United States Department of the Interior
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, OR 97459
Web Address: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: (541) 756-0100 Toll Free: (888) 809-0839 Fax: (541) 751-4303
IN REPLY REFER TO
1792 (ORC040)
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
Russell, Brummet, and Camas Weaver Road Repairs DNA
DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA
District ERFO Road Repair Environmental Assessment
July 21, 2015
Dear Concerned Citizen:
I have signed the Decision Record for the Russell, Brummet, and Camas Weaver Tie Road Repairs project
analyzed in the Documentation of NEPA Adequacy (DNA), DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA. The
proposed action described in this DNA is to repair three failed road segments along roads 30-12-19.0
(Russell Creek), 27-9-21.0 (Upper East Fork Brummet), and 28-09-25.1(Camas Weaver Tie). The BLM has
posted these documents at the BLM internet site: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay/plans/index.php .
The decision to implement this forest management project may be protested under 43 CFR 5003—
Administrative Remedies. As outlined in 43 CFR 5003 (a) and (b), protests of a forest management decision
may be made within 15 days of the publication date of the decision notice and shall contain a written
statement of reasons for protesting the decision. In accordance with the regulations, this notice constitutes
the decision document for the purpose of protests which must be filed by close of business (4:30 p.m.) on
August 6, 2015 with the Myrtlewood Field Manager, Kathy Westenskow, at the Coos Bay District Office,
1300 Airport Lane, North Bend OR, 97459. As interpreted by BLM, the regulations do not authorize
acceptance by the BLM of protests in any form other than a signed, paper document that is delivered to the
physical address of the BLM office within the 15-day period. Therefore, e-mail, verbal, or facsimile protests
will not be accepted.
For further information, contact Racheal Jones at 1300 Airport Lane, North Bend OR, 97459 or (541) 7560100, or by e-mail at [email protected] , ATTN: Racheal Jones
Sincerely,
/s/ Kathy Westenskow
Kathy Westenskow
Myrtlewood Field Manager
United States Department of the Interior
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, OR 97459
Web Address: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay
E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: (541) 756-0100 Toll Free: (888) 809-0839 Fax: (541) 751-4303
IN REPLY REFER TO
1792 (ORC040)
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
Russell, Brummet, and Camas Weaver Road Repairs DNA
DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA
District ERFO Road Repair Environmental Assessment
Decision Record for DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001
Russell, Brummet, and Camas Weaver Road Repairs Reduction -DNA
Background:
The Myrtlewood Field Office, Coos Bay District Bureau of Land Management (BLM), previously prepared the
District ERFO Road Repair Environmental Assessment (DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA) which contained
analysis of the effects of soil nailing to repair failed slope embankments that were exposed and prone to
continued failure, as well as analysis of a no action alternative. This Environmental Assessment (EA), which is
incorporated by reference, resulted in a FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) signed April 4, 2014. The
action as described in DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA proposes to repair failed road sections using soil
nailing. This proposed project is of like action and similar design to that analyzed in the District ERFO Road
Repair EA.
Decision:
It is my decision to implement the proposed road repairs on Russell Creek Road, Upper East Fork Brummet
Creek Road, and Camas Weaver Tie Road. The design features and actions of this project and the anticipated
environmental consequences are essentially the same as those analyzed in the existing NEPA document.
Conformance and Compliance:
The BLM reviewed the proposed road repairs and determined it is consistent with the 1995 Coos Bay District
Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (1995 ROD/RMP). The analysis supporting this decision
tiers to the 1994 Final Coos Bay District Proposed Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement.
This 1995 Record of Decision is also supported by, and consistent with, the 1994 Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) on Management of Habitat for Late Successional and Old Growth
Forest Related Species within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl and its associated Record of Decision.
This proposed action is in conformance with the Coos Bay District RMP because it is specifically provided for in
the following decisions.
x Develop and maintain a transportation system that serves the needs of users in an environmentally sound
manner (RMP p. 69) by:
¾ The BLM will accomplish this by locating, designing, constructing, and maintaining roads to standards
that meet management objectives in accordance with the District road management plan (RMP p. 70).
¾ Following Best Management Practices for water quality and soil productivity to mitigate adverse effects
on soils, water quality, fish, and riparian habitat during road construction and maintenance (RMP p. 70).
x Provide and maintain a cost-effective transportation system (TMP p. 11) by:
Reducing maintenance costs by maintaining [roads] to the appropriately assigned Maintenance Intensity
(TMP p. 11).
¾ Ensuring that the infrastructure is maintained in a suitable fashion that support’s the Bureau’s mission
effectively and efficiently (TMP p. 10).
Prevent watershed degradation—rather than using mitigation or planned restoration—to correct foreseeable
problems caused by management activities (RMP p. 25).
¾
x
This project also complies with the Oregon and California Lands Act (O&C Act) and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA), the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation Act and the BLM Special Status Species Program. The EA and FONSI analyzed the selected
alternative and found no significant impacts that would require the development of an EIS.
Public Involvement:
Scoping for the District ERFO Road Repair EA (DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA) occurred from November
8, 2013 to November 22, 2013. The BLM informed the public of the EA and FONSI through a direct notification
on April 4, 2014. The BLM received no comments on the EA and no protests on the Decision.
Decision Rationale:
The Coos Bay, Myrtlewood Field Office resource specialists reviewed the proposed action and all appropriate
project Design Features, as specified in the DNA Worksheet, will be incorporated into the proposal. Based on
this review, I have determined that the proposed action is adequately analyzed in the existing NEPA document
EA DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA and is in conformance with the Coos Bay RMP; no further analysis is
required.
Signature of Authorizing Official:
/s/ Kathy Westenskow
______________________________
Kathy Westenskow, Field Manager
July 21, 2015
Date:______________
Administrative Remedies:
The decision described in this document is a forest management decision and is subject to protest by the public. In accordance with Forest Management Regulations under 43 CFR Subpart 5003 Administrative Remedies, protests of this decision may be filed with the authorized officer, Kathy Hoffine, within 15 days of the publication date of the notice of decision/timber sale advertisement in The World newspaper, Coos Bay, Oregon.
43 CFR 5003.3(b) states: “Protests shall be filed with the authorized officer and would contain a written statement of reasons for protesting the decision.” This precludes the acceptance of electronic mail (email) or facsimile (fax) protests. Only written and signed hard copies of protests that are delivered to the Coos Bay district office will be accepted. The protest must clearly and concisely state which portion or element of the decision is being protested and the reasons why the decision is believed to be in error.
43 CFR 5003.3(c) states: “Protests received more than 15 days after the publication of the notice of decision or the notice of sale are not timely filed and shall not be considered.” Upon timely filing of a protest, the authorized officer shall reconsider the project decision to be implemented in light of the statement of reasons for the protest and other pertinent information. The authorized officer shall, at the conclusion of the review, serve the protest decision in writing to the protesting party(ies). Upon denial of a protest, the authorized officer may proceed with the implementation of the decision as permitted by regulations under 5003.3(f).
If no protest is received by the close of business (4:30 p.m.) within 15 days after publication of the decision notice, this decision will become final. If a timely protest is received, the project decision will be reconsidered in light of the statement of reasons for the protest and other pertinent information available, and the Coos Bay
district office will issue a protest decision.
For further information contact Racheal Jones at 1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, OR 97459; by phone at (541)
756-0100; or by email at [email protected], Attn: Racheal Jones.
e
rNTE~
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE
Bureau of Land Management
Coos Bay District
Works beet Docum entation ofNEPA Adequacy (DNA) BLM Office: Coos Bay District, Myrtlewood Field Office
Tracking No.: DOI-BLM-OR-C040-20 15-000 I-DNA
DNA Title: Russell , Brummet, and Camas Weaver Tie Road Repairs
A. Description of tbe Proposed Action: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposes to repair segments of
three roads damaged in storm events occurring between 2012 and 2014 (Map I). Attacbm ent A contains pictures of
the failed road segments and presents their locations on maps.
The BLM would stabilize failed portions of each road with soi l nai ling- a technique used to treat unstable soil slopes
by inserting reinforcing bars (rebar) into pre-drilled, regularly spaced holes, which are then grouted (cemented) into
place. The technique includes positioning the bars in a slight downward angle and then covering the inserted bars with
a layer of shotcrete (cement).
Repair of the failed road sections would include use of an excavator to remove minor amounts of loose debris and
vegetation and to contour the slope face to facilitate shotcrete placement; a drill-mounted attachment would install the
soil nails. Other operations which require large equipment would include a cement truck to haul and dispense cement
and a dump truck to haul away any excess dirt or vegetation. A gas or diesel power generator would power the cement
mixer and pressure the hose to dispense cement.
Location l: Russell Creek Road (#30-12-19.0), T. 30 S., R. 12 W., Sec. 19
Russell Creek Road failed along 90 lineal feet on the outside edge (Map 2). This road segment is an exclusive BLM
easement controlled by BLM. Since the BLM identified the failure in December 20 12, it has continued to degrade;
the road is currently open to through traffic. The road is located above Ru ssell Creek, which is undercutting the toe of
the slope and continuing to destabilize the s lope further.
The proposed road repair would take approximately 2 weeks to complete. The excavator would operate for
approximately 2 days and drilling would occur for approximately 3 days. Other equipment described above would
operate for less than 2 days. No construction activites would operate below the ordinary h igh water mark of Russell
Creek. The BLM would place e rosion control mats, certified weed-free straw, and native seed on the exposed soil
below the road to stabi lize the soil. Traffic could pass during off hours.
Location 2: Upper East Fork Brummet Creek Road (#27-9-21.0), T. 27 S., R. 09 W., Sec. 29
The outer edge of Upper East Fork Brummet Creek Road failed along approximately 40 lineal feet (Map 3). Upper
East Fork Brummet Creek Road is the access road for the Doerner Fir trailhead . After discovery of the failure, the
BLM closed the road to through traffic. The proposed road repair would take approximately 2 weeks to complete. The
excavator would operate fo r approximately 2 days and drilling would occur for approximately 3 days. Other
equipment described above would operate for less than 2 days.
Location 3: Camas Weaver Tie Road (#28-09-25.1), T. 28 S., R. 08 W., Sec. 25
The BLM closed the Camas Weaver Tie Road in December 2014 after the outside edge of the road failed along
approximately 265 lineal feet (Map 4). The road is not passable to vehicle traffic. Repairs would take approximately 5
weeks to complete, with construction activites occurring during daylight hours only. The road would remain closed
until construction was completed. The excavator would be working approximately half of a day for a week. The drill
would run approximately 10 days. The other equipment described above would run for less than 5 days.
Applicable design features, outlined in the District ERFO Road Repair Environmental Assessment (DOI-BLM-OR­
C040-2014-0001-EA) on pages 18-20, would be implemented as part of the proposed road repairs. Some of these
design features include:
OR 120-1792-01
•
•
•
•
•
•
Waste areas would be . ted in flat stable locations away from s. ms and designed to di sperse surface
water to vegetated stable areas.
A district-approved, weed-free, native seed mix fertilizer (if necessary), and mulch would be applied to bare
ground, including cut and fill slopes, ditch lines, borrow and waste sites.
All equipment would be power washed to remove all di1t, mud, and vegetative material prior to accessing
BLM lands.
Mechanized equipment would be inspected daily for fluid leaks .
For the Russel Creek road repair, erosion control materials would be used to prevent sediment and grout from
leaving the construction area.
The BLM would only allow construction for repairs along the Upper East Fork Brummet Creek Road and the
Camas Weaver Tie Road between August 5 and March l due to proximity to northern spotted owl and
marbled murrelet habitat-no construction would occu r inside critical breeding seasons .
B. Land Use Plan (LUP) Conforma nce
The BLM reviewed the proposed road repai rs and determined it is consistent with the 1995 Coos Bay District Record
of Decision and Resource Management Plan (1995 ROD/RMP). The analysis supporting this decision tiers to the
1994 Final Coos Bay District Proposed Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement. This 1995
Record of Decision is also supported by, and consistent with, the 1994 F inal Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (FSEIS) on Management of Habitat for Late Successional and Old Growth Forest Related Species within
the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl and its associated Record of Decision.
This proposed action is in conformance with the Coos Bay District RMP because it is specifically provided for in the
following decisions.
• Develop and maintain a transportation system that serves the needs of users in an environmentally sound manner
(RMP p. 69) by:
}>Locating, designing, constructing, and maintaining roads to standards that meet management objectives in
accordance with the District road management plan (RMP p. 70).
:> Following Best Management Practices for water quality and soil productivity to mitigate adverse effects on
soils, water quality , fish, and riparian habitat during road construction and maintenance (RMP p. 70).
• Provide and maintain a cost-effective transportation system (TMP p. 11) by:
,. Reducing maintenance costs by maintaining [roads) to the appropriately assigned Maintenance Intensity
(TMP p. 11).
,. Ensuring that the infrastructure is maintained in a suitable fashion that supp01ts the BLM's mission effectively and efficiently (TMP p. I 0). • Prevent watershed degradation-rather than using mitigation or planned restoration- to correct foreseeable
problems caused by management activities (RMP p. 25).
C. Id entify a pplicable NEPA docurn ent(s) a nd other· rela ted d ocuments that cove r th e proposed action.
• District ERFO Road Repair Environmental Assessment, DOI-BLM-OR-C000-2014-0001-EA, Apri l 2014.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, 01 EO FW00-2014-F-0163 , June 30, 2014.
D. NEPA Ad equacy C riteri a.
1. Is t he new pr oposed action a feature of, or essentia lly similar to, a n a lternative a na lyzed in the ex isting
NEPA docurn ent(s)? Is t he project within the same a nalysis a rea, or if t he project loca tion is different, ar e th e
geographic a nd resource conditions sufficiently simila r to th ose analyzed in the existing NEPA d oc urn ent(s)? If
th ere are differences, can you expl ain why t hey ar e not substantia l?
Yes. Both Weaver Road 28-08-18 and John's Creek Road 29-11-07 described in District ERFO Road Repair EA
(pp.14-15) included soil nailing to repair failed slope embankments that were exposed and prone to continued failure.
The action is substantially the same as previously analyzed in the EA on pages 21-38 and the effects would be of the
same magnitude or less than what the BLM analyzed in the EA. Each proposed road repair is located in the Coquille
watershed, as were seven of the eight road repairs analyzed in the EA. This proposed action does not change the scope
of the proposed action as previously analyzed, nor does it require further analysis.
OR 120-1792-0 I The failed road segment along Upper East Fork Brummet Creek Road is located near occupied northern spotted owl
habitat and unsurveyed, suitable marbled murrelet habitat. The failed road segment along Camas Weaver Tie Road is
located within suitable northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet habitat. Seasonal restrictions would be required at
both locations, which would only allow construction to occur between August 5 and March 1 (no construction would
occur inside critical breeding seasons).
2. Is the r ange of a lterna tives a na lyzed in the existing NEPA d ocument(s) a ppr opriate with respect to t he
curren t proposed action, g iven curren t environmental co ncerns, interests, and reso urce values?
The EA analyzed a no action and a proposed action alternative. No other reasonable alternatives to achieving the
purpose and need were identified by the Coos Bay District's Interdisciplinary Team or the public during development
of the District ERFO Road Repair EA. No new environmental concerns, interests, resource values, or circumstances
have arisen since the EA was published that would require the development of additional alternatives. Two of the
three segments are located in areas that could affect northern spotted owl and marble murrelet; however, because no
construction would occur during the critical breeding season, no effects to these species would occur.
Aerial photos and topographic maps were consulted and previous botanical survey information from the general area
of each project was reviewed. There is no habitat for any th reatened or endangered plant species listed under the ESA
in any of the project areas. I n addition, there are no known special status or Survey and Manage sites in any of the
project areas.
The District' s Archaeologist reviewed the proposed action and determined that these road repairs would not disturb
the ground outside the road prism. The land that would be disturbed within the prism was previously disturbed by
placement of the roads. There would be low (or no) probability of encountering unknown cultural resources.
However, if during the project any objects with potential cultural significance are located, work in the vicinity would
stop and the District Archaeologist be notified immediately. Work would proceed upon written authorization from
the District Archaeologist or Myrtlewood Field Manager.
3. Is t he existing a na lysis valid in light of any new informa tion or circums ta nces (s uch as, rangela nd hea lth
stand a rd assess ment, recent enda nger ed s peci es listings, updated lis ts of BLM-sensitive s pecies)? Can you
reasona bly conclud e th at n ew information and new circumstances would not s ubstan tially ch ange the a nalysis
of th e new proposed action ?
Yes. The existing analysis and conclusions are adequate. There is no new significant information or circumstances
relative to the analysis in the EAs or the current action. The analysis and conclusions in the EAs are appropriate and
adequate.
4. Are the direct, indirect, a nd cumula tive effects that would res ult f rom implementa ti on of the new proposed
ac tion similar (both qua ntitatively a nd quali tatively) to those a nalyzed in th e ex isting NEP A d oc um ent?
The EA analyzed direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the proposed action on affected resources
(fisheries/aquatic habitat, water quality, botany, invasive plants, and wildlife). There are no substantial changes from
those addressed in the ana lysis to the present.
5. Are t he public involvem ent a nd in te ragen cy review associated with existing NEP A d ocum ent(s) adeq uate for
tbe cur r en t proposed actio n?
Public involvement for the EA was adequate. The BLM sent scoping letters on November 8, 2013 to potentially
affected and or interested individuals, groups, and agencies. No comments were received during the scoping period
(EA pp. 4-5).
The BLM published the EA and signed FONS I for a IS-day public review on April 10, 2014. The BLM received no
comments on the EA or FONSL
OR 120-1792-01
E. Perso ns/Age ncics/BLM Statltonsulted
Wildlife: Consultation for road repair projects covered under thi s DNA has been completed under the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, OIEOFW00-2014-F-0163, June 30,2014. The proposed action would only occur
between August 5 and March I per the Biological Opinion. No further consultation is warranted.
Fish: The Russell Creek road repair site is located adjacent to Russell Creek which is listed as coho critical habitat.
There is an impassable waterfall just downstream from the road failure which is a barrier to coho and steelhead,
therefore coho are not present adjacent to the failure site. Coho are located below the barrier in Russell Creek,
approximately 300 feet downstream from the failure site. The proposed repair would not adversely affect fish habitat
in Russell Creek because equipment would remain on the road surface, shade would not be affected, and future wood
recruitment would remain unaffected. The repair work would decrease sedi ment input to Russell Creek and prevent
future failure. The Upper East Fork Brumm et and Camas Weaver Tie repairs are located outside of Riparian Reserves.
The proposed repairs would not affect fi sh habitat because the s ites are not hydrologically connected to stream
channels, are located outside of Riparian Reserves, would not remove shade producing trees, and would not affect
future wood recrui tment. No effects to listed fish s pecies or their critica l habitat would occu r. Consultation is not
warranted.
Note: Refer to the EA for a complete list ofthe team members participating in the preparation of the original
environmental analysis or planni ng documents.
Conclusio n: (Note:
Ifyoufound that one or more ofthese criteria is not met, you will not be able to check this box.)
Based on the review documented above, I conclude that this proposal conforms to the applicable land use plan and
that the NEPA documentation fully covers the proposed action and constitutes BLM's compliance with the
requirements of the NEPA.
Signature of Project Lead
Eva Bailey
Signature ofNEPA Coordinator
RachealJones
Signature of the Responsible Official:
Kathy Westenskow
_....~it~~Kd!:!!!I----=W:....=..!o::::~~::::::...=.!:::;:IIL~~~
==-------Date:
~
I/.:<t/<oL ~-
OR 120-1792-0J ATTACHMENT A OR 120-1792-01 Map 1: Russell, Brummet, and Camas Weaver Tie Road Repair Location Map
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
T26S-R11W
T26S-R13W T26S-R12W
T26S-R09W
T26S-R10W
Tioga
T27S-R13W T27S-R12W
Upper East Brummet
Failure
Fairview T27S-R11W
T27S-R10W
d
8.0
ey
R
Dora
T28S-R13W T28S-R12W
Sitk
um
Rd
Sitkum
28
-9-
Mc
kin
l
Coquille
T27S-R09W
Camas Weaver Tie
Failure
T28S-R11W
T28S-R10W
T28S-R09W
Norway
28-9-25.1
Myrtle Point
T29S-R12W
T29S-R11W
Broadbent
T30S-R12W
Denn
T30S-R11W
Gaylord
Rd
Camas Valley
T29S-R09W
Remote
Russell Creek
Failure
y
kle
Ec
T29S-R10W
Westside
Bridge
T30S-R10W
T30S-R09W T30S-R08W
Tioga
Coaledo
Fairview
101
Riverton
Bandon 42S
Dora
Sitkum
Norway
Te nm ile
42
Myrtle Point
Bridge
Broadbent
T31S-R12W
Powers
T31S-R11W
Camas Valley
Remote
Map Fea tures
T31S-R10W
Langlois
Cities
Gaylord
42
Overview Areas
T31S-R09W T31S-R08W
Coos Bay District Boundar y
542
Coos Bay Resource Area Boundaries
Powers
Pacific Ocean
Highway
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Map Features
Bureau of Land Management
Cities
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane
North Bend, Oregon 97459
0
1
2
3
4
Road Repair Locations
Brummet Creek/Camas Area Roads
Highway
5
County Roads
Map Pages
Miles
No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management
as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these
data for individual or aggregate use with other data.
Township
BLM Administered Land
Private or Other Lands
Map 2: Russell Creek Road Failure
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
13
19
T30S-R12W
T30S-R13W
e
m
De
ee k
Cr
nt
Rd
17
.0
2-19
30-1
24
18
20
30
-
12
25
30
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane
North Bend, Oregon 97459
-1 9
.1
29
Map Features
Work Locati on
Highway
County Road
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Paved Road
Miles
No warranty is ma de by the Bureau of Land Ma nagement
as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these
data for in dividual or aggregat e use with other data.
Gravel Road
Natural/Unk Surface Road
Russell Creek Road, #30-12-19.0 Failure.
Looking Southeast. Photo taken on March 10, 2015.
Section Lines
BLM Administered Land
Private or Other Lands
Map 3: Upper East Fork Brummet Road Failure
-9
27
.0
- 19
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
20
19
21
27- 9
-2 3
8.
27- 9-28.5
8.
0
0
2 7 -9
-17 .
27-9 -30 .0
-2 8.2
-9
-2
28
27 -
2
- 9-2 9.2
2 7 -9-2 9.0
4
8.
1
27-9 -28.
2 79- 2
0
1.
7
27-92
30.2
28
31
27-9-21.0
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane
North Bend, Oregon 97459
0
5.
28
-9
-
27-9
9-
21
.0
T27S-R09W
29
30
- 927
27
- 9-5.0
32
33
Map Features
Work Locati on
Highway
County Road
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Paved Road
Miles
No warranty is ma de by the Bureau of Land Ma nagement
as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these
data for in dividual or aggregat e use with other data.
Gravel Road
Natural/Unk Surface Road
East Fork Brummet Creek Road, # 27-9-21.0 Failure.
Looking North. Photo taken on May 05, 2014.
Section Lines
BLM Administered Land
Private or Other Lands
Map 4: Camas Weaver Tie Road Failure
23
28
5.0
2
-9
-2
DOI-BLM-OR-C040-2015-0001-DNA
24
8 - 9 - 2 6. 3
19
2 8-9-25.0
28- 9-2
6.0
1
-26.
28-9
6.
2
25
T28S-R09W
26
28-9-25
.2
2
92 8-
30
28
-9
-2
T28S-R08W
5.
4
28
28-8-18.0
-
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Coos Bay District Office
1300 Airport Lane
North Bend, Oregon 97459
25.1
35
31
9-
36
Map Features
Work Locati on
Highway
County Road
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Paved Road
Miles
No warranty is ma de by the Bureau of Land Ma nagement
as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these
data for in dividual or aggregat e use with other data.
Gravel Road
Natural/Unk Surface Road
Camas Weaver Tie Road, #28-9-25.1
Failure occurred between December 20-21, 2014.
Looking West. Photo taken on January 09, 2012.
Section Lines
BLM Administered Land
Private or Other Lands
Speci alist R eview ofDoc!
entati on of Land Use P lan Couforma nc!
d NEPA Adequacy (DNA)
In addition to the certification on the attached DNA Worksheet form (OR120-1792-l ), the following
resource specialists have reviewed this new project in light of the analysis made in the original
Environmental Assessment:
Printed Name
Resource
Signature
Date
?
Oat
//Is­
1
7 .zp. G Noxious Weeds
Date T, E, SSSP Fish T, E, SSSP Botany ' Cultural SoiIs/Geology Signature
~11-C t:: t1'116Qct82_ ?
Hydrology Signature
Port Orford Cedar
u
Date (
Date
)>W)f!5,J.~
¥o
c
7·ZP ·IS
Date
Safety
sjzhature
Engineering
-
~at-A~us.s~
Signature
41a..11/Is
Date
1~of,sDate
/<:"
/