Strategic Use of Financial Indicators: Performance Measurement and Strategy APHA LEARNING INSTITUTE, 2007 Part 3 Peggy A. Honore, DHA HHS, USM Cheryll D. Lesneski, DrPH, MA SPH, UNC Chapel Hill William N. Zelman, PhD SPH, UNC -Chapel Hill 1 The Perfect Storm: Performance Measurement Systems are In! Accountability Movement (Government)3 Balanced Scorecard Movement4 Process Improvement Movement1 Performance Measurement2 Google Hits 10/21/07: 1. Process Improvement ~117,000,000 2. Performance Measurement ~ 89,000,000 3. Government Accountability ~22,500,000 4. Balanced Scorecard ~ 2,190,000 2 Key Requirements of a Financial Performance Measurement System Help to Identify and Communicate: Current status Trends Possible problems Possible solutions Help to plan future activities See for instance: Doug Ishigaki, Effective Management Through Measurement, May 14, 2004 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/4786.html 3 Performance Measurement Systems Strategic Operational Strategic Management Operational Management Strategic Measurement Operational Measurement The goal is to manage for the short term while continuing to dream for the long term. 4 Performance Measurement Systems Operational Mantras: Long term goals are made up of short-term wins. Operational Management What gets measured, gets managed. Operational Measurement Definitions of Operations: • A series of actions or activities designed to achieve a result. • Often used with the modifier day-to-day 5 Performance Measurement Systems Strategic Strategic Management Strategic Measurement Mantras: If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. Win the battle, but lose the war. Definitions of Strategic: • A management buzzword that's often misunderstood. • A long term plan… • Key success approaches (vs. tactics and activities) 6 The Problem…. Illustrated $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Revenues Per Capita 7 The Problem….Illustrated Goal $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $- $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $2001 2002 2003 2004 Revenues Per Capita 2005 2006 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2010 Revenues Per Capita 8 The Problem….Illustrated Goal $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $- $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Revenues Per Capita Here: 2001-2006 are lagging indicators. They tell us where we’ve been. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2010 Revenues Per Capita Here: 2001-2006 are leading indicators. They help tell us how we are progressing toward our goal. 9 Factors Mitigating Strategic Financial Management in Public Health Departments1 Dependence on governmental funding Annual budgeting Categorical funding Line item budgeting Focus on annual performance “0” Surplus Competition with other priority services Other 1. No order implied 10 The Relationship Between Revenues, Services and Resources Revenues/Funding Services Expenses/Resources 11 Performance Measurement Systems: Leading and Lagging Indicators, Measuring and Managing Strategic Goals Measure Standard Key Elements Ownership Lagging Indicators Leading Indicators Activities 12 Desired Sources of Funds: 2010 Current Budget: $1,800,000 Goal: $2,500,000 by 2010 $2,500,000 County 2010 State $1,600,000 Cont. New $310,000 Cont. New Contracts $150,000 Cont. New FFS $280,000 Other $160,000 Cont. New Cont. New $1,200,000 $400,000 .... Program A ($400,000) Program B ($270,500) Program C ($280,000) Program N ($.......) 13 Leading and Lagging Indicators Strategic Goals Goal 1. To Increase Revenues to $2,500,000 in by 2010. Key Elements • Existing Programs • Existing Sources • New Programs • New Sources Lagging Indicators $Actual Revenue/ $2,500,000 target by 2010 Leading Indicators $ from continuing sources/annual target $ from new sources/Annual target 14 Leading and Lagging Indicators Strategic Goals Goal 1. To Increase Revenues to $2,500,000 in by 2010. Key Elements • Existing Programs • Existing Sources • New Programs • New Sources Lagging Indicators $Actual Revenue/ $2,500,000 target by 2010 Leading Indicators $ from continuing Programs/ Annual target $ from new programs/ Annual target 15 Performance Measurement Systems: Leading and Lagging Indicators, Measuring and Managing Strategic Goals Measure Standard Key Elements Ownership Lagging Indicators Leading Indicators Activities 16 Leading and Lagging Indicators Goal 1. To Increase Budgeted Revenues to $2,500,000 by 2010 Measure $Raised/ Target $ Standard 90% Ownership Position Name Activities 1. Increase line item in County Budget 2. Grant proposals submitted 3. Contracts signed 4. Etc. 17 Exercise: Leading and Lagging Indicators Strategic Goals Key Elements Lagging Indicators Leading Indicators 18 Exercise: Leading and Lagging Indicators Measure Standard Ownership Activities 19 Strategic Use of Financial Indicators: Performance Measurement and Strategy APHA LEARNING INSTITUTE, 2007 Peggy A. Honore, DHA HHS, USM Cheryll D. Lesneski, DrPH, MA SPH, UNC Chapel Hill William N. Zelman, PhD SPH, UNC -Chapel Hill 20
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz