General Fund Budget Recommendations FY 2014 - 2015 David J. Cummins Vice President for Finance & Administra9on/CFO Finance & Administra9on Commi<ee June 11, 2014 Ohio Ranking State Support State Appropriations per FTE 2004-2013 $ Per FTE Adjusted for HECA $14,000 $12,000 $ Per FTE $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 40 42 44 44 41 46 47 45 $4,000 46 41 Low Ohio High $2,000 $-‐ Source: SSDB Low '04-'11 = VT Low '12-'13 = NH High '04-'13 = WY 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year State support in Ohio fell 18.2% from FY 2008-13; yet that ranked Ohio 15th best in the nation over that period Source: SHEEO 2 Educational Appropriations/FTE, % Change by State FY’s 2008-13 Source: SHEEO 3 FY 2015 Starting Point Assumptions • Assume continued enrollment decline (4%) for FY 15 • Earmark funds for increased scholarships and/or reduction in tuition for access programs • Restore some reductions from prior years, and address other priorities such as high-demand academic programs, salaries, marketing, non-discretionary items • Modest increase in State Share of Instruction based on FY 14 actual earnings • Assume 2% tuition increase per State Biennial Budget cap 4 FY 2015 Budget Balancing • Starting Point identified the need to reduce/reallocate nearly $15 million based on enrollment decline and strategic priorities • Each Unit was given a starting allocation and directed to develop a budget within that amount – What actions are necessary to balance to the allocation amount? – What is the impact on service levels? – Are there revenue enhancement opportunities that can offset reductions? • Submissions were discussed among Unit Administrators, COO and EVP • Proposals were shared with UC Budget & Finance Committee which recommended acceptance of the unit plans 5 FY 2015 Major Resource Adjustments • Increase Tuition and Fees – Undergraduate and Graduate 2% • No increase for Wayne, Summit College associate degree programs, Law School – Miscellaneous fees tied to specific programs and/or services • Preliminary increase in State Share of Instruction is $2.6 million, 2.8% above FY 2014 actual • Impact of performance funding that rewards degrees • Reallocate to the General Fund 50% of the School of Law tuition earmark from the Building Fund • Draw from existing fund balances to support the year’s debt service related to the Energy Savings project 6 FY 2015 Major Expense Adjustments • Net reduction of $5.5 million in compensation • Operating budgets reduced $1.7 million • Scholarships increased $1.7 million to support recruitment and Under-represented Scholarships • Debt Service increased $1.8 million to adjust to prior spending level and lost refinancing opportunity – Plus first year of debt service on the Performance Contract adds $4.5 million net expense 7 UC Budget & Finance Score Card FY 15 Original FY 15 UC B&F $ Reduction % Reduction $ Reduction % Reduction STARTING POINT ASSUMPTIONS Tuition Shortfall (9.0) (9.0) Restore 1-‐time Reductions in FY 2014 Increase Scholarships/ Access (5.0) (2.0) (2.0) 0.0 (4.4) (20.4) (2.5) (13.5) Other Adjustments Negative Starting Point Additions FY 15 STARTING POINT REVENUE INCREASES 2% Undergraduate Tuition Increase-‐Net 2% Graduate Tuition Increase -‐ Net 1.5 (18.9) 1.5 (12.0) 3.7 2.7 0.4 0.4 SUBTOTAL 4.1 SUBTOTAL ACADEMIC SUPPORT Reduction Target Adjusted for Revenue Enhancements SUBTOTAL ACADEMIC Reduction Target Adjusted for Revenue Enhancements SUBTOTAL TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS BALANCE 0.0 1.8% 3.1 Comments Assumed 4% Enrollment Decline Achieving Distinction, Wayne College Overhead, Interest on Debt Scholarships Strategic Investments ($2.9M), Student Doubtful Accounts($1M), Student Recruitment($0.5M) Fall Reconciliation $ Reduction % Reduction ??? Increase in SSI above original FY 14 projection 0.0 Freeze Associate-‐level Courses at Summit and Wayne. Freeze Law School Tuition 1.4% 2.7 0.4 3.1 1.4% CENTRAL OBLIGATIONS 5.7 0.0 0.0 6.2% 4.8 3.7 4.8 5.3% 4.1% 4.8 3.7 4.8 5.3% 4.1% 9.1 6.7% 3.3% 2.6% 5.2% 4.5 3.5 4.5 12.4 12.4 3.3% 2.6% 9.1 18.9 (0.0) 4.5 3.5 4.5 12.4 0.4 5.7 3.4% 3.4% 8 Reductions Summary Target Total Adjustments Shortfall FY 15 $14,788,415 $9,290,393 ($5,498,022) Personnel Reductions Operating Reductions Revenue Increases Total Adjustments $5,516,919 $1,663,685 $2,109,790 $9,290,393 Temporary Savings FY 16 Estimated Savings $1,503,712 $1,170,823 FY 16 $1,170,823 $895,923 $154,900 $120,000 $1,170,823 9 FY 2014 General Fund Revenues FY 2013-‐14 Revised Projected Budget FY 2014-‐15 Proposed Budget Adjustments Proposal FY14 FY14 Budget Projecte to FY15 d to FY15 REVENUES Tuition/Gen Svc Fees (gross) Other Fees Total Tuition and Fees $226,499 24,863 $251,362 $228,093 24,830 $252,923 ($3,731) (63) ($3,794) $222,768 24,800 $249,129 -1.6% -0.3% -0.9% -2.3% -0.1% -1.5% State Share of Instruction $90,762 $92,257 $4,149 $94,911 4.6% 2.9% Inc. from Inv/Endowments Dept'l Sales/Svc Revenues Indirect Cost Revenue Miscellaneous Total Other Revenue $3,429 12,505 4,575 1,550 $22,059 $4,420 12,000 4,900 1,300 $22,620 $0 (1,065) 0 561 ($505) $3,429 11,440 4,575 2,111 $21,555 0.0% -8.5% 0.0% 36.2% -2.3% -22.4% -4.7% -6.6% 62.4% -4.7% Total Revenue $364,183 $367,800 ($150) $364,034 0.0% -1.0% Transfers-‐in Total Current Resources $406 $364,590 $406 $368,207 $2,594 $2,444 $3,000 $367,034 638.1% 638.1% 0.7% -0.3% 10 UA’s Shift in Revenue from FY06 - FY15 FY 2006 Resources Total = $270.4 million • The 10 year comparison illustrates the shift in support from the State to Tuition and Fees. • At the University of Akron, the student share of the cost has risen from 60% to 67% in FY15 over the past 10 years. Tui9on & Fees (Gross) 60% Other 3% Dept. Sales 3% State -‐ SSI 33% Inv/Endow 1% FY 2015 Resources Total = $367.0 million Tui9on & Fees (Gross) 67% Other 3% Dept. Sales Inv/ 3% Endow 1% State -‐ SSI 26% 11 FY 2014 General Fund Expenditures FY 2013-‐14 Revised Projected Budget FY 2014-‐15 Proposed Budget Adjustments Proposal FY14 FY14 Budget Projecte to FY15 d to FY15 EXPENDITURES Total payroll Fringe Benefits Total Compensation $159,694 53,924 213,618 $163,171 52,200 215,371 ($4,791) (661) ($5,452) $154,903 53,263 $208,166 -3.0% -1.2% -2.6% -5.1% 2.0% -3.3% Nonpersonnel operating Central Obligations Scholarships Utilities Total nonpersonnel $15,019 36,686 48,727 7,689 $108,121 $18,700 32,065 47,221 7,500 $105,486 ($1,145) 1,689 1,651 231 $2,426 $13,875 38,375 50,378 7,920 $110,547 -7.6% 4.6% 3.4% 3.0% 2.2% -25.8% 19.7% 6.7% 5.6% 4.8% $34,075 1,626 7,205 1,395 1,000 $45,301 ($621) (800) 1,843 0 5,048 0 $5,470 $364,590 $366,158 $2,444 $367,033 $0 $2,049 $0 $0 Aux. Support (incl. debt svc.) Set-‐aside for Law bldg Debt service (excl. aux.) Enrollment Reserve Performance Contract Plant Fund Total transfers out Total e xpenditures Net Surplus/Deficit $34,075 1,626 6,150 (0) 1,000 $42,851 $33,453 826 7,993 (0) 5,048 1,000 $48,321 -1.8% -1.8% -49.2% -49.2% 30.0% 10.9% 0.0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 261.9% 0.0% 0.0% 12.8% 6.7% 0.7% 0.2% 12 UA’s Shift in Expenditures from FY06 -FY15 FY 2006 Expense Components • • While compensation remains the largest component of expenses, it dropped from 62% of the budget in FY06 to 57% in FY15. Departmental operating budgets (non-personnel) is declining from 8% to 4%. Total = $273.7 million Compensa9on 62% Debt Svc & Aux. 5% Central Obliga9ons 14% Dept. Scholarships Opera9ng 9% 8% Misc. Transfers-‐out 2% FY 2015 Expense Components Total = $367.0 million • The largest shift was the commitments to debt service and support of auxiliaries. Some of this shift reflects an accounting change related to Misc. the General Services fees Transfers-‐ out since FY06. 0% Compensa9on 57% Debt Svc & Aux. 13% Central Obliga9ons 12% Scholarships 14% Dept. Opera9ng 13 4% FY 2015 Budget Development • Budget Proposal – Revenue Increases of $5.2 million • Including $3.1 million from approved Tuition increase – Unit Reductions of $7.2 million – Tuition and Fees revenue projection still based on 4% enrollment decline • Necessary Board Actions – Approval of FY 2015 General Fund and Auxiliary Budgets – Approve reduction in transfer of Law School Tuition to the Law School Building Fund – Use of up to $3 million of fund balance to support the first year’s debt service related to the Energy Savings Performance Contract • Will be reimbursed once the project is complete 14 Recap • Minimal adjustments from one-time or short-term sources – Some anticipated savings in future years replace short-term savings • Balanced to Base Resources if enrollment stabilizes • Only draw on fund balance is to address timing of Performance Contract project • Outstanding issues: – Minimal strategic investments within the budget – Not all reductions from FY 2014 implemented • Will reassess the status of the budget at the end of the first quarter with actual summer and fall enrollments 15 Questions? 16
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz