APPEL D’OFFRES INTERNE : PROJET DE RECHERCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE
LOT DE TRAVAIL ISITE-BFC
WP 2 RECHERCHE
(II) PREPARER L'EXCELLENCE DE DEMAIN
TYPE D'ACTION
PROJET DE RECHERCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE
OUVERTURE DE L'APPEL D'OFFRES
15 septembre 2016 à 12:00
ECHEANCE DE L'APPEL D'OFFRES
4 novembre 2016 à 12:00
MODE DE SOUMISSION
Canevas ci-joint complété et envoyé au format pdf comme pièce jointe d'un
courrier électronique adressé à [email protected] avant l'échéance précisée ci-dessus.
Afin de faciliter l'évaluation du projet par des experts internationaux, la rédaction
se fera en anglais. Dans ce canevas, les indications sur les nombres de pages sont à
comprendre comme des maxima de nombres de pages - figures et tableaux inclus,
instructions en rouge éliminées - formatées comme suit :
Corps de texte : police de caractères calibri ; minimum 11 points ; espacement
simple ; marges (gauche, droite, haut, bas) de 2 cm minimum.
Titres des sections de niveau 1 (Titre 1) : minimum 13 points.
Titres des sections de niveau 2(Titre 2) : minimum 12 points.
Pour les titres de sections, il est recommandé d'utiliser les styles définis dans le
canevas ci-joint.
CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIF
Le consortium a défini trois domaines de recherches intenses définis dans les notes
de bas de page numérotées 1 à 3 du canevas ci-joint. Ces trois domaines ne sont
pas définis dans l’idée d’en assurer l’indépendance vis-à-vis les uns des autres ou
vis-à-vis de tout autre domaine scientifique. ISITE-BFC consacre des ressources des
projets aux pistes de développement les plus prometteuses visant la fertilisation
croisée non seulement entre les domaines de recherche intenses mais aussi avec
d’autres domaines scientifiques.

PRINCIPAUX CRITERES D'EVALUATION
DES PROJETS SOUMIS




DUREE MAXIMALE DU FINANCEMENT
ISITE-BFC
Critère d'éligibilité : Lien avec au moins un domaine de recherche intense
(implication d'au moins un acteur relevant d'un des domaines de
recherches intenses).
Qualité et pertinence scientifique
Résultats attendus
Impact potentiel sur la structuration à venir de la recherche du consortium
ISITE-BFC et/ou sur les activités de formation au sein d'UBFC.
Faisabilité du principal volet du projet
36 mois
MONTANT MAXIMAL DU FINANCEMENT
150 k€
ISITE-BFC

PROCEDURES DE SUIVI DES PROJETS
RETENUS
AUTRES DIRECTIVES

Rapport tous les mois sous forme de trois diapositives préformatées. La
dernière diapositive devra comporter la liste des difficultés rencontrées
afin d'aiguiller les mesures appropriées de soutien au projet.
Evaluation « go / no go » après 18 mois sur des critères mesurant la mise
en œuvre du projet.
Il est recommandé de prendre connaissance des directives générales s'appliquant à tous les
appels d'offres ISITE-BFC & la FAQ prochainement accessibles via www.ubfc.fr .
ISITE-BFC WORK PACKAGE
ACTION
WP 2 RECHERCHE
(II) PREPARER L'EXCELLENCE DE DEMAIN
PROJET DE RECHERCHE INTERDISCIPLINAIRE
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT IS LINKED TO
[DELETE INAPPROPRIATE FIELD(S) ]
ADVANCED MATERIALS,
WAVES, SMART SYSTEMS1
TERRITORIES,
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD2
COMPREHENSIVE
INDIVIDUAL CARE3
OTHER4
PROJECT DURATION (MONTHS)
REQUESTED ISITE-BFC FUNDING (K€)
NAME:
COORDINATOR
FIRST NAME :
E-MAIL :
PHONE :
Section
Max. Mark
1
Project concept
2
Project objective
3
State of Art/ Position relatively to similar actions
5
4
Expected impact
5
5
CV of project leader
2
6
Work plan & deliverables
7
Project budget
5
3
TOTAL
1
1.
3
4
Project Mark
20
Ethical or security issues:
YES / NO
Keywords :
Advanced materials & processes: (nano)materials & composites, durable chemistry, structured thin films, functional
surfaces, micro/nano-material processing, nuclear component metals.
Integrated smart systems & underlying components: micro/nano-techs/robotics, nonlinear (nano)photonics, new
computing paradigms, phononics, time&frequency components, sensors.
Hydrogen energy, electric & thermal energy cogeneration: power generation materials & systems (stationary,
transportation, microgrids), electrical and thermal energy conversion systems.
2
Keywords :
Sustainable territories: complexity & transitions: evolving territories; land use; peopling systems; long term changes;
economical & social cooperation.
“Livelisystem” & environmental change processes, agroecology: ecosystem services; cropping systems; environmental
policies; landscape dynamics ; social-ecological systems.
Innovation in integrated food chains: production & behaviours: agrifood production; innovative food products;
behaviours & food; terroirs, quality & know-how.
Keywords :
Health: pharmaco-imaging, theranostic, lipoprotein, immunology, inflammation, cancer, oncogenetic, lipids, genetic and
developmental disorders.
Innovative smart systems technologies: drug delivery, lab-on-a-chip, new imaging probes.
Cognitive sciences: cognitive stimulation, rehabilitation, neural plasticity, ergonomics, virtual reality.
Human & Social sciences: business & economics, communication, medical ethics, sociology.
Any other field not covered by keywords of footnotes 1,2 and 3.
2/9
1. PROJECT CONCEPT (5 PAGES)
Describe the overall concept and the ambition of the project as well as the main ideas, models and
hypothesis underlying the concept.
2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES (2 PAGES)
Describe the project objectives which should be clear and measurable in some way (s) to be defined in this
section. The objectives should be realistic, thereby meaning achievable within the duration of the project.
References to the work schedule (section 6.3) are recommended.
3. POSITIONING RELATIVELY TO STATE OF THE ART AND/OR RELATIVELY TO SIMILAR ACTIONS (3 PAGES)
For research or development projects: describe the state of the art (with references to measurable data and
competitors) of the research field addressed by the project and how the project targets are beyond the state
of the art or proposes alternatives to the state of the art. Are they cooperation perspectives with some
organization, company or academic players (worldwide) mentioned in the state of the art analysis?
For other types of projects: identify similar actions in BFC, France and/or in Europe. How is the proposed
action going to be original, competing or cooperating with these similar actions?
4. EXPECTED IMPACT (3 PAGES)
Describe the impact of the project among one or several of the following categories which are most relevant
to the proposed action:
 Production of new knowledge: What is the breakthroughing nature of the concepts and/or
objectives of the project?
 Innovation potential: What are the potential applications that could benefit of the project results or
how could new knowledge be integrated in applications?
 Effect on BFC companies: Explain how the proposed action will strengthen the competitiveness or
growth of BFC companies by developing innovations meeting the market needs. Using the European
Technological Readiness Level (TRL) scale5, provide an assessment of the TRL at project start and
targeted by the most relevant deliverables of the project (References to the work schedule -section
6.3- are recommended). Which main principles will rule the management of Intellectual Property
Rights between companies and ISITE-BFC partner(s)?
 Partnership with companies outside BFC: Explain how the proposed action links the BFC players with
companies outside BFC. What are the benefits of the link (of any kind, e.g. amount of contracts, staff
recruited in BFC, funding or co-funding of investments, reputation/position on international scene,
etc)? Using the European Technological Readiness Level (TRL) scale5, provide an assessment of the
TRL at project start and targeted by the most relevant deliverables of the project (References to the
work schedule -section 6.3- are recommended). Which main principles will rule the management of
5
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-gtrl_en.pdf



