‫‪-1-3-1‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ]‪ 1GITR : [49‬ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ‬
‫‪0F‬‬
‫ﻫﺎﺭﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ‪ 2 WEF‬ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫‪1F‬‬
‫‪ ، 2001-2002‬ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﺎپ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ‬
‫ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ‪ 3NRI‬ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ‪ 75‬ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ‬
‫‪2F‬‬
‫ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ‬
‫ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺮﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪﻣﺠﺮﺏ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺧﺒﺮﻩ‬
‫ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﭘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ‪ ،‬ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻠﻞ)‪ (UNDP‬ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻭ‬
‫ﺟﻤﻊ ﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ‬
‫ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻒ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﻮﻻﻧﻮﻳﻦ ‪ 1‬ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﺡ‬
‫‪F3‬‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ‪ 2‬ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ‬
‫‪F4‬‬
‫ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎً ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ ICT‬ﺭﺍ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻛﻤﻚ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺭﻗﻤﻲ ‪ 3‬ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺰﻳﺖ ﺭﻗﻤﻲ ‪ 4‬ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‬
‫‪F5‬‬
‫‪F6‬‬
‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ‬
‫‪1. GITR: Global Information Technology Report‬‬
‫‪2. WEF: Word Economic Forum‬‬
‫‪3.NRI: Network Readiness Index‬‬
‫‪1.Bruno Lanvin‬‬
‫)‪2.Infdere : The Information for Development Program (www.infodere.org‬‬
‫‪3.Digital Divide‬‬
‫‪4.Digital Dividends‬‬
‫ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺩﺍﺩ‬
‫ﻭ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬
‫ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻲ ﻃﻠﺒﺪ ‪ .‬ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻻﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ‪ :‬ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ‪ 5‬ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ‬
‫‪F7‬‬
‫ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ‪ .‬ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ ICT‬ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ‪ 6‬ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ ‪ .‬ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ‪ 7‬ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ‬
‫‪F8‬‬
‫ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ‬
‫‪8‬‬
‫‪F9‬‬
‫ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ‪ :‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﺋﻴﻢ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ‪ ICT‬ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ‬
‫ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻣﻲ‬
‫ﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ‪ :‬ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻨﺠﻴﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪5.Network Economy‬‬
‫‪6.Social Contracts‬‬
‫‪7.Kirkman‬‬
‫‪8.Center for International Development‬‬
‫‪ -1-1-3-1‬ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪ :‬ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ‬
‫ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ‪ 5‬ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻲ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬ﺝ‪-18-4-‬‬
‫‪)-1-1‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ(‬
‫ﺝ‪)2-1-18-4 -‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ(‬
‫ﺝ‪) -3-1-18-4 -‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ(ﺝ‪) 4-1-18-4-‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭﺩﻭﻡ(ﺝ‪-4-‬‬
‫‪)5-1-18‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ( ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ‪25‬‬
‫ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪-‬ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻧﺪﻳﻨﺎﻭﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -‬ﻫﻔﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺳﻴﻪ )ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ(‪.‬‬
‫پ‪ -‬ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ )ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ(‬
‫ﺕ‪ -‬ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ)ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ(‬
‫ﺙ‪ -‬ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ)ﺍﺳﺘﻮﻧﻲ(‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ‪ ،‬ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ‪ 25‬ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -‬ﺩﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ)ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﭘﺮﻭ(‬
‫ﺏ‪ -‬ﻫﻔﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﺋﻲ)ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻫﻨﺪ(‬
‫پ‪ -‬ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ)ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻠﻐﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ(‬
‫ﺕ‪ -‬ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻳﻲ)ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﻳﺲ(‬
‫ﺙ‪ -‬ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ)ﻣﺼﺮ(‬
‫‪ 75‬ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ‪ 151‬ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ‪ 250‬ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﺳﺮﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ( ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﻠﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ )ﺩﻭﻡ( ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺪ )ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ( ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﺳﺖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻳﺴﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻳﺴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻭﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻧﻔﺮ‬
‫ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲ ﻃﻠﺒﺪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-1‬ﻣﺪﻝ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ)‪ : ( NRI‬ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺵ‪ ، -1-1-18-4-‬ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﭘﻨﺞ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ‬
‫ﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ‬
‫ﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺟﺰﺋﻲ‬
‫ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﺩ‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺯ‪ICT‬‬
‫ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳ‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫‪0B‬‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ‬
‫ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪2B‬‬
‫ﺑﻬﺮﻩ‬
‫ﮔﻴﺮﻱ‬
‫ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﻣﺸﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪5‬‬
‫‪F13‬‬
‫ﻣﺸﻲ ‪ICT‬‬
‫‪1B‬‬
‫ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪1.Network Readiness Index‬‬
‫‪2.Network Use‬‬
‫‪3.Enabling Factors‬‬
‫‪4.Network Access‬‬
‫‪5.Network policy‬‬
‫‪6.Network Society‬‬
‫‪7.Network Economy‬‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﻳﺎﺩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ICT‬‬
‫‪6‬‬
‫ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ‬
‫‪8‬‬
‫ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫‪7‬‬
‫ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺵ‪ -1-1-18-4-‬ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ‬
‫ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ 1‬ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ 2‬ﺑﻪ‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻭ ﻳﺎ‬
‫ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺁﺗﻲ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﺪﻝ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ‪ 135‬ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ‪ 65‬ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﺨﺖ‪ 3‬ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻲ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ‬
‫‪17‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪ 4‬ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ‪،‬‬
‫‪18‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫‪8.Social Capital‬‬
‫‪1. Network Use‬‬
‫‪2. Enabling Factors‬‬
‫‪3.Hard Data‬‬
‫‪4.Survey Data‬‬
‫ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺯﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ‪.‬‬
‫)ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﻨﻪ‪-‬ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ‬
‫×‪۶‬‬
‫‪+۱‬‬
‫ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ(‬
‫)ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﻨﻪ‪-‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ(‬
‫ﺳﭙﺲ ‪ 65‬ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﺩ‪ 5‬ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ‬
‫‪19‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻩ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‪ ،‬ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ(×‪)+0/5‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ( ×‪ =0/5‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×‪)+0/2‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×‪ =0/8‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -1-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -1-1-‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺎﻝ ‪2000‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -2-1-‬ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪2000‬‬
‫‪5.Micro-Indexes‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -3-1-‬ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ‬
‫‪2000‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -4-1-‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ‬
‫‪2000‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪-2-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -1-2-‬ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ‬
‫ﺏ‪-‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ(×‪)+0/25‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ(×‪)+0/25‬ﻣﺸﻲ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ(×‪)+0/25‬ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ(×‪=0/25‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ(×‪)+0/5‬ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ(×‪=0/5‬ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-1-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×]‪)+[4/9‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×]‪=[5/9‬ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-1-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-1-1-‬ﭼﮕﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭ‪ 1‬ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪2000‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-1-1-‬ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-1-1-1-‬ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-1-1-1-‬ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺧﻂ‬
‫ﺍﺻﻠﻲ‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪1.Teledensity‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -5-1-1-1-‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻜﺼﺪ ﺧﻂ‬
‫ﺍﺻﻠﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-1-1-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-1-1-‬ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-1-1-‬ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-2-1-1-‬ﺑﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-2-1-1-‬ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-1-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×‪)+0/6‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×‪=0/4‬ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ‬
‫ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-2-1-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-2-1-‬ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻜﺼﺪ‬
‫ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-2-1-‬ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫‪21‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-1-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-2-1-‬ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-2-1-‬ﭘﻮﺷﺎﺋﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-2-2-1-‬ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ (×‪)+0/5‬ﻣﺸﻲ‪=0/5×( ICT‬ﻣﺸﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻣﺸﻲ ‪: ICT‬‬
‫‪2.Software Piracy‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×‪)+0/8‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ( ×‪=0/2‬ﻣﺸﻲ‪ICT‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-2-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-1-2-‬ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-2-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-1-2-‬ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻭ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-1-2-‬ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ‪ ISP‬ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ‬
‫ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-2-1-2-‬ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-2-1-2-‬ﻧﻘﺶ ‪ ICT‬ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×‪)+0/9‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×‪=0/1‬ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-2-2-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-2-2-‬ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-2-2-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-2-2-‬ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-2-2-2-‬ﻛﺎﺭﺁﺋﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-2-2-2-‬ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﺎ )ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻗﻮﺍ‪( 3‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-2-2-2-‬ﺯﻣﺎﻥ )ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ( ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -5-2-2-2-‬ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -6-2-2-2-‬ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪23‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪24‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪1.Rule of Low‬‬
‫‪2.Goverment Effectivness‬‬
‫‪3.Regulatory Burder‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -7-2-2-2-‬ﺳﻬﻢ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -8-2-2-2-‬ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -9-2-2-2-‬ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-3-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ(×]‪)+[1/3‬ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ‪)+[1/3]×( ICT‬ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻱ(×]‪=[1/3‬ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-3-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-1-3-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-1-3-‬ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-1-1-3-‬ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-1-1-3-‬ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-3-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪: ICT‬‬
‫ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ =ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ICT‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-2-3-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-2-3-‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ‪ 1‬ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻫﺮ‬
‫ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-2-3-‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﺎﻥ‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-3-3-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×]‪)+[3/6‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×]‪=[3/6‬ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ‬
‫)ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ(‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-3-3-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-3-3-‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ‬
‫‪1.Brain Drain‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-3-3-‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-1-3-3-‬ﺑﻲ ﺳﻮﺍﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-3-3-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-2-3-3-‬ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-2-3-3-‬ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-2-3-3-‬ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻣﺮﻓﻬﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ‬
‫ﺏ‪-4-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ(×]‪)+[1/3‬ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ(×]‪)+[1/3‬ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ(×]‪=[1/3‬ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-4-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ=ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-1-4-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-1-4-‬ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ B2C‬ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-1-4-‬ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻫﺎﻱ ‪ B2B‬ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-1-1-4-‬ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﺍﻧﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-4-1-1-4-‬ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -5-1-1-4-‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻄﺮﭘﺬﻳﺮ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -6-1-1-4-‬ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -7-1-1-4-‬ﺭﻭﺍﺝ‪ 2‬ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺘﻨﺮﻧﺘﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -8-1-1-4-‬ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ‬
‫ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -9-1-1-4-‬ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪27‬‬
‫‪26‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫‪2.Venture Capital‬‬
‫‪3.Prerealence‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-4-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ= ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-2-4-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-1-2-4-‬ﻛﺎﺭﺁﺋﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ‪ICT‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-2-4-‬ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺏ‪-3-1-2-4-‬ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-1-2-4-‬ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺑﺮﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-4-‬ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ‪:‬‬
‫)ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ(×]‪)+[3/7‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ(×]‪=[4/7‬ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺏ‪-1-3-4-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻧﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-1-3-4-‬ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺑﺮﻕ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -2-1-3-4-‬ﻫﺪﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -3-1-3-4-‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻮﺳﻪ‬
‫ﺏ‪ -4-1-3-4-‬ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ‬
‫‪28‬‬
‫‪F‬‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-3-4-‬ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -1-2-3-4-‬ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺏ‪-2-2-3-4-‬ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺑﻲ ﻭ ﮔﻤﺮﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺏ‪-3-2-3-4-‬ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﺋﻲ‬
‫‪ -3-1-3-1‬ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ‪ :‬ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ‪ 65‬ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ‪ ،‬ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ)ﻳﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ!(‪ ،‬ﻫﺮﺍﺱ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ‪ 2‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ‬
‫‪F29‬‬
‫ﺗﺮﺱ ﺍﻭﺭﻭﻟﻲ)ﺑﺎﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ‪ ( 1984‬ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ‬
‫‪1.Paved‬‬
‫‪2.Big Brother‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ‬
‫ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻳﻚ‬
‫ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻠّﻲ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻋﺐ ﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻒ‪ -‬ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠّﻲ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ‪ -‬ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻲ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻘﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ‪65‬‬
‫ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻔﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫‪ -2‬ﭘﻮﺷﺎﺋﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫‪ -4‬ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ‬
‫‪ -5‬ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫‪-7‬ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺑﺮﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ‬
‫ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﺰﺑﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﭘﻨﺞ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺖ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺰء ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺝ‪-1-18-4-‬‬
‫‪ -6‬ﺩﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺭﺗ‬
‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ‬
‫ﺑﻪ‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫‪4‬‬
‫‪5‬‬
‫‪6‬‬
‫‪7‬‬
‫‪8‬‬
‫‪9‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪11‬‬
‫‪12‬‬
‫‪13‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪16‬‬
‫‪17‬‬
‫‪18‬‬
‫‪19‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ‬
‫ﺳﻮﺋﺪ‬
‫ﻓﻨﻼﻧﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺩﺍﻧﻤﺎﺭﻙ‬
‫ﺳﻮﺋﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺮﻭژ‬
‫ﻫﻠﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ‬
‫ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺯﻻﻧﺪﻧﻮ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻳﺴﻠﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ‬
‫ژﺍﭘﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻃﺮﻳﺶ‬
‫‪6/76‬‬
‫‪6/16‬‬
‫‪6/05‬‬
‫‪5/94‬‬
‫‪5/88‬‬
‫‪5/83‬‬
‫‪5/83‬‬
‫‪5/72‬‬
‫‪5/66‬‬
‫‪5/63‬‬
‫‪5/59‬‬
‫‪5/58‬‬
‫‪5/53‬‬
‫‪5/47‬‬
‫‪5/44‬‬
‫‪5/40‬‬
‫‪5/38‬‬
‫‪5/38‬‬
‫‪5/37‬‬
‫‪5/31‬‬
‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺝ‪-6-1-18-4-‬ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺧﺮﺩ‬
‫ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ‬
‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻭ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺳﻴﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ‬
‫ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ‬
‫ﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ‪ ،‬ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ‪ 80‬ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ‬
‫ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ‪ 90‬ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -2-3-1‬ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 2001‬ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ‪ : [48] 1‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫‪F30‬‬
‫ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺖ پ‪ 34-‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﻥ‬
‫ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ‪ :‬ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ‬
‫‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ژﺍﭘﻦ ‪ ،‬ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ‪ ،‬ﺩﺍﻧﻤﺎﺭﻙ ‪ ،‬ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ‪ ،‬ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺴﻠﻨﺪ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ‪،‬‬
‫ﻟﻮﮔﺰﺍﻣﺒﻮﺭﻙ ‪ ،‬ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ‪ ،‬ﻧﺮﻭژ ‪ ،‬ﭘﺮﺗﻘﺎﻝ ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻳﺲ ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﻼﻧﺪ ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ ‪ ،‬ﺯﻻﻧﺪﻧﻮ ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ‪ ،‬ﭼﻚ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﻠﻮﺍﻛﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺠﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ‪ ،‬ﻟﻬﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ‪ 29‬ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ‪ ،‬ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻤﺮﺩ‬
‫)ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲ ‪ www.OECD.org‬ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ ( ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ‪ 327‬ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ‪ 105‬ﺍﻟﻲ ‪ 127‬ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ‪.‬‬
‫‪1.OECD : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development‬‬
‫ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﺸﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺷﻜﻴﻞ‬
‫)ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ( ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ‬
‫‪2001‬ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺩﻩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺨﺶ ‪ ، ICT‬ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ‪ ICT‬ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 2001‬ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ‬
‫ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -1-2-3-1‬ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ‪ :‬ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ‪ ICT‬ﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﺎﻱ‬
‫‪ 1992‬ﺗﺎ ‪ 2001‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻨّﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺵ‪ 2-1-18-4-‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺵ‪ -2-1-18-4-‬ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ‪ ICT‬ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ‪ ICT‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺝ‪ 7-1-18-4-‬ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ‪،‬‬
‫ﺳﻬﻢ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ‪ ICT‬ﺩﺭﺝ‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ‪ ICT‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ‬
‫ﭼﻬﻞ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﺎﻳﻜﺮﻭﺳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ‪ 15/2‬ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 98‬ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 2001‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﺑﻪ ‪ 25/2‬ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