1
Minutes of the
Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee
18 November 2010
The Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (NHMPC) met from 9:30 a.m. until 1:04 p.m. on
Thursday, November 18, 2010 at the Emergency Management Nye County Building, 1510 Siri Lane,
Pahrump, Nevada. These minutes and related documents are posted on the Web site for the committee
(http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/nhmpc/nhmpc.htm).
Attendees included:
Elizabeth Ashby, Nevada Division of Emergency Management (DEM)
Mike Cyphers*, Henderson Emergency Management
Rick Diebold*, City of Las Vegas, Office of Emergency Management
Mike Dondero*, NV Division of Forestry
Gary Dunn*, Carson City of Emergency Management
Robert Fellows*, Carson City Public Works
Terri Garside, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology
Kim Groenewold*, Division of Water Resources
Karen Johnson, Division of Emergency Management
Brent Jones, Nye County Safety Officer
John Louie, Professor, Nevada Seismological Laboratory
Ron Lynn*, Department of Development Services, Clark County Building Department
Robert Martinez, Division of Water Resources
Jim Medici, Nye County Emergency Services
Missy Molt, Nye County Emergency Services
Vance Payne, Nye County Safety Officer
Jonathan Price*, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology
Jim Reagan*, NV Energy
Andrew Trelease*, Clark County Regional Flood Control District
Jim Walker*, Nevada Department of Transportation
* indicates a member of the Board of Directors.
Members of the Board of Directors of the Committee who were unable to attend include:
Joe Curtis*, Storey County Emergency Management
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Jon Price chaired the meeting. Attendees introduced themselves. A quorum (a majority of the 13 members
of the Board of Directors) was present. Jon explained that the NHMPC meeting was being held in
Pahrump to allow the Committee members to meet the local officials and to receive insight into the
County’s hazards.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM AUGUST 26, 2010
The minutes of the August 26, 2010, meetings of the committee were unanimously approved. Minutes of
the committee are posted on the NHMPC Web site at www.nbmg.unr.edu/nhmpc/nhmpc.htm.
Robert Martinez reported that a new pilot program, named the Silver Jackets Program, is being formed. It
will be comprised of federal, state, local, tribal, and non-governmental agencies. The concept of the
program is to provide a more formal and consistent strategy for implementing an interagency approach to
planning and implementing measures to reduce the risks associated with natural hazards. It will serve as
2
the mechanism for developing and maintaining interagency partnerships and collectively moving towards
solutions to high-priority issues. Robert stated he believes the NHMPC should serve as the lead
organization, with Jon Price representing the NHMPC. The first meeting is planned for January 13, 2011.
For additional information on the Silver Jackets, please contact:
Tammy Conforti
Institute for Water Resources, USACE
609 Second Street
Davis, CA 95616
530-756-1104
[email protected]
NYE COUNTY PRESENTATION
Brent Jones gave a presentation on the history, demographics, government, geography, and economy of
Nye County. The county has an area of approximately 18,000 square miles, with three stoplights. The
county has a current population of 46,200, which is down approximately 600 people from 2007. It is
comprised of all unincorporated towns (incorporation has been voted down three times).
The communities of Pahrump, Tonopah, and Round Mountain are governed by elected town boards, the
other communities are governed by Commissioners who are appointed. County Commissioners are
elected by residents.
Nye County is comprised mainly of federally owned land and houses the Nevada Test Site, Tonopah Test
Range, Yucca Mountain, and two sovereign Indian nations.
The County has nine volunteer fire departments and five volunteer ambulance services.
The terrain ranges from the low desert to the high mountains.
The County is currently building a 10,000-square-foot emergency operations center in Tonopah, a new
ambulance barn in Beatty, and a ten-acre state-of-the-art training center in Pahrump.
The economy is based on mining, ranching, agriculture, the Nevada Test Site, brothels (fees from brothels
provide $165,000 per year for ambulance services, and veteran services are funded from brothel fees), and
small businesses. Solar plants are planned for Amargosa Valley and Tonopah.
The County’s hazards are diverse and include mine rescue, fires from oil fields and refineries, wild land
rural fires (which have the potential for destroying small towns), power outages, winter storms, flash
flooding, African bees (they recently eradicated a swarm that was 12x20’), and the West Nile virus
(which killed twenty-four horses and one human a few years ago). While spraying infected mosquitoes,
officials had to find a way to prevent harm to the protected Amargosa toad.
The County suffers from economic hardship. Seventy percent of the school children in the County are on
either free or reduced meal programs.
With flash flood being a major hazard to the town of Pahrump, one future mitigation project would be to
divert the drainage of the Wheeler Wash so flood waters can’t inundate the town.
EARTHQUAKE HAZARD IN NYE COUNTY
3
Jon Price reported that earthquake faults occur throughout Nevada. The Nevada Bureau of Mines and
Geology recently released the map Quaternary Faults in Nevada (NBMG Open-File Report 09-9,
available at www.nbmg.unr.edu). The on-line version of the map is searchable, which allows for
searching all known large and potentially active faults in the area of a specific address. The map is to be
used for approximate fault locations and should not be used as a definitive location of faults. If planning
to build in one of the zones shown on the map, it is wise to hire a geological consultant to precisely locate
faults and determine their frequency of movement. By using the information icon, and clicking on a
specific fault, the known information on the fault appears. There are also layers that show the aerial
photography and topography.
Due to extension, Nevada is acquiring approximately 1.3 acres of land each year. Salt Lake City and Reno
are moving apart about a centimeter a year.
Jon distributed Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology’s Open-File Report 09-8, Estimated Losses from
Earthquakes near Nevada Communities, available at
www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/of098/Scenarios/OpenFileReport09-8.pdf. The report contains HAZUS runs for
38 communities in Nevada, essentially all towns with a population of at least 500. The report contains
runs for magnitudes 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, and 7 earthquakes. The runs were compiled using a fault on the
Quaternary fault map that is closest to the center of the community. The fault depth is run at 10 km (the
average depth of earthquakes in the Great Basin).
In 1932, Cedar Mountain (near Gabbs) recorded a 7.1 magnitude earthquake. Jon went on to show a
number of maps from the Nevada Seismological Laboratory’s website showing numerous small (from
magnitudes 3.1 to 4.3) earthquakes located in Nye County from 2005 to 2010.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the probability of a magnitude 6.0 earthquake within the next
50 years occurring near Pahrump is between 5 and 10%. The total economic loss to Pahrump for a
magnitude 6 earthquake is estimated at $84 million.
HAZUS is an excellent tool that city managers, emergency managers, and planners should use in hazard
mitigation, planning, and emergency response and recovery exercises.
The consequences of earthquakes can be huge in Nevada, particularly if individuals are not prepared.
The best thing that can be done to prevent building damage and loss of life or injury is to be prepared to
respond; mitigate structural risks, largely through having current building codes; and mitigate
nonstructural risks.
Jon’s PowerPoint presentation on “Earthquake Hazards in Nye County” is available online at
www.nbmg.unr.edu/Geohazards/Earthquakes/EarthquakeResources.html#Presentations.
FLOOD HAZARD IN NYE COUNTY/CITY OF PAHRUMP
Brent Jones reported that their main flood hazard is flash flooding from the Wheeler Wash. They had a
really wet year in 2005 and a lot of sediment washed out of the mountains, but it drained into the desert so
the community was not at risk. Most of the canyons along the Spring Mountains can produce large
amounts of flowing water.
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) BASICS
Kim Groenewold discussed the flood hazards in Nevada and the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP). She stated that most of the State-declared disasters have been from floods.
4
In Nevada, any sizable surface body of water will have water right issues.
Alluvial fan flooding can be very difficult to plan for because it doesn’t follow a predictable path.
Floods after a wildfire in the upper reaches of a steep watershed are common. The fire denudes the
hillsides so when it rains or the snow melts, the soils can become saturated and cause flooding.
Kim explained that her position is to act as the liaison between FEMA’s NFIP and the cities and counties.
Federal regulation requires an NFIP Coordinator in each state. Kim is the coordinator for Nevada.
If a property is not identified as being in the floodplain, but flood insurance is purchased, the insured
property is covered for flood damages (no matter the source) if at least two properties are flooded.
Kim reported that building codes are considered mitigation because they prevent future losses.
There are mitigation grants available. One is the FMA grant program that is available to all communities
participating in the NFIP.
2011 UNIFIED HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT CYCLE INFORMATION
Elizabeth Ashby reported on FEMA’s Unified Hazard Mitigation Assistance (UHMA) Program.
Two programs available to Nevada communities are:
I.
HMGP – Post Disaster Mitigation; available after a presidentially declared disaster.
II.
PDMC – Pre-disaster Mitigation; nationally competitive grants for pre-disaster projects and
planning activities. PDMC project grants require a Benefit-Cost Analysis and documentation that
will support the application. Documentation is critical to a successful proposal.
Elizabeth distributed a leaflet on the “Unified Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program in Nevada” (see
attached; deadlines are included in the flier). The next deadline is June 16, 2011 when the letter of intent
for applying for submitting applications is due.
DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF 2010 VERSION OF STATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
AND SUBMISSION TO FEMA
Jim Walker reported that the Nevada State Hazard Mitigation Plan update is completed and has been
approved by FEMA as an enhanced plan. The enhanced plan will allow for up to 20% in additional
funding for mitigation efforts after a Presidential declaration of disaster (instead of the current 15%).
The subcommittee will be meeting in January to start the next update process.
Elizabeth Ashby commented that Nevada is one of eight states with approved enhanced plans. Having an
enhanced plan increases the points awarded to grant applications by the regional FEMA office by a point
or two.
Jon commended Jim Walker for his efforts in keeping the committee going and the committee for doing
such an excellent job on the update.
The updated plan is posted on the NHMPC website.
CURRENT VACANCIES ON THE NHMPC BOARD
5
Jon Price reported that Press Clewe has resigned his position on the NHMPC Board. Press held the
Community Representative position on the Board. Jon requested recommendations for Press’
replacement. Numerous recommendations for a replacement were made. Elizabeth Ashby will submit the
recommendations to Frank Siracusa, who will make an appointment to the Board.
REPORT ON THE STATUS OF GRANTS
Karen Johnson reported on the status of the following funded projects (see attached):
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
• HMGP1540, Waterfall Fire funding - Pending FEMA closure;
• HMGP 1583, S. Nevada Floods - Pending FEMA closure;
• HMGP 1629, N. NV Flood – mostly completed; and
• HMGP 1738, Fernley Floods;
PDM (Pre-Disaster Mitigation) Grant Program:
• PDM 04/05, HAZUS Date Base Update – Closed:
• PDM 06, Elko Band Council Plan – Awaiting Elko Band adoption;
• PDM 07, awards for plans for Storey, Esmeralda, and Washoe Counties and the Henderson Sewer
project;
• PDM 08, Sky Tavern Wildfire water storage tank, Clark County Mitigation Plan Update;
• PDM 09, Funding requests from the Carson City Fire Department, Douglas County Emergency
Management, DEM, and Washoe County Emergency Management - FEMA NEPA Review
started; and
• PDM 10, funding increased by FEMA from $3 million to $4 million – Pending FEMA funding
Elizabeth Ashby reported that FEMA has requested that Nevada participate in a pilot project in which
URS would set up a GIS database to assist in tracking and mapping mitigation projects.
Ron Lynn asked if NHMPC has a plan for the future direction of the NHMPC. Jon Price suggested that
NHMPC have a future meeting devoted to long-term plans for NHMPC.
ACTION ITEM: An agenda item for strategic planning for the NHMPC will be added to a future meeting.
PRIORITAZATION OF UNIFIED HAZARD MITIGAITON ASSISTANCE SUBAPPLICATIONS
John Louie gave a brief presentation on the revised Las Vegas Microzoanation project. The project budget
had to be decreased to no more than $400,000 because that is all FEMA will allow for projects in a state
that has a revised Hazard Mitigation Plan. Of the $400,000, $20,000 is to be allocated for Daphne
LaPointe to assist DEM in keeping the current enhanced plan updated.
Committee members ranked each of the eight proposals submitted for new funding. Rankings ranged
from 1 to 8 ranking, with 1 being the highest (most favored).
First priority to Douglas Route, 88 Flood Mitigation Project;
Second priority to Pershing, Humboldt Lander, Tri-County Hazard Mitigation Plan;
Third priority to Caliente Spring Heights Flood Project;
Fourth priority to Marlin Channel Flood Mitigation Project;
Fifth priority to Ft. Churchill Flood Mitigation Project;
Sixth priority to Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update;
6
Seventh priority to UNR NSL – Las Vegas Microzonation; and
Eighth priority to Elko County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
A motion to accept the proposed ranking and subsequent submission to DEM was approved.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments received.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF FUTURE MEETINGS
Thursday, February 10, 2011 – in northern Nevada – Yerington
Thursday, May 26, 2011 – in southern Nevada
Thursday, August 23 and 25, 2011 – in northern and southern Nevada (depending on proposal
submissions)
Thursday, November 10, 2011 – in southern Nevada
REVIEW OF ACTION ITEMS
An agenda item for strategic planning for the NHMPC will be added to a future meeting.
ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at 1:04 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Terri Garside November 23, 2010
Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee
c/o Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology
University of Nevada, Reno/MS 178
Reno, NV 89557-0178
775-784-4415
State Contacts
Eligible Activities by Program
HMGP & PDM
Elizabeth Ashby
NV Division of Emergency Management (DEM)
(775) 687-0314 - [email protected]
FMA, RFC, & SRL
Kim Groenewold
NV Division of Water Resources (NDWR)
(775) 684-2884 - [email protected]
Dates & Deadlines
March 2011
Nevada UHMA Training –
locations and dates to be
announced
Early June 2011
FEMA application period opens
Jun 16, 2011
Notice of Interest forms due to
DEM or NDWR
Jun 30, 2011
Establish eGrants access
Aug 11, 2011
Scope of Work & Benefit Cost
Analysis in eGrants
Aug 23, 2011
Southern Nevada NHMPC
meeting – Presentations to
NHMPC
Aug 25, 2011
Northern Nevada NHMPC
meeting – Presentations to
NHMPC
Oct 26, 2011
Full Application Package with
backup documentation in
eGrants
Nov 10, 2011
NHMPC meeting – final review
& ranking
Nov 17, 2011
Final submission of application
in eGrants
Early December
State submits applications
to FEMA, application
period closes
in Nevada
Hazard Mitigation
Assistance (HMA)
HMA under FEMA’s Mitigation Directorate
unifies the pre-disaster grant programs to
better support the overall goal of reducing the
loss of life and property due to natural
hazards.
Post-Disaster Hazard Mitigation
Grant Program (HMGP)
Repetitive Flood Claims (RFC)
Program
The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
provides grants to States and local governments to
implement long-term hazard mitigation measures after a
major disaster declaration. Authorized under Section
404 of the Stafford Act and administered by FEMA,
HMGP was created to reduce the loss of life and
property due to natural disasters. The program enables
mitigation measures to be implemented during the
immediate recovery from a disaster.
The RFC grant program was created with the goal of
reducing flood damages to individual properties for
which one or more claim payments for losses have been
made under flood insurance coverage and that will
result in the greatest savings to the NFIF (National
Flood Insurance Fund) in the shortest period of time.
http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/hmgp/
Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM)
Program
The HMA programs: Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM),
Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA), Repetitive Flood
Claims (RFC), and Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL)
provide mitigation grants annually on an allocation and
competitive basis to State, Territory, Tribal, and local
entities. The new unified process achieves economies of
scale and portfolio management for Federal, State, and
local officials by aligning program requirements in a
unified HMA guidance document. The intent of this
alignment is to enhance the quality and efficiency of
grant awards.
In addition, under the unified process, eligible sub
applications submitted but not funded under a specific
grant program may also be considered for another
mitigation grant program(s).
The PDM program provides funds to States, Territories,
Federally recognized Indian Tribal governments, and
communities for hazard mitigation planning and the
implementation of mitigation projects prior to a disaster
event. The goal of the PDM Program is to reduce
overall risks to the population and structures, while also
reducing reliance on funding from actual disaster
declarations.
www.fema.gov/government/grant/pdm/index.shtm
Flood Mitigation Assistance
(FMA) Program
The FMA grant program provides funding to States,
federally recognized Indian Tribal governments, and
communities so that cost-effective measures can be
taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood
damage to buildings, manufactured homes, and other
structures insured under the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP).The long-term goal of FMA is to
reduce or eliminate claims under the NFIP through
mitigation activities.
www.fema.gov/government/grant/fma/index.shtm
The RFC program is subject to the availability of
appropriation funding. RFC grants will be awarded on a
national basis without reference to State allocations,
quotas, or other formula-based allocations of funds.
The funding source for the RFC grant program is the
NFIF.
www.fema.gov/government/grant/rfc/index.shtm
Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL)
Program
The SRL program provides funding to reduce or
eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage to severe
repetitive residential structures insured under the NFIP.
The definition of severe repetitive loss as applied to this
program is a residential property that is covered under
an NFIP flood insurance policy, and:
(a) That has at least four NFIP claim payments
(including building and contents) over $5,000 each,
and the cumulative amount of such claims
payments exceeds $20,000; or
(b) For which at least two separate claims payments
(building payments only) have been made with the
cumulative amount of the building portion of such
claims exceeding the market value of the building.
For both (a) and (b) above, at least two of the referenced
claims must have occurred within any 1-year period,
and must be greater than 10 days apart. The long-term
goal of the SRL program is to reduce or eliminate
claims under the NFIP through project activities that
will result in the greatest savings to the NFIF in the
shortest period of time.
www.fema.gov/government/grant/srl/index.shtm
1 of 7
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Hazard Mitigaiton Grant Program
HMGP 1540 - Waterfall Fire
Available Funding
12-Month Lock-In
State Management Costs
5% Initiative Public Awareness
7% Planning Project
Regular Projects
Requesting Entity
Proposals
Federal Award
$
$
$
$
$
Expended
Allowable
726,541.00
226,808.97
36,327.00
50,858.00
413,053.00
Allocated
$
$
$
Difference
36,327.00 Public Awareness
$
50,352.00 Elko Co.
$
271,044.00 SPWB & State Parks $
Balance
Status as of:
State Parks
$
87,202.03
$
87,202.03
$
-
The request for closure is pending at FEMA Region IX.
Elko County
$
50,352.00
$
50,352.00
$
-
CLOSED
SPWB
$
325,851.00
$
184,743.00
$
141,108.00
Public Awareness
$
36,327.00
$
36,309.92
$
17.08
$
499,732.03
$
358,606.95
$
141,125.08
UNR
$
42,493.20
$
42,492.91
$
0.29
DEM
$
184,315.77
$
87,711.32
$
96,604.45
Subtotal
$
226,808.97
$
130,204.23
$
96,604.74
Total
$
726,541.00
$
488,811.18
$
237,729.82
Subtotal
506.00
142,009.00
1-Aug-10
The request for closure is pending reimbursement of Admin
CLOSED
State Management Costs
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
2 of 7
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
HMGP 1583 - 2005 Flood
Available Funding
12-Month Lock-In
5% Initiative
7% Planning Project
Regular Projects
Proposals
Requesting Entity
$
$
$
$
Federal Award
Allowable
533,519.00
26,676.00
37,346.00
469,497.00
Allocated
$
$
$
Expended
Difference
25,851.00 State Parks
37,346.00 UNR Risk Ass.
328,519.00 SPWB
Balance
$
$
$
825.00 State Mgmt
140,978.00
Status as of:
1-Aug-10
Proposals 5% Initiatives
State Parks
$
25,851.00
$
25,851.00
$
-
SPWB
$
469,497.00
$
328,519.00
$
Proposal Planning
UNR Risk Assessmt
$
37,346.00
$
37,346.00
$
$
532,694.00
$
391,716.00
$
140,978.00
$
825.00
$
795.71
$
29.29
$
533,519.00
$
392,511.71
$
141,007.29
CLOSED
Proposals Regular Projects
Subtotal
State Management Costs
Total
140,978.00
-
The request for closure is pending at reimbursement of admin.
CLOSED
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
3 of 7
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
HMGP-1629-New Year's Flood
Available Funding
12-Month Lock-In
Allowable
$625,497.00
$31,274.85
$45,675.00
$548,547.15
5% Initiative
7% Planning Project
Regular Projects
Requesting Entity
Proposals 5% Initiative
Sparks
Federal Award
Allocated
$
$
Expended
Difference
22,872.00
45,248.00
Balance
Status as of:
1-Aug-10
$
25,125.00
$
22,872.00
$
2,253.00 Moved to Management Costs
$
45,675.00
$
56,800.39
$
(11,125.39) Completed.
$
444,017.00
$
33,487.99
$
410,529.01 Closed - $288,024 Transferred to State Mgmt. & Reno - Lawton
$
(288,024.00)
Reno- Lawton Interceptor
Subtotal
$
$
286,680.00
513,473.00
$
$
10,350.00
123,510.38
$
$
276,330.00 Complete except for re-vegetation
677,986.62
Management Costs
UNR - NHMPC support
UNR - Planning Sub. Support
DEM
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
150,364.63
45,478.73
67,938.00
263,781.36
$
$
$
$
14,207.41
6,708.11
60,783.21
81,698.73
$
$
$
$
136,157.22
38,770.62
7,154.79
182,082.63
$
777,254.36
$
205,209.11
$
860,069.25
Proposals Planning
State Plan Update
Proposals Regular Projects
Washoe Co School
Total
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
4 of 7
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
HMGP-1738 - Fernley Flood
Available Funding
12-Month Lock-In
Allowable
5% Initiative
7% Planning Project
Regular Projects
$
$
$
$
Requesting Entity
Proposals 5% Initiative
URM inventory - NBMG
$
23,776.90
Proposals Planning
Lyon County Plan I
$
33,287.66
Proposals Regular Projects
Lyon County Plan II - Outreach
SPWB
City of Reno Dant Wash
$
$
$
14,028.00
100,445.00
304,000.00
$
-
$
$
475,537.56
$
$
23,253.81
$
$
555,855.93
$
Subtotal
State Management Costs
Total
Federal Grant
Allowable
475,538.00
23,776.90
33,287.66
418,473.00
Allocated
$
$
Expended
$
1,687.50
23,776.90 State Management
33,287.66
Balance
$
25,464.40 In process
$
33,287.66 Contracting w/URS
Difference
$
23,253.81
Status as of:
-
$
$
$
14,028.00 Contracting w/URS
100,445.00 Reviewing Ely Conservation Seismic Retrofit
304,000.00 Pending NEPA & FEMA Funding
-
$
418,473.00
5,964.99
$
17,288.82
7,652.49
$
494,513.88
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
1-Aug-10
5 of 7
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grants
2004-2005
Requesting Entity
UNR-BMG
$
Federal Grant
60,063.50
$
Expended
60,063.50
Balance
$
Status as of:
-
1-Aug-10
CLOSED
2006
Requesting Entity
Federal Grant
Elko Band Council
Expended
29,115.00
Balance
29,115.00
$
-
Status as of:
1-Aug-10
FEMA Approved Plan - Awaiting Elko Band adoption - closing
requested
.
2007
Requesting Entity
Storey County Plan
Esmeralda Co. Plan
Washoe Co. Plan
Henderson Sewer
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
Federal Grant
26,377.50
24,949.50
38,406.75
377,853.00
467,586.75
$
$
$
$
$
Expended
26,377.50
24,725.32
35,302.14
86,404.96
$
$
$
$
$
Management Cost
UNR
DEM
Subtotal
$
$
$
44,000.00
2,779.00
46,779.00
$
$
$
44,000.00
2,779.00
46,779.00
$
$
$
$
514,365.75
$
133,183.96
$
Requesting Entity
Reno - Sky Tavern Wildfire
Clark Co. Mit Plan update
Subtotal
$
$
$
Federal Grant
464,081.50
56,985.42
521,066.92
$
$
Expended
-
$
$
Management Costs (10% of
federal funds received)
$
52,106.69
$
-
$
52,106.69 Pending
$
573,173.61
$
-
$
52,106.69
Total
Balance
Status as of:
1-Aug-10
FEMA Approved Plan
224.18 FEMA revisions in process
3,104.61 FEMA approved pending adoption request to closeout to FEMA
377,853.00 Construction Contract Awarded
381,181.79
-
Completed
Completed
381,181.79
2008
Total
Balance
Status as of:
464,081.50 Pending award from State
56,985.42 Consulting Contract to be awarded
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
1-Aug-10
6 of 7
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grants
2009 - Pending Funding
Requesting Entity
Douglas County Emerg. Mgmt.
Douglas County Emerg. Mgmt.
Subtotal
Federal Grant
$
482,580.00
$
488,325.00
$
970,905.00
Management Costs (10% of
federal funds received)
$
97,090.50
$
1,067,995.50
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Federal Grant
500,000.00
1,350,000.00
834,597.00
30,799.00
52,500.00
41,250.00
39,001.50
1,239,711.04
$
4,087,858.54
$
408,785.85
$
4,496,644.39
Total
Expended
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
-
Balance
Status as of:
482,580.00 FEMA NEPA Review started
488,325.00 FEMA NEPA Review started
970,905.00
1-Aug-10
97,090.50 Pending FEMA Funding
$
1,067,995.50
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Balance
500,000.00
1,350,000.00
834,597.00
30,799.00
52,500.00
41,250.00
39,001.50
1,239,711.04
$
4,087,858.54
2010 - Pending Funding
Requesting Entity
City of Reno JES Wildland Fuel
Douglas Co. - 395 Culvert Proj.
TRFP - Demo Edison Way
Lincoln Co. Plan Update
Churchill/Mineral County Plan
White Pine County Plan
Nye County Plan Update
Storey - 6 Mile Canyon
Subtotal
Management Costs (10% of
federal funds received)
Total
Expended
$
$
-
-
Status as of:
Pending FEMA Funding
Pending FEMA Funding
Pending FEMA Funding
Funded
Funded, In Process
Funded
Funded
Pending FEMA Funding
$
408,785.85 $15K received. Pending FEMA Funding
$
408,785.85
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
1-Aug-10
7 of 7
PDM Grant $ / Year
PDM & HMGP Grant $/Year
4500000
4500000
4000000
4000000
3500000
3500000
3000000
3000000
2500000
HMGP
2500000
2000000
PDM
2000000
1500000
1500000
1000000
1000000
500000
500000
0
0
2001
2003
2005
2007
NV Hazard Mitigation Grant $
by Hazard Category
4%
1% 5%
4%
27%
45%
0%
2001
2009
14%
Earthquake
Flood
Wildfire
Public Awareness
Total Projects
Planning
Management Planning
Management
Hazard Type
2003
2005
2009
2011
FEMA Funding
Earthquake
$
513,262.00
Flood
$
3,924,418.25
Wildfire
$
2,047,127.29
Public Awareness
$
36,310.00
Total Projects
$
6,521,117.54
Planning
$
Management Plannin $
Management
Total
2007
$
$
566,991.42 County Planning
178,750.93 State Plan
717,365.08 $447,547 Pending/ $90K Deoblig
7,984,224.97
C:\Documents and Settings\tgarside\My Documents\Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee\MINUTES\Grant Report 1 Nov 2010.xls
Nevada Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee
Meeting Schedule
2011
Date
February 10
Thursday
Time
9:30 AM
Location
Northern Nevada
Yerington, Lyon Co
May 23
Monday
10 30AM
Southern Nevada
Clark Co.- Overton, NV
May 24
Tuesday
09:00 AM
Southern Nevada
Clark Co.- Overton, NV
August 23ss
Friday*
9:30 AM
Southern Nevada
Henderson, NV
August 25
Thursday
9:30 AM
Northern Nevada
Storey Co.
November 10
Thursday
9:30 AM
Southern Nevada
Clark County Flood
Control District
Las Vegas, NV
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Objective
Updates to State Plan
2011 UHMA Grant Cycle Schedule
Earthquake Hazard in Host County
Host County Presentation
Dam Safety Presentation
Glen Daily Presentation on Truckee
River Lawton Interceptor Project
1. Develop strategic plan
2. Revise prioritization criteria
1.
2.
3.
4.
Updates to State Plan
Earthquake Hazard in Host County
Host County Presentation
Eric Smith, NDW, Propane Tank
Safety Presentation (pending)
1. Grant application presentations
Southern Nevada
2. Possible tour of City of Henderson’s
Pittman Pecos project
1. Updates to State Plan
2. Grant application presentations
Northern Nevada
3. Earthquake Hazard in Host County
4. County Presentation
5. (possible tour of Six Mile Canyon
project)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Updates to State Plan
Presentation to Gale Fraser
Prioritization of all apps
Earthquake Hazard in Host County
Host County Presentation
Possible Pittman Pecos project tour
* Meeting is contingent on the number of applications submitted from Southern Nevada.