Roger LeRoy Miller Economics Today Chapter 25 Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Strategic Behavior Miller, Economics Today, © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Introduction Shoppers at the Web site of the apparel manufacturer Eddie Bauer can use a “virtual dressing room” to click and drag clothes together for a closer look. By making its Web site interesting and useful Eddie Bauer seeks to differentiate its brand name and attract customers. To understand the actions of firms that sell similar but differentiated goods, you must learn about monopolistic competition. Slide 25-2 Learning Objectives Discuss the key characteristics of a monopolistically competitive industry Contrast the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms Slide 25-3 Learning Objectives Outline the fundamental characteristics of oligopoly Understand how to apply game theory to evaluate the pricing strategies of oligopolistic firms Slide 25-4 Learning Objectives Explain the kinked demand curve theory of oligopolistic price rigidity Describe theories of how firms may deter market entry by potential rivals Slide 25-5 Chapter Outline Monopolistic Competition Price and Output for the Monopolistic Competitor Comparing Perfect Competition with Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Slide 25-6 Chapter Outline Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Price Rigidity and the Kinked Demand Curve Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Deterring Entry into an Industry Comparing Market Structures Slide 25-7 Did You Know That... 80 percent of initial customer contacts for General Motors Saturn division now originate on the Internet? GM and other businesses leave no stone unturned to inform people about what they sell, where people can buy it, and at what price? Slide 25-8 Monopolistic Competition Monopolistic Competition – A market situation in which a large number of firms produce similar but not identical products – Entry into the industry is relatively easy Slide 25-9 Monopolistic Competition Characteristics of monopolistic competition – Significant number of sellers in a highly competitive market – Differentiated products – Sales promotion and advertising – Easy entry of new firms in the long run Slide 25-10 Monopolistic Competition Implications of the large number of firms – Small market share – Lack of collusion – Independence Slide 25-11 Monopolistic Competition Product Differentiation – The distinguishing of products by brand name, color, and other minor attributes Slide 25-12 Monopolistic Competition Product differentiation and price – Differentiate perfectly • Producer is a monopoly – Significant influence on price – Differentiation is not perfect • Producer is a monopolistic competitor – The more successful it is at differentiation the more control over price Slide 25-13 Monopolistic Competition Ease of entry – Threat of a more efficient competitor is always present Slide 25-14 Monopolistic Competition Sales promotion and advertising – Can increase demand for a firm – Can differentiate a firm’s product – Should be continued to the point at which the additional revenue from one more dollar of advertising just equals that one dollar of marginal cost Slide 25-15 Monopolistic Competition Advertising as signaling behavior – Advertising over a long period of time is a signal that a firm wants repeat business Slide 25-16 Monopolistic Competition What do you think? – Would a perfect competitor have any incentive to advertise? – Why would a monopolistically competitive firm advertise? – Can advertising lead to efficiency? Slide 25-17 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition • Price (P1) > ATC • Economic profit Figure 25-1, Panel (a) Slide 25-18 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition -Price (P1) < ATC -Economic loss Figure 25-1, Panel (b) Slide 25-19 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition -Price (P1) = ATC -Normal rate of return Figure 25-1, Panel (c) Slide 25-20 Comparing Perfect Competition with Monopolistic Competition Perfect competitors and monopolistic competitors earn zero economic profit. How are they different? Slide 25-21 Comparison of the Perfect Competitor with the Monopolistic Competitor Figure 25-2, Panels (a) and (b) Slide 25-22 Comparing Perfect Competition with Monopolistic Competition What do you think? – Would you want to live in a perfectly competitive world with homogenous products? Slide 25-23 Oligopoly Oligopoly – A market situation in which there are very few sellers – Each seller knows that the other sellers will react to its changes in prices and quantities Slide 25-24 Oligopoly Characteristics of oligopoly – Small number of firms – Interdependence • Strategic dependence Slide 25-25 Oligopoly Strategic Dependence – A situation in which one firm’s actions with respect to price, quality, advertising, and related changes may be strategically countered by the reactions of one or more other firms in the industry Slide 25-26 Oligopoly Why oligopoly occurs – Economies of scale – Barriers to entry – Mergers • Vertical mergers • Horizontal mergers Slide 25-27 Oligopoly Vertical Merger – The joining of a firm with another to which it sells an output or from which it buys an input Horizontal Merger – The joining of firms that are producing or selling a similar product Slide 25-28 Oligopoly Measuring industry concentration – Concentration Ratio • The percentage of all sales contributed by the leading four or leading eight firms in an industry Slide 25-29 Computing the Four-Firm Concentration Ratio Firm Annual Sales ($ Millions) 1 2 3 4 5 through 25 150 100 80 70 50 Total 450 Total number of firms in Industry = 25 400 = 88.9% Four-firm concentration ratio = 450 Slide 25-30 Computing the Four-Firm Concentration Ratio Industry Percentage of Value of Total Domestic Shipments Accounted For By the Top Four Firms % Domestic motor vehicles 84 Breakfast cereals 85 Soft drinks 69 Tobacco products 93 Primary aluminum 59 Household vacuum cleaners 59 Electronic computers 45 Printing and publishing 23 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Slide 25-31 Oligopoly What do you think? – Are oligopolies inefficient? Slide 25-32 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Explaining the pricing and output behavior of oligopoly markets – Reaction Function • The manner in which one oligopolist reacts to a change in price, output, or quality made by another oligopolist in the industry Slide 25-33 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Game Theory – A way of describing the various possible outcomes in any situation involving two or more interacting individuals when those individuals are aware of the interactive nature of their situation and plan accordingly Slide 25-34 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Cooperative Game – A game in which the players explicitly cooperate to make themselves better off Slide 25-35 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Noncooperative Game – A game in which the players neither negotiate nor cooperate in any way Slide 25-36 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Zero-Sum Game – A game in which any gains within the group are exactly offset by equal losses by the end of the game Slide 25-37 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Negative-Sum Game – A game in which players as a group lose at the end of the game Slide 25-38 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Positive-Sum Game – A game in which players as a group are better off at the end of the game Slide 25-39 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Strategies in noncooperative games – Strategy • Any rule that is used to make a choice • Any potential choice that can be made by players in a game – Dominant Strategies • Strategies that always yield the highest benefit Slide 25-40 Prisoner’s Dilemma You and your partner rob a bank and get caught. Slide 25-41 Prisoner’s Dilemma You are separated and given these options: – Both confess and get 5 years in jail – Neither confess and get 2 years – One confess and the other does not • Confessor goes free • One who does not confess get 10 years Slide 25-42 Prisoner’s Dilemma What would you do? – Remember • No cooperation Slide 25-43 The Prisoners’ Dilemma Payoff Matrix Figure 25-3 Slide 25-44 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Applying game theory to pricing strategies – Would you choose a high price or a low price? • Remember – No collusion Slide 25-45 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Figure 25-4 Slide 25-46 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Opportunistic Behavior – Actions that ignore the possible long-run benefits of cooperation and focus solely on short-run gains Slide 25-47 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Opportunistic behavior – Implies a noncooperative game – Not realistic • We make repeat transactions Slide 25-48 Strategic Behavior and Game Theory Tit-for-Tat Strategic Behavior – In game theory, cooperation that continues so long as the other players continue to cooperate Slide 25-49 International Example: Strategically Relating Subsidies to Nuclear Weapons Pakistan agreed to certain conditions for an IMF loan – In 1999, the IMF discovered that Pakistan had spent much of this loan on the development of nuclear weapons – Soon, Pakistan had to default on its debt Why would Pakistan engage in this behavior with the IMF? Slide 25-50 Price Rigidity and the Kinked Demand Curve d1 is relatively elastic • if one firm raises its price the others will not and it will lose market share d2 is relatively inelastic • if one firm lowers its price the others lower their price so gain in sales is small Figure 25-5, Panel (a) Slide 25-51 Price Rigidity and the Kinked Demand Curve The kinked demand curve indicates the possibility of price rigidity Figure 25-5, Panel (b) Slide 25-52 Price Rigidity and the Kinked Demand Curve Changes in cost do not impact output and prices as long as MC remains in the vertical portion of MR Figure 25-6 Slide 25-53 Price and Marginal Revenue per Unit Criticisms of the Kinked Demand Curve • Cannot determine P0 • Empirical evidence does not confirm the kinked demand theory d1 P0 MR1 d2 MR2 q0 Quantity per Time Period Slide 25-54 Strategic Behavior Do pet products have nine lives? – H.J. Heinz’s Pet Products Company • Dropped its price of 9-Lives cat food by 22% to meet increased competition from Nestle, Quaker, Grand Metropolitan, and Mars • Heinz then decided to raise prices • Its competition did not and Heinz’s market share dropped from 23 to 15 percent Slide 25-55 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Price Leadership – A practice in many oligopolistic industries in which the largest firm publishes its price list ahead of its competitors, who then match those announced prices Slide 25-56 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Price War – A pricing campaign designed to drive competing firms out of a market by repeatedly cutting prices Slide 25-57 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Markets where price wars are common – Cigarettes – Long-distance telephone companies – Airlines Slide 25-58 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Markets where price wars are common – Diapers – Frozen foods – PC hardware and software Slide 25-59 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Cigarette price wars – Philip Morris cut Marlboro by 40 cents a pack – RJR Nabisco matched the cut for Camel – Marlboro’s market share rose from 22.1% to 27.3% – Profits and stock prices fell Slide 25-60 Strategic Behavior with Implicit Collusion: A Model of Price Leadership Cigarette price wars – Phillip Morris reduced prices by 18% and sales went up by only 12.5% • Profits fell by 25% Slide 25-61 Deterring Entry Into an Industry Entry Deterrence Strategy – Any strategy undertaken by firms in an industry, either individually or together, with the intent or effect of raising the cost of entry into the industry by a new firm Slide 25-62 Deterring Entry Into an Industry Increasing entry cost – Threat of price wars – Government regulations • Environmental regulation • Safety standards Slide 25-63 Deterring Entry Into an Industry Limit-Pricing Strategies – A model that hypothesizes that a group of colluding sellers will set the highest common price that they believe they can charge without new firms seeking to enter that industry in search of relatively high profits Slide 25-64 Deterring Entry Into an Industry Raising customer’s switching cost – Examples • Non-compatible software • Non-transferability of college courses Slide 25-65 Comparing Market Structures Market Structure Number of Sellers Unrestricted Entry and Exit Ability to Set Price Long-Run Economic Profits Possible Product Nonprice Differentiation Competition Examples Perfect competition Numerous Yes None No None None Agriculture, coal Monopolistic competition Many Yes Some No Considerable Yes Toothpaste toilet paper, soap, retail trade Oligopoly Few Partial Some Yes Frequent Yes Cigarettes, steel Pure monopoly One No (for entry) Considerable Yes None (product is unique) Yes Some electric companies, some local telephone companies Slide 25-66 Issues and Applications: Product Differentiation on the Web Some Internet-based companies such as Yahoo and AOL are now in the top echelons of American business because they forged a recognized brand name. New companies copy the strategies of successful companies – Barnes and Noble and Books.com copied Amazon.com Slide 25-67 Web Links The following Web link appears in the margin of this chapter in the textbook: – http://www.csgb.ubc.ca/ccpp/simulation Slide 25-68 Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives Key characteristics of monopolistic competition – Large number of small firms – Differentiated products – Easy entry and exit – Advertising and sales promotion Slide 25-69 Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives Contrasting the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms – Monopolistically competitive firm • • • • MR = MC determines output Price set on demand curve P > MC P = ATC in the long-run Slide 25-70 Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives Contrasting the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms – Perfectly competitive firm • MR = MC determines output • P = MR = MC • P = minimum ATC in the long-run Slide 25-71 Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives The fundamental characteristics of oligopoly – Economies of scale – Barriers to entry – Strategic dependence Applying game theory to evaluate the pricing strategies of oligopolistic firms – Game theory looks at competition for payoffs • That depends on the strategies that others employ Slide 25-72 Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives The kinked demand theory of oligopolistic price rigidity – If a firm believes that rivals will follow price cuts but not price increases, it will be reluctant to change price. How firms may deter market entry by potential rivals – Raise entry costs – Limit pricing – Switching policies Slide 25-73 End of Chapter Chapter 25 Monopolistic Competition, Oligopoly, and Strategic Behavior
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz