Chessie BIBI Updates - Chesapeake Bay Program

Chessie BIBI Updates
Zachary M. Smith
[email protected]
ICPRB
1
Objective
Update and refine the 2011 Chessie BIBI for
Chesapeake Bay Program assessment
purposes.
2
Master Taxa List
Taxa
– Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates
collected in the Chesapeake Bay watershed
• 222 of families (151 insect families)
• 760 of genera (621 insect genera)
3
Master Taxa List
Common Attributes
• Municipal Waste Tolerance Values
• Functional Feeding Groups (FFG)
• Habits
EPA Attributes (USGS 2006, EPA 2012)
• Respiratory Type
• Voltinism
• Specific Stressors
4
BIBI Workflow
Site Classification
Metric Calculation
Metric Sensitivity
Redundancy Analysis
Metric Selection
Scoring Metrics
5
Site Classification
• Classes in each bioregion (7)
– Reference
– Near Reference
– Minor Degradation
– Moderate Degradation
– Severe Degradation
– Mixed
6
0
1
2
3
Specific
Conductivity
500
750
2
1,000
1
0
Rapid Habitat
Assessment
5
2
Degradation
Score
16
1
0
1
2
pH
5
6
8
9
7
Ideal Class Gradient
IBI SCORE
100
50
0
REF
NEAR
MIN
MOD
SEV
8
Biological Condition
Biological Condition Gradient
1
Reference
Near Ref.
Minor Deg.
2
3
Moderate Deg.
5
Severe Deg.
6
Stressor Gradient
4
9
Metric Calculation
Metrics
– BIBI R-package
• 78 metrics from the literature
• Exploration of new metrics
10
Metric
Sensitivity
Approach
Barbour
et al.
1996
Quantile
Threshold
Redundancy
Wilcoxon Rank
Analysis
Sum Test
Approach
Confusion
Matrix Accuracy
(CMA)
Pairwise Confusion
Matrix Accuracy (CMA)
Scoring
All
Ref.
Threshold
Categorical
Approach
Gradient Gradient Gradient
11
n = 43
415 1,073
445
49
6,663
12
Index Resolution Type
Low Resolution
– Order Level Index
– Volunteer programs and in situ identification
Moderate Resolution
– Family Level Index
– Studies with limited funding and/or minimal
macroinvertebrate identification experience.
13
Index Ranks
High Resolution
– Genus Level Index
– Studies with extensive funding and
macroinvertebrate identification experience.
– Secondary indices identifying specific
stressors
14
Metric
Sensitivity
Approach
Barbour
et al.
1996
Quantile
Threshold
Redundancy
Wilcoxon Rank
Analysis
Sum Test
Approach
Confusion
Matrix Accuracy
(CMA)
Pairwise Confusion
Matrix Accuracy (CMA)
Scoring
All
Ref.
Threshold
Categorical
Approach
Gradient Gradient Gradient
15
Family
Order
Genus
16
Ongoing Analyses
• Test for agency differences within each bioregion
– Sampling period differences
– Differences in taxa identified
• Deal with unidentified taxa and unclassified taxa
– Missing tolerance values, FFG, or habits
• Compare the 2011 indices to the 2016 indices
17