Node Buffer Size in Intermittently Connected Mobile Wireless Networks with Infrastructure Support Tuo Yu Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Outline Introduction Motivations Objectives Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 2 Motivation Under certain constraints, wireless networks are only intermittently connectivity: A complete path from the source to the destination does not exist all the time. Intermittently connectivity requires adequate node buffer, even with infinite channel capacity and processing speed. Packets have to be stored in the node temporarily if its next neighbors are inactive. 3 Motivation Initial work has been done by Yuanzhong Xu: the lower bound for buffer occupation in static random wireless networks is ( n ) or (1) , according to the probability for the node to be inactive. How about the buffer size in mobile wireless networks with infrastructure support such as base stations ? 4 Objectives We focus on node buffer occupation in mobile wireless networks with intermittent connectivity and base stations: 1.What is the relationship between the buffer requirement, network size and the number of BSs? 2.Is it necessary to apply infrastructure support ? 5 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 6 Model and Assumption – I/VI Network Model: We assume that the size of the network is L L ,with constant node density . Then we have L ( n ) . Locations of nodes follows uniform distribution . Direct Links: Each node covers a disk shaped area with radius r. Two nodes have a direct link if and only if they overlap. 7 Model and Assumption – II/VI Mobility Model : Time is slotted, slot length: The location of each node changes with different time slots. The mobility is independent and identically distributed(i.i.d.). Base Station Model : Base Stations are fixed in the network uniformly with number of m . The network is divided into m cells. All the BSs are connected with wire. Model and Assumption – III/VI Assumption on Node Density: There exists a giant cluster in the network. The size of it goes to infinite when L . The giant cluster still exists in mobile networks, but it would be various with different time slots. 9 Model and Assumption – IV/VI Node inactivity – Each node switch between active state and inactive state: States of each nodes would be changed among time slots. The probability to be active is for all nodes. States of different nodes are i.i.d. 10 Model and Assumption – V/VI Traffic Pattern of Connected Nodes – Random Unicast Each source messages to a single destination in constant rate. Transmission is in multi-hop. Since the transmission rate is constant, the size of one packet transmitted in a single time slot is in the constant order. 11 Model and Assumption – VI/VI Buffering In each hop, if the transmitter or the receiver is inactive, the messages should be buffered in the transmitter until both are active. Assumption on Capacity and Processing speed Channel capacity is large enough to be viewed as infinity, compared to the actual utilization. Node processing speed is also infinite, compared to the state-switching frequency. 12 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 13 Percolation of Active Nodes Active nodes density: p Threshold for probability of inactivity: pc ( ) c Supercritical Case: p pc ( ) active giant exists in each time slot Subcritical Case: p pc ( ) no active giant in each time slot 14 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer size in mobile network without BSs Subcritical Case Supercritical Case Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 15 Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Subcritical Case – I/IV Two-hop transmission: One relay node is needed to transmit a single packet. The transmission is divided into two steps. In step 1, each packet is transmitted by the source to a close-by relay node. In step 2, a packet is handed off to its destination if the relay node is close by. Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Subcritical Case – II/IV Subcritical case: Buffer Size : ( n) Delay of step1: n 1 (2 r )2 p 2 L2 (2r ) 2 p 2 n1 n P( step1) 1 ( ) ~ 1 e L2 1 e (2 r )2 p 2 const (n ) 1 Tdelay ( step1) const (n ) 1 ln( ) 1 P( step1) 17 Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Subcritical Case – III/IV Delay of step2: P( step 2) (2r ) p 2 2 L 2 1 ( ) n 1 Tdelay ( step 2) ( n ) n ln( ) n 1 Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Subcritical Case – IV/IV Assume that in every time slot each relay node can carry only one packet. The number of packets one relay node would carry in one period: L2 (2r )2 p 2 n1 (1 ( ) ) (n) (n) 2 L One period: The length of time while a relay node carries one package. Since the size of one packet is constant, the average buffer size of one node is: SMsub (n) (1) (n) Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer size in mobile network without BSs Subcritical Case Supercritical Case Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 20 Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Supercritical Case – I/V Multi-hop transmission Step1: Packets are transmitted from source to all the relay nodes that are in the same cluster in every time slot. Step2: As long as any of the relay nodes (or the source itself) and destination node are in the active giant, the packet will be sent to the destination directly. Then all the buffers will be released. Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Supercritical Case – II/V Supercritical case: p pc ( ) Buffer Size : (1) The work of Xu has proved that the number of relay nodes nr in one time slots follows: P(nr N ) ( N 1)e N where and are constant. The inequality means that nr is finite and independent from n. Assume that the time taken to reach step2 is Tr , then the expect number of relay nodes at the end of transmission is E (nT ) (nr 1)Tr Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Supercritical Case – III/V The expect number of Tr should satisfy: E (Tr ) 1 1 ln( ) 1 pr where pr donates the probability that any of the relay nodes and the destination node are in the active giant at the same p time slot. According to the theory of percolation, pr 1 (1 pG p 2 ) nT 1 pG is the probability for one node to be in the active giant, which is constant when and p do not change with n. Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Supercritical Case – IV/V The expect number of Tr should satisfy: 1 E (Tr ) 1 ln( ) 1 pr 2 nT 1 p 1 (1 p p ) r G Tr E ( n ) ( n 1) T r This is a transcendental equation set, which will have positive solutions of nr and Tr . Since all the coefficient of the equations are independent from n, (nr 1)T is also independent from n. Then we have E (nT ) (1) . r Buffer size in mobile network without BSs -Supercritical Case – V/V Then we draw the conclusion that the buffer size needed at supercritical case is: S M sup er (1) (n) E (nT ) (1) n This result means that at the supercritical case, the buffer occupied at each node is at constant order. Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer size in mobile network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion 26 Buffer size in mobile network with BSs – I/V Transmission Scheme This scheme can be used in both subcritical and supercritical case. Three steps are taken to finish the transmission from u to v. Step1: u→relay node→BS Step2: BSs wired link Step3: BS→relay node→v 27 Buffer size in mobile network with BSs – II/V Transmission Scheme Step1: u→relay node→BS The transmission follow the same scheme as that in the network without BS at subcritical case. The only different is that the destination of normal node is BS. According to the analysis above, the sum of the buffer size occupied in the cell n is (( ) 2 ) . m 28 Buffer size in mobile network with BSs – III/V Transmission Scheme Step2: BSs wired link Once the packet reaches the BS, it is transmitted to another BS in the cell which includes the destination node. Since the number of normal nodes that are connected to one BS is 2 n (2 r ) p (1) 2 m n/m Then the bandwidth needed would be constant, so there is no need to take the limit of bandwidth into account. 29 Buffer size in mobile network with BSs – IV/V Transmission Scheme Step3: BS→relay node→v Step 3 is actually reverse to step 1. So we directly reach the conclusion that the sum of the buffer size occupied in the cell n 2 is (( ) ) . m 30 Buffer size in mobile network with BSs – V/V Occupied Buffer Size : n m S MB n 2 n 2 m m n n m 2 m This result implies that the average occupied buffer size in the network is in inverse proportion to the number of BSs. 31 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion Feasibility of Base Stations Base Stations with Changeable Radius Other Achievements 32 Discussion -Feasibility of Base Stations Mobile network without BSs: Subcritical: ( n) Supercritical: 1 Mobile network with BSs: mn The conclusion show us that in subcritical case, the application of BSs will decrease the buffer size needed. If the number of BSs is in the same order of n, the buffer size will be in the constant order, which is a good result. However, in supercritical case it seems that there is no need to apply BSs to cut down occupied buffer size, because the existence of active giant ensures that the buffer size in need is in the constant order. 33 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion Feasibility of Base Stations Base Stations with Changeable Radius Other Achievements 34 Discussion -Base Stations with Changeable Radius -I/II In the analysis above, we assume that the radius of BSs is r, which is the same as that of normal nodes. What if the radius of BSs is changeable? Assume that the radius of BSs is R . To take the limit of bandwidth into account, the maximum number of nodes that are connected to a BS is limited to k . The analysis is similar to that above. The result is : S MBR n n / m ( R r ) 2 (2r ) 2 m 1 ln( 1n/m ) 1 p 2 n / mk n / m ( R r )2 1 ln( n/nm/ mk ) 35 Discussion -Base Stations with Changeable Radius -II/II SMBR 1 ln( n/nm/ mk ) According to the result, when k is in the constant order, the occupied buffer size is still n , which is independent of R. m When k is in the order of • When R R 2 , the result is S MBR , the buffer size in need is S n m 1 n/ m ln n/m ( Rr )2 MBR 1 . • When R 1 , the buffer size in need is still SMBR mn . 36 Outline Introduction Model and Assumption Percolation of Active Nodes Buffer Size in Mobile Network without BSs Buffer Size in Mobile Network with BSs Discussion Feasibility of Base Stations Base Stations with Changeable Radius Other Achievements 37 Discussion -Other Achievements Subcritical Case Static Wireless Networks (Yuanzhong Xu) n Static Wireless Networks with BSs Mobile Wireless Networks Mobile Wireless Networks with BSs Mobile Wireless Networks with BSs(changeable radius)(channel limit: k) Supercritical Case 1 n m n m n 1 mn mn 1 ln( n/nm/ mk ) 1 ln( n/nm/ mk ) 38 Thank you ! The Calculation of Buffer Size in Static Networks with BSs -I/II Buffer in Intermittently Connected Network Presentation 40 The Calculation of Buffer Size in Static Networks with BSs -II/II Buffer in Intermittently Connected Network Presentation 41 The Distribution of Occupied Buffer Size Near Base Station Buffer in Intermittently Connected Network Presentation 42
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz