Risks and Challenges in M&A of a General Insurer Ritesh Kumar May 19, 2017 HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited Why is this topic important? Insurance M&A is expected to rise in the coming years owing to a variety of reasons, as listed below (Source: Willis Towers Watson, 2016) Expansion through consolidation Modern distribution options and innovative technology Capital management Asia is rising An analysis of 778 transactions involving insurance companies between 1990 and 2014 found that only 51% created value and 49% destroyed value (Source: BCG, 2016) This is consistent across industries, with another report by Accenture saying – only 53% of M&A deals created value, while 47% resulted in value erosion (source: Accenture Research; Accenture / Economist Global M&A Survey of Top Managers) Company Confidential 2 Rationale of a typical M&A transaction How do we define ‘success’ in M&A? A successful M&A transaction is one where the Buyer is able to realize synergies as envisaged as per its business plan What does ‘synergy’ mean? Synergies are what makes a whole more than the sum of its parts, i.e. Value (A+B) > Value (A) + Value (B) Strategic drivers for M&A (shareholder considerations) Revenue synergies: New customer base New distribution channels Product function expertise Cost synergies / Economies of scale: Buyer has unutilized in-house capacities – people (productivity), infrastructure, etc.. Buyer enjoys favourable terms with business partners (compared to the Target) Service providers – for e.g., Garages, hospital networks, loss assessors etc. Reinsurers Capital efficiencies due to product diversification Other considerations – for e.g., the Buyer has a stronger brand Acquisitions can be funded via cash, share swaps or capital raise Company Confidential 3 Considerations of General Insurance M&A Characteristics of General Insurance business in India Short-term business – contracts are typically valid for one year By contrast, other businesses are typically medium- to long-term businesses Life insurance, Asset management, Financing / Banking High growth market Quality of business is known with a lag of 6-9 months from origination Provisioning / reserving play an important role in determining profitability Challenges in General Insurance M&A are the risks to achieving the business plan While the nature of business is short-term, the M&A process is longer End-to-end M&A process is longer (~12-18 months) compared to the short-term nature of the business Delays in any stage of process have a wider impact in GI than in other businesses Announcement of an M&A transaction leads to uncertainty among policyholders, business partners & employees (of Buyer and Target), increasing the risk of achieving business plan Company Confidential 4 A typical General Insurance M&A transaction: Process Ownership of Seller Pre-Signing Signing Strategic & commercial Milestone: Signing of evaluation of Industry binding agreement and Target by Buyer between Buyer and Seller (subject to Business plan and regulatory approvals) valuation Milestone: Non-binding Communication with offer employees, policyholders, Due diligence including channel partners and Management meetings other stakeholders, Business evaluation as needed Financial, actuarial, secretarial, tax & legal Milestone: Revised business plan and valuation Signing to Closing Two alternatives: One-stage or twostage M&A process Regulatory approval(s) Company to be managed as per terms agreed between Buyer and Seller Other conditions as agreed, to effect change in ownership Ownership of Buyer Closing Post-Closing Payment of Offer Price Communication with employees, policyholders, Milestone: Change in channel partners and shareholding other stakeholders, (change in as needed ownership) Re-alignment of reinsurance program, if needed Integration of Target with Buyer Corporate approvals Milestone: Binding offer Milestone: Finalization of Offer Price Negotiations on Share Purchase Agreement & related documents Company Confidential 5 Pre-Signing stage: Potential challenges Understanding business of Target Buyer gets limited time and opportunities to analyse the performance of Target (via financial and actuarial, tax, legal due diligence) and to interact with management (via management meetings) For example, assumptions and accounting practices play an important role in assessing adequacy of reserving methodologies for claims, gross receivables (co-insurance and re-insurance) and net receivables (co-insurance and re-insurance), etc.. Formulating the business plan for Target Typically, this is different from the Business Plan that the Target company may internally have For example, in case of overlap in corporate relationships between the Buyer and the Target, it may be difficult to retain 100% of the business from corporates. Similarly, in case of overlap in distribution relationships between the Buyer and the Target, retaining similar business contribution from the common distributors may be challenging Customers/distributors which may not want to work with the Buyer Customers/distributors which Buyer may not want to work with Gap in valuation expectations between the Buyer and the Seller Seller expects 100% value of standalone business Buyer expects to make an offer based on the value it can realize Risks to Business Plan arising out of delay in timelines and/or uncertainty due to deal announcement For example, negotiations of binding agreements may get protracted leading to Signing happening later than anticipated Company Confidential 11 Signing to Closing stage: Potential challenges In this phase, the Seller manages the company as per the terms contractually agreed with the Buyer. Typically, Buyer expects the company to be run by the Seller as per its ordinary course, such that there is No value erosion Business relationships with partners and customers are continued as usual Key employees are retained No new material obligations are undertaken without explicit consent of Buyer. Key challenges include: Actual Business progress of Target in this period may differ from assumptions made by Buyer Plan of Action to be in place to cater to: Protection of Policyholder’s interests: Policy servicing, Claims servicing, Renewal servicing Ensuring no disruption to relationships with Channel partners and other business partners Reinsurers Provider network including hospitals, motor garages, TPAs, loss assessors etc. Regulatory compliances Risks to the business plan arising out of delay in timelines and/or uncertainty of closing date For example, fulfilment of conditions necessary to effect the change in ownership may take longer than anticipated, or employee attrition may increase owing to the uncertainty Company Confidential 12 Post-Closing stage: Potential challenges Post-merger integration can be challenging due to a variety of reasons Maintaining adequate communication with employees, policyholders, channel partners and other stakeholders to address their concerns and uncertainties around how business would be conducted going forward Employee integration – an M&A transaction leads to uncertainty among employees of both the Target company and the Buyer company Cultural alignment of employees of Target company with that of the Buyer company Alignment of compensation structures and designations Organization structure alignment – redefined roles and responsibilities Retention of key talent Distribution integration (customers and distributors) Integration of relationship management of Target with Buyer Customer / distributor acquisition and onboarding process integration Reinsurance integration Operations & Customer service integration Alignment on service standards for seamless experience to customers and business partners Company Confidential 13 Post-Closing stage: Potential challenges Product & Underwriting integration Product integration – from the combined product bouquet, which products to continue and which ones to be phased out / discontinued with adequate disclosure to policyholders and channel partners and ensuring continuity of renewal related benefits Alignment of Underwriting guidelines and policy issuance process Claims integration Integration of relationships with loss assessors, hospital networks, garages, lawyers, etc.. Alignment of claims decision guidelines and claims processing practices – e.g. Migrating from TPAmanaged claims processing (by Target) to in-house claims processing (by Buyer) IT & Facilities integration Migration of data and system integration Branch integration Integration of relationships with service providers Company Confidential 14 Mitigating potential challenges in General Insurance M&A Communicate, communicate and communicate Proper communication to all stakeholders at every stage of the transaction Pre-Signing stage: Proper strategic fit developed basis rigorous strategy and target analysis Deep understanding of industry dynamics Thorough analysis of Target – due diligence, management meetings, etc.. Sound documentation - Tightly worded binding agreements, minimizing the room for interpretation Rights and obligations of both parties at every stage of the transaction, are defined and protected, and the consequences thereof Signing to Closing stage: Strong deal execution in the Signing to Closing phase Transition plan agreed between Buyer and Seller Initiate detailed integration planning exercise Separate functional plans – Distribution, Product, UW, Claims, IT, Operations, HR, etc.. Post-Closing stage: Focused implementation of integration plan PMO approach to execution with appropriate governance mechanism, e.g. Steering committee, periodic reviews, etc.. Company Confidential 15 HDFC ERGO’s acquisition of L&T General Insurance Marked the beginning of consolidation in Indian insurance industry L&T General: 100% subsidiary of L&T, commenced operations in 2010, 0.4% market share Rationale for the acquisition: Good strategic fit High standards of corporate governance Complementary product mix and channel mix Access to key partnerships Relatively smaller size of L&T General enabling seamless integration Integration progressing as per plan Employee integration: Employees integrated in HDFC ERGO structure Business integration: Relationship management aligned with HDFC ERGO for seamless experience to clients and distribution partners System & process integration: Parallel ecosystems for both organizations being merged Company Confidential 16 HDFC ERGO’s acquisition of L&T General Insurance Marked the beginning of consolidation in Indian insurance industry Milestones so far: Execution of Share purchase agreement (Jun 3, 2016) In-principle approval from IRDAI Approval of Competition Commission of India Share transfer from L&T to HDFC ERGO (Sep 9, 2016) – L&T General becomes 100% subsidiary of HDFC ERGO; Renamed as HDFC General Insurance Application for merger filed with High Court of Bombay (Oct 5, 2016), subsequently transferred to National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Key steps going forward: Approval from NCLT for merger Final approval from IRDAI Merger of HDFC ERGO and HDFC General Company Confidential 17 Thank You Company Confidential
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz