presentation slides - Optimus Education Blog

Webinar
MAT governance: changing structure to increase value for money
Lee Miller
Download this presentation from: [insert bitly link]
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Getting governance right
In this webinar, you will develop your understanding of:

why governance structures need to be reviewed in a multi-academy
trust

how to determine drivers for change

how to manage a move to a new governance structure

how to evidence the benefits of change and a new structure.
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Review – governance structure
Independent
Members
Elected
Board of
Directors
Stakeholder
representation
LGB (one for
each school)
Delegated authority
from LGB
LGB
committees (3
per school)
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Board
committees
Review – SLT structure
Accountable
officer
CEO
Lead
professional
EHT
EHT
EHT
Head of school
Secondary
academies
(Hub 1)
Primary
academies
(Hub 1)
Academies
(Hub 2)
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Define value for money
•
Economy: acquisition of resources in appropriate quality and quantity
at minimum cost - are we paying the right amount for it?
•
Efficiency: maximum output for any given set of inputs or the
minimum inputs for any given quantity and quality of goods and
services provided - are we doing it in the right way?
•
Effectiveness: extent to which any activity achieves the intended
results, which can be either quantitative or qualitative - are we doing
the right things?
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Review – drivers for change
Efficiency (are we doing it in the right way?)
• Duplication within the system
• Communication failures
• Over reliance on volunteers
Effectiveness (are we doing the right things?)
• No longer relevant to the SLT model
• Conflicts between trust and individual school
• Governance based on stakeholders rather than skills
Economy (are we paying the right cost for it?)
• Cost of meetings
• Cost for senior staff to attend meeting
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Investigate options
• June 2015: set up governance working group internally
• July 2015: commissioned an independent review of current
structures
• Sept 2015: working group identified key challenges and discussed
with consultant options
• Oct 2015: preferred option agreed
• Nov/Dec 2015: consultation with current governors
• Jan 2016: implementation
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Change management
Lewin’s 3 stages of change management
1. Unfreeze: focus on what is not working
2. Move: identify changes that can be made and how
3. Refreeze: focus on the improvements made
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
New governance structure
Independent
Members
Elected
Board of
Directors
Skill-based
appointments
RGB (One
for each
hub)
Stakeholder
representation
Academy Advisory
Board (1 per school)
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Board
committees
Impact statement
Efficiency (are we doing it in the right way?)
• Smaller numbers to communicate with
• Clear and simple schemes of delegation
Effectiveness (are we doing the right things?)
• Governors based on skills
• Governance model mirrors the organisational structure
Economy (are we paying the right amount for it?)
• Cost savings that this model has created
• Cost savings that can be generated by using regional governing bodies to
make decisions
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Impact on 16/17 budget plans
• Savings for clerking costs estimated at £15k per annum
• Savings for CEO/EHT/FD/principal’s time estimated at
£35k per annum
• Creation of hub-based staffing models for some roles are
estimated to save £150k per annum
• Creation of hub-based back offices – restructure already
happening and will save £200k per annum
• Efficiency savings from trust-led contracts and savings
target for £100k for 16/17 budget will be achievable
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER
Questions & Answers
Find more resources at:
http://my.optimus-education.com/knowledge-centre/leadership-governance
Follow us on Twitter:
@OptimusEd
DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER