EA# DOIBLMOR-8060-2009-0058-EA
Route Analysis
. ''
I ;_..
,,
..' -'
.....
·~ }
02
CUPA R.c:..~-<1" r'l'"
M.II)1AlEhii_M..poi_RAFCRP·1 4 :VI9120U
~ OOrift Fence
-
Direct Road/Way Closure
-
Cross Country
-
Closed Road to Trail
Desert Trai l
Non-Pa ved Improved Road
Na tural/Unknown Road Surface
@
Y
e,
Well-Water
Reservoir
Spring Developm ent
D
Cooperative
Management and
Protection Area
~:;:.::::'!,'!::'!!~=~auol
reblti.\lyCK~..IIIn•ssollltMd.ala
lotlndr.v4ual Of t.gogrogale~o~sew'Ahol~ dab
019NidaUwnCOft'lj)Ud•om v-o.+s
IO\Iotetlll'ndma y b•"P''I•Iod .,\flol.llnot•~~
m~
Steens Mtn Wi lderness
The 6LM ¢KH drtvdopmeN• on h
Bureau of Land Management
kiHielmiMtp«.ot oCO!'Io4he'9fOUI\d
lowWtoaol PfOP(ltotodi5<1odev•lop~ ......:llriloll
k:IIIU$Cra»lheoiVJt.oo'llftbutAollheoteii..KI
~lon11'4111JGIIC)'"Miuaebntpr.et.c.s
I
N
ROUTE ANALYSIS FORM CRP-14 For ONDA's Proposed CRP Alternative Map Referenced : Alt E Map 4
Proposed Route Closures
Segments/Road Name
legal
C. Carlson Creek Rd T.36S., R.32.75E., Sec 12
Indirect Route Closures
Segments/Road Name
Legal
A. Existing closed Rds
B. Cross Country Route
The existing closed roads with the cross country route connects
a unnamed road to the Indian Creek Road creating other hiking
recreational opportunities.
1) Is a right-of-way or easement associated with the road? Y/N
N_ _ __
a) If yes, what is the right-of-way or easement serial number: _ _ __ _ __
2) What is the primary purpose of the roads?
a) Does it facilitate travel, recreation (e.g. hunting, horseback riding, camp site), or other
access? Explain(type)
All segments of roads/ways are utilized for grazing management (monitoring: utilization,
supervision), first-rate motorized recreational opportunities {OHVing, hunting: ante lope,
deer), wild horse viewing, dispersed motorized camping. All segments are of this area are
well-traveled by motorized vehicles during the deer and ante lope seasons.
This area is highly valued for its OHV. Recreationists have expressed their desire to keep
these roads open.
b) Does it provide access to a communication site, power line, or other ROW permits?
None
c) Does it provide access to a range improvement or pasture?
yes
d) Does it provide reasonable access to private land or private interests in lands?
No
July 13, 2011
e) Does it provide access to existing weed sites or suspected areas and trend or other
monitoring locations?
Use supervision, monitoring utilization points, and trend plots. Potential for SSS pond
weed/monitoring. PODI
3) Is the route needed for safe access, e.g. firefighting and rescue personnel, and safety of all
users (e.g. public, grazing permittees, landowners, ROW holders, BLM staff)?
The routes can be used for fighting fire next the wilderness.
4) Could the road be used as a successful fire break if maintained? Explain
Yes, these routes can be used for a successful fire break.
5) Is the road needed to implement an on-going or reasonably foreseeable future project?
None
6) Does the route provide an additional evacuation route in case of an emergency (e.g. wildfire
or injuries)? Explain
Yes, the routes could be used for additional evacuation routes from the wilderness.
Prepared by:
&'1JM.kb1~
0.3- 13- IJ
Eric Haakenson Date
July 13, 2011
CRP-14
Alternative E-Map 1
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch = 266 feet
1,000
600
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
&..mt Oltlrkt8UA. Otegon
NowatteiWymtde by !he Bt.Miotus.oflhoe
dill lor putpot" 1'104 h ..- . , by 1M Bt.M.
AJtE8x11_RAFCRP-14_NAIP- 1 212612014