Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Pelvic Fractures: Analysis of Mortality, ISS, and Hemodynamic Parameters Lucas Anissian,MD,PhD,FACS James T. Nichols,MD First Coast Orthopaedics, Orange Park, FL Impetus For Investigation and Objectives LSUHSC-S population has 100% mortality with ISS > 54 and 86% mortality with ISS > 43 Statistical validation and investigation of observed trend Evaluate probability of death given ISS Determine other independent predictors of mortality in our population Introduction Approximately 50% of patients who die following pelvic fracture have associated hemorrhage Study goal: Examine the LSUHSC-S experience with the pelvic fracture cohort Effect of ISS, blood transfusion and hemodynamic parameters on mortality Introduction: ISS Anatomical scoring system Values from 1-75 Based on the AIS Sum of squares for 3 most significant injured regions Different injury patterns can result in same score Scores not weighted based on region injured Extent of injuries not known until full investigation completed: limits triage capabilities Introduction (Cont) ISS is correlated with mortality (1) Death frequently secondary to non pelvic injury Early significant transfusion volumes often required (3) Introduction (Cont) The majority of transfusion in the trauma patient is given in the first 24 hours (6) Efficacy of massive transfusions has been questioned (4,5) Continued transfusion supported in the setting of massive requirement and associated injuries (6) Methods IRB approval obtained LSUHSC-S trauma registry 2005-2010 Polytrauma Patients admitted with pelvic fractures Methods (cont) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Patients divided into two groups based on mortality Each group analyzed with respect to Age and race Hemodynamic parameters Transfusion requirements in first 24h ISS GCS Results: Descriptive Characteristic / Outcome Number (%) or Mean±SD, Median, Range Male sex Race: White Black Hispanic Other (Asian, Arabic) Died Age at admission (years) Length of hospital stay (days) GCS ISS Total Units of blood Respiratory rate Pulse rate SBP DBP MAP 624 (65.1) 635 (66.2) 300 (31.3) 18 (1.9) 6 (0.6) 55 (5.7) 37.1±18.4, 0 - 104 16.1±22.4, 0 – 366 12.8±4.4, 3 - 15 17.8±11.1, 4 - 75 0.23±1.10, 0 - 14.0 20.2±5.4, 3 - 48 99.4±22.7, 18 - 190 128.9±25.3, 47 - 217 75.8±17.7, 16 - 177 102.3±19.5, 32.5 - 175.5 Univariate Analyses * Variable Died (N=55) Did not die (N=904) p-value White race 55 (81.8%) 590 (65.3%) 0.01 Hospital stay (days) 5.4±12.9 16.8±22.7 (N=903) <0.01 Age (years) 48.2±23.8 36.4±17.9 <0.01 GCS 6.8±22.7 13.1±4.0 (N=902) <0.01 ISS 40.8 ±1 16.4±8.8 <0.01 SBP 112.9±39.6 (N=45) 129.8±24.1 (N=890) <0.01 DBP 59.0±22.3 (N=44) 76.6±17.0 (N=889) <0.01 MAP 85.2±29.2 (N=44) 103.1±18.5 (N=890) <0.01 Total units of blood 1.53±2.84 *Factors Significantly Associated with Mortality 0.15±0.83 <0.01 Distribution of ISS 1.2 1.0 .8 .6 .4 .2 0.0 -.2 0 ISS 20 40 60 80 ISS 80 60 610 641 256 142 404 98 456 74 760 382 403 119 48 800 528 440 901 668 40 20 353 ISS 0 -20 N= 904 55 Lived Died mortality 0=Lived, 1=Died Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis Used to determine independent and significant risk factors for mortality A patient would be predicted to die if probability of death given values for the independent risk factors was greater than observed mortality rate ISS threshold for predicting death was determined by equating observed mortality with estimated probability of death given ISS Multivariate Analysis Factor GCS ISS Age at admission Odds Ratio (OR) 0.88 1.15 1.05 95% CI for OR 0.82 to 0.95 1.11 to 1.19 1.03 to 1.06 p-value <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Adjusting for the effects of other significant factors, odds for death: 1. Increases by 12% for each unit decrease in GCS 2. Increases by 15% for each unit increase in ISS 3. Increases by 5% for each year increase in age Odds for death increases by 15% for each unit increase in ISS Probability of Death Patient will be predicted to die if probability of death using multiple logistic regression model is greater than 0.057 (observed mortality) Estimated probability of death is 5.6% at ISS of 26 Observed and Predicted Mortality Using Independent Variables * Predicted to Die Live Total Died 46 9 (16.4%) 55 Lived Total 111 (12.3%) 157 791 800 902 957 -Among all patients, total error rate = (9+111)/957 = 12.5% -Among the 55 patients who died, error rate = 9/55 = 16.4% (wrongly predicted to live) -Among the 902 who lived, error rate = 111/902 = 12.3% (wrongly predicted to die) *ISS, GCS, Age Observed and Predicted Mortality Using ISS And Total Units Transfused Predicted to Die Live Total Died 47 8 (14.6%) 55 Lived Total 100 (11.1%) 147 804 812 904 959 -Among all 959 patients, total prediction error rate = 11.3% -Among the 55 patients who died, 8 were predicterd to live; error rate 14.6% -Among the 904 patients who lived, 100 were predicted to die; error rate 11.1% Conclusion 1. 2. Two sets of independent risk factors for death identified: GCS, ISS, age at admission ISS and total units blood transfused in first 24 hours Using the second group (ISS and TBU) to predict death results in lowest prediction errors (11.1%) Limitations Population included acetabular fractures and isolated sacral fractures Significant potential for recording bias given retrospective analysis Any error in AIS scoring increases ISS error significantly Full description of patient injuries not known until full investigation completed; limits triage capabilities References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Balogh J, Varga E, Tomka J, Suveges G, Toth L, Simonka J. The New Injury Severity Score is a Better Predictor of Extended Hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit Admission Than the Injury Severity Score in Patients With Multiple Orthopaedic Injuries. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 17: 508-512, August 2003. Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L. Pelvic Fractures: Epidemiology and Predictors of Associated Abdominal Injuries and Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 195: 1-10, July 2002. Tachibana T, Yokoi H, Kirita M, Marukawa S, Yoshiya S. Instability of the Pelvic Ring and Injury Severity can be Predictors of Death in Patients with Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Traumatology. 10(2): 79-82, April 2009. Velmahos G, Chan L, Chan M, Tatevossian R, Cornwell E, Asensio J, Berne T, Demetriades D. Is There a Limit to Massive Blood Transfusion After Severe Trauma? Archives of Surgery. 133: 947-952, September 1998. Vaslef S, Dnudsen N, Neligan P, Sebastian M. Massive Transfusion Exceeding 50 Units of Blood Products in Trauma Patients. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 53(2): 291-296, August 2002. Como J, Dutton R, Scalea T, Edelman B, Hess J. Blood Transfusion Rates in the Care of Acute Trauma. Transfusion. 44:809-813, June 2004. Thank You
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz