r-----------------·---------·--'--- - - -
!
CALIFORNIA ST.A'I'E UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE
PHOENIX MISSILE FLIGHT TEST
AND DATA BASE
A Graduate Proj•2et s·ubmitt.ed in part.ial satisfaction
of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in
ENGINEERING
by
-
Mark James Bergeri
I
I
I
MAY 1975
J
'--------------------···---·-----------------··-·-----·--·------·~---
The graduate project of Mark Bergen is approved:
mittee Chairperson
California State University, Northridge
May 1975
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
;
: APPROVAL PAGE •
ii
iv
ABSTRACT
INTRODUC'riON
1
PHOENIX DATA STORAGE PROGRAM .
3
Background •
3
Designing the Program
4
Data Har.ipulation Program
9
Data Storage Program •
11
Results
11
PHOENIX FLIGHT TESTS .
16
F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A Weapon System
19
Reducing Missile Data
21
PVL Test Plan
25
OPEV.:Z\I. Final Launch H-3port •
Results
..
27
28
CONCLUSION •
29
REFERENCES •
30
APPENDICES .
31
LIST OF FIGURES
1.
2.
3.
4.
Unmodulated P~lse and Signal •
Ivlodulated Pulse and Signals
Summing Signals
Sum of Signals
iii
18
18
18
19
ABS'I'RACT
PHOENIX t.fiSSILE FLIGHT TEST AND DATA BASE
by
Mark James Bergen
Master of Science in Engineering
Hay 1975
The following publication documents work accomplished
in the areas of (1) designing a program to
sto~e
and re-
Lrieve launch data for the PHOENIX missile.and (2) preparing
a Flight Test Plan, monitoring the test, and writing the
Final Launch Report for a PHOENIX AIM-54A missile.
A basic
computer program incorporating string variables was compiled to be used in conjunction with the Hewlett-Packard
9830A
prograw~able
calculator for the purpose of storing
variable strings into data files on a magnetic cassette
tape.
b.. complimentary program was devised to recall and
print out all or portions of selected data strings.
A
documented listing of all programs involved is enclosed •
.A brief description of the F-14A/Av7G-9/AIM-54A
weapons system as it applies to Flight Testing of the
PHOENIX missile is given, followed by a short introduction
to the task of writing a Flight Test Plan for Performance
,Verification Launches, PVL-14, -15, -16, -17, -18, and
I
L---------·----------------·-···------·-..---·----- -----·-----------------------------·------------------------.. J
iv·
I
!
---·-----------·--·--·-----~------.·-----
subsequent Flight Test and Final Launch Reports conducted
and written for Operational Evaluation mission E-4.
IL
·-------_j
v
INTRODUCTION
On November 10, 1974, a Job Order
Specif~cation
was
submitted for a Technical Professional Work Assignment
• with the PHOENIX Ivlissile Group of the Fighter Weapons
Branch, Test Operations Department of the Naval Missile
Center, Point Mugu.
At this time, the work assignment as
specified in the Job Order Specification (JOS) consisted
basically of two parts:
(1) to design, develop and docu-
ment a computer program for storage and retrieval of
AIM-54A (PHOENIX Missile} test data; and (2) prepare a
flight test plan, assist in the conduct of the launch and
write the initial, final and summary launch reports in
support of the AIM-54A Performance Verification Launch
program.
The first
objf~ctive
mented in this projec-t report.
has been met and is docuTo meet the second set of
objectives, a Performance Verification Launch (PVL) was
assigned, PVL-16.
Under this launch assignment, extensive!
research was done and a detailed Flight Test Plan was
written.
Eut, because of funding problems, the flight
test was not conducted.
In lieu of the PVL-16 brief,
debrief, initial and final reports, experience with
various Operational Evaluation (OPEVAL) and Naval Flight
Verification (NFV) tests were substituted.
i
I
In partial
satisfaction of the second set of objectives, an OPEVAI,
"-- .. ---··- --------·--·-·-·-----······---·---·-· .
-·-·
·--------- •··
·- ...
----
1
.
...
·-·-----·-----------·---·--·..·····------·---- -·-·-
··-
JI
2
.brief and launch was attended, and ~he final launch report
!written (Final Flight Test Report of OPEVAL E-4).
l
This report then attempts to document and assess the
work completed in satisfaction of the original work assignment as described in the JOS of 13 November 1974.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
:
I
I
I
!I·
i
.
l-·-·----------------·-·----·--·--
···----·-- -··---··-·····--·····--·
·- - - - ·- - - - - - - -· - - - - - - . --------- - - - - - - · - ----'
.
.
-·
-·---
-·-
..
-- -
-
..
PHOENIX DATA STORAGE PROGRAM
i
Background
On 3 October 1974, the problem of developing a data
:base for PHOENIX missile launches was introduced.
I
assignment came as a result of three factors;
This
{1) A new
,job assignment was needed as the current VTAS (Visual
!
iTarget Acquisition System) fly-off program was facing
iI
!budget problems and schedule slippage;
1
(2) the new job
assignment would provide experience with the types of data
!
obtained from PHOENIX launches, which would in turn provide a good introduction to an inevitable job reassignment
currently being developed; and (3) the need for a data base
did exist due to.the continuing requirement for data from
past launches to support report writing, defining problem
areas, etc.
The initial requirement was to design a computer
.program for the Hewlett-Packard 9830A programmable calcu-
i
ila.tor that would print out AIM-54.A missile data from those
I
[launches that fit
a
given set of input restrictions.
As
i
!an
example, t.he program should be flexible enough to allow
I
/the user to require a complete or partial list of missile
!data for those launches that fit a set of several criterion
Ii (i.e.,
for air launches conducted above 20K FT, at speeds
iof
more than 900 knots, etc.).
L.....---------------------------·- ----~----------·--- ---- ~------·-- ---~------ ··------ -------------~
3
. ------------------ -----.. ·-----~---------~---------~----------
4
-
-··--.
The HP-9830.A was selected because of its ·availability-and ease of operation.
The
HP-983011~
available for this
assignment has a useable memory space of 3808 (16-bit,
I
i
two~byte)
words, uses BASIC as its programming language,
I
;and is combined with a thermal printer (HP-9866A Printer)
I
:capable of printing 80 characters per line, 240 lines per
ntinute.
i
It can also store (and read) programs, as well as
.
:data, onto (and from) a magnetic tape cassette.
The last
! •
1mportant .feature to be mentioned is the capability to
recognize and to operate on letter and word strings or
string variables {for more information on the Hewlett.Packard 9830A, see reference (1)}.
Designing the
Progra~
On 10 October 1974, the technical director specified
the proposed table of pertinent data to be stored for each
launch.
In addition, a set of twenty-four banks of launch
data was presented as a sample set of data to be used in
the program development.
'I'he -longest entry for each of
the thirty-six original data headings was assumed to be the
maximum allo\>lable space provided for the respective heading.
A quick calculation of the number of characters the
printer would allow per data heading if launch data were
printed in rows, produced two characters
pe~
heading (as
the maximum number of characters that may be printed per
/line from a print statement is seventy-two).
I constraint
I
This new
dictated that the launch data would be printed
-
i
I
j
!
I
!
mixture of
i_....Q!!.t_i_g __9_<:>_!.~Il1Q!?_._ ____'J:'_:Q_~___!1~1::':l:t:"~-- ()f the data (a
-- -- -------------·---------·------------J
5
.
,' words, lett.ers, abbreviations and numbers) also confined
the method of storing data to string variables.
Since
only 255 characters may be stored per variable string,
careful attention was given to the maximum allowable space
per data heading in all
s~rings.
The final allocations
can be seen in Appendix A (each dash following the data
heading allows one character).
It was also envisioned
that the headings would be printed on the left side of the
paper for each group of launch data.
A string was then
comprised to hold all of the characters necessary for a
complete list of data.
Since the headings alone filled
one string, a second string was designed to hold the
ing units.
h~ad-
•rhen the maximum number of data columns per
page was determined by first finding the largest sum of
the heading and 1/2 (corresponding data length).
This
then gave the centerline of the first data column as:
(1/2 {number of data characters) + number of heading
characters, or the number of characters required for heading and heading units>max + 2
where two spaces were to separate the da·ta from the
heading title.
Given the centerline of the first column
and the maximum length of data to be allo-v;ed, it was determined that four columns of data could be accomodated per
page given by the relation:
22 + 6 + (14) X = 72
where X
one less than ·total number of data columns
- - - · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - · - · - - · - - - - · · · - · - ......... _
I
.. __________ ._........____ .... ---·-·- ..· - - - · j
6
22
=
number of characters of {heading and half
data line>max
6 = half of maximum data line
14
=
maximum data line length and 2 spaces for
separation
72
~
total maximum line length
Once the format of the printout was
decided~,
the
first part of the program was constructed (refer to
I' Appendix
D.)
In what was to become two separate programs,
! a one dimensional matrix was initialized in seven separate
I groups.
Through a compromise of convenience and necessity,
it was decided that the user would have the option of
selecting any combination of six of the seven available
groups of data (i.e., launch parameters, relative data,
missile data, fuze functions, and comments).
The Mission
Date, Mission Title, Fighter Type/Number and Missile
Number formed the only group t.hat could not be deselected,
as it.was felt that these bits of data comprised the minimum data requirement.
The method used to initiate
initialization of the one dimensional matrix, A, for a
particular data group was by displaying a question and
simultaneously requesting an input into string A$.
This
was accomplished by a display command followed by an input
command, such as:
DISP "DATA II;
INPUT A$
t_where the semicolon in the display command allows whatever
7
is enclosed in quotes to remain on the display (followed
by a question mark) until the input is acted on by the
user.
Once an input is made, the string A$ is compared
to the substring "no" in an if statement:
if A$ = "no" then (line number)
This· is accomplished by comparing string A$ and substring
character by character (by comparing the octal codes of
each character, see Appendix A} until either a difference
is found or all of the characters in both strings have
compared favorably.
b~e
If a group of data is requested (in
this manner) by the user, the one dimensional matrix, A,
is subscripted by a counter, t, and in turn stores numbers
in sets of four.
The numbers stored into the one dimen-
sional matrix, A, form two pairs of subscripts which then
specify corresponding substrings in the heading and data
strings (refer to computer printout in Appendix D).
The
two pairs-0£ subscripts are:
W$ (A (I), A (!+45)); M$ (A
1
(!+90~,
(See Appendix D for program listing).
A (I+l35j)
At this time,
a
program was written that would determine the groups of dat
to be printed out as described above.
The data manipula-
tion portion of the program was then given careful consideration.
Since it had been known that string variables .
were to be used, a COM (comrnon} and DIM (dimension) statement would have to be used to allot space in memory for
the matrices and strings used in the program.
The size of
Lthe program dictated that it be broken up into at least
8
F-;;e;arate prog;_;-;;.--S-l~c~-- the--fl~st program initialized
the one-dimensional matrix A to be used to print out the
data in the second program, the second program had to be
linked to the first (by the Link command).
The Link com-
mand retains in memory all variables arid their values intraduced by the previous program while loading a second
program from the magnetic tape {i·t also automatically runs
the new program).
The fact that the second program was to
be linked then dictated that ·the COM and DIM statements
were to be introduced in the very first program.
Using the
COM statement requires that it be the first line in the
first program entered into computer memory if the succeeding programs are to be linked ·to that program.
The dimen-
Ision statement is usually all that is required to allot
1memory space for strings and matric2s, but because it was
Irequired that data strings be retained in memory while a
Ifile of data strings was to be entered, the COM had to be
Iused in conjunction with the DIM statement. For example,
I
I if
four data strings could be printed out at one time,
IT.ATould be necessary
,1,
it
to be capable of retaining three
::::d:::u:::: ::::n::c:h:::n::::r:::l:n:::::i:a::u: ~::a
i
strings with
th~
possible exception of the last group
printed out (consisting of four or less remaining data
strings).
The COM statement
the data strings.
therefo~e
contained all of
The residual strings and all matrices
were to be in the DIM statement.
Only one COM statement
9
may exist. in any program so the maximum number of data
strings that could be loaded from a data file (and consequent.ly stored onto a data file) was limited to the number
that could physically fit in a COM statement.
This number
turned out to be nine data strings, which when combined
with the required three residual strings, etc., used an
excessive amount of memory.
Eight data strings were then
designated as the maximum amount of data to be stored on
each data file.
Due to the amounts of memory required by
the COM and DIM statements, the first program was split
into two parts and linked together (See Appendix D for
progrru~
final
list).
Data Manipula-tion Program
Given subscripts for both data and labeling strings,
the remaining problem was that of selecting the data
strings to be list·ed and then listing them.
Since the
method of storing and retrieving data had been decided,
t~e
remaining problem reduced to that of basic program-
ing.
The method employed is shown in Appendix D in the
program list.
The design of the program is such that the
user is asked for the number ·of constraints to be imposed,
then is instructed to edit a series of "IF" statements
j
corresponding to the number of constraints desired.
I
for instance, two constraints are to be imposed, the sen-
!
tence:
I
If,
Press (stop), then enter your constraints in line
'l
(s) 450,470 then press {cont),
(2),
(0),
1___________________ .:....._ _______________________________ ............................... _
(0),
(execute);
i
-------------------------------------·---------J
10
process, a set of instructions are included in written
I
I
, form as well as being permanently stored on another magnetic tape labeled data program instructions,
Appendix B).
(see
The instructions aid the user in editing
"IF" statements in the program to hold his/her constraints.
The constraints when entered are used only once as they
are not permanently stored on the magnetic tape.
The
program then loads a data file and inspects each data
string, if constraints were entered.
A counter is em-
ployed and each good string is transferred to strings
W$, X$, Y$ the fourth string remaining in Z$.
-These four
strings are then printed out and the counter is reset
back to zero.
If less then four strings are found that
satisfy the input constraints, the good data strings are
stored in strings W$, X$ 1 Y$ and the next data file is
loaded in a.n attempt to complete the four string requiLement.
When each data file is loaded the H$ string is com-
pared to the substring "zip".
If this substring is found
in H$, the remaining good stri.ngs are printed and ·the proi.
gram is termina·ted.
The substring "zip" indicates that
the previous data file was the last file containing useable data therefore signaling the program to print out the
remaining good data files.
Ins·tructions for ope:r-ating the
recovery programs were developed as shown in Appendix B •.
11
r
------------------------------
Data Storage Program
At this time, the data storage program was developed
(see Appendix C for program listing}.When run, it asks for
the number of the last data file entered (written on the
back of the cassette tape} then loads that data file.
After comparing data strings to empty substrings the last
string to contain data is located and a counterJI)is
initialized so that the next data string (after the last
full data string) will receive the input data.
Questions
are then displayed and the number of characters allowed in
the reply is indicated .. When the string has been filled,
the operator is asked if another string is to ~e stored.
-~·
If the answer is not "no" the system is recycled and
allows the user to enter another string of data.
If the
counter indicates that eight strings.of data exist, all
data strings are stored onto a data file and the user is
asked if more data is to be stored.
The program is re-
cycle_d un·til the user answers "no 11 to the inquiry "want
to store another string?"
Instructions were developed for this storage program
and stored on the instruction tape.
A written copy of the
instructions for both data storage and data manipulation
1
are kept with the cassette tape.
(see Appendix B for
instructions).
L
Resul·ts
Due to late revisions in the print out format, data
12
has had to be re-entered four times.
Currently data from
eighteen PHOENIX launches have been stored on magnetic
cassette tape.
Several successful data listings have been
made by three of the four intended users.
In Appendix E,
communication exchanges between computer and user can be
seen for three data acquisition attempts.
For the given
examples, six dummy data strings were created and manipulated as shown in Appendix E.
In the first data print
out, the user is asked two questionsi "Do you want all of
the data?"
and "How many constraints do you want?"
In
this case a complete list of all the data in memory was
req~ired
therefore the replies were "yes"
sired) and
"~"
(all data de-
(no constraints imposed) respectively.
In the second example the user requires data for
only those launches where the AIM-54A was launched from an
altitude, greater than or equal to 27.31 KFT.
Since the
user indicated that all data was not desired, the computer then determined which of the possible six groups of
data were to be de-selected by asking the user six yes or
no questions.
As indicated in the example, a negative
response has to be NO, as any other possible group of
characters.will enable the computer to assume a positive
response.
One constraint was also asked for and conse-
, quently a set of basic instructions were printed out that
I
1,'
enable the user to edit the appropriate "IF" statement.
A set of editing
i~structions
available to the user then
directed the user to press:
(fetch), (4), (5), (0) 1
i
L_____________________________________ ·-·-···-··-........................................ --------- ....___ -·····------·------··----·..J
'
13
~ute).
I priate "I~'"
This command calls the line holding the approstatement to be edited.
The available
instructions (see Appendix B for instructions for the data
recovery program) then allowed the user to create an "IF"
statement given that launch altitude in KFT is identified
by Z$ (33,37)
=
"27.31", the program is then continued
from line 200, as directed by the printed command and the
result is as shown.
In the third example, only a brief list of available launch data is desired so the user asks for no data
and no constraints and receives only; "MISSION DATE",
"MISSION TITLE", "FIGHTER TYPE" and "MISSILE NO.".
This
data is then consider'ed to be the minimum data to be received and therefore can never be de-selected.
methods were
d~vised
Two
to create constraint "IF" statements.
The first method is'· to be used when searching for or comparing numeric answers only.
Example:
VAL (Z$ (33,37)) = 23.0
This method determines the numeric value of the sub-string
Z$ (33,37) and compares the given value to 23.
Z$
=
If
"23 ABC" then the "IF" statement would be satisfied.
If however Z$
=
"ABC 23" the "IF" statement would not have
been satisfied as the first character must be a digi·t,
decimal point or
E-notat~on.
The second method requires an exact match between
two sub-strings as each character is compared character
by character until a difference is found (by comparing t.he
14
,..------------·------------·-------·-----·----·--actual codes of each character). Example:
Z$ (33,37)
IF Z$ (33,37) equals
=
"ABCDE"
" ABCD" then the statement would
not have been satisfied as the octal value of a blank spac
is found to be 040 as compared to 101 for "A 11 •
There are possible improvements that could be incorporated into this program.
The first being that when
storing data, editing instructions were not provided for
so that any mistakes made when storing data cannot be
easily corrected.
-The options open at tl1is time in that
situation are {1) to turn the calculator off and re-enter
all the data {possibly up to eight strings),
o~
(2) store
t.he string as it is and have a more proficient programmer
edit the data strings at a later date.
It was felt that
editing instructions to cover all of the possible mistakes
imaginable would have been too time consuming and complicated to follow, therefore this alternative was delinea ted.
The second possible improvement is in the method
employed to enter constraints.
F'o.r a non-programmer the
editing process would be complicated ·to
s~y
the least, but:.
to make constraint entering possible in English would have
necessitated an exorbitant amount of computer memory.
After consulting the technical director about the options
open it was decided that an "IF 11 statement constraint
would suffice and consequently became an integral part of
the program.
·-----------------
15
After several users worked with the program, it was
t
confirmed to be a usable data storage and recovery system
and is thus currently in use •
. !
I
!
!
l
I
I'-·-·-·---·--------·----"----·-t
~
··~~-----·R~-~-----.J
·------------------
PHOENIX FLIGHT TESTS
On 25 November 1974, ·the Data Storage Program was
completed and verified.
At this time preparation was made
to facilitate familiarization with the F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A
Weapon system as it relates to the Performance Verification
Launch (PVL) program.
The PVL program was established under AIRTASK No.
A501-5104/054F/3501-000005, to perform those launches that
were left unaccomplished during the F-14A Board of Inspection and Survey (BIS), and the Navy Technical Evaluation
{NTE) program, and to provide a data base for the continuing evaluation of the AIM-54A missile.
Parameters for the
launches were either derived from BIS and NTE or developed
exclusively for PVL.
Five Electronic Counter Measures
(ECM) launches were assigned and designed under the PVL
program.
One.of these launches PVL-16 was assigned as a
Technical Professional Work Assignment.
At this time, the five ECM launch parameters were
still in the·design stage under the guidance and control of
the design engineer.
The design engineer was tasked to
lend guidance in the design of ECM tests for Navy Flight
Verification (NFV) and PVL programs.
During the period of
time research and investigation were being undertaken by
1the design engineer in the area of
16
PHOENI~_mi~sile __ Counter
17
funter Measure -{CcMi-capablli.tie~, the task of familiarizing oneself with the PHOENIX missile became the initial
Technical Professional (TP) work project.
In order to gain experience in reducing and evaluating
raw telemetry missile data several fleet launches were
assigned for reduction and evaluation.
The four fleet
launches assigned included one ECM shot and three launches
with differing launch modes (i.e., Track While Scan (TWS),
Air Combat Maneuvering (ACM) Active and Pulsed Doppler
!single Targe Track {PDSTT)).
I!research
.
The~,
as it became necessary,
was done 1n the area of basic radar operation and
!guidance logic for the PHOENIX missile.
The
!researched was that of basic radar operation.
first.are~
In order to
lunderstand guidance problems and ambiguities in missile
I
!launches
it was necessary to learn about pulsed radar oper1
ation.
The active radar system in the PHOENIX missile is
'comprised primarily of a single transmitter/receiver.
This
bit of knowledge then led to research in Pulse Repetition
l
Frequency modulation (PRF) in order to answer the question
of ranging amhiquitie.s in pulsed radars (particularly as
lit applies to the AWG-9
.radarY.
The operation of PRF
modulation as explained in reference {2) and clarified by
the technical director is as follows.
Ordinarily, unmodu-
lated pulsed radar could produce a false range track on a
target (A) as shown below, and therefore A would appear to
~e clo~er
than it actually was.
J
18
~---------·------··
pulses
·1
2
4
3
6
5
Unmodulated Pulse and Signal
Figure 1
Figure 1 shows image B to be less than the maximum unambiguous range (determined by the pulse rate of the radar)
as each return from B occurs prior to the next pulse.
But target A is ambiguous as its range is beb1een one to
two times the unambiguous range and appears to be closer
In order to alleviate this
after the second pulse.
problem, the PRF modulation method was employed and
operates as follows:
t.
B1
v I
0
I
1
.A1 B2
ll~~
0
2
A2
~Al
.3
B~
_,
0
A3B4
j_/D_
4
Figure 2 Modulated Pulse and Signals
v
!
I
I
I
A4
~
B
1~m· 6
time
---;,.-
Figure 3 Summing Signals
_j
19
·------~-----------·--------·--·-------.,
B
v\~L_ _ __
time
Figure_~
,.....
Sum of Signals
By modulating the frequency, as shown in figure 2, and
triggering from the pulse (see figure 3) an image of
target, B, which is less that the maximum unambiguous
range, increases in amplitude (above the threshold voltage) and is detected.
For targets whose range is greater
than the maximum unambiguous range the return image would
be blurred according to the number of different frequencies used.
An attempt was also made to aquaint oneself with the
theory behind several other radar phenomenon, such as;
sidelobes and isodops, range gateing and high and low PRF
coherent pulsed doppler radar frequency spectrum (see
reference 3).
Once the introduction to radar was com-
pleted, the PHOENIX guidande system was investigated.
Hughes Aircraft Company has furnished Systems Engineering
Ar..alysis (SEA) reports on most of the missile systems and
subaystems, which subsequently serves as the main text at
this time.
The following section will include a summary
of the F-14A/ANG-9/AIM-54A.weapons systems as obtained
through reading from the SEA reports.
I F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A Weapon System
L_______
The Phoenix missile
(AIM-54A) can operat_e__l_·n___
e_i_t_h_e_r__
20
active or semi active modes.
The missile and AWG-9 radar
system also have the unique ability to communicate during
missile flight via missile messages.
These coded missile
messages enable the AWG-9 to command the inflight, semi
active missile to an active mode.
The AWG-9 also has the
capability of updating the missile and in so doinq, may
control several infliqht missiles simultaneously.
Basic-
ally, the missile may be launched in one of three AWG-9
launch modes; Single Target Track (STT), Track While Scan
(TWS) or Air Combat Maneuvering (ACM) Active.
The AWG-9 can maintain track on several targets sim- !
ultaneously and in so doing facilitates rapid reattack
capabilities.
a track file,
When more than one target is maintained on
the aircrew may launch AIM-54 missiles in
the ACM active mode by first selecting a target then
launching the missile.
At Launch To Eject {LTE) the mis-
lile is given guidance data and an Active Transfer
Command (ATC).
This then allows the missile to ac·tively
guide on the target, releasing the AWG-9 of the responsibility to maintain track on the ·target.
Since t.he AWG-9
radar system has the ability to maintain track files on
up to six targets, six AIM-54A missiles may be launched
at six different targets in a matter of seconds.
In STT mode, the F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A weapon system
.
I
I
maintains track on one target and may launch a Semi Activel
(SA) PHOENIX missile at the target illuminated.
The
AIM-54A when launched in this mode, receives regular
I'
'!
!
•~-··~--·--·>·•·-~~--~-· .~---~----·--~·~·-----·-·.._....-.--~-----------·-"'----~--~-----~---~M---~---------·---·---·-r'
21
~----- --~·----·----·~~~~-~-
missile messages from the AWG-9 which provide tracking ~
data updates and steering commands.
The passive AIM-54A
then guides Semi Actively to target intercept.
In this
mode, the target must remain illuminated during the entire
missile flight time as the AIM-54A would not have the
capability to guide actively.
When the AIM-54A is launched in TWS, preset
instru~---~--------
tions allow the missile to obtain an optimum aerodynamic
flight geometry for each particular launch.
During- the
first phase of missile flight, the AIM-54A. guides via
1
sample data (this missile mode is called Sample Data
I
I::::i::s::::a::~~ag:~ ::::t::::~ :::e:::::l:na:::m;:: :o
Active, Sp/A.) The missile receives tracking data with
I, go active. If a successful active transfer occurs, the
Imissile then guides actively to intercept. If for some
unforeseen reason the missile should lose track during
active flight, it may receive and process the next
message sent for sample data.
mis~ile
At LTE, each missile is
·
I
assigned a code so that during missile flight, only those
missile messages postscripted with the proper missile code
will be processed.
Because each missile message is coded,
up to six missiles may be launched in TWS and simultaneously controlled by the AWG-9 during missile flight.
Reducing Missile Data
I
Once it was felt a basic understanding of the methods!
L_----------------------,----
··-·-J
22
-----------------.,
of operation of the F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A weapon system was
obtained, four· fleet launches were assigned for evaluation.
The distinguishing difference between fleet
launches and launches conducted on the Pacific Missile
Range by the Pacific Missile Test Center (formerly Naval
Missile Center} is the amount and types of data ohtained.
The F-14'8 used by the Systems Evaluation Directorate,
I
formerly Test Operations Department, are specially instrumental aircraft.
From these specially instrumental air-
craft, AWG-9 data is obtained via analog tabulation
(antab) data.
The antab data will recover such AWS-9
data as AWG-9 launch mod, launch range, the number. of
missile messages sent, information sent with each missile
message, etc.
Fleet launches usually never provide antab
data.
Radar data is usually available for launches performed on National Ranges.
The four fleet launches
assigned were performed at Barking Sands, Hawaii and
therefore were provided radar coverage.
usually smoothed into t\vo forms
(G,;,.·2~3)
Radar data is
and G-4-1) which
differ in information provided and also in the reference
frame used (i.e.; for one set of data all measurements are
made relative to the intercepter, G-2-3, and the other set
uses an arbitrary static reference point, G-4-1).
For both Pacific Missile Test Center and Fleet
launches, missiles used in test launches usually have a
l__!elemet_EY package which telemeters up to 108 channels of
23
missile functions (for non warhead missiles).
The analog
data gathered from these telemetry packages is used to
determine missile guidance performance.
Prior to aircraft
take-off, Missile On Aircraft Tests, MOATs, (MOATs are a
portion of the AWG-9 Built-In Test system, BITS) are con-. '
ducted and missile responses are monitored and evaluated
real time to insure ·the equipment is functioning properly.
In order to evaluate the analog data obtained from
each launch, calibration tables and charts are created
from laboratory results for each of the 108 telemetry
' channels.
Three strip charts were then devised for the
three most often used banks of data (launch data gener-
i .
ally provides 10 banks of data containing eight data
channels per bank) in order to facilitate ease of readin:g
missile data.
the
11
•rhe MO.h'I'S run during each flight prior to
hot" run (the portion of the flight when LTE is
initiated) are also used as calibration sources for a few
of the telemetry channels where accuracy is especially
important.
The targets used on the range are generally instrurnented and t.elemeter real time target data.
Of major
importance ·is the miss distance obtained from this data
either derived by photon scoring or cooperative doppler
methods.
The final source of data usually available when eval-1
uating a launch for a final launch report is the prelim.
I
!
inary firing message prepared by the agency performing
?"···-··~·---~~--~----~'<·-~-· ~------------··-'-·-~~---~.·--------
l
..
!
-------~----~.-----·--- -~--·~
24
r--------------------------------·----------------------------(responsible for evaluating) the test. This is generally
called a 24 hour launch report and is prepared by the lead
engineer on the project.
This report generally contains
de-brief information about the launch as well as basic
information otherwise almost impossible to obtain, such as
target type, augmentation used, ECM used, fuze type, etc.
For the four fleet launches evaluated, antab data was
not available and the preliminary firing message was found
for only one launch. _ The type of information obtained and
the format used can be seen in Appendix A.
The four launches were completely different comprising:
t
(1)
29 Sept. 1974, missile nru~ber 20015, was a coaltitude ACM Active Boresight launch at a
BQM-34A target.
(2)
21 Aug. 1974, missile Eumber 20055, was a lookup TWS launch at a BQM-34A target in an ECM
environment.
(3)
23 July 1974, missile number F-626, was a lookdown Pulse Doppler Single Target Track, (PDSTT)
launch at an augmented BQM-34E target.
(4)
27 Sept. 1974, missile number 20053, was a head
on, look-up TWS launch at a clear (unaugemented)
BQH-34A target.
T~e
ECM launch, particularly lent beneficial experi-
ence in an area that is covered by the test plan developed for the PVL program.
Due to the sensitivity of the
material, the results of the evaluations made of the
fleet launches will not be discussed in this report.
25
I PVJ., Test Plan
It seemed desirable to perform four specific ECM test
for two reasons:·
(1) The launches if used in the PVL pro-
gram could also be applied to the OPEVAL (Operational Eval~
uation) program conducted by VX-4 (Air Test and Evaluation
.Squadron FOUR) and {2) the F-14A/AWG-9/AIM-54A weapon
system capabilities in the proposed environments were previously ill defined.
For each proposal, certain parameter
were hard (not to be changed) as they crucially effected
the nature of the threat and others were soft (varying
from one test to another).
Those parameters that were sof
could be manipulated, possibly to test or verify other
characteristics of the weapon system.
The parameters that
vJere initially selected were taken from captive flight
parameters proposed in the Naval Flight Verification {NFV)
Program Test Plan.
The initial test of the suitability of
these parameters came as a result of determining the
(Launch Acceptability Region) Ll'..Rs for each launch para-.
meter.
This test determines if the AWG-9 radar will allow
the AIM-54A to be launched in each particular situation.
The next test of the feasibility of the launch parameters 'i.vas the a2rodynamic simulation for the AIM-54A
missile.
This simulation tvas run for each launch over all
of the parameter bounds {i.e.; for high and low bounds ofi
range, aspect angle, look angle, etc.) to determine if the
missile could theoretically get to the target.
The aero-
dynamic range of the missile as calculated in these
--~-------
26
simulations is also used as range criterion (if the maximum range of the missile exceeded the .range safety requirements, the parameters would be rejected).
As a final test, the operational environment was simulated on the SITS (System Integrated Test Station)
equipment.
In this system, all the components of a weapon
system plus its operating environment are simulated, there
by allowing all-around compatability of total system
components to be tested.
Concurrently, research was being initiated to determine the PHOENIX missile Counter-Counter MeasuY.es (CCM)
capability in each of these ECM environments.
It 'tvas
necessary in designing the test plan to be certain of the
required train of events leading to a successful target
track and intercept.
Potential problem areas had to be
clearly defined in the test plan so as to be easily
recognized if and when they occurred in the actual launch.
Following the introduction of the fifth launch.parameter and successful investigation of LARS, aerodynamic
simulation, and SITS evaluation, the Test Plan was written
for launches PVL-14, -·15, -16, -17, -18 (see Appendix F)
in accordance with the Test Plan Format found in Appendix
G.
Due to funding problems, the Flight Tes·t Program for
PVL-14, -15, -16, -17, -18 has been temporarily suspended.
To replace the follow-on effort unavailable in the PVL
program, experience in evaluating flight test data and
27
writing the Final Flight Test Report for OPEVAL mission
E-4 is hereby substituted.
OPEVAL Final Launch Report
On 27 March 1975 a PHOENIX AIM-54A missile was
launched by Air Test and Evaluation Squadron FOUR to
satisfy the objectives of PHOENIX Operational Evaluation
test E-4.
Missile on ground and in-flight BITS were con-
ducted and monitored real time.
Once these were completed
and satisfied, up missiles were designated and a "hot"
run commenced.
During the "hot" run, AWG-9 mode was
select as automatic TWS.
The missile (missile number
20024) was launched in SD/A mode and guided successfully
to interce.pt.
After the aircrew landed, a de-brief was
aftended by aircrew and engineers.
In flight launch con-
dition information was exchanged and it was noted that the
AWG-9 mode was switched during missile flight.
VX-4 wrote the preliminary firing report for the
launch which v.ras received 30 March 1975.
The signific.ance
of the mode switch was noted in the preliminary analog
missile data and corifirmed in the smoothed data.
Smooth-
ed G-2-3, and G-4-1 radar data was used to determine the
28
written (see cover letter, Appendix F).
The Final Report
was submitted for review at a division meeting on 29 May
1975 and has just completed the rewrite stage.
The Final Launch Report Format shown in Appendix H
was used in developing the Final Report for OPEVAL mission!
'
·,
Results
A rather disjointed, but none-the-less complete,
flight test cycle comprised of Flight Test Plan (PVL-14,
-15, -16, -17, -18), technical and operational brief
(Naval Flight Verification Program), flight
t~st,
debrief.
and Final Launch Report (OPEVAL mission E-4) was experienced.
Evaluation of several fleet launches supplemented
the required quota as well as researching a wide variety
of PHOENIX missile capabilities.
i
! .
I
L~---·------··-·-··----·-------·--··
----
---·--------..··-···
CONCLUSION
i of
The programs developed for storage and retrieval
AIM-54A test data were designed to be used by engineers
in the PHOENIX missile section.
The adequacy of the pro-
grams was determined by use, and the results were judged
acceptable by the Technical Direct.or.
Launch data has
since been stored and the storing of new data implemented
as st.andard procedure.
The introduction to PHOENIX launch data by working
with the programs proved to be valuable as an overview of
missile capabilities and because of the variety of
laun~h
types evaluated, a firm foundation was established in the
area of PHOENIX flight testing.
The flight test cycle experienced during the PVL
and OPEVAL programs provided a realistic look at missile
flight testing as concurrent missile tests are found to be
more common than not.
The exposure to Navy and Contractor
interfacing, budgeting and planning problems experienced
in this nssigrm1ent provided an hones·t look at the realistic world of missile testing.
i
i
'f
l
----_._,____ . _., ___~. ~J
L. . «··--·"·-·-··-·--·--·----29
REFERENCES
(1)
"Hewlett-Packard 9830A Calculator", Copyright by
Hewlett-Packard Company, 1973.
(2)
"PHOENIX Weapon Control System", HAC Ref. C5278,
15 May 1972.
(3)
"Radar Ha.ndbook 11 by Skolnik, Copyright 1970 by McGraw...,
Hill, Inc.
l
'
I
i
· - - - · · - - - · · - · - - - - - · - - - - - - - - -·-- •..J
30
APPENDIX A
DATA FOPMAT AND OCTAL CODES
L ____________.
31
32
~
I.
PROGRAM DATA
f.USSION - - - - - - - TITLE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FTR
.
~1SILE#-------
LAUNCH PARAHETERS
L ALT (KFT)
l t·IACH #
----L VEL (KTSJ _ _ _
· L HOG (DEG) - - - L RNGE (NM) - - - - - R RATE (KHZ) ___ - - - - - - - R RATE (KTS)
=====
TARGET PARA14ETERS
T ALT (KFT)
.
T lol.fi.CH #
------T VEL (KTS) _ _ _
T HDG (DEG) - - - T TYPE
-----
AUG/EW _
-=---=---=-_-=----=--=---=-_-=.__-=.__ __
RELATIVE DATA
TCA (DEG)
ASPECT tDEGT- - - --LOOK ANG (DEG}- ~-=-=-=---=-=-
_____ _
14ISSILE DATA
to~~i)~RESS ( P s F r - - - · - - 11\ISS FU TIME (SECT-_---G BIAS (G) _ _
~~
H BIAS ____
-=-==-
-1---------.
--
'
GO
ATCTTi1E (SECT-
MISS DIST {FT) - - - - - - - -
ACT FREQ
STANO
--------·
ns Acnv-
RHBT
{SEC)-=---=--:_--=:__-=-FUZE FUNCTIONS
ITL RETURN (SEC)
ATI (ENERG) (SEC)-=--=- _
ARt1 PULSE (SEC) _
--··· _____ _
C PULSE (SEC) -·-· _·_ _ _ _ ---' _ _ _ _ _
F PULSE ( S E C ) - - - - - - - - - -
_:_-:=_-_:=_
TYPE FUZE _ _ _:_ _ _ _ _ _ - - / - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
w-1:mns
OBJECTIVE ACHD
COH:1ENTS - · __::- .
'.
_-=._ __· _ - / - _._________ --.
'
1·
....
33
------·
OCT f;L
CODE
/\SCI!
CH/\Itl\ClT!{
·r
r-~CT~~-l---~~~;~--Tocrr_.,L
co•·-=_j
Clll\l'r "T"'l
1 con:::
d.:
t
·------- --------------.
134
076
>
o•••
I'
\~
I
1 t_
.i
•
~.•-
1\S~;~---l
CH/\i :t>.l~-i LH
.
0·10
Ot11
t~ U-.1_,.,~.)
o:12
@
A
?
0.'13
04.:1
-::·
101
04S
%
103
c
046
&
104
105
106
D
G
J
K
L
M
·N
0
Jo
s
047
102
Capo~t.)
050
051
053
+
107
110
111
05·~
, \comm:ll)_
112
052
OS5
'056
0:)7
OGO
[)~-) l
113
114
115
116
117
I
0
1
B
E
F
H
I
2
3
12o
p
063
064
121
Q
4
OG5
5
122
123
s
066
6
. 124
T
06"/
7
125
u
070
071
8
9
g~
v
w
062
072
I
077
100
073
074
075
<
J
130
131
132
133
R
13S
136
137
11&1
147.
143
144
145
146
1Li7
150
\
J
1
a
b
c
d
.e
f
g
h
151
Hi2
j
k
I
1!)3
154
155
m
EjfJ
n
157
160
161
162
163
164
0
_p
q
·r .
s
t
u
v
w
z
165
166
167
170
'171
[
172
z
X
y
t •.
X
y
'-•
....
..
~
,
APPENDIX B
OPE~~TING
INSTRUCTIONS
34
35
----·---------·
THIS IS 1'HE DATA SlORAGE
lU
F:Uf~
THI::;
Fr:i)Gf~:Hf'i,
ALL
l
PRuCR~M
I.-.-.il""ltll
,. I
(i)
FIP~::T TD HOTE THF:: i-~:_n~;;_:F::F.: (if-~ THE BF-iCt-.:·:;IT:C <;::.ID~-::: E:> OF ·r;--:t~ t.:r··:IS-.:::ETTE Gl'/Ul TO E:E THE U·o:::T Dt-iTti FILE U!TEF::Ell.
THEt·i C;F'EH THE CF;:::·::E·nc I!ODF: Ori THE ·:<::>:q=; Fit-iii ~=·LIP Itl rrE: Cf·r::SETTE ~30 THtU SIDE A I~:: FF!CJH;:; 'lOU, THUi CLO~::E THE DOOF:.
C4>
f~FTEf.:
PRESS
I c:: >
(6)
(LOAD),(0),(EXECUTE>
THt: DATA ~::TC!RF;CT FILE HF:~:.: BEC~! ~:nOF:ED I! L.FIZ\' CT · lHL.L
f;PF'Ue I li THE LEFT ·::I JE OF Tl-lf~ Du::p;. ri'i.
IT i·! TiL THU I E:E f·c~=::-.
::; I BLE Tl) PUt~ THE F'F:CiCr~::!~i·1 E_;'/ Pfr::f~:::;S I f-~G <FL.!!·!·)-: i_: E~;-::FCUTE) .
A
DUE~::;1
I Ot-l HILL T;-JEt-1 F!F'PEr"iP F GLLOl·~E:r)
r_;·(
Tf'"IE Hl..ll-if;[p OF
CHA~:-
f-iC:TEr:::.:; THAT t·j ILL EL fit_L .. O~·-!Fl~l FOf.:: 1 Hi:i f r:·r-;f.:~T I CUL.riF: DLJE~::;T I Ci!·-i ~
'-,=oL
Hfi"i' E;-!TEF~ '-:"'C!UF: DA·f~~1 C:OF:PE~::;PCit·~Il I f~G ·rc! THHT t~~l.Jt:~::;T I Ot-~ fiT T"H I~~; T I !·!t:::
SO LONG AS THE NUMBER OF CHARACTERS IN YOUR REPLY DOES NOT
D':CEED ·:HE: t·IUtt::";EF: i'iLLOlEl! FOf~: TH I~::: OUc:::::T I OH.
THE 1··1ETHOD u::::ED
FO~: Atl::;l,JEF: I ~-~G THEEE" l=~I.JEE;T I Ot-~S I::; F1::; FCLL.O~·~::;; F'PEE;::; (THE KE-~Y:=;
C:C•FRF.:~::;f'OiE: I tJG TO '/C:Uf;: r:!tF::l.iEf:::) ~ ( C<EC!JTt:: >.
'iC1U 'IHC:ti F:CF'EFiT THE' F'f<;CEJ!UF.:E CUT I!iED H! 0:::5
U f=ltJ~::l·1El? TH
F.:EH UE•Ek OF THE OUE~:C;T IOtJ~:::
IT lH LL HU 1 Fi T t·i:'iTI CALL\' F '/Cl_f..
IT~::: LF iJ~i I L THE u~::Dc: ItHi I FITE~::: THf·n
E or;,: H l!OE~:: t·WT l·J H TO
ENT RAND HER STRING OF DR A 8Y ANSWE lNG l 0 ,(EXECUTE)
THE QUEST ON CWANi TO STOP
ANOTHER S RING0
~:. -·~
L
1).:
36
--------------1~,
I
>
(l
-
.-I ....
1
.:
OPE:-~
T(.!
-
I . [,_
-
THE
! I'
[
I
1
'
;_I
(:n::·~::,~::.TTE
:=;f'TTf llj i'HF
·: :~ :•
1. ; l
Ui·~:·:::c:-rn:
1
-
1
_I
~
. '
D=~'Of·::
'
.
,
-
-
li..,J,
Ot4 Ti·![
COI:'-::F-:FiEIIT
,
l
.-,
9~::·:;(1!~ ~
l-H>
~·L~iCE
THE
Cfi:~::-
:::IDE i'i Ff'iCHJG THE U:::EF:,
TclEIJ F'k:E:<:; CLCr:iD:., <1) ~ ( E:·:f:..CI_; -~ £::) fHlD ;.if-, l T UrH I L THE Ph~;·J::,F:!-"jt-1 HH::: E't-~EI: cc:;1F'LETEL'i' l.C!fil!ED ( !ti'DE.FTE)) [:'t' THE PFF::_.FHCF OF
H t..AZ\' <T> It·i THE LEFT CCJF'~!E!~~ OF TliE DJ::;F'Lfi'/) E:EFOf?E
I tiC Or! TD HIE: tH::o:T ·::HF'.
(3)
<4 >
NOW PRESS
CRU~
1
~--,~~·CCEi"::D­
oCE\ECUTE).
t·~C!H
FiH·::kLF: fiLL OF ThE OUE::;T I Clf~~~; f:~::;vc.n OF 'lOU B\' PF:E~:;::, ~ tiG
(THE t<E\·~~; CC!F·f:::F·~;FCi~-~D I f·H~~ TC \'C!UF:: AH~~;J.!EF' >~ <E:·<ECUTE) ~
I:·:· SF'E1~: IF J C
LRUt-~CH~~:::· fiPE DF::: I ~~ED:: ::;f::E LEL.C~-J FC!!~: I l-1~::~1 k!_lCT: Clt-i3 FC;~~ i: ~-~rEf;: I t·IG
CC!t-:::::-~-;;:fi
I HT:::.
UffEPit1i:; THE COi·i:C:TF.:fHtH:3 ••• , •••••
(5)
r·~:E::: :;
'·.FETCH>, OT'r'::; C;3fd:::E:=.::iOtlD ItiG TO 1 Hl:: Ll tiE HIJt•iE:EF.: ,~;I '·/EJl
THf;T L·~ILL HCILI.l 'lOU~: CC!r-~::;Tf~~i1It-rrs .. ~ .. l T HILL ~:[ Pkit-~T[Il OUT li~ r;
CUt·E·1Htii' ::::TATU·1UH .. " .. THEPE l·ELL BE Dt·iE Ut!E tlUt1E:EF: GI'·/Et-l FOP
EACH CONSTRAINT ENTERED),(E~ECUl'E).
PRE?S <BACK) REPEATEDLY UNTIL THE FLASHING BLOCK COVERS
c
I -.
(9)
TtT F I F.::::T CHr~IF:fiCT t:F: Hi Tf-if=:T Ll HE ri·WT THE U i!E i !Ui·iE!ET:' i :. fHEti
::::;-F;;.;:·: EfHEF.: H!f; \'OUF.: COii::O:H:fi l t-iT :::H;TEi1Ei-!T. •••• idiFtl THHT 1 :;:; CCJi•1--
PLETED PRESS CENL OF LINE>.
IF WHILE ENTERING THE CONSTRAINT YOU RUN INTO THE CTHEN)
SlATEMENT, Sit!PLY TAP THE (INSERT) KEY ONCE FOR EACH REMAINHi•:;
Cfi~-;pf';:::TTF.
REFEAT roR THE
(IF THE: F'lJr:,:f:: tiC [:0:'< t::.: ::::TILL CJ!-i THE Ill :::;f"UI'/).
REM~INDER
OP YOUR tOHSiRAINTS.
REFER TO YOUR XEROX E\PLANATION
A~D
FORMAT.
.'
f:[LCJ~.j ;H LL E:E :;:Hc:l·.ii··1 Tlit= FCF:t·H·H TO m: U::::ED 1h ::;:F'EC IF \'1 1;:~ l·iiH CH t: IT OF
DFni'i !HAl ~·11!...'- t::E: lt·1F'LEr·lf:-JlTED It·i THE COtJ:::TAl!·f:-i:;::).
n-fE t·iE:THCii' Ci'~
EtzieL.O'/ I t-~C:. T~i;::::;E COf·~~:;l.PH I t-1-·i· ( ~::; > L·~ ILL THEl-~ FOL.LC!i,J .
IllATA TO 8E INSPECTED
I!1:::::3IUt·l <DATE>
HI::::::: I C,r: <T l TL.F::
zr.:: 1, F:r
~::t.::
u:;utEH Al. T I TUDE <iTT)
L!iUfVH i·JH;:.H t-!1.!t·!ETF'
i. J!I..H-lCH \.'FL.C!CJT\' <f:JWT::C)
LilUt·E H HU.:;l!; i L.~ ' I i! liEC:F:f.T:~:; >
l.:.HUrkH F:!~iHC;E •:ri:';UT .fC:fiL. r-JILF·:::;
r.::nn=:
RANGE RATE
:~ ~:
1·)' :-,,~)
<.: .: ::~ ).~~~ 1 ':·
2~$(4~~!! .q~:;::.
:::: :t <·:t f~
~ ::~ l~_i ~:­
-:f.fC:r
<::·; 1 ~
?-:t· <~5 t:. ~
~~NOTSI
?::!:-(61
_________ _______________
f'fHIGJ::.
I DDH IF H.''.! B\' ~
,
:-~-
~=;;:~)
~; ·~1 .)
~ c:~;:~
-~·----------1
~~'(~
'
:·~
!;
37
1
1ARG~;
·rfi~:Ctf:=~f
VELOCITY
HE;~I_!I~·~C
t
~:.I
TfiF'Gt:' T':T'E
I
HUGH:-:HT~T
I CtH f-li1fl .. ··oe EC:t-1
;~i·~g., c~:=::~E~Hl1 1 ~' :i:;~~F:g;~
LOCii<
f";t~Gi_E
( 1h
Z-l ( ?~;' ::: >
7J('?9!o :~~>
Z:t <::.:.:t ~ ::: .)
N~!~l
DECF-.EE~:;_:·
.
.
z~:.·~·~.:t,
_,
DECF:t.b;.
:?:J(l1.~l)l!5
2:h116ei26
liEGFEE~~:.)
LAUNCH MODE (FIRST
PA~T)
LAU!·i•: H t'iCIDE :: :::E;Ji~j]l Fii~:T)
U1UriCf! D':'tiril·i I C f'F,::;:::::;-:uPE .-: P:::F·
IH:::::::ru=. FLIGHT TiiiE o::~:EC)
::":t(l:36,144
Z:~-'-.14~;~ i4~:
>
Z::f.( 14'3, 153
~~:(154~ 159
G Blfr.=: <C! 8)
H
ce
r:rr:r:: o::c;, :::::>
ACTIVE TRANSFER l~AE (SEC)
MISS DISTfiNCE (fEET)
AClJVE FREQUENCY
:~::Tr~:T
I C!i~
~:~~::.~>
Z:f;_J(16, lJG
~:!~(i66:t170
Zt(171,1?4
?~~
~: :f.:
t-~t!t'1E:EF:
rT::. F!CT I '._.'fiTE
ROCK~T MOTOR SURN TIME (SEC>
<1?·:::='
(_ i ::: 0 '
179
j :::q
ITL F:ETUf·. i·i (SEC)
fiTJ <E!-~F!?C;IZE) .::~::;EC:>
COUNfER PULSE (SEC)
F!t7::E PL.it_·;;J:· <::;£(:)
zt:<:::1
TYPE OF FUSE <TVPE)
TYPE OF FUZE (SERIAL NUMBERJ
08JECTIVES ACHIEVED (COMMENTS)
BASIC COMMENTS tiST PART)
LA::: I C: COf+1EtH::: <C:t-m F'APT)
?t(~::;;:~~~?- 2~29
:;:~
221
<2:.::e,
::~!~
~~3?
z~:::: 2:~::::, 24~'
z:t.:(24i ~ 24::3
Zf-·(249, ~:55
Cl-~
tH t·l
t·1rlT L: L.
A I
0~
TO lF:iiW::FOrd·l
fJi·~[(~::;)
.L~:;
8'/ THE
EQUIRCD FOR THOSE
- ABOVL 24000 FEET
Cot! ·=:
or.:~
Lot·l'::;r::t~~,
PRO RAM AS SHOWN
THCI COt·l·B~LOW.
ENTERING THE ALTITUDE CONSTRAINT FIRST WOULD YIELD;
VALUES OF STRINGS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE INEQUALITY.
VAL(Z$(33,37))) 24 .• ~ .... WHICH COMPARES NUMERICAl VALUES
'·.IHU Z$ (1 E5, 1:_:::::)) >== ;~::::: • , • H! r:::: f f:!fd:!fi'( J:iU·::;: t::.E :.g:i::D L·Ji·lt)·J THEPt::· ·
I::: A CHfi!JCE C!f r·; tW~i- ~H.it:ET I C: f~;i·::l·lfi·:. ' fr::: ll l·JO'.!Ll:; r<!JT
FECOCt·l I ZC THE tititi--t!UI·1EP I C i'itJ:::. ;~~F~::::.
I i-'" Cili THE C:Tf-IEF.:
H~i!ill, IT I c:; r:r::; l F~i-H::u: -ro :~:FfikU' FCif.:: fi tH)tJ--tjUI·1ERI C .
n;·J:::l·jEf< ~ ::::I i !i>L. \ ;y;:;E •••••••
·-----------
__ j
·'7,rT
38
r: ;-: ,-,;:;,·;:
o..,,
- I , •·•
-,~,,,,~ Ft·'l··,
rn,·.co::Tr·o::.
·; ~·l"J ::; - i.lfii
I!
1
•• 1 •
t-.I
._
I
[':,;
j ... ,
•
-
:,··
- ' 1 , ,a.
-L ··~~I ::·:v
·-·
•
JF VAL(Z$(33,37))>24 THEN 5?0
q?G IF VAL(Z$(185,188)))=23 THEN
f!F:FFiTEF:~
1 t:F.t-~
LE::
THfit·i ::
E.-,., L TO :..:
j~.~i:~; THfit·J OF::
(;f;:F TH: TfiHI·l
hOT EC•UnL TO
~80
( >)
( <)
=)
C!Ufl
TO -·
R E UAL TO -
<<=>
()~)
#)
.....
.·
)•.
·---------.....1
·. ..
,._
~
.
--·--~---··---·-·---------------
APPENDIX C
DATA STORAGE PROGRAM
I
'
l
L
·-~------
39
...
:.:•:,
~·hO
:~: (:t
fi ~- :::: ..
40
~INPUT
40 DI:P
c:,t::!
THE LAST DATA
·F~LE
NO."!
I f~PUT 1)3
E0 LOHD
DATA 03
e~. ki-'~t·i tlOi·i THE U;·.::T DfiTR ::::n: ltH:; ErHEPED IH L.L. BE DETEF::t'll HEP
t~? F.:EI:
70 IF Ht=H$[?56,255] THEN 90
98 IF Gt=G$E25t,255J THEN 128
Wl.1 1=7
ilO GOTC! :310
120 IF F$=G$[256,255J THEN 150
i:::o I=6
14·0 GOTO :31iJ
1·Sl:") J.= :1
1 ?\'1 GOTO :31(1
:80 If Df=G$[256,255] THEN 210
190 J;;4
2iJ IF C$=G$C25G,255J THEN 240
248 IF Bt=G$[256,2551 THEN 270
270 IF
Kt~Gt[256,255J
THEN 300
C:OTO 3i0
I::.O
G~:~~::::C!3·-1
C:DTO 340
t<:EPi
iC.:f:t'l IF THE ErrllF<E DFiTFi FILE E; FULL" THE
THE i·iF:·: r
......
REM DATFi FlLE ..... Q3+i
f<EH
330 J:=:[l
::::.:1 Cl I 1 =:(;I
·:· 4 "' F: Et·i
~~;"1 :i:
F:Et-1 THE DfHfi ::;rp HiG:~; F'!F.:E EtHEPEil B\' Atl::;G£EF::It·lG '\HE: <='OLLUI.JI:·:t;
::; '1· C F: EJi
1 ~~;;;~;
1
°s~
DISP "IHPUT MISSION CDATE) 8 CHAR";
I t·IPUT ZJ
,::::?0 Z:H LE~i(Zi~)+1 J=A:H 1! 13 J
1:;::::=:~C~ ].! I ::,;p "t'il ~;:;,;I Ot·i 0 1TLE) 10 CHt':jF.:";
~:·:::[i J l··~f'UT Z$[ 9 J
•1130 ·?tf. L.Ct-u:zt>+l
}=•fl~'H
1, 1:3 J ·
. 401 I!J:::::p "FIGHTEF.: TYF'E (::: CHrH?)'';
4~j2 I t·H:·ur z:;:r 19 J
403 2:-H LEtj(Z:f::H1 )"-H$[ 1, 13]
4JO DI::;p "t-1I::::3ILL tlUt'JE:EF.: <C CHFlf;:) ";
420 INPUT Z$E27J
.
430 Zt[LENC2$)+1l=~t[i,13j
44~J
DJ:::;f· "LAUtJCH flL TITUDE, f::FT(5 CHfiF.:::O";
450 INPUT Z$[33]
..
)".
'.~ ··~
41
~ ..
t'
..~/(_1
.:~
JJ!'~;F·
"Lf:i~:l•::H
f·1FiCh
(.~
:~·Hr-iF·>··
;:::o I ~-~F'UT 2.4-L :~~:a J
'1 ·=:o
::tr u:.il .: ::'::-:. + 1 J=AH
~:Ot1 I;~::::;:~~ 1 0"
::2~?.1
1, ":=: J
. L F;'_:;;CH '•:'EL CIC lT't', f::. r::>. 4 CdHr::> "i
It·~f'UT ?.r•~ ~_:· J
Z:tE Lf:-]-~ ( 2t .) -t-1 J"::F;:.t[ 1 :t 1·? J
::."t:3u DISF' ''LriUt~Cl"l H£FJJl!·~G~ DEC<~5 CHH!?) ., ;
540 INPUT Z$[461
~~~~n z~:[ LEti r:: z::.) + 1 J:-:-;::~:[ 1, 1 :~::
j
DI SP "LriUHC!i RRf·~GE ~ t !t'l ( 5 CHF1P >'· ;
~57C, ItlF'UT ~:;:[:51 J
~5::0:0 Z:H L!OJJ <:: Z:r i + 1 J=R$[ 1, 1:::: J
590 D I SP . "F:Ar·.JGE !<:ATE i H VH2>: 5 CHFi~:) ";
~~:;f.o.
C88 INPUT Zt(5GJ
c 1o a ;: L Eti <:c: ,; :· + 1 J"' An i , i ::=: J
t::.il DI!cT ··::;:miCE F:riTE Ill f::T:::<5 CHF;F:)";
f:.l ::::: I :·~PUT Z:f.[ 6 i J
.:::·i ·:· 2~-[ ~.Et·!f::.~:f)·~ 1 J::·:AJL 1 ~ i:~: J
~i~~;J I;I~:;F·
l' C30
t~-j.!;;)
"lFiF:GET flLTITUI1~ It·~ KFT<5
INPUT Z$[66J
Z:f.l' LF~~ 0:: a o-r J J=A:H i, 1:::: J
CHHF~)";
650 ti!SP 'TARGET MACH N0.(4 CHAR)";
660 INPUT Z$[71]
670
6:::~3
f_;')}j
Zt[LEN(Z$)+tJ~A$[1,13J
"T1~1b-:GET \iELOCIT'l f:::T::;0::4
DI::;p
1 tif'tJ:
ar
?5 J
CH:iF.:)";
•·
~~:H U::H ( Z:j: '• + i J=Fi:H 1, l :3 J
(' 10 DI ::;;p ";mF:CET HEF!li 1tJG TIEG <5 CHAF:) ";
l tiPUT Z':H 79 J
Z:HLUJ<:?:f')+i J=AH 1,
1:~:]
DI:::p "TAr.:GET T\'F'Eo:. 10 CHfiF.:)";
I t·iPUT Z:H ::0:4 J
Z$1LEN(Z$)+1J=A$[1,13J
Iii::;r-· "FiUG.··ECi'1(12 CHAP)";
'HlF'UT Z:H '34 J
:':H Lffi ( Z$ >+ 1 J::::fj::j.:[ i, i. :~: J
TIJ.:~:p "Tcr:: HJ DEC<::'· CHfJF:)"i
INPUT. ~~H 106 J
Z$[LENCZ$)+1J=A$[1,13l
e~::t.i
DI~~;p
''H::;r·ECT
It·~
DEC~(~5
(:HFiP)~:;
848 INPUT Z$[1i1J
oC:~3Ci
eE:o
e;:'·o
Z:t[ LEH ( Z::!·) + i J::::A:t[ 1, 1::::)
DI SF' "LOO!< AHGL.E, DEG ( 11 CHAF.: :• ";
ItWUT 2$[ 1 :li5 J
c:::o 2$[LENCZ$)+1J=A$[1,13J
::::·:..:~]
DISP "LAUNCH MODE(lST PART)(9 CHAR)";
908 INPUT ZS[i27J
910 Zt[LEN(Z$)+tl=AS[1~13J
·:!20 D I::W "LnUtE:H t·ICDE>: 2t·JL' F'!if~:n ( 9 CHAF:>" i
930 JNPUT Z$[136]
1940
9~~iij
Z$CLENCZ$)+1J=A$[1,13J
DJ.:::p "LAUHCH Il'nJ FF.:E::.::: JH PSF<4 CHF;F:;:r";
960 INPUT Z$Ll45J
370 ZH LEH O::Z¥) + 1 1==fi$[ !. , 1:::: J
388 DISP "MISS. FLT. TiNE SECC5
0!90 TiWUT Z:H 1<19-i
1iJOO Z:H LEtj(,:::$)+1lc-fi$[ 1, i ::: J
1010 IJI::;p ··c;--E:IH:~:(G)C6 GH:lP)";
11820 INPUT 2$[154J
1030 Zf(LEN{Z$)+1J=A$[1,13J
CHf!F.:)";
42
l
iJI::=:f=·
'H--t::Tf-r'··C>,.? CH(ik.•">
=~-t[ 1 C.~J]
?:H Lf::H<Zt)+i J"'FIH 1, i3 J
s_
f-~f-'!_ 1 "!
'·G~3(4 CHr1P)";
tlPUT 2-!l lt::2 J
Z:H LGH ?:t :.+ 1 Jc-,R:H 1 , 1 ::: J
i 100 l!I~::;p "fiTC T Ir•IE~ ::·Eco::~~~ CHAP> .. ;
ti1C1 ItJF'UT ~:;[i86j
11?0 Z:H L.EtH?:t :;+1 J=-A:H 1, l::: J
r:r~:.F·
j
J.
1 :::Ci D1::;p "1·1 I:~:::; DI ::.:T. , F--e ( ··~ CHAP.:) .. ;
i 140 ItlF'UT Z:H 171}
11 ~5~:1 2S[ LEt-~ ( Zt) -t 1 J==AJ[ 1, 1:::: j
1 i 6(1 DI ::;p "ACT I '·/E FF.:EOUEtK l ( 4 CHAP)";
1170 INPUT Zt[i75J
11 f:C~ Z:H LEt; C2:t) + 1 J:;:fi:t[ 1, 1::::: J
·j i 90 Dl ::;p "~:;TAT I cq t-~0 ~ (_1 CHf1P >";
1200 INPUT
2~l179J
LEt-~ ( :~ $ + 1 J=A$ [ 1 ~ 1 -~; J
DI·~;F-· ''FT::; ACTI'·.·' (~! CHr:-;p:~)
12 l 0 ? J [
1.;?20
1t ~~::::0
.
>
,
I tJPUT Z:f[ i :::0 J
i240 ~'.HLEtl<::':t)+iJ,A:t[1,13J
j 2:::0 I1 I ~:;p .: F:O(!<ET f'IOTCF:: PUF.:H T 11·1E ( 4 CHAP)'';
1290 INPUT ::'$[1851
DE EHT[FFD
:
)•
J.t-~TCI
~:. -·~
43
~ 's~::e
1:::oro
------,
i t~;~:J
i ~:,9C1 D:t:=-?:i·
16(H_i GOT (I 1 (:=:(1
1;:;1u F:r<·l
1. C2U GOTO i
li t~J(I
t:.:::o
F:t.::.:Z~·
1(40 I~OTC! 1;.:;·::,:1
i 6~H3 G$=Z:!:
:i660 GOTO 16.::0
1670 H:t<:::t
.
l 6::0::(.1 IF I =E: TfifJi 1720
1690 DI:::;p "~·JAHT TO STORE iiHOTHEF.: :::TFiltlG";
1700 IHPUT 2:*:
1710 IF ZS#"NO" THEN 340
i ?l~:i l·!=l
1no I1::::I1+1
1 7;;·2 .F.:Et-1
1? :?:~: F:Ef'i l'HE PEt·1Fl It-~ I NG Dr;·T F;
t·?;~~;
PEt·1
:::T~:
I t-~c::; HF.:E :::ET
EG~L~nt_
-f 0
T~!E
EP1F' ·~· '·;·
~~-;-!·F::
t·~G
I
:l ;:_ ;;:::~3£: ~
c~::;:::;
>
FOLLOi·J I t·iG THE Lf!'c:T DnTA FILE UITEf?Efi I::: n DU'!I·i'y' FILE (·ornn IN J HG H:>
THE SUBSTRING "ZIP " SO AS TO INDICATE THAT ~iO MORE DATA FILES EXIS
l ~·'';?6 t:::Ei1
1727 REM
1?::"::9 F.:Et-1
l ?::a~~ GOTCJ
i 7:?:;:
c;o~r
I+i OF 17:35:! 174t3, i
o 1:::;:o
750~ l?(~),
1?::::r::1,
1.?'9~),.f:::oo,
1:::1.0
1735 K$=8$[256,255]
1740 B$=8$[256,255]
1750 C$=C$E256,255J
1160 D$=8$[256,255]
1?80 E$=8$[256,255]
1790 F$=8$[256,255]
1800 G$::::8$[256,255]
t:::: l 0 H.:t=B:H 256, ::::~35 J
i.C:11 IF I 1=i THEH 1S20
1 :~:1~: :-t:tc:::"ZIP
1n?o
o::.::::o::::+ 1
1830.STORE
DATA Q3
J :::40 I =t1
1850 IF 11=1 THFN 1720
1860 IF W=l THEN 1870
1865 DISP "WANT 10
STOR~
t:::C6 IHF'UT z.t
186? IF 2Stf"tl0" THEtl :340
1:::?0 PF.: I tH
F'F: I tH "F'LEfiSE PF.: I tH u::·:::T DIHR F l LE t·iO" ) "; 0:~:-·1; "Ot·l THL t:;;c;c; OF DflT:::-1 CR::::::E· TE
11 :;::;:H)
u::·:::o
l 900
! ·:.:iC1
i 920
·~
PF:Hn "Tf-Hitn:: 'lOU 1 1 ..
.PF.: I tn
Ff.':ItH
PF.:HH
, ·:;::::c PF.:ItH
·;:40 ·am
.,,
, ..
L
•
·, ·: ,·I ;
..
I •, .. ,.1 , · .
; ·,
1
.
·~ ..'
.
'I' I . ) . ,
1
'
'
I
_ •
~-------------------·-----"--·"-~-----~·---
1
APPENDIX D
DATA RECOVERY PROGRA}1
I
I
L__---44
45
f:J
CC'h t=-1:1:--[ 2~5~; .1~ f:·t·~ 2::;':~ J:; Ctr
:.)
"L1
.ii·i r-:~-L:~~.::;~~;1!i:::[2~:;~~5j!!!·~-~L
------------::;~; 1~ l"!!.-~- :--·::.~! :1~ [:·;:·[ ~~·"5·~; _:. r:::~L :··~~~:. J.. ~-.:tr ~~r-;~-; ]:; h1[ ;:·'i5 J, ;:ilL l:::~~ J
~--.~_-;J,>:1:L~-:··~·~:_~,:.:~.·:·:1~-.:..:~;:.~.:"~---J~ JU]~i-!lr.'-~-~~.]·.· ·;·~-~~:~_;]
0 E1=1
··~-:::: ·r~·F.J1 THF FIF~~:,T FOUR [:IT·:-: -C!F Lr:1Tn :-1~·-::( c::;TftCL ~:.·_:~i~-.IJ [:\' Il-!1 ·;·] f!L :?:tt~-::; THL::.E
't4 f.::Ei'l Pf1i-::r::. (I~- -~-HE AI< 1;::0) Ut!':C DiflUi:O:;IOtHIL t·F;T~:T:< .....
i~ ~-~
~5;:.
F.: Et1
mi
J=1
A[ 91 ]=1
f![ i 36 ]::::{'
f:"i[ 2
;'"(I
:::::~3
90
]=·::· /
iOO Fi[47J=-7.1B
itO :=i[ 92 J:-;::::
J i 1 !':[ 137 J"' L-:
j ~·0 fi[ 3 )::-: 19
j
4,::1 F-1r ·;'3 J=- J : : :
i:::;n
1 f_::o
fif 13::: J=15
r-~r
1 J:=45
i/IJ fl[2]cc5[1
1 i' ~::. t~[ 4 J~=50
j_ ::'
1
i ::<=~
m 4 J=27
m 49 J=o:3::~
JC:::,, F!['j.:.lj==16
: _ :::4 ;::iL 139 J===20
] 9C! I :.:·5
:::or:1
DI :::;F· .. DO '/OU ~·lfHH m_L CF THE DiHfi'';
10 I tlF'UT At.
2;-"'0 IF fi:i:::::: "HO" THEt·J ;::·~50
?2i fd:i·l
22:~~ PEt=i E 1:::2 IS U:~;El! It·~ (IF) ~~:Ti'iTEi=1Et~T3 TO [:\'
:::~
Pfi~:.::;
OUE~:;T
'1- i I
I Ot·~::;:;
1
i~:
T
r;n_;
l HE
223 REM DATA IS REQUIRED ....... .
;~::2~·
:?:::~3
. F-:~f:.i·1
E i :::..:2
;~~OTO
2:::;.~1
REt·1
F:Et·J THf::::;E OUE::n
10!4~:;
COfHF<OL I HIT 1 ALl ZfiTI OH OF· H<l :::o) FOF:: -,
REM GROUPS OF DATA ..
H~~
IF:
;~.
FH1
2~;:2i
DISP "DO YOU WANT MISSILE
DATA";
2:60 It-lPUT At
.-,-;;,·:.
.:::.;" t-,:1
IF Af.c,"tlC!" THEi-l ?Et
2BO H[ I
:~::60
J=<<::
nr I +90 J:::-?6
::::" o m r + 1:::: 5 J==<H
::=::;:(1 HL I J==54
::::90 I:ci+1
4CIO fir I l"42
'flO
m H45 J:::45
.~.
L
..
....
46
~:---::-:--::-~--------------·"·-·-----·---·----------------,
•1 l1 H[
.q. ,j ;:; t
Li 0 t·H
+
-,
J=<~::·
'j J =: :>.::
.:.i
6
0 I=~ -+
·, r
, _
0 nt .J-'-tr.)
~j
f,[ +45 Jo::C:,Ct
0 m I +·::·o J=:37
L}
(1
L-;·
.i ..-
.:~
~;
0 t4[ I J=11
510 hl+l
:.20 Ar I J=51
~/:H.1 ;::;[ I +45 J==5~5_
54[1 Fir I +90 J=42
~;st1 r:Jr I+ 1 :~:5 J==4 ;.-·
~=,,::r< HL l J=C
!::!70 I::::I+l
~~:::1~1 I:!L I J=56
590 F:[ I +45 J=6f1
:-_:-:oo r~:r I+·:.~~~; ]=4:::
(:. 1 0 Fli. 1 + i ::::;:. J=5:3
t:~"O t·H I J=21
t::~~o I= I+ 1
f';[
(i[
l ]"'61
I-! .:}5 J.~65
m 1+'C:O J=4B
fi[
I-+
~ :::~i
J:=5:::
II[IJ:=16
I=I+i.
IF El=2 THEN 740
DISP "DO YOU WANT TARGET DATA AT LTf";
IHF'UT Al
IF ftJ::::" t-~0
ll
THfJ~
i 110
~1::
I l=66
i'l[ H45 J=70
fH I +9~~1 J='54
F'![ I+ 1:35
t-l[ I J= 1
J.=5::~
?90 I==I+l
. 02[1 tE I J=50
.·I.
...·. .
~
~
47
l
I=J+1
t=![
I +~-t~;
j~
1L15
m I+·::••) J<:1
H[ I+ 1-~;~~;
m I)=':',;)
J~--:3~~·
I=I+1
IF
·rHEi·i
11.:1~~1
"t11:1 \'OU
~·JAt·~T
[1:.-~?
DI~:;p
IIWUT
r.;~;::]_f~Tl 1·.·'~
f!:j:
IF A:!:= .. NO"
THEt-~
1.3::::0
HLIJ=l06
m 1 +45 J:.:-1io
m I+·:•o J==::::::
f:[ I+ j ~::::; J::c'j[1
r-!riJ=1i
I==I+i
f;[IJ::c1J1
f~[ I+45 ]::.] 15
R[I+90J=91
A[ I+ l ::::5 J:::O:?:;:
\·j[
I
]o.: 11
I:::I+1
FIL
F-il
FIL
A[
I J=iE
I +4:=5 J:.:: 12C
I +90 J::::94
I+i:::::'::;j:::1£11
ti r I J"' i 1
I =I +1·
IF E 1 =<:· THEil
1330 DISP "DO YOU WANT MISSILE PARAMETERS";
i 340 HWUT fd:
1 ·:·'"rJ IF r:i:t:=" tiO" THt:t·l i ?60
I! :~;6rj m I J== 12?
t::=.:~'C tiL H45 ]""1:2:5
128~
~890
A[I+90J=102
A[I+13SJ=107
14~~i(i tE I ]==5(1
·14·HI I= 1+ 1
h.:120 FIL I J=1:36
.....
1430 A[I+45J~144
1440 !ili+9>:;J=i9
1450 R[ l+H5J=19
1460 m I J=so
14?0 I=I+l
J 4~:(1 Al I J== 145
1
1490'AEI+45J~l48
1500 AEI+S0J=108
1~510
A£1+1:.::5]=11?
I J<: 1
l5::::aYI::=I+1
1~;20
tl[
15•i->~1
H[ I ]:.: 149
1550 A[I+4jJ=153
1.:·.-·.•;· ~.-..' !l~1 f"i [ I + 9 0 J= i 1 :;;:
fi[ I+ 1 :;:5 J= 129
. ::;:=,:t3 i·l[ I ]=:::6
L~:::;q~-1 I=I+l
I.Gfn:1 A[!J=i54
![~~!.~: n(I+45J=i59
~ t ••:l) fl[ I +-:.<o J= r:::::o
~
1
1
.,
48
-----··---
r:-.::- ·:· f·1 n[ I + 1 ::; ~: ; J~= 1:::: :·;
I
I~ ;~:{E1 t~[
I ]0'041
1,;::_;o I=I+l
1 ct.r~ i:::lr
fi[
i 6:::\:J H
i690 FiL
i 700 tl[
u;?o
I J= 160
I +45
Jc~.t61
I I':J>:J J.=o Lt.
I+!::::5 ]=141
I J==41
i7E1 I=I+l.
i ?20 fiL I J= i 62
lr~~
l1?40
A[1~45J=165
AEI+90J=142
i ?50 CDTO 1 ??1~1
1 ?61~1 Z= 1
1 ??t) L I IlK 2
......
I
-···
.I , ' ·,., ·~•...i;. .. ,,~-- .•• .I .. I .1
•
I
,
{
',
t
t
•
·'
•.
...
....
49
Ir· :~1,~2 "iHf-.i:
F.'Er-1
P[t·1 :~: 1 i·~(i'~:
f:t:f'l C:F TH J.:;
F'f. t·l HirH TH1
l~P50
IF :;::>.~1
1466
A[I+135J~l43
1.1:=::~-J
I=J+1
THt~14
T I ;·~ T l L I ZHl iW OF f'l
,=· Ot·i
ur:· ;=l D Tf-:1
H
~-~ F1
N
T
I
Dt::~;
'
r~E.D
~·r:·c·
I !'•,:._
::-::<)
U LD l F IT L-jft:3
(I!J
L "f, • , • , , • ,
1;:;60
1 ,t·:.<o m I J== 166
15JO A[I+45J=170
1~.510 m I+-:.<OJ"'l-+4
1.5~?Ci
· riL
I+1:::::::;J:::~151
It ;:~g tii~ i .;~3':.
1 ':';5o m 1 :1=171
rH I-+ 45 ]=·1
1156:~-~
(':1
1570 A[I+90J=152
\.
l
I
..
L__
._-
50
l ·:.<: U !J[ I l<::t::
:·uot) J ~,J-~J
'= i~il n f1E r J"" 1':.·019
?~320
~![I
+-:·J5 ]::.::2
I +':?.0 J-~.:i:
HE I+l :~:':1 J=
t![ I J==::::t.
I'-' l-t 1
m r J=C\J4
~~;[
•::::
•··
2080 RCI+45l=212
2090 A[J+90J=210
2180 A[I+135l=21C
?110 t-![Il=36/
?ic'O I:.=I+1
~~~~g ~ff1~~~~221
ij~~~ ~t~~!i~;~~I.
2:1 ';ttl fiE I
J=2~:2
2200 A[l-t·45J=229
?::::1 o
2220
m I +'?O J=,2<::4
22:~:0
t·1L l J=50
A[I-t135J~232
c:240 I=I+l
2~?5f:.i m I J<:::::o
2?(;0 Hf. I +45 Jo.:,2:~:?
~~2:7(1
AII+90J=AEI+l35J=19
IE I Jc:5>3
I'" I+ i
IF El=2 THEN 2348
HI ::;p "DO \'OU [.Jfit·H COt·JCLU·:n Ot!.·'"Cot·nlEtH::;";
IilPUT F!~
IF ;:i:f'"" i·W" THEH ?490
f:r I
]::::2~:;::::
i''L ild·iTEfi I 11 Tt-:E tiE>Ci F-'F::C:GRfH
0
r·
f~3T
I O!·{
F"li·1~~~
CCif·JSEOUE~f··ITL
'/
.... .
51
1UD [:1=-I-1
·' ,_:;::· r:cn
10::; FEI·1 [:J
l
0~
DEH~f<i·1iriE:::
~~Ll . ! t·itiT~:l;::;.,
...
~
=.
HGL·; 1'iti!i';' E:lT::: OF iiHTh HH'v'E E.:ETH IHHliiUZEli
IIITC
THE R
10?· eF.:t-1 THE H::-r I~: l"HE Uf·-!IT:::- 3r:::·I~-H~~~ u:::E]J ~,~ITJ; THr~ LFH~:;::t.It~G ~:;lf::It-~G~ t'1~r.-,.
l!_L~; FH·l
110 f~.:·::-.::(1
.,.
111
~;~1-:L J, ~:~t J::::"i•1I~::.:~;lCit·iTl TLEFTF''·J·:~:L *;·L fl:_ TL l'if!Ci-!~. !,/ELL HI.H.~L f:J~GlP PFITE-f flL IT l·~r~
n~;r 6?~ 12;~! J=:"\'EL T HTiCT T'r'F'Ef"ii.IG . . Ei:·!··1TCAH~:::F'LOC~:: hi1CL. t·1C:li~~~-D\'f·-l F'FE::::?.::t·i~_:;L FL.~· T
i'l:f[ 12'3, 1:::;'J:::"EC t:lfr::H 8ltc;:::::;ORTC TII'1U1I:::::: I•I:::TACT FF:EO::::Tfl r·iOFT::: F1CT1\'F:t·1BT
..
15::;
156
MtC188~244J=''ITL
rr
.-i
RETURNATIARM PULSEC PULSEF PULSETYPE FUZEOBJ ACHIEVED"
1:-:,t F'Et·1
J'::;::;: H:H IF tlO COt·E::!F:FiJ t-n::; j.j[f:o'E DE::-:If?ED, HO IrE':TT:UCTIOt·.:::; l,iil.L EE F'PitFEil OUT
159
r~:EJ1
170
Z$(LEN(2t)+iJ="8,538,550,~!0'
1::;;o 2':)-:[:i2T·4-:::F4J::.:"; THI::!·~ F'F.:E::;:3 (COf·!T), <2>,
1 '30 F'FitH Z.f[ J. ~ ?::: J, ZH ;•::;:, LEtHZ:n J
J.=::?-5 ~·JFiiT ~~3l10ti
t.onn
DfHA
([1), (i~J)~
(E;:.::ECUTE)''
=+
f<::;[i
F'Et·J
REM THE FOLLOWING LINES ARE USED WHEN FOUR OR LESS GOOD DATA STRINGS
f::'Ef'i A'/FilLAE::U: AFTEP f"LL THE DRTA FILES HAVE BEEH SEARCHED •....
F!F:E
F:Ef'l
J=~<
IF HO.c:f:1~3J:fl"ZIP"
THEt·l
250
GQTO K+l OF 243,244,245,246
GOTO 1?'35
244 Xt=W$[25E~255J
245 tt=W$[256,255]
246 zs~Wt[256,255J
~::47 fi3=1
:?4::; COTO f~7'~3
~~50
.-
N=f1
252 REM N IS THE COUNTER USED TO IIIITJALIZE THE WORKING STRING TO EACH DATA
253 REM STRING TO BE INSPECTED (WHEN USING CONSTRAINTS) ..... .
:::::;4 PEt·1
~::60
t·l"·t·l+ 1
265 GOTO N OF 2?0,290,310,330,350·37&,390•410
2~7ti
2::;1~1
::$=R$
GOTO 420
2'3t1 Z$:=B:t
:::00 CDTO 420
:::10 2::1::=.('$
320 GOTO
.~:~:r,::l
42~3
~~~:::::D~:
-=:.:1.~·1 GCI'fO 420
r::::~0 ?:J:::.:E$
::6[1 GOTO 420
:::70 Z:t:::F$
:;::::o GCTO 420
:::·:10 Z:t=::G:t
+[1[1
COTO 420
J
L
-.~··;<'"
52
·--,
q l u ;_~:f.
·L<< l :· IJ:::-:::
"i-~:~ J PEl·l
.:1 :~::..
F.:LI1 \IF>
,1?·-1·
f~:Et'l
~:;T!::·r Et"1EJ~1
4?5 FOR J=l TO F4
"·-~
r'
oF .:1
:::;
'·'""'" VlA lHE C.Otl')if,fil'H
a
.....
&
M.
47o
I
e
,~~~~To. .J
~i c~ :o
~ ~t ·:.; (i ~ ~· 1. ~·:f ~ :::; :::: ~ ~:~d)~ ~; ·;:- (!
ZH?l,;C:6J::"'"24.:~:21" THEN 5:::o
4'5(i IF
'iiC.;:_i
COTO 2CO
~;(1(1
COTO
I
470 IF VAL<ZrC19S.201J) >= 23 THEN 580
.j :::o GOTO 260
490 IF Zt#"COHSTRAIHT" THEN 580
::.~6~3
510 IF Z5#"COHSTAINT" THEN 580
~5?0
~30
COTO 260
~;4~?:1
:;~~;o
C!JTO 260
~)(;fJ
GDTO 260
IF Z$#"CONSTAINT" THEN 580
IF Z:f# "C:Ci~!·::-:F:P I tJT" fHEH
~:.::>3
:;:o I r7 Z:t#" COt-J::::TR I HT" THEH 5f30
~5-?5 COlO 260
5 ::; ·~~ r-1 E;-:;r J
THEH
l :c .l + 1
t::[ I J=t-1
618 IF I#4 THEN 1000
620 I:=O
C21 FCI'l
622 REM l'HE FOLLOWING LINES PUT THE KNOWN GOOD DATA STRINGS INTO .THE
623 REM USED'lN THE PRINT SlRTEMENT ..
C24
630
f~:EH
FOR J=l+K TO 4 _
648 G6TO 8[-JJ OF 650,670,690~710,730,750,770s790
6:iO :::::t:=-=A:f.
cso •:;oro :::oo
t_:;?'o
Z:t:.:.B::i:~
t;:::~J
GOTO !:::00
c-?o
z.~:::cC$
?00 GOTO 8£10
?10 ?:t=D:f.
720 ~~OTO ::0:(10
?40 GOTO 800
-,
750 Z$==F$
760 COTO ::0:13(1
??0
·?:::~3
;:--·:;;o
~·::$~G:.t:
~~oro
:::e~J
Z::t:=H$
:;;2(1 GOTO :36(1
::::30 ::·:::r.==z:;:
:::.·tO COTO ::0:6(1
:::so
:::c~~1
\'$=Z:i:
tn::::n
._1
:::65 V:::::f1
:::66 P::U·1
::0:67 F:EI'1 :::;ooD DliHi STPHJC:;:: FiFE HdtHED OUT '·/lH THE FO!.. L_ClHt-lG C;~,i 1 i"inHD3.,,.
::: 6 ::: r:: E!'l
870 PRINT
'1·
L.--
__j
< ,~-·
·.:··~
53
i".
'11"
·~·
0 f'f.:
9
FCi F5:.o(1 ~~ Cll+A[JJ-A[J+45J)
0 r (.::-;:; 1 6-t 'S
c:
ll F?= :::o-r- ·-'
.
F: ;j F'F:
I
a:..z
c,
·~
'3
"
~~i
Til
tn
,,_,
I
r-·::::.:4:..:.+
q 0 F9=-.c5::::+ 5
•::j 0 FF< 1 HT
:$[A[ J+9C ], H;:: J+l:~:~~i J 1; f~tL t~[ ._1 ], t-~[ ._! }t.:~ J; TRC:Ft.:; ~-1::!-T f![ ._1 ):: 1-lL .J+~5 J }~ T(1BF7;
-t~: fir ..J J ~ fi[ ._! ·}·L·~:s J J; T f~EF·::: ~ '/ .-;::[ HL .J J, fit" _h-oi~::, J J; Tf1t:i=··~-~; 2 ~- L r·l[ .) J :~ i:l[ .J+ :!.5 ~]
·= 0 F' F~ r
trr
·3::-.::e F·f;: I IH
990 HE:-<T ._i
995 IF W:::c1 THEil
L~95
1000 IF H<B THEN 260
1010 FOR J=K+1 TO I
l fi 11 F::Et·1
1
,1012 REM THE REMAINING GOOD DAlA STRINGS CLLSS THAN FOUR) ARE STORED
10 l :~~ 1-:~[1·1 t·.!'
:=·::
~
'/
fit--In THE t-~E:=::T· DfiTf1 F l LE l S LOfiDEI.i" • ~
l~l
STRIN~S
=
1 J2;"?0 ;~:i:==CJ
1 (if:O GOTO 11 SO
110C GOTO iJBO
1;10 Zt:o:E::t:,
1120 GOTO 11 :;::o
1!. :30 Z$=F $
1140 GOTO ilt:e
1150 ;J=I:;$
11 GO GOTO 11 :::e
1 t 70 Z:t=H:;t:
.
1180 GOTO J OF 1190,1210,1230
1 1 ·== ~-:-~
l 2,:;(:;
~:J:t ~.:
z
:~:
GOTC! 1 <?40
;i 23~3
tlE'··'T
I1240
.
11?1~] ;.::t===Z$
·Y:•Vi GOTO 12•l0
\'$=1*:
?."',.1,:1· 1"·,-·.!.
L···:_';•
111260
~
I
·-
A1=A1+1
112BCi LOFLD
DfiTR flj
1290 L;OTO 241
1295 DISP "RELOAD FILE 1 FOR DIFFERENT DATA"
J. :;:oo EHD
!,·
L
....
------------·---
.··-.....-,
. ·· ...
APPENDIX E
SAMPLE DATA AQUISITION
54
55
F: t;
2i l----~.:1~-·· ?::1
- F'/L. -:::
TlTLE
FTP
F-14#t.06
1 7 l '?2R
L tiL TU<FT)
16.
7~3
CIF'E'·/FIL -1
F-·14#G31
F·-14#'301
i7171B
j7.20
. 623
c.-..~·:·
., ,_,;I
·-•
1 .. 10
·::.o::::.-·1
'·-•·-• -r"
1 ?2. i
1:::7... 2
1 ~:;. 01
11.20
2i. :::4
+60.1
756.0
14.'}5
T NiiCH #
T
'/EL<KT~:;::•
T HDG<DEG)
i4.:33
.5?0
. 58(1
495.
r..:·.·...- •
:352. 1
'l T\'PE
::::~:
. 6?
.··, ....
c--;::
..:''i'• ·-_IJ"
._It:• c..
:~:55
4i. 17
.. 2
E:C!t'l·-34A
fiU!; .. ·ECN
UtlriUGt1EtJTED
UHAUGt·iEt·~TED
TCfl(DEG':o
1 :::o. 13
177.0
9G. 15
.740
2.13130
06.013
6i. 88
i.
05. i F::.··2. '?Till
i 0. DL.-··::::, 5UP
LCII)f'.: titJG(DEG>
2. j L.J j . 8Dt-1
L t·IODE
PDSTT
HOk:i:1FiL
?(1
• 54f.'>2. i :3UF'
s ....-A
ACT I \IE
:36.2
MSl. FLT TIME<SEC)
84.51
65.
G Bl8S(G)
-6.25.
-2. t!
~~
0.
1
l' 'l ' i•
p::. 71
41. i .:;
0~~0
-1
o.
-l
fiTC T I t·iE <~:;EC :..
.·,...
::::2.54
D···H
. I! ·'H
1'.24
·-4
4
(~
..
l•l0.
56
i!·fi
,· r1 ....
~
.
.-.
.;-.
u; . 1
::::-:::<. 15
PUL~3E
.-,
...~. .J • .::.
15.42
1 ~; _ I('
HTI<·:LC)
FtPN
.-.c:
<SEC>
j?'
41
84 . 00
:34.47
TELEt·1ETF:\'
65.31
T'l'PE FUZl:-.
•. DAHl •.
non 9:::oo
'..•r·-.--.
; t: -=·
COt·it·iEiiT.
CUJ HERD
CUJ HEFID
tJU!
FfiiL-2 G
FED OUT
TUF:tJ- I H
'-•
!,·
57
OPE\Ifil.-3
TITLE
tlF\.>-?, '·/::·::·-4
F-14
FTF:.
~=-·:·-:::'·:··=·
t·FL P.
i
:::7. 12
AL T<f::FD
.:._I
·-''-'
\
i2.70
.67:3
542.
:372.
L. HT!G<DEG)
L::. 61
24.4:3
L F.:tic;L ( t·l/'1)
42.77
:::. 21
40.71
P F.:flTE ( f::T:::;)
.-..-, .-.
-·=·-=··=·.
12.
6.252
J::::.('H
j (1
.4C5
T t·H'ICH #
527.
T HDC:<DE::G>
45.37
T T'IT'E
HAPPOOt·l
.-.r-
:::-.;
.:._1 • .._} l
BOH-::::4A
f'IUG.····Ect·1
I
TC!:i ( DEG)
::::2.77
0.0
f'1::;;p ( l!EG)
~:5.
0.0
LIXW ·fit·lG ( DEG)
01
.....
<':i PT.··6. 5Dti
PI:STT
L. t·IODE
402.
MSL
~L.T
TIME<SEC)
G BIASCG)
81.71
+6.00
~6
[1.
GO
ATC TIMECSEC>
MISS DISTCFT)
-1
(1.
00
N/A
D/H
D..-H
-4
4
:::Tri t·10
FT:::: ACT I'-/
ti ..-A
t·kA
21.0
4~:.
21
f
•
• .
., ·'
·,
I
·, :
I
,
I
I ;
~ ~.
_• • • • • • • •
I ,
',
f
~
I
1
-'
.
'
'--
t
', '
·•
,
_l
"
.
·" j·, 1,·, ·•• '. ,, :. •..
."~
.
.
.....
58
47.
6::~
44.37
·•.,,,
- - .,,___
- ·- -·.·
..:,.. :.- .:... ·-' ..
.
t-1~=:--1414
T'/F'E FUZE
DOD 1600
OB.J ACH I E'./ED--COP1f'1EHT
~EL08D
'lES
C:U IDED
'··' r- ,-.
1
c ..:'
HT TF.:fi IL
FILE 1 FOR DIFFERENT OATA
....
59
·----··--·---~--------_..;.-----,
LDFJl;1
f··UH
IiO
~~·o;_,
!·~Fit iT
l·~:-1fiT
r:_ .:. i t.r
D!:iTA'?\'E·:;
Tf-.:;_ t:: r lq:rf r1 HT L.Tt= y::;
:CG \'CJU L,LiltT PLL -~ l;·/E I:nT;~ ffr L E'/i':~­
J)(! '-;C•U ~lHtn t·i I::. l ~.F PiiPAt·iETF"'. tK•
J-.{.! \·:_n_; l·Jr-::nT firr;· u:= -f:-:F FU::;E t-Lif~c·-::·t-~0
I;O 'f'Ci;_i l·JriHT (:i~!~-~C:L US I Ot~ . . . CC!I=it·1Ef-~ T:~·:?':'~::
f-i;)1·1 i··:A!h' COtJ:::;TF-fii!H:=:: VO 'r'G:..i ~F;;;T·~·j
r·F:E:::;=:; (·:;TOP), -f HEr~ Et·~·~ EP 'lOl.!i? C.O~·!:::;_;_fi It-~ T~:; I t-1 l_ J t-:E <~; > 4~in;
~,-), (2> ~ (~3) ~ (0) ~ <E><ECU#I.E)
T.iO ''I'C:U
COt·ll?OCI
fJ i
.---·ns ..---?5
TITLE
F-14
F·-14-#63i
27.:31
L fiLT(KFT>
.:::-;:-::::
L t·1ACH #
L '•/EL
<f<T~;)
1. 1(1
.678
:::79.
c::--~·-·
-J~.::..
12.61
54.51
.. t:'
""':'--.
i .J .. ( .:.,.
.-, i
...:.. J. •
,..., .'1
·:•'1
42. 7'7
.-.c
.:.._1. "tC...-,
-~
-120.
::::~:.
.762
·- t1ACH #
T HDG ·:. DEG >
o-:'7.
1. (17
111••:1
(:54.
52"?.
41 . 1.?
45 .. ::::?
I
E:C!N--34E
T T\'F'E
HUG
lCfi (DEG)
. 6. 252'
67
1. 5 :;GH
9(i., 15
UtlHUGNEtHED
fiUC. 7. :::01·1
:;:~~-
7"7.
n:::P<DEC)
:?lF.~T ....-6 ..
LOOK AHG<I•E;:;)
COt·ii·1EtlT
Tl'l DF:OP-F'Eft CIUT
fd:: L!XID F I L E
5Dt·i
Ti-ICH F'F:ES~:; ( Cnt:~
60
jj(jij
~·J(; :-j
J,~ ri r·~
!·!Fit-J
...
n
~J::;
1 c.~~-!--··cc~i
r-· .. I :-,-·.,-,1 ),-·,
c_ :·~ l -:· :· I·!'--'
r'l ii-i:::; tO \C:
.
_,-....
(1
TllLE
iHE #Cii
i
c; .-·o4 .. -,~;
./ij~::: ....-?5
OPC:',:'fiL --;
tHE #6E:
FTi?
t'II:::;~;ICtl
I
TITL t
jnr;:
DFiTE
1'?17'2A
i?1?1B
(I i ./(~5 . . . '?5
~11.---'06 . . . ~?5
f:055:~:
OF'E'·/FiL-:3
F--14
FOR DIFFERENT DATA
I
!o
•,•
APPENDIX F
FLIGHT TEST PLAN AND FINAL REPORT
61
62
N:'\v..u; ~nsm.'E' ~
.{'ui.r_>t 11"~" 1 C.tl.iL \lJI.)lJ
·
N213
. 8810
From:
To:
Commanding Officer, Naval r1issile Centet'
Commander, Naval Air Systems Command (AIR-51050)
Sub.i:
Naval r.lissile Center Test Plan for AI~1-54A r4iss'ile Performance
Verification Launches (PVL) 14, ·15, 16, 17, and 18; forwarding
of
Ref:
(a) Airtask No. A50l-5014/054F/3501-000005
Enc1:
(l) Conf AH1-54A Performance Verification Launches 'F1 ight Test
Plan for PVL-14, -15, -16, -17, -18
1.
Five electt·onic countet·measw·e test launches have been designed as
part of the AIN-54A Perf01·mance Verification Test established under t•eference (a). The plan for these launches is forwarded as enclosure (1).
I
G. C. GOOGii'l~
By dirc<::tion
Copy to:
HUGHES AIRCRAFT
CO. PT MUGU CA (2 w/encl)
Copy to:
.
I
I
\
N213A
N200
N210
N120
1623
N213/l.
(2 w/encl}
(w/o encl)
(~J/enc1)
(w/end)
(3, 2 ~1/o encl)
(retain)
-~~,,~J>repared by:
·n._
BERGEN/hd
Ext. 8977/8028
25 February 1975
·.
.
"
\
~
.
~~~~t~~f~FJ~~~ri~~~ /~:~c~t.t' . . ·.
..
.
..... .
