Debating A ‘How To…’ Guide Content /40 •The arguments •As if presented with it on paper •POIs Style /40 •Confidence •Articulation •Emotive •Rhetoric •Fluent •Clear Strategy •Engagement with opposition •Focus on issues •Structure •Timing •Teamwork /20 FIRST SPEAKERS Proposition (Agree) Opposition (Disagree) • Define Motion • Briefly outline team’s main points • Introduce 1 or 2 key arguments • Re-iterate • Team line • Briefly outline team’s main points • Rebut P1 • Introduce 1 or 2 key arguments • Re-iterate • Team line SECOND SPEAKERS Proposition (Agree) Opposition (Disagree) • Rebut O1 • Rebuild prop case • Introduce 1 or 2 arguments • Re-iterate • Team line • Rebut P2 • Rebuild opp case • Introduce 1 or 2 arguments • Re-iterate • Team line THIRD SPEAKERS Proposition (Agree) Opposition (Disagree) • Rebut O2 • Rebuild prop case • No new arguments • Identify case issues • Why prop is stronger • Team line • Rebut P3 • Rebuild opp case • No new arguments • Identify case issues • Why opp is stronger • Team line REPLY SPEECHES Opposition (Disagree) • Biased summary of debate • ½ time of other speeches • Strongest speaker Proposition (Agree) • Biased summary of debate • ½ time of other speeches • Strongest speaker 1. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO PROVE TO WIN? 2. WHAT IS YOUR MODEL? 4 min speeches 3. KEY ARGUMENTS (PLAN BACKWARDS) 4 speakers per team Use scripts to help 4. SIGNPOSTING structure 5. PREPARE CONTENT, STYLE, STRATEGY Team line Active listening CONTENT STRATEGY PRESENTATION Depth of content, (WHAT): (HOW): (PVLEGS): examples and Convincing Well-organised Clear speech evidence from arguments speech Confident eye arguments and Valid examples Lots of contact/body research and facts persuasive /face Discrediting rhetoric Interesting rebuttals Time well-used intonation
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz