Notice of Availability of the Final EIS for the TransWest Express 600-kV Direct Current Transmission Project in Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, and Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments

24962
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
transparency in Government by
disclosing information to the public, we
invite public comment on these permit
applications before final action is taken.
Under the MMPA, you may request a
hearing on any MMPA application
received. If you request a hearing, give
specific reasons why a hearing would be
appropriate. The holding of such a
hearing is at the discretion of the
Service Director.
III. Permit Applications
A. Endangered Species
Applicant: Tulsa Zoo Management, Inc.,
Tulsa, OK; PRT–54405B
The applicant requests a permit to
export one captive-bred Diana monkey
(Cercopithecus diana) for the purpose of
enhancement of the survival of the
species. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 1-year period.
Applicant: Florida International
University, North Miami, FL; PRT–
64111B
The applicant requests a permit to
import up to 150 skin, shell, or blood
tissue samples from up to 50 green sea
turtles (Chelonia mydas) and up to 150
skin, shell, or blood tissue samples from
up to 50 green Loggerhead sea turtles
(Caretta caretta) for the purpose
scientific research. This notification
covers activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Applicant: Miami-Dade Zoological Park
and Gardens, Miami, FL; PRT–59493B
The applicant requests a permit to
export two female pink pigeons
(Nesoenas mayeri) for the purpose of
enhancement of the survival of the
species. This notification covers
activities to be conducted by the
applicant over a 5-year period.
Applicant: Adrian Cieslak, Wallace, SC;
PRT–19311B
The applicant requests a captive-bred
wildlife registration under 50 CFR
17.21(g) for Cuban Crocodile
(Crocodilus rhombifer), Saltwater
crocodile (Crocodilus porosus), broadsnouted caiman (Caiman latirostris),
Chinese alligator (Alligator sinensis),
and common caiman (Caiman
crocodilus) to enhance the species’
propagation or survival. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Applicant: Project Survival, Dunlap,
CA; PRT–46280B
The applicant requests a permit to
import one wild female jaguar (Panthera
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
onca) for the purpose of enhancement of
the survival of the species from
Sorocaba Zoo, Sorocaba, Brazil.
Applicant: Project Survival, Dunlap,
CA; PRT–63546B
The applicant requests a permit to
import one wild margay (Leopardus
wiedii) and one captive born and six
wild ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) for
the purpose of enhancement of the
survival of the species from Chiriqui
Feline Center, Buqaba District, Chiriq
Province, Panama.
Multiple Applicants
The following applicants each request
a permit to import the sport-hunted
trophy of one male bontebok
(Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) culled
from a captive herd maintained under
the management program of the
Republic of South Africa, for the
purpose of enhancement of the survival
of the species.
Applicant: Jason Hagan, Hallettsville,
TX; PRT–58572B
Applicant: Jeffrey Hayer, Greenfield,
MA; PRT–63304B
Applicant: Terrance Lucht, Houston,
TX; PRT–62687B
Applicant: Jeffery Dobbins, Mountain
View, AR; PRT–63973B
B. Endangered Marine Mammals and
Marine Mammals
Applicant: Robert Rockwell, American
Museum of Natural History, New York,
NY; PRT–03086A
The applicant requests renewal of
their permit to import up to 1,000
biological samples annually from polar
bears (Ursus maritimus) from Canada for
the purpose of scientific research. This
notification covers activities to be
conducted by the applicant over a 5year period.
Concurrent with publishing this
notice in the Federal Register, we are
forwarding copies of the above
application to the Marine Mammal
Commission and the Committee of
Scientific Advisors for their review.
Brenda Tapia,
Program Analyst/Data Administrator,
Branch of Permits, Division of Management
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2015–10135 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
[LLWY920000.L51010000.ER0000–
LVRWK09K1160; WYW177893; COC72929;
UTU87238; N86732]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the TransWest Express 600-kV Direct
Current Transmission Project in
Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada,
and Proposed Land Use Plan
Amendments
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior; and Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), Utah
Reclamation Mitigation Conservation
Commission (URMCC), Western Area
Power Administration (Western) and the
United States Forest Service (Forest
Service) announce the availability of the
TransWest Express Transmission Project
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and proposed land use plan
amendments. The Final EIS analyzes the
potential environmental consequences
of granting a right-of-way (ROW) to
TransWest Express, LLC (TransWest) to
construct and operate an extra-high
voltage (EHV) direct current (DC)
transmission system (proposed Project).
DATES: BLM planning regulations (43
CFR 1610.5–2) state that any person
who meets the conditions as described
in the regulations may protest the BLM’s
Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS.
A person who meets the conditions and
files a protest must file the protest
within 30 days of the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EIS have
been sent to Federal, State, and local
governments, public libraries in the area
affected by the proposed Project, and to
interested parties that previously
requested a copy. The Final EIS and
supporting documents will be available
electronically on the following BLM
Web site: http://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/
info/NEPA/documents/hdd/
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
transwest.html. Copies of the Final EIS
are available for public inspection at the
locations identified in the
mailed to one of the following
addresses:
Regular mail:
Overnight delivery:
BLM Director, (210) Attention: Protest Coordinator, P.O. Box 71383,
Washington, DC 20024–1383.
BLM Director (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator, 20 M Street SE.,
Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
Protests on the BLM land use
planning process must be in writing and
24963
Sharon Knowlton, Project Manager;
Bureau of Land Management Wyoming
State Office; P.O. Box 20678, Cheyenne,
WY 82003; by telephone at 307–775–
6124; or email to: blm_wy_transwest_
[email protected]. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339 to
contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
For information about Western’s
involvement, contact Steve Blazek,
Western NEPA Document Manager:
Telephone 720–962–7265; email:
[email protected]; address: Western
Area Power Administration, P.O. Box
281213, Lakewood, CO 80228–8213. For
information about the Forest Service’s
involvement, contact Kenton Call,
Forest Service Project Lead: Telephone
435–691–0768; email: [email protected].
The Forest Service will provide a
mailing address in its TransWest Project
Final EIS NOA. For general information
on the Department of Energy’s NEPA
review procedures or on the status of a
NEPA review, contact Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC–54, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585; telephone
202–586–4600 or toll free at (800) 472–
2756, or email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
November 2007, National Grid filed a
ROW application with the BLM to
construct and operate an EHV
transmission line between Wyoming
and delivery points in the Southwestern
U.S. An amended application was filed
on September 2, 2008, and project
sponsorship was transferred to
TransWest Express LLC (TransWest), a
subsidiary of the Anschutz Corporation.
TransWest submitted additional
amended applications to the BLM in
late 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014 to
reflect minor changes and refinements
in the proposed Project.
In April 2010, the BLM and Western
entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) in which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
BLM and Western agreed to act as joint
lead agencies for the EIS. The BLM’s
status as a joint lead agency is based on
its potential Federal action to grant a
ROW across BLM lands. Western’s
status as a joint lead agency is based on
its potential Federal action to provide
Federal funds for the proposed Project.
Western and TransWest entered into a
development agreement (executed in
September 2011, amended in June 2014)
wherein Western agreed to support
Project development by providing
technical assistance and/or financing.
The Forest Service is a cooperating
agency in the proposed Project based on
its potential Federal action to issue a
special use permit across Forest Service
lands. Additional cooperating agencies
include Federal, State, tribal and local
agencies. On January 4, 2011, the BLM
and Western jointly published in the
Federal Register (76 FR 379) a Notice of
Intent to Prepare an EIS in compliance
with Federal requirements FLPMA and
NEPA. To allow the public an
opportunity to review information
associated with the proposed Project,
the BLM held public meetings from
January through March 2011 in Rawlins,
Rock Springs, and Baggs, Wyoming;
Craig, Rangely, and Grand Junction,
Colorado; Castledale, Duchesne, Nephi,
Delta, Richfield, Milford, Moab, Cedar
City, St. George, Pine Valley, Central,
and Enterprise, Utah; and Caliente,
Overton, Henderson, and Las Vegas,
Nevada. Issues and potential impacts to
specific resources were identified
during scoping and preparation of the
Draft EIS. The following issues were
identified in the scoping process:
• Selection of corridor alternatives;
• Potential private and public land
use conflicts;
• Impacts and mitigation to fish,
wildlife, vegetation, special status
species and habitat;
• Public health and safety;
• Impacts to areas with Special
Management designations;
• Cumulative impacts;
• Socioeconomic impacts; and
• Noxious weed control and
reclamation.
The BLM and Western, in
coordination with the Forest Service,
other Federal, State, and local
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
governments and agencies, considered
all public scoping comments received as
well as TransWest’s refinements to
identify the Agency Preferred
Alternative. The Agency Preferred
Alternative was developed through a
comparative evaluation of routing
opportunities and constraints and the
relative potential impacts among the
various alternative segments. The
various alternative segments within
regions were compared with each other
in accordance with standard criteria.
The primary criteria considered to select
the Agency Preferred Alternative were:
(1) Maximize the use of designated
utility corridors;
(2) Minimize requirements to amend
agency land use plans;
(3) Avoid and minimize resource
impacts regulated by law (for example,
the Endangered Species Act);
(4) Avoid and minimize proximity to
private residences and residential areas;
(5) Avoid and minimize resource
impacts to reduce the magnitude and
duration of adverse (residual) impacts;
(6) Minimize the use of private lands;
and,
(7) Minimize transmission system
construction, operation and
maintenance expense.
The Environmental Protection Agency
published a Draft EIS/Draft RMP
Amendments NOA on July 3, 2013 in
the Federal Register (78 FR 40163),
which began a 90-day public comment
period. To allow the public an
opportunity to review and comment on
the Draft EIS, the agencies held public
meetings in July, August, and
September 2013 in Rawlins and Baggs,
Wyoming; Craig, Colorado; Vernal, Fort
Duchesne, Duchesne, Price, Nephi,
Delta, Cedar City, and St. George, Utah;
Panaca and Henderson, Nevada. On
December 6, 2013, the Forest Service
published an additional NOA in the
Federal Register (78 FR 73524) to
initiate an additional 30-day public
comment period specific to Forest
Service decisions on the proposed
Project. The agencies received over
1,800 comments, contained in 457
submissions, during the Draft EIS public
comment periods. Principle comment
issues included:
• Mitigation;
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24964
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
• Opposition to, or support for,
specific routes;
• Effects to historic properties; and
• Effects to sensitive biological
resources, including sage grouse.
Other comments provided specific
edits and corrections to EIS sections and
general support or opposition to the
proposed Project. All submitted
comments were addressed in the Final
EIS. In response to public comments on
the Draft EIS, the agencies developed a
suite of hierarchical mitigation
strategies for application to onsite,
regional and compensatory mitigation,
as applicable, as well as landscape level
conservation and management actions
to reduce resource impacts and achieve
planning resource objectives for the
planning areas crossed by the project.
Specific examples include offsite
compensatory mitigation for impacts to
greater sage grouse and National
Historic Trails. TransWest project
proposal refinements include:
• Reduced separation distance from
existing transmission to reflect updated
Western Electricity Coordinating
Council guidance;
• Removed or adjusted portions of the
proposed Project that presented
conflicts and/or did not address
resource impacts not already addressed
by the existing range of alternatives; and
• Reduced the width of the study area
and refined the transmission alignment
to reflect preliminary engineering
designed to reduce resource impacts
and conflicts.
As a result of cooperating agency
input and public comments,
refinements were made to the Agency
Preferred Alternative presented in the
Final EIS. The following discussions of
proposed Project segments across
various land ownerships and
jurisdictions are specific to the Agency
Preferred Alternative.
Approximately 276 miles (38 percent)
of the Agency Preferred Alternative is
located within designated Federal
utility corridors. The Agency Preferred
Alternative is co-located with existing
transmission lines for a distance of 408
miles (56 percent) of the total length.
In Wyoming, the Agency Preferred
Alternative crosses 59 miles of Federal,
4 miles of State, and 30 miles of private
land. In Colorado, the Agency Preferred
Alternative crosses 62 miles of Federal,
12 miles of State, and 15 miles of
private land. In Utah, the Agency
Preferred Alternative crosses 210 miles
of Federal, 27 miles of State, and 153
miles of private land. In Nevada, the
Agency Preferred Alternative crosses
137 miles of Federal, 14 miles of tribal,
and 5 miles of private land. Lengths of
the Agency Preferred Alternative by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
agency jurisdiction are found in the
Final EIS, Chapter 2 Tables 2–23
through 2–26.
Other proposed Project alternatives
cross additional Federal land
jurisdictions that include: Colorado—
BLM Grand Junction Field Office, and
National Park Service; Utah—BLM
Moab, Richfield, Price, and St. George
Field Offices and National Forest
System land with the Fishlake, Ashley,
and Dixie National Forests; Nevada—
National Park Service and the
Department of Energy. These
alternatives also cross State and private
lands in addition to the Federal lands.
The requested ROW width would
generally be 250 feet. The alternative
segments were subdivided into four
geographic regions to provide a better
understanding of context for the impacts
resulting from the proposed Project
(Southern Wyoming and Northwestern
Colorado; Northwestern Colorado,
Eastern and Central Utah; Central and
Southwestern Utah, Southern Nevada;
Southern Nevada-Las Vegas
metropolitan area). The approximately
728-mile Agency Preferred Alternative
is discussed below, by region.
Region I (Southern Wyoming,
Northwestern Colorado). The Agency
Preferred Alternative transmission line
route would extend approximately 157
miles from the vicinity of Sinclair,
Carbon County, Wyoming to the vicinity
of U.S. Highway 40 southwest of
Maybell in western Moffat County,
Colorado.
Region II (Northwestern Colorado,
Eastern Utah, Central Utah). The
Agency Preferred Alternative
transmission line route would extend
approximately 252 miles from Maybell
Colorado, through eastern Utah, to the
vicinity of the IPP near Delta, Millard
County, Utah.
Region III (Central Utah, Southwest
Utah, Southern Nevada). The Agency
Preferred Alternative transmission line
route would extend approximately 282
miles from the vicinity of the IPP,
Millard County, Utah to the vicinity of
Apex on Interstate 15, northeast of Las
Vegas, Nevada.
Region IV (Southern Nevada—Apex
to the Marketplace Hub). The Agency
Preferred Alternative transmission line
route would extend approximately 37
miles from Apex on Interstate 15 to the
Marketplace Hub in the Eldorado
Valley, southeast of Las Vegas.
The BLM, Western, and cooperating
agencies worked together to develop
routes that would conform to existing
Federal land use plans. However, this
objective was not reached for a number
of the alternative routes analyzed in the
Final EIS. Plan amendments that would
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be necessary to implement each of the
evaluated alternatives were identified
by affected agencies and analyzed in
Chapter 4 of the Final EIS. The specific
land use plan amendments that are
actually needed will depend upon
which route is selected in the agencies’
final decisions. In the Final EIS, the
BLM and Western identify the Agency
Preferred Alternative, and BLM and
Forest Service identify the requisite
proposed plan amendments necessary to
implement that alternative.
The proposed BLM plan amendments
would: (1) Expand or extend an existing
utility corridor that allows for overhead
utilities; (2) Create a new utility corridor
to allow for overhead utilities and
exceptions to other resource stipulations
if avoidance measures or impact
mitigation are not feasible within the
designated corridor; or (3) Create a onetime exception through a ROW
exclusion area. Other BLM management
plans could be amended depending
upon the specifics of the route that is
selected in the Record of Decision.
Copies of the Final EIS are available
for public inspection during normal
business hours at the following
locations:
• BLM, Wyoming State Office, Public
Reading Room, 5353 Yellowstone Road,
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009;
• BLM, Rawlins Field Office, 1300
North Third Street, Rawlins, Wyoming
82301;
• BLM, Colorado State Office, Public
Reading Room, 2850 Youngfield Street,
Lakewood, Colorado 80215–7093;
• BLM, Little Snake Field Office, 455
Emerson Street, Craig, Colorado 81625;
• BLM, White River Field Office, 220
East Market Street, Meeker, Colorado
81641;
• BLM, Grand Junction Office, 2815 H
Road, Grand Junction, Colorado 81506;
• BLM, Utah State Office, Public
Reading Room, 440 West 200 South,
Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101–
1345;
• BLM, Cedar City Field Office, 176
East DL Sargent Drive, Cedar City, Utah
84721;
• BLM, Fillmore Field Office, 95 East
500 North, Fillmore, Utah 84631;
• BLM, Moab Field Office, 92 East
Dogwood, Moab, Utah 84532;
• BLM, Price Field Office, 125 South
600 West, Price, Utah 84501;
• BLM, Richfield Field Office, 150
East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701;
• BLM, St. George Field Office, 345
East Riverside Drive, St. George, Utah
84790;
• BLM, Vernal Field Office, 170
South 500 East, Vernal, Utah 84078;
• BLM, Nevada State Office, Public
Reading Room, 1340 Financial Blvd.,
Reno, Nevada 89502;
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
• BLM, Caliente Field Office, U.S.
Highway 93, Building #1, Caliente,
Nevada 89008;
• BLM, Las Vegas Field Office, 4701
North Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89130; and
• Forest Service (Lead Forest Office)
Dixie National Forest, 1789 North
Wedgewood Lane, Cedar City, Utah
84721.
A limited number of paper copies of
the document will be available as
supplies last. To request a copy, contact
Sharon Knowlton, Project Manager,
BLM Wyoming State Office, P.O. Box
20678, Cheyenne, WY 82003.
BLM Land Use Plan Amendments and
the Protest Process: Depending on the
route alternative, potential plan
amendments proposed by the BLM are
needed for the portions of the proposed
Project crossing BLM-administered
lands that do not conform to the
respective land use plan. These include
the following:
• Region I. Two plan amendments
would be required. The BLM Rawlins
and Little Snake Field Office plans
would be affected.
• Region II. One to four plan
amendments would be required. The
BLM White River, Vernal, Price, and
Salt Lake Field Office plans would be
affected.
• Region III. One plan amendment
would be required. The BLM Caliente
Field Office plan would be affected.
• Region IV. No plan amendments
would be required.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the Director of the BLM regarding the
proposed BLM land use plan
amendments may be found in the ‘‘Dear
Reader’’ Letter of the Final EIS and at 43
CFR 1610.5–2. All protests must be in
writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’
section above. Emailed protests will not
be accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular mail or
overnight delivery postmarked by the
close of the protest period. Under these
conditions, the BLM will consider the
email as an advance copy and it will
receive full consideration. If you wish to
provide the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct emails to
[email protected].
Forest Service Land Use Plan
Amendments: The following land use
plan amendments are proposed by the
Forest Service for the portions of the
proposed Project crossing National
Forest Lands to conform to the
respective Forest Service Plans:
• Region II. The Uinta, Ashley, MantiLaSal, Fishlake, and Dixie National
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Forest plans would be affected by one
or more of the alternatives.
Project-specific amendments for the
Uinta and Manti La-Sal National Forest
Plans are identified for the Agency
Preferred Alternative.
Agency Decisions on the proposed
Project: Based on the environmental
analysis in this Final EIS, the BLM
Wyoming State Director will decide
whether to authorize, authorize with
modifications, or deny the application
based on the proposed Project, Agency
Preferred Alternative, alternatives, or
any combination thereof on Public
Lands. Based on the BLM decision, the
Administrator for Western will decide
whether it would use its borrowing
authority to partially finance and hold
partial ownership with TransWest in the
resulting transmission facilities and
capacity. The Forest Service will issue
a separate ROD specific to its decision
whether to authorize a Special Use
Permit on National Forest System land.
Before including your phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your protest,
you should be aware that your entire
protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator, Western Area Power
Administration.
Mary Jo Rugwell,
Acting BLM Wyoming State Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–10248 Filed 4–30–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[S1D1S SS08011000 SX066A000 67F
134S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX066A00
33F 13xs501520]
Notice of Availability of the Final Four
Corners Power Plant and Navajo Mine
Energy Project Environmental Impact
Statement
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, et seq. (NEPA) the Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24965
Enforcement (OSMRE) has prepared a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for the Four Corners Power Plant
(FCPP) and Navajo Mine Energy Project,
and is announcing its availability.
DATES: The OSMRE will not issue a final
decision on the Proposed Action and
Alternatives for a minimum of 30 days
from the date that the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) publishes this notice in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: People interested in
reviewing the FEIS can access the
document via OSMRE’s Web site at:
http://www.wrcc.osmre.gov/Current_
Initiatives/FCNAVPRJ/FCPPEIS.shtm.
Copies of the FEIS are available to the
public at the OSMRE’s Western Region
office, located at 1999 Broadway, Suite
3320, Denver, Colorado 80202–5733.
Paper and CD copies of the FEIS are also
available at the following locations:
Navajo Nation Library—Highway 264
Loop Road, Window Rock, AZ 86515
Navajo Nation Division of Natural
Resources—Executive Office Building
1–2636, Window Rock Blvd., Window
Rock, AZ 86515
Hopi Public Mobile Library—1 Main
Street, Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Albuquerque Main Library—501 Copper
Ave., NW., Albuquerque, NM 87102
Cortez Public Library—202 N. Park
Street, Cortez, CO 81321
Durango Public Library—1900 E. Third
Ave., Durango, CO 81301
Farmington Public Library—2101
Farmington Ave., Farmington, NM
87401
Octavia Fellin Public Library—115 W.
Hill Ave., Gallup, NM 87301
Shiprock Branch Library—U.S. Highway
491, Shiprock, NM 87420
Tuba City Public Library—78 Main
Street, Tuba City, AZ 86045
Chinle Chapter House—Highway 191,
Chinle, AZ 86503
Coalmine Canyon Chapter House—
Highway 160 and Main Street, Tuba
City, AZ 86045
Nenahnezad Chapter House—County
Road 6675, Navajo Route 365,
Fruitland, NM 87416
Shiprock Chapter House—East on
Highway 64, Shiprock, NM 87420
Tiis Tsoh Sikaad Chapter House—12
miles east of U.S. 491 on Navajo
Route 5 and 1⁄2 mile south on Navajo
Route 5080
Upper Fruitland Chapter House—N562
Building #006–001, North of Highway
N36, Fruitland, NM 87416
BLM Rio Puerco Field Office—435
Montano Road, NE., Albuquerque,
NM 87107
BIA Navajo Region—301 West Hill
Street, Gallup, NM 87301
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1