BRICS COUNTRIES’ COOPERATION IN HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS: “NEW” DONORS & OLD RULES Ilya Ivanov Program assistant RIAC OUTLINE Humanitarian af fairs today New donors: types & approaches BRICS in the humanitarian af fairs Recommendations for the countries HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS TODAY Humanitarian assistance is not ODA: Disasters Emergencies Humanitarian crises 17.9 billion in 2012 37,3% needs unmet 2000-2008: 40% of disasters in the Asia Pacific 2008: 98% disaster-affected population Source: Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2013 lives in the AP NEW DONORS New donor=non-traditional donor=non-DAC donor BRICS countries, Mexico, Indonesia, etc. Former aid recipients Aspire for higher status Some not new: Russia ($26 bln. in 1986) Source: Development Initiatives based on OECD DAC and UN OCHA FTS data NEW DONORS: APPROACHES “Traditional approach”: Humanity Neutrality Impartiality Independence High aid politicization “Disaster diplomacy”: Chinese aid to Japan in 2011 - $16,5 mln. Chinese aid to the Philippines in 2013 - $100 000 Conceptual obstacles Non-traditional approach: South-South cooperation Donor-recipient equality “New stream” in humanitarianism Regional & thematic concentration BRICS IN THE HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS BRICS – not a humanitarian organization, but has capabilities BRICS countries showing interest in ODA & HA BRICS=majority of non-DAC donors Humanitarian crises may af fect all BRICS countries BRICS Development Bank (as a funding basis) Source: White, S. (2011) Emerging Powers, Emerging Donors RECOMMENDATIONS Improve coordination Create financial mechanism ( BRICS Development Bank) Intra-BRICS dialogue on ODA & HA Create an “OECD for non-DAC donors” Introduce new approaches Promote OECD-BRICS cooperation Set the global non-DAC agenda Introduce new rules, based on South -South coop., sovereignty & equality Promote states’ soft power & improve image THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz