Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
This document is a guide to how Council, through recommendations made by the Regional Transport Committee, has responded to
submissions on the draft Regional Land Transport Plan (2015-2021) and draft Regional Public Transport Plan (2015-2025). The Regional Land
Transport Plan (2015-2021) was approved by Council on 21 April 2015 and the Regional Public Transport Plan (2015-2025) on June 16 2015.
Council have responded to submissions in a number of ways, including:
-
Consequential amendments to the planning documents, including the programmed list of activities – these can be viewed separately in
the finalised Regional Land Transport Plan (2015-2021) and Regional Public Transport Plan (2015-2025).
Referral of the matter to a district council or the NZ Transport Agency for further comment – in some cases a submission point is best
addressed directly by a road controlling authority as it relates to a specific local matter.
Acknowledging points made and/or providing further comment and advice – further advice has been provided in instances where no
changes have been made.
Submissions below are listed in order of receipt and not in alphabetical order. Individual submissions can be found by using the number that
submitters received acknowledging their submission.
Page 1
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter fully supports
realignment of the
Matakohe Bridges.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Resilience
Submitter supports the
continued improvement to
the region’s transport and
connectivity through
roading.
Known trouble require
immediate remedial work.
Known flooding problem areas
to be addressed alongside local
landowners for best results.
The Regional Land Transport Plan
includes objectives, policies and
projects to target high risk areas
including areas susceptible to
frequent incidents of flooding and
slips/subsidence. The document
now contains greater detail on
longer term corridor planning for
resilience and safety.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter supports
maintaining existing public
transport as well as
ongoing improvements.
No specific relief sought.
Submitter’s comments have been
noted.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Full replacement of the
bridges at Matakohe with a
two-laned bridge will
improve safety and
economic outcomes for the
Kaipara District.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Full replacement of the
bridges at Matakohe with a
two-laned bridge will
improve safety outcomes
for the Kaipara District.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Demographic trend shows
an aging population in
Northland, with a large
increase in 2013-2014,
driving up demand for the
SuperGold Card. There is a
moratorium on further
services receiving funding.
Clarification on whether
SuperGold Card funding
gets carried from one
region to another to
accommodate population
movement.
That demographic analysis
should reflect the latest
information available.
The figures are based on the 2013
census release figures. These
represent the most recent and
accurate figures that staff are
aware of at the present time.
Anyone in receipt of a SuperGold
Card can ‘transfer’ that usage and
the associated reimbursement to
qualifying bus services in other
regions.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Rose Street bus terminus
needs to be improved
including seating, toilets
and added brickwork
features.
Consider improvements to the
Rose Street bus station.
The Regional Public Transport Plan
has a policy (Policy 1.6) that seeks
improvement to the Rose Street
bus station as a priority. The
Regional Council will work with the
Whangarei District Council (the
owners of the infrastructure) to
implement lighting, accessibility and
safety improvements.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Proposal for a public
transport loop service
linking the Brynderwyns –
Dargaville – Kaikohe and
the Bay of Islands. The
service will achieve the
following objectives:
Inferred the submitter wishes the
RPTP to include a West Coast
loop service.
The Regional Council has
contacted the submitter in regards
to the content of the submission.
1. Ken Cashin
2. Veronica Crene
2. Veronica Crene
3. Elizabeth Clark
4. Vicki Mottram
5. Betty McIntyre
5. Betty McIntyre
6. Fullers Bay of
Island
Summary of submission
-
-
-
Increase tourist
numbers and spending
to the west coast and
support farebox
recovery.
Provide a link between
remote communities
and service hubs such
as Kaikohe.
Connect with the
Intercity network for
those wishing to travel
further afield.
Page 2
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RPTP
7. Billy Portch
Subject
Public
Transport CityLink
Payment
Summary of submission
-
-
Lack of sufficient
smartcard vendors.
Smartcards have to be
purchased before they
can only be loaded.
Better pricing model for
short journeys as $3 is
too much to pay.
Increase number of vendors,
reduce upfront purchase costs,
reduce single fares.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The Regional Council will be
undertaking a fare structure review
in 2015. This will consider:
- Pricing of different ticket types.
- Incentivising the use of
smartcard technology.
- Consolidating point of sale
options.
RPTP
Public
Transport
CityLink
Infrastructure
Bus shelters are positioned
too far from bus stops (e.g.
Fisher Terrace)
Review location of bus shelters
The Regional Public Transport Plan
has a policy (Policy 1.6) that seeks
to improve infrastructure at bus
stops.
RPTP
Public
Transport
CityLink
Service
Patterns
-
Review service patterns to
address identify issues.
-
7. Billy Portch
7. Billy Portch
-
-
None of the bus routes
seem to connect
without requiring a 45
minutes to 1 hour wait
at Rose Street
No current service to
Okara Park
No services after lunch
on Saturdays, yet half
the weekend 'events'
staged are on at this
time and shops no
longer close at 1.00pm.
Changes to services so
that loop services will
be stopped would
fragment Whangarei
(having to travel into
town and back out).
-
-
Timetable issues will be
addressed at re-tender.
The Regional Council is
investigating options for
reintroducing a bus service to
Okara Park, integrating into
current service patterns.
Saturday afternoon services
were withdrawn due to lack of
patronage however this will be
reviewed at the time of retender.
RPTP
Public
Transport
CityLink
Other
Consider allowing dogs on
the bus (other than just
guide dogs).
Consider allowing dogs on
buses
The current policy stipulates only
guide dogs. This is consistent with
other regions in New Zealand.
RLTP
Resilience
-
Lack of Government
funding to improve
roading. Short term
solutions have been
used. More
Government funding
required. Funding
channelled towards
Auckland.
No specific relief sought.
Submitter’s comments noted.
The document now contains
greater detail on longer term
corridor planning for resilience and
safety.
-
Many Hapu have
prepared Hapu
Environmental
Management Plans
(HEMP) during 2006
and 2007. These
HEMP, give Hapu an
opportunity to be
involved in the planning
processes.
7. Billy Portch
8. Hugh Rihari
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter has been
travelling over Matakohe
bridges on average 10
times a week, and sees
near-misses and road-rage
regularly.
Submitter urgently asks the
Committee to consider what the
consequences will be if this is
left for another 3-5 years and
requests Matakohe Bridges is
progressed as a project in the
RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
See relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area This is an urgent project
which should be put at the top of
the list.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Critical that there is a road
realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges in the
2015-2021 RLTP for safety
reasons.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
9. Giles Stewart
10. Martyn Stewart
11. Annie Wearmouth
Change requested by
submitter
Page 3
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
See relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
States that it is an urgent
matter to include the road
realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges in the
2015-2021 RLTP for safety
reasons. Submitter suggest
as an interim solution,
clearing the big trees and
mangroves.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area Consider interim solutions
to the problem.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
See relief sought
Submitter states that as a matter
of urgency, the Matakohe road
needs realignment and
replacement of the one lane
bridges at it is currently
dangerous.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
See relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Imperative that the road
realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges is
included in the 2015-2021
for safety reasons.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
See relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Inclusion of the road
realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges in the
2015-2021 RLTP for safety
reasons.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels, along with
many others, that there is a
drastic call to have the
Matakohe road realignment
and bridge replacement
included in the 2015 -2021
RLTP. Ten people have
been killed approaching
these bridges over the
years.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter completely
supports the upgrade of the
Matakohe Bridges This
road is of utmost
importance as is the main
arterial route to the Kaipara
and for a time last winter
(2014). The route has
economic and resilience
significance.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
12. Andrew Stewart
13. Weston Stewart
14. Alan Stewart
15. Roxy Stewart
16. Jessica Hopkins
17. Selwyn Stewart
18. Craig Hodges
19. Tony Boakes
20. Daniel Simpkin
21. Mark Wearmouth
Subject
Page 4
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Safety is a major issue on
the Matakohe Bridges.
Contributing factors to the
safety issue is that the
morning sun is very
problematic through the
gully and the road is
inadequately sealed road.
Also during the summer
period, the flow over these
bridges doubles, if not
triples.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
The route is important for
freight.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP for
safety reasons.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter believes that
replacing the two one-lane
bridges at Matakohe due to
traffic volume and safety.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter therefore feels
there is an urgent need to
have the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter states that the
entire section of highway
between Maungaturoto and
Matakohe needs to be
considered with the
Matakohe bridges are
priority. This would benefit
the immediate region and
the entire Kaipara coast.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area consider the whole section
of highway between
Maungaturoto and Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
22. Glen Wearmouth
23. Roz McIntyre
24. Hamish Campion
25. Ben Foster
26. Natalya
Wearmouth
27. Sarah Stewart
28. Karen Fryer
29. Rick Silby
30. Jayden Flett
31. Peter Stewart
Subject
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Page 5
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP for
safety reasons and as an
alternative route.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP for
reasons of safety and to
promote economic
prosperity.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP for
reasons of safety and to
promote economic
prosperity.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels there is an
urgent need to have the
road realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges included
in the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter urges the
inclusion of road
realignment and
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges in the
2015-2021 plan as this is of
utmost importance for the
safety of road users and
the prosperity of the region.
Submitter expresses
support for having the
current one lane bridges at
Matakohe changed into 2
lane bridges. He has had
personal experience of an
accident at the bridge site.
Concern over Hardies and
Anderson one lane bridges
at Matakohe
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Refer to relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Refer to relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Refer to relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
33. Donald Campion
34. Grant Simpkin
35. Richard
Wearmouth
36. Paul Boakes
37. Chris Boakes
38. Thea Simays
39. Residents of
Kaipara District
40. Max Stewart
41. Neil Hodges
42. Arne Stewart
Subject
Page 6
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Summary of submission
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Refer to relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Refer to relief sought
Submitter wishes to see the
urgent progression in the 20152021 RLTP of the replacement
of the Matakohe bridges and the
re-alignment of the road in that
area.
RLTP
Connectivity
Refer to relief sought
The submitter would like to see
the plan enable:
- An extension of the
Northern Gateway Tollroad
to Wellsford, and ultimately
to Whangarei
43. Murray Foster
44. Jeff Wearmouth
46. Oliver Krollman
The RLTP promotes the
development of Mangakahia Road
– Otaika Valley Road as an
alternative strategic route/state
highway particularly for heavy
vehicles.
-
More three lane or even four
lane highways, to allow
better traffic flow and safe
passing
Extra passing lanes have been
added to State Highway 1 in recent
years. The potential for extra
passing lanes will form the basis of
strategic studies and corridor plans.
Refer to relief sought
Would like better quality control
of roadwork repairs, particularly
renewing or resealing instead of
repeatedly filling up potholes
RPTP
Public
Transport
Other
Refer to relief sought
This submitter would like to see
the plan enable:
- a passenger train
connection from Whangarei
to Auckland, with stations
every 25 to 35 km and Park
& Ride car parks at each
station
-
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
47. Mervyn Simpkin
48. Vernon Suckling
49. Stephen Simpkin
Submitter operates a
business in Dargaville and
has experienced significant
disruption when one bridge
was closed for repairs.
Submitter uses route
regularly and believes the
bridges at Matakohe are
dangerous. Dargaville is a
thriving town supplying
Kumara and other products
to the NZ market. The site
is winding, narrow and has
poor visibility.
Submitter and his family
regularly travel over the
bridges and believes the
bridges could be replaced
by a causeway and box
culvert design with Hardies
bridge as a causeway. This
could double as a
freshwater dam/irrigation
solution.
This is being progressed by NZTA
through the Road of National
Significance (RoNS) Programme
and the Auckland to Whangarei
Strategic Study and corridor plan.
An alternative route to SH1
of equal capacity
Maintenance
46. Oliver Krollman
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
-
RLTP
46. Oliver Krollman
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
additional CityLink
commuter bus routes to the
outer suburbs and towns,
like Tutukaka, Marsden,
Ruakaka, Waipu, with 4 to 6
services per day
This matter is an operational
roading matter and outside the
scope of the RLTP. Indirectly
however, the RLTP does include
projects to reseal and maintain
sections of local roads and State
Highways. A copy of this
submission has been forwarded to
the road controlling authorities for
comment.
The viability of this has been looked
at in the past. Investigations have
found that the market share for
passenger rail service between
Auckland and Northland is
extremely low.
The regional council investigates
the potential feasibility and viability
for proposals for new bus routes to
outlying areas, as and when
received.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Need to progress the road
realignment and replacement of
the Matakohe bridges through
the 2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Page 7
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Submitter’s comments are
acknowledged. Whilst it is agreed
the idea has longer term merit, the
RLTP is focussed on the next 10
year horizon.
RLTP
Other
Submitter discusses how
producing local fuel from
crops (for instance canola)
can support local transport,
create locally generated
sources of funding and
sustain communities more
effectively than current
funding models. More detail
is provided in the main
body of the submission.
The submitter wishes to see
these initiatives articulated
through the plan.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter lives close to
SH12 and has concerns
over bridge safety and
resilience of the economy
(if the bridges are
compromised). Safety and
resilience are key issues.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Road Safety
Rest Stops
A joint RTC – NZTA
strategy should be
developed for rest stops
that will:
- Determine whether
fatigue crashes justify a
rest stop.
- Determine whether rest
stops contribute
positively to reducing
fatigue.
- Determine a standard
in respect of location
(e.g. signage)
- Consider the provision
of proper stops, for
example for trucks.
In conjunction with NZTA, the
RTC develop a rest stop
strategy with an implementation
plan (it is inferred that the RLTP
should include direction to this
effect).
Agreed that rest stops are an
important part of safer journeys on
the roading network. Stronger
policy has therefore been included
in the RLTP to promote planning for
rest stops under the ‘safety section’
of the document. NZTA have
advised that they are undertaking a
national rest stop strategy. A copy
of this submission has been
referred to the NZTA for a detailed
response.
As an interim step, address
issues at existing rest
stops.
- Immediate attention for
dangerous stops (e.g
Top o the Dome).
- Immediate attention for
proper placement of
signage (e.g. Kaiwaka).
- Repeat signage at each
rest stop
- Distance to next rest
stop, at each rest stop.
- Signage to toilets.
In conjunction with NZTA, the
RTC addresses these
immediate issues of concern (it
is inferred that the RLTP should
include direction to this effect).
A copy this submission has been
referred to the NZTA for a detailed
response.
Dangerous right turns
All highways are scanned
for right turns which might
be dangerous in the
absence of a right turn
lane. Examples include:
- Top o the Dome
- Honey Centre
- Kaiwaka
Scan all highways for dangerous
right turns.
A copy this submission has been
referred to the NZTA for a detailed
response.
50. Godfrey
Waterhouse
51. Kelvin Wearmouth
52. Wayne Deeming
The submitter includes
detailed evidence to
support the submission
including discussion of
overseas examples.
Page 8
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
Subject
Other
53. Sheryl Bainbridge
Support for alternative into
greater access.
Change requested by
submitter
No relief sought
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Submitters comments are
acknowledged
Submitters comments are
acknowledged
Support for investigations
into alternative transport
modes.
No relief sought
Submitter requests that the
ranking of State Highways
1 and 10 north of
Kawakawa are
redesignated arterial routes
– reasons to include critical
connectivity and primary
access to a regional
hospital, both of which fit
the arterial route criteria.
Redesignate SH1 north of
Kawakawa and SH10 as arterial
routes on the state highway
network.
Submitter’s comments relate to
NZTA’s application of the One
Network Road Classification
(ONRC) to the State Highway
network. State Highways 1 (north of
Kawakawa) and 10 are both
designated ‘primary collector’
routes under the ONRC. The
application of the ONRC is a
process run separately to the
development of the RLTP and
although maintaining levels of
services based on ONRC will be an
important part of meeting plan
objectives and policies, the
designation of the routes
themselves is outside the scope of
the RLTP. A copy this submission
has been referred to the NZTA for a
detailed response.
RLTP
Kaeo Bridge
Two-laning Kaeo bridge.
The project is ranked as
having a high strategic fit
and a medium ranking for
effectiveness. Submitter
believes that the low BCR
is incorrect however and
should be increased:
- No longer fit for
purpose (being only
one lane).
- It is strategically
important to local
business and tourism
due to the lack of
satisfactory alternative
routes
- Required for lifeline
services.
Elevate the BCR of this project
to ensure it receives a higher
ranking and therefore be more
eligible for funding
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RPTP
Public
Transport
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter supports the
Busabout Kaitaia service.
Retain the funding for this
service.
This matter was also addressed
through the Northland Regional
Council Long Term Plan 20152025. As part of the deliberations
on this matter, it was recorded that
there was a large number of
submissions in support for the
continuation of this service. The
Council approved the continuation
of the targeted transport rate for
this service.
RLTP
Resilience
Submitter is concerned with
the resilience of roading,
particularly the SH1 from
the far north, south to
Whangarei.
Prioritise keeping a single lane
SH1 passable at all times
through the region. This could
be done by carrying out works at
the most vulnerable points, for
example the Moerewa Turntable
Hill bridge and the three bridges
at Kawakawa.
The RLTP recognises resilience as
one of the most important issues
facing Northland that needs to be
urgently addressed. These sites are
identified in the RLTP as being high
risk and will be subject to further
investigation.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Supports the realignment of
the Matakohe Bridges
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7. .
53. Sheryl Bainbridge
53. Sheryl Bainbridge
54. Mike Bryan
55. Pat Milich
Summary of submission
Page 9
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Summary of submission
RPTP
Public
Transport
Bus About
Kaitaia
Submitter wishes Busabout
Kaitaia is retained to
access sports and
recreational opportunities in
Kaitaia.
Retain Busabout Kaitaia Service
RPTP
Public
Transport
Bus About
Kaitaia
Submitter supports the Plan
and is happy to contribute
through a rating charge to
ensure that the Busabout
Kaitaia service continues to
operate.
Retain Busabout Kaitaia Service
This matter was also addressed
through the Northland Regional
Council Long Term Plan 20152025. As part of the deliberations
on this matter, it was recorded that
there was a large number of
submissions in support for the
continuation of this service. The
Council approved the continuation
of the targeted transport rate for
this service.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter points to recent
road testing of the 17002000 vehicles that utilise
the Matakohe Bridges, 172
are Heavy Vehicles. This is
the highest number in 25
years and will likely
increase. Submitter cites
personal example of being
rear ended by a logging
truck. Fog on the bridge is
a major issue – often there
is not a clear view across.
Due to cost increases ($4
million in 2002 to $5 million
today), the region cannot
afford to wait any longer.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Hancock Forest Managers
support the regional
priorities. In order for the
forestry industry to fully
leverage its economic
potential it is important that
roading is resilient and fit
for purpose.
No relief sought
Submitters comment acknowledged
RLTP
Resilience
Hancock Forest
Management (HFM)
support a resilient roading
network. The 2014 winter
storms cost the forestry
industry an estimated
$200,000 a day with road
closures on Mangakahia
Road and SH1. HFM would
like to see viable alternative
routes in place to avoid a
repeat of 2014 in the future
as well as main routes
being improved. Although
in the RLTP, Mangakahia
Rd has been identified as a
strategic freight route
alternative, the route was
compromised in the 2014
storm event and therefore
we ask that another route
be considered.
Improve main routes and
consider alternative routes (in
addition to Mangakahia Road) in
the event of extreme weather
events.
The RLTP seeks to improve levels
of service on this route to the point
where it can function as an
alternative to the State Highway
Although there may be local
deviation routes, Mangakahia Road
is the most logical alternative
regional route, running down the
spine of the region. The Regional
Transport Committee is working
closely with the NZ Transport
Agency for this road to be
designated a State Highway or
‘special purpose road’.
56. Miriam Urlich
57. Denis Lennox
58. Rochelle Butt
59 Tony Dwane
59 Tony Dwane
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
Page 10
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The relevant approved authorities
will continue to work closely with
forestry companies and truck
operators in an effort to allieviate
the dust problem. This includes
implementing the dust mitigation
framework. It is noted that NZTA
have provided a 22% funding
increase in local road operating and
maintenance investment to enable
localised dust mitigation measures.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Forestry supports the dust
on road mitigation
framework. This issue has
been ongoing for some
time and it is not going
away. Councils should
engage closely with the
forestry industry to identify
problem areas and practical
solutions that will minimise
effects on communities.
Councils should implement the
dust on road mitigation
framework in collaboration with
industry.
RPTP
Public
Transport
New Service
Submitter would like public
transport from rural areas
into Kaikohe. This could be
a twice weekly shuttle bus
operating to take people
who have transport
difficulties and live out of
town to get to the shops,
doctors surgery, the WINZ
office and to pay their bills.
It is inferred that the submitter
would like a Kaikohe based bus
service included in the plan.
Through the development of the
Northland Long Term Plan 20152025 a bus service is currently
being trialled in the mid-north. A
mid-north bus service has also
been recognised in the RPTP as a
potential future operating unit,
dependant on the outcome of this
trial. In addition, NRC are trialling
an Opononi/Omapere service to
Kaikohe.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is concerned with
the Matakohe Bridges and
believes there are
significant safety issues
with accidents and near
misses happening
reasonably frequently.
Safety reasons are cited.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is concerned with
the Matakohe Bridges due
to safety issues. Recent
crashes have been caused
by poor visibility and are
difficult to navigate. There
are also a lot of heavy
vehicles using the bridges.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is concerned with
the Matakohe Bridges due
to safety issues. Safety
reasons are cited.
Progress the road realignment
and replacement of the
Matakohe bridges through the
2015-2021 RLTP.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Issues
Submitter is concerned with
several issues in Ohaeawai
township:
-
Although these concerns are noted,
they are considered outside the
scope of the RLTP being primarily a
local issue and therefore these
matters have been forwarded to the
FNDC (the local roading authority)
for comment.
59 Tony Dwane
60. Rebecca
Henriksen
61. Andrew Boakes
62. Annalee Boakes
63. Ginny Boakes
64. Tracey Albert
(Ohaeawai Taiamai
Residence
Association)
-
-
Drainage and tennis
court maintenance
Existing footpaths to be
extended to reach
SH12 and SH1
Include engine braking
signs into township
Installation of mirror
opposite Hobson Street
to allow for safe
turning.
-
-
Drainage and tennis court
maintenance
Existing footpaths to be
extended to reach SH12
and SH1
Include engine braking signs
into township
Installation of mirror
opposite Hobson Street to
allow for safe turning.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter concerned with
Matakohe bridges as well
as sharp corners on the
road– Hardies & Andersons
Bridges – near Matakohe.
Would like removal of the two
one lane bridges and
improvement on tight corners in
the same area.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter concerned with
the two one lane bridges
near Matakohe. Also
impaired vision from
overgrowing mangroves
blocks the already
dangerous bridges.
Removal of one lane bridges
replaced with two lanes, or
realignment of the road.
Removal of mangroves.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
65. Denzil Boakes
66. Sheila Boon
Change requested by
submitter
Summary of submission
Page 11
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Akerama Curves is now under
construction and is due for
completion in 2017.
RLTP
Resilience
Submitter concerned
money for the Akerama
curves should be spent on
reducing flooding at
Moerewa bridge and
Kawakawa.
Use the money allocated to the
Akerama curves safety project
to reduceRod
flooding on the bridges at
Moerewa and Kawakawa,
including through the removal of
safety barriers that constrain
floodwaters.
RLTP
Dust
mitigation
Submitter concerned with
the state of Ruaroa Road
and in particular the high
level of dust arising from
the unsealed surface.
Seal Ruaroa Road to prevent
dust.
The relevant approved authorities
continue to work closely with
forestry companies and truck
operators in an effort to allieviate
the dust problem. This includes
implementing the dust mitigation
framework. It is noted that NZTA
have provided a 22% funding
increase in local road operating and
maintenance investment to enable
localised dust mitigation measures.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter concerned about
the two singe lane bridges
at Matakohe, including the
structure dealing with
heavy loads.
Restructuring of bridges to
support heavy loads and
increasing traffic. Double lanes.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter concerned with
the two one way bridges at
Matakohe. Feels they are
inadequate to support the
heavy traffic causing
dangerous points in the
state high way system.
Increase the safety of the state
high way by construction of two
lane bridges.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Issues
Submitter is concerned with
the speed limit and
inadequate road markings
on Kapiro Rd, Kerikeri.
Feels it is extremely unsafe
for cyclists and is also small
for cars with the width and
condition of the road.
1. Decrease of the speed limit
to 80kmph on Kapiro Rd.
Although these concerns are noted,
they are considered outside the
scope of the RLTP being primarily a
local issue and therefore these
matters have been forwarded to the
FNDC (the local roading authority)
for actioning.
67. Wayne Brown
68. Rachel BauckeBartlett
69. Robyn Roff
70. Trevor Roff
71. Raymond Baker
2. That at least 0.5m of seal be
added either side of Kapiro
road (from River Drive down
to the turnoff at landing Rd)
as road widening to allow for
safer cycling.
3. That the same edging in 2
above be done either side
from the Landing Rd turnoff
(Skudders Beach end) down
to the bridge at Waipapa
stream.
RPTP
Public
Transport
New Routes
Concerned with lack of
public transport in the Far
North.
Would like more public transport
in the Far North.
Several initiatives are underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RPTP
Public
Transport
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter would like the
BusAbout Kaitaia service to
be retained.
Submitter would like the
BusAbout Kaitaia service to be
retained.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on this matter, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service.
The Council approved the
continuation of the targeted
transport rate for this service.
72. Raewyn McDonald
73. Alex Tracey
Page 12
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
Subject
Summary of submission
RLTP
Kaeo Bridge
The one lane bridge at
Kaeo on SH10 is
dangerous. Views are
obstructed for example and
there is no weed control.
The pohutakawa trees on
the grass verge is a major
hazard. In addition the
speed limit is too high.
Make the Kaeo bridge area a
50km zone to slow traffic and
trim (though not remove) the
trees. Consider a bridge curving
across the river to avoid the
trees with a road leading into
Kaeo from the hills to avoid road
closure when flooding occurs.
RLTP
Other
Otangaroa Rd (which joins
the east side of Northland
to the west) is a major
under utilised road which
could be opened up as
another tourist road, for
people to travel direct to the
Hokianga from the Kaeo
area.
Otangaroa Rd to be sealed and
advertised opening new tourist
areas. Promote the route
through signage.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. A copy of this
submission has been forwarded to
the FNDC for their consideration.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Supports the re-alignment
of support Hardies and
Anderson Bridges at
Matakohe. Submitter feels
the bridges are hazardous
and require continuous
maintenance.
Realignment of the bridges as a
priority. If not then have
alternative routes for when
accidents occur (ones available
now require 4 wheel drive
vehicles).
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7. .
RLTP
Connectivity
Refer to relief sought
1. Submitter supports a
road/rail tunnel through
Brynderwyns as a priority for
safety and freight and
wishes to see this
progressed.
The long term focus of the RLTP is
to increase the level of service of
the route between Auckland and
Whangarei to that of a four-lane
highway. A tunnel could be a part of
the solution of meeting this goal
however other solutions (such as
an alternative route alignment) may
be more efficient and less costly.
2. Develop a strategic roading
route from Paihia to Kerikeri.
Whilst the RLTP includes a plan of
this route, this is expected to be a
longer term goal. A corridor plan
has been developed for the
Kerikeri-Waipapa triangle and is
included in the RLTP.
3. A regional touring route
should connect Ocean
Beach to Tutakaka over the
longer term.
Submitter’s comment is noted –
the RLTP does seek to maintain
and develop regional touring
routes. Funding has been
committed through Northland Inc. to
upgrade signage on this route.
Expanding the Twin Coast
Discovery Route to include new
roading connections is likely to be a
longer term ambition however.
74. Ramona Cording
74. Ramona Cording
75. Carsila Silby
76. Doug Smeal
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
Submitter supports for a
charging infrastructure for
electric vehicles and
encourages more of these
facilities to be available in
Northland.
Submitter would like more
charging stations for electric
vehicles.
These matters are presently being
considered through the Regional
Electric Vehicle Utility Project
(REVUP) group. This group
includes representatives from the
NRC, WDC, FNDC, KDC,
Northpower, Top Energy, NZTA,
Auckland Council and private
individuals. This submission has
been forwarded to this group for
their consideration and where
applicable, action.
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
Submitter feels there are a
lack of charging stations
available through Northland
for electric cars.
Set programme to encourage
electric car use and establish
charging stations throughout
Northland.
These matters are presently being
considered through the Regional
Electric Vehicle Utility Project
(REVUP) group. This group
includes representatives from the
NRC, WDC, FNDC, KDC,
Northpower, Top Energy, NZTA,
Auckland Council and private
individuals. This submission has
been forwarded to this group for
their consideration and where
applicable, action.
77. Derryn Brenan
78. Peter Shand
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $7m has been made in
the Regional Land Transport Plan
for the Kaeo Bridge project with a
Priority Rating of 4. The
maintenance matters have been
forwarded to the NZTA for
comment
RLTP/
RPTP
Page 13
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The RLTP includes policies on
promoting walking and cycling. In
addition there are several walking
and cycling projects prioritised in
the 2015-2018 funding round. A
copy of this submission will be sent
to the road controlling authorities.
Summary of submission
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Submitter feels the network
for cycling and walking is
too ‘car focussed’. Public
transport users are
subsidising private
transport users not having
to pay parking and
infrastructure.
Submitter would like progress on
cycling and walking networks will have health and security
benefits.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Hokianga Harbour ferry
route is too long through
the historical use of an
existing ramp further away
than it should otherwise be.
Building a new ramp at
Pinkney’s Point would save
money in fuel costs. A
cable ferry would be
another way of saving fuel.
A ferry from Ivydale to
Kohukohu would bring
more attraction to the
cycleway.
Opportunities to progress a new
ferry ramp at Pinkney’s point, a
cable ferry and a new ferry route
from Ivydale to Kohukohu
should be explored.
The Hokianga ferry service is
treated as a road (an ‘exempt
service) for the purposes of funding
subsidy and is managed and
funded by FNDC. This submission
will therefore be referred to the
FNDC for comment.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Dust issues on Riley Fisher
Rd and Kaingaroa Rd.
Would like tar sealing of the
road. If not tar seal the
remainder of Duncan Rd up to
the junction of Riley Fisher Rd.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. A copy of this
submission has been forwarded to
the FNDC for their consideration.
RLTP
Resilience
Improvements so that
SH12/Mangakahia Road
must be able to function
when other routes are
compromised.
Mangakahia Rd upgraded to a
viable alternative route.
The RLTP seeks to improve levels
of service on this route to the point
where it can function as an
alternative to the State Highway.
The Regional Transport Committee
is working with the NZTA in order
for this road to be designated a
State Highway or ‘special purpose
road’.
RLTP
Other
The ranking of State
Highways 1 and 10 north of
Kawakawa should be redesignated arterial routes.
These routes must be
resilient for freight to be
able to come in and out of
the area and to enable
access to the regional
hospitals.
The ranking of State Highways 1
and 10 north of Kawakawa
should be re-designated arterial
routes.
Submitter’s comments relate to
NZTA’s application of the One
Network Road Classification
(ONRC) to the State Highway
network. State Highways 1 (north of
Kawakawa) and 10 are both
designated ‘primary collector’
routes under the ONRC. The
application of the ONRC is a
process run separately to the
development of the RLTP and
although maintaining levels of
services based on ONRC will be an
important part of meeting plan
objectives and policies, the
designation of the routes
themselves is outside the scope of
the RLTP. A copy this submission
has been referred to the NZTA for a
detailed response.
RLTP
Kaeo and
Taipa
Bridges
The bridges on SH10 north
of Kaeo and Taipa do not
meet the regions needs
These bridges should be
upgraded.
Provision has been made in the
Regional Land Transport Plan to
upgrade the Taipa and Kaeo
Bridges with a Priority Rating of 7
and 4 respectively at a cost of
$15m and $7m.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Submitter does not support
the use of waste oil on
dusty roads.
Do not use waste oil.
This is currently prohibited under
the Regional Water and Soil Plan.
78. Peter Shand
79. Robin Hoare
80. Petrina Hodgson
81. Julianne
Bainbridge
81. Julianne
Bainbridge
81. Julianne
Bainbridge
81. Julianne
Bainbridge
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
Page 14
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on this matter, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service.
The Council approved the
continuation of the targeted
transport rate for this service.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Upgrade and straighten
Three Mile Bush rd.
Upgrade and straighten Three
Mile Bush rd.
It is noted that Transfield services
are undertaking remedial work on
this during 2015. A copy of
submission will be forwarded to the
WDC.
RLTP
Kaeo Bridge
Supports the two-laning of
the one way bridge north of
Kaeo as there are few
alternative routes available.
Would like a feasibility study be
conducted to investigate the
viability of redirecting SH10 to
the opposite side of the Kaeo
River i.e. using the two lane
bridge at Omaunu Road and
proceeding up Dip Road and
around the base of the hills to
reconnect with the existing
SH10.
Provision has been made in the
Regional Land Transport Plan to
upgrade the Kaeo Bridge with a
Priority Rating of 4 respectively at a
cost of $7m. The route
recommendation has been referred
to the NZTA for their consideration.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter feels there is a
lack of public transport
system linking main
Northland towns.
Would like a public transport
system linking; Hokianga,
Kaikohe, Kawakawa, Paihia,
Kerikeri, Kaeo, Kaitaia and
Whangarei
Several initiatives are underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RLTP
Cycling
The Twin Coast Cycle
Trails are very good
however are still disjointed.
The 3km cycleway on the Opua
trail from Taumarere to
Kawakawa is very dangerous.
Would like to see the completion
of the trail from Otiria to
Kaikohe.
Complete the section from
Okaihau to Horeke.
Strategic development of walking
and cycling routes is addressed in
the RLTP as well as funding for
walking and cycling projects. This
specific matter is presently been
dealt with by FNDC and this
submission has been forwarded to
them to provide a response.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Lack of long distance public
transport a concern.
Public transport connecting
towns of Northland in case car
unavailable.
Several initiatives are underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
Feels NRC has been
proactive in electric vehicle
charging facilities.
No specific relief.
Comment is acknowledged
81. Julianne
Bainbridge
82. A.W. Agnew
83. Neill Bainbridge
84. Waimarei Reihana
85. Ray Baker
86. Rita Baker
87. Andre LaBonte
Summary of submission
Page 15
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
These matters have been referred
to the NZTA for consideration and
response.
Summary of submission
RLTP
Safety/
Resilience/
Taipa Bridge/
Local
Roading
Submitter feels there is lack
of resilience and safety
signs on SH10 from Taipa
to Cable Bay. More details
are provided in the
submission.
Would like speed signs on SH10
from Cable Bay toilet block to
Taipa Area School (2.5km) as
well as appropriate crosswalks.
There are some erosion issues
along the route that need to be
addressed (a slippage at Crystal
Waters).
RLTP
Other
Has concern with some of
the terminology used in the
plan, such as the cascade
from objectives and policies
which then seem to be
named as themes.
The hierarchy should be policy,
plans, programs.
Under the LTMA (as amended
2013), a regional land transport
plan must set out the region’s land
transport objectives, policies, and
measures for at least 10 financial
years from the start of the plan.
RLTP
Other
The plan does not contain
much detail about the
existing and expected
growth in traffic volumes
and heavy vehicle
movements.
Include more detail on traffic
volumes including the outcomes
of any freight studies or plans
that UNISA have undertaken.
Additional detail has been included
in the RLTP.
RLTP
Rail
Submitter supports rail and
believes it should be given
a higher profile in the
document. There is a lack
of discussion of the role of
rail in connecting to
Marsden Point and a lack
of discussion on the role
rail has to play ot reduce
wear and tear on roads.
Increase the profile of rail in the
document (submitter provides
examples of where).
Additional detail has been included
in the RLTP.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Supports realignment of
singe lane bridges at
Matakohe for reasons of
safety.
Would like realignment,
improved signage and reduction
of speed at Matakohe Bridges.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Resilience/
Safety
Concerns over
improvements that only
benefit heavy vehicle users.
The improvement of
Mangakahia Rd will only
attract more trucks –
considers a bypass
westward of Pukenui Forest
for both cars and trucks
would be more beneficial.
Prioritise enforcing the 90kph
speed limit for heavy vehicles
and consider a bypass route
west of the Pukenui Forest
(around Whangarei). Do not
support HPMV promotion.
The RLTP includes funding towards
road safety promotion which should
include speed enforcement and
education. Mangakahia Rd is
considered to be the best
alternative bypass route. It is also
important to note that HPMV is a
nationally promoted initiative.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Connectivity
Council is too concerned
about connecting Northland
to Auckland instead of
connecting Northland as a
unit.
Specifically would like Old
Bay Rd to be brought up to
the standard of a State
Highway (west of Puketona
Junction).
Lack of connecting roads
between Kerikeri and
Paihia a concern.
Need to improve connectivity
around Northland’s hilly interior.
For example:
- bypass through Kawakawa
and Moerewa.
88. Mike Ward
89. Charles Adamson
89. Charles Adamson
89. Charles Adamson
90. Darryl Schick
91. Chris Joseph
91. Chris Joseph
RLTP
91. Chris Joseph
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
Rail
See relief sought
The Kawakawa-Moerewa area is
recognised as being a high risk
area for flooding in the RLTP and is
currently being investigated by
NRC/NZTA.
-
Develop more connecting
routes between Kerikeri and
Paihia.
The Kerikeri-Paihia Route is
recognised in the RLTP although
the Kerikeri-Waipapa triangle is the
more immediate focus due to
growth pressures.
-
Improve Old Bay Rd to the
standard of a State Highway
and remove one lane
bridges.
There are currently no plans
through the RLTP to upgrade this
road to a SH however the
submission has been forwarded to
the NZTA for comment.
-
Upgrade Te Pua Rd.
Te Pua Rd forms part of the
proposed inland freight route
project.
Rail line refitted to Kaikohe,
limiting the need for logging
trucks.
Additional detail has been included
in the RLTP on rail although there
is no specific provision for a refitted
line to Kaikohe.
Page 16
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Significant concerns over
safety and wearing of
bridges with all of the near
accidents. Closure of the
Brynderwyns on SH1
causes heavy traffic on
SH12 and up through the
Paparoa-Oakley Rd which
are believed to be
unsuitable roads.
Progress urgently the road
realignment and replacement of
the Matakohe bridges through
the 2015-2021 RLTP.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Lack of infrastructure
consideration on the
Western side of Northland.
North and South of
Hokianga there are a lot of
dirt roads which are
deteriorating with increased
logging truck movements.
Would like stabilising and
widening of corners as well as
maintenance, notably at
Runaruna Road and the
Taheke-Horeke Road.
This submission has been
forwarded to FNDC for their
response on this issue.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
See relief sought
Lack of cycle lanes on highways
needs improving. Shoulders on
more roads will increase the
safety of these roads and be
more inviting for cyclists.
The RLTP includes policy and
associated funding for projects on
walking and cycling improvements.
RLTP/
RPTP
Public
Transport
See relief sought
93. Christine Williams
Would like Rawene Vehicular
Ferry and the road from Rawene
to SH12 to become part of
State-highway system helping
the tourist route
The Hokianga ferry service is
treated as a local road (an ‘exempt
service) for the purposes of funding
subsidy and is managed and
funded by FNDC. This submission
has been forwarded to NZTA to
ascertain the feasibility of this
request.
RLTP/
RPTP
Public
Transport
Lack of public transport for
tourists and residents
however there is a need
and want for it. The subsidy
that has been secured by
NRC for a prospective
service in
Ompaere/Opononi area
should be retained if it is a
success.
Retain secured subsidy for
public transport in the Hokianga
if the pilot year is a success.
Comment is noted.
93. Christine Williams
94. Chris Baker
RLTP/
RPTP
Plan
Direction
Focus is on Whangarei
typically which is opposed.
Oppose Whangarei-centric
approach.
One of the focus areas of the RLTP
is to improve the highway between
Auckland and Whangarei as a
priority. Other parts of the plan
however include regional matters
(such as route resilience). In
addition, the RPTP is a regionally
focussed document and looks at
services in the mid-north and
BusAbout Kaitiaia.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation/
Rail
Feels strongly that heavy
trucks cause most road
damage but do not pay for
it. Lack of rail systems
especially for freight.
Submitter feels this would
reduce some dust and road
damage.
Would like transport companies
to pay for road maintenance.
Would like Kiwi Rail to advertise
the North Island more and
supply better freight facilities as
well as public transport on the
rails.
Heavy vehicle contributions to road
maintenance are outside the scope
of the RLTP as the road user
charge is set nationally. The RLTP
contains stronger provisions on
promoting the use of rail.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
bridges
Replace the bridges at
Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Matakohe Bridge concerns
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Matakohe Bridge concerns
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
92. Lynette Stewart
93. Christine Williams
93. Christine Williams
94. Chris Baker
96. Kay Williamson
97. Nigel Macintyre.
98. Charles Garton
Page 17
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Matakohe
Bridges
Matakohe Bridge concerns
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RPTP
Public
Transport
Mid North Service lacking.
Would like more areas through
Northland linked by public
transport, especially to
Whangarei, this would increase
employment, decrease
dependence on social welfare
and negativities that align with it.
Several initiatives are underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RLTP
Resilience
Lack of improvements on
SH1 north of Kawakawa.
Rangiahua bridge on SH1
floods cutting the rest of the
north off is not mentioned.
Wants one lane bridges
replaced with dual lanes and
recognition of State Highway 1
north of Kawakawa.
Rangiahua Bridge is included in the
map of high risk areas in the RLTP
and is recognised as having
flooding problems. Although no
specific State Highway
Improvement projects are proposed
in the RLTP in the 2015-2018
period in that area, NZTA will be
asked to provide details on any
maintenance planned. It is noted
Rangiahua Bridge is included in the
Government’s 10 bridges
programme for Northland.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Finds dusty roads a health
hazard and nuisance.
Would also like roads sealed.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerns for bridges,
Hardies and Andersons at
Matakohe.
Improvement of bridges,
including widening and more
structured railing.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Not
Stated
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerns for bridges,
Hardies and Andersons at
Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Resilience
Concerns over Mangamuka
Gorge section of SH1
where it is deteriorating.
Would like better maintenance
and more passing lanes to make
it a safer road.
Alhough no specific State Highway
Improvement projects are proposed
in the 2015-2018 period in that area
it is recommended that NZTA be
asked to provide details on any
maintenance planned.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerns for bridges,
Hardies and Andersons at
Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Only alternative is unsealed
roads.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
100. Dorothy Leaning
101. Lynette Adams
101. Lynette Adams
102. Wayne Ryder
104. Eric Shackleton
105. Joy Miller
106. Carolyn Hodges
107 Christine Miller
Change requested by
submitter
RLTP
99. Sheree Cottle
103. Devvel Campbell
Summary of submission
Page 18
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Lack of long distance public
transport a concern.
Public transport connecting
towns of Northland in case car
unavailable.
Several initiatives are underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Specific concerns with
roading maintenance at
Omapere.
Address poor road condition at
the Omapere garage and at the
campervan sewage disposal
area.
The specific concern is a local
maintenance matter. As such it has
been directed to the NZTA for
action.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Feels the police and
governments concerns over
1km/ph road tolerance is of
little worries compared to
other issues.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Various
The submitter has raised a
number of issues and will
expand on them at the
hearing.
None specifically stated.
No further information was
supplied.
108. Larry Spick
109. Grace Portanger
110. Melissa Wilson
111. Dorothy Quaife
112. Noeleen Gibson
112. Noeleen Gibson
113. Christopher
Sterling
114. Jane Alpine
115. Frances
Macintyre
118. Carl Miller
119. Frank Miller
120. Hans Linklater
Subject
Page 19
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Feels Northland is not
developing as it has the
potential to. Roading needs
to be provided to suit the
heavy traffic influxes.
Concerns over strength and
safety of Matakohe
Bridges.
Development in roading
systems. Replacement of
Matakohe bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Feels they are not safe
enough or high enough
standard for a state
highway.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe.
Eliminate all single lane bridges
from state highways.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe.
Believes replacement will help
attract people north as they
know it will be safer.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Does not want replacement
of bridges in Matakohe.
Believes single lane adds
character to Northland.
Submitter would like the bridges
to stay the same.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Agree generally with the
plan direction and the link
between improved
infrastructure and
stimulating economic
growth. In the absence of
effective rail, the road link
between Auckland and
Whangarei/Marsden Point
is very important.
Recommend that the draft be
strengthened to note that an
important growing segment of
the freight task in Northland
relates to just-in-time distribution
of goods services from Auckland
to Whangarei on SH1 (and
some offer loop services on
SH12 and SH10) to retail and
wholesale sector outlets serving
Northland’s consumer and
tourism sectors.
Further detail has been added in
the RLTP.
RLTP
Connectivity
Upgrade
Concerned also at lack of
detail in the draft about
when the Mangakahia Rd
upgrade will be completed
as well as upgrades to
SH1. The Draft should be
strengthened to better
reflect the critical urgency
and benefits to Northland’s
economy of delivering the
two projects simultaneously
over the next few years
The document should promote
the extension of the current
Puhoi to Wellsford RONS to go
all the way to Whangarei as a
single, rolling project with the
aim that by 2030 there will be a
4-lane Auckland-Whangarei
highway. Mangakahia Rd needs
to be upgraded to a SH within
10 years or sooner.
This submission has been
forwarded to the NZTA who will
provide comment on the feasibility
of this. The inland freight route
project is being progressed by
NZTA in close conjunction with the
Regional Transport Committee.
121. Robert Mitchell
122. Brian
Osbaldiston
123. Colleen
Jamieson.
124. Bev Hart
125. Paula Rogers
125. Paula Rogers
RLTP should therefore include
provision to seek an allocation
from the 20% balance of NLTF
funding to enable an
accelerated programme for
upgrading the Puhoi-Whangarei
corridor and ‘alternative’
Managakahia Road.
RLTP
Upgrade
Submits that there is a
need for a more
coordinated Northland-wide
approach to the
implementation and
communication of an
HPMV programme, not just
for bridges but the total
roading network.
Through the RLTP, council take
a leadership role to facilitate the
delivery of an HPMV
programme.
This is presently being done
through the Regional Transport
Committee.
RLTP
Resilience
Agree that there is a strong
need to provide viable route
alternatives - the priority
focus needs to be on the
upgrade of the Mangakahia
Road, Otaika Valley Road
corridor.
Adopt the One Network Road
Classification (ONRC) with a
focus on economic growth and
productivity, road safety and
delivering value for money.
This is currently being undertaken
by each Road Controlling Authority.
The NZTA has completed this
exercise.
125. Paula Rogers
125. Paula Rogers
Summary of submission
Page 20
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Summary of submission
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Focus on dust
suppressants is insufficient.
Policies 9 & 10 (page 10) be
amended from a focus on ‘dust
suppressants’ to focus on
developing a campaign and
progressive delivery of a
strategy to seal all Northland’s
local roads, starting with roads
shared by community residential
traffic and significant freight
vehicles, including and
especially dairy tankers and
logging trucks.
RLTP
Other
See relief sought
-
125. Paula Rogers
125. Paula Rogers
-
A circular route from the CBD to
Okara Park would benefit older
people. The addition of Puna
Rere drive would help many
Otangarei residents. The growth
of retirement village populations
also needs to be considered.
This will be addressed through
relevant corridor plans, now
included in the RLTP.
This matter to be further discussed
with the Northland Freight Group.
The regional council undertook a
review of the CityLink service in
2014. The review highlighted the
need to take into account changing
patterns of demand in the service
as well as new roading
infrastructure and development.
Policy 1.1, Method iv of the RPTP
provides strategic direction to
implement the findings of the
CityLink review.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Supports maintenance and
enhancement of CityLink
where feasible and where
demand exists.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Supports improving bus
stops and signage.
Larger print at bus stops would
assist those with a visual
impairment.
This has been forwarded to NRC
staff for consideration.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support improvement to
bus infrastructure
Particularly support an
accessibility audit of kerbs and
pavements at all bus stops.
This has been forwarded to NRC
staff for consideration.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Generally supports
objectives and policies
related to improving modal
choice and affordability.
One issue has been the
recent reduction in total
mobility users, attributed to
lack of affordability and lack
of reliability of operators.
Require greater accountability
from contract providers to
address reliability issues.
Operators have been reminded of
their responsibilities by staff.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Generally supports the
approach taken in the plan
to the transport
disadvantaged.
No specific relief sought
Comment is noted.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Ministry of Education have
moved the bus stop very
near one of the bridges
making it dangerous for
children waiting for the
school bus.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Concern over safety at
Pukenui.
Would like the speed limit on Far
North Rd at 50kph from the
wharf at Pukenui extended to
past the Houhora Refuse
Station. Double yellow lines
would also denote the no
passing rule.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
126. Positive Ageing
Advisory Group.
126. Positive Ageing
Advisory Group.
126. Positive Ageing
Advisory Group.
126. Positive Ageing
Advisory Group.
126. Positive Ageing
Advisory Group.
127. Helen Reynolds
128. Russel Simpkin
130. Josephine
Gibbes
Strategic roading projects,
as a level of service, should
include suitable passing
lanes, rest stops etc…
Regional council to work
with stakeholders to
increase uptake in the
freight sector (to address
shortage of truck drivers).
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
Page 21
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerns over Matakohe
Bridges being fogged over
and single laned.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RLTP
Safety
See relief sought.
Passing lanes on SH14.
131. Susan Reyland.
132. Peter Oldham
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This submission has been
forwarded to the NZTA for
comment.
More rest areas required.
RLTP
Local
Roading
See relief sought.
Concerns regarding footpath
replacement in
Opononi/Omapere and parking
outside the Four Square.
As a local roading matter this
matter has been referred to the
NZTA and FNDC.
RLTP
Upgrade
See relief sought.
Upgrade the Hokianga ferry and
northern Hokianga Twin Coast
route to a SH.
The Hokianga ferry service is
treated as a local road (an ‘exempt
service) for the purposes of funding
subsidy and is managed and
funded by FNDC. NZTA have been
forwarded this submission to
ascertain the feasibility of this
request.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter wishes to initiate
a trial bus service in the
Opononi-Omparere to
Kaikohe. Details of the
particulars are provided in
the contents of the
submission. Sourcing a
local service provider has
been an issue however.
No specific relief sought
NRC are currently helping to fund a
trial service on this route.
RLTP
Connectivity
Submission provides
evidence as to the
importance of SH1 from
Auckland to Northland and
generally supports the plan
direction on this issue
although would like it to go
further.
The RTC encourage NZTA to
make provision in the next NLTP
for a single, integrated “whole of
route” programme for the
upgrade of the Puhoi to
Whangarei section by 2030 or
sooner. That the RLTP be
strengthened to emphasise the
need for the above.
It is noted that NZTA are
undertaking work on a strategic
study for this route and has been
included in the RLTP as a corridor
plan.
RLTP
Safety
Lack of directional arrows
at intersections causing
accidents.
Directional arrows painted on
the roads or signage for tourists.
This matter has been referred to
the NZTA and the local RCA’s for
future implementation.
RLTP
Safety
Lack of directional arrows
at intersections causing
accidents.
Directional arrows painted on
the roads or signage for tourists.
This matter has been referred to
the NZTA and the local RCA’s for
future implementation.
RLTP
Maintenance
See relief sought.
State Highways in the region
need to be maintained to the
same standard as the south
island. A lot of the roads in the
north are not fit for purpose, e.g.
Mangakahia Rd.
There are unique challenges to
Northland (discussed in the RLTP).
The plan seeks that SH’s and other
roads are maintained so that they
are fit for purpose and that
Mangakahia Rd is upgraded to a
viable alternative route/State
Highway.
RLTP
Upgrade
See relief sought.
Mangakahia Rd to become a
State Highway with immediate
effect.
The RLTP seeks the upgrading of
this road to become a viable
alternative route/State Highway in
the region.
RLTP
Maintenance
Road maintenance does
not last a reasonable length
of time.
Provide reasons for why this is
the case – examples include
Wayby improvements on SH1
and Bank St in Whangarei.
There are unique challenges to
Northland (discussed in the RLTP).
The specific examples however
have been referred to the local
RCA’s/NZTA for comment.
RLTP
Resilience
Money is being spent in the
wrong areas – for instance
the south side of the
Brynderwyns is worse
affected than the north
side.
Work should be undertaken on
roading north of the
Brynderwyn’s including
bypassing the hills themselves –
i.e on a route through to
Kaikohe and beyond.
NZTA are proposing to undertake
strategic studies on the route of
SH1 from Whangarei to Ohaewai.
Mangakahia Rd is being sought as
a viable alternative to the SH.
132. Peter Oldham
132. Peter Oldham
132. Peter Oldham
134. Tony Garnier
(Auckland Business
Forum)
135. Ngaire McClure
136. Barry Kernot
137. Bevin Alison
137. Bevin Alison
137. Bevin Alison
137. Bevin Alison
Page 22
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
Subject
Summary of submission
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation.
Concern that Pipiwai Road
remains unsealed.
Seal Pipiwai Road.
RPTP
Other
See relief sought.
Buses should have a sign on
saying ‘let bus go first’.
Point noted – this can be discussed
at the recontracting of the CityLink
service in 2016/17.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Request to include a higher
profile for equestrians and
their needs. The
submission goes into detail
on where horse-riding
should be given greater
recognition in plan
provisions.
Elevate the importance of horseriding alongside walking and
cycling. In the document.
Policies have been expanded on
walking and cycling to include other
non-motorised users (such as
equestrians). This would also fit
with the plan’s strategic outcomes
that ‘all road users are safe on
Northland’s roads’ and that ‘our
people have transport choices to
access jobs, recreation and
community facilities’
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Resilience
Despite the focus on
resilience in the plan, all SH
improvements in the
programme tables lie south
of Whangarei or its vicinity.
This is despite the recent
winter storms when the Far
North was cut off. Generally
does not support upgrading
Mangakahia Rd where this
would divert resources
away from existing SH
maintenance requirements.
-
Akerama Curves funding has been
committed from the Accelerated
Growth Scheme and cannot be
reallocated.
137. Bevin Alison
137. Bevin Alison
138. Liz Woodward
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
-
Address route security and
resilience by directing
available funding toward
upgrading SH 1/SH10 from
Akerama Curves to Taipa
namely –
Kawakawa/Moerewa, Otiria,
Kaeo, Taipa on this
essential arterial route.
In particular programme as
a high priority Moerewa/
Kawakawa improvements
which are not included in the
6 year programme and is an
identified risk area. Utilise
the undesignated project
sum (p34) for enhanced
network resilience on the
Moerewa/Kawakawa flood
mitigation with an
appropriate budget
This is recognised as a high risk
area and improvements are being
discussed and investigated by NRC
and NZTA.
The intention is that Mangakahia
Rd be upgraded ‘in addition’ to
existing SH maintenance
expenditure.
RLTP
Other
Apart from Whangarei to
Kawakawa, which has a
slightly higher ranking
because of tourism, the
remainder of the Far
North’s State Highway
system is relegated to
being only “regional
collector” although it is an
essential artery
Re-designate the State Highway
road classification for SH1 north
of Whangarei as “nationally
strategic”, to give effect to the
GPS strategy to support
economic growth and
productivity, and enable road
investment decisions in
Northland to be made
appropriate to the risk.
Submitter’s comments relate to
NZTA’s application of the One
Network Road Classification
(ONRC) to the State Highway
network. State Highways 1 (north of
Kawakawa) and 10 are both
designated ‘primary collector’
routes under the ONRC. The
application of the ONRC is a
process run separately to the
development of the RLTP and
although maintaining levels of
services based on ONRC will be an
important part of meeting plan
objectives and policies, the
designation of the routes
themselves is outside the scope of
the RLTP. This has been forwarded
to NZTA for further comment.
RLTP
Rail
The draft RLTP notes that
there is additional capacity
for freight within the rail
network which it states
would assist in the long
term assist in reducing the
road freight burden.
However there is no
planned expenditure for the
NorthPort/Oakleigh rail link.
Progress the NorthPort/Oakleigh
rail link to connect the port to the
national rail network.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been added to the document.
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
Page 23
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
Subject
Upgrade
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Waipapa and Puketona
intersections have the right
conditions to be upgraded
with roundabouts. Although
Waipapa roundabout is
promoted for funding with a
priority ranking of 3 (P34) it
is not listed in the approved
funding list (Pp 32-33) for
regional improvements,
whereas some projects as
low as priority 10 are
promoted for regional
funding.
Progress both projects as
priority 3 and confirm funding.
Klinac Lane extension should
also be approved for funding as
a high priority and integrated for
planning with SH10/Waipapa
Road roundabout
RLTP
Kaeo and
Taipa
Bridges
See relief sought.
Kaeo bridge 2 laning is
supported with a higher priority
rating of 3 and confirmed for
funding as it is critical link in
route security and resilience of
SH1/SH10. Taipa Bridge is
supported for Far North route
security and resilience of
SH1/SH10. Priority 4 is
considered much more
appropriate than Priority 7.
Provision has been made in the
Regional Land Transport Plan to
upgrade the Taipa and Kaeo
Bridges with a Priority Rating of 7
and 4 respectively at a cost of
$15m and $7m.
RLTP
Other
Strategic studies in the
Waipapa and Kerikeri
growth areas are strongly
supported.
No specific relief sought.
Support is noted.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Only $22.1 million or 1.1%
of $1.5 billion is forecast in
2015-2025 for walking and
cycling. If safe walking and
cycling is delivered the
demand will certainly
follow. These activities are
associated with health,
reduce CO2 emissions, and
on the margin contribute to
reduced demand for
expensive road
improvements.
Consider an increased budget
for walking and cycling.
The share of national funding
allocated for walking and cycling is
decided centrally through the
Government Policy Statement
National Land Transport Funding.
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
Integrate safety features on new
and upgraded roads such as
building shoulders, cycle lanes
on roundabouts and separate
cycle lanes.
RPTP
Public
Transport
It would make more sense
for WDC to fund the
CityLink and FNDC to fund
the BusAbout subsidy with
targeted rates. NRC’s
rates are paid by all of
Northland’s property
owners even in areas of no
benefit.
Investigate a more equitable
means of subsidising public
transport from NRC rates.
FNDC subsidises ferry transport
but derives little benefit from
mostly Whangarei based bus
transport.
Local Share funding is sourced
through a Targeted Transport Rate
so only those who benefit will pay.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Has concerns that the
document is overly
focussed on Auckland and
Whangarei and believes
there are significant
resilience issues in the Far
North that need addressing.
The Far North also produce
raw commodities
transported to and
consumed elsewhere.
Create an all weather route from
Kaitaia to Whangarei and
provide information on heavy
vehicle journeys between
Kaitaia-Whangarei and
Whangarei-Auckland.
The RLTP seeks that Mangakahia
Rd is upgraded to a viable
alternative route/State Highway.
RLTP
Rail
See relief sought
Better utilise rail.
Stronger references to rail have
been included in the RLTP.
RPTP
Rail
Public
Transport
Submitter feels rail network
is being overlooked and not
properly considered and
that the public transport
system is operated by
private operators.
Would like rail networking for
passengers to be a priority
study. Arrival via public transport
in Auckland to arrive before
12.00 noon.
Stronger references to rail have
been included in the RLTP.
139. Rod Brown
(Vison Kerikeri)
140. Penny Smart
141. Mike Finlayson
141. Mike Finlayson
142. Neville
Rosengren
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
These projects have been listed in
the programme and are seeking
funding approval.
Inter-regional bus services attract
no central government subsidy and
are run as wholly commercial
services. As such they are not
subject to performance
specifications, timetabling or
controls set by the regional council.
Page 24
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
There is a Government moratorium
on using SuperGold card on new
bus services. The moratorium is
due to be lifted on 1 September
2015 for new services to enter the
scheme and BusAbout Kaitaia may
be elligible.
NZTA have been forwarded this
submission to ascertain the
feasibility of this request.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports Busabout Kaitaia
Would like SuperGold cards to
be available on busabout
service
RLTP
Upgrade
Comments that the
Rawene – Broadwood –
Kaitaia section of the Twin
Coast Discovery route
should be a State Highway
to reduce the burden on
ratepayers. Ratepayer
money could therefore be
spent on other routes in the
Hokianga – like Horeke
road.
Upgrade the Rawene –
Broadwood – Kaitaia section of
the Twin Coast Discovery route
to a SH.
Seal the Horeke Rd and improve
other routes in the Hokianga so
that they are viable alternative
routes or if this is not accepted,
then prohibit heavy vehicle
movements.
Availability of money for rural
sealing is strictly limited. The
Regional and District Councils and
the NZTA have developed a dust
mitigation framework to prioritise
rural sealing efforts mainly on the
grounds of human health. It is
noted that NZTA have provided a
22% funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This
submission has been forwarded to
FNDC for their comment on the
feasibility of restricting heavy
vehicle movements.
These are currently not included in
the RLTP. It is however noted that
the Government has committed to
upgrading 10 one lane bridges on
SH’s across Northland.
A bus service is currently being
trialled between Omapere and
Kaikohe with funding assistance
from the regional council.
The Hokianga ferry service is
treated as a local road (an ‘exempt
service) for the purposes of funding
subsidy and is managed and
funded by FNDC. This submission
has been passed to FNDC for
comment.
143. Faith Maxwell
144. Louis Toorenburg
RLTP
One Lane
Bridges
Single lane bridges in the
Hokianga present a safety
risk.
No specific relief sought.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter feels a bus
service would help benefit
the Hokianga.
Consider developing a
subsidised bus service in the
Hokianga to Kaikohe.
RPTP
Other
The Hokianga ferry, while
an essential public service
is expensive and costly to
run.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Consider an extended service
with two ferries at peak periods.
At the least, do not take the
current ferry out of service
during busy periods. Ideally it
would be free to use but
consideration should be given to
charging tour buses with locals
travelling free.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RPTP
Public
Transport
Bus service required
between Omapere,
Rawene to Kaikohe.
Bus service between between
Omapere, Rawene to Kaikohe.
A bus service is currently being
trialled between Omapere and
Kaikohe with funding assistance
from the regional council.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Would like a twice weekly bus
service from Omapere-Kaikohe.
A bus service is currently being
trialled between Omapere and
Kaikohe with funding assistance
from the regional council.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
No transport on community
or tourism level from
Dargaville to Kaitaia along
the West Coast. Loss of
young residents due to lack
of employment
opportunities and elderly
leave for care in bigger
centres.
New Bridges. Concerns for
bridges, Hardies and
Andersons at Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
144. Louis Toorenburg
144. Louis Toorenburg
144. Louis Toorenburg
145. Michelle Stewart
146. Margaret Bishop
147. Brett Austin
148. Susan Jackson
150. Bruce Miller
Summary of submission
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Page 25
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
151. Dale BradleyPage
151. Dale BradleyPage
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Not
Stated
Resilience
Safety
No specific relief sought.
Not
Stated
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Concern over SH12,
particularly through the
Waipoua Forest and more
generally flooding is an
issue that can lead to
isolation of the area when
roads are cut-off.
Specific concern about the
intersection of Fairlie
Crescent and SH12 in
Opononi.
Generally unhappy that the
document is Whangarei
focussed. Comments that
there is no public transport
in the Hokianga.
Has concerns that
Ngapipito road is not
highlighted in the plan for
seal extension. Evidence is
presented highlighting the
issues on this stretch of
road.
RLTP
Upgrade
Mangawhai is not easily
accessibly with people
bypassing it due to windy
roads.
When the motorway is finished
there should be a straight road
from the ‘Holiday Highway’ to
Mangawhai.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerns for bridges,
Hardies and Andersons at
Matakohe.
Road re-alignment and bridge
replacement at Matakohe
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Wants full bridge replacement
not just repairs.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Resilience
Feels that 20 years of talk
of replacement of
Matakohe bridges while
‘band aid repairs’ are done
is not good enough.
Submitter feels that the
piece of road between
Matakohe and Mangatoroto
Rail station is dangerous.
Submitter is supporting the
improvements of the
Matakohe bridges. He feels
there has been too much
talking about the
replacements but no action
being done.
Submitter feels that the
piece of road between
Matakohe and Mangatoroto
Rail station is dangerous.
See relief sought.
152. Vicki Holford
153.
154. Catherine and
Murray Boakes
155. Steven Wynn
156. Clive Smith
157. Steve Tapp
158. Jan Tapp
159. Yvonne Stevens
Change requested by
submitter
No specific relief sought.
A bus service is currently being
trialled between Omapere and
Kaikohe with funding assistance
from the regional council.
Ensure that Ngapipito road is a
priority area for sealing.
Availability of money for rural
sealing is strictly limited. The
Regional and District Councils and
the NZTA have developed a dust
mitigation framework to prioritise
rural sealing efforts mainly on the
grounds of human health. It is
noted that NZTA have provided a
22% funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
A key focus of the plan is to
improve the route between
Auckland and Whangarei although
future iterations of the plan could
include addressing the connection
to Mangawhai.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Wants the realignment project to
be underway. Also replacement
of the one lane bridges.
Replacement and realignment.
Wants a safer road.
Wants the realignment project to
be underway. Also replacement
of the one lane bridges.
Upgrade Mangakahia Rd to be a
viable SH alternative.
Flood proof all arterial routes.
RLTP
Rail
See relief sought
RLTP
One Lane
Bridges
See relief sought
Build rail to Marsden Point and
to Kaitaia and introduce
passenger services.
Replace all one-lane bridges.
RLTP
Project
See relief sought
Put a roundabout at Waipapa.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the two
single lane bridges at
Matakohe.
Would like road realignment as
well as stronger dual lane
bridges.
159. Yvonne Stevens
159. Yvonne Stevens
159. Yvonne Stevens
160. Patricia Hunt
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package. The
specific comment on the
intersection has been passed to the
NZTA/FNDC for further comment.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This has been signalled in the
RLTP.
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the document.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7,
$15.5 m for Taipa Bridge with a
Priority Rating of 7 and $7 million
for Kaeo Bridge with a Priority
rating of 4.
This project is in the RLTP with a
priority rating of 3.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Page 26
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
RPTP
Public
Transport
Feels there is a lack of
available transport options
connecting townships
Would like a bus or coach
service twice a day (morning
and evening) twice a week. This
would need to be connected
with the bus services travelling
between Whangarei and
Auckland.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Feels that SH12 is
underdeveloped compared
to other roads.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over safety and
structure of single land
bridges at Matakohe
Would like the replacement of
the single lane bridges at
Matakohe with two lanes. Feels
that road/bridge improvement
will have a positive effect on
Northlands economy.
Not Stated.
RLTP
Resilience
Not specifically stated – infer
that more projects/funding be
made available in the Far North.
RLTP
Connectivity
Concern at the lack of
projects listed in the RLTP
in the Far North (north of
Waipapa). The roads
around Kaitiaia for example
are congested in peak
season. In particular the
Rangihua Bridge and
Mangamukas are
dangerous.
Submitter feels that there
should be an express way
from Auckland to the Bay of
Islands.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Would like replacement of the
single lane bridges and a road
realignment.
RLTP
Resilience
Concern over safety and
structure of Matakohe
bridges. Concern over fog
covering visibility over the
bridges as it is unsafe.
Refer to relief sought
RLTP
Maintenance
Refer to relief sought.
RLTP
One lane
bridges
Refer to relief sought.
One lane bridges need to be
replaced on SH’s.
RLTP
Connectivity
Refer to relief sought.
Tunnel under the Brynderwyns.
160. Patricia Hunt
161. Barrie, Annette,
Neville Paterson.
162. Sheryl Towkin
163. Tyler Bamber
164. John Willets
165. Tony Dodge
166. Shaun Reilly
166. Shaun Reilly
166. Shaun Reilly
166. Shaun Reilly
Change requested by
submitter
Would like a four lane
expressway from Auckland
north.
Last years storm damage needs
to be repaired and measures put
in place to prevent Northland’s
isolation from extreme weather
events.
Arterial routes to be maintained
to the same standard as south
of Auckland.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
NRC are always willing to receive
applications for new public
transport services however the
regional council would need to
undertake a feasibility study before
a service could commence. This
would consider the availability of an
operator and the ability to source
funding.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
The Puhoi to Wellsford Roads of
National Significance (RoNS)
project will see double laning as far
as Wellsford (with the Warkworth
section due to commence 20162019). North of Wellsford, the RLTP
identifies the route to Whangarei as
an immediate priority. There are
three projects in the plan
investigating improvements to SH1
in Northland, Wellsford –
Brynderwyn, Brynderwyn –
Whangarei and Ohaeawai –
Whangarei.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
Northland has certain challenges
with road maintenance. These
challenges are articulated in the
plan. The plan seeks that SH’s and
other roads are maintained so that
they are fit for purpose
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7,
$15.5 m for Taipa Bridge with a
Priority Rating of 7 and $7 million
for Kaeo Bridge with a Priority
rating of 4.
The long term focus of the RLTP is
to increase the level of service of
the route between Auckland and
Whangarei to that of a four-lane
highway. A tunnel could be a part of
the solution of meeting this goal
however other solutions (such as
an alternative route alignment) may
be more efficient and less costly.
Page 27
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Detailed planning for this project
and any new development that
occurs as a result of it will need to
account for any flood risk at the
resource consent stage.
Summary of submission
RLTP
Resilience
Submitter states that when
considering projects for the
plan, NRC should look at
genuine need (in terms of
traffic volumes etc…) and
flood susceptibility/climate
change concerns.
Taking this into account,
submitter opposes projects to
improve McCathie Road at
Sh15a. The area is likely to see
greater flooding from sea level
rise and development should not
be promoted. Infer from the
submission that they seek its
deletion from the plan.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Submitter supports
cycleway development
providing they avoid
sensitive ecological areas.
No specific relief sought
Point acknowledged
RPTP
Public
Transport
Public transport should be
promoted as one way of
reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by providing
services from rural areas to
urban areas. This should
include looking at
reintroducing passenger
rail.
Promote public transport from
rural to urban areas and look at
reintroducing passenger rail.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been put in the RLTP.
168. Margaret Hicks
168. Margaret Hicks
168. Margaret Hicks
Several initiatives are underway for
public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter feels a bus
service would help benefit
the Hokianga.
Consider developing a
subsidised bus service in the
Hokianga to Kaikohe.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is very
concerned over the safety
of the Matakohe bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is very
concerned over the safety
of the Matakohe bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter is very
concerned over the safety
of the Matakohe bridges.
Feels that the traffic queues
on either side of the bridges
are just as dangerous as
the bridges themselves.
This is heightened by the
low fog and lack of light, but
also by the dangerous
positioning of the bridges
as well as the tight blind
corners.
Supporting Busabout
Kaitaia service
Feels that the alternative routes
(when bridges are being
repaired) are just as unsafe due
to narrow dirt roads. Would like
a full structure strengthen and
replacement of the bridges.
Would like the bridges
positioned better to improve
visibility and make the road
safer.
Would like double lane bridges
and a road realignment.
169. Betty Pennell
170. Raymond
Wearmouth
171. Danielle Silby
172. Sherie Campion
173. Ruth Roberts
RLTP
174. Waikato Regional
Council
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
Support for
RLTP
Submitter supports RLTP
and content
Would like Busabout to travel to
into Karikari Peninsula
No relief requested
NRC is helping to support, through
funding and advice, the trialling of
an Opononi/Omapere service to
Kaikohe.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
The current timetable is focussed
on current routes however new
routes may become operational
with sufficient demand.
Comments noted.
Page 28
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Change requested by
submitter
Submitter feels that the
extreme lack of visibility on
the single lane Matakohe
bridges is dangerous.
Not
Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Finds the busabout service
great for getting kids to
school
Retain the service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
No gold card use on
Busabout Kaitaia service.
Would use the Kaitaia Busabout
service more if gold card use
was made available
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
178. Barbara Curreen
RPTP
179. Judith Peters
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supporting Busabout
Kaitaia service
Lack of promotion means
not many runs.
Would like a road realignment to
reduce the number of blind
corners, as well as a better
positioning of the two bridges
that should be replaced with
double lanes.
Not Stated
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Matakohe
Bridges
177. Debby Curreen
180. Melissa Peters
Summary of submission
RLTP
175. Brad Boakes
176. Jean Gardner
Subject
Would like Busabout to travel to
into Karikari Peninsula
Would like a busabout service
run to Karikari Peninsula. Also
would like more runs.
No information supplied.
The moratorium on the gold card
scheme is due to be lifted on 1
September 2015 for new services
to enter the scheme and BusAbout
Kaitaia may be elligible.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
The current timetable is focussed
on current routes however new
routes may become operational
with sufficient demand.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
The current timetable is focussed
on current routes however new
routes may become operational
with sufficient demand.
Page 29
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RPTP
181. Pat Savill
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Summary of submission
Supports Busabout Kaitaia
RLTP
Waipu-Langs
Rd Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter feels that the
three one lane bridges are
a hazard. One is used as
an evacuation route and
therefore should be
upgraded very fast. The
bridges are a detour for
when the Brynderwyns are
closed and are not
designed to hold the heavy
traffic.
Concern over the Matakohe
bridges.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP
Rangiahua,
Taipa and
Kaeo One
Lane
Bridge’s.
RPTP
182. Peter Lindop
Change requested by
submitter
Would like SuperGold cards to
be available on busabout
service
Would like funding to replace the
three one lane bridges between
Waipu and Langs Road. A
suggestion is replacement of the
bridges with boxed culverts. This
is due to low water flows;
submitter feels it would also be a
cheap practical alternative.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
The moratorium on the gold card
scheme is due to be lifted on 1
September 2015 for new services
to enter the scheme and BusAbout
Kaitaia may be elligible.
There is currently no project listed
in the RLTP to upgrade these
bridges however this submission
has been referred to the WDC for
comment.
Would like a replacement with a
structure that can handle the
heavy traffic flows in a safe
manner.
Would like the present service to
continue.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Would like replacement of
Rangiahua bridge, as well as
Taipa’s one lane bridge and
Kaeo’s one lane bridge.
Provision of $15.5 m for Taipa
Bridge with a Priority Rating of 7
and $7 million for Kaeo Bridge with
a Priority rating of 4 has been made
in the RLTP.
Public
Transport
Concern over SH1
Rangiahua one lane bridge.
Lack of stability on road
through Mangamuka forest.
This requires constant
attention.
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like the present service to
continue.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the Matakohe
bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Would like these bridges to be
put at the top of the priority list
and replaced.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the Matakohe
bridges built in 1939. Feels
that the years of patch up
jobs are a waste and
money should be spent on
replacement and
realignment.
Feels that the Matakohe
bridges are so dangerous
and that when that closes
due to accidents the
alternative route is just as
dangerous.
Concern over shocking
state of bridges.
Would like a replacement with a
structure that can handle the
heavy traffic flows in a safe
manner.
Would like a replacement with a
structure that can handle the
heavy traffic flows in a safe
manner.
Replacement of Matakohe
bridges
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
183. Margaret
Hutchinson
184. Anne Kake
185. Adele Gardner
185. Adele Gardner
186. Natalie Lynch
187. Allan Reynolds
188. Michael Fox
189. Amelia Wood
Subject
Page 30
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
A dust mitigation framework has
been developed by Northland Road
Controlling Authorities. This will
address priority sites. It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the RLTP.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
bridges
Would like to modify and update
to two lane bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Submitter is very
concerned over the safety
of the Matakohe bridges.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Feels the lack of sealed
roads in Northland are a
health hazard and
nuisance, as well as a
driving hazard.
Would like the bridges
positioned better to improve
visibility and make the road
safer.
Would like to see rural dirt roads
in Northland sealed (200m
strips). This would make it safer
for transporting primary
products.
RLTP
Rail
Feels that rain link between
Auckland and Northland
should be high priority as it
is extremely viable.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP
Plan
Direction
No specific relief sought.
Acknowledge support given.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
General support for plan
direction particularly
Section 1.2 Challenges and
Opportunities and Section
2.1 Priorities for Economic
Growth and Productivity.
Comments that dust ‘can’
have the potential to affect
human health and the
environment implies it only
has the potential to.
Funding must be available
to maintain our unsealed
roads.
Delete ‘can’ as the link is well
proven.
RLTP
Safety
Support approach in the
plan to road safety. We
suggest that a primary
objective following a road
closure should be the reopening of at least a single
lane as soon as possible.
Regular reminders to keep
left on Northland roads
could also be of benefit.
No specific relief sought
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
The specific issue of a lack of
directional arrows has been
referred to the NZTA and the local
RCA’s for further comment.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like the present service to
continue.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
Feels that there should be
more rapid chargers for
electric cars throughout
Northland.
Every 100km there should be a
charging station. This would
cater for travellers wanting a
zero emissions holiday.
NRC are actively pursuing, as part
of a stakeholder group, increased
provision for electric vehicles.
Stronger policy has been included
in the RLTP on promoting this
activity.
190. Christine Birt
191. Lynn Silby
192. Tore Kronqvist
194. Brian Gillespie
195. Makiko Tanaka
196. Paul Jarmin
196. Paul Jarmin
196. Paul Jarmin
197. Graeme Moore
198. Michael Drayton
Summary of submission
The plan needs to emphasise
rail. KiwiRail needs to be
convinced to retain the rail link
between Northland and
Auckland and realise its
potential.
Would like the present service to
continue.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 31
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
bridges and alternative
route.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Safety
RLTP
Local
Roading
Projects
Concern over section of
road between SH10
roundabout and the start of
the 50km zone. This short
section of road is highly
hazardous to pedestrian
users including cyclists due
to the lack of footpath and
cycle lane combined with
an 80km speed limit.
Fully support the Waipapa/
SH10 roundabout and the
Puketone Junction
SH11/SH10 roundabout
projects.
199. Darcy Hodges
200. John Sanderson
200. John Sanderson
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP
Various
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter will present at the
hearing on each of the
following topics:
- Brynderwyns as a
barrier to the Northland
economy.
- Poor construction
techniques being used
with poor durability.
- Route security and the
cost to Northland’s
economy.
- Political interference vs
public input
- The gatekeepers of
projects and funding
distribution.
- Rail as a vital link for
productivity.
- The ability for
population distribution
of expenditure.
- Status of the highway
network for funding
distribution.
Supports a public bus
service around the Bay of
Islands and Mid-North.
201. Robert Lee
202. Ken Rintoul
203. Ken Rintoul
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Feels that Northland would
benefit economically if
realignment and replacement of
the bridges was progressed.
Safety would be greatly
improved by providing a footpath
and cycle lane for the length of
this road from SH10 down. A
more immediate improvement
would be to reduce the speed
limit from 80km to 50km, i.e.
continue the current 50km
speed limit up to the SH10
roundabout
Progress these projects through
the RLTP.
At Waipapa, the speed limit
could be reduced to 50km for
200m either side of Waipapa Rd
to acknowledge the dangerous
situation that exists.
Would like the present service to
continue.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
These specific concerns have been
referred to FNDC for further
comment.
Support is noted
The specific suggestion on speed
limits has been referred to NZTA
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Wishes to have enough time
allocated at the hearing to
discuss these topics.
No further information was
presented.
It is inferred the submitter
wishes a mid-north bus service
to be progressed.
Several initiatives are underway for
public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
Page 32
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
204. Stuart Knarston
Subject
Plan
Direction
(Auckland Transport)
Summary of submission
Recognise that Northland
are reliant on the efficiency
of Auckland’s road and rail
networks.
Specifically, Tomarata
Road (to Mangawhai) has
been designated a primary
collector road under
Auckland Transport’s
application of the ONRC.
Upgrading this road will
ensure a consistent
standard.
It is likely that following
electrification, there will be
an increase in passenger
services on the Auckland
western line. Concern over
any increased uptake in rail
freight between Northland
and Auckland
compromising passenger
services and track
maintenance in Auckland.
Submitter is very
concerned over the safety
of Matakohe bridges.
Safety and accidents from
wandering stock are
discussed.
Change requested by
submitter
No specific relief sought.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Comments are noted.
Steps will need to be taken to
ensure that access to rail is
available, current rail facilities
are maintained, and that
investment is available for the
necessary upgrades in the rail
network including level
crossings.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the RLTP.
Would like the replacement of
the bridges with safer and more
structurally sound bridges that
are dual lane. Also the
realignment of the road to ease
the worry of blind corners and
fog impairing visibility
Support widening of the one
lane bridges at Taipa and Kaeo
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
RLTP
Rail
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Disappointed that the Far
North does not have any
specific projects.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to encourage
the Busabout Kaitaia as it
helps the elderly and the
people who cannot afford
vehicles.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Although there are no specific
projects under SH improvements in
the very far north, the plan does
identify high risk areas (such as
Rangiahua Bridge) that will be
subject to further investigation. The
Government has signalled that 10
one lane bridges on SH’s in
Northland will be upgraded.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
207. Joe Carr
Not
Stated
Plan
Direction
Plan is too focussed on the
Auckland to Whangarei
corridor.
There needs to be a
comprehensive, integrated
improvement plan for SH1 and
SH11, to include route security
from flooding and the S-bends
South of Kawakawa.
A project is included in the plan to
strategically look at the SH between
Whangarei and Ohaewhai. Corridor
plans have been included in the
RLTP on various stretches of road
in the far north.
Not
Stated
Other
Refer to relief sought.
207. Joe Carr
SH1 as far as the SH10 turn-off
at Pakaraka must be designated
nationally significant.
Comments relate to NZTA’s
application of the One Network
Road Classification (ONRC) to the
State Highway network. The
application of the ONRC is a
process run separately to the
development of the RLTP and
although maintaining levels of
services based on ONRC will be an
important part of meeting plan
objectives and policies, the
designation of the routes
themselves is outside the scope of
the RLTP. This submission has
been forwarded to the NZTA for
comment.
204. Stuart Knarston
(Auckland Transport)
205. Andrew
Wearmouth
206. Stewart Russell
206. Stewart Russell
Page 33
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
207. Joe Carr
RLTP/
RPTP
Not
Stated
Subject
Local
Roading
Summary of submission
Concern over Far North’s
unsealed road network.
FNDC need a FAR lift to
70% while they carry out
necessary maintenance.
There needs to be a pavement
improvement strategy to
address this.
Progress the sealing of the
Runaruna road, a 9 km link of
much strategic benefit between
West Coast Rd (Panguru and
Pawarenga roads), and the
completion of the Fairburn Road
(Kaitaia and Peria/Taipa) using
Regional Fuel Taxes.
Not
Stated
Project
207. Joe Carr
Not
Stated
Upgrade
207. Joe Carr
Not
Stated
Upgrade
207. Joe Carr
207. Joe Carr
Not
Stated
Public
Transport
207. Joe Carr
Not
Stated
Public
Transport
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RLTP
Other
The Kaikohe public meeting
was not well attended.
It would be preferable in future if
a meeting is held at Kerikeri
instead.
208. Phillipa Campion
209. Adelle McNeice
210. Leigh Scott
211. Far North District
Council
States that a bridge across
the Hokianga would provide
benefits as the capital cost
of the two bridge system
linking all parts of Hokianga
is the same as the running
costs of the ferry service
over its economic life.
Support Mangakahia Road
being upgraded (as well as
Te Pua Rd) – a small driveover roundabout at Kaikohe
would be of benefit.
Rather than putting a
roundabout at Waipapa
(which would impinge on
the garage), there are
some simpler alternatives.
Change requested by
submitter
Support for mid-north bus
service proposed in the
NRC LTP. Believes that
integration with school
services would be of value.
Comments made on the
proposed Opononi/
Ompaere-Kaikohe trial bus
service.
Progress the Hokianga Bridge.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Government have signalled they
will not proceed with legislation
allowing a regional fuel tax.
The specific concerns about
maintenance and sealing of these
roads have been referred to FNDC.
The Dust Mitigation Framework
includes details on priority sites for
road sealing. It is noted that NZTA
have provided a 22% funding
increase in local road operating and
maintenance investment to enable
localised dust mitigation measures.
Funding Assistance Rates (FAR)
are set by the NZTA. They have
been asked to provide comment on
the current FAR for the FNDC.
A number of studies have already
been undertaken on the viability of
a crossing across the narrows at
Hokianga.
Progress the upgrading of
Mangakahia Road.
Support is noted.
Drop the speed limit from 70 to
50, provide a left hand turn
acceleration lane from Waipapa
road onto SH10 south, and allow
no outward traffic from the loop
road onto the Waipapa
crossroads. Traffic can use the
top end of the loop which has
great line of sight
Progress the service (subject to
consultation through the NRC
LTP).
NZTA have been asked to provide
a response to this submission point.
The community, in particular
those living in the area of benefit
need consulting with, as the
funding policy will have local
cost implications.
Wants to have them at the top of
the priority list for realignment
and replacement.
The service proposed is only a trial
to assess likely demand.
This service has been progressed
on a trial basis.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Point is noted for future
consultation.
Page 34
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Other
Many people do not
understand the purpose of
the plan nor the
terminology used.
RLTP
Other
There is no discussion on
horticulture under ‘key
opportunities’.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Refer to relief sought.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Comments on ‘priorities for
Northland’:
- Regional priorities
focus only on forestry
related traffic although
there are a multitude of
other heavy vehicle
uses.
- Integrated planning –
does this relate to land
use and transport
planning or
harmonisation of local
roading network and
SH’s.
Refer to relief sought.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Maintenance
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
Summary of submission
Under ‘Wider North Island
Context’ it would be
beneficial to demonstrate
that goods originate north
of Whangarei.
Integrated transport
planning – discussion
around the use of
infrastructure as a growth
tool. The provision of
suitably serviced industrial
land may be one tool to
enable economic growth.
UNISA have undertaken
work on this issue. The
reference to the ‘triangle in
the North’ requires
understanding of the
relationship between the
SH and the Waipapa
industrial zone.
The use of the low cost
Performance Specified
Maintenance Contract
(PSMC) locked in NZTA to
certain expenditure
between 2001-2011. Since
then maintenance for SH’s
has increased substantially
– Northland is now one of
the highest funded per lane
km.
NZTA have stated that they
will address areas of risk
with reference to the risk
map in the RLTP. However
NZTA has designated most
of the districts SH’s as
‘district connectors’ under
the ONRC. Under levels of
service for resilience this
means that the road will
‘nearly always be available’
except in extreme weather
events’
See relief sought.
Change requested by
submitter
Provide an executive summary
in plain English format:
- What does the network look
like now?
- What/where are the
problems issues?
- What are we doing to
resolve the issues?
- How roads are funded and
by whom.
Discuss horticulture in the plan.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
An Executive Summary was
produced as part of the consultation
process.
Comment is noted
‘Regional Cycle Network’ should
read ‘The Twin Coast Cycle
Trail’ as it is already part of the
National Cycle Network.
Broaden discussion of heavy
vehicle and clarify what is meant
by ‘integrated planning’.
Comment is noted
The ‘regional priorities’ section
needs to be better linked to the
relevant sections and pages.
Comment is noted
Include an arrow on Figure 4
north to Kaitaia (form
Whangarei).
This diagram originated from
UNISA and was not created by
NRC.
No specific relief sought.
This point is noted.
Reference should be to the fact
that the contract is at the end of
its life accounting for the
historical lower than average
spend (Figure 6) and that
significant increases will
continue in the future.
The graph has been updated with
more accurate information.
It is unacceptable that being cutoff without access to lifeline
services is not considered an
increased factor when
considering resilience.
This point to be forwarded to NZTA
for comment as this relates to the
ONRC network plan for State
Highways.
Reference should be made to
the NZTA research project on
road dust that councils will be
participating in.
Comment is noted.
‘Integrated planning’ in this context
refers to road network alignment
(for instance through the ONRC)
although given the focus further on
in the plan in terms of land use and
transport planning, this priority
could be broadened.
Page 35
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Road Safety
See relief sought.
RLTP
Road Safety
See relief sought.
RLTP
Other
See relief sought.
RLTP
Projects
FNDC questions why
projects with a priority
ranking of 10 have been
included in the NZTA
programme and is
concerned that the projects
on page 34 are not
included in the SHAMP.
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
Support BusAbout Kaitaia
and offer to continue to
collect the targeted rate at
no cost. The same offer
applies for any new bus
service in the mid-north.
Note that the Kaikohe midnorth service (to the east
coast) is not included in the
RPTP yet will be the
subject of consultation in
the upcoming NRC LTP.
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
Summary of submission
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
211. Far North District
Council
RPTP
212. Patrick Mason
BusAbout
Kaitaia
NRC should meet the
needs of the transport
disadvantaged in low socioeconomic areas by funding
services through dividends
received through its shares
and investments.
The one size fits all
Government policy is
leading to inequality
between the territorial
authorities in the Northland
region and is detrimental to
rural areas.
Objectives relating to rural
transport are too narrowly
focussed – the GPS
specifically links transport
to economic gains for
instance. The plan
generally shows a lack of
creativity providing
solutions for rural areas.
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
Change requested by
submitter
Given the number of recent
crashes involving tourists, there
should be an acknowledgement
this is an issue.
Figure 14 (KiwiRap rankings)
should relate only to SH’s.
Include more discussion about
the differences between
collective and personal risk.
Under minor improvements,
include ‘structures and culverts
(including bridges).
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This has been included in the RLTP
This has been included in the RLTP
This has been referred to NZTA as
they provide the format for the
funding categories.
Although FNDC support SH
projects in the programme that
are in the Far North, FNDC want
projects with a priority of 4-7 to
substitute for projects in NZTA’s
detailed 6 year programme that
are rated 10. E.g. the Saleyards
intersection improvement would
free up $4 million that could be
used for higher priority projects.
No specific relief sought.
NZTA have been asked to provide
comment on this matter.
If this service does not proceed
in the RPTP, then FNDC would
like to see further work
progressed on this route and a
feasibility/business case
developed in the RPTP 20182028.
The RPTP is required to group
contracted bus services in the
region into units (unless they are
exempt services). The draft RPTP
included the Kaikohe-Opononi
service as a potential future
operational unit but not the
Kaikohe-Mid north service. This
was considered to be an oversight
and it has now been included as
potential future unit subject to the
results of the trial.
Recommend that FNDC consider
making a submission on this point
to a future NRC Long Term Plan
consultation. FNDC may wish to
provide further details on the types
of services that might be provided
and their location.
Comment is noted.
Redirect funding from dividends
to fund local transport services
that do not qualify for NZTA
subsidy.
For future iterations of the plan
investigate:
- NRC advocate for a policy
change so that Northland
can have a national subsidy
not an individual service
subsidy.
- NZTA national subsidy
distributed on a per
population basis across the
region.
- Regional rather than local
targeted rates for the NRC
share.
The plan needs to focus more
on getting rural residents to
employment and to economic
and social activities (where there
is a lack of access to motor
vehicles). The plan should also
include greater consideration of
alternative service providers.
Funding should be set aside
through a regional pool to this
end.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Support is noted.
The issue of a regional rate for
public transport should be raised
through a future Northland LTP
consultation.
It is noted that NRC staff are happy
to assist with any proposals from
alternative service providers.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 36
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
Not stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Not specifically stated.
Support is noted.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Not specifically stated.
Comments noted
RLTP
Auckland
Whangarei
Corridor
General support for the
plan direction is expressed
including safety, public
transport, walking and
cycling, roading and
economic development.
Whilst supportive of the
land based components of
the plan, recognition should
be given to other forms of
transport particularly air
and overseas tourists
arriving by sea.
Supports the four laning of
SH1 between Auckland and
Whangarei
Support for four laning of SH1
between Auckland and
Whangarei
Support noted
RLTP
Public
Transport
Support that where feasible
provide PT as an
alternative form of
transport.
Where feasible provide PT as an
alternative form of transport.
NRC does this when requested.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Supports enhance of
walking and cycling
facilities. Low cost
alternatives to PT services
Provision of more walking and
cycling facilities
Planning and funding for walking
and cycling has been included in
the RLTP.
RLTP
Road Safety
Improving road safety
beneficial to all
Northlanders
Improving capacity of existing
roading infrastructure will
enhance road safety.
Comments noted
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Feels two lane bridges would be
safer as well as clearing corners
that limit the visibility made
worse by fog.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
The section on regional touring
routes should be updated to
reflect the current Twin Coast
Discovery Tourism Investment
Project (led by Northland Inc).
Comment noted
RLTP
Other
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges. Also
worries about the bridge
limiting the attraction of the
west coast.
Focus should remain on the
investment in road
enhancements ensuring the
roads are capable of
handling both freight and
visitors.
Some minor changes are
identified.
Comment noted
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges and lack
of visibility
Key opportunities – should
replace ‘fishing’ with
‘horticulture’. The fourth bullet
should be recast as an
opportunity statement. Within
‘regional priorities’, review the
forestry forecast volumes to see
if they are correct.
Would like to see lower speed
restrictions, dual lane bridges
and better visibility .
RPTP
Public
Transport
Lack of super gold card use
availability in Far North.
Would like SuperGold Card to
be extended to bus services in
the Far North.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Extension of BusAbout Kaitaia,
a shuttle service to Whangarei
hospital and a service to Kerikeri
are requested.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Extension of Kaitaia
Busabout service is needed
and bus services in the Far
North generally – including
to Kerikeri and Whangarei
hospital.
Total mobility scheme to
continue to include
transport in the Far North.
Consider having Age Concern
Kaitaia administer the scheme in
the Far North.
Age Concern Mid North administer
this scheme, being a local initiative.
There are currently no registered
service providers in Kaitaia.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Plan lacks detail on other
modes such as rail. There
is a lack of an evidence
base for the plan.
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges
Would like an economic model
to be funded to provide a base
plan for the future development
of land transport in Northland.
Would like realignment and
replacement of bridges.
RLTP
Matakohe,
Kaeo, Taipa
and
Rangiahua
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe,
Kaeo, Taipa and
Rangiahua single lane
bridges.
Would like Matakohe bridges
replaced with two lanes
A stronger emphasis on rail is now
in the document. Existing sources
of information have been drawn on
to develop the plan.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
214. Tanya Hendriks
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
215. Tony Collins
(Northland Chamber
of Commerce)
217. Kelvin Rountree
218. Vaughan Cooper
218. Vaughan Cooper
219. Joanne Rountree
220. Age Concern
Kaitaia District – Julie
Moebus
220. Age Concern
Kaitaia District – Julie
Moebus
220. Age Concern
Kaitaia District – Julie
Moebus
221. David Boyes
222. John Wearmouth
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This submission provided no
information.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
There is a Government moratorium
on SuperGold Card use on new bus
services. This moratorium is due to
end on September 1 2015, and new
bus services may be eligible to join
the scheme.
NRC will investigate the feasibility
of this request including looking into
alternative options.
Page 37
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Subject
Resilience
Maintenace
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Change requested by
submitter
See relief sought.
The slip south of Kawakawa
(from the 2014 winter storms)
needs to be repaired.
See relief sought.
Progress repairs to Pouto Rd.
See relief sought.
There is an urgent need for
passing lanes to be provided
between Whangarei and Kaitaia.
See relief sought.
Lighting needs to be installed on
the southern entrance to the
Dargaville bridge to improve
safety.
No specifc relief sought.
Maintenance
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Safety
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Safety
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Plan
Direction
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Upgrade
RLTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Other
RPTP
223. Bill Guest –
Farmers of NZ
Public
Transport
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
224. Louise Campion
225. Glenda Weber
226. John Tahana
227. Tim Wearmouth
Summary of submission
Whangarei’s need should
not be put at the expense
of the wider Northland
roading network.
Concern over the
Mangamuka gorge section
of SH1.
Submitter has been
advised this road has one
of the highest corner rates
for the distance travelled in
the world
Concern at Council
investment that is not
realising appropriate
returns when infrastructure
around the region is
degrading.
Does not believe that the
Northland Regional Council
should be obliged to fund
the mobility services that
the Ministry of Health are
obliged to provide and fund.
However, in regards to
immobility access onto
buses, public transport
buses today are designed
to provide immobility
access onto the buses
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges.
Submitter feels they were
designed for horse and cart
not the heavy traffic flows
that it handles every day.
Having single lane bridges
hold up traffic and when
there are accidents it is
worse going through the
diversion route.
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges
Would like to see better
timetables and extended
routes.
Submitter feels that the
replacement of the
Matakohe bridges should
be included in the 20152018 plan. They are
dangerous with limited view
and speed restrictions
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
Additionally this matter has been
forwarded to KDC to provide
comment.
The RLTP includes corridor studies
for part of this route which will
include such issues as passing
lanes. This matter has been
referred to NZTA for comment.
This matter has been referred to
NZTA for comment.
Comment noted.
This section of road should be
strengthened.
This matter has been referred to
NZTA for comment.
Would like to see a complete reevaluation of local governments
asset register and a
determination made whether we
would achieve wider economic
benefit for region in
reinvestment of this asset value
into essential infrastructure
Do not fund mobility services
that other agencies should fund.
Point acknowledged however
outside the scope of the RLTP and
RPTP
Would like realignment and
replacement of bridges.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Remove trees restricting views
of the on coming traffic.
Realignment and replacement of
bridges.
Need to introduce extra trips and
extend existing routes
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Extensions to the service will
depend on passenger and demand.
Submitter would like to have the
bridges replaced and road
realigned in order to make the
road safer.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Point acknowledged however
outside the scope of the RLTP and
RPTP
Page 38
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Submitter would like the
sealing of Rawhiti Road,
the 1.1km strip between
Whangamumu track and
Russel turn off.
Environmental benefits are
included in tarsealing such
as seagrass growth. It also
decreases the accidents
occurring on metal roads.
Would like Rawhiti Road
tarsealed
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
Would like realignment and
replacement to be done with
some funding.
RLTP
Upgrade
Concern over state of
Mangakahia Road and
truck movements.
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
Ratepayers association has
done a lot of work on the
viability of a bus service to
Kaikohe from OmapereOpononi.
Believes that funding for
rural areas should be
decided on a needs basis
rather than a 50% farebox
recovery ratio taking into
consideration the local
ratepayers’ willingness to
subsidise the service.
There is no formal mention
of additional resourcing or
prioritising funding for bus
services that particularly
address the needs of the
transport disadvantaged.
Would like rural services to
be given more emphasis
and support by making
more resources available to
trial and support new
services.
Support for BusAbout
Kaitaia.
Wishes the road to be upgraded
to a state highway with passing
lanes and wider corners as well
as a foot path over the
Mangakahia road river bridge.
Support for a twice weekly bus
service to Kaikohe from
Omapere-Opononi.
228. Barbara and
Victor Turner
229. Danielle
Williamson
230. Jeannette Head
231. John Schollum –
Kaikohe, Hokianga
Community Board
232. Simon Millichamp
(CBEC)
-
-
-
Public transport funding to
be determined on a needs
basis.
Provide more detail on extra
funding for bus services that
address the needs of the
transport disadvantaged.
More support for rural trial
bus services.
Retain funding for BusAbout
Kaitaia.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This has been
forwarded to FNDC for comment.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Support is noted – this forms part of
the direction of the RLTP seeking
the route is upgraded to an Inland
freight route/State Highway.
NRC is helping to support a trial
Opononi/Omapere service to
Kaikohe.
Comments are noted however
national funding is restricted to
those services that meet NZTA
criteria.
It is noted that several initiatives are
underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
Concern over monthly road
works between Karikari
Peninsula and Mangonui,
specifically between
Parapara Road and Taipa
View Road.
Feels that the busabout
Kaitaia is not supported
enough, lack of information
of timetables, stops and
even the service itself.
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
The rail route could possibly
take heavy traffic off this length
of road.
There is no rail route in the location
however the matter has been
referred to the NZTA for details on
road maintenance taking place in
that area.
Would like to see public
transport between
Cable/Coopers/
Mangonui. Provide more Council
support for BusAbout Kaitaia.
Would like realignment and
replacement to be done with
some funding.
BusAbout Kaitaia serves Mangonui
and Council give technical and
financial support to the service.
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
RPTP
Public
Transport
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Need a bus service
between Kaikohe, Opononi
and Dargaville.
Concerns over dust
inhalation and safety
concerns close to the
marae at Waimirirangi and
at Panguru Junction to
Tawarenga Junction (North
Hokianga).
Would like realignment and
replacement to be done with
some funding. Would also like a
speed restriction there.
PT Service ontroduced between
Kaikohe and Opononi and
possibly Dargaville.
Would like tarsealing and/or
widening of the road.
RLTP
Local
Roading
Rail
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
233. Sam Moody
233. Sam Moody
234. Garth Campion
235. Kevin Hodges
236. Jean Bellshaw
237. Wiromu Peita
Change requested by
submitter
Summary of submission
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
NRC are presently helping to fund a
trial service between Opononi and
Kaikohe.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This has been
forwarded to FNDC for comment.
Page 39
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
Public
Transport
New Service
Submitter would like public
transport from rural areas
into Kaikohe.
It is inferred that the submitter
would like a Kaikohe based bus
service included in the plan.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
Wants elimination of corners
nearing the bridges and
replaces with two lanes on the
bridge.
Wants elimination of corners
nearing the bridges and
replaces with two lanes on the
bridge.
Not Stated
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Would like more passing lanes
and pull off areas. Would like the
bridges to be dual lane and
realigned
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
SH14 is a slow road but a
main connector from the
East to the West coast.
Submitter also has
concerns for the Matakohe
bridges
Concern over the safety of
the two single lane bridges
in Matakohe.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Concerned about
hazardous dust
No specific relief stated.
RLTP
One Lane
Bridges
Concerned about SH10
single lane bridges.
No specific relief stated
RLTP
Maintenance
Concerned about the large
number of pot hole left for
weeks.
No specific relief stated
RLTP
Plan
Direction
No specific relief stated
RLTP
Maintenance
In general, concerned that
the plan ignores the
Hokianga area and is too
focussed on the east coast
and Whangarei in
particular. The Hokianga
has significant transport
challenges despite the
forestry resource in the
area and the Twin Coast
Discovery Route.
See relief sought.
RLTP
Safety
See relief sought.
Reduce speed limits for logging
trucks on unsealed roads to
70kph and for all other vehicles
to 80kph.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
See relief sought.
Recommend sealing outside
health clinics – for example
Pawarenga clinic. Seal
Runaruna road and Horeke to
Taheke.
238.
239. Kerry Bonham
240. Eric and Jillian
Parsons
241. Jim and Trish
Page
242. Barbara and
Roger Gillatt
243. Karyn Inder
244. June Harding
244. June Harding
244. June Harding
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
Realignment and replacement
with two lane bridges.
Focus on repairing flood
damage from storm repairs in
Hokianga.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
A mid-North bus service has been
recognised in the RPTP as a
potential future operating unit
depending on the outcome of a trial
that has been approved through the
Northland Long Term Plan 20152025.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures
Taipa and Kaeo bridges have been
included in the RLTP with a priority
ranking of 7 and 4 respectively.
The plan recognises that
Northland’s geology is challenging.
The plan includes projects to
improve Northland’s resilience and
improve maintenance outcomes.
One of the focus areas of the RLTP
is to improve the highway between
Auckland and Whangarei as a
priority. Other parts of the plan
however include regional matters
(such as route resilience). In
addition, the RPTP is a regionally
focussed document and looks at
services in the mid-north and
BusAbout Kaitiaia.
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package. In
addition this has been forwarded to
the FNDC for comment.
This matter is presently being
worked through with the relevant
freight operators. In some cases
operators have imposed selfrestricting speed limits.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This has been
forwarded to FNDC for comment.
Page 40
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Upgrade
See relief sought.
Designate the north Hokianga
portion and ferry service of the
Twin Coast Discovery route as a
State Highway.
RLTP
Maintenance
There should be a fairer
apportionment of funding
from users to maintain the
cost of local roads.
Policies to ensure there is fairer
contribution from the forestry
industry to maintain rural roads.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
See relief sought.
Develop local cycleways in the
Hokianga that will link to the
national cycleway.
FNDC advise that a possible
extension of the Coast-Coast
cycleway will be into the Hokianga.
RLTP
Various
Projects
Submitter will present this
information at the hearing.
Thank you for your comprehensive
submission. More time is however
needed to review and comment on
information supplied.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Submitter presents a
number of proposals for
projects in the region in the
2015-2018 programme
period.
Seal completion and
extension of Rawhiti Road
Bay of Islands. Submitter
feels the dust is a health
hazard and is ruining the
coastal environment due to
water contamination.
Would like the roads to be
sealed.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Would like longer double laned
bridges designed for modern
day and future vehicles and
numbers.
RLTP
Road Safety
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges. Feels
the bridges are too old and
not built or designed to
handle modern day
vehicles and the weight.
Also the road is used as an
alternative if the
Brynderwyn’s are closed
increasing the traffic flow
even more.
Ohaeawai township
concerns relating to traffic
volumes, speed, noise, lack
of visibility. Refer to
submission for more
details.
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This has been
forwarded to FNDC for comment.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Support Mangakahia Rd
upgrade.
RPTP
Public
Transport
RLPT/
RPTP
Electric cars
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
246. Steve Cornwall
248. Bryn Jamieson
249. Rick Simpkin
250. Roy Shackleton
250. Roy Shackleton
250. Roy Shackleton
252. David McConnell
253. Colleen Hopkins
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The Hokianga ferry service is
treated as a local road (an ‘exempt
service) for the purposes of funding
subsidy and is managed and
funded by FNDC. NZTA have been
forwarded this point to ascertain the
feasibility of this request.
The road user charge is set at a
national level.
RLTP
245. John
Wigglesworth –
Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust
251. Carl Barlev
Change requested by
submitter
Would like to see the 60km/h
speed limit through Ohaeawai
township to be reduced to 50.
Also the road approaches of
100km/h to be limited to 80.
Engine braking signs should
also be installed to reduce
noise. Due to lacking of visibility
at intersections mirrors had
been requested but have yet not
been installed. Support also for
a bypass that has been
proposed for the township.
No specific relief.
This has been referred to NZTA for
comment
Supports new bus routes
linking towns in the region.
No specific relief.
Point acknowledged.
The submitter has returned
from Norway and has had
some experience with
electric vehicles.
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges
The submitter wishes to speak
at hearings on the subject of
electric vehicles.
Additional policies have been
included in the RLTP on this matter.
Wants replacement and
realignment of the Matakohe
Bridges.
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Point acknowledged.
Page 41
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
NRC funding for land and
public transport for locals
and visitors.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
254. Nola Colville
255. Zoy Murray
256. Sonny Fong-Toy
257. Bryan Gleeson
258. Lawrence Hunter
259. Chris Fong-Toy
260. Nyla Jones
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 42
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service. No
increase in proce of fares.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service. No
increase in proce of fares.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service. No
increase in proce of fares.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
261. Fay Hawthorne
262. Isaiah Eramiha
263. DesMa Buckley
264. Shelley Sullivan
265. Marion Andrew
266. Chris Beukes
267. Graeme Bruce
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 43
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Plans and projects are included in
the plan however it must be noted
that this activity area only attracts a
limited proportion of funding
through the NLTF.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service. No
increase in proce of fares.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Support walking and
cycling as a strategic
priority.
NRC should advocate for more
funding for this area of activity.
RLTP
Dust
mitigation
Concern over health effects
from dusty roads. Believes
that the polluter should pay
principle applies here.
District Councils to commit to
more funding to seal unsealed
roads.
RLTP
Safety
Appreciate work that has
gone into reducing the road
toll. Believes that the road
toll should be reduced by
20% due to ‘road factors’.
Commit to reducing the road toll
by 20% due to road factors.
Correct a typographical error
(Figure 14 should be Figure 13).
RPTP
Plan
Direction
Recommend use of the’
transport users hierarchy’
(cars bottom – pedestrians
top) when planning new
development. Support for
the CityLink service. Some
of the drivers in section 1.3
have not been carried
through to the plan.
No specific relief sought.
Comment is noted.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Policy 1.2 – Support for
investigations that will
increase the use of public
transport.
Should look at bus passes for
tertiary students, people working
in the CBD and for the DHB.
Comments are noted – a CityLink
fare structure review due to take
place in 2015 will look at the fare
types on offer.
268. Moeke Waenga
269. Northland District
Health Board - Shirley
Crawshaw .
(Note also submission
283 from the NDHB)
269. Northland District
Health Board - Shirley
Crawshaw .
(Note also submission
283 from the NDHB)
269. Northland District
Health Board - Shirley
Crawshaw .
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
Typographical error noted. The
RLTP reflects Government’s
national priorities for road safety.
(Note also submission
283 from the NDHB)
269. Northland District
Health Board - Shirley
Crawshaw .
(Note also submission
283 from the NDHB)
269. Northland District
Health Board - Shirley
Crawshaw .
(Note also submission
283 from the NDHB)
Support for integration with
walking and cycling.
Ensure such initiatives align with
WDC’s walking and cycling
strategy.
No specific relief sought.
Support for expansion of
existing service and
effective urban design.
Reference to the 2011 census
should be the 2013 census.
Typographical error noted.
Minor typographical error
Page 44
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
Subject
Other
270. Shaun Sweet
(Department of
Conservation)
RLTP
Projects
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Resilience
271. Gary Stephens
271. Gary Stephens
271. Gary Stephens
RPTP
271. Gary Stephens
Public
Transport
Summary of submission
DOC has been recognised
as a road controlling
authority eligible for
financial assistance from
the NZTA. The department
are transitioning to a more
robust road management
approach. DOC have
identified Lookout Road,
Waipoua Forest and
Taputaputa Road, Cape
Reinga as their key roads
in the region. DOC wish to
work collaboratively with
the RTC and RCA’s to
understand road
management practices to
better estimate the funding
assistance rate they will
need for their roading. In
2015/18 period work will
focus on developing a
national asset management
plan. The 2018/21 period
will focus on applying the
learnings from the 2015/18
period.
A list of eligible DOC roads
(for financial assistance) in
the region is included in the
submission.
Concerned about Waipapa
intersection and its lack of
visibility – for example
where there is parking
along road side which
impairs visibility.
Does not support Puhoi to
Wellsford section of SH or
tunnel through the
Brynderwyns. Suggests a
heavy trucking route
around the south side of
the Brynderwyns to avoid
the Mangawhai diversion
route.
Concerns of isolation to the
Far North during storms.
Mangakahia Rd should be
upgraded to provide an
alternative when SH routes
are compromised. Also the
SH10 single lane bridges
should be addressed.
See relief sought.
Change requested by
submitter
DOC wishes to work with RTC
members; to design, document,
cost estimate, contract and
deliver appropriate road
management programmes for
Lookout Road, Waipoua Forest
and Taputaputa Road, Cape
Reinga through the Northland
RLTP; and to develop a road
focussed AMP utilising NZTA
FAR funding under work
category 003. Involvement in the
Northland Roading Advisory
Group would be an ideal step
toward this closer, collaborative
relationship.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Comments are noted.
Progress a project to construct a
roundabout at Waipapa
This project is included in the RLTP
with a priority rating of 3.
Instead of a tunnel have a
cheaper and safer alternative
route around the Brynderwyns
for all heavy vehicles (busses,
trucks, caravans and boats).
The Puhoi-Wellsford project is
driven through the RoNS process
(a national process). No approved
plans are in place for the remaining
section of SH1 north to Whangarei
though further work will be
undertaken through a corridor plan
(included in the RLTP) for this
route.
Upgrade Mangakahia Rd as a
viable alternative route. Upgrade
one-lane bridges on SH10.
Mangakahia Rd is included in the
RLTP in order for it to be upgraded
to a viable alternative route/State
Highway.
Wants a bus service to the
western side of the region for
locals and tourists via Waipoua
and Hokianga.
Taipa and Kaeo Bridges are
included in the RLTP with a priority
ranking of 7 and 4 respectively.
It is noted that several initiatives are
underway:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
Page 45
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Dust
mitigation
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Rail
Northport’s full potential is
not realised. There are
opportunities to utilise rail
to Northport and elevate
Northport to be the
container port for Auckland.
There should also be a rail
link to Ngawha
(Geothermal Power
Station) to realise its full
potential. Forestry and
tourism development could
also be supported through
greater multi-modal
transport options and there
are opportunities to develop
the airport to international
status) at Kerikeri).
Submission goes into more
detail about this point.
RLTP
Project
RLTP
Kaeo and
Taipa
Bridges
272. Alex Wright
273. Bus & Coach
Association NZ
273. Bus & Coach
Association NZ
273. Bus & Coach
Association NZ
273. Bus & Coach
Association NZ
273. Bus & Coach
Association NZ
274. David SIlby
275. Debbie Blythen
276. Bill Fenton –
Kerikeri Business
Assocation
276. Bill Fenton –
Kerikeri Business
Assocation
276. Bill Fenton –
Kerikeri Business
Assocation
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Concerned with health and
safety on the following
unsealed roads: Omauri,
Pipiwai, Henare, Moore,
Wright and McCardle .
Main issue is Air Quality
from the dust generated by
heavy traffic use on the
above named roads.
The Health and Safety of
the Mangakahia School
Bus on the unsealed
Pipiwai Wright and
McCardle Roads is of
concern.
RPTP doe not sufficiently
recognise the importance of
“partenering” to jointly
increase patronage and
reduce subsidies.
No policy that unit contracts
will have on the effect of
forming a partnership.
Submitter would like Omauri,
Pipiwai, Henare, Moore, Wright
and McCardle roads sealed.
No long term, full life cost,
quality based approach
when procuring PT
services.
Submits that fares should
not be raised to improve
fare box recovery ratio
without considering other
options.
Patronage based Financial
Incentive Mechanism as
apposed to Revenue based
Mechanism.
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges. Needs
to secure al alterative route
(Brynderwyns are too
fragile and already heavy
with traffic). Believes
people are having to wait
for oncoming traffic forming
queues where it could be
free flowing.
Concern over Matakohe
single lane bridges
Need to include a statement
providing a full life cost, quality
based approach when procuring
PT services.
NRC should not raise fares to
improve fare box recovery ratio
without considering all other
options
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures.
Include importance of Partnering
as shown under PTOM
A partnership delivery model will be
used for contracting under PTOM.
Include a policy that describes
what unit contracts will have on
the effect of forming a
partnership.
Policy 6.1 of the RPTP includes
details on what procurement
arrangements will be undertaken to
form a PTOM contract. Any unit
contracts will be in accordance with
NZTA requirements.
All PT service contracts will be
undertaken in accordance with
NZTA funding requirements.
NRC do this presently.
NRC implement a Patronage
Based Financial Incentive
Mechanism as apposed to
Revenue based Mechanism.
Would like to see the bridges
replaced with two lane
structures or box culverts.
Submitter believes it will help
Northland through tourism and
primary industries with people
feeling safer to travel the road.
Passenger based Financial
Incentive Mechanism already in
place on NZTA subsidised
contracts.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Wishes for realignment of the
road and replacement of the
single lane bridges with double
lanes.
Elevate the status of rail
including to Ngawha and
Marsden Point and to unlock
industry potential.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Rail has been more strongly
emphasised in the RLTP.
Wants a roundabout at
Waipapa. The Puketona
roundabout is a lower
priority however.
Progress the Waipapa project.
This is included in the RLTP with a
priority rating of 3.
Refer to relief sought
Two lane these bridges.
Taipa and Kaeo Bridges are
included in the RLTP with a priority
ranking of 7 and 4 respectively.
Page 46
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
276. Bill Fenton –
Kerikeri Business
Assocation
Subject
Plan
Direction
Summary of submission
Refer to relief sought
Change requested by
submitter
Upgrade Mangakahia Road and
SH1 south of the Brynderwyns.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The Puhoi-Wellsford project is
driven through the RoNS process
(a national process). No approved
plans are in place for the remaining
section of SH1 north to Whangarei
though further work will be
undertaken through a corridor plan
(included in the RLTP) for this
route.
Mangakahia Rd is included in the
RLTP in order for it to be upgraded
to a viable alternative route/State
Highway.
RLTP
Project
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
RLTP
Maintenance
RLTP
Maintenance
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
Submitter is supportive of
the concept of upgrading
Mangakahia Rd to the
status of that of a State
Highway. This is because
this road carries a high
level of heavy vehicles and
requires more maintenance
than any other road in the
Whangarei District.
Mangakahia Road carries
the same level of heavy
vehicles as SH14. The
average cost of maintaining
a km of road in Whangarei
District is $10,000 per km
per year. Otaika Road and
Mangakahia Road are
around $30,000 per km.
The average cost to
maintain a km of SH in
Northland is around
$42,000 per km. This
evidence supports
upgrading the route to SH
status.
WDC forestry routes –
submitter states that
following an assessment of
forestry routes, additional
funding (c. $1.3million) has
been put into the WDC
maintenance, operations
and renewals budget.
Pavement renewals – Over
the past 10 years, the
budget for pavement
renewals has fallen to the
point where WDC can only
reseal roads every 400
years. With the average
lifecycle of road sealing
being 35-50 years, WDC
has increased expenditure
in its maintenance,
operations and renewals
budget to allow pavement
resealing every 70 years.
WDC is promoting the
sealing of 100m strips in
front of priority sites along
with the Wright/Mc Cardle
Seal Extension to be
funded through the
Regional Improvements
activity class. WDC are
seeking 100% funding for
this work as it was meant to
be funded from the
Regional Development
Fund – however road
sealing was excluded from
consideration.
Support for Mangakahia Road
becoming a state highway and
wants the same for Otaika
Valley Road and Loop Road
North.
Mangakahia Rd is included in the
RLTP in order for it to be upgraded
to a viable alternative route/State
Highway.
No specific relief sought.
Point noted
No specific relief sought.
Point noted
No specific relief sought.
Point noted
Page 47
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
Subject
Upgrade
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
Summary of submission
LED Streetlight upgrades –
NZTA have advised that
this should be funded as a
separate improvement
project through ‘Road
Improvements’ rather than
its current location in
‘Maintenance, Operations
and Renewals’.
FNDC may have to make a
similar adjustment.
RLTP
Upgrade
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
RLTP
Upgrade
RLTP
Projects
RLTP
Projects
RLTP
Projects
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
277. Jeff Devine
(Whangarei District
Council)
278. Rebekah Rennell
(Better NZ Trust)
Kioreroa Road Level
Crossing Half Barrier Arm
Upgrade. This has been
included in Work Category
131 (Level Crossing
Warning Devices) in the
maintenance, operation
and renewal programme.
NZTA have now advised
this should be funded as a
separate project in work
category 321 (new traffic
management facilities).
Change requested by
submitter
Maintenance, Operations and
Renewals (work category 222)–
change costs to:
2015/16 - $652,600
2016/17 - $660,400
2017/18 - $669,500
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
These changes has been included
in the RLTP
Work Category 324:
Add a new improvement project
with the following budgets.
2015/16 - $702,800
2016/17 - $711,200
2017/18 - $721,000
Maintenance, Operations and
Renewals (work category 131) –
change costs to:
2015/16 – No Change
2016/17 - $25,296
2017/18 – No Change
These changes has been included
in the RLTP
Add a new improvement project
with the following budgets
2015/16 - $0
2016/17 - $50,600
2017/18 - $0
HPMV bridge upgrade
improvement programme.
This is made subject to
100% funding from NZTA
as the primary benefit is to
central government through
additional road user
charges and an increasing
profitable forestry industry.
SH1 corridor improvements
– Whangarei. WDC expects
the Whangarei SH
improvement projects to be
complete within the
2015/18 period.
Loop Rd – Smeatons Hill.
WDC support safety
improvements along this
stretch of road.
The project needs to be funded
100% to be viable – WDC may
have to withdraw this project if
this is not attained.
Point noted
Ensure the Whangarei
improvements are completed
within the 2015/18 period.
Point noted
Progress safety improvements
from Loop Road to Smeatons
Hill.
Point noted
SH14/Hospital Rd – WDC
support the DHB
submission to the RLTP in
favour of this project. This
should be funded by NZTA,
not the DHB as a condition
of consent from hospital
expansion projects.
The SH is the backbone of
Northland. This was
demonstrated when in the
July 2014 storms both
SH12 and SH1 were
severed. WDC support
NZTA funding to support
the SH network,
Submitter provides
evidence in their
submission on the
importance of electric
vehicles and the
infrastructure necessary to
support them. Promoting
their development in the
RLTP would align with
government priorities (in
the GPS) and plan
objectives. There would
also be tourism benefits.
Progress the SH14/Hospital Rd
intersection improvement
through the 2015-18 period.
Point noted
Progress the package 2
($5million per year) through the
regional improvement activity
class in the 2015/18 period.
Point noted
Recommendations include:
- Provide more EV charging
stations, particularly to
leverage tourism
opportunities.
- Specifically a fast charger in
Wellsford would support EV
use on the route between
Auckland and Whangarei.
NRC are actively pursuing, through
a stakeholder group, increased
provision for electric vehicles. In
addition the RLTP includes stronger
policy on promoting this activity.
Page 48
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The plan includes walking and
cycling projects and funding. This
specific matter has been forwarded
to FNDC for comment.
Summary of submission
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Walkway / Cycleway
Haruru Falls to Paihia.
Submitter states that this
has now been in the
submission process for 8
years. $800, 000 dollars
was designated for this
investigation and nothing
has been done. Feels It
would have been better to
spend $800,000 building
the footpath and it is only a
matter of time before there
is a tragic accident
involving pedestrians or
cyclists.
Infer that a walkway / Cycleway
Haruru Falls to Paihia be
progressed.
RLTP
Other
Identify areas of growth in the
plan. Provide more detail on
how money will be spent.
Comment is noted. The plan
includes corridor plans for specific
routes. One area of focus is the
Kerikeri-Waipapa growth triangle.
RLTP
Resilience
Infer that the plan should not
promote or accommodate larger
(up to 60 tonne) trucks on the
road.
HPMV is driven by central
Government policy.
RLTP
Other
Concern over lack of
identifying areas of
potential growth in the plan.
Support for parts of the
plan that promote transport
choices.
Supports state highway
improvements but not
permitting 40-60 tonne
trucks that damage our
local roads.
See relief sought.
The document is produced by the
NRC and therefore is available at
regional council offices as well as
libraries and online.
RLTP
Rail
Would like a hard copy of the
draft plan available at the Far
North District Council Office and
workshops to be more
prominently advertised.
Plans should continue the rail to
Kaitaia and tunnel through
Mangamuka Gorge.
RLTP
Safety
Monitor and change if needed
the speed limits in areas
Local speed limits is a matter for
the local road controlling authority.
RPTP
Public
Transport
See relief sought.
Procurement policy for public
transport services seeking subsidy
is set by the NZTA.
RLTP
Maintenance
RLTP
Safety
No specific relief.
Point acknowledged - the plan
includes projects to address high
risk areas and safety.
RLTP
Rail
Suggests that the plan
should have an economic
breakdown by production
sector of current and future
demand drivers. Roading is
very important to primary
producers. The plan needs
to allocate sufficient funding
to maintenance of rural
roading and heavily
trafficked routes that carry
dairy and logging trucks.
Submitter has concerns
that the funding increases
allocated to local roading
maintenance in the GPS
are well below inflationary
forecasts. Concern that
national projects such as
the RoNS has come at the
expense of local roading –
anecdotally amongst Fed
Farmers members it has
been recorded that local
roads are deteriorating.
Linked concern to the
above point, the greater
number of potholes,
slippage and other related
incidents compromise road
safety.
Retain the rail link to
Auckland as this is very
important to relieve the
burden of freight on roads.
Preference of tenders should be
given to local operators and
tenders. – monitor them
carefully and if not used then
they lose it
Provide more detail on primary
production activities and
demand drivers on the roading
network. Ensure that adequate
resources are put into local road
maintenance.
Retain the rail link to Auckland.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the document.
279. Laurie Byers
279. Laurie Byers
279. Laurie Byers
279. Laurie Byers
280. Tom Petricevich
Support revitalizing rail
services (freight and
passenger) from Auckland
to Okaihau.
Concern over speed limits.
280. Tom Petricevich
280. Tom Petricevich
281. Richard Gardner
– Federated Farmers
281. Richard Gardner
– Federated Farmers
281. Richard Gardner
– Federated Farmers
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the document.
Comment is noted. Direction is
however set nationally through the
GPS. The RLTP does recognise
that resilience and maintaining
roads are key issues for the region
and ones where more resources
must be put. More detail is included
on projected freight demands in the
RLTP.
Page 49
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RLTP
Project
282. Lynne
Warbrooke
283. Nick
Chamberlain (NDHB)
Subject
Summary of submission
Concerned over the
Matakohe bridges and the
length of time that it has
taken to develop. Submitter
feels the bridges are unsafe
and cannot handle the
heavy vehicles or the
increasing traffic flows.
Submitter also feels that
the bottlenecking effect the
two single lane bridges has,
is a danger and is
inefficient.
Submitter presents
substantive evidence on
the growth of demand for
hospital services (refer to
full submission for more
details of this) and patterns
of traffic movement. This
evidence serves as a
backdrop to a proposal to
upgrade the intersection at
hospital road/SH14 (Maunu
Road).
Change requested by
submitter
Would like two lane bridges that
are structurally sound and will
last in the future.
Progress the hospital road/SH14
signalisation proposal as soon
as possible.
Amend Strategic Outcome 4 to
read: Northland’s roading
network is developed and
maintained so it is fit for purpose
(including route resilience) and
provide efficient, effective and
safe access to vital emergency
and essential social/community
services.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This project is in the plan for the
2015-18 period with a priority rating
of 4 and therefore potentially
eligible to receive funding through
the NLTF.
The strategic outcome is cast
broadly although its intention is
spelt out further in the document (in
terms of access to lifeline services).
Specific benefits of the
project include:
- Establishment of a
clear way marker for
the hospital on Maunu
Rd.
- Guaranteed turning
movements.
- Improved access for
ambulance services.
- Improved access for
pedestrians and bus
passengers.
- Improved access for
bus and heavy vehicle
movements.
Whilst the DHB recognises
the project is included in
the RLTP with
design/construction to take
place in 2017/18, to avoid
any further deterioration
and to allow the DHB to
progress its projects, the
submitter seeks funding be
secured as soon as
possible.
The submitter provides
evidence that the project
aligns with higher order
documents including the
Land Transport
Management Act 2003, the
recent GPS and the Draft
RLTP Strategic Outcomes.
Additionally the hospital is
recognised as Regionally
Significant Infrastructure (in
the Proposed RPS for
Northland).
Using the NZTA Investment
Assessment Framework,
the project would appear to
score highly. Strategic fit –
high score due to the
hospitals key role in
addressing socio-economic
deprivation. Effective – the
project will provide a long
term solution and allow the
hospital to expand more
efficiently. Benefit Cost –
does not follow traditional
lines but scores highly for
socio-economic reasons.
Page 50
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RPTP
283. Nick
Chamberlain (NDHB)
Subject
Public
Transport
Summary of submission
Submitter discusses
increased traffic demand at
Whangarei hospital – as
much as 29% if expansion
plans are realised.
Change requested by
submitter
Changes to the bus service to
the hospital could be better
timed to capture shift changes.
Details on the timing changes
are provided in the submission.
Submission provides
details on demand patterns
– demand is particularly
high around the 7am
nursing shift change and
the 8am clerical/admin staff
change. This shift change
is less problematic as the
traffic is travelling west to
east (which does not
conflict with east to west
traffic and right turns into
hospital road from SH14).
The PM peak is more
problematic as traffic must
turn right out of hospital
road against the prevailing
(commuter and school)
traffic from town along
SH14.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
The RPTP includes Method ii
(under Policy 2.1) that NRC will
work with hospitals and other large
organisations on promoting travel
plans and integrating public
transport services. NRC are
supportive of working with the DHB
to integrate public transport in to
future hospital expansion. In terms
of current services, there is a
limited opportunity to make
substantial changes to service
patterns at this stage but will be
reviewed when the contract is
retendered in the 2016/2017
financial year.
Further details are provided
in the submission.
RLTP
Resilience
Submitter discusses
general issues with
resilience in the region
including the increased
freight load on roads due to
Auckland’s growth, the lack
of alternative routes, the
proposed closure of the
Dargaville branch line, the
relocation of seniors to the
region from Auckland and
the importance of tourism.
No specific relief sought.
Point noted.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Keep the submitter fully
informed throughout a business
case stage and any subsequent
stages of this project.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
RLTP
Resilience
Infer from the submitter that
there should be greater detail on
Northland’s roading resilience
needs and elevation of this issue
over connectivity to Auckland.
A key focus of the plan is resilience.
To this end, high risk areas and
corridors have been identified and
funding has been put forward for a
network resilience package.
RLTP
Project
Concerned on the state of
roading around the
Matakohe area (SH12).
Indications that the
construction phase of work
will take place in 2015/2016
(in the RLTP) is incorrect
and a business case will
have to be undertaken first.
The submitter is particularly
concerned with unfamiliar
visitors to the area and how
they tackle the bridges.
Lack of specific details in
the RLTP concerns the
submitter. Submitter feels
that weather affected areas
are not being focused on
(such as Moerewa, Kaeo
and Rangiahua). The RLTP
also is light on detail of
heavy vehicle movements –
these need to be properly
accounted for. Also the
submitter feels that focus
should not be on a 4 lane
highway from Auckland to
Whangarei, this is not
justifiable with the cost that
could be used for fixing the
already damaged roads.
Supports the 11 proposed
items but has strong
concerns over Waipapa
intersection.
Would like the Waipapa/SH10
roundabout to be built as a
priority.
The Waipapa roundabout project is
included in the RLTP with a priority
rating of 3.
284. Lisa Tolich – The
Kauri Museum
284. Lisa Tolich – The
Kauri Museum
285. Richard Sucich
286. Terry Goodall
Page 51
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
Public
Transport
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
RLTP
Rail
Would like council to encourage
and put financial resources
behind walking and cycling as
public transport and develop a
regional cycling strategy.
Enhance Northland rail to
transport larger loads. Construct
Marsden rail link and encourage
electrification
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Supports the increase in
walking and cycling with the
economic benefits but feels
it hasn’t reached full
potential.
Would like to see more
sustainable travel not fossil
fuels. The focus should be
on preventing road damage
in the first place.
Feels there is a lack of
walking cycling options.
RLTP
Electric
Vehicles
See relief sought.
Increase use and provision for
electric vehicles.
RLTP
Rail
Lack of rail links (both
freight and passenger)
through Northland and to
the port, as well as
Auckland is an issue.
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Rail
Concern over the state of
Northlands infrastructure
especially since 2014’s
storms. Submitter feels that
repairs are rough and are
not stable enough to last.
Particular concern that the
Maromaku slip has still not
been addressed on SH1.
Although submitter
supportive of a number of
the plans statements on
resilience, he is concerned
that the plan is still very
much roading focussed.
Concern over the lack of
rail option.
Create the rail link to the port
and upgrade the link to
Auckland. Develop a ferry
passenger ferry service from
Whangarei Heads to Marsden
Point and a passenger train
service from Whangarei to
Auckland.
Build a motorway that is safe
and fast from Whangarei to
Auckland (potentially using long
term government issued bonds).
RLTP
Plan
Direction
General support for the
direction of the plan.
RLTP
Safety
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
RLTP
Police
activities
RLTP
Funding
Support for approach taken
to road safety in the plan,
including safety
improvements to walking
and cycling. Particular
support for policies 4 and 6.
Support for approach taken
to walking and cycling,
particularly policies 5, 6 and
7.
Recognition for the role of
the NZ Police in achieving
plan policies.
Support for the
maintenance and possibly
increase of funding to
public transport, walking
and cycling and road safety
promotion activity classes.
287. Georgina
McGarry
288. Stuart Bell
289. Craig Salmon
289. Craig Salmon
289. Craig Salmon
290. Sophia XiaoColley
291. David Scoffman
291. David Scoffman
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
Summary of submission
Would like to see more walking
and cycling options.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Policy in the RLTP discusses the
possibility of developing a regional
strategy. Walking and cycling is
promoted through policy and
through projects in the programme.
A stronger emphasis on rail is
included in the document.
Policy in the RLTP discusses the
possibility of developing a regional
strategy. Walking and cycling is
promoted through policy and
through projects in the programme.
NRC are actively pursuing, through
a stakeholder group, increased
provision for electric vehicles.
Stronger policy is included in the
RLTP on promoting electric
vehciles.
A passenger rail service to
Auckland is unlikely to be viable at
the present time. A stronger
emphasis on rail has been included
in the RLTP.
The Auckland-Whangarei route is a
strategic priority in the plan and
included in the RLTP by way of a
corridor plan. The Auckland to
Wellsford section is part of the
Roads of National Significance
(RoNS) programme.
Upgrade the rail links throughout
Northland without closing down
Dargaville’s link. Investigate the
prospect of shifting container
shipping from Auckland to
Northport.
Retain outcomes and priorities.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the RLTP.
Retain policies on safety in the
plan.
Point noted
Retain policies in the plan.
Point noted
No change sought.
Point noted
No change sought.
Point noted
Point noted
Page 52
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RPTP
Public
Transport
RPTP
Public
Transport
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
292. Brad Olsen
293. Billy Leonard
293. Billy Leonard
294. Jonny Wilkinson
– Disability Advisory
Group
Subject
It is important to recognise
the role of services that do
not receive subsidy – such
as the Westcoaster.
Support for policies where
they relate to maintaining
and enhancing the CityLink
bus service. Although the
submitter is concerned
about any proposed fare
increases, they understand
the tensions that exist and
would rather the service
continue albeit with higher
fares. Support for looking at
extending the
concessionary fare regime
to other user groups.
No change sought.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Point noted
No change sought.
Point noted
Support for Policy 1.3.
addressing improving
public information on the
bus service however the
current email/txt message
system is not well known
amongst young people.
Support also for the
Snapper card system.
Support for Policy 1.5
relating feedback on the
CityLink service. The
timeliness of the service is
a very important issue for
young people.
Support for Policy 1.6
where it seeks to upgrade
facilities and improve
amenities. Rose St bus
station improvements
would help to increase
patronage. Support looking
at ways of transporting
bikes on buses.
Support policy for nonsubsidised services (Policy
2.1), support submissions
on consents for industry,
public infrastructure,
support also investigations
on mixed mode transport.
Submitter feels that
‘economic growth’ is the
wrong goal for the plan,
and that the focus should
be on people and nature.
NRC should look at more ways
of promoting these services and
investigate developing a smart
phone app.
NRC do not currently maintain a
text message and email alert
system – therefore Policy 1,3,
Method i in the RPTP should in fact
be deleted. The CityLink website
has however been updated
recently.
Retain policy.
Point noted
Retain policy.
Point noted
Retain policies
Point noted
Plan should focus on projects
that would benefit the ordinary
person – i.e. highway from
Auckland to Kaitaia, dust
mitigation and traffic lights at the
hospital road/SH14 intersection.
The plan contains policy direction
and projects on these issues.
Economic growth is a key part of
the Government’s GPS which this
plan must be consistent with.
Infer the plan should focus less
on financial returns and reduce
the user pays cost.
Bus services that receive subsidy
must contain an element ‘user
pays’. Current Government policy is
that this ratio should be at or near
to 50% of the total cost of the
service.
Retain related objectives and
polices in the RPTP.
Support is noted.
Summary of submission
Submitter feels the current
farebox recovery rate is too
high. The philosophy of a
user pays mentality is
environmentally
counterproductive.
Estimates that current user
pays costs is 57c per km
and would use the bus
more if this could be
reduced.
General support expressed
for objectives and policies
on maintaining and
enhancing the City Link
service in Whangarei. The
submitter specifically
expresses support for
measures that will improve
accessibility, safety and
other outcomes for disabled
users.
Change requested by
submitter
Page 53
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Feels concentration on
singular mode of transport
(roading) is limiting
sustainability.
RLTP
Safety
RLTP
Resilience
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter has concern
about road safety and
believes that the simple,
low cost things need to be
put right first.
Concern over gravel being
pushed into drains by
grader drivers. This forces
water across roads in down
pours. This causes more
pot holes. Submitter feels
that money is only being
spent to ‘mend’ roads as
well as private cars being
serviced and replaced due
to poor roads.
Refer to relief sought
RLTP
Resilience
Feels the main highways
are third world quality and
are not maintained to a
high enough standard that
a state high way should be.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
RPTP
Public
Transport
Other
Submitter believes
generally the plan is well
written and concise,
although has a number of
specific concerns:
295. Hans Mitt
295. Hans Mitt
296. Mary Mitt
297. Cliff Colquhoun
and Kathy Hancock
298. Theresa
Burkhardt
298. Theresa
Burkhardt
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
Summary of submission
-
-
-
Some of the wording in
the plan relates to
language that was
present in the Public
Transport Management
Act 2008. As this act
has now been repealed
it is no longer legally
possible to use the
terminology.
Other terminology uses
the word ‘subsidy’
which is a term the
Agency are moving
away from.
Reference to the
Agency’s Planning and
Investment Signals
(released in November
2013) is out of date and
does not give effect to
the new GPS.
Change requested by
submitter
Redevelop rail lines. Encourage
public transport (and divert
walking and cycling money to
this area in the short term).
Change advertising schemes to
fit the developing world and
people. Greater use of
technology to allow more flexible
use of public transport.
Road signs and markings need
improvement before road
restructuring. Increase road sign
locations and directional arrows
to enact behavioural change.
Better signage on roads
(frequent and better located
speed signs, as well as
directional arrows). Also
changes to speed limits need to
be double indicated especially
where they change seasonally
(Omapere-Opononi).
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Would like more resilient roads
through the region to handle or
eliminate possible road closures.
Prioritise engineering
assessments to the flood prone
roads. such as Kaeo &
Rangiahua
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Ensure the language in the plan
is consistent with the new Act. In
addition look carefully at some
of the other wording to ensure
the terminology reflects the
latest thinking and ensure
references to external
documents are up-to-date.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been put in the document.
The plan does contain policy and
projects on promoting walking and
cycling. There is also a Public
Transport Plan which includes
policy to promote the use of
technology.
The specific issue of a lack of
directional arrows has been
referred to the NZTA and the local
RCA’s for future implementation.
The specific issue of a lack of
directional arrows has been
referred to the NZTA and the local
RCA’s for future implementation.
The issue at Omapere-Opononi has
been forwarded to the NZTA.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service..
Resilience is a plan priority. The
two areas referred to by the
submitter are identified in the plan
as high risk areas in need of
attention.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Changes have been made to
ensure the Plan is legally compliant
use up-to-date terminology.
Page 54
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Changes have been made to the
plan.
Public
Transport
Payment
The Plan is silent on what
the current regional farebox
recovery ratio is.
State what the current regional
farebox recovery ratio is.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Payment
The plan appears to be
promoting Snapper which is
an interim solution and
subject to change as a
national system is
developed. Submitter has
concerns with the plan
promoting a particular
product.
Remove reference to Snapper
and replace with more generic
language. Signal that NRC are
working towards developing a
national system (with other
Councils and NZTA).
Changes have been made to the
plan.
RPTP
Public
Transport
Other
Status of RaweneKohukohu ferry
Refer to the service as ‘exempt’.
Changes have been made to the
plan.
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
The service is described as
‘excluded’ which is
incorrect.
RPTP
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
Public
Transport
Other
‘Standards’ can mean legal
requirements or contract
conditions and the use of
the term in this context is
not clear.
Clarify what is meant by the use
of the word ‘standards’ or refer
to the RUB and relevant vehicle
rules.
Clarify who is responsible for
each step. (step1 and 4 could
be instigated by the operator
and third party, step 2,3,6 and 7
by NRC).
Please reference the Act where
the document refers to the ‘legal
definition of transport
disadvantaged’.
Changes have been made to the
plan.
Submitter would like better
prioritising to occur in worse
affected areas and improved
communication with NZTA.
The document addresses this by
outlining the problem areas and
prioritising a list of projects for
national funding.
Public transport facilities to
occur covering Coast to Coast
(Omapere to Kerikeri), mid north
to Whangarei (Kaikohe to
Whangarei), and service linking
Northland from Whangarei to
Kaitaia and co-ordinating with
the above.
Several initiatives are underway for
public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
Public
Transport
Other
299.6 Guidelines for trial
bus services
RPTP
Public
Transport
Other
Transport disadvantaged
RLTP
Resilience
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter feels that the
poor roading through
Northland hampers the
economy of small towns
and the region as a whole.
Lack of communication to
NZTA is not maximising
work or benefits.
Believes that Kaikohe and
Hokianga populations are
disadvantaged by having
no public transport facilities
limiting job access.
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
300. Stephen
Sangster – Kaikohe
Business Association
Changes have been made to the
plan.
Requirement for Urban
Buses
RPTP
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
Kaikohe Business
Association
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
299. Deepak Rama
(NZ Transport
Agency)
300. Stephen
Sangster
Summary of submission
Changes have been made to the
plan.
Page 55
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
Public
Transport
Submitter feels the lack of
public transport in the Far
North is disappointing.
Service appears limited to
between Kawakawa and
Kaikohe on a return service
once a day. What about
Paihia and Kerikeri? Also
general support for the
vintage railway that may
one day link Kawakawa
and Opua.
Would like to see more transport
available. Would like a return
bus service into Paihia and
Kerikeri at least twice a day.
RLTP
Rail
Feels the ‘Land Transport’
plan deals mostly with road
transport and ignores other
areas. Specific concerns
include:
- Lack of discussion
around integrating rail
with shipping.
- Lack of promotion of
North Auckland Line
and Marsden Point Rail
Link.
- Addition of multi-modal
transport to ‘regional
aims and priorities’.
Infer from the submission that
the plan include greater
provision for non-road forms of
transport.
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the document.
RLTP
Resilience
Infer from the submission that
the plan should:
- Include provision for extra
funding to meet Northland’s
challenges.
- Oppose implementation of
62 T HPMV without extra
funding available.
The plan is framed in terms of
Northland’s challenges, painting a
strategic picture of needing more
funding. Plan projects include
packages to enhance network
resilience. HPMV is Government
policy and the plan recognises that
larger loads as well as having
benefits can create a resilience
issue.
RLTP
Electric cars
Have more suitably placed
charging stations through the
region.
Stronger policy on electric vehicles
has been included in the plan.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Concern over roading
resilience:
- Believes that
challenges of
typography and
weather patterns
should make extra
funding available.
- Strongly opposes any
implementation of 62
Tonne HPMV in
Northland and
questions why this is
under ‘resilience’ in the
plan.
Benefits of electric vehicles
raised. Concern that there
is only one rapid electric
car charger in Northland.
Concern over climate
change and resilience.
Development and
supportive infrastructure
should not occur where it is
likely to be susceptible to
sea level rise.
The strategic outcome ‘A
sustainable transport system
…’needs to be amended to
reflect climate change,
development and infrastructure
in vulnerable areas.
The document frames climate
change in terms of resilience to
extreme weather events.
301. Kate Moroney
302. Gordon Bonetti Far North Transport
Lobby
302. Gordon Bonetti Far North Transport
Lobby
303. E.A. Gaskin
304. David Lourie
Resilience
Need for better land use and
infrastructure planning – for
example the Marsden Point rail
route – and recognition that high
hazard areas are unsuitable for
infrastructure development.
RLTP
Travel
Choice
Support for non car modes
of transport.
No specific changes sought.
RLTP
Speed Limits
Refer to relief sought
Seeks that speed limits on
beaches be phased out –
reasons give in submission.
304. David Lourie
304. David Lourie
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Several initiatives are underway for
public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
In terms of roading resilience, high
risk areas and corridors have been
identified in the RLTP and funding
has been put forward for a network
resilience package.
Any development proposed in high
hazard areas would have to
demonstrate resilience through the
resource consent process and
comply with district plan rules.
Support noted – the plan includes
policies and funding for walking,
cycling and there is a stronger
policy emphasis on rail. The
Council is also funding several
public transport initiatives around
the region.
As speed limits are set by road
controlling authorities, this
submission has been forwarded to
these bodies for comment.
Page 56
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Request to include all forms
of non-motorised transport,
specifically horse-riding.
They make a number of
suggestions where horseriding is given greater
recognition.
Elevate the importance of horseriding alongside walking and
cycling.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Supports the replacement
of the two one way bridges
on SH12 near Matakohe.
Not Stated
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Supports the replacement
of the two one way bridges
on SH12 near Matakohe.
Not Stated
RLTP
Local
Roading
Would like this issue to be
addressed.
RLTP
Safety
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Rail
Entrances on SH12 on
Pakia Hill, Omapere onto
Te Hunoke Rd. The
entrance is narrow and bad
draining ditches erode the
gravel road.
Concern for tight corners
and 100kph speed limit in
the Omapere area. Also
issue with narrow
footpaths/lack of footpaths
where the speed limit is
100kph.
Patchwork on secondary
roads when main roads are
unusable due to flooding or
accidents.
Empty rail lines and full
roads with heavy freight.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concerned of unreliable
travel times due to bridge
safety.
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
Concern over Matakohe
bridges.
Wants realignment to be
planned for future demand. Build
a road to eliminate the hill climb.
RLTP
Other
Not stated.
RPTP
Other
RLTP
Other
RPTP
Other
RLTP
Kaeo Bridge
Supports submissions
made by Te Puna Kaitiaki
oo Rawene and Hokianga
Health Enterprise Trust in
their Entirety.
Supports submissions
made by Te Puna Kaitiaki
oo Rawene and Hokianga
Health Enterprise Trust in
their Entirety.
Submissions made at
hearings will be made on:
Part 1: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2, 2.1,
2.2, 2.3. Part 2: 5. RPTP.
Submissions made at
hearings will be made on:
Part 1: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4. Part 2:
2.1. Part 3: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,
3.7
Concerns over sharp steel
protruding from SH10 Kaeo
one lane bridge and
congestion.
305. Johanna
Peacock
306. Doug Blaxall
307. Kim Greaves
308. Anne Gambrill
308. Anne Gambrill
309. Clifton Knight
309. Clifton Knight
310. Kaipara District
Council
Support for Section 1.2
(Key Challenges and
Opportunities) and Section
1.3 (national and regional
priorities) and Section 2.1
(Economic Productivity)
and Section 2.2 (Safety)
and Section 2.3 (Travel
Choice). Retain
See relief sought.
310. Kaipara District
Council
311. Graham Taylor
312. Albert and
Gladys Russel
313. Stacey NathanTanner
313. Stacey NathanTanner
314. Charles Nathan
314. Charles Nathan
315. Bruce Mills
Change requested by
submitter
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
Policies on walking and cycling
have been expanded to include
other non-motorised users (such as
equestrians). This fits with the
plan’s strategic outcomes that ‘all
road users are safe on Northland’s
roads’ and that ‘our people have
transport choices to access jobs,
recreation and community facilities’
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This has been referred to the NZTA
for further comment.
Speed limits on SH12 (northern
side of the hill) from the lay by or
Te Hunoke or Newtons Road
reduced to 70-80kph from
100kph (similar to Ruawai).
This has been referred to the NZTA
for further comment.
Believes the region needs to
access its fair share of Road
Taxes to attend requirements.
This point is noted.
Would like the plan to include
greater emphasis of rail to take
freight off roads
Retain these sections. Retain
the following specifically
- Matakohe Bridges
- ‘T’ in the South.
- 4 laning to Auckland
- Upgrading of Mangakahia
Rd
A stronger emphasis on rail has
been included in the document.
Consider listing the PaparoaOakleigh route separately rather
than being aggregated into all
other projects under ‘enhanced
network resilience’ on page 33
and 34 (Appendix 1)
Wants realignment of SH12 to
bypass the Matakohe bridges.
Replace the two bridges
This has been referred to NZTA for
further comment.
These sections have been retained.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
Refer to Te Puna Kaitiaki oo
Rawene and Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust submissions.
Not Stated
Refer to Te Puna Kaitiaki oo
Rawene and Hokianga Health
Enterprise Trust submissions
Not Stated
No further information received.
Not Stated
No further information received.
Infer from the submission that
the Kaeo Bridge should be
replaced.
Kaeo bridge has been included in
the plan as a project with a priority
rating of 4.
Page 57
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
RLTP
Congestion
RLTP
Resilience
RLTP
Matakohe
Bridges
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
RLTP/
RPTP
Resilience
315. Bruce Mills
315. Bruce Mills
316. Ralph and Karen
Weber
317. Lynda Grieve
318. Ross Clark
Summary of submission
Waipapa roundabout is a
priority with high
congestion.
Concern over State
Highway resilience.
Concern over Matakohe
bridges. Submitter feels
they are inadequate for
type and flow of traffic (milk
tankers, logging trucks,
buses, campervans, and
coaches.
Submitter lives in Kaitaia.
Lack of available transport
is an issue for retiree’s.
Submitter feels the councils
proposals are very road
transport focussed but
there is a need for a ‘plan
B’ for future concerns
including climate change
and peak oil.
Change requested by
submitter
Infer from the submission that a
roundabout is needed at
Waipapa.
Have flood markers on flood
prone roads – have depth
markings on them. Make a rule
not allowing driving through
water 15 inches deep.
Wants replacement and
realignment of road/bridges.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Considers the region generally
needs a Plan B with input from
communities.
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This project is included in the
RLTP.
This has been referred to the
RCA’s for comment.
Provision of $22m has been made
in the Regional Land Transport
Plan for the Matakohe Bridge
project with a Priority Rating of 7.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
A stronger emphasis on electric
vehicles and rail has been included
in the RLTP. The RLTP also
includes policy and funding for
walking and cycling.
The RPTP details public transport
planning initiatives over the next 10
years.
In addition, several initiatives are
underway for public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
RLTP
Dust
Mitigation
Submitter has concerns
over dust and health risks
from Te Tii Road opposite a
school.
Would like to know how much
and if possible it would cost to
seal the Te Tii Road.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the need for local
bus service with help to
fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
319. June HeiHei
320. John Kenferdine
Councils are currently prioritising
sealing on the basis of the
approach minimising the harmful
effects of dust on human health (i.e.
the approach layed out in the dust
mitigation framework). It is noted
that NZTA have provided a 22%
funding increase in local road
operating and maintenance
investment to enable localised dust
mitigation measures. This matter
has been forwarded to FNDC for
comment.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 58
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Change requested by
submitter
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like bus services to
stay as they are.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports Pukenui Thursday
Bus – wants it to continue
with no change in the fare
(would be cheaper to go by
car if it increased)
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Hopes the Ahipara to
Kaitaia bus service will
continue
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports bus about Kaitaia
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Bus service is vital for
hospital services, workers
and shopping.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Not
Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports the bus service
because people are heavily
reliant. Would like to see
more.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
A visitor from Austria –
appreciates the bus
service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
322. John Ogilvy
323. Phillip Henare
324. Barbara Plank
325. Barney Dawson
327. Reg Walker
328. Ute Hinterleithner
Summary of submission
RPTP
321. Violet Scurrah
326. Dianne Davis
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
No information supplied
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 59
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service..
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports Kaitaia Busabout
service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Refer to relief sought
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
329. Awhina Tana
330. Lindsay
Matthews
331. Deanna Davis
332. Alexsis
Thompson Fona-Toy
333. Melody Anderson
334. Saint Wharewera
335. Sally Hale
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 60
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
RPTP
336. Gary Nichol
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Summary of submission
Refer to relief sought
Change requested by
submitter
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service. Need
to introduce gold card.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support fixed rate by NRC
to help fund Busabout
Kaitaia and Mangonui.
Would like to see more transport
services available in all
communities. The regional
council continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Happy with Busabout
service in Ahipara – wants
continuation with no
changes.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
337. Craig Wattan
338. Jon Earnshaw
339. Samantha
Spafford
340. Alan Baigent
341. Ibranheem
Davan
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
There is currently a moratorium on
SuperGoldCard funding. The
moratorium will be lifted on 1
September 2015, meaning that new
services will be eligible.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Several initiatives are underway for
public transport:
- Through the Northland Long
Term Plan 2015-2025 a bus
service is currently being
trialled in the mid-north.
- A mid-north bus service has
also been recognised in the
RPTP as a potential future
operating unit, dependant on
the outcome of this trial.
- Separate to this, NRC are
trialling an Opononi/Omapere
service to Kaikohe.
- Additionally through the
Northland Long Term Plan
2015-2025, BusAbout Kaitaia
will also continue to be funded
by NRC.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 61
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town. NRC
should fund the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Wishes to keep the
Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports NRC funding of
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
Not Stated
Cheaper travel
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Sees convenience in
Kaitaia Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Continue Kaitaia Busabout.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
342. Ngaire
Tahurigrangi
343. James Anderson
344. Toni Anderson
345. Glen Anderson
346. Nikora Paparoa
Grave
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Comment is noted.
347. Haupai Creach
348. Eileen Ratcliffe
349. Trey Subritzky
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 62
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Wishes to keep the
Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports people who do
not drive and rely on public
transport – increase the
frequency.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Definitely need to keep the
bus service as important
facilities are out of town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter feels public
transport is a life line for
people who live in Ahipara,
Doubtless Bay with no
private transport. Support
its continuation with no
change.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Feels shifting stores out of
town requires the need for
public transport.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter feels Busabout
service is a good
alternative to private cars –
hours are suitable for
schools
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
350. Joanne Shanks
351. Margaret Burke
352. Susan Cusack
353.Margaret Corbett
354. Julie Pengelly
355. Arron Sawers
356. Alistair Kelly
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 63
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports targeted rate for
Busabout Kaitaia as it
brings clients to town.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Travelling from Mangonui
to Kaitaia is easy.
Submitter supports the
targeted rate to continue
the service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Private transport is
unaffordable and therefore
need for public transport.
Since a lot of pensioners
use it, it needs to continue.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports local bus services
– positive feedback.
(Busabout Kaitaia)
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports the funding of the
Busabout Kaitaia as they
feel the town needs it for
elderly and youth to
participate and have
independence and
employment.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would be happy for a rates
donation target and wants
the Busabout service to
continue
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support targeted rate being
used to support bus
service. Low socio
economic region welcomes
any assistance to help
elderly and job seekers.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
357. Lindsay White
358. Harlan Cox
359. Walter Hoani
360. Lynette Malone
361. Toni McMahon
364. Craig Palatchie
365. Peter Hill
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 64
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Helpful for elderly
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports Busabout service
but know others who rely
on it and would not want to
lose it.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports local bus service
as a lot of people find it
difficult to run private
vehicles. Bus service helps
travel between
communities. (Ahipara to
Kaitaia, Doctors and
shopping).
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports Busabout where
no other means of
transport. Helps reduce
carbon footprint.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support NRC funding
Kaitaia Busabout service.
Helpful for retired people.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support Kaitaia Busabout
service as submitter knows
clients rely on public
transport.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
362. Rosina Petera
363. Lyn McDonald
366. Paul Hansen
367. Laura
Posinkovich
368. Foy Beazley
369. Lyndelle
Boniface
370. Sandra
McDonald
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 65
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter knows
employees rely on the
Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
Not Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
371. Lynda Perry
372. Jo Marsden –
The Warehouse
373. Dean Smith
374. Jane Noble
375. Margaret Hooper
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
No information supplied.
376. Adrian Haggard
377. Andrew
MacGiver
378. Adrienne
Harrison
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 66
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
379. Tamo Martin
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
Not
Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service with
subsidy.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Submitter does not support
Busabout but is happy to
subsidise with rates.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Not
Stated
Not Stated
Submitter needs NRC
support
Not Stated
380. Waikarere
Gregory
381. Yvonne Haimona
382. Glorid Larkins
383. Mary Graham
384. Etana Heka
385. Debbie McCabe
386. Zivka Ristich
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
No information supplied.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Comment is noted.
Page 67
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Would
like to see more transport
options
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Supports the Pak’n’save
bus (in Kaitaia). It is the
only affordable transport
available for the
community.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support the Pukenui Bus
on Thursdays and like to
see it continue.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
387. Peter Slavin
389. Debbera Morgan
390. Felicity Heka
391. Maureen Rehu
392. Sonya Faithful
393. Allison Carlier
394. Pauline Ogilvy
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 68
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
395. Jackson Chan
396. Cherry Chu
397. Thomas Matiu
398. Harold Hamlin
399. Jackie Simkils
400. Marilyn Reid
401. John Somerville
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 69
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service but
believes the fare should be
raised.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
402. Jenny Oxenham
403. Nina Tipene
404. Barry Ansell
405. Jay-Te Morgan
406. Anne Urlich
407. Marko Dracevich
408. Joy Walker
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 70
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
Not Stated
Not Stated
Not Stated
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
409. Isabelita Tual
410. Monique Morey
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
No information supplied.
411. Peter Walters
412. Andrew Parker
413. Leona Job
414. Bevin Beazley
415. Shirley Matthews
416. Haki Matthews
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 71
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Feels a
timetable change would
attract more people
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Review timetable to attract more
people.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
417. Ian Swindells
418. Lucia Haines
419. John Haines
420. R Posinkovich
421. Alan Robson
422. Trudy Crerar
423. Cameron
McCaskill
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 72
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Summary of submission
Change requested by
submitter
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
424. Jasmine Marino
425. Anna-May Horne
426. Patricia
Robertson
427. Rebecca Ranum
428. John Stephens
429. Dawn Pearce
430. Erica Whyte
Subject
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 73
Regional Land Transport Plan 2015-2021 and
Regional Public Transport Plan 2015-2025
Guide to Response/Action Taken on Submissions
Submitters name
and number
RLTP/
RPTP
Subject
Summary of submission
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Would like to see
continuation of Kaitaia
Busabout service. Support
NRC funding. Feels bus
route needs extending.
That the regional council
continue to support the
BusAbout Kaitaia service.
Consideration given to
extending routes.
431. Gilda Brown
432. Heather
Armstrong
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Generally support strategic
freight concept.
No relief sought.
RLTP
Plan
Direction
Support concept of a link to
Paihia from Kerikeri.
No relief sought
RLTP
Project
Refer to relief sought.
Wishes the Waipapa roundabout
to be progressed.
RLTP
Walking and
Cycling
Concern over promoting
cycling on roads which may
be dangerous.
No specific relief sought.
RLTP
Kaeo Bridge
Consider an upgrade to Kaeo
Bridge
RLTP
Local
Roading
RLTP
Other
Submitter provides
evidence on Kaeo Bridge
and believes it should be
improved to help prevent
flooding and safety.
Concern over drains and
flood gates on SH10
(bottom of Whangaroa
Harbour). Evidence
provided in submission.
Submitter wants NRC to
build relationships with Iwi
authorities.
RLTP
Other
Concerns for lack of climate
change plans for future.
Would like to see rail lines and
cycle friendly roads introduced
to help with a renewable
powered network.
RPTP
BusAbout
Kaitaia
Support Busabout Kaitaia
Retain this service.
434. Ian Hayes
434. Ian Hayes
434. Ian Hayes
434. Ian Hayes
434. Ian Hayes
434. Ian Hayes
435. Cathrine
Murupaenga – Ikeun
435. Cathrine
Murupaenga – Ikeun
435. Cathrine
Murupaenga – Ikeun
Change requested by
submitter
Guide to response/action taken
by Council, through the Regional
Transport Committee
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Extension of routes may occur if
there is demand.
Comment is acknowledged.
Comment is acknowledged. The
Waipapa-Kerikeri growth triangle is
considered to be an important local
priority although a potential link
between Paihia and Kerikeri could
be a future project.
This project is included in the RLTP
with a priority rating of 3.
The plan does not promote cycling
on roads per se. Any development
of a cycling route will need to take
into account safety concerns.
Kaeo Bridge has been included in
the plan with a priority rating of 4 at
a cost of $7 million.
Consider providing funding to
adequately maintain these
assets.
This submission has been referred
to NZTA for a response
No specific relief.
NRC has recently established a
Tangata Whenua Advisory
Committee to work on jointprojects.
A higher prominence towards
providing for electric vehicles has
been included in the plan. The plan
includes policy direction and project
funding addressing walking and
cycling.
This matter was addressed through
the Northland Regional Council
Long Term Plan 2015-2025. As part
of the deliberations on that plan, it
was recorded that there was a large
number of submissions in support
for the continuation of this service
made through the RPTP
consultation. The Council therefore
approved the continuation of the
targeted transport rate for this
service.
Page 74