Approximation Algorithm
Prepared by:
Lamiya El_Saedi
1
Introduction:
There are many hard combinatorial
optimization problems that can’t
be solved efficiently using
backtracking or randomization.
The alternative way for talking
some of these problem is to devise
an approximation algorithm.
2
The approximation is depend on the
reasonable solution that
approximations as optimal solution
There is a performance bound that
guarantees that the solution to a
given instance will not be far away
from the neighborhood of the exact
solution.
3
A marking characteristic of approximation
algorithms is that they are fast, as they
are mostly greedy heuristics.
The proof of correctness of greedy
algorithm may be complex.
In general, the better the performance
bound the harder it becomes to prove the
correctness of an approximation
algorithms.
4
Basic Definition:
Combinatorial
optimization
problem
For each solution
A set
DII
of instances
For each
There is
I in DII
SII(I) of
Candidate solution
σ
In SII(I) there is
A value
fII(σ)
Called the solution
value of σ
5
Note:
6
Cont.
In simple word:
assume that:
DII={I1,…,In}
SII(Ii)={σ1,…, σn}
fII(σi)={v1,…,vn}
fII(σ)=A(I)
7
Subset-sum problem:
Is a special case of the Knapsack problem in which
the item values are identical to their sizes.
Ex:
I= {I1,I2,I3,I4}
S= {1,2,3,4}
V= {1,2,3,4}
C (Knapsack capacity)= 5
The objective is to find a subset of the items
that maximizes the total sum of their sizes
without exceeding the Knapsack capacity.
8
Subset-sum algorithm:
9
Cont.
Time complexity of algorithm is
exactly the size of the table Θ(nC) as
filling each entry requires Θ(1) time.
10
Cont.
When I apply the example by using subsetsum algorithm the results appear like this:
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
s1
0
1
1
1
1
1
s2
0
1
2
3
3
3
s3
0
1
2
3
4
5
s4
0
1
2
3
4
5
11
Cont.
So, from the table:
OPT(4)={1} <4
OPT(3)={1,2} <3
OPT(2)={0} <2 does not exist in DII
OPT(1)= {0} <1 does not exist in DII
12
Now:
We develop an approximation
algorithm
for some positive integer k.
13
14
15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz