Appendix L. Grazing This appendix provides the background information regarding standards for range improvements, grazing allotments, and standards for rangeland health. These topics are referenced in Chapters 1 -3 in the Draft EIS. In this appendix: Standard Procedures and Design Elements for Range Improvements within the Klamath Falls Resource Area ........................................................................... 1263 Grazing Allotments in the Klamath Falls Resource Area and Medford District ...... 1270 Standards for Rangeland Health ....................................................................................... 1284 L – 1261 DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs L – 1262 Appendix L. Grazing Standard Procedures and Design Elements for Range Improvements within the Klamath Falls Resource Area Table 282. Proposed Klamath Falls Range Improvements by Allotment. Allotment Allotment Number Type of Improvement Number Edge Creek* 00102 Reservoirs 2 each T41S, R5E, S.11; T40S, R5E, S.35 Fencing 3 miles T41S, R5E, S.11,12; T41S, R6E, S.4,5,6,7,8 Buck Mountain Buck Lake 00103 Fencing 2 miles T39S, R5E, S.11,13 00104 Fencing 2 miles T38S, R5E, S.15,28,29; T38S, R6E, S.20 Dixie* 00107 Fencing 2 miles T41S, R5E, S.5,7; T41S, R4E, S.1,2,12 Grubb Springs 00147 Reservoirs 2 each T39S, R6E, S. 7,15 Stock Drive 00802 Fencing 1 mile T39S, R11E, S.31 J Spring 00803 Fencing 1 mile T38S, R14E, S.32 Barnwell 00807 Reservoirs 2 each T39S, R11.5E, S.4,8 Drew 00817 Reservoir 1 each T38S, R11.5E, S.5 Fencing 2 miles T38S, R11.5E, S.5,6; T37S, R11.5E, S.31,32 North Horsefly 00821 Reservoir 1 each T37S, R14E, S.16 Stukel-O’Neill 00822 Fencing 3 miles T39S, R10E, S.25,26; T40S, R10E, S.1,2 Reservoir 1 each T37S, R14E, S.4,9 Approximate Location North Horsefly 00823 Fencing 2 miles T37S, R14E, S.4,9 Haskins 00826 Fencing 1 mile T38S, R11.5E, S.29,30 Stukel-High 00827 Reservoir 1 each T39S, R11.5E, S.30,31 Horton 00829 Reservoir 1 each T39S, R11.5E, S.15 Ketcham 00835 Fencing 1 mile T39S, R11E, S.19 Reservoir 1 each T39S, R11E, S.21,27,28 Harpold Chaining 00836 Fencing 2 mile T39S, R11E, S.21,27,28 Windy Ridge 00838 Reservoirs 2 each T39S, R11.5E, S.24,25 Bryant-Loveness 00839 Fencing 2 miles T41S, R13E, S.5,6,7,8,17 Short Lake 00842 Fencing 2 miles T39S, R11E, S.27,28 Reservoirs 2 each T40S, R9E, S.15,21,22 Fencing 2 miles T40S, R9E, S.15,21,22,27,28 Fencing 2 miles T36S, R15E, S.28,30,32 Reservoirs 2 each T39S, R11E, S.29,30,31,32 Fencing 2 miles T39S, R11E, S.29,30,31,32 Reservoirs 2 each T40S, R11E, S.5,6,7,8 Fencing 3 miles T40S, R11E, S.5,6,7,8,9,10 Fencing 1 mile T38S, R11E, S.26,35 Reservoir 1 each T38S, R11E, S.26,35 Fencing 1 mile T38S, R11E, S.1,12,13 Reservoir 1 each T41S, R13E, S.7 Fencing 2 miles T41S, R13E, S.7 OK 00846 Swede Cabin 00847 Harpold Ridge 00851 Rodgers 00852 McCartie 00860 Yainax 00861 Mills Creek 00865 continued on next page L – 1263 DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs Reservoir 1 each T40S, R15E, S.17,18 Fencing 2 miles T40S, R14.5E, S.24,25; T40S, R15E, S.19,30,31 00879 Fencing 1 mile T39S, R13E, S.10,11,15 00881 Fencing 1 mile T39S, R13E, S.9,10,15 Horton 00883 Reservoir 1 each T39S, R12E, S.22 Panky Basin 00884 Reservoir 1 each T39S, R13E, S.27,28 Fencing 1 mile T39S, R13E, S.27,28 Dry Prairie 00885 Reservoirs 2 each T38S, R13E, S.27,34,36 Rock Creek 00888 Fencing 2 miles T41S, R15E, S.9,17 Timber Hill 00889 Reservoirs 2 each T41S, R14.5E, S.11,12,14,23 Williams 00892 Fencing 2 miles T39S, R12E, S.10,15 Bear Valley 00876 DeVaul Goodlow * Located within the Pokegama Herd Management Area The following standard procedures and design elements would be adhered to in implementation of the proposed construction of range improvements within the Klamath Falls Resource Area. • Inventories and surveys for cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, and special status species would be conducted prior to authorization of any project construction, and appropriate mitigation implemented to reduce or eliminate potential effects. • Surface disturbance at all project sites would be held to a minimum. Disturbed soil would be rehabilitated to blend into surrounding soil surface and reseeded as needed with a mixture of native grasses, forbs, and shrubs as applicable to replace ground cover, reduce soil loss from wind and water erosion, and discourage the potential establishment of any invasive, non-native plant species. • Where possible, existing roads and trails would provide access for range improvement construction. If needed, unimproved trails and tracks would be created to reach construction sites and provide access for future maintenance of the improvements. Additional design features specific to the individual types of improvements are described below. L – 1264 Appendix L. Grazing Reservoirs • Development of reservoirs would involve the construction of pits and dams to impound water for livestock and wildlife use as shown in Illustration 1. • Pits would be in dry lake beds or other natural depressions. Dams would be constructed in drainages. • Water rights applications would be coordinated with applicable agencies, irrigation districts, and other interested parties. • Water rights would be obtained from the Oregon Water Resources Department prior to construction. • Water storage capacity would range from 1.0 to 3.0 acre-feet. • Dams would be located, if possible, to take advantage of natural spillway sites; otherwise a spillway would be constructed for the reservoir. The slopes of the dam must be a minimum 3 to 1 on the upstream face and minimum of 2 to 1 on the downstream face. Minimum width of the top of all dams would be 12 feet. • The spillway would be designed to minimize the risk of the dam being overtopped during the design life of the structure. • Fill material, if needed, would come from the impoundment area and/or a borrow area for dams. • Excavated material from pits would be piled adjacent to the pit. Topsoil would be stockpiled and used to rehabilitate the borrow areas. L – 1265 DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs Figure 313. L – 1266 Reservoir Standards Appendix L. Grazing Fencing • Fences would be designed to prevent the passage of livestock without stopping the movement of wildlife as shown in Illustration 2. • Wire spacing would follow the specifications found in Illustrations 3. The majority of fences would be constructed as follows: 4 wire with the bottom wire 16-18” off the ground with the sequence of the remaining three wires above this being 6”, 6”, and 12”; the maximum height of the fence (ground to top wire) would be 42”. • The bottom wire on all fencing would be two-strand smooth wire, not barbed, to facilitate antelope crossings. • Steel “t-post” spacing would be between 16’ and 24’ depending on local conditions. • Brace posts, tree scabs, and/or rock jacks (rock cribs) would be constructed to enhance fence integrity with one at least every ¼ mile. • No woven wire “sheep” fences would be constructed on public lands. • Brushing and tree limb removal will be limited to only that necessary for surveying, placement, and construction of a fence. • Where fences cross existing roads, either gates or cattleguards would be installed. L – 1267 DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs Figure 314. L – 1268 Fence Standards Appendix L. Grazing Figure 315. Wire Spacings L – 1269 DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs If future rangeland improvement projects are proposed beyond those listed above, additional site-specific analysis of the environmental consequences would be necessary. Such changes could result from new initiatives or funding sources, changes in management priorities, new laws/ regulations, litigation, site specific activity planning, or future Rangeland Health Assessments. Grazing Allotments in the Klamath Falls Resource Area and Medford District The Draft EIS provides a summary of the number and acres of grazing allotments for the Klamath Falls Resource Area and the Medford District. The following tables contain detailed information about these grazing allotments including proposed improvements. L – 1270 L – 1271 195 207 204 280 12 320 10 8,823 8,860 7,022 11,971 120 2,287 145 00101 00102 00103 00104 00105 00107 00140 Chase Mountain Edge Creek Buck Mountain¹ Buck Lake Johnson Prairie Dixie¹ Dry Lake Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² Allotment Number Allotment Name BLM Acres 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) Table 283. Klamath Falls Resource Area Grazing Allotments. 5/1-6/30 5/1-8/15 C I C C 6/15 10/15 5/1-10/1 I I C Selective Management Category³ 5/15-9/1 5/1-9/1 5/15 8/13 Season of-Use 2001 2002 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Grazing System Yearly DeferredRotation Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor None Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing None Proposed Range Improvement, Common Allotment, Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement, Common Allotment, Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing, Portion Proposed for Closure None Other Information L – 1272 2 7 20 8 56 363 3,524 40 400 40 320 480 80 577 1,708 40 80 00142 00147 00800 00801 00802 00803 00804 00805 00806 00807 00808 00809 Long Lake Grubb Springs Adams Haught Stock Drive J Spring Bar CL SE 80 Two Mile Barnwell Lee Brown 30 10 100 27 6 130 18 80 3,422 00141 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² Chicken Hills BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) 6/1-8/30 6/1-8/15 5/1-6/15 C C C C C 5/1 10/31 5/1-9/30 C C C C 5/1-5/31 5/1-6/30 5/1-6/30 5/1-7/31 C 4/15 7/15 C 6/16 9/30 C C 5/15 9/15 5/1-9/30 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2006 2006 Not Completed 2003 Not Completed Not Completed 2005 2000 2000 2001 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Completed Yearly Not Completed Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Not Completed Yearly Not Completed Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding None None Proposed Range Improvement None None None Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement None None Proposed Range Improvement None None Other Information L – 1273 840 440 720 79 920 240 760 560 00814 00815 00816 00817 00819 00821 00822 00823 00824 00825 00826 Cunningham StukelDehlinger C. StukelDehlinger H. Drew Dupont North Horsefly Stukel O’Neill North Horsefly Jeld-Wen Naylox Haskins 00827 760 00812 Stukel-Coffin Stukel-High 875 00811 Cheyne 239 3,122 988 1,680 185 00810 Brenda BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 17 80 76 24 60 210 68 7 72 30 240 108 55 51 18 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) 5/1-6/15 5/1-7/15 5/1-6/30 6/1-7/15 6/16-8/1 5/1-7/15 5/1-6/15 4/15-6/1 5/1-6/30 5/10 8/10 4/15-8/8 5/1-6/15 5/1-7/1 C C C C C I C C C C I C C C C 5/16 6/30 5/1-6/15 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use 2003 2004 2005 2006 Not Completed 2002 Not Completed Not Completed 2005 2002 2002 Not Completed 2002 2004 2006 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Completed Yearly Not Completed Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Completed Meeting All Standards Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Yearly Grazing System Meeting All Standards Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement None None Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement None Proposed Range Improvement None None None None None None Other Information L – 1274 130 52 280 460 1578 335 320 1,249 600 3,440 565 348 440 00830 00831 00832 00834 00835 00836 00837 00838 00839 00840 00841 00842 Hungry Hollow Warlow Jesperson Kellison Ketcham Harpold Chaining BryantHorton Windy Ridge BryantLoveness Bryant-Lyon Marshall Short Lake 900 760 00829 Horton 40 14 38 490 96 20 19 158 50 40/H 26 60 960 00828 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² Stukel-Hill BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C C 4/21 5/30 5/1-6/30 C C C C C C C C C 5/1-9/30 5/1-6/30 5/1-5/31 6/1-7/9 5/1-5/30 5/1-6/15 5/1-6/13 5/1-7/1 5/1-9/30 C C 4/21 6/30 6/1-8/30 C Selective Management Category³ 5/1-6/15 Season of-Use 2005 Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2006 Not Completed Not Completed 2004 Not Completed Not Completed 2005 Not Completed 2002 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Completed Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Not Completed Not Completed Meeting All Standards Not Completed Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Not Completed Yearly Not Completed Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Not