Political Competition
The Role of Interest Groups
STRUCTURED PLURALISM
Individuals
with
interests that derive from their assets,
endowments, preferences
with interests that derive from their offices and
the requirements of success in office
WHERE YOU STAND DEPENDS ON
WHERE YOU SIT
We must start with individuals
[when we talk about collectivities, like labor, or
property owners, or even homeowners, we are
being a little bit sloppy. We are implying that
these folks all have identical wants and interests
and are prepared to do something about it]
Individuals
have multiple interests
They may join with others to advance some
of those interests thru political action
{groups}
Competitive political analysis looks at
the costs and benefits of group action
and predicts likely outcomes
Benefits
payoff
of GROUP ACTION depend on
if successful
[markets determine the payoffs accruing to alternative
rules/policies]
the
likelihood of success
[receptivity of institutions, opposition]
Costs
of GROUP ACTION depend on
the
costs of organization
[free rider problem]
by-product theory of group organization
ORGANIZING IS EASIER WHEN
PAYOFFS ARE LARGE, GROUPS ARE
SMALL, AND FREE-RIDERS CAN BE
SANCTIONED
DAIRY FARMERS ARE MORE
INFLUENTIAL THAN RANCHERS
BECAUSE THEY ARE BETTER
ORGANIZED -- WHY ARE THEY
BETTER ORGANIZED?
INDIVIDUAL PAYOFFS ARE LARGE
NUMBERS ARE NOT SMALLER, BUT
DAIRIES TEND TO BE SPATIALLY
CONCENTRATED
FREE-RIDERS CAN BE
SANCTIONED
Nature of Political Competition
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz