HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Update February 2009 Dr Nigel Dickson Director, AIDS Epidemiology Group Department of Preventive and Social Medicine University of Otago, Dunedin Update data on HIV diagnoses through antibody testing • 2008 figures and trends – 1999-2008 • New analyses – Ethnicity – “Late testers” • Mention new project – Follow up questionnaires 2008 figures and trends in people diagnosed with HIV through antibody testing – 1999-2008 Care with data … • Year of diagnosis not infection • Not all infected in New Zealand will have been diagnosed • Some infected people (most diagnosed initially overseas) do not have an antibody test in NZ – the data on these people captured through viral load testing Diagnosed HIV – through antibody testing – by year of test Unknown 200 Perinatal 180 Other IDU 160 140 Heterosexual contact Homosexual contact 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 Year of Diagnosis 06 07 08 Annual number of men diagnosed, infected through homosexual contact (MSM) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 MSM diagnosed with HIV – 1999-2008 Place of infection Place of residence at diagnosis 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 NZ 40 30 Overseas 30 20 Unk 20 Auckland 10 10 Age at diagnosis 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 1999 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 2000 0 0 Ethnicity 70 70 60 60 50 15-19 40 20-29 40 30 30-39 30 20 40-49 20 50+ 10 Europ 50 Maori PI Asian African 10 Other 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1999 0 0 Other NZ Overseas/unk Men and women diagnosed infected through heterosexual contact 50 45 Men 40 35 Women 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Heterosexually infected men and women diagnosed with HIV – 1999-2008 Place of residence at diagnosis Age at diagnosis 2008 1999 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 0 2007 10 Overseas/unk 2006 Unk 20 Other NZ 2005 Overseas 30 Auckland 2004 NZ 40 2003 50 2002 60 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2001 70 2000 Place of infection 80 Ethnicity 60 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 50 30-39 20 40-49 10 Asian African Other 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 0 2002 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 50+ PI 2001 20-29 Maori 30 2000 15-19 Europ 40 1999 <15 International comparison of MSM diagnosis rates – 2000-6 • Data recently published from 27/30 european (EU/EFTA ) countries • Canadian, Australian and US data from national surveillance reports Care with data… • Different patterns of HIV testing may exist • Rates of diagnosis derived from number of all men not MSM HIV diagnosis rate among MSM in major Western European countries + Australia, Canada, US and New Zealand 160.0 140.0 Australia Per million men aged 15-64yr Austria Belgium Canada 120.0 France Germany 100.0 Greece Ireland 80.0 Italy Netherlands 60.0 Norway Portugal 40.0 Spain Sweden 20.0 Switzerland United Kingdom 0.0 United States 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 New Zealand Ethnicity among people diagnosed with HIV through antibody testing • Information collected from clinician • Recent decade - 1999-2008 Care with data… • How ethnicity is determined • Rates of testing • Relatively small numbers Numbers of people diagnosed with HIV by year and ethnicity 90 80 70 Europ 60 Maori 50 PI 40 Asian African 30 Other 20 Unk 10 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Comparing disease between ethnic groups 1999-2008 Derive and compare rates – Numerator from clinician, denominator from census We have looked at… a) …overall comparison of diagnosis rates as an indication of newly recognised burden in these populations b) …comparison of age adjusted rate of diagnosis as a surrogate of infection risk Comparison of rates of newly diagnosed HIV among children and adults by means of infection 0-14yr MSM (all men 15-59yr men) Heterosexual males (all men 15-59yr men) Number Relative Rate and 95% CI Number Relative Rate and 95% CI Number Relative Rate and 95% CI Heterosexual Number females (all Relative women 15-59yr Rate and men) 95% CI European Maori Pacific Asian Other 4 6 3 4 30 1.0 (Reference) 4.5 (1.3-16.0) 4.6 (1.0-20.7) 8.9 (2.2-35.8) 527 (185-1500) 631 92 26 59 39 1.0 (Reference) 0.80 (0.64-1.0) 0.49 (0.33-0.72) 0.76 (0.58-1.0) 4.8 (3.5-6.7) 77 10 9 52 149 1.0 (Reference) 0.71 (0.37-1.4) 1.4 (0.69-2.8) 5.5 (3.9-7.8) 150 (114-197) 57 13 15 54 171 1.0 (Reference) 1.2 (0.66-2.2) 3.1 (1.8-5.5) 7.2 (4.9-10.4) 273 (202-368) Comparison of risks to predict future disease pattern in New Zealand • Use diagnosis rates as surrogates for infection rates • Need to take into account different age structures of population – Comparing age standardised rates and report as standardised incidence ratios + confidence intervals • Does the rate of infection in New Zealand give a better indication of likely future trends for infections here? – Overall SIRs and 95% CI – ‘”Infected in New Zealand” SIRs and 95% CI Standardised incidence ratio + 95% CI All infections All European Maori Pacific Asian Other 1.0 0.82 (0.67-97) 0.83 (0.63-1.07) 2.O (1.7-2.2) 42 (38-46) (Reference) MSM Hetero Males Hetero Females 1.0 0.80 0.48 0.77 (Reference) (0.64-0.97) (0.31-0.71) (0.59-0.98) 1.0 0.75 1.5 (Reference) (0.36-1.14) (0.67-2.8) 1.0 (Reference) 1.2 (0.62-2.0) 2.7 (1.5-4.5) 4.7 (3.4-6.5) 5.9 (4.4-7.7) 154 (130-180) 6.4 (4.8-10.2) 245 (210-284) Standardised incidence ratio + 95% CI People infected in New Zealand All European Maori 1.0 1.3 (1.0-1.6) (Reference) MSM 1.0 (Reference) Hetero Males Hetero Females 1.0 (Reference) 1.0 (Reference) Pacific Asian Other 0.81 0.96 (0.52-1.6) (0.70-1.29) 5.2 (3.2-7.8) 1.2 0.53 0.75 (0.88-1.5) (0.28-0.91) (0.49-1.1) 2.6 (1.2-4.8) 1.5 (0.48-3.5) 1.3 (0.16-4.7) 1.3 (0.27-3.8) 8.1 (1.0-29.3)) 2.8 (1.4-5.0) 3.3 (1.2-7.3) 3.6 1.7-6.7) 27 (9.8-58) Beware of CIs as small number in reference population Late diagnoses of HIV infection among adults in New Zealand “Early” diagnosis of HIV infection allows… • optimal decision regarding individual’s therapy • helps in control of spread – Behaviour change – Reduction in viral load “Late” diagnosis doesn’t! We defined “Late tester” either … • Diagnosis of AIDS around time of HIV diagnosis – Within 3/12 of each other • Initial CD4+ count ‹200 cells per µlitre Two things influence “late testers” as a proportion of all diagnoses • Testing practices • Dynamics of underlying HIV epidemic A higher proportion of “Late testers” found if: (a) Less testing of asymptomatic people (b) In the late-stage of a declining epidemic (c) Both 682 HIV diagnoses among adults through antibody testing 2005-8 (initial CD4 counts first collected here in 2005) • Initial CD4 count reported for 71% (490/682) • Of these 30.6% (150/490) “late testers” Are there different proportions of “late testers” among people diagnosed by demographic and other characteristics? “Late testers” by means of infection - 2005-8 MSM Heterosexual Other Unknown Total New diagnoses 245 217 6 22 490 ‘Late testers’ 24.5% 36.9% 33.3% 36.4% 30.6% OR 1.0 1.8 1.6 CI (95%) Ref. 1.2-1.7 0.41-11.1 * Adjusted for age Adj. OR* 1.0 2.0 1.2 CI (95%) Ref. 1.34-3.1 0.21-7.1 Late testers among MSM 2005-8 Year New diagnoses 127 118 44 85 116 ‘Late testers’ 24.4% 24.6% 6.8% 22.4% 32.8% OR CI (95%) 1.0 4.0 6.8 Ref. 1.1-14.5 2.0-23.4 Adj. OR* 1.0 0.93 CI (95%) Ref. 0.51-1.7 Age at Diagnosis 2005/6 2007/8 <30 30-39 40+ Ethnicity European 171 21.1% 1.0 Ref. Maori 32 40.6% 4.5 1.9-11.0 Pacific 7 28.6% 2.7 0.47-15.1 Other 33 27.3% 1.9 0.79-4.8 185 24.9% 1.0 Ref. Overseas 55 23.6% 0.94 0.46-1.95 Symptoms Other 87 154 46.0% 13.0% 5.0 1.0 2.6-9.5 Ref. Place of infection New Zealand Reason for testing * Adjusted for age Late testers among heterosexual men and women 2005-8 – work in progress Year Gender Age at Diagnosis Ethnicity Place of Infection Reasons for testing Total 2005/6 2007/8 Men Women <30 30-39 40+ European Maori Pacific Island Other New Zealand Overseas Unknown Symptoms Immigration medical Other Unknown New diagnoses 125 92 110 107 47 90 80 40 11 8 158 40 169 8 62 69 81 5 217 “Late testers” 32.8% 42.4% 45.5% 28.0% 27.7% 34.4% 45.0% 42.5% 54.5% 50.0% 33.5% 37.5% 37.3% 25.0% 66.1% 26.1% 19.8% 100.0% 36.9% Some international comparisons CD4<200 (+/- clinical late) Country Source Year NZ† National surveillance France† Overall MSM Hetero 2005-8 30.6% 24.5% M 46% F 28% 6 tertiary centers 2004–5 31.5% UK and Ireland* Info. from providers (76% RR) 2006 33% 20% M 43% F 36% Australia† National surveillance 2000-6 Est 25% 19.5% Est. 39% † CD4<200+clinical late Hetero>MSM *CD4<200 New initiative • Follow up questionnaire with clinician 3/12 post diagnosis – Up date information – Check for AIDS diagnosis – Ask about partner notification • Clinicians asked to give questionnaire to patient for him/her to return directly to us – Circumstances of HIV acquisition (if known) – Includes the census ethnicity question Conclusions • Worrying continuing increased level of new diagnoses – Safest to assume a reflection of new infections • Rise in diagnosis rate in New Zealand also seen in most Western European countries, US, Canada and Australia between 2000-2006 • Burden of new diagnoses not borne equally but all ethnic groups • If diagnosis rate of infections within New Zealand a surrogate for infection rates no major differences between ethnic groups among men, but among women relative to European women, women of “other” ethnic groups, Pacific and Maori women at greater risk • Late diagnosis rates slightly higher than Australia and similar to UK and France – Among MSM late diagnosis higher among Maori My recommendations • Review current of national strategy and action for HIV prevention + surveillance • Consider when prevention needs to be specific for HIV and when it should be part of general STI prevention • Improve surveillance of other STIs to identify risks among MSM Acknowledgements • • • • Organisers and funders of this meeting Funding of AEG Ministry of Health Clinicians who provide data Other members of AEG – Sue McAllister (Research Officer) – Charlotte Paul (Epidemiologist) – Katrina Sharples (Statistician) – Patricia Priest (Epidemiologist) www.aidsepigroup.otago.ac.nz/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz