CRP-13
Alternative E-Ma
Route Analysis
EA# DOIBLMOR-8060-Z009·005B·EA
,\
\'
CI.!PAR_a,oo Pun
M.J91A• U •II_Mapoi_RAfCRP· 13 212612013
-
Direct Road/Way Closure
-
Indirect Road/Way Closure
-
Cro ss Country
-
~·==tl:::~~":,'!:~auof
~Fence
Wilderness Study Area
~
Spring Development
Closed Road to Trail
Non-Paved Improved Road
Desert Trait
NaturaVUnknown Road Surface
Existing Trails
Steens Mtn Wilde rness
Bureau of Land M anagem en t
Private
D
Cooperative
Management and
Protection Area
IM~IyOI'tomplt~lnoftoeMd~
lorln4'flcNr.IOtagg,r~ate uMW>tl'l ot"''d.U
~~lb~..,.,.~d•orn v.,ovt
IO...re.t..-dma~MupoblltdMito6ul..ot4ta•on
l he 8 ll.t p!Ked ""'"opmef'il on 1M ml!p
lo .lAIII" lt.ir '1\(:ft;ly but n.ol l hef lucl
bell~ . Tt.
'All use N1-l pt.WC.J.
•nqo
loftlef-"Pt'C'r.c;;Of'i_..."9"wnd
loellkM'IIOi propoi...:ll.llediY't\op-tlbll'ldltll.f
1
N
ROUTE ANALYSIS FORM CRP-13 For ONDA's Proposed CRP Alternative Map Referenced: Alt E Map 4
Proposed Route Closures
Legal
Segments/Road Name
C. unnamed way T.34S.,
D. unnamed segment T.34S.,
E. West Basin Rd T.34S.,
G. unnamed segment T.34S.,
H. Indian Creek Rd T.34S.,
I. unnamed segment T.34S.,
R.34E., Sec 20
R.34E., Sec 19, 30
R.34E., Sec 30
R.34E., Sec 25, 26
R.33E., Sec 24
R34E., Sec 30
Indirect Route Closures
Segments/Road Name
Legal
A. Cross Country Route
Al is the cross country route between High Desert Trail and Big
Indian Creek Trail. A2 is the cross country route ties the High
Desert Trail and the Little Blitzen Trail together. A2 route may
not be needed because the segment L connects to segment H
then to segment B. A3 is the cross country route that would not
be needed if the hiker just followed the Indian Creek Road.
Existing
trails
B. Pike Creek and Dry Creek Trails
T. 34S., R.34E., Sec 30
F. West Basin Rd T.34S., R.34E., Sec 30
J. unnamed segment 1) Is a right-of-way or easement associated with the road? Y/N_Y
a) If yes, what is the right-of-way or easement serial number: easement on T.34S., R.34E., sec
20 OR 50825PT
2) What is the primary purpose of the roads?
a) Does it facilitate travel, recreation (e.g. hunting, horseback riding, camp site), or other
access? Explain(type)
Segment C was once a part of the two track mining roads. This route is no longer being used
for motorized access. Visitors park their vehicles on private lands and hike up to the Pike
Creek Trail.
All segments of road s/ways are utilized for grazing management (monitoring: utilization,
supervision), first-rate motorized recreational opportunities (OHVing, hunting: antelope,
deer), wild horse viewing, dispersed motorized camping. All segments are of this area are
well-traveled by motorized vehicles during the deer and antelope seasons.
This area is highly valued for its OHV. Recreationists have expressed their desire to keep
these roads open. This is the mostly highly used routes on the east side of the Steens
Mountain CMPA. Segment L provides another access to the High Desert Trail.
July 13, 2011
b) Does it provide access to a communication site, power line, or other ROW permits?
c) Does it provide access to a range improvement or pasture?
Road Segment
L
Range Improvements Indian Creek Spring Multiple fence segments d) Does it provide reasonable access to private land or private interests in lands? Explain
e) Does it provide access to existing weed sites or suspected areas and trend or other
monitoring locations? Explain
Use supervision, monitoring utilization points, trend plots, utilization points and aspen
exclosures. Potential for SSS pond weed/monitoring. POOl
3) Is the route needed for safe access, e.g. firefighting and rescue personnel, and safety of all
users (e.g. public, grazing permittees, landowners, ROW holders, BLM staff)? Explain
Yes, these routes are necessary for firefighting and protection of the historic Weston Mine.
4) Could the road be used as a successful fire break if maintained? Explain
Yes, these routes can be used for a successful fire break.
5) Is the road needed to implement an on-going or reasonably foreseeable future project?
Explain
Yes, range improvement maintenance (fences, springs, trough replacement)
6) Does the route provide an additional evacuation route in case of an emergency (e.g. wildfire
or injuries)? Explain
Yes, the routes could be used for additional evacuation routes.
Prepared by (print name/signature):
~tJcx.«k~
Eric Haakenson ·o..3- t
Date
~-
13
July 13, 2011
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 1
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
500
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
'*"let
lklmt
Bl M. Otogon
NO-ttll'ltytnlldtby ... Bl M ~ UM ol llw
d-IU tot putpol " 1'104 hltndtd by h BlM
AltE8x11_RAFCRP· 13_NAJP·1 212612014
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 2
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
500
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
&."' Dk.,kt BlM. Ofo,.m
No_",,... rNO. by 1M llM fof UM of tho
!Nil r.t pufpotH Ml h•n<JM by 1M BlM.
AHESx11_RAFCRP-1 3_NAIP-2 212812014
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 3
Route Analysis
o
o
o
Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
= 250 feet
500
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Bwfts Dlt~ BU.t Ottgon
No Wl"lnty mtdl by ... BI.M fof I.IM of lhl
dtll b' pu~posu not h ..tdlcl by lM BLM.
0
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 4
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
=250 feet
1,0.
00---------~.
600
Feet
________....0
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Butna Oitlrkt 8lt.4, Ofogon
tlo-n•nty rNIM by lht 8lt.4 for" " of tho
da'- for p.Hposoa not ln"n6t4 by tho BlM.
AltE8x11_RAFCRP·13_NAIP-4 212.612.0 14
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 5
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
=250 feet
1,0.•0_________..60.0---------·0 Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
&Mftt Oitllkt 8LM, Of•gon
l'owantNyll'll6tbyfM 8LMiofuMofiiM
cb\.t ltf pwpot•t Mt fnMndH by 1M BLM .
AltE8xt1_RAFCRP-13_NAIP-5 2128120141
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 6
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
600
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
8url'lt Dattr~ BU.t. Ot.gon
Ho ..,..,.,,..)',...... by h BlM lor 1o1M~ 1M
ciltt fof pYfpoiU nol h .. MedbyltM BlM
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 7
Route Analysis
Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
500
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Bufl'llt Olt.•kt 8Uol. Ott~
HoWitfal'lty-•41>y ... BlMfotvwoft~
data ltf
not ~llndld by liM BlM
,.,_po,..
AltE8x11_RAFCRP-13_NAIP-7 212612014
CRP-13 Alternative E-Map 8 Route Analysis
Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
=250 feet
----------·5·00·----------0 1,0u~O~ O
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Bu!ont Dil~kt BlM, Ongo~t
No-rr•ntynwcle bylhl Bl M ic.rua.of iM
datA~ putpot•t Mol h ..nct.d by h 8lM
AJtE8x11_RAFCRP·13_NAIP-8 211612014
CRP-13 Alternative E-Map 9 Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
500
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
&.v.ltDillrkCBLM.O.tOOft
tlo-nentyma6t byh 8LM fo1 UMollhe
pwpolltnoi ... MI'ICIId b)'ti'II8LM .
dati~
AltE8x11_RAFCRP-13_NAIP-9 212612014
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 10
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
500
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Bul'n• Dila-ld BLM, ONgon
NOW1111nlytni4Mbylhe BI.M tofut.eollhe
dltllof p.HpoiH no4 ~.. ndld bot 1M BU.I.
AIIEib11_RAFCRP-13_NAIP-10 212612014
CRP-13
Alternative E-Map 11
Route Analysis
· · · Proposal to Close Road
1 inch
1,000
=250 feet
600
0
Feet
2009 Half Meter Imagery
Bwn• O.lrld 8LM, OJ.gon
Ho-II• Ny mlde by !M BlM fof use of t.M
dll.llorpwpot•t noi ~..I'I!MdbyiM 8lM.
AIIE8x 11_RAFCRP-13_NAIP- 11 2126/201 4
TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH RANGE 34 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, OREGON
STATUS OF PUBLIC DOMAIN
LAND AND MINERAL TITLES
AND ACQUIRED LANDS
HARNEY COUNTY
BURNS DISTRICT
MT/USE PLAT
IHOD 10 $£GREGA'flED 1AACU
.1.
.1.
10---+-=--11-=-r:;...J
I~
OR IJffJ Uf(i$ 0 '?41111$ tkS ANwd AGRA
i
i
I
1&
17
I
ri"ll'fli"!'ll!flfl$ I CIRISIII!Il/1111
kc U I JtJI ;1.n JJ.Jf
16
p!p.t !flU Q!!" If/ tAU r' Cer 1!lJ/1!W
£MII:!''cfllffff!f11A. !Ptrlt!f....,friJ•
15
14
13
i
i
- ·­ ·­ ·j
24
Z1
25
-
M~
34
35
36
--
.~~----·
, ............. -
""'~'
. ..- . -.......
flllo
. ................... ~ ~:::.';:.:":.:':=:-:..:ov:.·.:·;:..:~:::
...........
...... ..--. ..t- ..............
"' lot.!--·
. . . . . . ., ,., M
o uonl ........... '"' ­
01