females
recorded in
breeding book*
Number of pure bred
females recorded in
gene bank (In situ)
Cika cattle
2005
1,083
450
300
Lipizzan horse
2005
822
225
84
Posavje horse
2005
478
415
-
Slovenian cold-blooded horse
2005
1,393
1,198
-
Krško Polje pig
2005
404
84
30
2005
2005
2005
2005
17,500
3,600
1,100
800
4,583
1,623
703
699
990
837
432
404
2005
600
389
201
2005
1,300
-
236
Ljutomer trotter
Haflinger
2005
2005
500
274
262
249
-
Slovenian landrace (Line 11)
Slovenian landrace (Line 55)
Large white (Line 22)
2005
2005
2005
13,471
331
2,584
4,055
255
869
-
2005
80,000
7,569
-
Slovenian Saanen goat
Slovenian Alpine
2005
2005
2,500
4,500
484
1,440
-
Slovenian barred hen
Slovenian silver hen
Slovenian brown hen
Slovenian early feathering hen
Slovenian late feathering hen
Slovenian heavy weight hen
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1,359
654
2,570
322
333
277
-
1,129
579
2,254
293
305
254
Breeds
AUTOCHTHONOUS BREEDS
Jezersko-Solèava sheep
Bovec sheep
Istrian pramenka - Istrijanka
Bela kraina pramenka
Drežnica goat
Styrian hen - Štajerka
TRADITIONAL BREEDS
Improved Jezersko-Solèava sheep
*: Pure bred animal is an animal the parents and grandparents are recorded in the main part of the breeding book of the same breed.
241
-
List of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties
The list of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties is shown in chapter B.
Requirements related to individual agri-environmental submeasures (Group II, Submeasure 214II/6 Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties), whereas the variety
description is shown in Annex 9.
-
Conservation of genetic resources in agriculture: type of beneficiaries, activities and details on
eligible costs
Beneficiaries, activities and details on eligible costs for the conservation of genetic resources are
laid down in chapter B. Requirements related to individual agri-environmental submeasures (Group
II, Submeasure 214-II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds, Submeasure
214-II/6 Production of autochthonous and traditional agricultural plant varieties).
Financing
-
Community co-financing rate
Agri-environmental submeasures are publicly financed, whereby up to 80 percent of the resources
are allocated from the EAFRD and minimum 20 percent from the budget of the RS.
-
Minimum/maximum eligible costs
Maximum amounts of per-hectare payments obtainable by a combination of agri-environmental
submeasures account to:
Table 50: Maximum payment amounts under agri-environmental submeasures combinations
Area - crop
Fields
Permanent plantations
Grassland (permanent grassland)
Amount
€600 per ha
€900 per ha
€450 per ha
If the total amount of utilised agricultural area on agricultural holding under agri-environmental
submeasures exceeds 100 hectares, the payment amount under these submeasures decreases by 50
percent for the areas exceeding 100 hectares.
Operating costs defrayed by agri-environmental payments for the submeasure 214-I/7 Organic
farming are calculated for the whole duration of the commitment and may not exceed 20 percent of
the income foregone and additional costs emerging from the commitment undertaken.
Transitional provisions
-
Shift from the agri-environmental payments scheme 2004-2006 to the agri-environmental
payments scheme 2007-2013
Pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation 1320/2006 agri-environmental commitments undertaken in
accordance with Regulation 1257/1999 (hereafter: existing commitments) shift to new five-year
commitments set out by Regulation 1698/2005 (hereafter: new commitments), which shall be
upgraded with the cross compliance requirements and the minimum requirements on the use of
fertilisers and plant protection products. Thus the existing commitments shall significantly
strengthen and enhance the benefits to the environment and animal welfare. As a result of these
242
requirements some agri-environmental measures under programming period 2004-2006 shall be
terminated, some shall be amended or even introduced anew. Therefore the beneficiaries
implementing agri-environmental measures in 2004-2006 shall be able to substitute them with agrienvironmental submeasures for 2007-2013 (Table 51). Thus, 2007 onward new five-year
commitments for the implementation of agri-environmental submeasures shall start running. This
way, the fulfilment of the objectives set shall be ensured and the current beneficiaries shall be able
to continue implementing the agri-environmental payments scheme and in 2007 new beneficiaries
shall be able to enter the scheme.
Table 51: Possible substitutions of agri-environmental measures 2004-2006 with agri-environmental
submeasures 2007-2013
Programming period 2004-2006
Programming period 2007-2013
Group I - reduction of negative impacts of agriculture on the environment
• I/1 Reduction of erosion in fruit and vine
• 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
production*
• 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/6 Production of autochthonous and
traditional agricultural plants
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas - perennial plantations
• I/2 Preservation of crop rotation
• 214-I/1 Preservation of crop rotation
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• I/3 Greening of arable land
• 214-I/1 Preservation of crop rotation
• 214-I/2 Greening of arable land
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• I/4 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
• 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• I/5 Integrated fruit production
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
• 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
243
Programming period 2004-2006
• I/6 Integrated vine production
Programming period 2007-2013
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
• 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
• 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• I/7 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
• 214-I/3 Integrated crop production
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/4 Integrated fruit production
• 214-I/5 Integrated vine production
• 214-I/6 Integrated horticulture (in open air and
protected indoor areas)
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• I/8 Organic farming
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
Group II - conservation of natural conditions, biodiversity, soil fertility and traditional cultural landscape
• II/1 Mountain pastures without herdsman
• 214-II/1 Mountain pastures without herdsman
• 214-II/1 Mountain pastures with herdsman
• II/1 Mountain pastures with herdsman
• 214-II/1 Mountain pastures without herdsman
• 214-II/1 Mountain pastures with herdsman
• II/2 Steep slopes mowing with inclination 35• 214-I/7 Organic farming
50%
• 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing with inclination
35-50%
• 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing with inclination
over 50%
• 214-II/4 Meadow orchards
• 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
• 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
• 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
• 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
• 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
• 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
• 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
244
Programming period 2004-2006
• II/2 Steep slopes mowing with inclination over
50%
•
II/3 Humpy meadows mowing
•
II/4 Meadow orchards
•
•
•
II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and traditional
domestic breeds
II/6 Production of autochthonous and traditional
agricultural plants
II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
Programming period 2007-2013
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing with inclination
over 50%
• 214-II/4 Meadow orchards
• 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
• 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
• 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
• 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
• 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
• 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
• 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/3 Humpy meadows mowing
• 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
• 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
• 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
• 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
• 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
• 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
• 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/4 Meadow orchards
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
• 214-II/5 Rearing of autochthonous and
traditional domestic breeds
• 214-II/6 Production of autochthonous and
traditional agricultural plants
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
• 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
• 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
• 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
• 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
• 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
245
Programming period 2004-2006
• II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
Group III - maintenance of protection areas
• III/1 Maintaining utilised and settled landscape
in protection areas*
• III/2 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
Programming period 2007-2013
• 214-I/7 Organic farming
• 214-II/2 Steep slopes mowing
• 214-II/3 Humpy meadows mowing
• 214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
• 214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
• 214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
• 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
• 214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
• 214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
• 214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
• 214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
- Supplementation not possible
•
•
•
•
•
o
o
•
III/3 Preservation of special grassland habitats
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
III/4 Permanent green cover in water protection
areas
III/5 Grassing and green fallow*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
214-I/7 Organic farming
214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
214-II/8 Extensive grassland maintenance
214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
214-I/3 Integrated crop production
214-I/7 Organic farming
214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas
214-I/7 Organic farming - grassland
214-II/7 Sustainable rearing of domestic animals
214-III/1 Animal husbandry in central areas of
appearance of large carnivores
214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland
habitats
214-III/3 Preservation of grassland habitats of
butterflies
214-III/4 Preservation of litter meadows
214-III/5 Bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites
214-III/6 Permanent green cover in water
protection areas - grassland
246
Programming period 2004-2006
Programming period 2007-2013
* Measure shall no longer be implemented in 2007-2013.
The beneficiaries who entered the agri-environmental measures 2004-2006 in accordance with
Regulation 1257/1999 shall be able to continue with their existing commitments in 2007-2013 until
the conclusion of their five-year commitments, if they should decide not to change the existing for
the new commitments due to the introduction of the cross compliance requirements and the
minimum requirements on the use of fertilisers and plant protection products commitments pursuant
to Article 11 of Regulation 1320/2006.
The procedure of the shift from the existing to new commitments shall be set out in the regulation
governing the payments for measures under axis 2.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
RESULT AND OUTPUT INDICATORS VALUES
Baseline
Specific
Increasing the share of areas
under organic production.
Increasing the extent of
sustainable farming in Natura
2000 sites.
Increasing the extent of
agricultural land under
sustainable farming methods.
Share of areas under submeasure organic
farming with regard to UAA
Areas within Natura 2000 sites on which
AE submeasures are implemented
Area under successful land management
contributing to:
Biodiversity,
Water quality,
Climate change,
Soil quality
Number of agricultural holdings under in
Operational Increasing the number of
agricultural holdings engaged AE payments
in AE payments.
Increasing the extent of areas Hectares supported under AE payments
under AE payments.
Increasing physical area under Net number of hectares, where at least one
AE payments.
AE submeasure is implemented
Increasing total number of
Number of commitments undertaken for
commitments undertaken for AE submeasures
AE submeasures.
Increasing the extent of
Number of commitments undertaken for
commitments undertaken for AE submeasures related to genetic
submeasures related to
resources
genetic resources.
Increasing the number of
Number of agricultural holdings engaged in
agricultural holdings engaged submeasure organic farming
in submeasure organic
farming
Anticipated
(2013)
4%
10%
57,200 ha
60,000 ha
55,700 ha
131,300 ha
-82,800 ha
73,600 ha
132,200 ha
65,000 ha
96,000 ha
22,400
26,500
361,000 ha
365,000 ha
199,500 ha
204,000 ha
48,200
52,000
3,100
4,400
1,650
5,000
247
5.3.3 Axis 3: Quality of life in the countryside and diversification or rural economy
Rationale
The rural areas fall behind the urban centres as regards the development and are therefore at greater
risk of depopulation on one hand and of marginalisation on the other, having negative economic,
environmental and social consequences. The main factors hampering a faster development of these
areas are as follows:
- limited employment opportunities and simultaneously poorly utilised labour potential in rural
areas, and lack of business and management skills as a factor hampering a faster
entrepreneurship development;
- poorer infrastructure development in villages and underexploited natural and cultural features as
a factor reducing the attractiveness of villages as a living environment and as a development
potential of other activities in the rural areas, in particular tourism.
Objectives
By supporting the investments the measures and activities under this axis are aimed at enhancing
the employment and job creation in the non-agricultural and agriculture related activities and by
supporting the arrangement of the rural settlements and their cultural heritage at enhancing the
development of the rural areas, and thus raising the income level and the living standard of the rural
communities.
Measures and activities
Code
31
311
312
32
322
323
Measure
Measures to diversify the rural economy
Diversification into non-agricultural activities
Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises
Measures to improve the quality of life in the rural areas
Village renewal and development
Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage
Regulation 1698/2005
Article 52(a) (ii), Article 53
Article 52(a)(i), Article 54
Article 52(b)(i)(ii), Article 56
Article 52(b)(iii), Article 57
Next to the specific conditions for each measure, for the measures under axis 3 the following
provisions shall apply as appropriate:
- The measures shall be implemented through the entire programming period outside the
settlements with the status of a town. Settlements with the status of a town are set out with a
Decision of the National Assembly of the RS on granting the status of a town to settlements in
the RS, OJ RS No 22/00 and 121/05 (Annex 1, Figure 7).
- The measures shall be implemented as one or multiannual commitments in accordance with the
criteria set.
- The beneficiary shall fulfil all conditions in accordance with the applicable legislation and the
specifications under the call for tender.
- The beneficiaries shall not apply the funds contrary to the purpose for which the funds were
granted.
- Based on the investment and technical documentation a beneficiary applying for funds for a part
of an investment must provide an inventory of works and costs for the entire investment, in case
of a phased construction he must provide a proof of the works completed and the value thereof.
- In case the measures are related to activities affecting the environment for which appropriate
administrative approval is required, it is necessary to draw up an adequate assessment of
impacts on the environment in accordance with the regulations.
- Co-financed shall be eligible costs arising after the date the decision was issued. Acknowledged
shall also be preliminary arising general costs related to the preparation and implementation of
the investment or activities, 01.01.2007 onward.
- The payment of customs and levies, the operational, bank and guarantees costs, as well as the
248
-
purchase of used machinery and equipment shall not be deemed eligible costs of an investment.
The investment is to be completed prior to the last disbursement of the funds.
In case of investments in new constructions or a reconstruction of facilities and the purchase of
the corresponding equipment located or to be located in the buildings constructed for other
purposes as well, only the costs, of the total construction or reconstruction costs of the entire
building, in the proportional share with regard to the net surface of the building covered by the
facilities concerned (common use areas, roof, façade, etc.) shall be deemed eligible costs.
Demarcation
Measures and activities under axis 3 are defined by specific conditions providing that the purposes
supported under this axis shall not be supported within the range of other axes of the RDP. The
demarcation with the measures under other Operational programmes with similar objectives and
measures is defined by the territorial coverage, purpose and/or the maximum total investment value.
The maximum total investment value does not apply for micro enterprises, except for micro
enterprises investing in renewable resources. The maximum total investment values are indicatively
outlined under each measure, whereby the value can be changed in agreement between both
Managing Authorities (GOLSGRP and MAFF) during the implementation. Before approving any
project the MAFF shall check the information on the amount of public resources already received
for the same project under other OPs.
Target group
The measures and activities are intended for micro economic operators on farms and broader rural
areas, local communities and the rural population by considering the conditions and restrictions
within the framework of each activity.
Financial provisions
Measures under axis 3 are financed from public resources, whereby up to 75 percent are confinanced by the EAFRD and 25 percent from the national budget of the RS.
The share of public resources for each measure shall be set by the regulation governing the
payments for measures under the RDP axes 1, 3 and 4 and by calls for tender. The commitments for
granting funds to the beneficiaries may be made up to the amount of opened resources for each
measure. The restriction criteria as a safety mechanism preventing the available resources from
being exceeded shall be outlined by the implementing rules.
Common objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
BASELINE INDICATORS
Promoting selfemployment and the
diversification of
activities in rural areas
Share of farmers with non-agricultural sources of
income
Employment in secondary and tertiary sector
Number of self-employed persons
GVA in secondary and tertiary sector
Tourism infrastructure in rural areas (number of
bed places)
Share of services GVA (of the total GVA)
Raising the living
standard in rural
communities and
reducing the risk of
marginalisation and
migrations
Net migration (index)
Share of households with Internet access
Share of training participants aged between 25
and 64 years
VALUES
Baseline
Target (2013)
74.4%
76
(2005)
824,000
869,000
(2005)
96,000
120,000
(2005)
€23,463 Mio. (2005)
€31,000 Mio.
78,960
82,000
(2005)
63.4%
64.8%
(2005)
100
95
48%
65
15.2%
17
(2005)
249
5.3.3.1 Measures to diversify the rural economy
5.3.3.1.1 Diversification into non-agricultural activities
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005; Article 52 (a) (i), Article 53
Measure code: 311
Rationale:
Farms and the resources on them offer opportunities for new forms of making income and
employment. By diversifying economic activities on farms the utilisation of human resources in
particular is improved as well as the improvement of the economic situation of agricultural holdings
and indirectly of the entire countryside is ensured.
Considering the physical (ha of UAA, LU) and economic indicators (SGM-ESU) the farm structure
in Slovenia is very unfavourable. In comparison to other European countries Slovenia is among the
countries in the EU with the lowest average farm size. At the same time the labour input on
Slovenian farms, measured in the PMWU coefficient, is at the level of the EU average. Hence,
compared to the EU average Slovenian farms use too much labour force. Due to the smallness of
the farms their labour potential remains unutilised. Farm size and on-farm labour force make them
uncompetitive. Furthermore, in future intense conditions in the labour market may be expected and
thus the importance of self-employment shall increase. The development of new, non-agricultural
on-farm activities opens numerous opportunities for self-employment and thus for the optimisation
of labour force and new sources of income for farm households.
Farms have many advantages, which can be used for the development of new activities. Tourism
represents an important business opportunity for farms as well as for Slovenia as a whole.
Considering the development level of Slovenian tourism and the existing development potential
tourism could in the coming years become one of the leading branches of Slovenian economy and
simultaneously the leading additional on-farm activity. Currently, 458 farms44 are engaged in
tourism on farm. However, there are still opportunities and conditions for further development,
particularly in the specialisation of the tourist offer on farms. Handicraft is an important part of the
traditional skills on farms and in the countryside. It represents a part of the overall tourist offer and
the promotion of Slovenia as well as one of the key conditions for the conservation of the Slovene
cultural heritage on one hand and of the commercial applicability on the other. Handicraft is also an
important factor of the social policy in the sense of the self-employment on farms.
New job and income opportunities are possible through the processing of the products outside
Annex I to the Treaty as well as the production of energy from renewable resources, marketing of
tourism products and marketing of products of the surrounding farms.
Objective
Support is aimed at ensuring the initiation or modernisation of performing non-agricultural
activities and thus at creating new jobs and additional source of income on farms as well as at
contributing to the improvement of social and economic conditions on farms.
Measure description
The measure is aimed at creating the conditions and opportunities for the creation of new jobs and
the realisation of business ideas of the members of farm households. It is mainly intended for
investments required for the initiation of performing a non-agricultural activity or for the
modernisation of already existing non-agricultural activity.
44
MAFF, Register of subsidiary occupations
250
Types of purposes:
- production activities related to traditional on-farm skills;
- production activities related to the processing of products outside Annex I to the treaty and other
non-agricultural products on farms;
- production of energy from renewable resources for on-farm sale;
- sales activities related to on-farm production activities (specialised stores for sale of products
from own production and the surrounding farms);
- on-farm service activities (tourism, childcare, care of older people, care of persons with special
needs).
The beneficiaries must meet all conditions for performing certain activities in accordance with the
applicable legislation and submit a business plan which must contain economic parameters of the
investment. In case of social-protection services in the countryside a special programme must be
submitted. If at the application submission a beneficiary does not fulfil the requirements set
referring to appropriate vocational skills and qualifications, he must fulfil these requirements before
the investment conclusion. Based on the submitted business plan or programme the beneficiary may
obtain support for training, provided it is relevant for the performance of the activity supported and
the application is accompanied by education or training plan. Mere training without the investment
is not an eligible cost. Training must be verifiable by a proof on concluded training and may not be
a part of the regular education system. For support to investments in renewable resources of energy
for sale projects may apply the estimated value of which does not exceed EUR 480,000. The
operator of subsidiary occupation or the majority owner of an enterprise must be a member of farm
household and must have permanent address at the address of the farm.
As eligible costs are acknowledged all costs related to building construction, purchase of new
machinery and equipment, purchase of ICT equipment and the costs of obtaining appropriate skills
as well as general costs directly related to the preparation and implementation of projects. For an
application to be approved the beneficiaries must, in accordance with the criteria, exceed the
minimum number of points, which shall be laid down in public tender.
Target group
Target group are legal and natural persons which are at the application submission registered45 as
individual independent entrepreneur, company, cooperative, or a farm engaged in subsidiary
occupation, and do not exceed the criteria on micro enterprises specified in the Commission
Recommendation 2003/361/EC (less than 10 employees and less than EUR 2,000,000 turnover
annually) and have registered office and perform the activity outside the settlements with the status
of a town according to the Decision of the National Assembly of the RS.
Operator of the subsidiary occupation on farm or legitimate representative of the independent
entrepreneur, cooperative or company must be a member of the farm household in accordance with
Article 35 of Regulation 1974/2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation
(EC) No 1698/2005.
Delimitation
RDP 2007-2013
Measure Diversification into non-agricultural activities is delimitated from the measures under axes
1 and 2 through support to different activities. Under axes 1 and 2 agricultural, food and forestry
activities are supported, whereas under measure Diversification into non-agricultural activities nonagricultural activity is supported. In case of wood processing under measure 122 Improving the
economic value of forests wood processing is supported under the statistical classification of
45
In case of a registered activity the enterprise is registered at a competent administrative authority (farms engaged in
subsidiary occupation at the MAFF, independent entrepreneurs in the register of independent entrepreneurs at the Tax
Administration of the RS and legal persons at the competent district court) and has acquired tax and registration number
(independent entrepreneurs and legal persons).
251
activities (SCA) SORS 20.1, while the remaining wood processing is supported within the range of
this measure. In case of investments in the production of energy from renewable resources under
axis 1 investments are supported which use the energy for the performance of agricultural, food
processing or forestry activity or for obtaining raw material for renewable resources (wood biomass,
biodiesel, bioethanol). Under this measure the energy produced is sold on the market. The measure
is delimited from measure Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises in regard
of the location of the investment. Measure Diversification into non-agricultural activities is
implemented only on farms. On-farm investment is deemed an investment implemented on the area
or facilities belonging to farm household and the beneficiaries are the members of this farm
household. Farms are entered in the register of agricultural holdings and have a KMG-MID.
Other Operational programmes
The measure is delimited from other operational programmes in the following manner:
- supported shall be only micro enterprises with registered office and operation in settlements
which do not have the status of a town;
- in case of investments in renewable resources the maximum estimated value of the investment
may be EUR 480,000;
- supported shall be training within the range of the investment which is necessary for successful
performance of the activity;
- investments in fisheries and fishery services shall not be supported.
Financial provisions
Financial aid is ensured as non-repayable funds. The maximum aid rate amounts up to 50 percent of
the acknowledged investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 3,500 per beneficiary. A beneficiary may obtain maximum
EUR200,000 in the period of the last three budget years.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Accelerating the creation of new
jobs and searching of new sources
of income in the countryside
Operational Promoting the diversification of
activities in the countryside and
supporting their development
VALUES
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Baseline
Anticipated
(2013)
0
720
GVA in supported projects (Index)
100
130
Additional number of tourists (Index)
100
120
Number of inhabitants in rural areas
enjoying the improved basic services in
rural areas
0
20,000
Number of beneficiaries
0
360
Number of supported tourism-related
projects
0
200
Number of participants who successfully
completed training
0
50
Total volume of investments
0
€63 Mio.
Total number of jobs created in
supported projects
252
5.3.3.1.2 Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 52 (a) (ii), Article 54
Measure code: 312
Rationale of the measure:
In the light of the labour market Slovenian rural areas have experienced a fast and extensive
transformation in the past ten years. The restructuring of agriculture and the bankruptcy of large
industry establishments, which employed predominantly rural population, resulted in structural
unemployment of the rural population. Certain disparities remain present requiring greater
flexibility of the labour force and the introduction of flexible employment types and
entrepreneurship activities. It may be anticipated that the intensified global competitiveness and the
relatively expensive domestic labour force shall create additional pressures on the labour market in
the coming years. Entrepreneurship therefore plays the key role in the national economic
development as the generator of new activities and thus the creation of new jobs.
The development of micro enterprises is particularly important for areas outside the cities and in
smaller settlements with limited employment opportunities. Successful diversification of the
economic activities in the rural areas and the entrepreneurship development require appropriate
qualification to perform a certain activity as well as the acquisition of business and management
skills. New enterprises and better employment opportunities, in particular for members of farm
households, women and young people, ensure the creation of a new value added in the rural areas,
bring a new impetus and thus contribute towards the preservation of populated countryside.
Objective
By supporting the creation and development of micro enterprises enabling the start or
modernisation of performing an activity, the measure is aimed at accelerating the creation of new
jobs, raising the business and management skills as well as improving the situation in
entrepreneurship in the rural areas, where the conditions for economic development are limited, and
thus contribute towards the improvement of the social and economic conditions in the countryside
as a whole.
Measure description
This measure shall support investments in already operating as well newly established micro
enterprises located and operating in the rural areas and providing or maintaining the already existing
jobs and increasing the income of the rural population.
Supported shall mainly be the diversification of activities performed by the rural population, e.g.
production activities utilising the advantages of the rural areas, energy production from renewable
resources for sale, sales activities related to the production activities, social security services
(childcare, care of elderly people and persons with special needs, etc.) as well as other activities
performed by micro enterprises in accordance with the provisions of the regulation and tender
conditions. The support for investments in renewable energy resources for sale shall be granted for
projects the estimated value of which does not exceed EUR 480,000.
The beneficiaries must meet all conditions for performing a certain activity in accordance with the
applicable legislation and submit a business plan which must contain the economic parameters of
the investment. In case of social security services in the rural areas a special plan shall be submitted.
If the beneficiary, at the time of submitting the application, does not fulfil the requirements set
regarding the adequate vocational skills and qualifications, he shall fulfil these requirements prior to
the completion of the investment. Based on the submitted business plan or programme the
beneficiary may also obtain support for training if it is relevant for the performance of the activity
supported and if the application is accompanied by an education or a training plan. Mere training
253
without an investment is not considered an eligible cost. Training must be ascertainable by a proof
on completed training and may not be a part of the regular education system.
As eligible costs shall be deemed all costs related to the construction or reconstruction of a building,
the purchase of new machinery and equipment, the purchase of ICT equipment and the costs of
acquiring appropriate skills as well as general costs directly related to the preparation and
implementation of projects. For an application to be granted the beneficiaries must reach, in
accordance with the criteria set, a minimum amount of points.
Target group
The beneficiaries are legal and natural persons which are, at the time of submitting the application,
registered46 as an individual independent entrepreneur, a company, or cooperative and do not
exceed the criteria on micro enterprises defined in the Commission Recommendation No
2003/361/EC (less than 10 employees and under EUR 2,000,000 of annual turnover) and have
registered office and operate outside the settlements with the status of a town in accordance with the
Decision of the National Assembly of the RS.
Demarcation
RDP 2007-2013
The measure Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises is delimited from the
measures under axis 1 and 2 by the designation of different activities. Axes 1 and 2 support
agricultural, food industry and forestry activity, while the measure Support for the creation and
development of micro enterprises supports non-agricultural activity. As regards wood processing
under the measure 123 Adding value to agricultural and forestry products the processing of wood is
supported by the statistical classification of activities (SCA) SORS 20.1, while the remaining wood
processing is supported within the range of this measure. In case of investments in energy
production from renewable resources under axis 1 support is devoted to investments which use the
energy to perform agricultural, food or forestry activity or to obtain raw materials for renewable
resources (biomass, biodiesel, bioethanol), while this measure support the sale of the produced
energy on the market. The measure is delimitated from measure Diversification into nonagricultural activities in regard of the location of the investment. Measure Support for the creation
and development of micro enterprises is not implemented on farms.
Other Operation Programmes
The measure is delimitated from other operational programmes in the following manner:
- Supported shall be only micro enterprises located and operating in settlements which do not
have the status of a town.
- In cases of investments in renewable resources the maximum estimated value of the investment
may be EUR 480,000.
- Supported shall be training within the range of an investment, necessary for successful
performance of the activity.
- Investments in fisheries and fishery services shall not be supported.
Financial provisions
The financial aid is provided in the form of non-repayable funds. Maximum aid rate amounts up to
50 percent of the acknowledged investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 20,000 per beneficiary. The beneficiary may obtain a
maximum amount of EUR 200,000 in the period of the last three budget years.
46
Registered activity means that the enterprise is recorded at the competent administrative body (self-employed persons
in the register of self-employed persons at the Tax Administration of the RS and legal persons at the appropriate local
court) and have a tax and ID number.
254
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Enhancing the creation of
new jobs and looking for
new sources of income in
the countryside
Promoting the
diversification of activities
in the countryside and
supporting the
development thereof
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Baseline
Total number of created jobs
in enterprises supported
GVA in enterprises
supported (index)
Additional number of
tourists (index)
Number of inhabitants in
rural areas enjoying the
improved basic services in
rural areas
Number of micro enterprises
supported
Number of supported
tourism-related projects
Number of participants who
successfully completed the
training
Total investment value
0
VALUES
Anticipated
(2013)
2,000
100
130
100
120
0
20,000
0
900
0
150
0
50
0
€ 111 Mio.
255
5.3.3.2 Measures to improve the quality of life in the rural areas
5.3.3.2.2 Village renewal and development
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 52(b) (i) (ii), Article 56
Measure code: 322
Rationale of the measure
The disparities between the urban and rural lifestyle are becoming less apparent, although the key
specifics of each remain clearly recognisable. Compared to the city areas the countryside has certain
specific developmental needs, problems and opportunities requiring a different developmental
approach. Very important is the infrastructure development and accessibility for rural population
and enterprises. In infrastructure development the rural areas are underprivileged in comparison to
the cities and thus more exposed to depopulation. The decline in the settlement of the countryside
may lead to the socially unwelcome depopulation and the loss of the cultural landscape value.
Rural settlements do dispose of a building stock which is, however, very poorly exploited and has
often no explicit use function. These facilities ought to be used for various activities, e.g. crossgenerational associating, cultural and art activities, sports and other leisure activities of the local
population.
Objectives of the measure
By supporting the investments in village renewal and development the measure is aimed at
improving the living conditions in rural communities and thus contributing towards the
attractiveness of the villages as a living environment and the development potential for other
activities, in particular tourism.
Measure description
Several activities are joined under this measure, but prevailing are those aimed at village renewal
and development. Activities belonging to basic services shall be allocated 20 percent of public
resources under this measure. Through the implementation under this measure, activities which
could belong to other measures (e.g. event platform) shall contribute to village revival and
encourage the arrangement of other parts of village as well. The activities are very related and by
constructing and renewing facilities to improve the quality of life in the rural areas they shall also
animate the development and access to various services and goods, which shall together with
territorial accessibility ensure the actual shift of the rural areas to a higher level of living.
Supported shall be the investments the estimated value of which does not exceed EUR 600,000 and
which are aimed at:
- arranging the surface serving to the common purposes and needs of the rural areas;
- arranging the village cores;
- arranging the infrastructure and connections within the settlements;
- reconstructing and constructing multipurpose buildings of common importance for
intergenerational gathering, cultural and art, sports and other leisure activities of the local
population.
Together with the application the beneficiaries shall submit a programme and fulfil other conditions
set in the call for tender. As eligible costs are deemed all costs related to the construction or
reconstruction of a building, the purchase of new equipment, and other general costs, directly
related to the preparation and implementation of projects. For an application to be granted the
beneficiaries must reach, in accordance with the criteria set, a minimum amount of points.
Target group
256
The measure is intended for the local population in settlements which do not have the status of a
town in accordance with the Decision of the National Assembly of the RS. Operating as
beneficiaries are local communities.
Demarcation
RDP 2007-2013
The measure Village renewal and development differs from the measures under axis and 2 in
purposes and well as beneficiaries, therefore no potential overlapping is present.
Other Operational Programmes
The measure is delimitated from other operational programmes in the following manner:
- The projects are of local importance.
- Support is granted to settlements without the status of a town.
- The maximum estimated investment value may be EUR 600,000.
- All plans on Natura 2000 are excluded from the RDP 2007-2013 since they shall be co-financed
from other operational programmes.
Financial provisions
The financial aid is provided as non-repayable funds. Maximum aid rate amounts up to 50 percent
of acknowledged investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 10,000 per beneficiary. A beneficiary may obtain a maximum
amount of EUR 750,000 in the programming period.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Improving the living
conditions in rural
communities
Arranging common surface
and facilities for various
purposes
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
population in rural areas
benefiting from improved
basic services in rural areas
Number of villages supported
Baseline
0
Total investments value
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
300,000
0
550
€48.5 Mio.
0
Objectives and indicators linked to basic services
OBJECTIVES
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Specific
Improving the living conditions
Population in rural areas benefiting from
in rural communities
improved basic services in rural areas
Operational Arranging common surface and
Number of projects supported
facilities for various purposes
Total investments value
VALUES
Baseline
Anticipated
(2013)
0
75,000
0
200
0
€12 Mio.
257
5.3.3.2.3 Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 52(b)(iii), Article 57
Measure code: 323
Rationale of the measure
Cultural heritage is an important economic opportunity, therefore it is necessary to identify these
potentials and increase the importance of cultural heritage as development factor. Rural heritage
covers the natural as well the cultural heritage. The nature value areas and the conservation of the
rural cultural heritage need to be cherished as a part of the national identity and as an opportunity to
promote tourism and the corresponding activities. The conservation of the rural cultural identity is
particularly important for a country as Slovenia - having a relatively high degree of preservation in
a relatively small territory.
Objective of the measure
By supporting the projects the measure is aimed at conserving the rural heritage and ensuring the
networking of cultural heritage, natural values and cultural landscape by developing tourism and
spending leisure time, improving the quality of life in the countryside and indirectly having positive
effects on greater economic vitality of the rural areas.
Measure description
Supported shall be projects the estimated value of which does not exceed EUR 360,000 and which
have a special meaning for the heritage conservation. The support shall be granted for:
- renewal of cultural and ethnological rural heritage;
- open-air museums;
- eco-museums;
- facilities for arranging permanent exhibitions of the ethnological heritage;
- arrangement and construction of thematic trails;
- other.
Together with the application the beneficiaries shall submit a drawn up programme and fulfil other
conditions set in the call for tender. As eligible costs are deemed all costs related to the construction
or reconstruction, purchase of new equipment, and other general costs, directly related to the
preparation and implementation of projects. For an application to be granted the beneficiaries must
reach, in accordance with the criteria set, a minimum amount of points.
Target group (beneficiaries)
Beneficiaries are natural and legal persons as well as local communities.
Demarcation
RDP 2007-2013
The measure Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage differs from the measures under axis
and 2 in purposes and well as beneficiaries, therefore no potential overlapping is present. The
measure 125 Improving and developing the infrastructure related to the development and adaptation
of agriculture supports the tracks and access to agricultural land in land consolidation areas,
thematic trails however are not supported under the measure 125 but under this.
Other Operational Programmes
The measure is delimitated from other operational programmes in the following manner:
- Support is granted to settlements without the status of a town.
- The maximum estimated investment value may be EUR 360,000.
258
Financial provisions
The financial aid is provided as non-repayable funds. Maximum aid rate amounts up to 50 percent
of the recognised investment value.
Minimum aid amount granted is EUR 3,000 per project. A beneficiary may obtain maximum
amount of EUR200,000 in the period of the last three budget years.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Improving the quality of life
of rural communities
Raising the attractiveness of
rural communities
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Population in rural areas
benefiting from improved
basic services in rural areas
Number of projects supported
Total investments value
Baseline
0
0
0
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
150,000
250
€29.4 Mio.
259
5.3.4 Axis 4: Implementation of the LEADER approach
Rationale
The lag of rural areas in the development and the changed role of the rural area indicate a need for
the implementation of local development strategies based on the LEADER principles and are
evident in:
- the exactly defined rural areas for which the strategies have been designed;
- the implementation of the strategies through the local action groups (public private
partnerships);
- the “bottom-up” approach in the drawing up and the implementation of the strategy;
- the multisectoral drawing up and implementation of the strategy, whereby the complexity of the
development strategy is accomplished;
- the strategy innovation (approach, method, product, project, market innovation, etc.);
- the implementation of cooperation projects;
- the networking of local partnerships.
The local population itself shall decide on the development of its environment and realise the
development ideas. This way only effective development and the implementation of the measures
under the remaining axes at the local level can be accomplished.
Objectives
The LEADER initiative and its measures are aimed at encouraging the decision-making on the
development of individual rural areas under the bottom-up approach. The measures shall contribute
to the accomplishment of the general objective under axis 4, i.e. building local capacities and
simultaneously towards the achievement of the objectives under axes 1, 2 and particularly axis 3.
Measures and activities
Code
41
(411,
412,
413)
421
421
431
431
Measure
Implementation of local development strategies
Implementation of local development strategies
Promoting inter-territorial and transnational cooperation
Promoting inter-territorial and transnational cooperation
Running local action groups, skills acquisition and animating the
territory
Running local action groups, skills acquisition and animating the territory
Regulation 1698/2005
Article 63(a), Article 64
Article 63(b), Article 65
Article 63(c)
Measures and activities under this axis are aimed at establishing and operating local action groups
as well as the implementation of projects under the LEADER approach.
Next to the specific conditions for each measure, for the measures under axis 4 the following
provisions shall apply as appropriate:
- The measures shall be implemented in the RS throughout the programming period.
- The measures shall be implemented as one or multiannual commitments in accordance with the
criteria set.
- The beneficiary shall fulfil all conditions in accordance with the applicable legislation and the
specifications under the call for tender.
- Co-financed shall be eligible costs arising after the date of the confirmation of the local
development strategy. Acknowledged shall also be preliminary arising general costs related to
the establishment of the local action group, regardless of the date they arose.
- The beneficiaries shall not apply the funds for investments contrary to the purpose for which the
funds were granted.
260
-
-
-
Based on the investment and technical documentation a beneficiary applying for funds for a part
of an investment must provide an inventory of works and costs for the entire investment, in case
of a phased construction he must provide a proof of the works completed and the value thereof.
The payment of customs and levies, the operational, bank and guarantees costs, as well as the
purchase of used machinery and equipment shall not be deemed eligible costs of an investment.
The investment is to be completed prior to the last disbursement of the funds.
In case of investments in new constructions or a reconstruction of facilities and the purchase of
the corresponding equipment located or to be located in the buildings constructed for other
purposes as well, only the costs, of the total construction or reconstruction costs of the entire
building, in the proportional share with regard to the net surface of the building covered by the
facilities concerned (common use areas, roof, façade, etc.) shall be deemed eligible costs.
A beneficiary who has already obtained funds from the national budget of the RS or EU funds
for the same purpose he is applying for under the RDP is not eligible for the RDP funds.
Target group
Beneficiaries are local action groups in rural areas including the settlements with less than 10,000
inhabitants.
Financial provisions
The measures under axis 4 are financed from the public resources, whereby up to 80 percent are cofinanced by the EAFRD and at least 20 percent from the national budget of the RS.
The share of public resources for each measure shall be set by the regulation governing the
payments for measures under axes 1, 3 and 4 and calls for tender. The commitments for granting
funds to the beneficiaries may be made up to the amount of opened resources for each measure. The
restriction criteria as a safety mechanism preventing the available resources from being exceeded
shall be outlined by implementing rules.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Integrating local
partnerships into rural
development
BASELINE INDICATORS
Population share in LAG areas
Number of inhabitants in LAG areas
Number of operating LAGs
Baseline
0
0
0
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
70%
1.4 Mio.
20
261
5.3.4.1 Implementing local development strategies
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 63 (a), Article 64
Measure code: 41 (411, 412, 413)
Rationale of the measure:
Slovenia has long-year experience in the “bottom-up” approach and the drawing up of the
innovative development programmes for rounded up rural areas, which, however, have not been
implemented by effective local development partnerships and which has reflected mainly in the
difficulties of realising the development projects.
Objectives of the measure
The measure is aimed at the implementation of the projects under the LEADER principles based on
the local development potentials and reflecting the needs of the local population as well as
contributing towards the improved quality of life and job creation in the countryside.
Measure description
Supported shall be the innovative projects which are compliant with the local action strategy and
are implemented in the areas where an operating local action group (LAG) exists.
Eligible for support under this measure are all LAGs local development strategies of which were
confirmed in a public tender and shall thus be accorded the status of operating LAGs. The first call
for tender shall be published after the adoption of the RDP 2007-2013. LAGs which shall not be
selected in the first call for tender shall be able to apply in the second call for tender which is
expected to be published by 2009.
The local development strategies shall be evaluated for their innovation, feasibility, sustainable
stance and consistency with other development programmes. Evaluated shall also be the
contribution of the strategy to the creation of new jobs and the integration of the marginal rural
population groups (women, young people) into the drawing up and implementation of the strategy.
Confirmed shall be those local development strategies which shall reach a sufficient number of
points in the call for tender.
Only a LAG with confirmed local development strategy shall award a contract with the MAFF
setting out mutual relations and indicative resources for all purposes of the measures under axis 4.
The implementation of the projects shall be devoted 70 percent of the resources allocated in the
RDP 2007-2013 for axis 4. They shall be allocated on the basis of the LAG population count, LAG
surface and the quality of the local development strategy. It is envisaged that by the end of the
programming period the entire rural space of the RS shall be covered by local development
strategies, with the exemption of the settlements with over 10,000 inhabitants. On about 80 percent
of the territory approximately 20 LAGs shall operate.
Based on its own standards and criteria set the LAG or its decision-making body shall select the
projects and submit them to the LEADER Office for confirmation. The LEADER Office checks if
the selected projects are compliant with the local development strategy and the amount of allocated
financial resources for each LAG. The projects must contribute to at least one of the priorities of the
RDP 2007-2013. In addition thereto, the implementation and financing of the projects must involve
also private partners.
In case a LAG is not the project holder, the LAG and the project holder enter a contract for cofinancing the project. After the project completion or its individual phases the LAG submits a claim
for reimbursement with all required evidence at the MAFF. After checking the claim entitlement the
ARSAMRD shall reimburse the funds to the LAG bank account.
262
As eligible costs are deemed the material costs47 for the implementation of the projects, costs of
obtaining the documentation and approvals, project promotion costs and other general costs directly
related to preparation and implementation of projects48. If the projects match the measures under
other three axes of the RDP 2007-2013 they shall be implemented under the conditions and in a
manner as set for these measures.
Target group
Beneficiaries under this measure are operating LAGs implementing local development strategies
and having a confirmed annual implementation plan.
Demarcation
RDP 2007-2013
The projects under this measure are related to a specific selection based on confirmed development
strategy of a LAG and the annual implementation plan and differ from the projects selection for
other axes. Beneficiaries under this measure are LAGs.
Other Operational Programmes
The measure is delimitated from other operational programmes in the following manner:
- The projects are of local importance.
- Support is intended for investments in settlements with less than 10,000 inhabitants.
- In the projects selection the LEADER principles are considered.
Financial provisions
The aid rate amounts to minimum 50 percent of the value of eligible costs for each project. In case
of non-profit projects the co-financing rate may amount up to 100 percent of the value of eligible
costs for a project. The contribution in kind may amount up to 20 percent of the total project value.
Minimum aid amount granted for each project amounts to EUR 2,000 and the maximum amount
EUR 70,000.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Accelerating creation of new
jobs and opportunities of
new sources of income in
rural areas*
Promoting LEADER
approach in the rural
development programming
Contribution to the
realisation of the RDP goals
by implementing local
development strategies under
the LEADER approach
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Total number of created jobs
Baseline
0
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
20
Beneficiaries supported
0
Increase
Number of LAGs
0
20
Total size of LAG area
0
16,000 km2
Population in LAG areas
0
1.4 Mio.
Number of projects covered by
LAGs
axis 1
axis 2
axis 3
0
650
0
0
0
30%
10%
60%
* Within the framework of the implementation of local development strategies projects no significant direct increase of
new jobs is expected. However, through its indirect impact the LEADER approach shall contribute to the creation of
new jobs within the framework of other measures under axes 1 and 3.
47
All costs for material without costs of services and work.
48
The costs shall be outlined in more detail in implementing documents.
263
5.3.4.2 Promoting inter-territorial and transnational cooperation
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 63 (b), Article 65
Measure code: 421
Rationale of the measure
For effective formation and implementation of the local development strategies it is important that
individual rural areas showing similar developmental opportunities, needs and challenges connect
and exchange experience. The implementation of joint or cooperation projects contributes to the
networking of LAG areas, accomplishment of the common development goals and common
development orientations of individual LAGs.
Objective of the measure
The measure is aimed at grouping rural areas with similar development opportunities and needs to
jointly implement development projects, exchange the knowledge and experience and thus
contribute to a more effective implementation of the local development strategies.
Measure description
Support under this measure shall be aimed at promoting the cooperation, which is one of the main
characteristics of the LEADER approach and enables the exchange of experience, transfer of good
practices and information flow between the local action groups. The inter-territorial cooperation
shall be implemented between individual LAG areas in Slovenia, whereas the transnational
cooperation relates to the cooperation with LAG areas of other Member States and the cooperation
with areas of third countries.
LAGs themselves select cooperation projects. The readiness of a LAG for project cooperation must
be clearly expressed in the Local development strategy. Proposed cooperation projects are
confirmed by the LEADER Office.
At least one LAG, together with other LAG or similarly formed groups, draws up a joint
cooperation project, which shall be coherent with the goals set up in the LAG development
strategies. Prior to the selection the cooperation projects must be confirmed by all cooperating
LAGs implementing the project. The cooperation project is registered by the leading LAG. The
application shall clearly show the tasks and responsibilities allocation as well as the financial
participation of each partner.
Experience, information and knowledge exchange necessary to implement the inter-territorial and
transnational cooperation projects between individual LAGs is the basis for the implementation of
joint project. For this purpose mainly the data bases and tools of the national as well as the
European rural network shall be applied. Cooperation projects shall be implemented by considering
all instructions and procedures set out by the European Commission.
As eligible costs are deemed material costs arising from the implementation of the cooperation
projects, experience exchange and information actions between the cooperating LAGs. Support
shall be granted only for expenses related to the areas within the Community. Each cooperating
LAG may claim the support only for its own expenses.
Target group (beneficiaries)
Supported shall be operating LAGs with confirmed local development strategies and which
implement cooperation projects.
Demarcation
Activities under this measure neither overlap with the measures of other axes under the RDP 2007264
2013 nor with other OPs.
Financial provisions
Ten percent of the resources earmarked for axis 4 of the RDP 2007-2013 shall be devoted to the
cooperation projects. The indicative allocation of the resources for the cooperation projects per
individual LAG shall be set on the basis of the number of inhabitants, LAG surface (km2) and the
quality of the development strategy.
Maximum aid rate for the implementation of the cooperation projects shall amount to 80 percent of
the value of eligible costs. Minimum aid amount granted for individual cooperation project shall be
EUR 2,000 and maximum amount EUR 30,000.
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Accelerating creation of new
jobs and opportunities of
new sources of income in
rural areas*
Promoting inter-territorial
and transnational
cooperation
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Total number of created jobs
Number of cooperation projects
supported
Number of LAGs
implementing cooperation
projects
Baseline
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
0
0
0
75
0
10
* Within the framework of the implementation of inter-territorial and transnational cooperation projects no direct
increase of new jobs is expected, but an indirect creation of new jobs within the framework of other measures under
axes 1 and 3.
265
5.3.4.3 Running local action groups, skills acquisition and animating the territory
Legal basis: Regulation 1698/2005, Article 63 (c)
Measure code: 431
Rationale of the measure:
Since in Slovenia public private partnerships have not yet been developed sufficiently to implement
the projects successfully under the LEADER approach and since at the local level there is lack of
interest and knowledge for development, it is necessary to animate the local population to
participate as much as possible in the processes of development planning and decision-making.
Present is an immense lack of self-initiatives and independence in the introduction of new activities
in the rural areas. Therefore, in the new programming period it is necessary to animate the local
population for the participation in the local action groups (LAGs) and to support the operation
thereof. For a successful LAG operation and involvement of the rural population in the process of
designing and realisation of the development programmes (local development strategies) it is
necessary to promote the education and skills acquisition as well.
Objective of the measure
The measure is aimed at animating the rural population to join into the local action groups and
qualification for running the local action groups as well as at successful implementation of the local
development strategy under the LEADER principles.
Measure description
A LAG must fulfil the requirements referred to in Article 62 of Regulation 1698/2005, and
particularly considering paragraph 1b.
Supported shall be the management and operation of LAGs, the activities of the rural population
animation, and skills acquisition for successful implementation of the local development strategy.
Support for the running and operating is intended for the LAG responsible for the implementation
of the local development strategy. The LAG selects an manager who designs the LAG operation,
animates the local population, collects project ideas, provides for the education of the local
population, prepares reports and performs other tasks entrusted to him by the LAG.
Animation activities shall be intended for rural population and its grouping into LAGs. The
animation activity is aimed at promoting the LEADER approach, local action groups, and local
development strategies in the area concerned of each LAG.
Regarding the skills acquisition the LEADER Office (MAFF) shall organise training for the LAG
operators, which shall be carried out by qualified education operators. Co-financed shall also be the
preparation of appropriate promotion and study materials.
As eligible costs are deemed the costs for the administrative establishment of a LAG, the
operational and running costs (material and operational costs, co-financing the salaries) as well as
the costs of training and animation organisation (organisation and preparation of workshops,
seminars, materials).
Target group
Eligible for support for the running of the local action groups, the skills acquisition and animation
of the territory are LAGs with confirmed local development strategies.
Demarcation
Activities under this measure neither overlap with the measures of other axes under the RDP 20072013 nor with other OPs.
266
Financial provisions
Maximum aid rate for the running the LAGs, skills acquisition and animation of the territory shall
amount up to 50 percent of the value of eligible costs and may not exceed 20 percent of the total
public expenditure of the local development strategy (Article 38 of Regulation 1974/2006). Support
for running and operating costs for each LAG shall be set up on the basis of the number of the
inhabitants and the LAG surface (km2).
Objectives and indicators
OBJECTIVES
Specific
Operational
Accelerating creation of new
jobs and opportunities of
new sources of income in
rural areas*
Establishing LEADER
approach in the rural
development planning and
raising interest and
competence for the
implementation of LEADER
RESULT AND OUTPUT
INDICATORS
Total number of created jobs
Number of supported
training/animation actions
Baseline
VALUES
Anticipated (2013)
0
15
0
250
*Within the framework of running local action groups no significant direct increase of new jobs is expected. It is
envisaged that through its indirect impact the LEADER shall contribute to the creation of new jobs within the
framework of other measures under axes 1 and 3.
267
6
6.1
FINANCIAL PLAN
Annual contribution by EAFRD
Table 52: Annual contribution by EAFRD (EUR)
Year
Total EAFRD
Convergence
regions
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
TOTAL
149,549,387
139,868,094
129,728,049
128,304,946
123,026,091
117,808,866
111,981,296
900,266,729
149,549,387
139,868,094
129,728,049
128,304,946
123,026,091
117,808,866
111,981,296
900,266,729
At the NUTS 2 level Slovenia is one region and is entirely entitled to aid under the Convergence objective.
6.2
Financial plan by axes
Table 53: Financial plan by axes (in EUR – entire period)
Public resources
Total
Grade of EAFRD
co-financing (%)
EAFRD
contribution
Axis
Axis 1
399,487,151
75.00%
299,615,363
Axis 2
587,640,844
80.00%
470,112,675
Axis 3
132,039,136
75.00%
99,029,352
Axis 4
33,760,006
80.00%
27,008,005
Technical assistance
6,001,779
75.00%
4,501,334
Total
77.68%
900,266,729
1,158,928,916
* For better transparency the EAFRD percentage in this table is rounded to two decimal places and the amounts by individual axes are set on the basis of rounding to seven decimal
places.
268
7
FRAMEWORK ALLOCATION BY RURAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURE
Table 54: Framework allocation by measure for rural development (in EUR, entire period)
Measure/axis
Public
expenditure
Private
expenditure
Total
111
13,570,600
0
13,570,600
112
35,253,235
0
35,253,235
113
38,097,939
0
38,097,939
121
82,334,549
82,334,549
164,669,098
122
24,939,252
24,939,252
49,878,504
123
93,171,965
133,934,701
227,106,666
125
43,633,948
0
43,633,948
131
40,400,000
0
40,400,000
132
18,570,337
0
18,570,337
133
6,619,268
2,836,829
9,456,097
142
2,896,057
0
2,896,057
Total axis 1
399,487,151
244,045,331
643,532,482
211
236,924,109
0
236,924,109
212
45,464,579
214
305,252,156
0
305,252,156
Total axis 2
587,640,844
0
587,640,844
311
31,551,000
31,551,000
63,102,000
312
55,520,136
55,520,136
111,040,272
322
323
30,259,000
14,709,000
30,259,000
14,709,000
60,518,000
29,418,000
132,039,136
132,039,136
264,078,272
23,632,002
23,632,002
47,264,004
411
7,089,601
7,089,601
14,179,202
412
2,363,200
2,363,200
4,726,400
413
14,179,201
14,179,201
28,358,402
421
3,376,002
1,446,858
4,822,860
431
6,752,001
6,752,001
13,504,002
33,760,006
31,830,861
65,590,867
Total axis 3
41
Total axis 4
Total axes 1, 2, 3 and 4
Technical assistance
1,152,927,137
45,464,579
407,915,328
5,401,601
1,560,842,465
5,401,601
National rural network
600,178
Running costs
120,036
120,036
Action plan
480,142
480,142
511 Technical assistance
Total
6,001,779
1,158,928,916
0
0
407,915,328
600,178
6,001,779
1,566,844,244
269
8
DDITIONAL NATIONAL FINANCING AT DISTINCTION OF MEASURES
CONCERNED, AS LAID DOWN BY REGULATION 1698/2005
For measures under the RDP 2007-2013 Slovenia has not envisaged to allocate aids exceeding
the maximum amounts set out by Regulation 1698/2005.
270
9
ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE ASSESSMENT IN THE LIGHT OF
COMPETITIVENESS RULES AND AID SCHEME APPROVED PURSUANT TO
ARTICLES 87, 88 AND 89 OF THE TREATY, APPLIED FOR THE PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION
A) Slovenia does not plan additional national financing of measures and activities under the RDP
2007-2013 falling under the scope of Article 36 of the EC Treaty.
B) For measures and activities under the RDP 2007-2013 which do not fall under the scope of
Article 36 of the EC Treaty and represent public financial contribution of Slovenia as a
complement to Community aid, Slovenia shall in favour of activities or measures, based on
Article 28 and Article 52 of Regulation 1698/2005, apply the provisions of Regulation
1998/200649.
Table 55: State aid schemes included in the programme implementation
Code
123
Adding value to
agricultural and forestry
products
(processing and
marketing of other
products, the raw
material of which are
agricultural products;
first stage of wood
processing and
marketing)
Article 28
311
Diversification into nonagricultural activities
Article 52
312
Support for the creation
and development of
micro enterprises
Article 52
322
Village renewal and
development
Article 52
323
Conservation and
upgrading of the rural
heritage
Article 52
Aid scheme
Indication of the scheme lawfulness
Duration of
scheme
By 31.12.2013
Adding value to
agricultural and forestry
products
Any aid for activities under this
measure which do not fall under the
scope of Article 36 of the EC Treaty
shall comply with Regulation
1998/2006.
Diversification into nonagricultural activities
Any aid under this measure shall
comply with Regulation 1998/2006.
By 31.12.2013
Support for the creation
and development of micro
enterprises
Any aid under this measure shall
comply with Regulation 1998/2006.
By 31.12.2013
Village renewal and
development
Any aid under this measure shall
comply with Regulation 1998/2006.
By 31.12.2013
Conservation and
upgrading of the rural
heritage
Any aid under this measure shall
comply with Regulation 1998/2006.
By 31.12.2013
aid
Any cases of application of the schemes enumerated above for which under State aid rules or
under conditions and commitments laid down in the respective State aid approval decision,
individual notifications are required, shall be notified individually pursuant to Article 88 (3) of
the Treaty.
49
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the
Treaty to de minimis aid (OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 5–10 )
271
10 INFORMATION ON COMPLEMENTARITY WITH MEASURES FINANCED BY
OTHER INSTRUMENTS UNDER THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY,
COHESION POLICY AND COMMUNITY AID FOR FISHERIES
The requirement of complementarity, consistency and conformity is set out as a basic principle
in Article 5 of Regulation 1698/2005.
The RDP 2007-2013 provides for conformity and complementarity within the individual axes
and also among them, as well as with the Common Agricultural Policy, Cohesion Policy and
Community fisheries funding instruments. Internal consistency is confirmed by the synergies
that the proposed goals and activities contained in individual axes are to have in relation to the
goals and measures contained in other axes.
10.1 Complementarity with Community activities, policies and priorities
The RDP 2007-2013 has been designed in line with Community Strategic Guidelines that
regulate conformity of the priorities of Member States with Community priorities in areas of
sustainable development goals from Gothenburg and the renewed Lisbon Strategy for Growth
and Jobs.
The basic motive of the RDP 2007-2013 is enhancing the economic competitiveness and
promoting economic growth, which is one of the foundations of the Lisbon Strategy. This
objective is pursued by means of axis 1 measures, which are aimed at enhancing the efficiency
and value of agriculture, agri-food and forestry, as well as by means of conserving production
resources and raising qualifications. Implementation of axis 3 measures, which are dedicated to
improving the quality of life in rural areas and the diversification of economic activities with a
view to promote micro enterprises and create jobs are also important from the viewpoint of
achieving Lisbon Strategy goals. Moreover, the planned measures provide for sustainable rural
development, the underlying objectives of the decisions adopted by the European Council in
Gothenburg.
Complementarity within and among axes
Conformity, the potential for synergies and clarity of individual measures are the key elements
for enhanced rural development. These principles, along with the specific needs and
requirements of the objectives in the respective axes, were kept in mind in devising the
measures. This applies for measures within individual axes as well as those among the axes,
which should provide for increased efficiency in achieving the set objectives.
Complementarity with the measures of the first pillar of the Common Agriculture Policy
The rural development policy promoted by the RDP 2007-2013 through its objectives and
measures are complementary with the measures under the first pillar of the CAP. The most
important features in this respect for Slovenia are direct payments, for which potential synergies
and demarcation issues are dealt with in a separate section.
In 2007 Slovenia introduced the system of single payments in line with CAP reforms adopted
between 2003 and 2005. The new system of direct payments shall help Slovenia to achieve a
more market-oriented, competitive and sustainable agricultural sector, which should in turn
contribute to the achievement of competitiveness, growth and employment goals under the
Lisbon Strategy. The renewed direct payments scheme also promotes the European agricultural
model, which places emphasis on the sector's multi-purpose role. The RDP 2007-2013 and CAP
resort to different instruments in seeking to achieve the same principles and goals.
The proposed direct payments scheme in Slovenia includes regionally-uniform area payments
coupled with various historic supplements and certain production payments. Agricultural
holdings shall be able to bid for additional payments for special breeding methods and quality
272
enhancement irrespective of their participation in the regional direct payment scheme. This is
part of "multi-purpose" measures aimed at promoting the upkeep and promotion of environmentfriendly extensive breeding that provides for the conservation of agriculture whilst promoting
production of prime quality beef.
The measures in the RDP 2007-2013 upgrade the measures under the first pillar of the CAP.
Reform of the direct payments scheme lessens the importance of production criteria in the
distribution of aid thereby placing greater emphasis on the market and promoting care for the
environment, which requires the continuation of intensive restructuring of agriculture and the
countryside. The RDP 2007-2013 strongly promotes such restructuring.
Prior to granting and distributing aid, the ARSAMRD is to carry out checks - including on-thespot visits - in order to avoid duplication of funds for measures funded from CAP instruments.
Beneficiaries eligible for aid under axis 1 who have already received grants from Slovenia or the
EU for a project shall not be entitled to aid under the RDP 2007-2013 for the same project.
Bidders for aid under axis 2 of the RDP 2007-2013 must file independent claims that shall be
checked by the Agency for the fulfilment of aid criteria. There is a link between per area
payments under the first pillar of the CAP and axis 2 instruments related to the implementation
of cross-compliance. The decision not to carry out the payment scheme for Natura 2000
measures in Slovenia means that there is no risk for duplication of payments with those under the
first pillar of the CAP, nor with those in axis 2 of the RDP 2007-2013.
The measures and activities of the RDP 2007-2013 conform fully with Article 5(6) of Regulation
1698/2005 on support for rural development by ensuring that areas subject to support measures
outlined in Annex I of Regulation 1974/2006 dealing with fruit and vegetables, wine, olive oil,
hops, cattle and calves, small livestock, beekeeping, sugar and direct payments are not also
supported as part of the RDP measures. The measures have been demarcated according to their
purpose, while entitlement criteria have been designed so as to exclude the duplication of aid.
The following section outlines the criteria and rules established in order to avoid the duplication
of support under the first pillar of the CAP, contained in Annex 1 of Regulation 1974/2006 with
the measures and activities contained in the RDP 2007-2013. A more detailed presentation of the
measures is contained in Chapter 5.3.
The activities in axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013 shall, by means of various measures, contribute to
the modernisation and enhancement of the competitiveness of the whole food processing chain.
This should be congruent with the renewed goal under the first pillar of the CAP to focus on
improvements in market-based operations and subsequently mitigate the negative economic
effects that are expected to be caused by the introduction of per area payments. In addition, axis
1 measures complement the goals of selected structural measures (wine, beekeeping) carried out
as part of common organisation of the market, resulting in synergies in efforts to enhance the
competitiveness of the agricultural sector. Although certain activities of the RDP 2007-2013
under axis 1 complement the objectives of the common organisation of the market the RS shall
ensure that no overlapping of the resources between the measures for rural development under
axis 1 and the measures of the common organization of the market shall occur.
Fruit and vegetables (Articles 14(2) and 15 of Regulation 2200/9650)
The contents of the one-year operational programmes of the recognised producer organisations
are not yet known, while reforms of the sector were being drawn up at the time of writing.
National regulations laid down that operational programmes of producer organisations cannot be
included in environmental measures or aid schemes (e.g. area payments) for the additional work
50
Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organization of the market in fruit and
vegetables (OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1–28)
273
that is required of them to ensure compliance with stricter environmental rules even if for this
purpose no financing from other public sources is possible.
Recognised producer organisations and producer groups with preliminary recognition or their
members are not eligible for support to investments under measures of axis 1 for the same
purpose, except in case of exemptions outlined under measure 121 Modernisation of agricultural
holdings. Overlapping with investments under axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013 shall be avoided
through appropriate control prior to granting and disbursement of funds.
The promotion of quality indications as well as special costs of enhancing quality are not related
to products included in food quality schemes, which is why there is no duplication with measures
in axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013 in the field of quality of agricultural production and products.
Wine (Title II, Chapter III of Regulation 1493/1999). Under the Decree on the Vine Production
Potential (OJ RS No 23/07) producers are entitled to aid for the discontinuation of winegrowing,
as well as grants for the restructuring of winegrowing areas on the basis of restructuring plans for
the costs of basic planting activities. There is no overlapping with investments as part of axis 1
of the RDP 2007-2013 in new buildings or the reconstruction of buildings and facilities for
processing, storage and preparation of wine, the purchase of new agricultural machinery and
equipment, the purchase of new hail netting, etc. as the launch of winegrowing or restructuring
of vineyards is not eligible for such aid.
Hops (Article 6 of Regulation 1952/200551, Article 68a of Regulation 1782/2003)
Slovenia has not earmarked the 25 per cent share of production-linked payments for the
implementation of work programmes by producer organisations. Hops producer organisations
are not funded under the first pillar of the CAP. As part of axis 1 measures of the RDP 20072013, measure 121 Modernisation of agricultural holdings, aid shall be granted to investments in
buildings and facilities for production, storage and drying of hops and the preparation of hops for
sale, first planting of hops and restructuring of existing hops plantations, the purchase of
agricultural machinery, etc. as well as for activities related to food quality schemes.
Olive oil and table olives (Article 110i (4) of Regulation 1782/2003, Article 8 of Regulation
865/200452, and Article 8 (1) of Regulation 865/2004). Measures under the first pillar are
intended to support market monitoring and management, enhancement of olive oil and table
olive production, improvements in traceability, certification and the protection of the quality of
olive oil and table olives by state authorities, and support measures in disseminating information
among members of producer groups. The listed activities under the first pillar of the CAP do not
apply to products in food quality schemes, which is why there is no overlapping with axis 1
measures in the area of quality of agricultural production and products. Under axis 1 measures
aid shall also be distributed for investments in the purchase, construction or renovation of
buildings and equipment intended for the production and sale of olive oil, as well as for the
general costs of projects for which there is no overlapping with measures under the first pillar.
51
Council Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005 of 23 November 2005 concerning the common organisation of the market
in hops and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1696/71, (EEC) No 1037/72, (EEC) No 879/73 and (EEC) No 1981/82
(OJ L 314, 30.11.2005, p. 1–7 ) and Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1952/2005 of 23 November 2005
concerning the common organisation of the market in hops and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1696/71, (EEC)
No 1037/72, (EEC) No 879/73 and (EEC) No 1981/82 (This text annuls and replaces that published in Official
Journal L 314 of 30 November 2005) (OJ L 317, 3.12.2005, p. 29–35 )
52
Council Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 of 29 April 2004.on the common organisation of the market in olive oil
and table olives and amending Regulation (EEC) No 827/68 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97–127)
274
Beekeeping (Article 2 of Regulation 797/200453)
A special attention will be made to the amount of support given for honey ensuring there is no
overlapping with aid granted on measures improving general conditions for the production and
marketing of apiculture products following Council Regulation (EC) Nº 797/2004. Technical
assistance for beekeepers shall be implemented under the Apiculture programme of Slovenia for
the period 2008-2010, which was adopted on 19.06.2007 by the Management Committee for
Poultry meat and Eggs (co-financing of development and modernisation of bee farms with
investments in fixed assets - smaller investments in equipment required for enhancing production
and marketing - is demarcated from investments under measure 121 Modernisation of
agricultural holdings through a clearly defined list of equipment).
No aid is envisaged under the RDP 2007-2013 for purposes of renewing bee populations (direct
testing of bee families, monitoring and assessment of the quality of bred queen bees) and
applicative research (research of apiculture products and the carrying of results into practice,
environmental effects on apiculture products). Therefore there can be no duplication of funds.
Sugar (Regulation 320/200654)
It has not yet been decided whether Slovenia shall approve restructuring aid under Article 3 of
Regulation 320/2006 and subsequently distribute EU aid also to producers of sugar beet and
sugar cane (for up to five years) as permitted under Article 110q of Regulation 1782/2003. A
Programme for Diversification Measures is to be drawn up on the basis of Article 3 of
Regulation 320/2006 that shall respect the need for demarcation from measures under the RDP
2007-2013. Aid measures in axis 1 of RDP 2007-2013 do not envisage the distribution of aid in
this area.
Axis 2 measures in the RDP 2007-2013 for strengthening the environmental aspect of farming
significantly complement the environmental care under the first pillar of the CAP. The measures
and submeasures of axis 2 have been set as to allow a clear outlining of the synergies with
measures under the first pillar, as well as to prevent any duplication of payments. In order to
avoid duplication of payments as part of agri-environmental measures, direct payments have
been taken into account in total payments for individual agri-environmental submeasures for
grasslands (mountain pastures, steep slopes mowing, humpy meadows mowing, extensive
grassland maintenance, preservation of special grassland habitats, preservation of grassland
habitats of butterflies, conservation of litter meadows, bird conservation in humid extensive
meadows in Natura 2000 sites and permanent green cover in water protection areas). There is no
duplication between additional premiums for sheep breeding in less-favoured areas (Small
Livestock, Articles 114 (1) and 119 of Regulation 1782/2003) and less-favoured area
compensations envisaged in Axis 2 of the RDP 2007-2013. Payments under the "extensification
premium« (Cattle and calves, Article 132 of Regulation 1782/2003) shall be phased out after 1
January 2007, meaning there can be no overlapping with measures in axis 2 of the RDP 20072013.
Activities under axis 3 of the RDP 2007-2013 promote the diversification of income sources and
creation of jobs in rural areas. This should assist agricultural holdings that have been affected
financially by the introduction of production-related measures.
53
Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 of 26 April 2004 on measures improving general conditions for the
production and marketing of apiculture products (OJ L 125, 28.4.2004, p. 1–3)
54
Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 of 20 February 2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring
of the sugar industry in the Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the
common agricultural policy (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 42–50)
275
10.2 Complementarity of RDP 2007-2013 with Cohesion Policy
The implementation of the Convergence objective under EU Cohesion Policy is planned in the
National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2007-2013, which contains three operational
programmes for speeding up the Convergence:
- Operational Programme for Strengthening Regional Development Potentials (European
Regional Development Fund)
- Operational Programme for Development of Human Resources (European Social Fund)
- Operational Programme of Environmental and Transport Infrastructure Development
(Cohesion Fund and European Regional Development Fund)
Along with the listed operational programmes, transnational operational programmes (5),
transnational operational programmes (4), the Rural Development Programme and the Fisheries
Development Programme shall contribute to the general objectives of the NSRF (promoting
economic growth, creating jobs and strengthening human capital and ensuring balanced
development, especially among the regions).
The NSRF is also a basis for drawing up the National Development Programme (NDP) 20072013. The NDP is to contain all development and investment programmes and projects planned
in Slovenia for the 2007-2013 period that shall be financed fully or in part from the state budget
and municipality budgets, including rural development programmes.
In line with the Operational programme for Strengthening Regional Development
Potentials for the period 2007-2013 (OP RR), resources from the European Regional
Development Fund shall be allocated for Slovenia's economic convergence by criteria of
sustainable development. This applies foremost to improving conditions for economic growth
and job creation through investment in physical and human resources, innovation promoting a
knowledge-based society, economic and social adaptability measures, environmental protection
and good governance. The goal of the operational programme is to support all measures that
improve competitiveness, economic and territorial cohesion (i.e. bridging of regional
differences), in line with the principles of sustainable development. It is meant to improve
economic competitiveness and enhance economic growth, although its primary objective is to
strengthen entrepreneurial development and the growth of small- and medium-sized companies.
The operational programme pursues four development priorities: enterprise competitiveness and
research excellence, economic-developmental infrastructure, networking of natural and cultural
potentials, and development of regions.
The RDP 2007-2013 contains measures and activities that are related to:
development priority Enterprise competitiveness and research activity:
- Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises in rural areas (axis 3) is
complementary with the priority promoting enterprises.
- Grants for new production practices (e.g. organic farming), new products and new operating
configurations (axis 1) constitute efforts in the field of innovation and technological
development that are complementary with goals of the Enhancing the competitiveness of
enterprises and research excellence priority.
development priority Economic-developmental infrastructure:
- Axis 3 measures (with support for purchase and use of ICT technology); support to
investments in purchase and modernisation of technological and ICT equipment on
agricultural holdings and enterprises (axis 1) is complementary with the information society
priority.
development priority Networking of natural and cultural potentials:
- Measures in the framework of grants for improving the quality of rural life (axis 3) are
276
complementary with actions in the area of investment grants in the tourism sector,
management of cultural monuments and cultural heritage sites, other cultural buildings and
sports buildings.
The RDP 2007-2013 contains measures and activities under axis 4 that are related to:
development priority Development of regions:
- the Implementing local regional strategies priority is complementary with the activities of the
grants scheme for regional development programmes.
The following demarcations shall be observed in order to achieve synergies and avoid
duplication between the RDP 2007-2013 and other funds:
Axis 1 of the RDP 2007-2013 supports activities in farming, agri-food and forestry, which are
not subject to aid in the OP RR. Axis 1 measures associated with the production and sale of
agricultural products are investment-linked (purchase of equipment, licenses and patents also),
while the OP RR endorses research and development projects (the result of which are also
patents), hence there is no risk of overlapping.
Axis 3 measures in the RDP 2007-2013 shall be carried out in extra-urban areas. The
demarcation shall also be based on the purposes and/or the highest common value of the
investment.
Under axis 4 of the RDP 2007-2013 grants are earmarked for the creation and running of Local
Actions Groups (LAGs). In implementing axis 4 projects limitations set for other axes must be
applied.
Complementarity with Cohesion Policy shall be achieved by ensuring that OP RR measures are
intended for companies larger than micro size in urban settlements as well as micro enterprises
headquartered and operating in urban areas. Generally, large projects shall be financed from
Cohesion Policy measures, while small, local projects shall be financed in the framework of rural
development measures. In the field of ICT the OP RR is to provide funding for the establishment
of multi-band ICT networks (system networks), with access provided for specific users
(educational, research and cultural institutions), avoiding overlapping with rural development
measures in this area. The rural development measures shall be limited to ICT equipment. The
same applies to projects of invigorating village centres and construction of multi-purpose
buildings that are inherently local, while projects supported under the development of regions
shall be regional in nature.
Precise demarcation of activities supported under the RDP 2007-2013 and activities supported
under ERDF is set out in Chapter 5.3 under the relevant measures.
The Operational programme for Development of Human Resource for the period 20072013 (OP ESF), which is backed with ESF funds, focuses on promoting enterprise and
adaptability, improving the employability of job-seekers, developing human resources and lifelong learning, promoting social inclusion and institutional and administrative qualifications.
The RDP 2007-2013 supports training for national professional qualifications in agriculture,
agri-food and forestry (axis 1), training for successful operations in specific activity branches as
part of related investments (axis 3), and training of the local population in rural development
(axis 4).
Axis 1 measures related to raising qualifications and employability in agriculture, agri-food and
forestry are intended for individuals that are involved in the production and processing of
agricultural and forestry products listed in Annex 1 of the EC Treaty as well as private forestland
owners and specific groups of confirmed national vocational qualifications and skills catalogues.
Qualification training under the RDP 2007-2013 is not entitled to support from the ESF funds,
277
except in cases of training of unemployed persons not entitled to rural development grants.
No overlapping shall occur between measures under axis 4 and the OP ESF and the development
priority Strengthening the development of non-governmental organisations, and civil and social
dialog, which also includes measures for promotion of NGO development and civil dialog. The
RDP 2007-2013 shall support education and training aimed at promoting development in local
environment and at local level, i.e. programmes particularly aimed at strengthening
organisational and institutional competence at the local level. Hence, there is no danger of
overlapping with the OP ESF.
The Operational programme of Environmental and Transport Infrastructure Development
for the period 2007-2013 (OP ETID) aims to enhance the reliability, efficiency and safety of the
transport system through the development and upgrading of transport infrastructure. The
priorities in the environmental protection development priority are municipal waste management,
drainage and treatment of municipal waste water, the distribution of drinking water and the
reduction of the negative impacts of waters, as well as sustainable use of energy.
Due to the emphasis on environmental component of development, which together with social
and economic aspects contributes to Slovenia's sustainable development, the RDP 2007-2013 has
a closer connection to the objectives of environmental protection.
The RDP 2007-2013 is expected to contribute with its priorities and measures to achievement of
the environmental protection priority:
Axis 1 activities related to the modernisation and restructuring of agriculture:
- the modernisation of agricultural holdings, agri-food and processing establishments
(arrangement of manure pits, waste treatment facilities, industrial waste treatment facilities at
beneficiary level);
- adapting agriculture to standards;
- improving and developing infrastructure associated with the development and adaptability of
agriculture and forestry (arranging public hydro-amelioration infrastructure as well as
building and arranging new infrastructure which is necessary in land consolidation and
envisaged in the idea design of land consolidation area arrangement and is directly related to
agriculture; arranging private irrigation systems, private water infrastructure (house
connection) and road infrastructure on agricultural holdings and private farmland and
forestland);
shall produce synergy effect on objectives of the OP related to the improvement of the quality of
the environment and appropriate infrastructure.
Overlapping between the funds is not expected as activities within the RDP are to be limited to
the implementation at the level of individual agricultural holdings and enterprises involved in
agricultural processing and production. More detailed divisions among planned measures are to
be defined in the implementing documents.
Measures under axis 2 of RDP 2007-2013 are carried out mostly in the form of per area
payments and do not overlap with the Cohesion Policy activities. There shall also be no
overlapping with axis 3 and axis 4 measures.
The RDP 2007-2013 is expected to contribute with its priorities and measures to the achievement
of the sustainable energy use priority:
RDP 2007-2013 activities promote the use of renewable energy under axis 1 (grants earmarked
for improving efficiency in supplying renewable energy sources, more efficient production and
use of renewable energy sources as well as increasing energy efficiency). It also contributes
directly to reduced CO2 emissions (grants for the purchase of wood biomass furnaces for the
heating of business and production facilities).
278
Axis 3 measures envisaging a possibility for supporting micro enterprises in the production of
electricity and district heating shall raise the share of renewable energy (limited to up to EUR
480,000), which is one of the objectives of the OP ETID. The demarcation between the OP ETID
and axis 3 and LEADER Axis measures shall be defined according to the investment location
and type of beneficiary.
There is a weaker link between the goals under the RDP and transport infrastructure goals
supported by the European Regional Development Fund.
RDP 2007-2013 measures are aimed foremost at maintaining access to farmland, fields and
forest roads under axis 1. The demarcation is based on the type of beneficiaries (agricultural
holdings) on private land. The ERDF earmarks aid for local roads that are part of the public
infrastructure network.
Axis 3 measures related to the improvement of the quality of rural life (theme trails) have an
inherent local nature, whereas the estimated value of the investment may not exceed EUR
360,000 (project limit value between the programmes).
In case of axis 4 of the RDP 2007-2013 support is intended for establishment and operation of
LAGs exclusively under the RDP 2007-2013 conditions and relates to smaller projects which
cannot overlap with the contents of the OP ETID. OP ETID supports building of infrastructure
which is under the responsibility of state institutions (railways, freeways, state and regional
roads, and cycle tracks) or municipalities in the field of environment, which relates to widerange investments which cannot be financed within LAGs. As regards the projects related to
sustainable energy, the same demarcation shall apply as for axis 3, i.e. based on project size.
The exact demarcation measures among the RDP and Cohesion Fund and ERDF activities are
outlined in Chapter 5.3 under the relevant measures.
10.3 Demarcation from fisheries development instruments
The RDP 2007-2013, whose priorities are funded from the EAFRD, does not overlap with the
priorities of the European Fisheries Fund (EFF). The Slovenian operational programme for the
development of fisheries sets out the following objectives:
Providing for sustainable and competitive fisheries,
Modernising and expanding aquaculture,
Modernising and expanding processing,
Promoting fish, fish products and the fisheries sector,
Providing suitable conditions for the work and safety of fishermen by means of
establishing suitable infrastructure and the maintenance of piers and unloading docks,
Promoting the development of coastal fishing areas and achieving long-term prosperity
through diversification and integration of fishing with tourism, cultural heritage and
national heritage.
The strategic goals of fisheries policies set down in the operational programme for fisheries
development complement the goals contained in the rural development policies.
The demarcation between fisheries and rural development is based principally on fishery policy
measures targeting a select group of beneficiaries (fishermen, aquaculture and the fish processing
industry). This group is not entitled to rural development policy aid. For cases of proven and
justified complementarity, demarcations shall be set during the process of drafting public tenders
under the Managing Authority.
For the 2007-2013 programming period Slovenia intends to carry out 11 measures across 4
279
priority axes together with measures of technical assistance as part of the Operational
Programme for Fisheries Development that is funded with the aid of the EFF:
-
-
-
-
-
Axis 1 - Sustainable use of fishing resources with the aim of ensuring sustainable and
competitive fishing, including by the division of vessels according to type and
activities that are not related to fisheries, investment in fishing vessels and equipment.
The measures are complementary with those contained in Axis 1 of the RDP. The
measures and target beneficiaries of this axis are not entitled to aid from Axis 1 of the
RDP, which is why no additional demarcation is required,
Axis 2 – Aquaculture, processing and sale with the aim of enhancing and expanding
fish farming, enhancing and expanding processing, promoting fish, fish products and
the fisheries sector. Activities and beneficiaries registered for fisheries activities
and/or fisheries processing and fish sales, including farmers who have registered fish
farming as a supplementary activity, are entitled to grants for investment in
commercial fisheries only as part of the OP for Fisheries Development and not as
Axis 1 measures in the RDP. Grants related to actions that improve and protect the
environment (protecting natural habitats) are entitled to RDP grants,
Axis 3 – Short-term measures of common interest with the goal of ensuring suitable
conditions for the work and safety of fishermen by means of establishing suitable
infrastructure and maintaining piers and unloading docks. Activities in this set of
measures do not overlap with RDP measures,
Axis 4 - Promoting the development of coastal fishing areas and achieving long-term
prosperity through diversification and integration of fishing with tourism, cultural
heritage and national heritage. A Coastal Action Group (CAG) is expected to be
selected for overseeing the implementation of axis 4 measures. Transparent
demarcation rules for measures and financing would be devised in the case that the
CAG area and partners were to overlap with the area and partners involved in LAGs
under axis 4 of the RDP and the same partners were chosen to implement local
strategies in coastal and rural areas,
The accompanying technical assistance measure in the fisheries operational
programme is intended for providing administrative support for implementing the
programme and does not overlap with the technical aid offered as part of the RDP.
10.4 Complementarity of RDP 2007-2013 with other policies and instruments
LIFE III Programme
In 2007 the third phase of the European Commission's LIFE financial programme (LIFE III)
shall be replaced by LIFE+. The new programme is divided into three sections: nature and
biodiversity, implementation of environmental policies and enhancing governance, and
environmental information and communication. The first two priorities are to be earmarked 78
per cent of the total funds that member states shall bid for with programmes and tenders, while
the third priority aims to integrate small and fragmented programmes from the previous
programming period. Slovenia is set to get around EUR4.5 million according to LIFE+ criteria in
2007, with the amount of annual funds increasing gradually to EUR5.5 million by the end of the
programming period. The country can secure the funds by registering strong projects that shall
get Commission backing. It is impossible to assess possible areas of overlapping between the
RDP 2007-2013 and projects that shall be entitled to LIFE+ funds at this time as the LIFE+
Directive is expected to be published by the summer, while tenders for the projects are to be
released by the European Commission by the end of 2007.
280
Complementarity with national documents
Co-financing of insurance premiums for the protection of crops and fruits
The measures of the RDP in axis 1 related to the modernisation of agricultural holdings envisage
investments in hail netting. This is complementary with the national scheme for co-financing
insurance premiums for crops and fruits that was introduced by Slovenia in 2006.
Forestry instruments
Activities in axis 1 of the RDP shall contribute to enhancing the economic efficiency of forest
management, improving the competitiveness of the forestry sector, and enhancing the value and
improving the quality of forestry products as well as in increasing the use of wood biomass for
energy purposes that shall benefit efforts to combat climate change (Kyoto Protocol). These
activities are related to and aid the implementation of the national forestry strategy set down in
the National Forest Development Programme (MAFF, 1996). Forestry activities included in the
RDP 2007-2013 do not overlap with activities planned as part of the national forestry scheme
that is focused on conserving, enhancing, developing and maintaining private forests for their
ecological, protective and recreational purposes. The scheme includes: the implementation of a
part of care and protection of forests maintaining the ecological balance of forests; protective
measures in forests (to protect against pests, to conserve protected beasts), conservation of wild
animal habitats, maintenance and development of infrastructure for preventing forest fires;
renewal of forests damaged by natural phenomena or fires, and the association of forest owners.
Under the scheme all measures ensuring the conservation and planned development of forests
shall be financed and co-financed in 2007-2013. Co-financing shall predominantly be
implemented to the extent to which a measure contributes to the enhancement of common
benefits of forests. The same has been notified on state aids for 2007-2013.
Training and information actions
 The RDP 2007-2013 includes activities in the field of training and education:
 Aimed at the professional training and education of beneficiaries that work in agriculture
and forestry and the agricultural and forestry processing sectors (axis 1);
 Related to training and informing actions for entrepreneurship in rural areas (axis 3);
 Intended for permanent training and the promotion of leadership of local partnerships
(axis 4).
The listed measures do not overlap with the training and information activities in the field of
agriculture and forestry that are carried out in Slovenia by a joint public body managed by the
Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry and the Slovenian Forest Service.
Internal consistency of the EU Cohesion Policy operational programmes with the Rural
Development Programme and the Fisheries Development Programme is provided for by the
National Development Programme 2007-2013 and other activities by the Slovenian Government
Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy. A Council for Structural Policy has been
established as an inter-departmental government coordination body under the 2005 Act on the
Promotion of Balanced Regional Development. The Council is responsible for ensuring the
consistency of development documents and development grants from various sources. In order to
implement the principle of partnership in drafting development documents and to promote wide
debate on issues related to sustainable development among the stakeholders, the government
established in 2003 the Council for Sustainable Development, which acts as an advisory body.
The Secretariat of the Council for Sustainable Development is also responsible for conformity
and consistency among activities in the field of sustainable development.
Conformity of the NSP and the RDP 2007-2013 with Cohesion Policy and the Fisheries
Development Programmes as well as other documents shall additionally be checked by the Rural
281
Development Supervisory Committee, an interdepartmental body associating officials of
responsible authorities for agriculture, cohesion and fisheries policy.
Furthermore, conformity and prevention of overlapping shall also be based on a mutual
exchange of information on individual tenders among the responsible Managing Authorities.
The Republic of Slovenia is drawing up Operational Programme Natura 2000 which shall set out
the rules on implementation and designing of management plans for Natura 2000 sites. The
programme shall be financed from the national budget.
282
11 DESIGNATION OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND BODIES RESPONSIBLE
The Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Food (MAFF) is the responsible authority for drawing
up the Rural Development Programme and monitoring and gauging its effects as set down in Article
16 of Regulation 1698/2005. The draft RDP 2007-2013 was subjected to harmonisation among the
relevant ministries (the environment; finance; culture; health; labour, the family and social affairs;
economy; educations and sports), government bodies (local self-government and regional
development) and the social partners, including the Government Office for Equal Opportunities, the
Association of Slovenian Rural Youth, and the Association of Women Farmers. During drafting of
the RDP 2007-2013 special consultations were held with the Ministry of the Environment and
Spatial Planning.
The organisation chart displays the structure of MAFF, including its internal bodies that have been
included in the drafting, monitoring and implementation of the Slovenian Rural Development
Programme.
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE,
FORESTRY AND FOOD
INTERNAL AUDIT
SERVICE
MINISTER'S OFFICE
EU COORDINATION
AND INTERNATIONAL
AFFAIRES SERVICE
DIRECTORATE FOR
AGRICULTURE
STRUCTURAL
POLICY AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
SECTION
PUBLIC RELATIONS AND
PROMOTION SERVICE
DIRECTORATE FOR
FOOD SAFETY
DIRECTORATE FOR
FORESTRY, HUNTING AND
FISHERIES
FOOD AND
FEED
SAFETY AND
QUALITY
SECTION
SUSTAINABLE
AGRICULTURE
SECTION
LEGAL
AFFAIRS
SERVICE
SECRETARIAT
BUDGET
AND
FINANCE
SERVICE
INVESTME
NT AND
GENERAL
AFFAIRS
SERVICE
HUMAN
RESOURCE
SERVICE
INFORMATICS
TECHNOLOGY
SERVICE
BODIES OF MINISTRY
VETERINARY
ADMINISTRATION
OF RS
AGENCY OF RS FOR
AGRICULTURAL MARKETS AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
VETERINARY
ADMINISTRATIO
N OF RS
INSPECTORATE OF RS FOR
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND
FOOD
MAFF is responsible for implementing the provisions of Regulation 1290/2005. It is also
responsible for establishing suitable governance and control mechanisms for balanced
implementation of the RDP 2007-2013.
To ensure effective protection of financial interests of the EU Slovenia implements all the
administrative measures set down in Article 9(1) of Regulation 1290/2005 – they have been defined
precisely in the national body of legislation.
In accordance with Regulation 1848/2006, Slovenia shall report regularly on the established
financial consequences of irregularities and on suspected cases of fraud.
11.1 Managing Authority
283
MAFF shall be responsible for carrying out the tasks of the managing authority set down in Article
74(2) of Regulation 1698/2005.
The tasks of the managing authority include:
-
-
approving criteria for the selection of projects financed under provisions of the RDP,
drafting national implementation regulations,
taking part in the governance committee for the RDP 2007-2013,
establishing suitable systems for collecting and keeping statistical and other data required for
monitoring and gauging of the programme,
informing all beneficiaries in the RDP of:
 their responsibilities to apply a separate accounting system or to use suitable accounting
codes for all transactions related to the support measures.
 requirements on providing and keeping data on effects of the programme.
implementation of all monitoring activities required to ensure the timely implementation of the
Significant Impact Assessment,
forwarding of monitoring and assessment results to the Monitoring Committee and the
European Commission,
formation of a Monitoring Committee and drafting of materials for the required monitoring of
the programme's implementation under the Monitoring Committee’s rules of procedure,
dissemination of public information, as defined by Article 76 of Regulation 1689/2005,
compiling annual progress reports, forwarding it to the Monitoring Committee and,
subsequently, to the European Commission,
providing all required information to the payment agency prior to the approval of payments,
including on the procedures and controls being carried out for support activities.
The Director of the Directorate General is the head of the Managing Authority and is as such
responsible for all contents related to the RDP 2007-2013. Directly responsible to the head of the
Managing Authority shall be the Secretariat, which shall be tasked with coordination at programme
and axis level, and administrative support as well as secretariat functions for the Monitoring
Committee.
Given the current organisation scheme at MAFF the Managing Authority shall operate at various
levels. The top level shall represent the Guidance Committee - composed of representatives from
the office of the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Food, the directors of the Directorate for
Food Safety and the Directorate for Forestry, Hunting and Fisheries. A key role in the Guidance
Committee shall also belong to the representatives of sectors responsible for individual measures
and support bodies, such as the Finance Office and Legal Affairs Office.
The Managing Authority shall approve criteria for project selection, monitor the implementation of
the collection of data for monitoring and assessment, inform beneficiaries of their obligations
stemming from the RDP 2007-2013, inform the public about the benefits of the RDP 2007-2013
and ensure balanced information flow between MAFF and the Payment Agency with a view to
ensure effective implementation of the RDP 2007-2013. The Managing Authority is tasked with
compiling annual and other reports for the Monitoring Committee, including documents related to
monitoring of the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013.
The individual working groups for monitoring and guiding the implementation of the RDP 20072013 are located at second level. They are responsible for: providing technical aid and information,
SFC2007 and programming support, data collection and reporting, deciding on appeals and
responding to financial questions and questions related to grant allocation. A special group
incorporating individual operators for the axes shall be formed to provide assistance in the
implementation of the RDP 2007-2013.
Written rules shall be drawn up outlining the activities of the Managing Authority.
284
The Managing Authority shall sign with the Payment Agency an agreement determining the
obligations of each institution, issues of data flow and the division of tasks with a view to ensure
balanced implementation of the RDP 2007-2013.
The measure Technical assistance and activities of the Rural Network shall be carried out in the
framework of the Managing Authority, while the payments are made by the Payment Agency.
MANAGING AUTHORITY
Head:
Director of the Directorate for
Agriculture
Secretariat
SFC2007
IT Support
Legal issues
Financial issues
GUIDANCE COMMITTEE
MEMBERS:
- Minister's Office
- Directorate for Food Safety
- Directorate for Forestry, Hunting and
Fisheries
- Sustainable Agriculture Section
- Structural Policy and Rural
development Section
- Finance Service
- Legal Affair Service
Head of Axsis/
Measures
axsis 1
axsis 2
axsis 3
axis 4 - LEADER
Monitoring and Reporting
indicators,
reports, analyses
Technical Assistance
information, assistance
Figure 15: Organisation chart for the Managing Authority
11.2 Paying Agency
The ARSAMRD is the only accredited payments agency for implementing measures of the
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in the country.
The Agency was established in 1999 for implementing the pre-accession SAPARD programme,
CAP and national measures.
The first national accreditation was issued to the agency in July 2001 and the first European
Commission accreditation in November 2001.
The MAFF, as the body authorised to issue and revoke accreditations for payments and to monitor
the agency's payments from the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and
Guarantee Fund, gave the agency full accreditation in October 2004 for carrying out CAP measures,
financed by the fund. The move also confirmed the suitability of the agency's organisational
structure and activities.
The criteria for accrediting the Payment Agency are in line with the provisions set in Regulation
1663/9555 and Regulation No 885/200656.
55
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee
Section (OJ L 158, 8.7.1995, p. 6–12)
285
The Agency is organised in accordance with the above listed criteria and carries out the following
basic tasks:
- Authorisation of payments,
- Execution of payments,
- Accounting for payments.
The structure of the Agency guarantees the implementation of all measures of the RDP 2007-2013.
DIRECTOR
GENERAL
INTERNAL AUDIT
SECTION
Franc KEBE
Darja BERLIÈ
AGRICULTURAL
MARKETS SECTION
M.Sc. Franc MUHIÈ
FOREIGN TRADE
DEPARTMENT
Dijana Pirc
INTERVENTION
MEASURES
DEPARTMENT
Vegetable part
DIRECT PAYMENTS
SECTION
Benedikt JERANKO
DIRECT PAYMENTS
DEPARTMENT
Nikolaj CELEC
AREA UNIT
Franc HORVAT
M.Sc. Andrejka ZNOJ
INTERVENTION
MEASURES
DEPARTMENT
Animal part
Marjan DVORNIK
MARKET
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT
Robert KAISERSBERGER
ANIMAL UNIT
Helena MEGLIÈ
SUSTAINABLE
AGICULTURE
DEPARTMENT
Majda POTOÈNIK
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
DEPARTMENT
M.Sc. Robert FABIJAN
NATURAL
DISASTERS
DEPARTMENT
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
SECTION
FINANCIAL SECTION
Mateja NEMANIÈ
CONTROL SERVICE
GENERAL AFFAIRS
SERVICE
Valdij PERIC
M.Sc Dušan VERBIÈ
SERVICE FOR
INFORMATION,
MANAGEMENT AND
TECNOLOGY
Hermina OBERSTAR
RESTRUCTURING OF
AGRICULTURE, FOOD
AND FISHERIES
DEPARTMENT
PAYMENTS
DEPARTMENT
mag. Aneta ABSEC
Janez LUŠIN
ACCOUNTING
DEPARTMENT
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Alenka ŠURK
MATERIAL TECHNICAL AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT
Bojan Bajde
LEGAL AFFAIRS
SERVICE
DATA ACCESS
DEPARTMENT
Jože MOŽGAN
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT
Renata KOLARIÈ
Janja ZUPAN NOVAK
Ariana LIBERTIN
MAIN OFFICE
Vida KAPUŠIN
PERSONNEL AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT
Katarina HOÈEVAR
PODGORŠEK
EU AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT
Štefka VIDEÈNIK
PUBLIC RELATIONS
M.Sc. Suzana BREŽNIK
The Agency has adequate internal controls and especially controls for payments in line with
eligibility conditions confirmed by the Managing Authority.
The controlling service at the Agency is responsible for carrying out on-site checks and to draft risk
analyses in cooperation with regional units which carry out the RDP 2007-2013 measures. The
controlling service is also tasked with monitoring of the on-site checks. Its organisation allows for
carrying out additional controls.
The Agency moreover ensures harmonised implementation of the Community’s executive
legislation, hands out the Community’s documents and guidelines, and reports to the European
Commission. The Agency has a controlling system in place for sending requests for reimbursements
and the required reports to the Commission.
The Agency’s internal auditing department meanwhile monitors the implementation of internal
controls of administrative and executive procedures based on an audit trail.
The Agency has a comprehensive system in place for uncovering, preventing and reporting on
irregularities and suspicions of fraud. The system works according to the guidelines and a reporting
system that was created in accordance with Regulation 1848/2006. The central unit for launching
procedures in the event of a discovery and for preventing and reporting irregularities and suspicions
of fraud is the controlling service, which reports to the European Anti-Fraud Office and the Budget
56
Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the
accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD (OJ L 171, 23.6.2006, p. 90–110)
286
Supervision Office at the MF. The agency has in place a procedure for a timely recovery of unduly
paid amounts. A completely computer-based system of monitoring shall be launched at the Agency
in September 2007. The institution’s finance department is tasked with recoveries and their
monitoring.
11.3 Certification body
The certification body for carrying out the Rural Development Programme measures is the Finance
Ministry’s Budget Supervision Office. Certification of EU payments is defined in the Public
Finance Act (OJ RS, nos 79/99, 124/00, 79/01, 30/02, 56/02, 110/02). The office has a special
department for the Common Agricultural Policy. The certification body uses the provisions of the
auditing programme for all CAP measures and ensures that the IT systems at the agency are secure,
as laid down in Regulation 885/2006.
Contact points
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food
Dunajska 56, 58
SI 1000 Ljubljana
Phone: + 386 1 478 9000
Fax: + 386 1 478 9021
E-mail: [email protected]
National SFC2007 coordinator for EAFRD
Leon Ravnikar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food
Dunajska 56, 58
SI 1000 Ljubljana
Phone: + 386 1 478 9309
Fax: + 386 1 478 9056
E-mail: [email protected]
Agency of the RS for Agricultural Markets and Rural Development
Dunajska 160
SI 1000 Ljubljana
Phone: + 386 1 580 7617
Fax: + 386 1 478 9206
E-mail: [email protected]
Budget Supervision Office
Glinška 3a
SI 1000 Ljubljana
Phone: + 386 1 369 6900
Fax: + 386 1 369 6914
E-mail: [email protected]
11.4 Description of the management structure and financial flow for payments to final
beneficiaries
Beneficiaries for aid under axes 1, 2 and 3 of the rural development programme file their
applications and claims at the Agency. The agency has in place written guidelines, control sheets
287
and reporting systems to process the applications, approve of and calculate the amount of aid in line
with Regulation 885/2006.
Measures of Axis 2
The measures “compensatory payments in less-favoured areas” and “agri-environmental payments”,
require the beneficiaries to file the claims on an application form which is also used for submitting
claims per unit of surface as parts of the first pillar of the CAP.
The Department for Environmental Programme and Less-Favoured Areas for Agriculture as part of
the Direct Payments Section at the Agency (hereinafter: Department for Environmental Programme
and Less Favoured Areas for Agriculture) processes the single applications in line with Regulations
796/2004 and 885/2006.
Detailed administrative checks are carried out prior to approving an application to determine its
completeness and whether the conditions for approving the payment are met. Administrative checks
and supervision of obligations that span several years are recorded with the aid of special software.
The Agency set up a complete IACS system with software administrative checks for processing the
single applications for compensatory payments in less-favoured areas for agriculture; for agrienvironmental payments; and for agricultural subsidies. These checks include:
- Cross-linked checks of reported crops and animals,
- Cross-linked checks with databases to ascertain whether aid would be justified.
The software support for implementing the agricultural policy measures (IACS) is checked in detail
before data is transferred from the applications and the amount of aid is calculated. The checks are
documented on special control sheets during the testing.
The amount of aid is calculated after the administrative and on-site checks are completed by the
controlling service. The finance section transfers the recorded amounts of aid to a joint order for
payment which is then sent to the Ministry of Finance. The finance section also checks whether the
joint payments correspond to the list of approved claims by beneficiaries. The payment is made
directly to the beneficiary’s bank account.
Additional information for approved claims ensures that an audit trail links the received application
for the payment to the beneficiary and the corresponding application for reimbursement, drafted in
line with Regulation 885/2006.
Measures of axes 1 and 3
Application claims for measures under axes 1 and 3 are filed by beneficiaries on set forms in line
with the demands of a public call for tenders. Detailed administrative checks are carried out prior to
approving an application to determine whether it was filed on time, was complete and whether the
conditions for approving the payment were met. The checks are documented on detailed
standardised check lists.
The applicants whose forms arrived on time, are complete and in line with the provisions of an
individual public tender have preferential treatment.
The amount of aid is calculated after the administrative and on-site checks are completed by the
controlling service. The finance section transfers the recorded amounts of aid to a joint order for
payment which is then sent to the Ministry of Finance. The finance section also checks whether the
list of payments corresponds to the list of beneficiaries entitled to monthly payments. The payment
is made directly to the beneficiary’s bank account.
Additional information for approved claims ensures that an audit trail links the received application
for the payment to the beneficiary and the corresponding application for reimbursement, drafted in
line with Regulation 885/2006.
288
Measures of axis 4 - LEADER
The LEADER Office (operates within the framework of the MAFF) is responsible for carrying out
the measures under axis 4. The office performs activities needed for establishing Local Action
Groups (LAGs) on the basis of detailed conditions, set forth in at least two calls for the period
2007-2013.
The LAGs submit Local Development Strategies to the MAFF. The LEADER Office checks
whether the Local Development Strategies meet the goals set in the NSP and the criteria demanded
by the call. It also drafts a list of LAGs, including a framework financial plan for carrying out the
activities in a LEADER area.
The list of selected LAGs, the submitted Local Development Strategies and the financial framework
are sent to the Managing Authority. This body also confirms the yearly amount of funds for
individual activities on an annual basis. The LEADER Office is moreover tasked with monitoring
the implementation of the projects as part of the yearly financial framework for an individual Local
Action Group and for reporting on all levels.
LAGs are meanwhile responsible for carrying out all the activities in the area (promoting interest,
drafting and selecting suitable projects for funding, overseeing the execution and reporting). LAGs
are also tasked with carrying out administrative checks before an individual project is approved, onsite checks before payments are approved, monitoring the implementation of the project and issuing
reports to the Managing Authority. The LEADER Office can approve the expenses for an individual
LAG based on the data sent by the group. Approved claims for reimbursement are sent by the
LEADER Office to the Agency which carries out the payment to beneficiaries under the procedure,
detailed above.
11.5 Monitoring system
The Agency carries out administrative and on-the-spot checks in line with Regulation 885/2006.
The Agency has handbooks for measures with detailed standardized control sheets to aid it in
carrying out the checks.
The Agency observes the rule that expenses that were not paid out correctly have to be recovered.
This rule applies to all measures of the rural development programme.
The agricultural policy measures (IACS) also sets out sanctions (reductions and cessation of
payments) and is used for all irregularities regarding payments for crops and/or animals. The
Agency controlling service has already drafted guidelines for that purpose. The document is in line
with Regulation 796/2004. Any other irregularities – such as other specific conditions for RDP
measures – are covered in the Agency’s List of Irregularities and Sanctions. The list is defined in
more detail in a national act that dealing with the reduction or cessation of payments.
Independently from the IACS demands for sanctions and reimbursing wrongly paid amounts, the
beneficiaries shall need to return any other aid if irregularities are discovered.
When an irregularity is detected, the controlling service informs the department responsible for
carrying out individual measures. The department then launches a procedure in line with the
national legislation to recover the funds.
The applicants are not required to reimburse the aid if conditions for approving the funds were not
met because of the following:
- Force majeure,
- Special provisions in adopted regulations,
- Right to cancellation due to unforeseen circumstances that could not have been influenced by
the beneficiary,
289
-
-
Changes that impact the implementation of the measure and were unknown when the
agricultural and environmental commitment was made, as described in more detail in chapter
5.3.2, and
Other similar circumstances.
The beneficiaries who are eligible for funds from the early retirement measure and do not inform
the Agency of joining the National Pension Scheme are penalised or excluded from the measure.
Every beneficiary receives a list of irregularities and sanctions before signing the contract. The
sanctions include the return of already paid amounts and cessation of payments.
Conducting physical inspections
On-the-spot controls are the responsibility of the agency’s controlling service. The organisational
structure of the Agency provides for a separation of administrative from on-the-spot controls. The
controlling service is tasked with preparing a risk analysis in cooperation with the agency’s
departments which are responsible for carrying out individual rural development programme
measures as well as for monitoring the implementation of the measures entrusted to it.
The risk analysis is drafted in phase one and is based on random sampling of a quarter of
applications. Phase two involves sampling on the basis of key risk criteria such as:
- Amount of aid,
- A major increase in the surface area,
- The first aid application by a beneficiary,
- Irregularities discovered in previous years (for the measures already carried out),
- The investors is near to the threshold for granting aid,
- Facts known about the beneficiary.
On-the-spot controls of applications and claims shall be carried out in any year by visits to farms
and shall include at least 5 per cent of approved applications for each of the measures in axis 2 of
the rural development programme, linked to surface areas, and at least 5 per cent of approved
applications in axes 1 and 3. Investments that require payments in several phases necessitate on-thespot controls at least once before the investment is completed.
These controls on agricultural holdings also verify the use of best agriculture practices, cross
compliance and other specific conditions for approving aid for an individual measure.
The cross compliance check shall involve at least 1 per cent of approved applications.
On-the-spot controls have to examine all those obligations of a beneficiary from the RDP 20072013 that can be verified during a visit to an agricultural holding. On-the-spot controls checks have
to be recorded on detailed and standardised sheets.
The Agency shall carry out additional controls after on-the-spot controls have been completed in the
amount of 1 per cent.
Supervising good agricultural practice
Good agricultural practice demands, as part of agricultural and environmental obligations, are
transferred from the previous programming period. They are based on several national regulations
on the environment and farming. The Slovenian Inspectorate for Agriculture, Forestry and Food
monitors the implementation of these obligations on the basis of indicators. The inspectors carry out
on-site checks. Checks on the bases of indicators in the RDP 2004-2006 are carried out during
every inspection of an agricultural holding. The IACS control procedures demand that inspectors
submit reports of the checks to the Agency for future procedures.
290
12 MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS AND ENVISAGED FORMATION OF
THE MONITORING COMMITTEE
12.1 Monitoring and evaluation systems
The quality of the Programme implementation is monitored by the Managing Authority and the
Monitoring Committee by way of financial indicators as well as output and result indicators.
The monitoring of the programme implementation enables a review of the programme performance
as regards the accomplishment of the objectives set with regard to the financial resources spent. It is
an ongoing procedure during the programme implementation aimed at correcting the programme in
case of deviations from the operational objectives accomplishment, at improving the
implementation quality and the optimisation of the budgetary resources allocation.
The limited number of common indicators applied in every programme is set with the common
monitoring and evaluation framework drawn up in cooperation between the Commission and the
Member States and adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 90(2) of
Regulation 1698/2005.
The approach towards the monitoring and evaluation of the Programme implementation in 20072013 is founded on the regulation from the previous programming period. It is however more
systematic and adapted to the new needs of Regulation 1698/2005.
The monitoring of the results, impacts and the accomplishment of objectives in individual
intervention areas shall additionally be carried out through indicators which are not part of the
common framework and shall be carried out by institutions competent therefore.
The changes in the environment status shall additionally be monitored through a set of agrienvironmental indicators and environmental indicators, for monitoring of which the ARSE is
responsible. Some of the mentioned indicators are quantitatively included into the baseline analysis.
Responsible for the status monitoring of the nature conservation, data gathering on plant and animal
species as well as their habitats and ecosystems and the monitoring of biodiversity is the Institute of
the RS for Nature Conservation (Nature Conservation Act, OJ RS No 41/04). The impacts emerging
from the implementation of the measures under the Programme shall be evaluated in more detail
through the monitoring systems and the data on the status of the nature conservation.
Indicators
The progress, performance and successfulness of the RDP 2007-2013 with regard to its objectives
are measured by means of indicators related to the baseline analysis and the financial
implementation, the outputs, results and impacts of the programmes.
Common and additional baseline indicators and result and output indicators are listed in Chapter 5
under each axis and corresponding measures and Annex 2. All indicators comprise an evaluated
baseline state and anticipated value at the end of the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013. Impact
indicators are evaluated in the light of the anticipated impact of the implementation of the RDP
2007-2013 on individual areas comprised by the indicators. All indicators shall be described and
outlined in a document which shall in detail set out the monitoring of the measure implementation
under the RDP 2007-2013.
The RDP 2007-2013 defines a limited number of additional indicators which are typical for it. The
data related to the indicators may be additionally divided by gender and age of the beneficiaries.
Annual progress report
The Managing Authority implements the activities of data gathering necessary for drawing up the
annual progress report pursuant to Article 82(2) of Regulation 1698/2005. The Managing Authority
291
sends the annual report, after a preliminary confirmation by the Monitoring Committee, to the
Commission by 30 June 2008 for the first time and then each year by the end of June.
Each annual progress report shall contain the following elements:
a) any changes of general conditions which would directly affect the conditions of the Programme
implementation, as well as any changes of the national or Community policies which would affect
the consistency of the EAFRD and other financial instruments;
b) Programme progress in accordance with the objectives set, as set out on the bases of result and
output indicators;
c) data on financial implementation of the programme showing expenditure disbursed to the
beneficiaries for each measure; if the programme relates to regions under the Convergence
Objective the expenditure is shown separately;
d) summary of ongoing monitoring activities;
e) measures of the Managing Authority and Monitoring Committee to ensure quality and efficiency
of the Programme implementation, in particular:
(i) monitoring and evaluation measures;
(ii) summary of major difficulties which emerged from running the Programme and measures
adopted, including those related to the remarks referred to Article 83 of Regulation 1698/2005;
(iii) use of technical assistance;
(iv) measures providing for public information pursuant to Article 76 of Regulation 1698/2005;
(f) statement of conformity with Community policies in the field of support, including difficulties
which emerged and actions to solve them;
(g) where necessary, reuse of recovered funds pursuant to Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No
1290/2005.
The Managing Authority shall send the last annual progress report on the implementation of the
Programme to the Commission by 30 June 2016.
Annual examination of programmes
Each year, on presentation of the annual progress report the Commission and the Managing
Authority shall examine the main results of the previous year, in accordance with procedures to be
determined in agreement with the Member State and Managing Authority concerned. Following
that examination the Commission may make comments to the Member State and to the Managing
Authority, which shall inform the Monitoring Committee thereof. The Member State shall inform
the Commission of action taken in response to those comments.
Strategic monitoring
The Managing Authority shall submit to the Commission a summary by 1 October 2010 pursuant to
Article 13(2) of Regulation 1698/2005. The report sets out the progress made in the implementation
of the National Strategy Plan and the accomplishment of the objectives as well as the contribution
to the achievement of the Community strategic guidelines. The Managing Authority shall submit
the summary report no later than 1 October each second year, the last one in 2014.
Evaluation
The RDP 2007-2013 shall be subject to ex ante, midterm and ex post evaluations in accordance
with Articles 85, 86 and 87 of Regulation 1698/2005.
The aforementioned evaluations shall aim to improve the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of the
implementation of the Rural Development Programme. They shall assess the impact of the
292
Programme as regards the Community strategic guidelines and the rural development problems,
taking into account sustainable development requirements and environmental impact as well as
meeting the requirements of applicable Community legislation.
The evaluations shall be carried out by independent evaluators. The results shall be available in
accordance with Regulation 1049/200157.
Member State shall provide the human and financial resources necessary for carrying out the
evaluations, organise the acquisition and gathering of the data required and shall make use of
different information provided by the monitoring system.
Ex ante evaluation
Ex ante evaluation is a part of the drawing up of each rural development programme and is intended
for the optimisation of the budgetary resources allocation and improvement of the Programme
quality. Its aim is to ascertain and assess mid- and long-term needs and objectives to be achieved,
anticipated results, evaluated results, particularly in the light of the impact on the baseline situation,
Community value added, to what extent the Community priorities have been considered, knowledge
gained from previous programming, as well as the quality of implementation, monitoring,
evaluation and financial management procedures.
Pursuant to Article 85 of Regulation 1698/2005 the ex ante evaluation was carried out under the
responsibility of the Managing Authority. The ex ante evaluation was conducted by independent
evaluators from the Biotechnical Faculty of the University of Ljubljana in cooperation with the
Danish company Orbicon.
The ex ante evaluation is a part of the RDP, as a summary in chapter 3.3 and as a whole in Annex
16 to the Programme.
Midterm and ex post evaluation
The Managing Authority shall conduct all necessary activities for carrying out the midterm and ex
post evaluation of the RDP 2007-2013 as regards the evaluation of the Programme progress in
relation to its objectives by means of result indicators and, where appropriate, impact indicators.
After the conducted midterm evaluation the Managing Authority shall assess the needs for possible
amendments to the RDP 2007-2013, in particular as regards the improvement of the quality of the
programme and the implementation thereof.
In 2010, ongoing evaluation shall take the form of a separate midterm evaluation report. That
midterm evaluation shall propose measures to improve the quality of the programme and the
implementation thereof.
In 2015, ongoing evaluation shall take the form of a separate ex post evaluation report.
The midterm and ex post evaluations shall examine the degree of the resources utilisation, the
effectiveness and efficiency of the programming of the EAFRD, its socioeconomic impact and its
impact on the Community priorities. They shall cover the objectives of the Programme and aim at
drawing the lessons concerning the rural development policy. They shall identify the factors which
contributed to the success or failure of the programmes’ implementation, including their
sustainability, and identify good practices.
Ongoing evaluation
Ongoing evaluation is a process comprising a set of evaluation tasks. It is aimed at continuous
monitoring of the Programme implementation and the changes achieved outside the Programme in
the sense of better understanding and outlining of accomplished outputs and results as well as the
57
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public
access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43–48)
293
progress in achieving long-term impacts. It provides for the overview of the Programme progress as
regards the objectives set through monitoring and evaluation of the result indicators and, where
appropriate, of the impact indicators (Article 86(2)(a) of Regulation 1698/2005). The findings of the
ongoing evaluation may be applied to improve the Programme quality and its implementation, to
analyse the proposals of essential Programme changes and data preparation for midterm and ex post
evaluation. The summary of the ongoing evaluation activities is included into the annual progress
report.
Ongoing evaluation is organised on the initiative of managing authorities in cooperation with the
Commission. It is organised on multiannual basis and comprises the period 2007-2015.
12.2 Envisaged formation of the Monitoring Committee
Based on the MAFF proposal the Government of the RS shall appoint the members of the
Monitoring Committee for RDP 2007-2013 within a maximum of three months following the
decision approving the programme.
The Monitoring Committee shall draw up its rules of procedure within the institutional, legal and
financial national framework and adopt them in agreement with the Managing Authority in order to
perform its duties in accordance with Regulation 1698/2005.
The chair of the Monitoring Committee shall take the State Secretary of the MAFF.
The Managing Authority shall set up the formation of the Monitoring Committee, including the
partners referred to in Article 6(1) of Regulation 1698/2005. The Monitoring Committee members
are representatives of ministries, government offices, public agencies, economic and social partners
and non-governmental organisations. It is of particular importance that the Monitoring Committee
shall have representatives of governmental bodies and organisations responsible for environmental
protection (Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, non-governmental organisations for
environmental protection, association of non-governmental organisations for environmental
programmes, public institutions for protection areas management, and social partners related to the
environment). All members must respect the objectives of the Monitoring Committee and the
partnership principle.
The Monitoring Committee must be assured of the effectiveness of the RDP 2007-2013
implementation. For this purpose and pursuant to Article 77 of Regulation 1698/2005 it shall carry
out the following activities:
- within four months following the decision approving the programme it shall advise in the
criteria for selecting the activities to be financed. The criteria on the selection are revised with
regard to programme needs;
- it shall periodically assess the progress of achieving the special programme objectives based on
documents submitted by the Managing Authority;
- it checks the implementation results, in particular the achievement of objectives set out under
each axis and the results of the ongoing evaluations:
- it considers and adopts the annual and the last progress report before they are sent to the
Commission:
- it may suggest to the Managing Authority programme adaptation or revision which could
contribute to the accomplishment of the EAFRD objectives referred to in Article 4 or to
management improvement, including the financial management;
- it considers and takes every proposal of content amendments from the Commission Decision on
the contributions from EAFRD.
294
13 PROVISIONS FOR ENSURING PUBLIC INFORMATION ON THE PROGRAMME
Efficient informing of the public is important for the general awareness-raising of the public and the
transparency of the EAFRD operation as well as for increased interest in benefiting from the
financial aid available. Consequently, the absorption of the EU funds mentioned should increase.
Complete and understandable information on particular issues establishes confidence between the
directly involved groups (public) and the competent authorities. Information actions are an essential
prerequisite for the participation of the interested public in the procedure of adopting and
implementing public policies, which leads to greater legitimacy of the decisions adopted.
For the purposes of reporting the MAFF has established a system for recording all activities and
monitoring of indicators in order to measure the effects of public information. The correspondents
at the INFO points shall record all public information activities organised as well as all client
questions. For easier and faster data recording a computer base has been established. It shall contain
all activities and indicators used to monitor the public information efficiency.
The realisation of the action plan shall be monitored by means of the data base analyses. This way
an insight in the number of particular activities in individual regions in Slovenia and the contents
released shall be provided.
The indicators for public information efficiency and public response are:
- Number of instructions for partners in the information system;
- Number of press releases;
- Number of press conferences;
- Number of media publications (clippings);
- Number of published publications (booklets, brochures);
- Number of homepage visits;
- Number of seminars and workshops;
- Number of INFO points;
- Number of contacts (visits, calls, e-mails) at INFO points.
The Managing Authority shall provide help of external experts for efficient implementation of the
communication plan. A study or research on the impacts of the communication measures on
different target groups shall be ordered.
During the preparation of the programme several workshops and seminars for informing the public
on the main EAFRD guidelines were organised. At the beginning of the RDP 2007-2013
implementation the information actions for the public shall be increased. Workshops and seminars
shall be organised, different publications published (booklets, leaflets) which shall represent the
measures of the Programme to potential recipients in more detail. Appearance in the media and
press conferences shall be aimed at raising the interest of potential recipients and general public.
During the implementation of the Programme the information actions shall continue by applying
different communication tools to ensure the best possible recognisability of the Programme and the
Community contribution. At the conclusion of the Programme a brochure "Examples of good
practices RDP 2007-2013" shall be published showing the best projects.
In 2007-2013 at least 10 percent of resources under technical assistance are devoted to
communication tools and the corresponding supporting activities. The EU shall cover 75 percent of
eligible costs and the RS the remaining 25 percent.
295
13.1 Envisaged measures for informing potential beneficiaries, professional organisations,
economic, social and environmental partners, bodies involved in promoting equality between
men and women and non-governmental organisations of the possibilities offered by the
Programme and the rules for obtaining financial resources under the Programme
The Managing Authority provides clear information to potential beneficiaries on: administrative
procedures to be considered, system for application processing, information on criteria applied in
selection procedure and evaluation mechanisms as well as the names of persons or contact points at
the national, regional or local level who can explain the operation of the aid programmes and the
criteria for obtaining aids.
This group includes all potential groups of final recipients and final recipients of funds under all
measures:
- agricultural holdings;
- food processing industry (enterprises, self-employed persons, cooperatives);
- forest owners and their associations, private forest leaseholders;
- local communities;
- companies;
- institutes;
- non-governmental organisations (associations).
Within the framework of the project, next to the entire coordination of public information and
reporting actions on the RDP 2007-2013, the MAFF shall set up:
- logo and the overall image;
- homepage, including the part of the homepage related to EAFRD;
- public information and promotion in appropriate media (radio, television, newspapers);
- printed and audio-visual promotion material;
- establishment of info points;
- seminars, workshops and round tables;
- fairs and exhibitions.
Homepage
The fast growth of the Internet access underpins the importance of the homepage as a tool for the
key messages of organisations and as a source of up-to-date information. The homepage shall be the
main communication tool of the communication plan.
The entire RDP 2007-2013 shall be presented in the web. There, the potential final aid recipients
shall be able to find all necessary information on individual measures (aim, eligible activities and
costs, beneficiaries, financial provisions and special conditions). The calls for tender shall also be
published in the homepage, including the tender documentation ready for print and all INFO points
which shall provide all additional information. In the homepage at least once per year the lists of the
final recipients and the amount of (public) financial resources granted under each measure shall be
published. Presented shall be cases of good agricultural practices in Slovenia and the operators
designing business plans and projects shall find all necessary instructions for their preparation.
Forum
The ARSAMRD homepage shall provide e-forum for all interested persons. There, they shall be
able to exchange opinions, ask questions and receive answers on EAFRD measures and drawing up
of business plans as well as the documentation preparation for calls for tenders, and receive
information on the implementation of the measures.
INFO points
296
The so called INFO points shall be information offices where all interested persons shall be able to
receive a wide range of information on obtaining funds from EAFRD.
Publications
During the programming period the issuing of numerous publications is foreseen. They shall be
used for various presentations of the RDP 2007-2013 (round tables, seminars, workshops, press
conferences, fairs). Next to flyers on EAFRD booklets on individual measures shall be published.
Press releases and explanations
They shall serve to inform the public through the media on all novelties and to answer all topical
questions regarding the activities of the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013.
Press conferences
They are intended for wide-ranged presentations of news to the media on key events. They shall be
organised at the MAFF, ARSAMRD and at locations of selected cases of good agricultural practice.
This way, successful investments in the rural areas shall be actively presented. Simultaneously, they
shall bring such investments closer to the target public.
Appearance in the media
The MAFF and ARSAMRD representatives shall actively be involved in radio and TV shows as
well as the printed media. We shall seek for live contact shows where listeners and viewers have the
opportunity to ask their questions. This way we shall be able to solve on-the-spot dilemmas and
problems of potential beneficiaries in obtaining EU funds.
Seminars and workshops
Organisation of seminars in the early phase is aimed at giving general information to the expert
public on the RDP 2007-2013 measures, tender conditions, documentation preparation, procedure
of obtaining funds and the information system throughout Slovenia. These seminars are firstly
intended for regional development agencies, municipalities and other technical services
(Agricultural advisory service, various project and business plan operators) which are directly
interacting with the potential beneficiaries.
Lectures
On invitation of other institutions and organisations we shall participate in different events, e.g.
round tables, technical consultations.
Promotion materials
For better EAFRD recognisability promotion materials shall be prepared. They shall be practically
applicable and visually appealing and shall contain useful information. They shall be used at
different events (seminars, workshops, press conferences, training).
297
Schedule of activities
Activities
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Design of overall graphical
image
Homepage
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Forum
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Info points
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Publications
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Appearance in the media
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Seminars and workshops
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Lectures
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Promotion material
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Advertising in the mass
media
Call centres
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Press
releases
explanations
Press conferences
and
Information actions are designed as a cooperation model between different organisations at the
regional and local level as well as with social partners, non-governmental organisations and experts.
Next to the MAFF the information system includes the following partners: Agency of the RS for
Agricultural Markets and Rural Development, Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry of Slovenia
(with its regional institutes), Slovenia Forest Service (with its local institutes), Chamber of
Commerce and Industry of Slovenia – Food Industries Association, Slovenian Rural Development
Network, local and regional authorities, non-governmental organisations engaged in the promotion
of the equality of men and women as well non-governmental organisations engaged in
environmental protection, Centre Europe and Commission representative office in Slovenia. Rural
network shall operate within the framework of the MAFF and shall group governmental, nongovernmental as well as private organisations and structures involved in the rural development.
13.2 Envisaged measures for informing beneficiaries on Community contribution
A very important aspect of communication are information actions for the beneficiaries on the
Community contribution. The Managing Authority ensures that at granting the funds the
beneficiaries are informed that the measure is financed from the Programme which is partially
financed by the EAFRD and priority axis of the RDP 2007-2013.
13.3 Measures for information of general public on Community role in programmes and their
results
For public information on the RDP a wide range of communication tools (homepage, info points,
publications, press releases, press conferences, media appearance, seminars, and promotion
298
materials) shall be applied with focus on the national media, e.g. TV, radio newspapers and web
media.
In the homepage at least once per year the lists of the final recipients and the amount of (public)
financial resources granted under each measure shall be published.
Schedule of activities
Activities
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Info points
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Publications
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Appearance in the media
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Promotion material
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Advertising in the mass
media
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Design of overall graphical
image
Homepage
X
Press
releases
explanations
Press conferences
and
299
14 THE DESIGNATION OF THE PARTNERS CONSULTED AND THE RESULTS OF
THE CONSULTATION
14.1 Designation of consultation partners
The basic element of modern democracy is participation in decision making. The quality, suitability
and effectiveness of EU policies depend on guaranteeing broad participation in the process of
drafting and implementing public policies. The partnership principle requires the use of
decentralised decision-making procedures as it needs close cooperation between the EU, national,
regional and local bodies, social partners, non-governmental organisations and other civil society
institutions. The partnership necessitates the cooperation of as many of partners as possible in
drafting individual policies. Cooperation of partners in the decision-making processes and carrying
out public policies gives an important boost to legitimacy of institutions and adopted decisions,
even if talks and agreements prolong the decision-making process.
Partnership is widely spread in Slovenia and is used in drafting all long-term development plans and
programmes, including the RDP 2007-2013. By acting in line with the principles of European
governance58 and national regulations, we wanted to attract as many interest groups into drafting
and implementing the RDP 2007-2013 as possible. Article 6 of Regulation 1698/2005 states that a
member state has to designate the most representative partners at national, regional and local level
and in the economic, social, environmental or other sphere who are involved in drafting,
implementing, monitoring and evaluating rural development programmes.
The MAFF has staged numerous presentations, consultations, workshops and meetings as part of
drafting the fundamental development documents for the National Strategic Plan and the RDP
2007-2013. These institutions included national bodies (MESP, ME, MLFSA, GOLSGRP);
regional development agencies, local and other public institutions (Municipalities Association of
Slovenia, Association of Municipalities and Towns of Slovenia); economic and social partners
(CAFS, Farmers’ union, CCIS, CC, association of cooperatives); non-governmental organisations
(Ecosocial Forum, Sustainable Development Coalition, association for countryside development);
organisations tasked with promoting gender equality (government’s Equal Opportunities Office,
association of women farmers); and interest groups. A public discussion and separate meetings on
the draft RDP 2007-2013 only served to increase the level of cooperation. Compliant to the
legislation the MAFF carried out all necessary activities for a comprehensive impact assessment,
including public display of the RDP 2007-2013, environmental assessment of the RDP 2007-2013
and its revision, which lasted 30 days. Within the framework of the public display public discussion
was organised. Within the framework of the public display no remarks on the documents displayed
were submitted.
Drafting the RDP 2007-2013 took place in several phases. Expert working groups were formed to
draft strategic documents dealing with rural development between 2007 and 2013. These groups
helped in drafting the first proposals for individual parts of the RDP 2007-2019. The MAFF then
decided on 18 October 2005 to appoint six expert working groups that would include MAFF
personnel and representatives of the following bodies: MESP, MLFSA, MH, ME, National Forestry
Service, National Forestry Institute, AIS, ARSAMRD, Employment Service, Public Agency for
Entrepreneurship and Foreign Investment, local administrative units and GOLSGRP.
The working groups were established to perform the following tasks:
- Analyse the situation from the standpoint of advantages and deficiencies, results achieved so far
by individual measures and the strategy, selected to tackle them;
- Explain the selected priorities while taking into account the strategic guidelines of the
Community and the National Strategic Plan as well as the impact of ex-ante evaluation;
58
European Governance, A White Paper; European Commission, Brussels, 25 July 2001, COM (2001) 428 final
300
-
-
-
Compile information and describe the priorities for each axis, alongside verifiable special goals
and indicators that allow evaluation of the programme’s progress, efficiency and successfulness;
Draft a detailed financial plan, broken down by priorities and sources of money for the entire
duration of the programme, including technical assistance (tables);
Compile information on differentiation from measures from other CAP instruments, cohesion
and fisheries policies;
Outline executive measures (implementation), including defining all the bodies involved in the
programme's implementation and certification (managing authority, payments body,
certification authority, supervisory body); the entire system of monitoring and evaluation;
description of supervising systems, linked to the implementation of the programme; a detailed
system of carrying out the LEADER approach; measures that ensure the public is informed;
describe the procedures for exchange of computer data linked with payments, monitoring and
evaluation;
Determine the partners and state the results of consultations held with them (i. competent
regional, local and other public authorities; ii. economic and social partners; iii. all other civil
society organisations and non-governmental organisation (especially environmental) and
organisations the task of which is to promote gender equality);
Prepare the positions for an ex-ante evaluation of the programme;
Other tasks connected to drafting strategic rural development documents.
The MAFF informed the public on each amended RDP proposal and published it on its homepage.
At the same time the MAFF opened an e-mail address where the public could send their questions
and proposals on the RDP 2007-2013 content. Received were also written questions and proposals.
Prior to each new proposal the amendments were also coordinated with social partners and other
relevant stakeholders.
Expert groups organised numerous workshops linked with drafting the RDP 2007-2013.
The first workshop for drafting the National Strategic Plan for Rural Development 2007-2013 (21 –
22 July 2005)
The first workshop took place between 21 and 22 July at Ig. The participating project team
members and experts produced a SWOT analysis for measures of individual axes, which are slated
to be carried out in the following programming period. The workshop was attended by 62
participants.
The second workshop for drafting the National Strategic Plan for Rural Development 2007-2013
(27 October 2005)
The second workshop for drafting the National Strategy Plan and the RDP 2007-2013, organised by
the MAFF, took place on 27 October at Ig. The participants included MAFF personnel, members of
the extended project team and experts. The workshop presented the proposed goals and priorities
alongside implementation measures in line with the priorities for axis 1 "Improving the
competitiveness of the agriculture and forestry sector", axis 2 “Improving the environment and the
countryside” and axis 3 “The quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy”.
The workshop was attended by over 100 participants and was divided into the plenary part and
group activities.
The “LEADER Approach within the Framework of the New Rural Development Policy 2007-2013” seminar,
Portorož, 30 November – 1 December 2005
The MAFF and the TAIEX service of the European Commission held the “LEADER Approach within the
Framework of the New Rural Development Policy 2007-2013” seminar in Portorož on 1 December 2005.
The LEADER programme is a novelty in the programming development period, meaning that Slovenia does
not have any experience nor do implementation structures (Local Action Groups) exist in the country. One
of the country’s long-term goals is also a successful implementation of the LEADER programme in
Slovenia, also helped by the seminar. The event was attended by 210 representatives of various
301
institutions and organisations, interested in implementing local development strategies and
measures for the wider rural economy and population. Participating at the seminar was a
representative of the European Commission (DG AGRI), a foreign expert from the field and
representatives of the MAFF. The presentations were followed by a debate with numerous
participants asking tangible questions. The debate shed light on numerous problems and
opportunities presented by the implementation of the LEADER approach in 2007.
Workshop: Preparing Materials for the Slovenian RDP, Strahinj, 4-6 July 2006
A workshop for representatives of ministries and the group tasked with drafting the Ex-ante
Evaluation of the RDP 2007-2013 took place in Strahinj between 4 and 6 July. The event was split
into two parts. The first day was taken by a plenary on which the evaluation group presented the
role evaluation plays in the RDP 2007-2013 programme and the EU’s formal demands regarding
the evaluation. Group work took place in the following two days with representatives of the MAFF,
other ministries and social partners carrying out a revision of the proposed measures. The workshop
was attended by 42 participants.
Public discussion
MAFF wanted to include the interested public in drafting the RDP 2007-2013 as soon as possible. It
published a draft RDP 2007-2013 on 10 November on its website (http://www.mkgp.gov.si/) and
sent it to members of the project group for drafting strategic documents of rural development for the
2007-2013 period and several key partners. The interested parties were given until 30 November
2006 to submit remarks regarding the proposal to the [email protected] mail address, created
specifically for collecting the opinions and proposals for the RDP 2007-2013. Over 50 remarks
were sent by individuals and organisations. Communication with interest groups went both ways as
the MAFF responded in writing to all initiatives, proposals and questions.
The RDP 2007-2013 proposal was also available on a CD, on paper and could be sent by email. The
launch of public scrutiny of the proposal was also published by media which enabled all interested
parties to take part in drafting the RDP 2007-2013.
The MAFF's website also contains a forum where interested parties can address questions to MAFF
official.
Special meetings with interested parties on the draft RDP 2007-2013 were held between 29
November and 6 December. After the public discussion was concluded, MAFF published on its
website a new draft RDP 2007-2013, amended in line with the public discussion.
Table 56: List of key coordination meetings
DATE
ORGANISATION
29 November 2006
- Sustainable Development Coalition,
- Ecosocial Forum of Slovenia,
- Cooperatives Association of Slovenia.
- Beekeepers Association of Slovenia
- Society for the Development of the Slovenian Countryside
- Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry of Slovenia
- Association of Women Farmers of Slovenia,
- Equal Opportunities Office,
- Association of Slovenian Rural Youth,
- Association of Municipalities and Towns of Slovenia,
- Municipalities Association of Slovenia.
- Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia
- Chamber of Craft of Slovenia
- Slovenian Consumers' Association,
- Farmers’ Union of Slovenia,
- Slovenian Tourist Board,
- Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning.
- Ministry of Health,
30 November 2006
1 December 2006
4 December 2006
5 December 2006
302
6 December 2006
14 December 2006
13. February 2007
28. March 2007
29. March 2007
25. April 2007
26. April 2007
18. May 2007
18. June 2007
- Health Protection Institute
- Ministry of Culture,
- Ministry of Finance,
- Ministry of Labour, the Family and Social Affairs,
- Ministry of Economy,
- Government Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy,
- Government Development Office,
- Ministry of Education and Sport.
Agency of the RS of Agricultural Markets and Rural Development.
Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning
- Ministry of Labour, the Family and Social Affairs,
- Government Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy,
- Slovene Enterprise Fund,
- Ministry of Economy,
- Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry of Slovenia,
- Farmers’ Union of Slovenia,
- Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry of Slovenia,
- Ministry of Finance
Numerous presentations of countryside development in Slovenia in the 2007-2013 programming
period were aimed at various target groups throughout the period of drafting the RDP 2007-2013.
Table 57: List of presentations of the RDP 2007-2013
PARTICIPANTS
Regional development agencies,
municipalities, Chamber of
Agriculture and Forestry of
Slovenia
Ministries, government offices
The Posoški razvojni center
development centre,
municipalities
Performers of rural development
programmes, municipalities
Agricultural Advisory Service
Biotechnological Faculty at the
University of Ljubljana,
Slovenian Agriculture Institute,
environmental protection NGOs,
performers of the RDP,
municipalities
RDP drafting workgroup,
ministries, social partners
Entrepreneurs, interest groups
Representatives of agricultural
holdings, cooperatives,
members of the Chamber of
Agriculture and Forestry of
Slovenia
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia – Kranj
regional unit
Agriculture Faculty at the
Maribor University
DATE
20 April 2005
PLACE
Žalec
SUBJECT
Meeting of cooperatives, presentation
of the rural development policy
24 June 2005
Ljubljana
29 September
2005
Idrija
Managing the countryside in Slovenia
as part of the RDP 2007-2013
Presenting the LEADER Axis in the
new programming period 2007-2013
28 October
2005
28 and 29
November
2005
1 December
2005
Ljubljana
January 2006
Brdo pri Kranju
19 January
2006
Maribor
7 March 2006
Portorož
10 March 2006
Kranj
Presentation of the rural development
policy
3 April 2006
Maribor
Presenting the rural development
strategy to students from various EU
Bled
Portorož
Presenting the LEADER approach
The 20th traditional meeting of AAS,
Presenting the National Strategic Plan
2007-2013.
TAIEX seminar, drafting the National
Strategic Plan.
Presentation of implementing the
LEADER initiative in Wales, transfer
of best practices, presentation of own
initiatives.
Drafting the RDP
Entrepreneurship conference.
Importance of entrepreneurship for
rural development
Meeting of cooperatives, presentation
of the rural development policy
303
countries as part of the Socrates
Erasmus programme.
Members of various associations
4 April 2006
Strahinj
Panel of the association for rural
development
Representatives of
municipalities, locals and other
interest groups
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia – Krško
regional unit
Representatives of agricultural
holdings, fruit growers
6 April 2006
Brda
Presenting the rural development
strategy 2007-2013
10 April 2006
Krško
Presenting the rural development
strategy 2007-2013
20 April 2006
Krško
Presenting the rural development
strategy 2007-2013
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia – Murska
Sobota regional unit
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia– Ptuj
regional unit, interest groups
17 May 2006
Murska Sobota
Debate on the National Strategic Plan
2007-2013
22 May 2006
Ptuj
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia – Koper
regional unit
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia– Murska
Sobota regional unit, association
for protecting the produce of the
Prekmursko region.
Chamber of Agriculture and
Forestry of Slovenia– Kranj
regional unit
Performers of rural development
programmes
National Assembly
5 June 2006
Sežana
Panel on the future challenges for the
countryside.
The rural development strategy was
outlined at the event that presented the
produce of Slovenian farms in 2006.
Presenting the rural development
strategy 2007-2013
7 June 2006
Murska Sobota
10 June 2006
Šenèur pri
Kranju
13 June 2006
Ig
15 June 2006
Ljubljana
4 and 5 July
2006
28 August
2006
Strahinj
Ministries, government offices,
ex-ante evaluators
Interest groups, visitors to the
44th International Fair of
Agriculture and Food
Representatives of ministries
(agriculture, environment,
helath), organic farmers, nongovernmental organisation,
companies, experts and
educators
MAFF, MESP, CAFS,
Municipality Solèava, Alpine
Association of Slovenia
Cooperatives Association of
Slovenia
Participants of the 44th
conference on agriculture
Cooperatives Association of
Slovenia
Gornja Radgona
4 September
2006
Ljubljana
11. December
2006
Solèava
16 January
2007
16 February
2007
6 March 2007
Ljubljana
Žalec
Portorož
Presenting the rural development
strategy 2007-2013.
A working meeting with agriculture
chamber representatives, association
members and a Greek delegation
Presenting the National Strategic Plan
2007-2013
Workshop, presenting the LEADER
Axis
Presenting the National Strategic Plan
2007-2013
Workshop, drafting the RDP 20072013
Lecture entitled “National Strategic
Plan for Rural Development in the
2007-2013 Period”.
Panel entitled “Organic Farming in
Slovenia in 2013”.
Within the framework of the
international day of mountains the RDP
2007-2013 was presented under the
title Biodiversity conservation –
Opportunity for development of
mountain areas
RDP 2007-2013 and possibilities for
cooperatives to apply for funds
Presentation of RDP 2007-2013
Presenting the RDP 2007-2013
304
Mayors of six municipalities
Mayors of municipalities
Regional development agencies,
municipalities, CAFS,
representatives of future LAGs
Association of the Mislinja farm
women, producers of must,
Koroška bread and other
products
Interested public
Interested public
Producers and processors of the
extra virgin olive oil –
Association of olive-growers of
Slovenian Istra
Participants of the 11th
conference of rural tourism
association
Visitors of the event Treats of
Slovene farms
20 March 2007
28 March 2007
13 April 2007
Brezovica
Raèe
Ljubljana
20 April 2007
Mislinja
21 April 2007
9 May 2007
11 May 2007
Brežice
Polhov Grades
Ljubljana
11 May 2007
Žalec
21 May 2007
Ptuj
Dairy factory KREPKO
23 May 2007
Ljubljana
Municipalities, Regional
development agencies, CAFS,
representatives of future LAGs
CAFS, interested public
Mislinja and Drava Valley LAG
19 June 2007
Ljubljana
20 June 2007
27 June 2007
Bohinj
Slovenj Gradec
6 July 2007
Dobrovnik
7 July 2007
Trebnje
Municipalities representatives,
interested public in Dobrovnik
and its surrounding
Interested public
LEADER and the role of municipalities
LEADER and the role of municipalities
Presenting the LEADER Axis 20072013, workshop
Opportunities for the Koroška
agricultural products and foodstuffs
National quiz “Youth and agriculture”
Round table
Presentation of RDP 2007-2013
measures related to quality schemes
Presentation of RDP 2007-2013
RDP 2007-2013 – opportunity to raise
the quality of life in rural areas and
creation of new jobs
Presentation of RDP 2007-2013
measures related to quality schemes
LEADER – opportunity for
development of Slovenian countryside
Round table RDP 2007-2013
Forms of LAG organisation in Slovenia
and EU experience
Forms of LAG organisation in Slovenia
and EU experience
Round table “Does the new RDP 20072013 encourages young people to take
over a farm”
14.2 The results of the consultation
Cooperation with government institutions
MAFF cooperated with numerous government institutions in drafting the RDP 2007-2013. The
draft RDP 2007-2013 was made available for public scrutiny as well as sent to the representatives
of the following institutions: GOLSGRP, MF, Government Development Office and the
ARSAMRD. MAFF invited the following institutions for talks on the document: MESP, MC, MH,
Health Protection Institute, MF, MES, MLFSA, ME, GOLSGRP, Government Development Office,
Government Equal Opportunities Office and the ARSAMRD. Remarks and proposals sent
beforehand by the institutions largely dealt with complementary issues with other environmental
programmes and development policies and only some dealt with the contents of the RDP (MC,
MESP, Government Equal Opportunities Office). All proposals and comments were considered by
working groups and the relevant ones were taken into account with due care.
Cooperation with regional and local institutions
A vertical partnership between the EU and national, regional and local structures is becoming
increasingly important as the quality of the programmes and their implementation often depends on
cooperation of partners on a sub-national level. Slovenia does not (yet) have regions and regional
development agencies have bridged this gap. Municipalities as self-governed local communities are
relatively small, meaning they have a poorer institutional, financial and personnel position.
305
Implementing the European structural policy was what launched cooperation between local
authorities, mainly because of a lack of the aforementioned resources. Local communities have
become irreplaceable in carrying out European structural policies because of their acquaintance
with the problems in their area and the means and ways of solving them.
The draft RDP 2007-2013 was sent to the MAS and AMTS. Representatives of the two
organisations also took part at a special meeting on the issue. Individual municipalities also sent
some remarks, mainly dealing with measures as part of axis 4 that deal with determining the
settlements that are entitled to aid and the setting of LFA and carrying out measures in axis 2. The
debate served to clear up critical points and resulted in the remarks being considered.
Cooperation with economic and social partners and non-governmental and expert
organisations
MAFF placed a lot of stress on cooperation with economic and social partners. Close cooperation
with the CAFS resulted in the institution taking part in a coordinating meeting and sending an
extensive list of remarks. The remarks dealt with situation analysis, measures, beneficiaries and
justifiable expenses. All remarks and proposals were carefully studied at the coordinating meeting
and those that were found justifiable were taken into consideration. Some remarks shall be
considered for documents of a lesser importance.
Also important was cooperation with the Trade Union of Farmers, the CCIS, the Association of
Cooperatives and the CC. Their remarks mainly dealt with the contents of measures and
beneficiaries. However, as the Regulation 1698/2005, setting the contents and the beneficiaries of
individual measures, was used as the basis for drafting the RDP 2007-2013, the remarks were only
partially taken into consideration.
Various phases of drafting the RDP 2007-2013 also saw cooperation with the following nongovernmental organisations: the Slovenian Association of Consumers, the Coalition for Sustainable
Rural Development, the Ecosocial Forum, the Association for the Development of the Slovenian
Countryside, the Association of Slovenian Rural Youth, the Association of Societies of Organic
Farmers, the Association of Women Farmers, the Beekeepers Association and many others. The
NGOs praised the endeavours of the MAFF for developing the countryside and the contents of the
RDP 2007-2013. Their remarks were mainly aimed at contents of the measures and the
beneficiaries. The majority of the remarks were taken into consideration or explained, while some
of them shall be used accordingly in drafting documents at lower levels.
The MAFF is also cooperating heavily with experts in the area of agriculture and rural development
in drafting the development documents. Numerous studies were carried out for the National
Strategic Plan and the RDP 2007-2013. Cooperation with the Biotechnological Faculty at the
University of Ljubljana was of key importance. The faculty carried out an ex-ante evaluation of the
RDP 2007-2013 in cooperation with the Danish Orbicon company and submitted its views on the
National Strategic Plan as well as the RDP. The Agriculture Faculty at the Maribor University was
also heavily involved, especially in drafting Axis 2 of the RDP 2007-2013.
Public discussion on the RDP 2007-2013 proposal allowed participation of all interested parties
regardless of their sex, ethnicity, religious belief or any other affiliation. The MAFF also placed
great stress on cooperation with government and non-governmental organisations that are involved
in the area of gender equality. The Association of Women Farmers, the Association of the
Slovenian Rural Youth and the Government Equal Opportunities Office were invited to the
meeting. While the office did not take part in the meeting it nevertheless submitted its remarks.
Such cooperation is also planned in implementing, monitoring and evaluating the RDP 2007-2013.
Cooperation with the European Commission
The first presentation of the “Commission Guidelines for Drafting National Strategic Plans” took
place on 19 November 2005 in Brussels. The Commission presented the strategic rural development
306
plans for the period 2007-2013 in Ljubljana on 8 December 2005. This meeting also saw a debate
on the open issues and potential problems as member states informally harmonised their draft
national strategic rural development plans for 2007-2013 with the Commission even before they
formally submitted them.
Close cooperation was maintained with the Commission also during the drafting of the National
Strategic Plan and the RDP 2007-2013. Several bilateral meetings were held with Commission
representatives, responsible for the area. A TAIEX workshop was meanwhile organised in the
coastal town of Portorož on 12 May 2005. The workshop presented the LEADER programme that
was hitherto not yet used in Slovenia. Commission representatives submitted their findings,
proposals and corrections of the RDP 2007-2013. The workshop was attended by many people and
provided answers to numerous open questions. Close cooperation with the Commission is expected
to continue.
Close cooperation with the Commission, relevant national authorities, local authorities, social
partners, NGOs and other interested parties is far from over and shall continue during the
implementation and monitoring of the RDP 2007-2013.
307
Table 58: List of remarks and proposals to the RDP 2007-2013 proposal, addressed in the public discussion
INSTITUTION/ORGANI
SATION
Slovenian Haflinger
Breeders’ Association
The Kokra Hunting
Association
REMARKS/PROPOSALS
ANSWER BY MAFF
Adding Slovenian Haflinger Breed to the List of Autochthonous and Traditional Breeds (recognised by
the MAFF Decision 2006).
Right to and from hunting as well as income from this activity, special-purpose hunting districts (Ibex).
Taken into account.
Institute Mrest
Draft of guidelines for the future of small farmers
Association for the
Conservation of the Cika
Breed in Slovenia
Rearing abandonment (in particular by smaller and older farmers) as a result of strict requirements obligatory entrance into A-E scheme; consideration of technical criteria by the gene bank.
A separated measure suggested which would not be bound by the A-E scheme.
The remark shall not be taken into account.
The guidelines lay down three pillars of successful development of Slovenian agriculture
which also covered in individual measures of the RDP 2007-2013. Projects suggested in
the study most certainly are innovative, but cannot be a general development course of
Slovenian rural areas, which is the purpose of the RDP 2007-2013.
Entrance into the A-E scheme is not obligatory; the farmers are free to enter the scheme
or not. In accordance with Regulation 1698/2005 the measure capturing endangered
breeds belongs to the A-E scheme.
The remark shall not be taken into account.
The remark shall not be taken into account.
The purpose of energy production and sale from renewable resources under measure 311
complements with the measure 312 (Support for the creation and development of micro
enterprises) as well as with other operational programmes (OP) of the RS (see AURE).
Considering the demarcation between measures and OPs the beneficiary must apply for
the appropriate purpose (measure).
- Axis 2: Litter meadows are included under Group III.
- Stating all forms of thematic trails in this phase is irrelevant. The remark shall not be
taken into account. The text is corrected accordingly.
CAFS – Institute NM
Ministry of Culture
Production and sale of on-farm energy from renewable resources, in particular with regard to the heat
sales – pointing out the problem.
-
-
Slovenian Cooperatives
Association
Classifying litter meadows into Group II.
Under operational objectives and description and scope of the measure 322 another indent is to
be added: drawing up appropriate developmental and spatial documents on village development
and renewal; under the activities foreseen cultural trails are to be explicitly stated.
Under the measure 111 Vocational training and information actions is to contain also vocational
training for art and traditional handicraft.
- The introductory chapter should include a short passage on cooperatives in Slovenia.
- The cooperatives should be more actively participating in the rural development.
Coalition for Sustainable
Development
- The RDP proposal is too focused on the support for integrated production. There are no arguments
for integrated production under axis 2.
- Focus on organic farming is insufficient.
- The issue on the minimum stocking density (0.5 LU/ha) in the Karst and other arid areas.
Ministry of Economy
Association of Slovenian
Forest Owners
Consistency of the NSP and the RDP with the Development Plan and the Orientations of Slovenian
Tourism as well as the Programme of the Promotion Measures for Entrepreneurship and
Competitiveness in 2007-2013.
- Support for thinning and forest conversion is not captured in the RDP.
The remark shall not be taken into account. Wild Game and Hunting Act (OJ RS No
16/04) does not specify particularly that a farmer as a forest owner is eligible for any
pecuniary compensation for hunting conducted on his/her property.
- Axis 1 - Vocational training for art and traditional handicraft does not fit under measure
No 111.
The remark shall not be taken into account.
- The introductory chapter shall include a short passage on cooperatives.
- The possibility of including cooperatives into RDP 2007-2013 measures shall be
checked.
- There are technical arguments for setting the integrated production into the RDP
proposal as well as for payment calculations. Integrated products are marketed similarly
to organic products on markets and have their own logo.
- The target share of organic farms by 2013 in the RDP 2007-2013 proposal was
designed based on financial circumstances and coordination with other measures.
- Possible solution on minimum stocking density is payment for as many areas as many
would be permissible by the livestock count per agricultural holding with regard to the
minimum stocking density requirement.
The demarcation between the RDP 2007-2013 measures and other OPs as well as
information on complementarity with other measures financed by other instruments is
outlined in Chapter 10.
- The measure is development-oriented. The public discussion so far showed that the
construction of forest roads and investments in the purchase of felling mechanisation and
equipment are the key elements in improving the economic value of forests. The
308
- The total amount of felled wood must be felled in private forests.
- Purchase of used forestry mechanisation
Slovenian Beekeeping
Association
Slovenian Farmers’
Association at SLS
(Slovenian People’s
Party)
- Organic beekeeping is insufficiently considered as in practice an upward trend is evident.
- The requirement of 1 hectare in the measure 112 is disputed since the majority of beekeepers does not
own any land.
- The investments in beehives and bee families are not emphasised sufficiently. The purchase of used
vehicle also not possible.
- The infrastructure of forest roads leading to the standing spots is not arranged properly.
- Endangerment of the Carniolan bee (Apis mellifera Carnica) and the preservation of its genetic
potential
- Disagreeing with the reduction of resources for payments under axis 2 in 2007- 2013, in particular for
LFA and A-E payments.
- Eliminating the inconsistency between the designation of LFAs and payments.
Urban municipality Novo
mesto
Office for Equal
Opportunities
Slovenia Forest Service
- Additional measures to preserve Slovenian vine growing and cultivation should be set into LFA and
A-E payments.
- The RDP does not remedy the problems related to LFA. Certain areas of cadastral municipalities
predominantly located in the area of the Gorjanci and partially in higher areas of the urban
municipality Novo mesto were not designated as LFA.
- The measure Implementation of local development strategies does not define the beneficiaries
specifically enough. Under target group the concept of the end-user should be defined as the recipient
of funds for a certain project (e.g. investor). Additional explanation is required for the concept “project
of greater importance for the region or other broader area” as the diction is very plain.
- In chapter 5.3.1.4. “Raising the competence level and increasing the employment in agriculture, food
industry and forestry” special attention should be paid to measures for vocational training of women.
- The measure “Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises” should pay special
attention to the promotion of female entrepreneurship.
- The measure “Village renewal and development” should include an assessment of the impacts on the
gender equality.
- The measure “Vocational training and information actions” should pay special attention to the
promotion of female entrepreneurship development.
- The measure “Skills acquisition and animation of rural population” needs to consider the differences
in the vocational education grade between men and women.
- The indicators should be recorded, where relevant, also by sex.
- Measure 122: In the description and scope of the measure the following text should be added in the
first indent “and preparation of forest tracks”; new indent is to be added – thinning of saplings and
thinner pole crops.
- Measure 111: After the word phrase “agricultural products” in the section target group the word
“forestry” is to be added.
measures of forest thinning and conversion shall continue to be implemented at the
national measures level. Should an increased need for the implementation of thinning and
conversion in private forests arise, shall the RDP 2007-2013 be amended accordingly.
- In principle, the measure is aimed at investments in forests in private property.
- Purchase of used mechanisation and equipment is questionable with regard to a high
number of accidents with forestry mechanisation.
- In general, the agreement on the exclusion of the requirement of 1 hectare under the
measure 112.
- In the measure 121 the investments in beekeeping have already been included in the
investments stated.
- The arrangement of accesses to beehives in forests can be an additional reason to plan
and construct forests trails but not the only one. The arrangement of trails to access
beehive standing spots for mobile apiary units on own agricultural holding can be
supported within the range of the measure 121. The arrangement of beehive standing
spots in own forest may be supported under the measure 122. The arrangement of
accesses to beehive standing spots to be managed by the Slovenian Beekeeping
Association is out of the range of the axis 1 measures.
- The possibility of supporting the preservation of the Carniolan bee genetic potential
shall be reviewed.
- The amount of resources for measures depends on the total amount of resources
available.
- All details on the designation of LFAs have been presented publicly on several
occasions together with all necessary calculations and facts.
- No agricultural production type has been excluded from the LFA support.
- All details on the designation of LFAs have been presented publicly on several
occasions together with all necessary calculations and facts.
- The definition of the end-user under the measure Implementation of local development
strategies is a subject of a lower ranked document. The concept “project of greater
importance for the region or other broader area” – the remarks shall be taken into account
and the diction has been amended.
- The implementation of the measure No 111 shall probably be carried out by the
principle “First come, first served”, therefore no special mechanisms are foreseen to give
advantage to women in obtaining funds.
- The remarks related to axis 3 shall be meaningfully considered in lower ranked
documents.
- The indicators should be recorded, where relevant, also by sex.
- See the answer to the Association of Slovenian Forest Owners.
- The remark shall be taken into account; the text is amended accordingly.
309
Slovenian Association for
Management in Grassland
SCAF – Institute Gorica;
Association of Slovenian
vine and wine growers
Municipality Sv. Andraž
in Slovenske gorice
Slovenian Eco-Social
Forum
Biotechnical Faculty
- Measure 142: In the description and scope of the measure in the second indent the words “and
forestry” are to be deleted and a new indent added: Common implementation of forestry management
measures and marketing of forestry products.
- Submeasure 214-III/2 Preservation of special grassland habitats: change of the third paragraph in
describing the conditions, as follows: The use of sod and land is not allowed prior to the flowering of
grasses and raising of the Corncrake offspring by 15.7. in the areas referred to in chapter 8.1.1 and by
1.8. in the areas referred to in chapter 8.1.2; as well as amendment of the submeasure conditions by
adding: The stay (pasture) of domestic animals (livestock) in the land captured in the submeasure
concerned is allowed by 30. April.
- LFA payments for vineyard land and queen cells lying in LFA areas.
- Submeasure proposal: Utilisation of steep vineyards.
- The highest payment amount for integrated vine production should be equalised with the one for
integrated fruit production (€821 per ha)
- Organic farming – vineyards: Change of the ratio for the highest possible payment amount between
vineyards and permanent grassland in favour of vineyards or increase of the highest possible payment
for vineyards.
- Agri-environmental payments: Decrease of perennial crops payments exceeding 100 ha by 30
percent.
- Simplification of renewal subsidies as in wine growing. The current procedure is completely
inappropriate.
- Renewal subsidies should be enabled to smaller fruit producing farms as well.
- Orchard renewal should no longer continue in accordance with the current birocratic subsidies system
– the esblished system of Austria should apply.
The simplified procedure of renewal subsidying should ensure as quick substitution of fruit varieties as
possible, setting up of protection nets agains hail and setting up of irrigation systems.
- Sustainable rearing should be added to quality schemes.
- Baseline analysis: In the data review in chapter 3 it would be appropriate to make more comparisons
between rural areas and the rest Slovenia.
- The importance of the SWOT analysis should be made more evident in outlining the objectives of the
programme.
- Connection between objectives, priorities and measures of the RDP is unclear.
- Missing contents: Model calculations for setting of agri-environmental payments and assessment of
impacts on the environment.
- Measure 123: Controversial decision on including all legal and natural persons registered for food
processing activity as final aid recipients (beneficiaries).
- Measure 122: Support for thinning and conversion in private forests should be included.
- Measure 211: Remedy of anomalies in payment amounts which were so far linked to the location of
agricultural holding (KMG-MID). A more fair solution would be to link LFA payments to agricultural
parcel (GERK).
- Measure 214: Payment amounts are relatively high; disagreement regarding the programme diction
on linear reduction of payment amounts in the first two years and further changes of payment amounts
in accordance with the annual decree.
- Measure 311: Retail trade is mentioned as one of the reasons for intervention, but is not stated as
eligible activity.
- Measure 312: Social activities are mentioned as one of the reasons for intervention, but are not stated
as eligible activity.
- Measure 331: It would be more reasonable to implement a part of the activities under group A
- The measure is aimed at the improvement of the common marketing of agricultural and
forestry products and not to the common implementation of all forestry measures.
- The proposal is being reviewed together with the MESP.
- LFA: already treated in the RDP proposal.
- The proposals are being reviewed.
- The List of Autochthonous and Traditional Varieties of Agricultural Plants has already
been amended. The varieties are being checked whether they fulfil the requirements for
incorporation into the List.
- Support shall be granted to large as well as smaller fruit producing farms for large and
small investments.
- A certain procedure simplification shall be provided in case of smaller investmetns.
More detailed conditions and provisions shall be laid down in implementing regulations.
- Sustainable rearing cannot be included into food quality schemes.
- Statistical data to provide data comparison between rural areas and rest Slovenia do not
exist.
- Food processing activity is not conducted only within the range of the food processing
industry.
- Regarding the thinning and conversion see answer to the Association of Slovenian
Forest Owners.
- MAFF already conducts certain activities in this area and shall be operational in the
next years.
- 311 – remark taken into account, retail trade is no longer mentioned.
- 312 – remark taken into account, social services are no longer mentioned.
- 331 – The remark shall be meaningfully considered in lower ranked documents.
310
(handicraft and similar activities) within the framework of the national vocational qualifications.
- In addition to subsidies for sustainable farming Slovenian breeders should be enabled to obtain also
subsidies under the measure animal welfare.
- All autochthonous and traditional domestic breeds meeting the conditions laid down in Annex I to the
Regulation 817/2004.
- Considered should be the calculated proposals for support amounts for rearing of autochthonous and
traditional domestic breeds.
Slovenian Farmers’
Union
- In the section on the amount of resources it should be clearly stated how much is devoted for
defraying of the commitments from previous years and the programme should thus be drawn up only
for the amount that retains after abstracting previous commitments.
- Measure 112: The amount per transferee at the national level is nearly one half less than the
maximum possible support amount.
- Cessation of measure 113 (early retirement) and transfer of resources to measure 112.
- Measure 121: Reduction of maximum aid granted from €500,000 to €250,000 and division of
investments.
- Measure 123: The proposal on division of resources.
- Measure 122: It should include also the thinning of saplings and pole crops; maximum support
amount granted should reduce to 250,000 EUR, and minimum support amount granted should reduce
from 1000 to 500 EUR; the condition regarding the minimum annual harvest of 300 m3 should be
reconsidered.
Municipalities
Association of Slovenia
Slovenian Rural
Development Network
- Measure 214: The table should be added another column which should contain support amount for
individual measures in the first two years (60 percent of the maximum amount possible).
- Measure 311: Minimum aid granted is to be reduced from 5000 to 2000 EUR.
Axis 4: Proposal for correction of geographical coverage since the current statement indicates that
settlements with over 10,000 inhabitants are excluded - settlements with over 10,000 inhabitants must
be included as well.
- The situation in the forestry sector should be improved within the framework of the RDP.
- The measure structure to promote a faster growth of organic farming is insufficiently stimulating and
does not contribute towards the accomplishment of the APOF.
- Measures should promote local application of local resources and encourage the public sector to
convert to the application of local resources.
- Promoted should be the creation of local supply chains and orientation to local markets.
- To co-finance projects a possibility to obtain loans through the Slovenian Rural Development Fund
should be ensured.
- The share of resources allocated to axis 3 and 4 is too low.
- Cooperatives are not stated as beneficiaries under individual measures and it is not clearly enough
specified whether they shall be able to apply or not.
- Measure 311: Under the purposes additional indent is to be added: other innovative on-farm
activities.
- Measure 312: Proposal that the activities list be broad enough to enable the realisation of different
business projects by inhabitants and micro enterprises which shall create new jobs and strengthen rural
- Model calculations for setting payment amounts were designed by an independent
institution. Payment amounts are set with regard to the model calculations and the
resources allocated for agri-environmental payments under the RDP.
- Measure 112: The amount of resources is in correlation with the resources for axis 1
and the allocation of resources within the axis. Certain smaller corrections of resources
allocation per measures are still possible.
- Measure 113 remains in the RDP.
- Measure 121: The proposal on reducing the maximum support amount granted from
500,000 to 250,000 EUR shall be reviewed and the investments divided wherefore a
proposal shall be drawn up.
- Measure 123: Foreseen is a division of resources in three sets.
Measure 122: Thinning of saplings and pole crops is a part of the regular forest
management and as such not eligible for payments. The proposal on reducing the
maximum support amount granted to €250,000, and minimum support amount granted
from 1000 to 500 EUR shall be reviewed as well as the condition regarding the minimum
annual harvest of 300 m3.
- Measure 214: The proposal is being reviewed.
- Measure 311: The reduction of maximum aid from 5000 to 2000 EUR is not possible.
Settlements with over 10,000 inhabitants can be a part of a LAG area, but cannot be
eligible for support for the implementation of measures and projects. The remark shall be
taken into account.
- Forestry sector is equally represented within the framework of the axis 1 measures.
- RDP 2007-2013 does not exclude the local application of local resources and the
exploitation thereof. The remark shall be meaningfully considered in lower ranked
documents.
- Under measure 142 the networking and common market occurrence of primary
producers shall be promoted and thus the creation of local marketing chains as well.
- Combinations of loans and non-repayable funds, as was applied prior to 2004 within the
framework of common tenders of the MAFF and the Regional Development Fund of
Slovenia, are not envisaged within the range of the RDP 2007-2013 since granting
duplicate aid is not allowed.
- The allocation of the resources by individual axes and measures shall be amended
during the implementation of the RDO 2007-2013 with regard of the absorption and
evaluation results, if a need therefore shall become evident. The remark shall not be
taken into account.
- Cooperatives are included in all relevant measures, but are not explicitly stated.
- 311 – due to the delimitation with other measures, particularly 312 and other Ops, the
remark shall not be taken into account.
- 312 – a more detailed list of activities shall be a subject of a lower ranked document.
311
Municipality Oplotnica &
Kozjansko Agency for
Development
CCIS
MESP
business projects by inhabitants and micro enterprises which shall create new jobs and strengthen rural
capacity.
- Measure 322: Under the section target group municipalities, local communities, public institutes and
non-governmental organisations are to be stated. The contribution in kind may represent up to 20
percent of the total project value.
- Measure 323: Under the section target group legal and natural persons, municipalities, local
communities, and non-governmental organisations are to be stated. The contribution in kind may
represent up to 20 percent of the total project value.
- Measure 331: Who shall apply at public tenders: individual inhabitants and individual micro
enterprises or providers of educational and training programmes for these target groups? The total
amount of resources under this measure for 2007-2013 is not stated.
- Measures 41 (411, 412, 413): Target group: legal and natural persons, municipalities, local
communities and non-governmental organisations; the project implementation and financing must
include local partners as well; in case a project is of greater importance for a LAG area and
significantly contributes to the development of the entire area the aid rate may be higher, however, not
higher than 80 percent.
- Measures 421, 431: Section “Eligible costs”: does not cover: employee salaries (co-financed by up to
70 percent).
- Restrictions in measures 321, 322 and 323: Proposal that an investment may be co-financed from one
measure under the RDP.
- Remark to the “Geographical coverage” in measures 321 and 322: additional criteria should me
clarified as soon as possible as municipalities are already preparing or are in the procedure of adopting
municipal budgets for the next year, which must contain all projects to be co-financed.
- Measure 322: Under the section target group municipalities, local communities, public institutes and
non-governmental organisations are to be stated.
- Measure 323: Under the section target group legal and natural persons, municipalities, local
communities, and non-governmental organisations are to be stated.
- Measures 41 (411, 412, 413): Target group: legal and natural persons, municipalities, local
communities and non-governmental organisations; the project implementation and financing must
include local partners as well; in case a project is of greater importance for a LAG area and
significantly contributes to the development of the entire area the aid rate may be higher, however, not
higher than 80 percent.
- Measures 421, 431: Section “Eligible costs”: does not cover: employee salaries (co-financed by up to
70 percent).
- Technical assistance resources should be devoted to a greater extent for the training of municipal
authorities employees in charge of the implementation of the rural development policy.
The first indent in page 179 should contain also “and construction of facilities for storing firm
livestock excrements.
- As baseline value of the HNV utilisation indicators the number 222,500 hectares should be used.
- In the A-E submeasure Rearing of domestic animals in the central area of the appearance of large
carnivores the payment for sheep and goats should be lower by 20 percent as payment for livestock.
Slovenian Vine
Association
- In conditions for the submeasure Preservation of special grassland habitats an amendment to the
indents 3 and 4 was proposed, as follows: Pasture or mowing and gathering after the flowering of
grasses and raising of the corncrake offspring (after 15.7. in areas referred to in chapter 8.1.1 and after
1.8. in areas referred to in chapter 8.1.2).
- Equal payments for agri-environmental submeasure of integrated fruit and vine production proposed.
- LFA measure does not refer to vine growing and queen-cell areas located in LFAs, therefore the
introduction of payments for the abovementioned areas was proposed.
- 322 – all proposed beneficiaries shall be taken into account. The contribution in kind
shall be outlined in lower ranked documents.
- 323 - all proposed beneficiaries shall be taken into account. The contribution in kind
shall be outlined in lower ranked documents.
- 331 – In training the applicants shall be individuals, in information actions providers.
The total amount of resources allocated for this measure is stated in chapter 7.
- The proposed target group are partners of a LAG which is a beneficiary. The second
part of the remark shall be meaningfully taken into account.
- The remark shall be meaningfully taken into account in lower ranked documents.
- General RDP 2007-2013 provisions lay down that resources for the same purpose may
be obtained only under one axis and one fund. - The remark shall not be taken into
account.
- Additional criteria are to be outlined in lower ranked documents. However, data without
a limit shall be made public in shortest time possible.
- 322, 323 – All proposed beneficiaries have been included. - The remark shall not be
taken into account.
- Proposed target group are partners of a LAG which is a beneficiary. The second part of
the remark shall be meaningfully taken into account.
- The remark shall be meaningfully considered in lower ranked documents.
- Technical assistance is intended for the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013, eligible
for the resources is the Managing Authority.
The proposal is not suitable; in place of “arrangement of manure pits” the term
“arranging facilities for storing livestock excretions” is used.
- The number of the HNV mentioned shall be included into the RDP proposal and the
value in the National Strategy Plan shall be corrected as well.
- The calculation for the submeasure Rearing of domestic animals in the central area of
appearance of large carnivores has a basis in additional work which is more extensive
with sheep and goats, therefore the reduction of the payment is not possible.
- The proposed diction in conditions for the submeasure Preservation of special grassland
habitats shall be taken into account.
- The proposal on equal payments is still open.
- No agricultural sector has been excluded from the LFA support. The proposal on
including the measure Utilisation of steep vineyards into the RDP is being reviewed and
312
Furman Breeders’
Association of ColdBlooded Horses Ilirska
Bistrica
Karst and Istra Breeders’
Association of Small
Ruminants
- Agri-environmental payments: Reduction of payments for perennial crops exceeding 100 ha by 30
percent and introduction of direct payment covering the utilisation of vineyards in steep slopes
(payment should amount to 300 EUR per ha for inclination 30 to 50 percent and 500 EUR per ha for
inclination over 50 percent)
In organic farming the stocking density is to remain at 0.2 LU/ha.
- Reduction of the minimum stocking density from 0.2 to 0.1 LU/ha for organic production and from
0.5 to 0.25 LU/ha for sustainable breeding in absolute karst pastures.
Ministry of Health
- Subsidies disbursement in due time.
- Measure 431 (b), indent 5 should be succeeded by indent 6: Awareness actions for farmers in public
procurement procedures to stimulate them to take the role of providers at the local level.
Municipality Metlika
- Regarding the consistency of the RDP 2007-2013 with other policies and instruments under point
10.4 all relevant policies which have been harmonised with the RDP during the process of its
preparation should be stated, among them also the Resolution on the national nutritional policy
programme 2005 – 2010.
- Financial resources for measure 322 are to be increased from the envisaged 25,696,000 to 35,000,000
EUR.
- Financial resources for measure 323 are to be increased from the envisaged 7,709,322 to 15,000,000
EUR.
- The resources are secured by an internal reallocation of financial resources under axis 3.
CAFS
1. The role of agricultural and forestry cooperatives is not defined.
2. Explicitly outlining the role of cooperatives in the development of agriculture and rural areas.
3. Under opportunities another indent should be added: adoption of stimulative tax legislation for the
development of subsidiary activities.
4. Detailed definition of “first ownership takeover of entire farm”. First ownership takeover is deemed
every first takeover of the entire agricultural holding in the manner that the transferee acquires the
exclusive ownership right. The entire holding is taken over also when the transferor retains up to 0.5 ha
comparable agricultural areas and/or for exempted areas of an individual smaller joint owner the
address of which cannot be determined.
5. In case of bee bearing and honey production no land need be owned as this activity is not related to
land.
6. Legal lease should be substituted with lease listed in land register.
7. Accomplishing goals from business plan. The realisation of envisaged profitability should be
considered the realization of the envisaged profitability.
8. What about other activities not linked to land? Meaningfully the same conditions as for beekeepers.
9. Early retirement - Duration of obtaining support up to 10 years does not enable an earlier farm
transfer.
10. Early retirement - Practicing farming for the 10 years preceding the transfer is irrelevant since the
minimum retirement age for entering the measure is set.
11. Early retirement - The definition of indent 5 is partially contradictory to the definition of indent 2,
12. Early retirement - Amount of support - The proposed amount of support is lower than set out in the
RDP 2004-2006.
13. Modernisation of agricultural holdings – too daring GVA/PMWU goals
data checked.
- Given the resources allocated for the measure agri-environment payments under the
RDP the proposal shall not be taken into account and payments for areas exceeding 100
ha are reduced by 50 percent.
Setting up of stocking density is still open.
Setting up of stocking density is still open.
Measure 431b is related to information actions on the initiative LEADER. Public
procurements are governed by a sector-specific act, which in the process of adoption, and
are a matter of the implementing level. The remark shall not be taken into account.
The resources under individual measures shall be reallocated during the implementation
of the RDP 2007-2013, if necessary. Inasmuch it shall become evident that there are too
many or too few resources for an individual measure, adequate actions shall be taken.
1. Initiated by the association of Slovenian cooperatives a section on the role of
cooperatives in Slovenia was included in the RDP 2007-2013.
2. In some measures under the RDP 2007-2013 cooperatives are defined as beneficiaries,
they may also be members of LAGs, but their role cannot be emphasises or pointed out
nor explicitly mentioned.
3. The RDP has neither goal nor possibility to guide tax legislation.
4. MAFF cannot interfere with ownership relations. The remark shall be reviewed from
the legal viewpoint.
5. The condition 1 ha shall be deleted.
6. The remark shall be considered.
7. The remark shall be considered at the implementing level.
8. The remark shall be reviewed.
9. The remark shall be reviewed. Simultaneously, the balance in relation to other
measures shall be reviewed.
10. The remark shall not be taken into account since this condition is laid down in Article
27(2)(c) of Regulation 1698/2005.
11. The inconsistency shall be corrected.
12. The remark shall be renewed. A new calculation shall be made.
13. The figures shall be corrected.
313
14. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Economic size in ESU - Due to the reform of direct
payments the methodology of the SGM calculation is changing
15. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Number of supported agricultural holdings in 7 years must
be significantly higher, kept separated by large and small investments.
16. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - First setting up or restructuring of existing perennial crops,
including fixing trellis wires.
17. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Due to the nature of works in renewing hop gardens we
are in favour of a specific, simplified and adjusted tender for perennial crops, suitable for less
extensive renewals as well.
18. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - An indent on beekeeping is missing, although honey is
mentioned among the sectors.
19. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - An indent on animal and bee queen purchase missing.
20. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - General efficiency of an agricultural holding and business
plan - Given the extent of investments aid shall be granted for large and small investments (no business
plan required for small investments.)
21. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Gross income from agricultural activities – extended by
“and forestry activities”.
22. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Cost of agricultural land purchase up to 10 percent of their
market value - Such a low share of eligible costs (4 or 5% of actual support) is not enough to apply in a
tender.
23. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Animal purchase and purchase of annual seedlings cannot
be a non-eligible cost.
24. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Higher support should be obtained also by young farmers
meeting the required conditions, but did not apply for funds for young transferees, or they have not
been granted.
25. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Higher support for young farmers also for investments on
organic farms.
26. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Maximum aid amount granted (500,000 EUR) is too high.
A lower amount would enable a larger number of farms to obtain investment support.
27. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - Target groups - suggested a separate treatment for natural
and legal persons.
28. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - It is impossible to conclude whether the tenders shall be
open or closed.
29. Modernisation of agricultural holdings - FADN - axis 1 should be run in accordance with the
FADN system.
30. Infrastructure improvement and development - Necessary to introduce the renewal of existing
irrigation systems.
31. Infrastructure improvement and development - Small irrigation systems missing.
32. Infrastructure improvement and development - Investment in the construction of small
accumulations is missing.
33. Meeting standards - Plant protection - The Rules on professional training and assessment of
knowledge in phytomedicine have been amended.
34. Meeting standards - Shall Slovenia not support the implementation of newly introduced standards?
14. The remark shall not be taken into account. This is one of the baseline indicators set
out by the EU.
15. The remark shall not be taken into account. The values in the table were drawn up
based on the implementation of the measure so far. Any different forecast is a pure
speculation.
16. The remark shall be taken into account at the implementation level. The general
diction contains all eligible costs. Therefore we see no need for additional division at this
level.
17. The problem shall be solved at the implementation level within the framework of
simple and demanding investments.
18. The remark shall not be taken into account. The beekeeping investments mentioned
have already been included in the current description of purposes.
19. Not allowed according to Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the remark shall
therefore not be taken into account.
20. The remark shall be taken into account.
21. The remark shall be reviewed – separate measures are intended for forestry.
22. The error shall be corrected: The new diction is as follows: “Cost of agricultural land
purchase up to 10 percent of the total investment value”.
23. The remark shall not be taken into account. Animal purchase and purchase of annual
seedlings are no eligible cost under Council Regulation (EC) No 1698. The restriction
does not apply for perennial crop seedlings.
24. The remark shall be partially taken into account. The diction shall be amended.
25. The remark shall be taken into account at the implementation level. Additional share
for supporting investments of organic farms is nearly impossible. In investments of
organic farms the maximum acknowledged cost could potentially be increased.
26. There shall be no separate tenders. The maximum aid amounts granted shall be
partially corrected.
27. There shall be no separate tenders. Investments shall be divided into simple and
sophisticated.
28. Applied shall be open tender and the applications shall be treated in the order of
submitted complete applications. Granted shall be applications which shall pass a certain
minimum threshold.
29. The problem is being solved. Due to the European requirements on monitoring of
measure outputs a certain monitoring system of on-farm management shall have to be
established. It is not necessary this to be FADN.
30. This has already been included in indent 4, although the European Commission is not
in favour thereof.
31. The construction of small irrigation systems and associated water sources has already
been captured within the framework of measure No 121.
32. The construction of small irrigation systems and associated water sources has already
been captured within the framework of measure No 121.
33. The remark shall not be taken into account. Conditions may not be changed.
34. Within the framework of this measure only commitments under the implementation
of the RDP 2004-2006 shall be disbursed. Inasmuch a need for the implementation of
314
35. Meeting standards -The introduction of new standards needs to be included.
36. Meeting standards - Eligible costs - Costs of documentation acquisition not stated.
37. Adding value to agricultural and forestry products - Necessary separate tenders for subsidiary
activities.
38. Adding value to agricultural and forestry products - Required detailed definition of evidence on
financial situation of the applicant - proof on ability to recover the proposed annual investment share.
39. Adding value to agricultural and forestry products - The list of beneficiaries in brackets is
misleading - added must be also natural persons.
40. Adding value to agricultural and forestry products - Enabling smaller producers and quality
product producers to apply as well.
41. Supporting producer groups - Considering the role of cooperatives which they play in food quality
schemes.
42. Supporting producer groups - Promotion of trademarks, except trademarks which simultaneously
promote an indication under the quality scheme, and vice versa.
43. Improving the economic value of forests - Conditions are not entirely realistic.
44. Raising the competence level - Confirmed annual activities plan - unclear what fore: information or
training.
45. Raising the competence level - of other trainings which would positively affect the competitiveness
of farms engaged in primary production in the economical and technological sense, social relations of
people living in the countryside, as well as trainings which positively affect on the computer
application on farms, practical use computers and application of information accessible via web.
46. Raising the competence level - Eligible costs - Added should be a new indent covering costs of the
preparation of educational programmes, tools and materials.
47. Raising the competence level - Very ambiguously and unclear defined target groups.
48. Supporting setting up of producer groups - The beneficiaries should also be cooperatives
49. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - It would be sensible to complement target groups.
50. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - Among eligible costs there are no costs related to
the documentation acquisition.
51. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - Extension of purpose types.
52. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - Maximum aid rate for young farmers need be
raised.
newly introduced standards should occur after 2009, the RDP 2007-2013 shall be
amended accordingly.
35. Support for metting newly introduced standards, particularly for adaption to
stondards under the heading animal welfare, shall be applied for within the range of
measure 121.
36. We agree, but there is no point in listing all types of costs. Therefore we shall
simplify the diction, as follows: “General costs related to the preparation and carrying out
of projects.”
37. The remark shall not be taken into account. Already, there is a problem with the
absorption of resources put out to tender for investments in subsidiary occupations.
38. Shall be arranged in implementing regulations. It must be pointed out that this
conditions does not relate to proving own share. Evidence on financial situation of the
applicant must show that the beneficiary has no financial problems.
39. The remark shall be taken into account; the text is amended accordingly.
40. The remark shall be reviewed and meaningfully considered. But there is no need for
fear. There shall be an open tender. If smaller investors prepare their applications in
accordance with the public tender conditions they shall be able to obtain resources as
well.
41. Beneficiaries under this measure are “natural and legal persons registered as producer
group and are engaged in one of the eligible quality schemes” If the producer group is
registered as a cooperative, it is a potential beneficiary for funds under the measure.
42. We agree, but based on the requirements of the Council Regulation (EC) No
1698/2005 trademarks may not be supported under this measure. The text shall be
corrected, as follows: “promotion of agricultural product indications as well as legal and
natural persons the name of which does not relate to the name of protected products.”
43. The remark shall not be taken into account. 27. Article 27 of Council Regulation
(EC) No 1698/2005 related to this measure set out in paragraph 2 that investments must
be based on forest management plans.
44. The remark shall be added. The activity are information actions.
45. We agree, it was related only to training under the National vocational qualification
system. The remark relates partially to measure 331. It shall be reviewed and added, if
possible.
46. The beneficiaries under this measure are persons engaged in production and first
stage of processing of agricultural products and the associations of natural and legal
persons. It is about reimbursement of education or training costs to the participants. The
measure is aimed at improving the qualification and awareness of people performing the
activities of the primary production and processing as well acquisition of certificated
under the NVQ and other qualifications.
47. The remark shall be reviewed. However, one must consider that natural persons area
eligible for refund of costs for different types of training; their associations shall be
eligible for co-financing of information programmes of their members.
48. Cooperatives are mentioned as beneficiaries.
49. Beneficiaries are individual persons. The remark shall not be taken into account.
50. The remark has already been considered and the costs included.
51. The remark cannot be taken into account due to the delimitation of measures under
RDP axis 3 and other OPs.
52. The remark cannot be taken into account.
315
53. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - Adding clubs, associations, etc to the target group.
54. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - Investment co-financing - Investment may be
financed also from other public resources, but the total amount of co-financing may not exceed the
regulatory set maximum amount.
55. Diversification into non-agricultural activities - In the maximum aid rate “up to” should be deleted.
56. Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises - The measure should include also
the creation and development of micro enterprises engaged in social services.
57. Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises - Supporting diverse service
activities in the countryside.
58. Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises - Unclear interpretation of set C 59. Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises - Newly created micro enterprises
have not received SAPARD - The explanation needs to be extended.
60. Support for the creation and development of micro enterprises - Investment co-financingInvestment may be financed also from other public resources, but the total amount of co-financing may
not exceed the regulatory set maximum amount.
61. Basic services for the economy and rural population - The measure is implemented within the
framework of measure 311 and 312.
62. Basic services for the economy and rural population - General eligibility conditions and eligible
costs - Are the conditions for a farm interested in carrying out the care of older residents set out?
63. Basic services for the economy and rural population - Equal treatment of cooperatives.
64. Village renewal - Thematic trails ought to be added.
65. Vocational training and information actions - Preservation of traditional values of agriculture Innovation can be also tradition.
66. LEADER - Necessary to introduce cooperation with AAS.
67. LEADER – AAS included into the Rural development network.
68. Axis 2 – Suggested that a new measure be introduced: Vineyard utilisation on slopes 30-50% and
over 50%.
69. Axis 2 – Proposed that RDP 2007-2013 contains sanction methods related to the fulfilment of cross
compliance requirements.
70. Axis 2 – “Certain A-E submeasures need to be implemented on the same area throughout the
commitment period.” Since this is very difficult to accomplish, we have a new proposal: “Certain A-E
submeasures must be implemented on the same area throughout the commitment period within
agricultural holding or on area compliant with the allowed reduction and increase of area”.
71. Axis 2 – Obligations emerging from the general condition on compliance with the minimum
requirements on the use of fertilisers and provision of permanent soil fertility should not apply for all
measures.
72. Axis 2 – Diction “The amount of applied organic nitrogen must not exceed 170 kg/ha annually”, is
not right.
73. Axis 2 – We disagree with shortened time for communicating changes to 10 work days. It should
be prolonged to 20 days, during which farmer is to inform the ARSAMRD from the day he is able to
do so.
74. Axis 2 – Wrong S50 combinations.
75. Axis 2 – Additional combinations IPS and IVG in VVO.
76. Axis 2 – Combination S35 and S50 with VVO should be added.
77. Axis 2 – We suggest that beneficiaries be allowed to quit a measure as stated in paragraph 2 on
page 137.
53. The beneficiaries are laid down in Article 53 of the Regulation No 1698/2005.
Therefore the remark shall not be taken into account.
54. The remark shall be taken into account.
55. The remark shall not be taken into account as different aid percentages can be set for
individual eligible costs.
56. Social services are transferred to measure 321.
57. Services are included in set B.
58. The remark is no longer relevant as set C was deleted from RDP 2007-2013.
59. General provisions lay down that investment must be carried out within the RS.
60. The remark shall be taken into account.
61. The remark shall not be taken into account.
62. The remark shall be reviewed and meaningfully considered in lower ranked
documents.
63. The cooperatives have the opportunity of getting engaged.
64. The remark shall not be taken into account as we shall not list individual thematic
trails.
65. The remark shall be taken into account.
66. Responsible for carrying out of training shall be the MAFF. Operators shall be
selected in accordance with general rules. SCAF is not excluded as a potential operator,
but it cannot be given an advantage or exclusive right to carry out training. The remark
shall not be taken into account.
67. The tasks of the national rural network shall be performed the MAFF.
68. The remark shall be reviewed.
69. The remark shall be reviewed.
70. The remark shall not be taken into account. The commission shall refuse any measure
where no GIS control per area is possible.
71. The remark shall be taken into account. The provision shall be set out in detail by a
decree.
72. The remark shall be taken into account.
73. The remark shall not be taken into account as required by the implementation
regulation.
74. Shall be corrected.
75. The remark cannot be considered as it would mean doubling of payments.
76. The remark cannot be considered as it would mean doubling of payments.
77. The remark shall be reviewed.
316
78. Axis 2 – Possibility of changing the measures REJ and ETA (ETA into REJ or REJ into ETA).
79. Axis 2 – Some calculations for IP are too low, therefore we would like to see the calculation which
served MAFF as the basis for such amounts.
80. Axis 2 – Changing the ratio between maximum payments vineyards-permanent grassland in favour
of vineyards or raising the maximum amount for vineyards where it is very difficult to produce organic
grapes due to natural conditions.
81. Axis 2 – The list of autochthonous and traditional plant varieties is missing.
82. Axis 2 – A-E payments - The payment should be defined for the entire programming period.
83. Axis 2 – In case of agricultural land under perennial crops exceeding 100 ha, we suggest that the
payments for these measures reduce by 30% and not 50%.
84. Axis 2 – A detailed definition of “Economically acceptable use of means of production” is
necessary.
85. Axis 2 –In integrated fruit production it would be necessary to adjust the measure in a manner
which would enable orchard renewal in spite engagement in the measure.
86. Axis 2 – The measure does not cover smaller areas of different fruit tree varieties in individual
intensive orchards. If its content does not change small orchard areas of other fruit varieties shall again
be excluded. Example: in case of 0.29 ha peach, 0.29 ha plum and 0.29 cherry no payment entitlement
under 214/I/4 can be claimed.
87. Axis 2 – What do veterinary-pharmaceutical measures mean?
88. Axis 2 – Integrated fruit production is not equal lesser application of PPP as regards the number of
spreading. IPS is aimed at controlled use of fertilisers and PPP.
89. Axis 2 – Regular Nmin analyses prior to N fertilisation in fruit production is not priority. Assessed
is the visual state of a plant.
90. Axis 2 – We propose amendment of the diction: “Establishment of integrated production
contributes to a reduced use of chemical substances and thus protects the environment and public
health and at the same time offers fruit with better internal and external characteristics.”
91. Axis 2 – Integrated vine growing does not envisage that during vineyard renewal the engagement
in the measure could be frozen for one or more years and after the renewal the implementation
continued.
92. Axis 2 – Controlled use of fertiliser substrates and PPP in horticulture.
93. Axis 2 – Minimum agricultural land area of the same use for the purposes of protected areas should
be diminished from 0.1 ha to 300 m2.
94. Axis 2 – Diction “network of organic farmers was established” is not suitable.
95. Axis 2 – Increase of stocking density in organic farming is proposed (from 0.2 to 0.5 LU/ha).
96. Axis 2 – Why is the indication of the stocking density not contained in the table “Measure
description” as in other measures? We suggest that indent 10 be deleted.
97. Axis 2 – The statement “active organic market in Ljubljana and Maribor” is not complete.
98. Axis 2 – We suggest detailed definition as to which PPP may not be used on these areas.
99. Axis 2 – Minimum stocking density for grazing animals has increased from 0.2 to 0.5 LU/ha.
100. Axis 2 – What happens to the beneficiaries after the reorganisation of the measure if their eligible
area should reduce, but all measurements of steep slopes were made according to the published rules?
101. Axis 2 – We disagree with the new requirement that the use of mineral fertilisers is prohibited.
102. Axis 2 – The comparison with intensive plantations is incorrect as meadow orchards have an
important function in the conservation of the traditional cultural landscape, biodiversity, preservation
of genetic material and relation to the tradition in rural areas.
103. Axis 2 – We propose that the MAFF reviews the possibility of including the Carniolan bee into
78. The shift from REJ to ETA is not possible due to the required stocking density for
REJ. The shift from ETA to REJ on the other hand is possible.
79. The calculations were made by the Faculty for Agriculture, Maribor (Èrtomir
Rozman, PhD). A presentation of the model calculations and a meeting with the operator
shall be organised.
80. The remark shall not be taken into account. Payments for EK cannot be increased.
81. The list of autochthonous and traditional varieties of agricultural plants has already
been amended. The varieties are being checked whether they meet the requirements for
being included on the list.
82. Payment amounts depend on the number of beneficiaries which can be different each
year.
83. Financial resources are limited and a decision on payment amounts had to be made.
84. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
85. The remark shall not be taken into account.
86. The remark shall be reviewed and considered is possible.
87. Error in the text that has been corrected.
88. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
89. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
90. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
91. The remark shall not be taken into account.
92. Technological guidelines must be harmonised.
93. The remark shall be reviewed.
94. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
95. The issue of the common stocking density in the Karst, which shall relate to all forms
of area linked aid is being reviewed.
96. The remark shall not be taken into account.
97. The text shall be rephrased.
98. The point of PPP shall be outlined clearer.
99. The remark shall not be taken into account since there are no problems in practice.
100. In 2009 there shall be a new register, it is merely a reminder.
101. The remark shall be reviewed once again with the MESP.
102. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
103. Payments under this measure are granted for rearing of autochthonous domestic
317
the list of autochthonous breeds.
104. Axis 2 – The list does not contain the Haflinger horse.
105. Axis 2 – The condition: “minimum 70% of fodder produced on own agricultural holding”. What
does on own agricultural holding mean?
106. Axis 2 – Stocking density for this measure is 0.5-1.9 LU/ha all 365 day per year. What happens to
AH which graze animals during summer period and the stocking density falls below 0.5 LU/ha.
107. Axis 2 – What does the diction “may claim payment only for the period during which the animals
are actually grazing”?
108. Axis 2 – In conditions the indents 3 and 4 do not clearly outline the conditions of mowing and
pasture. Indent 3 does not make clear if mowing is allowed and was excluded by mistake.
109. Axis 2 – In conditions the indents 3 and 4 are stated twice.
SCAF Foresters
110. Axis 2 – Exclusion of certain CC from the list of LFA with regard to that list in 2003.
111. Axis 2 – Prohibition of composting on composting heaps without foil is not technically founded.
112. Axis 2 – LFA payment should be set with regard to the GERK location and not to the seat of the
agricultural holding.
- Page 23, third paragraph, the amendment as follows: Most evident are the split-up forestry parcels,
unconnected forest owners in conducting forestry works and wood sales, weak and inadequate
infrastructure, insufficient competence and equipment of forest owners for forestry works as well as
inadequate organisation and too weak efficiency of existing advisory services.
- Page 23, chapter 3.1.3, the amendment as follows: Agricultural land and forests in Slovenia
represents nearly 92 percent of land use and have an important environmental, aesthetic and spatial
function. The nature and environmental protection have a general social importance in Slovenia,
which is evident from the current policies dealing with these issues. Slovenia applies sustainable and
multifunctional forest management methods and has a high standard in this area as it is often used an
example for others. In agriculture a wide-ranged implementation of agri-environmental submeasures
helps to maintain the utilisation of agricultural land in less favoured areas and to preserve the
multifunctional role of agriculture. So far, these measures have been the most important component of
the rural development policy and have been positively accepted by the beneficiaries as well by the
public.
- Page 24, the coverage of ecologically important areas in forests is to be added.
- Page 28, chapter State of Waters, the following text is added: Forests have an impact on the water
quality and quantity and the quantity distribution within space. Well-preserved forests and forest soil
are natural water “filter and mitigate soil and water acidification and eutrophication. Due to extreme
weather phenomena the preservation of forests plays an enormous role in balancing and mitigating the
water discharge rate, particularly in karst areas.
- Page 32, chapter Greenhouse Gases, the following text is added: Forests are a dominant and most
preserved natural ecosystem. They protect the landscape and secure ecological balance therein. For the
time being, since they are well preserved, the forests successfully mitigate negative impacts of the
civilisation on the environment. They are an important CO2 and carbon sinks. Given the data the
annual CO2 accumulation in Slovenian forests in 1990-2005 amounted to 9.867 Mt CO2 on average,
which means that in Slovenian forests over 60 percent of annual CO2 emissions in Slovenia are being
accumulated.
- Page 39, Advantages, human resources and the quality of life, in the last indent the following text is
added: established enterprise information, agricultural advising, educational and training network
throughout Slovenia and the awareness of its importance.
- Page 89, measure 125: description of the problem is extended to forestry as well and the measure is
also aimed at the implementation of land consolidation in forestry.
- Page 108 and 109, forestry measures:
A clear delimitation of how much resources are allocated for measure A and measure B should
be drawn, as well delimitation between forest owners – natural and legal persons.
breeds: horses, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and hens.
104. The breed has already been put on the list, but is being checked if it meets all
requirements
105. The remark shall be reviewed and redefined.
106. Exemption is added “when animals are grazing”.
107. Shall be reviewed.
108. The remarked is being checked with the proposer of the text.
109. Shall be checked and clearly laid down that mowing is conducted twice – once
obligatory and additionally due to the cross compliance requirements.
110. The remark shall be reviewed.
111. The remark shall be reviewed.
112. Payment calculation methodology is presented in the RDP 2007-2013.
- Baseline analysis – remark taken into account.
- Conducting land consolidation in forestry is an extremely demanding measure, which
has not yet been implemented in Slovenia in particular due to the configuration of the
forestry property. It is feasible only in cases of large forestry property in a plain area,
which do not exist in Slovenia. Legal groundwork for the implementation of such a
measure is also problematic, even though the Agricultural Land Act outlines forests as
the subject land consolidation, however, the sector-specific Act on Forests does not set
out land consolidation specifically. Considering that land consolidation under the
measure 125 shall be conducted on the bases of the Agricultural Land Act, land
consolidation in forestry is generally possible.
- The proposal on lower production volumes for mechanisation and equipment purchase
for forestry works shall be taken into account.
- The delimitation of resources shall be laid down in implementing regulations.
- Limitation of resources with regard to the legal status of a beneficiary has no legal
basis. Therefore the proposal cannot be taken into account.
- Measure 111 – the remark shall be taken into account.
-The inclusion of the measure vine production is still open, as well as the amendment of
payment amounts.
318
Measure “thinning and conversion” is added.
Conditions for obtaining resources under B should be lowered:
►
the condition for the purchase of mechanisation, except for machinery felling, is
harvest of 150 m3,
►
the condition for the purchase of new equipment for forestry works is forest property
at least 3 ha large or minimum harvest of 150 m3,
limited co-financing rate of up to 25 percent of the investment value is set for forest owners –
legal persons,
the minimum aid amount granted should be reduced to 500 EUR and the maximum aid amount
granted to 200,000 EUR,
financial provisions, intervention rate from wrong 6 percent is corrected to 60 percent.
- Page 114, target group, the following text is added: Target group (end-users) are persons engaged in
production and the first processing phase of agricultural products, forest production and primary
processing of forestry products and associations of natural and legal persons in the RS and meet the
conditions set for granting of resources.
- Page 131, Group III, first indent is amended, as follows: rearing of domestic animals in central and
peripheral area of appearance of large carnivores.
- Page 196, seminars and workshops, the amendment as follows: These seminars are foremost intended
to experts of the Slovenian Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry, regional development agencies,
municipal authorities and other professional services (various project and business plan designers)
which are in direct contact with potential end-users.
-
319
15 EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN AND NON-DISCRIMINATION
In the RS equal opportunities are provided by the following documents:
- Constitution of the RS (OJ RS No 331/1991-I), Article 14 states that in Slovenia everyone shall
be guaranteed equal human rights and fundamental freedoms irrespective of national origin, race,
sex, language, religion, political or other conviction, material standing, birth, education, social
status or any other personal circumstance;
- Equal Opportunities for Women and Men Act (OJ RS No 59/02) sets out common guidelines and
groundwork for the creation of equal opportunities and promotion of equality of genders in different
areas of life which are important in the light of gender equality (e.g. in political, economic and
social and education area, etc.). Under this Act the Government and individual ministries are
obliged to draw up regulations and other measures intruding upon the equal opportunities of
genders with regard to equality of genders;
- National programme on gender mainstreaming (OJ RS No 90/05) was drawn up within the
framework of the cooperation between the MAFF and FAO. It is a strategic document laying down
the key directions, goals, measures and activities as well as policy operators necessary to ensure
equal opportunities of both genders and different age and social groups in agriculture and in rural
areas as well as for the implementation of the envisaged activities;
- Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment Act (OJ RS No 50/04) lays down that based
on other personal circumstances other than gender (age, race, ethnic or national origin, or sexual
orientation) discrimination is not allowed and it is necessary to ensure equal treatment.
15. 1 Promotion of equality between men and women
Protection of individual’s rights with regard to human rights and freedoms and the equality before
the law is provided directly and by the institute of the Ombudsman as an independent body and by
the Office for Equal Opportunities.
The drawing up of the RDP, which systematically promotes equal opportunities and accessibility to
all measures regardless of the gender, ethnical, religious or any other origin, the provisions of the
national legislation were taken into account. Equal opportunities are and shall be considered during
all stages. Special promotion is devoted to activities in accessibility of education, training,
employment and other activities in human resources development for women. Activities shall also
be aimed at better integration of certain groups threatened by social exclusion.
During the preparation of the RDP 2007-2013 the MAFF worked together with organisations
responsible for promotion of equal opportunities between men and women. The representatives of
the Government Office of the RS for Equal Opportunities stated their remarks in the public
discussion on the RDP proposal and were also invited to a special coordination meeting. Their
remarks related mainly to the monitoring of indicators by gender and positive discrimination of
women. Invited to a special coordination meeting were also two important organisations, i.e.
Association of Slovenian Farm Women and Association of Slovenian Rural Youth.
The gender mainstreaming principle and promotion of equal opportunities shall be included into the
selection criteria. In certain axes and measures the “positive discrimination" of women is envisaged
(e.g. axis 1: investments on farm and setting up of young farmers; axis 3: entrepreneurship in rural
areas) based on which female beneficiaries may obtain a higher number of points. The national rural
network under axis 4 involves the national youth and women organisations. All reports must also
state the structure of involvement and the implementation separately by gender, where possible.
Within the framework of axis 3 under the measure “Support for the creation and development of
micro enterprises", which is aimed at the diversification of the rural population activities, also
supports the social security services in the rural areas, among them childcare, care of older people
and people with special needs.
320
15.2 Non-discrimination
Discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual
orientation is regulated under the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment Act (OJ RS
No 50/04). This act lays down common grounds and baselines for securing equal treatment of every
person in asserting their rights and obligations as well as in implementing their fundamental
freedoms in any area of social life, in particular in the area of employment, employment relations,
participating in unions and interest associations, education and schooling, social security, access to
goods and services and their supply, regardless of their personal circumstances such as nationality,
race or ethnic origin, sex, health, disability, language, religion or belief, age, sexual orientation,
education, financial situation, social position or other personal circumstances. In drawing up the
RDP 2007-2013, which systematically promotes equal opportunities and accessibility to all
measures, regardless of sex, ethnic origin, religion or any other circumstance and prohibits any
discrimination, the national legislation has been considered.
321
16 THECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
16.1 Description of drawing up, running, monitoring and evaluation of information and control
activities and aid programmes financed under Technical assistance
Technical assistance is aimed at providing efficient programme implementation /development
priorities / priority orientations/ projects. Activities to be implemented under technical assistance
shall increase the recognisability of the programme and its integral components, the quality of its
implementation, monitoring and surveillance over implementation and provide for better
coordination between partners. Within the framework of technical assistance numerous activities
shall take place, i.e. drawing up project proposals, carrying out different studies and evaluations,
information and communication activities to support project activities as well providing staff
support for the implementation of activities.
The technical assistance projects shall cover the following activities:
- preparation and selection of projects;
- studies for the implementation of development priorities /priority orientations / projects;
- evaluations / reports / technical assessments;
- measures intended for partners, beneficiaries, general and expert public, including public
information and communication activities, measures supporting the coordination and promotion
of cooperation between partners;
- activities for establishment, upgrading and networking of information systems for running,
monitoring, evaluation, reporting and surveillance of the implementation of projects / priority
orientations / development priorities;
- supporting activities in the implementation of the RDP 2007-2013 and activities for raising the
administrative competence of its beneficiaries (additional jobs, training, experience exchange,
Monitoring Committee operation).
16.2 National rural network
A detailed list of organisations and managing authorities participating in rural development,
procedures and time schedule for the establishment of the rural network
Organisations:
-
-
educational and expert institutions in the field of agriculture, forestry and food industry, spatial
planning and environmental protection, natural and cultural heritage and similar activities;
associations, chambers and unions of farmers, farm women and youth, forest owners, economic
interest associations, municipality associations and similar organisations at local and national
level;
other institutions engaged in rural development;
local action groups;
national institutions operating in the field of rural development;
European rural network and national networks of other Member States;
interested public.
Time schedule:
The national rural network shall be established not later than by the end of 2008 and shall be
gradually widened and upgraded, in accordance with the needs and requirements of the partners.
Detailed list of organisations and administrative authorities participating in rural development,
procedures and time schedule for the establishment of the national rural network are described in
detail in Annex 15 – Action plan of the rural network.
322
Objectives and activities
Regulation 1698/2005, Article 68 refers to the establishment, operation and financing of a national
rural network grouping all organisational structures of rural development. The establishment and
operation of the network shall contribute to successful information actions on objectives and
measures of the rural development policy and other development policies at the national as well as
the EU level. Good information actions shall enhance efficient implementation of the measures,
rural operators networking, experience exchange and cooperation. The network shall work in both
ways, which shall provide feedback information on the approach and implementation of the rural
development policy set and ensure more efficient evaluation and analysis.
The establishment and operation objectives of the national rural network are aimed at:
1. Providing information on rural development at the national and inter-territorial level.
2. Information actions on activities under rural development policy.
3. Promoting inter-municipal and international cooperation, networking and exchange of good
practices.
4. Providing feedback information on the effectiveness of the implementation of the national
development policies in individual areas and at the national level.
5. Increasing transparency of the measures and the realisation of the rural development policy set.
To accomplish the objectives set the following activities shall be implemented under the national
rural network:
a) Information actions for rural population and other organisational structures in rural areas on the
measures under the developmental rural policies (periodicals, promotion materials, homepage,
seminars, meetings, forum, contact points).
b) Enhancing the cooperation between the rural development operators at the inter-municipal and
international level (established and accessible data base of organisational structures in the
countryside, meetings and seminars, visits of good practices).
c) Collecting and forwarding information on the development of the rural areas and the
implementation of the measures under rural policies.
Organisation and structure
The rural network shall connect governmental, non-governmental and private organisations and
structures engaged in the rural development.
The national rural network shall operate under the MAFF. The implementation of individual tasks
of the network may be subcontracted on the basis of calls for tender to different competent
organisations and individuals. The control over the operation and implementation of the network
shall be conducted by the MAFF. The national rural network is also a supporting measure to the
tasks of technical assistance, particularly as regards the information actions for the public and data
gathering for evaluation.
Financing
Financial resources for the network are devoted under the measure Technical assistance. For the
operation of the network minimum 10 percent of the technical assistance resources shall be
allocated, thereof maximum 20 percent for the management. Eligible for support shall be
organisations which shall, based on call for tender, provide for the implementation of the network
tasks. Financing rate shall be 100 percent. The amount for running the national rural network
structure shall not increase unjustly during the programming period.
323