Intellectual Property Rights between companies and ISITE-BFC partner(s)?
Effect on the High Education & Research (HER) in BFC, e.g.: Improvement of the cooperation
between any subset of ISITE-BFC partners; increasing the long lasting critical mass of coordinated
(management & steering) BFC resources (human resources, equipments/facilities) devoted to some
focused activities addressed by the proposed action; improvement of the international
visibility/reputation of the BFC HER players involved in the project; improvement of the
training/research/innovation reputation/position of the target university UBFC.
Improvement of the quality of a subset of the training activities of one or several UBFC members.
Any other environmental or social impacts not already introduced above.
IMPORTANT:
 The impact description should be kept reasonable and credible: limit the impact description to these
categories which will be most probable at the end of the project. Impacting all categories is not
expected and is not a selection criterion.
 For projects linked to “Advanced Materials, Waves & Smart Systems”1, to “Territories, Environment,
Food” 2 or to “Comprehensive Individual Care”3, for each of the above impact categories you
selected, explain how the project is contributing to the broad scientific objectives cast in the ISITEBFC project6.
5. SHORT CV & RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE PROJECT LEADER (0,5 PAGE)
Provide a short CV of the project leader with emphasis on features that are most relevant to lead the
proposed project.
6
The ISITE-BFC broad scientific objectives may be found in sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 of the document “I-SITE BFC: mode
d’emploi & outils”, available here http://www.ubfc.fr/projet-i-site/mode-demploi/
4/9
6. WORK PLAN & DELIVERABLES
The work plan must be organized in Work Packages (WP), each WP is broken down in Tasks (see table of
section 6.3 below). A deliverable must be associated to each task. A deliverable is a well identifiable distinct
output of the project work, meaningful in terms of the project objective(s). It might be a report describing
results or any document relevant to demonstrate the progress of the project, a software, etc.
For the sake of readability, it is strongly advised that, if relevant, at least two WP's appear distinctly:
 A WP dealing with all matters related to project management, steering and reporting.
 A WP dealing with all matters related to communication (papers, video, web pages, etc),
dissemination (conferences, public events, press releases, interviews, etc), exploitation (patents,
tests by end users, etc) or training activities.
6.1. Overall strategy (3 pages)
After an introduction presenting the complementarity between partners, present the overall structure of the
work plan. Explain what are the WP and/or tasks interdependencies (e.g. in terms of execution timing,
technical prerequisites, legal or statutory constraints, achieved deliverable, etc)?
6.2. Possible difficulties & contingency plan (1 page)
Provide a list of the most critical steps of the project. For each of them, explain why there is a risk that they
could not be achieved and which contingency plan (“plan B”) could then be deployed.
6.3.
Work schedule (no page limit)
WP WP OBJECTIVE
1
TASK N°
SHORT TASK DESCRIPTION
TASK DELIVERABLE
1.1
…
...
…
PROJECT
MONTH
...
1.2
...
2.1
2
2.2
...
...
5/9
7. PROJECT BUDGET (NO PAGE LIMIT)
7.1. Cofinancing (No page limit)
SOURCE OF COFINANCING
OBTAINED / FILED / PLANNED
TYPE OF COST
AMOUNT (K€)
Date
Date
Date
Date
TOTAL
STAFF INVOLVED IN THE ACTION
NAME7
FIRST NAME
EMPLOYER
ACRONYM8
FACULTY/DPT
ACRONYM
PERSON-MONTHS
LABORATORY
GRADE9
DEDICATED TO THE
ACTION10
1
2
3
4
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
TOTAL PM
0
7
8
List all participants starting with the coordinator. Include also support & technical staff.
Use one of the following acronyms: UB, UFC, UTBM, ENSMM, Agrosup, ESC, ENSAM, CNRS, INRA, INSERM, CEA,
CGFL, CHU-Besançon, CHU-Dijon, EFS.
9 Needed to estimate the cofinancing of the action to be reported to ANR. Use french acronym: MCF, CR, PR, DR,
Tech, AI, IE, IR.
10 Needed to estimate the cofinancing of the action to be reported to ANR.
6/9
7.2. Requested PIA funding (No page limit)
REQUESTED ISITE-BFC FUNDING
CONSUMABLES
COST (K€)
...
...
EQUIPMENT
...
...
STAFF
PERSON MONTHS
...
...
TOTAL
7/9
8. REFERENCE SECTION
8.1. State of the art bibliography (No page limit)
[1] Entry
[2] Entry
[...] ...
8.2. List of publications of participants to the project (maximum 10 relevant to the project)
PARTICIPANT 1
(1) Entry
(2) Entry
(...) …
PARTICIPANT 2
(1) Entry
(2) Entry
(...) ...
8.3. Lists of any other relevant data (No page limit)
8/9
9. ETHICAL & SECURITY ISSUES (NO PAGE LIMIT)
Yes/No
9.1
Does your project raise any ethical issue?
9.1.1
If the answer to 9.1. is “yes”, explain the nature of the ethical issues
9.1.2
If the answer to 9.1. is “yes”, explain how ethical issues are addressed and/or comply with
regulations
9.2
Does your project raise any security issue?
9.2.1
If the answer to 9.1. is “yes”, explain the nature of the security issues
9.2.2
If the answer to 9.1. is “yes”, explain how security issues are addressed and/or comply with
regulations
Yes/No
9/9