2014-2016 State Plan for Independent Living
UPDATE
Overview, Impact and
Involvement
Outline of Presentation
• Overview of Goals, Objectives, and
Measureable Indicators
• Timeline
• Action: Collaboration and Stakeholder
Involvement
• Questions/Comments
Mission Analytics was contracted to
manage the SPIL process.
• The SPIL will
– Cover the period 2014-2016
– Establish the focus of 7B funds during this
period
– Encourage the IL network to undertake
new and innovative projects.
3
Overview of 2014-2016 SPIL
• preliminary draft of the SPIL goals,
objectives, and indicators.
• We expect to make substantial changes to
this document based on community
feedback.
• guidelines drawn from the SPIL
development workshop by ILRU; seen and
approved by RSA.
We used guidelines from an RSA
approved workshop
• First, decide what you want to
achieve.
– What are your goals and objectives?
• Second, create specifics.
– How will you measure this? What are
your targets?
• Third, develop an action strategy.
– What activities? Who is responsible?
What resources are need?
Overview:
Structure
• Goals: These are the desired outcomes. We may not
expect to complete a goal in three years, but we
should be able to see progress. We therefore tried to
create goals that are attainable and realistic.
• Objectives: These are our short-term outcomes. We
expect to be able to complete an objective in 3 years.
• Measurable Indicators: These are the data that we
expect to collect to know whether we are successful
with our objectives. An indicator defines our
objective.
• Vision: To influence policy and
access to service delivery for all
individuals with disabilities in
California.
• Mission: To create policy and
systems change for independent
living.
Goal 1: As a means to achieve lasting, grassroots change,
members of the IL network enhance their community organizing
efforts.
• Objective 1: The Systems Change Network provides members of
the IL network with technical assistance on community organizing
topics.
– Measurable Indicator: 100% of network entities that request it
receive technical assistance on community organizing topics.
• Objective 2: Members of the IL network increase community
engagement in events.
– Measurable Indicator: Members of the IL network increase
attendance at community events by 20 percent over 2013
baseline numbers.
Goal 1: As a means to achieve lasting, grassroots change,
members of the IL network enhance their community organizing
efforts.
• Objective 3: Through community organizing, members of the
IL network achieve "policy wins" (changes to local or regional
policy on issues such as housing, employment, etc.) that can
clearly be attributed to community organizing.
– Measurable Indicator: Members of the IL network achieve two (2)
documented policy wins that can clearly be linked to their community
organizing efforts (e.g., by showing that members of the community
drove the process of achieving these wins, engaged decision makers,
etc.).
Goal 2: Individuals currently residing in institutions
transition successfully into community settings.
• Objective 1: Funds awarded to the IL network through the transition fund
support the movement of individuals from institutions into the
community.
– Measurable Indicator: 80% of individuals who receive funds transition
into the community and remain in the community for at least one
year.
• Objective 2: Individuals who transition out of nursing homes are assessed
on their quality of life through the UCSF “Quality of Life” Survey.
– Measurable Indicator: 65% of individuals who transition complete
survey.
Goal 3: Members of the IL network build internal
capacity through entrepreneurial activities and
partnerships with other networks and organizations.
• Objective 1: The IL network undertakes
entrepreneurial ventures that sustain or grow their
capacity to serve consumers.
– Measurable Indicator: 100% of IL network entities
that receive 7B funds for an entrepreneurial
venture create a business plan.
– Measurable Indicator: 100% of IL sites that
receive 7B funds for an entrepreneurial venture
begin operation of their venture.
Goal 3: Members of the IL network build internal
capacity through entrepreneurial activities and
partnerships with other networks and organizations.
• Objective 2: IL network entities partner with
other networks and organizations to generate
revenue for their programs.
– Measurable Indicator: 100% of IL network
entities that receive 7B funds for an
entrepreneurial partnership execute a
memorandum of understanding or other
formal agreement with one or more
partners.
Goal 4: In order to build a more robust statewide
system, the IL network will achieve greater long-term
stability.
• Objective 1: A working group from the IL network identifies
new outcome measures to be captured in client databases
and pilots a standardized data collection system.
– Measurable Indicator: The working group produces a
recommendations document about outcomes measures.
– Measurable Indicator: The working group produces a
recommendations document about data collection
systems.
Goal 4: In order to build a more robust statewide
system, the IL network will achieve greater long-term
stability.
• Objective 2: IL network entities “in need” receive technical assistance
from a contractor hired using 7B funds.
– Measurable Indicator: 100% of IL network entities designated “in
need” receive technical assistance.
• Objective 3: IL network entities “in need” develop a mentorship
relationship with a successful entity in the IL network. The mentorship
program will be facilitated and monitored by a contractor hired using 7B
funds.
– Measurable Indicator: 50% of IL network entities designated “in need”
develop a mentorship relationship.
Goal 4: In order to build a more robust statewide
system, the IL network will achieve greater long-term
stability.
IL network entities are identified as “In Need” if
they are addressing organizational deficiencies
in policies or processes that have been identified
by Department of Rehabilitation (DOR),
Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA)
review teams, or by the organization’s board of
directors.
Other Notes:
• The group agreed to table the discussion on Special
Populations: youth, Asian Americans, deaf and hard of
hearing, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and
Intersex (LGBTQI). The group also agreed to wait to discuss
ILCs with lower penetration rates or transportation issues.
We will need to address this.
• We may change Goal 2, Objective 2 once we have more
information from UCSF about how they score their survey and
what changes they expect.
Timeline:
By 4/1, close of feedback on Goals,
Objectives, Indicators
April, develop detailed activities, dollar
amounts
4/15 SPIL Committee meeting
4/23-4/24 SILC Meeting in Riverside for
feedback on phase 2
Impact on Californians with
Disabilities
–
–
–
–
–
$2.3 Million in 7B funds
Distribution of AB 204
Guidelines for fee-for-service
Outreach to unserved, underserved
Plans for future network changes:
• Centers that close
• New Centers
• Other
Impact:
Action: Collaboration and Stakeholder Involvement
Feedback:
Public hearings
email to [email protected]
Phone the SILC Toll free: 1-866-866-7452
U.S. Mail: 1600 K Street, Suite 100,
Sacramento, CA 95814
Questions/Comments
You are the experts –
We need to hear from you
Thank you!
Liz Pazdral, Executive Director
(916) 445-0142
[email protected]