Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 1 Strengthening EU Competitiveness – Potential of Migrants on the Labour Market The Costs and Benefits of Economic Migration A Dutch Perspective Jos Jansen (Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment) February 26, 2009 Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 2 Outline • Migration in relation to key policy challenges (1) Sustainability of welfare state (2) Structural changes on the labour market • Dutch experience (1) Non-western immigration (from late1960s) (2) CEEC immigration (from late 1990s) • Conclusion Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 3 Broader setting: Key policy challenges Due to ageing of population, globalization, technological advances, etc.: • Sustainability of welfare state under pressure Shorter working lives Higher old age expenditures (pensions, care) Declining working age population Higher factor mobility • Structural changes on the labour market Demand: Sectoral shifts (e.g. care) Supply: Ageing of workforce, possibly decline Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 4 Working age population and dependency ratio, 2005-2050 Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 5 NPV net contribution to welfare state by age of entry – red line Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 6 (1) Sustainability of the welfare state • Policy approach along three tracks – Increase labour utilization (participation rate, hours per worker, working life) – Decrease government debt – Adjust current welfare state arrangements to reduce future spending (unemployment and disability insurance, social safety net, old age pension, longterm care) • Key issue: Need for more workers, not more people • What role for immigration? Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 7 Immigration and the welfare state • Immigrants who work Pay taxes and contributions But also accumulate rights on benefits • Immigrants are in many cases also citizens, with additional consequences for the welfare state Family reunion Family formation (spouse from home country, children) Duration, permanent residency • Selection: Do generous welfare states attract immigrants with low potential (Cohen and Razin 2008) Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 8 (2) Structural changes on the labour market • Effects of labour shortages and sectoral shifts may be mitigated by – Adjustment of wages and wage structure – More imports – More outsourcing – Investment in employability, human capital – Investment in labour-saving technological change – Activating untapped labour potential – Labour market institutions that support flexibility • What role for immigration? Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 9 Migration and the labour market • Benefits – Increases labour supply, reduces tightness – Increases output – Better matching on the labour market (larger pool) – Increases flexibility and dynamism on the labour market – Increase of high-quality human capital at work in case of highly-skilled immigrants • But … – Not every immigrant is successful – Displacement of native workers (esp. low-skilled) – No structural solution for future shortages Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 10 Dutch experience with immigration Focus on economic and labour market impact 1. Immigration from outside the EU: Morocco, Turkey, Surinam, Netherlands Antilles and other non-western countries 2. Immigration from within the EU: CEEC Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 11 Immigration from non-EU countries, 1995-2007 80000 Other 70000 Asylum Family 60000 Work 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 12 Immigration – Part of the solution? Impact on sustainability crucially depends on labour market integration of immigrants: • Skill level • Length of stay, remigration • Cultural distance (language, cultural capital) • Network effects • Integration in society (mixed marriages, follow-up migration) Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 13 NPV net contribution to welfare state by age of entry – blue line Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 14 Gap in male employment natives and foreign born (%), 2005-2006 15 10 5 0 CH GE FR AT BE DK -5 -10 low-skilled high-skilled -15 -20 SD NO NL Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 15 Enrollment in higher education (% of age group 18-20) 1995 2000 2007 Men 43 48 52 Women 46 56 61 Men 28 34 50 Women 27 38 61 Native background Non-western immigrant background Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 16 Number of workers from CEEC countries, January 1999 – December 2005 Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 17 Economic impact of CEEC labour migrants (1) • Estimates for 2008: 51,000 long-term and 107,000 temporary workers (3 months) • Employment in 2005: 0.7% of total hours worked • Displacement wrt jobs: None by long-term migrants; small effect by short-term migrants in expansion sectors (doubling their presence reduces number of ‘Dutch’ jobs by 0.08%) • Displacement wrt wages: Reverse pattern • The demand curve for labour is downward sloping Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 18 Economic impact CEEC labour migrants (2) • Use of benefit schemes is at present very low Based on rough calculations: • Short-term migrants: small positive net contribution to Dutch welfare state • Longer-term migrants (average): NPV of net contribution measured over duration of stay is modestly positive (1 yr state pension for 1 person) • Net contribution: modest but positive (robust) Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 19 NPV net contribution to welfare state by age of entry – green line Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 20 NPV net contribution to welfare state by age of entry – 4 cases (HC RM): (- -) (- +) (+ -) (+ +) Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 21 Conclusion • Migration by EU-nationals reduces labour shortages and modestly improves sustainability • Same (probably) holds for knowledge workers • Short-term immigrants from non-EU countries may under certain conditions have a positive impact on labour market and sustainability • Long-term/permanent migration without integration may well hurt sustainability • Domestic labour utilization is key to sustainability, not migration Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 22 Thank you for your attention Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 23 Immigration, 1995-2007 100000 non-EU 90000 EU 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid 24 Employment rates after arrival, 1997 cohort
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz