111TH CONGRESS
" HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1st Session
!
REPORT
111–149
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2010
JUNE 12, 2009.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of
the Union and ordered to be printed
Mr. MOLLOHAN, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
[To accompany H.R. 2847]
The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in
explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for
Commerce, Justice, Science, and related agencies for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.
INDEX TO BILL AND REPORT
Page Number
Bill
Report
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Title I—Department of Commerce ............................................................
Title II—Department of Justice ................................................................
Title III—Science ........................................................................................
Office of Science and Technology Policy ............................................
National Aeronautics and Space Administration .............................
National Science Foundation .............................................................
Title IV—Related Agencies ........................................................................
Commission on Civil Rights ...............................................................
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ..................................
International Trade Commission .......................................................
Legal Services Corporation ................................................................
Marine Mammal Commission ............................................................
Office of the United States Trade Representative ...........................
State Justice Institute ........................................................................
Title V—General Provisions ......................................................................
2
22
66
66
67
73
76
76
77
78
78
79
80
80
81
50–267
VerDate Nov 24 2008
07:29 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6659
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
10
51
129
130
131
153
160
160
161
162
162
163
163
164
165
2
BILL TOTALS
The President’s fiscal year 2010 budget request for activities
funded in the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Act totals $64,637,341,000 in new obligation authority,
of which $222,300,000 is for mandatory programs. The amounts
recommended by the Committee in the accompanying bill total
$64,415,041,000, $197,270,000 below the budget request and
$6,763,530,000 above the sums available to the departments and
agencies funded in this bill for fiscal year 2009, excluding emergency supplemental appropriations.
COMMITTEE BUDGET REVIEW PROCESS
During its review of the fiscal year 2010 budget request and execution of appropriations for fiscal year 2009, the Subcommittee on
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies held a total of
24 budget hearings. The Subcommittee received testimony from
Members of Congress and some 68 outside witnesses. In addition,
officials from the Administration representing the departments and
agencies funded in this bill testified before the Subcommittee. This
year, in particular, the Subcommittee focused a series of hearings
on investments for all facets of the science enterprise, climate
science and mitigation, as well as prisoner reentry programs, recidivism reduction, and criminal justice reform.
In developing its recommendations, the Committee has drawn
upon work and analysis of the Government Accountability Office,
the Congressional Research Service, offices of Inspectors General,
the National Academies and the Committee’s own surveys and investigations staff. The Committee appreciates the assistance and
contributions of the men and women of these organizations.
OVERVIEW
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
INVESTMENTS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Regaining our economic strength is critical to our national security. In order to improve the economic condition and to ensure longterm American prosperity, investments in science and technology
are required and will underpin future economic growth. As clearly
stated in the Rising Above the Gathering Storm report of the National Academy of Sciences, healthy levels of investment in scientific research are the key to long-term economic growth that exceeds population growth. These investments improve the quality of
life for all Americans and improve our national security.
The America Competes Act (Public Law 110–69) authorized
major increases in funding for the National Science Foundation
(NSF), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
and the Department of Energy Office of Science. This legislation
has led to major funding increases for these programs in both Public Law 111–8, the Omnibus Appropriations Act for 2009, and Public Law 111–5, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA). However, missing from this plan of increased investments
in science and technology funding are critical elements of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which
equally support the science enterprise of our Nation. In testimony
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
3
before the Subcommittee, both Dr. Ralph Cicerone and Dr. Lennard
Fisk noted that NASA’s science activities and NOAA research are
not markedly different or less important than other science disciplines funded by the NSF and NIST, and that there was little
reason for their exclusion from the doubling path envisioned in the
America Competes Act. The Subcommittee recommendation considers the robust budget requests for those activities authorized in
the America Competes Act in this context; accordingly, the Subcommittee provides appropriate increases for NSF and NIST, while
also providing appropriate and necessary increases for critical
science activities of NASA and NOAA. These agencies, collectively,
underpin our Nation’s science enterprise, and their collective research investment addresses the clear national needs.
While the economy is the major crisis confronting our Nation
today, climate change is a longer lasting threat to our future well
being. Through congressional testimony and numerous research papers, the science community has made clear that anthropogenic climate change has begun. The 40 percent increase in emissions of
greenhouse gases since 1990 is accelerating these changes, and as
the world economy recovers, these emissions will grow further.
While other legislation currently under consideration by the House
addresses mitigation, the responsibility for observing, understanding, predicting, and monitoring climate change falls primarily
to NOAA, NSF, and NASA—which are funded in this appropriations bill—and the United States Geological Service.
For the U.S. Government, NOAA leads the U.S. efforts in climate
study and has begun to form a National Climate Service that will
work in federation with other U.S. federal agencies and nations.
NOAA’s responsibility will continue to include long-term observations from space and ground-based systems but will also extend beyond NOAA’s traditional role in weather and predictions of climate.
While NOAA’s climate products and services must guide and monitor mitigation, adaptation will be required. NOAA requires increased resources to implement the National Climate Service and
mitigate the risks to the operational satellite observing systems in
polar and geostationary orbits. The Subcommittee recommendation
endorses and advances these critical efforts.
The Subcommittee recommendation also supports the work of the
NSF and NASA in climate change study and mitigation. NSF supports significant research in a broad range of research on climate
change and critical continuing observations through its long-term
ecological research sites and oceanographic cruises. While NSF
funding has been growing over the past several years, Earth
science funding at NASA has decreased more than one-third during
the past eight years. NASA’s Earth science programs and activities
seek to understand how Earth is changing and determine the consequences of those changes for life on our planet. Restoring the
Earth science budget continues to be a priority for the Subcommittee.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
PRISONER REENTRY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM
In 1974, American Sociologist Robert Martinson co-authored a report concluding that rehabilitative efforts had little impact on reducing recidivism, and that report formed the basis of a school of
thought referred to as ‘‘nothing works.’’ The ‘‘nothing works’’ con-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
4
cept has informed much of this country’s approach to criminal justice over the following decades, as the Federal and State governments came to rely on lengthy incarceration and truth-in-sentencing at the expense of rehabilitation. The result has been an increasing number of Americans under some form of criminal justice
supervision.
According to the Pew Center on the States, the number of people
imprisoned in the United States grew by approximately three percent per year between 1995 and 2005, compared to an overall population growth rate of one percent. In March 2009, the Pew Center
on the States released a report stating that the incarcerated population in the United States in 2008 reached 2.3 million, meaning
that one in 100 adults was in prison or jail. In addition, according
to that report, one in 31 Americans (7.3 million) in 2008 was under
some form of correctional supervision—either in jail, on probation,
or under some form of supervised release—compared to one in 77
in the early 1980s. The tables have turned, and it is now clear that
a primarily punitive approach to criminal justice does not work.
Moreover, the Federal and State governments can no longer afford
a criminal justice approach that is not based on clear evidence
about what does work.
More recent research, referred to as ‘‘what works,’’ has largely
debunked the conclusion that rehabilitation programs are ineffective. The determinative factor in whether rehabilitation is successful is whether it is evidence-based, fully implemented, and whether
it coordinates a full complement of rehabilitative services designed
to meet the needs of individual offenders, including drug abuse
treatment, vocational training, and educational services. Drug
abuse treatment is particularly important because reducing the
cravings associated with addiction is a prerequisite for allowing an
offender to make productive use of other rehabilitation services and
other opportunities for becoming productive members of society.
The Subcommittee conducted seven hearings focused on the challenges facing offenders as they reenter communities, programs that
facilitate reentry and reduce recidivism, and the state of research
on ‘‘what works’’ for offender reentry. An eighth hearing focused on
efforts by many states to reform fundamentally their criminal justice systems in a way that responsibly reduces prison populations
while reinvesting a portion of the associated savings on services to
prevent crime and reduce recidivism.
Witness testimony from researchers, practitioners, and corrections officials formed a consensus that insufficient resources and
attention are currently invested, at both the Federal and State levels, in evidence-based strategies for employing alternatives to incarceration; helping offenders transition back to society following
incarceration; and reducing recidivism. As a result, State and Federal prison populations continue to grow at an unsustainable rate,
with many of the same offenders being repeatedly recycled through
the country’s prisons at great expense to the taxpayer. Resources
provided in this bill are intended to spur and support evidencebased strategies and programs, at both the Federal and State levels, to reduce recidivism and improve the criminal justice system.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
5
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
MAJOR THEMES
AND INITIATIVES
The bill recommends funding for a diverse set of essential government activities that address the present needs of our country
and economy while preparing for and investing in our future as a
Nation.
Addressing law enforcement priorities.—In total, the bill provides
in excess of $26,861,981,000 for law enforcement activities, an increase of $1,595,043,000 over the 2009 enacted level. Investments
recommended by the Committee provide for:
• more than $585,000,000 to enhance and expand national
security programs at the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Prisons and others;
• $62,600,000 in new funding to address white collar crime,
including corporate fraud and tax evasion, and return resources to the Federal fisc;
• $23,700,000 in new funds to reinvigorate and expand civil
rights enforcement against racial, ethnic, sexual preference, religious and gender discrimination;
• $3,423,988,000 for grants to state and local law enforcement agencies, including $298,000,000 to put new police officers on the beat and $100,000,000 for ex-offender reentry initiatives;
• $70,600,000 for new correctional officer staffing at Federal
prisons to improve the safety and security of inmates and
guards; and
• $345,900,000 in new Department-wide activities to safeguard the southwest border, address Mexican cartel violence
and support activities of the Department of Homeland Security.
Science and technology.—The Committee recommendation includes $30,571,851,000 to support investments in science and technology, including science, technology, engineering and mathematics
(STEM) education, an increase of $1,049,255,000 over last year.
The Committee bill provides:
• $6,936,510,000 for the National Science Foundation, an increase of 6.9 percent over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level,
which maintains NSF on a doubling path. Within this level,
$862,900,000 is recommended for education programs of NSF,
such as Noyce Scholarships, the math and science partnership
program, and support for hands-on, inquiry-based instruction;
• $18,203,300,000 for NASA, an increase of $421,915,000
over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level. Investments in NASA
contribute to economic vitality, science and technology, national security and an improved quality of life. Within the
funds recommended for NASA, over $500,000,000 is provided
for critical investments in aeronautics research and development to maintain U.S. leadership in aeronautics, to plan for
and implement the Next Generation Air Transportation System and to invest in ‘‘green’’ aircraft technologies. Further,
over $175,000,000 is recommended for education programs, an
increase of nearly $50,000,000 over the request;
• more than $4,600,000,000 for activities of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, an increase of
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
6
$237,745,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and
$129,125,000 over the budget request. Within the funds recommended for NOAA, nearly $400,000,000 is provided for climate change research; regional climate assessments; enhanced
modeling capabilities; ocean observations and coral reef conservation; climate data records, and data access and archiving;
and a more robust education program focused on climate, including the transition of the GLOBE program from NASA to
NOAA. Full funding is also provided for acquisition, construction and operations of the GOES–R, NPOESS and NPP satellites, and Jason 3, which will provide sea surface elevation
and ocean circulation measurements. Within the recommendation, the requested increase of $56,500,000 for Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act activities to end overfishing by 2012
is fully funded. Funding is provided above the request in areas
of critical need such as protected species recovery, habitat restoration and coastal and estuarine land conservation.
• over $781,000,000 for the National Institute of Standards
and Technology, which includes an 8 percent increase for
science research and technical services over the fiscal year
2009 enacted level. Within the recommendation, $124,700,000
is provided for the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships program and $69,900,000 for the Technology Innovation Program,
the same as the request, which leverage private funds to invest
in research and development and improve manufacturing productivity and job creation.
• increases above the budget request to strengthen NSF,
NOAA and NASA education programs. The Committee recognizes that sustained enhancement of the scientific and technical capability of the American workforce requires more than
increased support for research and graduate education. Investments must be made in effective STEM education for students
in grades K–12 in both formal and informal settings.
Global climate change and sustainability.—The Committee has
provided over $2,000,000,000 in resources to address the reality of
global warming climate change and its effect on Earth’s environments, over $120,000,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level.
Specifically, the bill provides:
• nearly $1,300,000,000 in climate change programs at
NASA, including nearly $150,000,000 to develop and demonstrate space-based climate measurements identified by the
National Academy of Sciences and the science community;
• nearly $400,000,000 for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, of which more than $200,000,000 is to
enhance climate change research and regional assessments;
$90,000,000 enhances climate data records and data access and
archiving requirements; and $29,300,000 is for climate change
educational programs;
• nearly $310,000,000 for climate change programs at the
National Science Foundation;
• over $52,000,000 for educational programs directed at climate change as recommended by the National Academy of
Sciences;
• at least $25,000,000 for ‘‘green’’ building initiatives within
the Economic Development Administration;
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
7
• $14,500,000 for greenhouse gas emission standards development by the National Institute for Standards and Technology; and
• additional resources above the request to enhance the protection of endangered and threatened species, increase habitat
restoration and coastal and estuarine land conservation, and
monitor mammal adaptation to climate change.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
BY
MAJOR AGENCY
Department of Commerce.—In title I of this bill, the Committee
recommends a total of $13,847,433,000, an increase of
$4,579,916,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level. Highlights
of the Committee’s recommendation include:
• $293,000,000 for the Economic Development Administration, an increase of $9,000,000 over the request;
• $7,374,731,000 for the Bureau of the Census, an increase
of $4,234,881,000 above fiscal year 2009, and the same level as
the budget request;
• $781,100,000 for the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, which includes $194,600,000 for the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships and the Technology Innovation
Program. The bill includes $510,000,000 for scientific and technical research, which is $38,000,000 over fiscal year 2009; and
• $4,602,941,000 for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, which is $237,745,000 above fiscal year 2009
and $129,125,000 over the request.
Department of Justice.—In title II of this bill, the Committee recommends a total of $27,746,672,000, an increase of $672,762,000
over the budget request and $1,659,051,000 over the fiscal year
2009 enacted level. Highlights of the Committee’s recommendation
include:
• $7,851,537,000 for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including sufficient funding to annualize terrorism supplemental
costs into the Bureau’s base budget;
• $2,019,682,000 for the Drug Enforcement Administration
and $1,105,772,000 for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, including more than $42,000,000 in new
resources to fight narcotics and firearms trafficking at the
southwest border;
• $6,176,675,000 for the Federal Prison System, an increase
of $97,400,000 over the request, to address overburdened conditions in our federal prisons; and
• $3,423,988,000 for state and local law enforcement assistance, including the Office on Violence Against Women, the Office of Justice Programs, and the Office of Community Oriented
Policing Services.
Science.—In title III of this bill, the Committee recommends a
total of $25,146,964,000, an increase of $868,876,000 over the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level. Highlights of the Committee’s recommendation include:
• $6,936,510,000 for the NSF, an increase of $446,100,000
over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level, maintaining NSF on a
doubling path;
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
8
• $18,203,300,000 for the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, an increase of $420,915,000 over the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level; and
• $7,154,000 for the Office of Science and Technology Policy
of the Executive Office of the President.
Related agencies.—In title IV of this bill, the Committee recommends a total of $956,160,000, roughly equivalent to the budget
request and almost $83,763,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted
level. Highlights of the Committee’s recommendation include:
• $440,000,000 for the Legal Services Corporation, an increase of $50,000,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level;
• $367,303,000 for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which is $23,378,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted
level; and
• funding for the Commission on Civil Rights, United States
Trade Representative, International Trade Commission and
State Justice Institute at levels equal to the budget request.
TERMINATIONS, REDUCTIONS AND OTHER SAVINGS
In order to invest in the critical priorities identified in this bill,
and in an effort to build an economy on a solid foundation for
growth and put the Nation on a path toward prosperity, the Committee has proposed herein a number of program terminations, reductions and other savings from the fiscal year 2009 level totaling
over $1.3 billion. In addition, over $1 billion in other program terminations, reductions and other savings from the budget request
are recommended. These adjustments, no matter their size, are important to setting the right priorities within the spending allocation, for getting the deficit under control, and creating a government that is as efficient as it is effective.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
REPROGRAMMING
AND
SPENDING PLAN PROCEDURES
The reprogramming process is based on comity between the Congress and the Executive branch. This process is intended to provide
departments and agencies sufficient flexibility to meet changing
circumstances and emergent requirements not known at the time
of Congressional review of the budget, while preserving Congressional priorities and intent. In the absence of comity and respect
for the prerogatives of Congress, the Committee may choose to restrict further or eliminate reprogramming authority. Under such
circumstances, programs, projects and activities become more
strictly defined and the executive branch loses its ability to propose
changes in the use of appropriated funds.
The Committee expects that each department and agency funded
in this Act shall follow the directions set forth in this Act and the
accompanying report, and shall not reallocate resources or reorganize activities except as provided herein. Reprogramming procedures shall apply to funds provided in this Act, unobligated balances from previous appropriations Acts that are available for obligation or expenditure in fiscal year 2010, and non-appropriated resources such as fee collections that are used to meet program requirements in fiscal year 2010. In reiterating the Committee’s reprogramming procedures here, which are codified as section 505 of
this Act, the Committee expects that the Appropriations Sub-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
9
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
committees on the Departments of Commerce, Justice, Science and
Related Agencies of the House and Senate will be notified by letter
a minimum of 15 days prior to—
(1) reprogramming of funds, whether permanent or temporary, in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent, whichever is less,
between programs or activities. This provision is also applicable in cases where several activities are involved with each receiving less than $500,000. In addition, the Committee is to be
notified of reprogramming actions which are less than these
amounts if such actions would have the effect of committing
the agency to significant funding requirements in future years;
(2) increasing funds or personnel by any means for any
project or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted;
(3) relocating offices or employees;
(4) reorganizing offices, programs, or activities;
(5) contracting out or privatizing any functions or activities
presently performed by Federal employees; or
(6) proposing to use funds directed for a specific activity by
either the House or the Senate for a different purpose.
Furthermore, the reprogramming authorities do not allow the obligation of funds to create or initiate any new program, project or
activity.
Any reprogramming request shall include any out-year budgetary
impacts and a separate accounting of program or mission impacts
on estimated carryover funds. No changes shall be made to any
program, project or activity, except as provided by the Committee,
if it is to be construed to be a change in policy. Any program,
project or activity cited in the reports of the House or Senate accompanying this Act or the conference agreement shall be construed as the position of the Committee and shall not be subject
to reductions or reprogramming without prior approval of the Committee. The Committee further expects any department or agency
funded in this Act which plans a reduction-in-force to notify by letter the Appropriations Committees of the House and Senate 30
days in advance of the date of any such planned personnel action.
The Committee notes that when a department or agency submits
a reprogramming or transfer request to the Appropriations Committees of the House and Senate and does not receive identical responses from the House and Senate, it shall be the responsibility
of the department or agency seeking the reprogramming to reconcile the differences between the two bodies before proceeding. If
reconciliation is not possible, the items in disagreement in the reprogramming or transfer request shall be considered unapproved.
Lastly, the Committee directs the Departments of Commerce and
Justice, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and
the National Science Foundation to submit spending plans, signed
by the respective department or agency head, for the Committee’s
review within 120 days of enactment of this Act.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
10
TITLE I—COMMERCE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION
OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 .................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request 1 .................................................................
Recommended in the bill 1 .................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
1 Includes
$429,870,000
449,704,000
444,504,000
+14,634,000
¥5,200,000
$9,439,000 in offsetting fee collections.
The mission of the International Trade Administration is to create economic opportunity for U.S. workers and firms by promoting
international trade, opening foreign markets, ensuring compliance
with trade laws and agreements, and supporting U.S. commercial
interests at home and abroad.
The Committee recommendation includes $444,504,000 in total
resources for the programs of the International Trade Administration (ITA) for fiscal year 2010, which is $14,634,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level and provides for the agency’s highest priorities.
The Committee understands the difficulties of attempting to balance the positive and negative effects of a free trade agenda. The
Committee is determined to ensure that the United States Government upholds its responsibility to enforce trade laws, particularly
with China. If trading partners do not abide by the rules that are
set in the global trading system, United States firms are unable to
compete on a level playing field. The United States Government
has an obligation to ensure that U.S. companies are not forced to
compete with foreign companies that are engaged in unfair trading
practices.
The Committee continues to direct ITA to submit to the Committee, not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act, a
spending plan for all ITA units that incorporates any carryover balances from prior fiscal years and expects this plan to be updated
to reflect the obligation of funds on a quarterly basis.
Import Administration.—This program investigates antidumping
and countervailing duty cases to ensure compliance with applicable
U.S. statutes and administers certain other statutory programs relating to imports and foreign trade zones. The Committee urges the
ITA to implement proactive trade enforcement activities, including
textile safeguard actions with respect to China’s World Trade Organization Accession Agreement, bilateral quotas on non-WTO members, and textile provision of the United States preferential programs and agreements.
China Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Activities.—The
Committee recommendation designates funding of no less than
$7,000,000 for the Office of China Compliance, and no less than
$4,400,000 for the China Countervailing Duty Group within Import
Administration. The Office of China Compliance is dedicated to the
enforcement of anti-dumping law with respect to China and other
non-market economy countries. The Committee expects to be notified of any impediments to hiring or retaining the required staff expertise to conduct this work. The China Countervailing Duty Group
was established in fiscal year 2009 to accommodate the workload
that has resulted from the application of countervailing duty law
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
11
to imports from non-market economy countries. The Committee
also encourages ITA to allocate additional resources above the request to the activities of both these offices.
Market Access and Compliance (MAC).—The Committee continues to support the efforts of the ITA to enforce trade agreements
aggressively. MAC develops strategies to overcome market access
obstacles faced by U.S. businesses by monitoring foreign country
compliance with multilateral and bilateral trade-related agreements and identifying compliance and other market access obstacles.
Manufacturing and Services.—This program focuses on both the
domestic and international aspects of U.S. industrial competitiveness by working with U.S. industries to evaluate the needs of the
U.S. manufacturing and service sectors; conducting economic and
regulatory analysis to strengthen U.S. industry; obtaining input
and advice from U.S. industries for trade policy setting; and participating, as appropriate, with ITA trade policy and negotiation
advancement initiatives.
Executive Direction and Administration.—These programs provide policy leadership, information technology (IT) support and administration services for all of ITA. Executive Direction includes
the Office of the Under Secretary for International Trade and subordinate offices covering Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs,
Public Affairs, and the Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Trade promotion and the U.S. & Foreign Commercial Service.—
The Commercial Service conducts trade promotion programs intended to broaden and deepen the base of U.S. exports, particularly
of small and medium-sized firms; provides American companies
with reliable advice on the range of public and private assistance
available and knowledgeable support for all other Federal trade
promotion services; offers export assistance through information,
referral and follow-up services through its integrated global field
network; ensures adequate support for compliance and leads interagency advocacy efforts for major overseas projects, including early
involvement in project development and assistance to resolve postexport transaction problems.
Travel expenditures.—The Committee expects the Department to
submit quarterly reports to the Committee regarding ITA’s travel
expenditures, including separate breakouts of funding, number of
trips and the purposes of travel to both China and India.
Human rights training.—An understanding and appreciation of
human rights issues and impacts is essential to the pursuit of
international trade and commercial opportunities. The Committee
continues to support ITA’s efforts to ensure that American commercial officers and locally-engaged staff receive training on human
rights. The Committee expects ITA to devote no less than $500,000
for such training to ensure that, when counseling U.S. businesses
on market conditions with a particular country, employees include
information on human rights, rule of law, and corporate responsibility. In addition, ITA shall report to the Committee sixty days
after the enactment of this Act with an annual human rights training plan.
Facilitating exports with the People’s Republic of China.—Not
later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the Committee on Appropria-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
12
tions of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on
the status of the current program and the feasibility of providing
additional assistance to small- and medium-sized businesses in the
United States for purposes of facilitating exports of United States
goods to the People’s Republic of China (the PRC). The report shall
incude, but is not limited to the Department’s ability to provide
small- and medium-sized businesses with: (1) assistance to find and
utilize Federal and private resources to facilitate entering into the
market of the PRC; (2) continuous direct and personal contact with
businesses that have entered the market of the PRC; (3) assistance
to resolve disputes with the Government of the United States or
the PRC relating to intellectual property rights violations, export
restrictions, and additional trade barriers; (4) the location and recruitment of businesses to enter the market of the PRC; (5) trade
missions to the PRC; and (6) consolidation of fees charged by the
Department for Gold Key matching services provided for businesses
that export goods or services produced in the United States to more
than one market in the PRC. The report shall include cost estimates for any additional services not currently provided, the effect
of any fee reductions, and the number of additional personnel required.
Within the appropriation, $3,715,000 is provided for the following
activities:
BUREAU
OF INDUSTRY AND
SECURITY
OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION
$83,676,000
100,342,000
100,342,000
+16,666,000
............................
The mission of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is to
advance U.S. national security, foreign policy, and economic objectives by ensuring an effective export control and treaty compliance
system and promoting continued U.S. strategic technology leadership.
The Committee recommends $100,342,000 for BIS, which is
$16,666,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level and the same as the
budget request. Of the amount provided, $14,767,000 is for inspections and other activities related to national security. The recommendation includes $10,000,000 for the cyber espionage and sys-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 02 here 49735A.001
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
13
tem modernization initiative and $1,800,000 for the WMD and IED
nonproliferation initiative.
Management and Policy Coordination (MPC).—The Management
and Policy Coordination program supports all Bureau performance
goals. MPC develops, analyzes, and coordinates policy initiatives
within BIS and on an interagency basis.
Export Administration (EA).—The Export Administration carries
out BIS programs related to export control regulations, export licenses, treaty compliance, treaty obligations relating to weapons of
mass destruction, and the defense industrial and technology base
to meet national security needs. EA regulates the export of dualuse items determined to require export licenses for reasons of national security, nonproliferation, foreign policy, or short supply; ensures that approval or denial of license applications is consistent
with U.S. economic and security concerns; promotes an understanding of export control regulations within the business community; represents the Department in interagency and international
fora relating to export controls, particularly multilateral regimes;
monitors and seeks to ensure the availability of industrial resources for national defense under the authority of the Delegation
of Procurement Authority; analyzes the impact of export controls
on strategic industries; and assesses the security consequences for
the United States of certain foreign investments.
Export Enforcement (EE).—The Export Enforcement program detects and prevents the illegal export of controlled goods and technology. EE investigates and helps sanction violators of U.S. export
control, anti-terrorist and public safety laws and regulations; educates the business community to help prevent violations; and administers the Export Administration Act (EAA) (which expired on
August 19, 2001, but the provisions of which remain in force under
the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Executive Order 13222, as extended most recently by the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 44551 (August 7, 2006)) provisions restricting participation in foreign boycotts.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$272,800,000
284,000,000
293,000,000
+20,200,000
+9,000,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The mission of the Economic Development Administration (EDA)
is to lead the Federal economic development agenda by promoting
innovation and competitiveness, preparing American regions for
growth and success in the worldwide economy.
The Committee recommendation includes $293,000,000 for the
programs and administrative expenses of the EDA for fiscal year
2010, which is $20,200,000 above fiscal year 2009, and $9,000,000
above the request. The total recommendation for EDA consists of
the amounts appropriated in the following two accounts.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
14
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 .................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
1 Up
$240,000,000
246,000,000
255,000,000
+15,000,000
+9,000,000
to $4 million may be transferred to S&E for grants administration and management.
Economic Development Assistance Programs promote regional
economic development efforts that benefit distressed communities,
especially distressed rural communities. The Committee recommendation includes $255,000,000 for the Economic Development
Assistance programs, $15,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level.
Public Works.—The Committee provides $158,280,000 for Public
Works, $110,480,000 above the request and $25,000,000 above fiscal year 2009. The Committee believes that, given the current economic climate, these funds are critical to local communities and industries faced with increased economic pressures and dislocations
in the rapidly changing global economy.
Global Climate Change Mitigation Fund.—The Committee notes
the increased construction costs associated with the incorporation
of technologies and strategies that reduce energy consumption and
harmful gas emissions and contribute to sustainability. Within the
funds provided for Public Works, the Committee recommends no
less than $25,000,000 for the Global Climate Change Mitigation Incentive Fund, $8,500,000 above the request and $10,300,000 above
fiscal year 2009. The Committee emphasizes that to be successful
in today’s environment, economic development must address the effects of climate change, and directs EDA to expand the program beyond Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification. This can include renewable energy; energy efficiency;
reuse, restoration and recycling; green buildings; the development
of green products; the greening of an existing function, process or
activity; and the creation or renovation of a green building. The
Committee directs EDA to provide a report within 60 days of enactment of this Act, detailing the scope of the fund, the criteria for approval of fund expenditures, and the methodology EDA will employ
when reviewing grants.
Planning.—The Committee provides $31,000,000, the same as
the request, and directs the agency to continue to allocate funding
to the existing network of Economic Development Districts (EDDs),
consistent with last year’s direction. The continued support provides EDDs with the flexibility needed to engage local government,
business, and community leadership in setting and pursuing strategic job creation and retention initiatives effectively.
Technical Assistance.—The Committee provides an increase of
$400,000 over fiscal year 2009, and directs EDA to compete two additional University Centers each year, with the goal of ensuring
that each State has at least one Center. This will ensure that economically distressed communities are not further burdened by the
lack of representation and the need to share and stretch resources.
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).—While the Committee supports this program and the recently enacted authorization, EDA
must undertake efforts to improve overall organization, implementation and evaluation of its program before significant new invest-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
15
ments can be recommended by the Committee. In 2007, the Congressional Research Service reported that 61 percent of program
funds were spent on administration and TAA center (TAAC) operations, not on the projects for which firms applied for assistance.
The report states that EDA is unable to monitor and evaluate the
performance of either firms assisted or the TAACs, resulting in
limited evidence to determine program successes. The Committee
therefore directs EDA to institute such an evaluative process and
provide quarterly reports on the number of firms assisted, how that
assistance is quantified, and the value each TAAC adds to the process.
Economic adjustment assistance.—Within funding provided, the
Committee supports the efficiency gains of regional innovation clusters for applicants and the agency. The Committee directs EDA to
provide quarterly reports on progress and funding awards, and expects proven performance to continue the initiative. Funds are not
included for the proposed business incubator initiative as these activities are duplicative of programs administered by the Small
Business Administration.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$32,800,000
38,000,000
38,000,000
+5,200,000
............................
The administration of EDA’s Economic Development Assistance
Programs is carried out through a network of headquarters and regional offices. These activities include pre-application assistance
and development, application processing, and project monitoring as
well as general support functions such as economic development research, technical assistance, information dissemination, legal and
environmental compliance, financial management, budgeting and
debt management. The appropriation provides for the staffing levels as proposed in the budget request.
MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$29,825,000
31,000,000
31,000,000
+1,175,000
............................
The mission of the Minority Business Development Agency
(MBDA) is to achieve entrepreneurial parity for Minority Business
Enterprises (MBEs) by promoting their ability to grow and to compete in the global economy. MBDA helps minority-owned businesses obtain access to public and private debt and equity financing, market opportunities, and management and business information to increase business growth in the minority business community.
The Committee recommendation includes $31,000,000 for the
MBDA for fiscal year 2010. The recommendation is the same as the
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
16
request and $1,175,000 above fiscal year 2009. Within the appropriation, the Committee provides not less than $200,000 for the Office of Native American Business Development. The Committee expects the office to utilize the assistance of the Native American
Business Enterprise Centers to help fulfill its obligations to expand
business development, trade promotion and tourism opportunities
for Indian tribes and other Native American entities. Within the
appropriation, $900,000 is provided for the following activities, and
the agency is directed to work with the recipients to ensure that
projects meet the agency’s mission:
ECONOMICS
AND
STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$90,621,000
105,000,000
97,255,000
+6,634,000
¥7,745,000
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 04 here 49735A.002
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The mission of the Economics and Statistics Administration
(ESA) is to provide leadership and critical oversight of the Census
Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis. The mission of the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) is to promote the understanding
of the U.S. economy by providing timely, relevant, and accurate
economic accounts data. These statistics are key ingredients in decisions affecting interest and exchange rates, tax and budget projections, business investment plans, and the allocation of federal
funds, including programs such as Medicaid and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) among others. BEA prepares national, regional, industry and international accounts that present
essential information on such issues as economic growth, regional
economic development, inter-industry relationships and the Nation’s position in the world economy.
The Committee recommendation provides $97,255,000 for the
ESA, which is $6,634,000 above fiscal year 2009. This level provides funding for two new initiatives, including $1,500,000 to develop new estimation models for financial services statistics in
order to more accurately reflect the critical changes that are occurring in the financial sector of the U.S. economy; and $2,000,000 to
improve, accelerate, and expand county-level economic statistics.
17
BUREAU
OF THE
CENSUS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$3,139,850,000
7,374,731,000
7,374,731,000
+4,234,881,000
............................
The mission of the Bureau of the Census (Census) is to serve as
the leading source of quality data about the Nation’s people and
economy. To accomplish this mission, Census measures those
trends and segments of our population and economy most critical
to continued American success and prosperity. The Committee recommendation includes a total operating level of $7,374,731,000 for
the Bureau of the Census, which is $4,234,881,000 above fiscal
year 2009, excluding the $1,000,000,000 provided in the fiscal year
2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$233,588,000
259,024,000
259,024,000
+25,436,000
............................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
This appropriation provides for the collection, compilation, and
publication of a broad range of current economic, demographic, and
social statistics, to include current economic, general economic, foreign trade, and current demographic statistics, and survey development and data services. The Committee recommendation includes
$259,024,000 for the salaries and expenses of the Bureau of the
Census for fiscal year 2010, which is the same as the request and
$25,436,000 above fiscal year 2009.
Current economic statistics.—The business statistics program
provides current information on sales and related measures of retail and wholesale trade and selected service industries. Construction statistics are provided on significant construction activity,
while manufacturing statistics survey key industrial commodities
and manufacturing activities, providing current statistics on the
quantity and value of industrial output. Within this subactivity, an
increase of $11,661,000 allows for the expansion of an existing pilot
program into Longitudinal Employer Dynamics (LED), to provide
comprehensive and timely national, state, and local information on
worker job flows and businesses.
Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP).—The Committee provides $50,279,000, the same as the request and an increase of $4,579,000 over fiscal year 2009. Funds provided will ensure a full sample size and allow for improvements to the SIPP
system by fiscal year 2012, including updating computer programming; improving survey content; investigating, testing, and as appropriate, implementing an Event History Calendar; and security
enhancements to laptops used in the field.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
18
PERIODIC CENSUSES AND PROGRAMS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$2,906,262,000
7,115,707,000
7,115,707,000
+4,209,445,000
............................
The Committee recommendation includes a total of
$7,115,707,000 for all periodic censuses and related programs in
fiscal year 2010, which is $4,209,445,000 above fiscal year 2009
and the same as the request.
2010 Decennial Census Program.—The subactivity consists of
three highly integrated components: the American Community Survey (ACS), which collects detailed characteristics, which used to be
collected on the decennial long form, every year throughout the
decade; the Master Address File/Topographically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Enhancement
Program (MTEP), which realigns the TIGER map to take advantage of global positioning system capabilities, modernizes the processing system, and expands geographic partnerships; and the 2010
Census. Fiscal year 2010 is dedicated to final preparations and
completing the 2010 Census enumeration.
Field Data Collection Automation (FDCA) Contract Replan.—The
replan of the FDCA contract resulted in a significant overall increase in the life cycle cost of the Decennial Census, now estimated
at $14.7 billion. The Committee directs the Census Bureau to provide monthly status reports and obligation rates on this contract
and other large contracts related to the 2010 Decennial, and include the status of known risks to the success of the Decennial.
Communications.—A recent Joint Advisory Advertising Review
Panel (JAARP) characterized the decennial ad campaign as ‘‘obsolete.’’ Among its findings, the panel noted the ad campaign lacked
integration and coordination; failed to emphasize the security of
the data provided in response to the decennial questionnaire; did
not identify the consequences of failing to fill out the survey; and
lacked diversity among focus groups providing feedback on the
campaign materials. Census is, therefore, directed to work closely
with the communications provider to ensure that the decennial’s
outreach activities are targeted to ensure high rates of survey responses in all communities, particularly within hard-to-reach communities.
Paid media.—The Committee directs the Census Bureau to allocate sufficient funding to support robust paid media efforts in preparation for the 2010 Decennial Census, with specific focus on hardto-reach populations, and to ensure that these efforts surpass the
effectiveness of such efforts in 2000. The Committee takes note of
testimony by the Census Bureau that increasing the mail-back response rate through promotional efforts such as paid media—in
combination with partnership efforts—results in substantial savings in the non-response follow-up enumeration.
Partnership.—The Committee urges the Census Bureau to ensure it hires a diverse pool of employees, particularly for partnership specialist and enumerator positions for the 2010 Decennial.
These indigenous workers bring language skills and neighborhood
and cultural knowledge to bear on the task, and are thus more
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
19
likely to be accepted by communities during outreach and non-response follow-up, resulting in a more accurate count. The Census
Bureau is also encouraged to strive to maintain a more diverse,
full-time workforce, including at the senior management level.
Other languages.—The Committee is concerned that the Census
Bureau has not adequately planned for assistance in languages
other than Spanish for the 2010 Census and the ACS, which may
result in an inaccurate count of limited English proficient and immigrant communities. The Census Bureau should provide the Committee with updates on a semi-annual basis on its language assistance program, including information on how it will reach and assist
respondents who speak Asian, American Indian and Alaska Native
languages, Spanish, and other languages spoken by ethnic immigrants in the United States for the ACS and the 2010 Census.
Data on small population groups.—The Committee is concerned
about the availability of data on small population groups, especially
Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, and other national origins subgroups, from the American Community Survey and Decennial census. In many ethnic and immigrant communities, gathering accurate information about smaller subgroups is extremely important
for policymakers, as the needs among the various populations vary
significantly. The Committee urges the Census Bureau to ensure
that reliable information about these subgroups, especially numerically smaller groups, is collected and published, and directs the Bureau to report back within 90 days of enactment of this Act describing the steps it will take to ensure the availability and accuracy
of these data.
Offshore U.S. jurisdictions.—The Committee urges the Census
Bureau to consider new options for reporting aggregate data reflecting all citizens of the United States, including Puerto Rico and
other offshore jurisdictions.
Additional outreach.—The Committee directs the Bureau to ensure full funding of Census in Schools and adult education materials. The Committee notes that Census in Schools provides significant outreach to hard-to-reach populations through the medium of
take-home materials that educate school children and their parents
and extended families. Similar results are obtained by providing
adult education materials that also reach neighbors and friends in
these communities.
Non-decennial programs.—The Committee recommendation includes $214,581,000 for non-decennial periodic census programs,
the same as the request, and $8,119,000 below fiscal year 2009.
Funds are distributed as follows:
[In thousands of dollars]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Other Periodic Programs:
Economic Censuses .........................................................................
Census of Governments .................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
$111,678,000
8,253,000
Subtotal, Other Periodic Programs ........................................
Demographic Statistics Programs:
Intercensal Demographic Estimates .............................................
Demographic Survey ......................................................................
Geographic Support ........................................................................
Data Processing Systems ...............................................................
119,931,000
Subtotal, Demographic Programs ..........................................
Total, Non-Decennial Programs ......................................
94,650,000
$214,581,000
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6611
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$10,357,000
11,493,000
41,681,000
31,119,000
HR149
20
Economic Census.—Conducted every five years, the economic census is integral to the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ estimates of the
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and is the foundation of the Nation’s economic statistics programs. Fiscal year 2010 is the sixth
year of the six-year 2007 Economic Census cycle, and the first year
of the 2012 Economic Census cycle, and funding reflects a planned
reduction of $5,200,000.
Census of Governments.—The Census of Governments is also integral to the BEA’s estimates of GDP. It is the only source of comprehensive and uniformly classified data on the economic activities
of more than 90,000 State and local governments, which account
for about 12 percent of GDP and nearly 16 percent of the U.S.
workforce. Fiscal year 2010 is the first year in the five-year cycle
of the 2012 Census of Governments and funding provided reflects
a planned decrease of $702,000.
NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION
ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$19,218,000
19,999,000
19,999,000
+781,000
............................
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) serves as the Administration’s principle adviser on
telecommunications and information policy matters and develops
forward-looking spectrum policies that ensure efficient and effective
spectrum access and use. NTIA manages all spectrum use by Federal government departments and agencies and examines how the
radio frequency spectrum is used and managed in the United
States. NTIA advocates for policies and conducts technical research
that supports delivery of the latest telecommunications technology
and services to all Americans. The Committee recommendation includes $19,999,000 for the salaries and expenses of the NTIA,
which is the same as the request and $781,000 above fiscal year
2009.
Domestic and international policies.—NTIA develops and advocates policies to improve and expand domestic telecommunications
services and markets. NTIA provides advice to White House officials, coordinates with other Executive Branch agencies, and participates in relevant Congressional actions and interagency and
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proceedings on a host
of issues. NTIA advocates the advancement of U.S. priorities in
international telecommunications policy and regulatory areas.
Spectrum management.—NTIA manages the Federal Government’s use of the radio frequency spectrum, both domestically and
internationally.
Telecommunication sciences research.—NTIA develops improved
spectrum measurement techniques to address the increasing use of
broadband technologies, including digital signals, spread-spectrum,
and frequency agile systems.
Digital Television Transition And Public Safety Fund.—The Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Fund, created by the
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
21
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, as amended, received offsetting receipts from the auction of electromagnetic spectrum recovered from
discontinued analog television signals and provides funding for several one-time programs from these receipts. The amended Act also
provided borrowing authority to the Department of Commerce to
commence specified programs prior to the availability of auction receipts. Amounts borrowed from the Treasury have been repaid
using earned revenues from the auction. At the end of fiscal year
2009, NTIA will deposit in the General Fund $7,363,000,000 of the
earned revenues (receipts) for deficit reduction purposes, as required by law. Additional deposits of revenues to the General Fund,
estimated to be $8,688,000,000, will be initiated as program activities are completed. During fiscal year 2010, the following programs
are authorized to use receipts from the fund:
• Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Voucher Program;
• Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grants;
• Assistance to Low-Power Television Stations; and
• National and Remote Alert Programs.
PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, PLANNING AND
CONSTRUCTION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$20,000,000
............................
20,000,000
............................
+20,000,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The Public Telecommunications Facilities, Planning, and Construction (PTFPC) program awards competitive grants that help
public broadcasting stations, State and local governments, Indian
tribes and nonprofit organizations construct facilities to bring educational and cultural programming to the American public using
broadcasting and non-broadcasting telecommunications technologies.
The Committee recommendation includes $20,000,000 for
PTFPC, which is $20,000,000 more than the request, and the same
level as provided in fiscal year 2009. The budget request proposed
to eliminate the PTFPC program in fiscal year 2010, citing funding
available through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB).
However, it is not clear that CPB and PTFPC are authorized to
fund the same types of projects. PTFPC has been the primary
source for telecommunications infrastructure assistance for public
radio and television stations seeking assistance, particularly in
under-served rural areas. The Committee therefore directs that
NTIA work with CPB to provide a report to the Appropriations
Committees of the House and Senate within 30 days of enactment
of this Act, that clarifies the funding authority of the two agencies.
This report will ensure that any proposed changes in account structures that may be sought in subsequent budget requests will result
in efficiencies, not the elimination of a critical program.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
22
UNITED STATES PATENT
AND
TRADEMARK OFFICE
CURRENT YEAR FEE FUNDING
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$2,010,100,000
1,930,361,000
1,930,361,000
¥79,739,000
............................
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is
charged with administering the patent and trademark laws of the
United States. USPTO examines patent applications, grants patent
protection for qualified inventions, and disseminates technological
information disclosed in patents. The USPTO also examines trademark applications and provides federal registration to owners of
qualified trademarks. The USPTO advises the Office of the United
States Trade Representative on enforcement issues in connection
with free trade agreements and participates in consultations with
numerous foreign governments on a broad range of issues related
to the enforcement of intellectual property rights. The Committee
recommendation includes $1,930,361,000 for the PTO for fiscal year
2010, which is the same as the request.
Provision of fee collection projections.—The Committee directs the
UPSTO to provide quarterly reports on its projected fee collection
projections and to notify the Committee during any month when
significant changes in such projections prompt serious concern or
require drastic budgetary responses.
Backlog of patent applications.—Despite the projected decline in
patent applications, the backlog of unexamined patent applications
at the USPTO remains extraordinarily high. The increasing backload is largely a consequence of a globalized economy in which applicants are filing in more than one jurisdiction. This means that
the USPTO and other national patent offices are duplicating one
another’s work. The USPTO has recognized the relationship between rising workload and duplication of national examinations.
However, the USPTO’s efforts have proceeded very slowly and have
not yet resulted in significant relief for the USPTO.
The Government Accountability Office has found that the hiring
of additional patent examiners has not been sufficient to reverse
this trend and the recent and projected decrease in fee collections—
12.4 percent lower than the forecast for the fiscal year 2009 budget—makes it clear that the USPTO will not be able to rely on additional hiring as a method to reduce pendency. While a projected decline in patent applications may help to reduce the backlog, the
most effective, long-term means of reducing the pendency of patent
applications is for the leading patent offices to make more effective
use of one another’s work. The Committee directs the USPTO to
enhance its efforts to reduce duplication of work already performed
by another patent office in a manner that does not compromise the
quality of the examination or compromise the sovereignty of the
United States, such as the Patent Prosecution Highway, the Trilateral Strategic Working Group, and technical cooperative agreements with intellectual property offices in other countries. The
Committee directs USPTO to provide a report to the Committee on
its progress within 30 days of enactment of this Act.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
23
NATIONAL INSTITUTE
OF
STANDARDS
AND
TECHNOLOGY
(INCLUDING TRANSFERS)
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing
measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.
The Committee recommendation includes $781,100,000 for NIST
for fiscal year 2010.
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH AND SERVICES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$472,000,000
534,600,000
510,000,000
+38,000,000
¥24,600,000
To carry out its mission, NIST has an intramural research program made up of laboratories and technical programs and national
research facilities. The laboratories and technical programs develop
and disseminate measurement techniques, reference data and materials, test methods, standards, and other infrastructural technologies and services required by U.S. industry. National research
facilities include the NIST Center for Neutron Research and the
Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology. NIST also manages
the Baldridge National Quality Program, which promotes U.S. competitiveness in business, health care, education, and non-profit organizations through performance excellence criteria and other information transfer, and management of the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award.
The Committee recommendation includes $510,000,000 for
NIST’s scientific and technical core programs, which is $38,000,000
above fiscal year 2009, an increase of 8 percent. Within available
resources, the Committee supports the full funding of the comprehensive national cyber security increase.
The Committee approves NIST’s new budget structure consolidating all the functions of its laboratory research program under
one budget activity but the Committee will regard any deviation
from amounts specified in spend plans or reports for particular labs
and technical programs, or the use of deobligated funds, to be subject to reprogramming procedures.
INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$175,000,000
194,600,000
194,600,000
+19,600,000
............................
This appropriation provides funding for the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships (MEP) program and the Technology Innovation Program (TIP). The Committee recommendation includes
$194,600,000, which is $19,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and the same as the request. Of this amount,
$124,700,000 is provided for the Manufacturing Extension Partnerships (MEP) and $69,900,000 is provided for the Technology Inno-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
24
vation Program (TIP). In the current economic climate, these programs are critically important to ensure the competitiveness of
U.S. businesses.
MEP consists of a network of centers that provide business support and technical assistance services, and helps improve the productivity and competitiveness of small manufacturers. The centers
are funded from matching Federal and State or local resources and
fees charged for services. MEP leverages private resources in the
creation and retention of jobs, thereby increasing economic output
as well as Federal revenues.
TIP was established in section 3012 of the Competes Act and
speeds the development of high-risk, transformative research targeted to address key societal challenges. Funding is provided to
small and medium-sized businesses, and institutions of higher education or other organizations, such as national laboratories and
nonprofit research institutions to support, promote, and accelerate
innovation in the U.S.
CONSTRUCTION OF RESEARCH FACILITIES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$172,000,000
116,900,000
76,500,000
¥95,500,000
¥40,400,000
This appropriation supports the construction of new facilities and
the renovation and maintenance of NIST’s current buildings and
laboratories to comply with scientific and engineering requirements
and to keep pace with Federal, State, and local health and safety
regulations. The Committee recommendation includes $76,500,000,
of which $8,000,000 shall be available for the final year of the Neutron Center Expansion and Reliability Improvements, and
$20,000,000 shall be available for a competitive grant competition.
The Committee does not provide funding to begin two new multiyear construction projects, given budget constraints.
Competitive construction grants.—Within the appropriation, the
Committee provides $20,000,000 for competitive construction
grants for research science buildings in fiscal year 2010. The Committee notes that in just the first year of the program, the fiscal
year 2008 call for proposals yielded 93 requests, of which only
three were funded within available appropriations. The Committee
expects the Administration to include funding for this program in
future requests as these research science buildings leverage additional public and private funding, provide jobs, and improve science
research in the Nation.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
NATIONAL OCEANIC
AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is to understand and predict changes in Earth’s environment and conserve and manage coastal and marine resources
to meet our Nation’s economic, social and environmental needs.
NOAA supplies information on the oceans and atmosphere, provides stewardship of our coastal and marine environment, and
leads scientific research in such fields as ecosystems, climate, global climate change, weather and oceanography.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
25
The Committee recommendation includes a total of
$4,602,941,000 in discretionary appropriations for NOAA, which is
$129,125,000 above the request, and $237,745,000 above fiscal year
2009.
OPERATIONS, RESEARCH, AND FACILITIES
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 .................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request 1 2 ...............................................................
Recommended in the bill 1 .................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$3,045,549,000
3,087,537,000
3,198,793,000
+153,244,000
+111,256,000
1 Excludes $3,000,000
2 The budget request
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
in discretionary transfer from the Coastal Zone Management Fund.
proposes to transfer $50,000,000 from species recovery grants within the National
Marine Fisheries Service to fund activities within the Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Fund.
The Committee recommendation includes a total program level of
$3,317,393,000 under this account for the coastal, fisheries, marine,
weather, satellite and other programs of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. This total funding level includes
$3,198,793,000 in direct appropriations; a transfer of $104,600,000
from balances in the ‘‘Promote and Develop Fishery Products and
Research Pertaining to American Fisheries’’ account; a transfer of
$3,000,000 from the Coastal Zone Management Fund; and
$11,000,000 is derived from recoveries of prior year obligations.
The direct appropriation of $3,198,793,000 is $111,256,000 above
the request and $153,244,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level, and
includes $37,500,000 for congressionally directed activities.
The following narrative descriptions and tables identify the specific activities and funding levels included in this Act:
National Ocean Service (NOS).—The recommendation provides
$481,981,000 for NOS operations, research and facilities, which is
$19,310,000 above the request.
Navigation Services.—The Committee provides $48,081,000 for
mapping and charting of which, $750,000 is provided for the development and demonstration of unmanned surface vehicles for hydrographic survey operations, and $30,000,000 to address survey backlogs.
Ocean Assessment Program.—The recommendation provides
$20,000,000 for the Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) regional observations, which is $5,000,000 above the request, and
provides the requested level of $6,555,000 for NOAA IOOS. Given
the effect of climate change on coral reefs worldwide, the recommendation provides $29,000,000 for the Coral Reef Program,
which includes $2,273,000 in competitive funding above the request. The Committee recognizes the broad value of the consortium
of sensor testbeds and the vital services these efforts provide to
NOAA and other federal agencies. The agency is directed to report
to the Committee within 30 days of enactment of this Act on the
feasibility of establishing a cooperative institute for the purpose of
advancing and sustaining this essential capability and including it
in future requests.
Response and restoration.—The recommendation includes
$26,134,000 for Response and Restoration, which is $1,812,000
above the request, and which provides $3,000,000 for Estuary Restoration and $9,300,000 for Damage Assessment and Restoration.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
26
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Ocean and Coastal Management.—The recommendation includes
$49,946,000 for the Marine Sanctuary Program, an increase of
$4,997,000. Within the increase, the recommendation provides
$2,500,000 for purchase and installation of an integrated vessel
electronics bridge system. The Committee directs NOAA to use a
portion of the increases provided for Coastal Zone Management
grants for efforts to modernize and improve State information systems to assess, track and manage permitting and land-use tracking
procedures. An increase of $1,174,000 above the request is provided
for the National Estuarine Research Reserve System operations.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 08 here 49735A.003
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
27
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 09 here 49735A.004
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
28
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
29
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).—The recommendation provides $915,865,000 for NMFS operations, research and facilities, which is $25,223,000 above the request.
Protected Species Research and Management.—The recommendation includes $65,987,000 for an expanded species recovery grants
program, which is $5,000,000 above the request. The Committee
concurs with the need for increased funding for endangered, threatened, and at-risk marine and anadromous species. The Committee
supports the proposed recovery grants program to focus on conservation and recovery of all marine and anadromous species. Similar to the request, the recommendation provides $50,000,000 within
the species recovery grant program for salmon projects.
The Committee encourages NMFS to provide $7,100,000 from all
appropriated funding sources for the Hawaiian Monk Seal, as it is
one of the world’s most endangered marine species.
The Committee encourages NOAA to demonstrate and utilize biological pattern recognition technology where appropriate for tagging fish or threatened or endangered animal species.
Fisheries Research and Management.—The recommendation provides $423,967,000 for Protected Species Research and Management which is $2,500,000 above the request. Within this amount,
$190,133,000 is recommended for Fisheries research and management programs. The recommendation does not include $7,500,000
for CAMEO and assessments that are not Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act requirements. An increase of $10,000,000 above the
request is provided within Salmon management activities to begin
implementation of reforms developed by the Hatchery Scientific Review Group to operate these facilities in a manner more conducive
to salmon recovery.
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act (MSRA).—The Committee
recommendation includes the requested $56,500,000 increase for
MSRA requirements. These funds are necessary to halt the downward spiral of fisheries collapses and the need for subsequent disaster funding to support those industries which depend on fisheries. The Committee recognizes the need to ensure sustainable
fisheries that are more profitable and more efficient for the communities that depend on them economically—and to ensure the Nation
can rely on these resources in perpetuity. Of this funding,
$18,600,000 is designated to implement a sector-based management approach for New England and the transition to catch shares,
a new tool that provides flexibility for fishermen while maintaining
sustainability. Increased funding supports the cost of expanded
stock assessments required and is also provided for Regional Councils that make recommendations on annual catch limits (ACLs) to
NMFS based on those assessments.
Cooperative research provides a means for commercial and recreational fishermen to become involved in the collection of fundamental fisheries information; $4,800,000 will continue development
of a State-Federal national registry program for marine recreational fishing participants, and expand commercial fisheries’ biological sampling programs and electronic reporting of commercial
fisheries’ landings.
Economic and social science research.—The requested increase of
$3,357,000 is provided to address significant economic and social
science research data gaps in major Federal fisheries that are cru-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
30
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
cial to developing support tools to conduct MSRA-mandated costbenefit analyses of regulatory options, such as ACLs and Limited
Access Privilege Programs (LAPPs). These resources will allow the
affected regions to provide input and engage in solutions in their
own sectors, and to forge new relationships between the regions
and NMFS.
Enforcement and observers/training.—The funding provided will
increase NMFS’ capacity to monitor compliance with annual catch
limits, increase investigations of violations, and encourage voluntary compliance. Observer coverage will be expanded in three
fisheries, including the multi-species fishery in New England and
the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Observer Program, and pilot programs
will begin in three other fisheries. In addition, systems will be developed to monitor landings and discards; track allocations, balances and transfers; and ensure the long-term sustainability and
profitability of the fisheries.
Habitat Conservation and Restoration.—The recommendation
provides a total of $57,343,000 for Habitat Conservation and Restoration. Within this amount, $34,967,000 is provided for Fisheries
Habitat Restoration.
Other activities.—The Committee recognizes the importance of
ongoing surfclam and ocean quahog surveys to sustainable fisheries
management and encourages NOAA to work closely with stakeholders on this matter.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 012 here 49735A.005
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
31
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 013 here 49735A.006
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
32
33
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR).—The recommendation
includes $426,675,000 for OAR operations, research and facilities,
which is $32,470,000 above the request. The Committee supports
NOAA’s efforts toward the creation of a National Climate Service
and directs the agency to accelerate its current efforts with the additional funding provided in OAR and elsewhere within the bill.
The recommendation provides $229,040,000 for Climate Research, which is $19,200,000 above the request. Within that
amount, $5,000,000 is provided to fund a research grant competition relating to understanding and forecasting climate. The competition is to be open to all researchers at colleges, universities,
corporations, other private sector entities, and NOAA and other
government agency laboratories, and may cover field and laboratory measurements, modeling, data analysis, and data assimilation.
Following a process similar to that employed by the National
Science Foundation, proposal selection shall be based on research
manager judgments of science priorities and peer reviews. Within
the recommendation, the Committee provides $12,000,000 for regional climate assessments through OAR’s Regional Integrated
Sciences and Assessment program, and directs NOAA to expand
the program to cover additional regions. The recommendation also
includes $2,200,000 to continue chemical climate research important to climate modeling and atmospheric science research.
Weather and Air Quality research.—The recommendation includes $650,000 above the request for instrumentation and operation of state of the art monitoring of nutrients and mercury speciation measurement stations and laboratories.
Ocean, Coastal and Great Lakes research.—The recommendation
provides $59,085,000 for the Sea Grant program, which is
$4,000,000 above the request. The Committee encourages NOAA to
conduct long-term ice cover and water level outlooks for the Great
Lakes to report on the impact of climate change on the habitats,
fish and wildlife, commerce, recreational opportunities and water
supply of the Great Lakes.
The Committee is aware that ocean fertilization for the purpose
of drawing carbon into the oceans has the potential to be used for
climate change mitigation in the future, but that further research
is needed. Within the funds provided for oceanic research, the Committee encourages NOAA to support research into carbon sinks
through ocean fertilization.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 016 49735A.007
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
34
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 017 49735A.008
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
35
36
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
National Weather Service (NWS).—The recommendation provides
$857,218,000 for National Weather Service operations, research
and facilities. This includes an increase of $15,966,000 for Local
Warnings and Forecasts base above the fiscal year 2009 level and
provides $11,000,000 for the Center for Weather and Climate Prediction operations, as requested.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 018 49735A.009
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
37
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 019 49735A.010
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
38
39
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service
(NESDIS).—The recommendation provides $199,504,000 for
NESDIS operations, research and facilities, which is $27,767,000
above the request. The recommendation for NOAA’s Data Centers
and Information Services is $71,056,000, which is $23,917,000
above the request, and includes $7,000,000 above the request for
climate data records (CDRs) and additional environmental data
archiving, access and assessment activities. The recommendation
also provides a total of $3,850,000 for Regional Climate Centers.
The Committee directs NOAA, together with NASA which is
similarly directed, to continue co-funding joint studies within available funds that should lead to a fiscal year 2011 request to build
and fly an operational scatterometer providing sea surface vector
wind measurements. NOAA should aggressively pursue negotiations to secure a flight opportunity for this instrument that is both
reliable and timely.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 020 49735A.011
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
40
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 021 49735A.012
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
41
42
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Program Support.—The recommendation provides $436,020,000,
which is $16,360,000 above the request for Program Support.
Corporate Services.—The recommendation provides $228,549,000
for Corporate Services and includes requested funding to support
acquisition and grants services for NOAA. The agency is directed
to strengthen grants and contract oversight. The Committee acknowledges the requested increase in facilities funding and continues to direct NOAA to meet the out-year funding profile necessary to reverse the growing backlog of restoration projects, as
well as the backlog of maintenance and minor repair projects.
NOAA Education Program.—The NOAA Education program recommendation includes $31,323,000 to ensure a robust program.
NOAA education is particularly powerful in grades K–12 and the
Committee received testimony that children need to be reached by
the age of ten if they are to consider technical and scientific occupations. The Committee thus provides an increase of $7,000,000
above the request for competitive educational grants, to ensure
that at least 15 percent of applications are successful. In addition,
$3,000,000 is provided for the GLOBE Program. NOAA is instructed to work with NASA, which is similarly directed, during
fiscal year 2010 to transition program responsibility for GLOBE
from NASA to NOAA. The Committee expects the budget request
for fiscal year 2011 to include full funding for GLOBE as a NOAA
education program.
Justification improvement.—The Committee directs NOAA to
work with the Committee to reformat the justification into a more
useable and user-friendly document, starting with the fiscal year
2011 submission. While the Committee understands the pressures
of the past year in producing its budget, the Committee notes the
lack of justification for base program requests and other cross-cutting information. The Department is similarly directed.
Research and Development (R&D) tracking and outcomes.—The
Committee continues its direction that NOAA track the division of
R&D funds between intramural and extramural research, and assure consistency and clarity in the collection and reporting of data.
In addition, NOAA is directed to clearly state its expected research
outcomes and available funding in order to provide transparency
into the competitive grant process for extramural researchers. The
Committee further directs NOAA to increase extramural research
funding in future requests to build broad community support and
leverage external funding for mission-oriented research.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 022 49735A.013
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
43
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 023 49735A.014
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
44
45
PROCUREMENT, ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,243,647,000
1,391,279,000
1,409,148,000
+165,501,000
+17,869,000
This account funds capital acquisition, construction, and fleet
and aircraft replacement projects that support NOAA’s operational
mission across all line offices. Capital acquisition projects include
satellite procurements and surface weather observation equipment
for NOAA’s weather and climate programs. Construction projects
include new buildings or major modification of existing facilities.
Fleet and aircraft replacement includes acquisition of new and upgrades to existing aircraft and vessels.
The Committee recommendation includes a total program level of
$1,411,148,000 in direct obligations under this heading, of which
$1,409,148,000 is appropriated from the general fund and
$2,000,000 is derived from recoveries of prior year obligations. The
direct appropriation of $1,409,148,000 for the Procurement, Acquisition and Construction (PAC) account is $17,869,000 above the request and $165,501,000 above fiscal year 2009.
The bill includes language making any deviation from amounts
designated for specific activities in this report, or any use of
deobligated balances of funds provided under this heading in previous years shall be subject to the reprogramming procedures set
forth in section 505.
National Ocean Service (NOS).—The recommendation includes
$41,385,000 for NOS acquisition and construction. This includes
$6,500,000 above the request for the Coastal and Estuarine Land
Conservation (CELCP) program. As a result of the Omnibus Public
Lands Act, no less than 15 percent of CELCP funds shall be available for acquisitions benefitting National Estuarine Research Reserves (NERRS). The recommendation funds the NERRS Acquisition and Construction account at the request of $3,890,000, which
provides a total of $7,115,000 for NERRS, an increase of $72,000
above fiscal year 2009, and provides $3,275,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 level for non-NERRS CELCP projects, for a total of
$18,275,000. The recommendation also provides $15,995,000 for the
Marine Sanctuaries Construction and Acquisition programs,
$10,500,000 above the request.
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR).—The recommendation
includes $10,379,000 for OAR systems acquisition, the same as the
request.
National Weather Service (NWS).—The recommendation includes
$88,527,000 for NWS acquisition and construction.
National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service
(NESDIS).—The recommendation includes $1,268,857,000 for
NESDIS acquisition and construction. Of the $12,000,000 increase,
$2,000,000 is in support of the National Climate Service. This provides full funding for GOES–R and NPOESS. The Committee remains concerned about the impact of the GOES–R out-year costs
on NOAA’s traditional mission areas. However, the Committee is
particularly concerned with NPOESS’ management structure and
projected life-cycle cost growth of $1 to $2 billion dollars, as well
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
46
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
as additional schedule slips. The Committee notes that this situation has been developing for some time and is the result of a dysfunctional tri-agency management approach. The Committee anticipates a change in management structure to be announced by the
Administration soon. Accordingly, the Committee recommendation
deletes the 50/50 NOAA/DoD funding split requirement from the
bill language. This step will allow for more creative funding decisions to avert the critical climate and weather data gaps that are
sure to occur if a management solution is not identified soon.
The Committee acknowledges and fully supports the significant
step represented by the inclusion in the budget request of
$20,000,000 for Jason–3 to provide radar altimetry measurements
of sea surface elevation and ocean circulation.
Program
Support
(PS).—The
recommendation
includes
$2,000,000 for PS Construction.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 024 49735A.015
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
47
48
PACIFIC COASTAL SALMON RECOVERY
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$80,000,000
(1)
............................
¥80,000,000
............................
1 The budget request proposes to transfer $50,000,000 from species recovery grants within the National
Marine Fisheries Service to fund activities within this account.
The Committee recommendation proposes to fund the activities
of this program with the competitive protected species recovery
fund of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The new
species recovery fund specifically targets endangered, threatened,
and at-risk marine species, including salmon.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT FUND
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
¥$3,000,000
¥3,000,000
¥3,000,000
............................
............................
This fund was established by the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 (CZARA). The fund consists of loan repayments from the former Coastal Energy Impact Program. The
proceeds are to be used to offset the Operations, Research, and Facilities account for the costs of implementing the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended. The Committee recommendation includes language transferring not to exceed
$3,000,000 from the Coastal Zone Management Fund to the ‘‘Operations, Research, and Facilities Account.’’
FISHERIES FINANCE PROGRAM ACCOUNT
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
¥$4,000,000
¥5,000,000
¥5,000,000
¥1,000,000
............................
This account covers the subsidy costs of guaranteed loans (pre1997) and direct loans (post-1996) obligated or committed subsequent to October 1, 1991, as authorized by the Merchant Marine
Act of 1936 as amended. The recommendation includes language
under this heading limiting obligations of direct loans to $8,000,000
for Individual Fishing Quota loans and $59,000,000 for traditional
direct loans.
DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$53,000,000
64,000,000
60,000,000
+7,000,000
¥4,000,000
HR149
49
The salaries and expenses appropriation provides funding for Executive Direction and Departmental Staff Services. Executive Direction funds the development and implementation of policies and
coordinates Bureaus’ program activities. Departmental Staff Services funds the development and implementation of the Department’s internal policies, procedures and other administrative functions.
The Committee recommendation includes $60,000,000 for Departmental Management, which is $7,000,000 above fiscal year
2009 and $4,000,000 below the request. Within the amounts appropriated, the Committee provides $7,000,000 for the Department’s
highest priorities.
Minority serving institutions digital and wireless opportunity program.—Not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations of the House and the Senate a report describing the Department’s plans to support and assist minority serving institutions
(MSIs) in improving their instrumentation, connectivity, hardware
and software for intructional and research purposes as contemplated by the amendments to the Stevenson-Wydler Technology
Innovation Act of 1980. The Committee also encourages the Secretary to work with MSIs national stakeholder organizations in developing such strategies.
Justification improvement.—The Committee directs the Department to work with the Committee to reformat all Commerce justifications into more useable and user-friendly documents, starting
with the fiscal year 2011 submission. While the Committee understands the pressures of the past year in producing its budget, the
Committee notes the lack of justification for base program requests
and other cross-cutting information.
Departmental oversight.—The Committee directs the Department
to develop oversight capacity of the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, and to track fee collections and other pertinent policy and economic impacts, to avoid budgetary shortfalls, and ensure that the
Department and the Committee are fully informed on funding
issues.
The Committee continues the direction that the Department provide a report that audits and evaluates all decision documents and
expenditures by the Bureau of Census as they relate to the 2010
Decennial. The bill retains the provision restricting $5,000,000 of
the available appropriation from obligation until the Secretary certifies to the Committee that the Bureau of Census has met all
standards and best management practices and Office of Management and Budget guidelines related to information technology
projects and contract management. This provision ensures that the
Department will remain engaged and fully informed of issues regarding the Decennial and will reduce the possibility of further lifecycle cost increases and schedule delays.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HERBERT C. HOOVER BUILDING RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
$5,000,000
22,500,000
5,000,000
............................
¥17,500,000
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
50
This account provides funding for the Commerce Department’s
expenses associated with the modernization of the Herbert C. Hoover Building (HCHB). The Committee recommendation includes
$5,000,000 for continued renovation of the HCHB, the same level
as fiscal year 2009.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$25,800,000
27,000,000
27,000,000
+1,200,000
............................
The mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) is to provide
a unique, independent voice to the Secretary and other senior Commerce managers, as well as to Congress, in combating fraud, waste,
abuse and mismanagement, and in improving the efficiency, effectiveness and economy of Department operations. These funds provide for OIG’s work conducting audits, inspections, and investigations. The Committee recommendation includes $27,000,000 for the
OIG for fiscal year 2009, which is $1,200,000 above fiscal year 2009
and the same as the request. This includes funds to expand the
OIG’s cooperation with the Department of Justice in pursuing enforcement against restraint-of-trade and commerce activities that
relate to the Department of Commerce programs. The Committee
also notes the significant oversight required for the 2010 Decennial
and NOAA satellite programs.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
GENERAL PROVISIONS—DEPARTMENT
OF
COMMERCE
The Committee recommends the following general provisions for
the Department of Commerce:
Section 101 makes funds available for advanced payments only
upon certification of officials designated by the Secretary that such
payments are considered to be in the public interest;
Section 102 makes appropriations for the Department for Salaries and Expenses available for hire of passenger motor vehicles,
for services, and for uniforms and allowances as authorized by law;
Section 103 provides the authority to transfer funds between Department of Commerce appropriation accounts and requiring notification to the Committee of certain actions;
Section 104 provides that any costs incurred by the Department
in response to funding reductions shall be absorbed within the total
budgetary resources available to the Department and shall be subject to the reprogramming limitations set forth in this Act;
Section 105 extends Congressional notification requirements for
the GOES–R satellite program;
Section 106 provides for the reimbursement for services within
Department of Commerce buildings; and
Section 107 provides the Administrator with the authority to
avail NOAA of needed resources, with the consent of those supplying the resources, to carry out responsibilities of any statute administered by NOAA.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
51
TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$105,805,000
178,488,000
118,488,000
+12,683,000
¥60,000,000
General Administration (GA) supports the Attorney General (AG)
and senior policy level officials in managing Department resources
and developing policies for legal, law enforcement and criminal justice activities. GA also provides administrative support services to
the legal divisions. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $118,488,000, which is $60,000,000 below the budget request.
Post-Guantanamo activities.—The Committee recommendation
does not include the $60,000,000 requested for the anticipated costs
of detaining, prosecuting and incarcerating individuals transferred
from the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay. Instead, the Committee directs the Administration to submit a comprehensive plan
and cost estimates, and, if such plan, approved by Congress, involves increased costs to DOJ, to submit a budget amendment or
a supplemental request for these activities. That budget amendment or supplemental should consider the possibility of transferring to DOJ the funds currently used by the Department of Defense to operate the Guantanamo Bay facility, as those funds will
no longer be needed by DOD.
Reducing crime in Indian Country.—The Committee is concerned
about the epidemic levels of violent crime in Indian Country, including sexual and domestic violence and crime related to substance abuse, and provides significant additional resources in the
bill to help combat this crime. In addition to increased funding,
however, combating crime in Indian Country requires an increased
level of effort and coordination by Federal, State, and tribal law enforcement agencies.
To help foster such collaboration, the Committee directs the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretary of the Interior
and State and tribal officials, to establish an interagency and tribal
working group to clarify and resolve the law enforcement jurisdiction challenges that have hindered criminal investigations and
prosecutions in Indian Country and to identify other challenges
and needs related to tribal justice systems, including needs associated with secure law enforcement information sharing systems.
The working group shall develop recommendations on how to
streamline the Federal, State, and tribal response to criminal investigations and prosecutions, and shall submit a report containing
such recommendations to the Committee within 90 days of enactment of this Act.
Among the goals established for the working group shall be the
development of protocols to ensure that Federal law enforcement
agencies which decline to initiate an investigation or which terminate an investigation of an alleged violation of Federal law in Indian Country without referral for prosecution submit to the appro-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
52
priate tribal official a report describing the rationale for terminating the investigation; the type of crime alleged; the status of the
perpetrator; and the status of the victim. These protocols should
also ensure that United States Attorneys coordinate with tribal
prosecutors sufficiently well in advance of prosecution deadlines
mandated by the statute of limitations to permit tribal prosecutors
to pursue cases, as appropriate. The working group should also review and define the responsibilities of Assistant United States Attorneys serving as Tribal Liaisons in order to better coordinate the
prosecution of crimes on reservations.
NATIONAL DRUG INTELLIGENCE CENTER
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 .................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 ..........................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
............................
$44,023,000
44,023,000
+44,023,000
............................
1 Funding for this activity was previously provided through the Intelligence Community Management Account in the defense appropriations bill. In fiscal year 2009, $44,000,000 was appropriated for NDIC in the
defense bill (P.L. 110–329) and transferred to the Department of Justice.
The National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) provides strategic
drug-related intelligence, document and computer exploitation support, and training assistance to the drug control, public health, law
enforcement, and intelligence communities in order to reduce the
adverse effects of drug trafficking, drug abuse and other drug-related criminal activities. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $44,023,000, which is equal to the budget request.
JUSTICE INFORMATION SHARING TECHNOLOGY
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$80,000,000
123,617,000
109,417,000
+29,417,000
¥14,200,000
The Justice Information Sharing Technology (JIST) fund provides for corporate investments in information technology (IT). As
a centralized fund under the control of the DOJ Chief Information
Officer, it ensures that investments in information sharing technology and infrastructure are well planned and aligned with DOJ’s
overall IT strategy and enterprise architecture. For fiscal year
2010, the Committee recommends $109,417,000, which is
$14,200,000 below the budget request.
Litigation Case Management System (LCMS).—As recently revealed by the DOJ Inspector General (IG), the LCMS is at significant risk of failing to meet the Department’s expectations and requirements. Implementation of LCMS is well over budget and behind schedule and is now on indefinite hold at most of the Department’s litigating divisions. The recommended level does not include
funds for the continued deployment of the system, but the Committee will consider a reprogramming for these funds once the Department has completed all of the IG’s LCMS recommendations
and submitted a report to the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations detailing the steps taken to contain cost and schedule overruns.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
53
Unified Financial Management System (UFMS).—The Committee’s recommendation includes the restoration of funds for the
UFMS base program. The Department is directed to submit a list
of specific and detailed performance milestones for UFMS development and deployment in fiscal year 2010, including dates for
planned completion. These milestones should be reported to the
House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within 60 days of
the enactment of this Act, and quarterly updates should be provided on the Department’s progress in meeting those milestones.
Cyber security.—The Committee’s recommendation includes
$27,439,000, as requested, to strengthen DOJ’s cyber security program. The Committee supports the Department’s efforts to better
protect its networks and other information technology assets and
hopes that these resources will allow DOJ to achieve the same success in its cyber security implementation as it has achieved on its
FISMA report card. However, the Committee urges the Department to exercise discretion in testing cyber security protections to
ensure that all relevant players have been alerted to the timing of
these tests and to minimize any potential negative impact on DOJ
employees.
TACTICAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$185,000,000
205,143,000
205,143,000
+20,143,000
............................
The mission of Tactical Law Enforcement Wireless Communications is to provide secure, interoperable and reliable wireless communication services required by DOJ’s law enforcement components and all Federal agents and officers engaged in the conduct
of law enforcement, protective services, homeland defense and disaster response missions. This account funds component legacy network requirements, operations of the Wireless Management Office
and the acquisition of new equipment and services. For fiscal year
2010, the Committee recommends $205,143,000, which is equal to
the budget request.
IWN funding.—The Committee’s recommendation includes an increase of $20,143,000 for the continued development and deployment of the Integrated Wireless Network (IWN). Consistent with
direction in the explanatory statement accompanying P.L. 111–8,
all funds for IWN should be spent on the modernization and improvement of land mobile radio (LMR) systems. Secure cellular or
data systems and non-LMR tactical equipment must be budgeted
for and requested separately.
Performance milestone reporting.—The Committee expects to continue receiving quarterly reports on the achievement of established
performance milestones for the use of IWN funds. These reports,
which were begun in fiscal year 2009, should reflect the Department’s progress toward each milestone and the extent to which
those milestones are being achieved within cost, schedule and performance expectations.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
54
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
AND
APPEALS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 .................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request 1 .................................................................
Recommended in the bill 1 .................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
1 Total
$266,000,000
296,685,000
296,685,000
+30,685,000
............................
is net of a $4,000,000 transfer from the USCIS Immigration Examiners Fee account.
This appropriation supports the Executive Office of Immigration
Review (EOIR) and the Office of the Pardon Attorney (OPA). The
mission of EOIR is to provide the timely and uniform interpretation and application of immigration law, ensuring due process and
fair treatment for all parties involved. OPA receives, investigates
and considers petitions for all forms of executive clemency. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $296,685,000, which is
equal to the budget request.
Personnel and infrastructure increases.—The Committee recommendation includes $24,253,000 for personnel and infrastructure
investments needed to efficiently process an increasing immigration adjudication caseload. Of this total, $10,250,000 is for the
eWorld document management system to improve EOIR’s ability to
store, distribute and archive its files.
Legal Orientation Program (LOP).—The recommendation includes $6,500,000, an increase of $2,500,000, for the continued implementation and expansion of the LOP. EOIR is encouraged to
seek alien-specific detention costs and duration of detention data
from ICE in order to develop a more accurate estimate of the cost
savings to the government provided by participation in the LOP.
Competency standards.—The explanatory statement accompanying P.L. 111–8 urged EOIR to work with experts and interested parties in developing standards and materials for judges to
use in conducting competency evaluations of persons appearing in
immigration court. EOIR is directed to report to the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of the enactment of this Act on the status of its efforts to develop this competency bench book. The report should also address the steps DOJ
has taken to provide safeguards for the rights of aliens judged to
be mentally incompetent, as required by 8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(3).
Fraud program.—EOIR is urged to set written standards and criteria for use in judging potentially fraudulent evidence and testimony provided to an immigration court. The lack of such standards
encourages an ad hoc approach to fraud enforcement that may result in inconsistent or inaccurate determinations.
DETENTION TRUSTEE
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,295,319,000
1,438,663,000
1,438,663,000
+143,344,000
............................
The Office of the Federal Detention Trustee (OFDT) leads the development of DOJ detention policy and manages Federal detention
resources with the goal of maximizing available detention space
and containing costs associated with the detention of criminal de-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
55
fendants and aliens awaiting adjudication and/or removal from the
United States. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$1,438,663,000, which is equal to the budget request.
Inadequacy of budget requests.—The Committee remains frustrated by the regular occurrence of funding shortfalls at OFDT,
even when the budget request has been fully funded. In the past
year, the Committee has twice had to approve emergency
reprogrammings to avert deficiencies at OFDT, and it appears that
a third will be necessary before fiscal year 2009 is complete. OFDT
has either not requested sufficient resources to meet its projected
needs or its projections are too inaccurate to serve as predictors of
annual funding requirements. The Committee’s recommendation
fully supports OFDT’s projections for 2010, but more analytical attention is needed to determine whether OFDT’s methodology for
deriving those projections is sound. Accordingly, the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) is directed to review OFDT’s methods
for projecting population levels, jail day rates and other factors that
are translated into the annual budget request for detention capacity. GAO should make recommendations to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations on steps OFDT should take to develop more accurate projections of funding requirements no later
than August 31, 2010.
OFFICE
OF INSPECTOR
GENERAL
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$75,681,000
84,368,000
84,368,000
+8,687,000
............................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducts independent investigations, audits, inspections, and special reviews of DOJ personnel and programs to detect and deter waste, fraud, abuse, and
misconduct, and to promote integrity, economy, efficiency, and effectiveness in DOJ operations. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee
recommends $84,368,000, which is equal to the budget request.
Counterterrorism oversight.—The Committee’s recommendation
includes an increase of $4,000,000 for the OIG to continue counterterrorism and national security oversight begun with prior year
supplemental funds. With the annualization of these funds into the
regular budget process, the Committee expects the practice of requesting annual supplemental appropriations for the OIG to end.
Grants management.—The Committee’s recommendation also includes an increase of $2,000,000 for enhanced auditing and oversight of the Department’s grant programs. In the execution of these
funds, the Committee urges OIG to include a focus on financial
management issues at the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). The
Committee is particularly interested in assessing OJP’s ability to
track the disbursement of its appropriations by activity.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
56
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$12,570,000
12,859,000
12,859,000
+289,000
............................
The United States Parole Commission is an independent body
within the Department of Justice that makes decisions regarding
requests for parole of Federal offenders and certain District of Columbia Code offenders. The Committee recommends $12,859,000
for the United States Parole Commission, which is $289,000 above
the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and equal to the request.
LEGAL ACTIVITIES
SALARIES AND EXPENSES, GENERAL LEGAL ACTIVITIES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$804,007,000
875,097,000
875,097,000
+71,090,000
............................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
This appropriation supports the establishment of litigation policy, conduct of litigation, and other legal responsibilities of the Department of Justice through the Office of the Solicitor General, the
Tax Division, the Criminal Division, the Civil Division, the Environmental and Natural Resources Division, the Civil Rights Division, the Office of Legal Counsel, and Interpol-U.S. National Central Bureau. The Committee recommends a total of $875,097,000
for General Legal Activities, which is $71,090,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
The funding is provided as follows:
Solicitor General .................................................................................
Tax Division ........................................................................................
Criminal Division ...............................................................................
Civil Division ......................................................................................
Environment and Natural Resources ...............................................
Office of Legal Counsel ......................................................................
Civil Rights Division ..........................................................................
INTERPOL–USNCB ..........................................................................
Office of Dispute Resolution ..............................................................
$10,809,000
105,877,000
176,861,000
287,758,000
109,785,000
7,665,000
145,449,000
30,091,000
802,000
Total .............................................................................................
875,097,000
The Committee strongly supports the additional resources proposed for the Department’s litigation divisions, for which inadequate funding has been proposed in past years. The Committee is
particularly supportive of the additional resources proposed for the
Civil Rights Division to restore its base capacity to enforce civil
rights laws; expand its capacity to prosecute and provide litigation
support for human trafficking and unsolved civil rights era crimes;
carry out its responsibilities associated with the civil rights of institutionalized persons and the access rights of the disabled; and enhance the enforcement of fair housing and fair lending laws.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
57
In addition to inflationary and other base adjustments for the divisions within this account, the recommendation includes the proposed programmatic increases of $2,909,000 and 9 FTE for the Tax
Division; $4,430,000 and 13 FTE for the Criminal Division;
$11,760,000 and 37 FTE for the Civil Division; $4,200,000 and 8
FTE for the Environment and Natural Resources Division;
$15,723,000 and 51 FTE for the Civil Rights Division; and
$2,216,000 and 8 FTE for INTERPOL–USNCB.
VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION TRUST FUND
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$7,833,000
7,833,000
7,833,000
............................
............................
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund covers the Department of Justice’s expenses associated with litigating cases under
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The Committee
recommends $7,833,000 for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust
Fund, the same as the budget request and the fiscal year 2009 enacted level.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES, ANTITRUST DIVISION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
$157,788,000
¥157,788,000
............................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
163,170,000
¥102,000,000
61,170,000
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
163,170,000
¥102,000,000
61,170,000
+5,382,000
............................
The Antitrust Division investigates potential violations of Federal antitrust laws, represents the interests of the United States in
cases brought under these laws, acts on antitrust cases before the
Supreme Court, and reviews decisions of regulatory commissions
relating to antitrust law. Appropriations for the Antitrust Division
are offset by Hart-Scott-Rodino Act pre-merger filing fee collections.
The Committee recommends $163,170,000 in budget authority
for the Antitrust Division, $5,382,000 above the fiscal year 2009
enacted level and equal to the budget request. This appropriation
is offset by $102,000,000 in pre-merger filing fee collections, resulting in a direct appropriation of $61,170,000.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
SALARIES AND EXPENSES, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$1,836,336,000
1,926,003,000
1,934,003,000
+97,667,000
+8,000,000
HR149
58
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
This appropriation supports the Executive Office for United
States Attorneys (EOUSA) and the 94 United States Attorney Offices, which serve as the principal litigators for the U.S. Government for criminal, civil, and debt collection matters.
The Committee recommends $1,934,003,000 for the United
States Attorneys (USA), which is $97,667,000 above the fiscal year
2009 enacted level and $8,000,000 above the budget request.
Pro-IP Act.—Within the total amount provided, the Committee
recommendation includes an additional $2,000,000 above the budget request for activities authorized under Sec. 402 of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of
2008 (P.L. 110–403).
Child exploitation investigations and prosecutions.—The Committee expects EOUSA to continue to focus on investigations and
prosecutions of offenses related to the sexual exploitation of children, as authorized by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. Not less than $36,980,000 shall be available for this
purpose in fiscal year 2010.
Southwest border enforcement.—Within funds provided, the Committee includes the requested programmatic increase of $8,127,000
and 75 positions to strengthen prosecutions of criminal enterprises,
including human, drug, and weapon smuggling, along the southwest border.
Combating financial fraud.—Within funds provided, the Committee approves the programmatic request of $7,500,000 and 43 positions to enhance efforts in the areas of mortgage fraud, bankruptcy, affirmative civil enforcement, and white collar crime.
Prosecution of serious crimes in Indian Country.—The Committee
continues to be concerned about the rate of prosecution of serious
crimes in Indian Country, and notes that a Resource Plan for such
prosecutions was due to the Committee on May 11, 2009. The Attorney General is directed to expedite the submission of that report. Within the total amount provided, the Committee provides an
additional $6,000,000 for the hiring of additional Assistant U.S. Attorneys to increase the rate of needed prosecutions, and provides
a proportional increase to the appropriation for the Federal Bureau
of Investigation to support additional criminal investigations.
Terrorist recruitment.—The Committee is concerned by reports
that some young Somali-American men have been recruited by terrorist groups to fight in the Somali civil war. The Committee is
aware that the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota has engaged in efforts to help the Somali-American community in Minnesota prevent such recruitment, and urges the continuation and
expansion of those efforts.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
59
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE SYSTEM FUND
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Interest on U.S. Securities .................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
$217,416,000
¥160,000,000
¥5,000,000
52,416,000
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Interest on U.S. Securities .................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
224,488,000
¥210,000,000
¥5,000,000
9,488,000
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Offsetting Fee Collections ..................................................................
Interest on U.S. Securities .................................................................
Direct Appropriation ..........................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
224,488,000
¥210,000,000
¥5,000,000
9,488,000
+7,072,000
............................
The mission of the United States Trustee Program (USTP) is to
promote integrity and efficiency in the Nation’s bankruptcy system
by enforcing bankruptcy laws and providing oversight of private
trustees. The USTP is organized into three levels: the Executive
Office for United States Trustees in Washington, DC; United States
Trustees in 21 regions whose geographic jurisdiction is established
by statute; and 95 field offices, which cover 150 court sites and 280
other administrative hearing locations. The Committee recommends $224,488,000 for the USTP, which is $7,072,000 over the
fiscal year 2009 enacted level and equal to the budget request. The
appropriation is offset by $210,000,000 in offsetting fee collections
and $5,000,000 derived from interest on investments in U.S. securities, resulting in a direct appropriation of $9,488,000.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES, FOREIGN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT COMMISSION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,823,000
2,117,000
2,117,000
+294,000
............................
The mission of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission is to
protect the property rights of U.S. citizens abroad and promote the
international rule of law through adjudication of claims by United
States citizens against foreign governments. The Committee recommends $2,117,000 for the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, which is $294,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and
equal to the budget request.
FEES AND EXPENSES OF WITNESSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$168,300,000
168,300,000
168,300,000
............................
............................
This appropriation, which is considered mandatory for
scorekeeping purposes, provides for fees and expenses of witnesses
who appear on behalf of the Government in cases in which the
United States is a party. Eligible expenses include fees for fact and
expert witnesses, mental competency examinations and witness
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
60
and informant protection. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $168,300,000, which is equal to the budget request.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES, COMMUNITY RELATIONS SERVICE
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$9,873,000
11,479,000
11,479,000
+1,606,000
............................
The Community Relations Service was established by Title X of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide assistance to communities
in resolving disagreements arising from discriminatory practices.
The Committee recommends $11,479,000 for the Community Relations Service, which is $1,606,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
ASSETS FORFEITURE FUND
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$20,990,000
20,990,000
20,990,000
............................
............................
The Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF) provides funds for qualifying
investigative expenses of Federal law enforcement agencies and
their State or local partners. Funds for these activities are provided
from receipts in the AFF resulting from the forfeiture of assets. Expenses related to the management and disposal of the assets are
also provided from receipts in the AFF by a permanent indefinite
appropriation. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$20,990,000, which is equal to the budget request.
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$950,000,000
1,138,388,000
1,138,388,000
+188,388,000
............................
The United States Marshals Service (USMS) is responsible for
providing physical security to Federal judges and U.S. courthouses;
protecting witnesses, jurors and members of the public; safely and
humanely transporting and detaining Federal prisoners; and apprehending fugitives. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$1,138,388,000, which is equal to the budget request.
Sex offender apprehension.—The Committee appreciates that the
Marshals Service has annualized $15,812,000 of prior year supplemental funds into its fiscal year 2010 budget request for enforcement of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. However, the budget request does not provide any additional funds to
expand this program beyond the current level of effort. If the Marshals are going to make a significant impact on the estimated caseload of 100,000 non-compliant sex offenders, a concerted, multiyear effort to dedicate additional resources to the program is nec-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
61
essary. Consequently, the Committee’s recommendation includes
$20,000,000 to expand Adam Walsh Act enforcement activities in
districts across the country.
Immigration
enforcement.—The
recommendation
includes
$114,345,000 for new personnel, infrastructure, information technology and other items necessary to address the enormous workload generated by increased enforcement activity in other agencies
and bureaus. The Committee hopes that this investment will at
least partially alleviate the pressure on other Marshals programs,
such as fugitive apprehension, now that more dedicated personnel
will be available to handle the immigration-related caseload. Due
to the large funding increase, however, the Committee would like
to receive updates on the Marshals’ execution of these funds, including the amount of money obligated and the number of new
hires brought on board. The Marshals Service shall submit this information to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations
on a quarterly basis.
CONSTRUCTION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$4,000,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
+10,000,000
............................
This appropriation provides funds for construction and related
expenses in space controlled, occupied or utilized by the Marshals
Service for prisoner holding and related support. For fiscal year
2010, the Committee recommends $14,000,000, which is equal to
the budget request. These funds should be applied to the highest
priority renovation projects identified by the Marshals.
NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$83,789,000
87,938,000
87,938,000
+4,149,000
............................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The mission of the National Security Division (NSD) is to coordinate the Department’s efforts in carrying out its core mission of
combating terrorism and protecting national security. For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommends $87,938,000, which is equal
to the budget request.
National Security Reviews.—NSD’s budget justification shows
that fewer National Security Reviews than planned were undertaken in fiscal year 2008. NSD is directed to give immediate notice
to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations if there are
any deviations from the current plan to perform 20 such reviews
in fiscal year 2010.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
62
INTERAGENCY LAW ENFORCEMENT
INTERAGENCY CRIME AND DRUG ENFORCEMENT
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$515,000,000
537,507,000
528,569,000
+13,569,000
¥8,938,000
The Interagency Crime and Drug Enforcement (ICDE) account
seeks to combine the investigative and prosecutorial resources of
the Department to bring down the ‘‘worst of the worst’’ in multinational drug trafficking organizations. The interagency program of
the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) focuses participants on the mission of attacking high-level organizations through coordinated, multi-jurisdictional investigations. For
fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $528,569,000, which
is $8,938,000 below the budget request. The decrease reflects the
Committee’s intention to focus new program initiatives for the
OCDETF-participating components within those accounts rather
than through the OCDETF structure.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
enacted 1
request 2
the bill 2
Fiscal Year 2009
.................................................................
.................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010
Recommended in
.................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
1 Excludes
2 Includes
$7,065,100,000
7,718,741,000
7,718,741,000
+653,641,000
............................
$82,600,000 in emergency funding.
$101,066,000 for overseas contingency operations.
The mission of the FBI is to protect and defend the United States
against terrorism and foreign intelligence threats; to uphold and
enforce the criminal laws of the United States; and to provide leadership and criminal justice services to Federal, State, municipal
and international agencies and partners. For fiscal year 2010, the
Committee recommends $7,718,741,000, which is equal to the
budget request.
Materials submitted in support of the budget.—The FBI’s congressional budget justification requires some additional information
in order to better aid the Committee’s review and analysis of the
FBI’s needs. First, the FBI is directed to submit all future budget
requests with a listing of enhancement proposals in priority order
so that the Committee can weigh the relative importance of each
new initiative. A prioritization of enhancements within each end
state capability or grouped into tiers will not be sufficient to meet
this requirement.
Second, the justification needs to include more quantifiable descriptions of the end state capabilities. The Committee understands
that the Bureau is currently working to develop more discrete and
quantifiable end states and is encouraged by informal indications
of progress in this area. When this exercise is complete, the newly
refined end state capabilities should be included in justification
materials, along with a description of how each new initiative will
advance the Bureau toward the achievement of an end state.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
63
Finally, the classified nature of much of the FBI’s work necessitates classified descriptions of some of the enhancement requests.
However, the classified addendum to the justification is not always
made immediately available to the Committee on the date of budget submission. For the fiscal year 2011 process and all future requests, the FBI is directed to submit the classified addendum concurrently with the unclassified justification.
Hiring challenges.—The FBI has proposed extremely aggressive
hiring goals for both 2009, in which more than 2,200 positions will
need to be filled, and 2010, in which the FBI proposes adding 1,389
new positions while simultaneously managing attrition that can
also be expected to exceed 1,000 positions. The Committee is skeptical of the FBI’s ability to meet these hiring goals, as they exceed
what the Bureau was capable of achieving in 2008 (when directfunded on-board positions only increased by 928 and vacancies increased by 174).
In order to improve the Committee’s oversight of the FBI’s hiring
program, the FBI is directed to provide immediately to the House
and Senate Committees on Appropriations a hiring plan for directfunded positions in fiscal year 2010. This plan should show onboard start of year staffing, anticipated attrition, planned enhancement hiring, planned vacancy hiring and expected end of year vacancies. This data should be supplemented by quarterly reports
showing the number of direct-funded hires and separations in that
quarter, as well as a cumulative running total of each.
Hollow positions.—The FBI is still carrying at least 450 ‘‘hollow’’
positions, for which funds were appropriated but subsequently diverted by the FBI for other purposes. The Committee discourages
the FBI from continuing to carry these existing hollow positions or
taking any action that would create additional hollow positions in
the future. Consequently, the FBI is directed to prioritize the filling
of the 450 existing hollow positions prior to seeking additional new
positions in any future budget request. In addition, the FBI is directed to notify the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations prior to taking any action that would divert salary funds
away from the positions for which they were appropriated, either
for temporary uses (e.g., equipment purchases) or ongoing needs
(e.g., pay raise absorption).
White collar crime.—The Committee is concerned that the FBI’s
budget proposal focuses too exclusively on mortgage fraud at the
expense of other high priority financial fraud issues, including
fraud or abuse associated with the Troubled Asset Relief Program
and the investigation of accounting fraud, self-dealing and market
manipulation. The Committee’s recommendation includes an increase of $25,491,000, as requested, for mortgage fraud, but the
FBI is directed to also make these funds available for other high
priority financial fraud cases.
Civil rights enforcement.—The recommended level includes an increase of $8,000,000 for civil rights enforcement, which will complement civil rights initiatives funded in other portions of the Department. The Committee expects these funds to be used for investigations of human trafficking, hate crimes and cases pursued
under the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Act.
Intellectual property enforcement.—Within amounts provided,
FBI should dedicate no less than $8,000,000 for new agents to in-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
64
vestigate intellectual property (IP) cases as authorized under section 402 of the PRO-IP Act (P.L. 110–403). These new agents are
in addition to the IP-dedicated agents funded in the Fiscal Year
2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111–8) and identified in
the Department’s 2009 spend plan. The Department is directed to
provide a report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations with an expenditure analysis of these congressional augmentations to ensure that these agents are solely investigating and
supporting the criminal prosecution of violations of those Federal
intellectual property laws cited in the statement accompanying P.L.
111–8. The report shall provide an accounting of the agents placed
in specific field offices with Computer Hacking and Intellectual
Property units and the types of intellectual property investigations
pursued by these agents. Corresponding prosecutorial resources
have been provided in other portions of this Act.
Gangs and violent crime.—Gangs pose a continuing threat to
communities across the country and are a leading contributor to
rising violent crime rates in many jurisdictions. The recommendation includes an increase of $25,000,000 to expand the FBI’s ability
to confront gangs and violent crime in U.S. communities and in Indian Country through the Safe Streets and Safe Trails task force
programs. These programs allow each FBI field office to address
violent crime, major theft, street gang and drug-related violence
through the establishment of FBI-sponsored, long-term, proactive
task forces with State, local, tribal, and other Federal law enforcement agencies, focused on the dismantlement and disruption of violent street gangs. The Committee expects this increased funding to
be used to expand the resources of existing task forces, and to support the creation of at least 3 new task forces.
Records management.—The Committee’s recommendation includes requested funding to continue records indexing and other
preparations to make FBI’s case and administrative files universally searchable and accessible, and to ensure that they are useful
intelligence and investigative tools.
Overseas Contingency Operations.—The Committee’s recommendation includes $101,066,000, as requested, for the
annualization of FBI’s terrorism supplemental funds. The Committee expects this action to end the process of annual supplemental appropriations for the FBI.
Next Generation Identification (NGI).—The Committee remains
concerned with the size and scope of the FBI’s NGI program. With
respect to size, the Committee notes that the Incremental Development Plan (IDP) and the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) have
been rewritten three times over nine months, and the FBI advises
that program requirements are still not locked down. The inability
to finalize program requirements and a budget and schedule baseline raises the possibility of significant budget overages and schedule delays. The FBI is directed to notify the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations prior to acceptance of any Engineering Change Proposal that will change the IDP or the IMS as they
existed on April 14, 2009.
With respect to program scope, the Committee understands that
the FBI intends to engage in trade studies to determine the utility
of adding new biometric indicators to NGI. However, it is unclear
how the FBI will judge the reliability and suitability of these new
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
65
biometrics for use as an identification tool. The FBI is directed to
report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations
within 90 days of the enactment of this Act on the standards by
which the Bureau will assess the maturity of any biometric indicator being considered for inclusion in NGI.
National Security Reviews.—The budget justification for the National Security Division (NSD) indicates that NSD completed fewer
National Security Reviews than planned in fiscal year 2008 because the FBI’s Office of General Counsel, who must participate in
the reviews, was busy with other requirements and commitments.
This seems to imply that the FBI has insufficient resources dedicated to assisting in these reviews, which are required as part of
the Department’s National Security Letter (NSL) audit and remediation plan. The Committee does not understand how such a resource problem exists, however, given that several million dollars
of NSL remediation funds remain available from prior supplemental appropriations. If additional resources are required beyond
those existing remediation dollars, the FBI is urged to identify
those needs and request sufficient funds in fiscal year 2011.
Retention and relocation bonuses.—The Committee is aware of
continuing concerns about annuity losses and relocation costs associated with the implementation of the Field Office Supervisory
Term Limit policy. In light of such concerns, and difficulties in filling leadership positions at the field supervisor level, the FBI revised the policy in December, 2008 to extend the term limit from
five to seven years. Title V of this bill continues, and makes permanent, retention and relocation bonus authorities provided to the
FBI under 5 U.S.C. 5759. The Committee encourages the Bureau
to use these authorities to provide appropriate compensation to
agents who were relocated to high-cost areas or have been otherwise negatively affected by the implementation of the Field Office
Supervisory Term Limit policy. The Committee expects the FBI to
propose legislation or to request appropriations, if appropriate, to
address any further impacts attributable to this policy.
CONSTRUCTION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...............................................................
Recommended in the bill ...............................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ........................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ........................................................
$153,491,000
142,796,000
132,796,000
¥20,695,000
¥10,000,000
This appropriation provides funds for the construction of FBI facilities and related activities. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee
recommends $132,796,000, which is $10,000,000 below the budget
request.
Construction queue.—The budget proposes funds to begin another
new construction project at the FBI Academy even though there
are other construction projects pending for which additional funds
are required. It is inefficient to continue appropriating funds to
begin new construction without first sufficiently funding existing
projects. Consequently, the Committee has not provided funds for
any new projects this year.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
66
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,939,084,000
2,014,682,000
2,019,682,000
+80,598,000
+5,000,000
DEA’s mission is to enforce the controlled substances laws and
regulations of the United States; bring to the criminal and civil justice system those organizations and principal members of organizations involved in the growing, manufacturing or distribution of controlled substances appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the
United States; and support non-enforcement programs aimed at reducing the availability of illicit controlled substances on the domestic and international markets. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee
recommends $2,019,682,000, which is $5,000,000 above the budget
request.
Diversion control program.—In addition to the direct appropriation, the recommendation provides $251,790,000 for the Diversion
Control program, which is fully offset with fee collections. This
funding level includes an increase of $2,706,000 for expanded forensic support of diversion cases.
Southwest border enforcement.—The Committee recommendation
includes an increase of $24,075,000 in support of DEA’s enforcement efforts along the southwest border. These resources will help
DEA to expand its presence along the border, address increased
workload related to narcotics seizures by DHS and respond to special field intelligence priorities.
Continuing narcoterrorism investments.—The Committee’s recommendation includes $10,000,000, as requested, for the annualization of DEA supplemental funds that are not otherwise provided
for through the Department of State request. The Committee expects this action to end the process of annual supplemental appropriations for DEA.
Mobile Enforcement Teams (MET).—The Committee recommendation includes $5,000,000 above the request to continue the
effort to reestablish Mobile Enforcement Teams (MET) in each domestic field office. The activities of MET should continue to include
a focus on methamphetamine enforcement.
Methamphetamine strategy.—The rise of ‘‘smurfing’’ as a mean of
evading the pseudoephedrine purchase limits contained in the
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act has created a resurgence
in the number of small toxic labs operating in the country. The
Committee directs DEA to report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within 90 days of the enactment of this Act
on the smurfing enforcement strategy it intends to pursue. The
strategy report should describe both the actions DEA can pursue
with current enforcement authorities, as well as any legislative
changes that might improve DEA’s ability to identify and apprehend individuals engaged in smurfing.
Medical marijuana policies.—Within 60 days of enactment of this
Act, the Department shall provide to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations clarification of the Department’s policy
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
67
regarding enforcement of federal laws and use of federal resources
against individuals involved in medical marijuana activities.
BUREAU
OF
ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS
AND
EXPLOSIVES
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,054,215,000
1,114,772,000
1,105,772,000
+51,557,000
¥9,000,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
ATF is responsible for enforcing Federal criminal laws and regulating the firearms and explosives industries. The combined efforts
of special agents and industry operations investigators allow ATF
to identify, investigate and recommend for prosecution violators of
the Federal firearms and explosives laws. Additionally, ATF ensures that licensees are operating within established laws and regulations. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$1,105,772,000, which is $9,000,000 below the budget request.
Southwest border enforcement.—The Committee recommendation
includes an increase of $17,989,000 in support of ATF’s Project
Gunrunner. This brings the total amount available to ATF for
weapons trafficking along the border to $59,929,000. However,
$10,000,000 of that total is one-time money provided through the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Accordingly, these funds
need to be built into ATF’s regular appropriation no later than fiscal year 2011 in order to avoid a diminution of effort directed to
Project Gunrunner. The Committee directs ATF to ensure that
these funds are annualized into its fiscal year 2011 request.
eTrace reconfiguration.—ATF may need to expand and reconfigure eTrace and related systems in order to efficiently find and
package responses to trace data requests as permitted by the bill
language associated with this account. If additional resources are
necessary for this reconfiguration, ATF is encouraged to use the
Department’s authorities under P.L. 102–140 to access up to
$8,500,000 of expired prior year funds for this purpose.
National Center for Explosives Research and Training
(NCETR).—Funds associated with Phase Two of the NCETR
project have not been included in the Committee’s recommendation.
While the Committee supports the work that will be done at
NCETR, limited fiscal resources must be first directed to the southwest border firearms trafficking efforts that support the Department’s larger Mexican Cartel Strategy.
Gangs and violent crime.—The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 for ATF’s Violent Crime Impact Team (VCIT)
program for violent crime and gang enforcement. VCITs are interagency task forces that identify, target, disrupt and refer for prosecution violent criminals and gang members. The Committee expects these resources to be used to expand the activities of existing
VCITs and to establish new VCITs in geographic areas of highest
need.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
68
CONSTRUCTION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
............................
$6,000,000
............................
............................
¥6,000,000
This appropriation provides funds for the construction of ATF facilities and related activities. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee
recommends no funding for this account.
NCETR.—In accordance with the funding recommendation for
the ATF Salaries and Expenses account, construction funds requested for Phase Two of the NCETR project have not been included in order to preserve the Committee’s immediate focus on
southwest border firearms trafficking efforts.
FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$5,595,754,000
5,979,831,000
6,077,231,000
+481,477,000
+97,400,000
The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is responsible for confining offenders in the controlled environments of prisons and community-based
facilities that are safe, humane, cost-efficient and appropriately secure, and for providing work and other self-improvement opportunities to assist offenders in becoming law-abiding citizens upon release. The Committee recommends $6,077,231,000 for the salaries
and expenses of the Federal Prison System, which is $481,477,000
over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $97,400,000 above the
budget request.
Correctional officer staffing.—The Federal prison population has
grown explosively over the last 20 years. Rising from roughly
25,000 prisoners in 1980, the population is estimated to grow to
more than 210,000 by the end of fiscal year 2010. Correspondingly,
the overcrowding rate is projected to rise to 38 percent in 2010, up
from 37 percent in 2009. Chronic underfunding based on inadequate budget requests have forced BOP to rely excessively on correctional officer overtime and the diversion of program staff instead
of hiring additional correctional officers, leaving the workforce
spread dangerously thin and compromising BOP’s ability to operate
the Federal Prison System in a safe and efficient manner.
Although Congress provided an additional $160,000,000 above
the budget request for fiscal year 2009, BOP used those additional
funds to meet the basic operational needs of its facilities, and plans
no net increase in staffing in fiscal year 2009 to begin to address
its understaffing problem. The Committee is extremely concerned
that the proposed budget for fiscal year 2010 would once again not
permit BOP to manage the basic operational needs of its prisons.
It is particularly concerning that the BOP budget justification describes as ‘‘program increases’’ a number of inflationary cost increases that should be considered budget adjustments required to
meet BOP’s basic operational needs. In addition, while the BOP
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
69
budget proposes funding increases to activate two new prisons and
to hire a significant number of new correctional officers, the Committee is not convinced that BOP will actually be able to carry out
those proposals while its basic operational needs continue to be underfunded.
The Committee believes that the activation of newly constructed
prisons and a reduction in the staff-to-prisoner ratio must not be
delayed. As a result, the Committee directs that no less than
$70,568,000 of the total salaries and expenses appropriation be
used entirely for additional correctional officer staffing. As requested, no less than $52,696,000 of the total shall be used to activate FCI McDowell and no less than $49,424,000 of the total shall
be used to activate FCI Mendota, including all net new staffing
that will be required to operate these facilities. If additional salaries and expenses funding is required to meet BOP’s operating
needs during fiscal year 2010, the Committee fully expects the Department to propose a reprogramming of funds from outside BOP
to meet those needs.
The Committee notes that the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) is currently evaluating BOP’s budget formulation methodology, and expects BOP and the Department to review carefully
any recommendations made by GAO when formulating BOP’s fiscal
year 2011 budget to ensure that sufficient funding to meet basic
operationial needs is proposed. The Department should also
present the fiscal year 2011 budget for BOP in a way that accurately differentiates non-discretionary, inflationary cost adjustments to BOP’s base budget requirements from program and staffing enhancements.
To ensure that BOP’s correctional worker staffing needs are
clearly defined, the Committee directs BOP to provide a report to
the Committee, within 60 days of enactment of this Act, identifying
the appropriate number of correctional workers, differentiated by
staffing category, required at each BOP prison facility to ensure
the safe and effective operation of that facility. The Committee understands that staffing needs vary based on each facility’s security
level, programming needs, design, and other factors, but strongly
believes that assessing staffing needs on a facility-by-facility basis
is a more effective way of establishing staffing goals than using a
system-wide staff-to-prisoner ratio. The Committee directs BOP to
premise its funding proposal for staffing in fiscal year 2011 on such
a facility-specific assessment of staffing needs.
Federal Prison System population.—Between 2010 and 2014,
BOP estimates that it will experience a net growth of 22,500 prisoners while planning to add only an additional 13,000 beds in new
prisons during the same time period. With the BOP prisoner population currently exceeding the rated capacity of BOP facilities by 37
percent, the Federal Prison System prisoner population is on an
unsustainable path. While the Committee fully supports consequences for convicted offenders that are commensurate with the
seriousness of their crimes, it also notes the importance of ensuring
that those consequences minimize costs to the American taxpayer
and reduce the incidence of recidivism.
The Committee is aware that a number of States, through a reform effort known as Justice Reinvestment, have initiated efforts to
identify the major drivers of the growth in their prison populations
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
70
and implement evidenced-based reforms designed to reduce prison
population growth and recidivism while restoring high-crime communities and improving public safety. These States have found
that the growth in prison populations is primarily fueled by high
recidivism rates, including high probation and parole revocations
that are often driven by technical violations. These factors lead to
higher prison admissions that require more investments in prison
construction and prison operations. With bipartisan support, evidence-based criminal justice reforms have helped a number of
States, including Texas and Kansas, significantly reduce recidivism
rates and reduce the need for new prison construction, allowing
States to reinvest resources in prisoner reentry, crime prevention,
and other programs that help to further reduce recidivism.
The Committee is aware that a similar effort is underway at the
Federal level through a high level Department task force that is
evaluating various legislative and administrative options for reforming the Federal criminal justice system in ways that could help
reduce the population of the Federal Prison System. The Committee strongly encourages this effort, and particularly urges the
Department and BOP to consider evidence-based policy changes
that BOP could make under its current statutory authority that
would help it responsibly manage its offender population while reducing recidivism, improving public safety, and reducing future
costs to the American taxpayer.
The Committee notes that an American Bar Association Commission on Effective Criminal Sanctions roundtable recently made a
number of recommendations for using current legal authorities to
reduce the number of nonviolent offenders in BOP facilities in ways
that could also contribute to reduced recidivism among those offenders. Among the recommendations were a proposal to change
the way BOP calculates good time to make it consistent with the
guidelines of the U.S. Sentencing Commission and a proposal to reduce the sentences of nonviolent criminal aliens who agree to be
deported, a tool that a number of States are successfully using to
reduce their own prison populations and reduce prison expenditures.
The National Institute of Corrections (NIC), an agency within the
BOP that provides support and assistance to Federal, State and
local correctional agencies, is currently evaluating the potential of
various evidence-based criminal justice reforms on State prison
populations to quantify the potential cost savings that could be
achieved if those reforms were implemented. The Committee directs the NIC to expand its analysis to include the potential effect
of reforms on the Federal prison population and to provide a report
to the Committee on the results by March 1, 2010.
Second Chance Act implementation.—The Second Chance Act
(P.L. 110–199) imposed new requirements on BOP to facilitate the
successful reentry of offenders back into their communities and reduce the rate of recidivism. Among those requirements are the establishment of recidivism reduction goals and increased collaboration with State, Tribal, local, community, and faith-based organizations to improve the reentry of prisoners. The Committee is aware
that BOP is currently developing an Inmate Skills Development
(ISD) strategy, as required by the Second Chance Act, to assess a
prisoner’s skills upon incarceration and provide programming
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
71
based on that assessment to fill skill deficits and address other reentry needs. The Committee recommendation includes $13,778,000
and 61 FTE for ISD and other Second Chance Act activities, as proposed by the Department. The Committee notes, however, that
BOP has indicated that approximately $80,000,000 is required to
fully implement its Second Chance Act responsibilities. The Committee expects the Department to propose significant additional
funding for this purpose in the fiscal year 2011 budget request.
The Second Chance Act clarified that BOP has the authority to
place offenders in community corrections, including residential reentry centers (RRCs), for up to 12 months to facilitate their successful reentry and reduce recidivism. In addition, the Act directed
BOP to provide incentives, such as increased time in community
corrections, to encourage prisoners to fully participate in skills development programs. The Second Chance Act also makes clear that
community corrections may include a period of home confinement
for up to the shorter of 10 percent of an offender’s term of imprisonment or six months.
BOP has indicated that decisions about length of stay in RRCs
are influenced by a higher marginal cost of RRCs compared to the
marginal cost of keeping a prisoner in a BOP facility. While the
Committee appreciates the short term trade-offs involved in annual
budgeting for RRCs, it believes that the increased use of RRCs and
home confinement, when implemented as part of a comprehensive
prisoner reentry program, can contribute to reduced recidivism,
safer and more stable communities, and reduced costs for the Federal Prison System. The Committee strongly urges the Department
to propose significant additional funding in the fiscal year 2011
budget submission to increase the use of RRCs as part of a comprehensive prisoner reentry program.
In addition, given that home confinement—with appropriate supervision and services—is significantly less costly than either confinement in BOP facilities or RRCs, BOP should make appropriate
use of this option when considering how to provide reentering prisoners with up to 12 months in community corrections. The Committee directs BOP to report quarterly on the average length of
stay in community corrections, defined as both RRCs and home
confinement.
Critical to prisoner reentry and recidivism reduction are substance abuse, mental health, educational, vocational, and other
services provided in prisons or during confinement in community
corrections. Substance abuse treatment is particularly essential because 40 percent of inmates enter the Federal Prison System with
a substance abuse disorder. Within the amount provided for salaries and expenses, not less than $90,000,000 is made available for
drug abuse treatment services for all eligible inmates as required
by law, and not less than $150,000,000 is made available for inmate education and vocational training programs.
To the greatest extent possible, BOP shall prioritize the participation of nonviolent offenders in the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP) in a way that maximizes the benefit of sentence reduction opportunities for reducing the prisoner population.
In addition, as part of its RDAP, the Committee encourages BOP
to conduct a pilot initiative on the use of anti-craving medications
as a component of drug abuse treatment. Such an initiative should
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
72
continue the use of anti-craving medications through an offender’s
period of confinement in community corrections and period of supervised release. The Committee encourages BOP to collaborate on
this initiative with the National Institute of Drug Abuse, which is
currently supporting a research study on the effectiveness of anticraving medication on probationers and parolees.
As part of its portion of the Department’s fiscal year 2010 spending plan, BOP shall include a description of all of its activities related to Second Chance Act implementation, including inmate drug
abuse treatment programs, inmate education and vocational training programs, and all other program services designed to facilitate
offender reentry, along with the estimated costs associated with
those activities in fiscal year 2010. The Committee also directs
BOP to include, as part of the Department’s fiscal year 2011 budget
submission, the estimated costs of full implementation of each of its
programs and activities related to offender reentry in fiscal year
2011.
In addition, to ensure that BOP is benefiting from outside expertise and viewpoints, the Committee directs BOP to convene an
independent panel to make recommendations for future options for
the development of prisoner reentry programs, including options related to the role of faith-based and community programs. The Committee expects the report of this panel to be submitted with the Department’s fiscal year 2010 spending plan.
The Committee also directs GAO to evaluate BOP’s implementation of Second Chance Act requirements, including the adequacy of
funding proposals by the Department to carry out those requirements, and to provide recommendations to the Committee by
March 1, 2010, on how BOP should adapt its facilities, programs,
and budgeting processes to fully implement the provisions of the
Act that apply to BOP.
Counterterrorism activities.—Within the amount provided in this
account, not less than $14,200,000 is for the full estimated cost of
BOP’s counterterrorism activities, including monitoring and translating the communications of incarcerated terrorists and disseminating information to law enforcement agencies, as appropriate.
These activities have been partially funded through supplemental
appropriations in previous fiscal years.
Reimbursement for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) detainees.—The Committee directs BOP to work cooperatively with the Department of Homeland Security to transfer expeditiously the estimated 850 ICE detainees who are currently
housed in the Federal Prison System, or to obtain prompt and fair
reimbursement from ICE for the costs of incarcerating them.
National Institute of Corrections (NIC).—The NIC provides valuable training and services, including research and evaluation, technical assistance, information sharing and planning to State and
local adult corrections agencies, the BOP and other Federal agencies. To address deficiencies identified by the U.S. Census Bureau
in the reporting of inmate address information, the Committee encourages the NIC to work with State corrections agencies to develop better procedures and systems for collecting and maintaining
corrections records.
Stun lethal fences.—The Committee notes that BOP correctional
officers have expressed concerns about the use of ‘‘stun lethal’’
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
73
fences at BOP facilities in lieu of correctional officers in perimeter
towers. BOP is directed to submit a report to the Committee, within 60 days of enactment of this Act, on the reliability and effectiveness of these fences.
Privately-contracted prison facilities.—Based on cost data provided by BOP, the cost of contracting with private sector companies
for the use and operation of low security prison facilities appears
to cost more than operating BOP low security facilities when discounting BOP’s cost of inmate programming, which is not provided
in most private facilities. The Committee directs BOP to submit a
report, by March 1, 2010, on its long term strategy for minimizing
the cost of incarcerating low security criminal alien offenders, including an assessment of the potential for closed military facilities
to be converted to low security prisons operated by BOP.
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$575,807,000
96,744,000
96,744,000
¥479,063,000
............................
The Committee recommends $96,744,000 for the construction,
modernization, maintenance, and repair of prison and detention facilities housing Federal inmates, which is $479,063,000 below the
fiscal year 2009 enacted level and equal to the request. Of the
total, no less than $71,358,000 is for modernization and repair
(M&R) activities.
Modernization and repair.—The Committee is extremely concerned about the growing backlog of health and safety repairs in
Federal prison facilities. Thirty-four (one-third) of BOP’s 114 institutions are more than 50 years old, and most have not undergone
major renovations since they were constructed or acquired by BOP.
In addition, the BOP has a backlog of major modernization and repair (M&R) projects valued at nearly $300,000,000. BOP’s budget
justification indicates that it ‘‘strives to follow’’ the Federal Facilities Council recommendation of budgeting annually for M&R needs
equal to two percent of the asset value of its facilities, which in the
case of BOP facilities totals more than $400,000,000. Unfortunately, the Department has proposed only $71,358,000 for M&R activities in fiscal year 2010. BOP is directed to provide a report to
the Committee, within 30 days of enactment of this Act, itemizing
all pending M&R projects for Federal prison facilities, specifying
when each project was first identified, and estimating the cost associated with each project. The Committee also directs BOP to provide an updated M&R backlog list as part of its fiscal year 2011
budget request.
Construction.—The BOP budget proposes $25,386,000 for construction-related activities, including $10,000,000 required for lease
payments for the Oklahoma Transfer Center. Although BOP plans
to activate four new prisons in 2014, it will be unable to maintain
that schedule without a significant new construction appropriation
by fiscal year 2011. The Committee notes, however, that even if
BOP stays on track in activating planned new prisons, it will add
approximately 13,000 new beds between 2010 and 2014 at the
same time that the BOP population is expected to grow by 22,500.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
74
The Committee expects the Department to ensure that the fiscal
year 2011 budget proposal for BOP contains sufficient resources for
BOP to at least stay on track with its current plan to activate new
prisons, and for BOP to address its M&R backlog.
LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES, FEDERAL PRISON
INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$2,328,000
2,700,000
2,700,000
+372,000
............................
Created by Federal statute in 1934, Federal Prison Industries
(FPI) operates as a wholly-owned, self-sustaining Government corporation. FPI employs and provides skills training to Federal inmates.
The Committee recommends a limitation on administrative expenses of $2,700,000 for FPI, which is $372,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level and equal to the request. In testimony before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related
Agencies, the BOP Director stated that FPI is the BOP’s most important correctional program because it has been proven to substantially reduce recidivism and it is self-funded from the proceeds
of sales. In addition, it keeps prisoners productively occupied, making them substantially less likely to engage in misconduct. The
Committee is concerned that the percentage of BOP’s inmate population involved with FPI has decreased 30 percent from just six
years ago. The Committee urges the Department to explore new
program models, and to seek new funding and authorities, as necessary, to create additional inmate work and training programs
that prepare inmates for successful reentry into the community.
The Department shall submit, within 60 days after the enactment
of this Act, a plan describing such options for increasing inmate
work opportunities.
STATE
AND
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
In total, the bill provides $3,423,988,000 for State and local law
enforcement and crime prevention grant programs, which is
$196,888,000 more than the fiscal year 2009 funding level and
$670,500,000 above the budget request. The Committee directs the
Department to work closely with recipients of congressionally-designated funding to ensure that funded projects are consistent with
authorized criminal justice purposes and goals. No grant funding
shall be used for luxury items, real estate, or construction projects.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
75
OFFICE
ON
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PREVENTION AND PROSECUTION
PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill 1 .................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted 1 ..........................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request 1 ..........................................................
$415,000,000
414,000,000
400,000,000
¥15,000,000
¥14,000,000
1 The recommended level does not include funding for programs that were funded through this account in
fiscal year 2009 that are administered by the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). For fiscal year 2010, funding
for each of these OJP-administered programs is appropriated directly to OJP at the fiscal year 2009 level.
The Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) coordinates legislative and other initiatives relating to violence against women and
administers grant programs to help prevent, detect, and stop violence against women, including domestic and dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. A number of programs that received
funding through this appropriation in fiscal year 2009 are funded
in this bill through the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) appropriation because they are administered by OJP. These include: the
CASA Special Advocates program; the Training for Judicial Personnel program; the Stalking Database program; the Research on
Violence Against Women program; Training Programs to Assist
Probation and Parole Officers; and the Closed Circuit Television
program. The Committee recommends funding through OJP for
each of these programs at the fiscal year 2009 level. For grants and
programs administered directly by OVW, the Committee recommends $400,000,000 in fiscal year 2010, $11,000,000 above the
comparable budget request and the comparable fiscal year 2009
level.
The Committee directs OVW, as part of the Department’s spending plan for fiscal year 2010, to provide details on OVW’s planned
training and technical assistance (T&TA) activities and research
and statistics activities. The spending plan shall differentiate those
activities performed via grant, cooperative agreement, interagency
agreement, under contract, and performed directly by OVW. In addition, the Committee directs the Department, as part of the fiscal
year 2011 budget submission, to provide similar details on OVW’s
planned T&TA activities and research and statistics activities for
fiscal year 2011.
The funding requested through OVW for the Safe Start program
is not provided through OVW because Safe Start is administered
by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, within the Office of Justice Programs. The Committee instead recommends funding for Safe Start through the Juvenile Justice appropriation.
[In thousands of dollars]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Program
Recommended
STOP Grants .....................................................................................................................................................
National Institute of Justice (R&D) .........................................................................................................
Transitional Housing Assistance .............................................................................................................
Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies ................................................................................................................
Rural Domestic Violence Assistance Grants ....................................................................................................
Violence on College Campuses ........................................................................................................................
Civil Legal Assistance ......................................................................................................................................
Sexual Assault Victims Services ......................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$200,000
(3,000)
(18,000)
60,000
41,000
9,500
37,000
13,000
HR149
76
[In thousands of dollars]
Program
Recommended
Elder Abuse Grant Program .............................................................................................................................
Safe Havens Project .........................................................................................................................................
Education & Training for Disabled Female Victims ........................................................................................
Court Training and Improvement .....................................................................................................................
Services for Children/Youth Exposed to Violence ............................................................................................
Advocates for Youth/Services for Youth Victims (STARY) ...............................................................................
National Tribal Sex Offender Registry ..............................................................................................................
Engaging Men and Youth in Prevention ..........................................................................................................
National Resource Center on Workplace Responses ........................................................................................
4,250
14,000
6,750
3,000
3,000
3,500
1,000
3,000
1,000
Total 1 ......................................................................................................................................................
400,000
1 The
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
recommended level does not include funding for programs that were funded through this account in fiscal year 2009 that are administered by the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). For fiscal year 2010, funding for each of these OJP-administered programs is appropriated directly to OJP at the fiscal year 2009 level. For programs administered by OVW, the total is an increase of $11,000,000 above the comparable
FY 2009 funding level.
STOP formula grants (grants to combat violence against
women).—The Committee recommendation provides $200,000,000,
which is $10,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level and the request, for coordinated, multidisciplinary efforts to improve the
criminal justice system’s response to violent crimes against women
and encourage the development and improvement of related law
enforcement and prosecution strategies. Within the funding provided, $3,000,000 is made available to the National Institute of
Justice for research and evaluation of programs to prevent violence
against women and $18,000,000 is available for transitional housing assistance. An additional $225,000,000 was appropriated for
STOP grants through the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, P.L. 111–5.
Grants to encourage arrest policies.—The Committee recommendation provides $60,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009
level and the request, for grants to encourage jurisdictions to implement mandatory and pro-arrest policies as an effective domestic
violence intervention.
Rural domestic violence assistance.—The Committee recommendation provides $41,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009
level and the request, for Rural Domestic Violence Assistance
Grants, which enhance the safety of victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, and child abuse in rural America. This funding is
equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Violence on college campuses.—The Committee recommendation
provides $9,500,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request, to encourage institutions of higher education to adopt comprehensive, coordinated responses to violent crimes against women
on campuses.
Civil legal assistance.—The Committee recommendation provides
$37,000,000 to increase the availability of legal assistance necessary to provide effective aid to victims of domestic violence, stalking, sexual assault, or dating violence who are seeking relief in
legal matters arising as a consequence of that abuse or violence.
This amount is equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Sexual assault victims services.—The Committee recommendation provides $13,000,000, which is $1,000,000 above the fiscal year
2009 level and the request, to assist state coalitions in coordinating
victim services activities, and for collaboration and coordination
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
77
among Federal, State, and local entities engaged in activities to
prevent violence against women.
Elder abuse grant program.—The Committee recommendation
provides $4,250,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request, for community-based projects designed to improve the justice
system’s response to elder abuse and violence.
Safe haven project.—The Committee recommendation provides
$14,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request, for
efforts to prevent and reduce the impact of children’s exposure to
family and community violence.
Education and training for disabled female victims.—The Committee recommendation provides $6,750,000, equal to the fiscal
year 2009 level and the request, to provide education, consultation
and information to service providers to address obstacles encountered by women with disabilities who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking.
Court training and improvements program.—The Committee recommendation provides $3,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009
level and the budget request, for efforts to improve court responses
to adult and youth domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Services for children/youth exposed to violence.—The Committee
recommendation includes $3,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009
level and the request, for services for children, including direct
counseling, advocacy, and mentoring.
Advocates for youth/services for youth victims (STARY).—The
Committee recommendation includes $3,500,000, equal to the fiscal
year 2009 level and the request, for projects that provide direct
counseling, advocacy, legal, and mental health services for children
and young adults who have experienced domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking.
National tribal sex offender registry.—For maintaining a National Tribal Sex Offender Registry, the Committee provides
$1,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Engaging men and youth in prevention.—For programs to engage
men and youth in preventing domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, and stalking, the Committee provides $3,000,000,
equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
National resource center on workplace responses.—The Committee recommendation provides $1,000,000, equal to the fiscal
year 2009 level and the request, for a national resource center on
workplace responses to assist victims of domestic and sexual violence.
Jessica Gonzales victim assistance program.—The Committee recognizes the critical value of victim assistants who act as liaisons
between local law enforcement agencies and victims of domestic
and dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking in order to improve the enforcement of protection orders. The placement of these
special victim assistants is an eligible purpose for funding under
the STOP Violence Against Women formula grant program.
Salaries and expenses.—The Committee provides management
and administration funding for the Office on Violence Against
Women through a salaries and expenses appropriation under OJP.
As a result, no administrative overhead costs shall be deducted
from the programs funded from this account.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
78
OFFICE
OF
JUSTICE PROGRAMS
The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) was established to provide
Federal leadership, coordination, and assistance to make the Nation’s justice system more efficient and effective in preventing and
responding to crime. OJP is responsible for administering grants;
collecting statistical data and conducting analyses; identifying
emerging criminal justice issues; developing and testing promising
approaches to address these issues; evaluating program results;
and disseminating these findings and other information to State,
tribal, and local governments.
The Committee recommends $2,221,988,000 for the Office of Justice Programs, which is $643,500,000 above the budget request and
$155,388,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted level.
The Committee directs OJP, as part of the Department’s spending plan for fiscal year 2010, to provide details of its planned training and technical assistance (T&TA) activities and research and
statistics activities. The spending plan shall differentiate those activities performed via grant, cooperative agreement, interagency
agreement, under contract, and performed directly by OJP. In addition, the Committee directs the Department, as part of the fiscal
year 2011 budget submission, to provide details of OJP’s planned
T&TA activities and research and statistics activities for fiscal year
2011.
Evidence-based programs.—The Committee urges OJP to ensure,
to the greatest extent practicable, that competitive grants are used
for evidence-based programs and activities.
Services for victims of rape.—The Committee is aware that an estimated one in six women in the United States will experience a
sexual assault in her lifetime, and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ranks rape as the second most violent crime, second
only to murder. The Department of Justice is encouraged to continue supporting programs, including hotline programs, which facilitate the delivery of confidential recovery services to rape victims.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
............................
$213,388,000
213,388,000
+213,388,000
............................
To achieve greater transparency, efficiency, and accountability in
the management, administration, and oversight of the Justice Department grant programs, Congress established a new salaries and
expenses account for fiscal year 2009 within State and Local Law
Enforcement Activities. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee provides this appropriation within the Office of Justice Programs, as
requested, to facilitate the allocation of salaries and expenses funding among the grant offices.
A total of $213,388,000 is provided for salaries and expenses for
Department of Justice grant programs in fiscal year 2010, including $139,218,000 for the Office of Justice Programs (OJP);
$37,462,000 for transfer to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS); and $15,708,000 for transfer to the Office on
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
79
Violence Against Women (OVW). The Committee expects all activities related to the management and administration of grant programs, grants, and cooperative agreements—including activities related to peer review—to be supported with salaries and expenses
funding. Training and technical assistance (T&TA) activities and
research and statistics activities performed by OJP, OVW, and
COPS, or through interagency agreements or under contract for
OJP, OVW, and COPS, may be supported with program funds, subject to the submission of details related to these costs in the Department’s fiscal year 2010 spending plan.
Within the funds provided, $21,000,000 is made available to the
Office of Audit, Assessment, and Management (OAAM). The Committee expects OAAM to continue to develop its capacity to evaluate, in coordination with the National Institute of Justice, the effectiveness of programs and projects funded by OJP, OVW, and
COPS, using rigorous research and evaluation methods that generate valid evidence on the effectiveness of crime prevention strategies.
JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$220,000,000
225,000,000
226,000,000
+6,000,000
+1,000,000
The Justice Assistance account provides support to State and
local law enforcement agencies in the form of grants, contracts and
cooperative agreements for research, evaluation, and dissemination
of statistical and scientific information. The Committee recommends $226,000,000, which is $6,000,000 above the fiscal year
2009 enacted level and $1,000,000 above the budget request.
The funds are to be distributed as follows:
[In thousands of dollars]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Program
Recommended
National Institute of Justice ...........................................................................................................................
Bureau of Justice Statistics ...........................................................................................................................
National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) ........................................................................................
Redesign of the NCVS ...........................................................................................................................
State Automated Victim Notification System .................................................................................................
Regional Information Sharing System (RISS) ................................................................................................
Missing and Exploited Children .....................................................................................................................
$48,000
60,000
(26,000)
(15,000)
12,000
45,000
61,000
Total .......................................................................................................................................................
226,000
National Institute of Justice (NIJ).—The Committee includes
$48,000,000 in direct funding for the NIJ, which is equal to the
budget request and the fiscal year 2009 level. NIJ is the primary
Federal source of research and development in the field of criminal
justice.
National crime victimization survey (NCVS).—Within the funds
provided for the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), the Committee
directs $26,000,000, as requested, for the NCVS, which since the
1970s has been a critical tool for understanding the costs and context of crime victimization in the United States. Also within the
funds provided, the Committee makes available the requested
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
80
$15,000,000 to implement and test the redesign of the methodology
for the NCVS. The redesign of the NCVS methodology was recommended in the National Research Council’s report, Surveying
Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization
Survey, and BJS is currently conducting a program of research to
develop the new methodology. The redesigned survey is intended to
provide better sub-national data and more concurrent information
on emerging trends and issues, and to improve the cost efficiency
of the data collection process.
Victim notification.—The Committee includes $12,000,000 to support the Statewide Automated Victim Information Notification
(SAVIN) program, which helps protect the legal rights of crime victims by providing registered victims with timely and accurate information about changes to the status of their offender, including information about offender relocation and release.
Regional information sharing.—The Committee recommends
$45,000,000 for regional information sharing to ensure the efficient
and effective automated exchange of crime and terrorism information among Federal, State, and local agencies. The recommendation
is equal to the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and the request.
Missing and exploited children.—The recommendation includes
$61,000,000 for the Missing and Exploited Children program,
$1,000,000 above the budget request, which is sufficient to provide
continued level funding for all ongoing programs funded in fiscal
year 2009. An additional $50,000,000 was provided for the Internet
Crimes Against Children Regional Task Force program as part of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111–5.
Hate crimes.—The Committee directs the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) to assess the feasibility and associated costs of establishing a national helpline for victims of hate crimes. In addition, the Committee directs NIJ to evaluate trends in hate crimes
against new immigrants, individuals who are perceived to be immigrants, and Hispanic-Americans, and to assess the underlying
causes behind any increase in hate crimes against such groups.
Forensic science.—The National Research Council report,
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, called for improving the scientific foundations of the forensic
disciplines, particularly those that are dependent on qualitative
analyses and expert interpretation of observed patterns. The Committee is aware that NIJ has initiated efforts to respond to the National Research Council’s recommendations, and urges NIJ to continue and accelerate those efforts.
Collaboration among state corrections, alcohol and drug abuse,
and mental health program directors.—The Committee is aware
that the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) has worked with the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) to support collaboration among the Association of State
Corrections Administrators (ASCA), the National Association of
State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (NASADAD), and the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors
(NASMHPD), and encourages BJA to continue efforts to foster such
collaboration.
Threat assessment for state courts.—The Committee is concerned
about reports of a rising trend in violence and threats of violence
against State courts and court officials. Within the funds provided,
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
81
the Committee encourages BJA to support efforts to establish and
maintain threat assessment databases, based on core data elements determined by BJA that facilitate the collection of uniform
data.
Salaries and expenses.—The Committee provides management
and administration funding for Justice Assistance programs
through a salaries and expenses appropriation under OJP. As a result, no administrative overhead costs shall be deducted from the
programs funded from this account.
STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$1,328,500,000
728,000,000
1,312,500,000
¥16,000,000
+584,500,000
The Committee recommends $1,312,500,000 for State and Local
Law Enforcement Assistance programs, which is $16,000,000 below
the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $584,500,000 above the request. For fiscal year 2010, this appropriation includes funding for
several programs administered by the Office of Justice Programs
(OJP) that were funded for fiscal year 2009 through the Office on
Violence Against Women and the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
The accompanying table details funding recommended for these
programs:
[In thousands of dollars]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Program
Recommended
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants ....................................................................................................
National Institute of Justice ..................................................................................................................
State and Local Intelligence Training ...................................................................................................
State criminal justice reform and recidivism reduction ......................................................................
Byrne Discretionary Grants .............................................................................................................................
Byrne Competitive Grants ..............................................................................................................................
Tribal Assistance ............................................................................................................................................
Detention facilities ................................................................................................................................
Courts ....................................................................................................................................................
Alcohol and substance abuse grants ...................................................................................................
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program ......................................................................................................
Southwest Border Prosecutions ......................................................................................................................
Victims of Trafficking Grants .........................................................................................................................
Residential Substance Abuse Treatment .......................................................................................................
Mentally Ill Offender Act ................................................................................................................................
Drug Courts ....................................................................................................................................................
Prescription Drug Monitoring .........................................................................................................................
Prison Rape Prevention and Prosecution .......................................................................................................
Justice for All—Capital Litigation/Wrongful Conviction Review ...................................................................
Missing Alzheimer’s Patient Grants ...............................................................................................................
Economic, High-tech and Cybercrime Prevention ..........................................................................................
CASA–Special Advocates ................................................................................................................................
Training for Judicial Personnel ......................................................................................................................
Stalking Database ..........................................................................................................................................
Research on Violence Against Indian Women ...............................................................................................
Training Program to Assist Probation and Parole Officers ...........................................................................
Closed Circuit Television Grants ....................................................................................................................
Violent Gang and Gun Crime Reduction ........................................................................................................
Bullet-Proof Vests ...........................................................................................................................................
National Instant Criminal Background Check System grants .......................................................................
Criminal Records Upgrade .............................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$529,000
(5,000)
(2,000)
(10,000)
124,000
40,000
47,000
(10,000)
(25,000)
(12,000)
300,000
30,000
10,000
30,000
12,000
45,000
7,000
15,000
5,500
2,000
20,000
15,000
2,500
3,000
1,000
3,500
1,000
15,000
25,000
20,000
10,000
HR149
82
[In thousands of dollars]
Program
Recommended
Total .......................................................................................................................................................
1,312,500
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Edward Byrne memorial justice assistance grant program.—The
Committee recommends $529,000,000 for activities under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program.
When excluding one-time fiscal year 2009 costs for reimbursement
of State and local governments for security and other expenses related to the presidential transition and inauguration, the funding
level for this account is $10,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level
and the request. When excluding $10,000,000 made available in fiscal year 2010 for recidivism reduction activities, funding for ByrneJAG formula grants in fiscal year 2010 is equal to the fiscal year
2009 level. An additional $2,000,000,000 was provided for this program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, P.L. 111–5.
Funding under this program is authorized for law enforcement
programs; prosecution and court programs; prevention and education programs; corrections programs, including community corrections; drug treatment and enforcement programs; planning,
evaluation, and technology improvement programs; and crime victim and witness programs, other than compensation. Funding is
not available for luxury items, real estate, or construction projects.
Within the amount provided, $2,000,000 is for intelligence training for State and local law enforcement entities; $5,000,000 is for
the National Institute of Justice to help local units of government
identify, select, develop, modernize, and purchase new technologies
for use by law enforcement; and $10,000,000 is for technical assistance, incentive grants, and other activities in support of comprehensive, evidenced-based criminal justice reform and recidivism
reduction efforts by States.
The Committee believes that JAG funding should be targeted by
State and local governments to programs and activities that are in
conformance with a state-wide, evidenced-based strategic plan developed through broad stakeholder involvement. The Committee
strongly urges State Administering Agencies (SAAs) to develop or
update existing, statewide plans as soon as practicable and to submit those plans to the Attorney General for review. The Attorney
General shall work with States to complete such plans as soon as
reasonable and shall make technical assistance available to assist
States in constructing such plans.
Byrne
discretionary
grants.—The
Committee
provides
$124,000,000 for Byrne discretionary grants to prevent crime, improve the criminal justice system, provide victims’ services, and for
other similar activities. The accompanying table details funding for
congressionally-designated activities, which are incorporated by reference in the bill:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 01 here 49735A.016
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
83
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 02 here 49735A.017
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
84
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 03 here 49735A.018
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
85
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 04 here 49735A.019
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
86
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 05 here 49735A.020
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
87
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 06 here 49735A.021
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
88
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 07 here 49735A.022
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
89
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 08 here 49735A.023
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
90
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 09 here 49735A.024
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
91
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 010 here 49735A.025
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
92
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
93
Byrne competitive grants.—The Committee recommendation includes $40,000,000 for competitive, peer-reviewed grants to programs of national significance to prevent crime, improve the administration of justice or assist victims of crime. An additional
$225,000,000 was provided for this program as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111–5. As part
of its portion of the Department’s spending plan, OJP is directed
to detail the criteria and methodology that will be used to award
grants. It is expected that national programs that have previously
received funding under the Byrne discretionary program and programs for which specific funding is designated in this Act will be
eligible to compete for funding under this competitive grant program.
Tribal assistance.—The Committee strongly supports efforts to
help Tribes improve the capacity of their criminal justice systems.
The Committee recommendation includes $47,000,000 for Tribal
Assistance, which is $22,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level
and the request. Of the total, $10,000,000 is for tribal detention facilities, $25,000,000 is for tribal courts, and $12,000,000 is for alcohol and substance abuse grants. An additional $225,000,000 was
provided for tribal detention facilities as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111–5. Separate funding
for tribal law enforcement activities is provided through the Office
of Community Oriented Policing.
The Committee directs OJP to coordinate with the Bureau of Indian Affairs in the Department of the Interior in developing a priority list for detention facility construction, targeting tribal areas
with the greatest need, and to incorporate the priority system into
the ranking criteria for grants. The Committee also directs OJP to
develop a voluntary annual training program for tribal court officials and judges to promote improvements in tribal judicial systems.
State criminal alien assistance program (SCAAP).—The Committee recommends $300,000,000 for reimbursement to States and
localities for their costs for incarcerating criminal aliens, a decrease
of $100,000,000 below the fiscal year 2009 level. The Administration proposed the elimination of the program.
Southwest border prosecutions.—The Committee recommends
$30,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the budget request, to provide assistance to State and local law enforcement (including prosecutors, probation officers, courts, and detention facilities) along the southwest border related to the investigation and
prosecution of drug and alien cases referred from Federal arrests.
Victims of trafficking.—The Committee recommendation includes
$10,000,000 for task force activities and services related to victims
of human trafficking. The Committee is aware that the Office for
Victims of Crime is considering a solicitation for demonstration
grants to target minor victims of human trafficking that are resident aliens or U.S. citizens. The Committee strongly supports this
initiative and encourages OVC to move forward with the proposed
solicitation.
Residential substance abuse treatment.—The Committee recommendation includes $30,000,000 for State prison substance
abuse treatment programs, an increase of $20,000,000 above the
fiscal year 2009 level and equal to the request. This program helps
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
94
State and local governments develop, implement, and improve residential substance abuse treatment programs in correctional facilities, and establish and maintain community-based aftercare services for probationers and parolees.
Mentally Ill Offender Act.—Mentally Ill Offender Act funding
helps State and local governments design and implement programs, including mental health courts, that improve the response
of the criminal justice system to offenders with mental illness. The
Department proposed a combined appropriation of $59,000,000 for
drug, mental health, and problem solving courts, while proposing
the elimination of separate funding for drug courts and for activities under the Mentally Ill Offender Act. Because the Mentally Ill
Offender Act supports activities other than mental health courts,
the Committee continues to provide a separate appropriation for
activities under the Act. The Committee recommendation includes
$12,000,000 for Mentally Ill Offender Act activities for fiscal year
2010, an increase of $2,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level.
Drug courts.—The Committee strongly supports drug courts,
which serve a vital role in the Nation’s justice system. By providing
alternatives to the prosecution and incarceration of offenders with
substance abuse problems, drug courts help rebuild lives, support
families, and reduce recidivism and the costs of incarceration. The
Committee continues to provide a separate appropriation for drug
courts, recommending $45,000,000 for the program for fiscal year
2010, an increase of $5,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level. To
facilitate the use of State clinical treatment standards, discourage
system fragmentation, promote sustainability, and encourage the
use of common client level performance and outcomes data, the
Committee strongly encourages collaboration between drug courts
and State agencies that oversee substance abuse prevention and
treatment services.
Hal Rogers prescription drug monitoring program.—The Committee includes $7,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and
the request, for the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. This
program assists States in developing systems to monitor prescription drugs and scheduled listed chemical products on either an
intra-state or inter-state basis. The Committee expects OJP to continue working with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to
implement this program.
Prison rape prevention and prosecution.—The Committee provides $15,000,000 for grants to prevent, respond to and prosecute
prison rape, including training, education and services to victims.
The recommended funding level is an increase of $2,500,000 above
the fiscal year 2009 level and the Administration request.
Justice for all.—The Committee recommendation includes
$5,500,000 for capital litigation/wrongful conviction review grants,
equal to the fiscal year 2009 level, and equal to the level proposed
by the Department for capital litigation grants. Of the amount provided, $2,500,000 is made available for capital litigation grants,
which improve the quality of representation and the reliability of
verdicts in local and state capital cases through training for prosecutors, defense counsel and trial judges. Also within the amount
provided, $3,000,000 is for competitive grants to public and nonprofit entities that work to exonerate individuals who have been
wrongfully convicted.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
95
Missing Alzheimer’s disease patient program.—The Committee
recommendation includes $2,000,000 for Missing Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Program grants, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level.
The Department proposed no funding for this program.
Economic, high-tech and cybercrime prevention.—The Committee
recommendation includes $20,000,000, an increase of $2,000,000
above the fiscal year 2009 level, for competitive grants to State and
local law enforcement agencies as authorized by the Prioritizing
Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008,
P.L. 110–403. The Administration proposed no funding for this program.
CASA–special advocates.—CASA supports programs designed to
ensure that abused and neglected children benefit from timely and
effective representation in dependency court hearings. For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee provides $15,000,000 for the CASA program, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the budget request.
Training for judicial personnel.—The Committee recommends
$2,500,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request, for
programs to improve the ability of judicial personnel to handle
child abuse and neglect cases.
Stalking database.—For grants to upgrade State and local protection order systems, the Committee recommends $3,000,000,
equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Research on violence against Indian women.—For comprehensive
research on violence against Native American women, the Committee recommends $1,000,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level
and the request.
Training program to assist probation and parole officers.—For
training and technical assistance to State, local, and tribal jurisdictions to establish comprehensive strategies to manage sex offenders
under community supervision, the Committee recommends
$3,500,000, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Closed circuit television grants.—The Committee recommendation provides $1,000,000 for closed circuit television grants for televised testimony, equal to the fiscal year 2009 level. The Department proposed no funding for this program.
Violent gangs and gun crimes.—The Committee recommends
$15,000,000 for competitive grants to State and local law enforcement agencies to combat violent crime, with special emphasis on
areas plagued by violent gangs. This amount is equal to the fiscal
year 2009 level and the request.
Bulletproof vests.—The Committee provides $25,000,000 to assist
State and local law enforcement agencies in purchasing bullet and
stab resistant vests, equal to the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and
the request.
NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007.—The Committee
includes $20,000,000 for grants to assist States and tribal governments in updating the National Instant Criminal Background
Check System with the criminal history and mental health records
of individuals who are precluded from purchasing or possessing
guns. This amount is an increase of $10,000,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 level and the request.
Criminal history record upgrades.—In addition to the funds provided for NICS grants, the Committee includes $10,000,000 for
grants to ensure that accurate criminal history records are avail-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
96
able for use in law enforcement. This program helps States build
their infrastructure to connect to national record check systems,
both to supply information and to conduct the requisite checks.
This amount is equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
National Motor Vehicle Title Information System.—The Committee is aware that planned enhancements to the National Motor
Vehicle Title Information System will require additional funding
sources beyond the current fee structure. OJP is encouraged to
work with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, which operates the system, on options for funding those enhancements.
Salaries and expenses.—As in fiscal year 2009, the Committee
provides management and administration funding for OJP and
other grant offices through a salaries and expenses appropriation
under OJP. As a result, no administrative overhead costs shall be
deducted from the programs funded from this account.
WEED AND SEED PROGRAM FUND
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$25,000,000
25,000,000
15,000,000
¥10,000,000
¥10,000,000
The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for the Weed and Seed
Program, which is $10,000,000 less than the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and the request.
JUVENILE JUSTICE PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$374,000,000
317,000,000
385,000,000
+11,000,000
+68,000,000
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP) was established to provide Federal leadership, coordination, and resources to prevent and respond to juvenile delinquency
and victimization. OJJDP is responsible for supporting States,
Tribes, and communities in their efforts to develop and implement
effective and coordinated prevention and intervention programs
and to improve the juvenile justice system so that it protects public
safety, holds offenders accountable, and provides treatment and rehabilitative services tailored to the needs of juveniles and their
families.
The Committee recommends $385,000,000 for Juvenile Justice
Programs, which is $68,000,000 above the request and $11,000,000
above the fiscal year 2009 level. The accompanying table details
funding recommended for these programs.
[In thousands of dollars]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Program
Recommended
Part B—State Formula ................................................................................................................................
Part E—Challenge Grants—Demonstration Projects ..................................................................................
Youth Mentoring Grants ...............................................................................................................................
Title V—Incentive Grants ............................................................................................................................
Tribal Youth .........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
$75,000
68,000
80,000
62,000
(25,000)
HR149
97
[In thousands of dollars]
Program
Recommended
Gang Prevention ..................................................................................................................................
Alcohol Prevention ...............................................................................................................................
Investigation and Prosecution of Child Abuse Program ..............................................................................
Juvenile Accountability Block Grants ...........................................................................................................
Community-Based Violence Prevention Initiative ........................................................................................
Safe Start .....................................................................................................................................................
(10,000)
(25,000)
20,000
55,000
18,000
7,000
Total ................................................................................................................................................
385,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Part B—State formula grants.—The Committee provides
$75,000,000 for grants to implement comprehensive State juvenile
justice plans, including community-based prevention and intervention programs and activities for juvenile offenders. This amount is
equal to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Part
E—discretionary
grants.—The
Committee
includes
$68,000,000 for Part E discretionary grants for activities related to
juvenile justice and at-risk youth. The accompanying table provides
amounts for congressionally-designated activities, which are incorporated by reference in the bill.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 042 here 49735A.026
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
98
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 043 here 49735A.027
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
99
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 044 here 49735A.028
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
100
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 045 here 49735A.029
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
101
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 046 here 49735A.030
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
102
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 047 here 49735A.031
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
103
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 048 here 49735A.032
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
104
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 049 here 49735A.033
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
105
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 050 here 49735A.034
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
106
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
107
Youth mentoring grants.—To support the critical work of national, regional and local organizations in nurturing and mentoring
at risk children and youth, the Committee recommends
$80,000,000 for competitive, peer-reviewed youth mentoring grants.
As part of its portion of the departmental spending plan, OJJDP
is directed to detail the criteria and methodology that will be used
to award these grants. It is expected that national programs that
have received funding under the Byrne discretionary program or
the Juvenile Justice Part E program will be eligible for funding
under this competitive grant program. This funding level is equal
to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Title V—Incentive grants.—The Committee provides $62,000,000
for community-based delinquency prevention grants, equal to the
fiscal year 2009 enacted level and the request. Within funds provided, $25,000,000 is for tribal youth delinquency prevention programs, $10,000,000 is for gang prevention education and training,
and $25,000,000 is activities related to the enforcement of underage drinking laws. These amounts are equal to the fiscal year 2009
level and the request.
Investigation and prosecution of child abuse program.—The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for programs authorized under the
Victims of Child Abuse Act, including grants to provide technical
assistance and training to professionals involved in investigating,
prosecuting, and treating child abuse. This funding level is equal
to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Juvenile accountability block grants.—The Committee provides
$55,000,000 for grants to support State and local government efforts to combat serious and violent juvenile crime. This funding
level is equal to the budget request and the fiscal year 2009 level.
Community-based violence prevention initiatives.—The Committee provides $18,000,000 for community-based strategies that
focus on street-level outreach, conflict mediation, and the changing
of community norms to reduce violence.
Safe start.—The Committee recommendation includes $7,000,000
for the Safe Start Initiative, which helps prevent and reduce the
impact of children’s exposure to violence in both the home and the
community. The Department had proposed funding for this program through the Office on Violence Against Women.
Mental health services for youth in foster care.—The Committee
recognizes the importance of improving the quality of mental
health services for youth in foster care or who have been adopted
from foster care, and encourages OJJDP to work with the Administration for Children and Families at the Department of Health and
Human Services and non-profit organization with expertise on the
mental health needs of such children when developing and implementing related programs.
Child exploitation prevention and interdiction.—The Committee
notes that the Protect Our Children Act (P.L. 110–401) directs the
Attorney General to designate a senior departmental official to coordinate the development of a national strategy for child exploitation prevention and interdiction. The Committee urges the Attorney General to designate such an official as soon as possible.
Salaries and expenses.—The Committee provides management
and administrative funding for Department of Justice grant offices
through a salaries and expenses appropriation under OJP. As a re-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
108
sult, no administrative overhead costs shall be deducted from the
programs funded from this account.
Reprogramming of prior year funds.—Funds appropriated in
Public Law 111–8, Division B—Commerce, Justice, Science, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009, under the heading Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Juvenile Justice,
Part E-discretionary grants, to Allegheny County for an afterschool initiative at the Harrison Township Community Center is
reprogrammed to the Allegheny County Housing authority for the
same purpose.
PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS BENEFITS
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$119,100,000
70,100,000
70,100,000
¥49,000,000
............................
The Public Safety Officers Benefits (PSOB) program provides
benefits to public safety officers who are severely injured in the
line of duty and to the families and survivors of public safety officers whose death was the direct and proximate result of an injury
sustained in the line of duty.
The Committee includes $70,100,000 for PSOB, which is
$49,000,000 below the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and equal to
the request. Within funds provided, $61,000,000 is for death benefits for survivors, an amount estimated by the Congressional Budget Office that is considered mandatory for scorekeeping purposes.
The Committee also recommends $9,100,000, as requested, for disability and education benefits for injured officers.
COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$550,500,000
761,000,000
802,000,000
+251,500,000
+41,000,000
The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) was
established to assist State and local law enforcement agencies
through grants, training and technical assistance to prevent and
combat crime in communities across the Nation. The Committee
recommends $802,000,000 for COPS programs, which is
$251,500,000 over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and
$41,000,000 above the request.
The Committee directs COPS, as part of the Department’s spending plan for fiscal year 2010, to provide details of its planned training and technical assistance (T&TA) activities and research and
statistics activities. The spending plan shall differentiate those activities performed via grant, cooperative agreement, interagency
agreement, under contract, and performed directly by COPS. In addition, the Committee directs the Department, as part of the fiscal
year 2011 budget submission, to provide details regarding T&TA
activities and research and statistics activities planned by COPS
for fiscal year 2011.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
109
The accompanying table details funding recommended for COPS
programs for fiscal year 2010:
[In thousands of dollars]
Program
Recommended
COPS Hiring Program ...................................................................................................................................
COPS Technology and Interoperability .........................................................................................................
Meth Hot Spots .............................................................................................................................................
Transfer to DEA ...................................................................................................................................
Tribal meth enforcement grants .........................................................................................................
Tribal Law Enforcement ...............................................................................................................................
DNA Backlog Reduction ................................................................................................................................
Debbie Smith DNA Backlog grants .....................................................................................................
Post Conviction DNA Testing grants ...................................................................................................
Second Chance Act/Offender Re-entry .........................................................................................................
Adult and Juvenile Offender Reentry Demonstration Grants ..............................................................
State, tribal and local reentry courts .................................................................................................
Grants for family-based substance abuse treatment ........................................................................
Evaluate and improve education at prisons/jails/juvenile facilities ..................................................
Technology careers training demonstration grants ............................................................................
Offender reentry substance abuse and criminal justice collaboration ..............................................
Offender mentoring and transitional services ....................................................................................
Prisoner reentry research ....................................................................................................................
Child Sexual Predator Elimination/Sex Offender Management ....................................................................
Sex Offender Management ..................................................................................................................
National Sex Offender Registry ...........................................................................................................
Secure Our Schools Act ................................................................................................................................
Community Policing Development ................................................................................................................
$298,000
123,000
32,000
(10,000)
(5,000)
40,000
151,000
(146,000)
(5,000)
100,000
(37,000)
(10,000)
(7,500)
(2,500)
(5,000)
(13,000)
(15,000)
(10,000)
28,000
(15,000)
(1,000)
16,000
14,000
Total ................................................................................................................................................
802,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
COPS
Hiring
Program.—The
Committee
recommends
$298,000,000 for the COPS universal hiring program. These grants
are available to State, local, and tribal governments for the hiring
and rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers for deployment in community-oriented policing across the nation. An additional $1,000,000,000 was provided for this program as part of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111–5.
Law enforcement technologies and interoperable communications.—The Committee includes $123,000,000 for grants to State,
local, and tribal law enforcement to develop and acquire effective
technologies and interoperable communications that assist in the
prevention and response to crime. COPS is directed to ensure that
all equipment funded under this program meets the requirements
of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Office of
Law Enforcement Standards. The accompanying table details funding for congressionally-designated activities, which are incorporated
by reference in the bill:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 011 here 49735A.035
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
110
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 012 here 49735A.036
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
111
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 013 here 49735A.037
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
112
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 014 here 49735A.038
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
113
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 015 here 49735A.039
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
114
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 016 here 49735A.040
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
115
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 017 here 49735A.041
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
116
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 018 here 49735A.042
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
117
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 019 here 49735A.043
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
118
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 020 here 49735A.044
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
119
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 021 here 49735A.045
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
120
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 022 here 49735A.046
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
121
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 023 here 49735A.047
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
122
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 024 here 49735A.048
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
123
124
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Methamphetamine enforcement and clean-up.—The production,
trafficking, and abuse of methamphetamine—an extremely destructive and addictive drug—continues to be a serious national problem. The Committee recommends $32,000,000 for activities to address public safety and methamphetamine manufacturing, sale,
and use in ‘‘hot spots.’’ Within the funds provided, the Committee
includes $10,000,000 for transfer to the Drug Enforcement Administration to assist State, local and tribal law enforcement agencies
with the proper removal and disposal of hazardous materials at
clandestine methamphetamine labs, including funds for training,
technical assistance, a container program, and purchase of equipment.
Also within the total, the Committee provides $5,000,000 for tribal methamphetamine enforcement activities. COPS is directed to
consult with tribal governments on the distribution of these funds
to ensure that they are targeted to areas with the greatest need.
The accompanying table details funding for congressionally-designated activities related to methamphetamine enforcement, which
are incorporated by reference in the bill:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 66 here 49735A.049
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
125
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 67 here 49735A.050
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
126
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
127
DNA analysis grants.—The Committee recommends $151,000,000
for grants to strengthen State and local government DNA collection
and analysis systems, which can be vital to successfully prosecuting the guilty and protecting the innocent from wrongful conviction. This funding level is equal to the request and $5,000,000
below the fiscal year 2009 enacted level. Within the funds provided,
$146,000,000 is for Debbie Smith DNA backlog reduction grants,
and $5,000,000 is for post-conviction DNA testing grants.
Second Chance Act programs.—The Committee strongly supports
efforts to improve and strengthen programs that facilitate the successful reentry of prisoners into communities following incarceration. The Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Subcommittee conducted a series of hearings on effective prisoner reentry programs and the state of research on ‘‘what works’’ for prisoner reentry. The lessons learned from those hearings are that investments in prisoner reentry program demonstrations and research are critical to making prisoner reentry more successful and
reducing the rate of recidivism, and that successful prisoner reentry can significantly reduce the personal, social and economic
costs associated with crime and incarceration. The hearings also
made clear that, in order to have a significant impact on reducing
recidivism, prisoner reentry efforts must be coordinated at the
State level, based on comprehensive plans developed through input
from a broad array of stakeholders.
The Committee recommends $100,000,000 for activities authorized under the Second Chance Act of 2007 (P.L. 110–199) to reduce
criminal recidivism, which is $75,000,000 above the fiscal year
2009 enacted level and equal to the request. The Committee
strongly urges the Attorney General to establish the Interagency
Task Force on Federal Programs and Activities Relating to the Reentry of Offenders into the Community, as envisioned by the Second Chance Act. The Committee includes bill language authorizing
the Attorney General to waive the matching requirements for Adult
and Juvenile Reentry Demonstration Projects grants awarded in
fiscal year 2010.
Tribal law enforcement.—The Committee provides $40,000,000
for the hiring, equipping, and training of tribal law enforcement officers, $20,000,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
The Committee provides additional funding for Tribes through the
State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance appropriation under
the Office of Justice Programs (OJP).
Child sexual predator elimination/sex offender management.—
The Committee provides $28,000,000 for assistance to State, tribal,
and local law enforcement to locate, arrest, and prosecute child sexual predators and exploiters, and to enforce sex offender registration laws. Of the total, $1,000,000 is for the National Sex Offender
Public Registry and $15,000,000 is for sex offender management
assistance (SOMA). The increase of $10,000,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level for SOMA activities is intended for assistance to tribal and other law enforcement entities with the greatest
need for such assistance.
Secure Our Schools Act.—The recommendation includes
$16,000,000 for grants to schools for equipment such as metal detectors, locks, lighting and other deterrent measures; security assessments; security training of personnel and students; and coordi-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
128
nation with local law enforcement agencies. This amount is equal
to the fiscal year 2009 level and the request.
Community Policing Development.—The Committee recommendation includes $14,000,000 for community policing development activities, including training and technical assistance and the Police
Integrity Initiative, which is an increase of $10,000,000 above the
fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $2,000,000 below the request.
Salaries and Expenses.—As in fiscal year 2009, the Committee
provides management and administration funding for the Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services through a salaries and expenses appropriation under OJP. As a result, no administrative
overhead costs shall be deducted from the programs funded from
this account.
Reprogramming of prior year funds.—Funds appropriated in
Public Law 111–8, Division B—Commerce, Justice, Science, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009, under the heading Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services, Methamphetamine Enforcement and Clean-up, to the Blount, Dekalb,
Etowah, Marshall, Marion, Morgan, Pickens, Walker Counties, Alabama Drug Task Forces for the Anti-Methamphetamine Project are
reprogrammed to the Etowah County Drug Enforcement Unit for
the Dekalb, Etowah, Marshall, Marion, Morgan, Pickens, Walker
Counties, Alabama Drug Task Forces and the Blount County Sheriff’s Department.
Funds appropriated in Public Law 111–8, Division B—Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2009, under the heading Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Services, Law enforcement technologies and interoperable communications, for technology upgrades for Southside
Virginia law enforcement are reprogrammed to the Sheriffs’ Offices
of Pittsylvania, Cumberland, Bedford, Henry, Brunswick, Campbell, and Greene Counties in Virginia and the Sheriff’s Office of the
City of Martinsville, Virginia for law enforcement technology.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
GENERAL PROVISIONS—DEPARTMENT
OF
JUSTICE
The Committee has included the following general provisions for
the Department of Justice in this bill:
Section 201 makes available additional reception and representation funding for the Attorney General from the amounts provided
in this title.
Section 202 prohibits the use of funds to pay for an abortion, except in the case of rape or to preserve the life of the mother.
Section 203 prohibits the use of funds to require any person to
perform or facilitate the performance of an abortion.
Section 204 establishes the obligation of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide escort services to inmates receiving an
abortion outside of a Federal facility, except where this obligation
conflicts with the preceding section.
Section 205 establishes the Committee’s requirements and procedures for transfer proposals.
Section 206 authorizes the Attorney General to extend an ongoing Personnel Management Demonstration Project.
Section 207 extends specified authorities to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for undercover operations.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
129
Section 208 prohibits the use of funds for transporting prisoners
classified as maximum or high security, other than to a facility certified by the Bureau of Prisons as appropriately secure.
Section 209 prohibits the use of funds for the purchase or rental
by Federal prisons of audiovisual equipment, services and materials used primarily for recreational purposes, except for those
items and services needed for inmate training, religious, or educational purposes.
Section 210 requires review by the Deputy Attorney General and
the Department Investment Review Board prior to the obligation or
expenditure of funds for major information technology projects.
Section 211 requires the Department to follow reprogramming
procedures prior to any deviation from the program amounts specified in this title or the reuse of deobligated funds provided in previous years.
Section 212 prohibits the use of funds for A–76 competitions for
work performed by employees of the Bureau of Prisons or Federal
Prison Industries, Inc.
Section 213 prohibits the use of funds to pay the salary, benefits
or expenses of a U.S. Attorney performing dual duties that exempt
that U.S. Attorney from established residency requirements.
Section 214 prohibits the use of funds for future phases of the
Sentinel program until the AG certifies that work on existing
phases has been substantially completed under a validated performance baseline.
Section 215 permits the use of up to one percent of formula grant
funds made available to the Office of Justice Programs for research
or statistical purposes, and permits the use of up to three percent
of funds made available to that office for training and technical assistance.
Section 216 gives the AG authority to waive matching requirements for Second Chance Act adult and juvenile reentry demonstration projects.
Section 217 makes permanent retention and relocation bonus authorities previously provided to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Section 218 extends foreign language proficiency pay authorities
to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
TITLE III—SCIENCE
This title includes funding for the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation (NSF),
though science funding in this Bill extends beyond this title. Two
major research agencies within the Department of Commerce—the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—are
funded in title I of this bill. Science and engineering also are of increasing importance in law enforcement and commercial activity.
In total, the bill provides $30,571,851,000 in science and technology
investments, an increase of $1,049,255,000 over the fiscal year
2009 enacted level.
In the late 1990s, Congress and the Administration cooperated to
double annual federal spending for the National Institutes of
Health. Following recommendations in the Rising Above the Gath-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
130
ering Storm report of the National Academy of Sciences, the Congress passed the America Competes Act recognizing the need to
double the budgets for NSF, NIST, and the Department of Energy
Office of Science. This year in testimony before this Committee,
leaders from the science and engineering communities made clear
that NASA science and NOAA research merit similar increases. Accordingly, increases are recommended over the fiscal year 2009 enacted level for research at NSF, NIST, NASA, and NOAA—with increases above the requests for NOAA research and select areas of
NASA.
The challenge of anthropogenic climate change confronts the Nation today. Increased research through the programs of NOAA is
needed to strengthen the foundation for NOAA’s leadership role in
climate, and the Earth Science program within NASA plays a critical role in support of NOAA in developing and demonstrating new
modeling, analysis and measurement techniques while contributing
to the overall climate change science program.
In testimony before this Committee, Dr. Lennard Fisk, former
NASA Associate Administrator for Space Science and Applications,
stated that the termination of NASA funding for microgravity research—research that can only be done in orbit—has devastated
this area of research in the United States. Given the substantial
investment in the International Space Station where much of this
research would take place, funding is recommended to resurrect
this research program within funds to be appropriated to NASA.
In testimony before the Committee on science education, it was
stated that most children decide to be interested in pursuing
science, engineering or math by age 10 or so. Inspiring interest in
young minds requires them to have opportunities to come in contact with research and engineering, to take measurements and
think creatively and analytically in a scientific fashion and to gain
a sense of wonder at the physical and intellectual adventure involved and the contributions science and engineering make in today’s world. Accordingly, increases above the budget request are included to strengthen NSF, NOAA and NASA education programs.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
OFFICE
OF
SCIENCE
OF THE
AND
PRESIDENT
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$5,303,000
6,154,000
7,154,000
+1,851,000
+1,000,000
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is essential
to the restoration of science to its proper place in the formulation
of policy and the operations of the federal government. The Committee recommendation is $1,851,000 above the amount appropriated for fiscal year 2009 and $1,000,000 above the budget request. This increase is provided to ensure that OSTP has adequate
staff to fulfill key requirements in the coming year.
OSTP is directed to develop a plan for achieving and sustaining
global Earth observations in collaboration with NOAA, NSF,
NASA, USGS, the Department of Energy and other appropriate
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
131
agencies and in consultation with the Earth science community,
and to direct implementation of this Earth observations plan as
called for in the National Academy of Sciences report Earth Science
and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next
Decade and Beyond. This plan should include satellite, suborbital,
ground- and ocean-based observations and be delivered to the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate no later than
April 1, 2010.
The Committee anticipates that OSTP will need to provide leadership and active coordination on hydrology research and water resources, understanding terrestrial managed and unmanaged ecosystems and their role in climate change, nanotechnology, including its societal dimensions, and science, technology, engineering
and mathematics (STEM) education. Each of these areas involves
significant activities of multiple departments and agencies.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS
AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was
established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, as
amended, to:
(1) plan, direct and conduct aeronautical and space activities;
(2) arrange for participation by the scientific community in
planning scientific measurements and observations to be made
through use of aeronautical and space vehicles, and conduct or
arrange for the conduct of such measurements and observations;
(3) provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof;
(4) seek and encourage, to the maximum extent possible, the
fullest commercial use of space;
(5) encourage and provide the Federal government use of
commercially provided space services and hardware, consistent
with the requirements of the Federal government; and
(6) carry out a comprehensive program of research, technology, and monitoring of the phenomena of upper atmosphere
as to provide for an understanding of and to maintain the
chemical and physical integrity of the Earth’s atmosphere.
The Act calls on NASA to expand human knowledge; develop and
operate advanced aeronautical and space-faring vehicles; encourage
commercial use of space; exchange with other U.S. agencies findings useful to each other to maximize research results; cooperate
with other nations in research and applications; and preserve U.S.
preeminence in aeronautics and space. NASA’s unique mission is
to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery and
aeronautics research.
Programs and activities undertaken by NASA were last authorized in fiscal year 2009. An authorization for fiscal year 2010 is not
yet enacted.
Investments in NASA.—Properly structured, NASA’s programs
can contribute to an improved quality of life, economic vitality, U.S.
leadership in peaceful cooperation with other nations on challenging undertakings in science and technology, national security
and the advancement of knowledge. Investments in NASA’s programs promote research and development and support the competi-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
132
tiveness of the United States. For 50 years, the investments in
NASA have facilitated the transfer of NASA technology to the private sector, benefiting global competition and the economy. The resulting commercialization has contributed to the development of
commercial products and services in the fields of health and medicine, industry, consumer goods, transportation, public safety, computer technology, and environmental resources. In addition,
NASA’s view from space brings science to bear on national priorities like improved predictions of climate, weather and natural hazards, which have corresponding implications for commerce and the
human condition.
Moreover, as noted previously in this report, Dr. Ralph Cicerone
and Dr. Lennard Fisk both stated in testimony before the Subcommittee that NASA’s science activities are not markedly different or less important than other science disciplines funded by
the NSF and NIST, and that there was little reason for their exclusion from the doubling path envisioned for those agencies in the
America Competes Act. The Committee’s recommendation reflects
this sentiment and continues to invest in NASA’s science activities.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
AGENCY SUMMARY
The Committee recommendation includes $18,203,300 for NASA,
$482,700,000 below the request and $420,915,000 above the comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted level. Funding included in this Act
provides for continued efforts to fly the Shuttle as safely as possible
until its retirement in 2010; to complete the international space
station; continue to advance human space flight activities; to advance knowledge in the fundamental disciplines of aeronautics and
develop technologies for safer aircraft and higher capacity traffic
air systems; to further understanding of Earth, its climate and
global environment, the connections among the other planets and
the Sun, and the origin and evolution of planetary systems and the
origin and distribution of life in the universe; and to inspire and
educate students at all levels to pursue careers in the fields of
science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
NASA’s appropriations are now arrayed in multiple appropriations accounts rather than in three accounts as in previous years.
Beginning in fiscal year 2009, budgets for NASA’s programs and
projects are requested and appropriated only in terms of direct
cost, and not the additional indirect costs associated with operating
NASA’s centers, safety and mission success, and Agency management and operations. The direct budgets continue to reflect labor
and travel costs associated with each program and project. The indirect costs are now budgeted solely within the Cross Agency Support account, and not in NASA’s programs and projects. This
change was the result of the Committee’s continuing endeavors to
provide greater transparency to NASA’s stakeholders and improve
program estimates, costs, review and oversight. The Committee
continues these efforts as is evidenced in the recommendations
herein.
Financial management.—The Committee remains concerned
about NASA’s management of its budget, as well as its financial
recordkeeping and reporting. Fiscal year 2002 was the last year
NASA was able to produce an annual financial statement that
could be audited by its independent accountants. For fiscal years
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
133
2003 through 2008, the accountants were unable to find sufficient
evidentiary support for amounts presented in NASA’s financial
statements, including the combined statements of budgetary resources—which are supposed to present accurate budget execution
data. Recent reports by Committee staff have found additional disquieting evidence concerning NASA’s financial management. As
discussed in the explanatory statement accompanying the 2009
Omnibus Appropriations Act, a review of NASA’s leasing and collections authority found that NASA’s implementation of the authority lacked transparency and that NASA was not effectively managing and accounting for leasing receipts. An April 2009 report by
the staff found that NASA was improperly administering its authority to convert funds for construction projects to no-year availability by apportioning these funds as no-year dollars before initial
obligations on construction projects, ignoring provisions in law that
the conversion be preceded by an initial obligation. The report also
found that the amount allocated to construction in NASA’s annual
operating plans often substantially exceeds the amount justified in
NASA’s budget estimates. Many of the construction projects included in the operating plans, but not the budget estimates, are of
such scale that NASA clearly must have been aware of the projects
at the time it formulated its estimates. A second April 2009 report
found that, although NASA has improved its obligation rate in response to the Committee’s concerns, many NASA programs did not
match this obligation rate with a commensurate improvement in
accrual of costs and outlays. The report also found that NASA’s obligation rate may be overstated because of non-transparent reserve
practices and because it deobligates and recovers significant
amounts of prior year obligated balances.
To address these issues, the Committee recommends several
changes to NASA’s appropriation. The Committee recommendation:
• consolidates all programmatic and institutional construction and environmental compliance and remediation activities
into a new account, for which the period of availability would
extend for five years;
• subjects expenditures planned from the collection of enhanced use lease receipts to an annual appropriations limitation first enacted in fiscal year 2009;
• limits funding for the Cross Agency Support and Inspector
General accounts to be available for one year, reflecting the administrative nature of these accounts;
• limits most funding in NASA’s operating accounts (Aeronautics Exploration, Science, and Space Operations) to oneyear, while providing an allowance of ten percent in each account as two-year funding, recognizing historical obligation
data and that cutting edge aeronautics and space research and
development involves an element of uncertainty; and
• fully funds Center administrative activities in the consolidated Cross Agency Support account, realigning the remaining
FTE currently being charged to programmatic accounts.
Construction.—The Committee proposes establishment of a new
construction account to fund all institutional and programmatic
construction. As shown in the Committee’s review, the longstanding arrangement of funding construction within other accounts without specifying an amount for construction has resulted
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
134
in a lack of discipline in NASA’s planning for programmatic construction and a lack of transparency in presenting and justifying
construction projects. The new account will fund discrete construction projects, minor revitalization and construction projects, facility
planning and design, demolition, and environmental compliance
and restoration. Appropriated funds shall be available for five
years, as requested.
Limitation on expenses associated with enhanced use lease receipts.—The Committee has continued a provision capping the expenditure of enhanced use lease (EUL) gross receipts and collections in fiscal year 2010 at $0 and requiring NASA to include a
separate accounting for and justification of its EUL collections and
proposed expenditures in its annual budget justification. The justification shall include a separate accounting by Center of gross receipts and collections and shall include a detailed presentation of
all proposed expenditures by Center, to include but not limited to
full-time equivalent (FTE) staff years and object class data, and
justification for such proposed expenditures by project or activity.
One-year availability for Cross Agency Support and Inspector
General accounts.—The Committee proposes that funding for the
cross agency support (CAS) and Office of Inspector General accounts be available for one-year, as opposed to two years provided
in the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act. In the realigned NASA
budget structure that was adopted in fiscal year 2009, these appropriations are primarily for administrative salaries and expenses activities. According to the object class table presented in the Appendix to the 2010 budget, fully one-third of the CAS account is for
pay and benefits for Federal employees. Much of the balance of the
account is for administrative functions, such as operation and
maintenance of equipment and facilities. In fiscal year 2008, center
management and operations and corporate general & administrative costs (then funded as overhead, but now in CAS) obligated all
but $33,400,000 of $2,600,000,000 in new budget authority, an obligation rate of 99 percent.
Limited two-year availability for NASA’s operating accounts.—
The Committee proposes that most funding in NASA’s operating
accounts (Aeronautics, Exploration, Science and Space Operations)
be available for one year, with an allowance of 10 percent in each
account as two-year funding. The Committee recognizes that cutting edge aeronautics and space research and development involves
an element of uncertainty. Even with the best planning and management, unexpected technical and operational setbacks may force
obligation delays. However, in 2008 NASA demonstrated an ability
to obligate 95 percent or more of the new budget authority in the
missions that are now included in the four operating accounts.
Similarly, for the period 1998 through 2002, NASA’s carryover was
consistently below six percent. From 2003 through 2007 NASA appears to have lost focus on financial management. In fiscal year
2007, the obligation rate for some missions was as low as 81 to 82
percent. Funding the operating accounts with primarily one-year
funding will encourage NASA to maintain financial discipline. It
will also encourage NASA to carefully examine its reserve and recovery practices, to ensure that obligated funds are in fact applied
to accomplish the work for which they were appropriated. At the
same time, the allowance of a reasonable amount for two-year
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
135
funding, together with the continued availability of transfer and reprogramming authority, will allow NASA to address unexpected developments.
Administrative activities.—The realignment of NASA’s budget
structure required by the fiscal year 2008 Omnibus Appropriations
Act was intended to improve the transparency of NASA’s budget by
separately funding programmatic and administrative activities. It
was the Committee’s intent that the Cross Agency Support account
fully fund Center administrative activities, including human resources, financial management, procurement, facilities operations,
information technology services, and public affairs. As the 2009
budget is being executed by NASA, it appears that significant numbers of Center FTE in these administrative areas are being charged
to programmatic accounts.
NASA’s Office of Program and Institutional Integration (OPPI)
has developed Center Management and Operations ‘‘Content Definitions.’’ These definitions specify the core functions that all of
NASA’s nine field Centers should provide to programs. The Committee directs that, for fiscal 2011, NASA realign the CAS budget
to fully fund the Center administrative functions specified in
OPPI’s content definitions, including all human resources, financial
management, procurement, facilities operations, information technology services, and public affairs personnel. To the extent that
NASA believes that this realignment requires transfer of funding
from programmatic accounts, NASA’s budget estimate shall specify
by mission, theme and program the amounts proposed to be transferred and the number and job series of FTE associated with these
amounts. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee proposes to transfer
these administrative FTE from the program accounts to Center
management and operations within the CAS account, as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Realign SMD administrative activities to CAS ...............................
Realign ARMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign ESMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign SOMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign EMD administrative activities to CAS ...............................
Net adjustment to CAS ...............................................................
¥$24,266,000
¥5,982,000
¥33,457,000
¥33,771,000
¥1,254,000
+98,730,000
Reporting of cost, schedule and content for NASA research and
development projects.—To better understand the underlying issues
common to NASA’s performance on major projects and to develop
a process for identifying corrective action, the Fiscal Year 2008
Consolidated Appropriations Act mandated the Government Accountability Office to report on the status of large-scale NASA programs, projects and activities. The Committee expects this report
to be delivered to the Congress semiannually, the first of which
was delivered in March 2009. The Committee anticipates this annual report in advance of the annual budget submission of the
President. To that end, the Committee directs NASA to cooperate
fully and to provide timely program analysis, evaluation data and
relevant information to the GAO so that it can conduct this review
and meet the annual Congressional mandate. Such information includes, but is not limited to, copies of preliminary cost estimates,
access to relevant online agency applications, databases, and web
portals, and access to information from contractor and agency personnel.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
136
Breach reporting.—Pursuant to section 108 of Public Law 109–
155, the NASA Authorization Act of 2005, NASA is required to deliver several reports to the appropriate authorizing committees
when project costs grow in excess of certain thresholds. The Committee expects that NASA submit concurrently to the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations the reports required by section 108 of Public Law 109–155.
Monthly reports.—To improve the usefulness of monthly reports
on obligations and disbursements required by section 525(b) of the
fiscal year 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Act, NASA is directed to
include in the funding that it reports as available not only new
budget authority, but also carryover and recoveries. Specifically, on
November 20, 2009, and on the 15th business day of each month
thereafter, the Administrator of NASA shall report in writing to
the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate detailed financial information on the execution of the Administration’s budget for the preceding month and for the fiscal year to
date. Each report shall provide information on the appropriation
for the fiscal year, available carryover of prior year appropriations
and recoveries of prior year obligated balances, obligations and cost
incurred against, and outlays made from, the appropriation for the
year and carryover and recoveries, presented by (1) appropriation
account, (2) theme, (3) program or project, (4) Center, and (5) object
class, as well as any other financial information requested by the
Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate.
Reserves reporting.—NASA is directed to include in its budget
justification the reserve assumed by NASA to be necessary within
the amount proposed for each directorate, theme, program, project
and activity, or, if the proposed funding level for a directorate,
theme, program, project or activity is based on confidence level
budgeting, the confidence level assumed in the proposed funding
level. Maintaining a reserve during the course of a fiscal year may
be prudent management. However, the recent staff report found
that some programs maintain large reserves and that there is limited central oversight of program-level reserves. This directive
seeks to encourage more consistency in reserve practices and provide for the oversight of the reasonableness of reserve assumptions
during consideration of NASA’s budget.
Reprogramming procedures.—As noted earlier in this report, the
Committee continues to have a particular interest in being fully informed of reprogrammings which, although they may not change
either the total amount available in an account or the general purposes for which the funds are available, represent a departure from
the explicit budget plans presented within the annual congressional justifications and approved or modified by the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations through the annual appropriations process. The Committee is concerned that movements of
funds above the de minimis levels specified in section 505 of this
Act may be occurring without Congressional notification. That section requires notification to the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations of deviations from the budgeted and appropriated
levels specified for all programs, projects and activities. To clarify
the level at which reprogramming actions are to be measured, the
Committee has chosen to include by mission directorate a summary
table delineating each program, project and activity against which
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
137
the reprogramming thresholds are to be measured. This display in
no way curtails NASA’s current flexibility in managing its diverse
portfolio of research and development and operational programs.
Rather, it will require NASA to inform the Committee on any deviations, subject to the thresholds specified in section 505 of this Act,
from the levels explicit in the agency’s budget justification, as adjusted for congressional action, as shown in the accompanying summary table. The Committee’s recommendation for NASA is delineated more fully in the table below and in the following account
summaries.
PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION
[Dollars in millions]
Recommended
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Science Mission Directorate:
Earth Science:
Earth Science Research .................................................................................................................
Earth Science Research and Analysis ..................................................................................
Computing and Management ................................................................................................
Earth Systematic Missions .............................................................................................................
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) .............................................................................
Glory Mission .........................................................................................................................
Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) .............................................................................
NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) ........................................................................................
Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat II) .............................................................
Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) .............................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Earth System Science Pathfinder ...................................................................................................
Aquarius ................................................................................................................................
Venture Class Missions .........................................................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Earth Science Multi-Mission Operations
Earth Science Multi-Mission Operations ...............................................................................
Earth Science Technology ...............................................................................................................
Earth Science Technology ......................................................................................................
Applied Sciences ............................................................................................................................
Pathways ...............................................................................................................................
$429.5
313.7
115.8
730.5
159.5
27.1
120.6
112.8
39.2
70.0
201.3
55.0
18.3
12.9
23.8
149.9
149.9
45.9
45.9
32.2
32.2
Subtotal, Earth Science ....................................................................................................
Planetary Science:.
Planetary Science Research ...........................................................................................................
Planetary Science Research and Analysis ............................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Education and Directorate Management ..............................................................................
Near Earth Object Observations ............................................................................................
Lunar Quest Program .....................................................................................................................
Lunar Science ........................................................................................................................
Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer ..............................................................
International Lunar Network ..................................................................................................
Discovery .........................................................................................................................................
Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) .................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
New Frontiers ..................................................................................................................................
Juno .......................................................................................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Mars Exploration .............................................................................................................................
2009 Mars Science Lab ........................................................................................................
MAVEN ...................................................................................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Outer Planets ..................................................................................................................................
Outer Planets .........................................................................................................................
Technology ......................................................................................................................................
Technology .............................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
1,443.0
163.7
135.1
21.4
1.4
5.8
103.6
33.3
66.5
3.7
213.2
124.1
89.1
264.1
237.2
26.9
416.1
204.0
53.4
158.7
98.6
98.6
89.0
89.0
HR149
138
PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION—Continued
[Dollars in millions]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recommended
VerDate Nov 24 2008
Subtotal, Planetary Science ..............................................................................................
Astrophysics:
Astrophysics Research ....................................................................................................................
Astrophysics Research and Analysis .....................................................................................
Ballons Project ......................................................................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Cosmic Origins ...............................................................................................................................
Hubble Space Telescope (HST) ..............................................................................................
James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) ...................................................................................
Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy ................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Physics of the Cosmos ...................................................................................................................
Joint Dark Energy Mission .....................................................................................................
Other Missions and Data Analysis ........................................................................................
Exoplanet Exploration .....................................................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
Astrophysics Explorer ......................................................................................................................
Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) ..........................................................................
Nuclear Spectrosopic Telescope Array (NuStar) ....................................................................
Astro–H ..................................................................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
1,348.3
Subtotal, Astrophysics ......................................................................................................
Heliophysics:
Heliophysics Research ....................................................................................................................
Heliophysics Research and Analysis .....................................................................................
Sounding Rocket Operations .................................................................................................
Research Range ....................................................................................................................
GSFC Building Support ..........................................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
Living with a Star ..........................................................................................................................
Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) .......................................................................................
Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) ....................................................................................
Solar Probe Plus ....................................................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
Solar Terrestrial Probes ..................................................................................................................
Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) ........................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
Heliophysics Explorer Program .......................................................................................................
GOLD ......................................................................................................................................
Other Misions and Data Analysis .........................................................................................
New Millennium ..............................................................................................................................
New Millennium .....................................................................................................................
Subtotal, Heliophysics .......................................................................................................
1,170.9
Realign the costs of administrative FTE to CAS .........................................................
Unallocated adjustment to reflect carryover ...............................................................
Consolidate construction in single account ................................................................
Affordability adjustment ...............................................................................................
¥24.3
¥23.2
¥12.6
¥11.0
Total, Science ...........................................................................................................
4,496.1
Aeronautics Mission Directorate:
Aviation Safety ........................................................................................................................................
Integrated Vehicle Health Management .........................................................................................
Aging Aircraft and Durability .........................................................................................................
Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control ..............................................................................................
Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Technologies ............................................................................
Airspace Systems ....................................................................................................................................
NextGen Concepts and Technology Development ...........................................................................
NextGen Systems Analysis, Integration, and Evaluation ...............................................................
Fundamental Aeronautics ........................................................................................................................
Subsonic—Rotary Wing .................................................................................................................
60.1
19.8
11.4
16.4
12.5
81.4
53.3
28.1
228.4
26.1
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
151.9
61.1
26.7
64.1
717.2
112.6
441.4
72.8
90.4
147.7
6.4
141.3
46.2
46.2
107.9
13.0
59.9
10.9
24.1
178.6
35.4
66.5
19.2
3.0
54.5
212.2
34.1
137.1
4.0
37.0
143.0
118.6
24.4
69.4
0.5
68.9
1.8
1.8
605.0
HR149
139
PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION—Continued
[Dollars in millions]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recommended
VerDate Nov 24 2008
Subsonic—Fixed Wing ...................................................................................................................
Supersonics ....................................................................................................................................
Hypersonics .....................................................................................................................................
Aeronautics Test Program .......................................................................................................................
Aero Ground Test Facilities ............................................................................................................
Flight Operations and Test Infrastructure .....................................................................................
Integrated Systems Research ..................................................................................................................
Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project ...............................................................................
Realign the costs of administrative FTE to CAS ....................................................................................
101.7
40.6
60.0
74.7
48.6
26.1
62.4
62.4
¥6.0
Total, Aeronautics ..................................................................................................................
501.0
Exploration Mission Directorate:
Constellation System ...............................................................................................................................
Constellation Systems Program .....................................................................................................
Program Integration and Operations ....................................................................................
Crew Exploration Vehicle .......................................................................................................
Crew Launch Vehicle .............................................................................................................
Cargo Launch Vehicle ...........................................................................................................
Commercial Crew and Cargo .........................................................................................................
Advanced Capabilities .............................................................................................................................
Human Research Program .............................................................................................................
ISS Medical Project ...............................................................................................................
Research Infusion Projects ....................................................................................................
Exploration Technology Development .............................................................................................
ISS Research .........................................................................................................................
Technology Infusion Projects .................................................................................................
Lunar Precursor Robotic Program ..................................................................................................
LPRP Mgmt ............................................................................................................................
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ..............................................................................................
Consolidate construction in single account ..................................................................................
Realign the costs of administrative FTE to CAS ...........................................................................
2,919.2
2,880.1
610.3
1,221.3
1,018.5
30.0
39.1
477.4
151.8
19.9
131.9
269.3
50.0
219.3
56.3
16.4
39.9
¥69.9
¥33.5
Total, Exploration ..........................................................................................................
3,293.2
Space Operations Mission Directorate:
Space Shuttle Program ...........................................................................................................................
Program Integration .......................................................................................................................
Flight and Ground Operations ........................................................................................................
Flight Hardware ..............................................................................................................................
International Space Station Program ......................................................................................................
ISS Operations ................................................................................................................................
ISS Cargo Crew Services ................................................................................................................
Space and Flight Support .......................................................................................................................
Space Communications and Navigation ........................................................................................
Space Communications Networks .........................................................................................
Space Communications Support ...........................................................................................
TDRS Replenishment .............................................................................................................
Human Space Flight Operations ....................................................................................................
Space Flight Crew Operations ...............................................................................................
Launch Services .............................................................................................................................
Launch Services ....................................................................................................................
Rocket Propulsion Test ...................................................................................................................
Rocket Propulsion Testing .....................................................................................................
Crew Health & Safety .....................................................................................................................
Crew Health and Safety ........................................................................................................
Unallocated adjustment for lack of justification ..........................................................................
Consolidate construction in single account ...........................................................................................
Realign the costs of administrative FTE to CAS ....................................................................................
3,157.1
678.1
1,035.1
1,443.9
2,267.0
1,639.0
628.0
733.8
496.5
427.1
43.4
26.0
114.7
114.7
85.9
85.9
45.8
45.8
8.6
8.6
¥17.7
¥26.8
¥33.8
Total, Space Operations ...............................................................................................
6,097.3
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
140
PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION—Continued
[Dollars in millions]
Recommended
Education:
Higher Ed. STEM Education ....................................................................................................................
STEM Opportunities (Higher Education) .........................................................................................
NASA Space Grant ..........................................................................................................................
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research ...........................................................
Minority University Research & Education Program ......................................................................
Global Climate Change Education .................................................................................................
K–12 STEM Education .............................................................................................................................
STEM Student Opportunities (K–12) ..............................................................................................
STEM Teacher Development (K–12) ...............................................................................................
K–12 Competitive Educational Grant Program ..............................................................................
Informal STEM Education ........................................................................................................................
Science Museums and Planetarium Grants ...................................................................................
Realign the costs of administrative FTE to CAS ....................................................................................
122.8
11.6
45.6
25.0
30.6
10.0
46.5
10.5
21.0
15.0
7.0
7.0
¥1.3
Total, Education ....................................................................................................................
175.0
Cross Agency Support:
Center Management and Operations ......................................................................................................
Center Management and Operations .............................................................................................
Center Institutional Capabilities ...........................................................................................
Center Programmatic Capabilities ........................................................................................
Agency Management and Operations .....................................................................................................
Agency Management ......................................................................................................................
Agency Management .............................................................................................................
Safety and Mission Success ..........................................................................................................
Safety and Mission Assurance ..............................................................................................
Chief Engineer .......................................................................................................................
Chief Health and Medical Officer .........................................................................................
Independent Verification and Validation ..............................................................................
Agency IT Services ..........................................................................................................................
IT Management ......................................................................................................................
Applications ...........................................................................................................................
Infrastructure .........................................................................................................................
Innovative Partnerships Program ...................................................................................................
Technology Infusion ...............................................................................................................
Small Business Innovative Research ....................................................................................
Small Business Technology Transfer Research ....................................................................
Partnership Development ......................................................................................................
Innovative Technology ...........................................................................................................
Strategic Capabilities Assets Program ..........................................................................................
Simulators .............................................................................................................................
Thermal Vacuum Chambers ..................................................................................................
Arc Jets ..................................................................................................................................
Congressionally Directed Items ......................................................................................................
2,182.9
2,182.9
1,707.5
475.4
965.4
412.7
412.7
209.2
53.3
102.2
3.7
50.0
150.4
31.9
70.2
48.3
163.7
9.3
115.7
13.9
23.8
1.0
29.4
11.7
8.3
9.4
15.7
Total, Cross-Agency Support ........................................................................................
3,164.0
Construction and environmental compliance and remediation:
Science ....................................................................................................................................................
Exploration ...............................................................................................................................................
Space Operations ....................................................................................................................................
Cross-agency support ..............................................................................................................................
Institutional investments ...............................................................................................................
Environmental compliance and restoration ...................................................................................
12.6
69.9
26.8
332.4
261.2
71.2
Total, Construction and environmental compliance .............................................................
441.7
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Inspector General
35.0
Total, NASA ..............................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
18,203.3
HR149
141
SCIENCE
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$4,503,019,000
4,477,200,000
4,496,100,000
¥6,919,000
+18,900,000
This appropriation provides for the full costs associated with the
science activities of the agency, which consist of the programs, or
themes, within the Science Mission Directorate. The full costs include all labor, travel, procurement, test and fabrication costs to
execute these programs, which provide for all of the research; development; operations; salaries and related expenses; and other
general and administrative activities supporting the themes within
this account. NASA’s Science Mission Directorate encompasses four
themes: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. The Directorate seeks to answer fundamental questions
concerning the ways in which Earth’s climate is changing; the comparison of Earth with other planets in the solar system and around
other stars; the connections among the Sun, Earth, and
heliosphere; and the origin and evolution of planetary systems, the
galaxy, and the universe, including the origin and distribution of
life in the universe. The Directorate achieves its objectives through
robotic flight missions, ground-based scientific research and data
analysis, and the development of new technologies for future missions.
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $4,496,100,000,
an increase of $18,900,000 above the budget request, and
$6,919,000 below the fiscal year 2009 comparable levels. The appropriation shall be available for one fiscal year, except that
$450,000,000 shall be available for two fiscal years. The recommendation makes the following adjustments to the budget request:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Earth science research and analysis .................................................
Earth science, other missions and data analysis .............................
Orbiting carbon observatory (incl. FY 2009 balances) ....................
Near Earth object observations .........................................................
Astrophysics, other missions and data analysis ..............................
Realign the costs of administrative activities to CAS .....................
Consolidate all agency construction in new account .......................
Affordability adjustment ....................................................................
+$32,000,000
+15,000,000
¥32,200,000
+2,000,000
+50,000,000
¥24,300,000
¥12,600,000
¥11,000,000
Earth science.—The Committee supports the development of Tier
I missions in support of NASA’s Earth science program. These missions, in coordination with small and medium class missions being
developed by the agency, are critical to address global challenges
in climate change and other areas.
Earth science, other missions and data analysis.—The recommendation includes $201,300,000 for Earth science, other missions and data analysis. An increase of $15,000,000 is provided
above the request to advance further the studies of the next two
decadal survey missions, the Climate Absolute Radiance and
Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) and the Deformation, Ecosystem Structure, and Dynamics of the Ice (DESDnyl).
Scatterometer.— The Committee directs NOAA and NASA to continue joint studies leading to a NOAA request in the fiscal year
2011 budget to build and fly an operational scatterometer to pro-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
142
vide sea surface vector wind measurements. NASA should continue
to co-fund this study in fiscal year 2010 and then supply its customary implementation support to NOAA satellite activities on a
reimbursable basis beginning in fiscal year 2011. The Committee
acknowledges that a radar scatterometer could have been adopted
as an operational NOAA instrument many years ago and appreciates the support NASA has provided to the operational data users
by flying scatterometers as part of its Earth science research mission.
Orbiting carbon observatory (OCO).—In February, a rocket failure sent OCO into the ocean off the coast of Antarctica, depriving
climate scientists of measurements meant to bridge data collected
by a seven-year-old satellite and a more advanced spacecraft is not
expected to launch for at least several years. This satellite was to
map Earth’s carbon dioxide concentrations in unprecedented detail.
Several options have been suggested following the loss of the OCO:
extend the operations of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS)
instrument aboard the Aqua spacecraft, launched in 2002; accelerate the development of the follow-on spacecraft, ASCENDS,
which is currently not slated until after 2013; and building and flying another OCO. The Committee awaits NASA’s informed judgment on how best to proceed, including schedule and cost estimates
for its recommendation, but expects such determination by September 1, 2009.
Near Earth object observations.—The recommendation includes
$5,800,000 for near Earth object observations, an increase of
$2,000,000 to support ongoing scientific research at the Arecibo Observatory in the fields of climate change and space weather.
GLOBE.—Within the amounts provided for Earth science,
$3,000,000 is provided for the GLOBE program. NASA is directed
to work cooperatively with NOAA during fiscal year 2010 to transition program responsibility for GLOBE from NASA to NOAA.
Mars program.—Exploring Mars remains one of NASA’s most
challenging and exciting endeavors. The Committee continues to
support a robust Mars exploration program and recommends funds
for the completion of the Mars Science Laboratory for launch in
2011.
Astrophysics other missions and data analysis.—Within the
amounts provided, not less than $50,000,000 is available to continue efforts in the use of the next generation of human space
flight architecture to service existing and future observatory-class
scientific spacecraft as identified in the conference report accompanying division B of Public Law 111–8.
Astrophysics exoplanet exploration, other missions and data analysis.—Building on NASA’s decades of investment in interferometric
capabilities and technologies, the Committee recommendation includes funds requested to enable SIM-Lite to continue mission concept, technology and risk reduction efforts in fiscal year 2010.
Jupiter system mission.—In February 2009, after a competitive
review by the world’s leading planetary scientists and senior NASA
leadership, NASA formally decided that the top priority Outer
Planet flagship mission was the Jupiter Europa orbiter/lander,
which would launch in 2020. This review also concluded that a mission to Saturn’s moon, Titan, would follow later in the decade. The
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
143
Committee continues to support the Jupiter Europa orbiter/lander
and NASA’s decision.
The Jupiter system mission consists of two spacecraft to explore
the Jupiter system and investigate the emergence of potentially
habitable worlds around giant planets. The mission places a special
emphasis on two of Jupiter’s giant moons, Europa and Ganymede,
and would be conducted in concert with the European Space Agency. The Committee recommendation includes $18,000,000 to further
study the Europa Jupiter system mission and to address the primary risk to the mission, the energy particle radiation environment
of Jupiter. Included in these funds shall be efforts to assist the
science community in preparing to respond to the announcement of
opportunity for the instruments.
The Committee is concerned that the budget profile for the Outer
Planets flagship mission to Europa appears inconsistent with a
2020 launch. Therefore, NASA is directed within 60 days of enactment of this Act to provide a projected full lifetime budget outline
for the Europa mission, to include anticipated contributions from
foreign partners, and an alternative budget profile that would accelerate the launch to 2018.
Planetary science, technology.—Within the funds provided for
planetary science, resources are provided for test and development
of thermal protection systems (TPS), such as coal-based carbon
foam ablative devices, in future missions to and from Mars and
Moon.
AERONAUTICS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2009 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$500,000,000
507,000,000
501,000,000
+1,000,000
¥6,000,000
This appropriation provides for the full costs associated with the
aeronautics activities of the agency, which consist of the programs,
or themes, within the Aeronautics Mission Directorate. The full
costs include all labor, travel, procurement, test and fabrication
costs to execute these programs, which provide for all of the research; development; operations; salaries and related expenses; and
other general and administrative activities supporting the themes
within this account. NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate is committed to expanding the boundaries of aeronautical
knowledge for the benefit of the Nation and the broad aeronautics
community. NASA conducts cutting-edge research that includes
foundational research across a number of core competencies that
support aeronautics and space exploration activities; research in
key areas related to the development of advanced aircraft technologies and systems, including those related to aircraft safety, environmental compatibility, and fuel efficiency; and research that
supports the Next Generation Air Transportation System in partnership with the Joint Planning and Development Office.
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommendation includes
$501,000,000, a decrease of $6,000,000 from the budget request,
and $1,000,000 over comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted levels.
The appropriation shall be available for one fiscal year, except that
$50,000,000 shall be available for two fiscal years. The rec-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
144
ommended adjustment to the budget estimate realigns costs of administrative activities to CAS for an adjustment of ¥$6,000,000.
EXPLORATION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request 1 .................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$3,505,469,000
3,963,100,000
3,293,200,000
¥212,269,000
¥669,900,000
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
1 Following the human space flight review, the Administration will provide an updated request for Exploration activities reflecting the review’s results.
This appropriation provides for the full costs associated with the
exploration activities of the agency, which consist of the programs,
or themes, within the Exploration Mission Directorate. The full
costs include all labor, travel, procurement, test and fabrication
costs to execute these programs, which provide for all of the research; development; operations; salaries and related expenses; and
other general and administrative activities supporting the themes
within this account. The Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
was established to realize the Vision for Space Exploration. Exploration Systems includes two themes that work together to enable
sustainable exploration and scientific discovery in the solar system:
Constellation Systems and Advanced Capabilities.
Through Constellation Systems, NASA will develop, demonstrate,
and deploy the transportation, life support, and surface systems
that will enable sustained human and robotic exploration of the
Moon, Mars, and beyond. Human exploration will enable scientific
activities and discoveries not obtainable with robotic explorers. Initial capabilities include the Orion crew exploration vehicle that will
transport and support crews traveling beyond low Earth orbit, and
the Ares I launch vehicle for transporting Orion into space. Following the development of these initial capabilities, Constellation
Systems will develop capabilities to support a human mission to
the lunar surface by 2020 though this timeline may change. These
capabilities include the Ares V heavylift launch vehicle, leveraging
engineering design and capabilities from the Shuttle program; an
Earth departure stage to propel Orion from low Earth to lunar
orbit; a lunar surface access module to safely transport astronauts
to and from the lunar surface; and systems, capabilities, and support for extended human stays on the lunar surface. Future development will provide crew, cargo transportation, and destination
support capabilities required for human exploration of Mars and
beyond.
The Advanced Capabilities theme consists of three programs: the
lunar precursor robotic program, the exploration technology development program, and the human research program. Activities
within these programs help prepare for human lunar exploration,
test new technologies that enable exploration, and further understanding of the effects of space on human performance. The lunar
precursor robotic program is developing a precursor mission to
characterize the lunar environment. The lunar reconnaissance orbiter and lunar crater observing and sensing satellite, scheduled to
launch in June 2009, will seek to find safe landing sites, locate potential resources, characterize the radiation environment, and demonstrate new technology. The lunar precursor robotic program will
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
145
work with the Science Mission Directorate and international partners on future missions to ensure that NASA gains the data it
needs for safe and cost-effective future exploration.
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommendation includes
$3,293,200,000, a decrease of $212,269,000 over the comparable enacted level and $669,900,000 below the budget request. The appropriation is available for one fiscal year, except that $330,000,000
shall be available for two fiscal years. Recommended adjustments
to the budget estimate are as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Adjustment pending blue ribbon panel review:
Constellation systems .................................................................
Advanced capabilities ..................................................................
Realign the costs of administrative activities to CAS .....................
Consolidate all agency construction in new account .......................
¥$586,300,000
+19,800,000
¥33,500,000
¥69,900,000
Adjustment pending Blue Ribbon Panel review.—In early May,
the Administration announced that NASA initiated an independent
review of planned U.S. human space flight activities and alternatives to ensure that the Nation is undertaking efforts that are
safe, innovative, affordable and sustainable in the years following
completion of the Space Shuttle manifest and retirement. The review panel is to consider:
• expediting a new U.S. capability to support use of the
International Space Station;
• supporting missions to the Moon and other destinations
beyond low Earth orbit;
• stimulating commercial space flight capabilities; and,
• fitting within the current budget profile for NASA exploration activities.
The panel will present its results in time to support an Administration decision on the way forward by August 2009, during which
time NASA will continue its current exploration projects, including
Ares I, Orion, commercial crew and cargo efforts and lunar systems.
In light of this ongoing review, and pending the recommendations of the panel and a determination by the Administration on
the way forward, the Committee recommends deferring an increase
from the fiscal year 2009 enacted level. This deferral is taken without prejudice to the existing architecture. The funding of
$3,293,200,000 provided in this bill, together with $250,000,000 in
funds provided for Exploration activities in the American Recovery
and Reinvention Act of 2009, will provide resources for NASA to
continue its efforts in human space flight in fiscal year 2010.
The Committee reaffirms its commitment to preserve the United
States’ world leadership in space exploration. This Committee has
long supported the Nation’s space program; that support of NASA
and its manned space program continues today. The Committee acknowledges the unsustainable circumstances the Nation finds itself
today with the lag between the retirement of the Shuttle and the
launch of the next generation manned spacecraft and encourages
the Administration and NASA to mitigate that hiatus to the extent
practicable. The Committee recognizes that the United States cannot maintain its world leadership in space exploration without a robust manned space program capable of carrying crews beyond low
Earth orbit.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
146
The Committee looks forward to receiving the findings and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Panel. To that end, however, the
Committee asserts that its recommendations herein should not be
viewed by the Blue Ribbon Panel as a diminution of the Committee’s support for NASA’s human space flight program. Previous
budget requests have failed to fund fully the Nation’s identified
human space flight program, which over the years and in turn,
have eroded in part NASA’s ability to bring Constellation’s initial
operating capability within earlier established timelines. These
budget shortfalls further exacerbate total program costs. Accordingly, after the work of the panel is complete, the Committee expects the Administration will amend its fiscal year 2010 budget request to fund fully the plan advocated by the panel and that the
Administration’s subsequent budget requests shall similarly include resources to fund fully the Nation’s human space flight program. Lastly, the Committee looks forward to the appropriate authorizing committees’ review and subsequent authorization of
NASA’s exploration programs and activities.
International Space Station (ISS) research.—These funds support
the study of life and physical sciences phenomenon in microgravity,
as well as in the partial gravity environments of the Moon and
Mars. In testimony before the Committee, Dr. Lennard Fisk noted
that investments in life science and microgravity have suffered ‘‘far
more egregious’’ and disproportionate reductions in investments
than any other science discipline at NASA. Accordingly, within
funds provided for exploration technology development, the Committee provides $50,000,000 for ISS research in fiscal year 2010, an
increase of $28,200,000 above the request and $5,200,000 over fiscal year 2009.
Technology infusion.—A total of $219,300,000 is provided for
technology infusion, the same level as provided in fiscal year 2009.
Within the funds provided, resources are available for the development of new technologies, including filament wound aluminum
metal matrix composite technology for use in cryogentic fuels systems for space vehicles, to include Ares launch vehicles and the
Altair lunar lander.
SPACE OPERATIONS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$5,764,710,000
6,175,600,000
6,097,300,000
+332,590,000
¥78,300,000
This appropriation provides for the full costs associated with the
space operations activities of the agency, which consist of the programs, or themes, within the Space Operations Mission Directorate. The full costs include all labor, travel, procurement, test
and fabrication costs to execute these programs, which provide for
all of the research; development; operations; salaries and related
expenses; and other general and administrative activities supporting the themes within this account. Funding in this account is
provided for the International Space Station and related activities,
and the Space Shuttle program. The Shuttle program will support
the Space Operations and Exploration Systems Mission Directorates to leverage select Shuttle flight hardware and ground sys-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
147
tems to advance the development of the Orion crew exploration vehicle, the Ares I crew launch vehicle, and the Ares V heavy lift
launch vehicle.
For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommendation includes
$6,097,300,000, a decrease of $78,300,000 below the request and
$332,590,000 over comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted levels. The
bill includes provisions providing specific amounts for Space Shuttle, International Space Station and Space and Flight support activities. The appropriation shall be available for one fiscal year, except that $610,000,000 shall be available for two fiscal years. Recommended adjustments to the budget estimate are as follows:
Realign the costs of administrative activities to CAS .....................
Consolidate all agency construction in new account .......................
Space and flight support operations unjustified program increase
¥$33,800,000
¥26,800,000
¥17,700,000
EDUCATION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$169,200,000
126,100,000
175,000,000
+5,800,000
+48,900,000
This appropriation provides for the full costs associated with the
education activities of the agency, which consist of the programs,
or themes, within the Education Mission Directorate. The full costs
include all labor, travel, and procurement costs to execute these
programs, which provide for all general and administrative activities supporting this mission. NASA’s Education program works to
inspire and educate students at all levels to pursue careers in the
fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, while
also engaging the education community to reach this goal. The
Education portfolio demonstrates a commitment to science, technology, engineering and mathematics education to ensure that the
next generation of explorers and innovators is fully prepared to join
NASA’s workforce while contributing to national needs. NASA’s objectives are to (1) provide elementary and secondary students and
teachers with NASA-related education opportunities; (2) support
higher education research capability and opportunities that attract
and prepare students and faculty for NASA-related careers; (3) provide students, teachers, faculty and researchers from underrepresented and underserved communities with opportunities in
NASA-related science and technology fields; (4) and increase student, teacher and public access to NASA education resources by developing and deploying innovative technology applications platforms. NASA engages the public in shaping and sharing the experience of exploration and discovery by improving public understanding of science and technology, including NASA aerospace technology, research and exploration missions.
The Committee rejects the Administration’s proposal to cut
NASA’s education programs from comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted levels. The 2005 National Academies’ report, Rising Above
the Gathering Storm, noted that the scientific and technological
building blocks of the United States’ economic leadership are eroding at a time when other nations are gathering strength. The necessary key identified in the report is to improve America’s talent
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
148
pool by vastly improving Kindergarten through twelfth grade
science and mathematics education. In addition, a recent congressionally-mandated task force found that by the end of this year,
over one-quarter of the U.S. aerospace workforce will be eligible to
retire, with too few engineers graduating from college to replace
them. A continuing dearth of students and graduates in math,
science and engineering cannot be sustained. Short-term cuts in
education programs have long-term effects. Accordingly, for fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommends $175,000,000, an increase
of $48,900,000 over the budget request, and $5,800,000 over comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted levels. Funds provided in this appropriation are to be allocated as follows:
Higher education STEM education:
STEM opportunities (higher education) ....................................
Space Grants ...............................................................................
EPSCoR ........................................................................................
MUREP ........................................................................................
Global climate change education ...............................................
K–12 STEM education:
Student opportunities K–12 .......................................................
STEM teacher development .......................................................
Competitive educational grant ...................................................
Informal education:
Science museums and planetariums .........................................
Realign the costs of administrative activities to CAS .....................
Total, Education ..........................................................................
$11,600,000
45,600,000
25,000,000
30,600,000
10,000,000
10,500,000
21,000,000
15,000,000
7,000,000
¥1,300,000
175,000,000
National Space Grant College and Fellowship program.—For this
program, the Committee recommends $45,600,000 to fund 42 states
or jurisdictions at $900,000 each and 10 states or jurisdictions at
$700,000 each.
CROSS AGENCY SUPPORT
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$3,306,387,000
3,400,600,000
3,164,000,000
¥142,387,000
¥236,600,000
This appropriation provides for the agency supporting functions
associated with the science, aeronautics, education, space operations and exploration activities of the agency. This account provides for the research; development; operations; salaries and related expenses; and other general and administrative activities
supporting the themes within the five other program accounts.
Cross Agency Support provides a strategic focus for managing
agency mission support functions and some of NASA’s unique research facilities. This budget area consists of three themes: center
management and operations; agency management and operations;
and institutional investments. The center management and operations theme includes the basic costs to manage and operate each
of the nine NASA field centers and to maintain the technical capabilities required to support the agency’s mission. This budget
theme is not directly identified or aligned to a specific program or
project requirement, but is necessary for efficient and effective administration and operation of the NASA centers. The agency management and operations theme provides for the management and
oversight of agency missions, functions, and the performance of
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
149
some agency-wide activities and unique research capabilities and
facilities. Theme responsibilities include the determination of programs and projects; establishment of management policies, procedures, and performance criteria; evaluation of progress; and the coordination and integration of all phases of the agency’s mission.
The five major programs included in this theme are agency management, safety and mission success, agency IT services, innovative
partnerships program, and strategic capability asset program. The
institutional investments theme provides for design and execution
of non-programmatic discrete and minor revitalization construction
of facilities projects, facility demolition projects, and environmental
compliance and restoration activities.
For fiscal year 2010, the bill provides $3,164,000,000,
$236,600,000 below the budget request. Appropriations are made
available for one fiscal year, reflecting the administrative nature of
the account. The Committee recommendation provides for the following allocation of funds within cross-agency support programs:
Realign the costs of administrative activities to CAS .....................
Consolidate all agency construction in new account .......................
Safety and mission success ................................................................
Innovative partnership programs .....................................................
Congressionally-designated items .....................................................
+$98,900,000
¥355,400,000
+25,300,000
¥21,100,000
+15,700,000
Center management and operations.—The realignment of NASA’s
budget structure required by the fiscal year 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Act was intended to improve the transparency of NASA’s
budget by separately funding programmatic and administrative activities. It was the Committee’s intent that the Cross Agency Support account fully fund Center administrative activities, including
human resources, financial management, procurement, facilities
operations, information technology services, and public affairs. As
the 2009 budget is being executed by NASA, it appears that significant numbers of Center FTE in these administrative areas are
being charged to programmatic accounts. For fiscal year 2010, the
Committee proposes to transfer these administrative FTE from the
program accounts to Center management and operations within
the CAS account, as follows, and provide a total of $2,182,900,000
for center management and operations:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Realign SMD administrative activities to CAS ...............................
Realign ARMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign ESMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign SOMD administrative activities to CAS .............................
Realign EMD administrative activities to CAS ...............................
Net adjustment ............................................................................
+$24,300,000
+6,000,000
+33,500,000
+33,800,000
+1,300,000
+98,900,000
Safety and mission success.—The Committee recommends a total
of $209,200,000, an increase of $25,300,000 over the budget estimate, for safety and mission success. These funds shall be available
for NASA’s overall software assurance and risk management strategy to ensure the correctness and quality of critical and complex
software systems. Within the funds provided for safety and mission
success, $50,000,000 shall be for independent verification and validation activities.
Innovative partnerships.—In total, the recommendation includes
$163,700,000 for innovative partnership programs. This level represents an increase of $3,500,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $21,100,000 from the budget estimate. The rec-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
150
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
ommendation does not include funding requested for several new
activities that were not funded in fiscal year 2009, including innovation incubator, future centennial challenges and innovative technology, due to affordability considerations.
Congressionally-directed items.—Within the appropriation for
cross-agency support programs, the Committee recommendation
provides for the following Congressionally-directed activities:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert graphic folio 075 49735A.051
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
151
152
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
AND REMEDIATION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
............................
(1)
$441,700,000
(1)
+441,700,000
1 The budget requests funds for programmatic construction and environmental compliance and remediation
in the respective mission directorates, and funds for institutional construction within the cross agency support account.
The Committee recommendation includes a new appropriation
for the construction of facilities (CoF) and environmental compliance and remediation. In total, the bill provides $441,700,000: the
same level as requested in the budget estimate for programmatic
construction in the Science and Space Operations mission directorates; $66,900,000 for the Exploration mission directorate, which
is the same level as provided in the fiscal year 2009, pending the
conclusions of the Blue Panel Review; and a reduction of
$23,000,000 from the amounts requested for institutional investments within Cross Agency Support account. These funds, available for five years, are allocated within the bill and are to be available as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Science ....................................................................................................
Exploration .............................................................................................
Space operations ....................................................................................
Cross agency support .............................................................................
Institutional investments ...............................................................
Environmental compliance and restoration .................................
Total, construction and environmental compliance and remediation ..............................................................................
$12,600,000
69,900,000
26,800,000
332,400,000
(261,200,000)
(71,200,000)
441,700,000
NASA makes numerous changes to its construction of facilities
program between the submission of the annual budget and project
initiation and completion. Funding for programmatic (i.e., from
within the mission directorates) CoF has increased nearly 46 percent between the original fiscal year 2004 to fiscal year 2008 budget requests and the fiscal year 2008 operating plan and funding for
institutional (i.e., from within cross agency support) CoF has increased 8 percent between the original fiscal year 2004 to fiscal
year 2008 budget requests and the fiscal year 2008 operating plan.
However, scant detail and justification is provided in the operating
plans for the numerous changes to the CoF program, and operating
plans do not provide an effective mechanism to track the execution
of CoF funding or project progress over time. The Committee asserts that changes to the way NASA’s CoF funding is appropriated
and administered, and specific reporting requirements for the CoF
program, will provide more visibility into NASA’s CoF program
execution. NASA is directed to provide NASA form 1509 for each
CoF project submitted in the annual budget request or an initial
operating plan and for each CoF project subject to a reprogramming notification. The Committee’s recommendation to create a
new account will not affect NASA’s current flexibility for managing
its CoF program, but will ensure the detail and transparency needed to assess the validity and scope of a project and the appropriateness of its funding source. In total, these changes will restore a
more disciplined approach to NASA’s use of appropriated funds for
the construction of its facilities.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
153
Cross agency support.—Within institutional investments, the recommendation provides inflationary adjustments for the various activities as reflected in the following adjustments to the budget request:
Minor renovation of facilities at various locations ..........................
Demolition of facilities .......................................................................
Construction, planning, design and management ...........................
¥$12,100,000
¥4,700,000
¥6,200,000
Total, recommended adjustments ..............................................
¥23,000,000
As Shuttle transition proceeds, the Committee urges NASA to
maintain and update facilities at all 10 centers to ensure that each
may participate in the work of future NASA missions and endeavors. NASA is directed to provide to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, within 60 days of the enactment of this Act,
a comprehensive 5-year detailing by center projected facilities infrastructure improvements and construction. The plan shall also
include current and projected mission assignments by center and
how such proposed improvements meet each center’s mission objectives.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$33,600,000
36,400,000
35,000,000
+1,400,000
¥1,400,000
The Inspector General Act of 1978 established the Office of Inspector General. The Office’s mission is to prevent and detect
crime, fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement while promoting
economy, effectiveness, and efficiency with NASA. The Committee
recommendation includes $35,000,000 for the Office of Inspector
General, $1,400,000 above the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and
$1,400,000 below the budget estimate. The appropriation shall be
available for one fiscal year.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
The bill includes a provision that funds for announced prizes otherwise authorized shall remain available until expended, until the
prize is claimed or the offer withdrawn.
The bill includes a provision that establishes thresholds for the
transfer of funds.
The bill includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds to implement any reduction in force or other involuntary separations
(except for cause) by NASA prior to September 30, 2010.
The bill includes a provision that provides for the transfer of balances under the old appropriations account structure to the new
appropriations account structure.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 established the
Foundation ‘‘to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; and to secure the national
defense.’’ The National Science Foundation (NSF) supports all the
non-medical fields of science, engineering and mathematics. While
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
154
the NSF serves as an efficient mechanism for funding research by
the nation’s colleges and universities focused on topics of critical
national need, such as climate change, NSF’s essential function is
to fund a broad array of research. In this way, as new issues arise,
the United States has technical expertise available to respond and
maintains a nimble science and engineering enterprise that is positioned to capitalize on new opportunities.
The value of the NSF to the future growth of the United States
economy was clearly acknowledged in the National Academy of
Sciences report Rising Above the Gathering Storm and in the America Competes Act (Public Law 110–69). NSF’s budget is on course
to double by fiscal year 2016, and the funding recommended in this
bill is consistent with this goal.
Continuity in funding levels.—The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) included an additional
$3,002,000,000 in funding for NSF. Roughly two-thirds of these
added funds will support 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year research grants, with
the overwhelming majority of this amount likely going to fund 3year grants, consistent with normal NSF practice. These grants
will encourage many undergraduate science, engineering, and
mathematics majors to go to graduate school in their technical
fields and will support a pulse of research positions employing new
graduate degree recipients. The budget request projects NSF funding in fiscal year 2012 of $8,490,000,000. This level is only
$1,990,000,000 above the base level for fiscal year 2009. The Committee expects future budget requests for NSF at least adequate to
sustain the levels of science workforce supported in fiscal year 2009
by the combined Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law
111–8) and ARRA so as to avoid a boom-bust cycle in science, engineering, and mathematics employment. It is critical that there be
sufficient NSF funding in fiscal year 2012 to support opportunities
for this pulse of additional graduate students and young researchers to continue their careers when the 3-year grants funded by
ARRA expire.
The budget request projects NSF funding in fiscal year 2011 of
$7,250,000,000, which is less than 3 percent above the fiscal year
2010 request. The Committee finds this level of request inadequate
given the critical role played by NSF and the Nation’s colleges and
universities. A 7 percent increase, as projected for the annual increases in fiscal years 2013–2016, would be more consistent with
10-year doubling of NSF’s budget.
The Committee directs the Foundation to convene a panel of experts to survey U.S. pre-K to 12 schools that are highly successful
in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and a sampling of corresponding institutions abroad and report recommendations to Congress on how their STEM education
practices might be more broadly replicated in the U.S. public school
system. The membership of the panel should include educators,
businesspersons, scientists, engineers and others, based on their
expertise and contributions in the aforementioned fields. The Foundation shall submit a report of the findings and recommendations
of this panel to the Committee within 180 days of the enactment
of this Act.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
155
RESEARCH AND RELATED ACTIVITIES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$5,183,100,000
5,733,240,000
5,642,110,000
+459,010,000
¥91,130,000
The Research and Related Activities appropriation enables the
United States to provide leadership and promote progress across
the expanding frontiers of scientific and engineering research and
education. This appropriation provides resources for NSF’s major
research activities, which include biological sciences; computer and
information science and engineering; engineering; geosciences;
mathematical and physical sciences; social, behavioral, and economic sciences; Office of International Science and Engineering;
U.S. polar research programs; U.S. Antarctic logistical support activities; integrative activities, including the Experimental Program
to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR); Office of Cyberinfrastructure; and the U.S. Arctic Research Commission.
The Committee recommends an appropriation for research and
related activities of $5,642,110,000 for fiscal year 2010, an increase
of $459,010,000 over the comparable fiscal year 2009 enacted level.
The reduction recommended from the request for NSF research
support enables increases in important research and education
funding in NOAA and NASA.
Climate change.—All requested increases for climate change in
the various research programs are supported.
Graduate research fellows.—The budget request provides funding
for the selection of 1,654 new fellows in fiscal year 2010. The Administration has set a goal of 3,000 new graduate research fellows
per year by 2013. To accelerate the increase in graduate research
fellows, the request is increased by $14,010,000 to enable NSF to
select and support 2,000 new fellows in fiscal year 2010.
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
(EPSCoR).—EPSCoR is critical as one means to build science expertise in all States. The Committee recommendation includes
$147,120,000, the same as the request.
High-risk, High-reward Basic Research.—The Committee supports the proposal in the budget request to set aside a minimum
of $2,000,000 in each research division to explore methodologies
that support transformative research. The Committee understands
that this initiative will total approximately $92,000,000 Foundation-wide, and may include innovative processes for identifying potentially transformative research, special solicitations and competitions including innovation prizes, increased use of specialized funding mechanisms, and exploring novel processes for problem solving.
Major research instrumentation.—The recommendation includes
no funds for Major Research Instrumentation. This reduction of
$100,000,000 from the request recognizes that NSF has issued two
solicitations during fiscal year 2009 for Major Research Instrumentation with awards expected to total $400,000,000. The Committee
expects the 2011 request again will seek significant funds for this
important program within Research and Related Activities.
Materials research.—The request for additional work in Research
Resources for Materials Research within Mathematical and Phys-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
156
ical Sciences is not supported in light of the major similar investments in basic energy sciences within the Department of Energy
Office of Science.
Hydrology and terrestrial ecosystems research.—The Committee
notes the success of the National Center for Atmospheric Research
in serving as an institutional focus for atmospheric research and in
the provision of shared infrastructure, especially supercomputing
and the community climate model. The Committee sees the need
for an appropriate mechanism to bring together the hydrology research community and better integrate the different types of data
and observing systems and enhance support of hydrology modeling.
The Committee also sees the need for an appropriate mechanism
to bring together the terrestrial ecology research community including the existing Long Term Ecological Research sites and their
data, the considerable efforts in agriculture, forestry, and the
USGS Biological Research Program, those who use satellite data
such as that from Landsat, EOS, and the operational NOAA satellites, and the new NEON distributed observing system. NSF is
directed to report its recommendations on the need for and establishment of mechanisms in these two areas of research with the
budget request for fiscal year 2011.
Climate change education.—Using the most current information
available, the National Academy of Sciences is undertaking a study
to evaluate the implications of different atmospheric greenhouse
gas concentration target levels and explain the uncertainties inherent in the analyses to inform policy makers as they make decisions
about stabilization target levels for atmospheric greenhouse gas
concentrations. Within the amounts appropriated, $100,000 is included for transfer to the National Academy of Sciences to develop
educational materials based on the conclusions of this study for use
at the collegiate level to strengthen climate education.
Ocean acidification.—Ocean acidification is a critical problem
with potentially destructive effects on coral reefs and commercial
fisheries. Within the amounts appropriated, funding is included for
research into the causes of and solutions to the growing threat of
ocean acidification at levels consistent with the recommendations of
the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Program.
Metagenomics research.—In environmental research and soil
science, the new approach of metagenomics, in which genes are
identified within samples without isolating individual species, is of
increasing value.
MAJOR RESEARCH EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$152,010,000
117,290,000
114,290,000
¥37,720,000
¥3,000,000
The Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction
(MREFC) appropriation provides funding for the construction and
acquisition of major research facilities that provide unique capabilities at the cutting edge of science and engineering. Operations and
maintenance costs of the facilities are provided through appropriations made to Research and Related Activities (R&RA). For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommendation includes $114,290,000,
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
157
a decrease of $37,720,000 from the fiscal year 2009 enacted level
and $3,000,000 below the budget request. The recommendation deletes $3,000,000 proposed to repay the Judgment Fund. The bill
also includes language prohibiting the use of funds to repay the
Judgment Fund.
The following table shows the specific projects for which funding
was requested and is recommended.
Advanced LIGO ......................................................................................
Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) ..........................................
Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST) ....................................
Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) ..................................................
Ice Cube ..................................................................................................
$46,300,000
42,760,000
10,000,000
14,280,000
950,000
Distributed and networked observing systems.—Future major research equipment projects that involve spatially distributed networks of sensors, such as envisioned for NEON, are likely to be
critical resources required for use by many researchers in oceanography, limnology, terrestrial and marine ecology and other fields.
Funding for such systems is appropriate for inclusion in MREFC.
EDUCATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$845,260,000
857,760,000
862,900,000
+17,640,000
+5,140,000
The Foundation’s Education and Human Resources activities
support all levels of education and training from pre-Kindergarten
through career development; promote public understanding of
science, mathematics, engineering and technology; and ensure the
United States has world-class scientists, mathematicians and engineers. This appropriation supports a cohesive and comprehensive
set of activities that encompass every level of education and every
region of the country. The major components of this directorate include research and learning in formal and informal settings; undergraduate education; graduate education; and human resource development.
The Committee recommendation provides $862,900,000 for education and human resources, an increase of $17,640,000 over the
fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $5,140,000 above the budget request. The recommendation includes adjustments to the budget request for the specific programs, as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Discovery research K–12 .......................................................................
Research and evaluation on education in science and engineering
Course, curriculum and laboratory improvement ...............................
STEM talent expansion program .........................................................
Robert Noyce scholarship program ......................................................
Advanced technology education ............................................................
Math and science partnership ..............................................................
Tribal colleges and universities ............................................................
+$20,000,000
+5,000,000
+5,000,000
+2,560,000
+10,000,000
¥41,600,000
+2,780,000
+1,400,000
Advanced Technology Education.—The recommendation supports
continuation of all existing grants within the Advanced Technology
Education Program but does not support any new grants. The Committee recommends that future requests for this program of training technicians to work in industry be made in more appropriate
departments or agencies such as the Department of Education.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
158
K–6 science education.—In testimony before the Commerce, Justice, Science Subcommittee, it was stated that most children decide
to pursue science, engineering or mathematics in elementary
school. NSF is directed to prepare a report on K–6 science education compiling all state standards, evidence of their effectiveness,
and the degree to which they inculcate scientific inquiry in the education of young students. This report is due to the Committees on
Appropriations of the House and Senate no later than April 1,
2010. NSF is encouraged to work with the National Research
Council, the National Science Teachers Association, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science in the preparation
of this report and to include recommendations for how to improve
science education in grades K–6.
Experiential learning.—The Committee strongly believes that
students need to have experience doing science and not merely
reading about it. Half a century ago an advantage of U.S. science
education was the inclusion of laboratory work in high school and
college science courses. Today, this type of practical student experience needs to extend beyond reproducing standard experiments to
taking measurements where the correct result is not already
known. Furthermore, it should extend beyond the four walls of a
physics, chemistry, or biology lab. Opportunities for scientific measurement are all around us in the ever changing natural world and
are simple enough to be accessible even to elementary school students with affordable equipment such as thermometers. Such
hands-on measurement experiences are the central element of inquiry-based instruction where students ‘‘do’’ science: formulating
research questions, taking measurements, analyzing data using
their mathematics skills, and articulating their results. It is critical
that hands-on, inquiry-based instruction form the basis of student
learning because addressing the complexity and uncertainty inherent in current real world problems requires the integrated application of all the sciences and mathematics and research shows that
this improves student achievement and retention. Science literacy
for the general public and future innovation workforce relies on
students doing and thinking of how to apply science and math together from their earliest years. Accordingly, the Committee recommendation provides an increase of $30,000,000 above the request to enhance research, implementation and evaluation of inquiry-based, hands-on instruction for K–12 science students and
those who will teach them.
Discovery research K–12 (DR–K12).—The increase above the request for the DR–K12 program is to enhance advancement of inquiry-based instruction in K–12 STEM teaching with at least half
the funding focused on grades K–6. This may be done through the
development, implementation, and study of resources, models, and
technologies for use by students, teachers, and policymakers.
Research and evaluation of inquiry-based instruction.—The increase above the request for the Research and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering (REESE) program is provided to
enhance support for empirical research on inquiry-based instruction.
Inquiry-based undergraduate instruction.—The increase above
the request is provided to support creation, adaptation, and dissemination of learning materials and teaching strategies that im-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
159
plement inquiry-based instruction in teaching science to future K–
12 teachers and other undergraduates and to assess student learning and evaluate course effectiveness. Teachers need to experience
a model of inquiry-based science instruction in order to have a
model for use of inquiry in their classrooms.
Hispanic Serving Institutions—Undergraduate Program.—NSF is
directed to provide a report detailing plans to establish a Hispanic
Serving Institutions—Undergraduate Program no later than 90
days following enactment. The Committee expects a significant
funding request for such a program to be included in the fiscal year
2011 budget request for NSF.
AGENCY OPERATIONS AND AWARD MANAGEMENT
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$294,000,000
318,370,000
299,870,000
+5,870,000
¥18,500,000
The Agency Operations and Award Management appropriation
includes funding for staff salaries, benefits, staff travel, training,
rent, information technology, administrative contractual services,
supplies, equipment and other operating expenses necessary for
management of NSF’s research and education activities. This appropriation supports full-time equivalents, provides for current administrative services and enhances the agency’s investment in information technology to increase productivity. For fiscal year 2010,
the Committee recommendation provides $299,870,000, $5,870,000
above the fiscal year 2009 enacted level and $18,500,000 below the
budget request. The recommended level provides for inflationary
increases in staffing at the NSF. NSF continues to be a well-managed, adequately staffed agency. Given the challenging economic
climate of the Nation, NSF is encouraged to avoid excessive salaries for rotators.
NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2008 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2009 request ............................................................
$4,030,000
4,340,000
4,340,000
+310,000
............................
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The Office of the National Science Board, established in 1950, establishes policies and assesses the quality, relevance and performance of the National Science Foundation’s awards and capital investments. In addition, the Board provides advice to the executive
branch and Congress on matters of science and engineering policy.
For fiscal year 2010, the recommendation provides $4,340,000, the
same as the budget request and $310,000 above the fiscal year
2009 enacted level.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
160
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2008 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2009 request ............................................................
$12,000,000
14,000,000
13,000,000
+1,000,000
¥1,000,000
The Office of the Inspector General was established to promote
economy, efficiency and effectiveness in administering the Foundation’s programs; to detect and prevent waste, fraud or abuse within
the Foundation or by individuals that request or receive National
Science Foundation funding; and to identify and resolve cases of
misconduct in science. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends $13,000,000, an increase of $1,000,000 above the fiscal
year 2009 enacted level and $1,000,000 below the budget estimate.
TITLE IV—RELATED AGENCIES
COMMISSION
ON
CIVIL RIGHTS
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$8,800,000
9,400,000
9,400,000
+600,000
............................
The United States Commission on Civil Rights was created to be
an independent, bi-partisan, fact-finding agency. The Commission
is responsible for investigating charges of citizens being deprived of
voting and other civil rights and collecting, studying and disseminating information on the impact of Federal laws and policies on
civil rights. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$9,400,000, which is equal to the budget request.
Support of State Advisory Committees (SACs).—The Committee
is supportive of the Commission’s goal to increase the number of
SACs with active charters. However, the published chartering goals
for 2009 and 2010 appear unrealistic when compared to the pace
at which the Commission re-chartered SACs in 2007 and 2008. In
order to improve the Committee’s ability to track chartering
progress, the Commission is directed to submit to the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations a biannual report listing the
51 SACs and the expiration date of the most recent charter for
each. The report should also include the projected date of re-chartering for those SACs whose most recent charter has expired and
a description of the recent activities undertaken by those that do
have an active charter.
In the event that the Commission is able to achieve its chartering goals, the Committee notes that significant vacancy rates in
regional offices will still impede the Commission’s larger goal of reinvigorating its SACs. Under the assumptions in the budget request, there will be more active SACs in operation in 2010, but the
number of regional office staff available to support them will actually decrease. Only one of the six regional offices is projected to be
fully staffed, and one is projected to enter its third year with a secretary as the only onboard staff. The Commission is urged to en-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00160
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
161
sure that its regional office staffing plan is coordinated with its
charter expansion plan so that newly reinvigorated SACs will have
the operational support necessary to succeed.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$343,925,000
367,303,000
367,303,000
+23,378,000
............................
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has jurisdiction over employment discrimination issues within the Federal government and also for private employers, State and local
agencies, employment services and labor organizations. For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommends $367,303,000, which is
equal to the budget request.
Backlog reduction.—The Committee remains very concerned
about EEOC’s increasing charge backlog, which is on pace to reach
102,944 charges by the end of fiscal year 2010. This is nearly double the size of the backlog as it existed less than three years ago.
Clearly, staff levels have been inadequate to deal with this workload, and a significant new investment in personnel, particularly
investigators and attorneys, will be necessary to even maintain the
backlog at current levels.
The Committee is disappointed, therefore, that the budget request does not contain more resources for staffing. At the requested
level, EEOC will only be able to fill existing ‘‘hollow’’ FTE rather
than increase staffing above the current FTE ceiling. At these levels, EEOC can expect, at best, a slowing of the rate of growth in
the backlog projections rather than any substantive backlog reduction. The Committee urges the EEOC to develop and implement a
multiyear plan to increase EEOC staffing to the levels necessary to
achieve backlog reduction in a timely manner. In the meantime,
EEOC is directed to submit to the House and Senate Committees
on Appropriations quarterly reports on projected and actual agency
staffing levels so that the Committee can better monitor EEOC’s
personnel resources.
Workload projections.—EEOC is reminded that workload projections should be continually calibrated with actual data as it becomes available through midyear reviews and other means. EEOC
is also directed to ensure that its workload projections account for
necessary changes in overtime policy as required by a March 23,
2009 arbitration decision addressing EEOC overtime payments.
Federal sector hearings.—The budget request notes EEOC’s intention to prioritize Federal sector cases into fast, regular or complex discovery tracks in order to improve the efficiency of the hearing process. EEOC is directed to submit to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations within 60 days of the enactment of
this Act an implementation plan for the new process, including
background on the need for these changes, the proposed implementation schedule and an analysis of the potential impact, both positive and negative, on the ability of Federal employees to get a fair
hearing under the track system.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
162
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$75,100,000
82,700,000
82,700,000
+7,600,000
............................
The International Trade Commission is an independent, quasi-judicial agency responsible for conducting trade-related investigations; providing the Congress and the President with independent,
expert technical advice to assist in the development and implementation of U.S. international trade policy; responding to the Congress and the President on various matters affecting international
trade; maintaining the Harmonized Commodity Description and
Coding System of internationally accepted product nomenclature;
providing technical assistance to eligible small businesses seeking
remedies and benefits under the trade laws; and performing other
specific statutory responsibilities ranging from research and analysis to quasi-judicial functions on trade-related matters.
The Committee recommends $82,700,000 for the International
Trade Commission (ITC) for fiscal year 2009, which is $7,600,000
above the fiscal year 2009 level and the same as the request. This
provides for the acquisition of additional space and fills key positions to meet the increased section 337 intellectual property caseload.
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
PAYMENT TO THE LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$390,000,000
435,000,000
440,000,000
+50,000,000
+5,000,000
The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is a private, non-profit corporation that provides free civil legal assistance, according to locally-determined priorities, to people living in poverty. For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommends $440,000,000, which is
$5,000,000 above the budget request.
Increasing financial impact.—Given the increasing demand for
legal aid services and the contraction of non-federal legal aid funding sources, it is critical for LSC to identify every possible means
to increase the impact of its Federally appropriated dollars. Obtaining more services at no or low cost through private attorney involvement would provide one such means, and the Committee encourages LSC to increase its efforts to do so. The Committee also
encourages LSC to reevaluate its prioritization between basic field
grants and Technology Initiative Grants (TIG). LSC has provided
examples of how effective TIG implementation has increased efficiency, allowed grantees to serve a greater total number of clients
and freed up attorney resources for use on the most complex cases.
With these benefits in mind, the Committee hopes that LSC will
consider more significant increases to the TIG program when making future funding requests.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
163
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISION—LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
A general provision in Title V of the bill revises the administrative provision in order to permit grantees to pursue the recovery
of attorney’s fees when recovery is permitted or required under
Federal or State law. The Committee believes that this action will
level the playing field between legal aid attorneys and their counterparts in the private sector and provide a potentially crucial
source of additional revenue to legal aid providers in a year in
which state and private funding sources are decreasing.
MARINE MAMMAL COMMISSION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$3,200,000
3,000,000
3,300,000
+100,000
+300,000
The Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of Scientific
Advisors on Marine Mammals are charged with overseeing and advising on domestic and international actions to further the policies
and provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The Commission provides objective, science-based advice to the Congress and
the Executive Branch on issues related to the protection of marine
mammals. For fiscal year 2010, the Committee recommends
$3,300,000, which is $300,000 above the budget request. The Committee further recommends that the Commission continue its global assessment of marine mammals and prepare a summary report
for Congress prioritizing international research and conservation
efforts.
OFFICE
OF THE
UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$47,272,000
48,326,000
48,326,000
+1,054,000
............................
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) seeks to contribute to U.S. economic growth, competitiveness and prosperity by
opening markets and reducing trade and investment barriers
around the world to create new commercial opportunities for U.S.
goods and services industries, workers, ranchers and farmers. The
Committee recommendation includes $48,326,000 for the Office of
the United States Trade Representative (USTR) for fiscal year
2009, which is $1,054,000 above the fiscal year 2009 level and the
same as the request.
The U.S. Trade Representative is a member of the President’s
Cabinet and serves as the President’s principal trade advisor, negotiator, and spokesperson on trade issues. USTR is part of the Executive Office of the President. Through an interagency structure,
USTR coordinates trade policy, resolves disagreements, and frames
issues for presidential decision. The USTR is also the Vice-Chairman of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, a member of
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
164
the Board of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, an ex officio
member of the Export-Import Bank Board of Directors, and a member of the National Advisory Council on International Monetary
and Financial Policies.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).—The Committee is aware of
significant intellectual property issues that infringe on our trading
relationships with China, Russia and Canada. The Committee encourages USTR to continue to prioritize such issues in bilateral and
multilateral trade negotiations, and in particular, to provide semiannual reports to the Committee on Russia’s progress in complying
with intellectual property commitments.
International Standards.—The Committee directs the USTR to
ensure that U.S. business interests are fully represented in international standards negotiations. The Committee directs the USTR
to collaborate with the Department of Commerce, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the State Department to reduce trade barriers to U.S. exports. The Committee
continues its direction to the USTR to ensure U.S. standards are
adopted in international negotiations.
Textiles.—The Committee is aware of concerns about the World
Trade Organization negotiations concerning textiles and apparel.
Specifically, the Committee is concerned that the current part of
tariff reduction negotiations under the Doha Round will result in
a non-reciprocal arrangement detrimental to United States manufacturers. The Committee believes such negotiations should be consistent with the trade negotiating objectives of the United States
contained in section 2012 of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 3802) and directs to report to the
Committee within 60 days of enactment of this Act regarding adherence to these objectives. Bill language is included regarding this
matter.
STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ...................................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ...................................................................
Recommended in the bill ...................................................................
Bill compared with:
Fiscal Year 2009 enacted ............................................................
Fiscal Year 2010 request ............................................................
$4,100,000
5,131,000
5,131,000
+1,031,000
............................
The State Justice Institute (SJI) is a non-governmental organization that awards grants and undertakes other activities designed
to improve the administration of justice in State courts. For fiscal
year 2010, the Committee recommends $5,131,000, which is equal
to the budget request.
Grant funding.—The Committee’s recommendation will allow SJI
to increase grant funding available for each of its five categories of
major grants. Deficits in State governments across the country will
likely encourage more State courts to look for outside funding
sources to support their initiatives, and the Committee is hopeful
that the increases provided in this bill will allow SJI to meet this
increased demand for its services.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
165
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
TITLE V—GENERAL PROVISIONS
The Committee recommendation includes the following general
provisions for the departments and agencies funded in the accompanying bill.
Section 501 prohibits the use of funds for publicity or propaganda
purposes unless expressly authorized by law.
Section 502 prohibits any appropriation contained in this Act
from remaining available for obligation beyond the current fiscal
year unless explicitly authorized.
Section 503 provides that the expenditure of any appropriation
contained in the Act for any consulting service through procurement contracts shall be limited to those contracts where such expenditures are a matter of public record and available for public inspection, except where otherwise provided under existing law or
under existing Executive Order issued pursuant to existing law.
Section 504 provides that if any provision of the Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held
invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of such provisions to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is
held invalid shall not be affected.
Section 505 provides for the Committee’s policy concerning the
reprogramming of funds. Section 505(a) prohibits the reprogramming of funds which: (1) creates or initiates a new program, project
or activity; (2) eliminates a program, project, or activity, unless the
Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified
15 days in advance; (3) increases funds or personnel by any means
for any project or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted, unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of
Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (4) relocates offices or
employees, unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of
Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (5) reorganizes or renames offices, programs, or activities, unless the Appropriations
Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (6) contracts out or privatizes any function or activity presently performed by Federal employees unless the Appropriations
Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (7) proposes to use funds directed for a specific activity by
either the House or Senate Committees on Appropriations, unless
the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (8) augments funds for existing programs, projects or activities in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent,
whichever is less, or reduces by 10 percent funding for any existing
program, project, or activity, or numbers of personnel by 10 percent
as approved by Congress, unless the Appropriations Committees of
both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; or (9) results from any general savings, including savings from a reduction
in personnel, which would result in a change in existing programs,
activities, or projects as approved by Congress unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15
days in advance. No reprogramming of funds is permitted after August 1, except in extraordinary circumstances and only after the
House and Senate Committees are notified in advance of such reprogramming of funds. Agencies must follow reprogramming procedures with respect to carryover funds.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
166
Section 506 prohibits funds from being used to implement, administer, or enforce any guidelines of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission covering harassment based on religion similar to proposed guidelines published by the EEOC in October 1993.
Section 507 provides that if it is determined that any person intentionally affixes a ‘‘Made in America’’ label to any product that
was not made in America that person shall not be eligible to receive any contract or subcontract with funds made available in this
Act.
Section 508 requires quarterly reporting to Congress of unobligated balances that were received during any previous fiscal year.
Section 509 provides that any closing or downsizing costs incurred by a department or agency funded under this Act resulting
from funding reductions in the Act shall be absorbed within the
budgetary resources available to the Department or agency, and
provides transfer authority between appropriation accounts to
carry out the provision, subject to reprogramming procedures.
Section 510 prohibits funds made available in this Act from being
used to promote the sale or export of tobacco or tobacco products
or to seek the reduction or removal of foreign restrictions on the
marketing of tobacco products, provided that such restrictions are
applied equally to all tobacco products or tobacco products of the
same type. This provision is not intended to impact routine international trade services provided to all U.S. citizens, including the
processing of applications to establish foreign trade zones.
Section 511 prohibits funds made available in this Act from being
used to implement a Federal user fee for background checks conducted pursuant to the Brady Handgun Control Act of 1993, or to
implement a background check system that does not require and
result in the destruction of certain information within 24 hours.
Section 512 delays the obligations of any receipts deposited into
the Crime Victims Fund in excess of $700,000,000 until October 1,
2010. This language is continued to ensure a stable source of funds
will remain available for the program, despite inconsistent levels of
criminal fines deposited annually into the fund.
Section 513 prohibits the use of Department of Justice funds for
programs that discriminate against or denigrate the religious beliefs of students participating in such programs.
Section 514 prohibits the transfer of funds in the Act to any department or agency of the United States Government, except for
transfers made under authorities provided in this, or any other appropriations Act.
Section 515 provides that funds provided for E-Government Initiatives shall be subject to the procedures set forth in section 505
of this Act.
Section 516 requires the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives to include specific language in any release of tracing study data that makes clear that trace data cannot be used to
draw broad conclusions about firearms-related crime.
Section 517 requires certain timetables of audits performed by
Inspectors General of the departments and agencies funded in this
Act.
Section 518 prohibits the use of funds to process patents of
human organisms. The intent of this provision is as expressed in
the colloquy between the provision’s sponsor in the House and the
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
167
Ranking Minority Member of the House Committee on Appropriations as occurred on July 22, 2003, with respect to any existing patents on stem cells.
Section 519 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to be used to
support or justify torture by any official or contract employee of the
United States Government.
Section 520 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to require certain export licenses.
Section 521 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to deny certain
import applications regarding ‘‘curios or relics’’ firearms, parts, or
ammunition.
Section 522 prohibits the use of funds to include certain language
in trade agreements.
Section 523 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to authorize or
issue a National Security Letter (NSL) in contravention of certain
laws authorizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation to issue
NSLs.
Section 524 requires the congressional notification of any project
within the Departments of Commerce or Justice, or the National
Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics Space Administration totaling more than $75,000,000 that has cost increases of
at least 10 percent.
Section 525 deems funds for intelligence or intelligence-related
activities as authorized by the Congress until the enactment of the
Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010.
Section 526 requires the departments and agencies funded in
this Act to establish and maintain on the homepages of their Internet website direct links to their Offices of Inspector General, and
a mechanism by which individuals may anonymously report cases
of waste, fraud and abuse.
Section 527 prohibits contracts or grant awards in excess of
$5,000,000 unless the prospective contractor or grantee that has
not certified that he has filed all Federal tax returns, has not been
convicted of a criminal offense under the IRS Code of 1986, and has
no unpaid Federal tax assessment.
Section 528 prohibits the use of funds in this Act that is inconsistent with the principal negotiating objectives of the United
States with respect to trade laws.
Section 529 provides for rescissions of unobligated balances in
certain departments and agencies funded in the Act.
Section 530 prohibits the use of funds in this Act for the purchase of first class or premium airline travel.
Section 531 prohibits the use of funds to pay for the attendance
of more than 50 employees at any single conference outside the
United States.
Section 532 prohibits the use of funds for the release of an individual detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the
United States, and prohibits the transfer of an individual detained
at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until a comprehensive
plan is submitted.
Section 533 allows LSC grantees to recover attorney’s fees when
permitted under Federal or State laws.
Section 534 provides authority to the Attorney General to pay
certain relocation expenses of the immediate dependent family of a
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
168
law enforcement or corrections officer who dies while performing official duties.
HOUSE
OF
REPRESENTATIVES REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The following materials are submitted in accordance with various
requirements of the Rules of the House of Representatives:
CHANGES
IN THE
APPLICATION
OF
EXISTING LAW
Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House
of Representatives, the following statements are submitted describing the effect of provisions in the accompanying bill which directly
or indirectly change the application of existing law.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Title I—Department of Commerce
International Trade Administration:
• Includes language providing funds for engaging in trade promotion activities abroad, including in expenses of grants and cooperative agreements for the purposes of promoting exports of U.S.
firms.
• Includes language that provides full medical coverage for dependent members of immediate families of employees stationed
overseas and employees temporarily posted overseas; travel and
transportation of employees of the United States and Foreign Commercial Service; employment of Americans and aliens by contract
for services; rental of space abroad and expenses of alteration, repair, or improvement; purchase or construction of temporary demountable exhibition structures for use abroad; and payment of
tort claims.
• Includes language regarding official representation expenses
abroad and the purchase of passenger motor vehicles for official use
abroad.
• Provides a legislative set-aside, for the Office of China Compliance and the China Countervailing Duty group.
• Includes language regarding the contribution to the Mutual
Educational and Culture Exchange Act of 1961 to include payment
for assessment.
• Includes language that relates to World Trade Organization
negotiations and antidumping and countervailing duties.
• Includes language regarding the World Trade Organization
and negotiating objectives.
• Includes language that stipulates that funds provided for specific items shall be available in the amounts specified in the report
accompanying this Act.
Bureau of Industry and Security: Operations and Administration:
• Includes language regarding export administration and national security activities of the Department of Commerce.
• Includes language providing for the costs associated with the
performance of export administration field activities both domestically and abroad; full medical coverage for dependent members of
immediate families of employees stationed overseas; employment of
Americans and aliens by contract for services abroad; payment of
tort claims; official representation expenses abroad; awards of compensation to informers; purchase of passenger motor vehicles for of-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
169
ficial use and motor vehicles for law enforcement use; and inspections and other activities related to national security.
• Includes language regarding the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 and the retention of payments and contributions.
Economic Development Administration: Salaries and Expenses:
• Includes language regarding the monitoring of approved
projects.
Minority Business Development Agency:
• Includes language making funds available for developing minority business enterprise, including expenses of grants, contracts
and other agreements.
• Includes language that stipulates that funds provided for specific items shall be available in the amounts specified in the report
accompanying this Act.
Bureau of the Census Periodic Census and Programs:
• Includes language regarding collecting data on race.
• Includes language relating to the use of funds for promotion,
outreach and marketing activities.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration:
• Includes language permitting the Secretary of Commerce to
charge federal agencies for costs in spectrum management, analysis, operations, and related services; and to use such collections in
telecommunications research.
Public Telecommunications Facilities, Planning and Construction:
• Includes language providing funds available for program administration and makes unobligated balances available for grants.
United States Patent and Trademark Office:
• Includes language providing that appropriated funds be reduced as offsetting collections are assessed and collected and reducing appropriations if fee collections are less than appropriated
funding.
• Provides for the availability of funds received in excess of appropriations to be available until expended.
• Includes language regarding basic pay and certain retirement
benefits; limiting official reception and representation expenses;
and providing that sections 801, 802, and 803 of division B, of P.L.
108–447 shall remain in effect during fiscal year 2010.
• Includes authority to permit the establishment of fees related
to the electronic filing of documents.
• Provides authority to enter into cooperative agreements to conduct policy studies related to fair international protection of intellectual property rights.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Scientific and
Technical Research and Services:
• Includes language limiting funds for official reception and representation expenses and transfers to the working capital fund.
Industrial Technology Service:
• Provides for the multi-year availability of funds provided for
the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership.
• Provides for the multi-year availability of funds provided for
Technical Innovation Program.
Construction of Research Facilities:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
170
• Provides for the multi-year availability of funds provided for
construction of research facilities.
• Includes language regarding the submission of certain materials in support of construction budget requests.
• Provides funding for a competitive construction grant program.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Operations, Research and Facilities:
• Includes language specifying the use of funds and providing for
two year availability for cooperative enforcement funds.
• Includes language allowing fees and donations received by a
particular line office to be retained and used for expenses related
to those activities.
• Provides that certain funds be derived from various sources.
• Includes language limiting the amount of funds that can be
provided for corporate services, administrative support, and the Department working capital fund, including general counsel legal
services.
• Includes language specifying that deviations from amounts included in the report accompanying the Act shall be subject to section 505 of this Act.
• Includes language restricting funds under the Coastal Zone
Management Act of 1972, as amended.
• Includes language providing for retired pay expenses.
• Includes language that stipulates that funds provided for specific items shall be available in the amounts specified in the report
accompanying this Act.
Procurement, Acquisition and Construction:
• Provides for the multi-year availability of funds provided for
construction of facilities.
• Provides that certain funds be derived from various sources.
• Includes language that stipulates that funds provided for specific items shall be available in the amounts specified in the report
accompanying this Act.
• Includes language specifying that deviations from amounts included in the report accompanying the Act shall be subject to section 505 of this Act.
Coastal Zone Management Funds:
• Includes language relating to offsetting collections.
Fisheries Finance Program Account:
• Includes limitations on individual fishing quota loans and for
traditional direct loans and prohibits direct loans for any new fishing vessel that will increase the harvesting capacity in any U.S.
fishery.
Departmental Management:
• Includes language limiting funds for official reception and representation expenses.
• Includes language regarding audits and evaluations by the Bureau of the Census and retains from obligation funds until the Secretary has certified that the Bureau of the Census has met all best
practices related to contracting and information technology.
Herbert C. Hoover Building Renovation and Modernization:
• Includes language regarding blast windows for renovation and
modernization.
General Provisions: Department of Commerce
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
171
• Includes language making appropriations and funds available
for advance payments only on the Secretary’s certification that
such payments are in the public interest.
• Includes language providing for use of appropriations for salaries and expenses for hire of passenger motor vehicles and uniforms or such allowances, as authorized.
• Includes a provision regarding transfers between NOAA and
the Department.
• Includes a provision requiring the absorption of funding reductions related to personnel actions.
• Includes a provision adopting section 112 of division B of Public Law 110–61.
• Includes a provision allowing the Secretary of Commerce to
furnish services within Department of Commerce buildings for reimbursement, which would then be credited to the appropriation or
fund that provides such services.
• Includes a provision authorizing the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to avail the agency
of resources of other departments, agencies or instrumentalities of
the United States or any political subdivision thereof, or foreign
government or international organization to carry out the responsibilities of any statute administered by the agency.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Title II—Department of Justice
General Administration (GA):
• Includes language authorizing the transfer of funds between
offices in this account; limiting the amount that offices within GA
can increase or decrease; providing for specific amounts for various
offices; extending availability for construction funds; and requiring
notification on funding changes.
National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC):
• Includes language designating funds for reimbursement of personnel for support of the Department of Defense’s counter-drug intelligence responsibilities.
• Includes language establishing that NDIC shall maintain the
personnel and technical resources needed to conduct document and
computer exploitation capabilities.
Justice Information Sharing Technology:
• Includes a specific amount for the unified financial management system.
Tactical Law Enforcement Wireless Communications:
• Includes language regarding the transfer of funds for purchasing portable and mobile radios, which shall be subject to section 505 of this Act.
Detention Trustee:
• Includes language establishing that the Trustee shall be responsible for managing the Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System.
• Includes language limiting the amount of funds considered as
‘‘funds appropriated for State and local law enforcement assistance’’.
General Legal Activities:
• Includes language limiting the amount of funds for official representation and reception expenses available to the United States
National Central Bureau.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
172
• Includes language providing the Attorney General certain authorities when emergent circumstances require additional funding
for litigation activities, which shall be subject to the provisions of
section 505 of this Act.
• Provides funds to reimburse the Office of Personnel Management for expenses associated with the election monitoring program
and provides for extended availability.
Antitrust Division:
• Includes language regarding the use of fees under the HartScott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act.
United States Attorneys:
• Includes language limiting funds for official reception.
United States Trustee System Funds:
• Includes language regarding refunds due depositors; provides
for the extended availability of certain funds and the use of offsetting collections.
Fees and Expenses of Witnesses:
• Includes language regarding funds for construction of buildings
for safesites, armored and other vehicles, and telecommunication
equipment.
Community Relations Service:
• Includes language regarding the transfer of funds for conflict
resolution and violence prevention activities within the community
relations service, which shall be subject to the provisions of section
505 of this Act.
United States Marshals Services:
• Includes language providing for official reception and representation expenses, information technology systems, and courthouse
security.
National Security Division:
• Includes language providing for the transfers of funds in emergent circumstances, which shall be subject to the provisions of section 505 of this Act.
Interagency Law Enforcement, Interagency Crime and Drug Enforcement:
• Includes language regarding certain reimbursements.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI):
• Includes allocations of funds for certain activities within the
FBI.
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA):
• Provides funding for necessary expenses of the DEA, to include
drug education and training programs, and provides for official reception and representation expenses.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF):
• Provides funding for the necessary expenses of the ATF, to include training of state and local law enforcement, training of canines and provision of laboratory assistance.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses in connection with
consolidating or centralizing records of acquisition and disposition
of firearms maintained by Federal firearms licensees.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to implement
amendments to 27 CFR 478.11, change the definition of ‘‘Curios or
relics’’ or remove items from ATF publication 5300.11.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00172
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
173
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to investigate or act
upon applications for relief from Federal firearms disabilities under
18 U.S.C. 925.
• Includes language regarding expenses to investigate applications filed by corporations for relief from section 925(c) of title 18
U.S.C.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to transfer mission
or activities from ATF to other agencies.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to disclose part or
all of the contents of the Firearms Trace System database or any
information required to be kept by licensees, except as provided.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to promulgate or implement any rule requiring a physical inventory of licensed businesses.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to retrieve certain
information electronically.
• Includes language that prohibits expenses to deny an application for certain licenses.
Federal Prison System:
• Includes language that provides for the transfer to the Health
Resources and System Administration funds necessary for medical
relief of inmates.
• Includes language that provides authority to the Director to
enter into contracts to furnish health care.
• Includes a limitation on funds for receptions and provides authority for the Federal Prison System to accept donated property
and services.
Building and Facilities:
• Includes language stating labor of prisoners may be used for
work.
Federal Prison Industries, Incorporated:
• Includes language authorizing Federal Prison Industries to
make expenditures in accord with the law.
• Includes a limitation on administrative expenses for Federal
Prison Industries.
Office on Violence Against Women:
• Includes a limitation on funds to be made available for expenses related to evaluation, training, and technical assistance,
and provides for specific appropriations for various programs within the Office on Violence Against Women.
Justice Assistance:
• Includes language providing specific appropriations for various
programs within the Office of Justice Programs.
State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance:
• Includes language providing for specific appropriations for various programs and activities.
• Includes language requiring units of local government that receive funds through this appropriation for increasing their number
of law enforcement officers to achieve a net gain in the number of
law enforcement officers who perform non-administrative public
safety service.
Juvenile Justice Programs:
• Includes language providing for specific appropriations for various programs and activities.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
174
• Includes a limitation on funds to be made available for expenses related to research, evaluation, and statistics activities and
a limitation on funds to be made available for expenses related to
training and technical assistance activities.
Community Oriented Policing Services:
• Includes language providing funds for specific appropriations
for various programs and activities.
• Includes language regarding funds derived from deobligated
balances shall be available in accordance with the provisions of section 505 of this Act.
General Provisions, Department of Justice:
• Includes a provision making available additional reception and
representation funding for the Attorney General from the amounts
provided in this title.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds to pay for an abortion, except in the case of rape or to preserve the life of the mother.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds to require any person to perform or facilitate the performance of an abortion.
• Includes a provision establishing the obligation of the Director
of the Bureau of Prisons to provide escort services to inmates receiving an abortion outside of a Federal facility, except where this
obligation conflicts with the preceding section.
• Includes a provision establishing the Committee’s requirements and procedures for transfer proposals.
• Includes an authorization for the Attorney General to extend
an ongoing Personnel Management Demonstration Project.
• Includes an extension of specified authorities to the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for undercover operations.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds for transporting prisoners classified as maximum or high security, other than to a facility certified by the Bureau of Prisons as appropriately secure.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds for the purchase or
rental by Federal prisons of audiovisual equipment, services and
materials used primarily for recreational purposes, except for those
items and services needed for inmate training, religious, or educational purposes.
• Includes a requirement for review by the Deputy Attorney
General and the Department Investment Review Board prior to the
obligation or expenditure of funds for major information technology
projects.
• Includes a provision requiring the Department to follow reprogramming procedures prior to any deviation from the program
amounts specified in this title or the reuse of deobligated funds
provided in previous years.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds for A–76 competitions for work performed by employees of the Bureau of Prisons or
Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds to pay the salary,
benefits or expenses of a U.S. Attorney performing dual duties that
exempt that U.S. Attorney from established residency requirements.
• Includes a prohibition on the use of funds for future phases of
the Sentinel program until the AG certifies that work on existing
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
175
phases has been substantially completed under a validated performance baseline.
• Includes a provision allowing the use, for research and statistical purposes, of up to one percent of funds made available to OJP
as formula grants and the use, for training and technical assistance, of up to three percent of funds made available to OJP.
• Includes authority for the Attorney General to waive matching
requirements for adult and juvenile offender state and local reentry
demonstration grants under the Second Chance Act.
• Includes the extension of permanent retention and relocation
bonus authorities to the FBI.
• Includes the extension of foreign language proficiency pay authorities to the FBI.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Title III—Science
National Aeronautics and Space Administration:
Science:
• Includes appropriations for one- and two-year availability.
Aeronautics:
• Includes appropriations for one- and two-year availability.
Exploration:
• Includes appropriations for one- and two-year availability.
Space Operations:
• Includes appropriations for one- and two-year availability.
• Includes language providing specific amounts for Space Shuttle, International Space Station operations, and Space and Flight
Services.
• Includes language that states that amounts provided for Space
operations include expenses of certain utilization flights, which
shall be considered henceforth as baseline flight, and requires the
Administrator to certify to the Congress that each mission is necessary and can be flown safely.
Cross Agency Support:
• Includes an appropriation available for one year.
• Includes language providing for specific sums for independent
verification and validation activities.
• Includes language subjecting to annual appropriations receipts
and expenditures made pursuant to enhanced use lease arrangements.
• Includes language that stipulates that funds provided for specific items shall be available in the amounts specified in the report
accompanying this Act.
Construction and environmental compliance and remediation:
• Includes an appropriation for construction and environmental
compliance and remediation to be available for five years, and
specifies amounts for specific mission directorates and institutional
investments.
Administrative Provisions:
• Includes language regarding the availability of funds for announced prizes.
• Includes language regarding transfers of funds.
• Includes language regarding reductions in force.
National Science Foundation:
• Includes language regarding the procurement of polar
icebreaking services, reimbursements to the Coast Guard for sums
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
176
as agreed to according to the existing memorandum of agreement,
and authority to credit to the appropriation receipts from support
services and materials.
• Includes language providing amounts for the Experimental
Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR).
Agency Operations and Award Management:
• Includes language regarding contracts for maintenance and operation of facilities and the reimbursement for security guard services.
Office of the National Science Board:
• Includes language funds for official reception and representation.
Title IV—Related Agencies
Commission on Civil Rights:
• Includes language prohibiting expenses to employ a specific
level of full-time individuals or to reimburse Commissioners for certain billable days.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission:
• Includes language limiting funds for official reception and representation.
• Includes language prohibiting any action to implement any
workforce repositioning, except as in accordance with the provisions of section 505 of this Act.
• Includes language authorizing the Chair to accept donations or
gifts to carry out the work of the Commission.
Legal Services Corporation:
• Includes language regarding pay for officers and employees.
• Includes language continuing certain conditions and restrictions on the use of funds.
Office of the United States Trade Representative:
• Includes language limiting funds for official reception and representation and provides funding for specific activities.
State Justice Institute:
• Includes language limiting funds for reception and representation.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Title V—General Provisions
Section 501 prohibits the use of funds for publicity or propaganda
purposes unless expressly authorized by law.
Section 502 prohibits any appropriation contained in this Act
from remaining available for obligation beyond the current fiscal
year unless explicitly authorized.
Section 503 provides that the expenditure of any appropriation
contained in the Act for any consulting service through procurement contracts shall be limited to those contracts where such expenditures are a matter of public record and available for public inspection, except where otherwise provided under existing law or
under existing Executive Order issued pursuant to existing law.
Section 504 provides that if any provision of the Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held
invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of such provisions to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is
held invalid shall not be affected.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
177
Section 505 provides for the Committee’s policy concerning the
reprogramming of funds. Section 505(a) prohibits the reprogramming of funds which: (1) creates or initiates a new program, project
or activity; (2) eliminates a program, project, or activity, unless the
Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified
15 days in advance; (3) increases funds or personnel by any means
for any project or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted, unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of
Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (4) relocates offices or
employees, unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of
Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (5) reorganizes or renames offices, programs, or activities, unless the Appropriations
Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (6) contracts out or privatizes any function or activity presently performed by Federal employees unless the Appropriations
Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (7) proposes to use funds directed for a specific activity by
either the House or Senate Committees on Appropriations, unless
the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; (8) augments funds for existing programs, projects or activities in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent,
whichever is less, or reduces by 10 percent funding for any existing
program, project, or activity, or numbers of personnel by 10 percent
as approved by Congress, unless the Appropriations Committees of
both Houses of Congress are notified 15 days in advance; or (9) results from any general savings, including savings from a reduction
in personnel, which would result in a change in existing programs,
activities, or projects as approved by Congress unless the Appropriations Committees of both Houses of Congress are notified 15
days in advance. No reprogramming of funds is permitted after August 1, except in extraordinary circumstances and only after the
House and Senate Committees are notified in advance of such reprogramming of funds. Agencies must follow reprogramming procedures with respect to carryover funds.
Section 506 prohibits funds from being used to implement, administer, or enforce any guidelines of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission covering harassment based on religion similar to proposed guidelines published by the EEOC in October 1993.
Section 507 provides that if it is determined that any person intentionally affixes a ‘‘Made in America’’ label to any product that
was not made in America that person shall not be eligible to receive any contract or subcontract with funds made available in this
Act.
Section 508 requires quarterly reporting to Congress of unobligated balances that were received during any previous fiscal year.
Section 509 provides that any closing or downsizing costs incurred by a department or agency funded under this Act resulting
from funding reductions in the Act shall be absorbed within the
budgetary resources available to the Department or agency, and
provides transfer authority between appropriation accounts to
carry out the provision, subject to reprogramming procedures.
Section 510 prohibits funds made available in this Act from being
used to promote the sale or export of tobacco or tobacco products
or to seek the reduction or removal of foreign restrictions on the
marketing of tobacco products, provided that such restrictions are
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
178
applied equally to all tobacco products or tobacco products of the
same type. This provision is not intended to impact routine international trade services provided to all U.S. citizens, including the
processing of applications to establish foreign trade zones.
Section 511 prohibits funds made available in this Act from being
used to implement a Federal user fee for background checks conducted pursuant to the Brady Handgun Control Act of 1993, or to
implement a background check system that does not require and
result in the destruction of certain information within 24 hours.
Section 512 delays the obligations of any receipts deposited into
the Crime Victims Fund in excess of $700,000,000 until October 1,
2010. This language is continued to ensure a stable source of funds
will remain available for the program, despite inconsistent levels of
criminal fines deposited annually into the fund.
Section 513 prohibits the use of Department of Justice funds for
programs that discriminate against or denigrate the religious beliefs of students participating in such programs.
Section 514 prohibits the transfer of funds in the Act to any department or agency of the United States Government, except for
transfers made under authorities provided in this, or any other appropriations Act.
Section 515 provides that funds provided for E-Government Initiatives shall be subject to the procedures set forth in section 505
of this Act.
Section 516 requires the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives to include specific language in any release of tracing study data that makes clear that trace data cannot be used to
draw broad conclusions about firearms-related crime.
Section 517 requires certain timetables of audits performed by
Inspectors General of the departments and agencies funded in this
Act.
Section 518 prohibits the use of funds to process patents of
human organisms. The intent of this provision is as expressed in
the colloquy between the provision’s sponsor in the House and the
Ranking Minority Member of the House Committee on Appropriations as occurred on July 22, 2003, with respect to any existing patents on stem cells.
Section 519 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to be used to
support or justify torture by any official or contract employee of the
United States Government.
Section 520 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to require certain export licenses.
Section 521 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to deny certain
import applications regarding ‘‘curios or relics’’ firearms, parts, or
ammunition.
Section 522 prohibits the use of funds to include certain language
in trade agreements.
Section 523 prohibits the use of funds in this Act to authorize or
issue a National Security Letter (NSL) in contravention of certain
laws authorizing the Federal Bureau of Investigation to issue
NSLs.
Section 524 requires the congressional notification of any project
within the Departments of Commerce or Justice, or the National
Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics Space Adminis-
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
179
tration totaling more than $75,000,000 that has cost increases of
at least 10 percent.
Section 525 deems funds for intelligence or intelligence-related
activities as authorized by the Congress until the enactment of the
Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010.
Section 526 requires the departments and agencies funded in
this Act to establish and maintain on the homepages of their Internet website direct links to their Offices of Inspector General, and
a mechanism by which individuals may anonymously report cases
of waste, fraud and abuse.
Section 527 prohibits contracts or grant awards in excess of
$5,000,000 unless the prospective contractor or grantee that has
not certified that he has filed all Federal tax returns, has not been
convicted of a criminal offense under the IRS Code of 1986, and has
no unpaid Federal tax assessment.
Section 528 prohibits the use of funds in this Act that is inconsistent with the principal negotiating objectives of the United
States with respect to trade laws.
Section 529 provides for rescissions of unobligated balances in
certain departments and agencies funded in the Act.
Section 530 prohibits the use of funds in this Act for the purchase of first class or premium airline travel.
Section 531 prohibits the use of funds to pay for the attendance
of more than 50 employees at any single conference outside the
United States.
Section 532 prohibits the use of funds for the release of an individual detained at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the
United States, and prohibits the transfer of an individual detained
at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until a comprehensive
plan is submitted.
Section 533 allows LSC grantees to recover attorney’s fees when
permitted or required under Federal or State law.
Section 534 provides authority to the Attorney General to pay
certain relocation expenses of the immediate dependent family of a
law enforcement or corrections officer who dies while performing official duties.
APPROPRIATIONS NOT AUTHORIZED
BY
LAW
Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House
of Representatives, the following table lists the appropriations in
the accompanying bill which are not authorized by law:
[$ in 000s]
Last year of authorization
Agency/program
Authorization
level
Appropriations in
last year of authorization
Appropriations in
this bill
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration:
Economic Development Administration, S&E .......
Economic Development Assistance Programs:
Public Works and Economic Development ............
International Trade Administration:
Export Promotion ...................................................
Bureau of Industry and Security:
Export Administration ............................................
Defense Production Act .........................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 6659
2008
such sums
$30,832
$38,000
2008
$425,000
235,000
255,000
1996
such sums
248,726
248,200
2001
2009
such sums
such sums
64,711
14,767
54,432
14,767
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
180
[$ in 000s]
Last year of authorization
Agency/program
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
National Telecommunications and Information Administration:
National Telecommunications and Information
Administration—S&E .......................................
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:
Operations, Research and Facilities:
National Ocean Service:
Coral Reef Conservation .......................................
Coastal Zone Management ...................................
Hydrographic Service Improvement ......................
Marine Protection, Research, Preservation &
Sanctuaries .......................................................
Estuary Restoration ...............................................
National Marine Fisheries Services:
Endangered Species Act Amendment ...................
Marine Mammal Protection ...................................
International Dolphin Conservation Program .......
NOAA Marine Fisheries Program ...........................
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research:
National Sea Grant College Program ...................
Procurement, Acquisition and Construction:
National Ocean Service:
Marine Protection, Research, Preservation &
Sanctuaries .......................................................
National Institute of Standards and Technology:
Scientific & Technical Research & Services:
Earthquake Hazard Reduction ..............................
Authorization
level
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 6659
Appropriations in
this bill
1993
17,900
21,823
19,999
2004
1999
2007
16,000
55,100
148,219
16,000
58,500
231,500
31,500
77,900
152,293
2005
2005
40,000
76,500
57,958
1,092
49,995
3,000
1992
1999
2001
2000
6,750
14,768
6,800
110,470
8,236
22,927
3,146
125,596
15,987
47,000
3,700
190,133
2008
103,000
57,043
59,085
2005
6,000
3,683
15,995
2009
14,640
1,700
4,100
105,805
1,295,319
80,000
185,000
266,000
75,681
12,570
........................
804,007
157,788
1,836,336
1,823
954,000
168,300
9,873
20,990
515,000
7,065,100
1,939,084
1,054,215
6,171,561
118,488
1,438,663
109,417
205,143
296,685
84,368
12,859
87,938
875,097
163,170
1,934,003
2,117
1,152,388
168,300
11,479
........................
528,569
7,851,537
2,019,682
1,105,772
6,176,675
........................
3,000
........................
58,879
32,335
29,000
12,000
2,000
213,388
45,000
60,000
45,000
12,000
2,000
........................
........................
........................
........................
10,000
5,000
124,000
40,000
TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
General Administration—S&E .......................................
2009
181,561
Detention Trustee ...........................................................
2009
1,858,509
Justice Information Sharing Technology ........................
2009
204,152
Law Enforcement Wireless Communications .................
2009
144,771
Administrative Review & Appeals .................................
2009
243,291
Office of the Inspector General .....................................
2009
81,922
U.S. Parole Commission .................................................
2009
12,711
National Security Division .............................................. ........................ ........................
General Legal Activities Salaries & Expenses ...............
2009
764,526
Antitrust Division—S&E ................................................
2009
162,488
U.S. Attorneys—S&E ......................................................
2009
1,829,194
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission ........................
2009
1,429
U.S. Marshals Service ....................................................
2009
900,178
Fees & Expenses of Witnesses ......................................
2009
203,755
Community Relations Service ........................................
2009
10,977
Assets Forfeiture Fund Current Budget Authority .........
2009
22,000
Interagency Crime and Drug Enforcement ....................
2009
744,593
Federal Bureau of Investigation ....................................
2009
6,480,608
Drug Enforcement Administration—S&E ......................
2009
1,930,462
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives .....
2009
1,038,939
Federal Prison System ....................................................
2009
5,698,292
Office on Violence Against Women:
Research on Violence Against Women (NIJ) ......... ........................ ........................
Office of Justice Programs:
Salaries & Expenses ............................................. ........................ ........................
National Institute of Justice .................................
1995
33,000
Bureau of Justice Statistics .................................
1995
33,000
Regional Information Sharing Systems ................
2003
100,000
Victim Notification System ...................................
2009
5,000
State and Local Antiterrorism Training ................
2009
2,000
State criminal justice reform/recidivism reduction .................................................................... ........................ ........................
Assistance to local units of government (NIJ) ..... ........................ ........................
Byrne Discretionary Grants ................................... ........................ ........................
Byrne Competitive Grants ..................................... ........................ ........................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
Appropriations in
last year of authorization
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
181
[$ in 000s]
Agency/program
Last year of authorization
Authorization
level
Appropriations in
last year of authorization
Appropriations in
this bill
Tribal Detention Facilities .....................................
Tribal Courts .........................................................
Alcohol and Substance Abuse programs ..............
Southwest Border Prosecutor Initiative ................
Residential Substance Abuse Treatment ..............
Drug Courts ...........................................................
Prescription Drug Monitoring ................................
Capital Litigation Improvement Grants ................
Missing Alzheimer’s Program ................................
Training for Judicial Personnel .............................
Research on Violence Against Indian Women ......
Grants for Televised Testimony ............................
Violent Gang and Gun Crime Reduction ..............
Criminal Records Upgrades ..................................
Part B—State Formula .........................................
Part E—Demonstration Grants ............................
Youth Mentoring ....................................................
Title V—Local Delinquency Prevention Incentive
Grants ...............................................................
VOCA—Investigation and Prosecution of Child
Abuse ................................................................
Juvenile Accountability Block Grant .....................
Community Based Violence Prevention Initiative
Safe Start ..............................................................
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services:
Community Policing ..............................................
Post-Conviction DNA Testing grants ....................
Secure our Schools ................................................
Sex Offender Management ....................................
Sex Offender Management ...........................
National Sex Offender Public Registry ........
2000
2004
........................
........................
2000
2008
........................
2009
1999
2005
2008
2005
........................
2007
2007
2007
........................
2,753
such sums
........................
........................
72,000
70,000
........................
75,000
900
2,300
1,000
1,000
........................
250,000
such sums
such sums
........................
5,000
7,898
........................
........................
61,677
15,200
........................
5,500
898
0
940
0
........................
9,873
78,978
104,674
........................
10,000
25,000
12,000
30,000
30,000
45,000
7,000
5,500
2,000
2,500
1,000
1,000
15,000
10,000
75,000
68,000
80,000
2008
such sums
61,100
62,000
2005
2009
........................
2007
8,481
350,000
........................
such sums
11,000
55,000
........................
9,898
20,000
55,000
18,000
7,000
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2008
1,047,119
5,000
30,000
such sums
such sums
850
250,500
5,000
16,000
18,000
[5,000]
[850]
507,000
5,000
16,000
28,000
[15,000]
[1,000]
TITLE III—SCIENCE
NASA:
Science ..................................................................
2009
4,932,200
Aeronautics ............................................................
2009
853,400
Exploration .............................................................
2009
4,886,000
Education ..............................................................
2009
128,300
Cross-agency support ...........................................
2009
3,299,900
Space operations ...................................................
2009
6,074,700
Construction and environmental compliance and
remediation ....................................................... ........................ ........................
Office of Inspector General ...................................
2009
35,500
4,503,019
500,000
3,505,469
169,200
3,306,387
5,764,710
4,496,100
501,000
3,293,200
175,000
3,164,000
6,097,300
........................
33,600
441,700
35,000
8,904
58,295
300,000
1,240
41,552
3,760
9,400
82,700
440,000
3,300
48,326
5,131
TITLE IV—RELATED AGENCIES
Commission on Civil Rights ..........................................
1995
International Trade Commission ....................................
2004
Payment to the Legal Services Corporation ..................
1980
Marine Mammal Commission ........................................
1999
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative ........................
2004
State Justice Institute ....................................................
2008
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
TRANSFERS
OF
9,500
57,240
205,000
1,750
33,108
7,000
FUNDS
Pursuant to Clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House
of Representatives, language is included transferring unexpended
balances as follows:
Under Coastal Zone Management Fund, language is included to transfer funds to NOAA’s operations, research
and facilities account.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
182
Under Community Oriented Policing Services, language
is included to transfer funds to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
RESCISSIONS
Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House
of Representatives, the following table is submitted describing the
rescissions recommended in the accompanying bill:
‘‘Legal Activities, Assets Forfeiture Fund’’, $285,000,000;
‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation, Salaries and Expenses’’,
$50,000,000;
‘‘Federal
Bureau
of
Investigation,
Construction’’,
$80,822,000;
‘‘Office of Justice Programs’’, $42,000,000;
‘‘Community Oriented Policing Services’’, $40,000,000.
COMPARISON WITH
THE
BUDGET RESOLUTION
Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an explanation of compliance with section
308(a)(1)(A) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control
Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–344), as amended, which requires that
the report accompanying a bill providing new budget authority contain a statement detailing how that authority compares with the
report submitted under section 302 of the Act for the most recently
agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal year
from the Committee’s section 302(a) allocation.
[In millions of dollars]
302 (b) allocation
Budget authority
General purpose discretionary .......................................................
Mandatory ......................................................................................
64,314
222
Outlays
This bill
Budget authority
70,655
257
65,415
222
Outlays
70,736
257
FIVE-YEAR OUTLAY PROJECTIONS
In compliance with section 308(a)(1)(B) of the Congressional
Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–
344), as amended, the following table contains five-year projections
associated with the budget authority provided in the accompanying
bill:
FISCAL YEAR 2010 OUTLAYS
in millions of dollars
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Budget authority .............................................................................................................................................
Outlays:
2010 ......................................................................................................................................................
2011 ......................................................................................................................................................
2012 ......................................................................................................................................................
2013 ......................................................................................................................................................
2014 and future years ..........................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
64,415
43,948
14,949
4,377
2,623
1,192
HR149
183
ASSISTANCE
TO
STATE
AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
In accordance with section 308(a)(1)(C) of the Congressional
Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–
344), as amended, the fiscal assistance to State and local government is as following:
Millions of dollars
FY 2010 new budget authority ......................................................................................................................
FY 2010 outlays resulting therefrom .............................................................................................................
985
68
CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
Clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives states that:
Each report of a committee on a bill or joint resolution
of a public character shall include a statement citing the
specific powers granted to the Congress in the Constitution
to enact the law proposed by the bill or joint resolution.
The Committee on Appropriations bases its authority to report
this legislation from Clause 7 of Section 9 of Article I of the Constitution of the United States of America, which states:
No money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of Appropriations made by law. * * *
Appropriations contained in this Act are made pursuant to this
specific power granted by the Constitution.
STATEMENT
OF
GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS
AND
OBJECTIVES
Pursuant to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House
of Representatives, the following is a statement of general performance goals and objectives for which this measure authorizes funding:
The Committee on Appropriations considers program
performance, including a program’s success in developing
and attaining outcome-related goals and objectives in developing funding recommendations.
COMPLIANCE WITH RULE XIII, CL. 3(e) (RAMSEYER RULE)
In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the
House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill,
as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic,
existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman):
CHAPTER 57 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE
SUBCHAPTER I—TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES; MILEAGE
ALLOWANCES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Sec.
5701.
Definitions.
*
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00183
*
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6611
*
*
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
*
HR149
184
5751.
5761.
SUBCHAPTER IV—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Travel expenses of witnesses.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Foreign language proficiency pay awards for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SUBCHAPTER IV—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
§ 5759. Retention and relocation bonuses for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ø(e) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to grant bonuses under this section shall cease to be available after December
31, 2009.¿
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
§ 5761. Foreign language proficiency pay awards for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation may, under
regulations prescribed by the Director, pay a cash award of up to
10 percent of basic pay to any Bureau employee who maintains proficiency in a language or languages critical to the mission or who
uses one or more foreign languages in the performance of official
duties.
SECTION 504 OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE,
JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED
AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1996
SEC. 504. (a) None of the funds appropriated in this Act to the
Legal Services Corporation may be used to provide financial assistance to any person or entity (which may be referred to in this section as a ‘‘recipient’’)—
(1) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ø(13) that claims (or whose employee claims), or collects and
retains, attorneys’ fees pursuant to any Federal or State law
permitting or requiring the awarding of such fees;¿
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
FULL COMMITTEE VOTES
Pursuant to the provisions of clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House
of Representative, the results of each roll call vote on an amendment or on the motion to report, together with the names of those
voting for and those voting against, are printed below:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
ROLL CALL NO. 1
Date: June 9, 2009.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
185
Measure: Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2010.
Motion by: Mr. Calvert.
Description of Motion: An amendment to increase appropriations
for the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program by $100,000,000
by reducing appropriations for Periodic Censuses and Programs by
a like amount.
Results: Rejected, 21 yeas to 30 nays.
Members Voting Yea
Members Voting Nay
Mr. Aderholt
Mr. Alexander
Mr. Bonner
Mr. Calvert
Mr. Carter
Mr. Cole
Mr. Crenshaw
Mr. Culberson
Mrs. Emerson
Mr. Frelinghuysen
Ms. Granger
Mr. Kingston
Mr. Latham
Mr. Lewis
Mr. Rehberg
Mr. Rogers
Mr. Simpson
Mr. Tiahrt
Mr. Wamp
Mr. Wolf
Mr. Young
Mr. Chandler
Ms. DeLauro
Mr. Dicks
Mr. Edwards
Mr. Farr
Mr. Fattah
Mr. Hinchey
Mr. Honda
Mr. Israel
Mr. Jackson
Ms. Kaptur
Ms. Kilpatrick
Ms. Lee
Mrs. Lowey
Ms. McCollum
Mr. Mollohan
Mr. Moran
Mr. Murtha
Mr. Obey
Mr. Olver
Mr. Pastor
Mr. Price
Mr. Rodriguez
Mr. Rothman
Ms. Roybal-Allard
Mr. Ryan
Mr. Schiff
Mr. Serrano
Mr. Visclosky
Ms. Wasserman Schultz
ROLL CALL NO. 2
Date: June 9, 2009.
Measure: Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2010.
Motion by: Mr. Tiahrt.
Description of Motion: To rescind unobligated balances of previous appropriations made in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Results: Rejected, 22 yeas to 29 nays.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Members Voting Yea
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Members Voting Nay
Aderholt
Alexander
Bonner
Calvert
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Mr.
Frm 00185
Fmt 6659
Chandler
DeLauro
Dicks
Edwards
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
186
Mr. Carter
Mr. Cole
Mr. Crenshaw
Mr. Culberson
Mrs. Emerson
Mr. Frelinghuysen
Ms. Granger
Mr. Kingston
Mr. Kirk
Mr. Latham
Mr. Lewis
Mr. Rehberg
Mr. Rogers
Mr. Simpson
Mr. Tiahrt
Mr. Wamp
Mr. Wolf
Mr. Young
DISCLOSURE
OF
Mr. Farr
Mr. Fattah
Mr. Hinchey
Mr. Honda
Mr. Israel
Mr. Jackson
Ms. Kaptur
Ms. Kilpatrick
Ms. Lee
Mrs. Lowey
Ms. McCollum
Mr. Mollohan
Mr. Moran
Mr. Murtha
Mr. Obey
Mr. Olver
Mr. Pastor
Mr. Price
Mr. Rodriguez
Mr. Rothman
Ms. Roybal-Allard
Mr. Ryan
Mr. Schiff
Mr. Serrano
Ms. Wasserman Schultz
EARMARKS AND CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED
SPENDING ITEMS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
DIRECTED SPENDING
BY
CONGRESS
AND BY THE
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
This bill contains $8.73 billion in grant funding awarded solely
at the discretion of the Administration, and $57 million in funding
requested by the President for specific projects. In addition to placing a one year moratorium on earmarks in appropriations bills enacted in 2007 so that new rules could be put in place, the Committee has subsequently taken unprecedented action to increase
transparency and reduce funding for earmarks. This bill continues
to further reduce earmarks in 2010, by 3 percent below 2009. In
this bill since 2006, the total funding earmarked has been reduced
by 52 percent. This year earmarked funding will equal 1 percent
of the cost of the bill. It should also be noted that under the policies adopted by the Committee the use of member earmarks awarded to for-profit entities as a functional equivalent of no bid contracts is ended. In cases where the Committee funds an earmark
designated for a for-profit entity, the Committee includes legislative language requiring the Executive Branch to nonetheless issue
a request for proposal that gives other entities an opportunity to
apply and requires the agency to evaluate all bids received and
make a decision based on merit. This gives the original designee
an opportunity to be brought to the attention of the agency, but
with the possibility that an alternative entity may be selected.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
187
2006
2008
$ in millions
$1,564 ...................................
#
2009
$ in millions
1,728
$823
#
2010 Committtee
$ in millions
1,544
$758
#
$ in millions
1,089
$368
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The following table is submitted in compliance with clause 9 of
rule XXI, and lists the congressional earmarks (as defined in paragraph (e) of clause 9) contained in the bill or in this report. Neither
the bill nor the report contain any limited tax benefits or limited
tariff benefits as defined in paragraphs (f) or (g) of clause 9 of rule
XXI.
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
MBDA
DOC
ITA
DOC
ITA
ITA
DOC
DOC
ITA
ITA
DOC
DOC
Account
Account
Agency
Agency
Account
NDIC
GP
DOC
DOJ
GP
DOC
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Jamaica Chamber of Commerce, Jamaica, NY
UC Davis, Davis, CA
Textile/Clothing Textile Corporation, Raleigh, NC
St. Francis University and St. Vincent College,
Loretto, PA
National Textile Center, Raleigh, NC
Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Recipient
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE
Operations of the NDIC
NIST Center for Neutron Research Expansion and
Reliability Improvements
HCHB Renovation and Modernization Project
Project
Jamaica Export Center
Textile Research at UC Davis
Textile Research Programs
Saint Francis University Center for Global Competitiveness
Textile Research
Textile Research at Clemson University
Project
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
National Drug Intelligence Center, Johnstown, PA
National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Gaithersburg, MD
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE
[Presidentially Directed Spending Items]
$100,000
$250,000
$965,000
$350,000
$1,800,000
$350,000
Amount
Amount
$44,023,000
$8,000,000
$5,000,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Requester(s)
House
Meeks (NY)
Thompson (CA)
Price (NC); Aderholt; Coble; Shuler; Miller (NC); Kissell;
Butterfield; Spratt; Watt
Murtha
Price (NC); Coble; Miller (NC); Scott (GA); Shuler; McIntyre; Butterfield; Etheridge; Watt
Barrett (SC)
Requester(s)
The President
The President
The President
Administration
188
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
NOAA—ORF
DOC
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
MBDA
MBDA
DOC
DOC
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Development
Corporation,
HR149
Aeronautical
University,
Great Lakes Science Center, Cleveland, OH
Embry-Riddle
Beach, FL
Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI
Eastern Kentucky PRIDE, Inc., Somerset, KY
Daytona
Department of Lands and Natural Resources,
Saipan, MP
Delaware River Basin Commission, West Trenton,
NJ
Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL
City of Hardy, Hardy, AR
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD
Caribbean Coral Reef Institute, University of Puerto
Rico, Mayaguez, PR
California State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, CA
Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH
Blue Guardians, Philadelphia, PA
West Liberty State College, West Liberty, WV
McAllen Economic
McAllen, TX
Great Lakes Water Project
Aviation and Hurricane Research Utilizing Unmanned Aerial Systems
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Science-Based
Management of Invasive Species in the Detroit
River International Wildlife Refuge
Eastern Kentucky PRIDE, Inc.
Mariana Islands Sanctuary Scoping and Outreach
Delaware River Enhanced Flood Warning System
Biological and economic consideration of coastal
fisheries population
Upper Spring River Flood Warning System
Alliance for Coastal Technologies
Caribbean Coral Reef Institute Grant Program
California Seafloor Mapping Program
Monitoring of Lake Erie Water Quality with Remote
Sensing
Coastal Environmental Education Outreach
Emerging Minority Business Leaders
McAllen Manufacturing Research and Education
Park
$250,000
$300,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$220,000
$200,000
$750,000
$125,000
$500,000
$100,000
$300,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$300,000
LaTourette
Kosmas
Dingell; Conyers
Rogers (KY)
Sablan
Hinchey; Holt; Dent; Castle; Hall (NY)
Bonner
Berry
Hoyer
Pierluisi
Schiff; Capps
Latta
Fattah
Mollohan
Hinojosa
189
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
Account
DOC
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring,
MD
Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL
Morgan State University Estuarine Research Center,
St. Leonard, MD
Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ
Mobile County Commission, Alabama, Mobile, AL
Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Marine Mammal Center, Sausalito, CA
Maine Department of Marine Resources, Augusta,
ME
Louisiana State University A&M College, Baton
Rouge, LA
Illinois State Geological Survey, Champiagn, IL
Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID
Shrimp Industry Fishing Effort Research Continuation
Science Consortium for Ocean Replenishment
(SCORE)
Oyster Hatchery Economic Pilot Program
The Resilient Coastal Urban Community and Ecosystem (RESCUE) Initiative
Coastal tidal gauges
NOAA Northern Gulf Institute
Emergency Response and Health Investigations for
Endangered and Threatened Pinniped Populations in the Pacific
Maine Lobster Research and Inshore Trawl Survey
The Louisiana Geodetic Spatial Reference Center
Illinois Height Modernization
Boise Center Aerospace Laboratory Watershed Modeling Utilizing LiDAR
Protected Species Habitat at Kure Atoll (HI)
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$700,000
$1,500,000
$200,000
$250,000
$600,000
$700,000
$300,000
$200,000
$700,000
$800,000
$500,000
$100,000
Amount
Ortiz; Boyd; Cao; Crenshaw; Wasserman Schultz
Buchanan; Dicks
Hoyer; Cummings
Pallone; Holt; Smith (NJ); Rothman (NJ)
Bonner
Harper
Woolsey
Pingree (ME); Michaud
Alexander
Johnson (IL); Schock
Simpson
Hirono
Requester(s)
190
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
NOAA—ORF
DOC
Frm 00191
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
for
Coastal
Studies,
State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY
State of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Southern Regional Climate Center, Baton Rouge, LA
San Jose State University, San Jose, CA
Provincetown Center
Provincetown, MA
Partnership for Mid-Atlantic Fisheries, Point Pleasant Beach, NJ
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL
NOAA Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring,
MD
NOAA Office of Education, Monterey, CA
NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, Annapolis, MD
NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, Severn, MD
Nicholls State University Department of Biological
Sciences, Thibodaux, LA
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
Silver Spring, MD
Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Models
for NY State Forests
Wisconsin Height Modernization Program
NOAA Regional Climate Center program
Training the Next Generation Weather Forecasters
Northeast Coastal Monitoring Collaborative
Summer Flounder and Black Sea Initiative
Disease Reduction in Klamath River Salmon
National Coral Reef Institute
Hawaiian Monk Seal Recovery Plan Implementation
California Bay Watershed Education and Training
Program (B-WET)
Native Oyster Restoration
Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System
Institute for Seafood Studies
West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health
$100,000
$1,000,000
$850,000
$180,000
$550,000
$600,000
$600,000
$200,000
$275,000
$2,500,000
$700,000
$350,000
$325,000
$500,000
Arcuri; Tonko
Kagen; Obey
Alexander
Honda
Delahunt; Tsongas
LoBiondo; Bishop (NY); Pallone; King (NY)
Walden; DeFazio; Schrader; Wu
Klein (FL); Wasserman Schultz
Hirono
Pelosi; Farr; Capps
Hoyer; Connolly (VA); Van Hollen; Norton; Scott (VA);
Moran (VA); Edwards (MD); Sarbanes; Ruppersberger;
Kratovil
Kratovil; Sarbanes; Ruppersberger; Castle; Scott (VA);
Moran (VA)
Melancon
Farr; Wu; Capps; Blumenauer
191
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
NOAA—ORF
DOC
Account
NOAA—ORF
DOC
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma,
TN
University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC
University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA
University of Maryland, College Park, MD
University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD
University of Guam, Mangilao, GU
Town of Dauphin Island, Dauphin Island, AL
The Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association,
Anchorage, AK
The Nature Conservancy, Middletown, CT
The JASON Project, Ashburn, VA
The Alaska Sea Otter and Steller Sea Lion Commission, Old Harbor, AK
Lake Erie Hydrological & Climate Modeling
Atmospheric Science Research
National Weather Radar Testbed Phased Array
Radar
Aquarius Reef Base Program
Climate System Research Center
Development of Earth System Information Delivery
and Assessment
Metagenomic Analysis of Chesapeake Bay
Coral Reef Research Institute
Engineering feasibility study
The Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association
Ecosystem Vitality Through Habitat Restoration
Science education through exploration
Steller Sea Lion Comanagement, Biosampling and
Outreach/Education
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$150,000
$495,000
$150,000
$100,000
$300,000
$1,500,000
$100,000
$200,000
$4,000,000
$500,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Kaptur
Davis (TN)
Cole; Fallin; Boren
McIntyre
Olver
Hoyer; Ruppersberger; Sarbanes; Bartlett
Ruppersberger; Sarbanes; Van Hollen
Bordallo
Bonner
Young (AK)
DeLauro
Kennedy; Mollohan; Langevin; Culberson; Moran (VA)
Young (AK)
192
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00193
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOJ
NOAA—ORF
NOAA—ORF
DOC
DOC
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Etowah County Drug Enforcement Unit, Gadsden,
AL
ELKHART COUNTY, INDIANA, Elkhart, IN
Daviess County Sheriff, Owensboro, KY
Contra Costa County, Martinez, CA
Clackamas County, Portland, OR
City of Bastrop, Bastrop, LA
California State Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA
California Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA
California Deparment of Justice (CADOJ), Sacramento, CA
Arizona Meth Project, Phoenix, AZ
American Detoxification Foundation/UMCP, Salt
Lake City, UT
Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY
West Virginia Department of Natural Resources,
Charleston, WV
Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Glouster Point,
VA
Blount, Dekalb, Etowah, Marshall, Marion, Morgan,
Pickens, Walker, Winston Counties, AL Drug Task
Forces Anti-Methamphetamine Project
Elkhart County Criminal Intelligence Interdiction
Initiative
Second District Methamphetamine Eradication
Methamphetamine Eradication and Suppression
Program
Clackamas County Interagency Methamphetamine
Initiative
Bastrop-Morehouse Parish Meth Initiative
California Methamphetamine Strategy (CALMS)
Meth Enforcement/Interdiction in San Bernardino
County
San Diego California Methamphetamine Strategy
(CALMS)
Arizona Meth Project
Utah Meth Cops Program
Bronx River and South Bronx Waterfront
Natural Stream Design and Restoration
Virginia TRAWL Survey
$1,500,000
$250,000
$300,000
$200,000
$550,000
$650,000
$500,000
$600,000
$250,000
$200,000
$200,000
$1,000,000
$750,000
$300,000
Aderholt
Souder; Donnelly (IN)
Guthrie
Tauscher
Schrader; Blumenauer
Alexander
Honda
Lewis (CA)
Hunter
Pastor (AZ)
Bishop (UT)
Serrano
Mollohan
Connolly (VA); Nye; Moran (VA); Wittman; Scott (VA)
193
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00194
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
Account
COPS Meth
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Polk County Sheriff, Bartow, FL
Pierce County Alliance, Tacoma, WA
Northeast Law Enforcement Administrators Council,
Chisholm, MN
Montana Meth Project, Missoula, MT
Mississippi—North Central Narcotics Taskforce,
Port Gibson, MS
Mineral Area Drug Task Force, Leadington, MO
Methodist University, Fayetteville, NC
Marion County, OR, Salem, OR
Jefferson County, Colorado, Golden, CO
Jackson County Sheriff, Jackson County, MS
Illinois State University, Normal, IL
Illinois Meth Project, Springfield, IL
Idaho Meth Project, Boise, ID
Hillsborough County, Florida, Tampa, FL
Heartland Family Service, Inc., Council Bluffs, IA
Polk County Methamphetamine Prevention Project
Washington State Methamphetamine Initiative
Northeast Law Enforcement Administrators Council
Methamphetamine Reduction Project
Montana Meth Project
Mississippi—North Central Narcotics Taskforce
Mineral Area Drug Task Force
Methamphetamine Educational Training Program
Kids First Phase II
Methamphetamine Response Collaborative
Methamphetamine Enforcement and Cleanup
Illinois State University Meth Project
Illinois Meth Project
Idaho Meth Project
Hillsborough County Methamphetamine Enforcement and Cleanup
Heartland Family Services Residential Methamphetamine Treatment in Southwestern Iowa
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$1,500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$200,000
$150,000
$200,000
$245,000
$350,000
$200,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$250,000
$200,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Putnam
Reichert; Dicks; Baird; Larsen (WA); Smith (WA)
Oberstar
Rehberg
Thompson (MS)
Emerson
Etheridge; Kissell; McIntyre
Schrader
Perlmutter
Taylor
Johnson (IL)
Hare; Schock
Simpson
Bilirakis; Putnam
King (IA)
194
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Meth
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
Adams County Department of Emergency Services,
Gettysburg, PA
Abington Township Police Department, Abington, PA
Winchester Police Department, Winchester, KY
Washington State Meth Initiative, Tacoma, WA
Ventura County Sheriff, Ventura, CA
University of Missouri St. Louis College of Nursing,
St. Louis, MO
University of Arkansas Criminal Justice Institute,
Little Rock, AR
Twiggs County Sheriff, Jeffersonville, GA
Tennessee Meth Task Force, Chattanooga, TN
St. Joseph County Prosecutor, South Bend, IN
Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force, Sikeston, MO
South Coast Interagency Narcotics Team, Coquille,
OR
South Central Drug Task Force, West Plains, MO
Sioux City Police Department, Sioux City, IA
Rusk County Sheriff, Ladysmith, WI
Radio System Upgrade
Technology upgrades and enhancements for police
vehicles, Abington
Winchester Police Department Law Enforcement
Technology
Washington State Meth Initiative
California Multi-jurisdictional Methamphetamine
(CAL MMET) Investigators
Methamphetamine Prevention Education
Arkansas Methamphetamine Education and Training Project
Meth Task Force
Tennessee Statewide Methamphetamine Task Force
Methamphetamine and Illegal Firearms Investigation and Prosecution Project
Southeast Missouri Drug Task Force
South Coast Interagency Narcotics Team
South Central Drug Task Force
National Meth Training Center
Methamphetamine Prevention and Enforcement
$200,000
$195,000
$30,000
$100,000
$350,000
$250,000
$575,000
$140,000
$2,000,000
$100,000
$200,000
$500,000
$250,000
$800,000
$300,000
Platts
Schwartz
Chandler
Hastings (WA)
Gallegly
Carnahan
Boozman; Snyder
Marshall
Wamp
Donnelly (IN)
Emerson
DeFazio
Emerson
King (IA)
Obey
195
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 6659
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
Account
COPS Tech
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Borough of East Rutherford, East Rutherford, NJ
Borough of Cliffside Park, Cliffside Park, NJ
Blacksburg Police Department, Blacksburg, VA
Ben Hill County Sheriff, Fitzgerald, GA
Beaver County Sheriff, Beaver, PA
Bartlesville Police Department, Bartlesville, OK
Baltimore County Sheriff, Towson, MD
Baldwin County Sherriff, Milledgeville, GA
Baldwin County Commission, Fairhope, AL
Ardmore Police Department, Ardmore, AL
Anson County Sheriff, Wadesboro, NC
Allentown Police Department, Allentown, PA
Alamosa Police Department, Alamosa, CO
Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC), Montgomery, AL
East Rutherford Police & Courts Facility
Replacement of Computer Hardware and Software
for Dispatching Radio System
New River Valley Emergency System
In Car Video Systems
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Bartlesville Police Department Mobile Data Technology
Local Law Enforcement Enhancement
Regional Dispatch and Emergency Management
Center
Baldwin County, AL courthouse security
Law Enforcement Technology Equipment and Upgrades
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence Tool
Lehigh and Northampton Counties Interoperability
Development Project
Alamosa Public Safety Mobile DATA
Electronic Training and Security Tools (ETAST)
Phase III
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$500,000
$270,000
$250,000
$55,000
$120,000
$800,000
$200,000
$250,000
$500,000
$20,000
$500,000
$800,000
$125,000
$250,000
Amount
Rothman (NJ)
Rothman (NJ)
Boucher
Marshall
Altmire
Sullivan
Ruppersberger
Barrow
Bonner
Griffith
Kissell
Dent
Salazar
Aderholt
Requester(s)
196
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00197
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Centre County Commissioners, Bellefonte, PA
Cayuga County, NY, Auburn, NY
Carroll County Sheriff, Carrollton, OH
Carlisle Borough, Carlisle, PA
Cambria 9th Public Service Providers, Patton, PA
Calvert County Department of Public Safety, Prince
Frederick, MD
California Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA
Butler Police Department, Butler, GA
Briarcliff Manor Police Department, Briarcliff
Manor, NY
Brazos County Sheriff, Bryan, TX
Bourbon County Sheriff, Paris, KY
Borough of Quakertown, Quakertown, PA
Borough of Pompton Lakes, Pompton Lakes, NJ
Borough of McKees Rocks, McKees Rocks, PA
Borough of Leonia, Leonia, NJ
Borough of Lavallette, Lavallette, NJ
Police
Department—Communications
Centre County—911 Emergency Communication
System Upgrade
Cayuga County Interoperable Communications Upgrade
Carroll County Sheriff Equipment Upgrade
Public Safety Video Surveillance Project
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Calvert Mobile Data Terminals
Mobile Live Scan Fingerprint Devices for LA and
Orange Counties
Law enforcement equipment
Briarcliff Manor, NY, Police Department Equipment
Brazos County Law Enforcement Technology
Bourbon County Law Enforcement Technology
Law enforcement technology and communications
Pompton Lakes Police and Emergency Services
Interoperability Equipment Upgrade
Surveillance Camera Network Installation
Lap Top Computers for Patrol Vehicles
Lavallette
Update
$250,000
$300,000
$140,000
$200,000
$300,000
$500,000
$100,000
$75,000
$40,000
$200,000
$50,000
$100,000
$240,000
$120,000
$33,000
$185,000
Thompson (PA)
Arcuri
Space
Platts
Shuster
Hoyer
Rohrabacher
Bishop (GA)
Lowey
Edwards (TX)
Chandler
Murphy, Patrick
Pascrell
Doyle
Rothman (NJ)
Adler (NJ)
197
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00198
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
Account
COPS Tech
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
City of Barrackville, WV Police Department,
Barrackville, WV
City of Banning, Banning, CA
City of Auburn, Auburn, WA
City of Auburn, Auburn, AL
City of Arlington, Arlington, GA
City of Alexandria, Alexandria, VA
City of Albuquerque, Public Safety Department, Albuquerque, NM
City of Albertville, Albertville, AL
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco,
CA
Christian County Sheriff, Taylorville, IL
Chesterfield County Police Department, Chesterfield, VA
Chester County Sherriff, Chester, SC
Charlevoix Cheboygan Emmet Central Dispatch Authority, Petoskey, MI
Charles Mix County, Lake Andes, SD
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Banning Multi-Agency Interoperability Capability
Valley Cities Public Safety Regional Broadband
Network
City of Auburn Mobile Data System
Wireless IP Technology System
Crime Scene Investigations Mobile Technology
Comprehensive Information System Project
Public Safety Mobile Data System
San Francisco Gun Location Technology and Policing Project
Interoperable Communications Upgrades
Police Officer Communications Radio Project
Chester County Communications Tower
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Charles Mix County 911 System Upgrade
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$25,000
$300,000
$150,000
$100,000
$100,000
$140,000
$400,000
$1,400,000
$750,000
$250,000
$930,000
$300,000
$300,000
$100,000
Amount
Mollohan
Lewis (CA)
Smith (WA); Reichert
Rogers (AL)
Bishop (GA)
Moran (VA)
Heinrich
Aderholt
Pelosi
Shimkus
Forbes
Spratt
Stupak
Herseth Sandlin
Requester(s)
198
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00199
Fmt 6659
COPS Tech
DOJ
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Doral, Doral, FL
City of Dodge City Police Department, Dodge City,
KS
City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department, Detroit,
MI
City of Corona, Corona, CA
City of Commerce City, CO, Commerce City, CO
City of College Park, GA, College Park, GA
City of Cochran Police Department, Cochran, GA
City of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
City of Chester, Chester, IL
City of Central Falls Police Dept, Central Falls, RI
City of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
City of Blue Island Police Department, Blue Island,
IL
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham, AL
City of Bethlehem, WV Police Department, Bethlehem, WV
City of Bayonne, NJ, Bayonne, NJ
City of Bastrop, Bastrop, TX
City of Doral Public Safety & Surveillance System
Dodge City Police Department Equipment and
Technology Upgrade Project
City of Detroit—Police Northwestern District Wide
CB Patrol
Interoperability Upgrades for the City of Corona Police Department
Interoperable communications equipment
Emergency Operations Center Technology Upgrade
Police Department Technology Program
800MHz Radios for Cincinnati
Public Safety Technology Improvements for the City
of Chester
Cops Technology
TraCS Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Urban Crime Prevention Initiative
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Bayonne Law Enforcement Technology
Bastrop Police Department Technology and Equipment
$750,000
$200,000
$350,000
$150,000
$110,000
$450,000
$70,000
$625,000
$100,000
$100,000
$600,000
$150,000
$250,000
$25,000
$100,000
$40,000
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Moran (KS)
Kilpatrick (MI); Conyers
Calvert
Perlmutter
Lewis (GA)
Marshall
Driehaus
Costello
Kennedy
Slaughter
Rush
Davis (AL); Bachus
Mollohan
Sires
Doggett
199
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00200
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
Account
COPS Tech
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
City of Glendale, California, Glendale, CA
City of Glen Cove, Glen Cove, NY
City of Gilbert Police Department, Gilbert, MN
City of Gary, Gary, IN
City of Gardena, Gardena, CA
City of Galesburg, Galesburg, IL
City of Gadsden, Gadsden, AL
City of Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN
City of Foley, Alabama, Foley, AL
City of Fayetteville, Fayetteville, NC
City of Farmington, Farmington, NM
City of Eugene, Eugene, OR
City of East Point, East Point, GA
City of Durango, Durango, CO
Foothill Regional Forensic DNA Lab
Law Enforcement Technology Improvements
City of Gilbert Integrated Radio System
Law enforcement equipment for the Gary Police Department
Gardena Public Safety Surveillance
Upgrade 911 systems to a Next Generation NG-911
digital system
Law Enforcement and Forensic Science Technology
and Equipment
Palm Print AFIS
Foley Public Safety Initiative
Regional Public Safety Communications
Interoperability Radio Communications, Farmington,
NM
Public Safety Technology Improvements
East Point Law Enforcement Technology Upgrade
Durango Police Department Interoperability Completion
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$500,000
$615,000
$35,000
$92,000
$350,000
$100,000
$150,000
$600,000
$400,000
$300,000
$100,000
$150,000
$100,000
$300,000
Amount
Schiff
King (NY)
Oberstar
Visclosky
Waters
Hare
Aderholt
Souder
Bonner
Etheridge
Lujan
DeFazio
Lewis (GA)
Salazar
Requester(s)
200
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00201
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Lacey, Lacey, WA
City of Kirkland, Kirkland, WA
City of Kannapolis, Kannapolis, NC
City of Jacksonville Beach, FL, Jacksonville, FL
City of Jackson, Jackson, MS
City of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
City of Hot Springs, Arkansas Police Department,
Hot Springs, AR
City of Homestead, FL, Homestead, FL
City of Hollywood, Hollywood, FL
City of Hobart, Hobart, IN
City of Highland, Highland, CA
City of Hickory Hills, Hickory Hills, IL
City of Hialeah, Hialeah, FL
City of Hampton, Virginia, Hampton, VA
City of Hackensack, Hackensack, NJ
City of Greenwood, Greenwood, MS
City of Greenville, North Carolina, Greenville, NC
Records Management System
Emergency Services Equipment—City of Kirkland
Kannapolis Regional Radio Upgrade
Interoperability P-25 Compliant Radio System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Automated Fingerprint Identification System and
IMPD Technology Equipment
Mobile Data Terminals
Emergency Wireless Law Enforcement Technology
Law Enforcement Technology
Law enforcement equipment for the Hobart Police
Department
Highland Police Technology Program
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Equipment Upgrades
Emergency Communications System, Hampton, VA
The City of Hackensack Police and Emergency
Services Communication Upgrade Project
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
City of Greenville Law Enforcement Technology Improvement Initiative
$200,000
$300,000
$575,000
$250,000
$100,000
$300,000
$325,000
$500,000
$400,000
$90,000
$500,000
$125,000
$250,000
$200,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
Baird; Smith (WA)
Inslee
Coble
Crenshaw
Thompson (MS)
Carson (IN)
Ross
Diaz-Balart, Mario
Wasserman Schultz; Meek (FL)
Visclosky
Lewis (CA)
Lipinski
Diaz-Balart, Mario; Diaz-Balart, Lincoln
Nye; Wittman; Scott (VA)
Rothman (NJ)
Thompson (MS)
Butterfield
201
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00202
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
City of Oakland, California, Oakland, CA
City of Norman, Norman, OK
City of Norfolk, Virginia, Norfolk, VA
City of Newport, Newport, RI
City of Newark, Newark, CA
City of Mountain Village, Mountain Village, CO
City of Moultrie Police Department, Moultrie, GA
City of Monterey Park, Monterey Park, CA
City of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN
Automatic Vehicle Locating (AVL) Systems
Norman Public Safety Networking Initiative
Police Tactical And Surveillance Equipment And
Other Technologies
National Incident Management System
Public Safety Interoperability Program
Mountain Village Public Safety Communications
System
Firearms/Weapons Judgmental Simulator
Police Communications Upgrade
Digital Cameras and Mobile Data Computers for
Public Safety
Enhanced Communications and Vehicular Video
Fiber Optic Connection Upgrade for the City of
Mascoutah
Blount County Communications System
Law Enforcement Technology Upgrades
Forensic Investigation Equipment
Lockhart Police Department Technology
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
City of Middletown Police Department, Middletown,
NY
City of Mascoutah, Mascoutah, IL
City of Maryville, Maryville, TN
City of Maitland, Florida, Maitland, FL
City of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
City of Lockhart, Lockhart, TX
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$250,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$275,000
$100,000
$250,000
$100,000
$65,000
$650,000
$750,000
$400,000
$100,000
$125,000
Amount
Lee (CA)
Cole
Nye; Scott (VA)
Kennedy
Stark
Salazar
Marshall
Schiff
Ellison
Hinchey
Costello
Duncan
Mica
Richardson
Doggett
Requester(s)
202
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00203
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Rialto Police Department, Rialto, CA
City of Redondo Beach, Redondo Beach, CA
City of Redlands, Redlands, CA
City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Raleigh, NC
City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, Poughkeepsie, NY
City of Piedmont, WV Police Department, Piedmont,
WV
City of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
City of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
City of Philippi, WV Police Department, Philippi, WV
City of Parsons, WV, Parsons, WV
City of Palm Bay, Palm Bay, FL
City of Paden City, WV Police Department, Paden
City, WV
City of Ozark, Ozark, AL
City of Oxnard, Oxnard, CA
City of Orlando, FL, Orlando, FL
City of Orange Township, Orange, NJ
Rialto Police Department Surveillance Cameras
Redondo Beach Emergency Operations Center
Redlands Police Information Technology Infrastructure
City of Raleigh: Rapid Fingerprint Identification
CCTV and Interoperability Upgrades and Enhancement
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
City of Phoenix Enhanced Mobile Data Security
City of Phoenix COPLINK
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Palm Bay Mobile Command Unit Communications
System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Ozark Police Department Technology Improvements
City of Oxnard Comprehensive Critical Assets Remote Surveillance Program
Innovative Response to Improve Safety (I.R.I.S.)
Public Safety Information Technology Restoration
$300,000
$200,000
$350,000
$300,000
$100,000
$25,000
$300,000
$500,000
$25,000
$25,000
$600,000
$25,000
$140,000
$300,000
$200,000
$450,000
Baca
Harman
Lewis (CA)
Price (NC); Miller (NC); Etheridge
Hinchey
Mollohan
Pastor (AZ)
Pastor (AZ); Mitchell
Mollohan
Mollohan
Posey
Mollohan
Bright
Capps
Brown, Corrine
Payne
203
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00204
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Sumter Police Department, Sumter, SC
City of Summit, NJ, Summit, NJ
City of Suffolk, Suffolk, VA
City of Stamping Ground, Kentucky, Stamping
Ground, KY
City of Stafford, Stafford, TX
City of Seattle, Seattle, WA
City of San Jose, San Jose, CA
City of San Diego, California, San Diego, CA
City of San Antonio (San Antonio Police Department), San Antonio, TX
Sumter—Police Technology
Regional Police and Emergency Management Interoperable Communication Network and Facility
Suffolk Police Department Technology Enhancement
Initiative
City of Stamping Ground Law Enforcement Technology
Stafford Emergency Operations Center Emergency
Management Equipment
Seattle Police Forensics and Digital Imaging Infrastructure Upgrade
Mobile Data Computer Replacement
San Diego Crime Lab Technology
City of San Antonio, TX Police Technology Improvements
Digital Surveillance Cameras
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Police Technology Upgrade Project
Rockford Crimefighting Technology Initiative
City of Riverside Public Utilities Infrastructure
Video Security
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
City of Saginaw, Police Department, Saginaw, MI
City of Round Rock, Round Rock, TX
City of Rockville, MD, Rockville, MD
City of Rockford, Illinois, Rockford, IL
City of Riverside Public Utilities, Riverside, CA
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$1,000,000
$70,000
$30,000
$100,000
$300,000
$710,000
$200,000
$1,100,000
$300,000
$300,000
$100,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Amount
Spratt
Lance
Forbes
Chandler
Green, Al
McDermott
Honda; Lofgren, Zoe
Davis (CA)
Smith (TX); Rodriguez; Gonzalez
Kildee
Carter
Van Hollen
Manzullo
Calvert
Requester(s)
204
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00205
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Clay County Sheriff, Liberty, MO
Clark County, LAS VEGAS, NV
Clarion County Commissioners, Clarion, PA
City of York Police Department, York, SC
City of Yakima, WA, Yakima, WA
City of West Haven, West Haven, CT
City of West Columbia, West Columbia, SC
City of Waupun Police Department, Waupun, WI
City of Vancouver, Vancouver, WA
City of Valdosta, Valdosta, GA
City of Union City, NJ, Union City, NJ
City of Tucson, Tucson, AZ
City of Torrington, Torrington, CT
City of Tempe, AZ, Tempe, AZ
City of Tamarac, Tamarac, FL
City of Surprise, Arizona, Surprise, AZ
City of Sunny Isles Beach , Sunny Isles Beach , FL
City of Sunbury, Sunbury, PA
Clay and Platte Counties Communications Interoperability Project
Justice Information Sharing System
North West Central Regional Interoperability Strategic Telecommunication Plan
City of York Police Department Technology and
Records Management Upgrade
Yakima County Integrated Public Safety System
West Haven Two-Way Public Safety Radio System
Replacement Project
West Columbia Law Enforcement Communications
P25 Compliance/Communication Upgrade
Records Management System in Vancouver, WA
Valdosta/Lowndes Joint Crime Lab
Union City Law Enforcement Technology
Tucson Finger Imaging Upgrade System
Public Safety Communications Project
Public Safety Communications/Interoperability
Interoperable Communications System
City of Surprise Police Officer Technology Upgrade
Law Enforcement and Communications Equipment
Video Surveillance Project and other IT issues
$660,000
$300,000
$500,000
$100,000
$500,000
$300,000
$350,000
$30,000
$300,000
$500,000
$350,000
$150,000
$175,000
$300,000
$300,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
Graves
Berkley
Thompson (PA)
Spratt
Hastings (WA)
DeLauro
Wilson (SC)
Petri
Baird
Kingston
Sires
Giffords
Larson (CT)
Mitchell
Wexler; Wasserman Schultz; Hastings (FL)
Franks (AZ)
Wasserman Schultz
Carney
205
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00206
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
Account
COPS Tech
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Deep East Texas Council of Governments, Jasper,
TX
Dallas County Sheriff’s Department, Dallas, TX
Cumberland County Government, Carlisle, PA
County of Volusia, DeLand, FL
County of Orangeburg, Orangeburg, SC
County of Kings (California), Hanford, CA
County of Fresno, Fresno, CA
County of Franklin, VA, Rocky Mount, VA
County of Calaveras, San Andreas, CA
County of Bergen, Hackensack, NJ
Collier County, Florida, Naples, FL
Cobb County Government, Marietta, GA
Cleburne Police Department, Cleburne, TX
Collaborative Fingerprint & Palmprint Identification
Dallas County Intake/Release Project
Emergency Communications Infrastructure
Evidence Photo Management System
Law Enforcement Automated Data Repository
(LEADR)
Interoperable Emergency Communications System
Regional Data Interoperability
Microwave ring between Franklin, Patrick and
Henry Counties and the City of Martinsville for
Public Safety/E911 Voice and Data Interoperability
Law Enforcement Radio and Data Communications
County-Wide Public Safety Radio Communication
System
Emergency Services Technology, Collier County,
Florida
Regional Communications and Interoperability
City of Cleburne Communication Technology Upgrade
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$1,000,000
$100,000
$200,000
$150,000
$500,000
$300,000
$150,000
$200,000
$1,250,000
$215,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$150,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Barton (TX)
Johnson, Eddie Bernice
Platts
Mica; Brown, Corrine
Wilson (SC)
Costa
Costa
Perriello
Lungren, Dan
Rothman (NJ)
Mack; Diaz-Balart, Mario
Gingrey (GA); Scott (GA)
Edwards (TX)
206
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00207
Fmt 6659
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Fleming County Fiscal Court, Flemingsburg, KY
Fayette County Commissioners, Uniontown, PA
Fairview, WV Police Department, Fairview, WV
Etowah County Commission, Gadsden, AL
Essex County Office of Emergency Management,
Newark, NJ
Escambia County, FL, Pensacola, FL
Elgin Police Department, Elgin, IL
El Paso Police Department, El Paso, TX
El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, El Paso, TX
E-Com Dispatch Center, Homewood, IL
Eastern Riverside County Interoperable Communications Authority, Indio, CA
East Bay Regional Communications System Authority, Dublin, CA
Downriver Community Conference, Southgate, MI
Dobbs Ferry Police Department, Dobbs Ferry, NY
Dilley PD, Pearsall PD, Floresville PD, Atascosa
County, Dilley, Pearsall, Jourdanton, TX
Law Enforcement Equipment Project, Fleming
County, KY
Fayette County Public Safety Equipment Upgrade
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Interoperable Communications & Centralized Dispatch System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Escambia Emergency Radio Infrastructure Replacement
Elgin Police Car Video Recording Replacement
Public Safety Radio Voice/Data Systems Interoperability
El Paso County Sheriff’s Office-Border Crime Enhancements
E-Com Power Supply/Generator
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
East Bay Regional Communications System
Coordinated Emergency Dispatch and Mutual Aid
System Preparedness IV
Equipment for Vehicles
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
$48,000
$1,000,000
$25,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$460,000
$250,000
$250,000
$100,000
$500,000
$1,050,000
$650,000
$50,000
$100,000
Davis (KY)
Murtha
Mollohan
Aderholt
Frelinghuysen
Miller (FL)
Foster
Reyes
Rodriguez
Jackson (IL)
Bono Mack
McNerney; Tauscher; Stark
Dingell
Lowey
Cuellar
207
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00208
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Hearne Police Department, Hearne, TX
Hays County Sheriff Department, San Marcos, TX
Haverhill Police Department, Haverhill, MA
Hastings Police Department, Hastings on Hudson,
NY
Harrisville, WV Police Department, Harrisville, WV
Hagerstown Police Department, Hagerstown, MD
Grimes County Sheriff, Anderson, TX
Greene County, Missouri, Springfield, MO
Gonzales Sheriff’s Office, Gonzales, TX
Glencoe Department of Public Safety, Glencoe, IL
Garrard County Fiscal Court, Lancaster, KY
Franklin County Emergency Services Alliance,
Chambersburg, PA
Fort Mill Police Department, Fort Mill, SC
City of Hearne Law Enforcement Technology
Hays County Police Equipment and Technology Upgrades
Haverhill Police Radio Project
Hastings, NY, Police Department License Plate
Reader
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Hagerstown Radio Equipment Acquisition
Grimes County Law Enforcement Technology
Equipment for Emergency Operations Center
Gonzales Sheriff’s Office Technology and Equipment
Atmospheric Detection Equipment For the Northern
Illinois Police Alarm System
Garrard County Law Enforcement Technology
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Fort Mill Police Department Technology Implementation
Florida Silver Alert Program
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Tallahassee, FL
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$40,000
$150,000
$17,000
$25,000
$750,000
$100,000
$350,000
$80,000
$675,000
$145,000
$300,000
$300,000
$100,000
Amount
Edwards (TX)
Doggett
Tsongas
Lowey
Mollohan
Bartlett
Edwards (TX)
Blunt
Doggett
Roskam; Bean
Chandler
Shuster
Spratt
Bilirakis; Young (FL)
Requester(s)
208
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00209
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners, Louisville, GA
Jefferson City, MO, Police Department, Jefferson
City, MO
Jasper County Sheriff, Monticello, GA
Jasper County Commission, Carthage, MO
Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office, Jacksonville, FL
Jackson Township Police Department, North Jackson, OH
Itasca County, Grand Rapids, MN
Inyo County, Independence, CA
Indianapolis Housing Agency, Indianapolis, IN
Indiana County Commissioners, Indiana, PA
Idaho State Police, Meridian, ID
Huntington Police Department and Cabell Co. Sheriff, Huntington, WV
Hornell Police Department, Hornell, NY
Henry County Sheriff, New Castle, KY
Henderson County Sheriff’s Department, Hendersonville, NC
Jefferson County Emergency Dispatch System Upgrade and Enhancement Project
Central Missouri Regional Justice Information System
Lap Top Computers for Patrol Division
Cornerstone Regional Justice Information System
Atmospheric Detection Equipment for the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office
Jackson Township, Mahoning County Police Facility
Upgrade
Itasca County 9-11 Radio System
Emergency Operations Center
IP Video Technology In Federally Assisted Housing
Indiana County Public Safety Radio Communications Project
Idaho State Police (ISP) participation in Criminal
Information Sharing Alliance Network (CISAnet)
Joint Technology Initiative and Digital Communication
Hornell Police Intelligence Equipment
Law Enforcement Equipment Upgrades, Henry
County, KY
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence Tool
$100,000
$1,000,000
$62,000
$250,000
$750,000
$100,000
$500,000
$240,000
$100,000
$650,000
$500,000
$665,000
$197,000
$82,000
$300,000
Barrow
Skelton
Marshall
Blunt
Crenshaw; Brown, Corrine
Wilson (OH)
Oberstar
McKeon
Carson (IN)
Murtha
Simpson
Rahall
Massa
Davis (KY)
Shuler
209
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
Account
COPS Tech
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
Lee County, Jonesville, VA
Lawrence County Sherriff and 911 Center, Ironton,
OH
Lawrence County Sheriff, New Castle, PA
Lawrence County Sheriff, Moulton, AL
Larchmont Police Department, Larchmont, NY
Lake County, Painesville, OH
Lake County Sheriff’s Department, Crown Point, IN
Lake County, Tavares, FL
Lafourche Parish Sheriff, Thibodaux, LA
La Vernia, Poth, and Stockdale PD, La Vernia, Poth,
Stockdale, TX
Kankakee County Sheriff, Kankakee, IL
Kanawha County Prosecuting Attorney, Charleston,
WV
Jenkintown Borough Police Department, Jenkintown,
PA
Law Enforcement Technology Grant for Lee County
Lawrence County Interoperable Radio/MARCS Communications Project
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Larchmont, NY, Police Department Communications
System
Lake County Public Safety Radio System
Law enforcement equipment for the Lake County
Sheriff’s Department
Lake County Law Enforcement Technology
In-Car Cameras
La Vernia, Poth, and Stockdale PD equipment
Technological Improvements for the Kankakee
County Sheriff
Kanawha Prosecuters Case Management
Equipment Upgrades, Jenkintown
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$265,000
$300,000
$120,000
$40,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$800,000
$200,000
$100,000
$325,000
$85,000
$40,000
Amount
Boucher
Wilson (OH)
Altmire
Griffith
Lowey
LaTourette
Visclosky
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Melancon
Cuellar
Halvorson
Capito
Schwartz
Requester(s)
210
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Marion County, Florida, Ocala, FL
Manchester Police Department, Manchester, NH
Maine Warden Service, Augusta, ME
Madison County, Wampsville, NY
Macomb County Emergency Management & Communications, Mount Clemens, MI
Lynwood, Thornton, and East Hazel Crest ETSB,
Lynwood, IL
Lycoming County Commissioners, Williamsport, PA
Lower Providence Township, Eagleville, PA
Louisville Metropolitan Police Department, Louisville, KY
Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, Baton Rouge, LA
Lorain County Sheriff, Elyria, OH
Linn County Sheriff, Marion, IA
Liberal Police Department, Liberal, KS
Leon County, Tallahassee, FL
Leon County Sheriff, Tallahassee, FL
Marion County Law Enforcement Technology
Portable Radios, Tactical Gear and other equipment
Maine Search and Rescue Enhancement Project
Madison County Interoperable Communications
System
Macomb County Centralized Dispatch
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Lycoming County Emergency Operations Center
Equipment
Police Department Technology Improvements
Mobile Data Computers
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Lorain County Sheriffs Office Law Enforcement Digital Radio Project
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
City of Liberal Equipment Upgrade Project
Joint Emergency Communications Center
Leon County Sheriff’s Department Visual Intelligence Technology
$200,000
$315,000
$200,000
$800,000
$500,000
$350,000
$250,000
$200,000
$300,000
$300,000
$245,000
$145,000
$200,000
$200,000
$300,000
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Shea-Porter
Michaud
McHugh
Levin
Jackson (IL)
Thompson (PA)
Sestak
Yarmuth
Alexander
Sutton
Loebsack
Moran (KS)
Boyd
Boyd
211
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00212
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Municipality of Vieques, Vieques, PR
Municipality of Rio Grande, Rio Grande, PR
Municipality of Patillas, Patillas, PR
Municipality of Naguabo, Naguabo, PR
Municipality of Catano, Catano, PR
Municipality of Aibonito, Aibonito, PR
Morgan County, AL Commission, Decatur, AL
Montgomery Township, Montgomery, PA
Miller County Sheriff, Texarkana, AR
Middlesex Sheriff, Medford, MA
Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami, FL
Mendocino County, Ukiah, CA
Medina County Sheriffs Office, Hondo, TX
Medina County Sheriff, Medina, OH
McGregor Police Department, McGregor, TX
Mass. Criminal History Systems, Boston, MA
Recipient
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Mobile Data Terminal Update
Technology Upgrade with In-Car Video Cameras
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Middlesex House of Corrections Safety Project
Technological Equipment Upgrade For Miami-Dade
Schools Police Department
Public Safety Microwave System Phase II: Expansion
Medina Mobile Data Systems
Medina County Community Safety Initiative
City of McGregor Law Enforcement Technology
Mass. Criminal History Systems Board Back-up
Data Center
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$160,000
$75,000
$100,000
$800,000
$600,000
$250,000
$250,000
$27,000
$100,000
$100,000
Amount
Pierluisi
Pierluisi
Pierluisi
Pierluisi
Pierluisi
Pierluisi
Aderholt; Griffith
Schwartz
Ross
Markey (MA)
Diaz-Balart, Lincoln; Meek (FL)
Thompson (CA)
Rodriguez
Boccieri
Edwards (TX)
Markey (MA)
Requester(s)
212
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00213
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Oldham County Police Department, LaGrange, KY
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Oklahoma
City, OK
Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation, London, OH
Office of the Sheriff, Winnebago County, Rockford,
IL
Oakland County Sheriff’s Office, Pontiac, MI
Northern Berks Regional Police Department, Reading, PA
North Worcester County Drug Task Force, Gardner,
MA
Newport News Police Department, Newport News,
VA
New York State Police, Kingston, NY
New Rochelle Police Department, New Rochelle, NY
New Bedford Police Department, New Bedford, MA
NC State Bureau of Investigation, Raleigh, NC
Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow,
NY
Nassau County Police Department, Mineola, NY
Oldham County Mobile Data Terminal Project, KY
Statewide Public Safety Communications System
Enhancement of Ohio AFIS System
Communications Equipment for Winnebago County
Sheriff’s Department
Oakland County Sheriff’s Department Biometric
Identification Enhancement Project
Northern Berks Regional Police Department Infrastructure, Technology and Communications
Project
North Worcester County Drug Task Force Interoperable Credentialing, Crime Scene & Access Control Project
Newport News Law Enforcement Technology
New York State Police Scuba
New Rochelle, NY, Police Department Equipment
and Training
Gunshot Location System
NC SBI Firearms and Ballistics Analysis Equipment
Sexual Assault Response Team
Enhance Shot Spotter System
$57,000
$350,000
$455,000
$250,000
$1,025,000
$175,000
$400,000
$200,000
$135,000
$340,000
$950,000
$300,000
$200,000
$150,000
Davis (KY)
Fallin; Boren
Kilroy; Sutton; Kucinich; Ryan (OH)
Manzullo
Rogers (MI); Peters; Levin
Holden
Olver
Wittman; Scott (VA)
Hinchey
Lowey
Frank (MA)
Price (NC)
McCarthy (NY)
McCarthy (NY)
213
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00214
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Randolph County, AR Sheriff, Pocahontas, AR
Prince George’s County, Upper Marlboro, MD
Pocahontas County Iowa Sheriff, Pocahontas, IA
Pinellas County Sheriff, Largo, FL
Pima County Sheriff’s Department, Tucson, AZ
Pierce County, WA Sheriff Department, Tacoma, WA
Philadelphia Police Department, Philadelphia, PA
Petersburg, WV Police Department, Petersburg, WV
Pennsboro, WV Police Department, Pennsboro, WV
Pendleton County Sheriff, Falmouth, KY
Ottumwa Police Department, Ottumwa, IA
Ottawa County Emergency Management Agency,
Port Clinton, OH
Orange County Sheriff, Chelsea, VT
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Prince George’s County Interoperable Radio System
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence Tool
Joint Use Firing Range
PCWIN Countywide Public Safety Interoperable
Communications System
Region 43, Pierce County Metropolitan Public Safety Communications Interoperable First Responder Emergency Communication System
Gunshot Location System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Ottumwa Police Department Equipment
Ottawa County Public Safety Infrastructure
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Interoperable Emergency Communications
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Ontario County Police Department, Canandaigua,
NY
Onondaga County, Syracuse, NY
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$140,000
$600,000
$200,000
$250,000
$200,000
$500,000
$500,000
$25,000
$25,000
$12,000
$150,000
$200,000
$200,000
$100,000
$200,000
Amount
Berry
Van Hollen; Edwards (MD)
Latham
Young (FL)
Giffords
Reichert
Brady (PA)
Mollohan
Mollohan
Davis (KY)
Loebsack
Kaptur
Welch
Massa
Maffei
Requester(s)
214
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00215
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Santa Clara County, San Jose, CA
Sangamon County Sheriff’s Office, Springfield, IL
Sandy City, Sandy, UT
San Pablo, CA Police Department, San Pablo, CA
San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, Redwood City,
CA
San Francisco Department of Emergency Management, San Francisco, CA
San Diego County, San Diego, CA
San Bernardino County Sheriff, San Bernardino, CA
Roland Police Department, Roland, OK
Rockland County Office of Fire & Emergency Services, Pomona, NY
Rockdale County Sheriff’s Office, Conyers, GA
Rochester Police Department, Rochester, NH
Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, Riverside,
CA
Riverside County Sheriff, Riverside, CA
Rio Grande Council of Governments, El Paso, TX
Ridgefield Park Village, Ridgefield Park, NJ
Santa Clara County Criminal Justice Information
Control Law & Justice Systems Plan
Sangamon County Sheriff Technology Upgrades
Sandy City Police Department Treatment Improvement Program
Gunshot Location System
Mobile Emergency Command Center
Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications
System
Regional Communications System (RCS) Upgrade
San Bernardino County Scientific Investigations Division
Police Department Equipment
Rockland County Public Safety Interoperable Communications Network
Law Enforcement Mobile Data Network
Law Enforcement Technology
Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Digital Management System
Night Vision Binoculars for the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence tool
Digital Mobile Video Camera Conversion
$1,000,000
$660,000
$300,000
$360,000
$300,000
$750,000
$1,200,000
$500,000
$180,000
$250,000
$150,000
$285,000
$450,000
$700,000
$250,000
$85,000
Honda; Lofgren, Zoe
Schock
Matheson
Miller, George
Speier; Eshoo
Pelosi
Bilbray; Davis (CA); Filner
Lewis (CA); Baca
Boren
Lowey; Hall (NY)
Johnson (GA)
Shea-Porter
Lewis (CA)
Calvert
Rodriguez
Rothman (NJ)
215
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00216
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Springfield Police Department, Springfield, IL
Spencer Police Department, Spencer, WV
Southeastern Oklahoma University, Durant, OK
SouthCom Dispatch, Matteson, IL
South Windsor Police Dept, South Windsor, CT
South Russell Police Department, South Russell,
OH
Somersworth Police Department, Somersworth, NH
Somerset County Office of Emergency Management,
Somerville, NJ
Snohomish County Regional Drug Task Force, Everett, WA
Smyth County, Marion, VA
Sistersville, WV Police Department, Sistersville, WV
Shinnston, WV Police Department, Shinnston, WV
Springfield Police Department Technology Upgrade
Spencer PD Computer System
Emergency Response System
SouthCom Technological Upgrades
Upgrades to Communications System
Transition to 800MHz Digital Communication Technology
Portable Police Radios
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Local Law Enforcement Technology for Smyth
County
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
P25 Wide Area Radio Network
Schuyler County Sheriff Technology Upgrades
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Shelby Township Police Department, Shelby Township, MI
Shelby County Sheriff, Columbiana, AL
Schuyler County Sheriff’s Office, Rushville, IL
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$150,000
$40,000
$270,000
$100,000
$350,000
$35,000
$22,000
$1,000,000
$70,000
$235,000
$25,000
$25,000
$200,000
$500,000
$50,000
Amount
Schock
Capito
Boren; Cole
Jackson (IL)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Shea-Porter
Frelinghuysen
Larsen (WA)
Boucher
Mollohan
Mollohan
Miller (MI)
Bachus
Schock
Requester(s)
216
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00217
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Police
Department,
HR149
Sumter County Sheriff, Sumter, SC
Summit County Sheriff, Akron, OH
Sterling Heights
Heights, MI
State of Delaware Capitol Police, Dover, DE
Sterling
State of Connecticut Department of Public Safety,
Middletown, CT
Stark County Sheriff, Canton, OH
Stanislaus County and the City of Modesto, Modesto, CA
Stafford County, Stafford, VA
St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office, Leonardtown, MD
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, St. Louis,
MO
St. Lawrence County District Attorney, Canton, NY
St. Johns County, St. Augustine, FL
St. Francois County, Missouri, Park Hills, MO
St Louis County Sheriff, Duluth, MN
Visual Intelligence Technology
Law Enforcement Tactical Safety Vehicle, Summit
County Sheriff
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
New Castle County Courthouse Capitol Police Command Center and Lobby Surveillance Project
In-Car Camera Technology Upgrade
Visual Intelligence Update for Law Enforcement
and Governmental Agencies
Regional Operability for Public Safety Communications
Stafford County Law Enforcement Technology
St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office In-Car Video
Technology
In-Car Video System (ICVS) program
St. Lawrence County Drug Investigation Equipment
Project
St. Johns County Emergency Interoperability Equipment
Visual Intelligence Tool for Mineral Area Missouri
Law Enforcement
Regional Interoperability Data System Project
$1,000,000
$100,000
$300,000
$130,000
$175,000
$400,000
$250,000
$300,000
$500,000
$200,000
$200,000
$250,000
$697,000
$500,000
Brown (SC); Clyburn
Sutton
Miller (MI)
Castle
Larson (CT); Courtney; Himes; Murphy (CT)
Boccieri
Cardoza
Wittman
Hoyer
Carnahan
McHugh
Mica
Emerson
Oberstar
217
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00218
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Torrance County Sheriff, Estancia, NM
Toms River Police Department, Toms River, NJ
Tohono O’odham Nation, Sells, AZ
Thomas County E-9-1-1, Thomasville, GA
The Village of Skokie, Skokie, IL
The Police Department in the Borough of Etna,
Pittsburgh, PA
The County of Bucks, Doylestown, PA
The City of Houston, TX, Houston, TX
The Chickasaw Nation, Ada, OK
Tega Cay Police Department, Tega Cay, SC
Tazewell County Sheriff’s Office, Pekin, IL
Taney County Commission, Fortsyth, MO
Tamaqua Borough Police Department, Tamaqua, PA
Torrance County Drug Enforcement
Township-wide Wi Fi Mesh Canopy/ In-Car Video/
License Plate Recognition Project
Tohono O’odham Nation, Arizona Law Enforcement
Communications System
Emergency Communications Center
Communications Center at New Police Station
Security Cameras and Police Equipment
Law enforcement data-sharing infrastructure
Houston Interoperability Initiative
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence Tool for the
Chickasaw & Choctaw Nations
Interoperability and Technology Enhancement for
the City of Tega Cay Police Department
Interoperable Law Enforcement Communications
White River Area Emergency Project
Tamaqua Police Department Technology and Security Project
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Sussex County Office of Emergency Management,
Newton, NJ
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$200,000
$700,000
$100,000
$150,000
$465,000
$100,000
$300,000
$1,350,000
$750,000
$135,000
$140,000
$400,000
$200,000
$1,000,000
Amount
Heinrich
Adler (NJ)
Grijalva
Bishop (GA)
Schakowsky
Doyle
Murphy, Patrick
Jackson-Lee (TX); Green, Gene; Culberson
Cole; Boren
Spratt
Schock
Blunt
Holden
Frelinghuysen
Requester(s)
218
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00219
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Town of Porter, Porter, IN
Town of Ossining Police Department, Briarcliff
Manor, NY
Town of Merrillville, Merrillville, IN
Town of Masontown, WV, Masontown, WV
Town of Highland, Highland, IN
Town of Hebron, Hebron, IN
Town of Hackleburg, Hackleburg, AL
Town of Grant Town, WV Police Department, Grant
Town, WV
Town of Framingham, Framingham, MA
Town of Colmar Manor, Brentwood, MD
Town of Clarkstown, NY, New City, NY
Town of Cheektowaga, Cheektowaga, NY
Town of Carmel, Mahopac, NY
Town of Burrillville Police Department, Oakland, RI
Town of Ayden, North Carolina, Ayden, NC
Law enforcement equipment for the Porter Police
Department
Town of Ossining, NY, Police Department Equipment
Law enforcement equipment for Merrillville Police
Department
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law enforcement equipment for the Highland Police Department
Law enforcement equipment for the Hebron Police
Department
Police Technology Upgrades
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Framingham Townwide Wireless Mesh Network
The Town of Colmar Manor Interoperable Radio
Project
Clarkstown, NY, Police Department Communication
System Upgrades
Law Enforcement Technology for the Town of
Cheektowaga
Police Vehicle Video Systems
Burrillville Cops Technology
Town of Ayden Public Safety Technology Improvement Initiative
$68,000
$6,000
$500,000
$25,000
$485,000
$190,000
$75,000
$25,000
$200,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$145,000
$92,000
$250,000
Visclosky
Lowey
Visclosky
Mollohan
Visclosky
Visclosky
Aderholt
Mollohan
Markey (MA)
Van Hollen
Lowey
Higgins
Hall (NY)
Kennedy
Butterfield
219
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00220
Fmt 6659
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Union County Sheriff, El Dorado, AR
Umatilla County Sheriff, Pendlton, OR
Tulsa Police Department, Tulsa, OK
Township of Woodbridge, Woodbridge, NJ
Township of Spring, Reading, PA
Township of Irvington, Irvington, NJ
Town Watch Integrated Services, Philadelphia, PA
Town of Woodbury Police Department, Central Valley, NY
Town of White Hall, WV Police Department, White
Hall, WV
Town of West Liberty, West Liberty, WV
Town of Warren, Warren, RI
Town of Vernon, Vernon, CT
Town of Southwest Ranches , Southwest Ranches,
FL
In-Car Video and Audio Recording Devices
Mobile Video Equipment
Law Enforcement Interoperability / Regional Expansion Project
Woodbridge, New Jersey Interoperable Law Enforcement Trunked Digital Radio System
Video Recorder System Purchase
Irvington CAD/RMS Project
Town Watch Program
Emergency Energy Supply
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Information Technology and communications upgrades
Radio System Digital Upgrade
Public Safety and Law Enforcement Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Town of Ridgeley, WV Police Department, Ridgeley,
WV
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$75,000
$130,000
$200,000
$500,000
$90,000
$200,000
$100,000
$60,000
$25,000
$25,000
$500,000
$300,000
$500,000
$25,000
Amount
Ross
Walden
Sullivan
Lance; Sires
Gerlach
Payne
Fattah
Hall (NY)
Mollohan
Mollohan
Kennedy
Courtney
Wasserman Schultz
Mollohan
Requester(s)
220
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00221
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Village of Melrose Park Police Department, Melrose
Park, IL
Village of La Grange, La Grange, IL
Village of La Grange Park, La Grange Park, IL
Village of Clearview, WV, Wheeling, WV
Village of Chagrin Falls Police Department, Chagrin
Falls, OH
Village of Campton Hills Police Department,
Campton Hills, IL
Village of Bosque Farms, Bosque Farms, NM
Vienna, WV Police Department, Vienna, WV
Vanderburgh County Commissioners, Evansville, IN
Upper Peninsula 9-1-1 Authority, Escanaba, MI
University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX
University of Maryland Public Safety Training and
Technical Assistance Program, Greenbelt, MD
University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK
University of Akron, Akron, OH
Union County, FL Sheriff, Lake Butler, FL
Wireless Surveillance System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Interoperable Communications and Operations Center
Campton Hills Police Mobile Patrol
Valencia County Law Enforcement Uniform Records
Management System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Civic Center Complex Security Improvements
Upper Peninsula 9-1-1 Computer Aided Dispatch
and Records Management System
Open Source Lab for Law Enforcement Intelligence
Analysis on Latin America
Prince George’s County Municipal Interoperability
Upgrades
Central Oklahoma /State of Oklahoma Forensic
Laboratory Program Enhanced DNA Analysis
Training for Law Enforcement Professionals
High Technology Forensics Laboratory and Resource
Center
Law Enforcement Visual Intelligence Tool
$300,000
$100,000
$75,000
$25,000
$250,000
$25,000
$400,000
$25,000
$200,000
$250,000
$400,000
$500,000
$150,000
$500,000
$500,000
Quigley
Lipinski
Lipinski
Mollohan
LaTourette
Foster
Teague
Mollohan
Ellsworth
Stupak
Reyes
Hoyer
Fallin
LaTourette
Crenshaw
221
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00222
Fmt 6659
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
Sfmt 6602
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Webb County Sheriff, Laredo, TX
Wayne County, Detroit, MI
Watertown, CT, Watertown, CT
Washoe County Sheriff’s Office, Reno, NV
Washington Parish Sheriff, Franklinton, LA
Warner Robins Police Department, Warner Robins,
GA
Wake County, Raleigh, NC
Waco Police Department, Waco, TX
Virginia Center for Policing Innovation, Richmond,
VA
Virgin Islands Police Department, St. Croix, VI
Village of Thornton, IL, Thornton, IL
Village of Pelham Manor, Pelham Manor, NY
Village of North Aurora, North Aurora, IL
South Texas Forensics Laboratory
Wayne County, MI Radio Communications Interoperability
Emergency Communications System
Washoe County Patrol Vehicle Safety Systems
Law Enforcement Equipment
Forensic Video System
Wake County 800 MHz Base Infrastructure Expansion
McLennan County Communications Technology Upgrade
Virginia Center for Policing Innovation
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Mobile Data Browsing Software Upgrade
Village of Pelham Manor, NY, Police Department
Fingerprint Scanner
Village of North Aurora Police Digital Radio Interoperability
Law Enforcement Equipment
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Village of Monroe Police Department, Monroe, NY
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$300,000
$300,000
$500,000
$291,000
$20,000
$400,000
$450,000
$300,000
$550,000
$100,000
$30,000
$200,000
$160,000
Amount
Cuellar
Conyers
Murphy (CT)
Heller
Scalise
Marshall
Price (NC); Miller (NC); Etheridge
Edwards (TX)
Scott (VA); Moran (VA); Nye; Wittman
Christensen
Jackson (IL)
Lowey
Foster
Hall (NY)
Requester(s)
222
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00223
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Alabama District Attorneys Association, Montgomery, AL
Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital, Downers Grove,
IL
ACCESS—Arab Community Center for Economic
and Social Services, Dearborn, MI
A Safe Haven, Chicago, IL
A Child Is Missing, Inc, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
A Better Way, Inc., Columbia, SC
9th Judicial District, Koochiching County, International Falls, MN
180 Turning Lives Around, Inc, Hazlet, NJ
14th Judicial District Durham County North Carolina, Durham, NC
Yellowstone County Sheriff’s Office, Billings, MT
Wilmington Police Department, Wilmington, NC
Williamstown, WV Police Department, Williamstown,
WV
Wilcox County Sheriff, Abbeville, GA
Wichita State University, Wichita, KS
Weston Police Department, Weston, WV
West Union, WV Police Department, West Union, WV
Alabama Computer Forensics Labs
Assisting Victims of Domestic Violence at Advocate
Good Samaritan Hospital
ACCESS Youth Center
Comprehensive Substance Abuse Services to Ex-Offenders
Assist in finding missing children or adults.
Project Gang Out (GO)
Koochiching County DUI/Substance Abuse Court
180 Child and Teen Violence Reduction and Treatment Expansion, Hazlet, NJ
14th Judicial District of Durham County: New Life
Job Court
Yellowstone County Mobile Digital Video Camera
Gunshot Location System
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
Portable and Vehicle Radios
Kansas Regional Community Policing Institute
Weston Police Department Technology Upgrade
Law Enforcement Technology and Equipment
$900,000
$75,000
$200,000
$500,000
$300,000
$250,000
$100,000
$500,000
$100,000
$147,000
$315,000
$25,000
$25,000
$650,000
$250,000
$25,000
Bonner; Rogers (AL); Aderholt
Roskam
Dingell
Davis (IL)
Klein (FL)
Clyburn
Oberstar
Pallone; Holt
Price (NC)
Rehberg
McIntyre
Mollohan
Marshall
Tiahrt
Capito
Mollohan
223
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00224
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Borough of Jamesburg, Jamesburg, NJ
Bluegrass Domestic Violence Program, Lexington,
KY
Billings Clinic, Billings, MT
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Mississippi Valley,
Davenport, IA
Bee County Sheriff, Beeville, TX
Baltimore County Executive Office, Towson, MD
Baltimore City Mayor, Baltimore, MD
Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Jamesburg Police Communications Modernization
Program
Bluegrass Domestic Violence Transitional Housing
Billings Clinic Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Mississippi Valley
Expansion and Enhancement Initiative
Equipment for new officers
9-1-1 Communications Center
Baltimore City Reentry Employment Center
Auburn University Canine Program
Armstrong County Emergency Operating Center Upgrades
American Judges Association Judicial Education
Initiative
Criminal Justice Program Initiative
The Border Institute of Excellence
National Online Hotline and comprehensive services for sexual assault survivors
Management of Offenders with Co-occurring Mental
Illness and Addiction Disorders
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Armstrong County Emergency Operating Center,
Kittanning, PA
American Judges Association, Williamsburg, VA
Alvernia University, Reading, PA
Aliviane, Inc., El Paso, TX
Alamo Area Rape Crisis Center, San Antonio, TX
Alachua County, FL, Gainesville, FL
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$95,000
$325,000
$250,000
$200,000
$250,000
$500,000
$500,000
$900,000
$100,000
$350,000
$470,000
$250,000
$200,000
$900,000
Amount
Holt
Chandler
Rehberg
Hare
Hinojosa
Ruppersberger; Kratovil; Cummings
Cummings
Rogers (AL); Aderholt
Dahlkemper
LaTourette
Gerlach
Reyes
Gonzalez
Stearns; Brown, Corrine
Requester(s)
224
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00225
Fmt 6659
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Chrysalis House, Lexington, KY
Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters, Norfolk, VA
Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Charlotte, NC
Chapman University, Orange, CA
Chabad of Riverside, Riverside, CA
Center Point, Inc., San Rafael, CA
Center for Court Innovation, New York, NY
CeaseFire Chicago, Chicago, IL
California Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA
California Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA
Buffalo City Mission, Buffalo, NY
Brockton Area Private Industry Council, Inc., Brockton, MA
Brinkley, AR Police Department, Brinkley, AR
BRIDGES USA, Memphis, TN
Breaking Ground, Chicago, IL
Chrysalis House Substance Abuse Rehabilitation
Program
Child Abuse Treatment Services (VA)
The Chicago School Partnership with Community
Mental Health Council
Gang of One Pilot Program
Chapman University Domestic Violence Clinic
Chabad of Riverside’s Project PRIDE (Prevention,
Resource, Information and Drug Eradication)
Re-Entry and Community Integration Services
Enhanced Services for Veterans in Drug Court
CeaseFire Chicago Project
Riverside Gang Suppression Enforcement Team
Gang Suppression Enforcement Team (GSET)
Project
Cornerstone Manor Program Expansion
Gateway Program
Law Enforcement Equipment
BRIDGES SPAN Program for Memphis City Schools
Job Training and Placement Services for Ex-Offenders
$175,000
$100,000
$350,000
$200,000
$100,000
$400,000
$250,000
$100,000
$250,000
$250,000
$100,000
$200,000
$250,000
$62,000
$300,000
$100,000
Chandler
Scott (VA)
Jackson (IL)
Kissell; Watt
Sanchez, Loretta
Calvert
Woolsey
Hinchey
Jackson (IL)
Calvert
Cardoza
Slaughter
Lynch
Berry
Cohen
Davis (IL)
225
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00226
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Folsom, Folsom, CA
City of Evanston Police Department, Evanston, IL
City of Escondido, Escondido, CA
City of Detroit, Detroit, MI
City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department, Detroit,
MI
City of Denton, Denton, TX
City of Colton, Colton, CA
City of Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN
City of Carlsbad, Carlsbad, CA
City of Baltimore Police Department, Baltimore, MD
City of Austin, Austin, TX
City of Annapolis, Maryland, Annapolis, MD
City of Adelanto, Adelanto, CA
Citizens for NYC, New York, NY
Folsom Emergency Operations Center
Undercover Operations Personnel
Mobile Data Computer Infrastructure
City of Detroit—Parolees, Technical Parole Violators, and Former Prisoners Project
City of Detroit—Firearm Reduction Initiative
Denton Public Safety Training Facility
City of Colton Police Department Back-up Generator
City of Chattanooga Law Enforcement Training
Center
Joint First Responders Training Facility
Baltimore City Gun Violence Reduction Initiative
Austin Police Technology
Capital City Safe Streets Program
Emergency Operations Center
Community Crime Stoppers
Ex-Offender and Homeless Job Training Initiative
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Chrysalis-Changing Lives Through Jobs, Los Angeles, CA
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$35,000
$200,000
$550,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$200,000
$500,000
$300,000
$500,000
$250,000
$100,000
$375,000
$200,000
$500,000
Amount
Lungren, Dan
Schakowsky
Bilbray
Conyers; Kilpatrick (MI)
Conyers; Kilpatrick (MI)
Burgess
Baca
Wamp
Bilbray
Ruppersberger
Smith (TX)
Sarbanes
McKeon
Crowley
Roybal-Allard
Requester(s)
226
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00227
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
City of Montgomery, Montgomery, AL
City of Midland, Midland, TX
City of Miami Beach, FL, Miami Beach, FL
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
City of Lakewood, CO, Lakewood, CO
City of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
City of Irondale, Irondale, AL
City of Hutchinson Police Department, Hutchinson,
KS
City of Houston, Houston, TX
City of Henderson, Henderson, NV
City of Glendale, Glendale, CA
City of Glendale, Glendale, AZ
Youth
Development
Zone—
City of Montgomery and Montgomery County Interoperable Upgrades
Emergency Communications Equipment, Midland,
Texas
Miami Beach After School Gang and Drug Prevention Program
Rape Kit Backlog Elimination Program
Gang Reduction
Pacoima
Domestic Abuse Response Team (DART)
Community Law Enforcement and Recovery Program
Substance Abuse Treatment for Youth Offenders
Community Justice Program
Law Enforcement Equipment and Technology Upgrades
Emergency Response Team Equipment Upgrade
Project
Targeted Narcotics Enforcement Team, Houston, TX
Regional Law Enforcement Training Facility
Interagency Communications Interoperability System, Glendale/Burbank, CA
Glendale Computer Aided Dispatch and Records
Management System
$360,000
$325,000
$500,000
$500,000
$100,000
$100,000
$500,000
$45,000
$100,000
$350,000
$200,000
$350,000
$300,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
Bright; Rogers (AL)
Conaway
Ros-Lehtinen; Wasserman Schultz
Schiff
Berman
Watson; Sherman
Roybal-Allard
Perlmutter
Cleaver
Bachus
Moran (KS)
Culberson; Poe (TX)
Titus
Schiff
Franks (AZ); Pastor (AZ)
227
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00228
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Claiborne County Sheriff, Port Gibson, MS
Claflin University, Orangeburg, SC
City of Yonkers, Yonkers, NY
City of Wrens, Wrens, GA
City of Westminster, CA, Westminster, CA
City of Tucson, Tucson, AZ
City of Trenton, New Jersey, Trenton, NJ
City of Stockton, Stockton, CA
City of San Jose, San Jose, CA
City of San Fernando, San Fernando, CA
City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA
City of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia,, PA
City of New Haven, New Haven, CT
City of National City, National City, CA
City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley, CA
Recipient
County-wide law enforcement programs
Claflin Certified Forensics Laboratory
Yonkers WAVE drug sweep
Wrens city security project
Asian Criminal Enterprise Initiative
Tucson Drug Trafficking Suppression Initiative
YouthStat Violence and Gang Prevention
Operation Peacekeeper Gang Outreach Program
Skills to Succeed Prisoner Re-Entry Pilot Project
School Resource Officer Program
San Bernardino Project Phoenix Neighborhood Initiative
City of Phoenix Electronic Prosecutor Records Management
Youth Violence Reduction Partnership (YVRP)
City of New Haven Re-entry Program
Homeless Outreach Program and Enforcement
(HOPE) Project
City of Moreno Valley Gang Prevention Program
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$75,000
$290,000
$400,000
$310,000
$200,000
$400,000
$450,000
$500,000
$100,000
$250,000
$500,000
$95,000
$500,000
Amount
Thompson (MS)
Clyburn
Engel
Barrow
Royce; Rohrabacher; Sanchez, Loretta
Giffords; Grijalva
Smith (NJ); Holt
Cardoza; McNerney
Honda
Berman
Lewis (CA)
Pastor (AZ)
Fattah
DeLauro
Filner
Bono Mack
Requester(s)
228
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00229
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Criminal Justice Institute, Little Rock, AR
Criminal Justice Institute, Little Rock, AR
Covenant House California, Oakland, CA
County of San Diego, Sheriff’s Department, San
Diego, CA
County of San Diego, District Attorney, San Diego,
CA
County of Monterey, Salinas, CA
County of Merrimack, New Hampshire, Concord, NH
County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, Monterey Park, CA
Converging Industries Research Foundation, Cambridge, MA
Conservation Corps of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
Community Foundation of Wyandotte County, Kansas City, KS
Coalition for a Drug-Free Lanai, Lanai City, HI
Clearfield City, Clearfield, UT
Clarke County Sheriff, Berryville, VA
Rural Executive Management Institute (REMI)
Project
Arkansas School Resource Officer Program
Covenant House, Oakland Housing and Career Center
San Diego County Regional Gang Enforcement Collaborative
DA Gang and Drug Crime Investigation and Prosecution
Monterey County Street and Anti-Gang Project (aka:
Gang Task Force)
Merrimack County Mental Health Court Pilot Program
Rape Kit Backlog Reduction Program
Massachusetts Initiative for Real-Time Wireless
Emergency Communications
Environmental Job Training Program for Youth AtRisk in Southeast Los Angeles County
NeighborhoodsNOW Crime and Safety Initiative
Youth Mentoring Program
Digital Technology for Drug Enforcement/Gang-Related Strategic Initiative
Northwest Regional Gang Task Force
$200,000
$600,000
$250,000
$350,000
$200,000
$500,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
$250,000
$100,000
$500,000
$25,000
$425,000
$1,000,000
Berry
Boozman; Berry; Snyder
Lee (CA)
Hunter; Filner; Davis (CA)
Filner; Davis (CA); Bilbray
Farr
Hodes
Schiff
Capuano
Sanchez, Linda
Moore (KS)
Hirono
Bishop (UT)
Wolf
229
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00230
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Board
of
Commissioners,
HR149
Exeter Police Department, Reading, PA
Essex County Sheriff’s Department, Middleton, MA
Essex County District Attorney, Salem, MA
Episcopal Community Services of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Enough is Enough, Great Falls, VA
Emanuel County
Swainsboro, GA
East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, PA
East Helena Police Department, East Helena, MT
East Bay Community Law Center, Berkeley, CA
Diverse and Resilient, Inc., Milwaukee, WI
Digital Development Corporation and Oversight
Committee (DDCOC), Chicago, IL
Cuyahoga County Board of County Commissioners,
Cleveland, OH
Berks County Emergency Response Team (BCERT)
Comprehensive Substance Abuse Education and
Treatment Program
Essex County District Attorney’s Child Abuse, Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault Specialized
Prosecution Program
Jericho Reentry: Workforce Development for Ex-Offenders
VA Internet Safety 101
Emanuel County Emergency Vehicle Acquisition
The Cyber Crime and Forensics Institute
East Helena Community Policing Hiring Effort
Clean Slate Clinic for Community Re-entry & Reintegration
Diverse and Resilient, Inc.
SECOND CHANCES Job Training Program
Cuyahoga County Prisoner Re-entry Program
Cuyahoga County Fatherhood Initiative
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Cuyahoga County Board of County Commissioners,
Cleveland, OH
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$350,000
$280,000
$250,000
$100,000
$160,000
$100,000
$500,000
$60,000
$250,000
$155,000
$250,000
$400,000
$300,000
Amount
Gerlach
Tsongas; Tierney
Tierney
Ruppersberger; Cummings
Moran (VA)
Barrow
Kanjorski
Rehberg
Lee (CA)
Baldwin
Davis (IL)
Kucinich; Fudge
Kucinich
Requester(s)
230
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00231
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Hanover Park Police Department, Sergeant Tim
Podlin, Hanover Park, IL
Hampden County Sheriff, Ludlow, MA
Guilford College, Greensboro, NC
Grundy County Emergency Telephone System Board,
Morris, IL
Glenville State College, Glenville, WV
Glenville State College, Glenville, WV
Genesee Community College, Batavia, NY
Gallatin County, Montana, Bozeman, MT
Fulton County, Atlanta, GA
Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL
First Step, Taylor, MI
Findlay Police Department, Findlay, IL
Father’s Day Rally, Philadelphia,, PA
Family Reentry, Norwalk, CT
Family Justice Center, Hillsborough County, Tampa,
FL
Fairfield Police Department, Fairfield, IL
Rapid Response to School Violence
Integrated Reentry Program
Enhancing Technical Expertise in Forensics in Guilford County, North Carolina
Grundy County ETSB Consolidation Project E911
System
Glenville State College, WV Electronic Crimes Education and Training Program
Glenville State College, WV Anti-Recidivism Prisoner Education Program
Integrated Campus Security Initiative
Gallatin County Treatment Court
Fulton County High Intensity Crime Area Task Force
FGCU Law Enforcement and Public Safety
First Step Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Program
Findlay Police Equipment
FDRC
Fresh Start Reentry Program
Family Justice Center
Farifield Police Department Emergency Communications and Equipment Upgrades
$48,000
$350,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$406,000
$537,000
$185,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$10,000
$250,000
$900,000
$200,000
$110,000
Roskam
Neal
Miller (NC)
Halvorson
Mollohan
Mollohan
Lee (NY)
Rehberg
Scott (GA); Lewis (GA)
Mack
Dingell
Shimkus
Fattah
Larson (CT); Himes
Castor (FL)
Shimkus
231
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00232
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Foundation,
Rancho
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Izard County, AR Sheriff, Melbourne, AR
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Iowa Governor, Des Moines, IA
Iowa Central Community College, Ft. Dodge, IA
Idaho Department of Corrections, Boise, ID
Hoxie, AR Police Department, Hoxie, AR
Houston Police Department, Houston, TX
Hope Through Housing
Cucamonga, CA
Homestretch, Falls Church, VI
Holmes County Sheriff Department, Lexington, MS
Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science, New
Haven, CT
Hawaii Immigrant Justice Center, Honolulu, HI
Calico Rock, AR Police Program
Iowa State Forensic Testing Lab
Internet Scale Event & Attack Generation Environment
Drug Endangered Children Program and Drug Diversion Deterrence
Iowa Central Law Enforcement Training Center
NCOMS Medical and Mental Health Sharing Software Development
Law enforcement programs and equipment
Mobile AFIS Equipment and LiveScan Equipment
After School and Beyond -Violence Prevention
Homelessness and Domestic Violence Programs
County-wide law enforcement programs
Regional Crime Scene Response Team
Human Rights Alliance
Gang Identification and Enforcement Unit
Preventing Violence Against Women
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Harris County Constable Precinct Six, Houston, TX
Harris County Constable Precinct 4, Springt, TX
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$1,400,000
$400,000
$300,000
$500,000
$500,000
$50,000
$910,000
$850,000
$300,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$110,000
$90,000
Amount
Berry
Latham
Latham
Boswell
Latham
Simpson
Berry
Poe (TX)
Miller, Gary; Baca; Tauscher
Moran (VA)
Thompson (MS)
DeLauro
Abercrombie; Hirono
Green, Gene; Green, Al
Poe (TX)
Requester(s)
232
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00233
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Miami Dade College North Campus, Miami, FL
Men of Valor Academy, Oakland, CA
Men Aspiring Leaders through Education, Inc.,
Houston, TX
Mattie Rhodes Center, Kansas City, MO
Maryland State Police, Pikesville, MD
Lucas County TASC, Inc., Toledo, Ohio, OH
Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, Leesburg, VA
Local Initiatives Support Corporation, New York, NY
LIGALY, Bayshore, NY
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Las
Vegas, NV
Lane County Administration, Eugene, OR
Kokomo Police Department, Kokomo, IN
King of Kings Foundation, Jamaica, NY
King County Sheriff, Seattle, WA
Justice 2000, Inc., Milwaukee, WI
Joiner, AR Police Department, Joiner, AR
Johnson County Sheriff, Cleburne, TX
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY
Jefferson County Sheriff, Fayette, MS
Officer Tactical Facility Enhancements
Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Center for Building
Our Community Green
M.A.L.E. Reentry Program
Latino Youth Crime Prevention Project
Gang Elimination Task Force
Reentry Coalition Of Northwest Ohio
Northern Virginia Regional Gang Task Force
LISC Community Safety Initiative
The Anti-Violence Project
Information Sharing and Analysis Tools for the Las
Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Offender Treatment and Transition Program
Kokomo Police Department Forensic Crime Lab
Anti-Drug & Anti-Gang Warriors Program
King County Gang Intervention Initiative
Community justice centers
Law enforcement programs and equipment
Stop the Offender Program
National Academy for Reentry Policy and Practice
County-wide law enforcement programs
$200,000
$100,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$3,000,000
$225,000
$500,000
$325,000
$500,000
$100,000
$290,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
Meek (FL)
Lee (CA)
Green, Al
Cleaver
Ruppersberger
Kaptur
Wolf; Connolly (VA); Moran (VA)
Oberstar; Langevin; Conyers
Israel
Berkley; Titus
DeFazio
Donnelly (IN)
Meeks (NY)
McDermott
Moore (WI)
Berry
Edwards (TX)
Rangel; Towns; Engel
Thompson (MS)
233
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00234
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Nassau County Executive, Mineola, NY
My Home, Your Home Inc., Milwaukee, WI
Multnomah County, OR, Portland, OR
Multi-County Juvenile Attention System (MCJAS),
Canton, OH
MTSU, Murfreesboro, TN
Montgomery YMCA, Montgomery, AL
Monroe County Department of Public Safety, Rochester, NY
Monroe County Department of Public Safety, Rochester, NY
Monmouth County Sheriff, Freehold, NJ
Mississippi Military Department, Jackson, MS
Minot State University, Minot, ND
Minnesota State Patrol, St. Paul, MN
Family Court Technology Improvements
Lissy’s Place
Multnomah County (OR) Department of Community
Justice Re-Entry Services
Tuscarawas Attention Center Project
Training of Law Enforcement Personnel
Cleveland Avenue YMCA
Monroe County Regional Crime Laboratory
Biology/DNA Module
Trunk Radio System
Regional Counterdrug Training Academy
Rural Methamphetamine Education Project
MN 8th District State Patrol In-Squad Digital Cameras
Legal services outreach, internet upgrade and immigration services
Mortgage Fraud Task Force
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Micronesian Legal Services Corporation, Saipan, MP
Miami-Dade County, Miami, FL
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$235,000
$180,000
$500,000
$275,000
$625,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$120,000
$300,000
$350,000
$240,000
$180,000
$150,000
Amount
McCarthy (NY)
Moore (WI)
Blumenauer; Wu
Space
Gordon (TN)
Bright
Maffei
Slaughter
Holt
Harper
Pomeroy
Oberstar
Sablan
Meek (FL); Diaz-Balart, Mario; Wasserman Schultz; DiazBalart, Lincoln
Requester(s)
234
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00235
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Office of the Queens County District Attorney, Kew
Gardens, NY
Office of the King’s County District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY
Office of Human Affairs, Newport News, VA
NYC Police Foundation, New York, NY
Northwest Missouri Interagency Team Response
Operation, Cameron, MO
Northampton Community College, Bethlehem, PA
North Arlington Borough, North Arlington, NJ
New Man Development Community Corporation,
Rehrersburg, PA
New Jersey Department of Children and Families,
Trenton, NJ
Nevada Department of Public Safety Parole and
Probation, Carson City, NV
National Forensic Science Technology Center,
Largo, FL
National District Attorneys Association, Alexandria,
VA
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges, Reno, NV
Nassau County Police Department, Mineola, NY
Specialized Effort to Combat Financial Crimes and
Mortgage Fraud
ComALERT Project
Visual and Performing Arts After School Program,
Newport News, VA
Project COPE
Multi-Jurisdictional Drug and Violent Offender Task
Force
Campus-Wide Security System
Cops in Schools and Cops on the Street
Employment Preparation Project at New Man Development Community Corporation
Child Forensic Interviewers for Child Advocacy Centers
State of Nevada, Parole and Probation Technological Advancement and Improvement
National Forensic Science Technology Center, Forensic Technology Center of Excellence
National Advocacy Center State and Local Prosecutors Training Program
Child Abuse Training Programs for Judicial Personnel: Victims Act Model Courts Project
Heroin Abatement Program
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$500,000
$200,000
$300,000
$100,000
$25,000
$100,000
$150,000
$2,000,000
$150,000
$1,875,000
$385,000
Weiner
Weiner
Scott (VA)
McMahon
Graves
Kanjorski
Rothman (NJ)
Coble
Holt; Pascrell
Titus
Young (FL)
Kratovil; Ruppersberger; Spratt; Aderholt; Rothman (NJ)
Granger; Titus; Conyers; Honda; Grijalva; McDermott;
Berkley
King (NY)
235
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00236
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Account
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
Peralta Community College District, Oakland, CA
Penobscot County Sheriff, Bangor, ME
Pennyrile Narcotic Task Force, Hopkinsville, KY
PAX/Real Solutions to Gun Violence, New York, NY
Parents for Megan, Stony Brook, NY
Oriana House, Inc., Akron, OH
Oregon Partnership, Portland, OR
Orange County Human Trafficking Task Force,
Westminster, CA
Operation UNITE, Somerset, KY
Operation Our Town, Altoona, PA
Oldham County Sheriff’s Office, LaGrange, KY
Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, OH
Oglala Sioux Tribe Department of Public Safety,
Pine Ridge, SD
Oakland Center for Public Safety at Merritt College
Sheriff Taskforce to collaborate with Maine schools
in a comprehensive multi-hazard interoperable
response plan
Law Enforcement Programs and Equipment
SPEAK UP Hotline and Awareness Campaign Access
Expansion
Institute Sex Offender Registration Tips (SORT) and
Support Programs
Misdemeanant Facility
Rx for Saving Oregon Teens
Victim and Outreach Services Enhancements
Narcotics Law Enforcement & Interdiction, Education and Deterrence
Drug Treatment and Prevention
Equipment Upgrades, Oldham County Sheriff, KY
University Of Toledo and Ohio Attorney General Forensic Crime Lab
Law Enforcement Programs
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$125,000
$250,000
$750,000
$240,000
$300,000
$100,000
$470,000
$220,000
$4,450,000
$300,000
$75,000
$100,000
$165,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Lee (CA)
Michaud
Whitfield
Pascrell; McCarthy (NY)
Israel; Bishop (NY); King (NY)
Ryan (OH); Sutton
Walden; Wu
Sanchez, Loretta
Rogers (KY)
Shuster
Davis (KY)
Kaptur
Herseth Sandlin
236
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00237
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX
Salem Police Department, Salem, MA
Saginaw County Sheriff, Saginaw, MI
Safe Streets Campaign, Tacoma, WA
Sacramento Police Department, Sacramento, CA
Rockdale County Sheriff’s Office, Rockdale County,
GA
Rio Hondo College, Whittier, CA
Ready Willing & Able, Philadelphia, PA
Puyallup Tribe of Indians, Tacoma, WA
Providence Police Department, Providence, RI
Portage County Commissioners, Adult Probabtion
Department, Ravenna, OH
Phoenix House, Springfield, MA
Phoenix House, NY, New York, NY
Philadelphia Safety Net, Philadelphia,, PA
Persad Center, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
Perry Police Department, Perry, FL
Sam Houston State University Regional Crime Laboratory
Regional Approach to Law Enforcement Technology
Services
Facilitating Justice Information Sharing
Pierce County Regional Gang Prevention Partnership, Safe Streets Campaign
Sacramento Police Department Cold Case Justice
Project
Rockdale County Sheriff’s Office—Gang Intervention Project
Regional Homeland Security Training Center Initiative
Ready Willing & Able Philadelphia Program
Puyallup Justice Center Project
Providence Gun Violence and Gang Reduction Initiative
Community Integration and Socialization Program
Drug Treatment Technology Enhancement Initiative
Drug Treatment Technology Project
Safety Net Program
Community Safe Zone
Perry Police Department Canine Program
$1,000,000
$250,000
$280,000
$500,000
$100,000
$250,000
$300,000
$200,000
$400,000
$500,000
$200,000
$500,000
$500,000
$300,000
$150,000
$105,000
Brady (TX)
Tierney
Kildee
Dicks; Smith (WA)
Matsui
Johnson (GA); Scott (GA)
Napolitano; Miller, Gary; Schiff
Fattah
Smith (WA)
Kennedy
Ryan (OH)
Neal
Rangel
Fattah
Doyle
Boyd
237
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00238
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Account
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
St. Thomas University, Miami Gardens, FL
Southwest Tennessee Community College, Memphis, TN
Southeast Missouri Network Against Sexual Violence, Cape Girardeau, MO
South Western Judicial Circuit Family Violence
Council, Inc., Americus, GA
Sisters of Charity, Columbia, SC
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate, Agency Village, SD
Shelby Township Police Department, Shelby Township, MI
Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) Center, Anchorage, AK
Saving Our Seeds, Chicago, IL
Sanctuary, Inc., Guam, Chalan Pago, GU
San Jose State University Research Foundation,
San Jose, CA
San Francisco District Attorney, San Francisco, CA
San Diego Second Chance Program, San Diego, CA
Human Trafficking Initiative
Forensic Science Program
Enhanced Victim Assistance
Domestic Violence Advocate
Jobs Not Jail: An Alternative to Incarceration
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Transition Assistance
Law Enforcement Programs, Prosecution, Drug
Treatment and Enforcement Programs
Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) Center
Life Skills Program
Sanctuary, Inc., Guam At-Risk Youth Services Programs
Community Collaborative Response to Victims of
Domestic Violence
San Francisco Reentry Center
Second Chance Prisoner Reentry Employment Program
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$500,000
$100,000
$200,000
$75,000
$265,000
$110,000
$200,000
$400,000
$51,000
$150,000
$440,000
$750,000
$400,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Ros-Lehtinen; Wasserman Schultz
Cohen
Emerson
Bishop (GA)
Spratt
Herseth Sandlin
Miller (MI)
Young (AK)
Davis (IL)
Bordallo
Lofgren, Zoe; Honda
Pelosi
Filner
238
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00239
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Police
Department,
Sterling
HR149
The Criminal Justice Training Center, Golden West
College, Huntington Beach, CA
The City of Center Point, Center Point, AL
The City of Belton, Texas, Belton, TX
Texas State University—San Marcos, San Marcos,
TX
Texas Engineering Extension Service, College Station, TX
Texas Border Sheriffs Coalition, El Paso, TX
Taylor County Sheriff, Medford, WI
Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX
Tallahassee Community College, Tallahassee, FL
Tahirih Justice Center, Falls Church, VA
Synergy Services, Parkville, MO
Survivors, Inc., Gettysburg, PA
Superior Police Department, Superior, WI
Suffolk County Police Department, Yaphank, NY
Stetston University College of Law, Gulfport, FL
Sterling Heights
Heights, MI
Virtual Interactive Training Simulator
Center Point Community Policing Project
Belton, Texas First Responder Equipment, Technology and Interoperability Upgrades
Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training (ALERRT)
Forensic Science Academy
Operation Linebacker
Law Enforcement Technology
Tarleton State University Rural Law Enforcement
Project
Florida Public Safety Institute
Immigrant Women and Girls Legal Services
Community Response to Domestic Violence
Legal Advocacy and Hotline Project
Forensic Technology Task Force
Suffolk County, NY, Police Department Computer
Crimes Initiative
National Clearing House for Science, Technology
and the Law
Law Enforcement Programs, Prosecution, Drug
Treatment and Enforcement Programs
$900,000
$200,000
$700,000
$1,300,000
$300,000
$4,850,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$245,000
$500,000
$140,000
$25,000
$550,000
$250,000
$400,000
$300,000
Rohrabacher
Davis (AL)
Carter
Conaway; Granger; Edwards (TX); Smith (TX); Johnson,
Eddie Bernice
Edwards (TX)
Culberson
Obey
Carter
Boyd; Crenshaw
Moran (VA)
Graves
Platts
Obey
Bishop (NY); King (NY)
Young (FL)
Miller (MI)
239
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00240
Fmt 6659
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Account
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
United Way for Southeastern Michigan, Detroit, MI
Uintah County, Vernal, UT
Turning Point, Inc., Woodstock, IL
Township of North Brunswick, North Brunswick, NJ
Town of Greenburgh Adult Drug Treatment Court,
Greenburgh, NY
Toledo Fair Housing Council, Toledo Ohio, OH
Thiel College, Greenville, PA
The Women’s Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX
The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
The St. Petersburg College, St. Petersburg, FL
The PROGRAM for Offenders, Pittsburgh, PA
The Doe Fund, Inc., New York, NY
Project
Binational Migration Institute
United Way for Southeastern Michigan Ex-Offender
Reentry Program
Uintah County Drug Court
Law Enforcement Advocacy Partnership (LEAP)
North Brunswick Video Surveillance Program
Town of Greenburgh, NY, Adult Drug Court Treatment Program
Predatory Lending Program
Thiel College Community Police Partnership
Emergency Shelter Project
Texas Cyber Security Research and Training Institute
Model State Partnership for Cybercrime and Security
St. Petersburg College National Terrorism Preparedness Institute
Family Reunification Project
Ready, Willing & Able
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$300,000
$200,000
$300,000
$185,000
$50,000
$125,000
$500,000
$200,000
$529,000
$500,000
$1,500,000
$100,000
$600,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Grijalva
Conyers
Matheson
Bean
Holt
Lowey
Kaptur
Dahlkemper
Doyle
Gohmert
Aderholt
Young (FL)
Doyle
Nadler (NY); Towns; Maloney
240
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00241
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Weathersfield Township Trustees, Mineral Ridge,
OH
Wayne State University, Detorit, MI
Wayne County Sheriff, Fairfield, IL
Wayne County Prosecutor, Detroit, MI
Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Washington County, Oregon, Hillsboro, OR
Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC
Voorhees College, Denmark, SC
Village of Southern View, Springfield, IL
Village of Downers Grove, Downers Grove, IL
Ventura County Sheriff, Ventura, CA
Ventura County District Attorney, Ventura, CA
University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA
University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
University of Mississippi School of Law, University,
MS
University of Maryland Public Safety Training and
Technical Assistance Program, Greenbelt, MD
Weathersfield OH Regional Interoperable Communication Project
Prisoner Re-Entry Program
Equipment and Supplies for Wayne County Sheriff
The Wayne County Mortgage Fraud Team
Washington State University Center for the Study of
Addiction: Methamphetamine, Prescription, and
Other Drugs of Abuse
Washington County (OR) Drug Court
Public Safety for Growing Region
Domestic Violence Against Women
Southern View Police Training and Equipment
Internet Safety Programs
Regional Gang Unit—Forensic Scientists
DNA Cold Case Prosecution Unit
University of West Georgia K-12 School Safety and
Emergency Response Initiative
Ohio Trafficking in Persons Study Group
National Center for Justice and the Rule of Law
Prince George’s County-Montgomery County Gang
Prevention and Suppression Task Force
$495,000
$250,000
$100,000
$250,000
$500,000
$300,000
$300,000
$250,000
$100,000
$5,000
$80,000
$570,000
$250,000
$250,000
$600,000
$2,700,000
Ryan (OH)
Kilpatrick (MI)
Shimkus
Dingell
McMorris Rodgers
Wu
Price (NC); Miller (NC); Etheridge
Clyburn
Shimkus
Biggert
Gallegly; Capps
Gallegly
Gingrey (GA)
Kaptur
Childers
Van Hollen; Hoyer; Edwards (MD)
241
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00242
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
OJP—Byrne
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—Byrne
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
A Place Called Home, Los Angeles, CA
Zero to Three, Washington, DC
YWCA Silicon Valley, San Jose, CA
YWCA of Silicon Valley, San Jose, CA
YWCA of Madison, Madison, WI
YWCA of Greater Toledo, Toledo, OH
YWCA of Greater Flint, Flint, MI
YWCA of Greater Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
Wilmington Police Department, Wilmington, OH
Whatcom County, Bellingham, WA
Health, Nutrition and Well-being Program
New Haven Court Team for Maltreated Infants and
Toddlers
Human Trafficking Victim Support Center
YWCA Rape Crisis Center
Community of Opportunity At-Risk Youth Initiative
Enhancing Programs for At-Risk Youth and Domestic Violence Survivors
Partners in Transition Program for At-Risk Young
Women
NIA: A Program to Promote Self-Sufficiency for AtRisk Young Women Aging Out of Foster Care
Wilmington Police Department—Equipment Replacement and Modernization project
Whatcom County Rapid Border Prosecution Initiative
Expanded Building a Bridge to Improve Student
Success At-Risk Youth Project
West Virginia University Technology Design Initiative
West Virginia University Identification Technology
Research and Transition Center (CiTeR)
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$300,000
$300,000
$450,000
$200,000
$150,000
$125,000
$600,000
$100,000
$140,000
$430,000
$100,000
$500,000
$500,000
Amount
Becerra
DeLauro
Honda
Eshoo
Baldwin
Kaptur
Kildee
Fudge
Turner
Larsen (WA)
Murphy (CT)
Mollohan
Mollohan
Requester(s)
242
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00243
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Bolder Options, Minneapolis, MN
Big Brothers of Rhode Island, East Providence, RI
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Will and Grundy County,
Joliet, IL
Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation of New Jersey,
Parsippany, NJ
Berkshire South Regional Community Center, Great
Barrington, MA
Beaver County Minority Coalition, Beaver Falls, PA
Bay County Neighborhood Resource Center/Bay Regional Medical Center, Bay City, MI
Barron County Restorative Justice Inc., Rice Lake,
WI
Bardavon 1869 Opera House, Inc. (UCCC), Poughkeepsie, NY
Aztecs Rising, Los Angeles, CA
Art Center of the Grand Prairie, Stuttgart, AR
An Achievable Dream, Inc., Newport News, VA
Alameda County Social Services, Oakland, CA
Academy School of Careers, El Paso, TX
Abraham House, Bronx, NY
ABC Unified School District, Cerritos, CA
Bolder Options Replication and Expansion
Mentorship Program for At-Risk Children
Expansion of One to One Mentoring Services for AtRisk Children in Will and Grundy Counties
New Jersey Mentoring Initiative
Action Adventures Out-of-School Anti-Bullying
Project, southern Berkshire County
Beaver County Juvenile Justice Program
Bay County Neighborhood Resource Center
Anti-Truancy Initiative
OJJDP In-School Residency and Community Outreach Support for At-Risk Youth
Aztecs Rising Gang Intervention Program
Grand Prairie Arts Initiative
An Achievable Dream Academy
Family Visitation Center
Project Salud
Abraham House Programs for At-Risk Youth
Hawaiian Gardens Gang Prevention/Drop Out Intervention Program
$300,000
$100,000
$185,000
$400,000
$135,000
$100,000
$200,000
$230,000
$100,000
$225,000
$155,000
$600,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
Ellison
Kennedy
Halvorson
LoBiondo; Payne; Pallone; Sires
Olver
Altmire
Kildee
Obey
Hinchey
Becerra
Berry
Wittman; Scott (VA)
Stark
Reyes
Serrano
Sanchez, Linda
243
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00244
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
of
Rutherford
County,
HR149
Calhoun County Family Connection, Edison, GA
Cabrini College, Wayne, PA
Building Toward Wellness Community Coalition
Inc., Columbus, GA
Brown Memorial Baptist Church, Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn Academy of Music, Brooklyn, NY
Bronx Council on the Arts, Inc., Bronx, NY
Bronx Cluster of Settlement Houses, Bronx, NY
Brick Township Police Athletic League, Brick, NJ
Boys Town, Louisiana, New Orleans, LA
Boys and Girls Club of Worcester, MA, Worcester,
MA
Youth-Senior Partnership Program
Fostering Community Partnerships for Justice: Domestic Violence Education for Pre-Service and
Practicing Professionals
Positive Steps After School Program
MLK Strivers After School Program
BAM Brooklyn Youth Initiatives
BCA Bronx WritersCorps: Youth Development/Delinquency Prevention
Bronx Cluster Youth Development
Brick PAL After-School and Kids Camp Program
Expansion of Boys Town Louisiana Projects
Gang Prevention Through Targeted Outreach Program
Life Skills Development Program for At-risk Youth
Project Learn
Building Futures Educational Initiative
Bolder Options Rochester expansion
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley, Monterey Park, CA
Boys & Girls Club
Murfreesboro, TN
Boston Urban Youth Foundation, Roxbury, MA
Bolder Options, Minneapolis, MN
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$75,000
$100,000
$75,000
$150,000
$200,000
$150,000
$350,000
$250,000
$147,000
$350,000
$75,000
$150,000
$250,000
$100,000
Amount
Bishop (GA)
Sestak; Gerlach
Bishop (GA)
Towns
Clarke; Towns
Serrano
Engel
Smith (NJ)
Scalise; Melancon; Cao
McGovern
Schiff
Gordon (TN)
Capuano
Walz
Requester(s)
244
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00245
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
City of East Palo Alto, East Palo Alto, CA
City of Chino, Chino, CA
City of Cairo, Cairo, GA
City of Baltimore Police Department, Baltimore, MD
City of Alexandria, Alexandria, VA
Children and Families First Delaware, Wilmington,
DE
Childhelp, Phoenix, AZ
Childhelp, Flagstaff, AZ
ChildHelp River Bridge Center, Glenwood Springs,
CO
Childhelp of East Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Chapel Hill Missionary Baptist Church, Detroit, MI
Chabad of the Valley, Tarzana, CA
Chabad of San Jose, Los Gatos, CA
Centinela Youth Services, Inc, Hawthorne, CA
CASA serving Lancaster, Monterey Park, CA
CAPPA, Inc. (Community Alliance for Progressive
Positive Action), Williamsport, PA
East Palo Alto Violence Prevention Initiative
City of Chino—Chino Experience Teen Center
Holder Park Youth Resource Center After-school
Program
Baltimore City Juvenile Screening and Diversion
Program
Youth Building Green
Functional Family Therapy for At-Risk Youth
Childhelp Children’s Center-expansion of services
Childhelp Mobile Advocacy Center of Northern Arizona
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment in Garfield,
Pitkin and Rio Blanco Counties
Child Abuse Treatment in Knox County
Chapel Hill Children and Youth Art Center
Prevention, Resource, Information and Drug Education (PRIDE) Project
Prevention, Resource, Information and Drug Education Project
Parent Efficacy Program
Court Appointed Special Advocates Program
CAPPA Youth Intervention and Development Project:
Creating Solutions
$200,000
$150,000
$75,000
$200,000
$200,000
$120,000
$100,000
$300,000
$300,000
$250,000
$500,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$300,000
$350,000
Eshoo
Miller, Gary
Bishop (GA)
Ruppersberger
Moran (VA)
Castle
Pastor (AZ)
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Salazar
Duncan
Kilpatrick (MI)
Sherman
Honda
Waters
McKeon
Carney
245
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00246
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Community Connections, Inc., Bluefield, WV
City Parks Foundation, New York, NY
City of Wilson, North Carolina, Wilson, NC
City of Victorville, Victorville, CA
City of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA
City of Rochester, City of Rochester, NY
City of Richmond, Virginia, Richmond, VA
City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program, Philadelphia, PA
City of Pasadena, Pasadena, CA
City of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
City of Las Cruces, Las Cruces, NM
City of Jacksonville, FL, Jacksonville, FL
City of Hartford Police Department, Hartford, CT
City of Garfield, Garfield, NJ
City of Gadsden, Gadsden, AL
Southern West Virginia Community Coalition Outreach and SADD Outreach Campaign
City Parks Foundation Park Activity Expansion
Wilson Gang Prevention Initiative
Uturn Gang Prevention Strategy
City of Sacramento Attendance Centers
After-School Jobs Program for At-Risk Youth
Targeted High-Risk Youth Achievement Program,
Richmond, Va
Restorative Justice Project
Neighborhood Outreach Workers (NOW) Program
Youth Career Academy
Juvenile Justice and Law Enforcement After School
Program
At-Risk Youth Intervention Initiative
Truancy Reduction Program
School Resource Officer Program (Cops In School)
Helping Families Program
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$187,000
$200,000
$100,000
$82,000
$280,000
$200,000
$200,000
$100,000
$250,000
$300,000
$250,000
$1,250,000
$300,000
$100,000
$250,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Rahall
McMahon; Engel; Rangel
Butterfield
McKeon
Matsui
Slaughter
Scott (VA)
Fattah
Schiff
Richardson
Teague
Crenshaw; Brown, Corrine
Larson (CT)
Rothman (NJ)
Aderholt
246
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00247
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Economic Opportunity Council, Wyandanch, NY
Dutchess Community College, Poughkeepsie, NY
Dooly County Community Coalition/Family Connection, Vienna, GA
Devereux, King of Prussia, PA
Devereux Kids Florida, Ocala, FL
Delaware Mentoring Council, Newark, DE
Dauphin County Human Service Director, Harrisburg, PA
Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch, Minot, ND
D.A.R.E. New Jersey, Inc., Cranbury, NJ
Crawford Counseling and Community Learning
Center, Roberta, GA
Covenant House of Florida, Orlando, FL
Covenant House Georgia, Inc, Atlanta, GA
Court Appointed Special Advocate, Monterey Park,
CA
Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA), Monterey
Park, CA
Save Our Youth Violence Prevention After School
Program
At-risk Youth Education and Training Programs
Delinquency Prevention
Program-Wide Positive Behavior Support for At-Risk
Youth
Devereux Kids abuse and neglect prevention program
Mentoring Initiatives for At-Risk Children and
Youth
Family Group Conferencing Community Expansion
Project
High-Risk Youth Program
Middle School Drug and Safety Prevention Project
Parenting and Life Choices Program/Employee Assistance Program
Parent Education and Health Support Program
Covenant House Georgia Rights of Passage Transitional Living Program
Court Appointed Special Advocate Program for Infants and Toddlers
Court Appointed Special Advocates Recruitment for
38th District
$300,000
$400,000
$75,000
$100,000
$200,000
$750,000
$300,000
$200,000
$350,000
$50,000
$200,000
$100,000
$375,000
$200,000
Israel
Hinchey
Bishop (GA)
Sestak
Stearns
Castle
Holden
Pomeroy
Smith (NJ); Pascrell; LoBiondo; Payne
Bishop (GA)
Grayson
Lewis (GA)
Roybal-Allard
Napolitano
247
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00248
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
Gang Alternatives Program, Los Angeles, CA
Four Oaks Family Services & Benton/Iowa County
Decategorization Project, Marengo, IA
Fountain Avenue Community Development Corporation, Brooklyn, NY
Forsyth County, North Carolina, Winston-Salem, NC
Forever Family, Fort Lauderdale, FL
Focus: HOPE, Detroit, MI
Florida Venture Foundation, Miami, FL
First Gethsemane Center for Family Development,
Louisville, KY
FC Harlem, New York, NY
Fairfax Childhelp Center, Fairfax, VA
Enough is Enough, Great Falls, VA
El Museo del Barrio, New York, NY
Eden Housing, Hayward, CA
Gang Alternatives Program for Southeast Los Angeles County
Benton/Iowa County After-school Program and
Functional Family Therapy Initiative
After school program
Gang and Delinquency Prevention Initiative
Forever Family Child Safety and Adoption Initiative
Focus: HOPE Youth Media Initiative
Youth Build Development Strategies
Reducing Barriers to Success for At-risk Youth
Lion Share Youth Development Program
Providing specialized care and treatment for child
abuse victims
Maryland Internet Safety 101: Empowering Parents
Program
El Museo del Barrio’s Bronx Educational Programs
for At-Risk Youth
Digital Connectors At-Risk Youth Program Expansion
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$135,000
$100,000
$100,000
$450,000
$400,000
$100,000
$400,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$250,000
$100,000
$575,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Sanchez, Linda
Boswell
Towns
Watt
Hastings (FL); Wasserman Schultz; Wexler
Conyers
Diaz-Balart, Lincoln
Yarmuth
Rangel
Connolly (VA)
Bartlett; Ruppersberger; Sarbanes
Serrano
Stark; Lee (CA); Tauscher; McNerney
248
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00249
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Hoops Express, Inc., Newburgh, NY
Holy Cross Children’s Services, Clinton, MI
Hollenbeck Police Activities League, Los Angeles,
CA
Hillside Family of Agencies, Rochester, NY
Hillside Family of Agencies, Hillside Work-Scholarship Connection, Syracuse, NY
Hillside Family of Agencies, Greenbelt, MD
Highland Park Community Development Corporation, Brooklyn, NY
Hartford Behaviorial Health, Inc., Hartford, CT
Harlem RBI, Inc., New York, NY
Green Bay YWCA, Green Bay, WI
Governor’s Prevention Partnership, Hartford, CT
Good Shepherd Services, New York, NY
GMHC, New York City, NY
Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, NY
Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas, San Antonio, TX
Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles, Arcadia, CA
Helping Our People Excel Project
Edward J. Overstreet Center for Excellence in Children’s Services
Hollenbeck PAL-Youth Crime Prevention
Workforce Development Initiative for Youth AgingOut of Foster Care
Hillside Work-Scholarship Connection (HW-SC) Syracuse Program Expansion
Hillside Family of Agencies, Hillside Work-Scholarship Connection
Values Education Through Cooperative Activities
Program
The Stump the Violence Youth Leadership Institute
Youth Development through Year-Round Sports and
Teams
Green Bay YWCA After-School Programs
Prevention Initiative for At-Risk Youth
Afterschool programming for at-risk youth
Protecting Health and Building a Prosperous Future
for At-Risk Youth in New York City
Girl Scouts Beyond Bars
VIVA Texas
VIVA California
$250,000
$225,000
$250,000
$100,000
$300,000
$100,000
$300,000
$300,000
$100,000
$600,000
$300,000
$250,000
$1,500,000
$1,350,000
$350,000
$115,000
Hinchey
Kilpatrick (MI); Levin
Roybal-Allard
Arcuri
Maffei
Edwards (MD)
Towns
Larson (CT)
Rangel
Kagen
Larson (CT)
Velazquez
Rangel; Nadler (NY); Weiner; Towns; Meeks (NY); Engel;
Clarke
Kennedy; Abercrombie; Rush; Ruppersberger
Gonzalez; Green, Gene
Becerra
249
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00250
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
KidsPeace, West Seneca, NY
KidsPeace, Indianapolis, IN
KidsPeace, Altamonte Springs, FL
Kidsbridge, Trenton, NJ
Kentler International Drawing Space Inc., Brooklyn,
NY
Juvenile Justice Center, Little Rock, AR
Jobs for Ohio, Columbus, OH
Jackson County Court Appointed Special Advocates,
Kansas City, MO
i-SAFE, Inc., Carlsbad, CA
Institute for the Study and Practice of Non-violence, Providence, RI
Improved Solutions for Urban Systems (ISUS), Dayton, OH
Human Development Commission, Caro, MI
HoustonWorks USA, Houston, TX
KidsPeace Ithaca Therapeutic Foster Care Program
KidsPeace Evansville Therapeutic Foster Care Program
KidsPeace Florida Therapeutic Foster Care Program
Kidsbridge Life Skills, Gang Resistance and Violence Prevention
K.I.D.S. Art Education Program
Child Maltreatment and Delinquency Project
Jobs for Ohio’s Graduates Dropout Prevention Initiative
Legal Child Advocate Program
i-SAFE e-Safety Education and Outreach Initiative
Nonviolence Program
Improved Solutions for Urban Systems—21st Century Jobs for Disengaged Youth
Generations
The Juvenile Justice Initiative
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$200,000
$200,000
$90,000
$100,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
$630,000
$300,000
$860,000
$100,000
$400,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Hinchey
Ellsworth
Mica
Smith (NJ)
Velazquez
Snyder
Sutton
Cleaver
Shimkus; Kilroy; Young (AK); Kennedy; Pomeroy; Grijalva;
Berkley
Langevin; Kennedy
Turner
Kildee
Green, Gene; Jackson-Lee (TX); Green, Al
250
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00251
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Community
Center,
Beaver
Miller County New Vision Coalition, Inc., Colquitt,
GA
Middlecreek Area
Springs, PA
Men Engaged in Nonviolence, Inc, Taos, NM
Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, Baltimore, MD
Mary Mitchell Family and Youth Center, Inc., Bronx,
NY
Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom Center, Oakland, CA
Main Line Chinese Culture Center, Inc. (MLCCC),
Wynnewood, PA
M.L. Wilson Boys & Girls Club of Harlem, New York,
NY
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule, SD
Long Beach Community College District, Long
Beach, CA
Laughlin Community Center, Inc., Wheeling, WV
LACER, Los Angeles, CA
LA County—Deparment of Children and Family
Services, Los Angeles, CA
Klingberg Family Centers, Hartford, CT
KidsVoice, Pittsburgh, PA
Too Good for Drugs After-School Program
Linkages Mentoring Program and Youth Aid Panel
Men Engaged in Nonviolence Activities Program
Maryland Civic Justice Corps
Mary Mitchell Family and Youth Center: Ongoing
Programs for At-Risk Youth
Youth Non-Violent Leadership Program
Preparing Philadelphia
Career Launch/Club Service
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Boys and Girls Club
Business Training for At-Risk Youth in WattsWillowbrook
Laughlin Community Center Science and Mathematics Excellence Program
At the Park After Dark
Independent Living Program, San Gabriel Valley
Klingberg Child Abuse Treament Services
Child Advocacy Program
$80,000
$100,000
$24,000
$200,000
$250,000
$250,000
$100,000
$100,000
$300,000
$100,000
$70,000
$75,000
$250,000
$400,000
$500,000
Bishop (GA)
Carney
Lujan
Sarbanes; Cummings
Serrano
Lee (CA)
Brady (PA)
Rangel
Herseth Sandlin
Sanchez, Linda
Mollohan
Becerra
Schiff
Larson (CT)
Murphy, Tim; Doyle
251
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00252
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
North Alabama Child Maltreatment Collaborative,
Huntsville, AL
New York Junior Tennis League, Woodside, NY
New York City Outward Bound Center, Inc., Long
Island City, NY
New Orleans Crime Coalition/New Orleans Business
Council, New Orleans, LA
New Mexico Sheriff and Police Athletic League, Albuquerque, NM
New Freedom Theater, Philadelphia, PA
National Council on Crime and Delinquency
(NCCD), Oakland, CA
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges, Reno, NV
National Child Protection Training Center at Winona State University, Winona, MN
My Turn Inc., Brockton, MA
Museum of the City of New York, New York, NY
Montana Youth and District Court Services Bureau,
Helena, MT
National Children’s Advocacy Center
Tennis, Sports, Literacy, and Education Programs
for High Risk New York City Young People from
Low-Income Families
At-Risk Students Program
New Orleans Crime Coalition
Anti-Gang Initiative and the Be a Fit Kid Health
Mentorship Program
Performing Arts Training Program (PATP)
Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Center for Asian
Pacific Islander Youth in Oakland
Judicial Training, Research & Technical Assistance
Child Protection Professionals Training
Out-of-School Youth Intervention Program
Out of School Time
MONTS-Juvenile Justice System
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$350,000
$100,000
$200,000
$1,500,000
$275,000
$100,000
$100,000
$600,000
$300,000
$200,000
$350,000
$600,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Griffith
Clarke
Maloney
Cao
Lujan
Fattah
Lee (CA)
Heller; Honda; Grijalva; Conyers; McDermott; Berkley;
DeLauro
Walz
McGovern
Maloney; Rangel
Rehberg
252
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00253
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Olive Crest Treatment Centers, Santa Ana, CA
Olive Crest—Pacific Northwest, Tacoma, WA
Old Bethel UMC, Charleston, SC
Ohio Assn of Police Athletic/Activities League, Euclid, OH
Ohel Children’s Home and Family Services, Miami
Beach, FL
Ohel Childrens Home and Family Services, Brooklyn, NY
Ohel Children’s Home & Family Services, Teaneck,
NJ
Ohel Children, New York, NY
Ogden City School District, Ogden, UT
Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA
Ocean Tides School, Narragansett, RI
Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition,
Bronx, NY
Northern Forest Canoe Trail, Waitsfield, VT
North East Florida Education Consortium, Palatka,
FL
North Carolina Mentoring Partnership, Raleigh, NC
Olive Crest Independent Living Skills for At-Risk
Youth
Push to Permanence Project
Bethel Community Outreach Program
Ohio Police Assn of Police Athletic/Activities League
Cops and Kids
At Risk Youth and Child Abuse Prevention Program
At Risk Youth and Child Abuse Prevention Program
Ohel At-Risk Youth and Child Abuse Prevention
Program
Ohel At-Risk Youth and Child Abuse Prevention
program
Ogden Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Initiative
Gang Prevention Coordination Program
School to Work Program
Sistas and Brothas (S&B) United Youth Leadership
Program
Northern Forest Explorers Outdoor Program
North East Florida Education Consortium Dropout
Prevention
North Carolina Mentoring Partnership: Mentoring
Programs for At-Risk Youth
$500,000
$500,000
$300,000
$200,000
$200,000
$350,000
$200,000
$250,000
$375,000
$100,000
$200,000
$100,000
$300,000
$450,000
$400,000
Calvert; Sanchez, Loretta; Bono Mack
Dicks
Clyburn
Ryan (OH)
Klein (FL); Wasserman Schultz; Ros-Lehtinen
Velazquez; Nadler (NY); Weiner; Engel; McCarthy (NY);
Clarke
Rothman (NJ)
Rangel
Bishop (UT)
Scott (VA)
Langevin
Serrano
Pingree (ME); Welch; Arcuri; McHugh
Boyd
Price (NC); Watt
253
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00254
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Philadelphia Teen Court, Philadelphia, PA
PEOPLE TO PEOPLE, Newport News, VA
Pemi Youth Center, Plymouth, NH
Pee Dee Boys and Girls Club, Florence, SC
Pawtucket Police Department, Pawtucket, RI
Patrick Henry Community College, Martinsville, VA
Pasadena Symphony Association, Pasadena, CA
PACE Center for Girls, Inc., Jacksonville, FL
Overtown Youth Center, Inc., Miami, FL
Outright Vermont, Burlington, VT
Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
Orangeburg Consolidated School District Five,
Orangeburg, SC
Orange Police Department, Orange, MA
Operation QT, Inc., Paradise Valley, AZ
Teen Court Program
PEOPLE TO PEOPLE Neighborhood Center Pilot
Project, Newport News, Virginia
Pemi Youth Center After School Program
At-risk youth intervention
Pawtucket at risk youth program
At Risk Youth Program
Music Access and Education for At-Risk Youth
PACEWorks!
At Risk Youth Program
Rural Vermont Bullying Initiative
Orlando Health Orange County Children’s Advocacy
Center Programs
Alternative Youth Education Program
Implementation of the Training Active Bystanders
Program and Enhancing Community Policing,
Athol, Orange, Fitchburg, Greenfield, Holyoke and
Pittsfield, MA
Operation Quality Time After School Program
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$200,000
$125,000
$400,000
$100,000
$300,000
$75,000
$400,000
$100,000
$100,000
$250,000
$500,000
$620,000
$300,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Fattah
Scott (VA)
Hodes
Clyburn
Kennedy
Perriello
Schiff
Wasserman Schultz; Brown, Corrine; Crenshaw
Meek (FL)
Welch
Grayson; Kosmas; Brown, Corrine
Clyburn
Olver
Pastor (AZ)
254
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00255
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Rocking the Boat, Inc., Bronx, NY
Richmond Police Activities League, Richmond, CA
Richmond Black Firefighters Association, Richmond, CA
Resurrection Health Care, Broadview, IL
Restoration Ministries, Harvey, IL
Ramsey County Community Corrections, St. Paul,
MN
Pulaski County Youth Services, Little Rock, AR
Project Rebound, Inc., Columbus, GA
Project Goal, Providence, RI
Project Avary (Alternative Ventures to At-Risk
Youth), Novato, CA
Polk County Sheriff, Bartow, FL
Police Athletic League, Toledo Ohio, OH
Police Athletic League, Norristown, PA
Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners,
Clearwater, FL
Phoenix Academy, Lake View Terrace, CA
Phoenix Academy of Orange County, Santa Ana, CA
RTB Education Programs for At-Risk Youth
Changing Habits, Attitudes & Mind Program
(CHAMP)
Richmond Youth Academy
Multi-Systemic Therapy Program
Project Intercept
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Youth Initiative to Encourage Learning and Development
Juvenile Diversion Program
Champions of Change/Project Goal
Building Skills and Capacity of Children of Prisoners
Polk County Gang Prevention Initiative
Police Athletic League Youth Center
Norristown Youth Program Support
Pinellas County At-Risk Youth Diversion Prevention
Project
Strengthening Family and Mental Health Services
for Underserved Youth in Los Angeles County
Strengthening Family and Substance Abuse Services for At-Risk Youth
$250,000
$390,000
$250,000
$210,000
$200,000
$560,000
$350,000
$250,000
$100,000
$125,000
$250,000
$300,000
$90,000
$300,000
$800,000
$230,000
Serrano
Miller, George
Miller, George
Gutierrez
Jackson (IL)
McCollum
Snyder
Bishop (GA)
Kennedy
Pelosi; Woolsey
Putnam
Kaptur
Gerlach
Young (FL); Castor (FL)
Sherman; Harman; Roybal-Allard; Berman
Sanchez, Loretta
255
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00256
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Siena College, Loudonville, NY
Sid Jacobson Jewish Community Center, East Hills,
NY
SGA Youth and Family Services, Chicago, IL
Sea Research Foundation, Mystic, CT
School District of Palm Beach County, West Palm
Beach, FL
School Biz Match, Inc., Washington, DC
Save the Children, Westport, CT
Save Our Future, Inc, Los Angeles, CA
Santa Clara County of Education, San Jose, CA
San Fernando Valley Partnership, Inc., San Fernando, CA
Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA
Safe Harbor Child Advocacy Center, Inc., Madison,
WI
Siena College At-Risk Youth Service Initiative
Youth Action After School Program
Juvenile Justice Program
Immersion Presents After School Program
Career Education for At-risk and Adjudicated Youth
Pilot program to be run in various sites in the District of Columbia within the business sector,
community-based operations and the school
district, including charter schools when appropriate.
Arkansas Rural Literacy Program
Save Our Future/Mothers On the March After-School
Program, Intervention & Enrichment
Information Network for Student Success
Chicas in Control and Succeeding
Saint Joseph’s University Institute for Violence Research and Prevention
Child Abuse Victim Services
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$200,000
$185,000
$100,000
$200,000
$200,000
$300,000
$300,000
$400,000
$450,000
$200,000
$195,000
Amount
Tonko
Ackerman
Gutierrez
Courtney; DeLauro
Wexler; Hastings (FL)
Norton
Berry
Watson
Honda
Berman
Brady (PA); Gerlach
Baldwin
Requester(s)
256
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00257
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
The After-School Corporation, New York, NY
Texas A&M Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX
Team Focus, Inc., Mobile, AL
Taylor County Family Matters Collaborative, Butler,
GA
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara,
San Jose, CA
Suffolk University, Boston, MA
State of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Starr Commonwealth Battle Creek Campus, Battle
Creek, MI
Starr Commonwealth, Detroit, MI
Starr Commonwealth—Van Wert, Van Wert, OH
Starfinder Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Fort Yates, ND
Sports Foundation, Inc., Bronx, NY
Southwest Georgia Humanitarian Rural Outreach,
Bainbridge, GA
South Central Community Services, Inc., Chicago,
IL
Soundview Community in Action, Bronx, NY
After School Apprenticeship Program (ASAP)
Texas A&M Adjudicated Youth Program
Birmingham Mentoring and Education Program
Taylor County After-School Program
Santa Clara County Delinquency Model Court
Juvenile Justice Center at Suffolk University
Gang Prevention and Intervention Services
Expansion of Starr Commonwealth Battle Creek
Parent-Referred Day Treatment Program
Bridges to Responsible Adulthood
Expansion of the Adolescent Delinqency Program
Youth Soccer Gang Prevention Initiative
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Child Protection Services
SFI Anti-Drug Programs for At-risk Youth, Bronx,
New York
Rural Outreach Program
SCCS, Inc. At-Risk Youth program
Outreach Programs for At-Risk Youth
$100,000
$250,000
$500,000
$145,000
$170,000
$250,000
$500,000
$300,000
$200,000
$500,000
$100,000
$350,000
$125,000
$75,000
$300,000
$300,000
Clarke
Ortiz
Bonner; Bachus
Bishop (GA)
Honda
Lynch
Ruppersberger
Schauer
Conyers; Kilpatrick (MI)
Latta
Fattah
Herseth Sandlin
Serrano
Bishop (GA)
Rush
Crowley
257
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00258
Fmt 6659
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, NY
The Women’s Sports Foundation, Atlanta, GA
The POINT Community Development Corporation,
Bronx, NY
The Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center, New
York, NY
The Manor, Jonesville, MI
The Friendship Circle, West Bloomfield, MI
The Family Center of Columbus, Inc., Columbus, GA
The Emily Krzyzewski Center, Durham, NC
The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven,
New Haven, CT
The City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT
The Bronx Comunity Pride Center, Bronx, NY
Anti-gang initiative for at-risk age groups
GoGirlGo! Atlanta Initiative
The POINT Community Development Corporation:Youth Development Program
Violence and Risky Behaviors Prevention
The Manor Children’s Safety and Security Updates
Project
Self-Determination Anti-Bullying in LifeTown (SAIL)
Project—Year 2
Family Disintegration Prevention and Assistance
Project
The Pioneer Scholars Program at the Emily
Krzyzewski Center in Durham, North Carolina
Interventions for Children and Families Exposed to
Violence and Trauma
Lighthouse After-School Program
BCPC: Youth Academic Programming
Armory Prep
Life-Management Skills Intervention/Re-entry Program for High Risk Youth
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
The Armory Track & Field Foundaiton, New York, NY
The ARISE Foundation, North Palm Beach, FL
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$100,000
$100,000
$150,000
$100,000
$200,000
$150,000
$200,000
$200,000
$500,000
$350,000
$200,000
$150,000
$550,000
Amount
Bishop (NY)
Lewis (GA)
Serrano
Rangel
Schauer
Peters
Bishop (GA)
Price (NC)
DeLauro
Himes
Serrano
Rangel
Hastings (FL); Kosmas; Diaz-Balart, Mario; Stearns;
Wexler; Brown, Corrine; Wasserman Schultz; Meek
(FL); Klein (FL); Ros-Lehtinen; Diaz-Balart, Lincoln
Requester(s)
258
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00259
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
HR149
Weld County Juvenile Assessment Center, Greeley,
CO
Wayne County Department of Children and Family
Services, Detroit, MI
Watson Children’s Shelter, Missoula, MT
Washington State Mentors, Issaquah, WA
Virginia Mentoring Partnership, Richmond, VA
Valley Youth House Committee, Inc., Allentown, PA
Urban Dreams, Des Moines, IA
University of Montana, Missoula, MT
University of Mobile, Mobile, AL
University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO
United Way of North Central Massachusetts, Fitchburg, MA
United Way of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA
United Way for Southeastern Michigan, Detroit, MI
United Methodist Children, Selma, AL
Uhlich Children, Chicago, IL
U.S. Soccer Foundation, Washington, DC
Turning the Hearts Center, Chula Vista, CA
Truancy Response and Intervention Program
Wayne County, Michigan Juvenile Mentoring Program
Western Montana Children’s Safety Initiative
Mentoring Initiative for At-Risk Youth
Mentoring Programs for At-Risk Youth
Adventure Challenge Education for Gang Prevention
(ACE)
Urban Children are Really Essential (U-CARE)
Montana Safe Schools
University of Mobile, AL RamKids Program
Colorado Schools Safety Program (CSSP)
Engaging Youth for Success
Youth Futures Commission
United Way Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program
Security and IT Improvements
Violence Prevention and Youth Leadership Program
Champions of Change: Youth Soccer Gang Prevention Initiative
Turning the Hearts Center Project
$245,000
$400,000
$500,000
$300,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$250,000
$850,000
$300,000
$350,000
$275,000
$250,000
$150,000
$100,000
$200,000
$100,000
Markey (CO)
Conyers; Dingell
Rehberg
Inslee; McDermott
Moran (VA); Nye
Dent
Boswell
Rehberg
Bonner
Polis
Olver
Doyle
Levin; Peters; Dingell
Bachus; Aderholt
Quigley
Roybal-Allard
Filner
259
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00260
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Account
OJP—JJ
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
HR149
YWCA Pasadena, Pasadena, CA
YWCA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Youth Power Center, Washington, DC
Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice, Bronx, NY
Youth and Tennis, Inc., Jamaica, NY
Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP), Charleston,
SC
York County Children’s Advocacy Center, York, PA
YMCA of Burbank, Burbank, CA
Yakima County, Yakima, WA
World Vision, Philippi, WV
Woodstock Film Festival, inc (WFF), Woodstock, NY
WNY Americorps, West Seneca, NY
Widener University, Chester, PA
Development and Education Program for At-risk
Girls
Project Empowerment
Youth Power Center Tutoring and Mentoring Program Expansion
Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice: Education
Programs for At-Risk Youth
Juvenile Deliquency Prevention
South Carolina Gang Initiative
SAFE Team
Youth Development and Government Program
Yakima County Gang Initiative
World Vision Appalachia at-risk youth programming
Woodstock Film Festival Youth Initiative / Youth at
Risk
WNY Americorps for Programs to Assist At-Risk
Youth
Widener University Delaware County Violence Prevention Collaborative
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$75,000
$100,000
$350,000
$250,000
$150,000
$250,000
$60,000
$45,000
$400,000
$250,000
$30,000
$200,000
$200,000
Amount
Schiff
Watson
Norton
Serrano
Meeks (NY)
Brown (SC)
Platts
Schiff
Hastings (WA)
Mollohan
Hinchey
Higgins
Brady (PA)
Requester(s)
260
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00261
Fmt 6659
CAS
NASA
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
CAS
CAS
NASA
NASA
CAS
CAS
NASA
NASA
CAS
NASA
CAS
CAS
NASA
NASA
CAS
NASA
CAS
NASA
CAS
OJP—JJ
DOJ
NASA
OJP—JJ
OJP—JJ
DOJ
DOJ
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
MTSU, Murfreesboro, TN
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda,
CA, CA
Fulton-Montgomery Community College, Johnstown,
NY
FOTO, Los Angeles, CA
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott
Campus, Prescott, AZ
Educational Advancement Alliance (EAA), Philadelphia,, PA
East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, PA
Drew University, Madison, NJ
CORE Philly, Philadelphia, PA
Baylor University, Waco, TX
Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership, Houston,
TX
ZERO TO THREE, Hattiesburg, MS
ZERO TO THREE, Douglasville, GA
Zero to Three, Cherokee, NC
Aviation Safety and Human Factors Research Using
Emerging Technologies
Space Radiation Health Research Program
Center for Engineering and Technology at FultonMontgomery Community College—Phase Two
Science Education Programming
NASA Educator Resource Center
Math Science and Technology (MST) Program
Marine Science Consortium Student-Faculty Research Collaborative with NASA Goddard Wallops
Flight Facility
Drew University Environmental Science Initiative
CORE Philly Scholarship Program
Advanced Composite Materials Research
Bay Area Houston SATOP
Court Teams for Maltreated Infants and Toddlers
ZERO TO THREE: Douglas County Court Team for
Maltreated Infants and Toddlers
Cherokee Court Team for Maltreated Infants and
Toddlers
$700,000
$2,800,000
$300,000
$200,000
$200,000
$1,000,000
$450,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$400,000
$1,000,000
$300,000
$100,000
$100,000
Gordon (TN)
Lewis (CA)
Tonko
Schiff
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Fattah
Kanjorski
Frelinghuysen
Fattah
Edwards (TX)
Paul
Taylor
Scott (GA)
Shuler
261
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
CAS
NASA
NASA
Frm 00262
Fmt 6659
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
CAS
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
NASA
CAS
CAS
PO 00000
NASA
CAS
NASA
Account
CAS
NASA
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Recipient
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Universtiy of Mississippi, University, MS
University of Toledo, Toledo Ohio, OH
Towson University, Towson, MD
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
The Thurgood Marshall College Fund, New York, NY
The Foundation for Community Empowerment, Inc.,
Dallas, TX
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Tennessee Tech, Cookeville, TN
ScienceSouth, Florence, SC
National Youth Science Foundation, Charleston, WV
Great Science Online
Aviation Safety Research and Design
Innovative STEM Eduation
Advanced Photovoltaics Array Testing
The Baltimore Excellence in Science Teaching
(BEST) Partnership
Miniature Antennas for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
The Minority Science Initiative
Dallas Achieves—Transforming Public Education in
Dallas, Texas, Through Math, Science and Technology Initiatives
Engineering support for extended human and
robotic space flight missions—Texas Tech University
Center for Teaching & Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM)
Innovative Science Learning Center
Youth Science Discovery Experience and science
center curriculum
Project
[Congressionally Directed Spending Items]
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE—Continued
$250,000
$500,000
$200,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$350,000
$100,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$400,000
$500,000
$200,000
Amount
Requester(s)
Mollohan
Mollohan
Childers
Kaptur
Ruppersberger; Sarbanes
Aderholt; Bachus
Ruppersberger; Meek (FL); Cummings
Johnson, Eddie Bernice
Neugebauer; Hall (TX)
Gordon (TN)
Clyburn
Mollohan
262
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00263
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
OJP—JJ
COPS Meth
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
DOJ
COPS Tech
COPS Tech
DOJ
DOJ
COPS Tech
Account
DOJ
Agency
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Allegheny County Housing Authority, Pittsburgh, PA
Etowah County Drug Enforcement Unit, Gadsden,
AL
Pittsylvania County Sheriff, Chatham, VA
Martinsville City Sheriff, Martinsville, VA
Henry County Sheriff, Martinsville, VA
Greene County Sheriff, Stanardsville, VA
Cumberland County Sheriff, Cumberland, VA
Campbell County Sheriff, Rustburg, VA
Brunswick County Sheriff, Lawrenceville, VA
Bedford County Sheriff, Bedford, VA
Recipient
COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE
Harrison Township Community Center After-School
Program
Anti-Methamphetamine Project
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Southside Virginia Law Enforcement
Project
[Fiscal Year 2009 Project Reprogramming]
$400,000
$1,000,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$75,000
Amount
Altmire
Aderholt
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Perriello
Requester(s)
263
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
264
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL)
AUTHORITY
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
The following table provides a detailed summary, for each department and agency, comparing the amounts recommended in the
bill with fiscal year 2009 enacted amounts and budget estimates
presented for fiscal year 2010:
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00264
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00265
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 285 here HR149.001
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
265
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00266
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 286 here HR149.002
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
266
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00267
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 287 here HR149.003
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
267
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00268
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 288 here HR149.004
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
268
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00269
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 289 here HR149.005
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
269
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00270
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 290 here HR149.006
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
270
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00271
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 291 here HR149.007
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
271
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00272
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 292 here HR149.008
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
272
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00273
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 293 here HR149.009
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
273
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00274
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 294 here HR149.010
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
274
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00275
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 295 here HR149.011
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
275
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00276
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 296 here HR149.012
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
276
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00277
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 297 here HR149.013
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
277
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00278
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 298 here HR149.014
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
278
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00279
Fmt 6659
Sfmt 6602
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
Insert offset folio 299 here HR149.015
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
279
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF JERRY LEWIS AND FRANK R. WOLF
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
We commend Chairman Mollohan and Chairman Obey for the
even-handed and collaborative approach taken in assembling this
bill providing appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and
Justice, Science, and Related Agencies for fiscal year 2010. The bill
includes important increases to programs that represent top national priorities, including counterterrorism, crime fighting, and
scientific research and education. Both Chairman Mollohan and
Chairman Obey have been open and responsive to issues and concerns raised by Republican Members and we appreciate their commitment to bipartisanship and regular order during consideration
of this bill through the Committee process. We urge the majority
to adhere to an open process as this and other fiscal year 2010 appropriations bills move forward and strongly believe that the Committee should not take actions that unnecessarily restrict the ability of Members to offer amendments, especially through onerous
pre-printing requirements for floor amendments.
The allocation given to the Subcommittee is $64.4 billion, which
is $6.8 billion or 11.7% above 2009, and $197 million below the
President’s request. We believe that the Subcommittee could have
met the most pressing funding needs by prioritizing within a lower
allocation. With this very generous allocation virtually every agency and account in the bill receives a significant increase. This corresponds with the majority’s overall budget blueprint which increases discretionary spending by $77 billion above fiscal year
2009. Since the Democratic Party took control of Congress, discretionary spending has increased by 41 percent. Non-defense, nonVeterans Affairs discretionary spending has increased by a staggering 85 percent. Spending at this rate is unsustainable, and will
exacerbate the burden of our deficits and debt, and prolong our economic downturn. As Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testified to Congress earlier this month, large budget deficits threaten the longterm health of the economy, and restoration of fiscal balance is necessary to restoring and maintaining the confidence of the financial
markets.
Materials posted to the Committee website by the Majority suggest that the bill terminates 11 programs and makes reductions to
33 additional programs. However, this information is misleading.
Of the 11 listed program terminations, eight were one-time construction or acquisition projects which were completed with fiscal
year 2009 funds and therefore had no ongoing funding requirements. Another of the program ‘‘terminations’’ was the Pacific
Coastal Salmon Recovery program. This activity is not terminated
in the fiscal year 2010 bill. The funding is continued at a reduced
level under a different account.
Of the 33 programs identified as ‘‘reduced’’ in the bill, most involve reductions from the request, not from the amount appro(280)
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:48 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00280
Fmt 6604
Sfmt 6604
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
281
priated in fiscal year 2009, and again, many of the so-called reductions represent one-time, non-recurring or phasing-out activities for
which there is no continuing funding requirement. In fact, within
the entire list of 33 programs, only four represent ongoing programs where the amount in the fiscal year 2010 bill is less than
the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2009: the State Criminal
Alien Assistance Program; NSF’s Advanced Technology Education
program; Missing and Exploited Children programs; and NIST’s
maintenance and repair account.
We commend the Chairman for including in the bill the full request for the salaries and expenses appropriation for the FBI, including an increase of over $400 million in critical counterterrorism
and other national security programs. The bill also includes a critically important $35 million initiative for FBI and ATF to address
the problem of violent gangs that plague our communities nationwide.
While the bill includes more than $600 million above the request
for State and local law enforcement accounts, the amount for the
State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) is reduced by
$100 million from the fiscal year 2009 level of $400 million. It is
a Federal responsibility to secure the border, yet the burden of
costs for incarcerating criminal aliens falls overwhelmingly on
States and localities. The rising costs incurred by local jurisdictions
to incarcerate undocumented criminal aliens are putting enormous
pressure on State and local budgets. We hope that, as the bill
moves forward, SCAAP funding can be restored to at least the fiscal year 2009 level.
We also commend the Chairman for his initiative to provide increased funding for prisoner re-entry programs at the Federal,
State and local level. We strongly support efforts to increase work
opportunities for inmates, and reduce criminal recidivism, as well
as innovative programs like Drug Courts that provide alternatives
to the prosecution and incarceration of offenders with substance
abuse problems.
The bill funds NASA at $18.2 billion, but freezes funding at the
current level for Exploration activities pending a blue ribbon
Human Space Flight Review panel report on future options. This
represents a cut of more than $560 million to the request. The
funding level in the bill will not be sufficient to sustain the current
development schedule for the new generation of Constellation vehicles. In fact, the level in the bill is likely to be inadequate to sustain any option that the Human Space Flight Review panel may
recommend. Therefore, we look forward to working to ensure that
the final bill will include sufficient funds to continue the U.S. leadership role in space.
Finally, the bill includes important language limiting the use of
funds by the Department to undertake activities related to the closure of the Guantanamo Bay Detention facility. The bill does not
include the $60 million requested by the administration to support
these activities, in recognition that the administration has not submitted a plan that details how they will carry out the closure and
resolve the disposition of individual detainee cases. The bill prohibits the use of funds to release detainees into the United States.
The bill also prohibits the transfer of detainees to the United
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00281
Fmt 6604
Sfmt 6604
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149
282
States for detention or prosecution unless the President presents a
plan to Congress that details the costs and risks. Finally, the bill
prohibits the use of funds to transfer or release detainees abroad
unless the President sends a report 30 days in advance that includes an assessment of risk.
We are deeply concerned by the releases and transfers of detainees by the administration in recent days. The administration continues to withhold information from the Congress and the American public, and appears to be racing to move detainees before the
will of the Congress can be enacted into law. Director Mueller of
the FBI recently testified before Congress that bringing detainees
to the United States, including bringing them here for detention
and trial, poses risks to national security, including providing financing, radicalizing others and undertaking attacks in the United
States. Further, the Department of Defense has released findings
that various former Guantanamo detainees are known to have reengaged in terrorists activity associated with the Al Qaeda network, including facilitating the travel of terrorists into war zones,
providing funds to Al Qaeda, and supporting and associating with
known terrorists. This administration appears to be ignoring or disregarding those risks, as detainees are being released and transferred without justification to or oversight by the Congress.
In conclusion, while we have concerns with the overall spending
in the bill, and the items mentioned above, we would like to again
express appreciation to Chairman Mollohan and Chairman Obey
for their openness and consideration. We are grateful for the cooperative approach, and look forward to working together as the process continues to produce a bill that funds critical national priorities.
JERRY LEWIS.
FRANK R. WOLF.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
Æ
VerDate Nov 24 2008
06:11 Jun 13, 2009
Jkt 050267
PO 00000
Frm 00282
Fmt 6604
Sfmt 6611
E:\HR\OC\HR149.XXX
HR149