19 DECEMBER 2011
PUBLICATION CORE STRATEGY
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Poor health is one of the biggest problems facing Salford, and significantly
impacts on the quality of life of its residents. Delivering a healthy city is one of
the seven themes of Salford’s Sustainable Community Strategy1, and this
includes both improving health and removing health inequalities. Its approach
is centred on prevention rather than cure, promoting behavioural change and
empowering people to take more responsibility for their own health and
wellbeing.
1.2
Although many aspects of health improvement are outside the control of the
planning system, it can have a significant role in a number of ways, including
by:






supporting and enabling the improvement of health facilities,
ranging from local GP surgeries to Salford Royal Hospital;
promoting healthy lifestyles, such as through improvements in
the quality and accessibility of recreation opportunities, and the
enhancement of pedestrian and cycling routes;
reducing contributors to poor health and mitigating their risks,
such as those associated with climate change, flooding,
hazardous uses, crime and poor air quality;
improving access to employment, and particularly higher value
employment, recognising the clear links between income and
health;
supporting good mental health, for example by helping to reduce
deprivation and providing high quality homes within an attractive
environment; and
supporting healthy eating, for example through increasing
opportunities for food growing and controlling the amount and/or
location of hot food takeaways.
1.3
Whilst there is no statutory duty to undertake a Health Impact Assessment, it
is considered best practice, and provides a useful tool to inform decision
making. This Health Impact Assessment (HIA) report explains how the health
impacts of the Core Strategy have been assessed during the document’s
production, and identifies the prospective health impacts of the policies
contained within the Salford Publication Core Strategy, which is the version of
the Core Strategy that the city council considers it should adopt.
2.
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS TO DATE
“Connecting people to opportunities: Salford’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2009-2024”
– Partners IN Salford (2009), p.26-29
1
1
19 DECEMBER 2011
2.1
A Health Impact Assessment of the Draft Core Strategy was carried out in
August 2010, retrospectively of the document being published for consultation
in November 2009. The assessment considered the health impacts of each of
the thematic chapters in the Draft Core Strategy against the following key
health issues:









Mental health
Social and cultural isolation
Obesity and cardiovascular disease
Respiratory disease
Diet
Impacts of excessive cold and heat
Safety, injuries and hazards
Healthcare provision
Spending on own health
2.2
These issues were considered to reflect the broad range of health factors that
planning could potentially influence, and were identified primarily from two key
documents.2
2.3
The health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy also included some
detailed commentary on health inequalities and some of the key health issues
in Salford. These have not changed significantly in the interim and so are not
repeated in this updated health impact assessment.
2.4
The health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy indicated that it had
the potential to have a positive effect on the health of people living in Salford.
Some of the health inequalities experienced by Salford residents are driven by
lifestyle choices and differences in opportunity, which it is considered that the
Core Strategy could make a positive contribution to towards changing,
although the extent of its influence needs to be acknowledged. Some of the
key positive health impacts identified for the Draft Core Strategy are listed
below.



Planning for a large amount of employment development would
significantly increase the number of employment opportunities in the
city, improving job security and people’s socio economic position.
Planning for sufficient housing to meet identified needs and ensuring
that there is a good mix of well-designed dwellings would assist in
ensuring residents have a good quality of life and are able to access
suitable housing, would help to promote good physical and mental
health.
Improving the town and local centres and supporting the development
of new shops and facilities within them would assist in encouraging
their use, creating a focal point for communities and potentially
Delivering Healthier Communities in London – NHS London Healthy Urban Development
Unit, Land Use Consultants and CREH (July 2007) and A Guide to Health Impact
Assessment: A Policy Tool for New Zealand – Public Health Advisory Committee (June
2005).
2
2
19 DECEMBER 2011




improving community cohesion, reducing fear of crime and helping to
maximise resident’s ability to walk to shops.
Supporting improvements to education facilities across the city would
contribute towards increased skill levels, which would increase access
to employment opportunities and help to reduce worklessness and
some of the health issues that accompany it.
Developing an integrated walking and cycling network would provide
more opportunities for free active travel and help to tackle issues such
as obesity, cardiovascular disease and social exclusion.
Minimising the risk and impact of flooding would help to reduce the
occurrences of injuries and illnesses associated with flooding and the
potential mental health consequences as a result of flooding.
Working towards local standards for recreation would have the
potential to encourage people to participate in sport and exercise more
regularly, improve air quality and provide more opportunities for social
interaction.
2.5
Carrying out a health impact assessment at this stage in the process was
considered to be particularly valuable, as it provided an opportunity to identify
ways in which the emerging Core Strategy policies could potentially be
adjusted to maximise their health benefits and minimise any harmful effects
on people’s health as far as possible before the document was finalised. The
health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy included a number of
suggestions as to how the Core Strategy could potentially be further improved
to maximise its possible health benefits. It was recognised that it may not be
appropriate or realistic to take forward all of those recommendations in the
Publication Core Strategy, for example due to the fact they may be considered
undeliverable, outside of the scope of the Core Strategy, to significantly
impact on development viability or inconsistent with national planning policy.
In the case of some of the recommendations, it may be more appropriate to
take these forward in another planning document, such as a Supplementary
Planning Document. Table 1 provides details of all of the recommendations of
the health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy, and explains where
these have been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy, and where it is
not considered appropriate to address the issue raised, the reasons for this.
2.6
Table 1 shows that a large number of the recommendations of the health
impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy have been taken forward in
producing the Publication Core Strategy. This has been achieved through the
introduction of new policies and in some cases amendments to the policy
approach. The key changes made between the Draft and Publication stages
that it is considered will make the most difference to the overall health benefits
of the Core Strategy are:


The introduction of a minimum amenity space standards policy for new
residential development, which will help to make new dwellings more
functional and support a higher quality of life and better health.
The green infrastructure policy has been amended to require that in
providing green infrastructure, new developments should support and
enhance identified priority functions within different areas of the city. So
3
19 DECEMBER 2011




for example, within areas of poor resident health, green infrastructure
should provide opportunities for physical activity, and in the Air Quality
Management Area, green infrastructure should be designed so that it
helps to remove pollutants from the air. This will help to tackle specific
health issues and potential health hazards in some areas of the city.
A series of detailed design policies have been introduced which it is
considered will have a range of health benefits by ensuring that issues
such as amenity, crime and the microclimate are given careful
consideration in the design of new development.
Some of the major development proposals that it was identified could
potentially have negative health impacts have not been included in the
Publication Core Strategy. These include the proposal to release land
in the Green Belt at Barton for industry and warehousing development
and the proposal to develop hard surface runways at Barton
Aerodrome to support the expansion of business and general aviation
activity at the airport.
A series of policies have been introduced to control development so
that it does not result in unacceptable levels of pollution, and ensure
that development is not permitted where it would be subject to
unacceptable levels of pollution. Having these controls in place should
ensure that the amenity of residents is sufficiently protected.
The Publication Core Strategy now includes a policy that protects and
strictly controls development that would affect existing recreation
facilities. This should encourage people to participate in sport and
exercise, and assist in tackling issues such as cardiovascular disease,
obesity and respiratory disease.
4
19 DECEMBER 2011
TABLE 1 RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE DRAFT CORE STRATEGY AND DETAILS
OF THE RESPONSES TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Employment
Programmes to improve skill levels so residents can access jobs
are largely outside the scope of the Core Strategy but there may
be potential to utilise section 106 agreements to secure training
programmes (mental health)
Consider whether one or more major new sites for industry and
warehousing are required in Central Salford to ensure good new
provision across the whole city, accessible to all deprived
communities (mental health)
Local jobs provide more opportunities to walk and cycle to work,
promoting healthy lifestyles. Ensure that loss of employment
areas does not reduce overall accessibility of jobs as far as
possible (obesity and cardiovascular disease)
No. It is not considered appropriate to go into this level of detail
in the Core Strategy. The existing Planning Obligations
Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) requires that new
development contributes to the development of construction skills
amongst Salford residents and it is considered that any further
requirements should be incorporated into a revised SPD.
No. There are no large new sites in Central Salford suitable for
the development of major new industry and warehousing
facilities, and so there will be a reliance on existing employment
areas.
No. The Publication Core Strategy seeks to protect and enhance
the city’s employment areas as far as possible. However, it is
recognised that some existing employment areas will find it
increasingly difficult to attract and retain businesses. The release
of such sites will therefore be appropriate and the Publication
Core Strategy seeks to control this process carefully, ensuring
that only those employment areas that are unable to secure a
long term economic future are redeveloped. There is therefore
potential that residents living in some parts of the city will not
have access to the same range of local employment
5
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Consider whether more guidance should be provided on the
siting of hazardous substances. Detailed guidance on the siting
of hazardous installations is provided by the Health and Safety
Executive, and so further advice in the Core Strategy or
supporting documents on their location is probably unnecessary
(Safety, injuries and hazards)
Need to ensure that site allocations in the Allocations
Development Plan Document fully take into account risks from
hazardous installations (Safety, injuries and hazards)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
opportunities in close proximity of their home that they once had.
Yes. Policies PH4 and PH5 of the Publication Core Strategy
control the location of hazardous uses and development near
hazardous installations.
No. This was identified as a matter for the Allocations
Development Plan Document.
Housing
Consider whether there is potential for increasing further the
proportion of houses compared to apartments (mental
health/obesity and cardiovascular disease)
Consider whether even stricter size standards for apartments are
required (mental health)
Consider whether specific outdoor space standards are required
(mental health/cardiovascular and obesity)
Consider whether specific separation distances should be
included to protect privacy and levels of daylight either through
Yes. Policy H4 of the Publication Core Strategy anticipates that
38.7% of all new dwellings will be houses. This represents a
significant increase compared to the proportion of houses in the
Draft Core Strategy (28.15%).
Yes. Policy H5 of the Publication Core Strategy includes stricter
size standards than those proposed in the Draft Core Strategy,
and requires that a greater proportion of the dwellings within a
development meets the size standards listed.
Yes. Policy H6 of the Publication Core Strategy establishes
amenity space standards for new development and requirements
for how such amenity space should be designed and provided.
Yes. Policy D9 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that new
development maintains specific separation distances from
6
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
the Core Strategy or supplementary planning document (mental
health)
principal windows of habitable rooms on dwellings. This policy
also requires that development provides all users with an
acceptable level of amenity in terms of sunlight, space, layout,
aspect, privacy, daylight, tranquillity and temperature.
No. Although housing demand in this part of the city is high, the
opportunities for residential development are relatively limited
compared to other parts of the city. The Strategic Housing Land
Availability Assessment (SHLAA) has been reviewed and the
anticipated supply of dwellings in this location remains broadly
the same. The approach to maximise housing supply in this part
of the city by taking a more flexible approach than in other parts
of the city to infill housing schemes and the redevelopment of
existing properties into a larger number of dwellings is retained in
policy SF2A of the Publication Core Strategy.
Yes. Policy H7 of the Publication Core Strategy has been
introduced to ensure that apartment developments provide well
designed, functional communal areas that are subject to
appropriate management and maintenance measures. Policy
DP7 of the Publication Core Strategy requires more generally
that all development should ensure that appropriate management
and maintenance provisions are made, which will also assist in
addressing this issue.
Yes. The overall scale of housing development proposed in the
Publication Core Strategy (22,100) is significantly lower than the
figure in the Draft Core Strategy (33,750). The Draft Core
Strategy proposed a particularly large amount of housing in the
Regional Centre (16,850 dwellings) and this has been reduced
Seek to identify through the Strategic Housing Land Availability
Assessment additional land for large houses in Broughton Park
and Higher Broughton (social and cultural isolation)
Consider whether additional guidance on the design,
management and maintenance of apartments is required, either
through the Core Strategy or a supplementary planning
document (mental health)
Consider whether less housing could be provided in some
locations or the overall scale of housing development reduced
across the board to address concerns expressed by existing
residents who consider it will significantly reduce their quality of
life (mental health)
7
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Consider whether more than 10% wheelchair housing could be
justified (cultural and social isolation)
Consider whether relying on the incorporation of the Lifetime
Homes standard into the Code for Sustainable Homes is
sufficient, or whether something specific is required in the Core
Strategy or a Supplementary Planning Document (cultural and
social isolation)
Consider whether specific design advice is required for housing
development within the air quality management area (respiratory
disease)
Further increase the emphasis on public transport, cycling and
walking as modes of travel (respiratory disease)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
significantly in the Publication Core Strategy (10,000 dwellings).
No. The requirement that 10% of all dwellings should be
designed to be wheelchair accessible has been deleted. The
approach instead is that all dwellings should be designed to meet
the Lifetime Homes standard, which includes some Housing that
is designed to the Lifetime Homes Standard should be
convenient for most occupants, including some wheelchair users.
Whilst applying the Lifetime Homes Standard will not guarantee
that housing is immediately suitable for wheelchair users, it
should ensure that dwellings are designed in such a way that
they can be easily adapted.
Yes. Policy H7 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that all
dwellings meet the Lifetime Homes standard.
Yes. Although not specific to residential development, policy GI2
of the Publication Core Strategy requires that development in the
Air Quality Management Area should provide trees and green
roofs to help remove pollutants from the air, whilst avoiding
species that release high quantities of volatile organic
compounds.
Yes. The priority to secure a modal shift to more environmentally
friendly forms of transport such as walking and cycling is
8
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
identified as a key priority in the accessibility spatial strategy
(policy A1) in the Publication Core Strategy. The Publication
Core Strategy includes minimum cycle parking standards and
requirements that cycle parking is designed so as to encourage
and enable its use.
Seek to identify more land for housing outside the Air Quality
No. The updated Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
Management Area through a review of the Strategic Housing
identifies where sites are located within the Air Quality
Land Availability Assessment (respiratory disease)
Management Area (AQMA), however it has been assumed that
any air quality issue can be dealt with through the design of the
development rather than removing sites in the AQMA from the
identified housing supply. Publication Core Strategy policy GI2
will help to ensure this by requiring that green infrastructure in
new development in the AQMA is designed so that it helps to
remove pollutants from the air. Policy PH2 of the Publication
Core Strategy will ensure that development is not permitted
where it would be subject to unacceptable levels of pollution.
Seek to reduce the extent of the Air Quality Management Area by Yes. The Publication Core Strategy includes an Accessibility
minimising road traffic, through the location of development and
Spatial Strategy, which seeks to reduce the need to travel and
encouraging people to use public transport and active modes of
secure a modal shift to more sustainable modes of transport.
travel by investing in the necessary infrastructure (respiratory
This will be in part delivered by the overall development strategy,
disease)
which places a strong emphasis on high density, mixed use
development in the Regional Centre, to enable people to live and
work in close proximity. The scale of investment in Salford’s
public transport infrastructure will be largely determined by
Transport for Greater Manchester and many of the issues
relating to Salford’s public transport system can only be
addressed at the conurbation wide level. Policy A5 of the
9
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Consider whether minimum size standards are required for
kitchens, to ensure sufficient room for food storage, preparation
and cooking. It may be that it is more appropriate to address this
in a supplementary planning document (diet)
Continue other programmes aimed at tackling fuel poverty, such
as the city council’s very successful Warm Front project (impacts
of excessive cold and heat)
Consider whether specific standards for private amenity space
and other green infrastructure to combat the urban heat island
effect should be provided, either in the Core Strategy or a
supplementary planning document (impacts of excessive cold
and heat)
Update assumptions regarding housing and flood risk once the
new Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment has been
completed and take a precautionary approach (safety, hazards
and injuries)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Publication Core Strategy establishes a broad set of principles
for improving Salford’s public transport network, to ensure that as
funding becomes available, the priorities for investment in Salford
are clear.
No. It is considered that such requirements are too specific for
the Core Strategy and may not provide sufficient flexibility to
developers in designing schemes. It is considered that the
minimum size standards for dwellings (which are a requirement
of Publication Core Strategy policy H5) will assist in ensuring that
kitchens are of a reasonable size.
No. This is outside of the scope of the Core Strategy.
Yes. Policy H6 of the Publication Core Strategy establishes
amenity space standards for new development and requirements
for how such amenity space should be designed and provided.
Policy GI2 in the Publication Core Strategy requires that
development in the Regional Centre and other areas of high
density provide green infrastructure that offers relief from high
temperatures.
Yes. The updated Strategic Housing Land Availability
Assessment has taken into account the Level 2 Strategic Flood
Risk Assessment and as a result some housing sites have been
removed from the supply of suitable, available and achievable
sites, and for other sites the mix of dwellings has been revised,
taking into account the flood risk issues.
10
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Town Centres and Retailing
Consider whether there needs to be a specific emphasis on
developing/improving pedestrian and cycling routes between
existing residential areas and town/local centres to encourage
communities to use these centres more (social and cultural
isolation)
Consider whether there needs to be greater emphasis on the
provision of leisure facilities and open space in the town centres
(obesity and cardiovascular disease).
Consider whether there needs to be a specific emphasis on
enhancing the green infrastructure network in town centres, as
parts of all four of the town centres are located in the air quality
Yes. Although the Core Strategy does not specifically state that
routes between existing residential areas and town centres
should be improved, policy A4 of the Publication Core Strategy
includes a more general reference to seeking to address
identified gaps in the cycling network. The city council’s cycling
strategy is due to be reviewed in 2012, and this will identify
where the gaps need to be filled, concentrating on developing a
core network that connects residential areas with key facilities
such as employment opportunities, recreation facilities and local
shopping facilities. This issue should therefore be addressed
through the review of the cycling strategy, although the general
principles are addressed in the Core Strategy.
No. The Publication Core Strategy does not make specific
reference to encouraging the development of open space and
leisure facilities within town centres, and it is considered that it
would be more appropriate to identify opportunities for creating
open spaces through detailed area based planning guidance
documents or masterplans. The Publication Core Strategy does
however seek to maximise the amount of green infrastructure as
far as possible in new developments and in areas of poor
average health, and the provision of green infrastructure that
provides opportunities for physical activity is a particular priority.
Yes. Policy GI2 of the Publication Core Strategy seeks to ensure
that the green infrastructure network is maximised across the
city, including town centres. With regards to addressing the air
11
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
management area (respiratory disease)
quality issues in the town centres, policy GI2 requires that within
the Air Quality Management Area, the priority for green
infrastructure will be the provision of trees and green roofs to
help remove pollutants from the air.
Yes. The Publication Core Strategy includes an accessibility
spatial strategy (policy A1) which prioritises local enhancements
to walking, cycling and public transport within a number of key
destinations, including the Regional Centre and Salford’s other
town centres.
No. This issue is considered too detailed for the Core Strategy
and any proposals to support improvements to, or the
development of,local markets within individual centres should be
addressed through area based planning guidance documents or
regeneration strategies.
No. It is not considered appropriate to restrict the number of hot
food takeaways in the Core Strategy. Taking this approach would
single out hot food takeaways as the only outlet where unhealthy
food choices are available, whereas supermarkets, small
convenience stores and cafes equally offer unhealthy food
choices. There is potential that taking this approach could have
adverse community impacts and disadvantage some ethnic
minority groups, whose livelihood is derived from this type of
business.
Consider whether there are opportunities for further public
transport access improvements to the town centres, helping to
minimise traffic in and around the centres (respiratory disease)
Consider whether improvements to town centres should include
reference to supporting and improving local markets to provide a
convenient venue for buying fresh and affordable produce (diet).
Consider whether it is appropriate to place greater restrictions on
the number and location of hot food takeaways. Establishing
frontage policies potentially through another development plan
document could exercise some control over this type of
development (diet).
Consider whether the Core Strategy needs to be more explicit
about how the night time economy in the relevant centres will be
developed whilst supporting health objectives (diet/safety injuries
No. This issue is considered too detailed for the Core Strategy
and any proposals to support improvements to the evening
economy within individual centres should be addressed through
12
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
and hazards).
area based planning guidance documents or regeneration
strategies.
Education
There may be potential to utilise section 106 agreements to
secure training programmes associated with new employment
development which can provide opportunities for young people to
gain skills in for example construction (mental health)
Consider whether it is appropriate to require that in delivering
major improvements to existing schools and in developing new
schools it is appropriate to require that traffic calming measures
and parking exclusion zones are established in order to create
safer routes and encourage more walking and cycling to school
(obesity and cardiovascular disease)
The University of Salford is located within the air quality
management zone. Consider the need to include reference to
No. It is not considered appropriate to go into this level of detail
in the Core Strategy. The existing Planning Obligations
Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) requires that new
development contributes to the development of construction skills
amongst Salford residents and it is considered that any further
requirements should be incorporated into a revised SPD.
Yes. Whilst the Publication Core Strategy does not specifically
state that traffic calming and parking exclusion zones are
required, policy ED1 does require that all schools are located and
designed to minimise the impacts of associated traffic and
parking on the surrounding area, and are highly accessible to
their intended catchments by walking and cycling. Policy A4 of
the Publication Core Strategy also requires that where
practicable, developments should support the improvement of
the walking and cycling network, particularly in terms of
enhancing accessibility from development to local facilities such
as schools. These policies should help to address the issue
raised without placing very specific requirements on all
developments when they may not be appropriate in some
circumstances.
No. Policy GI2 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that
developments within the Air Quality Management Area should
13
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
enhancing the green infrastructure on the University of Salford
campus as part of the public realm enhancements (respiratory
disease)
incorporate green infrastructure that helps to remove pollutants
from the air, such as trees and green roofs. This requirement
would apply to any development proposals for the university.
Health facilities
Consider whether priority locations for enhanced/expanded
provision should be identified (obesity and cardiovascular
disease)
Work in partnership with the Primary Care Trust to determine the
need for new services in the context of the scale and distribution
of housing development proposed in the Core Strategy. Consider
setting out in the policy where in the city the need is the greatest
and placing a requirement on developers to ensure that land is
set aside for community health uses accordingly. This could be
picked up in more detail through the Allocations DPD (healthcare
provision)
In delivering major improvements to hospital and primary care
facilities, consider whether the policy should include a criterion to
ensure that new development is designed to assist in positive
health outcomes, taking into account issues such as views, noise
levels, exposure to natural light and privacy (healthcare
provision)
No. It is not considered appropriate to go into such detail in the
Core Strategy. There is significant uncertainty around the
delivery of new facilities in light of the proposed abolition of
Primary Care Trusts and the transfer of powers to GP consortia
and local authorities, which makes it very difficult to determine
where improvements to existing facilities or new facilities are
likely to be required or delivered. Instead, policy HH1 of the
Publication Core Strategy includes a more general reference to
supporting improvements to the quality and accessibility of
primary healthcare facilities where this would help to deliver more
positive health outcomes.
Yes. Whilst not picked up specifically in relation to healthcare
developments, policy D9 of the Publication Core Strategy
requires that all development provides all potential users with an
acceptable level of amenity. The policy explains that amenity
includes issues such as daylight, sunlight, tranquillity and
privacy. These issues would therefore be given consideration in
determining any proposals for healthcare facilities.
14
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Transport
Consider having an overarching transport policy outlining major
transport links that need to be improved in the context of current
provision/capacity, existing patterns of movement and the scale
and distribution of development being planned in the Core
Strategy (mental health)
No. Investment in the city’s strategic transport infrastructure is
generally outside of the control of the city council, and funded by
other organisations such as Network Rail, the Highways Agency
and Transport for Greater Manchester. The Publication Core
Strategy identifies all of the major schemes that are proposed to
be delivered by these organisations during the plan period,
however it is not the case that there are schemes in place to
address all of the existing or forecast capacity issues on Salford’s
transport network. Policy A1 of the Publication Core Strategy
includes a more general objective to maintain the successful
functioning of existing transport infrastructure and services,
delivering improvements where possible.
Consider whether guidance is required on minimising the
negative aspects of transport infrastructure including the impact
of major new transport infrastructure such as the Ordsall Chord
(mental health)
Yes. Policy A6 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that the
Ordsall Chord is constructed in such a way that minimises its
impact on the ability to successfully develop adjacent sites.
Policy DP6 in the Publication Core Strategy requires more
generally that developments should provide appropriate
mitigation for any impacts that they may have.
No. Policy A1 of the Core Strategy identifies those locations
where it is considered most important to strengthen public
transport connections to i.e. the major employment locations.
The accessibility of individual neighbourhoods may change
during the plan period if public transport services are reviewed.
Identify those neighbourhoods where enhancing transport
connections to employment/leisure opportunities is the greatest
priority (social and cultural isolation)
15
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Requiring that cycle hubs include showers, lockers and clothes
drying areas could encourage more people to walk/cycle to work
(obesity and cardiovascular disease)
No. Cycle centres will be provided in different forms, varying in
size and the range of services they provide. It is not considered
appropriate to be so prescriptive as to require that all cycle
centres provide showers, lockers and clothes drying areas, as
this may not be feasible to deliver in practice and may result in
fewer cycle centres being provided. Policy A4 of the Publication
Core Strategy requires that such facilities are provided where
practicable.
Yes. Policy A4 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that
developments should where practicable support the
enhancement of the walking and cycling network, particularly in
terms of enhancing access from the development to public
transport stops.
Yes. Although the Publication Core Strategy does not specifically
require that new highways include tree planting, policy GI2
requires that developments within the Air Quality Management
Area incorporate green infrastructure that helps to remove
pollutants from the air, such as trees or green roofs. It is not
considered appropriate to require that all new/improved highways
include planting to mitigate air pollution as some of these roads
may be located in areas of the city where air quality is not an
issue, or it may not be a realistic option.
No. It is considered that the more general references to ensuring
that the network is safe would address this issue sufficiently in
the Core Strategy.
Consider whether to place an emphasis in policies T4 and T5 on
connecting pedestrian and cycle routes to major public transport
facilities (obesity and cardiovascular disease)
Consider whether to place a requirement on new/improved
highways to include trees and/or planting to contribute to
mitigating air pollution from traffic, particularly where there is a
forecast increase (respiratory disease)
Consider the need to include reference to lighting and visibility of
the pedestrian and cycle network (in policies T4, 5 and 6), to
maximise the safety and usability of these routes throughout the
day and evening, although such detailed design guidance may
be more appropriate in a supplementary planning document
16
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
(safety, hazards and injuries)
Consider whether there is more potential for off-road recreational
routes (safety, hazards and injuries)
Investigate in more detail the airspace safety implications of the
expansion of City Airport Manchester and include any necessary
measures in the criteria for the policy (safety, hazards and
injuries)
Consider whether the Core strategy can take a more proactive
approach to the development of home zones where streets are
‘reclaimed’ from cars as a way of improving safety and reducing
traffic speeds in residential areas (safety hazards and injuries)
No. This is considered too detailed an issue for the Core
Strategy. The potential to develop more off road cycling routes
will be addressed when the city council’s cycling strategy is
reviewed in 2012 and the key gaps in the network identified.
No. The proposal to expand City Airport Manchester is not
included in the Publication Core Strategy and therefore it is not
considered necessary to address the issue raised. Policy A14 of
the Publication Core Strategy explains that the airport will be
retained and protected as a general aviation facility.
No. It is considered that this issue is adequately addressed by
ensuring that all development is designed so as to maximise the
use of modes towards the top of the transport hierarchy (i.e.
walking and cycling).
Energy
Any approach to decentralised energy production will need to be
carefully managed to ensure that it has a positive impact by
reducing rather than increasing costs, and by improving security
of supply (mental health)
Consider whether additional guidance should be included on
design issues such as insulation and passive solar gain, which
could help to minimise the risk of excessive heat and cold in
dwellings (impacts of excessive cold and heat).
Yes. Policy EG2 explains that in determining the likely benefits of
individual renewable and low carbon energy schemes, regard will
be had to its potential to improve Salford’s energy security and
any direct benefits for the local community such as through
reduced energy costs.
Yes. Policy D10 of the Publication Core Strategy seeks to ensure
that development maintains and enhances the comfort of the
local microclimate, and requires that development is designed to
help mitigate higher temperatures associated with the heat island
17
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
effect. Retaining the energy hierarchy in the Publication Core
Strategy (policy EG1) should encourage developers to design
buildings to that they minimise heat loss as far as possible.
Policy D9 requires that all development provides potential users
with an acceptable level of amenity, including addressing issues
of sunlight and temperature.
Water
Consider whether there is potential to further reduce the number
of new dwellings located within the flood risk area (mental
health/safety injuries and hazards)
Some of Salford’s most economically important and socially
deprived areas are at significant risk of flooding, and therefore
enabling regeneration and development in these areas remains
an important priority. Policy WA5 of the Publication Core Strategy
provides a detailed policy framework for considering proposals in
areas at risk of flooding. It should however be noted that the
updated Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment has
taken into account the Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment,
and as a result some housing sites have been removed from the
supply of suitable, available and achievable sites, and for other
sites the mix of dwellings has been revised, taking into account
the flood risk issues.
Consider whether it is necessary to include proposals to further
improve the water quality of the Bridgewater Canal, particularly in
the context of its tourism/recreation focus (safety, injuries and
hazards)
Design
No. The Bridgewater Canal Corridor Masterplan has not
identified that water quality is an issue or a concern in relation to
increasing its recreation role.
18
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Consider whether more detail is required to expand on some of
these general principles, or whether this is best contained in one
or more separate supplementary planning documents (mental
health)
Consider adding a reference to increasing the level of community
involvement in the design process, which can help to reduce the
stress associated with new developments (mental health)
Yes. Policies D1 – D12 of the Publication Core Strategy provide
more detailed guidance in relation to a range of issues including
amenity, space, layout, views, adaptability and materials.
Consider whether the design principles should include a specific
reference to supporting the road user hierarchy and/or require
that design of new development maximises opportunities for
walking and cycling, although these issues are also addressed to
some extent in the Transport chapter (obesity and cardiovascular
disease)
No. This would be unnecessary repetition. The transport
hierarchy is retained in policy A2 of the Publication Core
Strategy.
Reference could be made to green infrastructure, although this
issue is covered in a separate chapter (respiratory disease)
Yes. However, rather than addressing the design of green
infrastructure in the design policies, reference has been made to
having regard to the design context in the green infrastructure
policy (Policy GI2) in the Publication Core Strategy. Design
principles for spaces within new developments are provided in
policy D5 of the Publication Core Strategy, which will also be
applicable to the design of some green infrastructure.
Yes. Policy GI2 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that in
the Air Quality Management Zone, green infrastructure within the
development should help to remove pollutants from the air.
Consider whether there should be a specific reference to
ensuring design minimises the impacts of pollution (e.g. air and
noise), particularly for new dwellings (respiratory disease)
No. Other policies in the Publication Core Strategy (DP4
supporting successful neighbourhoods and DP6 Mitigating the
impacts of development) should help to ensure that development
benefits the wider community and that any negative impacts are
appropriately addressed.
19
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
The design policy could be more specific about making adequate
provision for space for food growing (diet)
Consider whether additional guidance should be included on
issues such as insulation and passive solar gain, which could
help to minimise the risk of excessive heat and cold in dwellings
(impacts of excessive cold and heat)
Consider requiring that public realm and open space is located
where opportunities for passive surveillance occur (safety,
hazards and injuries)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Where there are already significant levels of pollution, policies
PH1 and PH2 of the Publication Core Strategy recognise that it
may be necessary to control the type and form of developments
and does not permit development where it would be subject to
unacceptable levels of pollution.
Yes. Whilst there is no specific requirement in the Publication
Core Strategy to provide space for food growing, the introduction
of the minimum amenity space standards in residential
development (policy H6) and the increase in allotments
standards from 10 to 20 plots per 1,000 households (policy R2)
should help to ensure that the amount of space available for food
growing is maximised.
Yes. Retaining the energy hierarchy in the Publication Core
Strategy (policy EG1) should help to ensure that buildings
minimise heat loss as far as possible. Policy D9 requires that all
development provides potential users with an acceptable level of
amenity, including addressing issues of sunlight and
temperature.
Yes. Policy D11 of the Publication Core Strategy requires that
development is designed so that it allows for the natural
surveillance of public spaces. Policy D5 also requires that
boundary treatments for public spaces provide visual
permeability and that street furniture does not create
unnecessary visual obstacles.
Heritage
Consider how the Core Strategy could recognise the value of and No. It is considered that this should be addressed through the
20
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
protect wider heritage assets which may be important to the local
community and the character of the area, for example it may be
appropriate to retain and enhance older housing in some areas
rather than redevelop. Any locally important heritage assets are
however likely to be identified on the city council’s local list
(mental health)
Consider whether it is feasible to develop a heritage based
walking and cycling route along the Manchester Ship Canal to
encourage further opportunities for exercise and link up with the
walking routes on the other canals (obesity and cardiovascular
disease)
development of the ‘local list.’ Policy HE1 of the Publication Core
Strategy provides more general principles for the protection of
heritage assets, and recognises that the level of protection
afforded should reflect the nature, extent and level of its
significance.
Consider whether there should be more emphasis on linking the
Bridgewater Canal into the wider pedestrian and cycle network
(obesity and cardiovascular disease)
No. This is considered too specific for the Core Strategy. Policy
HE1 of the Publication Core Strategy recognises that the
Bridgewater Canal Corridor is an important heritage asset and
supports the expansion of its tourism and leisure role. Policy D12
also requires that development adjacent to waterways such as
the Bridgewater Canal provides a waterside pedestrian and
cycling route.
No. The Publication Core Strategy does not include this as a
proposal, however policy R5 of the Unitary Development Plan is
proposed to be retained and should be considered alongside the
policies in the Core Strategy once it is adopted. This identifies a
proposed recreation route along the Manchester Ship Canal.
Green Infrastructure
Consider whether to place specific requirements on development
in the Regional Centre where the negative health impacts are
potentially greater as a result of the scale and density of
development and more innovative solutions to providing green
infrastructure are likely to be required e.g. street trees, window
boxes, green facades and roofs, green security, converting
Yes. Policy GI2 notes that the priority function for green
infrastructure in the Regional Centre is to provide relief from high
temperatures, and recognises that the provision of open spaces
may not always be practicable, therefore innovative solutions
such as green roofs and walls are encouraged so that overall,
the amount of green infrastructure can be maximised as far as
21
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
selected streets into green ways (mental health)
possible without affecting the amount of land available for
development.
Yes. One of the functions of the green infrastructure network in
the Publication Core Strategy is ‘providing space for public
events, meeting places and quiet contemplation’ (Policy GI1).
Policy SF3F of the Publication Core Strategy recognises that
parts of Chat Moss are notable for their tranquillity, and seeks to
protect the tranquil character of the area.
Yes. The Publication Core Strategy includes policies that require
that all elements of development are subject to appropriate
maintenance provisions, including the landscaping within any
development (Policy DP7). Policies D5 (Spaces) and D11
(Design and crime) require that careful consideration is given to
the design, location and means of access to open spaces, to
ensure that crime and fear of crime are minimised as far as
possible.
No. This is considered a detailed design issue that would be
most appropriate to consider through a Supplementary Planning
Document. However, policy GI2 does require that developments
should maximise the interconnectedness of green infrastructure,
which may contribute to this.
In part. Policy GI2 of the Publication Core Strategy identifies that
the green infrastructure network should have priority functions
within some parts of the city, to address some of the identified
pressures such as poor health, flood risk, air quality etc.
Consider whether one of the Green Infrastructure Network
functions should be to provide tranquil spaces within the city
(mental health)
Consider whether there needs to be more emphasis on safety
and maintenance of the green infrastructure network (mental
health)
Consider whether there needs to be more detail in the policy, to
ensure that the green infrastructure wraps around development
so that all users can easily benefit from it (mental health)
The Core Strategy could go further by identifying specific
standards, and the priority functions of the Green Infrastructure
Network in different parts of the city. This would ensure that in
enhancing or adding to the network, health benefits are
maximised by tailoring the type of green infrastructure provided
to the needs of that part of the city. It is currently anticipated that
22
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
an SPD will provide the more detailed advice in relation to this
matter (social/cultural isolation)
The policy could potentially identify those parts of the city where
mitigating air pollution will be a particular priority function for the
Green Infrastructure Network (respiratory disease)
Consider whether it is appropriate to make it a more explicit
requirement to provide opportunities for local food production in
areas around new residential developments (diet)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
Yes. This is identified in policy GI2 of the Publication Core
Strategy.
No. This is not identified as a requirement in the Publication Core
Strategy, however it is considered that the requirement for new
residential developments to contribute towards the achievement
of the allotments standards and the minimum requirements for
outdoor amenity space should assist in creating sufficient
opportunities for food growing.
Consider whether requirements should be placed on the
No. This requirement is considered to be too specific for the Core
integration of rainwater storage/harvesting facilities to support the Strategy. Policy GI2 of the Publication Core Strategy identifies
Green Infrastructure Network, particularly in areas of the city
the more general priority functions of the green infrastructure
more vulnerable to increased temperatures. Sustainable
network relevant to some of the key pressures facing the city,
drainage systems (SUDS) could also assist in managing/storing
including high temperatures and flood risk. Policy WA6 of the
excess water (impacts of excessive cold and heat)
Publication Core Strategy also requires that new development
minimises the amount of surface water run off and water
pollution.
Consider whether reference should also be made to using green Yes. Although not specifically addressed through the green
infrastructure to minimise wind speeds and turbulence, which can infrastructure policy, policy D10 of the Publication Core Strategy
increase the negative impacts of cold weather (impacts of
requires that development is designed in such a way that it does
excessive cold and heat)
not have an unacceptable impact on the local mircoclimate,
including for example the tunnelling, speed and direction.
Consider whether it is appropriate to place more emphasis on
No. Whilst the Publication Core Strategy does not place greater
increasing the quantity of green infrastructure in flood risk areas
emphasis on increasing the quantity of green infrastructure in the
(safety, injuries and hazards)
flood risk areas, policy GI2 does specify that within the flood risk
23
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
zones green infrastructure within new developments should
provide capacity for water storage.
Green Belt
Consider whether there are alternative ways in which the city’s
development needs can be met without using part of the Green
Belt at Barton (mental health)
Consider whether there are additional ways in which the Green
Belt can be more effectively integrated within the rest of the city,
so that it feels less isolated (social/cultural isolation)
Whilst Chat Moss is a major green infrastructure resource, there
is a risk that increasing public access will only benefit those living
in the communities immediately surrounding it. Consider whether
specific reference needs to be made to improving access to Chat
Moss, through for example linking into the existing walking and
cycling network. Equally this may assist in reducing social
isolation for those living in the mosslands (obesity and
cardiovascular disease)
Consider whether an even stronger approach should be taken to
Yes. The proposal to release land in the Green Belt at Barton for
employment development has been dropped and is not included
as a proposal in the Publication Core Strategy.
Yes. Policy GB1 of the Publication Core Strategy provides a
spatial strategy for Salford’s Green Belt and supports the positive
use of the Green Belt, particularly where this would increase its
accessibility to Salford residents. The farm diversification policy
(GB4) is also more positively worded in the Publication Core
Strategy, and explains that farm diversification projects that
support the rural economy will be permitted, particularly where
they enhance public access to the Green Belt. The proposal in
the Draft Core Strategy to increase public access throughout
Chat Moss has been retained in policy SF3F of the Publication
Core Strategy.
No. The Publication Core Strategy seeks to maintain and
enhance the network of walking and cycling routes, but does not
identify improving connections into Chat Moss as a priority. The
review of the city council’s cycling strategy will identify the gaps
in the network and determine the key priorities for investment in
the network.
Yes. The Publication Core Strategy includes a policy on
24
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
the retention of high quality agricultural land outside the
heartland, including potentially deleting the Green Belt
employment proposal (diet)
agricultural land (GB5), which seeks to protect high grade
agricultural land as far as possible, and identifies the limited
circumstances where development that would result in a
reduction in high grade agricultural land will be permitted. The
proposal in the Draft Core Strategy to release land in the Green
Belt at Barton for employment development, which included
some high quality agricultural land, is not included in the
Publication Core Strategy.
Tourism and recreation
Consider whether the strategic recreation facilities in the
Regional Centre have the potential to provide tranquil spaces
(mental health)
Improving the quality of greenspaces makes people’s experience
of them more enjoyable. Consider whether a set of quality
standards for greenspace should be established (considering
things such as for example cleanliness, lighting, seating,
signage, bins etc). It may be more appropriate to address this
through an SPD (social and cultural isolation)
Consider whether there are any areas of the city where
accessibility to strategic recreation facilities is particularly poor.
This may place greater emphasis on enhancing existing
resources in the city so that they can perform a strategic
No. The Irwell River Park is the main strategic recreation scheme
proposed to be delivered within the Regional Centre. It is
anticipated that this will provide a range of high quality
multifunctional spaces and walking/cycling routes. There is
potential that some of the spaces will provide quiet spaces,
however this is considered too detailed to include in the Core
Strategy.
No. This is considered too detailed for the Core Strategy.
However, together the various design policies introduced in the
Publication Core Strategy should ensure that new green spaces
provide users with an acceptable level of amenity (Policy D9
amenity) and that any street furniture incorporated into public
spaces is carefully designed and located (Policy D5).
No. Strategic recreation facilities play a complementary role to
local recreation facilities and the list of strategic recreation
schemes in policy R1 of the Publication Core Strategy reflects
the location of existing facilities with potential to expand their role
25
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
recreation function, for example the Chat Moss area (obesity and
cardiovascular disease)
and key opportunities to develop new facilities. The local
recreation standards in policy R2 of the Publication Core
Strategy should ensure that all residents have good access to a
range of recreation opportunities.
No. Consideration was given to including the Woodland Trust
Woodland Access Standard, but it was concluded that it would
be unrealistic to achieve these standards and seeking to do so
could compromise other objectives. It is considered more
appropriate to retain the natural greenspace standards instead.
Yes. The standard has been increased to 20 plots per 1, 000
households in the Publication Core Strategy (Policy R2).
Consider whether a separate standard is required in Policy TO3
on access to woodland, which could help to mitigate air pollution
(respiratory disease)
Consider whether a more ambitious target for allotment
standards is required, given that the recommendation of the
National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners is 20 rather
than 10 plots per 1,000 households (diet)
Biodiversity
Consider whether there should be more emphasis on enhancing
biodiversity in the Regional Centre where the population and
densities will be the greatest (mental health)
Consider whether there are particular habitats that could be
targeted, in addition to lowland raised bog (mental health)
No. The Publication Core Strategy seeks to enhance the size,
diversity and interconnectedness of the city’s habitats. It is not
considered realistic to increase biodiversity more in the Regional
Centre than in other areas of the city. Policy GI2 of the
Publication Core Strategy recognises the importance of
delivering green infrastructure in the Regional Centre and
suggests that the efficient use of surfaces will be important in
achieving this. This should help to increase biodiversity levels in
the Regional Centre.
No. The restoration of lowland raised bog is identified as a
specific priority in the Core Strategy as Chat Moss provides the
most significant opportunity for habitat restoration in Salford, and
26
19 DECEMBER 2011
Possible mitigation (health issue to which it relates)
Has this been addressed in the Publication Core Strategy?
is therefore a key objective of the Core Strategy. It is not
considered appropriate to identify other particular habitats that
could be targeted in the Publication Core Strategy. Policy BG2 of
the Publication Core Strategy requires that development should
not have an adverse impact on other priority habitats identified at
the national, Greater Manchester or local level wherever
practicable.
27
19 DECEMBER 2011
3.
3.1
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PUBLICATION CORE
STRATEGY
The health impact assessment of the Publication Core Strategy assesses
each of the thematic chapters against the same set of key health issues
considered in the health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy.
3.2
The policies in the Spatial Framework chapter mainly pull together proposals
contained elsewhere in the Core Strategy, and so these policies have not
been subject to a health impact assessment. The Sustainable Development
policy (SD1) provides a very broad overarching policy, which sets the context
for the rest of the policies in plan, and therefore the health impacts of this
policy have not been assessed.
3.3
Chapters 24 (Waste) and 25 (Minerals) of Publication Core Strategy policies
explain that the Greater Manchester Joint Waste Development Plan
Document and Greater Manchester Joint Minerals Development Plan
Document will provide the main development plan framework for minerals and
waste related developments. These documents are both due to be adopted in
2012. Given that policies WM1 (Waste Management) and M1 (Minerals) only
go as far as to establish some general principles, and provide a signpost as to
where these issues are addressed in detail elsewhere in the Local
Development Framework, it is not considered necessary to assess the health
impacts of these policies.
3.4
Whilst a number of amendments have already been made to the Core
Strategy in light of the recommendations of the health impact assessment of
the Draft Core Strategy, some opportunities to further maximise the beneficial
effects or minimise the harmful effects have been identified. Where
opportunities to improve the health impacts of policies have been identified,
consideration is given to whether it would be appropriate to amend the
Publication Core Strategy further and where it is considered that the
recommendation cannot be taken forward in the Publication Core Strategy,
the reasons for this are explained.
3.5
Where mitigation measures or opportunities to improve the health benefits of
the document were identified in the health impact assessment of the Draft
Core Strategy and dismissed (as shown in table 1), these have not been
suggested again in the health impact assessment of the Publication Core
Strategy.
28
19 DECEMBER 2011
TABLE 2 HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PUBLICATION CORE STRATEGY
Development principles
 Policy DP1 Encouraging the reuse of previously developed land and buildings
 Policy DP2 Managing the use of land
 Policy DP3 Efficient use of land
 Policy DP4 Supporting successful neighbourhoods
 Policy DP5 Co-ordinated development
 Policy DP6 Mitigating the impacts of development
 Policy DP7 Management and maintenance
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Requiring that development contributes to the regeneration and
enhancement of the area (Policy DP4) will assist in creating
successful neighbourhoods, which in turn has the potential to
improve mental health in some areas of the city.
Ensuring that development provides appropriate mitigation for
any negative impacts (Policy DP6) should help to ensure that
there is no decline in the city’s neighbourhoods.
Requiring that development makes provision for management
and maintenance measures (Policy DP7) should assist in
ensuring that development remains attractive and is able to
function successfully in the longer term, which should help to
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
Policy DP3 sets a minimum density
requirement of 30 dwellings per hectare
for new development, but indicates that a
significantly higher density will be
appropriate in the Regional Centre. There
is potential to provide more certainty to
communities by setting an upper limit for
residential densities in the Regional
Centre. Whilst this may help to address
potential community concerns regarding
overdevelopment, it is considered that it
would be unnecessarily prescriptive and
inflexible for sites coming forward in the
29
19 DECEMBER 2011
maintain community pride and minimise the potential for the
environmental quality of neighbourhoods to decline and crime
and safety to become significant issues.
Social/cultural
isolation
Ensuring that development promotes community cohesion and
equality (Policy DP4) should help to encourage positive
relationships between different groups in the community and
reduce social exclusion. Requiring that development makes
provision for management and maintenance measures (Policy
DP7) will mean that development remains attractive and is able
to function successfully. This will help to ensure that community
pride is maintained.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
No issues
Regional Centre. Policy DP6 establishes
circumstances where development that
would have an unacceptable impact on an
interest of acknowledged importance.
There is potential that the Core Strategy
could take a stronger line with regards to
such proposals, and not permit
development where it would have an
unacceptable impact on an interest of
acknowledged importance. This approach
is unlikely to be considered acceptable in
the context of the emerging National
Planning Policy Framework, and in
particular the presumption n favour of
sustainable growth.
None. The emphasis is therefore instead
on ensuring that the positives of
development outweigh the negatives
(SD1) and the negatives are minimised
and mitigated as far as possible (DP6).
None
30
19 DECEMBER 2011
Respiratory
disease
Diet
No issues
None
No issues
None
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
No issues
None
Requiring that development makes provision for appropriate
management and maintenance of external spaces and
landscaping (Policy DP7) should ensure that development does
not lead to increases in crime and fear of crime.
Requiring that development makes provision for any additional
infrastructure needs it generates (policy DP6) should help to
ensure that there are sufficient health facilities in the city.
No issues
None
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
None
None
Economic development
 Policy EC1 Economic development spatial strategy
 Policy EC2 Office development
 Policy EC3 Industrial and warehousing development
 Policy EC4 Existing employment areas
 Policy EC5 Tourism development
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Unemployment can have a negative impact on mental health.
The large scale of employment development proposed (Policies
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
31
19 DECEMBER 2011
EC1, EC2 and EC3) should assist in increasing the number of
employment opportunities in Salford and maximise the economic
success of the city and the prosperity of its residents. It is made
clear in the supporting text to policy EC2 that the figures for office
development are not intended to act as a constraint on
development and that there is scope for even greater levels of
new office floorspace if investment conditions are positive. This
offers the potential to secure further employment opportunities in
the city. Improving transport connections to employment
opportunities outside of the city (Policy EC1) will also help to
maximise accessibility to jobs. Supporting the development of the
city’s tourism economy (Policy EC5) will create further
employment opportunities in the city, which should contribute to
improving the resident employment rate.
Social/cultural
isolation
There is potential that the loss of some industrial and
warehousing floorspace over the plan period (policy EC3) will
result in fewer jobs in some areas of the city. However, the
circumstances within which existing employment areas will be
permitted to be redeveloped will be strictly controlled by policy
EC4 of the Publication Core Strategy, to ensure that only those
sites and areas that are unable to secure a long term economic
future are released.
Employment offers regular opportunities for contact and social
interaction, and so can help to reduce social isolation. Policies
EC2, EC3 and EC5 will help to secure a range of different types
of employment opportunities within the city. There is potential that
this will increase the number of flexible employment opportunities
across the city, which may be suitable for lone parents, carers
and people with physical/mental health problems.
The Core Strategy could require that new
employment development make specific
social provision to maximise the range of
people who can access jobs e.g. through
crèche provision. This approach is
considered to be unduly onerous and
inflexible.
32
19 DECEMBER 2011
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
3.6
No issues
None
There is potential for some employment uses to generate harmful
emissions, however the location of such uses will be controlled
by policy PH1 (Pollution control).
No issues
No issues
None
There is potential for some employment uses to involve the
production and/or storage of hazardous uses, however these
types of development will be sufficiently controlled by policy PH4
(Control of hazardous uses).
No issues
None
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Housing
 Policy H1 Housing spatial strategy
 Policy H2 Scale and distribution of housing development
 Policy H3 Phasing of new housing development
 Policy H4 Type of housing
 Policy H5 Size of dwellings
 Policy H6 Amenity space in residential development
 Policy H7 Housing design
 Policy H8 Affordable housing
 Policy H9 Conversion of existing houses
None
None
None
None
33
19 DECEMBER 2011




Policy H10 Housing for older people
Policy H11 Gypsies, travellers and travelling show people
Policy H12 Student housing
Policy SF2A Broughton Park and Higher Broughton (whilst this policy is not within the housing chapter, it addresses housing
issues that are not covered in the housing policies)
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Living in overcrowded accommodation can adversely affect
mental health. Policy H5 establishes minimum size standards for
new dwellings, which should help to minimise overcrowding and
the impacts of small dwellings on mental health. This is
complemented by policy H6, which establishes amenity space
standards for residential new development.
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
There is potential that the Core Strategy
could make specific provision for housing
for those with mental health issues, but
this is considered too detailed for the Core
Strategy.
Ensuring that housing is designed to provide a high level of
amenity (Policy H7) should have a positive impact on people’s
mental health. Requiring that communal areas in residential
developments do not lead to significant disturbance for occupiers
will also contribute to this. Requiring that all housing
developments are designed to meet the Lifetime Homes standard
will enable people to remain in their homes for longer as their
needs and circumstances change.
A lack of affordable homes may result in households being
unable to meet their housing needs, which could lead to
increased levels of psychological distress. Increasing the
availability of affordable housing (policy H8) will help to reduce
34
19 DECEMBER 2011
this risk. Whilst the Core Strategy is seeking to maximise the
overall amount of affordable housing as far as possible, it is
necessary to ensure that the requirements placed on developers
to provide affordable housing do not make development
financially unviable.
Social/cultural
isolation
Requiring that new residential developments meet the Lifetime
Homes standard (Policy H7) will mean that dwellings should be
adaptable to people’s changing needs, enabling people to stay in
their homes for longer.
None
The Core Strategy recognises that it can be difficult to find
suitable accommodation for uses such as nursing homes,
children’s homes and hostels and that the conversion of houses
that are currently single dwellings may sometimes provide the
best opportunity. Carefully controlling the conversion of houses
for these uses (Policy H9), enables the occupants to be
integrated into rather than separated from communities whilst
ensuring that the stability and amenity of existing neighbourhoods
is not compromised.
Concentrating new student accommodation in the areas
immediately around the main campuses (Policy H12) will
maximise students’ accessibility to everyday services and
facilities, and provide a more supportive and inclusive
environment for students. Taking a flexible approach to
redevelopment and infill schemes in the Broughton Park and
Higher Broughton area (Policy SF2A) will increase the overall
supply of housing in an area where housing demand is high and
sites for new residential development are limited. This will enable
35
19 DECEMBER 2011
newly forming households within for example, the Orthodox
Jewish population, to remain in the same broad area as their
families. Requiring that communal areas within residential
developments are robust and well designed and maintained
(Policy H7) should make an important contribution to the long
term success of apartment developments, which will help to
reduce turnover and maintain stability within communities.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Establishing minimum amenity space standards for new
residential development (Policy H6) should provide more
opportunities for children to play and therefore could increase
physical activity levels. It could also encourage more physical
activity in adults through for example, gardening.
None
Respiratory
disease
Large parts of the city are within the Air Quality Management
Area, and therefore it will be necessary to locate some of the new
housing within this area. This could potentially affect the
respiratory health of residents. The potential negative health
impacts as a result of this are mitigated through policy GI2 of the
Publication Core Strategy, which requires that green
infrastructure within new developments helps to remove
pollutants from the air. Also policy PH2 controls the location of
new development to ensure that it is not permitted where it would
be subject to unacceptable levels of pollution. Living in poor
housing stock can lead to respiratory diseases. Supporting
improvements to the quality of existing housing (Policy H1)
should reduce the incidences of this.
There is a potential opportunity to further
improve the health benefits of policy H7
by requiring that new dwellings in the Air
Quality Management Zone provide more
outdoor amenity space, to maximise
opportunities to remove pollutants from
the air by creating more green
infrastructure. Much of the Air Quality
Management Zone is located within
Central Salford and in the Regional
Centre, where development densities are
higher. The specific characteristics of the
area mean that taking this approach is
unlikely to be feasible in practice and the
emphasis is therefore on maximising the
36
19 DECEMBER 2011
ability of the green infrastructure network
that is provided in such areas to mitigate
air pollution (Point G of Policy GI2).
Another potential opportunity is to seek to
increase the number of people living at
the heart of the city, in order to increase
the number of long distance commutes
through the city that contribute to poor air
quality. The Core Strategy is already
seeking to achieve this by directing a
large number of the new dwellings to the
Regional Centre.
Diet
Establishing minimum amenity space standards for new
residential development (Policy H6) will mean that regardless of
the size of the property, all occupiers should have the opportunity
to grow their own fruit and vegetables should they wish to,
thereby increasing people’s access to fresh produce.
Impacts of
excessive cold and
Cold homes are linked to increased risk of cardiovascular,
respiratory and rheumatoid diseases and depression. Supporting
The Draft Core Strategy required that
developers of residential schemes provide
sufficient topsoil within the gardens of new
dwellings to enable people to grow their
own vegetables. This has not been taken
forward in the Publication Core Strategy
on the basis that the amenity standards
would enable people to grow their own
food should they wish to. Placing specific
requirements on developers to provide
sufficient topsoil could potentially be
unsustainable if residents to not wish to
choose grow fruit and vegetables in part
or all of their garden.
There is potential that the Core Strategy
could seek to exceed the minimum
37
19 DECEMBER 2011
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
improvements to the quality of existing housing stock (Policy H1) thermal standards in the building
through programmes such as Decent Homes should minimise the regulations, but the Government’s
development of such illnesses as a result of housing conditions.
proposed timetable for moving to zero
carbon homes is already considered to be
quite challenging.
Housing related hazards including structural defects that increase None
risk of an accident (such as poor lighting, lack of handrails)
increase the likelihood of people suffering an accident or being
injured at home. Supporting improvements to existing housing
stock (Policy H1) through programmes such as Decent Homes
should help to address potential hazards. The Strategic Housing
Land Availability Assessment that has informed the proposed
distribution of dwellings in policy H2 of the Publication Core
Strategy has excluded land where there is a safety risk
associated with a hazardous installation. It has also taken into
account flood risk issues. Relocating the existing Fairways
travelling showpeople site to a location outside of the 1 in 100
year flood risk zone (Policy H10) will address the existing health
and safety concerns.
No issues
None
High spending costs on housing can reduce the amount of
money that households have to spend on maintaining their own
health. Increasing the supply of affordable housing in Salford
(Policy H8) should help to address this issue.
Town centres and retail development
 Policy TC1 Town centres spatial strategy
 Policy TC2 Boundaries of centres
 Policy TC3 Scale and distribution of new retail and leisure development
None
38
19 DECEMBER 2011



Policy TC4 Sequential approach to town centres
Policy TC5 Impact of new retail and leisure development
Policy TC6 Change of use within town centres
Issue
Mental health
Potential impact
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
A lack of accessible employment opportunities can have a
Consideration has been given to whether
negative impact on mental health. Policy TC3 proposes the scale it is appropriate to take a more ambitious
and distribution of new retail growth that should be delivered
approach to retail growth within Salford’s
during the plan period, which should assist in creating further
centres and support the development of
employment opportunities in Salford. Enhancing Salford’s town
more retail floorspace than is proposed in
and local centres (Policy TC1) and supporting their growth (Policy policy TC3. This could lead to the
TC3), should encourage more people to use them, which could
development of even more employment
improve people’s perceptions of centres and the level of natural
opportunities in the city. It is not
surveillance within them during the daytime and evening. This
considered that it is realistic to increase
could assist in reducing fear of crime.
the retail floorspace growth figures any
further, as these are based on the
proposed scale and distribution of housing
development in the Core Strategy
together with forecast increases in per
capita retail expenditure and existing
shopping patterns. Supporting the
development of retail floorspace beyond
this may result in units being built and
remaining vacant, which is likely to have
an impact on the vitality and viability of
centres and may generate negative health
impacts.
39
19 DECEMBER 2011
Social/cultural
isolation
Town and local centres provide focal points for communities and None
opportunities for social interaction. Protecting and enhancing the
network of centres within Salford (Policy TC1) could therefore
encourage greater use of the centres, increase pride of place and
community cohesion. Policies TC4, TC5 and TC6 will also help to
maintain the vitality and viability of these centres by carefully
controlling the development of town centre uses. The provision of
new centres in areas where there is a significant scale of new
housing proposed (Policies TC1 and TC3) will ensure that all
local communities should have good access to shopping
facilities. These hubs of activity within new communities will help
to encourage community cohesion.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Policy TC3 identifies the scale and distribution of convenience
goods (i.e. every day items including food) floorspace over the
plan period. This should provide communities with more
opportunities to purchase healthy food.
Respiratory
disease
Some parts of the town centres are located within the Air Quality None
Management Zone, which could potentially affect the health of
the people working and living in the centres. This will be mitigated
to some extent by policy GI2 of the Core Strategy which requires
that green infrastructure within the Air Quality Management Zone
should help to remove pollutants from the air.
Policy TC3 identifies the scale and distribution of convenience
None
goods (i.e. every day items including food) floorspace over the
plan period. This should provide communities with more
opportunities to purchase healthy food.
Diet
None
40
19 DECEMBER 2011
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
No issues
None
Enhancing Salford’s town and local centres (Policy TC1) and
supporting their growth (Policy TC3), should encourage more
people to use them, which could improve people’s perceptions of
centres and the level of natural surveillance within them during
the daytime and evening. This could assist in reducing crime and
fear of crime.
None
Healthcare
No issues
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Education
 Policy ED1 Schools and further education facilities
 Policy ED2 University of Salford
None
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Improving the quality of schools and further education facilities
(Policy ED1) will assist in improving the skills and qualifications of
Salford residents, which will in turn increase access to
employment opportunities and reduce worklessness.
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
Social/cultural
isolation
Encouraging the community use of playing fields and other
school facilities (Policy ED1) will provide further opportunities for
communities to come together and enable schools to develop as
None
None
41
19 DECEMBER 2011
focal points for communities. Ensuring that development
proposals for the Peel Park and Frederick Road campus form
part of a comprehensive development strategy (Policy ED2)
should help to minimise any adverse impacts on surrounding
communities and promote good relationships between the
University of Salford and the surrounding community. Improving
the integration of the university campus with its surroundings
(policy ED2) should also assist in improving community cohesion
in this part of the city.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Encouraging the community use of playing fields and other
school facilities (Policy ED1) has the potential to provide more
opportunities for people to partake in sport and recreation.
Requiring that new school sites are highly accessible to their
intended catchments, particularly by walking, cycling and public
transport (Policy ED1) should assist in encouraging more active
travel. Enhancing pedestrian and cycling routes through the
University of Salford campus (policy ED2) should encourage
active travel within the student population. Policy H12 of the Core
Strategy should also encourage more active travel among the
student population as it requires that new student
accommodation should be located in the areas immediately
around the campuses.
The main University of Salford Campus is located within the Air
Quality Management Zone. There is also potential that new
schools may need to be located within it. However, this should be
mitigated by policy GI2 to some extent, which requires that green
infrastructure in these locations should help to remove pollutants
from the air. Policy PH2 should also assist, by controlling the
None
None
42
19 DECEMBER 2011
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
location of development, so that it is not permitted in locations
where it would be subject to unacceptable levels of pollution.
No issues
None
New education buildings will be encouraged to move as far up
the energy hierarchy as possible (policy EG1) and therefore the
occupants of the building should be subject to comfortable
conditions.
Improvements to the public realm and pedestrian and cycling
connections within the Peel Park and Frederick Road campus
(Policy ED2) may assist in reducing crime and fear of crime.
No issues.
None
Improving skills will increase the opportunity for people to secure
employment (Policy ED1) and will enable people to spend more
on their own health.
None
None
None
Health
 Policy HH1 Provision of primary care facilities
 Policy HH2 Salford Royal Hospital
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
Delivering improvements in the quality and accessibility of
The Core Strategy could require that
primary health care facilities (Policy HH1) should improve access developers submit a health impact
to treatment and preventative services. Supporting the ongoing
assessment alongside major planning
redevelopment of the Salford Royal Hospital (Policy HH2) and
applications. It is not considered
future enhancement of the hospital will improve the delivery of
necessary to require this, as careful
healthcare services and should maximise residents’ access to the consideration has been given to ensuring
highest possible quality of healthcare facilities, including
that the policies in Core Strategy promote
43
19 DECEMBER 2011
neurology and rehabilitation services.
Social/cultural
isolation
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Encouraging the co-location of new primary care facilities with
other public facilities such as libraries (Policy HH1), could result
in the creation of community ‘hubs’, which could assist in
promoting community cohesion.
Delivering improvements in the quality and accessibility of
primary health care facilities (Policy HH1) should improve access
to treatment and preventative services. Supporting the ongoing
redevelopment of the Salford Royal Hospital and future
enhancement of the hospital (Policy HH2) will improve the
delivery of healthcare services and should maximise residents’
access to the highest possible quality of healthcare facilities,
including cardiology services.
good health and require that any adverse
impacts on human health are minimised
as far as possible.
None
None
Respiratory
disease
Delivering improvements in the quality and accessibility of
primary health care facilities (Policy HH1) should improve access
to treatment and preventative services. Supporting the ongoing
redevelopment of the Salford Royal Hospital and future
enhancement of the hospital (Policy HH2) will improve the
delivery of healthcare services and should maximise residents’
access to the highest possible quality of healthcare facilities,
including respiratory medicine.
None
Diet
The co-location of GP practices (Policy HH1) offers the potential
for GPs to provide a wider range of healthcare services such as
nutritional advice.
None
44
19 DECEMBER 2011
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
No issues
None
Supporting the ongoing redevelopment of the Salford Royal
Hospital and future enhancement of the hospital (Policy HH2) will
improve the delivery of healthcare services and should maximise
residents access to the highest possible quality of healthcare
facilities, including accident and emergency services.
None
Healthcare
provision
Supporting improvements in the quality and accessibility of
primary health care facilities (Policy HH1) and the ongoing
redevelopment of the Salford Royal Hospital (Policy HH2) should
result in better healthcare facilities for residents of Salford.
None
Spending on own
No issues
health
Accessibility
 Policy A1 Accessibility Spatial Strategy
 Policy A2 Transport Hierarchy
 Policy A3 Transport Assessments, travel plans and personal travel planning
 Policy A4 Walking and cycling
 Policy A5 Public transport
 Policy A6 Rail infrastructure
 Policy A7 Water transport
 Policy A8 Highway infrastructure
 Policy A9 Impact of development on the highway network
 Policy A10 Parking provision and drop-off facilities in new developments
None
45
19 DECEMBER 2011




Policy A11 City centre car parking
Policy A12 Park and ride facilities
Policy A13 Electric vehicle charging points
Policy A14 Barton Aerodrome
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Improving people’s ability to move round the city in a quick and
efficient way (Policy A1) will reduce the risk of delay and stress
associated with travel and help to ensure that people are able to
access employment opportunities. The construction of major new
transport infrastructure can have a negative impact on people’s
mental health and raise concerns about noise, traffic and safety.
Whilst there are some major transport infrastructure proposals in
the Core Strategy (policies A6 and A8), where these require
planning permission, appropriate mitigation measures should be
secured through policy DP6 (mitigating the impacts of
development). The development of Port Salford and the
increased use of the Manchester Ship Canal for freight
movement (Policy A7) should generate a significant number of
new employment opportunities in the city and contribute towards
reducing worklessness and the stresses associated with this.
Deleting the proposal to develop hard surface runways at Barton
Aerodrome should minimise noise and air pollution impacts
associated with the airport (Policy A14) and any associated
mental health issues.
Social/cultural
Reducing the need to travel and encouraging a modal shift to
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
None
46
19 DECEMBER 2011
isolation
more sustainable modes of travel (Policy A1), should maximise
the number of people that are able to access employment and
leisure opportunities easily, regardless of their income and
without having to rely on a private car. Prioritising local
enhancements to walking, cycling and public transport in the
areas where the concentration of jobs is the greatest (Policy A1)
will also help to maximise general accessibility. The transport
hierarchy promotes the use of more sustainable and socially
inclusive modes of transport in new development and highway
design (Policy A2).
Improving the speed, capacity, reliability and coverage of the
public transport network (Policy A5) will help to ensure that all
residents are able to access employment and leisure
opportunities.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Encouraging a modal shift to more sustainable modes of travel
(Policy A1) and promoting a transport hierarchy that prioritises
pedestrians and cyclists above other road users should
encourage more active travel. Enhancing the network of walking
and cycling routes, and requiring that development complies with
minimum cycle parking standards (Policy A4) has the potential to
increase the number of journeys made on foot and by cycle and
improve people’s general health and fitness.
None
Respiratory
disease
Salford’s highways fulfil a number of different roles. The
motorways running through Salford are used by people travelling
The policy could go further by requiring
that all new developments provide electric
47
19 DECEMBER 2011
Diet
between Manchester City Centre, Warrington, Liverpool,
Lancashire and the Trafford Centre. The amount of traffic
travelling through the city on the motorways has a significant
impact on the level of pollution in Salford. The implementation of
the various highways schemes (Policy A8) to increase the
capacity and journey time reliability of the motorways should
assist in reducing air pollution overall. The pilot hard shoulder
running scheme on the M42 reported that vehicle emissions were
reduced by 10% as a result of the proposal. However, there could
potentially be a worsening of the situation in particular locations.
The increased use of the Manchester Ship Canal for freight
movement (Policy A7) should help to reduce heavy goods vehicle
movements on the roads and associated air pollution. However,
there could be some worsening of air quality around the
proposed new wharves where freight is transferred from water to
road. Encouraging a modal shift to more sustainable modes of
travel (Policy A1) could reduce car usage and therefore help to
improve air quality. This will be subject to delivering major
improvements to the public transport system within Salford and
the wider Greater Manchester area. The development of park
and ride schemes (Policy A12) has the potential to support the
increased use of public transport and reduce vehicular traffic
levels, which could assist in improving air quality within Salford.
Encouraging a shift to low-emission vehicles through the
development of a network of electric vehicle charging points
(Policy A13) could help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
associated respiratory diseases.
vehicle charging infrastructure. This is not
considered to be appropriate as there is
potential that it could undermine viability
and it is difficult to establish a generic
requirement for non residential
development as demand is likely to vary
depending on the nature of the
development and its occupier and the
further rapid development of electric
vehicle technology.
No issues
None
48
19 DECEMBER 2011
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
No issues
None
The implementation of a road user hierarchy (Policy A2) which
None
prioritises the needs of pedestrians and cyclists in the first
instance should assist in improving road safety for these users.
The proposed hard shoulder running scheme on the motorways
(Policy A8) should help to improve safety on busy stretches of
motorway, as there would be an associated reduction in the
speed limit. Not permitting development where it would have an
unacceptable impact on the safe operation of the highway
network (Policy A9) and requiring that development proposals are
accompanied by a transport assessment/statement (Policy A3)
will ensure that highway safety is not compromised as a result of
development. Development is required to provide sufficient off
street parking so that it does not have an unacceptable impact on
the safe and efficient operation of the highway network (Policy
A10). This should ensure that road safety is not compromised as
a result of a lack of parking. Policy A14 is clear that development
at Barton Aerodrome will only be permitted where it would not
have an unacceptable impact on the operational safety of the
facility and therefore there should be no risk to public safety as a
result of the proposals.
The proposed improvements to walking and cycling routes
None
(Policy A4) and public transport services and facilities (Policy A5)
should assist in improving access to health facilities.
No issues
None
49
19 DECEMBER 2011
Energy
 Policy EG1 Energy strategy
 Policy EG2 Renewable and low carbon energy
 Policy EG3 Coal bed methane
 Policy EG4 Electricity supply infrastructure
Issue
Potential impact
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
Mental health
Some of the renewable and low carbon energy opportunities
identified (Policy EG2), could, if implemented, have a negative
impact on mental health through stress associated with the
anticipated impact of the development, and concerns about
noise, sleep disturbance, traffic associated with the development
etc. However, the policy requires that development proposals for
such schemes should be located and designed so as to minimise
their adverse impacts. Establishing an energy hierarchy (Policy
EG1) could help to promote energy security and reduce stress
associated with fuel poverty and sudden increases in fuel prices,
as people would be less reliant on global energy prices.
Social/cultural
isolation
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
No issues
None
No issues
None
Only permitting proposals involving the combustion of biomass or
other materials (Policy EG2) or the extraction of coal bed
methane (Policy EG3) where there would be no unacceptable
The Core Strategy Pre-Publication
Changes Report included maximum
emissions standards for new biomass
50
19 DECEMBER 2011
adverse impact on local air quality, will ensure that incidences of
respiratory disease are not increased as a result of such
proposals.
fired energy facilities, but these have been
deleted as it was considered that they
were too inflexible.
Diet
The sustainable energy opportunities map identifies potential
areas for growing energy crops (Policy EG2). This area excludes
high grade agricultural land and so opportunities for local food
production should not be compromised by this policy.
None
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Establishing an energy hierarchy (Policy EG1) could help to
promote energy security and reduce fuel poverty, which should
help to minimise the risk of excessive cold in dwellings.
Safety, hazards
and injuries
The Core Strategy supports the sensitive exploitation of coal bed
methane resources (policies EG1 and EG3). However, this is
subject to there being no risk of groundwater contamination or
methane leakage as a result of the proposals (Policy EG3). The
risks to human health as a result of such proposals should
therefore be minimised.
No issues
There is potential that the Core Strategy
could seek to exceed the thermal
requirements of the building regulations,
but the Government’s proposed timetable
for moving to zero carbon homes is
already considered to be quite
challenging.
None
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
Establishing an energy hierarchy (Policy EG1) could help to
promote energy security and reduce fuel poverty, which could
leave people with more money to spend on their own health.
None
None.
Water
51
19 DECEMBER 2011






Policy WA1 Water spatial strategy
Policy WA2 Water supply and water efficiency
Policy WA3 Water quality
Policy WA4 Flood related infrastructure
Policy WA5 Development and flood risk
Policy WA6 Surface water
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Protecting and enhancing the water supply network (Policies
WA1 and WA2) should further improve water security and reduce
the very limited threat to mental health associated with
inadequate water supply for drinking, bathing, cooking, cleaning
and sanitation. Minimising the risk and impact of flooding and
ensuring that flood risk is appropriately managed through a
combination of measures (Policies WA4, WA5 and WA6) should
prevent mental health consequences as a result of flooding, such
as stress related to extensive damage, the threat of repeated
floods and the withdrawal of insurance cover impacting on the
saleability of properties.
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
The Core Strategy could go further by
restricting development completely in
those areas which are significantly at risk
of flooding. This would effectively be a no
risk approach in flooding/health impact
terms. However, it is considered
unrealistic to adopt a development
strategy based on significantly restricting
development and investment in these
areas, as this would constrain the future
development and regeneration of some of
Salford’s most deprived areas and the
Regional Centre, which is central to the
success of Greater Manchester. The
approach of ensuring that development is
appropriately designed and adequate
flood response plans are in place is
therefore considered appropriate.
52
19 DECEMBER 2011
New development is essential to the
regeneration of these areas in Salford and
new development should have mental
health benefits. In addition, some of the
new development will replace existing
development that would be impacted on
more in the event of a flood.
None
Social/cultural
isolation
Minimising the risk and impact of flooding and ensuring that flood
risk is appropriately managed through a combination of measures
(Policies WA4, WA5 and WA6) should help to avoid temporary
isolation for individuals and communities as a result of flooding.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
No issues
None
No issues
None
The city is already well served by water supply infrastructure and
protecting this and further augmenting it (Policies WA1 and WA2)
will ensure that there is sufficient water for drinking and cooking.
No issues
None
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
None
Regulating activities within the Ground Water Source Protection
None
Zone (Policy WA3) will ensure that groundwater sources used for
public drinking water are not adversely affected by contamination.
Controlling developments that will result in water pollution and
securing investment in the city’s wastewater treatment works
(Policy WA3) will also minimise risks to public health as a result
53
19 DECEMBER 2011
of development.
Minimising the risk and impact of flooding and ensuring that flood
risk is appropriately managed through a combination of measures
(Policies WA4, WA5 and WA6) should reduce speed and depth
of flood waters, and the occurrences of injury and serious
medical conditions as a result of flooding. These can occur when
for example flood waters carry pollutants or are mixed with
contaminated water.
Improving the resilience of existing homes within areas of
significant risk of flooding, enhancing the scope and coordination
of emergency planning procedures and relocating critical
infrastructure and highly vulnerable uses from areas at significant
risk of flooding (Policy WA1) will help to minimise the impact of
flooding and therefore offer greater protection to public safety in
the event of a flood. Not permitting the development of highly
vulnerable uses (including ambulance stations, police stations,
fire stations, command centres and telecommunications required
to be operational during flooding) should help to ensure that the
necessary emergency services can continue to operate efficiently
in the event of a flood.
Measures to improve the water quality at Salford Quays and
along the Manchester Ship Canal (Policy WA3) will reduce the
risk of those undertaking watersports catching an infection or
illness.
Healthcare
provision
Ambulance stations are defined as highly vulnerable uses.
Seeking opportunities to relocate highly vulnerable uses from
None
54
19 DECEMBER 2011
areas at significant risk of flooding (Policy WA1) and not
permitting the development of such uses in the 1 in 100 year
flood risk area (Policy WA3) should ensure that emergency
medical services are able to continue to operate in the event of a
flood.
No issues
Spending on own
health
Design
 Policy D1 Design principles
 Policy D2 Local character and distinctiveness
 Policy D3 Layout
 Policy D4 Views
 Policy D5 Spaces
 Policy D6 Architectural design
 Policy D7 Alterations and extensions
 Policy D8 Materials
 Policy D9 Amenity
 Policy D10 Microclimate
 Policy D11 Design and crime
 Policy D12 Waterside development
None
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Ensuring that development protects, enhances and responds to
the character of the area and contributes to its local identity and
distinctiveness (Policy D2) should help to maintain a recognisable
environment that offers familiar surroundings to communities.
Protecting views of important buildings, townscapes, landscapes,
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
55
19 DECEMBER 2011
waterways and other features (Policy D4) will also contribute to
this. Requiring that the boundary treatments of public spaces
provide visual permeability and that street furniture is positioned
so that it does create visual obstacles (Policy D5) could assist in
reducing fear of crime and incidences of crime within public
spaces, which could have a positive impact on mental health.
Requiring that alterations and extensions to properties respect
the scale, character, rhythm etc of the original building (Policy
D8) and ensuring that development does not have an
unacceptable impact on the amenity of the users of other
buildings and spaces should help to avoid neighbour conflict with
regards to house extensions, and the stress associated with it.
The separation distances (Policy D9) provide clarity as to what is
considered to be acceptable.
Social/cultural
isolation
Requiring that the layout of spaces and buildings is designed to
None
ensure that it is easy to physically move through and easy to
navigate (Policy D3) should help to ensure that all people can
access and use a development, regardless of any physical
disability they may have. Ensuring that public spaces are
designed so that they have a clear purpose and role and
encourage a variety of uses (Policy D5) could help to support
community interaction and add to an area’s local identify,
therefore helping to promote community pride. Requiring that
developments are designed so that they can be adapted to
different user requirements (Policy D7) should help people stay in
their home and community if their circumstances change, for
example as a result of age or a disability.
56
19 DECEMBER 2011
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
Requiring that public spaces are designed so that they
encourage a variety of uses (Policy D5) may create more
opportunities for people to exercise outdoors. Ensuring that
development adjacent to waterways provides a pedestrian and
cycling route (Policy D12) should help to encourage more active
travel and provide opportunities for people to exercise outdoors.
No issues
None
Requiring that public spaces are designed so that they
encourage a variety of uses (Policy D5) may create more
opportunities for local food growing.
Requiring that development is designed so that it helps to
mitigate the higher temperatures associated with the heat island
effect, provides shelter and does not have an unacceptable
impact on the microclimate through for example wind tunnelling
(Policy D10) should ensure that users of buildings are not subject
to extreme heat/cold/other conditions, which could result in ill
health.
Requiring that the boundary treatments of public spaces provide
visual permeability and that street furniture is positioned so that it
does not create visual obstacles (Policy D5) could assist in
reducing fear and incidences of reduce fear of crime within public
spaces. Requiring that development is designed to minimise
opportunities for crime and antisocial behaviour and the threat of
terrorism (Policy D11) should improve safety.
None
No issues
None
No issues
None
None
None
None
57
19 DECEMBER 2011
3.7
health
Heritage
 Policy HE1 Heritage spatial strategy
 Policy HE2 A positive future for heritage assets
 Policy HE3 Works to heritage assets
 Policy HE4 Archaeological investigations
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Protecting and enhancing the city’s heritage assets (Policy HE1)
will assist in maintaining local identity and character, promoting
civic pride and providing a recognisable environment that offers
familiar surroundings for local residents. Securing investment in
the city’s heritage assets in Greengate/Chapel Street/The
Crescent and Worsley Village/The Bridgewater Canal (Policy
HE1) should help to increase the visitor appeal of these areas,
and potentially increase the number of employment opportunities
in the tourism industry in the city. This should make a contribution
to reducing worklessness in Salford.
Social/cultural
isolation
Enhancing the city’s heritage assets (Policy HE1) offers
opportunities for members of the community with a common
interest to come together, influence changes, meet for social
events and develop social networks through the establishment of
local interest groups and civic trusts. Maximising opportunities for
public engagement in archaeological investigations (Policy HE4)
could assist in developing a sense of place and identity, and also
offers opportunities for communities to come together to carry out
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
None
58
19 DECEMBER 2011
archaeological digs and attend open days. Protecting and
enhancing the city’s heritage assets (Policy HE1) should help to
retain important aspects of cultural identity. Requiring that
development proposals take appropriate measures to record and
preserve assets of archaeological importance (Policy HE4) will
also ensure that evidence about how the city has evolved is
protected.
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
Securing investment in the heritage assets along the Bridgewater None
Canal Corridor (Policy HE1) will assist in the development of its
leisure role. This should provide new and improved opportunities
for walking and cycling in the area and should therefore provide
more opportunities for exercise.
Securing a positive use for heritage assets and appropriate works None
to them (Policy HE2) should help to ensure that buildings are
subject to a proper maintenance regime. This should reduce the
potential for damp, mould and other conditions to contribute to
respiratory disease.
No issues
None
Enhancing the city’s heritage assets (Policy HE1) and securing a None
positive use for them (Policy HE2) should encourage investment
in historic buildings, which may involve improvements to the
energy efficiency and heating systems within the building,
addressing problems of excessive cold. Any works will need to be
carried out in accordance with policy HE3, which requires that
works should maintain the physical and historic integrity of the
building.
Enhancing the city’s heritage assets (Policy HE1) and securing a None
59
19 DECEMBER 2011
and injuries
positive use for them (Policy HE2) should encourage investment
in the city’s historic buildings and potentially address issues of
structural instability.
No issues
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Green infrastructure
 Policy GI1 Green infrastructure spatial strategy
 Policy GI2 Green infrastructure requirements for development
None
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Developing a green infrastructure network (Policy GI1) and
requiring that developments maximise the amount of green
infrastructure they provide on site (Policy GI2) will assist in
providing relief from high density development. This will be
particularly important in areas such as the Regional Centre where
a significant scale of development is planned and development
densities are higher. Green Infrastructure will have an important
role in providing an ‘escape’ from city life, which can help to
encourage relaxation and reduce depression. Requiring that
developments provide opportunities for the provision of habitats
in areas where access to natural greenspace is poor (Policy GI2)
should maximise the biodiversity value of the city. Environments
rich in wildlife will help to improve people’s satisfaction with
where they live and may have the potential to encourage people
to have a more positive outlook on life.
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
None
60
19 DECEMBER 2011
Social/cultural
isolation
Developing a green infrastructure network (Policy GI1) and
requiring that developments maximise the amount of green
infrastructure they provide on site (Policy GI2) will provide a
range of different opportunities for social interaction, from smaller
meeting places and seating areas, to neighbourhood food
growing spaces and large spaces for events.
Expanding the green infrastructure network will be vital to
enhancing the enhancing quality of life for residents and
supporting health improvements in Salford (Policy GI1). It will
create many more opportunities for enjoying outdoor recreation
and should assist in encouraging more people to partake in
physical activity. Requiring that in creating green infrastructure in
areas of poor average resident health, developments provide
opportunities for physical activity where practicable (Policy GI2)
should help to encourage exercise.
None
Respiratory
disease
Expanding the green infrastructure network will be vital to
enhancing the enhancing quality of life for residents and
supporting health improvements in Salford (Policy GI1). It will
create many more opportunities for enjoying outdoor recreation
and should assist in encouraging more people to partake in
physical activity. Requiring that in creating green infrastructure
within the Air Quality Management Area, developments help to
remove pollutants from the air where practicable (Policy GI2) will
make an important contribution to mitigating air pollution and
reducing the incidences of respiratory disease as a result of it.
None
Diet
Enhancing and expanding the green infrastructure network will
None
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
None
61
19 DECEMBER 2011
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
create additional opportunities for food production (Policy GI1).
Requiring that in creating green infrastructure within areas of high
grade agricultural land developments provide opportunities for
food production where practicable (Policy GI2) should increase
opportunities for local food growing, and therefore access to fresh
fruit and vegetables.
Enhancing and expanding the green infrastructure network will
None
increase the number of green spaces in the city that can provide
relief from high temperatures (Policy GI1). Requiring that in
creating new green infrastructure within the Regional Centre and
other areas of high density development, developments provide
relief from high temperatures where practicable (Policy GI2),
should assist in combating the urban heat island effect.
Enhancing and expanding the green infrastructure network will
increase the number of green spaces that can potentially mitigate
the risk and impacts of flooding (Policy GI1). Requiring that in
creating green infrastructure within the areas at greatest risk of
flooding, developments provide capacity for water storage where
practicable (Policy GI2), should help to minimise the risk and
impact of flooding.
No issues
None
Healthcare
None
provision
Spending on own
No issues
None
health
Green Belt
 Policy GB1 Green Belt spatial strategy
 Policy GB2 Extension, alteration and replacement of dwellings within the Green Belt.
 Policy GB3 Occupancy conditions
62
19 DECEMBER 2011


Policy GB5 Farm diversification
Policy GB5 Agricultural land
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Maintaining the extent of the Green Belt (Policy GB1) should
protect the character of the city. This should provide reassurance
to communities that this part of the countryside will be
safeguarded from encroachment. Supporting farm diversification
projects that support the rural economy (Policy GB4) could create
more employment opportunities in this part of the city and reduce
levels of worklessness. Protecting the highest grade agricultural
land (Policy GB5) will also help to support the long term success
of the rural economy.
Supporting the positive use of the Green Belt (Policy GB1)
particularly where this would increase its accessibility to Salford
residents for recreation purposes may result in the creation of
more opportunities for communities living in this part of the city to
get together and enjoy their leisure time.
Supporting the positive use of the Green Belt (Policy GB1) may
create more opportunities for people to exercise outdoors, for
example through the creation of recreational routes. The addition
of around 40 hectares of land to the Green Belt in Little Hulton
(Policy GB1) will help to protect the long term recreation use of
this land.
Social/cultural
isolation
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
No issues
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
None
The Core Strategy could potentially take a
more positive approach to the use of the
Green Belt for recreation, but it is
considered important to balance the other
functions such as biodiversity and
agriculture, which also have health
benefits.
None
63
19 DECEMBER 2011
Diet
Protecting high grade agricultural land (Policy GB5) will help to
maintain food security and provide opportunities for local
commercial food growing. This should help to provide an
accessible supply of fresh produce to Salford residents, however,
there is no guarantee that this produce would be sold in Salford.
No issues
None
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
No issues
and injuries
Healthcare
No issues
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Biological and geological diversity
 Policy BG1 Biodiversity spatial strategy
 Policy BG2 Development and biodiversity
 Policy BG3 Geological biodiversity
None
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
Protecting and enhancing the city’s habitats will help to achieve a
considerable increase in the city’s overall nature conservation
value (Policies BG1 and BG2). Time spent in inspiring, wildliferich environments will help to improve people’s satisfaction with
where they live and can promote a positive outlook on life.
Increasing the nature conservation value of the city (Policy BG1)
may raise people’s awareness of and interest in their local
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
Social/cultural
isolation
None
None
None
None
64
19 DECEMBER 2011
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
environment, potentially resulting in the development of local
conservation and interest groups.
Increasing the nature conservation value of the city (Policy BG1)
may encourage more people to exercise outdoors. The city’s
biodiversity assets can provide a social, simple and unstructured
opportunity to exercise, in contrast to playing team sports or
visiting the gym.
No issues
The development of a biodiversity heartland (Policy BG1) is likely
to remove some of the high grade agricultural land from
agricultural production, but this could be returned to agricultural
use at some point in the future if there were an urgent need.
Establishing a biodiversity heartland in Chat Moss, with a
particular emphasis on restoring lowland raised bog (Policy BG1)
should help to ‘lock in’ additional carbon and could make a small
contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
potentially health issues associated with heat waves.
No issues
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
No issues
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Recreation
 Policy R1 Recreation spatial strategy
 Policy R2 Recreation standards
 Policy R3 Recreation facilities and residential amenity
 Policy R4 Protection of recreation land and facilities
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
65
19 DECEMBER 2011
Issue
Potential impact
Mental health
The creation of strategic recreation facilities in the Regional
Centre (Policy R1) such as Irwell City Park and Crescent
Meadows, will provide a retreat for people living and working in
high density urban areas, which could help to reduce stress and
depression.
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
None
Requiring that new residential developments contribute towards
the achievement of natural greenspace standards (Policy R2),
and protecting existing facilities (Policy R4) should provide
opportunities for people to enjoy wildlife, which can help to
improve people’s satisfaction with where they live and alleviate a
range of mental health problems.
Ensuring that a distance of at least 30 metres is maintained
between the curtilage of residential properties and recreation
facilities (Policy R3) should ensure that the amenity of
surrounding residents is not adversely affected by noise and
activity associated with the recreation facilities. Without these
controls in place there is potential that resident’s amenity could
be compromised which could potentially lead to conflicts and
stress.
Social/cultural
isolation
Increasing the range of local and strategic recreation facilities
(Policies R1 and R2) and protecting existing facilities (Policy R4)
will provide different opportunities for social interaction, from
None
66
19 DECEMBER 2011
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
smaller meeting places and seating areas, to neighbourhood food
growing schemes and large spaces for public events.
Increasing the range of local and strategic recreation facilities
None
(Policies R1 and R2) and protecting existing facilities (Policy R4)
has the potential to encourage people to participate in sport and
exercise more regularly. People’s accessibility to these facilities
should be maximised by requiring that new residential
development contributes towards the achievement of the local
recreation standards (Policy R2).
Working towards achieving the identified local recreation
None
standards (Policy R2) should assist in creating more ‘green lungs’
which could contribute towards improving air quality and reducing
the incidences of respiratory diseases.
Establishing a local standard for allotments (Policy R2) should
create more opportunities for local food growing. The allotments
standard in the Publication Core Strategy is greater than that
proposed in the Draft Core Strategy.
Increasing the number of natural greenspaces, parks, amenity
spaces and local nature reserves (Policies R1 and R2) will assist
in moderating temperatures in extreme heat conditions by
providing shade and evaporative cooling. This will be particularly
important in high density areas.
Increasing the number of natural greenspaces, parks, amenity
spaces and local nature reserves (Policies R1 and R2) will assist
in reducing surface water run off in periods of increased winter
precipitation expected as a result of climate change, thereby
helping to minimise flood risk.
No issues
None
None
None
None
67
19 DECEMBER 2011
provision
Spending on own
No issues
health
Pollution and hazards
 Policy PH1 Pollution control
 Policy PH2 Development that could be affected by pollution
 Policy PH3 Land instability
 Policy PH4 Control of hazardous uses
 Policy PH5 Development near hazardous installations
Issue
Mental health
Social/cultural
isolation
Obesity and
cardiovascular
disease
Respiratory
disease
None
Potential impact
Potential mitigation measures and
further opportunities to maximise the
beneficial effects of the policy
Controlling development so that it does not result in unacceptable None
levels of pollution (Policy PH1) should provide residents with
confidence they will not be adversely affected by pollution as a
result of development. Without these controls in place, residents
may potentially experience stress and anxiety. Not permitting
development where it would be subject to unacceptable levels of
pollution (Policy PH2) will also ensure that resident’s amenity is
protected.
No issues
None
No issues
None
Controlling development so that it does not result in unacceptable
levels of air pollution (Policy PH1) should ensure that the
68
19 DECEMBER 2011
Diet
Impacts of
excessive cold and
heat
Safety, hazards
and injuries
Healthcare
provision
Spending on own
health
incidences of respiratory disease are not increased as a result of
development. Not permitting development where it would be
subject to unacceptable levels of pollution (Policy PH2) will also
assist in ensuring this.
Controlling development so that it does not result in unacceptable None
levels of water and soil pollution (Policy PH1) should ensure that
opportunities for local food growing are not compromised as a
result of pollution. Not permitting development where it would be
subject to unacceptable levels of pollution (Policy PH2) will also
assist in ensuring this.
No issues
None
Land instability and hazardous uses present potentially significant None
risks to public health. Not permitting development where it would
be subject to an unacceptable risk of land instability (Policy PH3)
and carefully controlling the location of hazardous uses (Policy
PH4) and development nearby them (Policy PH5) should reduce
the potential for these issues to cause any significant harm to the
public.
No issues
None
No issues
None
69
19 DECEMBER 2011
4.
CONCLUSIONS ON THE HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE
PUBLICATION CORE STRATEGY
4.1 The health impact assessment of the Publication Core Strategy demonstrates
that the Publication Core Strategy is likely to have a range of positive effects
on people’s health in Salford. A large number of the recommendations of the
health impact assessment of the Draft Core Strategy have been taken forward
in the Publication Core Strategy, which it is considered has significantly
increased the document’s potential health benefits.
4.2 In carrying out the health impact assessment of the Publication Core Strategy,
some further opportunities to improve the health benefits of the document
could be amended to further improve the health benefits of the document, it is
important to recognise that in the interests of producing a sustainable long
term vision and strategy, health benefits need to be carefully considered and
balanced alongside key issues such as development viability. Furthermore,
improving some health benefits could negatively impact on another.
4.3 It is essential that the Publication Core Strategy is consistent with the
emerging National Planning Policy Framework, which is explicit that plans and
strategies should adopt a presumption in favour of sustainable development,
and is clear that plans should have sufficiently flexible policies to deal with
changing circumstances. These issues have been taken into account in
carrying out the health impact assessment of the Publication Core Strategy,
and on this basis it is not considered that any further changes should be made
to the document.
4.4 Ultimately, maximising the positive health outcomes will depend on how the
Core Strategy policies are implemented and the extent to which the proposals
within the document are delivered. It will therefore be essential to ensure that
health issues are properly considered in determining planning applications
and producing other local development documents.
70