Supplementary Materials
Video S-1. Dynamically thresholded EZMs with T threshold ranging from 2.5 to 14. The
video may be downloaded at http://emotion.nbe.aalto.fi/media/
Erogenous Zones
2
Table S-1. Correlations between relationship and sexual function variables.
Physical Sexual
Sell
Marital attract- attract- Relationship Sexual Sexual HomoAge
Marital status
status tiveness tiveness satisfaction desire activity sexuality
0.21**
Physical
attractiveness
0
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.81**
0.03
0.79**
0.05
0.08*
0.15** -0.06
0.16**
0.24**
-0.05
Sexual
attractiveness
Relationship
satisfaction
Sexual desire
Sexual activity
0.05
0.46**
0.11**
0.18**
0.58**
0.40**
Sell Homosexuality
-0.04 -0.10*
-0.04
-0.02
-0.05
0.20** 0.10**
0.10*
0.19**
0.25**
0.11**
0.39** 0.50**
Sell Heterosexuality -0.02
Note: *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05
-0.18**
Erogenous Zones
Figure S-1. Correlations between tactile and nociceptive sensitivity maps with EZMs
masturbation and sex with partner conditions. All shown correlations are significant at p
< 0.05.
Female
Male
Tactile partner
Tactile masturbation
Nociceptive partner
Nociceptive masturbation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Correlation with erogenous zone map
3
Erogenous Zones
Figure S-2. Time series (log time) of attending different bodily regions. Colorbar
indicates the regionwise cumulative t statistic, asterisks denote time bins where FDRcorrected t values reach significance.
4