L1010 FY2010 - 2012 Field Office Performance Review
February 2013
Per BST recommendation, a performance criterion for the L1010 functional area has been
developed for the L1010 BAM. Performance is based on a field office’s reporting the beneficial
use of water assigned to the BLM under Appropriated Licenses and Permits (LP), and Statements of
Diversion and Use (SDU) to the State Water Resources Control Board as required under California
water law and BLM policy. Program element EC documents this work.
Licenses and Permit water rights require annual report filing, and SDU claims require reporting
once every three years. Thus, a minimum EC workload for a field office can be calculated by
multiplying the total number of LPs by 3, and adding the total number of SDUs as illustrated with
the formula (3*LP) + SDU = Total EC over three years. The following table summarizes, by field
office, their 3 Year EC potential (as defined by the formula) and a three year total of EC reported
from FY2010 – 2012. If all ECs were reported, a field office would achieve a minimum of 100%
EC reported to EC potential. Because EC also includes work besides annual reporting of water
rights, it is possible for a field office to exceed 100% (see Bishop).
For purposes of BAM calculations, the percentage completed is converted into an integer, so that a
total for the state can be summed. The integer, divided by the total yields a proportion of statewide
accomplishment. If all field offices ultimately achieve 100% of their reporting requirements, all
will share equally the money allocated in this criterion, regardless of the total number of water
rights held. Supporting data can be found on the SWARF sharepoint site at: POD Attribute Table
BAM Calculations.
Table 1: Total possible EC compared to actual EC claimed in PMDS over a three year period.
App L/P
SDU
3 Year Total
2010
2011
2012
3 YR EC
Total
Alturas
116
79
427
20
3
20
43
Arcata
12
1
37
0
5
2
7
Bakersfield
5
798
813
0
0
0
0
Barstow
1
35
38
0
0
0
0
Bishop
9
298
325
288
0
45
333
164
20
512
15
47
30
92
El Centro
1
37
40
0
0
0
0
Hollister
28
77
161
0
0
0
0
Mother Lode
10
9
39
9
9
5
23
Needles
3
14
23
0
0
0
0
Palm Springs
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
Redding
15
18
63
0
5
15
20
Ridgecrest
13
24
63
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
1
13
145
184
14
68
5
87
391
1557
2730
Eagle Lake
Surprise
Ukiah
606
Table 2: Allocation percentage based on Total 3 year EC completed compared to total EC possible.
FO
Total EC
Potential
Total 3 YR EC
Completed
%3YR EC to Total
EC
Allocation
Fraction
Integer
Alturas
427
43
10%
10
0.031447
Arcata
37
7
19%
19
0.059748
512
92
18%
18
0.056604
Redding
63
20
32%
32
0.100629
Surprise
3
1
33%
33
0.103774
Ukiah
184
87
47%
47
0.147799
Bakersfield
813
0
0%
0
0
Bishop
325
333
102%
100
0.314465
39
23
59%
59
0.185535
161
0
0%
0
0
63
0
0%
0
0
2
0
0%
0
0
El Centro
40
0
0%
0
0
Barstow
38
0
0%
0
0
Needles
23
0
0%
0
0
2707
606
Eagle Lake
Mother Lode
Hollister
Ridgecrest
Palm Springs
318