63
NAVAL NI5SILE CENTER
FLIGHT TEST DIVISION
AIM--54A PERFORI~ANCE VERIFICATION lAUNCHES
FliGIIT TEST PLAI{ FOR PVL-14, -15, -16, -17, -18 (U)
21
FEBRUARY 1975.
_·Prepared by:
•
.,=:_r:y\ -~~./\~;:..:.....--..:..-..:.__
1
Submitted
;R. M. BERGU .
(.}
by:_~iJ!&~-­
L. N. VESTAL, CDR,~_z_
t-rl" _Y- c .ce~-~j
· Appt·oved by:
R. E. BOX, CDR, USN
.
.
End ( 1 ) lu X·\ \":\:ISCEX scri:tl
--..C.lli_
ClASSIFIED BY NAVAIRINST 5511.4A
OF Jf1NUARY 1971
EXCLUDED FROM GDS
DECLI\SS I FY ON 31 DECEr1BER 1987
of
5
~larch 1975
.·~~\:(?
•
\ J
~ ~ ~
·. ..
,·_
•
~
64
fl213A
8810
~­
;
-e6NriOC-N·T-~l~I-R-E&--u?6t~GF-Eiol€1::e-st:JR&-(4-)~ iY\ <.~13
1
l
i
From:
To:
Commanding Officer, Naval liissile Center
Commander, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron FOUR
Subj:
Naval r.:issile Center Test Results of OPEVAL AIM-54A Hissile
Firing E-4 Firing Repor·t; fon:arding of
Ref:
(a') C0:10PTEVFOR 023016~ APR 75
(b) NAVAIR Task Number ASl0-5102/054-F/4\4-1627-0000
Encl:
(1) (C) Naval Missile Center Test Results of OPEVAL AIM-54A
Missile Firing E-4, Final Report
1. PHOENIX AIM-54A missile number 20024 was launched by Air Test and
Evaluation Squadron FOUR on 27 ~larch 1975 to satisfy the objectives
of PHOENIX Operational Eva1uation (OPEVAL) test E-4. The preliminary
results WE!re reported in reference (a). The Naval Missile Center
detailed final report is forwarded ns enclosure (1) in accordance with
. the technical support requirements for OPEVAL. as delineated in
reference (b).
·
i -~
: \
Internal copy to:
N213A {2 w/encl)
N200 (w/o encl)
~!210
.!
Ii
'
{\·1/encl }·
N120
(w/encl}
(w/encl)
1623 (3. 2 w/o encl)
fl213A {retain)
N3GO
Prepared 1:-y:
U. BERGEN/AS
EXT. 8977
23 April 1975
I
I
I
i
I
I
. l_
l
I
I
·l
I
~,_.
I
'-..;
-i
\
I
··-----·--------·- ---·-
\
I
L._ ___________ , _________________ -·--------·-·--· - · - · -·--·· . ---··-··
'=·
i~
t;
1
~'
~:
fj
iifi
i<
NAVAL mSSILE CENTER
FLIGHT TEST DIVISION
Ij
TEST RESULTS
OPERATIONAL EVALUATION (OPEVAL)
OF PHOENIX AIM-54A
MISSILE FIRING E-4
FINAL REPORT
ii
H
l'
{~
li
I'
t
~
~t:
23 APRIL 1975
'"l1
El
."
Prepared by:
t~
t
MR. M. BERGEN
r
•'
_f;,
!·
Submitted by:
t
:
D. E. COI·ILES, CDR, USN
-
t
I
!
I
I
Approved by:
i'
l
~
I
D. T.
SCH~IAAB,
COR. USt:
-I
.i
1
!
:l
I!I!
j
I
I
:;
I
iI
.~
t:
!'
f!.
~
.,:!
.f'
~;
·'
t~
~-
f~
I
i
I
"'
..
I
I
i
i
l
;,
CLASSIFIED-BY NAVAIRINST 551l.4A
I'
OF JANUARY 1971
EXGLU!JED FROil, GDS
DECLASSIFY ON 31 DECHISER 1987
~
,~;;
·~!
'
..r!~
I
~
I
I
II
I
i
t
~
}:f
I
I
i
l
L-..----------·-. ·-----~--. -· _ . . . ---------------·-------- ·- · . . ·-·---- ---------·- -----------· -------------· ____________J
~::..'
••
1
l'!'
!>
i'
t~
~-:;
l'
~--
l
J:.
:l'
Ji
.j:..:!
;
l
APPENDIX G
FLIGHT TEST PLAN FORMAT
66
67
!TEST PLAN FOR1·1AT
Test plans may be composed of the below listed sections and s
sections. Depending upon the complexity of the tests. envolved all
the sub-sections may not be required. However, all sections are c
sidered necessary, and all astricked sub-sections will be addresse
Front Cover
Table of Contents
i<ey Personnel
I.
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
- Contractors
Previous Tests
AIRTASKS *
B. Purpose of Test*
c. Chronologi:*
- Due dates
- Lead time requirements
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
A. Descr1ption of ~j2ment to be Tested*
B. O[!er:_ation oi_j:ou·iprr;ent to be Tested*
III. TEST DESCRIPTION
A. S~QPe of the Test*
- Environmental requirements/restrictions
- Operational restrictions/limitations*
'
B.
L
- Specification requirements*
- Specific questions to be answered*
Method of Test*
- Theory (\·Jhere necessary)
- Test procedures
Rationale for specific tests
- Test instrume~tation/equipment
Criteria for assessing data obtained in tests
(ALL SUBSEQUENT
SUB~SECTIONS
MUST BE ADDRESSED)
-------·------------1
bof
n•
68
. IV.
CONDUCT OF TEST
A. Preflight and Operational
B.
V.
Co~ntdown
- Leadtime for flight/ground preparation
- Countdown
- Responsibility for preflight/checkout
leading/arming etc
Operaticn_al Procedures (for apropos tests)
1. Launch Flights
(a) No-go items
- Switchology
- Procedure
Safety
2. Captive Flights
(a) No-go items
- Swtichology
- Procedure
- Safety
3. Separation Flights
{a) No-go items
- Svd tcho 1ogy
- Procedure
- Safety
4. Ground Tests.
- Switchology
Procuedure
- Safety
C. Test Parameters
(Refer here to Appendices for mission profiles, etc.)
SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS
A. Personnel
B. Aircraft
- Type·
Loading
- Chase/Photo
69
~-.-·.---------·------·-----------·--.
I
I
c.
Instrumentation
______ .
1. On Bou.rd
2. Telemetry.
Format
- Frequencies
- Presentations required real time
3. Type data X, Y, z accuracy required
4. Radar
5. The.odo 1i te
D. Targets
~_,
1.
2.
E.
Type
Configuration
- Ni ss Distance Indico.tor ·
Photographs
Heapons
1.
Type
.
- Harhe'ld
-
,_
2.
F.
Tele~o:ctl'Y
Packilge
Hazard Safety l'equi ;-ernents
_Bange Area_
1. Range Safety. Footpdnt
2. \>leather
- Ninimums
- Sun posit{on
- Sea state
G.
Data
Requirement~
1.
Specific Data Points Required
2.
1\cqui~ition
- Fl.ight CreN
Format
Dat<~ Reduction
3. Analysis
- Responsibility
- Support ~nd Coordination
- Charts, graphs, tables
4. Evaluation
70
furpose of_1est
This fs a brief
stat~nent
of
th~ purpos~
of the project.
The
project directive questions \'/hich are to be ansi·tel·ed as a result of the·
test will be stated clearly and concisely.
Chronology
.
.
The Chronology is the anticipated ca1endar h·istory of the project.
A Chronology should indicate major milestone dates such as:
a. AIRTASK/Job Ordei' received.
b. Tht: project aircr.uft and/or equipmen·c received.
c. Instrumentation installed.
d. Flight test to conwence.
e. Any anticipated prolonged delays
in PAR, for example).!
f. All tests to be completed.
g. Report to be completed.
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
Descrioti!_).n_of ~n;_ent to be Tested
This sub-sectibn should describe only the article tested, d~fine
differences bet\'::oen the test article and the item the test article n1p~·~scnt
(ifpossible) and pertain only to those ite!nS v;hich a1·e directly related
to the evaluation.
This sub-section must include enough. descl"iptive
informatio_n to
.
meet the need:; of the reader \·:ho does not have ready access to hiindbooks or
other similar material but excessively detailed descriptiqn should be avoide •
OperatiQ_n of E_g_uipm2r.t to be Tested
This sub-section \·till be , very similar to the preceeding
sub.
.
section but will d~al with the operation of the test article vice the
(~ircraft
I
i
description of the article.
..
will be addressed.
TEST DESCRiPTION
Scope of Tests
This section tells what tests are to be conducted and the limits
of the test. If any r-estrictions on the test u.r::icle or test vehicle have
limited the scope, the restrictions should be included. If the restrictions
are 1eng thy, they shou1 d be put ·; n an app!:ndix.
The Scope of Tests l'lill 'include a list of the specification·
requirements against \thich the equipment is to be teste.d. If this list
________________
.__
Al1 significant operation features
-
'
71
r-I
1 ·....
----··--------~~----~~----~
.
VI.
REPORTS
- Responsibility
- Type
- Distribution
Due Date
FROIH COVER
The cover.of the test plan \'1'111 contain the title, the date, the
names of the project officer and/or project engineer preparing the test
plan, the Branch Head submitting the test plan and the Division Head
approving the test plan, the security classification and the NAVMISCEN
distl'ibution. The title should be the same as that of the AIRTASK/Hork
Unit if the title meets the requil'ements fo.r report titles; othenlise the
report should be given a title 1·1hich meets these rE-quireHJents:
a.
The nature 6f the project.
b.
c.
The equipment/weapon tested.
Significant limitation of the te~~~.
If possible, the title should b~ unclassified:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A tab i e of contents is requit·ed if the numbe~ of pages in the .body
of the test plan is greuter than 15, but may·be used in shorter test plans.
A table of CC'ltents normally lists all primary and secondary headings,
begining with Key Personnel.
KEY PERSONNEL
The Key Personnel listed \'li11 be on1y the key personne·1 \'Jithin the
NJl.Vf•1ISCEN/Point Hugu complex.
rank or by t~r., as appl'opriate.
These personne1
will. be . listed by military
.
First names are uormally not appropriate.
INTRODUCTION.
Background
The background introduces the project to the reader. It should
state as s'imply as possible hovt and why the project came into being, but
must include the AIRTASK number and the Naval t1issile Center Job Order
Specifications.
L____
4
APPENDIX H
FINAL LAUNCH REPORT
FO&~AT
_______j
l
L_.
_________.
72
·--------"---
-~----
-~---
----
----~---
----------- ·- ------ ---------- ----------
---~-------·---·----··-...;
I
RCPORT FORW\T
FOR
REPORTING MISSILE ~IRING
Letter of
I
Tl~ansmitta i
Title Page
Surnmar·y
·rable of Contents. (Optional)
I.
II.
INTRODUCTION
A.
Backgl'OJ...!_nd
B.
Purpose of Test
TEST DESCRIPTION
A.
ScoQe of Test
B.
System Descriptio[
C.
Instrumentation
D.
Chronolog_y
E.
Test Parameters (brief table)
III. TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
i
I
IV.
A.
Pre(l ight Testii!.9._
C.
l~issile
D.
Missile Guidance Performance
E.
Missile : uzin~
Receiver Performance
Performan~~
CONCLUSIONS
I
I"
APPENDICES
'
I
L_________----.------·------·-------------·--·····---·------··-··- ·-·-··-----·------------·-----J
74
-·--------·-
.Let tc·r of Tro 11srii1tEJl ···----- · ·------- ------ · --------·-- --------·--···------------ ---------------.,
·----
The letter vlill be shot~t.
!
It will g~ve the missile number, ~he
j
'
; 1aunch date, the l auncil_ agency, and the reporting agency (NAVi'llSCEN). i
i
'
!
I
'It will refet·ence the test plan, the initial message, and the I·WJI.\ISCEN
I
! task document .
. !
;Title Paae
i
oJ
The cover of the report
~ill
contain the title, the date, the
nJ.me(s) of the author(s), and the security classincation.
Summary
The summary is a synopsis of the body of the t·eport and should
briefly state the launch agency, the basic test objectives, the
elementary t·esults, and if the objectives wel'·e achieved:
If.
at ail
possible, it should be unclassified.
The table of contents is not required, but if used, should
corit~in
I
I
a list of the rr:ajor headings, the appendices c.nd the references.
I.
I
i
INTRODUCTION
.I
Should provide the reader with all the background information on
!
i
the program required to understand why the test was attempted and. why
!
we are reporting on it (ie, test objectives, air tasks, pertinent
agencies, reporting objectives).
Jhis section should also reference
the initial launch message or any other reporting pertinent to this
test.
; II.
TEST DESCRIPTION
Ii ·
This section should provide a descri.ption of· the weapon system,;
l
~-
I
particulal'ly any peculiarities o·r special modifications. the scope
j
I~-of-the-tests-;--any sp_ecial. instrumentat1on.
.
.
.
I
pert1nent
__d at~_?_re___1f.!t]ll.9...1
75
~-
.
. I. ..
·f
to preparation or conduct of th~ test, and tiae d~si red and acta.J~l test
Pil ramcter·s (a brief tab 1e in the body 0 f th(> repot·t ·j s <tp[H'Opri ate j.
III. TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
i.
i
This is the meat of the reptJrt and should contain all ev·idence ·
leading to the conclusions.
It should provide a complete analysis
-of the launch.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
lhis section provides a brief description of the
comp~cte
test and
results with conclusions and a statement of the completion of test
obje:::tives.
APPENDICES
The appendices should have a cover page Nhich llsts the contents.
The. appendi.ces must be referenced end used in the text_, and should contain
the detailed data which supports the text.
I
I__________
[
!
I.
"';""""""-·•
-·---------- ------------..·--------
I
·-··· ---- --------------------·---- --- ____ , _________ ~----- ..- - - - - - - ____ _J