School of English Forensic Linguistics: Module Handbook Autumn 2014-2015 Module convenor: Charlotte Taylor Room: Arts B245 Tel: (87) 3173 E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: Tuesday 17.00-18.00 Wednesday 15.00-16.00 A. Module description Overview In this module we look at the interaction between linguistics and the law and more specifically we focus on the face-threatening strategies of deception, manipulation and aggression. This is a practical module in which we study the ways that linguistics can be applied in non-academic contexts. We start by examining the role of the linguist as an expert witness in the legal system and in this section we focus on the use of stylistics in investigating disputed authorship, for instance in missing person cases. We also examine and evaluate research into linguistic markers of deception. In the second part of the module, we analyse the language used in the legal process, with a particular focus on courtroom discourse and police interviews. In this part, students will visit a courtroom and report back on the language practices they observed. We will describe the norms of courtroom discourse with particular reference to the pragmatic and discourse features. Subsequently, we focus on the ways in which certain groups may be linguistically disadvantaged in that process and how they are, or could be, protected from discrimination. Learning objectives By the end of this module, you should be able to: Critically appraise different linguistic approaches to authorship attribution and identification of deception Describe the dynamics of interactions in police interviews/courtroom discourse with reference to pragmatic and narrative features Discuss the ways in which particular social groups may be linguistically disadvantaged by the structure of courtroom discourse Identify the linguistic features which contribute to a perception of complexity in legal language Teaching/Learning structure This module is taught by one 50-minute lecture and one 50-minute seminar. You are expected to attend and participate in both. Lectures are usually supported by PowerPoint slides, which can be downloaded from Study Direct shortly before or after the session. Seminar activities are generally based on the topic of the previous lecture and seminar preparation tasks will be made available on the day of the lecture. Seminar activities vary from week to week, and may include: opportunity to discuss and ask questions about the material from lecture/reading, presentation(s) by students, discussion of exercises prepared beforehand, group work on exercises provided in seminar. Expectations You are expected to attend all lectures and seminars, complete the required reading and preparation tasks, including participation in the Study Direct forums. Please note that in Week 5 you are expected to complete a courtroom observation task and in Week10 you will be asked to lead part of the seminar. Be aware of the definitions and consequences of academic misconduct - and don’t commit misconduct! Misconduct includes plagiarism (using other people’s words or ideas without proper attribution) and collusion (working with someone else on an assignment without the permission of the tutor). You are absolutely responsible for knowing and using this information. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/studentlifecentre/academic/academicmisconduct Schedule Week 1: Introduction to forensic linguistics Week 2: Authorship attribution Week 3: Authorship attribution Week 4: Deception Week 5: Visit to courtroom & online discussion Week 6: Language in the legal process: Introduction Week 7: Reading week Week 8: Courtroom discourse: Focus on questions Week 9: Courtroom discourse: Focus on responses Week 10: Vulnerable participants (student presentations) Week 11: Making legal language accessible: Jury instructions Week 12: Tutorials Variation to the schedule: There is no lecture in Weeks 5 and 10. In Week 5 the seminar discussion will take place online. In Week 10 you will be scheduled for an additional seminar and tutorial. B. Assessment This module is assessed by a 3000-word portfolio. Your portfolio is marked is a whole and you must demonstrate achievement of the learning objectives listed above. You should also refer to the English Language Marking Grid. The portfolio is due at the end of the teaching period (check Sussex Direct for your assessment deadline) but you are strongly advised to prepare the individual components in advance of this deadline, the tasks will be released sequentially to facilitate this. Portfolio component 1. Text analysis: authorship Word limit 1400 Task release date Week 4 2. Text analysis: power 800 Week 9 3. Complexity & disadvantage 800 Week 1 NB In addition to the usual office hours, I will be available for extra tutorials at the times of the lectures/seminars in Weeks 5 and 12. C. Reading Recommended introductions/overviews Coulthard, M. & A. Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge. [ebook available] Coulthard, M. & A. Johnson. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics London: Routledge. [ebook available – useful for reference] Eades, D. 2010. Sociolinguistics in the Legal Process. Multilingual Matters. [only covers the second part of the module] Gibbons, J. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. Mooney, A. 2014. Language and Law. Palgrave Macmillan. Olsson, J. & J. Luchjenbroers. 2014. Forensic Linguistics. Bloomsbury. The recommendations here are intended to help you get started, you should then use them to identify more specialist sources. You should also check for recent journal articles on your topic – bear in mind that most books were probably written two years before publication. Additional recommendations will be made in lectures. Week 1 Topic Overview of forensic linguistics Recommended reading Olsson & Luchjenbroers 2014, Ch. 1 2 Language as evidence: Introduction Mooney 2014, Ch. 7 Coulthard & Johnson. 2007, Ch 6 Gibbons 2004, Ch 9 2-4 Language as evidence: Authorship & deception 6 Language in the legal process: Introduction 8-9 Language in the legal process: spoken interactions Olsson & Luchjenbroers 2014, Parts 1 & 2 Mooney 2014, Ch. 8 Coulthard & Johnson. 2007, Ch 7-9 Coulthard & Johnson (eds). 2010. Chs 25, 31-34 Mooney 2014, Ch. 2 Coulthard & Johnson. 2007, Ch 2 Coulthard & Johnson (eds). 2010. Chs 2-4 Gibbons 2004, Ch 2 Mooney 2014, Ch. 4-5 Olsson & Luchjenbroers 2014, Ch 13-14 Coulthard & Johnson. 2007, Ch 4-5 Coulthard & Johnson (eds). 2010. Chs 8-12, 14 Gibbons 2004, Chs 3-4 Eades, D. 2010. Most chapters. 10 Vulnerable / potentially disadvantaged witnesses Mooney 2014, Ch. 6 Olsson & Luchjenbroers 2014, Ch. 15 Coulthard & Johnson (eds). 2010. Ch 20 Eades 2010, Ch. 4,5,8 Gibbons 2004, Chs 6-7 11 Language in the legal process: jury instructions The law on language Coulthard & Johnson (eds). 2010. Ch 17 12 Gibbons 2004, Ch 8
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz