References
A b o wd, J. an d F arb er, H. ( 1982) . J o b Q u e u e s a n d t h e U n i o n S t a t u s o f
Wo r k e r s , I n d u s t r i a l L a b o r a n d R e l a t i o n s R e v i e w, 3 5 ( 3 ) , 3 5 4 - 3 6 7
A h n , H. and P owe l, J. (199 3) . S e mi p a r a me t r i c E s t i ma t i o n o f C e n s o r e d
S e l e c t i o n M o d e l s w i t h a N o n p a r a me t r i c S e l e c t i o n M e c h a n i s m,
J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s, 5 8 ( 1 / 2 ) , 3 - 2 9
Althauser, R. and Rubin, D. (1971). T h e C o mp u t e r i s e d C o n s t r u c t i o n
o f a M a t c h e d S a mp l e , A m e r i c a n J o u r n a l o f S o c i o l o g y, 7 6 , 3 2 5 - 3 4 6
Amemiya,
T.
(1973).
Regression
Analysis
Whe n
the
Dependent
V a r i a b l e i s T r u n c a t e d N o r ma l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 1 , 9 9 7 - 1 0 1 6
Amemiya, T. (1980). Selection of Regressors, International Economic
R e v i e w, 2 1 , 3 3 1 - 3 5 4
Amemiya,
T.
(1984).
Tobit
Models:
A
Survey,
Journal
of
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 2 4 ( 1 / 2 ) , 3 - 6 1
Anderson, S., de Palma A. a n d T h i s s e , J - F . ( 1 9 9 2 ) . D i s c r e t e C h o i c e
Theory of Product Differentiation, MIT Press
A n g r i s t, J., Imbens, G . and Rubin, D. ( 1996a) . I d e n t i fi c a t i o n o f
Causal
Effects
Using
I n s t r u me n t a l
Variables,
Journal
of
the
American Statistical Association, 91 (434), 449-454
A n g r i s t , J . , I m b e n s , G . a n d R u b i n , D . ( 1 9 9 6 b ) . I d e n t i fi c a t i o n o f
C a u s a l E f f e c t s U s i n g I n s t r u me n t a l V a r i a b l e s : R e j o i n d e r , J o u r n a l o f
t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n, 9 1 ( 4 3 4 ) , 4 6 8 - 4 7 2
A s h e n f e l t e r , O . ( 1 9 7 8 ) . E s t i ma t i n g t h e E f f e c t o f T r a i n i n g P r o g r a ms o n
Earnings, Review of Economics and Statistics, 6 (1), 47-57
Barnow, B., Cain, C. and Goldberger, A. (1980). I s s u e s i n t h e
Analysis of Selectivity Bias, In E. Stromsdorfer and G. Farkas,
e d s . , E v a l u a t i o n S t u d i e s , V o l . 5 , S a g e P u b l i c a t i o n s , B e v e r l y H i l l s,
CA, 290-317
193
B a r r o n , J . , B e r g e r , M . a n d B l a c k D . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . How We ll Do We
Measure Training?, Journal of Labor Economics, 15 (3), 507-528
B a r r o n , J . , B l a c k , D . a n d L o we n s t e i n , M ( 1 9 8 9 ) . J o b M a t c h i n g a n d
On-The-Job Training, Journal of Labor Economics, 7 (1), 1-19
B a s s i , L . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . E s t i ma t i n g t h e E f f e c t o f T r a i n i n g P r o g r a ms w i t h
N o n r a n d o m S e l e c t i o n , R e v i e w o f E c o n o m i c s a n d S t a t i s t i c s, 6 6 ( 1 ) ,
36-43
Bera, A., Jarque, C. and Lee, L-F. (1984). T e s t i n g t h e N o r ma l i t y
A s s u mp t i o n s i n L i mi t e d D e p e n d e n t V a r i a b l e M o d e l s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l
E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 2 5 ( 3 ) , 5 6 3 - 5 7 8
Blundell, R. and Meghir, C. (1987). Bivariate Alternatives to the
T o b i t M o d e l , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s, 3 4 ( 1 / 2 ) , 1 7 9 - 2 0 0
B l u n d e l l , R . , M e g h i r , C . a n d H a m , J . ( 1 9 8 7 ) . U n e mp l o y me n t a n d
F e ma l e L a b o r S u p p l y , E c o n o m i c J o u r n a l , 9 7 , 4 4 - 6 4
B o y d , J . a n d M e l l m a n , J . ( 1 9 8 0 ) . The Ef f e c t of Fue l Ec onomy
S t a n d a r d s o n t h e U S A u t o mo t i v e M a r k e t : A H e d o n i c D e ma n d
A n a l y s i s , T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e s e a r c h , 14A, No 5- 6, 367- 378
Burtless, G. and Hausman J. (1978). The Effect of Taxation on Labor
S u p p l y : E v a l u a t i n g t h e G a r y N I T E x p e r i me n t , J o u r n a l o f P o l i t i c a l
Economy , 8 6 ( 6 ) , 1 1 0 3 - 1 1 3 0
B u r t l e s s , G . a n d O r r , L . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . A r e C l a s s i c a l E x p e r i me n t s N e e d e d f o r
Manpower Policy?, Journal of Human Resources, 21 (4), 606-639
B u r t l e s s , G . , ( 1 9 8 5 ) . A r e T a r g e t e d Wa g e S u b s i d i e s H a r mf u l ? E v i d e n c e
f r o m a Wa g e V o u c h e r E x p e r i me n t , I n d u s t r i a l a n d L a b o r R e l a t i o n s
R e v i e w, 3 9 ( 1 ) , 1 4 2 6 - 1 4 3 4
B u r t l e s s , G . , ( 1 9 9 5 ) . T h e C a s e f o r R a n d o mi z e d F i e l d T r i a l s i n
E c o n o mi c a n d P o l i c y R e s e a r c h , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m i c P e r s p e c t i v e s,
9 (2), 63-84
C a v e s, D . an d C h ristense n, L. ( 1980) . E c o n o me t r i c A n a l y s i s o f
R e s i d e n t i a l T i me - o f- U s e E l e c t r i c i t y P r i c i n g E x p e r i me n t s , J o u r n a l
of Econometrics, 14 (3), 287-366
194
C h a m b e r l a i n , G . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . A s y mp t o t i c E f f i c i e n c y i n S e mi - P a r a me t r i c
Models with Censoring, Journal of Econometrics, 32 (1), 189-218
Chesher, A. and Irish, M. (1987). Residual Analysis in the Grouped
D a t a a n d C e n s o r e d N o r ma l L i n e a r M o d e l , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s ,
34 (1/2), 33-62
C h u a , T . an d F u ller W. ( 1987) . A M o d e l f o r M u l t i n o mi a l R e s p o n s e
Error Applied to Labor Flows, Journal of the American Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 2 , 4 6 - 5 1
Clark, C. (1961). The Greatest of a Finite Set of Random Variables,
Operation Research, 9, 145-162
C o c h r a n , W . ( 1 9 6 5 ) . T h e P l a n n i n g o f O b s e r v a t i o n a l S t u d i e s o f H u ma n
Populations (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical
S o c i e t y, S e r . A. , 1 2 8 , 2 3 4 - 2 5 5
Cochran, W. and Rubin, D. (1973). C o n t r o l l i n g B i a s i n O b s e r v a t i o n a l
S t u d i e s , S a n k y h a, 3 5 , 4 1 7 - 4 4 6
C o s s l e t t , S . ( 1 9 8 3 ) . D i s t r i b u t i o n - F r e e M a x i mum L i k e l i h o o d E s t i ma t o r
o f t h e B i n a r y C h o i c e M o d e l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 1 ( 3 ) , 7 6 5 - 7 8 2
C o x , D . (1986). S t a t i s t i c s a n d C a u s a l I n f e r e n c e : C o mme n t , J o u r n a l o f
t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 1 ( 3 9 6 ) , 9 6 3 - 9 6 4
C r a g g , J . ( 1 9 7 1 ) . S o me S t a t i s t i c a l M o d e l s f o r L i mi t e d D e p p e n d e n t
V a r i a b l e s w i t h A p p l i c a t i o n s t o t h e D e ma n d f o r D u r a b l e G o o d s ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 3 9 ( 5 ) , 8 2 9 - 8 4 4
Crouchley, R. , O s k r o c h i , R . a n d B r a d l e y , S . ( 2 0 0 2 ) . E v a l u a t i n g t h e
I mp a c t o f M i s s i n g D a t a i n S o c i a l R e s e a r c h : S i mul a t i o n s a n d
Applications Using the BHPS and the NCDS, Proceedings of the
1 7 t h I n t e r n a t i o n a l W o r k s h o p o n S t a t i s t i c a l M o d e l l i n g , mi me o
C u r r i m , I . ( 1 9 8 2 ) . P r e d i c t i v e T e s t i n g o f C o n s u me n r C h o i c e M o d e l s N o t
Subject to Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, Journal of
Marketing Research, 19, 202-222
Dawi d, A. (1979). C o n d i t i o n a l I n d e p e n d e n c e i n S t a t i s t i c a l T h e o r y ,
J o u r n a l o f t h e R o y a l S t a t i s t i c a l S o c i e t y, S e r i e s B, 4 1 , 1 - 3 1
195
Dawid, A. ( 2 0 0 2 ) . I n f l u e n c e D i a g r a ms f o r C a u s a l M o d e l l i n g a n d
Inference, International Statistical Review, 70 (2), 161-189
Davidson, C. and Woodbury, S. (1993). T h e D i s p l a c e me n t E f f e c t o f
R e e mp l o y me n t B o n u s P r o g r a ms , J o u r n a l o f L a b o r E c o n o m i c s , 1 1
(4), 575-605
D e a t o n , A n g u s a n d I r i s h , M a r g a r e t ( 1 9 8 2 ) . S t a t i s t i c a l M o d e l s fo r
Zero
Expenditures
in
Household
Budgets,
Journal
of
Public
Economics, 23 (3), 59-80
Debreu, G. (1960). Review of D. Luce, Individual Choice Behavior: A
T h e o r e t i c a l A n a l y s i s , A m e r i c a n E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 5 0 , 1 8 6 - 1 8 8
Dempster, A., Laird, N. and Rubin, D. (1977). M a x i mum L i k e l i h o o d
fr o m I n c o mpl e t e D a t a V i a t h e E M A l g o r i t h m, J o u r n a l o f t h e R o y a l
S t a t i s t i c a l S o c i e t y, S e r i e s B, 3 9 , 1 - 3 8
D o m e ncich, T . an d McF adde n, D. ( 1975) . U r b a n T r a v e l D e ma n d : A
Behavioural Analysis, North Holland
D o n a l d, Step h en (1995). T w o - S t e p E s t i ma t i o n o f H e t e r o s c e d a s t i c
S a mpl e S e l e c t i o n M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s, 6 5 ( 2 ) , 3 4 7 380
Draper, N. and Smith, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd
e d i t i o n , Wi l e y , N e w Y o r k
Dubin, J. and McFadden, D. (1984). A n E c o n o me t r i c A n a l y s i s o f
Residential
Electric
Appliance
Holdings
and
C o n s u mp t i o n ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 2 ( 2 ) , 3 4 5 - 3 6 2
Dubin, J. and Rivers, D. (1993). E x p e r i me n t a l E s t i ma t e s o f t h e I mp a c t
o f Wa g e S u b s i d i e s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 5 6 ( 1 ) , 2 1 9 - 2 4 2
Durbin, J. (1954). Errors In Variables, Review of International
S t a t i s t i c a l I n s t i t u t e, 2 9 , 2 3 - 3 2
Fisher,
R.
and
Cornish,
E.
(1960).
The
percentile
Points
of
D i s t r i b u t i o n s H a v i n g K n o w n C u mul a n t s , T e c h n o m e t r i c s, 2 , 2 0 9 - 2 2 5
F e c h n e r , G . ( 1 8 6 0 ) . E l e me n t e d e r P s y c h o p h y s i k ( B r e i t k o p f a n d H a t e l ,
L e i p z i g , G e r ma n y )
196
F r a k e r , T . a n d M a y n a r d , R . ( 1 9 8 7 ) . T h e A d e q u a c y o f C o mpa r i s o n
G r o u p D e s i g n s f o r E v a l u a t i o n o f E mp l o y me n t - R e l a t e d P r o g r a ms ,
Journal of Human Resources, 22 (2), 194-227
Freedman, D. ( 1 9 9 7 ) . F r o m A s s o c i a t i o n t o C a u s a t i o n v i a R e g r e s s i o n ,
Advances in Applied Mathematics, 18, 59-110
Freedman, D. ( 2 0 0 2 ) . F r o m A s s o c i a t i o n t o C a u s a t i o n . S o me R e ma r k s
on the History of Statistics, In Stochastic Musings: Perspectives
from the Pioneers of the Late 20th Century, J. Panaretos eds,
L a w r e n c e E r l b a u m , USA
G a l l a n t , A . R . a n d N y c h k a , D . ( 1 9 8 7 ) . S e mi - N o n p a r a me t r i c M a x i mum
L i k e l i h o o d E s t i ma t i o n , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 5 ( 2 ) , 3 6 3 - 3 9 0
Garen, J. (1984). The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias
A p p r o a c h w i t h a C o n t i n u o u s C h o i c e V a r i a b l e , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 2
(5), 1199-1218
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1958). Threshold in Choice and the Theory of
Dema nd, E c o n o m e t r i c a, 2 6 ( 1 ) , 1 5 7 - 1 6 8
G e we k e ,
J.,
Keane,
M.
and
Runkle,
D.
(1994).
Alternative
C o mp u t a t i o n a l A p p r o a c h e s t o I nfe r e n c e i n t h e M u l t i n o mi a l P r o b i t
Model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 609-632
Ghidey, W., Lesaffre, E., Eilers, P. and Verbeke, G. (2002). P-spline
S moothing
for
R andom
Ef f e c ts
Distribution
E s t i ma t i o n ,
Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Statistical
M o d e l l i n g , mi me o
G l i l i c h e s , Z. ( 1 9 5 7 ) . S p e c i f i c a t i o n B i a s i n E s t i ma t e s o f P r o d u c t i o n
Functions, Journal of Farm Economics, 39, 8-20
G l y m o u r , ( 1 9 8 6 ) . S t a t i s t i c s a n d C a u s a l I n fe r e n c e : C o mme n t : S t a t i s t i c s
a n d M e t a p h y s i c s , J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n,
81 (396), 964-966
G o u r i e r o u x , C . , M o n f o r t , A . , R e n a ult, E. and Trognon, A. (1987).
Generalized Residuals, Journal of Econometrics, 34 (1/2), 5-32
197
G r a n g e r , C . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . S t a t i s t i c s a n d C a u s a l I n f e r e n c e : C o mme n t , J o u r n a l
o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 1 ( 3 9 6 ) , 9 6 7 - 9 6 8
Greenberg,
D.
E x p e r i me n t s ,
and
Shroder,
Madison,
M.
(1991).
Wisconsin,
Digest
Institute
of
of
the
Social
Research
on
P o v e t r y , U n i v e r s i t y o f Wi n s c o n s i n
G r e e n e , W . ( 1 9 8 1 ) . S a mp l e S e l e c t i o n B i a s a s a S p e c i f i c a t i o n E r r o r :
C omme nt, E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 9 ( 3 ) , 7 9 5 - 7 9 8
G r o n a u , R . ( 1 9 7 4 ) . Wa g e C o mpa r i s o n s - A s e l e c t i v i t y B i a s , J o u r n a l o f
P o l i t i c a l E c o n o m y, 8 2 ( 6 ) , 1 1 1 9 - 1 1 4 4
H a a v e l m o , T . ( 1 9 4 4 ) . T h e P r o b a b i l i t y A p p r o a c h i n E c o n o me t r i c s ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 1 2 ( 1 ) , S u p p l e me n t
H a j i v a s s i l i o u , V . a n d M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . T h e M e t h o d o f S i mu l a t e d
S c o r e s f o r t h e E s t i ma t i o n o f L D V M o d e l s , W o r k i n g P a p e r , L o n d o n
S c h o o l o f E c o n o m i c s , S u n t o r y T o y o t a , E c o n o me t r i c s
Hausman,
J.
(1978).
Specification
Tests
in
E c o n o me t r i c s ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 7 ( 6 ) , 1 2 5 1 - 1 2 7 2
H a u sman, J. an d McF ad de n, D. ( 1984) . S p e c i f i c a t i o n T e s t s f o r t h e
M u l t i n o mi a l L o g i t M o d e l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 2 ( 5 ) , 1 2 1 9 - 1 2 4 0
Hausman, J. and Wise, D. (1978). A Conditional Probit Model for
Qualitative Choice: Discrete Regions Recognizing Interdependence
a n d H e t e r o g e n e o u s P r e f e r e n c e s , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 6 ( 2 ) , 4 0 3 - 4 2 6
H a u s m a n , J . a n d W i s e , D . ( 1 9 7 9 ) . A t t r i t i o n B i a s i n E x p e r i me n t a l a n d
Panel
Data:
The
Gary
I n c o me
Maintenance
E x p e r i me n t ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 7 ( 2 ) , 4 5 5 - 4 7 3
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 7 4 ) . S h a d o w P r i c e s , M a r k e t Wa g e s a n d L a b o r S u p p l y ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 2 ( 4 ) , 6 7 9 - 6 9 4
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 7 8 ) . D u mmy E n d o g e n o u s V a r i a b l e s i n a S i mul t a n e o u s
E q u a t i o n S y s t e m, E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 6 ( 4 ) , 9 3 1 - 9 6 0
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 7 9 ) . S a mp l e S e l e c t i o n B i a s a s a S p e c i f i c a t i o n E r r o r ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 7 ( 1 ) , 1 5 3 - 1 6 1
198
Heckman, J. (1984). The X^2 Goodness of Fit Statistic for Models with
P a r a me t e r s E s t i ma t e d fr o m M i c r o d a t a , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 2 ( 6 ) , 1 5 4 3 1 548
Heckman, J. (1990a). Alternative Approaches to the Evaluation of
Social
P r o g r a ms :
E c o n o me t r i c
and
E x p e r i me n t a l
Methods,
B a r c e l o n a L e c t u r e, B a r c e l o n a
Heckman, J. (1990b). Varieties of Selection Bias, American Economic
R e v i e w, P a p e r s a n d P r o c e e d i n g s , 8 0 ( 2 ) , 3 1 3 - 3 1 8
Heckman, J. (1991a). Identifying the Hand of the Past: Distinguishing
S t a t e D e p e n d e n c e f r o m H e t e r o g e n e i t y , A m e r i c a n E c o n o m i c R e v i e w,
81 (1), 75-79
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 9 1 b ) . R a n d o mi z a t i o n a n d S o c i a l P o l i c y E v a l u a t i o n , I n
C. Manski and I. Garfinkel, eds., Evaluating Welfare and Training
P r o g r a m s , H a r v a r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , C a mbr i d g e , 2 0 1 - 2 3 0
Heckman,
J.
(1996a).
I n s t r u me n t a l
Identification
Variables,
Journal
of
of
Causal
the
Effects
American
Using
Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 9 1 ( 4 3 4 ) , 4 5 9 - 4 6 2
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 9 6 b ) . R a n d o mi z a t i o n a s a n I n s t r u me n t a l V a r i a b l e ,
Review of Economics and Statistics, 78 (2), 336-341
H e c k m a n , J . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . I n s t r u me n t a l V a r i a b l e s : A S t u d y o f I mp l i c i t
B e h a v i o r a l A s s u mp t i o n s i n O n e Wi d e l y U s e d E s t i ma t o r , J o u r n a l o f
H u m a n R e s o u r c e s, 3 2 ( 3 ) , 4 4 1 - 4 6 1
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1997). Matching As An
E c o n o me t r i c E v a l u a t i o n E s t i ma t o r , R e v i e w o f E c o n o m i c S t u d i e s, 6 5
(2), 261-294
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1998). Matching As An
E c o n o me t r i c E v a l u a t i o n E s t i ma t o r : E v i d e n c e f r o m E v a l u a t i n g a J o b
T r a i n i n g P r o g r a m, R e v i e w o f E c o n o m i c S t u d i e s , 6 4 ( 4 ) , 6 0 5 - 6 5 4
Heckman,
J.,
Ichimura,
Characterizing
H.,
Selection
Smith,
Bias
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 6 6 , 1 0 1 7 - 1 0 9 8
199
J.
and
Using
Todd,
P.
E x p e r i me n t a l
(1998).
Data,
H e c k m a n , J . a n d K o t z, J . ( 1 9 8 9 ) . C h o o s i n g A mo n g A l t e r n a t i v e
M e t h o d s o f E s t i ma t i n g t h e I mp a c t o f S o c i a l P r o g r a ms : T h e C a s e o f
Manpower
Training,
Journal
of
the
American
Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 4 ( 4 0 8 ) , 8 6 2 - 8 7 4
H e c k m a n , J . a n d K o t z, J . ( 1 9 8 9 ) . C h o o s i n g A mo n g A l t e r n a t i v e
M e t h o d s o f E s t i ma t i n g t h e I mp a c t o f S o c i a l P r o g r a ms : T h e C a s e o f
Manpower Training: Rejoinder, Journal of the American Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 4 ( 4 0 8 ) , 8 6 2 - 8 7 4
H e c k m a n , J . , L a L o n d e , R . , a n d S m i t h , J . ( 1 9 9 9 ) . T h e E c o n o mi c s a n d
E c o n o me t r i c s o f A c t i v e L a b o r M a r k e t P r o g r a ms , H a n d b o o k o f
Labor Economics, Volume 3, Ashenfelter, A. and D. Card, eds.,
A ms t e r d a m: E l s e v i e r S c i e n c e
Heckman,
J.
and
Robb,
R.
(1985a).
Alternative
Methods
for
E v a l u a t i n g t h e I mp a c t o f I n t e r v e n t i o n s : A n O v e r v i e w , J o u r n a l o f
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 3 0 ( 1 ) , 2 3 9 - 2 6 7
Heckman, J. and Sedlacek, G. (1985). Heterogeneity, Aggregation and
M a r k e t Wa g e F u n c t i o n s : A n E mp i r i c a l M o d e l o f S e l f - S e l e c t i o n i n
the Labor Market, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6), 1077-1125
H e c k m a n , J . a n d S m i t h , J . ( 1 9 9 3 ) . A s s e s s i n g t h e C a s e f o r R a n d o mi s e d
E v a l u a t i o n o f S o c i a l P r o g r a ms , I n K . J e n s e n a n d P . K . M a d s e n ,
eds., Measuring Labor Market Measures, Ministry of Labor,
C o p e n h a g e n , D e n ma r k
Heckman, J. and Smith, J. (1995). Assessing the Case for Social
E x p e r i me n t s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m i c P e r s p e c t i v e s , 9 ( 2 ) , 8 5 - 1 0 0
H e c k m a n , J . a n d S m i t h , J . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . E v a l u a t i n g t h e We l f a r e S t a t e , i n S .
S t r o m , e d . , E c o n o m e t r i c s a n d E c o n o mi c s i n t h e 2 0 t h C e n t u r y : T h e
Ragnar
Frisch
Centenary,
Cambridge
University
Press
for
E c o n o m e t r i c S o c i e t y M o n o g r a p h S e r i e s , C a m b r i d g e, C a mb r i d g e
University Press
200
Heckman, J. and Smith, J. (1999). The Pre-Program Earnings Dip and
t h e D e t e r mi n a n t s o f P a r t i c i p a t i o n i n a S o c i a l P r o g r a m: I mp l i c a t i o n s
f o r S i mpl e P r o g r a m E v a l u a t i o n S t r a t e g i e s , E c o n o m i c J o u r n a l
Heckman, J., Smith, J. and Clements, N. (1997). Making the Most
O u t o f P r o g r a mme E v a l u a t i o n s a n d S o c i a l E x p e r i me n t s : A c c o u n t i n g
for
Heterogeneity
in
Program
I mp a c t s ,
Review
of
Economic
Studies, 64 (4), 487-535
Heckman, J., Smith, J. and Taber, C. (1998). Accounting for
D r o p o u t s i n E v a l u a t i o n o f S o c i a l P r o g r a ms , R e v i e w o f E c o n o m i c s
and Statistics, 80 (1), 1-14
H e c k m a n , J . , T o b i a s , J . a n d V y t l a c i l , E . ( 2 0 0 0 ) . S i mpl e E s t i ma t o r s
f o r T r e a t me n t P a r a me t e r s i n a L a t en t V a r i a b l e F r a me w o r k w i t h a n
A p p l i c a t i o n t o E s t i ma t i n g t h e R e t u r n s t o S c h o o l i n g , W o r k i n g P a p e r
N o 7 9 5 0 , N a t i o n a l B e r e a u o f E c o n o m i c R e s e a r c h , C a mb r i d g e , M A
H e c k m a n , J . a n d V y t l a c i l , E . ( 1 9 9 9 ) . L o c a l I n s t r u me n t a l V a r i a b l e s a n d
Latent Variable Models for Identifying Research and Bounding
T r e a t me n t E f f e c t s , P r o c e e d i n g o f t h e N a t i n a l A c a d e m y o f S c i e n c e s,
96, 4730-4734
Heckman, J. and Vytlacil, E. (2000a). The Relationship Between
T r e a t me n t
P a r a me t e r s
Wi t h i n
a
Latent
Variable
F r a me w o r k ,
E c o n o m i c L e t t e r s, 6 6 , 3 3 - 3 9
H o d g e s, J. an d L eh mann , E. ( 1963) . E s t i ma t i o n o f L o c a t i o n B a s e d o n
Ranked Tests, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 598-611
Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference, Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 81 (3), 945-960
H o l l a n d , P . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . S t a t i s t i c s a n d C a u s a l I n fe r e n c e : R e j o i n d e r , J o u r n a l
o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 1 ( 3 ) , 9 4 5 - 9 6 0
Holland,
P.
(1989).
Choosing
A mo n g
Alternative
Methods
of
E s t i ma t i n g t h e I mp a c t o f S o c i a l P r o g r a ms : T h e C a s e o f M a n p o w e r
Training:
C o mme n t ,
Journal
A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 4 ( 4 0 8 ) , 8 7 5 - 8 7 7
201
of
the
American
Statistical
H o n o r e, B ., K yriazid ou , E . and Ur dy, C. ( 1997) . E s t i ma t i o n o f T y p e 3
Tobit
Models
Using
S y mme t r i c
T r i mmi n g
and
Pairwise
C o mpa r i s o n s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 7 6 ( 1 / 2 ) , 1 0 7 - 1 2 8
Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge University Press
f o r E c o n o m e t r i c S o c i e t y M o n o g r a p h S e r i e s, Cambridge, UK
Ichimura,
H.
(1993).
S e mi p a r a me t r i c
Least
Squares
(SLS)
and
We i g h t e d S L S E s t i ma t i o n o f S i n g l e - I n d e x M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 5 8 ( 1 ) , 7 1 - 1 2 0
I m b e n s , G . a n d A n g r i s t , J . ( 1 9 9 4 ) . I d e n t i fi c a t i o n a n d E s t i ma t i o n o f
L o c a l A v e r a g e T r e a t me n t E f f e c t s , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 6 2 ( 4 ) , 4 6 7 - 4 7 6
Ipsen,
J.
an d
Jern e,
N.
( 1944) .
Graphical
Evaluation
of
the
D i s t r i b u t i o n o f S ma l l E x p e r i me n t a l S e r i e s , A c t a P a t h o l o g i c a ,
M i c r o b i o l o g i c a e t I m m u n o l o g i c a S c a n d i n a v i c a, 2 1 , 3 4 3 - 3 6 1
Johnson,
N.
and
K o t z,
Z.
(1972).
Distributions
in
Statistics:
C o n t i n u o u s M u l t i v a r i a t e D i s t r i b u t i o n s , W i l e y , New York
K a l a c h e k , E . a n d R a i n e s , F . ( 1 9 7 0 ) . Labor Supply of Low Income
Wo r k e r s , T e c h n i c a l S t u d i e s , P r e s i d e n t ’ s C o m m i s s i o n o n I n c o m e
M a i n t e n a n c e P r o g r a m s, Wa s h i n g t o n , D C
K e a n e , M . , M o f f i t t , R . a n d R u n k l e , D . ( 1 9 8 8 ) . R e a l Wa g e s O v e r t h e
B u s i n e s s C y c l e : E s t i ma t i n g t h e I mp a c t o f H e t e r o g e n e i t y w i t h M i c r o
Data, Journal of Political Economy, 96 (6), 1232-1265
K e e l e y , M . , R o b i n s , P , S p i e g e l m an, R. and We st , R. ( 1978) . T h e
E s t i ma t i o n o f L a b o r S u p p l y M o d e l s U s i n g E x p e r i me n t a l D a t a , T h e
A m e r i c a n E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 6 8 ( 5 ) , 8 7 3 - 8 8 7
Klein,
R.
an d
S p ad y,
R.
( 1993) .
An
E ffi c i e n t
S e mi p a r a me t r i c
E s t i ma t o r o f t h e B i n a r y C h o i c e M o d e l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 6 1 ( 2 ) , 3 8 7 421
K o t z, S . , J o h n s o n , N . a n d C a m p e l l , B . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . E n c y c l o p e d i a o f
S t a t i s t i c a l S c i e n c e s , N e w Y o r k , Wi l e y
K y r i a zi d o u , E . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . E s t i ma t i o n o f a P a n e l D a t a S a mpl e S e l e c t i o n
M o d e l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 6 5 ( 6 ) , 1 3 3 5 - 1 3 6 4
202
LaLonde,
R.
(1986).
Evaluating
the
E c o n o me t r i c
Evaluations
of
T r a i n i n g P r o g r a ms w i t h E x p e r i me n t a l D a t a , A m e r i c a n E c o n o m i c
R e v i e w, 7 6 ( 4 ) , 6 0 4 - 6 2 0
L e e , L - F . ( 1 9 8 2 ) . S o me A p p r o a c h e s t o t h e C o r r e c t i o n o f S e l e c t i v i t y
Bias, Review of Economic Studies, 49 (3), 355-372
L e e , L - F . ( 1 9 8 3 ) . G e n e r a l i z e d E c o n o me t r i c M o d e l s w i t h S e l e c i v i t y ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 1 ( 2 ) , 5 0 7 - 5 1 2
L e e , L - F . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . T e s t s f o r t h e B i v a r i a t e N o r ma l D i s t r i b u t i o n i n
E c o n o me t r i c M o d e l s w i t h S e l e c t i v i t y , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 2 ( 4 ) , 8 4 3 8 63
L e e , L - F . ( 1 9 9 2 ) . S e mi p a r a me t e r i o c N o n l i n e a r L e a s t S q u a r e s E s t i ma t i o n
o f T r u n c a t e d R e g r e s s i o n M o d e l s , E c o n o m e t r i c T h e o r y, 8 , 5 2 - 9 4
L e e , L - F . ( 1 9 9 4 ) . S e mi p a r a me t r i c T w o - S t a g e E s t i ma t i o n o f S a mp l e
Selection Models Subject to Tobit Type Selection Rules, Journal of
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 6 1 ( 2 ) , 3 0 5 - 3 4 4
L e i b o wi t z, A . ( 1 9 7 8 ) . E d u c a t i o n o f t h e A l l o c a t i o n o f Wo me n ’ s T i me ,
In Carnegie Commission Essays on Education, Ed. T. Juster, New
Y o r k , N a t i o n a l B u r e a u o f E c o n o mi c R e s e a r c h
L e r m a n , S . a n d M a n s k i , C . ( 1 9 8 1 ) . O n t h e U s e o f S i mul a t e d
F r e q u a n c i e s t o A p p r o x i ma t e C h o i c e P r o b a b i l i t i e s , I n C . M a n s k i a n d
D. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with
E c o n o m e t r i c A p p l i c a t i o n s, M I T P r e s s
Leung, S-F. and Yu, S. (1996). O n t h e C h o i c e B e t w e e n S a mp l e
Selection and Two-Part Models, Journal of Econometrics, 72 (1/2),
107-128
L e wi s , H . G . ( 1 9 7 4 ) . C o mme n t s o n S e l e c t i v i t y B i a s e s i n Wa g e
C o mpa r i s o n s , J o u r n a l o f P o l i t i c a l E c o n o m y , 8 2 , 1 1 4 5 - 1 1 5 5
Lindley, D. (2002). Seeing and Doing: The Concept of Causation,
International Statistical Review, 70 (2), 191-214
203
L i o u k a s , S . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . T h r e s h o l d a n d T r a n s i t i v i t y i n S t o c h a s t i c C o n s u me r
C h o i c e : A M u l t i n o mi a l L o g i t A n a l y s i s , M a n a g e m e n t S c i e n c e , 3 0
(1), 110-122
L o u i s , T . ( 1 9 8 2 ) . F i n d i n g t h e O b s e r v e d I n f o r ma t i o n M a t r i x Whe n U s i n g
t h e E M A l g o r i t h m, J o u r n a l o f t h e R o y a l S t a t i s t i c a l S o c i e t y, S e r i e s
B , 44, 226-233
Lydall, H. (1968). The Structure of Earnings, Oxford, Clarenton Press
M a d d a l a , G . S . ( 1 9 8 3 ) . L i mi t e d D e p e n d e n t a n d Q u a l i t a t i v e V a r i a b l e s i n
E c o n o me t r i c s , C a m b r i d g e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s
M a d d a l a , G . S . ( 1 9 9 4 ) . E c o n o me t r i c M e h t o d s a n d A p p l i c a t i o n , V o l I ,
Economists of the Twentieth Century Series
M a n n i n g , W . e t a l ( 1 9 8 7 ) . H e a l t h I n s u r a n c e a n d t h e D e ma n d f o r
M e d i c a l C a r e : E v i d e n c e f r o m a R a n d o mi z e d E x p e r i me n t , The
A m e r i c a n E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 7 7 ( 3 ) , 2 5 1 - 2 7 3
Manning, W., Duan, N. and Rogers, W. (1987). M o n t e C a r l o E v i d e n c e
o n t h e C h o i c e B e t w e e n S a mpl e S e l e c t i o n M o d e l a n d T w o - P a r t s
M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s, 3 5 , 5 9 - 8 2
M a n s k i , C . ( 1 9 7 5 ) . M a x i mum S c o r e E s t i ma t i o n o f t h e S t o c h a s t i c
Utility Model of Choice, Journal of Econometrics, 3, 205-208
M a n s k i , C . ( 1 9 8 7 ) . S e mi p a r a me t r i c A n a l y s i s o f R a n d o m E f f e c t s L i n e a r
M o d e l s f r o m B i n a r y P a n e l D a t a , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 5 ( 2 ) , 3 5 7 - 3 6 2
M a n s k i , C . ( 1 9 8 9 ) . A n a t o my o f t h e S e l e c t i o n P r o b l e m, J o u r n a l o f
H u m a n R e s o u r c e s, 2 4 ( 3 ) , 3 4 3 - 3 6 0
M a n s k i , C . a n d L e r m a n , S . ( 1 9 7 7 ) . T h e E s t i ma t i o n o f C h o i c e
P r o b a b i l i t i e s fr o m C h o i c e - B a s e d S a mpl e s , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 5 ( 8 ) ,
1977-1988
M a n s k i , C . a n d M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 8 1 ) . A l t e r n a t i v e E s t i ma t o r s a n d
S a mpl e D e s i g n s f o r D i s c r e t e C h o i c e A n a l y s i s , I n C . M a n s k i a n d D .
McFadden,
eds.,
Structural
Analysis
of
Discrete
Data
E c o n o m e t r i c A p p l i c a t i o n s , M I T P r e s s , C a mbr i d g e , M A , 1 - 5 0
204
with
M a t zk i n , R . ( 1 9 9 2 ) . N o n p a r a me t r i c a n d D i s t r i b u t i o n - F r e e E s t i ma t i o n o f
the Binary Threshold Crossing and the Binary Choice Models,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 6 0 ( 2 ) , 2 3 9 - 2 7 0
M c C u llogh , R . and R ossi, P. ( 1994) . A n E x a c t L i k e l i h o o d A n a l y s i s o f
t h e M u l t i n o mi a l P r o b i t M o d e l , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 64, 207 240
McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of the Qualitative
Choice Behavior, In P. Zarembka, eds., Frontiers in Econometrics,
A c a d e m i c P r e s s, New York
M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 7 4 a ) . T h e M e a s u r e me n t o f U r b a n T r a v e l D e ma n d ,
Journal of Public Economics, 26, 303-328
M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 7 5 ) . E c o n o mi c A p p l i c a t i o n s o f P s y c o l o g i c a l C h o i c e
Models, Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, Working Paper
No
7519,
Institute
of
Transportation
Studies,
University
of
C a l i f o r n i a, B e r k e l e y
McFadden, D. (1976). Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey, Annals of
E c o n o m i c a n d S o c i a l M e a s u r e m e n t, 5 , 3 6 3 - 3 9 0
McFadden, D. (1978). Moddeling the Choice of Residential Location,
In A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars and J. Weibull, eds.,
Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, North Holland
M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 8 1 ) . E c o n o me t r i c M o d e l s f o r P r o b a b i l i s t i c C h o i c e , I n
C. Manski and D. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete
Data with Econometric Applications, Harvard University Press
McFadden, D. (1987). Regression Based Specification Tests for the
M u l t i n o mi a l L o g i t M o d e l , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 3 4 ( 1 ) , 6 3 - 8 2
M c F a d d e n , D . ( 1 9 8 9 ) . A M e t h o d o f S i mul a t e d M o me n t s f o r E s t i ma t i o n
o f D i s c r e t e R e s p o n s e M o d e l s Wi t h o u t N u me r i c a l I n t e g r a t i o n s ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 7 ( 4 ) , 9 9 5 - 1 0 2 6
205
McFadden,
D.
and
Forecasting
Reid,
From
F.
(1975).
Disaggregated
Aggregate
Behavioral
Travel
D e ma n d
Models,
In
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e s e a r c h R e c o r d : T r a v e l B e h a v i o r a n d V a l u e s, No
534, 24-37
McFadden, D. and Ruud, P. (1994). E s t i ma t i o n B y S i mu l a t i o n , R e v i e w
of Economics and Statistics, 76, 591-608
M c F a d d en, D . and T rain , K. ( 2000) . M i x e d M N L M o d e l s f o r D i s c r e t e
R e s p o n s e , J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 1 5 ( 5 ) , 4 4 7 - 4 6 0
McLachlan, G. and Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM Algorithm and
E x t e n s i o n s , W i l e y e d s . , New York
M e i l i j s o n , I . ( 1 9 8 9 ) . A F a s t I mp r o v e me n t t o t h e E M A l g o r i t h m o n i t s
O w n T e r ms , J o u r n a l o f t h e R o y a l S t a t i s t i c a l S o c i e t y, S e r i e s B, 5 1
(1), 127-138
Melino, A. (1982). Testing for Selection Bias, Review of Economic
Studies, 49 (1), 151-153
Meng, X. and Rubin, D. (1991). U s i n g E M t o O b t a i n A s y mp t o t i c
V a r i a n c e - C o v a r i a n c e M a t r i c e s : T h e S E M A l g o r i t h m, J o u r n a l o f t h e
American Statistical Association, 86 (3), 899-909
Mills, J. (1926). Table of the Ratio: Area to Bounding Ordinate for
A n y P o r t i o n o f N o r ma l C u r v e , B i o m e t r i c a, 1 8 , 3 9 5 - 4 0 0
M o f f i t , R . ( 1 9 9 6 ) . I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f C a u s a l E f f e c t s U s i n g I n s t r u me n t a l
V a r i a b l e s , J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n, 9 1
(434), 462-465
M o l e n b ergh s, G., B ijnens, L. and Shaw, D. ( 1997) . L i n e a r M i x e d
M o d e l s a n d M i s s i n g D a t a , S p r i n g e r , New York
N e l s o n , F . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . E fficienc y of the Two- St e p E s t i ma t o r f o r M o d e l s
w i t h E n d o g e n o u s S a mp l e S e l e c t i o n , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 2 4
(1/2), 181-196
N e we y , W . ( 1 9 9 0 ) . S e mi p a r a me t r i c E f f i c i e n c y B o u n d s , J o u r n a l o f
A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 5 ( 2 ) , 9 9 - 1 3 5
206
N e we y , W . a n d P o we l l , J . ( 1 9 9 3 ) . Ef f ic ie nc y Bounds f or Some
S e mi p a r a me t r i c S e l e c t i o n M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s , 5 8
(1/2), 169-184
N e we y ,
W.,
P o we l l ,
J.
and
Walker,
J.
(1990).
Se mi pa r a me t r i c
E s t i ma t i o n o f S e l e c t i o n M o d e l s : S o me E mp i r i c a l R e s u l t s , A m e r i c a n
E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, P a p e r s a n d P r o c e e d i n g s , 8 0 ( 2 ) , 3 2 4 - 3 2 8
Nijman, T. and Verbeek, M. (1992). Nonresponse in Panel Data: The
I mp a c t o n E s t i ma t i o n o f t h e L i f e C y c l e C o n s u mp t i o n F n c t i o n ,
J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 7 ( 3 ) , 2 4 3 - 2 5 7
O l s e n , R . ( 1 9 7 8 b ) . N o t e o n t h e U n i q u e n e s s o f t h e M a x i mu m L i k e l i h o o d
E s t i ma t o r for t h e T o b i t M o d e l , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 6 ( 5 ) , 1 2 1 1 - 1 2 1 5
O l s e n , R . ( 1 9 8 0 ) . A L e a s t S q u a r e s C o r r e c t i o n fo r S e l e c t i v i t y B i a s ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 4 8 ( 7 ) , 1 8 1 5 - 1 8 2 0
P a g a n , A . an d V ella, F . (19 89) . D i a g n o s t i c T e s t s f o r M o d e l s B a s e d o n
I n d i v i d u a l D a t a : A S u r v e y , J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 4 ( 4 ) ,
S 2 9-S 59
Panaretos, J. (1974). Linear Relationship Between Two Variables
Affected by Error, M.Sc. Dissertation, Department of Statistics,
University of Sheffield, England
P h i l l i p s , P . ( 1 9 8 3 ) . E R A ' s: A Ne w Appr oa c h to Sma ll Sa mple The or y ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 1 , 1 5 0 5 - 1 5 2 7
Poirier, D. (1980). Partial Observabilty in Bivariate Probit Models,
J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s, 1 2 ( 2 ) , 2 0 9 - 2 1 7
P o we l , J . ( 1 9 8 4 ) . L e a s t A b s o l u t D e v i a t i o n s E s t i ma t i o n for t h e C e n s o r e d
Regression Model, Journal of Econometrics, 25 (3), 303-325
P o we l , J . ( 1 9 8 6 ) . S y mme t r i c a l l y T r i mme d L e a s t S q u a r e s E s t i ma t i o n fo r
T o b i t M o d e l s , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 4 ( 6 ) , 1 4 3 5 - 1 4 6 0
Q u a n d t , R . ( 1 9 7 2 ) . M e t h o d s f o r E s t i ma t i n g S w i t c h i n g R e g r e s s i o n s ,
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67 (3), 306-310
R a n d l e s, R . an d Wolfe, D. ( 1979) . I n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h e T h e o r y o f
N o n p a r a me t r i c S t a t i s t i c s , Wi l e y , N e w Y o r k
207
R i v e r s , D . an d V u on g, Q . ( 1988) . L i mi t e d I n f o r ma t i o n E s t i ma t o r s a n d
E x o g e n e i t y T e s t s f o r S i mul a t n e o u s P r o b i t M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 3 9 ( 3 ) , 3 4 7 - 3 6 6
R i v l i n , A . ( 1 9 7 4 ) . H o w C a n E x p e r i me n t s B e M o r e U s e f u l ? , A m e r i c a n
Economic Association, 64 (2), 346-354
Robins, J. and Greenland, S. (1996). Identification of Causal Effects
U s i n g I n s t r u me n t a l V a r i a b l e s , J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l
A s s o c i a t i o n, 9 1 ( 4 3 4 ) , 4 5 6 - 4 5 8
R o b i n s on, P . (1988). R o o t - n C o n s i s t e n t S e mi p a r a me t r i c R e g r e s s i o n ,
E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 6 ( 4 ) , 9 3 1 - 9 5 4
Rosenbaum,
P.
I n s t r u me n t a l
(1996).
Identification
Variables,
Journal
of
of
Causal
the
Effects
American
Using
Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 9 1 ( 4 3 4 ) , 4 6 5 - 4 6 8
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1983a). T h e C e n t r a l R o l e o f t h e
Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,
B i o m e t r i k a, 7 0 ( 1 ) , 4 1 - 5 5
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D. (1985). C o n s t r u c t i n g a C o n t r o l G r o u p
U s i n g M u l t i v a r i a t e M a t c h e d S a mpl i n g M e t h o d s t h a t I n c o r p o r a t e t h e
P r o p e n s i t y S c o r e , J o u r n a l o f t h e A m e r i c a n S t a t i s t i c a l A s s o c i a t i o n,
39 (1), 33-38
R o y , A. (1951). S o me T h o u g h t s o n t h e D i s t r i b u t i o n o f E a r n i n g s , O x f o r d
Economic Papers, 3, 135-146
Rubin, D. (1973a). M a t c h i n g t o R e mo v e B i a s i n O b s e r v a t i o n a l S t u d i e s ,
B i o m e t r i c s, 2 9 , 1 5 9 - 1 8 3
Rubin, D. (1973b). T h e U s e o f M a t c h i n g a n d R e g r e s s i o n A d j u s t me n t t o
R e mo v e B i a s i n O b s e r v a t i o n a l S t u d i e s , B i o m e t r i c s, 2 9 , 1 8 5 - 2 0 3
Rubin,
D.
(1979).
Using
Multivariate
Matched
S a mp l i n g
and
R e g r e s s i o n A d j u s t me n t t o C o n t r o l B i a s i n O b s e r v a t i o n a l S t u d i e s ,
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 318-328
Rubin, D. (1980). B i a s R e d u c t i o n U s i n g M a h a l a n o b i s M e t r i c M a t c h i n g ,
B i o m e t r i c s, 3 6 , 2 9 3 - 2 9 8
208
Rubin, D. (1986). S t a t i s t i c s a n d C a u s a l I n fe r e n c e : C o mme n t : Whi c h I fs
Have
Causal
Answers,
Journal
of
the
American
Statistical
A s s o c i a t i o n, 8 1 ( 3 9 6 ) , 9 6 1 - 9 6 2
Schmertmann, C. (1994). Selectivity Bias Correction Methods in
P o l y c h o t o mo u s S a mpl e S e l e c t i o n M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f E c o n o m e t r i c s ,
60 (1/2), 101-132
Singh, S., Bhattacharya, B. and Yadava, R. (1979). An Adjustme nt o f
S e l e c t i o n B i a s i n P o s t p a r t u m A me n o r r e a f r o m F o l l o w - U p S t u d i e s ,
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 916-920
Skinner, C. (1998). Logistic Modelling of Longitudinal Survey Data
w i t h M e a s u r e me n t E r r o r , S t a t i s t i c a S i n i c a, 8 , 1 0 4 5 - 1 0 5 8
Smith, R. and Blundell, R. (1986). An Exogeneity Test for a
S i mul t a n e o u s E q u a t i o n T o b i t M o d e l w i t h a n A p p l i c a t i o n t o L a b o r
S u p p l y , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 5 4 ( 3 ) , 6 7 9 - 6 8 5
T h e R o y a l S we d i s h A c a d e m y o f S c i e n c e s ( 2 0 0 0 ) . T h e S c i e n t i fi c
C o n t r i b u t i o n s o f J a me s He c k ma n a n d D a n i e l M c F a d d e n , Kung l
V e t e n s k a p s a k a d e m i e n , I n f o r m a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t , S t o c k h o l m, Sweden
T h e i l , H . ( 1 9 6 9 ) . A M u l t i n o mi a l E x t e n s i o n o f t h e L i n e a r L o g i t M o d e l ,
I n t e r n a t i o n a l E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 6 9 , 4 9 3 - 5 1 3
T h u r s t o n e , L . ( 1 9 2 7 ) . A L a w o f C o mpa r a t i v e J u d g e me n t , P s y c h o l o g i c a l
R e v i e w, 3 4 , 3 4 1 - 3 6 7
T o b i n , J . ( 1 9 5 8 ) . E s t i ma t i o n o f R e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r L i mi t e d D e p e n d e n t
V a r i a b l e s , E c o n o m e t r i c a, 2 6 ( 1 ) , 2 4 - 3 6
V e l l a , F . ( 1 9 9 2 ) . S i mpl e T e s t s fo r S a mp l e S e l e c t i o n B i a s i n C e n s o r e d
a n d D i s c r e t e C h o i c e M o d e l s , J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 7
(4), 413-421
V e l l a , F . ( 1 9 9 3 ) . A s i mpl e E s t i ma t o r fo r M o d e l s w i t h C e n s o r e d
E n d o g e n o u s R e g r e s s o r s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 3 4 ( 2 ) ,
441-457
V e l l a , F . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . E s t i ma t i n g M o d e l s w i t h S a mp l e S e l e c t i o n B i a s : A
Survey, The Journal of Human Resources, 33 (1), 126-169
209
V e l l a , F . a n d V e r b e e k , M . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . Wh o s e Wa g e s D o U n i o n s R a i s e ? A
D y n a mi c M o d e l O f U n i o n i s m a n d Wa g e R a t e D e t e r mi n a t i o n f o r
Y oung Men, J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d E c o n o m e t r i c s, 1 3 , 1 6 3 - 1 8 3
V e r b e e k , M . a n d N i j m a n , T . ( 1 9 9 2 a ) . T e s t i n g for S e l e c t i v i t y B i a s i n
P a n e l D a t a M o d e l s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l E c o n o m i c R e v i e w, 3 3 ( 3 ) , 6 8 1 704
Verbeke, G. and Lesaffre, E. (1996). A linear Mixed Model with
Heterogeneity in the Random Effects Population, Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 91, 217-221
Verbeke, G. and Molenberghs, G. (1997). Linear Mixed Models in
P r a c t i c e : A S A S O r i e n t a t e d A p p r o a c h , S p r i n g e r , New York
W a l e s, T . an d Wood lan d, A. ( 1980) . S a mpl e S e l e c t i v i t y a n d t h e
E s t i ma t i o n o f L a b o r S u p p l y F u n c t i o n s , I n t e r n a t i o n a l E c o n o m i c
R e v i e w, 2 1 ( 2 ) , 4 3 7 - 4 6 8
Willis, R. and Rosen, S. (1979). Education and Self-Selection, Journal
o f P o l i t i c a l E c o n o m y , 87, S1- S36
Wooldridge, J. (1995). Selection Corrections for Panel Data Models
U n d e r C o n d i t i o n a l M e a n I n d e p e n d e n c e A s s u mpt i o n s , J o u r n a l o f
E c o n o m e t r i c s, 6 8 , 1 1 5 - 1 3 2
h t t p : / / www. india n a . e d u / ~ s t a t m a t h / s t a t / a l l / c a t / 2 b 2
210