Utility 1 An economic term referring to the total satisfaction received from consuming a good or service. A consumer's utility is hard to measure. However, we can determine it indirectly with consumer behavior theories, which assume that consumers will strive to maximize their utility. Utility is a concept that was introduced by Daniel Bernoulli. He believed that for the usual person, utility increased with wealth but at a decreasing rate. Investopedia Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk - 1738 Utility and Risk Aversion An individual may value expected outcome differently based on their risk aversion which may be based on wealth or preferences The utility of a financial gain or loss to an individual is likely dependent on current wealth 8 7 U(w) 6 5 4 3 U(w)=ln(1+w) 2 1 0 $0 $250 $500 $750 w $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 Utility and Risk Aversion An individual has wealth of 1000 and has the opportunity to participate in a fair ‘financial game.’ 50% chance to gain 100 or lose 100. Assume her utility function is the natural log of her wealth U(w) ln(1000 1) 6.909 U(w) .5 ln(900 1) .5 ln(1100 1) 6.904 What probability of winning 100, p, would motivate her to play the financial game? U(w) (1 p) ln(900 1) p ln(1100 1) 6.909 She needs a 52.5% probabilit y of winning U(w) .475 ln(900 1) .525 ln(1100 1) 6.909 Her expected wealth after game is $1005.00 w .475 900 .525 1100 $1005.00 Risk – Return Utility Curve Expected Return & Utility of Expected Return [%] 11% A=3 10% 9% ( ) 3×s2 U r,s =r2 Note the same utility for these assets 8% 7% 6% u = 10% s = 20% 5% u = 7% s = 14% 4% u = 4% s = 0% 3% 2% 1% 0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% Expected Risk [Std Dev %] Attitude Towards Risk A>0 A=0 Risk decreases utility of return Individual is risk averse and is thus an ‘investor’ Investor will not participate in a ‘fair financial game’ Risk does not effect the utility of return Individual is risk neutral and will participate in a ‘fair financial game’ A<0 Risk increases utility of return Individual will participate in an “unfair financial game” Las Vegas Indifference Curves Expected Return % Risk – Return Indifference Curve 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 3 s2 u uCE 2 Note the investor’s indifference between these assets uCE = 11% s = 0% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Expected Risk [Std Dev %] 14 16 18 20 u = 12% s = 8% u = 14% s = 14% Optimal Portfolio 50% CAL line contains all possible portfolios 45% What’s your allocation of funds between assets Depends on your “A” and say its 5 Set the shape and orientation of indifference curve Your optimal portfolio is at the tangent point Equal slopes Indifference curve with A=5 tangent to the CAL 40% 35% Expected Return 30% l 25% 20% Asset A CAL 15% uCE 10% 5% Asset P Asset F 0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Expected Std Dev 30% 35% 40% Portfolios With Two Risky Assets 9 2.4% 2.2% 2.0% rAB=-1 Expected Return Rate 1.8% B 1.6% 1.4% rAB=-.5 rAB=0 rAB=1 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% A 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% Expected Std Dev sp2 w2A s2A wB2 sB2 2 wA wB sA sB ρAB 18% Now Determine Your Optimal Portfolio 10 3.0% 2.5% Indifference curves A=2 , 4, 7 Expected Return Rate 2.0% B 1.5% T: Optimal Risky Portfolio V 1.0% A 0.5% P: Your optimal portfolio F 0.0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Expected Std Dev 16% 18% 20% Portfolio with 2 Risky Assets 11 3.0% 2.5% Indifference curves A=4 Return 2.0% B 1.5% T: Optimal Risky Portfolio V 1.0% A 0.5% P: Your optimal portfolio F 0.0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Std Dev 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz