Directorate Update - R. Buckius

Directorate for Engineering
Advisory Committee Meeting
May 3 - 4, 2006
National Science Foundation
Directorate for Engineering
Acting Assistant Director for Engineering
Richard O. Buckius
1
Topics
Î New
Staff Introductions
Î Reorganization Update
Î ENG and Engineering Education
Î ENG Updates and Trends
Î Summary
2
New Staff Introductions
3
New Staff Introductions – CMS
Î Civil
Š
and Mechanical Systems
Perumalsamy Balaguru
y Program Director, Infrastructure Materials and Structural
Mechanics, Rutgers University Center for Advanced
Infrastructure and Transportation
Š
Thomas Birkland
y Program Director, Infrastructure Management and Hazard
Response, University at Albany's Rockefeller College of Public
Affairs and Policy
Š
Clark Cooper
y Program Director, Surface Engineering and Material Design,
United Technologies Research Center
Š
Trena L. Robinson
y Program Assistant, CMS
4
New Staff Introductions – CTS and ECS
Î Chemical
Š
and Transport Systems
Judy Raper
y Program Director, Particulate and Multiphase Processes,
University of Missouri-Rolla
Š
Latisha Wadlington
y Office Automation Assistant, Student Temporary
Employment Program
Î Electrical
Š
and Communications Systems
Ronqing Hui
y Program Director, Electronics, Photonics and Device
Technologies, University of Kansas
5
New Staff Introductions – EEC and OII
Î Engineering
Š
Education and Centers
Dawn Applegate
y Part Time, Chief Executive of RegeneMed
Š
Deborah Jackson
y ERC Program Director for Microelectronics, Jet
Propulsion Laboratory
Î Office
Š
of Industrial Innovation
F.C. Thomas Allnutt
y Program Manager, SBIR/STTR
6
ENG Reorganization Update
7
Directorate for Engineering
Current
Office
Office of
of the
the Assistant
Assistant Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Assistant
Assistant Director
Director
Bioengineering
Bioengineering and
and
Environmental
Environmental
Systems
Systems
BES
BES
Office
Office of
of
Industrial
Industrial
Innovation
Innovation
OII
OII (SBIR/STTR)
(SBIR/STTR)
Chemical
Chemical and
and
Transport
Transport
Systems
Systems
CTS
CTS
Civil
Civil and
and
Mechanical
Mechanical
Systems
Systems
CMS
CMS
Senior
Senior Advisor
Advisor
Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Electrical
Electrical and
and
Communications
Communications
Systems
Systems
ECS
ECS
Design
Design and
and
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Innovation
Innovation
DMI
DMI
Engineering
Engineering
Education
Education and
and
Centers
Centers
EEC
EEC
8
Directorate for Engineering
FY 2008
Office
Office of
of the
the Assistant
Assistant Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Assistant
Assistant Director
Director
(OAD)
(OAD)
Crosscutting Areas
Senior
Senior Advisor
Advisor
Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Disciplinary Areas
Emerging Frontiers
in Research and
Innovation
(EFRI)
Chemical, Bioengineering,
Environmental, and
Transport Systems
(CBET)
Engineering
Education and
Centers
(EEC)
Civil, Mechanical,
and Manufacturing
Innovation
(CMMI)
Industrial
Innovation and
Partnerships
(IIP)
Electrical,
Communications
and Cyber Systems
(ECCS)
9
EFRI Annual Process
Sources
Sources
• •Communities
Communities
• •Workshops
Workshops
• •Advisory
Advisorycommittees
committees
• •Technical
meetings
Technical meetings
• •Professional
Professionalsocieties
societies
• •Academies
Academies
• •Publications
Publications
• •Proposals/Awards
Proposals/Awards
• •Panels
Panels
• •COV
COV
Continuous
Final
FinalAnnouncement
Announcement
Completion
Completion
• •ELT
ELTfinal
final
recommendations
recommendations
• •ENG
ENGfinalizes
finalizes
announcements
announcements
July
Program
ProgramDirector
Director
Proposals
Proposals
• •Identify
Identifyleading
leading
frontier
topic
frontier topic
• •Identify
Identifysignificance
significance
potential,
potential,and
andneed
need
for
research
for research
• •One
Onepage
pagewrite
writeup
up
Program
ProgramDirectors
Directors
Retreat
Retreat
• •Organize
Organizeby
bysubmitted
submitted
topical
themes
topical themes
• •Presentations
Presentations
• •Create
Createsynergisms
synergisms
• •Identify
nearIdentify near-and
and
long-term
long-termimpact
impact
• •Prioritize
Prioritizetopic
topic
recommendations
recommendations
November -- December
December - February
Announcement
Announcement
Formulation
Formulation
• •Form
Formworking
workinggroups
groups
• •Generate
proposed
Generate proposed
announcements
announcements
• •ENG
ENGAdvisory
Advisory
Committee
Committeeinput
input
April – June
EFRI
EFRIPrioritization
Prioritization
• •Identify
Identifyproposed
proposed
investments
investments
• •ELT
ELTRetreat
Retreat
March
10
Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental,
and Transport Systems
CBET
CBET
Division
Division Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Division
Division Director
Director
Chemical,
Chemical,
Biochemical,
Biochemical, and
and
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Systems
Systems
Transport
Transport and
and
Thermal
Thermal Fluid
Fluid
Systems
Systems
Biomedical
Biomedical
Engineering
Engineering and
and
Engineering
Engineering
Healthcare
Healthcare
Senior
Senior Advisor
Advisor
Environmental
Environmental
Engineering
Engineering and
and
Sustainability
Sustainability
11
Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Innovation
CMMI
CMMI
Division
Division Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Division
Division Director
Director
Engineering
Engineering
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Systems
Systems
Innovation
Innovation Sciences
Sciences
and
Decision
and Decision
Engineering
Engineering
Materials
Materials
Transformation
Transformation
and
and Mechanics
Mechanics
12
Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
ECCS
ECCS
Division
Division Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Division
Division Director
Director
Electronics,
Electronics,
Photonics
Photonics and
and
Device
Device
Technologies
Technologies
Power,
Power,
Controls
Controls and
and
Adaptive
Adaptive Networks
Networks
Senior
Senior Advisor
Advisor
Interactive,
Interactive, Hybrid
Hybrid
and
and Complex
Complex
Systems
Systems
13
Engineering Education and Centers
EEC
EEC
Division
Division Director
Director
Deputy
Deputy Division
Division Director
Director
Centers
Centers
Engineering
Engineering
Research
Research
Centers
Centers
Earthquake
Earthquake
Engineering
Engineering
Centers
Centers
Nanoscale
Nanoscale
Science
Science and
and
Engineering
Engineering
Centers
Centers
Deputy
Deputy Division
Division Director
Director
Education
Education
Engineering
Engineering
Education
Education
Research
Research
Experience
Experience for
for
Undergraduates
Undergraduates
Research
Research
Experience
Experience
For
For Teachers
Teachers
Network
Network for
for
Computational
Computational
Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
14
Industrial Innovation and Partnerships
IIP
IIP
Division
Division Director
Director
Industry
Industry University
University
Cooperative
Cooperative
Research
Research Centers
Centers
Office
Office of
of
Industrial
Industrial
Innovation
Innovation
Partnerships
Partnerships
for
for Innovation
Innovation **
Senior
Senior Advisor
Advisor
Grants
Grants Opportunities
Opportunities
for
for Academic
Academic
Liaison
Liaison With
With
Industry
Industry
Small
Small Business
Business
Innovation
Innovation
Research
Research
Small
Small Business
Business
Technology
Technology
Transfer
Transfer
* Program funds reside in OIA.
15
Reorganization Process and Status
Î
Î
Î
Î
Î
Î
Î
Throughout 2004: ENG conducted a strategic planning
process. Among the goals identified by this process was
“Organizational Excellence.”
Spring 2005: Engineering Advisory Committee reviewed and
commented on conceptual framework for reorganization.
Summer/Fall 2005: Public comments were solicited via the
NSF website.
Fall 2005: Engineering Advisory Committee reviewed
conceptual framework in light of public comments.
End of 2005: Conceptual structure complete.
Spring 2006: NSF and ENG Budget rollout, position
announcements, and personnel alignment request completed.
FY 2007: Engineering Directorate reorganized.
16
Task Force Progress and Status
Î
Î
Throughout FY 2004 and FY 2005, ENG produced a
series of task force reports to provide direction. The
reorganization is a direct outgrowth of this process.
The recommendations from each task force continue
to be discussed and acted upon.
Š
Š
Š
Š
Š
Š
Strategic Thinking Group
Awards and Solicitations
Awards Impact and Assessment
Making the Case for Engineering
Engineering Organization and Structure
Engineering Workforce
17
ENG and Engineering Education
18
ENG and NSF Investments
FY 2005
Other
41%
NSF
ENG
Indirect & Fringe
27%
Graduate
Students
15%
Post Doc &
Other Prof
5%
Senior
Personnel
12%
Indirect &
Fringe
25%
Other
48%
Graduate
Students
10%
Post Doc
& Other
Prof
8%
Senior
Personnel
9%
Other includes: direct costs (subcontracts, materials and supplies, consultant services), permanent
equipment, travel, other personnel, etc.
19
Research and Education
ENG Integration
Î CAREER
Š
Š
Š
Proposals
Program started in 1994
Must have a well thought-out plan for integration of
research and education, in addition to significant
research project
ENG provides approximately 1/4 of all NSF CAREER
awards
Î Engineering
Š
Š
Research Center (ERC) Awards
Program initiated in 1985
ERC innovations in research and education are
expected to impact curricula at all levels -- from precollege to life-long learning -- and to be disseminated
to and beyond academic and industry partners
20
Research and Education
$20
35%
$18
30%
$16
$14
25%
$12
20%
$10
$8
15%
$6
$4
10%
5%
$2
$-
0%
2003
2004
2005
[2005, NSF]
ENG REU $
ENG REU as % of NSF
ENG REU Investment (% of total NSF REU)
ENG REU Investment (In Millions)
ENG REU Funding
21
Research and Education
$5.50
60%
$5.00
50%
$4.50
$4.00
40%
$3.50
30%
$3.00
$2.50
20%
$2.00
10%
$1.50
0%
$1.00
2003
2004
2005
[2005, NSF]
ENG RET $
ENG RET % of NSF
ENG RET Investment (% of total NSF RET)
ENG RET Investment (In Millions)
ENG RET Funding
22
Research and Education
NSF Programs
Î
Î
In addition, other NSF-wide activities include
Š ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of
Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers
Š Centers for Learning and Teaching
Š Graduate Research Fellowships
Š Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education
Š Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship
Program
Š Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education
Š National Nanoscale Infrastructure Network
In addition to ENG Engineering Education and Centers programs,
other ENG/EHR activities include
Š NSF-Navy Civilian Service Fellowship-Scholarship Program
Š SBIR Supplemental Funding for Diversity Collaborations
23
Updates and Trends
24
American Competitiveness Initiative
NSF Implications
Î NSF
funding derived from the
ACI initiative is expected to
support:
Š
More than 500 additional research
grants in 2007
Š
Provide opportunities for upward
of 6,400 additional scientists,
engineers, students, postdoctoral fellow, and technicians
to contribute to the innovation
enterprise.
25
American Competitiveness Initiative
FY 2007 – FY 2016
Source: OSTP, Feb. 2006
26
ACI-Driven NSF Budget Projections
$12.00
$11.00
$10.00
Dollars in Billions
$9.00
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$0.00
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
NSF
NSF Projections
FY 2006 through FY 2016 budgets are estimates based on White House data.
27
ENG Budget History
Dollars in Millions
$700.00
$600.00
$500.00
$400.00
$300.00
$200.00
$100.00
$0.00
FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
ENG
SBIR/STTR
28
ACI and ENG
Î
Î
Î
Î
The centerpiece of the American Competitiveness Initiative
(ACI) is the commitment to double investment over 10 years in
key Federal agencies that support basic research programs in
the physical sciences and engineering.
Specifically, the ACI doubles, over 10 years, funding for
innovation-enabling research at key Federal agencies that
support high-leverage fields of physical science and
engineering at NSF, DOE Office of Science, and NIST.
These agencies have “… a strong track record of leading to
scientific publications, patents and eventually to new products
and technologies.”
The NSF funds “ … potentially transformative basic research in
areas such as nanotechnology, advanced networking and
information technology, physics, chemistry, materials science,
mathematics and engineering.”
29
NSF Research and Related Activities
FY 2007 Request by Directorate (Dollars in Millions)
Biological Sciences
Computer & Information Science &
Engineering
Engineering (includes SBIR/STTR)
Geosciences
Mathematical & Physical Sciences
Social, Behavioral &
Economic Sciences
Office of Cyberinfrastructure
Office of International Science and
Engineering
U.S. Polar Research Programs
U.S. Antarctic Logistical Support
Activities
Integrative Activities
Arctic Research Commission
Total, R&RA
FY 2006
Current Plan
FY 2007
Request
Amount
Change
Percent
Change
$576.69
496.41
$607.85
526.69
$31.16
30.28
5.4%
6.1%
580.92
702.83
1,085.45
199.91
628.55
744.85
1,150.30
213.76
47.63
42.02
64.85
13.85
8.2%
6.0%
6.0%
6.9%
127.12
34.52
182.42
40.61
55.3
6.09
43.5%
17.6%
322.68
66.66
370.58
67.52
47.9
0.86
14.8%
1.3%
137.12
131.37
-5.75
-4.2%
1.17
1.45
0.28
23.9%
$4,331.48
$4,665.95
$334.47
7.7%
Totals may not add due to rounding.
30
ENG’s NSF-wide Leadership in Sensors
Î
Î
Î
Î
The Foundation is requesting $20.0 million to support
leading edge, frontier research on sensors and related
topics.
This will be NSF-wide, interagency effort, led by ENG.
Research will advance fundamental knowledge in
sensors and other technologies, focusing on
prediction and detection of explosive materials and
related threats.
An NSF-wide working group will be formed to develop
the solicitation and management of plan.
31
Average Award Duration in Years
ENG Research Grants
Average Duration in Years
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
32
Annual Award Size
Averages for ENG Research Grants
$130,000
$116,000 Ave +
• MRI
• NIRT
• PFI
• NEES Research
$120,000
Average Annual Award Size
$110,000
$100,000
$90,000
$100,400 Ave +
• DLR
• HSD
• BE
• DDDAS
• Sensors-teams
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$94,900 Ave
• NER
• Unsolicited
• Sensors-small
• CAREER
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Award size data annualized.
33
Solicitation Actions with ENG Involvement
With ENG FY 2006 Proposal Generating Documents
90
Number of Solicitations Per Fiscal Year
80
70
60
50
40
ENG
30
Interagency
20
10
NSF
0
FY 2002
FY 2003
FY 2004
FY 2005
FY 2006 (Est.)
34
Institution Submissions
Number of Institutions Submitting
Non-SBIR
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
35
PI and Co-PI Submissions
10000
1.5
9000
1.45
8000
1.4
7000
1.35
6000
1.3
5000
1.25
4000
1.2
3000
1.15
2000
1.1
1000
1.05
0
1
2000
2001
Number of PIs and CoPIs
2002
2003
2004
2005
Average Number of Proposals per PI and CoPI
Average Number of Proposals per PI and Co-PI
Number of PIs and Co-PIs Submitting
ENG Research Grants
36
ENG Proposals and Awards
Research Grants
ENG Proposals and Awards
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Proposal
Estimate
ENG Proposals
ENG Awards
37
ENG and NSF Funding Rates
7000
35%
6000
30%
5000
25%
4000
20%
3000
15%
2000
10%
1000
5%
0
0%
2000
2001
ENG Proposals
2002
2003
ENG Awards
2004
2005
ENG Funding Rate
Funding Rate Percent
ENG Proposals and Awards
Research Grants
2006
2007
Estimate Request
NSF Funding Rate
38
Summary
39
Summary
The reorganization of the directorate has gone
smoothly, and ENG has been able to work
effectively with the various stakeholders within
NSF to move this forward.
Î The EFRI process was well-received by ENG
division directors and program managers.
Internally, the process to date has been very
successful.
Î ENG appears to be on track to increase funding
rates.
Î The ACI will significantly benefit NSF and ENG.
Î
40
Summary
Current trends indicate that ENG will
experience increased impact and growth for
the foreseeable future.
Î With these increasing opportunities, there are
also increasing responsibilities.
Î Clearly defined priorities will be essential for
the future of ENG.
Î Areas where ENG can take a leadership role
will be important.
Î
41
Questions
42
NSF and ENG Priorities
Î
Î
Topics
Š represent a significant intellectual opportunity for
NSF and ENG,
Š have matured to a point where multiple disciplines
can contribute, and
Š focused enough so that NSF and ENG can have a
unique and meaningful impact.
Priorities
Š provide broad guidance on those areas where NSF
and ENG can advance a body of knowledge in
meaningful ways, and
Š are tools that communicate the societal impact of
our investments to the research community, to
Congress, and to the public at large.
43
NSF and ENG Priorities
Î
Timeline
Š FY08 topics initiated in Spring 2006
Š ENG Advisory Committee meeting
Š OSTP/OMB R&D priorities provided in early summer
Š Budget calls in summer of 2006
Š FY08 budget request to OMB in Fall 2006
Š ENG Advisory Committee meeting
Š Throughout the Fall, OMB/White House determine
request level
Š EFRI Program Directors meeting
Š FY08 Budget released in February 2007
44
45