Key Issues Major Conclusions

OTHER PERTINENT
INSTANT
There
STUDY
are
primitive
the
passage
The
three
INFORMATION RELATING TO IDAHOS STUDY
three
AREAS
Instant
prior to
of
FLPMA
ISAs
ISA
Birds
acre
wilderness
for their
three
were
These
of
to
the
WSAs
in
or
areas
study
with
Idaho
1985
in
Congress
as natural
designated
as wilderness
qualified
advance
in
submitted
were
areas
automatically
suitability
areas
designation
with
inholdings
private
lands
resulted
There
in
has
are
been
no
Therefore
Idaho
wilderness
package
NAME
being
action
in
tabular
Congress
of
designation
omnibus
of an
as part
uses
Since
wilderness
for
values
as the
The
addition
recommended
not
recommended
partially
1985
have
lands
of
acquired
of
state
by
BLM
recommended
previously
these
acres
24350
been
for
wilderness
for
lands
acquired
has
for wilderness
on the omnibus
Idahos
was
for other
recommendations
the
three
ISA
Bill
since
for the three
its
ISAs
introduction
as part
of
in
this
1985
statewide
ISAs
NONSUITABLE
ACRES
TOTAL ACRES
STATUS
ACRES
346800
33400
380200
Original
SUITABLE
Great Rift
for
recommended
display
ISA
quality wilderness
recommended
Cup ISA were
China
acre
Great Rift
recommended
portion
high
has included
is
followiiig
the
same
acres
346800
161
the
acre
being recommended
acres
within
the
and
for wilderness
and
The 380200
33400
possess
Prey ISA
of
designation
and
These
ISA
these
on
Idaho
in
and
1976
Bill
The 26713
The
November
studied
were
Recommendations
ISAs
Areas
Study
areas
to
submitted
Congress
May
1985
Birds
of
Prey
26713
26713
Original
to
submitted
Congress
May
1985
China
Cup
160
160
Original
to
submitted
Congress
May
1985
SECTION
This
report
202
WILDERNESS
includes
when combined
wilderness
FLPMA
identified
and
the
Idaho
lands
in
this
of
study
report
wilderness
as
areas
that
another agency
202
of Section
authority
identified
the
wilderness
the contiguous
under
are
during
of
category
with
study
STUDIES
of
Section
inventory
have
wilderness
The
BLM
the Federal
202
WSAs
characteristics
lands
were
Land
Policy
and
Ten
Section
202
only
selected
for
Management Act
areas
were
The
WSAs
202
the Section
Generally
WSAs
each
value
of
202
areas
studied
are
area
the
using
as wilderness
was
same
as established
criteria
with
compared
other
603
for Section
values
multiple-use
of those
areas
Nine
Section
Environmental
Idaho
proposed
Six of
the
U.S
WSAs
Four Section
Forest
Idahos
Section
Amendment
202
Section
designation
to
MFP
in
One
studied
were
Impact Statement
Service
and
Small Wilderness Study
202
Environmental
Final
including Selkirk
WSAs
202
are
recommended
or
designated
Crest
SECTION
recommended
wilderness
for
suitable
440
Creek
Falls
Worm
Boulder Creek
10
Peak
Little
Wood
Black
Butte
Selkirk
3500
340
acres
40
River
are
acres
nonsuitable
acres
suitable/b
40
3290
All
3290
acres
nonsuitable
1930
All
1930
acres
nonsuitable
3880
All
3880
acres
suitable
4265
All
4265
acres
suitable
4068
All
4068
acres
nonsuitable
All
720
720
Crest
contiguous
nonsuitable
acres
All
Creek
Borah
440
All
350
Goldburg
wilderness
WSAs
areas
All
3500
Henrys Lake
North
1986
PREFERRED
ALTERNATIVE
ACREAGE
Lower Salmon
for
These
wilderness
WSA
Box Creek
the
WSAs IN IDAHO
202
NAME
in
Impact Statement
not
are
recommended
Wilderness
addressed
Crest was
Selkirk
Final
Area
acres
nonsuitable
suitable
nonsuitable
acres
MILITARY OVERFLIGHTS
WSAs
Many
aircraft
Idaho
in
approved
during
WSAs
22
identified
the
MFP
Wilderness
and
significant
Guard
in
of
portion
routes
training
particularly
addressed
the
MTR
Idaho
but
are
to
and
Owyhee
The
the
in
critical
as
Southwestern
in
The
operations
military
EISs
those
Jacks
their
are
and
Creek Jarbidge
plans
Paradise
of
are
Air
not
Force
overflown
regularly
Idaho
Air
Owyhee
22
WSAs
MOA
Area
Operation
National
only
and
Navy
Marine
and
Units
have
Owyhee
underlie
and
used by the Air Force
by military
Guard
Canyonlands
These
operations
Military
MOA and MTR
used by numerous
Idaho
Air Force
five
and
military
Air
National
from Nevada
and
California
Last
year
scheduled
increased
With
the
approximately
in
since
proposed
analyzed
would
an
of
to
EIS
range
Idaho
in
the
in
Air
expansion and
ground
of
were
MTRs
the
scheduled
and
the
in
MOAs
the
Paradise
and
and
Owyhee
3548
missions
MOAs
has
were
steadily
1975
Force
Base
projected
for the Saylor
increased
missions
training
The usage
George
Target and
result
365
creation
their
closure
94 F-4 Aircraft
preparing
MTRs
the
Creek
use
disturbance
subsonic
and
California
bombing
associated
low-level
in
Idaho
within
range
increased
areas
and
is
higher
subsequent
expansion
flight
would
the
estimated
not
activities
to
In
on
be within
level
the
supersonic
ElS
The Air Force
the
wilderness
WSAs
relocation
possible
double
impact of the
values
however
overflights
will
be
the action
of
is
BLM
the
recognizes
preparedness
warrant
of
of these
importance
this
but
country
did
recommendation
nonsuitable
military training
not consider
for
the
of
any
of
impacts
WSAs
the
the
within
the
for
operations
national
overflights
defense
to
sufficient
as
the designated
operation
flight
areas
WATER SITUATION
An
issue
and
uses
springs
of
of general
concern
of
Many
which
impoundments
or
WSAs recommended
the
mentioned
of wilderness
effect
fish
vegetation
contain
and
for wildlife
have
on
designation
for wilderness
water
provide
for wilderness
riparian
support
the
is
WSAs recommended
the
and
in
human
use
to
rights
including
number
small
the
water
also provide
may
water
future
values
addition
possibly
stream flows which
populations
and
existing
water-related
uses
already
downstream
to
users
Interior Solicitors
recent
Act
does not create
itself
reserved
water
BLM
area
in
rights
will
for
file
review
opinion
the designation
water rights
beneficial
for
Only
create
can
legislation
appropriations
General concludes
by the Attorney
federally reserved
reserved
under
uses
The Wilderness
that
water rights
Idaho
State
on
language
Congressional
specific
wilderness
for
law
BURNT CREEK WSA
The Big Lost/Pahsimeroi
WSA
24980
Rare
adjacent
II
of
management
the
the area
for
Forest
Service
acres
16680
are
acres
of
NORTH FORK OWYHEE
The recommendation
increases
The
of
of
of
portions
area
due
lands
BLM
the
that
without
costly
to
the
release
recommendations
its
lands
Creek
and
suitable
led
to
by the
BLM
to
The remaining
designation
lower quality of naturalness
their
to
and
Subsequent
now recommended
wilderness
for
and
difficult
modified
adjoining
WSA
wilderness
be
Service
Service
That
Fork Owyhee
need
of
20 years
used to maintain
and
severity
fire
in
the wilderness
calls
The
ecosystem
ecosystem
treatment
period
North
identified
fire
Reestablishment
bunchgrass
BLM
that
and
WSA
RIVER
for the
The ETS
sagebrush-bunchgrass
acres
for
Forest
Forest
Creek
for
removal of individual juniper
mechanical
which
to
Burnt
the
would
solitude
U.S
the
Burnt
be recommended nonsuitable
to
U.S
for the
information
wilderness
the preliminary
on
for solitude
opportunities
wilderness
and
border with
recommended
not
was going
ETS
Final
based
was
adjoining
complementary
is
8300
recommending
on
common
7.5 mile
Peak
naturalness
for
Big Lost/Pahsimeroi
suitable
U.S
Borah
area
study
recommended no
Wilderness EIS
recommendation
recommendation
complementary
of
Final
This
acres
and
limited
has
this
area
WSA
with
desired
less
use
been
forage
in
one
means
balance
would
percent
Thereafter
between
to
prescribed
invaded
maintaining
treatment
than
of
is
41665
designate
language
Congress
by
acres
burning to maintain
natural
non-native
by cheatgrass
as
allow
to
plant
value
removal of young
percent
by mechanical
The
WSA
legislative
the
WSA
an important factor
is
for 100
the
has
River
special
juniper
occur
western juniper/sagebrush
on
400 acres
approximately
being
growth less than
prescribed
and
50
treated
ten
in
percent
any given
years juniper
burning and
sagebrush-bunchgrass
natural
fire
species
4150
year
for
would
be
KEY ISSUES AND MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
issues
Eighteen separate
identified
the wilderness
during
such
WSAs
broader issues such as the impact of wilderness
to
Issues
as the
were
concerns
through IV
almost
in
appeared
Wilderness
wilderness
that
authorities
The
foregone or
lost
addressed
where
Livestock
and
wilderness
range
existing
and
projects
existing authorized
improvements
some cases
be
Critical
allowed
and
Energy
and
exploration
Wilderness
as having
habitats
on released
in
this
of
found
Idahos
in
the
of
the
under
wilderness
where
areas
lands
released
actions
The
with
lands
972239
totaling
retain
would
and
existing laws
values
be
could
of wilderness
topography
rough
on
abundance
an
of
very
lands
outside
this
use
of
existing
occurs
within
of
report
activities
vehicle
portion
Idaho
within
in
recreation
motor
small
land
public
analyses
site-specific
motorized
Recreational
only
BLM-administered
is
on
designation
areas
potential
any situation
identify
and
development
of
would
grazing
maintenance
EISs
wilderness
be
range
maintained along
with
that
increased
of
some
livestock
grazing
the
and
projects
By law
however
implementation
of
CONCLUSION
permitted
maintenance
of
of
development
management
is
grazing
new
would
techniques
be
Mineral
of
Statewide
site-specific
would
wildlife
lands
of
be
Vegetative
to
impacts
in
under
protected
habitat
wildlife
addressed
Environmental
Critical
Specific
was
habitat
wildlife
critical
The impact
Resources
development
potential
for
of
Concern
wilderness
are
studies
On
designation
ACEC
treatments
habitat
wildlife
ten
wilderness
to
improve
addressed
the
in
released
would
designations
wildlife
in
habitat
site-specific
report
would
was
identified
not
of
occurrence
areas
Wilderness
analysis
as
significantly
for mineral
prepared mineral assessments
part
the
eight
such as Area
protection
designation
high
the
the
Permanent
27 areas
of
administrative
identifies
individual
levels
protection
actions
provide
included
analyses
The
Habitat
administrative
would
and
Much
uses
through
to
recognized
is
in
and
impacted
and
in
Idaho
in
wilderness
CONCLUSION
lands
It
improvements
restricted within
Wildlife
use
lands
designation
CONCLUSION
use
significantly
Livestock
WSA
each
for
concern
CONCLUSION
studies
studies
There
The
allowed
be
an issue identified
was
Due
designation
is
would
use
Grazing
improvements
in
such use
motorized
The impact
environmental
motor vehicle
for wilderness
WSA
Islands
motor vehicles
uses
wilderness
within
other
for
future
each
for
resource
Use
Vehicle
wilderness
for recreational
recommended
where
14
be released
River
of
analysis
site-specific
wilderness
wilderness
all
through wilderness
for the foreseeable
analysis
of potential
in
use
received
testimony
diversity
protected
the
site-specific
Snake
the
key issues are of greatest
five
and
and
on recreational
designation
in
from
ranging
process
Box Creek
the
discussed
are
issue
major
would
acres
because of other
allowed
opportunities
wilderness
be
site-specific
in
be
would
values
Motor
Recreation
not
was
825217
rich
possesses
values
and
following
documents
written
Idaho
values
existing natural
would
of the
all
The
report
study
in
development
EISs
wilderness
this
wilderness
acres meaning
was
of
Values
of
preservation
their
the 14
in
are analyzed
Volumes
the best
impact on hydroelectric
for
of wilderness
issue
an
The U.S
recommended
WSA
designation
nine
impact any areas
for
and
of
the
14
known
Geological
wilderness
on
energy and/or
wilderness
to contain
Survey
and
designation
summary of the findings
recommended in whole or in part
Study Report
each
in
10
EISs
mineral
the
of
for
resources
Bureau
These
mineral
of
assessment
wilderness
or
rated
Mines
assessments
each
resource
CONCLUSION
are
is
designation
MINERALS
raw
that
Recognizing
assessments
of
assessments
are
Geological
Survey
assessment
were
and
The
rock
economical
feasible
future
WSA
It
is
might not be
of
minerals
explanation
Geological
site
used
an area
extract
today
values
detailed
U.S
to
in
Survey
specific
economy and
an
to
prior
area
the
suitable
Bureau
underground
and
of
completed
and
The
1989
air
sampling
and
by the U.S
conducted
in
that
The
Federal Land Policy
the
was
mapping
geologic
wilderness
designated
603
recommendations
Mines
of
being
Section
in
directed
Congress
security
means
borne
of
geophysical
study
standards
classification
Idahos
and
surface
on
our national
Wilderness Act and
with
cooperation
based
to
conducted
of
assessment
geochemical
mineralized
vital
by both The
The
in
are
potential be
required
Management Act
survey
materials
mineral
to
difficult
Bureau
do
predict
the wilderness
of projected
reflect
standards
tomorrow and
in
or
BLM
by
These
mineral
of
Mines
vice
the
potential
not
reflect
demand
the future
versa
It
is
may be
mineral
for
minerals
to
impossible
undiscovered
commodity
What
accurately
of
occurrences
or
is
deposit
may be economically
predict
future
uses
or
equation
suitability
occurrence
report
there
that
whether
is
which
analysis
11
found
in
accompany
the
14
this
wilderness
report
and
ElS statements
is
summarized
and
in
the
the
MINERAL REEVALUATION
During
review
public
Study Areas
in
environment
for
County
areas
and
significant
which
to
received
during
that
discoveries
conducted
Survey
the
of
Owyhee
Owyhee
River
River
Little
Owyhee
Deep
Creek-Owyhee
River
Creek
Yatahoney
Battle
River
Canyon
Creek
Creek
Juniper
Fork
Owyhee
River
disseminated
period
ID-016-040
1719-A
ID-016-048B
1719-D
ID-016-048C
1719-C
ID-016-049A
1719-D
ID-016-049D
1719-B
ID-016-049E
1719-B
ID-016-052
1719-B
ID-016-053
1719-F
ID-017-011
1720-B
Bruneau
River
ID-111-017
1720-B
ID-111-044
1719-G
The USGS
the
potential
completed
of
results
its
evaluation
follow-up
the
evaluation
for undiscovered
USGS
resources
of
of
these
upgraded
low-grade
WSAs
and
the mineral
issued
potential
epithermal
geologic
metals
precious
GS BULLETIN
River
Creek
Wilderness
for
in
felt
the
Owyhee
in
included
Jarbidge
Upper Deep
were
USGS BLM managers
The WSAs
by the USGS
NUMBER
North Fork
Reports
areas
by the
consideration
this
Mineral
indicating
where
Oregon
warranted follow-up
comments were
USGS
submitted
the studies
WSA
South
Survey
Geological
southeastern
in
made subsequent
been
comments were
U.S
County comments were
similar to
had
deposits
for
period
Owyhee
hot-spring
Report 89-0531
Open-File
ratings
gold
from
and
NO
low potential
silver
deposits
to
in
Based
on
moderate
these
WSAs
While
the
these
changes
recommendations
in
potential
of the
EIS
ratings
were
noteworthy
prepared for these
WSAs
12
BLM
were
did
not
feel
warranted
that
amendments
or
changes
to