Year_2011______Inventory Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte East/OR-015-004B
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of this area?
No
(go to Form 2) Yes ___X____ (if more than one unit is within the area,
list the names/numbers of those units.)
a) Inventory Source: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
Wilderness Inventory, Oregon and Washington: Final Intensive Inventory Decisions,
November 1980. Pgs. 34-35.
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s): Walker Cabin/OR-1-4
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s): N/A
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s):_Lakeview District/Lakeview Resource Area
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit/acreage and answer each
question individually for each inventory unit):
Unit#/
Name
BLM
Size
(historic
acres)
34,080
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
Outstanding
Solitude?
Y/N
NO
NO
Outstanding
Primitive &
Unconfined
Recreation?
Y/N
NO
Supplemental
Values?
Y/N
NO
Summarize any known primary reasons for prior inventory findings listed in this table):
The previous inventory concluded the unit did not appear to be in a generally natural
condition where the works of man were substantially unnoticeable. The lakebed
developments, ways, and 500 KV power lines on the eastern boundary had a significant
impact in the area to a degree where the works of man were substantially noticeable from
most places within the unit.
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY CONDITIONS
Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte East/OR-015-004B
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size? Yes X
No
Boundary Determination: In 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the BLM conducted field inventory of
the area to update its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo
documentation of the boundary routes. Using BLM photos, field logs, and staff field
knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an analysis of the motorized routes
within the area in February of 2011.
On the west, the unit is bounded by Unnumbered Road #1. On the north, the unit is bounded by
BLM 6171-CA (Walker Cabin Road). On the south, the unit is bounded by Unnumbered Route
#3, and Unnumbered Route #2. On the east, the unit is bounded by the 500 KV BPA power line
corridor. (See Map 2, road analysis forms, photos, and photo logs in the wilderness inventory file
for additional supporting information regarding these boundary determinations).
Additional background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in the document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview
Resource Area, BLM, contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
Inventory unit OR-015-004B is comprised of approximately 9,268 acres of BLM administered
land and is located about 12 miles north of Christmas Valley, Oregon. The terrain is mostly
rolling with small hills. Most of the unit is populated with moderate to dense juniper.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition? Yes
No __X____
Primitive motorized routes exist within the unit totaling about 2.3 miles. Additionally, there is
one water development located near the eastern boundary. On the east is the 500KV BPA
power line corridor which forms approximately 5 miles of the eastern boundary and can be seen
from one half mile away in some places, and from greater distances in others. A 326 acre private
inholding exists near the western boundary (See Map 2a).
The density of human disturbances within the unit as a whole is low. The water developments,
related ways, and undeveloped private inholding within the unit would be relatively unnoticeable
to the average visitor. However, the 500 KV BPA power lines to the east is a major outside
impact and significantly detracts from the overall apparent naturalness of the unit as a whole.
2
For the reasons specified above and based on a review of all of the available information
including BLM photos, staff knowledge, and field review, the ID team concluded that due to the
major outside impact of the power lines, the unit is not in a natural condition primarily affected
by the forces of nature.
(3) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
solitude?
Yes
No
N/A____X____
Opportunities for solitude were not evaluated because the unit failed to meet the naturalness
criteria.
(4) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
primitive and unconfined recreation?
Yes
No
N/A__X______
Opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated because the unit failed
to meet the naturalness criteria.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values? Yes
No ______ Unknown ___X____
Supplemental values were not evaluated because the unit failed to meet wilderness criteria.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Walker Butte East/OR-015-004B
Summary Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
_X__ Yes ___No
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
___Yes __X__No
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
____Yes ____No __X__N/A
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
___Yes ____No __X__N/A
Conclusion (Check One):
_____ The area- or a portion of the area- has wilderness character:
(items 1, 2 and 3 must be checked “yes”).
___X__
The area does not have wilderness character: (any of items 1, 2 and 3 are
checked “no”).
4
ID Team Members:
7lu (j
Chris Bishop
Casey O'Connor --~,.....~--------F-----------Date:
Range Management Spec · st
.
~
----~~~~~~~~~:;;;:::--;;:2:::-::::>~::__Date:
Edward Hennagin_ _
Cartographic Technician
~~~
ZachAdams
Cartographic Tee
Date:
· ian
],b~ll
Approved by:
¥om Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It does not
represent a formal/and use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative remedies under either
43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
5
Year_2011______Inventory Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte North/OR-015-004A
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of this area?
No
(go to Form 2) Yes ___X____ (if more than one unit is within the area,
list the names/numbers of those units.)
a) Inventory Source: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
Wilderness Inventory, Oregon and Washington: Final Intensive Inventory Decisions,
November 1980. Pgs. 34-35.
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s): Walker Cabin/OR-1-4
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s): N/A
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s):_Lakeview District/Lakeview Resource Area
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit/acreage and answer each
question individually for each inventory unit):
Unit#/
Name
BLM
Size
(historic
acres)
34,080
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
Outstanding
Solitude?
Y/N
NO
NO
Outstanding
Primitive &
Unconfined
Recreation?
Y/N
NO
Supplemental
Values?
Y/N
NO
Summarize any known primary reasons for prior inventory findings listed in this table):
The previous inventory concluded the unit did not appear to be in a generally natural
condition where the works of man were substantially unnoticeable. The lakebed
developments, ways, and 500 KV power lines had a significant impact in the area to a
degree where the works of man were substantially noticeable from most places within the
unit.
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY CONDITIONS
Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte North/OR-015-004A
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size? Yes X
No
Boundary Determination: In 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the BLM conducted field inventory of
the area to update its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo
documentation of the boundary routes. Using BLM photos, field logs, and staff field
knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an analysis of the motorized routes
within the area in February of 2011.
On the west, the unit is bounded by a combination of Lake County Road 5-12D (Millican Road)
and a 640 acre private inholding. On the south the unit is bounded by a combination of a private
inholding and BLM 6171-CA (Walker Cabin Road). On the north, the unit is bounded by BLM
6171-00 (North Boundary Road), and Unnumbered Route #5. On the west, the unit is bounded
by the BPA power lines. (See Map 2, road analysis forms, photos, and photo logs in the
wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information regarding these boundary
determinations).
Additional background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in the document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview
Resource Area, BLM, contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
Inventory unit OR-015-004A is comprised of approximately 9,344 acres of BLM administered
land and is located about 12 miles north of Christmas Valley, Oregon. The terrain is mostly
rolling with small hills near Walker Butte. Most of the unit is populated with moderate to dense
juniper. The center of the unit contains three fairly large ephemeral lakes.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition? Yes
No ___X___
Primitive motorized routes exist within the unit totaling about 6.5 miles. Additionally, there are
3 waterholes and one reservoir located in the northern half of the unit which are accessed by the
primitive motorized routes that run generally through the center of the unit from north to south.
On the east is the 500KV BPA power line corridor which can be seen from one half mile away in
some places, and from greater distances in others. The private inholding contains numerous
water derricks and a very large storage tank which can be observed from the southwestern
quarter of the unit.
The density of human disturbances within the unit as a whole is high. The water developments
and related ways exist within the core of the unit and would be easily noticeable to the average
visitor. The BPA power lines to the east and developments on private lands to the south are
2
major outside impacts and significantly detract from the overall apparent naturalness of the unit
as a whole.
For the reasons specified above and based on a review of all of the available information
including BLM photos, staff knowledge, and field review, the ID team concluded that due to the
density of man-made disturbances (internal and external), the unit is not in a natural condition
primarily effected by the forces of nature.
(3) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
solitude?
Yes
No
N/A____X____
Opportunities for solitude were not evaluated because the unit failed to meet the naturalness
criteria.
(4) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
primitive and unconfined recreation?
Yes
No
N/A__X______
Opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation were not evaluated because the unit failed
to meet the naturalness criteria.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values? Yes
No ______ Unknown ___X____
Supplemental values were not evaluated because the unit failed to meet wilderness criteria.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Walker Butte North/OR-015-004A
Summary Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
_X__ Yes ___No
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
___Yes __X__No
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
____Yes ____No __X__N/A
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
___Yes ____No __X__N/A
Conclusion (Check One):
_____ The area- or a portion of the area- has wilderness character:
(items 1, 2 and 3 must be checked “yes”).
___X__
The area does not have wilderness character: (any of items 1, 2 and 3 are
checked “no”).
4
ID Team Members:
Chris Bishop
.
Recreation Planner
~(f
f1l-,
~ 5f/
Casey O'Connor
Range Management Speciali
C
Edward Hennagin
Cartographic Technician
Date:---1-f---L~
_
~e:
- --T------''---f--
.
~
~
Date:
Date:
ZachAdams
Cartographic Tefffoician
7
L-Jzoq
I
J/l(;vll
Approved by:
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It does not
represent a formal/and use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative remedies under either
43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
5
Year_2011______Inventory Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte Southwest/OR-015-004C
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of this area?
No
(go to Form 2) Yes ___X____ (if more than one unit is within the area,
list the names/numbers of those units.)
a) Inventory Source: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
Wilderness Inventory, Oregon and Washington: Final Intensive Inventory Decisions,
November 1980. Pgs. 34-35.
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s): Walker Cabin/OR-1-4
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s): N/A
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s):_Lakeview District/Lakeview Resource Area
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit/acreage and answer each
question individually for each inventory unit):
Unit#/
Name
BLM
Size
(historic
acres)
34,080
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
Outstanding
Solitude?
Y/N
NO
NO
Outstanding
Primitive &
Unconfined
Recreation?
Y/N
NO
Supplemental
Values?
Y/N
NO
Summarize any known primary reasons for prior inventory findings listed in this table):
The previous inventory concluded the unit did not appear to be in a generally natural
condition where the works of man were substantially unnoticeable. The lakebed
developments, ways, and 500 KV power lines on the eastern boundary had a significant
impact in the area to a degree where the works of man were substantially noticeable from
most places within the unit.
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY CONDITIONS
Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte Southwest/OR-015-004C
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size? Yes X
No
Boundary Determination: In 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the BLM conducted field inventory of
the area to update its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo
documentation of the boundary routes. Using BLM photos, field logs, and staff field
knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an analysis of the motorized routes
within the area in February of 2011.
On the west, the unit is bounded by Lake County Road 5-12D (Millican Road). On the north, the
unit is bounded by a combination of BLM 6171-CA (Walker Cabin Road) and private land. On
the south, the unit is bounded by private lands. On the east, the unit is bounded by Unnumbered
Route #1. (See Map 2, road analysis forms, photos, and photo logs in the wilderness inventory
file for additional supporting information regarding these boundary determinations).
Additional background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in the document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview
Resource Area, BLM, contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
Inventory unit OR-015-004C is comprised of approximately 6,970 acres of BLM administered
land and is located about 12 miles north of Christmas Valley, Oregon. The terrain is mostly
rolling with small hills in the north of the unit which tapers to sage flats in the south.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition? Yes
X
No ______
Primitive motorized routes exist within the unit totaling about 3.4 miles, most of which lies in the
north of the unit with an additional 0.3 miles of reclaiming routes, also located in the north.
There is also 3.0 miles of pasture division fence in the unit which runs generally east-west
through the center of the unit. Approximately 230 acres of private land forms a peninsula that
partially forms the northern unit boundary (See Map 2a).
The density of human disturbances within the unit as a whole is moderate. However, the listed
disturbances are all considered to be minor impacts and would be substantially unnoticeable to
the average visitor moving through the unit.
2
For the reasons specified above and based on a review of all of the available information
including BLM photos, staff knowledge, and field review, the ID team concluded that the unit
appears to be in a natural condition primarily affected by the forces of nature.
(3) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
solitude?
Yes
No
X
N/A________
Unit OR-015-004C has a long narrow shape which measures approximately 2 miles by 6.5 miles
and is comprised of low rolling hills in the north which taper to sagebrush flats toward the south
and generally has a predominantly south facing slope. The vegetation varies from medium
density juniper in the north half of the unit; to sparse sagebrush in the southern half (see Map 3).
Agricultural land is located to the immediate south of the unit. Activities associated with
agricultural development dominate the southern view from most of the unit while noise from
machinery is pervasive and can be observed from the southern half of the unit.
The density of juniper in the north allows for pockets of good vegetative screening where one
could avoid the presence of others. However, the shape of the north portion of the unit where
this screening exists narrows to an area of approximately 2,000 acres. In the southern half of the
unit, the lack of tall vegetative screening and absence of topographic screening, provide no
opportunity to find solitude or avoid the presence of others within the unit.
For the reasons specified above and based on a review of all of the available information
including BLM photos, staff knowledge, and field review, the ID team concluded that although
some vegetative screening exists in in the northern half of the unit, it is limited to a relatively
small area due to the narrow shape of the unit, and as whole, the unit does not present any
outstanding opportunities for solitude.
(4) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
primitive and unconfined recreation?
Yes
No
X
N/A__X______
The previous inventory in 1978 listed numerous primitive and unconfined recreation
opportunities. They were as follows; photography, wildlife observation, and hunting. These
opportunities for primitive and unconfined recreation still exist today. However, based on a
review of all of the available information including BLM photos, staff knowledge, and field
review, the ID team concluded that none of these opportunities are outstanding.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values? Yes
No ______ Unknown ___X____
Supplemental values were not evaluated because the unit failed to meet wilderness criteria.
3
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Walker Butte Southwest/OR-015-004C
Summary Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
_X__ Yes ___No
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
_X__Yes ____No
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
____Yes _X___No ____N/A
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
___Yes ____No __X__N/A
Conclusion (Check One):
_____ The area- or a portion of the area- has wilderness character:
(items 1, 2 and 3 must be checked “yes”).
___X__
The area does not have wilderness character: (any of items 1, 2 and 3 are
checked “no”).
4
ID Team Members:
Date:. _ _.L_--Y---1---Jr--.2 0
Chris Bishop
Recreation Planner
Casey O'Connor
Range Management Speci
<:::::::-...
Edward Hennagin
Cartographic Technician
Date:
7~ :2
~
ZachAdams
/(/
Cartographic Te1!f}lda;,
t(
2-eJfJ
-
--"--.£__-
Date:
Date:
-+--
7hlz~lf
I
'
1/1/;;bJl {
Approved by:
"Lc~. .
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It does not
represent a formal/and use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative remedies under either
43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
5
Year: 2011 Inventory Unit Number/Name:
Walker Butte Area Units<5,000 Acres
FORM 1
DOCUMENTATION OF BLM WILDERNESS INVENTORY FINDINGS ON RECORD
1. Is there existing BLM wilderness inventory information on all or part of this area?
No
_____ (go to Form 2) Yes ____X___ (if more than one unit is within the area,
list the names/numbers of those units.)
a) Inventory Source: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
Wilderness Inventory, Oregon and Washington: Final Intensive Inventory Decisions,
November 1980. Pgs. 34-35.
b) Inventory Unit Name(s)/Number(s): Walker Cabin/OR-1-4
c) Map Name(s)/Number(s): N/A
d) BLM District(s)/Field Office(s): _Lakeview District/Lakeview Resource Area
2. BLM Inventory Findings on Record
Existing inventory information regarding wilderness characteristics (if more than one
BLM inventory unit is associated with the area, list each unit/acreage and answer each
question individually for each inventory unit):
Unit #
OR-1-4
(Walker
Cabin)
BLM
Size
(historic acres)
34,080
Natural
Condition?
Y/N
Outstanding
Solitude?
Y/N
NO
NO
Outstanding
Primitive &
Unconfined
Recreation?
Y/N
NO
Supplemental
Values?
Y/N
NO
Summarize any known primary reasons for prior inventory findings listed in this table:
Two of these units were part of inventory unit OR-1-4 (Walker Cabin) which was
evaluated in 1980 and was deemed to be not in a natural condition, primarily affected by
the forces of nature. (See Map 4)
1
FORM 2
DOCUMENTATION OF CURRENT WILDERNESS INVENTORY CONDITIONS
a. Unit Number/Name: Walker Butte Area Units<5,000 Acres
(1) Is the unit of sufficient size? Yes
No
X
Boundary Determination: In 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the BLM conducted field inventory of
the area to update its road and wilderness inventories. This field work included photo
documentation of the boundary routes. Using BLM photos, field logs, and staff field
knowledge, a BLM inter-disciplinary (ID) team completed an analysis of the motorized routes
within the area in February 2011.
On the north, the units are bounded by a combination of private lands and BLM 6171-00 (North
Boundary Road). On the west, the units are bounded by a combination of private lands, Squaw
Ridge Lava Bed WSA, and the Deschutes National Forest. On the east, the units are bounded by
the 500KV BPA power lines. On the south the units are bounded by a combination of private
lands and Lake County Road 5-12D (Millican Road). (See Map 2, route analysis forms, photos,
and photo logs in the wilderness inventory file for additional supporting information regarding
these boundary determinations).
As a result, there are a total of 20 inventory units within the Walker Butte Area. Three of these
inventory units met the minimum size criteria and have been evaluated separately, leaving the
remaining 17 units less than 5,000 acres. The average size of these 17 units is 1,856 acres. They
range in size from 3 acres to 4,213 acres and do not meet any exception to the size requirement.
Additional background on the process that the BLM ID team followed during this evaluation is
contained in document, Wilderness Inventory Maintenance Process for the Lakeview Resource
Area, BLM, which is contained in the wilderness inventory file.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The 17 unnumbered inventory units in the Walker Butte are comprised of approximately 31,567
acres of BLM administered land located approximately 12 miles north of Christmas Valley,
Oregon. The terrain consists mostly of low rolling which are populated primarily by juniper and
small desert shrubs. Major human activities in the area include hunting, ranching, and OHV
recreation.
(2) Is the unit in a natural condition? Yes
No _____ N/A
X
The current natural condition of these units was not evaluated because the units failed to meet the
minimum size requirement.
2
(3) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
solitude?
Yes
No
N/A___X_____
The current opportunities for solitude within these units were not evaluated because the units
failed to meet the minimum size requirement.
(4) Does the unit (or the remainder of the unit if a portion has been excluded due to
unnaturalness and the remainder is of sufficient size) have outstanding opportunities for
primitive and unconfined recreation?
Yes
No
N/A___X_____
The current opportunities for recreation within these units were not evaluated because the units
failed to meet the minimum size requirement.
(5) Does the unit have supplemental values? Yes
No
N/A___X_____
Supplemental value was not evaluated within these units because the units failed to meet the
wilderness criteria.
Summary of Findings and Conclusion
Unit Name and Number: Walker Butte Units<5,000 Acres
Summary Results of Analysis:
1. Does the area meet the size requirements?
___Yes _X__No
2. Does the area appear to be natural?
___Yes ____No __X_ N/A
3. Does the area offer outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and
unconfined type of recreation?
____Yes ____No __X_ N/A
4. Does the area have supplemental values?
___Yes ____No __X_ N/A
Conclusion (Check One):
_____ The area- or a portion of the area- has wilderness character:
(items 1, 2 and 3 must be checked “yes”).
___X__
The area does not have wilderness character: (any of items 1, 2 and 3 are
checked “no”).
3
ID Team Members:
Date:
7/7/'t-oq
I
'
Approved by:
~c-4-..-
Tom Rasmussen, Field Manager
Date
This form documents information that constitutes an inventory finding on wilderness characteristics. It does not
represent a formal/and use allocation or a final agency decision subject to administrative remedies under either
43 CFRparts 4 or 1610.5-2.
4
Map 1 - Wilderness Character Evaluation Area
Deschutes County
Lake County
Fort Rock
Christmas Valley
Silver Lake
Lake County
Harney County
Summer Lake
Paisley
Legend
Cities
Walker Butte Area
Resource Area Boundary
Major Utility Corridors
Lake County
Klamath County
Major Roads
Valley Falls
Plush
0 3.5 7
14 Miles
.
Lakeview
Adel
No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,
reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with
other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information
may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed
through digital means and may be updated without notification .
New Pine Creek
23153
00
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
61D
59
-00
D
D
12
5-
D
ty
Cn
D
D
!
(
!
(
!
(
D
OR-015-004A
!
(
D
D
D
DD
D
DD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Cnty 5-14C
!
D
D
D
!
BD D
Cnty 5-12B
!
!
!
!
D
!
DD
D D
!
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
D
D
!
D
D
D
D
!
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
6109-C0
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!!
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Old
5-1
2
DD
DD
D
D
D
DD
D
!
(
D
D
D
!
(
D
D
!
(
D
±
!
(
!
(
Map 2 - Wilderness Character in the Walker Butte Area
!
(
D
D
!
(
D
1.6
Miles
D
!
(
D
D
D
!
(
D
D
D
0 0.4 0.8
D
D
!
(
D
D
!
(
!
(
D
D
D
U.S. Forest Service
D
!
(
!
(
!
(
D
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
!
(
!
(
!
(
D
PrivateBed WSA
!
( Ridge Lava
Squaw
!
(
Cnty 5-12B
!
(!
(
!
(
DD
Bureau of Land Management
!
(
D
Oregon WSA
State
D
D
Seeding Treatments
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Squaw Ridge Lava Bed WSA
"
/ Mineral Pits
!
(
D
D
D
D
D
D
Regional Utility Lines
!
(
D
D
D
Pipelines
! LVRA Distribution Lines
D
D
Trails
!
( 0
D
D
D
Cat Lines
!
!
D
!
(
ReclaimingSquaw
Routes Ridge Lava Bed WSA
D
D
!
D
D
D
D
WELL
Closed Routes
D
D
D
D
Fences
B
!
(
D
Motorized Routes
61
09
-
D
WATERHOLE
D
RESERVOIR
!
(
D
!
(
D
DAM
D
D
!
(
D
D
OR-015-004C
guzzlers
D
D
D
D
D
Legend
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
(
D
D
-0
0
1-C0
617
D
!
(
D
D
D
!
( 616
9
D
D
D
D
Squaw
!
( Ridge Lava Bed WSA
D
D
D
D
D
!
D
D
D
D
!
(
D
OR-015-004B
D
!
(
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
(
!
(
!
(
D D
D
D
D
D
D
6169-A0
D
D
D
D
!
(
!
(
!
(
D
DD
D
D
D
D
!
(
A
0
!
(
D
DD
D
!
(
D
D
-C
71
61
D
D
2315880
!
(
D
-A
71
61
!
(
D
DD
D
!
(
D
D
D
23
15
50
0
D
!
(
D
D
DD
D
!
(D
D
!
(
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
(
D
D
D
D
D
!
(
!
(
!
(
D
D
0
531
231
D
DD
D
D
D
D
D
6
42
15
23
DD
D
D
D
D
6171-B
0
D
D
!
(
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
!
(!
( D
!
(
D
6171-00
D!
(
0
653
0-CO
D
O
-C
71
61
-C
30
65
0
34
15
23
"
/
OR-015-004A
OR-015-004B
OR-015-004C
Legend
Walker_Butte_Evaluation_Units
High Juniper Density
Medium Juniper Density
Low Juniper Density
Lakeview District Slope
Value
­
0 0.35 0.7
0-2
2.1 - 15
15.1 - 35
35.1 - 60
>60
1.4 Miles
Map 3 - Screening in Walker Butte Area