USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06)
Date of Report: 09/20/2012
BURNED-AREA REPORT
(Reference FSH 2509.13)
PART I • TYPE OF REQUEST
A. Type of Report
[X] 1. Funding request for estimated emergency stabilization funds [ ] 2. Accomplishment Report [ ] 3. No Treatment Recommendation B. Type of Action
[X] 1. Initial Request (Best estimate of funds needed to complete eligible
stabilization measures)
[ ] 2. Interim Report #_ _•
[ ] Updating the initial funding request based on more accurate site data
or design analysis
[ ] Status of accomplishments to date
USDA-FORESTSEAVICE FS-2S00-8 (6/06)
[) 3. Final Report (Following completion of work) PART II • BURNED-AREA DESCRIPTION A. Fire Name: Goff Fire of the Fort Complex
B. Fire Number: CA-KNF-OOS6S9
C. State: CA
D. County: Siskiyou County
E. Region: AS and R6
F. Forest: Klamath & Rogue River-Siskiyou
G. District: Happy Camp and Oak Knoll (AS);
Siskiyou Mountains (R6)
H. Fire Incident Job Code: PSGSF7
I. Date Fire Started: AugustS, 2012
J. Date Fire Contained: September 10, 2012 K. Suppression Cost: $27,430,978 (Cost of suppression for the Fort Complex as of 9/16/2012) L. Fire Suppression Damages Repaired with Suppression Funds 1. Fireline waterbarred (miles): Approximately 39 miles of handline and 4.7 miles of
dozer line waterbarred.
2. Fireline seeded (miles): None seeded at this time.
3. Other (identify): Safety zones, staging areas, spike camps and drop points are in the
process of being repaired if needed. Roads were graded and drainage repaired where
suppression activities warranted doing so.
M. Watershed Numbers:
Soil Burn Severity Acres by Watershed
tlUC
HUCName
Very
Low
Burn
Severity
(Acres)
Low
Burn
.Severity
(Acres)
Moderate
Burn
Severity
(Acres)
High
Burn
Severity
(Acres)
Total
Watershed
Burned
(Acres)
Total
Watershed
Area
(Acres)
Percent
Watershed
Burned
1657
2621
2148
522
6948
8286
84%
9
7
4
0
20
6137
0%
84
106
202
56
449
2261
20%
K NF:
California
(HUC 14)
18010209020202
Fort Goff
18010209020103
Middle Thompson
18010206110202
West Fork Seiad
18010209020201
Portuguese
1339
1848
1538
231
4956
5580
89%
18010206110204
Canyon Creek
1381
1060
569
67
3077
4286
72%
18010209020104
Lower Thompson
142
109
35
3
289
5524
5%
2
FS-2500-8 (6/06} USDA-FORESTSERVICE 18010206110203
Middle Seiad
505
607
568
154
1834
5715
32%
18010209020203
Ladds Creek
89
100
29
0
218
4761
5%
18010206110205
Lower Seiad
1081
1014
563
45
2703
3844
70%
18010206110307
West Grider
489
307
85
882
4026
22%
11671
8%
0
21377
total
RR-S NF:
California
(HUC 12)
171003090101
Butte Fork Applegate R.
288
435
217
Grand Total
N. Total Acres Burned: [22080) NFS Acres
(0) Other Federal
947
7
(0] State
22324
[246] Private Soil Burn Severity Acres by Land Status
Land Owner
Klamath NF
Private
Rogue River- Siskiyou
NF
Very
Low
Severity
(Acres)
6621
155
288
Low
Severity
(Acres)
Moderate
Severity
(Acres)
High
Severity
(Acres)
Total
Burned
(Acres)
7710
5722
19
217
1079
0
7
21133
246
947
71
435
0. Vegetation Types:
Klamath NF: Generally, mixed evergreen forests dominated by Douglas-fir and ponderosa
pine, with mixed components of sugar pine, white fir, and incense cedar. Hardwood
understories composed of mixed evergreens including Pacific madrone, interior live oak,
and giant chinquapin are common. Areas of previous burns are dominated by regenerating
shrub fields (multiple species of manzanita and Ceanothus) and intermittant conifer
plantations. Unique assemblages containing Baker Cypress, Cupressus bakeri, occur in the
East and West forks of Seiad Creek.
Rogue River-Siskiyou NF: Mixed conifer forests dominated by white fir and Douglas-fir, with
incense cedar, Shasta red fir, sugar pine, Western white pine, Jeffrey pine, Pacific madrone,
giant chinquapin, and greenleaf manzanita.
P. Dominant Soils:
Rogue River-Siskiyou NF: Loamy-skeletal mixed frigid family of Entic Xerumbrepts &
Loamy-skeletal mixed family of Entic Cryumbrepts; loamy-skeletal mixed frigid family of Ultic
Haploxeralfs & loamy-skeletal mixed family of Typic Cryoboralfs.
3
FS-2500-8 (6/06) USDA-FORESTSERVICE
Klamath NF: Clallam Family (Loamy-skelatal mixed mesic Dystric Xerochrepts), Deadwood
Family (Loamy-skelatal, serpentinitic Typic Cryothents), Woodseye Family (Loamy-skeletal
mixed frigid Lithic Xerumbrepts).
Q.
Geologic Types:
The entire analysis area (Klamath NF and Rogue River Siskiyou NF) is underlain by Western
Paleozoic and Triassic Rattlesnake Terrain of the Klamath Mountains. The bedrock is made
up of amphibolite schist (R17) with lenses of ultramafic rock (harzburgite (R19), dunite (R24)
and serpentinite (R25). There is metavolcanic/metasedimentary bedrock along the Klamath
River in the analysis area. Approximately 12% of the area is covered with landslide deposits
(Qis).
R. Miles of Stream Channels by Order or Class:
Flow Regime by Severity (Miles)
Flow Regime by Land Status
Very Low
Severity
(Miles)
Moderate
Severity
{Miles}
Low
Severity
(Miles)
High
Severity
(Miles}
Total
(Miles)
36
40
19
3
98
Intermittent
15
19
10
2
47
Perennial
13
15
6
1
34
Ephemeral
8
6
3
1
18
Class 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Class 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Class 3
0.6
1.3
0.2
0.0
2.1
Class 4
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.6
72
83
39
6
199
Klamath NF
Rogue-Siskiyou NF
Grand Total
S. Transportation System
Trails: 27.4 miles
FS Roads: 3.2 miles
County Road: 4.3 Miles
The Seiad Creek Road, made up of County Road 80002 and FS Road 48N20, coincided with
the fire perimeter. The burn severity mapping does not capture the impacts to the road due to its
proximity to the fire perimeter. The watersheds above the road did burn with high and moderate
severity. Therefore, the road is included in the analysis and the fire is considered to have
impacted the road.
4
USDA-FORESTSERVICE
FS-2500-8 (6/06) Miles of Trail by Severity
Klamath NF
Rogue River- Siskiyou
Very
Low
Severity
(Miles)
Low
Severity
(Miles)
Moderate
Severity
(Miles)
Severity
(Miles)
8.3
0.2
9.2
0.7
7.3
0.4
1.2
0.1
High
Total
Burned
(Miles)
26
1.4
NF
PART Ill - WATERSHED CONDITION
A. Burn Severity (acres): 7064 (very low)
8216 (low)
5958 (moderate)
1086 (high)
NOTES - The above numbers incluae all lands within the fire perimeter. Burned Area
Reflectance Classification (BARC) imagery was obtained on 9/7/12 and the fire perimeter as
of 9/10/12. This data was used as the Team's starting point for field validation of burn
severity. Some burnout operations occurred after that date, as well as a slop-over fire on
9/12-13. Another BARC image was attempted on 9/14/12 but problems with the image
made it unusable. The fire perimeter from 9/10/12 (date of containment) was the most up-to­
date perimeter available when the Team started their analysis and best matched the BARC
imagery date. Therefore the burnouts and slopover on the Rogue River-Siskiyou NF were
then digitized in and severity estimated based on field reports.
As you can see in the soil burn severity map below, most of the acreage in the Goff Fire
perimeter was classified as low and very low soil burn severity. The low and very low soil
burn severities occurred near stream channels and the lower slope positions. Moderate and
high soil burn severity occurred mostly at the top of Fort Goff and Portuguese drainages, as
well as a the face drainages along Seiad Creek. The amount of and location of low and ve~
low soil burn severity will temper the post fire effect on sediment and runoff in 61h and 7
field response reaches (mouths of Fort Goff and Portuguese Creeks).
5
USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06) Very Low
Lo w
Moderate
High
B. Water-Repellent Soil (acres): 543 (50% repellency on total high severity acres)
C. Soil Erosion Hazard Rating (acres):
901 (moderate)
20974 (high)
449 (low)
D. Erosion Potential: # tons/acre average erosion potential 21 .5 tons/acre (Calculated from
WEPP-ERMiT for a 2-year storm event and untreated hillslope. Model accuracy is +-50%)
E. Sediment Potential: # cubic yards I square mile 230 cu yards/sq mi (Calculated from
USLE model)
PART IV - HYDROLOGIC DESIGN FACTORS
A. Estimated Vegetative Recovery Period, (years): 5
(based on recovery of hydrophobic soils and burned off brush fields that represent the pre­
fire condition)
B. Design Chance of Success, (percent): 80
C. Equivalent Design Recurrence Interval, (years): 25
D. Design Storm Duration, (hours): 6
E. Design Storm Magnitude, (inches): 3.0
6
USOA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06) F. Design Flow, (cubic feet I second/ square mile): 188
(calculated from the average design flow of the 5 watersheds modeled in Map Zone C)
G. Estimated Reduction in Infiltration, (percent): 32
(calculated based on adjusted design flow)
H. Adjusted Design Flow, (cfs per square mile): 248
(note: this is the design flow based on the 25-year 6-hour rainfall intensity it is not a 25 year
peakflow design. Should a culverts capacity need to be increased then the standard
upgrade would be a 100-year pipe and/or a critical dip.
PART V - SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
A. Describe Critical Values/Resources and Threats (narrative):
The following is a brief ·summary of the values within and along the fire area as well as the
threats to those values.
Values at Risk:
The risk matrix below, Exhibit 2 of Interim Directive No.: 2520-2010-1, was used to evaluate the
Risk Level for each value identified during Assessment:
Probability
of Damage
or Loss
Very Likely
Likely
Possible
Unlikely
Magnitude of Consequences
Major
Moderate
RISK
Very High
Very High
Very High
High
High
Intermediate
Intermediate
Low
Minor
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
• Human Life and Safetyo (R5): Potential loss of or injury to human life exists from flooding and debris flows as
a result of wildfire. The Probability of Damage or Loss is possible on Highway 96 and
County Road 80002 and likely on Forest Service Road 48N20 and the Magnitude of
Consequences from human life and safety is moderate . Therefore risk to human life
and safety intermediate to hiah._Treatments Recommended - Improve drainage
features on Forest Service Road 48N20and inform cooperating agencies and
community groups in Seaid Valley of risk of debris flow and flooding and.
County and State government should be advised of the risk of the flooding,
debris flows and associated road failures along the Seiad Creek County Road
80002 and Highway 96 particularly the smaller drainages (Darkey Creek,
Sawmill Gulch, School House and other unnamed face drainages to Seiad
Creek and the Klamath River) that do not have enough channel storage
7
USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06) capacity or adequate road stream crossings structures designed to handle
debris flows.
o The Probability of Damage or Loss to human life and safety for the Pacific Crest Trail
(Forest Trail No. 2000), Portuguese Creek Trail (Forest Trail No. 5252) and Fort Goff
Trail (Forest Trail No. 5250) would be Possible depending on the intensity of the burn
and the topography of the area. The Magnitude of Consequences would be
Moderate with potential injury to humans and Moderate property damage. With these
two elements combined the risk is identified as Intermediate Treatments
Recommended -Install hazard signs and trail work to improve safety
o (R6): Potential loss of or injury to human life exists throughout the fire area due to
post-fire environmental conditions primarily due to hazard trees, and rolling rocks
and debris due to burned over steep slopes. The probability of damage from hazard
trees and rolling debris is possible with the magnitude of consequence being ma;or
resulting in a high risk along major travel routes. Treatments Recommended ­
Hazard warning signs for a trail system through the burned area in the Red
Buttes Wilderness.
• Propertya (RS): Forest Road 48N20. Based on the runoff and debris flow modeling results the
Probability of Damage or Loss of the fire affected road segment is Likely and the
Magnitude of Consequences would be Moderate resulting in a High risk.
Treatments Recommended - Install rolling dips, critical dips, and
upgrade/install new culverts on undersized and diversion prone road stream
crossing and x-drains.
o (R6): There is a maintained trail system in the Red Buttes Wilderness, which also
connects with the Boundary Trail that travels east-west along the crest dividing the
Rogue River-Siskiyou NF and the Klamath NF. These trail systems also tie into the
Pacific Crest Trail. In R6, Trail956 from Cedar Basin to Lonesome Lake was burned
over in the Goff Fire, as well as a portion of the Boundary Trail where it ties into Trail
956 and another short section along the crest. Due to the mosaic nature of the fire
and the rocky soils the trails are built on, the Probability of Damage or Loss of the
trail system due to the fire is unlikely and the Magnitude of Consequences would be
minor resulting in a verv low risk. No Treatments Recommended.
• Natural Resources ­
o Water used for municipal, domestic, hydropower1 or agricultural supply or waters with
special state or federal designations on or in close proximity to the burned NFS
lands. There are no values at risk relating to Waters within the Goff Fire. No
Treatments Recommended.
o Soil productivity and hydrologic function on burned NFS lands. After a fire there is
the potential threat of increased soil erosion affecting site productivity, and ash flows
and increased peak flows that could cause streambank erosion. However, the
majority of the fire areas was unburned/very low severity or low severity. The
remaining areas of moderate and high severity are at some risk for loss of long term
soil productivity, but soil movement is tempered by a high amount of surface rock
and mosaic nature of remaining vegetation and surface litter. The Probability of
USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06) Damage or Loss is unlikely and the Magnitude of Consequences would be minor
resulting in verv low risk. No Treatments Recommended.
o Critical habitat or suitable occupied habitat for federally listed threatened or
endangered terrestrial, aquatic animal or plant species on or in close proximity to the
burned NFS lands.
• (RS): Probability of Damage or Loss of habitat for FS Sensitive steel head as
well critical habitat for Federally Threatened Coho would be Possible. The
Magnitude of Consequences would be Moderate. With these two elements
combined the risk is identified as Intermediate. Treatments Recommended ­
Improve trail prism to reduce erosion threat to resources and implement
previously described road treatments.
• (R6): There are no values at risk relating to these critical values within the
R6 portion of the Goff Fire. No Treatments Recommended.
o Native or naturalized communities on NFS lands where invasive species or noxious
weeds are absent or present in only minor amounts.
• (RS):The Goff Fire on Klamath National forest lands occurred in largely
unroaded areas, accessible only by trails. The perimeter of the fire area,
where roads were opened to ridge tops for drop points and cat lines to
contain spot fires or deploy crews contained scattered infestations of yellow
star thistle and dyer's woad; the ICP contained infestations of meadow
knapweed, that were initially mowed, and then proceede to resprout and
flower during the course of the fire. Due to the nature of fire suppression
activities where tractors are used, the Probability of Damage or Loss from
non-native species introduction is likelvto occur, with the Magnitude of
Consequences being Moderate, because most locations of likely introduction
can be accessed by road, or with moderate hikes.This results in a risk
assessment of High. Treatments Recommended - Noxious weed
detection surveys. see Treatment Narrative for details.
• (R6):The Goff Fire burned within the Red Buttes Wilderness on the Rogue
River-Siskiyou NF. No known locations of noxious weeds are known to occur
within the Red Buttes Wilderness, and likely few non-native species. The
helibase for the fire on the RRSNF side expanded for loading cargo nets into
an area infested with star thistle, an aggressive noxious weed considered to
have severe ecological impacts ("high" rating by theCA Invasive Plant
Council). Many trips were flown with cargo from this helibase to H1 in the
wilderness where a major spike camp was established near the fire area
This spike camp is also adjacent to wilderness trail 956, which traverses
through the burned area, including areas with moderate to high severity burn.
Due to the likely introduction of star thistle at H1, direct location of Trail 956
capable of being a vector for spread, and the remote location making
eradication of established weed populations difficult, the Probability of
Damage or Loss to the native plant community in the wilderness is likelv, with
the Magnitude of Consequences being major resulting in a very high risk.
Treatments Recommended - Noxious weed detection surveys at
Helispot 1 and associated spike camp, and along the 956 trail to
Lonesome Lake.
9
USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06) • Cultural Resources ­
o There are no values at risk relating to Cultural Resources within the Goff Fire.
Treatments Recommended.
No
B. Emergency Treatment Objectives (narrative): The primary objective of this Burned Area
Emergency Response Report is to recommend prompt actions deemed reasonable and
necessary to effectively protect, reduce or minimize significant threats to human life and
property and prevent unacceptable degradation of natural resources. The application of
these BAER treatments would minimize on-site and downstream damages to the identified
values at risk. The emergency treatments being recommended by the Fort Complex-Goff
Fire BAER Team are specifically designed to achieve the following results.
AS Proposed Treatments The objectives of the treatments are to: 1. Protect human life and safety by raising awareness through posting hazard warning
signs on trails, reinforcing trail tread, improving trail drainage, improving road drainage,
and communicate hazard of flooding and debris flow to cooperating agencies and
community groups
2. Protect Forest Service investment in road and trail infrastructure by installing drainage
features capable of withstanding potential increased stream flows and/or debris flows.
3. Protect ecological values of critical habitat of federally listed coho salmon on Fort Goff,
Portuguese and Seaid Creeks through road and trail work. Protect ecological vaue of
biological diversity by monitoring and treating as necessary, sites where introduction of
noxious weeds may have occurred in previously uninvaded sites.
R6 Proposed Land and Protective Treatments The objectives of the land and protective treatments are to: 1. Protect human life and safety by raising awareness through posting hazard warning
signs for the 956 Trail to Lonesome Lake. Sign locations would be at the Rr Glade and
Sucker Gap Trailheads accessing the Red Buttes Wilderness.
2. Monitor and treat as necessary, sites where introduction of noxious weeds may have
occurred in the Red Buttes Wilderness, such as helispots, drop points, and spike camps.
Prevent the establishment and spread of new noxious weeds into the burned area in the
Red Buttes Wilderness, particularly at Helispot 1 and associated spike camp, and along
the 956 Trail to Lonesome Lake that travels through Moderate and High Severity burn.
C. Probability of Completing Treatment Prior to Damaging Storm or Event:
Land 90%
Channel N/A
Roads/Trails 80%
Protection/Safety 90%
D. Probability of Treatment Success
L
~
Land
~ '··
Years after Treatment
1
3
5
80
90
90
I
lO
USDA-FORESTSERVICE I
FS-2500-8 (6/06) Channel
N/A
N/A
N/A
Roads/Trails
80
90
95
Protection/Safety
80
90
90
E. Cost of No-Action (Including Loss): $166,000 (combined for Regions 5 and 6 calculated
from the Values at Risk (VAR) tool)
F. Cost of Selected Alternative (Including Loss): $121,863 (combined for Regions 5 and 6
calculated from the Values at Risk (VAR) tool)
G. Skills Represented on Burned-Area Survey Team:
[x]
[]
[)
(x]
Hydrology
Forestry
Contracting
Fisheries
[x]
[x]
[]
(]
Soils
Wildlife
Ecology
Research
[x]
(]
[x]
[)
Geology
Fire Mgmt.
Botany
Landscape Arch
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
Range
Engineering
Archaeology
GIS
Team Leaders: Joe Blanchard - Region 5 - Forest Soil Scientist, Klamath NF
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 530-4841-4591
FAX: 530-841-4571
Joni D. Brazier- Region 6- Forest Soil Scientist, Rogue River-Siskiyou NF
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 541-471-6760
FAX: 541-471-6512
Team:
BARB MUMBW (R6)- BOTANISTI INVASIV£ SPECIES
BRIAN LONG(R6)-RECREA TION
MIKE MITCHELL ( R6)- GIS
GREGG BOUSFIELD ( R5)-HYDROLOGY
MARLA KNIGHT (R5) - BOTANIST/ INVASI VE SPECIES
ANGIE BELL (R5) ·GEOLOGY/GIS
T OGAN CAPOZZA (R5)- R ECREATION
H. Treatment Narrative:
(Describe the emergency treatments, where and how they will be applied, and what
they are intended to do. This information helps to determine qualifying treatments for
the appropriate funding authorities. For seeding treatments, include species,
application rates and species selection rationale.)
II USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06)
Land Treatments: (R5): Noxious Weed/Invasive Prant Detection Surveys. Detection surveys would include areas that were previously un-infested prior to the fire, which include: o
the PCT trail access from road 47N80 that was opened to just east of Lily Pad
lake;
o
the PCT from end of the road above to Rattlesnake Mtn.
o
peripheral roads where tractor access to ridge tops for containment lines, safety
zones, and medivac pads were constructed (roads 18N02 to Tims's peak; 19NO1 to
Jackson Peak, 48N20 to Cook and Green Pass);
o
Helispots 6 (main helispot for sling loads), and 12 (dominant supply helispot);
o
Drop points 25, 32, 34, 36, 38, 50, and @ end of road to PCT at Lily Pad Lake
(this was an un-named drop point).
(R6): Noxious Weed/lnva~ive Plant Detection Surveys- This treatment would involve
assessing for new invasive weeds within and adjacent to the fire area and treating them
prior to spread within the first year after the fire. Primary areas targeted are locations with
the greatest threat of new weed spread in the Red Buttes Wilderness due to likely
introduction from helicopter cargo transport from a star thistle-infested helibase, travel
routes, and vicinity to high and moderate severity burned areas. Detection surveys and
treatment would be primarily focused on Helibase 1 and an associated spike camp, and the
956 Trail from Cedar Basin to Lonesome Lake which passes through H1 and into the burned
area, including areas of moderate to high severity burn which are particularly susceptible to
weed establishment. Difficulty of treatment due to the remote access makes it critical to
prevent noxious weed populations from establishing as soon as possible. Requesting 4
employee days at $350 for a total of $1400.
.Channel Treatments: AS: None requested. R6: None requested. Roads Treatments:
(RS):Drainage improvement of FS road 48N20
Runoff and debris flow modeling predicted a moderate to high risk of a damaging event
occurring over the next 5 years in faces drainages above 48N20. Most of the culverts on the
affected road segment are undersized (<1 0 year event) and have diversion potential.
Rolling dips, critical dips with culvert upsizing and installing new culverts would save
infrastructure and road fills from being delivered to Seiad Creeks mainstem where
endangered coho salmon are present.
There are no proposed road treatments in R6.
Trail Treatments:
(RS): Reinforce TraiiTread, Install Drainage StructuresThis treatment will reduce hazards to the recreating public byreinforcing collapsed trail tread
and reducing surface erosion on trails and the potential for runoff concentration .. In areas
where there are burned out cavities beneath the trail tread, rock would be used to fill the
area that has or has potential to collapse. This treatment will also install water bars to divert
12 USDA-FORESTSERVICE FS-2500-8 (6/06)
increased runoff and sediment movement associated with burned areas.
Drainage
structures will help prevent unacceptable erosion, and minimize degradation to water
quality, anadramous fish habitat, and spawning habitat.
There are no proposed trail treatments in R6.
Protection/Safety Treatments:
(RS): Install Trail Hazard Signs ­
Six (6) signs warning visitors of hazards in the burned area, including loose rocks, falling
trees and limbs, and impacts to trail conditions will be purchased and installed at the
following entry points to trails within the Goff Fire: Fort Goff Trailhead, Portuguese Creek
Trailhead, PCT Trailheads at Hwy, 96 and Cook and Green, Darkey Creek Trailhead, and
Boundary Trail at the PCT, Signs will be 12"x18", poly-flex, yellow-black, non-reflective trail
sign mounted on a 4"x4"x8' post at a height and distance mandated in the USFS Handbook.
(R6): Install Trail Hazard Signs ­
Place 2. signs, to inform visitors of burned over conditions along the 956 Trail to Lonesome
Lake and accessing the Boundary Trail. Signs would be located at the Fir Glade and Sucker
Gap Trailheads accessing the Red Buttes Wilderness. Note that other Red Buttes
Wilderness trail access points that access the Goff Fire were assessed for the Hello and Lick
Fires earlier this season and signs are being installed under BAER authority for those fires.
Ensure maximum visibility and readability of signs warning visitors of hazards in the burned
area, including loose rocks, falling trees and limbs, and impacts to trail condition. Sign would
be 12"x18", poly-flex, yellow-black, non-reflective trail sign mounted on a 4"x4"x8' post at a
height and distance mandated in the USFS Handbook.
I. Monitoring Narrative:
(Describe the monitoring needs, what treatments will be monitored, how they will be
monitored, and when monitoring will occur. A detailed monitoring plan must be
submitted as a separate document to the Regional BAER coordinator.)
R5: None requested. R6: None requested. USDA-FORESTSERVICE
Pa rt VI
FS-2500-8 (6/06) - REGION 5 Emergency Sta billzatlon T reat ment s an d 5 ource o f Funds
I~ lands
Une Items
lkits
Unit
Cost
#cl
Urits
Other
BieR$
$
#of
lMs
Other Lands
Fed #d Nmfec
Units
$
$
All
Tdal
$
A LandTn!almerts
t-.bxia.s Weed Det€dion
~les
$64
50
1nss1 reN ilfrrs ztxr.e ltls lne
Sb:tal LarrJ Tll:lflbn&ts
$3190
$0
$3,10C
$C
$C
$0
$)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3.1~
$0
$)
$C
$C
$0
$0
~oc
$0
~~
$0
$0
$0
$3,190
$0
~
~
$)
$)
$C
$)
$C
~
$(]
$C
$C
$)
$)
$)
$0
$C
~
$C
$C
B Olannel Treab nents
~ reN hErr's2ixTie ltls lne
~al (hamel T1981.
oc
oc
oc
~~
C Fbad and Trails
R:>lino dt:E>
OJivert r~ , "" dnsb
Oitical dp; w'rufvert raPe
Cbntract MrirVdeSgl
Trail \\Oik
lns8t reNitsrs cm\8 dis Ire
eat!
eat!
eat!
100:
6
$6,00C
$0
~
750C
1000C
3
!l:??.50C
OCJ
4
1
8
$40,00C
$0
$)
15%cl 1027C
rrile
4,547.5C
&tir:XaJ RJacJ& Trails
n ProEct:U.,
I~'Sal! hazard sigls
ea::h .204.67
1nss1 rav ;~srs cm\8 ttis Ire
SJ::JdaJ Stii.CUes
E. BAER Evaludion
Fegon5crly
6
$10,275
$0
~.38C
$0
$C
$115,155
~
$1,228
$C
$0
$C
$1,228
$0
rep:xt
,Jr6e1 rav 11srs<i:xJ\e ttis Ire
-­
i&/:k1al E.eluaJiaJ
-­
$0
$0
$0
~
oc
oc
$C
$C
$C
$C
$C
g
$C
$0
$C
$12,!n)
$0
$12,900
$C
$C
$C
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
to.oo:
!!:?? Fl'l
WHIT
$10,2n
~.30C
$C
$115,1§1:
$1,22!:
$0
$:
.$:
$0
$0
~
$1,22t:
$0
$0
#FER
$0
#FEA
$:
F.MO'litai~
$0
$0
$0
$0
$C
$C
$11957~
$12,00)
$0
lr681 reN itsrs<i:xJ\e lffs /rei
SJ:JdaJ Mxitairg
G Totals
Ptevioosly CW'CM:ld
Tdal for this rt>n~IIX:t
$119.57~
)4 $0
$0
$C
$:
$:
$:
$0
$0
$0
$0
#FEP.
USDA-FORESTSERVJC€
FS·2500-B (6106)
Part VI - REGION 6 I
L.lnall-
Un~
I
IWI
Colli
IIABI S
-
·~ ~Source of ~nd
.....
l•at
OIMr
~-
F.cl
s
,"""..
Units
lenA
s
USDA·FOfiESTSERVICE
FS-2500-8 (6/06)
M
Talol
s
PAR!VJI • APPROVALS
~
r.....
~
:H
$(
$1.
-
; ;;..---;;;;;
....
s·
~NIOI
~""""""r-
51,
s:
$::
t:
51.
5(
' Road anoj 'fnolla
SOD
•
·~
O!a:h
4e
:-lliii!R-~
Aodon8t'IW
1­
~
.......
~
2711
i89l
a:
Sl
Sl
t:
sc
5I:
$C
---
TcYfrtt-riiiniiiiiii
52.2!1
IS
S(
sc
stll
sc
sc
sc
sc
•
S(
j
$2.77!
sc
..
sc
1. =-~~~--~--~-
Forest Supervisor (Rogue Fllver·Sis~lyou NF) (signature)
~ R6
~~~~--~~--~
Regional Forester (&igniii\Jfe)
S8
$(
•
sc
II
18
sc
sc
sc
so.
5I:
sc
$2.771!11
$2.~
•
s~
s:
S89C
5I:
lii'TOiiiiia
a:
sc
iTiili
>Triii.-Siats
5(
sc
sc
sz.m
ill:
52.m
sc
,.
•
115.011
16
USOA·FORESTSERVJCE FS.2500·8 (6106)
USOA·FORESTSERVICE increased runoff and sediment movement associated with btJrned areas. Drainage
structures will help prevent unacceptable erosion, and minimite degradation to water
quality. anadramous fiSh habital. and spa'Mling hab~at.
FS-2500-8 (6106)
Part VI- REGION S E
IJrD ltllre
There are no proposed trail treatnen&s in R6.
StabiH.zation Treatments •nd Source of Funds
ht6l.lrds
Wier l.ancls
Urit lei
Ohlr
Fed ld NcnFel
I.Wia Qat lktts Bote'IS
$
\rita
s lds $
"''
A LandT.-merts
~>«us WeJitj O!ledim
Prottction/S!fttv T!'!!!tf!ll!ltt:
(R5): lnatall Trllil H11111rd SignsSix (6) signs warrW!g visitors of hazards in the bumed area, Including loose rocks, falling
trees and limbs, and impacts to trail condMioriS will be purchased and installed at the
follovmg entry points to traits within lfle Goff Fire: Fort Goff Trahad, Portuguese Creek
Trahad, PCT Trahads at Hwy, 96 and Cooll and Green, Oarkey Creek Trailhead, and
Boundary Trail at the PCT, Signs wil be 12"k18", poly·llex, yelow-black, non·reflectlve trail
sign mounted on a 4"X4"x8' post at a height and distance mandalad In the USFS Handbook.
(R6): lnstaN Tlail Hazard Signs ­
Place 2 signs, 10 inform visitors of burned over condltions along the 9S6 Trail to Lonesome
Lake and aocessing the Boundary Trail. Signs would be located at the Fir Glade and Sucker
Gap Trailhead$ aocesslng the Aed Buttes Wilderness. Note !hal olfler Red Buttes
Wilderness tralaccess poinls that access the Golf Fire were assessed 100' the Hello and Lick
Ares earUer this ~n and signs are being installed under BAEA authority lot those lires.
Ensure maximlm visolity and readability of signs warning visitors of hazards in the ~med
area, Including loose rocks, falling trees and limbs, and impacts to trail condition. Sign would
be 12"x18", poly·flex, yellow-black, noll-fefledive trail sign mounted on a 4"x4"x8' post at a
height and distance mandated In the USFS Handbook.
I!CieS
S64
50
$3,19(
~,_ I....,..C..IUifrll
$3.1
9.4U/UnJ-..u
m
s:
s:
s:
s:
m
m·
m
s:
s:
s:
9::
9::
9::
All
Tdal
s
S3.!g:
s:
s:
s:
$3.19:
B Clwtnelll'elmlrlls
$0111
$Dill
m
m
t.nf'fltli.-r.Dwt,Jhl
s:
9.4U/fhwnl r-.
c Ft.! elllliaila
FOirgdps
ClNrt
____,.,..
____ ,..""'
eadl
ea:h
1
Oii:a dps -.la.Mrt rid .n 1
Olltlildltctrirt'de9 ()'l 15l0d I
TIWIWOik
rnle
4,s47.S:
6
$6.
3
S?2..
4
1
$40.
8
~
s:
SIC
$(
94AIIft.dl-
s
$6.00
m
m
m
m
m
S22.
$«),•
sto.:
535.
$115.15
:w
$'115,I
$1.221
$ll
$1
Q
1. Monitoring Narl'lltlve:
{DHcribe the monitoring needs, what trutmenta will be monllor.d, how they wll be
monitored, lind when monitoring wiH occur. A detailed monitoring plan mU$1 be
submlned es a separate document to the Regional BAER coordinator.)
lrSIIIII'azads01S
eadl a:>4.§1
$
$(
$(
9.4U/9ou:tlw
As: None requested. R6: None requested. __..,._,..,..
--...-,..,..
.~
$1,221
EB&ewu.lal
Riden Saw
so
so
so
$12.900
!em!
so
a-ll~
. Mcrit~rir\'1
$(
$(
$(
94AII~
IGTalall
A9vioos~~
Taallaltls rtOJBSI
~
IIi
sc
m
$:
$ll
$12.900
sc
so
so
sc
$}
~
$()
$1;
Sll
:ww
$119.57 :_$12,1Ql
$11ll.57<
$1
~
!Ill
tFER
.s:
I FER
s:
s:
$tl
s:
I FER