Set 7 due April 11 • Set 8 due Apr 18 • C-3 due Apr 18 DECISION ANALYSIS:Ch 12 I. Probabilities Given A. Expected Value B. Opportunity Loss II. Probabilities NOT Given A. Maximax B. Maximin C. Minimax I.A. Expected Value E ( x) xP( x) Expected Value x P(x) xP(x) 2 .7 1.4 3 .3 0.9 SUM 1 2.3=E(x) Excel Previous table as computer spreadsheet Probability Here: given Real life: Calculate using formulas in previous section Decision Example Should we build a new plant? Source: Render,B. and Stair,R., Quantitative Analysis (6th ed) Prentice-Hall, 1997, p 100 Alternative Actions Act 1: Build large plant Act 2:Build small plant Act 3:Do not build new plant OBJECTIVE: Maximize Profit Outcomes (States of Nature) P(x) (1) Favorable demand .5 (2)Unfavorable demand .5 Payoff Table Action Large plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000 UnFavorable -180,000 Small plant 100,000 -20,000 No plant 0 0 Expected Value: Large Plant Outcome x=payoff P(x) xP(x) Favorable 200,000 .5 100,000 Unfavorable -180,000 .5 -90,000 E(x) 10,000 Expected Value: Small Plant Outcome x= payoff P(x) xP(x) Favorable 100,000 .5 50,000 Unfavorable -20,000 .5 -10,000 E(x) 40,000 Summary Act E(x) Large plant 10,000 Small plant 40,000=MAX E(x) No plant 0 Objective: MAX E(x) Build small plant DECISION TREE Alternative Graphical Tool to re-do same problem Symbols in tree Decision Node Outcome Node 200,000 .5 Fav Unfav Large .5 10,000 Fav 40,000 -180,000 100,000 .5 Small 40,000 .5 Unfav No 0 -20,000 IB: Opportunity Loss OL = Best payoff for each outcome - Actual Payoff Table Action UnFavorable -180,000 Small plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000= BEST IN COL 100,000 No plant 0 0 = BEST IN COLUMN Large plant -20,000 OL Table Action Large plant Small plant No plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000 -200,000= 0 200,000 -100,000= 100,000 200,000 -0=200,000 UnFavorable 0-(-180,000)= 180,000 0-(-20,000)= 20,000 0-0=0 Economic Interpretation Loss resulting from wrong decision Different Example Quit job to start new business. OL= Loss of current salary +loss of interest income if you withdraw from savings EOL=Expected OL: Large Plant Outcome OL P(OL) OL(P(OL)) Favorable 0 .5 0 Unfavorable 180,000 .5 90,000 EOL 90,000 EOL=Expected OL: Small Plant Outcome OL P(OL) OL(P(OL)) Favorable 100,000 .5 50,000 Unfavorable 20,000 .5 10,000 EOL 60,000 EOL=Expected OL: No Plant Outcome OL P(OL) OL(P(OL)) Favorable 200,000 .5 100,000 Unfavorable 0 .5 0 EOL 100,000 Summary Act EOL Large plant 90,000 Small plant 60,000=MIN EOL No plant 100,000 Summary Build Small Plant to MIN EOL Compare and Contrast • Both E(x) and EOL give same optimal decision (Build small plant) • Both E(x) and EOL have same arithmetic differences between optimal and alternatives • EOL better than E(x) to interpret “do nothing” alternative • MINIMUM EOL = EVPI = Expected Value of Perfect Information = Most you would pay someone to tell you if demand favorable or unfavorable EVPI = $60,000 Suppose consultant bid $70,000>EVPI, so reject bid CAUTION No consultant has perfect information, so bid should be much less than $60,000 II. Probabilities Not Given Some managers do not trust subjective probabilities IIA. MAXIMAX Same example as before, but without probabilities Note: Go back to original payoff table MAXIMAX Step 1: For each act, find the outcome with maximum payoff Maximax Step 1 Action Large plant Small plant No plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000=MAX IN ROW 100,000= MAX IN ROW UnFavorable -180,000 0= MAX IN ROW 0 -20,000 Maximax Step 2 Choose the act with maximum of maximum values Maximax Act Maximum Large plant 200,000= MAX of MAX Small plant 100,000 No plant 0 Maximax Decision Build large plant What personality type is Maximax? Maximax personality • • • • Optimistic Aggressive Risk seeker (gambler) Entrepreneur II B. Maximin Step 1: For each act, find minimum payoff Maximin Step 1 Action Large plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000 UnFavorable -180,000=MIN OF ROW Small plant 100,000 -20,000= MIN OF ROW No plant 0 0=MIN OF ROW Maximin Step 2 Choose act with MAXImum of MINimum values Maximin Act Minimum Large plant -180,000 Small plant -20,000 No plant 0=MAX Maximin Decision No plant What personality type is maximin? Maximin • Pessimistic • Cautious • In 1961 would have advised against Moon landing project • In 1965 would have advised against US troops in Viet Nam • In 1996 would have advised against deregulation of electricity companies II C. Minimax Step 1: Opportunity Loss Table OL Table Action Large plant Small plant No plant Favorable Demand $ 200,000 -200,000= 0 200,000 -100,000= 100,000 200,000 -0=200,000 UnFavorable 0-(-180,000)= 180,000 0-(-20,000)= 20,000 0-0=0 Minimax Step 2 For each act, find maximum opportunity loss OL Table: Step 2 Action Favorable Demand 0 UnFavorable 180,000=MAX IN ROW Small plant 100,000=MAX IN ROW 20,000 No plant 200,000=MAX IN ROW 0 Large plant Minimax Step 3 Find MINImum of MAXimum OL MINIMAX Step 3 Act MAX OL Large 180,000 Small 100,000=MIN No plant 200,000 Minimax Decision Build small plant
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz