North East Region Inside Housing Solutions Appendix A Market Research & Business Analysis North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 1 Background Introduction A hugely important part of any feasibility study is to look at what the market thinks, wants and can demand. We need to understand not just what we may be competing against, but whether a niche or gap in the market exists. Once we understand these issues, then we can consider whether we are able to develop a service, what that service might need to look like and how such a service might be resourced and delivered. Our ‘customers’ and market for procurement of properties in the private rented sector are Landlords and Letting Agents. Additionally we wanted to learn from other lettings schemes run by Councils or Social organisations, that are competing within the private rented sector. So, this consultation was split into three parts; Landlord & Letting Agent consultation with structured interviews Letting Agent mystery shopping Consultation with existing Social Lettings Agencies Additionally we carried out a SWOT analysis to look at issues not picked up by the various consultations. Within each part we have identified the issues and offered explanations and reasoning. As part of the business analysis we have assumed that a regional Local Lettings Agency (LLA) may be developed, and our recommendations are on this basis. Landlords & Letting Agent Consultation The Process We asked all the Councils involved in the partnership to provide us with a range of Landlords and/or Letting Agents who they work with, or who are prominent in their area. To achieve a good cross section of views we feel it is important to speak to all types of Landlords and Letting Agents, including those that have never worked with a Local Authority. Even those without experience have perceptions and prejudices that are useful to explore as part of this process, and it is fair to say that a key to engaging a market with any product, is to ensure that preconceptions about the product or the ‘company’ delivering it, are addressed as far as possible. North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 2 The officer who undertook this work is experienced in this type of consultation, so although she had a structured set of interview questions, her remit and experience dictate that the conversations do develop further than might be expected, from just looking at the questions. Additionally, due to her experience she is able to guide a Landlord gently back onto the subject, should the conversation deviate (as it occasionally does), too far from the topic. Interview Questions 1. How do they currently work with Council X (i.e. how many properties do they have with current schemes, how frequently do they use the schemes, do they use the schemes for all their lets or do some do a mixture of Council and private – if so why?) 2. If they no longer work with Council X on their schemes, why not? Was there one key thing that broke the relationship, or is it a list of things over time? 3. Have they worked with any other Councils in the region? If so, what is the experience in comparison? 4. What are the good and bad aspects of the current scheme if they work with it? (why are they good, what is it that makes the service they provide good? Or why is it a waste of time? Could it be improved to be a useful thing or does it need scrapping? etc…) 5. Whether they work with the Council or not, are there any other comments about working with Council X, (or Councils generally) that they might want to add? 6. What has the Landlord heard about welfare reforms, in particular Universal Credit; Do they know about the welfare reforms coming in next year? How are they planning to change their approach to letting (sell up, no benefit tenants, more landlord insurance / guarantors, work only with Agents who manage the tenants not just the tenancy (such as Social Lettings Agencies etc..) What could the Council do to continue to work with the Agent/Landlord? (guaranteed rent, full lettings management type service, tenant training, better references, cash incentives etc..) 7. What other letting options might they consider? (self-manage, other schemes, letting agent, housing association leasing scheme etc…)? And why (what are the benefits over the other options?) 8. And finally, is there any one thing that would persuade them to work with Council X? Unfortunately not all of the Local Authorities involved in this project felt able to provide Landlord or Letting Agent contact details, so the consultation was not as complete as we would have liked. However, several consulted Landlords / Agents worked across Council boundaries and so some clear themes and issues emerged. Inside Housing Solutions North East Region 3 The results from this consultation process are not broken down by Local Authority area, as we felt that would be both unfair to those that were unable to assist in the process, as well as not entirely appropriate, given that this project is a regional one and this document will be read by persons from across the region. Results of Landlord & Letting Agent consultation Its important to note that not all consultees comments are accepted as fair or an accurate reflection of the service they may have had, or may receive. Additionally, it is acknowledged that consultees are more likely to highlight negative experiences or perceptions than positive ones. However, the importance of the comments is in directing us to the current issues, perceived or real, so that we can identify and develop approaches to address the issues. Some recurring themes emerged from the market research. Negative issues such as preconceptions about data protection, type of tenant, the Housing Benefit process, communication, access to and skillsets of staff and a lack of a consistent approach/product were mentioned time and again by the consultees. Positive issues such as, “Councils are best placed to assist tenants who need ongoing support ”, direct housing Benefit payments to Landlords and “helpful and honest” staff were also mentioned Also, there was a general acceptance (albeit under duress on occasion) that some ongoing and pre-tenancy support (such as completing initial paperwork/HB forms) does indeed have a value to Landlords that could be expressed in financial terms, although perhaps not at current service levels, consistency being the major issue. Our experience of this type of market research shows, whilst hugely valuable in highlighting obstacles that need to be overcome, it does tend to lend itself to over-reactive statements by Landlords such as “if they charged I’d never use the service”, “when Universal credit comes in I’ll not touch benefit claimants again” and so forth. However, when presented with competitive and realistic new options (such as a more comprehensive charging LLA service), whether Landlords would behave in exactly the way they indicated during this research is doubtful. Overview of the issues identified by the market research: Positives Potential good supply of tenants Councils best placed to assist, support and ‘manage’ vulnerable clients in receipt of benefits Some very positive and responsive staff Good ‘brand name’ recognition Potentially a level of accountability that is better Negatives Require rent paid direct to Landlords - will not house HB claimants if rent not received direct or a guarantor not offered The Housing Benefit process Inconsistent communication / customer service / confusion about who does what at Council Inside Housing Solutions North East Region 4 than a High Street Letting Agent A small number of Landlords indicated a willingness to pay, “if service could be better than what other Letting Agents currently offer” Poor marketing and information on what the Council can offer for Landlords / Tenants + poor relationship generally Client mindset (do not see the PRS as a ‘home’, but as a temporary stop prior to social housing) Conflict of Interest Staff skillset inadequate Lack of professional approach Lack of information given on tenants (even when Council knows information it won’t pass it on) Welfare Reform worries Welfare Reform worries / Direct Rent Payments / Housing Benefit (HB) Process Almost without exception consultees said they would no longer take clients in receipt of HB unless payments were made directly to the Landlord. Even though there was an agreement that not all clients in receipt of HB create rent payment issues, the idea of Universal Credit and Tenants managing their own finances was one that caused strong responses. The key appears to be, that its not a matter of whether Tenants will make their rent payments, but the increased management that Landlords and Agents perceive will be the case once UC is fully implemented. Consultees were very clear on the additional risks that a claimant in receipt of benefits presented to them. In order to maintain that risk at anywhere near acceptable levels in their eyes, a way to ‘guarantee’ that their rent was paid to them must be found. Clearly Landlords are business people and are well aware there are no guarantees, irrespective of the tenant and their background. However, continued access to the private rented sector will only be possible if the risk can be substantially mitigated. Knowledge of the impact of other welfare reform issues was limited amongst the consultees, and this actually added to the negative perception of working with clients in receipt of benefits. There is a clear need for Landlords and Agents to be educated on the welfare reform programme and the impact on the private rented sector. The HB process generally received very poor feedback. This is common when consulting Landlords and not always a fair reflection on HB services themselves, but more a mis-understanding of what HB is for and what the Departments can achieve. Certainly the matter of direct payment of HB to Landlords was one that had been welcomed and lots of good comments were made about how this had been achieved and sustained by some HB Depts, (although one suspects that this reflects favourably on persuasive Housing Options teams as well). North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 5 Consultees were clear that a large proportion of the ‘hassle factor’ in dealing with HB Clients is not just the Client themselves, but is dealing with HB Department issues and the lack of information and assistance and moreover the HB process generally. Improving how this relationship works with Landlords must be considered. If you proceed with a LLA, then a ‘hassle free’ method of resolving HB issues quickly and effectively is essential. From a positive point of view, this creates the probability that some Landlords will pay to have this ‘hassle factor’ removed, (possibly via a comprehensive LLA service). Extending this positivity further, encouraging comments were made about how regular and on time rent payments would be a vital requirement to Landlords if they were to consider working with Clients in receipt of UC. Landlords clearly value this aspect and how it allows them to plan. So in terms of ‘added value’, this aspect would be an important part of a LLA service and is a reason to consider a guaranteed rent option, (which provides regular and on time payments) providing security and reducing the ‘hassle factor’ for Landlords. Issues to consider in Business Development: Develop “hassle free” services. Could guaranteed rent be offered, but the risk to a LLA be managed and contained? Review any additional services from a “what added value do they bring to Landlords” point of view There would need to be initial and sustained marketing of a new LLA (or any new services) and their positive aspects in removing the hassle factor associated with letting and specifically letting to those on HB / UC. Given the consultees view that ‘Councils are best placed to help clients in receipt of HB’, this needs to be a strong line taken in the marketing and / or establishment of a brand Consider how any issues within PRS tenancies can be identified and managed quickly across the region to reduce the impact on the Landlord or the LLA providing Landlord services Review how a regular, on-time rent payment approach could be delivered through LLA. This means looking not just at the front end product for Landlords, but also how an in house system (such as rent collection and monitoring) might allow this to happen. This process could be helped by close study of the existing arrangements for in-house or partner PSL schemes Quality and Supply of Tenants Access to a potentially huge supply of Tenants is a positive issue that a LLA would be able to advertise. However, how these Tenants are ‘supplied’ and the suitability for the private rented sector would need to be managed correctly if that market advantage was not to be lost. The consultation process once again highlighted the poor perception of Clients in receipt of Housing Benefit when it comes to running a tenancy in an appropriate and ‘low maintenance’ way. Comments such as “traditional referencing useless for HB Clients”, “I’m always given the problem tenants” and “data protection always quoted when we ask for information on Clients” means you would need to review what North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 6 information you provide on potential Tenants and how it is provided. It is accepted that Tenants claiming HB do not generally fair well when traditionally credit checked, in the same way it is accepted that as a Council you often say “we can’t tell you that about a Tenant because of data protection”. A more commercially minded LLA would be expected to be more Landlord friendly in these matters, and therefore the issue of providing a sensible and relevant reference, yet within the confines of the data protection legislation needs exploring. The benefits of a guaranteed rent scheme in this regard should be commented upon. This type of scheme clearly reduces the importance of referencing (and ‘quality of Tenant’) for Landlords, as they are receiving guaranteed rent. As such their main issue then becomes whether their property is returned to them in the same condition as when they first let, but this is an easier obstacle to overcome than ‘will they pay their rent’. Issues to consider in Business Development: Can a regional assessment and referencing tool for clients looking for private rented sector accommodation be developed? Provide clear guidance on how a LLA might reference its tenants, including how the information will be owned by Clients Can a regional minimum “tenancy ready” standard for prospective tenants be introduced? If a guaranteed rent scheme is considered, then the need for action on this issue diminishes, but the professionalisation of your brand would benefit hugely from having an identifiable bespoke referencing system, that underpinned an “improved quality of tenant” Communication / Customer Service There were inconsistencies such as ‘difficult to get hold of’, ‘have to tell the same thing to different people if you don’t get the right person on the phone’, ‘some very good officers……”, “………but slowed by the system within which they work’ and so forth. Positively, certain officers were praised for their customer service and knowledge of the Landlords perspective. The over-riding issue to come out of this, is the lack of consistency and the knock on impact on the perception of overall professionalism of the organisations. “You might get a good service, but its pot luck depending on who you get hold of”. There was some feedback that suggested that the idea of letting their properties to HB Tenants was far too complex and therefore ‘not worth the hassle’. This led to discussions around how marketing of new services would need to be comprehensive and clear in what Landlords could expect from the service and how ‘hassle factors’ had been removed. Additionally, even marketing of existing services and information currently provided to Landlords was criticised as inadequate and only added to the perception of the hassle of working with “Council Clients”. Issues to consider in Business Development: North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 7 Assign dedicated ‘Tenancy Managers or Account Managers’ to Landlords and Tenancies with detailed direct contact information made available Investigate the feasibility of an out of hours ‘emergency’ contact line Ensure good back office data management system that will include ‘officer notes’ so that a more consistent service can be provided to Landlords even when key officers are absent Develop a specific website and associated communication tools such as use of Twitter, Facebook, Webchats etc. to enhance the perception of an open and communicative LLA Training for staff, including specific Letting Agency training and work on customer service ethos Consider how you will brand the LLA, including the development of a marketing programme for the LLA that clarifies how the service will be different to what has gone before, ensuring a consistent message is delivered to Landlords and other potential Clients of the LLA If a regional LLA is not developed then consider whether a dedicated regional “Rapid Response” team might be able to improve communications and services to Landlords Accountability This was a comment from Landlords attributed to working with Letting Agencies generally and not just a comment on the current Council operated schemes. There is a perception that should things go wrong the Landlord is left very much on their own. Letting Agents will help with enforcement action (for a price), but there is a feeling that perhaps a Council wouldn’t be so keen to enforce an eviction for example due to their statutory responsibilities. “Landlords would still be expected to do stuff even if you call it fully managed” was a pertinent comment. Given the risk factors of anti-social behaviour, damage to properties and tenants leaving without giving correct notice, a robust inspection process, indeed a detailed ‘terms of business’, would need to be developed to protect all parties, as well as reduce the perception of lack of accountability. However on the positive side consultees indicated that they may feel more comfortable with a Council backed scheme, as there are clear levels of management and accountability. Therefore this potential market advantage needs to be built upon and used in the marketing / branding of a LLA. A ‘safe, accountable and sensible approach’ to lettings? Issues to consider in Business Development: Development of more professional ‘Lettings Packs’, including clarity on what you are charging Landlords for and how it will be delivered Develop a clear and published regional enforcement policy; set out clearly in a Landlords Pack what help will be provided in the event of problems arising with the tenant A LLA would require a ‘terms of business’, service standards and a complaints policy Develop the brand and the service as being robust in this area North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 8 Develop a regional Landlords Consultation group to assist as part of ongoing LLA development Ensure robust regular inspection procedures, end of tenancy & voids procedures Conflict of Interest It is clear that the perception exists that by using a Council scheme, Landlords may have to deal with issues such as additional enforcement inspections and/or Housing Options officers advising tenants to ‘stay put’ if they receive a S.21 or S.8 notice. It should be noted that this is correct advice given by Housing Options officers to Tenant concerning their rights, however its not advice a Landlord would expect his ‘Letting Agent’ to be offering his Tenant. Whilst these perceptions may be slightly unfair, it is an issue that needs addressing. In the research some Landlords specifically mentioned the advice given to Tenants (i.e. to stay put if receiving a notice to leave), when letting through a Council scheme as opposed to using a Letting Agent on the High Street. Once again, a guaranteed rent offer greatly reduces the impact of the issue, as the Landlord will be less concerned whether the Tenant pays their rent or not, as it does not affect them directly. However, working with Council schemes (LLA or not), needs to be seen to be an advantage, and not have any negative connotations, such as a demand for increased property standards. Issues to consider in Business Development: Clear and concise standards for accommodation would need to be set that are comparable with those required by the rest of the lettings market in the region Remove the conflict of interest that may exist for anyone inspecting properties. (It is difficult to be a Council Enforcement Officer and commercially driven Lettings Officer at the same time) Ensure LLA model reduces the perception that conflict of interest will be an issue for a LLA (i.e. by outsourcing LLA to another provider) Clear marketing of the new standards and the reduction in bureaucracy Develop the Landlords Consultation group to tackle issues such as ‘conflict of interest’ on an individual basis as they arise Develop the dedicated Tenancy / Account Manager role to provide dedicated support and advice for the Landlord in the event of problems arising in the tenancy Consideration of the guaranteed rent option, as this would remove the Landlords concern about conflict of interest, as they would not be financially affected by Tenants remaining in the property. Fees / Level of Service North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 9 Clearly an initial reaction from Landlords and Letting Agents is always going to be a negative one (who is likely to say “oh yes I’m happy to pay”?). In terms of a comparison with Letting Agents charges and services in the region, this is looked at in the Mystery Shopping section, later on in this Appendix. Some consultees indicated a willingness to pay for a management or guaranteed rent service, if the service was at least equal to, but preferably better than other lettings options they had on the open market. The concept of a Council backed scheme charging for its services did not seem unreasonable to the vast majority of consultees. An important point to note here is the doubt that the cycle of advertising and bidding used for Choice Based Lettings in the region would be competitive due to timescale and bureaucratic requirements. Tenant Find Service The most common current service provided through the Council schemes in the region is one that could be compared to a High Street ‘Tenant Find’ service. This is a service where a Landlord self-manages his property after being supplied with a suitable Tenant from an Agent. The ‘Tenant Find’ service usually includes advertising, viewings, referencing, deposit protection, legal agreements etc.. With the rollout of Universal Credit, starting in October 2013, this ‘self managing’ is likely to be a less attractive option for Landlords, particularly with Clients in receipt of Universal Credit. However, as some consultees identified ‘self management’ as their preferred letting option, a LLA should offer this as a service. It is unlikely that any significant charge could be made by the LLA, given the perception of the ‘hassle’ involved in managing a Client in receipt of UC, but the benefit to the Councils in housing Clients and developing relationships with Landlords would be advantageous. Fully Managed Service A traditional ‘fully managed service’ may not play to a LLAs strengths. This type of service manages the tenancy (with the resource implications that implies), including rent collection, but only passes on the rent which it is able to collect. The perception that a Council backed service would be softer on Tenants in terms of eviction and rent collection, would make this type of service a difficult sell to Landlords. A comparable traditional High Street service, not bogged down with conflicting issues, would be a more attractive option. It should be noted here that the staff and systems required to run a fully managed service are very similar to those needed to run a guaranteed rent service. The only real difference is the risk to the organisation. The financial risk posed by a fully managed service is far less, as if rent is not collected, then the loss to the organisation is only the management fee, rather than the full rent amount, which it potentially could be in the case of guaranteed rent. North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 10 However if procurement is to be effective, then a service needs to have customers willing to purchase it, and therefore a balance between risk and product offered needs to be struck. Bearing in mind that a LLA would be likely to reduce or waive costs to Tenants, (where High Street Letting Agents generate significant income), this makes income generation opportunities from Landlords more vital to the ongoing viability of a LLA. It is unlikely a ‘fully managed service’ offers enough to Landlords to make charging an option if this service is adopted. Guaranteed Rent Service The benefits of operating a guaranteed rent service are discussed at numerous points in this Appendix and the report generally. However the issue of being able to charge a fee dependent on service has not. Prior to Universal Credit, a guaranteed rent service would have been an interesting option for Landlords, although largely made irrelevant by the offer of direct to Landlord Housing Benefit payments. Their risk was mitigated by the direct payments and it in a sense offered them guaranteed rent, albeit in arrears and still open to issues in the event of a break of claim or change of circumstances. However, with the removal of direct Landlord payments under Universal Credit, then a genuine guaranteed rent service suddenly becomes of major value to Landlords. As a guaranteed rent service would also remove those other issues that came with Housing Benefit (change of circumstances, break in claims etc..), it is a service that provides Landlords with a genuine option when they consider their letting options. Other Fees and Services issues With a large number of tenancies created by the various Council Rent Deposit schemes across the region in the past few years, a strategy could be developed to approach these Landlords and offer the more comprehensive services of a charging LLA. It is likely that if these tenancies are still sustained, the Landlord and Tenant are reasonably happy with the arrangement. With the rollout of UC, a number of these tenancies will come under threat, and a charging LLA could offer services that will allow the tenancy to continue. The importance of bringing in these tenancies to the LLA, and generating a fee income for the LLA should not be under-estimated, in particular given the noted risk factor mentioned by existing LLAs (later on in this Appendix) of procuring enough properties to make their schemes viable. The consultation identified the issue of Landlords not paying for something they currently receive ‘for free’. Therefore should you decide to develop a regional LLA, strong consideration must be given to making the LLA the main vehicle for all the partners’ private sector schemes. If you decide to run existing ‘free’ schemes alongside a new LLA, you may reduce its ability to be viable, both by splitting your resources and creating more options for Landlords. North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 11 However, if you decided that a LLA could be provided by an external provider, then the responsibility falls to that provider to have a commercial product that is attractive to Landlords. Issues to consider in Business Development: Consider a guaranteed rent scheme. In terms of services and fees, this would have several benefits to your LLA. Services are simplified in Landlords eyes, you also provide a competitive option offered by few existing Agents. It may also allow you to charge a ‘sign up’ fee to Landlords who are then getting guaranteed rent in advance Develop a robust rent collection and management procedure to reduce the risk to the organisation Develop a cost comparison tool, to demonstrate to Landlords the financial benefits of working with your guaranteed rent scheme vs. the other market options Develop a strategy and incentives to transfer tenancies from existing schemes to the new LLA Consider whether an external provider may be best placed to develop a LLA in the region Sustainability Welfare reform provides an opportunity for local Councils to demonstrate the security, sustainability and support of their approach, when compared to the less tenant supportive approach offered by traditional Letting Agencies. A consistent ingredient in the success of LLAs is allocated and sustained funding, certainly in the medium term. An interesting aspect that came out of the research was the comment that the Councils can offer schemes, and if they fail, they simply go back to doing what they did before. So, it appears the perceived risk to the Council (from its Landlord customers) is slight. However, this clearly isn’t the case, but the perception (that the Councils may not take development and sustainment of a new scheme (or LLA) seriously) is an issue that needs addressing. Landlords are more likely to engage with a LLA and plan for the long term if they can see the service is financially secure and therefore likely to be able to deliver on its terms of business and service provision. Part of this security is the ongoing fee structure and business plan, which if developed with your Landlords Consultation group, feeds into the Landlords communication network and is helpful in building reputation. Another important aspect of sustainability of a LLA is the quality and reputation of the provider. Therefore if an external provider is considered then any selection process must place a heavy emphasis on track record and financial stability of the provider. Issues to consider in Business Development: Ensure detailed financial modeling for the LLA is in place for at least years 1-3 North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 12 Develop income generating structure and ensure communication and involvement of Landlords Consultation group Identify source, sustainability and quantity of start up and ongoing funding. One obvious source are the current budgets for Private Sector property procurement covering different current schemes in the different Council areas Investigate benefits of appointing an external provider for a LLA who may be able to contribute skills and business acumen to the project, as well as stabilize the risk to the procuring LAs Letting Agent Mystery Shopping The Process Letting Agents operating across the entire region as well as ‘Virtual’ Agents operating services that are accessible online were mystery shopped as part of this process. A mixture of phone calls, emails and information gathering from existing and available sources were used to compile the data. Most Agents offer ‘headline’ figures that are negotiable depending on a number of issues such as; Location of property Number of properties in your portfolio The negotiating stance that we (The Landlord) take During the mystery shopping we did not specifically ask whether Tenants who would be placed in our property may be on ‘benefits’, as this may have alerted the Agents to the purpose of the call, but much comment was made by all Letting Agents about how professional and comprehensive their referencing processes were. It is likely that most Letting Agents would look to use Tenants who were not claiming benefits. This is supported by information from the Landlord and Letting Agent consultation, when most Letting Agents advised they would not take Tenants on ‘benefits’. Results A more detailed list of results from this exercise are contained at the end of this Appendix. An overview of Agent fees indicated that existing High Street Agents in the region vary widely in fees charged, between 5 – 15% as a monthly management fee for a ‘fully managed’ Agency service. North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 13 The ‘Virtual Agents’ in particular focus on ‘tenant find’ services and offer services starting as low as £15 for a simple marketing service. This adds strength to the argument that a Council backed LLA may not be able to make any charge for a similar ‘tenant find’ service, if it wants to attract Landlords to such a product. Most Agents offer a range of additional services, that may not necessarily be cost effective for them to offer, but add to their attractiveness as an Agent. It would be important for a LLA to develop a similar range of services and not to be restricted to using ‘in-house’ Departments to deliver the service, or be bound by bureaucratic procurement or tendering rules. Void cleaning, legal help, gas, electric or energy performance certificates are all services that should be developed to compete with High Street Agents. Professionalism and marketing of services is not consistent and perhaps reflects that different Agents are pitching their services to different Landlord markets. However, some valuable lessons can be learnt from the good and bad aspects of how these organisations portray themselves and market their services. There are some additional issues relating to fee charging and one revolves around the Housing Benefit issue. Landlords are unlikely to agree to pay an Agent a ‘sign up fee’ for Tenants who are having their HB paid in arrears, (a sign up fee is charged by most High Street Letting Agents offering ‘fully managed’ services, and covers work such as Tenancy Agreements, Inventories, Inspection, Rent Account set up and so forth). In the mind of the Landlord if they have to wait for Housing Benefit to be paid in arrears, they are then paying a sign up fee and offering a months free rent up front. This needs to be considered as it would be unviable commercially to ask Landlords to engage with a fully managed service with new LLA, pay an upfront sign up fee and also wait several weeks for any rental income. As most Agents are willing to negotiate once they have engaged you in a dialogue, its important that a commercial Council backed LLA allowed its officers similar freedom, within sensible parameters. Issues to consider in Business Development: Clearly specified services and fee structure Identify a ‘brand’, establish your niche and pitch the services accordingly – do not try to “compete” with existing commercial services Competitive and flexible rates, open to negotiation by the lettings team A developed ‘tenant find’ service that is free, but acts as a ‘loss leader’ in the expectation that Landlords using this service may upgrade to a fee charging service at a later stage A free tenant find service would also allow a LLA to work with existing High Street Agents who may want to access this service, therefore reducing the impact of suddenly excluding all work with existing Agents How to facilitate access to or develop a wider range of services, comparable to those of a High Street Agent North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 14 Clear communications strategy, including website and other ‘access points’ such as Twitter, Facebook etc. Consultation with existing LLAs Nationally, geographical coverage by LLAs is currently low and random in its spread, although development is increasing. We are fortunate to have worked with a number of LLAs during their development and business planning stage, so we were able to use these contacts to discuss with them risks they had encountered and any success factors they considered essential to their development processes. Risks Identified by existing LLAs Welfare reform and other housing benefit issues including relationship with the Housing Benefit department Not procuring enough properties to cover operational costs and/or hit financial targets, particularly at the start of the new business Detrimental effect to the LLA of staff changes and staff skillset Financial risk – that the LLA model would not be self-sustaining Lack of suitable Tenants Potential compromise on standard of properties to ensure supply Concerns that the partner private agent (where applicable) would not fulfill their part of the LLA and cooperate with the policies & procedures agreed at the outset Competition from other local Agents and Schemes who focus on Tenants in receipt of Housing Benefit Property voids and subsequent loss of income Anti-social behaviour of Tenants Damage caused to properties by Tenants Lack of officer autonomy due to Audit requirements Success Factors identified: Identified start up funding for the medium term (2-3 years) to allow the service to establish itself A LLA has an improved chance of survival where there is a high % of private rented accommodation in comparison to the owner occupied and social housing stock Market research conducted was able to demonstrate a demand / gap for such a service Establishment of a identifiable brand Excellent initial and sustained marketing of service Quality and skillset of front line staff The focus of the customer service is on Landlords Inside Housing Solutions North East Region 15 Good communication / consultation with Landlords Good working relationship with Council Departments Local Housing Allowance and average market rents are close Products offered are relevant and competitive in the market It is interesting to note that several of the success (and fail) factors identified here by existing LLAs, can be seen across the region. Whilst the LLAs consulted operate in different parts of the country and in very different markets, the factors listed above were recurring. Of particular importance were the issues that revolved around playing on existing strengths (such as stability of brand, supply of tenants and support for tenancies), and mitigating perceived weaknesses (such as quality of tenants, risk of rent arrears and lack of commercial acumen. As such, it is strongly suggested that the success factors in the list above are used as a checklist during business development. SWOT Analysis Understanding the internal and external factors that a LLA in the region would have to deal with is an essential part of any business planning process. This involves taking into account the wider social, political and economic issues in order to identify the factors that may help or hinder development, and consider longer-term issues that may impact on the enterprise. Generally, the most common tool used to understand these issues is a SWOT analysis. It is by no means the perfect tool to use, but we feel it has benefits when looking at the feasibility of a venture such as this, and should complement the market research we undertook: SWOT Analysis Strengths Value to Councils in having a specific ‘vehicle’ created to assist in discharging its homeless duty Experienced staff with knowledge of local housing market Established links to vital Depts, such as HB Access to large pool of tenants, so turnaround times and efficiencies (such as reducing voids) possible Access to existing ‘back office’ resources such as Weaknesses Requires joined up inter-Authority working LLA model may require ongoing subsidy if unable to sustain financial projections Data protection issues Conflict of interest issues Not previously charged Landlords for Private Sector Access schemes Lack acumen and experience in business start ups Inside Housing Solutions North East Region 16 Finance, Accounting, HR, Legal etc. Access to many existing relevant policies and procedures such as lone working, rent arrears and service standards Strong local recognition and standing (brand) Initial start up funding may be available within existing resources Landlord Consultation group could be developed to assist with developing LLA services A strong regional partnership between the Councils could be a commercially strong organisation Opportunities Legislation change to support ‘discharge into the private sector’ with greater ease Welfare reform, in particular the rollout of Universal Credit, creating the environment where few understand or want to be involved in assisting this part of the market A relationship with local Landlords already established due to current private sector working Develop a more ‘hands on’ Landlords consultation group Opportunity for strong regional brand if a successful model can be developed Potential to reduce expenditure on discharging housing duty and in particular in the use of temporary accommodation Potential to generate an income from discharging housing duty, that could offset costs in providing this service LLA current hot topic, so best practice guidance, funding opportunities and business assistance developing all the time Hugely different markets across the region Restrictions in working with certain contractors or suppliers due to Council procurement rules Lack of experience in collecting and managing rent accounts (although skills do exist due to knowledge of PSL schemes) Differing resources, needs and demands can mean that partnership working moves at the pace of the slowest Threats Landlords may be reluctant to engage with the Council due to its wider statutory duties including enforcement of property standards and assisting those threatened with homelessness Reaction of existing High Street Letting Agents to a ‘Government funded’ competitor Benefits’ tenants culture still exists amongst Landlords Landlords don’t like LHA and are difficult to engage if they haven’t worked with LHA Clients before Future Benefit changes, in particular Universal Credit Long term engagement with private sector could be affected if LLA fails Potential for LLAs or competing schemes operated by neighbouring Councils or other organisations to start up within region Efficiencies reduced and bureaucracy increased through Council procedures / risk aversion Powers to discharge duty into the private sector come with restrictions such as minimum property standards North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 17 Conclusions and Business Development Issues Business Development Issues to consider These issues are pulled together and condensed from the various elements of market research as above; Welfare Reform Services need to be “hassle free” and bring tangible value to a Landlord Marketing of this “hassle free” aspect needs to be paramount Issues within PRS tenancies need to be dealt with proactively and effectively A regular, on-time rent payment approach needs to be delivered Quality of Tenant Can a regional assessment and referencing tool for PRS clients be developed? Can a regional minimum “tenancy ready” standard for prospective tenants be introduced that underpins the perception of an “improved quality of tenant”? Communication / Customer Service Dedicated Tenancy Managers for Landlords with detailed direct contact information made available How will out of hours contacts be serviced? Ensure good data management system so that a consistent service is provided to Landlords Develop a specific website and tools such as use of social media Training (staff skillset), including specific Letting Agency training and work on customer service ethos Consider LLA branding and marketing that clarifies how the service will be different to what has gone before, ensuring a consistent message is delivered to Landlords and other potential Clients of the LLA Consider whether a dedicated regional “Rapid Response” team might be able to improve communications and services to Landlords Accountability Develop professional ‘Lettings Packs’, including clear outlines of charges and services Consider regional enforcement policy Set out clearly in a Landlords Pack services available in the event of problems arising with the tenant A LLA would require a ‘terms of business’, service standards and a complaints policy Develop the brand and the service as being robust in this area Develop a regional Landlords Consultation group Ensure robust regular inspection procedures, end of tenancy & voids procedures North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 18 Conflict of Interest Clear, concise and consistent standards for accommodation would need to be set Remove the conflict of interest for Council officers Clear marketing of the new standards and the reduction in bureaucracy Develop the Landlords Consultation group to tackle issues such as ‘conflict of interest’ Develop the Tenancy Manager role to provide dedicated support and advice for the Landlord Consider guaranteed rent option, as this would remove the Landlords concern about conflict of interest, as they would not be financially affected by Tenants remaining in the property Fees / Level of Service Consider a guaranteed rent option. In terms of services and fees, this would have several benefits to a LLA. Services are simplified in Landlords eyes and it’s an attractive option offered by few existing Agents Ensure a robust rent collection and management procedure to reduce the risk to the organisation Develop a cost comparison tool, demonstrating the financial benefits of working with your guaranteed rent option Consider a strategy and incentives to transfer tenancies from existing schemes to the new LLA Consider whether an external provider may be best placed to develop a LLA in the region Sustainability Ensure detailed financial plan for the LLA is in place for at least years 1-3 Develop income generating structure and ensure involvement of Landlords Consultation group Identify source, sustainability and quantity of start up and ongoing funding Consider benefits of appointing an external provider for a LLA who may be able to contribute skills and business acumen to the project, as well as stabilize the risk to the procuring LAs Letting Agent Mystery Shopping Clearly specified services and fee structure are required Identify a ‘brand’, establish your niche and pitch the services accordingly – do not try to “compete” with existing commercial services Competitive and flexible rates, open to negotiation by the lettings team A developed ‘tenant find’ service that is free, but could act as a ‘loss leader’ in the expectation that Landlords using this service may upgrade to a fee charging service at a later stage A free tenant find service would also allow a LLA to work with existing High Street Agents who may want to access this service How to facilitate access to or develop a wider range of services, comparable to a High Street Agent Clear communications strategy, inc. website and other ‘access points’ such as Twitter, Facebook etc. North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 19 Consultation with existing Local Letting Agencies Whilst the LLAs consulted operate in different parts of the country and in very different markets, the factors listed in this section were recurring. Of particular importance were the issues that revolved around playing on existing strengths (such as stability of brand, supply of tenants and support for tenancies), and mitigating perceived weaknesses (such as quality of tenants, risk of rent arrears and lack of commercial acumen). Conclusions A Council backed regional Local Lettings Agency would have a number of strengths that could not be said of existing Letting Agent competitors on the High Street, allowing the LLA to develop a service that could potentially fill a niche in the market in this region. Opportunities such as welfare reform, an established presence in the market and the savings that could be made in the temporary accommodation budget make the development of a LLA enticing and with huge potential. A major area for concern is whether it is possible to get a start up LLA business to a stage where it is generating an income and is stable. Once Universal Credit and other welfare reforms are fully embedded, then a LLA service would have a clear niche in the PRS procurement and management field. This research has demonstrated that a LLA that can effectively; Reduce the risk (perceived or actual) to Landlords working with benefit claimants Assist claimants with ‘responsibility’ aspects such as self-managing their claim, budgeting and sustaining their tenancy through appropriate behavior Offer ‘softer’ ongoing support to tenancies that may get into trouble, so that the tenancy can be saved and relationships maintained would have a tangible value to Landlords, and therefore a chance to be a viable if it could operate effectively as a commercial concern. Until that time, this is a difficult business launch, even in ideal circumstances. The demand for a LLA operating as above has not yet been clearly understood by the market and additionally there remain the following issues that mean we are not in ‘ideal circumstances’ at the current time; The logistical issues in developing a business with many partners across a variable market and a large geographical area Many Landlords still receive Housing Benefit for their tenant direct, and may do so up until the end of 2017 Some of the 12 LAs involved do not currently see the need to embark on such a project, and to be fair to those LAs, some of their markets do not justify such a venture North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 20 The idea of LAs operating commercial services is still fairly new and as such is viewed with considerable scepticism in some quarters, including importantly, potential customers, officers and funders Additionally, what appear relatively minor issues, such as effective marketing, branding, rent collection, distribution of rent to Landlords and an efficient ‘back office’ monitoring and management system would also need to be developed, process mapped and trialed to make sure they could deliver a service as advertised. Although touched on above, it is important to reiterate, as this would be a regional project, there is also a concern that a LLA could struggle with basic partnership working, bureaucracy and a common drive to take the business forward. For a project of this nature to work, partners need to be committed to taking the project forward and responsive to making changes that may be required as the business is developed. Creating a regional LLA would be a huge step in any market, but more so given the reasons outlined above. Bearing in mind the market research, there are other more sensible, cost effective, yet still innovative steps that could be taken by the partners in this project to improve PRS procurement in the short term, and improve readiness to develop services further in the medium term. Once we have looked at other aspects that impact on service development, these steps can be further defined. Detailed Letting Agent data Local / Regional Agents ANDREW CRAIG Full management: Tenant find only: Referencing: Rent payment: Repairs: Check in: Check out: Other “deals”: Other relevant info: Operates in: 12.5% plus VAT £350 plus VAT Employment history, credit check, previous landlord reference, affordability check (earnings multiplier), public records Paid by BACs on full management All arranged under full management. Get authorisation from landlord to carry out repair. Inspection, inventory, utility set up Inspection Rent guarantee insurance provided free for first 6 months and after first 6 months landlord can purchase the insurance at a “good rate”. Named contact provided for pre-tenancy and different named contact provided once tenancy is being managed Durham, Sunderland, North Tyneside, South Tyneside, Gateshead, Newcastle North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 21 SARAH MAINS Full management: Tenant find only: Referencing: Rent payment: Repairs: Check in: Check out: Other “deals”: Other relevant info: Operates in: FRASER LAKE Full management: Tenant find only: Referencing: Rent payment: Repairs: Check in: Check out: Other “deals”: Other relevant info: Operates in: 15% plus VAT One month’s rent plus VAT Employment history, credit check, previous landlord reference, affordability check (have to earn 2.5 times months’ rent), public records Paid by BACs on full management, once rent received, deduct fee and pay to landlord bank account within 3 working days All arranged under full management. Get authorisation from landlord to carry out repair for anything more than £150. Inspection, inventory (costs £200 plus vat for tenant find but free under full management), utility set up and then regular inspections throughout tenancy Inspection Offer rent guarantee insurance for £150 for 12 months but tenant must pass reference checks Named contact provided throughout. Tenants have a 24 hr emergency repairs phone number. Gateshead, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, South Tyneside 10% plus VAT 50% of first month’s rent plus VAT Employment history, credit check, previous landlord reference, affordability check (have to earn 2.5 times months’ rent), public records Paid by BACs on full management, once rent received, deduct fee and pay to landlord bank account within 10 days All arranged under full management Inspection, inventory (costs £45), utility set up and then regular inspections throughout tenancy Inspection Advertising of property done on Rightmove, Zoopla, own website, shopfront and local papers None Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Gateshead North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 22 NGU HOME LETTINGS Full management: Tenant find only: Referencing: Rent payment: Repairs: Check in: Check out: Other “deals”: Other relevant info: Operates in: Please note PATTINSONS Full management: Tenant find only: Referencing: Rent payment: Repairs: Check in: Check out: Other “deals”: Other relevant info: Operates in: ½ price offer currently at 5%, increases to 10% after the first 6 months Did not say In-house referencing completed for all tenants and guarantors Will visit tenants in their current property to see how they live and take a larger bond/deposit if there are any concerns Only charge management fee on rent collected. If tenant stops paying the rent, they will send an “outbound” officer All arranged on behalf of landlord Inventory completed 12 mth inspection completed (included in fee) will advise tenant to put right anything that needs repairing None Normally takes 2-4 weeks to find a tenant Newcastle, Gateshead, Sunderland, Durham, Northumberland, Middlesbrough, Stockton-on-Tees, Hartlepool, Darlington A lot of the properties they advertise are aimed at people on benefits so they do work in this market however, they are subject to a credit reference check. They cover a large area so they’re not a million miles away from being a “social letting agent” for the North East – potential to look at making them more of a partner or providing funding to assist more benefit clients 5-8% plus VAT One month’s rent plus VAT Robust referencing – credit checks, employment checks including 6 months’ pay slips, must earn 30 x month’s rent, employment reference, previous landlord reference, character reference. Anyone not passing requires a guarantor who does pass the above BACs to landlord account minus management fee All arranged on behalf of landlord Did not say Did not say Also offer rent guarantee insurance. Will match another Agent’s quote Regular property checks. Will find a tenant within 2 weeks. Could meet prospective tenants. Newcastle, Sunderland, Middlesbrough, Redcar & Cleveland, Durham, Northumberland North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 23 Virtual or Online Agents Letting Supermarket www.lettingsupermarket.com Bronze: £14.99 per month + vat Silver: £24.99 per month + vat Gold: £34.99 per month + vat Also offer a make your own package where you can choose different elements and come up with a fully costed bespoke package Secure Guaranteed Rent www.secureguaranteedrent.co.uk Bronze: 3% per calendar month (4% for rents under £600) Silver: £59 upfront then 3% per calendar month (4% for rents under £600) Gold: £59 upfront then 7% per calendar month (8% for rents under £600) Gold package includes guaranteed rent. London based company but covers all UK online My Online Estate Agent www.myonlineestateagent.com Rental package: £49 + vat Premium package: £249 + vat Mainly an online advertising service Upad www.upad.co.uk Tenant find: £299 + vat Full management: £299 + vat plus £60 per month Photo & floorplan pack: £130 + vat Photography: £85 + vat Property listing (advertise property on major property sites): £99.00 + vat Room listing: £50 + vat Iigloo www.iigloo.co.uk Listing a property on 500 of the UK’s largest property websites: £40 + vat Tenant find plus (as above plus referencing & tenancy agreement): £80 + vat MakeYourMove www.makeurmove.co.uk Can create bespoke tenant find and management packages – lots of options Marketing only (ie property details onto major UK property websites): £49 + vat Full management: 7% North East Region Inside Housing Solutions 24 WiseMoves www.wise-moves.co.uk Market property only: £49 + vat Enhance property marketing (photos/floor plan/brochure/to let board): £199 + vat Complete property service: £249 + vat (as above plus tenancy agreement/deposit admin/first month rent payment taken) Tenants 4 U http://www.tenants4u.com/landlord_services Market property only: FREE Enhance property marketing (photos/floor plan/brochure/to let board): £49 + vat Guaranteed Rent: (via insurance scheme): £99 + vat (not guaranteed rent, but purchase of an insurance service) Full Management: £15 per month
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz