FY 2012 Budget

Financiall Overview
F
O
and Budget
g Recommendations
David Cummins
Vice P
Vi
President
id t ffor Fi
Finance
and Administration/CFO
Mike Sherman
Senior Vice President and
Provost; Chief Operating Officer
Overview: FY12 General Fund Revenues
General Fund revenue comes from two
primary sources: Tuition/fees and state
appropriations. UA expects about $15M
less in state appropriations.
The General Fund pays for instruction,
research, public service, academic
support student services and other
support,
activities.
Tuition and fees,
69% [$271M]
State
appropriations,
23% [$90M]
Transfer-in from
FY11 underspend,
2% [$8M]
Investment/
endowment
income 1% [$2M]
income,
Departmental
sales, 4% [$14M]
Other, 2% [$6M]
•
Indirect cost
recovery
•
Quaker Sq. lease
payments
•
Overhead
reimbursement
from foundation
Th generall ffund
dd
The
does nott pay ffor:
1. Auxiliary Services (parking, dining,
retail, etc.)
2 Residential
2.
R id ti l Lif
Life and
dH
Housing
i
3. Most Capital projects
GENERAL FUND REVENUE,
FY12 BUDGET
2
Overview: FY12 Proposed Expenditures
Personnel, including Dept. Sales, 42% [$164M]
Fringe benefits
benefits, including Dept
Dept. Sales,
Sales 15%
[$60M]
Scholarships, including GA fee remissions,
[
]
10% [$39M]
Auxiliary support, 9% [$37M]
Central funded operational support, 8% [$29M]
Non-personnel academic, 3% [$11M]
Non-personnel academic support, 3% [$13M]
Operations supported with dedicated fees, 3%
[$13M]
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES,
EXPENDITURES
FY12 BUDGET
Departmental sales, non-personnel
non personnel only, 2%
[$10M]
Debt retirement, 2% [$9M]
Transfer to reserves, 2% [$6M]
3
Overview: State Support and Tuition since 1987
1987
198
2012
Since 1987, the cost of higher education has shifted from the state to the student.
4
Budget Recommendations for FY2012
5
Major Changes in Revenue, FY11 vs. FY12
• $15M reduction
d ti in
i state
t t funding
f di
• Increase in tuition of 3.5%
• Projected increase in student
credit hours of instruction 3.5%
3 5%
Image (to come)
• Transfer from FY11 to FY12
under spending of $8.4
under-spending
$8 4 million
6
FY12 Budget: Effect on Units
C ll
Colleges
= average reduction
d ti off 2%
Academic Support Units = average reduction of 4%
UNIT BUDGETS TO BE DETERMINED STRATEGICALLY BY:
1 Alignment
1.
Ali
t with
ith th
the strategic-plan
t t i l priorities
i iti
2. Enrollment growth in recent years
3. Growth in budget over recent years
7
Major Changes in Expenditures, FY12 vs. FY11
CAPACITY AND
EXCELLENCE
ASSURANCE, 51%
FUNDING
ENHANCEMENTS
STRATEGIC
INVESTMENTS, 39%
$20 million
FISCAL
INTEGRITY, 10%
8
FY12 Budget: Priority I
CAPACITY AND EXCELLENCE ASSURANCE
• Compensation adjustments
pp for extended locations: Lakewood,, Medina,, etc.
• Support
• Additional graduate student fee remissions
9
FY12 Budget: Priority II
STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS
• Increase scholarship pool proportionally to tuition increase
• New student scholarships:
•
Pell-eligible continuing students who were ineligible for general
scholarships on admission, but since have earned a cumulative 3.0
with a two-semester, full-course load
•
Select new freshmen with an ACT of 21 and a 3.0 or better
•
New freshmen with ACT between 22-26
• Increase full
full-time
time faculty
• Start-up funds
10
FY12 Budget: Priority III
FISCAL INTEGRITY
• Ensure appropriate
reserves [Ohio Senate Bill 6
ratio
ti off 2.5
2 5 or greater]
t ]
• Build the reserve
• Build a fund
to enhance facilities
11
FY12 budget: New investments
Funding enhancements = $20M
NEW INVESTMENTS TO BE WEIGHED BY:
1 Alignment
1.
Ali
t with
ith th
the strategic
t t i plan’s
l ’ priorities
i iti
2. Viability of unit’s proposal to meet criteria of Fiscal
Integrity Capacity and Excellence Assurance
Integrity,
Assurance, and
Strategic Investments
12
Our Budget: Selected Cost Containment Measure
GRO
OUP INSURA
ANCE ANNU
UAL EXPEN
NSES
Our move to self-insurance in FY11 has helped contain healthcare costs.
Change from FY10: – 5.6%
13
Questions?
14