NAAC - QIF for Universities
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL, BENGALURU
Proposed - Quality Indicator Framework: A Pilot Study
(QIF for Universities)
Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curriculum Design and Development
Sl. No.
1.1.1
1.1.2
Metrics
Response
Curricula developed /adopted have
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
relevance to the local/ national /
process in your institution 4-0 scale
regional/global developmental
needs with learning objectives and, 4
3
2
1
0
programme outcomes, programme
specific outcomes and course
outcomes
Percentage of programmes / courses
where syllabus revision/ review
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬/𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡
was carried out during the last 3
𝐬𝐲𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝
𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟑 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
years
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞/𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭
𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟑 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
1.1.3
Percentage of programme / courses
having focus on employability/
entrepreneurship/skill development
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞/𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐟𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐧
𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩
𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞/𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬
Note: Unless stated otherwise the period to be considered is the assessment period (5 Years)
Page 1 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility
Sl. No.
1.2.1
Metrics
New programmes introduced as a
percentage of total number of
programmes.
New courses (within a programme)
introduced as a percentage of the
total number of courses (across all
programmes)
1.2.2
Percentage of programmes in
which Choice Based Credit System
(CBCS) has been implemented
Response
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬
𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐢𝐧
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬
𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐢𝐧
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬
𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐂𝐁𝐂𝐒 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭
Page 2 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
Sl. No.
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
Metrics
Institution integrates the cross
cutting issues relevant to Gender,
Environment and Sustainability,
Human Values and Professional
ethics into the curriculum
Number of value-added,
transferable, life skills courses,
including communication skills/soft
skills, available for students
Percentage of students enrolled in
the courses under 1.3.2 above
Percentage of students undertaking
field projects / internships
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬
𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝
𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 / 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
Page 3 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator – 1.4 Feedback System
Sl. No.
1.4.1
1.4.2
Metrics
Structured feedback is received from
1) Students, 2) Teachers,
3) Employers, 4) Alumni
5) Parents for design and review of
syllabus
Semester wise /year wise
Option:
A. Any 4 of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above
Feedback processes of the institution may
be classified as follows:
A. Feedback not collected
B. Feedback collected
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected, analysed and
action has been taken
E. Feedback collected, analysed and
action taken and feedback
available on website.
Response
Choose the applicable option
Choose the applicable option
Page 4 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criteria 2 – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
Sl. No.
Metrics
2.1.1
Percentage of students from other
States and Countries
2.1.2
Demand Ratio
(Average of last five years)
2.1.3
Aggregate percentage of seats filled
against seats reserved for various
categories as per applicable
reservation policy
Response
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫
𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝑿 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝
𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫
𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐆𝐎𝐈 𝐨𝐫
𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐫𝐮𝐥𝐞
X 100
Page 5 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
2.2.1
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
The institution assesses the learning
process in your institution 4-0 scale
levels of the students, after
admission and organises special
4
3
2
1
0
programmes for advanced learners
and slow learners.
2.2.2
Student Teacher Ratio
Students : Teachers
2.2.3
Percentage of differently abled
students (Divyangjan) on rolls
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲
𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
X 100
Page 6 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process
Sl. No.
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
Metrics
Student centred methods, such as
experiential learning,
participative learning and
problem solving methodologies
are used for enhancing learning
experiences.
Percentage of teachers using ICT
for effective teaching. (E-learning
resources OER’s, NPTEL, ePathshala, CEC, etc.)
The institution has a mentoring
system in place to meet the academic
and personal needs of students.
Ratio of mentor to students
Online student satisfaction survey
regarding teaching learning
process of about 50 to 100 students.
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Number of teachers using ICT
Total number of teachers
X100
Mentor : Mentee
Online survey to be conducted by NAAC
Page 7 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
Sl. No.
Metrics
2.4.1
Percentage of regular teachers
against sanctioned posts
2.4.2
Percentage of teachers with Ph.D.
qualification
2.4.3
Average teaching experience of
teachers (number of years)
Response
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐏𝐡. 𝐃.
𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
𝑵
𝟏
× ∑ 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒊
𝑵
𝒊=𝟏
Where:
N = Number of teachers
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐢 = Number of years of experience of ith
teacher
2.4.4
2.4.5
Percentage of teachers who
received awards recognition
/fellowships at State/ National/
International level from
Government/ recognised bodies
during the last five years
Percentage of teachers from other
states against sanctioned posts
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬
𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥 + 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥 +
𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥
𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
Page 8 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
Sl. No.
Metrics
2.5.1
Institution ensures declaration of
results within a stipulated period
2.5.2
Percentage of student
complaints/grievances about
evaluation against total number
appeared
2.5.3
Percentage of applications for
revaluation leading to change in
marks
2.5.4
Reforms in the examination
procedures and processes including
continuous internal assessment
have positive impact on the
examination management system
Response
Specify the average number of days from the
date of the last examination till the
announcement of results
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞
𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐝
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞
𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝
𝑿 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 9 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Sl. No.
2.6.1
2.6.2
Metrics
Programme outcomes and course
outcomes are stated and displayed
on website
Learning Outcomes are evaluated
by the institution
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
Average pass percentage of students
during assessment period
2
1
0
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
2.6.3
3
3
2
1
0
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
Page 10 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criteria 3 – Research, Extension and Innovations
Key Indicator - 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities
Sl. No.
3.1.1
3.1.2
Metrics
Response
The institution has a well defined policy for
promotion of research and the same is
uploaded on institutional website
YES / NO
The institution facilitates its faculty to
undertake research by providing seed money
for research (mention the average seed money
per year)
3.1.3
Number of workshops/ training programmes/
sensitization programmes conducted by the
institution to promote research culture
(during last five years)
3.1.4
Number of faculty members availing
international fellowship for advanced studies/
research (during last five years)
3.1.5
Number of JRF/Post Doctoral
Fellows/Research Associates/ other research
fellows in the university (during last five
years)
3.1.6
Efforts are made by the institution to improve
its infrastructure to facilitate research.
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒆𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒚 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚
𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆
𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝟓 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒔
𝟓
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 11 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
3.1.7
University has the following facilities
1. Instrumentation centre
2. Incubation centre
3. Competency training centre
4. Finishing school
Options:
A. All four facilities exist
B. Three of the facilities exist
C. Two of the facilities exist
D. One of the facilities exist
E. None of the facilities exist
3.1.8
Percentage of departments with UGC /SAP
/CAS/ DST-FIST etc.
Choose options from A to E
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐔𝐆𝐂 𝐨𝐫
𝐒𝐀𝐏 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐀𝐒 𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐒𝐓 − 𝐅𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐞𝐭𝐜.
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
Page 12 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
Sl. No.
3.2.1
Metrics
Grants for projects sponsored by the
industry / corporate houses /
international bodies/ endowment/
chairs in the institution (during last
Response
In Crores of rupees
five years)
3.2.2
The number of research centres
recognised by National and
International bodies, eg. UGC,
ICSSR, ICHR, ICPR, DST, DBT,
UNESCO, UNICEF, ICMR
3.2.3
Number of Externally funded
major/minor research projects /per
teacher during the last five years
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝
𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡
𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
Page 13 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 3.3 Innovations
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
3.3.1
Institution has brought innovative
methods in creation and transfer of
knowledge
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
3.3.2
Incubation centre is established and
functional
3.3.3
Number of workshops/seminars
conducted on Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR) and Innovative
practices (during last five years)
3.3.4
Number of awards for innovation
won by institution/teachers (during
last five years)
3.3.5
Number of Start-ups incubated on
campus (during last five years)
3.3.6
Commercialisation of research
generated through Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) (during last
five years)
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
YES / NO
YES / NO
Page 14 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicators - 3.4 Research Publications and Awards
Sl. No.
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.4
Metrics
The institution has a stated Code of
Ethics to check malpractices and
plagiarism in Research
Number of malpractices and
plagiarism cases detected and action
taken
The institution has instituted research
awards and incentives to the faculty
for receiving state, national and
international recognition
Number of Patents/Gene sequences
/Copyrights awarded (during last five
years)
Output of Ph.D per teacher (during
last five years)
Response
YES / NO
YES / NO
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐡. 𝐃 𝐝𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐝
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐬
3.4.5
Publications per teacher as per list of
Journals notified in UGC website and
chapters in edited volumes books
(during last five years)
3.4.6
Percentage of papers published in top
ranked high impact journals listed in
UGC Website
3.4.7
Number of reference books published
by teachers (during last five years)
3.4.8
Number of papers with more than 10
citations in recognised databases (Web
of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar,
Indian citation) – Index, PUBMED
(during last five years)
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
𝐢𝐧
𝐔𝐆𝐂 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐬 +
𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤
𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭
𝐔𝐆𝐂 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬
Page 15 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicators - 3.5 Consultancy
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
3.5.1
Institution has a policy on
consultancy including revenue
sharing between institution and
individual (State the ratio)
Revenue generated from consultancy
during the last five years (Rupees in
thousands)
Institution : Individual
3.5.2
3.5.3
Revenue generated from corporate
training by the Institution during last
five years (Rupees in thousands)
Page 16 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicators - 3.6 Extension Activities
Sl. No.
3.6.1
Metrics
Extension activities in the
neighbourhood community in terms
of impact and sensitising students to
social issues and holistic development
(during last five years)
3.6.2
Number of activities conducted
in partnership with industry,
community and NGOs for
extension activities (during last five
years)
3.6.3
Number of awards and recognition
received for extension activities
from Government /Recognised
Bodies (during last five years)
3.6.4
Number of extension and outreach
programmes conducted through
NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., per
year
3.6.5
Percentage of students participating
in extension activities with GOs,
NGOs and programmes such as
Swachh Bharat, Aids awareness,
Gender Issue, etc..,
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝟓
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧
𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
Page 17 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 3.7 Collaborations
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
3.7.1
Collaborations for activities such as
research, faculty exchange, student
exchange, placement, training etc.
per year (number of activities)
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝟓
3.7.2
Number of linkages with
institutions/industries through
internships, on-the-job training,
project work, sharing of research
labs etc. (during last five years)
3.7.3
Number of functional MoUs with
institutions of national/
international importance/other
universities/ industries/ corporate
houses etc. (during last five years)
Page 18 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criteria 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources
Key Indicator - 4.1 Physical Facilities
Sl. No
Metrics
4.1.1
The institution has adequate
facilities for teaching - learning. viz.,
classroom, laboratory, computer,
equipment, etc.
4.1.2
4.1.3
The institution has adequate
facilities for sports, games (indoor,
outdoor, gymnasium, yoga centre
etc.,) and cultural activities.
Percentage of classrooms and
seminars halls with ICT-enabled
facilities
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐬/𝐬𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞
𝐈𝐂𝐓 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐬/𝐬𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬
𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
4.1.4
Percentage of budget allocation of
non-salary expenditure for
infrastructure augmentation
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐀𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞
𝐚𝐮𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐧𝐨𝐧−𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞
×100
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐨𝐧−𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞
Page 19 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
Sl. No.
4.2.1
Metrics
Library is fully automated using
Integrated Library Management Software
(ILMS)
4.2.2
Total number of books available in the
library (in thousands)
4.2.3
Does the institution subscribe to
1. INFLIBNET Data Base
2. e-Shodh Sindhu
3. e-Shodh Ganga
4. e-resources
5. N-LIST
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Choose an option
Options:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
4.2.4
Any 4 of the above
Any 3 of the above
Any 2 of the above
Any 1 of the above
None of the above
Average yearly expenditure of funds for
the purchase of books and journals (Rs in
lakhs)
(during last five years)
𝑵
𝟏
× ∑ 𝑬𝒙𝒑𝒅𝒊
𝑵
𝒊=𝟏
Where:
N = Number of years
𝐄𝐱𝐝𝐢 = Expenditure in rupees for the
purchase of books and journals of ith year
Page 20 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
4.2.5
Number of computers with
internet/LAN, Wi-Fi etc., available for
staff and students in the library
4.2.6
Percentage per day usage of library by
staff, students and stakeholders
4.2.7
Teachers are involved in e-content
development
1. e-Pathshala
2. CEC/MOOCS/MOODLE
3. SWAYAM
4. NPTEL
A. All 4 of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1 of the above
E. None of the above
𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 (𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒇𝒇, 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔,
𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒌𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔) 𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒍𝒊𝒃𝒓𝒂𝒓𝒚
𝑿 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒇𝒇, 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔
𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔
Choose an option
Page 21 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure
Sl. No.
Metrics
4.3.1
Institution frequently upgrades its
IT facility and has latest computing
facilities – hardware and software
4.3.2
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Student computer ratio
Number of students : Number of computers
4.3.3
Number of computers with 1GBPS
and above bandwidth internet
connection
4.3.4
Facilities for e-content development
YES / NO
Page 22 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus
Sl. No.
4.4.1
4.4.2
Metrics
The institution has a budget for
maintenance of the facilities
available on the campus – physical
facilities and academic support
facilities
(Percentage of non-salary
expenditure annually)
There are established procedures
and systems for maintaining and
utilizing physical and academic
support facilities - laboratory, library,
sports complexes, computers,
classrooms etc.
Response
𝑩𝒖𝒅𝒈𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒏𝒐𝒏 − 𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚
𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆
𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒖𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒔
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒏𝒐𝒏 − 𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚
𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 23 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criterion 5 - Student Support and Progression
Key Indicator - 5.1 Student Support
Sl. No.
5.1.1
Metrics
Student welfare measures
(scholarships and free ships) provided
by the government.
Percentage of student benefited by these.
Student welfare measures
(scholarships, free ships, etc.) provided
by the institution besides government
schemes.
Percentage of student benefited by these.
5.1.2
Number of capability enhancement
and development schemes – coaching
for competitive examinations, career
counselling, soft skill development,
remedial coaching, language lab, bridge
courses etc.
5.1.3
Number of employers who visited the
campus of the institution in the last 5
years through the placement cell of the
Institution
Response
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐛𝐲 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐭
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞
𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒔
Page 24 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.1.6
The institution offers coaching for
competitive examinations and c a r e e r
counselling. Percentage of student
benefited by these
The institution has an international
students cell to cater to the requirements
of foreign students
The institution has a t r a n s p a r e n t
mechanism for timely redressal of
student grievances including sexual
harassment and ragging cases
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐜𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝
𝐛𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡
𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
YES / NO
Page 25 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 5.2 Student Progression
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
5.2.1
Percentage placement of outgoing
students averaged over last five
years
𝟏
× ∑ 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒊
𝑵
𝑵
𝒊=𝟏
Where:
N = Number of years
𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐢 = Percentage of placement in ith year
=
5.2.2
5.2.3
Percentage of students
progression to higher education
Percentage of students qualifying
in state/ national/ international
level examination per year
(eg: NET/SLET/GATE/
GMAT/CAT, GRE/ TOFEL/ Civil
Services/State government
examination)
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐝
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈
𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒆𝒙𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓
𝑿𝟏𝟎𝟎
(𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒅
𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏)
Page 26 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
Sl. No.
Metrics
5.3.1
Number of awards/medals for
outstanding performance in
sports/cultural activities at Inter University / State /
national/international level
5.3.2
Presence of an active student council
& representation of students on
academic & administrative bodies of
the institution
5.3.3
Average number of sports and cultural
activities / competitions organised at
the institution level per year
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞
𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬
𝟓
Page 27 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 5.4 Alumni Engagement
Sl. No.
5.4.1
Metrics
The Alumni Association (registered and
functional) contributes significantly to
the development of the institution
5.4.2
Alumni Contribution during last five
years (in lakhs)
5.4.3
Number of alumni meets held during last
five years
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 28 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criteria 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management
Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
Sl. No.
6.1.1
Metrics
The governance of the institution is
reflective of an effective leadership
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
6.1.2
The institution practices decentralization
and participative management
3
2
1
0
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 29 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
Sl. No.
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
Metrics
Perspective plan document is an important
component of the institution’s strategy
development and deployment process is
available on the website
The institution has a well defined
organizational structure including
governing body, administrative setup, and
functions of various bodies, service rules,
procedures, recruitment, promotional
policies and grievance redressal mechanism
put up on the website
Implementation of e-governance in areas of
operation
1. Administration
2. Examination
3. Finance and Accounts
4. Student Admission and support
5. Planning and Development
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Choose among options
Options:
A. All 5 of the above
B. Any 4 of the above
C. Any 3 of the above
D. Any 2 of the above
E. Any 1 of the above
6.2.4
Percentage representation of staff (teaching
/ non-teaching) in decision making bodies
6.2.5
Regular meetings of various
bodies/cells/committees and
implementation of their resolutions
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟
(𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 / 𝐧𝐨𝐧 − 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠)
𝐢𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 /
𝐧𝐨𝐧 − 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟
Based on your judgement, rate the quality
of this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 30 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
6.3.1
The institution has an effective
welfare mechanism for teaching and
non-teaching staff
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
6.3.2
The institution regularly conducts
audit to ascertain inclusiveness
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
Number of other professional
development programmes organized
by the institution per year
6.3.5
Percentage of staff attending the
professional development
programme per year (OP, RC, STC,
FDP etc.)
6.3.6
Institution has a system of Annual
Performance Appraisal aimed at staff
development
1
0
process in your institution 4-0 scale
3
Average number of
national/international/ University
level conferences /workshops
organised per department, per year
6.3.4
2
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
4
6.3.3
3
2
1
0
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬
𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐛𝐲
𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞
𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫
𝐗 𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 31 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
Sl. No.
6.4.1
Metrics
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
Institution conducts internal and
external audits regularly
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
6.4.2
6.4.3
Funds / Grants received from nongovernment bodies or individuals
during the assessment period.
(Please specify the amount in rupees)
Institutional Strategies for
mobilisation of funds and the optimal
utilisation of resources
3
2
1
0
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 32 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
Sl. No.
Metrics
Response
6.5.1
Internal Quality Assurance Cell
(IQAC) has contributed significantly
for institutionalizing the quality
assurance strategies and processes
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of this
6.5.2
The institution reviews its teaching
learning process, structures &
methodologies of operations and
learning outcomes at periodic
intervals through IQAC set up as per
norms
Options:
A. Review in 3 months
B. Review in 6 months
C. Review in 9 months
D. Review in 12 months
E. Review in >12 months
6.5.3
Average number of activities per
year conducted by IQAC for
promoting quality culture
Quality assurance initiatives of the
institution include:
1. Accreditation by national
body
2. International accreditation
3. Participation in NIRF
4. Academic Administrative
Audit (AAA)
Options:
A. All 4 of the above
B. Any 3 of the above
C. Any 2 of the above
D. Any 1of the above
E. None of the above
6.5.4
process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Choose among the option
Choose among the options
Page 33 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Criteria 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices
Key Indicator - 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
Sl. No.
7.1.1
Metrics
Response
Gender Equity
1. Percentage of women appointed in
teaching positions
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
2. Percentage of women appointed in
non - teaching positions
3. Number of Gender sensitization
programmes organized by the
institution (last five years)
4. Institution shows gender sensitivity
in providing facilities such as:
a) Social Securities
b) Counselling
c) Common Room
7.1.2
Environmental Consciousness and
Sustainability
Alternate Energy Initiatives such as
1. Replacement of existing
conventional bulbs /tube lights with
power savings CFL/LED bulbs
𝐍𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝
𝐢𝐧 𝐧𝐨𝐧 − 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
𝐗𝟏𝟎𝟎
𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬
𝐢𝐧 𝐧𝐨𝐧 − 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
YES / NO
Page 34 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities



2.
Conventional energy power
replaced by renewable energy
sources (Solar, Bio, Wind Energy
and any other)
YES / NO
3.
Energy audit of the institution
and measures taken for
conservation of energy
YES / NO
4.
Waste Management Steps such as
Recycling of waste (solid and liquid)
generated on the campus
E-waste disposal and Management
YES / NO
Solid waste conversion for source of
energy and manure (vermi compost)
YES / NO
5. Rain water harvesting structures
and utilization in the campus
YES / NO
6. Green Practices
 Students, staff using
a) Bicycles
b) Public Transport
c) Pedestrian Friendly Roads
 Plastic free campus
 Paperless office
 Green landscaping with trees
and plants
7. Institution provides Budget for
green initiatives and ensures its
utilisation
7.1.3
Differently abled (Divyangjan
friendliness)
Resources available in the institution
1) Physical facilities
2) Provision for lift
YES / NO
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
YES / NO
Choose among the options
Page 35 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Ramp / Rails
Wheel Chair
Braille Software/facilities
Rest Rooms
Scribes for examination
Special skill development for
differently abled students
9) Any other similar facility
(Specify)
Options:
A. 8 and more of the above
B. At least 6 of the above
C. At least 4 of the above
D. At least 2 of the above
E. None of the above
7.1.4
Inclusion and Situatedness
 Number of specific initiatives to
address locational advantages
and disadvantages?
 Number of initiatives taken to
engage with and contribute to
local community
(Not covered elsewhere)
7.1.5
Human Values and Professional Ethics
YES / NO
Code of conduct handbook for students,
teachers and support staff
Display of core values in the institution
and on its website
Number of activities conducted for
promotion of national integration and
communal harmony
Institution makes conscious efforts to
promote values professional ethics for
academic integrity and transparency in
its transaction
YES / NO
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 36 of 37
NAAC - QIF for Universities
Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices
Sl. No.
7.2.1
Metrics
State one of the institutional best
practices and rate on the scale provided
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
Sl. No.
7.3.1
Metrics
This Key Indicator aims to provide an
opportunity for the Institution to
exemplify performance in an area
aligned to its vision, priority and thrust
Response
Based on your judgement, rate the quality of
this process in your institution 4-0 scale
4
3
2
1
0
Page 37 of 37