Dear Reader, Thank you for your interest in public lands and welcome to the Lower Grave Vegetation Management Project Environmental Assessment Reader’s Guide. This Reader’s Guide is meant to assist you in understanding this project and the Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action. Inside you will find a description of the what, where, and why of the project we are proposing. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) analyzes multiple resources when considering the appropriate treatments on public lands. This process includes internal and external scoping which helps define the issues that are analyzed within the Environmental Assessment. Inside this Reader’s Guide you will find a discussion of the Purpose and Need for the project, a description of the Alternatives, the Proposed Action (which includes a description of the proposed treatments and associated road work), and a map of the project area with the proposed treatments. Near the back of the document you can read about the public involvement process and how you can participate. The last page of the Reader’s Guide contains a Forest Management Tour in the Lower Grave area and is designed to show past treatments from similar management projects. We hope this document helps you understand the project and the analytical process that developed it. Please contact our office if you have questions. Your input is an important part of the management of your public lands. Allen Bollschweiler Field Manager, Grants Pass Resource Area BLM January 2015 Medford District - Grants Pass Resource Area Lower Grave Vegetation Management Project: Environmental Assessment Reader’s Guide 1 Lower Grave Vegetation Management (LGVM) Purpose and Need for this Project (EA, pp. 8-9) The project’s purpose is to implement forest management activities that improve forest health and vigor, reduce wildfire danger, and produce a sustainable supply of timber and other forest commodities. The BLM is required to implement the Oregon and California (O&C) Railroad Revested Lands Act*, the 1997 Northwest Forest Plan, and the 1995 Medford District Resource Management Plan (RMP). An example of healthy BLM forests after the application of several tools to meet resource objectives developed by multiple diciplines. Many such tools are part of the Lower Grave Vegetation Management Project. Active management includes a combination of commercial thinning, density management, regeneration harvest, and hazardous fuels reduction. Active management is needed because the forests of Southwest Oregon are dynamic and will benefit from treatments that improve forest and stand health. These activities will help restore forests in Southwest Oregon, assist in meeting mandated Allowable Sale Quantity, maintain/improve critical habitat units in occupied Northern Spotted Owl (NSO) sites, and retain legacy conifers and hardwoods. *Requires the Secretary of the Interior to manage O&C lands for permanent forest production. Alternatives Below is a simple description of the project. For a more in-depth discussion of the project, see the LGVM Project EA. The No Action Alternative provides a baseline for the comparison of the Action Alternative and describes the existing condition and the continuing trends within the Planning Area. Unhealthy forest floor in need of hazardous fuels treatment. The Alternative 1: The No Action Alternative (EA, p. 13) No Action Alternative would maintain these current conditions. This alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the project. Under the No Action Alternative, the present environmental conditions and trends will continue. Timber harvest and vegetation treatments would not occur at this time, nor would the associated employment opportunities for local communities or the opportunity to fund and implement maintenance projects. Road maintenance would be dependent on funding and reciprocal right-of-way agreements. Future vegetation treatments would not be precluded 2 2 Alternative 2: The Action Alternative or The Proposed Action (EA, pp. 14-22) The BLM is proposing a variety of treatments within the LGVM Project Planning Area. The treatments are described in the following pages of this Reader’s Guide. The proposed treatments meet the Purpose and Need, as described in the section on the previous page. Below is a summary of the treatments proposed under Alternative 2. Not all proposed treatments will be selected for implementation. Summary of Proposed Lower Grave Vegetation Management Project Activities Forest Management Commercial thinning* Variable density thin* Regeneration harvest* Density management Hazardous Fuel Reduction Total acres Number of units Matrix LUA Acres 177 332 63 9 295 876 41 Riparian Reserve LUA Acres 43 8 0 0 83 134 *Commercial component Road Work Summary Approximate Amount (miles) Total Existing Temporary Route Reconstruction 0.78 miles 7 temporary routes New Temporary Route Construction Road Maintenance 1.12 miles 9 temporary routes New Road Construction 47 miles 34 existing system roads 0.31 miles 1 permanent road (1 truck turnaround) Proposed Forest Management Activities by Percentages Commercial Thinning: 20% Variable Density Thinning: 38% Regeneration Harvest 7% Density Management: 1% Hazardous Fuels Reduction: 34% 3 3 Alternative 2 (Continued) Commercial Thinning (CT) (EA, pp. 15-16) Commercial thinning is a treatment applied to overstocked forest stands where some trees are removed but not all (generally less than 60% of the trees in the stand). Forest stands proposed for CT treatments generally occur where stands of single tree species are mostly the same size and age. This treatment emphasizes retention of the healthiest most dominant trees. Commercial thinning objectives include: Commercial thin • Improving the health of the remaining trees which improves the overall health of the stand. • Improving wildlife habitat by increasing the size and health of individual tree crowns. • Decreasing mortality of the remaining trees. • Producing wood volume and increasing/maintaining growth rates. • Improving individual tree resiliency to wildfire. Variable Density Thinning (VDT) (EA, pp. 17-18) Variable density thinning treatments are applied to forest stands that are generally more diverse than stands proposed for commercial thinning treatments. Stands proposed for VDT contain multiple tree species of various sizes and ages. This type of thinning may include treatments that create space (gaps) around large legacy trees of less prominent species such as pine, oak and cedar. It may also maintain denser areas that may remain untreated (skips). VDT objectives include: • Removing excess trees that create “ladder fuels” which improve a forest stand’s ability to recover from or withstand wildfire. • Improving wildlife habitat. • Favoring the retention of more fire tolerant and drought tolerant trees. • Increasing the overall health of the forest by improving the health of individual trees. Variable Density Thin: Desired Conditions on Less than 35% Slope Adapted from Rolf Gersonde, Silviculturist, Watershed Services Division, Seattle Public Utilities. 4 4 Regeneration Harvest (RH) (EA, p. 18) Regeneration harvest is a treatment applied to forest stands that have reached the maximum growth potential in height and diameter. This type of treatment would remove a majority of the trees (treatments maintain 6-8 trees per acre greater than 20 inches in diameter) in a single entry and allows the establishment of a younger vigorously growing stand, usually through planting. This treatment protects habitat features such as snags and fallen dead trees. Regeneration harvest objectives include: • Fostering the establishment of vigorous young forests while retaining habitat components such as large trees, snags and fallen dead trees. • Reducing the instances of insect and disease outbreaks that may be associated with older forest stands. • Providing a sustainable supply of timber and other forest products. Recent Regeneration Regeneration implemented 10+ years ago Density Management (DM) (EA, p. 18) Density management is a treatment applied to stands that have a mixture of small trees and larger trees. The intent of this treatment is to remove a portion of the small trees and leave the large trees. This treatment creates a stand with an overall larger tree diameter. DM objectives include: • Reducing the density of the forest stand which will increase the available water, growing space, nutrients and sunlight for the remaining trees. • Stimulating growth, improving tree crown densities and creating a more fire tolerant forest stand. • Enhancing and promoting the longevity of the future forests by retaining drought tolerant species such as pine, cedars, oak and other large hardwoods. Density Management would thin smaller trees, leaving the larger ones in place. 5 5 Alternative 2 (continued) Hazardous Fuels Reduction (HFR) (EA, pp. 18-19) Hazardous fuel reduction is a treatment applied to areas that exhibit thick uncharacteristic growth of understory brush, shrubs, hardwood trees and conifers. These areas have extra fuel loading and pose a wildfire hazard to adjacent forest stands, wildlife habitat and human populations. This treatment may be proposed and conducted as a stand-alone procedure or it may be implemented in conjunction with the treatments described previously in this Reader’s Guide. Treatments that reduce hazardous fuels include: slashing, hand piling, pile burning, chipping, lopping and scattering, biomass removal and/or underburning. HFR objectives include: • Reducing existing fire hazard by thinning the understory. • Reducing the amount of “ladder fuels” which will reduce the risk of crown fire. • Creating a discontinuous fuel concentration and reducing the presence of surface fuels. Pile Burning Underburning Riparian Reserve Thinning (RRT) (EA, p. 19) Lop and Scatter Riparian thinning treatments are applied in portions of forest stands near stream channels. They are designed to meet and/or speed the attainment of Aquatic Conservation Strategy (ACS) objectives. Within the LGVM Project, there are 134 acres proposed for RRT, 83 acres associated with HFR will not have commercial extraction. The remaining 51 acres will occur within units proposed for CT and DM treatments and may have commercial extraction. For more information on ACS objectives see Appendix 2 of the LGVM EA. Riparian thinning objectives include: • • • • 6 Restoring and maintaining the ecological health of watersheds and aquatic ecosystems. Protecting fish habitat and other riparian-dependent species. Restoring and preventing degradation to riparian habitats. Increasing the size and health of retained trees to improve future wood recruitment into stream channels. 6 Proposed Road Work (EA, pp. 22-23) Temporary Route Construction (1.7 miles) • These routes are created in areas where no previous routes exist. They allow operators temporary access to harvest units. • Temporary routes would be decommissioned after use. Temporary Route Reconstruction (0.87 miles) • These routes already exist on the landscape. • Reconstruction restores an existing road to its engineered condition. • These routes would be decommissioned after use. New road construction (0.31 miles) • The proposed new road would become a permanent part of the BLM-managed forest transportation system. • Developed and maintained system that serve the needs of users. • Needed to facilitate an economically viable timber sale. • This road will not be decommissioned after use. Road Maintenance (47 miles) • Activities on existing roads to maintain their original design standard. • Reduce unwanted effects from road runoff. Road Maintenance Typical BLM road Decommissioned road (mulched road bed) Temporary Route Reconstruction 7 7 Lower Grave Project Unit Selection Process An interdisciplinary team (IDT) of resource specialist is brought together during the planning stages of a project. There are many steps that the IDT must go through before the final proposed treatment units are selected. Below is a brief description of the unit screening and selection process. Step 1 - Delineate Project Area (22,841 acres) and identify BLM-Managed lands (11,066 acres) Private lands** removed within project area Step 2 - Identify Riparian, Soils, Flora and Fauna Protection Areas (~5,000 acres). Identify areas based on access, forest health, age, etc (~5,000 acres). Land Available* after Biotic and Physical Geographic Features Screen *Darker hillshade = BLM-managed **White = Private, Non-BLM Step 3 - Identify Proposed Units & Prescriptions Resulting from the Screening Process After all filters, potential treatment areas = 1,010 acres *Darker hillshade = BLM-managed **White = Private, Non-BLM or Dropped BLM acres Proposed LGVM Project Units as Compared with Total Project Area Non BLM (private/ state/county): 52% Screened out by age, access, etc: 22% Screened out by biotic features: 22% *Darker hillshade = BLM-managed **White = Private, Non-BLM or Dropped BLM acres 8 Proposed LGVM Units: 4% 8 Public Involvement Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Public involvement for the Lower Grave Vegetation The Environmental Assessment Process Management Project began on February 7, 2013. A preliminary project map and scoping letter were sent to Identify the Purpose and Need for the residences within and adjacent to the LGVM Project Planning proposed action Area. The Grants Pass Interdiciplinary Team held a public Internal and External Scoping meeting and field tour on February 23, 2013 in the Wolf Creek area. Public Scoping Meeting and Field Trip From these efforts, the BLM received a total of 14 public comments (letters, emails and phone calls). Public input, resulting from scoping has helped shape the LGVM Project. EA 45-day Public Comment Period Public participation for the LGVM Project is not over. The EA is open for a 45-day public comment period beginning on Tuesday, January 13, 2015 when the BLM publishes a legal notice in the Grants Pass Daily Courier. We request that your comments regarding this project be submitted before February 27, 2015. The draft Finding of No Significant Impact for the project will be available for a 30-day public comment period beginning on January 28, 2015. Comments received between now and February 27, 2015 will be incorporated into the decision making process for the project. Comments may be submitted in hardcopy or electronically to the address listed below. For more information on the LGVM Project visit the Medford District website http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/medford/plans/ index.php. or call our Project Lead, Ferris Fisher at the number listed below. Ferris Fisher Planning and Environmental Coordinator Grants Pass Resource Area 2164 NE Spalding Avenue Grants Pass, Oregon 97526 (541) 471-6639 [email protected] Identify Issues for analysis Develop Alternatives Analyze Impacts and Identify Mitigation Measures Describe Affected Environment Analyze Environmental Effects of Alternatives Release Environmental Assessment (EA) and the draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) EA Public Comment Period (current phase) Review and Incorporate EA Comments into Decision Making Process Release DR and final FONSI for EA Key Points of Public Participation List of Reviewers : Environmental Coordinator Fire and Fuels Specialist Hydrologist Botanist Fisheries Biologist Wildlife Biologist Forester (silviculture) Forester (harvest systems) Engineer (roads) Archaeologist Recreation Planner 9 9 10 10 11 Forest Management Tour in the Lower Grave Area The Grants Pass Resource Area invites you to personally view previous BLM forest management treatments, similar to the types of treatments proposed in Alternative 2 of the EA. If you choose to make this trip, please plan accordingly: Check the weather forecast, bring appropriate clothing and equipment, and tell someone where you are going. This tour may take approximately 3 hours. Stop #1: (27-3A) 2003 Commercial Thin 2005 Hand Pile Burn Stop #2: (507) 2002 Broadcast Burn Stop #3 2005 Density Management Stop #5 2003 Overstory Removal Stop #6 2003 Overstory Removal Stop #7 2003 Commercial Thin 2005 Hand Pile Burn Stop #4 2010 Hand Pile Burn 12 Medford District Bureau of Land Management • Grants Pass Resource Area 2164 NE Spalding Ave • Grants Pass, OR 97526 541-471-6500
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz