Module 34 Monopolistic Competition Module Objectives Students will learn in this module: • How prices and profits are determined in monopolistic competition, both in the short run and in the long run. • How monopolistic competition can lead to excess capacity and inefficiency. Module Outline I.Understanding Monopolistic Competition A.Monopolistic competition in the short run 1. Because there are many firms in monopolistic competition, firms cannot collude to increase their market power. 2. Each firm in a monopolistically competitive industry faces a downwardsloping demand curve and a downward-sloping marginal revenue curve. 3. In the short run, a monopolistically competitive firm has an upwardsloping marginal cost curve and a U-shaped average total cost curve. 4. To maximize profits in the short run, a monopolistically competitive firm should choose an output level were marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost. 5. The key to whether a firm with market power is profitable or unprofitable in the short run lies in the relationship between its demand curve and its average total cost curve. 6. If the average total cost curve is below the demand curve at the profitmaximizing level of output, then the monopolistically competitive firm is profitable. 7. If the average total cost curve is above the demand curve at the profitmaximizing level of output, then the monopolistically competitive firm is unprofitable. 8. Text Figure 34-1, shown on the next page, illustrates monopolistic competition in the short run. 185 186 module 34 monopolistic competition The Monopolistically Competitive Firm in the Short Run (b) An Unprofitable Firm (a) A Profitable Firm Price, costs, marginal revenue Price, costs, marginal revenue MC MC ATC ATC PP ATCU PU Profit ATCP Loss DP DU MRP MRU QU Quantity QP Profit-maximizing quantity Quantity Loss-minimizing quantity B. Monopolistic competition in the long run 1. Entry and exit affect the demand curve of every firm in the market. 2. If firms are earning economic profits, new firms will enter the market, shifting the demand curve for the existing firms to the left. 3. If firms are incurring losses, firms exit the industry, shifting the demand curve for existing firms to the right. 4. The market is in long-run equilibrium when there is no exit or entry. 5. Definition: In the long run, a monopolistically competitive industry ends up in zero-profit equilibrium: Each firm makes zero profit at its profitmaximizing quantity (see text Figure 34-3, shown below). 6. In the long run, firms will earn zero economic profits, and each firm’s average total cost curve will be tangent to its demand curve at the profitmaximizing level of output. The Long-Run Zero-Profit Equilibrium Price, costs, marginal revenue MC Point of tangency ATC PMC = ATCMC Z MRMC QMC DMC Quantity module 34 monopolistic competition 187 II.Monopolistic Competition Versus Perfect Competition A.Price, marginal cost, and average total cost 1. Monopolistically competitive firms and perfectly competitive firms are similar in that in the long run both receive a price that is equal to their average total cost. This is illustrated in text Figure 34-4, shown below. Comparing Long-Run Equilibrium in Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition (a) Long-Run Equilibrium in Perfect Competition Price, costs, marginal revenue MC (b) Long-Run Equilibrium in Monopolistic Competition ATC Price, costs, marginal revenue MC ATC PMC = ATCMC PPC = MCPC = D = MR = PPC ATCPC MCMC QPC Minimum-cost output Quantity MRMC DMC QMC Quantity Minimum-cost output 2. They differ in the following ways: a.The price a perfectly competitive firm earns is equal to its marginal cost. A monopolistically competitive firm earns a price that is above its marginal cost. For this reason, monopolistically competitive firms want to sell more than they are currently selling at the going price. b.Firms in perfect competition earn a price that is equal to their minimum average total cost, while monopolistically competitive firms produce less than the quantity that would minimize average total cost. c.Definition: Firms in monopolistic competition face excess capacity: They produce at an output that is less than what would minimize average total cost. B.Is monopolistic competition inefficient? 1. Some mutually beneficial trades go unrealized. 2. The excess capacity leads to wasteful duplication: There are too many varieties of products. 3. Consumers, however, do benefit from the diversity of products in monopolistic competition. 188 module 34 monopolistic competition Teaching Tips Understanding Monopolistic Competition Creating Student Interest Have students create a list of firms in the area that have recently entered or exited. Discuss what type of products the firms sell. How many other firms sell the same product? Presenting the Material Explain that firms in monopolistic competition have some market power because they can differentiate their product, and they also face a downward-sloping demand curve. Give a concrete example of a monopolistically competitive firm in the short run and have students determine the output level and price at which profits will be maximized. Use the table shown below. Quantity Price 0 $17 Total revenue $0 1 16 15 3 14 4 13 5 12 6 11 7 10 8 9 9 8 25 27 28 32 38 48 72 62 8 –2 5 +7 2 8.3 +17 2 6.8 +25 3 5.6 +32 4 5.3 +34 6 5.4 +32 10 6 0 Profit — –$10 11.5 2 72 4 70 23 Marginal cost 18 6 66 18 8 60 — 10 52 Average total cost 12 42 $10 14 30 Total cost 16 16 2 Marginal revenue +24 14 6.9 +10 The profit-maximizing price is $11, and the output is 6. Total profits at this level of production are $34. Point out that the first two columns represent the demand curve; the fourth column is the downward-sloping marginal revenue curve. Draw a graph to illustrate the profit-maximizing output and the level of profit. Point out to the students that in the short run this looks just like the monopoly outcome. In the long run, the monopolistically competitive firm will earn zero economic profit just like the perfectly competitive firm. Be sure to discuss what happens to the firm’s demand module 34 monopolistic competition and marginal revenue curves when firms enter this industry (where firms are earning positive profit). Illustrate the long-run equilibrium and make sure students understand why economic profit will be equal to zero. Monopolistic Competition Versus Perfect Competition Creating Student Interest Ask students to name a “monopolistic” industry. See how long it takes for someone in the class to ask whether you mean a monopoly or a monopolistically competitive industry. Use the confusion to point out the difference between the two market structures and the importance of being clear about which one you are talking about (by not simply saying “monopolistic”). Ask what makes a monopolistically competitive firm competitive and what makes it like a “mini-monopoly.” Presenting the Material Use the characteristic of market structures (number of firms, type of product, control over price, ease of entry) to show that monopolistic competition has characteristics in common with both perfect competition and monopoly (hence the hybrid name). Like perfect competition, monopolistic competition has multiple firms and easy entry. Therefore, the long-run result is the same as perfect competition (normal profit). As in monopoly, firms in monopolistic competition sell a unique (or at least differentiated) product and have some control over price. Therefore, they can earn a profit in the short run by differentiating their product. Engage students in a debate about whether a monopolistically competitive industry is inefficient. Discuss the two possible points of inefficiency: firms sell for a price greater than marginal cost, and produce at a point where average total cost is not minimized, suggesting there is excess capacity. Now point out a benefit of monopolistic competition: more choice for consumers. Common Student Pitfalls • Confusion over the term “Monopolistic”. Students may confuse monopolistic competition with monopoly. Explain that the “monopolistic” aspect of monopolistic competition means that firms attempt to convince consumers that they have a unique product. Case Studies in the Text Economics in Action The Housing Bust and the Demise of the 6% Commission—This EIA explains how the use of real estate agents to buy and sell houses fits the model of monopolistic competition and how recent changes have affected the tradition of 6% commissions on the sale of a house. Ask students the following questions: 1. How were real estate agents able to prevent competition from lowering the standard 6% commission on house sales for so long? (Control of the multiple listing system.) 189 190 module 34 monopolistic competition 2. What recent changes have led to an increase in discount real estate agencies? (The Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission have fought anticompetitive tactics and excessive profits generated during the real estate boom.) Activities Who’s Profitable? (3–5 minutes) Put these three graphs on the board. Ask students to characterize the firm as earning economic profits, having break-even profit, or bearing losses. (a. economic profit; b. loss; c. break-even profit) (a) Price (b) Price MC P MC ATC P ATC D Q MR Quantity (c) Price MC P ATC D Q MR Quantity D Q MR Quantity
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz