Talent Identification or Talent Development? Objectives Define Talent Identification and Talent Development List potential implications for Talent programmes Identify the issues surrounding Talent ID Develop an argument for an against ID or Development The Argument Talent Detection and Identification or Talent Development? The Implications Funding Resource deployment Coach / Practitioner education Others? Physical Potential Predictors of Talent NATURE OR NURTURE? Sociological Physiological Psychology & Personality Detection and Identification Genetics Australian sports scientists have discovered a specific gene linked to athletic performance ACTN-3 2 Types: predisposed as sprinters Excellence in endurance sports Miah and Rich (2006) Heritability coefficients Adapted from Bouchard and Malina (1983) and Maes et al (1993) A coefficient of 1 indicates a total dependence on genetic factors 0 indicates no genetic influence Anthropometry Height 0.85±0.07 Leg Strength 0.80±0.10 Height / Weight 0.53±0.19 Skinfolds 0.55±0.26 Ectomorphy 0.35±0.50 Mesomorphy 0.42 Endomorphy 0.50 VO2 Max 0.30-0.93 Slow-twitch muscle fibres 0.55-0.92 Anaerobic power 0.44-0.97 Muscle endurance 0.22-0.80 Physiology Field & Performance tests Sprinting 0.45-0.91 Jumping 0.33-0.86 Flexibility 0.69-0.91 Balance 0.24-0.86 Static Strength 0.30-0.97 Physiological Testing Cost Is mass screening possible? Validity? Reliability? Snap shot Needs to be longitudinal / progressive Would this defy the purpose of talent ID? Maturation? Breakdown of birth dates for England World Cup campaign players between 1986 and 1998 (Richardson, 1998). % of players 250 200 World Cup Year 150 1998 1994 1990 1986 100 50 0 Sept-Dec Jan-April May-Aug Time of year born Conclusions & Implications? Trials A method of identifying talent Advantages Low costs Low administration Disadvantages Psychological tension Familiarity Overplay Isolation Environment Summary: Talent Detection & Identification Compile a summary One paragraph List the positives associated with talent Detection and Identification programmes Identify the potential issues Discuss in pairs Talent Development: The Case Robin Friday – Footballer A true story Should have played for England Played for Reading 135 times (53 goals) Played for Cardiff 25 times (7 goals) Quit the game Died aged 38 following years of alcohol and drug abuse Troubled, strong-minded & reckless Talent Development Sociological factors Family, Friends, Coaches, School teachers all have the potential to influence talent development Psychological characteristics No study in sport has shown psychological characteristics to be stable through development period (adolescence to adulthood) Morris (2000) Use of psychological skills discriminates medal and non-medal winners Gould et al (1992) The Role of Nature and Nurture in Elite ‘Player’ Development (adapted from Bloom, 1976) Initial Performance Process Eventual Performance • Motor / Technical • Perceptual / Cognitive • Psychological • Physical • Physiological NATURE • Practice • Coaching / Instruction • Training & Preparation • Familial influences • Resources NURTURE Conclusion Nature (detection / identification) and Nurture (Development) both contribute to Talent production Where should the focus of Talent programmes lie? Balancing Act? Development Detection / Identification Write your own conclusion: Consider both viewpoints Identification 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. Development Reading Abbott, A. and Collins, D. (2004). Eliminating the dichotomy between theory and practice in talent identification: considering the role of psychology. Journal of sports sciences, 22, 395-408. Miah, A. & Rich, E. (2006). Genetic tests for ability?: talent identification and the value of an open future. Sport, Education and Society, 11,3,pp259 -273. Reilly, T., Bangsbo, J. & Franks, A. (2000). Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 669-683.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz