ONLINE RESOURCE FILE
For Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution?
Applying lessons from history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva,
doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4
This file provides additional bibliographic substantiation for some of the arguments made in the
above work. Each numerically labelled section corresponds to a particular assertion made in the
text. Some sources appear in more than one section, because they provide substantiation for more
than one assertion. Some sources used in the review do not appear in the numbered sections here,
because they were only discussed more directly in the text. For the convenience of readers, a single
reference list for all 178 sources formally reviewed for the manuscript is provided at the end of the
document. Note that this does not include additional sources referenced to frame the review: they,
and all other sources directly referenced in the manuscript, are fully cited in the reference list
proper, at the end of the manuscript.
OR1
Dinsmore, Charles E. 1995. Animal regeneration: From fact to concept. BioScience 45 (7):484-492.
Elwick, James. 2012. Layered history: Styles of reasoning as stratified conditions of possibility.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43:619-627.
Iliffe, Rob. 1998. Review essay: Rational artistry. History of Science 36 (3):329-357.
Johns, Adrian. 1997. Prudence and pedantry in early modern cosmology: The trade of Al Ross.
History of Science 35 (1):23-59.
Kusch, Martin. 2010. Hacking’s historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning. Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 41:158-173.
Kusch, Martin. 2011. Reflexivity, relativism, microhistory: Three desiderata for historical
epistemologies. Erkenntnis 75:483-494.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2012a. Autonomy and objectivity of science. International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science 26 (3):309-334.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2012b. Senses of localism. History of Science 50:477-500.
La Berge, Ann. 1999. The history of science and the history of microscopy. Perspectives on Science
7 (1):111-142.
Latimer, Joanna, and Mara Miele. 2013. Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human.
Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7/8):5-31. doi:10.1177/0263276413502088.
Maas, Ad. 2010. Civil scientists: Dutch scientists between 1750 and 1875. History of Science
48:75-103.
Mayhew, Robert. 1998. The character of English geography c. 1660-1800: a textual approach.
Journal of Historical Geography 24 (4): 385-412.
Medina-Doménech, Rosa. 2009. Scientific technologies of national identity as colonial legacies:
Extracting the Spanish nation from Equatorial Guinea. Social Studies of Science 39 (1):81112. doi:10.1177/0306312708097658.
Moxley, Roy A. 1997. Skinner: From determinism to random variation. Behavior and Philosophy
25 (1):3-28.
Nyhart, Lynn K. 2012. Wissenschaft and Kunde: The general and the special in modern science.
Osiris 27 (1):250-275.
Patiniotis, Manolis. 2013. Between the local and the global: History of science in the European
periphery meets post-colonial studies. Centaurus 55:361-384.
Paul, Herman. 2012. The Life and Thought of Herbert Butterfield: History, Science and God [Book
Review]. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):232-235.
Raina, Dhruv. 1998. Historiographic concerns underlying Indian Journal of the History of Science:
A bibliometric inference. Economic and Political Weekly 33 (8):407-414.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 1
Reiss, Michael J., and Sue Dale Tunnicliffe. 2001. What sorts of worlds do we live in nowadays?
Teaching biology in a post-modern age. Journal of Biological Education 35 (3):125-129.
doi:10.1080/00219266.2001.9655760.
Roberts, Lissa. 2013. Agency and industry: Charles C. Gillispie’s “The Natural History of
Industry,” then and now. Technology and Culture 54 (4):922-941.
doi:10.1353/tech.2013.0141.
van der Velden, Maja. 2013. Decentering design: Wikipedia and indigenous knowledge.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (4):308-316.
doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.765768.
Vermeir, Koen. 2007. Athanasius Kircher’s magical instruments: an essay on ‘science’, ‘religion’
and applied metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38 (363-400).
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.008.
OR2
Cabral, Regis. 1996. Herbert Butterfield (1900-79) as a Christian Historian of Science. Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 27 (4):547-564.
de Chadarevian, Soraya. 2009. Microstudies versus big picture accounts? Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40:13-19.
Golinski, Jan. 2012. Is it time to forget science? Reflections on singular science and its history.
Osiris 27 (1):19-36.
Johns, Adrian. 1999. Identity, practice, and trust in early modern natural philosophy. The Historical
Journal 42 (4):1125-1145.
Roberts, Lissa. 2009. Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of
circulation. Itinerario 33 (1):9-30.
Rochberg, Francesca. 2002. A consideration of Babylonian astronomy within the historiography of
science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33:661-684.
Smith, Pamela H. 2009. Science on the move: Recent trends in the history of early modern science.
Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2):345-375.
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2009. Periodization problems in the economic history of science and
technology. Investigaciones de Historia Económica 5 (15):47-73.
OR3
Brazelton, William J., and Woodruff T. Sullivan, III. 2009. Understanding the nineteenth century
origins of disciplines: lessons for astrobiology today? International Journal of Astrobiology
8 (4):257-266.
Buning, Marius. 2014. Inventing scientific method: The privilege system as a model for scientific
knowledge-production. Intellectual History Review 24 (1):59-70.
OR4
Buning, Marius. 2014. Inventing scientific method: The privilege system as a model for scientific
knowledge-production. Intellectual History Review 24 (1):59-70.
Cohen, Benjamin R. 2010. The moral basis of soil science and geology: What antebellum farmers
knew and why anyone cared. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35:860-867.
Dodds, Lara. 2008. ‘Great things to small may be compared’: Rhetorical microscopy in Paradise
Lost. Milton Studies 47:96-117.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 2
OR5
Brazelton, William J., and Woodruff T. Sullivan, III. 2009. Understanding the nineteenth century
origins of disciplines: lessons for astrobiology today? International Journal of Astrobiology
8 (4):257-266.
Carnino, Guillaume. 2013. The romantic machine: Utopian science and technology after Napoleon.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44:608-612.
Cohen, Benjamin R. 2001. On the historical relationship between the sciences and the humanities:
A look at popular debates that have exemplified cross-disciplinary tension. Bulletin of
Science, Technology & Society 21 (4):283-295. doi:10.1177/027046760102100407.
Cohen, Benjamin R. 2010. The moral basis of soil science and geology: What antebellum farmers
knew and why anyone cared. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35:860-867.
de Bont, Raf. 2013. “Writing in letters of blood”: Manners in scientific dispute in nineteenthcentury Britain and the German lands. History of Science 51:309-335.
Dear, Peter. 1995. Cultural history of science: An overview with reflections. Science, Technology,
& Human Values 20 (2):150-170.
Dear, Peter. 1998. The mathematical principles of natural philosophy: Toward a heuristic narrative
for the Scientific Revolution. Configurations 6 (2):173-193.
Dear, Peter. 2001. Religion, science and natural philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham’s thesis.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2):377-386.
Dear, Peter. 2003. The ideology of modern science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
34:821-828.
Dear, Peter. 2012a. Historiography of not-so-recent science. History of Science 50:197-250.
Dear, Peter. 2012b. Science is dead; long live science. Osiris 27 (1):37-55.
Dodds, Lara. 2008. ‘Great things to small may be compared’: Rhetorical microscopy in Paradise
Lost. Milton Studies 47:96-117.
Golinski, Jan. 2012. Is it time to forget science? Reflections on singular science and its history.
Osiris 27 (1):19-36.
Johns, Adrian. 1999. Identity, practice, and trust in early modern natural philosophy. The Historical
Journal 42 (4):1125-1145.
Kohler, Robert E. 2005. A generalist’s vision. Isis 96 (2):224-229.
Kohler, Robert E. 2008. Lab history: Reflections. Isis 99 (4):761-768.
Osler, Margaret J. 1997. Mixing metaphors: Science and religion or natural philosophy and
theology in early modern Europe. History of Science 35:91-113.
Osler, Margaret J. 1998. Essay review: Medieval natural philosophy in context. Studies in History
and Philosophy of Science 29 (2):305-311.
Pickstone, John V. 2007. Working knowledges before and after circa 1800: Practices and
disciplines in the history of science, technology and medicine. Isis 98 (3):489-516.
Raven, Diederick. 2011. What needs to be explained about modern science? The British Journal for
the History of Science 44 (3):449-454.
Smith, Pamela H. 2009. Science on the move: Recent trends in the history of early modern science.
Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2):345-375.
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2009. Periodization problems in the economic history of science and
technology. Investigaciones de Historia Económica 5 (15):47-73.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2000. Scientific publishing and the reading of science in nineteenth-century
Britain: A historiographical survey and guide to sources. Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science 31 (4):559-612.
Tosh, Nick. 2003. Anachronism and retrospective explanation: In defence of a present-centred
history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34:647-659.
Wegener, Daan. 2010. De-anthropomorphizing energy and energy conservation: The case of Max
Planck and Ernst Mach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41:146-159.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.02.001.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 3
Wray, K. Brad. 2009. Did professionalization afford better opportunities for young scientists?
Scientometrics 81 (3):757-764. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2254-x.
OR6
Pickstone, John V. 2007. Working knowledges before and after circa 1800: Practices and
disciplines in the history of science, technology and medicine. Isis 98 (3):489-516.
Strickland, Stuart. 1995. Galvanic disciplines: The boundaries, objects and identities of
experimental science in the era of romanticism. History of Science 33:449-468.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2000. Scientific publishing and the reading of science in nineteenth-century
Britain: A historiographical survey and guide to sources. Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science 31 (4):559-612.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2009. Rethinking the history of science popularization/popular science. In
Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800-2000, eds. Faidra
Papanelopoulou, Agustí Nieto-Galan, and Enrique Perdiguero, 1-20. Farnham: Ashgate.
OR7
Dear, Peter. 2001. Religion, science and natural philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham’s thesis.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2):377-386.
Golinski, Jan. 2012. Is it time to forget science? Reflections on singular science and its history.
Osiris 27 (1):19-36.
Osler, Margaret J. 1997. Mixing metaphors: Science and religion or natural philosophy and
theology in early modern Europe. History of Science 35:91-113.
Strickland, Stuart. 1995. Galvanic disciplines: The boundaries, objects and identities of
experimental science in the era of romanticism. History of Science 33:449-468.
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2009. Periodization problems in the economic history of science and
technology. Investigaciones de Historia Económica 5 (15):47-73.
OR8
Dear, Peter. 2003. The ideology of modern science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
34:821-828.
Dear, Peter. 2012. Science is dead; long live science. Osiris 27 (1):37-55.
Kohler, Robert E. 2005. A generalist’s vision. Isis 96 (2):224-229.
Kohler, Robert E. 2008. Lab history: Reflections. Isis 99 (4):761-768.
Pickstone, John V. 2007. Working knowledges before and after circa 1800: Practices and
disciplines in the history of science, technology and medicine. Isis 98 (3):489-516.
Smith, Pamela H. 2009. Science on the move: Recent trends in the history of early modern science.
Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2):345-375.
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2009. Periodization problems in the economic history of science and
technology. Investigaciones de Historia Económica 5 (15):47-73.
OR9
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2011. I am knowledge. Get me out of here! On localism and the
universality of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:590-601.
Raina, Dhruv. 1999. From west to non-west? Basalla’s three-stage model revisited. Science as
Culture 8 (4):497-516.
Raven, Diederick. 2001. How not to explain the Great Divide. Social Science Information 40
(3):373-409. doi:10.1177/053901801040003002.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 4
Rochberg, Francesca. 2002. A consideration of Babylonian astronomy within the historiography of
science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33:661-684.
Rochberg, Francesca. 2010. Beyond binarism in Babylon. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35 (34):253-265.
Somsen, Geert J. 2008. A history of universalism: Conceptions of the internationality of science
from the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Minerva 46:361-379.
Stearns, Justin. 2011. Writing the history of the natural sciences in the pre-modern Muslim World:
historiography, religion, and the importance of the early modern period. History Compass 9
(12):923-951.
Turnbull, David. 1997. Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures 29
(6):551-562.
Yousefi, Najm al-Din. 2008. Secular sciences and the question of “decline”. Iranian Studies 41
(4):559-579.
OR10
Allen, R C. 2011. Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the
scientific revolution. The Economic History Review 64 (2):357-384.
Atlan, Henri. 2007. Knowledge, glory and ‘on human dignity’. Diogenes 215:11-17.
doi:10.1177/0392192107080714.
Berquist, Emily. 2007. Science and nature in the early modern Iberian world: A review essay.
Itinerario 31:95-98. doi:10.1017/S0165115300001200.
Bousquet, Antoine. 2008. Chaoplexic warfare or the future of military organization. International
Affairs 84 (5):915-929.
Brînzeu, Pia, and György E Szönyi. 2011. The esoteric in postmodernism. European Journal of
English Studies 15 (3):183-188. doi:10.1080/13825577.2011.626934.
Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge, and Benjamin Breen. 2013. Hybrid Atlantics: Future directions for the
history of the Atlantic world. History Compass 11 (8):597-609. doi:10.1111/hic3.12051.
Carneiro, Ana, Ana Simões, and Maria Paula Diogo. 2000. Enlightenment science in Portugal: The
estrangeirados and their communication networks. Social Studies of Science 30 (4):591619. doi:10.1177/030631200030004004.
Chang, Ku-ming (Kevin). 2011. Alchemy as studies of life and matter: Reconsidering the place of
vitalism in early modern chymistry. Isis 102 (2):322-329.
Charlton, Anne. 2005. An example of health education in the early 17th century: Naturall and
artificial Directions for Health by William Vaughan. Health Education Research 20
(6):656-664. doi:10.1093/her/cyh030.
Corteguera, Luis R. 2013. Artisans and the new science of politics in early modern Europe. Journal
of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 43 (3):599-621. doi:10.1215/10829636-2338617.
David, Paul A. 2004. Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: functionalist
economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change 13 (4):571-589.
doi:10.1093/icc/dth023.
Elliott, Paul. 2000. The birth of public science in the English provinces: Natural philosophy in
Derby, c. 1690-1760. Annals of Science 57:61-100. doi:10.1080/000337900296308.
Ferrone, Vincenzo. 1998. The Accademia Reale delle Scienze: Cultural sociability and men of
letters in Turin of the Enlightenment under Vittorio Amedeo III. The Journal of Modern
History 70 (3):519-560.
Garner, Phillip. 2008. Productivity revolutions and science driven growth. Economics Letters
101:24-26. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.03.021.
Hansen, Jens Morten. 2009. On the origin of natural history: Steno’s modern, but forgotten
philosophy of science. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 57:1-24.
Healey, Richard. 2013. Physical composition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
44:48-62. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.05.001.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 5
Hole, Robert. 2000. Incest, consanguinity and a monstrous birth in rural England, January 1600.
Social History 25 (2):183-199. doi:10.1080/030710200363195.
Hunter, Matthew C. 2013. Picture, object, puzzle, prompter: Devilish cleverness in Restoration
London. Art History 36 (3):546-567. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12018.
Jackson, Myles W. 2001. Music and science during the Scientific Revolution. Perspectives on
Science 9 (1):106-115.
Kaplan, Debra. 2012. Jews in early modern Europe: The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
History Compass 10 (2):191-206. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00821.x.
Karimov, Alexei. 1999. Russian cadastral surveys before and after Peter the Great. The
Cartographic Journal 36 (2):125-132.
Lux, David S, and Harold J Cook. 1998. Closed circles or open networks: Communicating at a
distance during the Scientific Revolution. History of Science 36 (2):179-211.
Macrakis, Kristie. 2010. Confessing secrets: Secret communication and the origins of modern
science. Intelligence and National Security 25 (2):183-197.
doi:10.1080/02684527.2010.489275.
Magruder, Kerry V. 2009. Jesuit science after Galileo: The cosmology of Gabriele Beati. Centaurus
51:189-212. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2009.00148.x.
Mallon, Ron. 2013. Was Race thinking invented in the modern West? Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 44 (77-88). doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.001.
Marshall, David L. 2011. The current state of Vico scholarship. Journal of the History of Ideas 72
(1):141-160. doi:10.1353/jhi.2011.0004.
McConville, David. 2012. Domesticating the universe. Digital Creativity 23 (1):30-47.
doi:10.1080/14626268.2012.664822.
McNeely, Ian F. 2009. The Renaissance academies between science and the humanities.
Configurations 17:227-258.
Newman, William R. 2011. What have we learned from the recent historiography of alchemy. Isis
102 (2):313-321.
Ortolano, Guy. 2002. Two cultures, one university: The institutional origins of the “two cultures”
controversy. Albion 34 (4):606-624.
Piccolino, Marco, and Nicholas J. Wade. 2008. Galileo’s eye: A new vision of the senses in the
work of Galileo Galilei. Perception 37:1312-1340.
Saunders, Julia. 2002. ‘The Mouse’s Petition’: Anna Laetitia Barbauld and the Scientific
Revolution. The Review of English Studies 53 (212):500-516.
Schliesser, Eric. 2012. Newton and Spinoza: On motion and matter (and God, of course). The
Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436-458. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00132.x.
Shapin, Steven. 2000. Descartes the doctor: rationalism and its therapies. The British Journal for
the History of Science 33 (2):131-154. doi:10.1017/S000708749900391X.
Shoja, Mohammadali M., Mohammad Reza Rashidi, R. Shane Tubbs, Jalal Etemadi, Feridoon
Abbasnejad, and Paul S Agutter. 2011. Legacy of Avicenna and evidence-based medicine.
International Journal of Cardiology 150:243-246. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.019.
Watts, Ruth. 2005. Gender, science and modernity in seventeenth-century England. Paedagogica
Historica: International Journal of the History of Education 41 (1-2):79-93.
doi:10.1080/0030923042000335475.
Wennerlind, Carl. 2003. Credit-money as the Philosopher’s Stone: Alchemy and the coinage
problem in seventeenth-century England. History of Political Economy 35:234-261.
Wesemael, François. 2010. ‘Les termes de toutes les sciences’: The treatment of astronomy and
physical science in Antoine Furetière’s Dictionnaire Universel (1690). International
Journal of Lexicography 23 (2):157-172. doi:10.1093/ijl/ecq003.
Wolfe, Charles T. 2013. Vitalism and the resistance to experimentation on life in the eighteenth
century. Journal of the History of Biology 46:255-282. doi:10.1007/s10739-012-9349-1.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 6
OR11
Arikha, Noga. 2006. Form and function in the early Enlightenment. Perspectives on Science 14
(2):153-188.
Burns, Tony. 2000. Zamyatin’s We and postmodernism. Utopian Studies 11 (1):66-90.
Gingras, Yves, and Alexandre Guay. 2011. The uses of analogies in seventeenth and eighteenth
century science. Perspectives on Science 19 (2):154-191.
Jütte, Daniel. 2012. Trading in secrets: Jews and the early modern quest for clandestine knowledge.
Isis 103 (4):668-686.
Mottana, Annibale. 2012. Mineral novelties from America during Renaissance: the “stones” in
Hernández’ and Sahagún’s treatises (1576-1577). Rendiconti Lincei-Scienze Fisiche e
Naturali 23:165-186. doi:10.1007/s12210-012-0175-3.
Rabinovitch, Oded. 2013. Chameleons between science and literature: Observation, writing, and the
early Parisian Academy of Sciences in the literary field. History of Science 51:33-62.
Vickers, Brian. 1995. Essay Review: The occult in the Renaissance. Annals of Science 52:77-84.
doi:10.1080/00033799500200121.
OR12
Bilban, Tina. 2013. Husserl’s reconsideration of the observation process and its possible
connections with quantum mechanics: Supplementation of informational foundations of
quantum theory. Prolegomena 12 (2):459-486.
Corcoran, Kevin. 2007. From the Scientific Revolution to evidence-based practice: Teaching the
short history with a long past. Research on Social Work Practice 17 (5):548-552.
doi:10.1177/1049731507301036.
de Meis, Leopoldo, and Jacqueline Leta. 1997. Modern science and the explosion of new
knowledge. Biophysical Chemistry 68:243-253.
Deming, David. 2014. Pierre Perrault, the hydrologic cycle and the Scientific Revolution.
Groundwater 52 (1):156-162. doi:10.1111/gwat.12138.
Galle, Karl. 2008. Building on ruins: Copernicus’ defense of ancient astronomers against modern
critics. Endeavour 32 (3):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2008.07.003.
Jaeger, Lydia. 2010. The contingency of laws of nature in science and theology. Foundations of
Physics 40:1611-1624. doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9470-y.
Lin, Justin Yifu. 1995. The Needham puzzle: Why the Industrial Revolution did not originate in
China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (2):269-292.
Naeem, Shahid. 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: The evolution of a paradigm.
Ecology 83 (6):1537-1552.
Naylor, Ron. 2014. Paolo Sarpi and the first Copernican tidal theory. The British Journal for the
History of Science 47 (4):661-675.
Sibum, H. Otto. 2003. Experimentalists in the Republic of Letters. Science in Context 16 (1-2):89120. doi:10.1017/S0269889703000747.
Soffer, Oren. 2004. The case of the Hebrew press. Written Communication 21 (2):141-170.
doi:10.1177/0741088303262845.
Wolloch, Nathaniel. 2011. The civilizing process, nature and stadial theory. Eighteenth-Century
Studies 44 (2):245-259. doi:10.1353/ecs.2010.0026.
Wootton, David. 2010. Accuracy and Galileo: A case study in quantification and the Scientific
Revolution. The Journal of the Historical Society 10 (1):43-55.
Zambelli, Paola. 1995. Alexandre Koyré versus Lucien Lévy-Bruhl: From collective representations
to paradigms of scientific thought. Science in Context 8 (3):531-555.
doi:10.1017/S0269889700002155.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 7
OR13
de Meis, Leopoldo, and Jacqueline Leta. 1997. Modern science and the explosion of new
knowledge. Biophysical Chemistry 68:243-253.
Deming, David. 2014. Pierre Perrault, the hydrologic cycle and the Scientific Revolution.
Groundwater 52 (1):156-162. doi:10.1111/gwat.12138.
Lin, Justin Yifu. 1995. The Needham puzzle: Why the Industrial Revolution did not originate in
China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (2):269-292.
Sibum, H. Otto. 2003. Experimentalists in the Republic of Letters. Science in Context 16 (1-2):89120. doi:10.1017/S0269889703000747.
OR14
Ayala, Francisco J. 2008. Where is Darwin 200 years later? Journal of Genetics 87 (4):321-325.
Carey, Toni Vogel. 2012. Always or never: Two approaches to Ceteris Paribus. Erkenntnis 77:317333. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9403-6.
Chalmers, Alan. 2012. Intermediate causes and explanations: The key to understanding the
scientific revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43:551-562.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.06.005.
Chalmers, Alan F. 2010. Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.001.
Cook, Alan. 1997. Seeds of the Scientific Revolution. Notes and Records of the Royal Sociey of
London 51 (2):327-334.
Ehrlich, Mark E. 1995. Mechanism and activity in the Scientific Revolution: The case of Robert
Hooke. Annals of Science 52:127-151. doi:10.1080/00033799500200151.
Fuller, Steve. 2008. The normative turn: Counterfactuals and a philosophical historiography of
science. Isis 99 (3):576-584.
Henry, John. 2008. Ideology, inevitability, and the Scientific Revolution. Isis 99 (3):552-559.
Keevil, Stephen F. 2011. Physics and medicine: a historical perspective. Lancet 379:1517-1524.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60282-1.
Van Berkel, Klaas. 2010. The Dutch Republic. Laboratory of the Scientific Revolution. BMGN The Low Countries Historical Review 125 (2-3):81-105.
OR15
Garber, Daniel. 2004. On the frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne learned to love
Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
Lamont, John. 2009. Fall and rise of Aristotelian metaphysics in the philosophy of science. Science
and Education 18:861-884. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9118-2.
Lehoux, Daryn. 2006. Laws of nature and natural laws. Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science 37:527-549. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.001.
Matthews, Michael R. 2009. Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science.
Science and Education 18:697-728. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9132-4.
Osler, Margaret J. 2001. Whose ends? Teleology in early modern natural philosophy. Osiris
16:151-168.
Peterson, Gregory R. 1999. The three crises: science, history, and plurality. Zygon 34 (4):683-694.
Smolarski, Dennis C. 2002. The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum, Christopher Clavius, and the study of
mathematical sciences in universities. Science in Context 15 (3):447-457.
doi:10.1017/S026988970200056X.
Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava. 1997. Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy.
Science in Context 10 (4):529-570. doi:10.1017/S0269889700002805.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 8
OR16
Bennett, Karen. 2011. The Scientific Revolution and its repercussions on the translation of technical
discourse. The Translator 17 (2):189-210. doi:10.1080/13556509.2011.10799486.
Kennedy, Rick. 1998. Creating credibility with submerged assumptions in the scientific revolution.
Fides et Historia 30 (1):89-97.
Merchant, Carolyn. 2008. Secrets of nature: The Bacon debates revisited. Journal of the History of
Ideas 69 (1):147-162.
OR17
Baldasso, Renzo. 2006. The role of visual representation in the Scientific Revolution: A
historiographic inquiry. Centaurus 48:69-88. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2006.00042.x.
Cook, Harold J. 2011. The history of medicine and the Scientific Revolution. Isis 102 (1):102-108.
Debus, Allen G. 1998. Chemists, physicians, and changing perspectives on the Scientific
Revolution. Isis 89 (1):66-81.
Henry, John. 2008. The fragmentation of Renaissance occultism and the decline of magic. History
of Science 56:1-48.
Heymann, Matthias. 2010. The evolution of climate ideas and knowledge. Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Climate Change 1:581-597. doi:10.1002/wcc.61.
Martinón-Torres, Marcos. 2011. Some recent developments in the historiography of alchemy.
Ambix 58 (3):215-237. doi:10.1179/174582311X13129418299063.
Moran, Bruce T. 2005. Knowing how and knowing that: artisans, bodies, and natural knowledge in
the Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36:577-585.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.005.
Smith, Pamela H. 2000. Artists as scientists: nature and realism in early modern Europe. Endeavour
24 (1):13-21.
Smith, Pamela H. 2006. Art, science, and visual culture in Early Modern Europe. Isis 97 (1):83-100.
OR18
Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. 2004. Iberian science in the Renaissance: Ignored how much longer?
Perspectives on Science 12 (1):86-124.
Cook, Alan. 1997. Ladies in the Scientific Revolution. Notes and Records of the Royal Sociey of
London 51 (1):1-12. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1997.0001.
Cook, Harold J. 2012. Moving about and finding things out: Economies and sciences in the period
of the Scientific Revolution. Osiris 27 (1):101-132.
De Vos, Paula. 2013. The “Prince of Medicine”: Yūḥannā ibn Māsawayh and the foundations of the
western pharmaceutical tradition. Isis 104 (4):667-712.
De Vos, Paula Susan. 2006. The science of spices: Empiricism and economic botany in the early
Spanish Empire. Journal of World History 17 (4):399-427. doi:10.1353/jwh.2006.0054.
Nelson, Bradley J. 2014. Knowledge (scientia), fiction, and the Other in Cervantes’s La Gitanilla.
Romance Quarterly 61 (2):125-137. doi:10.1080/08831157.2014.878636.
Schabas, Margaret, and Neil De Marchi. 2003. Introduction to Oeconomies in the Age of Newton.
History of Political Economy 35:1-13.
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. Reading relations backward. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute 20:3-19.
Xu, Ting, and Khodadad Rezakhani. 2012. Reorienting the Discovery Machine: Perspectives from
China and Islamdom on Toby Huff’s Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A
Global Perspective. Journal of World History 23 (2):401-412. doi:10.1353/jwh.2012.0058.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 9
OR19
Cook, Harold J. 2012. Moving about and finding things out: Economies and sciences in the period
of the Scientific Revolution. Osiris 27 (1):101-132.
de Meis, Leopoldo, and Jacqueline Leta. 1997. Modern science and the explosion of new
knowledge. Biophysical Chemistry 68:243-253.
OR20
Boschiero, Luciano. 2005. Stories about the birth of modern science. Minerva 43:311-318.
doi:10.1007/s11024-005-6511-3.
Park, Katharine. 2006. Women, gender, and utopia: The Death of Nature and the historiography of
Early Modern Science. Isis 97 (3):487-495.
Zinsser, Judith P. 2011. Multiple beginnings: new insights on the Scientific Revolution and
Enlightenment in France. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:245-249.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.017.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 10
Complete list of sources reviewed
Allen, R C. 2011. Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the
scientific revolution. The Economic History Review 64 (2):357-384.
Arikha, Noga. 2006. Form and function in the early Enlightenment. Perspectives on Science 14
(2):153-188.
Atlan, Henri. 2007. Knowledge, glory and 'on human dignity'. Diogenes 215:11-17.
doi:10.1177/0392192107080714.
Ayala, Francisco J. 2008. Where is Darwin 200 years later? Journal of Genetics 87 (4):321-325.
Baldasso, Renzo. 2006. The role of visual representation in the Scientific Revolution: A
historiographic inquiry. Centaurus 48:69-88. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2006.00042.x.
Bennett, Karen. 2011. The Scientific Revolution and its repercussions on the translation of technical
discourse. The Translator 17 (2):189-210. doi:10.1080/13556509.2011.10799486.
Berquist, Emily. 2007. Science and nature in the early modern Iberian world: A review essay.
Itinerario 31:95-98. doi:10.1017/S0165115300001200.
Biagioli, Mario. 1998. The Scientific Revolution is undead. Configurations 6 (2):141-148.
Bilban, Tina. 2013. Husserl’s reconsideration of the observation process and its possible
connections with quantum mechanics: Supplementation of informational foundations of
quantum theory. Prolegomena 12 (2):459-486.
Boschiero, Luciano. 2005. Stories about the birth of modern science. Minerva 43:311-318.
doi:10.1007/s11024-005-6511-3.
Bousquet, Antoine. 2008. Chaoplexic warfare or the future of military organization. International
Affairs 84 (5):915-929.
Brazelton, William J, and Woodruff T Sullivan, III. 2009. Understanding the nineteenth century
origins of disciplines: lessons for astrobiology today? International Journal of Astrobiology
8 (4):257-266.
Brînzeu, Pia, and György E Szönyi. 2011. The esoteric in postmodernism. European Journal of
English Studies 15 (3):183-188. doi:10.1080/13825577.2011.626934.
Buning, Marius. 2014. Inventing scientific method: The privilege system as a model for scientific
knowledge-production. Intellectual History Review 24 (1):59-70.
Burns, Tony. 2000. Zamyatin's We and postmodernism. Utopian Studies 11 (1):66-90.
Cabral, Regis. 1996. Herbert Butterfield (1900-79) as a Christian Historian of Science. Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 27 (4):547-564.
Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge, and Benjamin Breen. 2013. Hybrid Atlantics: Future directions for the
history of the Atlantic world. History Compass 11 (8):597-609. doi:10.1111/hic3.12051.
Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. 2004. Iberian science in the Renaissance: Ignored how much longer?
Perspectives on Science 12 (1):86-124.
Carey, Toni Vogel. 2012. Always or never: Two approaches to Ceteris Paribus. Erkenntnis 77:317333. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9403-6.
Carneiro, Ana, Ana Simões, and Maria Paula Diogo. 2000. Enlightenment science in Portugal: The
estrangeirados and their communication networks. Social Studies of Science 30 (4):591619. doi:10.1177/030631200030004004.
Carnino, Guillaume. 2013. The romantic machine: Utopian science and technology after Napoleon.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44:608-612.
Chalmers, Alan F. 2010. Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.001.
Chalmers, Alan. 2012. Intermediate causes and explanations: The key to understanding the
scientific revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43:551-562.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.06.005.
Chambers, David Wade, and Richard Gillespie. 2000. Locality in the history of science: Colonial
science, technoscience, and indigenous knowledge. Osiris 15:221-240.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 11
Chang, Ku-ming (Kevin). 2011. Alchemy as studies of life and matter: Reconsidering the place of
vitalism in early modern chymistry. Isis 102 (2):322-329.
Charlton, Anne. 2005. An example of health education in the early 17th century: Naturall and
artificial Directions for Health by William Vaughan. Health Education Research 20
(6):656-664. doi:10.1093/her/cyh030.
Cohen, Benjamin R. 2001. On the historical relationship between the sciences and the humanities:
A look at popular debates that have exemplified cross-disciplinary tension. Bulletin of
Science, Technology & Society 21 (4):283-295. doi:10.1177/027046760102100407.
Cohen, Benjamin R. 2010. The moral basis of soil science and geology: What antebellum farmers
knew and why anyone cared. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35:860-867.
Cohen, H. Floris. 1999. The Scientific Revolution: Has there been a British view? - A personal
assessment. History of Science 37 (1):107-112.
Cook, Alan. 1997a. Ladies in the Scientific Revolution. Notes and Records of the Royal Sociey of
London 51 (1):1-12. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1997.0001.
Cook, Alan. 1997b. Seeds of the Scientific Revolution. Notes and Records of the Royal Sociey of
London 51 (2):327-334.
Cook, Harold J. 2011. The history of medicine and the Scientific Revolution. Isis 102 (1):102-108.
Cook, Harold J. 2012. Moving about and finding things out: Economies and sciences in the period
of the Scientific Revolution. Osiris 27 (1):101-132.
Corcoran, Kevin. 2007. From the Scientific Revolution to evidence-based practice: Teaching the
short history with a long past. Research on Social Work Practice 17 (5):548-552.
doi:10.1177/1049731507301036.
Corteguera, Luis R. 2013. Artisans and the new science of politics in early modern Europe. Journal
of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 43 (3):599-621. doi:10.1215/10829636-2338617.
David, Paul A. 2004. Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist
economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change 13 (4):571-589.
doi:10.1093/icc/dth023.
de Bont, Raf. 2013. "Writing in letters of blood": Manners in scientific dispute in nineteenthcentury Britain and the German lands. History of Science 51:309-335.
de Chadarevian, Soraya. 2009. Microstudies versus big picture accounts? Studies in History and
Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40:13-19.
de Meis, Leopoldo, and Jacqueline Leta. 1997. Modern science and the explosion of new
knowledge. Biophysical Chemistry 68:243-253.
De Vos, Paula Susan. 2006. The science of spices: Empiricism and economic botany in the early
Spanish Empire. Journal of World History 17 (4):399-427. doi:10.1353/jwh.2006.0054.
De Vos, Paula. 2013. The "Prince of Medicine": Yūḥannā ibn Māsawayh and the foundations of the
western pharmaceutical tradition. Isis 104 (4):667-712.
Dear, Peter. 1995. Cultural history of science: An overview with reflections. Science, Technology,
& Human Values 20 (2):150-170.
Dear, Peter. 1998. The mathematical principles of natural philosophy: Toward a heuristic narrative
for the Scientific Revolution. Configurations 6 (2):173-193.
Dear, Peter. 2001. Religion, science and natural philosophy: Thoughts on Cunningham's thesis.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32 (2):377-386.
Dear, Peter. 2003. The ideology of modern science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
34:821-828.
Dear, Peter. 2012a. Historiography of not-so-recent science. History of Science 50:197-250.
Dear, Peter. 2012b. Science is dead; long live science. Osiris 27 (1):37-55.
Debus, Allen G. 1998. Chemists, physicians, and changing perspectives on the Scientific
Revolution. Isis 89 (1):66-81.
Deming, David. 2014. Pierre Perrault, the hydrologic cycle and the Scientific Revolution.
Groundwater 52 (1):156-162. doi:10.1111/gwat.12138.
Dinsmore, Charles E. 1995. Animal regeneration: From fact to concept. BioScience 45 (7):484-492.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 12
Dobbs, B. J. T. 1994. Newton as final cause and first mover. Isis 85 (4):633-643.
Dodds, Lara. 2008. 'Great things to small may be compared': Rhetorical microscopy in Paradise
Lost. Milton Studies 47:96-117.
Ehrlich, Mark E. 1995. Mechanism and activity in the Scientific Revolution: The case of Robert
Hooke. Annals of Science 52:127-151. doi:10.1080/00033799500200151.
Elliott, Paul. 2000. The birth of public science in the English provinces: Natural philosophy in
Derby, c. 1690-1760. Annals of Science 57:61-100. doi:10.1080/000337900296308.
Elwick, James. 2012. Layered history: Styles of reasoning as stratified conditions of possibility.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43:619-627.
Feldhay, Rivka. 1994. Narrative constraints on historical writing: The case of the Scientific
Revolution. Science in Context 7 (1):7-24. doi:10.1017/S0269889700001563.
Ferrone, Vincenzo. 1998. The Accademia Reale delle Scienze: Cultural sociability and men of
letters in Turin of the Enlightenment under Vittorio Amedeo III. The Journal of Modern
History 70 (3):519-560.
Findlen, Paula. 1998. Between Carnival and Lent: The Scientific Revolution at the margins of
culture. Configurations 6 (2):243-267.
Fuller, Steve. 2008. The normative turn: Counterfactuals and a philosophical historiography of
science. Isis 99 (3):576-584.
Galle, Karl. 2008. Building on ruins: Copernicus’ defense of ancient astronomers against modern
critics. Endeavour 32 (3):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2008.07.003.
Garber, Daniel. 2004. On the frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne learned to love
Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
Garner, Phillip. 2008. Productivity revolutions and science driven growth. Economics Letters
101:24-26. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.03.021.
Gaukroger, Stephen. 2002. The historical aims of science. The British Journal for the History of
Philosophy 10 (2):277-288. doi:10.1080/09608780210123382.
Gingras, Yves, and Alexandre Guay. 2011. The uses of analogies in seventeenth and eighteenth
century science. Perspectives on Science 19 (2):154-191.
Golinski, Jan. 2012. Is it time to forget science? Reflections on singular science and its history.
Osiris 27 (1):19-36.
Hansen, Jens Morten. 2009. On the origin of natural history: Steno's modern, but forgotten
philosophy of science. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 57:1-24.
Healey, Richard. 2013. Physical composition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
44:48-62. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.05.001.
Hellyer, Marcus (ed.). 2003. The Scientific Revolution: The Essential Readings. Malden: Blackwell.
Henry, John. 2008a. The fragmentation of Renaissance occultism and the decline of magic. History
of Science 56:1-48.
Henry, John. 2008b. Ideology, inevitability, and the Scientific Revolution. Isis 99 (3):552-559.
Heymann, Matthias. 2010. The evolution of climate ideas and knowledge. Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Climate Change 1:581-597. doi:10.1002/wcc.61.
Hole, Robert. 2000. Incest, consanguinity and a monstrous birth in rural England, January 1600.
Social History 25 (2):183-199. doi:10.1080/030710200363195.
Hunter, Matthew C. 2013. Picture, object, puzzle, prompter: Devilish cleverness in Restoration
London. Art History 36 (3):546-567. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.12018.
Iliffe, Rob. 1998. Review essay: Rational artistry. History of Science 36 (3):329-357.
Jackson, Myles W. 2001. Music and science during the Scientific Revolution. Perspectives on
Science 9 (1):106-115.
Jaeger, Lydia. 2010. The contingency of laws of nature in science and theology. Foundations of
Physics 40:1611-1624. doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9470-y.
Johns, Adrian. 1997. Prudence and pedantry in early modern cosmology: The trade of Al Ross.
History of Science 35 (1):23-59.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 13
Johns, Adrian. 1999. Identity, practice, and trust in early modern natural philosophy. The Historical
Journal 42 (4):1125-1145.
Jütte, Daniel. 2012. Trading in secrets: Jews and the early modern quest for clandestine knowledge.
Isis 103 (4):668-686.
Kaplan, Debra. 2012. Jews in early modern Europe: The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
History Compass 10 (2):191-206. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00821.x.
Karimov, Alexei. 1999. Russian cadastral surveys before and after Peter the Great. The
Cartographic Journal 36 (2):125-132.
Keevil, Stephen F. 2011. Physics and medicine: a historical perspective. Lancet 379:1517-1524.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60282-1.
Kennedy, Rick. 1998. Creating credibility with submerged assumptions in the scientific revolution.
Fides et Historia 30 (1):89-97.
Kohler, Robert E. 2005. A generalist's vision. Isis 96 (2):224-229.
Kohler, Robert E. 2008. Lab history: Reflections. Isis 99 (4):761-768.
Kusch, Martin. 2010. Hacking's historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning. Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 41:158-173.
Kusch, Martin. 2011. Reflexivity, relativism, microhistory: Three desiderata for historical
epistemologies. Erkenntnis 75:483-494.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2011. I am knowledge. Get me out of here! On localism and the
universality of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:590-601.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2012a. Autonomy and objectivity of science. International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science 26 (3):309-334.
Kuukkanen, Jouni-Matti. 2012b. Senses of localism. History of Science 50:477-500.
La Berge, Ann. 1999. The history of science and the history of microscopy. Perspectives on Science
7 (1):111-142.
Lamont, John. 2009. Fall and rise of Aristotelian metaphysics in the philosophy of science. Science
and Education 18:861-884. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9118-2.
Latimer, Joanna, and Mara Miele. 2013. Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human.
Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7/8):5-31. doi:10.1177/0263276413502088.
Lehoux, Daryn. 2006. Laws of nature and natural laws. Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science 37:527-549. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.001.
Lin, Justin Yifu. 1995. The Needham puzzle: Why the Industrial Revolution did not originate in
China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (2):269-292.
Lux, David S, and Harold J Cook. 1998. Closed circles or open networks: Communicating at a
distance during the Scientific Revolution. History of Science 36 (2):179-211.
Maas, Ad. 2010. Civil scientists: Dutch scientists between 1750 and 1875. History of Science
48:75-103.
Macrakis, Kristie. 2010. Confessing secrets: Secret communication and the origins of modern
science. Intelligence and National Security 25 (2):183-197.
doi:10.1080/02684527.2010.489275.
Magruder, Kerry V. 2009. Jesuit science after Galileo: The cosmology of Gabriele Beati. Centaurus
51:189-212. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2009.00148.x.
Mallon, Ron. 2013. Was Race thinking invented in the modern West? Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 44 (77-88). doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.001.
Marshall, David L. 2011. The current state of Vico scholarship. Journal of the History of Ideas 72
(1):141-160. doi:10.1353/jhi.2011.0004.
Martinón-Torres, Marcos. 2011. Some recent developments in the historiography of alchemy.
Ambix 58 (3):215-237. doi:10.1179/174582311X13129418299063.
Matthews, Michael R. 2009. Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science.
Science and Education 18:697-728. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9132-4.
Mayer, Anna-K. 2004. Setting up a discipline, II: British history of science and "the end of
ideology", 1931-1948. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35:41-72.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 14
Mayhew, Robert. 1998. The character of English geography c. 1660-1800: a textual approach.
Journal of Historical Geography 24 (4):385-412.
McConville, David. 2012. Domesticating the universe. Digital Creativity 23 (1):30-47.
doi:10.1080/14626268.2012.664822.
McNeely, Ian F. 2009. The Renaissance academies between science and the humanities.
Configurations 17:227-258.
Medina-Doménech, Rosa. 2009. Scientific technologies of national identity as colonial legacies:
Extracting the Spanish nation from Equatorial Guinea. Social Studies of Science 39 (1):81112. doi:10.1177/0306312708097658.
Merchant, Carolyn. 2006. The Scientific Revolution and The Death of Nature. Isis 97 (3):513-533.
Merchant, Carolyn. 2008. Secrets of nature: The Bacon debates revisited. Journal of the History of
Ideas 69 (1):147-162.
Moran, Bruce T. 2005. Knowing how and knowing that: artisans, bodies, and natural knowledge in
the Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36:577-585.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.005.
Mottana, Annibale. 2012. Mineral novelties from America during Renaissance: the "stones" in
Hernández' and Sahagún's treatises (1576-1577). Rendiconti Lincei-Scienze Fisiche e
Naturali 23:165-186. doi:10.1007/s12210-012-0175-3.
Moxley, Roy A. 1997. Skinner: From determinism to random variation. Behavior and Philosophy
25 (1):3-28.
Naeem, Shahid. 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: The evolution of a paradigm.
Ecology 83 (6):1537-1552.
Narasimha, Roddam. 2003. The Indian half of Needham's question: some thoughts on axioms,
models, algorithms, and computational positivism. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 28
(1):54-66. doi:10.1179/030801803225010340.
Naylor, Ron. 2014. Paolo Sarpi and the first Copernican tidal theory. The British Journal for the
History of Science 47 (4):661-675.
Nelson, Bradley J. 2014. Knowledge (scientia), fiction, and the Other in Cervantes's La Gitanilla.
Romance Quarterly 61 (2):125-137. doi:10.1080/08831157.2014.878636.
Newman, William R. 2011. What have we learned from the recent historiography of alchemy. Isis
102 (2):313-321.
Nyhart, Lynn K. 2012. Wissenschaft and Kunde: The general and the special in modern science.
Osiris 27 (1):250-275.
O'Brien, Patrick. 2013. Historical foundations for a global perspective on the emergence of a
western European regime for the discovery, development, and diffusion of useful and
reliable knowledge. Journal of Global History 8:1-24. doi:10.1017/S1740022813000028.
Ortolano, Guy. 2002. Two cultures, one university: The institutional origins of the "two cultures"
controversy. Albion 34 (4):606-624.
Osler, Margaret J. 1997. Mixing metaphors: Science and religion or natural philosophy and
theology in early modern Europe. History of Science 35:91-113.
Osler, Margaret J. 1998. Essay review: Medieval natural philosophy in context. Studies in History
and Philosophy of Science 29 (2):305-311.
Osler, Margaret J. 2001. Whose ends? Teleology in early modern natural philosophy. Osiris
16:151-168.
Park, Katharine. 2006. Women, gender, and utopia: The Death of Nature and the historiography of
Early Modern Science. Isis 97 (3):487-495.
Patiniotis, Manolis. 2013. Between the local and the global: History of science in the European
periphery meets post-colonial studies. Centaurus 55:361-384.
Paul, Herman. 2012. The Life and Thought of Herbert Butterfield: History, Science and God [Book
Review]. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):232-235.
Peltonen, Markku. 1999. Book review: A revisionist history of the Scientific Revolution. Social
Epistemology 13 (3/4):323-330.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 15
Peterson, Gregory R. 1999. The three crises: science, history, and plurality. Zygon 34 (4):683-694.
Piccolino, Marco, and Nicholas J. Wade. 2008. Galileo's eye: A new vision of the senses in the
work of Galileo Galilei. Perception 37:1312-1340.
Pickstone, John V. 2007. Working knowledges before and after circa 1800: Practices and
disciplines in the history of science, technology and medicine. Isis 98 (3):489-516.
Rabinovitch, Oded. 2013. Chameleons between science and literature: Observation, writing, and the
early Parisian Academy of Sciences in the literary field. History of Science 51:33-62.
Raina, Dhruv. 1998. Historiographic concerns underlying Indian Journal of the History of Science:
A bibliometric inference. Economic and Political Weekly 33 (8):407-414.
Raina, Dhruv. 1999. From west to non-west? Basalla's three-stage model revisited. Science as
Culture 8 (4):497-516.
Raven, Diederick. 2001. How not to explain the Great Divide. Social Science Information 40
(3):373-409. doi:10.1177/053901801040003002.
Raven, Diederick. 2011. What needs to be explained about modern science? The British Journal for
the History of Science 44 (3):449-454.
Reiss, Michael J., and Sue Dale Tunnicliffe. 2001. What sorts of worlds do we live in nowadays?
Teaching biology in a post-modern age. Journal of Biological Education 35 (3):125-129.
doi:10.1080/00219266.2001.9655760.
Roberts, Lissa. 2009. Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of
circulation. Itinerario 33 (1):9-30.
Roberts, Lissa. 2013. Agency and industry: Charles C. Gillispie's "The Natural History of Industry,"
then and now. Technology and Culture 54 (4):922-941. doi:10.1353/tech.2013.0141.
Rochberg, Francesca. 2002. A consideration of Babylonian astronomy within the historiography of
science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33:661-684.
Rochberg, Francesca. 2010. Beyond binarism in Babylon. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35 (34):253-265.
Saunders, Julia. 2002. 'The Mouse's Petition': Anna Laetitia Barbauld and the Scientific Revolution.
The Review of English Studies 53 (212):500-516.
Schabas, Margaret, and Neil De Marchi. 2003. Introduction to Oeconomies in the Age of Newton.
History of Political Economy 35:1-13.
Schliesser, Eric. 2012. Newton and Spinoza: On motion and matter (and God, of course). The
Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):436-458. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00132.x.
Shapin, Steven. 2000. Descartes the doctor: rationalism and its therapies. The British Journal for
the History of Science 33 (2):131-154. doi:10.1017/S000708749900391X.
Shoja, Mohammadali M., Mohammad Reza Rashidi, R. Shane Tubbs, Jalal Etemadi, Feridoon
Abbasnejad, and Paul S. Agutter. 2011. Legacy of Avicenna and evidence-based medicine.
International Journal of Cardiology 150:243-246. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.019.
Sibum, H. Otto. 2003. Experimentalists in the Republic of Letters. Science in Context 16 (1-2):89120. doi:10.1017/S0269889703000747.
Smith, Pamela H. 2000. Artists as scientists: nature and realism in early modern Europe. Endeavour
24 (1):13-21.
Smith, Pamela H. 2006. Art, science, and visual culture in Early Modern Europe. Isis 97 (1):83-100.
Smith, Pamela H. 2009. Science on the move: Recent trends in the history of early modern science.
Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2):345-375.
Smolarski, Dennis C. 2002. The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum, Christopher Clavius, and the study of
mathematical sciences in universities. Science in Context 15 (3):447-457.
doi:10.1017/S026988970200056X.
Soffer, Oren. 2004. The case of the Hebrew press. Written Communication 21 (2):141-170.
doi:10.1177/0741088303262845.
Somsen, Geert J. 2008. A history of universalism: Conceptions of the internationality of science
from the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Minerva 46:361-379.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 16
Stearns, Justin. 2011. Writing the history of the natural sciences in the pre-modern Muslim World:
historiography, religion, and the importance of the early modern period. History Compass 9
(12):923-951.
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. Reading relations backward. Journal of the Royal Anthropological
Institute 20:3-19.
Strickland, Stuart. 1995. Galvanic disciplines: The boundaries, objects and identities of
experimental science in the era of romanticism. History of Science 33:449-468.
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2009. Periodization problems in the economic history of science and
technology. Investigaciones de Historia Económica 5 (15):47-73.
Tirosh-Samuelson, Hava. 1997. Theology of nature in sixteenth-century Italian Jewish philosophy.
Science in Context 10 (4):529-570. doi:10.1017/S0269889700002805.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2000. Scientific publishing and the reading of science in nineteenth-century
Britain: A historiographical survey and guide to sources. Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science 31 (4):559-612.
Topham, Jonathan R. 2009. Rethinking the history of science popularization/popular science. In
Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800-2000, eds. Faidra
Papanelopoulou, Agustí Nieto-Galan, and Enrique Perdiguero, 1-20. Farnham: Ashgate.
Tosh, Nick. 2003. Anachronism and retrospective explanation: In defence of a present-centred
history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34:647-659.
Turnbull, David. 1997. Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures 29
(6):551-562.
Van Berkel, Klaas. 2010. The Dutch Republic. Laboratory of the Scientific Revolution. BMGN The Low Countries Historical Review 125 (2-3):81-105.
van der Velden, Maja. 2013. Decentering design: Wikipedia and indigenous knowledge.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (4):308-316.
doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.765768.
Vermeir, Koen. 2007. Athanasius Kircher's magical instruments: an essay on 'science', 'religion' and
applied metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38 (363-400).
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.008.
Vickers, Brian. 1995. Essay Review: The occult in the Renaissance. Annals of Science 52:77-84.
doi:10.1080/00033799500200121.
Watts, Ruth. 2005. Gender, science and modernity in seventeenth-century England. Paedagogica
Historica: International Journal of the History of Education 41 (1-2):79-93.
doi:10.1080/0030923042000335475.
Wegener, Daan. 2010. De-anthropomorphizing energy and energy conservation: The case of Max
Planck and Ernst Mach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41:146-159.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.02.001.
Wennerlind, Carl. 2003. Credit-money as the Philosopher's Stone: Alchemy and the coinage
problem in seventeenth-century England. History of Political Economy 35:234-261.
Wesemael, François. 2010. 'Les termes de toutes les sciences': The treatment of astronomy and
physical science in Antoine Furetière's Dictionnaire Universel (1690). International Journal
of Lexicography 23 (2):157-172. doi:10.1093/ijl/ecq003.
Wolfe, Charles T. 2013. Vitalism and the resistance to experimentation on life in the eighteenth
century. Journal of the History of Biology 46:255-282. doi:10.1007/s10739-012-9349-1.
Wolloch, Nathaniel. 2011. The civilizing process, nature and stadial theory. Eighteenth-Century
Studies 44 (2):245-259. doi:10.1353/ecs.2010.0026.
Wootton, David. 2010. Accuracy and Galileo: A case study in quantification and the Scientific
Revolution. The Journal of the Historical Society 10 (1):43-55.
Wray, K. Brad. 2009. Did professionalization afford better opportunities for young scientists?
Scientometrics 81 (3):757-764. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2254-x.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 17
Xu, Ting, and Khodadad Rezakhani. 2012. Reorienting the Discovery Machine: Perspectives from
China and Islamdom on Toby Huff's Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A
Global Perspective. Journal of World History 23 (2):401-412. doi:10.1353/jwh.2012.0058.
Yousefi, Najm al-Din. 2008. Secular sciences and the question of "decline". Iranian Studies 41
(4):559-579.
Zambelli, Paola. 1995. Alexandre Koyré versus Lucien Lévy-Bruhl: From collective representations
to paradigms of scientific thought. Science in Context 8 (3):531-555.
doi:10.1017/S0269889700002155.
Zinsser, Judith P. 2011. Multiple beginnings: new insights on the Scientific Revolution and
Enlightenment in France. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42:245-249.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.017.
Online Resource File for Lindy A. Orthia, ‘What’s wrong with talking about the Scientific Revolution? Applying lessons from
history of science to applied fields of science studies’, Minerva, doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9299-4 — page 18