VIBRATION PHASE BASED ORDERING OF VIBRATION PATTERNS ACQUIRED WITH A SHEARING SPECKLE INTERFEROMETER AND PULSED ILLUMINATION Peter A.A.M. Somers and Nandini Bhattacharya Optics Research Group, Delft University of Technology Lorentzweg 1, NL-2628 CJ Delft, the Netherlands [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT A method for both temporal and spatial characterization of harmonic vibrations is presented. The method is based on simultaneous acquisition of phase-stepped speckle interference patterns along with measurement of vibration phase for each vibration state. An unsynchronized free running pulse laser is used for illumination yielding speckle interference patterns in random vibration phase order. Two π/2 phase-stepped speckle interference patterns are acquired simultaneously for each recorded vibration state. The data-set is sorted using the vibration phase as sorting key. Subsequently the sorted speckle interferograms are processed to obtain wrapped phase difference maps or accumulated unwrapped phase distributions. Introduction Harmonic vibrations of diffusely reflecting objects can be visualized using interferometric methods such as holography or speckle interferometry [1, 2]. The vibrating object can be illuminated by a continuous wave laser or a pulse laser. When using a continuous wave laser and exposing the holographic plate or CCD camera for a period that is relatively long compared to the vibration period time average interferograms can be obtained, showing the vibration pattern. When a pulse laser is used two exposures with appropriate timing can be made to obtain correlation fringes by subtracting the two speckle interference patterns. A particular implementation with limited requirements on synchronization is based on the use of a double pulse laser, and the spatial carrier phase-shift method to obtain phase [3]. Phase information can also be obtained by applying phase stepping for measured vibration states, imposing more extensive requirements on synchronization of vibration, illumination, camera exposure and phase stepping. For quantitative evaluation of the vibration pattern for a particular vibration phase using a continuous wave laser, the camera shutter must be synchronized to the vibration phase. In addition, phase stepping must also be synchronized to both camera exposure and vibration phase. Generally several vibration periods are required to obtain the number of phase-stepped interference patterns that are necessary for the chosen algorithm for the calculation of phase. When full temporal characterization of the vibration pattern is required a series of measurements has to be taken with appropriate timing in order to obtain data for a sufficient number of different vibration phase values. For this purpose a stroboscopic approach can be used, either employing synchronized pulsed illumination or synchronized camera exposure [4, 5]. In most cases the object vibration is considered to be the master process: the other processes are synchronized to the vibration frequency. Consequently, stroboscopic measurements using a pulse laser require the laser pulses to be coupled with the vibration process. However, not all pulse lasers that provide sufficient power can be easily synchronized to external events. An alternative method for stroboscopic measurements that use a synchronized pulse laser is proposed. Instead of triggering the pulse laser by pulses that are derived from the vibration process the laser is free running, acting as the master process. Simultaneous acquisition of interference patterns and vibration phase For our experiments a free running flash lamp pumped Nd:YAG pulse laser was available that could not be triggered externally, but did provide access to synchronization pulses. Using those, a set-up has been developed in which the pulsed illumination was the master process. Image acquisition was controlled by synchronization pulses that were provided by the pulse laser. The interferometer we have used to measure vibration patterns records two π/2 phase-stepped speckle interference patterns for one particular vibration state simultaneously [6, 7]. When two of these phase-stepped speckle interferogram pairs are taken, one for a reference vibration state and the other for a current one, four phase-stepped speckle interference patterns are available, from which phase difference ∆ϕ between the two states of the object at times t and t + ∆t can be calculated, using the 2-bucket algorithm [7, 8] given in Eq. (1) I 0(t ) − Iπ / 2(t + ∆t ) ∆ϕ = π / 2 + 2 arctan Iπ / 2(t ) − I 0(t + ∆t ) (1) where I0 and Iπ/2 are the intensities corresponding with phase steps 0 and π/2. There is no need to acquire the second pair during the same vibration period if displacement is periodic, which was assumed to be the case for our experiments. The second pair can be acquired several vibration periods later and can still be combined with the first pair if relative displacement is within a certain range. Available power per pulse and pulse duration can be chosen such that the effective integration time of the camera is short enough to freeze the vibration pattern, even at high vibration frequencies. Vibration phase can be recorded also, simultaneously with speckle data for each state. For that purpose a counting board and some custom electronics for pulse shaping were used to implement measuring of elapsed time between two types of input pulses: vibration sync and laser sync pulses. The two pulse series, originating from the two independent sources, the vibration set-up and the pulse laser were combined by an OR circuit to produce a combined series of pulses, basically at the vibration frequency, including sparse laser sync pulses at random positions between two vibration sync pulses (Figure 1). The set-up is shown in Figure 2. The counter is read out and restarted on every incoming pulse, which can be either a next vibration sync pulse or a laser sync pulse. Elapsed time now represents either the vibration period or the vibration phase. Laser sync pulses can be identified by also observing the next read-out: in that case the sum of the elapsed times belonging to a valid vibration phase measurement and the next one is equal to one full vibration period (Figure 3). A valid vibration phase measurement can now be assigned to a simultaneously acquired pair of phase-stepped speckle interference patterns. Vibration period Vibration phase 1.5 1 0.5 Vibration amplitude 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 -0.5 -1 -1.5 Time Vibration pulse Laser pulse Figure 1. Synchronization pulses from two independent sources: vibration set-up and pulse laser After having acquired a given number of phase-stepped speckle interference pattern pairs, along with their respective vibration phase, the latter can be used to sort the speckle interference patterns. Speckle patterns can be now acquired in random order using a free running pulse laser as the illumination source. Sorting the speckle interference patterns using the vibration phase as the sorting key results in a series of speckle pattern pairs that can be processed as if they were acquired in the sorted order. There are some limitations to the laser repetition rate in order to achieve full coverage of the vibration period: the sampling and vibration frequencies should be asynchronous. CCD Camera trigger Laser pulses OR Counter PC Vibration pulses 20 MHz clock Figure 2. Overview of measurement system for simultaneous acquisition of vibration patterns and vibration phase 20000 15000 10000 Vibration period (counts) 5000 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Measurement # Figure 3. Identification of a vibration phase measurement. A vibration phase measurement is characterized by a time shorter than the vibration period and verified by also observing the next measurement. The sum of the two measurements is equal to the vibration period Vibration frequency is considered to be an independent variable while sampling frequency is governed by pulse repetition rate, which is also independent in our present set-up. Although the laser could not be synchronized as a slave process, it was possible to change its pulse repetition rate in order to avoid the vibration frequency to be a multiple of the sampling frequency, a condition that also has to be met for stroboscopic systems. With proper settings an even distribution of samples over the vibration period can be obtained. In practice, where sampling and vibration frequencies differed by one or two orders, it appeared to be very hard to achieve settings for which an unacceptable distribution of samples over the vibration period was obtained. Figures 4 and 5 show some examples for possible distributions of samples over the vibration period. Figure 4 presents an unacceptable distribution obtained for a setting for the laser pulse repetition rate close to 10 Hz and a vibration frequency of 900 Hz. Figure 5 shows an acceptable distribution for a slightly changed value of the pulse repetition rate. Both examples were obtained during testing of the set-up where laser sync pulses were replaced by a pulse generator and vibration sync pulses were obtained from the vibration set-up. If a sufficient number of interference patterns are acquired, phase difference between two states can be kept within the range of -π to +π. In that case temporal phase unwrapping [9] can be applied, which does not rely on evenly distributed samples. After sorting the series of speckle interference patterns using the vibration phase as the sorting key, the data can be processed sequentially to produce phase difference maps that might be wrapped and unwrapped accumulated phase difference distributions for all values of the vibration phase. 0 2π Figure 4. Distribution of 50 vibration phase values when vibration frequency is close to a multiple of laser repetition rate 0 2π Figure 5. Distribution of 50 vibration phase values when vibration frequency is not related to laser repetition rate Experimental Some experiments have been carried out on a vibrating Aluminum plate of 240x240 mm, with a thickness 0.5 mm. The plate was elastically supported by four springs, attached to the corner of the plate (Figure 6). The specimen was excited by a V201 shaker, manufactured LDS, which was driven by a 100 W PA audio amplifier. The signal source was a Hewlett Packard 33120A arbitrary waveform generator, providing a sine wave of 900 Hz, which was one of the resonance frequencies of the plate. Figure 6. Experimental set-up The specimen was illuminated by a divergent beam, provided by a system 2000 pulsed Nd:YAG laser, manufactured by JK, delivering approximately 30 mJ at a repetition rate of 10 Hz. Pulse duration was 15 ns approximately. The laser provided two synchronization pulses, one synchronized with the Pockel’s cell, the other was a pre-trigger signal about 100 µsec earlier. The first pulse was used to read out and restart a general-purpose counter, available on a National instruments PCI-6713 DAQcard, that was used to measure vibration period or phase, the last one to trigger the CCD camera. Another trigger signal, derived from the waveform generator was OR-combined with the laser sync pulses, and the combined pulse series fed to the vibration period/phase counter. The counter was driven by a 20 MHz clock, yielding around 18,000 pulses during one vibration period. Vibration patterns were acquired in random order and sorted using vibration phase as the sorting key. After sorting, the interference patterns were processed in sorted order using temporal phase unwrapping [9], allowing accumulation of phase differences to obtain unwrapped phase data at any instance of the vibration phase. Results Figures 7-9 show phase differences between a series of intermediate vibration states and the reference state, which was close to the static state, where vibration amplitude was zero. Figure 7 shows the results for an intermediate vibration state during the first half of the vibration period. Figure 8 shows a result for a vibration state halfway the vibration period. In figure 9 a result for a vibration state during the second half of the vibration is presented. For most of the measured intermediate states the displacement related phase differences were higher phase than +/-π, resulting in wrapping. Since the interferometer is of the shearing type spatial derivatives of the out of plane displacement are shown. Shear is in vertical direction. Figures 7 and 9 clearly show the reversal of phase for first and second halves of the vibration. Figure 7. Intermediate vibration state during the first half of the vibration period Figure 8. Intermediate vibration state halfway the vibration period Figure 9. Intermediate vibration state during the second half of the vibration period When a sufficient number of samples per period are taken, phase difference between samples can be smaller than +/- π, avoiding wrapping and allowing phase differences to be accumulated over all or a selection of measurement intervals. Following this procedure, the results for a selection of measurement intervals during the positive and the negative part of the vibration period have been accumulated. Figure 10 shows the accumulated phase difference distribution for the positive portion of the vibration; figure 11 shows the results for the negative part. Again the reversal of phase for first and second halves of the vibration is clearly shown. Figure 10. Accumulated phase difference distributions during the first half of the vibration period Figure 11. Accumulated phase difference distributions during the second half of the vibration period Conclusions A set-up for performing phase-stepped measurements to measure dynamic phase changes using a free-running pulsed laser has been established. Two phase-stepped speckle interference patterns are acquired simultaneously for each recorded vibration state, in random vibration phase order and sorted using the vibration phase as sorting key. The set-up is capable of characterizing periodic dynamic events both spatially and temporally. Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO and the technology program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. We thank Günther Ouwendijk, Polytechnic of Rijswijk, for his contribution to this work. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Vest, C.M., “Holographic interferometry”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1979). Tiziani, H.J., “Vibration analysis and deformation measurement”, in “Speckle metrology”, Erf, R.K., editor, Academic Press, New York, (1978). Pedrini, G and Tiziani, H.J., “Double pulse electronic speckle interferometry for vibration analysis”, Applied Optics Vol. 36, No 22, 5310-5316 (1997). Anderson, D.J., Valera, J.D. and Jones, J.D.C., “Electronic speckle pattern interferometry using diode laser spectroscopic illumination,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 4, 982-987 (1993). Cookson, T.J., Butters, J.N. and Pollard, H.C., “Pulse lasers in electronic speckle pattern interferometry”, Opt. Laser Technol. 10, 119-124 (1978). Somers, P.A.A.M. and Bhattacharya, N., “Polarization plane rotator used as a phase stepping device in a 2-channel shearing speckle interferometer”, in Proceedings of SPIE conference “Optical Metrology 2005”, SPIE vol. 5856, edited by W. Osten, C. Gorecki and E. Novak, SPIE, Bellingham, 664-673 (2005). Somers, P.A.A.M. and van Brug, H., “A single camera, dual image real-time-phase-stepped shearing speckle interferometer”, Proceedings of Fringe 2001, edited by W. Osten and W. Jüptner, Elsevier, Paris, 573-580, (2001). van Brug, H., “Temporal phase unwrapping and its application in shearography systems”, Applied Optics Vol. 37, No. 28, 6701-6706 (1998). Huntley, J.M. and Saldner, H., “Temporal phase-unwrapping algorithm for automated interferogram analysis”, Applied Optics Vol. 32, No. 17, 3047-3052, (1993). Filename: ICEM13_Full_Paper_68_Somers.doc Directory: H:\Publicaties\Alexandropoulos Template: \\tudelft.net\staff-homes\S\psomers\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates\Normal.dot Title: FATIGUE CHARACTERIZATION OF TIRE RUBBER Subject: Author: user Keywords: Comments: Creation Date: 14-1-2007 18:57:00 Change Number: 4 Last Saved On: 15-1-2007 11:06:00 Last Saved By: psomers Total Editing Time: 29 Minutes Last Printed On: 15-1-2007 11:20:00 As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages: 7 Number of Words: 2.422 (approx.) Number of Characters: 13.321 (approx.)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz