Barriers to Successfully Using Performance Measures for Strategic

Strategic Use of Financial Indicators:
Performance Measurement and Strategy
APHA LEARNING INSTITUTE, 2007
Part 3
Peggy A. Honore, DHA
HHS, USM
Cheryll D. Lesneski, DrPH, MA
SPH, UNC Chapel Hill
William N. Zelman, PhD
SPH, UNC -Chapel Hill
1
The Perfect Storm: Performance
Measurement Systems are In!
Accountability
Movement
(Government)3
Balanced
Scorecard
Movement4
Process
Improvement
Movement1
Performance
Measurement2
Google Hits 10/21/07:
1. Process Improvement
~117,000,000
2. Performance Measurement ~ 89,000,000
3. Government Accountability ~22,500,000
4. Balanced Scorecard
~ 2,190,000
2
Key Requirements of a Financial
Performance Measurement System
Help to Identify and Communicate:
 Current status
 Trends
 Possible problems
 Possible solutions
Help to plan future activities
See for instance: Doug Ishigaki, Effective Management Through Measurement, May 14, 2004
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/4786.html
3
Performance Measurement Systems
Strategic
Operational
 Strategic
Management
 Operational
Management
 Strategic
Measurement
 Operational
Measurement
The goal is to manage for the short term
while continuing to dream for the long
term.
4
Performance Measurement Systems
Operational
Mantras:
Long term goals are made up of
short-term wins.
 Operational
Management
What gets measured, gets managed.
 Operational
Measurement
Definitions of Operations:
• A series of actions or activities designed to achieve a result.
• Often used with the modifier day-to-day
5
Performance Measurement Systems
Strategic
 Strategic
Management
 Strategic
Measurement
Mantras:
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.
Win the battle, but lose the war.
Definitions of Strategic:
• A management buzzword that's often misunderstood.
• A long term plan…
• Key success approaches (vs. tactics and activities)
6
The Problem…. Illustrated
$45
$40
$35
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Revenues Per Capita
7
The Problem….Illustrated
Goal
$45
$40
$35
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$-
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$2001
2002
2003
2004
Revenues Per Capita
2005
2006
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2010
Revenues Per Capita
8
The Problem….Illustrated
Goal
$45
$40
$35
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$-
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Revenues Per Capita
Here: 2001-2006 are lagging
indicators. They tell us where we’ve
been.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2010
Revenues Per Capita
Here: 2001-2006 are leading
indicators. They help tell us how we
are progressing toward our goal.
9
Factors Mitigating Strategic Financial
Management in Public Health Departments1








Dependence on governmental funding
Annual budgeting
Categorical funding
Line item budgeting
Focus on annual performance
“0” Surplus
Competition with other priority services
Other
1. No order implied
10
The Relationship Between Revenues,
Services and Resources
Revenues/Funding
Services
Expenses/Resources
11
Performance Measurement Systems: Leading
and Lagging Indicators, Measuring and
Managing
Strategic
Goals
Measure
Standard
Key
Elements
Ownership
Lagging
Indicators
Leading
Indicators
Activities
12
Desired Sources of Funds: 2010
Current Budget: $1,800,000
Goal: $2,500,000 by 2010
$2,500,000
County
2010
State
$1,600,000
Cont.
New
$310,000
Cont. New
Contracts
$150,000
Cont. New
FFS
$280,000
Other
$160,000
Cont. New Cont. New
$1,200,000 $400,000
....
Program A ($400,000)
Program B ($270,500)
Program C ($280,000)
Program N ($.......)
13
Leading and Lagging Indicators
Strategic
Goals
Goal 1. To Increase
Revenues to $2,500,000
in by 2010.
Key
Elements
• Existing Programs
• Existing Sources
• New Programs
• New Sources
Lagging
Indicators
$Actual
Revenue/
$2,500,000
target by
2010
Leading
Indicators
$ from
continuing
sources/annual
target
$ from new
sources/Annual
target
14
Leading and Lagging Indicators
Strategic
Goals
Goal 1. To Increase
Revenues to $2,500,000
in by 2010.
Key
Elements
• Existing Programs
• Existing Sources
• New Programs
• New Sources
Lagging
Indicators
$Actual
Revenue/
$2,500,000
target by
2010
Leading
Indicators
$ from
continuing
Programs/
Annual target
$ from new
programs/
Annual target
15
Performance Measurement Systems: Leading
and Lagging Indicators, Measuring and
Managing
Strategic
Goals
Measure
Standard
Key
Elements
Ownership
Lagging
Indicators
Leading
Indicators
Activities
16
Leading and Lagging Indicators
Goal 1. To Increase Budgeted Revenues to $2,500,000 by 2010
Measure
$Raised/
Target $
Standard
90%
Ownership
Position Name
Activities
1. Increase line item in County
Budget
2. Grant proposals submitted
3. Contracts signed
4. Etc.
17
Exercise: Leading and Lagging Indicators
Strategic
Goals
Key
Elements
Lagging
Indicators
Leading
Indicators
18
Exercise: Leading and Lagging Indicators
Measure
Standard
Ownership
Activities
19
Strategic Use of Financial Indicators:
Performance Measurement and Strategy
APHA LEARNING INSTITUTE, 2007
Peggy A. Honore, DHA
HHS, USM
Cheryll D. Lesneski, DrPH, MA
SPH, UNC Chapel Hill
William N. Zelman, PhD
SPH, UNC -Chapel Hill
20