Framework of Programme Impact Pathway (PIP)
OIOS
1|Page
Internal Audit Division
2|Page
Investigations Division
3|Page
Inspection and Evaluation Division
4|Page
Programme Impact Pathway (PIP) - Indicators
IAD Indicators
Output
Activity
1. % of audits for which final report is
issued within 3 months of exit
meeting
2. % of engagements with elapsed
time from entry conference to exit
meeting is less than 4 months
2014-15
Target
100%
ID Indicators
1. Increased % of cases reported to
the Office by UN personnel
2014-15
Target
TBD
100%
2. Average # of days’ slippage primary
submission
milestones,
as
established by ID does not exceed
10 days
0 days
3. % of audits for which charged
auditor hours do not exceed the
planned budget by more than 10%
100%
80:20
4. % of total staff days spent on
engagements vs. total available
days
90%
3. Ratio of total staff days spent on
investigation project work to total
staff work days spent on other
initiative
4. Staff vacancy rate
5. Staff vacancy rate
10%
6. % of internal quality assessments
with conclusions of “generally
conforms to IAD audit manual”
7. % of external quality assessments
with conclusions of “generally
conforms to IIA Standards”
8. % accomplishment of audits
planned to be completed by
targeted deadline
100%
9. Annual and quarterly reports
submitted by established deadlines
100%
10%
IED Indicators
1. % of assignments for which charged
staff work days do not exceed the
planned budget by more than 10%
2. Average # of days’ slippage from
primary submission milestones in
IED Report Tracker (draft inception
paper, final inception paper, draft
evaluation report) does not exceed
5 days
3. % of evaluations conducted with
elapsed time from start to issuance
of final report is no more than 12
months
4. Ratio of total staff days spent on
evaluation project work to total
staff work days spent on other
initiatives
5. Staff vacancy rate
2014-15
Target
100%
0 days
100%
80:20
10%
100%
100%
5. Average # of months to complete
OIOS-ID Closure and Investigation
reports with no one more than 12
months total
6. Increased % of closure and
investigation reports that meet
timeline target
7. Increased # of UN personnel
responsible
for
investigations/investigation tasks
who receive training
6 months
75%
6. % of OIOS-IED inspection or
evaluation reports delivered to
DGACM
or
programme
management by targeted deadline
7. Increased # of programmes
evaluated and inspected
100%
7
100
(2014)
150
(2015)
5|Page
IAD Indicators
2014-15
Target
ID Indicators
IED Indicators
2014-15
Target
70%
(2014)
80%
(2015)
8. % of OIOS-IED inspection or
evaluation reports deemed by
external peer reviewers to be of
high credibility
80%
(2014)
90%
(2015)
70%
9. % of OIOS-IED’s main stakeholders
reporting OIOS-IED evaluations to
have been of high credibility and
utility
75%
70%
10. % of OIOS-IED’s main stakeholders
reporting
that
they
have
considered OIOS-IED evaluation
results when making budget and
programmatic decisions
75%
90%
11. % of OIOS-IED recs implemented
by date targeted in Plan of Action
90%
12. Increased % of programme and
thematic
inspections
and
evaluations that have contributed
to more informed decisionmaking on relevance, efficiency
and
effectiveness
in
the
implementation of programmes
90%
(Critical)
80%
(Imp)
60%
Output
8. # of UN personnel who receive ID
trainings and other forms of
outreach
10. Increased mention of IAD reports
in the decision making of Member
States
Outcome
11. % of audit recommendations
implemented by programme
managers (by targeted deadline)
12. % of critical audit
recommendations accepted by
programme managers relating to
accountability, efficiency and
effectiveness
13. % of (client) programme managers
who express satisfaction with the
quality and usefulness of IAD
reports
14. % audit committee members who
express satisfaction with the quality
and usefulness of IAD reports
N/A
90%
(Critical
)
80%
(Imp)
95%
9. %
reduction
in
ongoing
investigations extending beyond a
period of 2 years
10. %
reduction
in
ongoing
investigations extending beyond a
period of 1 year
11. % of OIOS-ID investigations deemed
to be timely, credible and
conforming to ID processes determined through OSSS internal
review, and occasional external
review (80%).
12. % of OIOS-ID's main stakeholders
reporting investigations to have
been
timely
and
credible
(Programme Managers, OHRM)
13. % of OIOS-ID-trained staff, UN
personnel
and
managers
demonstrating
enhanced
knowledge, awareness, attitudes
and
behaviours
surrounding
prevention of / response to
misconduct as a result of OIOS-ID
training and outreach programmes
2014-15
Target
100
(2014)
150
(2015)
100%
50%
6|Page
Impact
IAD Indicators
2014-15
Target
ID Indicators
2014-15
Target
IED Indicators
2014-15
Target
15. % of client programme managers
and audit committee members who
agree with the statement that
IAD’s assurances and
recommendations help improving
the Organization’s risk
management, control and
governance processes
90%
14. Overall reduction in the # of reports
of misconduct and wrongdoing in
the Organization, accounting for
external factors
TBD
13. % of OIOS-IED inspections and
evaluations for which Secretariat
programme managers provide
credible evidence of long-term
programme improvements
75%
15. % of OIOS-ID investigation reports
that result in appropriate action
within 12 months
50%
16. Increased
%
of
closure/investigation reports for
which processes for applying
corrective measures to commence
within 12 months
50%
Note: Bolded indicators are captured in the existing strategic framework.
7|Page