Completed Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Proposed Range Improvement None None Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement None Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement None None None Proposed for Conversion from Horse to Cattle Proposed Range Improvement None Other Information L – 1275 235 500 1,260 1,921 724 240 400 1,043 2,355 688 00845 00846 00847 00848 00849 00850 00851 00852 00853 00854 00855 00856 00857 Klamath Hills OK Swede Cabin Pope Rajnus Bros. Wilkinson Harpold Ridge Rodgers 7C Jump BryantSmith BryantStastny BryantTaylor 1,080 440 1,140 200 108 440 00844 Paddock 74 70 109 20 104 18 16 57 108 105 55 31 10 80 00843 McAuliffe Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C C C C 5/15 8/31 5/10 9/30 4/15 9/30 C 5/1-5/30 5/1-6/30 I M 4/21 6/30 5/1-7/1 C C C I C C 5/1-6/5 5/1-6/17 5/1-7/31 5/1-6/15 5/1-6/15 4/1-5/31 M C 4/16 6/15 5/1-6/30 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2003 2006 Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2003 Not Completed Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Yearly Yearly Yearly DeferredRotation Meeting All Standards Not Completed Yearly Grazing System Not Completed Rangeland Health Assessment Finding None None None None None Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement None None None Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement None None None Other Information L – 1276 60/H 83 120 47 100 110 40 432 420 370 545 2,520 2,520 1,200 1,440 280 5,018 9,220 1,465 00859 00860 00861 00862 00863 00864 00865 00876 00877 00878 Cunard McCartie Yainax Butte Klamath Forest Estates Wirth Rajnus & Son Mills Creek Bear Valley Bumpheads Campbell 47/H 300 6,448 00858 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² Swan Lake Rim BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 13 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) I I C 4/21 6/30 5/1 10/26 C 7/1-8/9 5/1-6/14 C C 4/15 10/15 5/1-6/30 M M C C M Selective Management Category³ 5/1-5/31 7/1-9/30 5/1-5/30 5/1-7/31 5/1-6/30 Season of-Use 2002 2003 2000/2003 Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2005 2005 2004 2002 2006 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed DeferredRotation DeferredRotation Meeting All Standards Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Yearly Yearly Not Completed Meeting All Standards Yearly Not Completed DeferredRotation Meeting All Standards Yearly RestRotation Meeting All Standards Not Completed RestRotation Meeting All Standards Yearly RestRotation Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Proposed for Conversion from Horse to Cattle Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement, Common Allotment, Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement None None None Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Proposed Range Improvement Proposed for Conversion from Horse to Cattle Common Allotment Other Information L – 1277 434 216 9,180 9,280 2,750 00884 00885 00886 00887 00888 Pankey Basin Dry Prairie Horse Camp Rim Pitchlog Rock Creek 00889 445 800 00883 Horton Timber Hill 58 26,356 00882 Horsefly 2,937 7,231 282 2656 285 00881 Goodlow 270 642 43 32 12 240 00879 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² DeVaul BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name 134 639 796 281 358 38 211 2075 52 15 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C C 4/21 5/20 5/15 8/31 6/21 7/31 I I I 5/10 6/30 5/1-5/31 I 5/1-7/31 I I 4/15 6/30, 10/1 11/15 5/1-9/30 C C Selective Management Category³ 5/1-8/31 5/1-8/30 Season of-Use 1999/2003 2003 1999/2003 2003 1999/2003 2003 2002 1999/2003 2003 2003 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing, Common Allotment RestRotation/ High IntensityShort Duration RestRotation RestRotation/ High IntensityShort Duration RestRotation Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Yearly Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing RestRotation Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Yearly Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing, Common Allotment, Proposed Range Improvement Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Proposed Range Improvement Yearly Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Proposed Range Improvement Yearly Meeting All Standards Proposed Range Improvement Yearly Meeting All Standards Other Information Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding L – 1278 6 8 60 9 180 112 600 120 00893 00894 00895 00896 01800 30855 Fields Voight Harpold Canyon McFall Bly Mountain Wood River 13,103 204,815 5,540 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 506 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) N/A 6/1-8/31 5/1-6/30 5/1-9/30 N/A C C C C C 4/21 5/20 5/1-6/15 M I Selective Management Category³ 5/1-5/31 4/15 6/30 Season of-Use 2000 Not Completed 2006 2006 2003 2005 2004 2000/2003 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed ³Selective Management Categories: Improve (I)-managed to resolve a high level of resource conflicts and concerns and receive the highest priority for funding and management actions; Maintain (M)-managed to maintain satisfactory resource conditions and will be actively managed to ensure that resource values do not decline; Custodial (C)-managed custodially to protect resource conditions and values. ²Active Preference is cattle AUMs unless specified as H for domestic horse use ¹All or a portion of the allotment is located within the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument 0 2,970 76 75 1,790 00892 Williams 760 1258 20,460 00890 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² Willow Valley BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly N/A Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Not Completed Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly RestRotation Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is a factor Meeting All Standards Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing None Common Allotment None None None Proposed Range Improvement Exclosures or Other Areas Closed to Grazing, Common Allotment Other Information L – 1279 328 22 92 56 66 45 15 12,421 320 1,564 552 1,240 3,790 202 10002 10004 10007 10008 10009 10012 10013 10015 10016 Flat Creek Longbranch Meadows Neil-Tarbell North Sams Valley Upper Table Rock Clear Creek Lick Creek Brownsboro Park 381 68 8 382 11,518 10001 Lost Creek 120 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² BLM Acres Allotment Number Allotment Name Table 284. Medford Grazing Allotments. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) Selective Management Category³ I C C I C C I C C I Season of-Use 04/16 10/31 05/01 10/15 04/16 05/15 04/16 06/30 04/16 05/31 06/16 07/31 05/01 05/30 05/16 10/31 04/16 05/15 04/16 05/31 2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2003 2002 2000 2001 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding None None None None None None None Portion Proposed for Closure None Common Allotment Other Information L – 1280 Allotment Number 10017 10019 10021 10022 10023 10024 10027 10029 10031 10035 10037 Allotment Name Kanutchan Fields Sugarloaf Section 9 Section 7 Bull Run Big Butte Reese Creek Derby Road Sawmill Summit Prairie Vestal Butte Bear Mountain 1,008 2,240 30,743 521 40 22,118 40 371 404 1,566 2,419 BLM Acres 81 120 1,165 45 7 1,663 5 11 25 15 177 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C C C I C C I I 04/16 06/30 04/16 05/31 06/01 06/30 04/16 06/30 05/01 06/30 04/16 07/15 04/16 09/30 04/16 06/15 I C 04/16 06/30 04/16 05/31 I Selective Management Category³ 04/16 05/31 Season of-Use 2002 2003 1999 2003 1999 2000 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed DeferredRotation Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Yearly Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Yearly DeferredRotation Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding None None Common Allotment None Common Allotment Common Allotment None None None None None Other Information L – 1281 Allotment Number 10038 10039 10040 10041 10043 10044 10108 10109 10110 10112 10114 10115 10116 10118 Allotment Name Crowfoot Crowfoot Creek Cobleigh Road Moser Mountain Devon South Salt Creek Jenny Creek¹ Agate¹ Soda Mountain¹ Cove Creek Buckpoint Keene Creek¹ Howard Prairie Siskiyou¹ 2,163 320 23,643 3,835 1,207 35,619 82 1,417 462 402 40 80 521 7,393 BLM Acres 200 60 1,612 150 75 1,794 9 115 85 33 3 7 70 365 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C I I C I 05/01 09/15 05/01 10/15 05/01 06/15 05/01 06/15 05/01 10/15 I I 05/16 09/10 05/01 09/15 I 04/16 06/30 M C 04/16 06/30 10/16 11/15 C C 04/16 04/30 06/01 07/15 C I 04/15 16/30 04/16 06/30 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Meeting All Standards Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 2002 1999 2003 2003 1999 2003 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly DeferredRotation Yearly DeferredRotation Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Grazing System None Common Allotment None None Common Allotment None None None None None None Other Information L – 1282 Allotment Number 10119 10121 10122 10124 10126 10132 10133 10134 10136 10137 10143 10148 20106 Allotment Name Grizzly Lake Creek Spring Lake Creek Summer Deer CreekReno Lease Heppsie Mountain Antelope Road Brownsboro Yankee Reservoir Canal Box R Ranch¹ Cove Ranch North Cove Creek Deadwood¹ 8,004 281 80 88 440 120 80 200 4,076 4,025 5,561 4,679 5,167 BLM Acres 788 20 20 5 58 15 7 19 294 314 550 447 378 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) I C 07/01 11/30 06/16 08/15 C 10/01 02/28 C C 05/01 06/15 07/16 09/15 I C 04/01 06/15 05/01 06-15 C I C I 04/16 05/30 05/01 10/15 05/01 09/30 07/16 10/15 I I 06/01 10/15 05/16 07/15 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Yearly Meeting All Standards Not Completed Yearly Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Yearly Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Completed Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding 2003 2003 2003 2003 Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed Not Completed 1999 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed Common Allotment None None None None None None None None None None None Common Allotment Other Information L – 1283 20113 20117 20203 20206 20219 20224 20308 Poole Hill Conde Creek Billy Mountain Lower Big Applegate Foots Creek Ferns Lease Deer Creek 77 13,055 228,387 28 12 258 175 591 25 Active Grazing Preference (AUMs)² 887 246 115 11,712 4,758 5,346 1,760 BLM Acres 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Suspended Grazing Preference (AUMs) C C C 05/01 06/15 04/01 12/15 I 04/16 06/30 05/01 06/30 I 06/16 09/30 I C 10/01 10/15 04/16 06/15 Selective Management Category³ Season of-Use 2003 Not Completed 1999 Not Completed 1999 Not Completed 2003 Rangeland Health Assessment Completed ³Selective Management Categories: Improve (I)-managed to resolve a high level of resource conflicts and concerns and receive the highest priority for funding and management actions; Maintain (M)-managed to maintain satisfactory resource conditions and will be actively managed to ensure that resource values do not decline; Custodial (C)-managed custodially to protect resource conditions and values. ²Active Preference is cattle AUMs ¹All or a portion of the allotment is located within the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument Allotment Number Allotment Name Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Yearly Not Completed Meeting All Standards Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Completed Yearly Yearly Not Meeting Standards, Grazing is not a factor Not Completed Grazing System Rangeland Health Assessment Finding Portion Proposed for Closure None None None None Common Allotment None Other Information DEIS for the Revision of the Western Oregon RMPs Standards for Rangeland Health The following section contains the Standards for Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management for Public Lands Administered by the Bureau of Land Management in the States of Oregon and Washington. These standards and guidelines are referenced in Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of this Draft EIS. Livestock grazing would be managed in accordance with these standards and guidelines. L – 1284 Figure 316. Standards for Rangeland Health. L – 1285 L – 1286 L – 1287 L – 1288 L – 1289 L – 1290 L – 1291 L – 1292 L – 1293 L – 1294 L – 1295 L – 1296 L – 1297 L – 1298 L – 1299 L – 1300 L – 1301 L – 1302 L – 1303
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz