Global Value Added: Costs of trade © Professor Daniel F. Spulber The Global Value Connection Strategies to maximize net gains from trade Home country Supplier countries International business Customer countries Partner countries 2 Globalization: Growth of world trade indicates decreasing costs of trade Since WWII: • World trade/World output Growth at 2.9% per year • Manufactured goods trade/Manufactured output Growth of 3.7% per year • FDI/world output Growth at 3% per year Hummels, Ishii and Yi, J. International Economics 3 Further evidence of decreasing costs of trade • Technological improvements in transportation and communications • Decrease in trade barriers • Acceptance of market system in more countries • Convergence of international business practices Creates need for extreme advantage … Still a long way to go in reducing costs of trade 4 Costs of trade: strategic effects Maximize net gains from trade Customer Country Y High P 200 High T 140 Supplier country X Target customer countries that are easier to serve – May choose customer countries near supplier countries Customer Country A Low P 100 Low T 25 5 Costs of trade: strategic effects Supplier country X Low P 50 High T 80 Minimize total costs of sourcing Customer country A Supplier country B High P 75 Low T 25 Choose supplier countries based on trade costs – may choose those that are close to customer countries 6 Costs of trade: Example • World Tools, based in Seattle, plans to export a machine tool to a customer based in Tokyo • The ex works price, that is the price at the factory with the buyer responsible for all export arrangements, is $ 20,000 • A Japanese competitor offers a comparable product for $ 25,000 Is the price offered by World Tools competitive? 7 Costs of trade: Example (continued) Ex works price 20,000 Administrative cost to buyer 750 Freight (Seattle-Tokyo) 1,500 Import tariff (15% cif) 3,300 Insurance 500 Local port costs 350 Document preparation 230 CIF price 22,000 Custom broker fee 750 (cost, insurance, freight) Freight forwarder fees (1% of cif) 220 Bank costs (2% of ex works price) 400 Total landing charges 6,000 Total 28,000 8 Costs of trade: Example (continued) • Competitive disadvantage: $ 3,000 ($28,000 versus $25,000) • Even with transportation cost, World Tools had a competitive advantage of about $3,000 ($22,000 versus $25,000) – This is hidden cost of trade. • NOTE: If transaction go through a distributor who marks up by 35%: Competitive disadvantage is $ 4,050 ($37,800 versus $ 33,750) Taxes and other proportional mark-ups widen the disadvantage 9 Costs of Trade PA : Price in customer country – ask price PB : Price in supplier country – bid price PA − PB : International bid-ask spread T: Cost of trade If the spread is less than T, there is no trade: autarky PA − PB < T If the spread is greater than or equal to T, there is a basis for international trade and arbitrage PA − PB ≥ T 10 Costs of Trade Trade flows from lower-priced countries to higher-priced countries. Competitive market equilibrium with trade: price differences tend toward the cost of trade No-arbitrage condition: PA - PB = T • Direct costs of trade: The four Ts • Hidden costs of trade are very high: They are the foregone opportunities for international business 11 How big is T is practice? Estimate of average costs of trade Markup: PA PB PB T PB 170%. Breakdown of the effects as tariff equivalents: 21% Transportation 44% Border-related trade barriers 55% Retail and wholesale trade 1.21 * 1.44 * 1.55 = 2.7 = 1 + 1.7 An estimate of time costs is 9% tariff equivalent J. Anderson and E. van Wincoop, 2004, Trade Costs, Journal of Economic Literature 12 Do arbitrage opportunities exist? YES. Evidence is that the Law of One Price (LOP) generally does not hold internationally Pi Domestic Currency Price of a particular good i Pi* Foreign Currency Price of a particular good i X Nominal Exchange Rate Pi = X * Pi* Example: [Price in Yen] = [Yen/Dollar exchange rate] times [Price in Dollars] 10,000 ¥ = 125 * $80 13 Do arbitrage opportunities exist? Yes. Evidence is that Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) does not hold Pi is the domestic consumer price index Pi = X * Pi* Pi* is the foreign consumer price index X is the exchange rate • Absence of PPP likely due to trade costs • National price levels should be equal when converted to a common currency • This relationship should be observed if the law of one price holds because aggregate price levels would be correlated • The long term speed of convergence of currencies to PPP is very slow – only about 15% per year! – never converges 14 Purchasing Power Parity Example Pi = X * Pi* Burger price: Japan 280 ¥ US $2.80 Tall latte price: Japan 320 ¥ US $2.80 Yen to Dollar exchange rate = 125 Market basket is a burger and a latte: 280 ¥ + 320 ¥ = 600 ¥ 125 * ( $2.80 + $2.80 ) = 700 ¥ PPP does not hold Exchange rate would have to be about 107 Yen to Dollar (about right) 15 The PPP Puzzle: Evidence from Germany and the US 16 The Big Mac Index “Burgernomics is based on the theory of purchasing-power parity, the notion that a dollar should buy the same amount in all countries. Thus in the long run, the exchange rate between two countries should move towards the rate that equalises the prices of an identical basket of goods and services in each country. Our "basket" is a McDonald's Big Mac, which is produced in about 120 countries. The Big Mac PPP is the exchange rate that would mean hamburgers cost the same in America as abroad. Comparing actual exchange rates with PPPs indicates whether a currency is under- or overvalued.” 17 The Big Mac Index 18 Law of one price versus averages over multiple goods -- PPP Starbucks latte differs From McDonald’s Big Mac 19 The four Ts 1. Transaction costs Greater in international business! • Search for trading partners • Marketing and sales costs • Contracting: – Negotiating contract terms – Monitoring performance • Purchasing, Financing • Human resource management: • Logistics and inventory • Backoffice: Accounting, Tax, Orders, Bills, Payments • Currency conversions • International finance costs • International communication – Differences in languages, cultures, social customs – Time zones – Distance • Different business practices • Handling multiple legal and regulatory jurisdictions 20 The four Ts Business strategies to reduce transaction costs • International sourcing and serving expertise and careful choice of customer and supplier countries • Economies of scale and scope in transactions • Information technology and communications technology • Outsourcing to specialized intermediaries • Innovative types of transactions Example: Dell has web sites aimed at 85 countries, employs a common technology platform for consistent ordering and product information 21 The four Ts 2. Tariff and nontariff barriers T (per unit of output) is a “specific” tariff. An “ad valorem” tariff t is a percentage of the international price. These are equivalent: T = tPW. With international competition, price falls to PW + T or (1 + t)PW 22 The four Ts Tariffs About 6% of world trade Import-wtd. Average Simple Average Total Merch. Imports, in Millions of US $ Imputed Tariff Revenues, in Millions of US $ Africa 15.10 19.88 62,189 9,392 Asia (excl. Hong Kong and Taiwan Australia, New Zealand, Japan EU & Scandinavia 15.27 25.22 693,764 105,942 2.30 3.07 413,295 9,525 3.52 3.83 2,019,146 71,107 Eastern Europe & former USSR US, Canada, Caribbean South & Central America Worldwide 10.11 7.56 295,953 29,919 3.10 9.32 1,102,816 34,201 12.77 9.85 291,164 37,186 6.10 13.55 4,879,113 297,456 23 The four Ts Tariffs and effective rate of tariff protection Effective trade protection: Compare tariff with economic activity Example: Ad valorem tariff on imported computers: 25% of price World price: PW = $800. Domestic price of computer after tariff is (1 + .25) PW = $1000 Unit costs (components domestic or imported): $700 Price of computer minus cost of components is value added by assembly business: $800 - $700 = $100 Mark up from tariff tPW = $200 Effective rate of trade protection is equal to double the returns to assembly: 200% !!! Entry barrier to assembly exporter. 24 The four Ts Tariffs and effective rate of tariff protection Tariff on imported components • Benefits domestic components producers • Harms domestic assembly industry • Benefits assembly exporter entering country by subsidizing entry of assembled products Example: 10% tariff on components of $700 = $70 Harm to domestic assembly industry of 70%. 25 The four Ts Non-Tariff Barriers • Anti-dumping duties • Import quotas • Voluntary export restraints (VERs) • Licensing by governments • Domestic content requirements • Domestic subsides • Technical barriers and standards: compatibility, quality, health, safety, packaging, labeling 26 The four Ts Business strategies to reduce tariff costs • Take advantage of regional trade agreements: e.g. Canada, Mexico and the US do not have a common external tariff so import through lowest tariff country • Use bilateral agreements with trade blocks: e.g. EU has agreements with 70 LDCs for duty-free or quota free trade—source from these countries when serving EU • Choose among classifications to lower tariffs: changing one or two product components can change classification of the whole product, which may put it into a lower-tariff classification • Source and serve within the same country or trade block 27 The four Ts 3. Transportation About 5.6% of world trade -- geography matters World total Ind. Countries Dev. Countries Africa Asia Europe Middle East Western Hem. Table 1 Imports Freight Other Total transp. Transp. 5386700 3477000 1909700 100747 1019377 318409 161097 310081 206784 111273 95511 9009 52469 8653 10737 14643 97682 304466 69948 181221 27735 123246 1846 10855 15722 68191 3899 12552 2110 12847 4158 18801 % of imports 5.6 5.2 6.45 10.8 6.7 3.9 7.9 6.1 World transport costs in million $US. Source of data: IMF. Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook, 1998 28 The four Ts Ratio Air freight versus ocean shipments Greater efficiencies in transport. Also, outsourcing increases demand for JIT transportation services 29 The four Ts Business strategies to reduce transport costs • • • • • • Coordinate locations for sourcing and serving Use economies of scale in transport (containers) Source groups of components from same region Predictability of demand influences modal choice (Recall Acer) Weigh inventory costs against shipping costs Weigh economies of scale in manufacturing against shipping costs • Trade off speed and flexibility versus shipping costs • Outsource to logistics specialists 30 The four Ts 4. Time Example: Regulation -- time to start a business in days Australia Canada Denmark US France Singapore Turkey Hong Kong Netherlands 2 3 4 5 8 8 9 11 11 Venezuela Azerbaijan Angola Indonesia Brazil Mozambique Congo Haiti 116 123 146 151 152 153 155 203 Doing Business in 2005, World Bank. 31 The four Ts Business strategies to reduce time costs of trade • • • • Establish local or regional distribution or manufacturing Learn local market conditions Train local and transferred employees Delays associated with international transportation and communication • Speed of government regulations and legal system • Time to negotiate, monitor and enforce contracts Time costs are business foregone and time costs of money 32 Trade-Blocks • WTO: 148 member countries as of 2005 • European Union EU: 25 countries • ASEAN: (Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) • Lome convention: EU members and 70 African, Caribbean, and Pacific countries OPTIONAL MATERIAL 33 • Founded 1989 • Membership – Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Thailand, United States, and Vietnam • Population : over 2 billion • Output – $14,469 billion at market exchange rates – $16,578 billion at PPP rates • Foreign Trade (exports plus imports) – Approx $4 trillion, of which 74% was OPTIONAL intrabloc MATERIAL 34 APEC agenda • Trade and investment liberalization • Technical and economic cooperation to promote economic development • Regional development (Voluntary unilateral tariff reduction, No formal dispute resolution mechanism) OPTIONAL MATERIAL 35 Latin America OPTIONAL MATERIAL 36 Latin America Growth Rate OPTIONAL MATERIAL http://tendencias.infoamericas.com/article_archive/2003/037/037_economic_outlook.htm 37 Mercosur • Founded 1991 • Membership: – Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and now Chile (Bolivia associate member) • Population: 220 million • Total GDP $ 1,100 billion • GDP per capita over $5,000 OPTIONAL MATERIAL 38 Mercosur • Brazil and Argentina account for over 95% of the GDP • Decisions are made by consensus • Imperfect customs union • Relies on Rules of Origin as well as Common External Tariffs • Has a dispute resolution mechanism, but occasionally relies on the WTO for dispute resolution OPTIONAL MATERIAL 39 Mercosur • Largest trade group after EU and Nafta • Working on convergence in Common External Tariffs • Major effort is need toward harmonization of macroeconomic policy • Integration with FTAA an important issue OPTIONAL MATERIAL 40 North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA • Founded 1994 • Membership – Canada, Mexico and the United States • Population – 380 Million • Foreign Trade about 40% intrabloc OPTIONAL MATERIAL 41 North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA • Free Trade Area not Customs Union • Legally binding agreement enforced through penalties and sanctions • Dispute resolution mechanism through FTC • Supplemental agreements on environmental cooperation and labor laws • Import restriction through non-tariff barriers is prohibited • Sensitive issues are energy, agriculture and transportation OPTIONAL MATERIAL 42 Summary and take-away points • Coordinate choice of customer and supplier countries to reduce trade costs • Costs of trade offset gains from product variety and scale • Costs of trade favor domestic competitors • The international businesses in global competition can gain competitive advantage by reducing its costs of trade 43
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz