Equality impact Assessment form (Part 1) Screening Name of strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: Draft Statement of Community Involvement Name and telephone number of officers completing assessment: Alison Robinson Ext:6167 Date completed: 5 October 2009 Section one: Identify your aims and objectives The purpose of an Equality Impact Assessment is to improve the work of the Council by making sure it does not discriminate and that, where possible, it promotes equality. It is a way to make sure individuals and teams think carefully about the likely impact of their work on people in Reigate & Banstead and take action to improve strategies, policies, procedures, projects and functions where appropriate. Consider the following questions with regard to your strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: How will it be put into practice and who will be responsible for it? Who are the key stakeholders? What are you trying to achieve and for whom? What is the main aim or purpose of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function? The Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) sets out when and how the Council will engage with and involve stakeholders and the public in respect of Planning matters, including the consideration of planning applications and preparation of planning policy documents. The SCI was adopted in September 2006. The Local Development Scheme prescribes a review of the SCI three years after adoption. As a result of changes in the relevant legislation, guidance and best practice, elements of the Statement of Community require updating to reflect the current position, particularly in respect of the revised statutory procedures for adopting Development Plan Documents. 1 List the main activities or objectives of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function (for strategies list the main policy areas): SCI sets out the principles for engagement with the local community in the preparation of Local Development Documents and in the consideration of planning applications Principles for LDDs Production of Consultation Statement for all DPDs (Development Plan Document) that set out who has been consulted and how, summary of main issues raised and other representations and how those issues have been addressed in the DPD SCI sets out the publicity that will be carried out at statutory stages in the preparation of DPDs SCI sets out how the publicity will be carried out at key stages in the preparation of Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) and requirement for the Production of a Consultation Statement The SCI sets out possible engagement methods that might be considered in the preparation of DPDs and SPDs Planning Applications SCI summarises the different methods the Council uses to involve the community in pre-application advice and planning applications SCI sets out the way the Council notifies and / or publicises the receipt of planning applications Who are main beneficiaries of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function and in what way? Stakeholders, the public, users of the Council’s Planning Services. Section two: Consider data and research A vital part of the process is exploring any available data and relevant research. This will help to form an opinion on the implications a strategy/policy/procedure/project/function may have in relation to equality and diversity. Data can be statistical information from formal audits, consultation exercises (both external and internal), and surveys. Qualitative and quantitative data can be used. This may include service performance information, workforce profiles, local population and census data. Statistical data can be found in the About the Borough section of The Knowledge under Facts and figures Consultation data can be found in the About the Borough section under Consultations Where data is limited or not available managers should identify this as a limitation and devise action plans to overcome this. This may be achieved by contacting specialist 2 organisations, representatives from the respective equality groups, and by further research of existing regional and national data. What data is available to help inform the EIA? Consultation Exercises To date the Council has undertaken considerable consultation to inform development of the Core Strategy. Consultation has been informed by the 2006 SCI. LDF Core Strategy DPD Consultation Statement January 2009 The Consultation Statement sets out the different stages of consultation that have informed the development of the Core Strategy. It contains a summary of the bodies consulted and how they were consulted. It also summarises the main issues that were raised and how they were addressed in the Core Strategy. LDF Core Strategy Statement of Consultation Regulation 30 (1)(e) Statement: Representation Made and Summary of Main Issues March 2009 The Core Strategy was published in January 2009 to enable representation to be made prior its submission to the Secretary of State to ensure there would be no issues raised that would cause the Council to re-consider its submission and enable minor alterations to be made to the document. Representations will be taken into account at the Core Strategy examination. Equalities Data A range of demographic data is available. This has informed the identification of groups of the community that have been traditionally hard to reach such as the young, older people, the disabled, ethnic minority groups, Gypsies & Travellers and people on low incomes. The SCI seeks to identify different groups in the community and ways we might be able to engage with them during consultation on planning matters. Are there any gaps which may require further research or consultation? No. Section three: Assess the impact on equality target groups Assess where you think that the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function could have a negative impact on any of the equality target groups i.e. it could disadvantage them or where it could have a positive impact or contribute to promoting equality, equal opportunities or improving relations within equality target groups. Consider the following: publicity, including design, distribution, accessible communications issues physical access location, geography 3 poverty, deprivation and social exclusion issues employment safety direct discrimination: does the strategy, policy or project intentionally exclude a particular equality category? Is this justified? indirect discrimination: does the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function affect some equality categories disproportionately? Is this justified? Is the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function or its outcomes (such as the services provided) likely to be equally accessed by all? Are there barriers that might inhibit or restrict access to the service for some people? This section can be difficult to answer in areas where there is little or no information but lack of data should not be a reason to halt the process. Please continue to complete this form. Using the table below, take each one of the equality target groups and predict the likely impact on people from these groups. Impact can be positive, negative, direct or indirect. You do not have to complete all the boxes. Only those where there is a disproportionate or greater impact either way. Positive impact (it could benefit) Women Gender Men Transgendered Men/Women Race The categories used in the Race section are those used in the 2001 census. Consideration should be given to the needs of specific communities within the broad categories. Disability Long term health impairment could include, mental health problems, Asian Black Mixed race White Chinese Other racial or ethnic groups specify Physical Sensory Learning Neutral Negative impact (it could disadvantag e) Reason High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low 4 Positive impact (it could benefit) asthma, heart conditions, chronic fatigue etc. Long Term Health Impairment Sexual orientation Heterosexuals, lesbians, gay men and bisexuals Neutral Older people Age Reason Negative impact (it could disadvantag e) Younger people and children High Low High Low High Low High Low Religion or belief Faith groups cover a wide range of groupings, the most common of which are Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, and Sikhs. Consider faith categories individually and collectively when considering positive and negative impacts. Faith groups High Low If you have indicated there is a potential negative impact on any group, are these Intentional and of a High Impact? Intended? – i.e. can be justified in terms of legislation e.g. Concessionary fares over 60s Yes No High impact? – i.e. it is or may be discriminatory against some groups. Yes No Is the negative impact NOT INTENDED and/or of HIGH IMPACT? 5 If yes, a full assessment is required. Please complete the Equality impact assessment form Part Two: Full assessment. If no, complete the rest of this form below and consider if completing the Equality impact assessment form Part Two: Full assessment would be helpful in making a thorough assessment. Do not ignore low impacts – these could help you develop services in the future. 6 Section four: Improvement planning It is important to consider any influence the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function is having, or could potentially have, on the individual strands of equality. The strategy/policy/procedure/project/function should be examined for its effectiveness in: promoting equality eliminating discrimination achieving equity Could you minimise or remove any low negative impact or improve the positive impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function and if so how? Analysis must be undertaken with the strategic objectives of the Council in mind and the questions should reflect legal requirements, the emerging Local Development Framework and population needs. Use the table below to record how you could minimise or remove any low negative impact or improve the positive impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: Issue Action If there is no evidence that the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function promotes equality, equal opportunities or improved relations – could it be adapted so that it does? How? 7 Section five: Monitoring and reviewing What data do you have which monitors the impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function on minority groups? Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) Planning application performance indicators. How is this data used? The AMR and planning application performance indicators are used to monitor the effectiveness of planning policies and outcomes. This ensures that policies are achieving the outcomes intended and identifies performance issues. It enables the Council to address any shortfalls or unintended outcomes of planning policies. If there is no data, please explain how you intend to continue monitoring the impact of this strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: Please send a copy of the completed form to the Equalities Steering Group, via Lorraine Hatton at [email protected]. 8
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz