GSK U.S. Public Policy Position Paper Value Based Delivery: Accountable Care Organizations & Patient Centered Medical Homes The Issue Many factors have led to a fractured healthcare system. Value Based Delivery models, such as the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH), Accountable Care Organization (ACO), and various payment arrangements aim to contain rising healthcare costs and restructure financial incentives across healthcare stakeholders. Tenets of Value Based Deliver are improving the delivery of high-quality, coordinated care, decrease the cost of care and to align incentives across stakeholders. This concept is manifesting through new models for healthcare delivery and payment. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a primary care-based delivery model that provides continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated care in the context of family and community, encouraging whole-person care by offering participating providers a per-member, per-month (PMPM) care i coordination fee. The accountable care organization (ACO) is a group of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who come together voluntarily to be accountable to deliver coordinated high-quality care to patients. Though ACOs can vary considerably in their structure and processes, they all include elements of collaboration to meet patient needs, to maintain or enhance quality of care, and to lower costs. When an ACO succeeds in both delivering high-quality care and spending health care dollars ii more wisely, it will share in the savings. Payment models, such as pay for performance (P4P), bundled payment, and global payment, offer payment to providers who meet certain cost and quality standards during a specific care episode or time frame. Additive bonus payments may also be offered to high-performers. Such payment models can be provided as an add-on to shared savings and per member per month (PMPM) fees in ACOs and PCMHs. GSK Position The development and implementation of new payment and delivery models is a crucial step in identifying innovative ways to deliver high-quality, efficient care to patients. GSK continues to support the development of Value Based Delivery models, where there is accountability for both the delivery of quality and efficiency. In these emerging models, GSK supports the use of performance measures to encourage the advancement of high-quality care through adherence to clinical guidelines, improvements to care coordination and care transitions, and a focus on patient decision making and patient experience of care. . Key Points Gaps in Value Based Delivery: Existing measures do not adequately assess outcomes and efficiency Uptake of e-measures is critical to success, to ensure that performance measures are consistently defined, implemented, and compatible across EHRs and other clinical IT systems A Publication of GSK Public Policy and Government Relations (continued from front) Gaps in Value Based Delivery: Data sharing across stakeholders is often limited Risk adjustment methodologies need a clear process for incorporating new information Challenges: Limitations in data sources cause delays in evaluation and limit measures that can be used Appropriate measures that may better assess performance in these models have yet to be developed and/or integrated into current models iii Stakeholders have different goals and, therefore, different definitions of success Public Policy Opportunities Encourage the adoption of evidence-based measures endorsed through a transparent multistakeholder process (e.g. National Quality Forum) within Value Based Delivery models Support outcomes based measures that improve patient health Promote measuring quality at the healthcare organization level using measures that address prevention, care coordination, care transitions, comprehensive medication management, patient outcomes, and efficiency Encourage regular updates to reflect the latest medical knowledge, clinical guidelines, and innovation within value based delivery models Support the adoption of e-measures, which provide standardized electronic information and technology to enhance delivery and payment reform with the understanding that improvements in quality and efficiency are mutually dependent on parallel adoption Include quality and accountability measures that maximize medication adherence, self-management, and clinical health improvements within evaluation of ACOs, PCMHs, health homes, community care teams, and other collaborative care models Updated 10-28-2013 i American Academy of Family Physicians, et al. (2007). Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/joint%20Statement.pdf. Accessed February 2011. ii Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/ACO/ iii “Building the Evidence Base for the Medical Home: What Sample and Sample Size Do Studies Need?” AHRQ. October 2011. http://pcmh.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/community/pcmh__home/1483/pcmh_evidence___evaluation_v2. [i] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/ACO/ A Publication of GSK Public Policy and Government Relations
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz